Google
This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project
to make the world's books discoverable online.
It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject
to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books
are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover.
Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the
publisher to a library and finally to you.
Usage guidelines
Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing tliis resource, we liave taken steps to
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying.
We also ask that you:
+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for
personal, non-commercial purposes.
+ Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help.
+ Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for in forming people about this project and helping them find
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it.
+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe.
About Google Book Search
Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web
at |http: //books .google .com/I
THE
^atholie ^orld
MONTHLY MAGAZINE
OF
General L(Iterature and Science
PUBLISHED BY THE PAULIST FATHERS.
VOL. ex.
OCTOBER, 1919, TO MARCH, 1920
NEW YORK :
THE OFFICE OF THE CATHOLIC WORLD
120 West 60th Street
1920
CONTENTS.
A Medical View of Miracles.--
Sir Bertram Windle, M,D„ F.R.S,,
A Study In Sin— Macbeth.— A /&erf
B. Purdie,
American Family Life In Fiction. —
Maurice Francis Egan,
An Irish Pilgrimage.— £. /. Quigley,
Armenian Crisis, The.— Wa/<er
George Smith,
"Beneficent America." — One in the
Government Service
Big Bus;ipje4i, The Problem of.—
Leo Af, Murraif,
Capitalism and Christian Democ-
racy. — Anthoni^ J. Beck, ,
Chesterbelloc, The. — Theodore May-
nard, . . . 145, 319, 483,
Atonement of St. Paul, The. — L. £.
BellanH, SJ^,
Beaver Island, The Story of. —
Rose Mullay,
Cardinal ^Newman, The Personal
Influence of. — W. A, Conacher,
Christmas in the Rio Grande Coun-
try. — Margaret B. Downing, .
Conservative Mind, The. — William
J, Kerhy, Ph.D„ . . . . .
Digby, Kenelm Henry. — Henry A.
Lappin,
Doctrine of Signatures, The. — Har-
riette Wilbur, ......
Dorothea. — May Tomlinson,
Evil of Poverty, The.— Vincent 3fc-
Nabb, 0.P
Facts Respecting Spirit-Photog-
raphy. — /. Godfrey Raupert,
K.S.G., .
Fair Play in Ireland. — John Barnes,
Father Kino, The Lost Manuscript
of. — Margaret Hayne Harrison,
M.A.,
Fiction, American Family Life in.
— Maurice Francis Egan,
French-Canadian Poets and Poetry.
— Thomas 0*Hagan, ....
French Catholic Scholars. — William
P. H, Kitchin, Ph,D„ ....
Henry Bordeaux at the Croal. —
William H, Scheifley, Ph.D., .
Hohenzollem, A Seventeenth Cen-
tury. — Mary J, Malloy,
How to Read St. John's Gospel.-^
C. C. Martindale, S.J.,
Ireland, Fair Play in. — John Barnes,
Irish No Man*s Land, The.— P. G.
Smyth '. . .
Is There a Catholic Theory of
Criminology? — Francis T. J.
Burns,
Keltic Poe. A.— Joseph J, Reilly,
Ph.D
Literature, The Lithuanian Clergy
and. — F. Aurelio Palmieri, O.S.A.,
Ph.D
221
184
289
630
305
591
231
355
617
721
782
773
344
577
1
Lithuanian Clergy and Literature,
The.— F. Aurelio Palmieri, O.S.A.,
PJ^D 161
Lost Manuscript of Father Kino,
The.— Margaret Hayne Harrison,
M.A., 653
Luxemburg.— A. P. Schimberg, . 57
Macbeth— A Study in Sin.— Albert
B. Purdie 134
Mind, The Conservative.— W«»a/n
/. Kerby, Ph.D 577
Miracles, A Medical View of.— S^r
Bertram Windle, M.D., F.R.S., . 221
National Resurrection, A Polish
Mystic on the. — Monica M. Gard-
«^'' 444
"Open Bible" In Pre-Reformation
Times, The.—/. M. Lenhart.
O.M.Cap 601
Personal Influence of Cardinal New-
man, The.— W. .4. Conacher, . 773
"Petering Out."— Francf* Aveling,
S.T.D 763
Polish Mystic on the .National
Resurrection, A. — Monica. M.
Gardner, ...'..., 444
Present Wages and Prices.— 7o7in A.
Ryan, D.D., 433
Problem of Big Business, The.—
Leo M. Murray, . '. . . 231
310 Recent Events,
37 \ 123, 269, 414, 553, 699, 845
^Revival of French Catholic Social
Activity.- Afax Turmann, LL.D., 504
Russian Revolution, A Theorist of
the. — F, Aurelo Palmieri, O.S.A.,
Ph.D 331
Scholars, French Catholic— W//-
licun P. H, Kitchin, Ph.D., . 634
Seventeenth Century Hohenzollem,
A. — Mary J. Malloy 646
Shakespeare and the Art of Music.
— F. /. Kelly, Mus.D., . . . .498
Silver Lining, The. — John Cava-
naugh, C.S.C., 456
Story of Beaver Island, The. —
Rose Mullay, 782
St. Patrick's Folk in America.—
Carl Holliday 787
St. Paul, The Atonement of. — L. E.
Bellanti, S.J., 721
The Irish No Man*s Land.— P. G.
Smyth ^ . .196
14 r[l Theorist of the Russian Revolution,
w/ A.— F. Aurelio Palmieri, O.S.A.,
196 \ Ph.D 331
Thomas of London. — Horace H.
Hagan, 208
742 Three New Irish Novels.— tfenrg A,
Lappin 734
751 Treasures That Grow Not Old. —
Fanny Morton Peck 175
Washington's Associate at York-
161 town. — Margaret B. Downing, . 95
464
653
289
373
634
471
646
65
STORIES.
An Uncanonlzed Saint — Mary
Foster, ..... 82, 241, 365
Road to Connaught, The, . . . 382
The First Snow.— E. /. O'Toole, . 476
The Little Brown Bird.— A radeZ
Mgulton-Barrett, 29
The Loyalist. — James Francis Bar-
rett 515, 661, 796
CONTENTS
111
POEMS.
A Ballad of Dying. — Franklin C,
KeyeBp V* *
Afflrmatioii. — Laura Simmons, .
A Prayer Upon the Sea.^-CAar2e« /.
Powers, C,S,P
Beauty. — Armel O'Connor, .
Friends. — James J, Daly, SJ„ .
3femorles of France. — Francis P,
Donnelly, SJ.,
My Answer. — C. A, Chilton,
207
470
793
060
741
174
47
Niagara In Winter. — Edward F.
Gareschi, S.J„
Song of Going. — Katharine Tynan,
The First Christmas.— Coro/toe Gil-
tinan,
The Holy Free.^Afary /. 0*Brien,
The Lamb. — Fmncis Ctwlin,
The Return of the Magi. — Geoffrey
Bliss, SJ,
To the Supreme. — Harry Lee, .
**Whose, Then, Shall Those Tilings
BeV*— Emily Htckey
WITH OUR READERS.
American Catholic Historical Asso-
ciation,
America's Tribute to Cardinal
Mercier,
Call of the Foreign Missions, .
Catholic Mission Board for Colored
People,
715
2S2
430
j ' ^'^
Cattiolic Preaching in Hyde Park, 141
Cattiolic Soldiers by Sixty Chap-
lains and Many Others, 710
Comments on Cardinal Mercier, 138
Competition of the United States
Catholic Historical Society, . . 287
Father Hecker and Present Prob-
lems, 564
Hon. Thomas J. Lanahan, 718
Labor Agitation, 278
Pastoral Letter, . . . . .854
Prayer for Church Unity, .
Relics of Louvain,
Rev. Gilbert Simmons, C.S.P.,
Spiritism and Fortune-Telling,
Spiritual Values,
The Catholic Press, . . . .
The National Catholic Welfare
Council, .......
The Industrial Conflict,
The Lecture Guild, ....
The New Paullst Superior, Very
Rev. Thomas F. Burke, C.S.P.,
The Spirit of Lent.
The Soul of Ireland and Phases of
Irish History,
The World's Need for Catholic
Principles Today, ....
Thrift, k . .
496
463
354
781
600
317
772
63
675
717
143
429
137
135
285
281
286
141
858
861
425
716
NEW PUBLICATIONS.
A Daughter of the Northwest, . 550
A Cattiolic Social Platform, . . 121
A Geograpliical Dictionary of Mil-
ton, 120
A History of the Great War, . . 112
A History of Latin America, . 545
A History of the New Thought
Movement, 689
A Padre in France, .... 404
A Primer of Old Testament History, 265
A Scholar's Letters from the Front, 395
A Sketch of Mother Mary Lawrence, 413
A Spinner of Webs, . .842
A Student's History of the United
States, 414
A Subject-Index to the Poems of
Edmund Spenser, .... 684
A Vision of Music, 267
A Wliisper of Fire, .844
A World of Windows, .696
Addresses in America, . .543
Albania, Past and Present, . 252
American Painting and Its Tradi-
tion, 683
Bach for Beginners in Organ Play-
ing, 267
Baker's Biographical Dictionary of
Musicians, 263
Barbara of Baltimore, .... 412
Baudelaire 843
Bible Stories for Children, . 266
Blood and Sand, 838
Blue Smoke, 542
Bolshevism, 254
Books in General, . . 543
Broome Street Straws, .... 830
Canada at War, . . .115
Captain Zillner, 550
Catechism Notes, 266
Catechist's Manual, 410
Catholic Tales and Christian Songs, 108
Chatterjee's Picture Albums, . . 267
ChrisUan Ethics, 535
Common Sense Drawing, '. 255
Completed Tales of My Knights
and Ladies, 262
Conferences for Married Women, . 840
Crucible Island, 116
Cynthia 256
Dangerous Days, 260
David Blaize and the Blue Door, . 686
Democracy, 408
Dictionary of the Apostolic Church, 546
Dictionnaire Apolog^tique, . . .414
Don Falquet, 267
Elementary American History and
Government, 835
Essentials of Spelling, .... 121
Eunice 690
Everyday Science, 841
Experiments in Psychical Science, 104
Fantastics, 836
Father Duffy's Story, . .824
Father Tom, 253
Fields of Victory, 694
Fifty Years of Europe, .... 257
Flexible Ferdinand, .... 119
Foreign Publications, 122, 268, 698
French Ways and Their Meaning, 688
Good Old Stories for Boys and
Girls, 413
Gold, Frankincense and Myrrh, 833
Greater Extension and Development
of Church Influence, .... 828
Heritage, 118
Hidden Treasure, 119
Historical Records and Studies, 404
Ibsen in England, 686
\^
1 '.'■■*' >
IV
CONTENTS
Ireland's Fairy Lore, .... 642
Iron City, 604
Joan of Are, 680
John Ayscough's Letters to His
BCother, 307
Labor in tlie Changing World, . 825
Life of Blessed Margaret Mary
Alaeoque, 114
Lo» and Behold Yel .... 683
Lost With Lieutenant Pike, . . 605
hyrtk. Angelica, 265
Making Tin Can Toys, .... 844
Man's Great Concern, .... 843
Man-0-War Rhsrmes, .... 110
Marriage While You Wait, . . 602
Mary Olivier, 412
Mary the Mother 530
Merchants of the Morning, . 400
Model English 601
Moments With the Consoling
Christ, 263
Mother Anne of Jesus, .... 606
Mr. Dooley on Making a Will, . 261
Mr. Steadfast, 410
My Italian Year. 258
"My Little Bit," 603
My Rose and Other Poems, . . . 685
New Modem Illustrative Bookkeep-
ing. 120
New Rivers of the North, . . .44
Old-Fashioned Verses, .... 548
Our America, 685
Our Casualties and Other Stories, 551
Our Own St. Rita, . . . . .115
Out to Win, 540
Plant Production, 267
Poems, 682
Poems by Francis X. Doyle, S.J., 607
Poems — First Series, .... 538
Poems, With Fables in Prose, . 540
Preparation for Marriage, . . .120
Punishment and Reformation, . 306
Questions of the Day, . . 121
Rezanov. 412
Robert Bums, 697
Rhymes with Reasons, . .109
Sailor Town, 110
Second Marriage, 410
Second Report of the Joint Com-
mission on the Book of Common
Prayer, 536
Sermons in Miniature for Medita-
tion, j. 406
Self-Govemment in the Philippines. 116
Shining Fields and Dark Towers. . 403
Simon 842
Singing Mountains. 688
Small Craft, 110
Small Things, 603
Social Studies of the War, . . 259
Spiritism and Religion, . . .826
Standing By, 105
Storm in a Teacup. .... 694
Studies in the Elizabethan Era, . 544
Sweden's Laureate, 690
The Acts of the Apostles. . . . 831
The American Priest, .... 552
The Awakening of Asia. 251
The Catholic Home Annual for 1920, 414
The Christian Monarch. . .262
The Chronicles of America, . 398
The Church and the Ministry, 107
The Complete Poems of Francis
I^dwidge 827
The Confessions of a Browning
LK>ver, 253
The Crime,
The Curious Republic of Gondour,
The Day of Glory,
The Day's Burden,
The Death of Tumos,
The Deep Heart,
The Doing of RaflOes Haw,
The Dramatic Story of Old Gloiy,
The Dream of Mary, ....
The Epitome of Moral Theology, .
The Essentials of Spiritual Unity,
The Four Roads,
The Freedom of the Seas, .
This Giddy Globe,
The Gospel and the Citizen,
The Government of Religious Com-
munities
The Gray Nuns in the Far North,
The Heavenly Road, ....
The Hills of Desire, ....
The Home and the World,
The International Pocket Library,
The Journal of a Disappointed
Man,
The Lady of the Crossing,
The League of Nations,
The Life of the Party,
The Little Flowers of Saint Francis,
The Mind of Arthur JameS Balfour,
The Modem Comedy, ....
The Mud Larks,
The New Earth,
The Next Step in Democracy,
The Old Madhouse, ....
The Place of Agriculture in Recon-
struction,
The Prisoners of Mainz.
The Priests* Canonical Prayer,
The Reformation,
The Shamrock Battalion of the
Rainbow, .
The Spanish Armada, ....
The Story of the Rainbow Division,
The Sword of Deborah,
The Tower of London from Within,
The Symbolist Movement in Liter-
ature. .......
The Three Mulla-Mulgars,
The Things Immortal, .
The Victory of the Gardens.
The Wild Swans at Cool. .
The Will of Song, . . .
The Words of Ufe, . .
The Young Visiters.
7'ales from Hans Andersen,
••That Arch Liar, Froude,"
Their Mutual Child. . .
Theodore Rooseveit,
Theodore Roosevelt's Letters to
Children,
Travelling Companions,
Treaty of Peace with Germany,
Trouping for the Troops,
True Stories for First Communion.
Vergil and the English Poets,
Walled Towns.
War and Love.
War in the Crarden of Eden, .
WTiat is America?
Whom the Lord Lovcth,
Why We Fail As Christians, . .
Winona's Way,
Wooden Spoil.
World's War Events, ....
Zionism and the Future of Pales-
tine, '.
His
530
842
250
534
406
842
261
lis
264
606
121
258
407
844
121
113
835
413
256
841
606
111
605
829
262
537
681
542
540
263
836
533
252
111
843
681
691
108
549
.396
839
840
831
266
547
264
119
409
266
260
261
254
832
405
266
687
265
548
602
411
545
547
552
253
832
117
405
109
* 1 I •
OCTOBER 1919
a, oV^» THE
. . Of *AvV/^
^atholie^pld
Kenelm Henry Digby Henry A. Lap pin 1
Fair Play in Ireland John Barnes 14
The Little Brown Bird Arabel Moult on-Barrett 21)
Dorothea May Tomlinson 37
My Answer C A, Chilton 47
Facts Respecting Spirit-Photography i. Ovdfrey Raupert, KS,G. 48
Luxemburg A. P. Schimberg 57
"Whose, Then, Shall Those Things BeV* Emi/y Hickey (53
How to Bead St John's Oospel C. C. Martindale, SJ, 65
An Uncanonized Saint ' Mary Foster 82
Washington's Associate at Torktown Margaret B, Downing 95
New Books
Becent Events
Russia, Germany, Hungary
Austria, Rumania^ Ualy.
With Our Beaders
Price -25 cents; $8 per year
THS OFFICE OF THE CATHOLIC WOBLD, NEW TOBE
120-122 West 60th Street
I
p
Enteied as second-class nmtter at the Post Office at New York, N. Y.
Awo&fi, iifiy
rs:
^ ' '■"
* "^ E IV «P t/ ® L I C cA T I fl S
A Primer of
Old Testament History
'By Rev. Francis E. Gigo(, D.D.
The Well Known Biblical Scholar of St. Joseph's
Seminary, Dunwoodle, New York
' I ^HIS is the first of a series of Kiblical
Primers to be publisjied. It sum-
marizes Sacred History from the crea-
tion of the world to the coming of
Our Blessed Lord. The book is well
printed in handy size. It is enriched
with illustrations and appropriate maps.
An excellent volume to be in the
hands of pupils beginning a Scripture
Course.
Price 60 Cents
Carriage loc
THE PoA UL 1 S T <J> R E S S
120-122 fVEST 60th STREET,
NEW YORK CITY
=5\
i!/
i)
id monthly by the Missionary Society of St. Paul t)»€ Apostle of the Stale of New York (Paulist Fathers).
iJisecoDd class matter July 8, 1879, at the post office at New York, New York, under the^ctof March 3,
1879. Acceptance for mailing: at special rale of postage provid» d for in Sectinn 1 103,
Act of October 3. 1917, authorised October c, 1918
■> m
THE
^atholie^pld
Vol, CX,
OCTOBER, 1919
No. 655.
KENELM HENRY DI6BY.
BY HENRY A. LAPPIN.
F the small band of defenders and interpreters of
Catholic truth and life writing in England today,
Mr. Bernard Holland is one of the most schol-
arly, dignified and convincing. His pen is grace-
f ul, lucid and flexible, and everything from it is
read with interest and sympathy even by those whose religious
views differ widely from his own. He commands a knowl-
edge of history and of the history of apologetic which is exten-
sive and thorough : his narrative and expository skill is of the
highest His latest work, the biography of an eminent Catho-
lic Victorian,^ is eloquently, and at times brilliantly, written:
there is vigor and freshness on every page.
Almost forty years have elapsed since the laborious and
fruitful life ended of which the record is now first given to the
world. Bom at the beginning of the last century Kenelm
Henry Digby died in 1880. During sixty of his four-score years
he wrote assiduously and produced many volumes. Besides
his Norrisian prize essay, composed in his twentieth year while
he was a Cambridge undergraduate, he published The Broad-
stone of Honour (1822) — later revised and issued in four
volumes; Mores CatholicU which appeared in eleven volumes
between 1831 and 1842; Compitum, published in seven volumes
^M$moir of Kenelm Henry Dtgby. By Bernard HoUand« CV. New York: Long-
mABt, Green A Co. 15.00.
Gopjrrlght. 1019. Thk Missionaby Society op St. Paul thk Apostuc
IN nn State or Niw Toul.
(B. 1
2 KENELM HENRY DIGBY [Oct,
between 1849 and 1854; The Lovers' Seat (two volumes), 1856;
The Children's Bower (two volumes), 1858; The Chapel of
St. John, 1861; Evenings on the Thames (two volumes), 1864.
This is the full tale of his prose. Of his verse no less than ten
volumes came from the press between 1865 and 1876. This
imposing array of books 'Mr. Holland has thoroughly mas-
tered, and in appraising them he has exercised the sound judg-
ment of an admirably-balanced critic of the conservative
school.
The events of Digby's intimate family life, also, are here
recorded sympathetically and attractively. To measure the
exact altitude of his subject's talent or to discover his precise
place in English letters was no part of the biographer's pur-
pose; he makes no attempt to analyze Digby's style — though
thereupon he offers more than one illuminating comment — or
to suggest comparisons with other writers: his object is sim-
ply to give such an account of Digby's life and works as may
induce people to admire the one and read the other. It is a
pleasure to welcome a book which will indubitably take and
keep a foremost place in the biographical literature of modem
English Catholicism.
The Digbys have a long and honorable history, going
back to the days of Edward the Confessor. One of them met
his death at Towton Field in the cause of the Red Lancastrian
Rose. A later bearer of the name, Sir Everard, was executed
for complicity in the Gunpowder Plot. The seventeenth cen-
tury Sir Kenelm Digby fought a duel at Paris on behalf of his
kingly master, the first Charles; published a criticism of that
benign book, Religio Medici: discovered the necessity of oxy-
gen to the life of plants; married Venetia Stanley, a very great
lady; and had Descartes for his friend. The father of the nine-
teenth century Kenelm Digby was Dean of Clonfert in the
Irish Establishment, a mighty athlete and traveler. Kenelm
Henry was the younger son of the Dean's third wife, who was
a kinswoman of the Ahh6 Edgworth, into whose ear was whis-
pered the last confession of that ill-fated monarch, Louis XVI.
The boy came of right lusty stock, for he entered the world
when his father was a sexagenarian. In his twentieth year
Kenelm, through the death of his elder brother, came into pos-
session of the family estates and possessions, and was thus en-
abled to order his life as he desired. His childhood was spent
1919.] KENELM HENRY DIGBY 3
in one of the most beautiful spots in the heart of Ireland, at
Geashill, where he fleeted the time carelessly amid the sur-
rounding woods and meadows, looked out upon the loveliness
of the distant Sleeve Bloom range, and invited his awakening
soul with the novels of Scott and the plays of Shakespeare.
Canying with him a great love for Ireland and many happy
memories, Digby, after a period of preparation at Petersham
School near Richmond, went to Trinity College, Cambridge, in
1815, and there quickly made his reputation as the most fear-
less of youths and the " founder of boating on the Cam." Upon
one so constituted, emotionally and intellectually, the gray old
Alma Mater could not fail to lay her immemorial spell. The slow
waters gliding in peace beneath the ancient walls of colleges
and chapels founded by great kings and their daughters; the
golden stillness sleeping among the trees of venerable gardens on
endless summer afternoons; sober-suited evenings in the Long,
filled with the drowsy music of college bells and the drowsy fra-
grance of limes; the first pale violets at Grantchester in Febru-
ary, the russet blooms of autumn at Cherry Hinton — these
were the gracious influences that helped to mold and must
have powerfully affected the early manhood of the author of
The Broadstone of Honour and The Lovers' Seat " Here if
anywhere ** — a great living scholar has written — " the student
may hope to hear the still voice of truth, to penetrate through
the little transitory questions of the hour to the realities which
abide. • • ."
The title of his Norrisian essay, Digby's first book. Evi-
dences of the Christian Religion, provides a clue to the nature
of the studies to which he was thenceforth to devote his days,
and gives evidence of his already wide range of reading. He
turned now with eagerness to the study of books upon chivalry
and the history of the Middle Ages. From Sir Walter Scott
he had learned to love those dayjs of faith, and to explore them
upon their spiritual side. Chateaubriand's Le Ginie du Chris-
tianisme (18Q2) had already marked the beginning of that
revival which found its further and more complete expression
when Joseph de Maistre, in his Du Pape (1819), insisted upon
the necessity of the Papacy as a bond of union among believers
and a palmary source of inspiration for the life of religion.
The Oxford Movement had not yet come to quicken a stag-
nant Ecclesia Anglicana, to vitalize English theological
4 KENELM HENRY DIGBY [Oct.,
thought, to recover a past that was forgotten, not to say dis-
owned, and to originate a definitely ecclesiastical revival in
church art, music and architecture. Eenelm, indeed before
going to Cambridge, had discovered an interest in Catholicism.
As a youngster at Petersham he had come in contact with two
Catholic laymen as learned as they were pious: Charles But-
ler, nephew of the Alban Butler whose Lives of the Saints has
made his name a household word among English-speaking
Catholics the world over, and Sir Henry Englefield. True it
is that they made no attempt to influence the boy in the du*ec-
tion of Rome; their talk to him was mainly of the great writers
of classical antiquity: but their bearing and character were a
living testimony to the Faith they professed.
At the end of his Freshman year Digby set out on the
usual Continental tour, going through Belgium, Switzerland,
Italy and France. Then for the first time he went into a Catho-
lic church and had, in his own words, his " first view of Popish
superstition.** He speaks of the incomprehensible operations
of the ministering priests, yet notices that ** there is not a sin-
gle individual to be observed either inattentive or behaving
irreverently.** But the time had not yet come when it would
be impossible for him to write, as now he wrote, of ** that dark
empire when priests held a dominion over the minds and
bodies of men, which kept all Europe in ignorance and misery,
which was the disgrace of Christianity and the scourge of
humankind.**
Though, like many another, he realized it not, Rome even
already had marked him for her own. At Cambridge, some-
time after his return from abroad, he spent a night of vigil in
King*s Chapel; and at Marklye in Sussex, with his friend Darby,
he conducted a solemn tournament in approved mediaeval
fashion ** with ponies for steeds and hop-poles for spears.*' For
the Trinity dons of his time his respect was deeper than that
ordinarily entertained by the undergraduate; Whewell and
Julius Hare, in especial, he revered. Among his fellow-
students were numbered not a few who in years to come were
to achieve fame and to have honors thrust upon them. To
mention only two: W. M. Praed and Thomas Babington
Macaulay were his direct contemporaries, and between 1825
and 1828, while Digby was still intermittently resident, there
came to Cambridge, Trench, the future Archbishop of Dublin,
1919.] KENELM HENRY DIGBY 5
John Sterling, Frederic Maurice, Edward Fitzgerald, Alfred
Tennyson and Arthur Hallam. Mr. Holland interestingly notes
that The Broadstone of Honour, published in 1822, greatly in-
fluenced the early poems of Tennyson. Strangely enough,
Di^y seems to have refused an invitation to join the ranks of
"^The Cambridge Apostles," that brilliant university society
which included so many subsequently famous men.
Of Di^yy's foreign wanderings in undergraduate and later
years the story is charmingly set forth in the long poem. The
Temple of Memory, which he wrote when he was nearing the
end of his life. Di^y was as fond of swimming as were Byron
and Swinburne, and he performed some striking feats in the
great rivers of Germany and Italy. He swam across the peril-
ous breadth of the Rhine near Drachenf els, and he was called
a water-rat by the riparian Romans who saw him breast the
rushing waters of the Tiber. It was Italy in particular, and the
city of Rome, that won and held his love. ** At Rome," writes
Mr. Holland, **he loved to see the rising sun stream on the
portals of the great church of St. John, or the ancient Benedic-
tine Convent on the side of the valley at Subiaco, or the view
from Tivoli of * the distant rising majesty of great St. Peter's
matchless pile ' while the setting sun colored all the plain with
deep ruddy hues." In Mores Catholici, written several years
later, there are many exquisite descriptions of the scenes upon
which he looked so lovingly at this time. Nothing could be more
beautifully impressive than those pages wherein he describes
his feelings when he first saw the College of Cardinals in stately
congress, or his memories of the uplands of Switzerland
studded with monasteries and convents and churches: or of
the roads by the side of which he talked with happy children,
kindly old men and women, and gentle priests.
It was such sights as these, and the enlargement of mind
— to use Newman's phrase — ^which came gradually to him in
the course of the social and historical studies he prosecuted in
preparation for The Broadstone of Honour, that at length de-
termined him to submit to the See of Rome, the Source of Unity
and the Centre of Truth. He came finally to recognize, in his
biographer's apt words, ** that the leading motives of the men
who broke with Rome and made essential changes in the an-
cient doctrines and ritual of religion in England were of the
most material and secular kind, and that they were a minority
6 KENELM HENRY DIGBY [Oct.,
forcing their policy upon a mostly reluctant people who had no
real voice in the matter and lost by the changes then made. . . .
First came the breach, the act of will, and then to justify it,
theories arose about the Church. And these theories have ever
since been in a Protean process of perpetual change and varia-
tion, in accordance with the changing humors of various
times."
In Digby's early days it was a more formidable adventure
to take the road to Rome than happily it is now; for one thing,
the social consequences of such a step were likely to be much
more painful, and there were many avenues of advancement,
professional and other, from which a Catholic was debarred
because of his Faith. Digby, however, having made up his mind,
would permit no obstacle to stand in the way of the fulfillment
of his purpose, and although he was rebuffed by at least two
priests, in succession — ^who, it may be, doubted his earnestness
— ^he succeeded at last in being received into the Church by a
London Jesuit to whom Charles Butler had directed him.
From now on, for several years, Digby lived at Cambridge,
^ reading in libraries books not often in modem days disturbed
from their secular repose, and decanting their contents into
volumes of his own making." The liberal dons meantime per-
mitted him to retain rooms at Trinity; possibly they looked
upon his change of religion as an unfortunate aberration to be
passed lightly over in a young man of so much learning, sin-
cerity and charm! Not long after his conversion Digby be-
came the friend of Ambrose Lisle March Phillips, who had
already been two years in the Church, and who as a fervent
layman was destined in years to come to do a great work for
Catholicism in England. Later on the two friends saw much
of the Honorable and Reverend George Spencer, another Trin-
ity convert who afterwards found his vocation in the Passionist
congregation and, as Father Ignatius of St. Paul, died the
death of a saint in 1864.
These three Cambridge men," Mr. Holland notes, • . .
all became Catholics before the Oxford Movement had begun.
Each of them contributed his share to the return towards
Catholic principles which brought many to the Chair of St
Peter, and brought far more to the half-way shelter which be-
gan to arise within the Anglican Church. Kenelm Digby con-
tributed to this by his writings, Ambrose de Lisle by his en-
1919.] KENELM HENRY DIGBY 7
thusiastic propaganda in action, and Spencer by his personal
influence. Thus the Catholic movement began, as a matter of
fact, not at Oxford, but in the more decidedly Protestant Uni-
versity of Cambridge. The reason perhaps is that Cambridge
was less isolated than Oxford then was in narrow self-esteem,
and more open to continental influences. Thus it was sooner
touched by the great wave of the romantic return to the
mediseval spirit, which was sweeping over Germany and even
France, as a reaction against the strictly classical spirit of the
French Revolution and the Napoleonic period.*' When, in
1825, Digby became a Catholic, Pugin's "little gem," St.
Andrew's Catholic Church, had not yet been built, and the
convert was obliged to ride twenty-six miles each way to Mass
on Sunday at Old Hall. Faithfully every Sunday the two friends,
Phillips and Digby, rode over, fasting, to early Communion,
High Mass, and Vespers, getting back to Cambridge at night-
fall.
Those were the days when to become a Catholic was to
make sacrifices. But Digby did not complain. He had found
that after which his heart had longed. He was in love with the
Faith into whose joy he had entered. And, as Mr. HoUand
says finely at the ^close of his account of Digby's conversion,
** the Christian religion is a love affair, and the complete con-
summation so far as it can be on earth is in or through the
Catholic Church. Between mere friendship and love com-
pleted there is for him who has once felt the attraction, no firm
standing ground any more than for the earthly lover in the
conception of * Platonic love.' Those who have never been real
lovers can be friends, but those who have been can hardly fall
back upon the line of friendship. If they retreat at all they
must retreat much further into the wilderness of uncertainty
and doubt."
The Broadstone of Honour, the first of Digby's longer works,
derives its title from the ruined castle of Ehrenbreitstein, across
the Rhine from Coblenz. As Mr. Holland indicates, this book was
for Digby what The Essay on Development was for Newman
and By What Authority for Robert Hugh Benson — and, one
might appropriately add. The Principles of Church Authority
(that forgotten masterpiece of Anglo-Roman controversy) for
Archdeacon Robert Wilberforce; in each case the book im-
mediately preceded or followed the author's submission to the
8 KENELM HENRY DIGBY [Oct,
Ifoly See. The intention of Digby in The Broadstone was to
demonstrate the greatness and display the beauty of the Catho-
lic Church through the centuries. There was then, there is
always, room for such a work. Since the so-called Reforma-
tion nothing had been left undone to vilify the Spouse of
Christ, no slander had been thought too l]jase or too ab-
surd to heap upon her, no lie too foul with which to besmirch
her. To The Dublin Review and to Studies Hilaire BeUoc has
recently contributed certain vital and scholarly articles, in
which he shows how the original authorities and documents
have been handled by a modern historian like Gibbon. It
would be no difficult task for a trained Catholic historian to
discover many similar suppressiones ueri and suggestiones
falsi in the work of most of the standard historians who have
written from a non-Catholic or ** impartial '* standpoint dur-
ing the last hundred years or so. Unfortunately for the cause
of truth and justice the James Gairdners have been few and
far between, and the wells have been pretty thoroughly
poisoned.
The Broadstone is divided into four parts entitled respec-
tively Godefridus, Tancredus, Morus and Orlandus. '* The first
two are so named after the heroes of the ICrusades, the thurd
after the Catholic martyr, Sir Thomas More. The main object
of the book is to describe the heroic and chivalrous spirit,
intimately bound up with the religious faith as it appeared in
the Middle Ages. But in Morus and in part of Orlandus are
stated those undeniable facts about the Protestant Revolution
in England, and on the Continent, the public exhibition of
which gave so much offence to the excellent rector of Hurst-
monceaux. [Julius Hare, of Guesses at Truth fame, who later
wrote to Digby: *' Luther is the man to whom I feel that I
myself, and that the whole world, owe more than to any man
since St Paul."] In one of his latest works, written when he
was over seventy, Digby admits that in his youth he wrote
things in religious controversy possibly too wounding to others,
and expressed more strongly than he would have expressed
them in old age. This is a very common reflection in old age
concerning ardent and intolerant youth, which has the defects
of its qualities. All the same, in England, in these days it is
well to be definite and lucid in order to avoid misinterpreta-
tion. From his early youth till the end of his very long Ufe
1919.] KENELM HENRY DIGBY 9
Kenefan Di^^y never wavered for one moment in his definition
€d the Catholic Church. It is for him, that religious society
existing throughout the world, of unbroken historic continuity,
and consisting of people of all nations and languages, which
is visibly, avowedly, and organically connected with the cen-
tral Apostolic See at Rome, and it is nothing either more or less
than this. ... He never admitted the assertion made by some
modems that the Catholic Church consists of ^ all who profess
and call themselves Christians," or the more exclusive asser-
tion made by other moderns that it consists of an imagined
combination of certain churches having properly descended
episcopal institutions.
The Broadstone of Honour has not been without its in-
fluence upon subsequent English hterature. Mr. iHolland, as
we have recorded, notes the indebtedness of Tennyson to it in
his early poems. Ruskin also, whom Digby greatly admired,
has paid tribute to this great book, assuring the reader of
Modem Painters that he ** will find every phase of nobleness
illustrated in Kenelm Digby's Broadstone of Honour*' It may
be, too, that Ruskin modeled the titles of some of his own later
opuscula upon those of Digby's lesser prose-writings, e. g.. The
Children's Bower^ The Lovers' Seat. And the author of Sesame
and Lilies did not hesitate to acknowledge a further debt:
" The best help I have ever had,*' he writes in Modern Painters
— ** so far as help depended on the sympathy or praise of others
in work which, year after year, it was necessary to pursue
through the abuse of the brutal and the base — ^was given me
when this author, from whom I had first learned to love noble-
ness, introduced frequent reference to my own writings in his
Children's Bower." It is a pity that Ruskin did not learn yet
more from these powerful and persuasive pages; that he did
not go on to admire and embrace the marvelous coherence
and unity (^ that dogmatic truth out of which Digby*s highest
inspirations proceeded; but many things are hidden from the
prudent that are revealed unto babes, and Ruskin was never
made wise unto salvation. Brought up in a rigidly Puritan
atmoqphere he never knew at first hand the daily lives of Cath-
olic men and women. Perhaps it was because of this that he
was capable of writing: "Modem Romanism is as different
from thirteenth century Romanism as a prison from a prince's
chamber."
10 KENELM HENRY DIGBY [Oct,
It is to be feared that many of the absurd assumptions
and statements made by those who sit in judgment on Cathol-
icism, are attributable entirely to their crass ignorance of the
real motives and beliefs of the Catholic. W. E. H. Lecky, for
instance, has talked amazing nonsense about '*the enormous
difference ^ between the ofiBcial Catholicism of the Council of
Trent and of the writings of Bossuet and Newman and the
'" pure and manifest polytheism and idolatry [italics are ours]
of the actual religion as it is practised in a great part of Europe
with the direct sanction and under the special benediction of
the highest authorities of the Church/' Even so keen and so
honorable a writer as Bishop Gore asseverates that a modem
Roman Catholic wiU hardly find himself at home in St. Paul's
epistles! It is inexplicable that Christian men of intelligence
should write like this, and should fail to realize that the evi-
dences of Christianity are all, when examined, equally
evidences of Catholicism.
To the writing of his next, longest, and, beyond question,
his most enduring work, Digby gave no less than ten years. At
the end of Mores Catholici there is a noble passage — ^recalling
the famous paragraph in his Autobiography wherein the
author of The Decline and Fall records the bringing to a close
of his master-work — ^in which Digby describes the circum-
stances under which he entered upon its composition; but not
Gibbon himself, it is scarcely an exaggeration to declare, ever
achieved a more sumptuous pageant of prose.
The plan of the book is simple enough : taking up the eight
beatitudes he demonstrates by a vast accumulation of interest-
ing and beautiful examples how each of them was realized in
the lives of mediaeval men and women. He shows how the
ideals of the beatitudes were maintained and inculcated by the
mediaeval Church, and how they influenced the individual in
every walk of life, in youth and age, in peace and war, in
sorrow and in joy.
The scope of these eleven eloquent volumes is admirably
summarized in the view Digby commends to us at the begin-
ning of Mores Catholici: ** Such a view would present a varied
and immense horizon, comprising the manners, institutions,
and spirit of many generations of men long gone by; we should
see in what manner the whole type and form of life were Chris-
Qan, although its detail may often have been broken and dis-
1919.] KENELM HENRY DIGBY 11
ordered; for instance, how the pursuits of the learned, the con-
solations of the poor, the riches of the Church, the exercises
and dispositions of the young, and the common hope and
consolation of all men, harmonized with the character of those
who sought to be poor in spirit; how again, the principle of
obedience, the constitution of the Church, the division of min-
istration and the rule of government, the manners and insti-
tutions of society, agreed with meekness and inherited its
recompense; further, how the sufferings of just men, and the
provisions for a penitential spirit were in accordance with the
state of those that were to mourn and weep; then, how the
character of men in sacred order, the zeal of the laity, and
the lives of all ranks, denoted the hunger and thirst after
justice; again, how the institutions, the foundations and the
recognized principle of perfection proclaimed men merciful;
moreover, how the philosophy which prevailed, and the spir-
itual monuments which were raised by piety an4 genius,
evinced the clean of heart; still further how the union of
nations and the bond of peace which existed even amidst
savage discord, wars and confusion, as also how the holy re-
treats for innocence which then everywhere abounded, marked
the multitude of pacific men; and finally, how the advantage
taken of dire events and the acts of saintly and heroic fame
revealed a spirit which shunned not suffering for the sake of
justice.**
Mores Catholici is a veritable library in itself, and the
devout Catholic in this age of small things would do weU to
make the book his constant companion. After the writings of
Cardinal Newman, it is one of the greatest contributions ever
made by a Catholic to English prose literature. There are
not so many great Catholic men of letters in our own time
that we can afford to ignore Kenelm Digby. The Catholics
who spend money on books are neither numerous nor wealthy,
Bfr. HQlland laments, and he expresses the pious hope that
some rich benefactor of his kind might cause the Mores Cath-
olici to be republished at a price within the reach of the lean-
est purse. It is, indeed, a matter for grave concern that what
he admirably calls **this immense storehouse of wisdom and
beauty and knowledge** must remain inaccessible to the
majority of readers today. There is truth in his remark that
^ a priest who possessed The Broadstone of Honour, Mores Cath^
12 KENELM HENRY DIGBY [Oct.,
olici and Compitum would have an inexhaustible store of
ammunition from which to feed his sermons. On every page
he will find quotations from the best ancient and modem
thinkers and poets suggesting trains of thought to himself » and
many a tale of heroic and saintly deeds to illustrate his
themes.**
The last of Digby's three longer works, Compitum,
was published in 1849. His later writings are, after all, merely
opuscula — ^mellow, delightful and wise, it is true, but bearing
the same relation to the three great books as a foothill to Mount
Everest. Compitum is ^ the Latin word for a point at which
roads meet, or to which they converge, like the straight
drives one sees in such forests as Compi^gne or Fontaine-
bleau, meeting at a point from which they radiate like
spokes in a wheel. The meeting point in the book is formed
by the central principles of the Catholic Church, in which
alone is found the happiness and peace of those who
travel by the many roads. The roads are the various
phases of human life, such as the road of children, the
road of youth, the road of the family, that of old age, that of
the schools, that of travelers, of joy, of sorrow, of death, of
contemplation, of wisdom, of warriors, of priests, of kings,
of active life, of the poor, of friendship, and many others,
through seven long volumes, crowded with admirable quota-
tions and reflections." Here almost more than in any other of his
books Digby is unflinchingly Catholic and Roman. His chief con-
cern now is to make abundantly and convincingly clear his idea
of Rome as the Centre of Unity, ** as the guardian of what he so
often calls * central principles' of life in all its provinces.'*
Digby had no patience with those eclectic souls who refuse
the magisterium of the Church on the score that it is a
** Western growth,** "legal and Roman,** *" unknown to St.
Athanasius, etc.,** Qui vos audit me audit was to his mind a
sufficient answer to them; the magisterium of Rome is surely
preferable to that of Mowbray, he would have said had he
lived in these days. Newman said that to be deep in history
was to cease to be a Protestant, and Digby was logical and
knew his history.
Into the Compitum as into its two predecessors, Di^y
poured the riches of his theological, historical and literary
knowledge. His range of allusion is wider even than Milton,
1919.] KENELM HENRY DIGBY 13
and unlike Milton he was not cut off by imperfect sympathies
and downright prejudice from some of the most treasurable
writings of the Bfiddle Age. His knowledge of the liturgy of
the Church he uses with something of Dante's beautiful effec-
tiveness. ^ He is an excellent guide in reading/* his biographer
dryly remarks, ** to those who prefer literature somewhat mel-
lowed by time to the last books from Smith's or Mudie's, and
the solid wisdom of the ages to the latest theory in cir-
culation.''
Digby's minor works, the titles of several of which were
mentioned at the beginning of this article, need not detain us
long. The best of them are the two books of reflections and
discussions. The Lovers' Seat and Evenings on the Thcunes;
and one might fitly call them ** Recreations of the author of
Mores CatholicL" He brings his imagination home, so to
speak, from its indefatigable joumeyings through Europe, and
writes of familiar scenes and every-day topics. The note of
these later and briefer books is somewhat that of a peculiarly
Victorian benevolence and cheerfulness. They abound, like
everything he wrote, in pleasant autobiographical touches,
and are characterized throughout by his usual surprisingly
wide allusiveness. Adequately to annotate the works of Di^^y
would require the cooperation of a committee of scholars!
Some of these lesser writings are filled with a moving tenderness
and wistful regret. In The Children's Bower he tells the story of
his beloved children, and it is difficult to read with dry eyes
the heartbroken father's grief at the death of his baby son,
John Gerald, ^the sweetest companion that ever man bred
his hopes out of, so loving and so joyous. . . ." Mr. Holland
devotes two long chapters of the Memoir to an account of
Digby's family life, a chronicle of domestic piety and rectitude,
of profound happinesses tranquilly and joyfuUy shared, of
sorrows and bereavements and disasters manfuUy borne and
turned to heavenly uses. Such lives and such approaches to
death are the mountain-summits towards which we who walk
in the plains below must raise eyes and hearts of aspiration.
FAIR PLAY IN IRELAND.
BY JOHN BARNES.
IIBERTY has inspired raptures in all languages,
but no one can speak about it more movingly
than the Englishman. The Englishman that
talks — the orator, the historian, and the poet —
has rung the changes upon this most abused of
until the Englishman that listens may be forgiven
if he has yielded to the spell and come to look upon liberty as
a sort of English shamrock, a growth of English soil, luxuriat-
ing at home, transplanted only to perish. At least the converse
holds true, according to the famous decision of a famous
jurist, which the poet has expressed in lines dear to every Eng-
lish heart:
Slaves cannot breathe in England; if their lungs
Receive our air, that moment they are free;
They touch our country and their shackles fall.
In favor of his sincerity is the choice he has made of a
national virtue — fair play — the best preservative against the
abuse of power, in a majority or an oligarchy or a despot, and
almost of itself sufficient to keep unrestraint from license.
It is no sign that a man loves liberty simply that he wishes to
be free. Every man does that, be be a roisterer in the clutches
of a policeman for doing his own sweet will or the worst
tyrant that ever kept the world in chains. There is little merit
in a love of virtue with reservations, according to the adage
about " honor among thieves." Not until one brings oneself
to look beyond the interests of oneself or one's clan does one
get much farther than Nero or the Puritans. The familiar line,
" who rules o'er freemen must himself be free." might better
read, " he that loves l^eedom rules not over slaves." In the
portrait painted by hipiself the Englishman never fails to make
fair play the most prominent feature. He would not, to be
sure, be understood to mean that he is the discoverer of the
Golden Rule, or that no one else knows how to play fair; but,
whether it be that fair play is the exception elsewhere but in
1919.] FAIR PLAY IN IRELAND 15
En^and the rule, or that others have it as an acquired virtue
while the Englishmen is to the manner bom, it is a virtue
distinctively English.
It would be superfluous to add fresh colors to so lively a
picture, and spiteful to try to spoil it. England has fairly
earned the right to have a good opinion of herself. After prej-
udice has set on one side all that can be said against her, there
will remain enough to her credit in the cause of humanity to
make any other nation slow to cast the first stone. If she has
gained power she has used it beneficently, either by spreading
the blessings of freedom in both hemispheres over tracts where
her own little island could be hid in a comer, or by bestowing
upon subject races a degree of well-being which they could
not hope to attain to of themselves. And this power has come
to her in no small measure from her love of liberty and fair
play. Nor is it any drawback from her deserts that her tri-
umphs in the cause of liberty, from Magna Charta to the Re-
form Bill, have been achieved, not in pursuit of a Quixotic
ideal, but under the pressure of grievances that were felt as
intolerable. Rather this speaks well for her good sense, since
it shows that she has as little use for the political charlatan
as she has for the despot.
If the picture is spoiled this will not be done by any man
outside of England. But it stands in danger of being spoiled
there at the present hour. She herself has to choose, and she
must make her choice in the broad light of day, whether she
will live up to her professions and gladden the heart of every
true lover of liberty, or give them the lie, to the great glee of
those who are waiting their opportunity to point at her the
finger of scorn. Just off her western shore lies the sister isle,
which ought to be a happy spot if nature had her way, since
she made it beautiful and rich and peopled it with a warm-
hearted race. The passions of men have been let loose there
for eight hundred years, and the story they have made is the
saddest history has to tell. There, at the present moment, all
the fine phrases about English liberty and English fair play
sound like cruel mockery. How the world applauded little
Belgium because for the space of four years it refused to be
cowed beneath the heel of the conqueror! A nation whose
spirit has not been broken in twice as many centuries has
proved its right not to be deprived of its nationality. The Irish
16 FAIR PLAY IN IRELAND [Oct,
have been left to starve and coaxed into the soup-houses by
turn, they have been chased into the bog and ushered into their
seats in the British Parliament, but they have never been
brought to acquiesce in the spoliation. Being of the tempera-
ment they are, with the spectacle before their eyes of their
ancestral domain in the possession of strangers, the wonder
is, not that they have been restive, but that they have been so
little turbulent.
Deep feelings crave a symbol, and Ireland has her own
Bastille perpetually before her eyes as the embodiment of her
wrongs. Here is how it looked to Justin McCarthy : ** Ameri-
can readers in general can have but little idea as to the
peculiarities of that singular institution Dublin Castle, the cen-
tre and fortress of Irish government. It has become from gen-
erations of usage, a very bulwark against the progress of Irish
national sentiment. The fresh current of feeling from the out-
side seems to make little impression on its stagnant and moldy
atmosphere. It is ruled by tradition, and to that tradition be-
longs the rule of hostility to every popular feeling and every
national demand.'' ^ Gazing up at it, the chronicler sighs over
what has been, the poet dreams of what might have been, but
even the child starting out in life with the burden of ages upon
his back thinks of the morrow, and asks himself, what is to be?
If Ireland were made to feel that she is living in an age of
democracy she could place her trust in the people, for Ireland's
friends are the people everywhere. If she could get her case
submitted to arbitration, she could rest it upon justice, for the
native race were in peaceful possession of the soil centuries
before the invader left his German home. If she were to get
the benefit of that law of human nature by which pity is con-
verted into indignation, a law which even the despot some-
times has to take into account, she could appeal to humanity,
and the answer would come in tones which even the venal
press would be forced to hear. But so long as she is left to ^eal
alone with her rulers her reliance must be upon English fair
play. The best settlement of all, if it ever comes about; as
much better than any other as an understanding between
friends is better than the decisions of armies or tribunals.
Now it may be said frankly that things would be more
hopeful for Ireland if her English ruliers were less conscious
> PoUHcal PoTtraiU.
1919.] FAIR PLAY IN IRELAND 17
of the possession of this virtue. Once a man persuades him-
self that any moral virtue whatever is in his blood, those who
are on the safe side can afford to laugh at him, but those who
have to deal with him are rather fiUed with concern about the
possibilities for evil in his self-deception. At least such is the
view of the moralists, and the novelists and the dramatists
seem to be of the same opinion. ** Beware instinct '' is the best
advice to be given one that is not afraid of going wrong. The
first impression made by a moral portrait in which the colors
are unusuaUy bright is suspicion rather than admiration; all
the more when the artist sits for his own portrait. If when the^
features are those of a single individual we are inclined to
think that such a picture flatters him, what are the chances that
it will be a true likeness when it is the composite picture of a
large body of men, of a party or a people, though only for one
generation. And, with regard to the particular virtue in ques-
tion, there is all the more reason for mistrust, if, as one of Eng-
land's greatest political thinkers teUs us, ** the genuine love of
liberty is very rare.*' A virtue that is rare the world over is not
likely to be a universal possession in any one land, even though
that land be England. Indeed, it is England herself that Burke
has in mind, and as he proceeds, he finds the '' love of domina-
tion ** a strong trait in the English character.
Let us say rather, in human nature, and add that the Eng-
lish character is not exempt. For it is in human nature that
the power begets the will to play the bully. Even Jack the
Giant Killer must have felt the temptation to swagger a little
after his deed of prowess. Jack might well be forgiven for
letting his head be a little turned when he *" felt the thews of
Anakim, the pulses of a Titan's heart;" but he could not have
indulged the humor and tried to play the giant himself with-
out losing our affection. To assert that John Bull has always
been stronger than the temptation would be fulsome flattery.
A recital of instances to the contrary will be gladly spared by
the reader. But if he has revealed his soul in his literatiu*e it
will be sufficient to allude to that. The note df Ciois Romanus
sum is found there as clearly discernible as in Virgil or in Livy
— Tu regere imperio populos, Ronvane, memento. It is already
heard in the older literature; but it has grown Ibuder rather
than fainter with the* passage of time. ' It is a note which can-
not b^ struck too often or with too much force to please the
18 FAIR PLAY IN IRELAND [Oct,
multitude. Macaulay and Mr. Rudyard Kipling may be called
to mind as instances in our own and the preceding generation;
the writings of both resound with the notes that so grated on
the ears of Burke — ** Our colonies," " Our empire."
Here was too good an opportunity to be lost by the other
side, who were blamed for precisely the same excess; and they
were not slow to seize upon that titbit furnished by the national
anthem, which, from the perfectly laudable sentiment that
*• Britons never shall be slaves," draws the inference that they
must rule over two-thirds of the surface of the globe. So Eng-
land herself has supplied Anglophobes with material to feed
the suspicion that the peace which she has in mind is a pax
Anglicana. Our view has traveled over a range wider than
our subject, but stiU it embraces our subject. If the
question were put whether Burke is right in sa3ring that
the English love to domineer, the general run of Irishmen
would unhesitatingly answer, yes, and they would point to
their own experience as a proof.
Granted, then, that the Englishman has more of the virtue
of fair play than the rest of us, still it cannot be admitted that
he plays fair by instinct, or that he is free from the danger of
doing his neighbor wrong. A glance at the history of reform
teaches otherwise. So far is he from being carried away by an
uncontrollable impulse to do as he would be done by, that cry-
ing abuses have been remedied only after efforts that took long
years. This, however, the Englishman has to his credit, that
with time and patience he can be educated up to a perception
of what is amiss; and England herself has been blessed with a
succession of men worthy to assume the task of instruction —
great souls with the clear insight and the fertility of resources
that belong to genius, with noble ideals and the courage to
work on in the midst of failure and the face of obloquy.
Thanks to the efforts of such men, who have kept their eyes
fixed as steadily upon the standard of justice as upon the Union
Jack, multitudes have been won over in the past to the cause
of the downtrodden. Alas for Ireland! England now has no
Burke nor Bright nor Gladstone, and Ireland no 0*Connell.
There is a guilty past which those who do not know it by
heart can find, if they care to learn it. Bad as it looks when set
forth with righteous indignation by an Irish pen, it looks ten-
fold worse when told sorrowfully, and with a sense of shame.
1919.] FAIR PLAY IN IRELAND 19
by a truthful Englishman; but it never looks more revolting
than when a Froude has daubed his powder and smeared his
rouge over the hideous features. One short line of a humorous
jingle sums it up : ^ I like to see 'em squirm." Not even Sir
Edward Carson, or the most rabid of his followers, would have
the face to stand before the world and say that this past is
something for England to be proud of. The Englishman of the
present hour may flatter himself that he is above anything of
the kind, but perhaps he will not be judged more leniently by
his posterity than he himself judges his forbears. The reason
why Ireland is more discontented now than she was in sorer
times may be that relatively she is worse off than ever; just as
the woridngman is more discontented because, though he is
better off than in the olden time, he is not as well off as he
thinks he ought to be. The ^ ferocity " of Queen Anne laws
has gone out of fashion; but for this the thanks are due to civil-
ization. If the love of domination is still active, it will not
make itself more amiable by gilding the chains or covering
them with velvet.
What part Ireland would have acted in the late War if
Pitt had played fair with the Irish people and refused to soil
his hands with the dirty work of stealing her Parliament; or if
Gladstone's efforts had been crowned with success and so much
as one generation of Irishmen had been allowed to grow up
to feel that the British flag could be to them something like
what it is to a Canadian or an Australian; or even if in 1914,
the Government, after dangling before the eyes of a heartsore
people the promise of better things, did not pull it away just
when loyalty was most needed, is a question which each one
will be able to answer wisely for himself according to his
knowledge of human nature. The fact is that in the year of
grace, one thousand nine hundred and nineteen, the Irish-
man, after more than seven centuries of conquest, is more
than ever **a disaffected subject of the British Crown ;** far
more disaffected than he was at the beginning of the century.
The cause of the increased discontent is another chapter added
to the already too long story of misrule.
The contents of this last chapter are not known to us in
their entirety; but the eagerness of Ireland to get the story be-
fore the world, and the violent efforts of England to suppress
it, warrant the suspicion that it is not all a chapter of fair play.
20 FAIR PLAY IN IRELAND [Oct,
The proof is public, however, that, in the view of the English
Government, toy-rebellions are a luxury, innocent enough in
a handful of invaders whose interest it is to keep the native
race in subjection, but a crime to be pimished pitilessly in
those who have no interest in any other soil but that which has
mingled with the dust of their fathers. It is an axiom of de-
mocracy that the sense of the people is to be trusted to know
what is good for them, far better than a benevolent despot.
There is no mistaking the sense of the Irish people now. Their
discontent is not, as is too often the case, that of a handful of
restless men stirred up by demagogues against the sober wishes
of the majority. One piece of the meagre information that
has leaked out of the unfortunate country is that they tell you
there, '* We are all Sinn Feiners now." Something has hap-
pened to sweep away the Nationalist Party. The voice of
moderation is no longer heard. And that party which yester-
day went begging for a few votes now has with it the temper
of a united people.
While the native race are trying to grope their way from
bondage into freedom, and the politicians are playing their
fantastic tricks l^efore high heaven, we may leave them both
to the unknown forces which control the future. Little as we
know about these, perhaps we know not less than the rulers.
Wise as these may be, perhaps they are no wiser than some of
their predecessors from whom they now and then take a text
when they wish to descant upon the shortsightedness of states-
men. In the meantime we may indulge our fancy a little and
taty to imagine what would take place in Ireland if this world,
instead of being a world of shams where politicians blow hot
and cold in the same breath, were a fairyland where political
^thyrambs are meant to be taken seriously.
If English rulers sincerely wish to bring contentment to
Ireland they know how to do so, or their ignorance is beyond
cure. The method is prescribed in that speech which every
member of the British Cabinet may be presumed to have read
over and over again for its noble concept of the British Empire
and its stores of political wisdom, set forth in glowing
eloquence. Indeed, so clearly is the method there marked out
for dealing with ^ a people that think they ought to be free and
know they are not," that its principles are accepted as
fixiomatic and the statesmen who were so blind as not to see
1W9.] FAIR PLAY IN IRELAND 21
them are spc^en of as England's evil genius. How, for in-
stance, could humanity better articulate its feelingi with re-
gard to Ireland than thus? ** You ought not in reason to trifle
with so large a mass of the interests and feelings of the human
race. You could at no time do so without guilt; and be assured
you will not be able to do it long with impunity/' Or, with the
change of a word or two, we have the truly democratic appeal
to public opinion enunciated in a way that cannot be improved
upon : *' If I were sure the colonists had at their leaving this
country sealed a regular compact of servitude, that they had
solenmly abjured all the rights of citizens, that they had made
a vow to renounce all ideas of liberty for them and their pos-
terity to all generations; yet I should hold myself obliged to
conform to the temper I found universally prevalent in my own
day, and to govern two millions of men, impatient of servitude,
on the principles of freedom/' Or again, it formulates the
principle of fair play : *^ It is not what a lawyer teUs me I may
do, but what humanity, reason, and justice tell me I ought to do.
Is a politic act the worse for being a generous one? " Or, once
more, how completely it sweeps away the plea of the benevo-
lent despot: **If you mean to please any people, you must
give them the boon which they ask — ^not what you may think
better for them, but of a kind wholly different"
But of what use to Ireland are all the fine phrases in the
world unless a contented Ireland is really an object of desire.
The liveliest interest in her affairs is manifested by that faction
which makes no secret of its view that a subject Ireland is the
foremost consideration, compared with which contentment
is only a secondary matter. Indeed, there is good reason to
believe that the will is not lacking to embroil the natives with
their rulers, and to get affairs in such a tangle as the British
Government alone can unravel. At least, so it has been of yore.
One of the dark crimes that history has to record is rebellion
fomented with malice prepense in order to furnish a pretext
for coercion. To attract the attention of the world to this
sort of foul play was a rare good service unwillingly done by
the London Times. Let us trust that this instance was the last,
and that the specific details which have recently been offered
in support of the same ugly charge belong to the realm of the
imagination.
But with all the good will in the world fair play will not
22 FAIR PLAY IN IRELAND [OcU
get very far if it has to make its way through a fog of prej-
udice. The weapon within easiest reach of prejudice, and a
powerful one when it is dexterously wielded, is travesty. It
has been used upon the Irish character pitilessly. So it was even
from the beginning. For instance, the following citation
appears in a well-known account of the Elizabethan drama:
** The Irish masquers were so well liked at court the last week
that they were appointed to perform again on Monday; yet
their device, which was a mimical imitation of the Irish, was
not pleasing to many, who think it no time, as the case stands,
to exasperate that nation by making it ridiculous." ' From then
on up to within recent times, when gentler manners have put
some restraint upon explosions of ill nature in print, the wits
have had their way. But no limit has been fixed beyond which
the cartoonist is not to pass. The manner in which he has
abused his liberty in English sheets — and, sad to say, also in
sheets on this side of the water — shows, if it shows nothing else,
what a weight of prejudice has first to be removed if Ireland
is to get her measure of fair play. The use for political pur-
poses is obvious. Make your enemy contemptible and you keep
him from gaining friends. Get the world to believe that Ire-
land is a nation of Yahoos and Kerns and Gallowglasses and
she must be civilized before she is granted self-determination.
But all the heirs to the bigotry of a bygone age are not
strong enough of themselves to delay the triumph of justice.
Indeed, there is nothing formidable in their numbers if we can
trust the count which has been made. Part of the blame must
rest on the indifferent many whose silence gives consent. But
most is to be feared from those who satisfy themselves, per-
haps too easily, that they are filled with good intentions. '' Put
yourself in his place " is the best rule to apply whether in judg-
ing of the deeds of our fellow mortals or in adjusting differ-
ences between man and man. As this is not an easy thing to
do when self-interest stands in the way, it is well to eke it out
with the poet's prayer for the gift " to see ourselves as others
see us.** It cannot be denied that it is a rule which makes de-
mands for nothing less than a considerable degree of the dra-
matic faculty; but if any nation might be supposed to be
favored in this respect it is the English, to judge by the excel-
lence of their dramatic literature. Whether they are blessed
*Hiitorg of BnglUh Dramatie LUerature, By A. W. Ward, toI. IL, p. 996.
1919.] FAIR PLAY IN IRELAND 23
with it in the same degree in political matters is another ques-
tion. In the view of the late Mr. Andrew Lang they are not.
According to him, ** Englishmen especially find it impossible
to understand tastes and emotions that are not their own — ^the
wrongs of Ireland (till quite recently), the aspiration of
Eastern Rumelia, the demands of Greece."* The Irishman
may be wrong from his own point of view, but at least he has
his own point of view, which must be reckoned with if an
accommodation is to be reached. It was set forth dramatically
at the outbreak of the War by a writer who is not, or at least
was not, a Sinn Feiner, as might appear, but a Nationalist.^
**Let us suppose that Germany smashes England in this
War and takes over the government of England. Let us sup-
pose that all the English people are swept like vermin to the
mountains of Wales, and the shires of England are planted
with German junkers. Let us suppose that the governor of Eng-
land is a German princeling surrounded by German younger
sons and that all legislation for England is made by Germans in
Berlin. Let us suppose that laws are passed in Berlin making
it illegal for the English to export any article that could pos-
sibly compete with Germany, making it criminal for any Eng-
lishman to own property or be educated or practice a learned
profession. Let us suppose that all young Germans are taught
to believe that the English are poor and dirty and lazy and low,
and that all Germans are righteous and Grod-f earing and * play
the game.' Let us suppose that education is at last introduced
into England, education of a wretchedly inferior character,
and the English are taught to sing, in German, ' We are happy
little German children.' Let us suppose that, under the benev-
olent German regime, a famine occurs in which one-eighth of
the population, or over four million dirty English people, die
simply of starvation. Let us suppose that the English revolt
and are finally allowed to send representatives to sympathetic
Berlin, where, after many years' agitation, they are graciously
permitted to buy their land back from the junkers, but are re-
proached continually for poverty, ignorance and sloth. Let us
suppose that the tenacious Englishmen in Berlin keep up their
agitation, always struggling to get a parliament established in
London, and are finally told that the thing is practically im-
possible, because the descendants of the Prussians in York-
24 FAIR PLAY IN IRELAND [Oct,
shire and Lancashire feel safer in the hands of Germany. Let
us suppose, however, that finally a bill is drafted which half-
heartedly concedes a limited measure of Home Rule, but that
the German army refuses to go against the rebellious Yorkshire
and Lancashire Prussians. Let us suppose that the bill is event-
ually passed, subject to Yorkshire amendment — and a war
breaks out against the Japanese, in which the Germans turn to
the English and say : * Come, fellow Germans, to the defence of
your Empire I * Ufider these circumstances, would it be sur-
prising if one found the English * involuntary and disaffected
subjects' of the German Empire? ^
We can imagine an Englishman stopping his ears at such
language, which must sound to him little short of blasphemy.
But if the bare imagination is painful, what must the reality
be to the Irish?
On the other hand we must avoid falling into the very
excess we condemn. This article will have much overshot the
mark if it seems to convey the impression that fair play is
known in England only by reputation. On the contrary, there
is a great deal of it there, and more now than ever. In days
when it was rarer than it is now, it is interesting to find among
those that were able to enter sympathetically into the minds
of the Irish that stanch old Tory, Samuel Johnson. Whether
his views were drawn from his conversations with Burke or
from his own goodness of heart, we find that English misrule
attracted his attention on more than one occasion. For in-
stance, looking back over the past, he once remarked : ** The
Irish are in a most unnatural state; for we see there the
minority prevailing over the majority. There is no in-
stance, even in the ten persecutions, of such severity as
that which the Protestants of Ireland have exercised over
the Catholics. Did we tell them we have conquered them,
it would be above board: to punish them by confiscation
and other penalties, as rebels, was monstrous injustice.*' '
In reference to their then condition he was not less strong.
To a gentleman who hinted that the ^* barbarous debilitat-
ing 'policy*' might be necessary to support the authority
of the British Grovemment he replied : ^* Let the authority of the
English Government perish rather than be maintained by in-
iquity. Better would it be to restrain the turbulence of the
* Lif4 of Samuel Johmon, By Jaoim Bocw^.
1919.] FAIR PLAY IN IRELAND 25
natives by authority of the sword, and to make them amenable
to law and justice by an effectual police than to grind them to
powder by all manner of disabilities and incapacities. Better
to hang or drown the people at once than by an unrelenting
persecution to beggar and starve them." *
The Government in time came around to the Doctor's way
of looking at the matter; but there is another conversation
worthy of a place here for its bearing on complaints that are
still heard. It took place with George Faulkner up in the
Hebrides. *" George said that England had drained Ireland
of fifty thousand pounds in specie annually for fifty years.
' How so. Sir? ' said Dr. Johnson. * You must have very great
trade.* — * No trade.' — * Very rich mines? ' — * No mines.' — * From
whence, then, does all this money come?' — * Come I why out
of the blood and bowels of the poor people of Ireland.'" ^ But
the Doctor also attempted the r61e of a prophet, and it appears
he did not do so badly. ** Do not make a union with us. Sir,*'
he said to an Irish genUeman when that important question
was mooted. ^We should unite with you only to rob you.'*
And he adds the characteristic touch: ^'We should have
robbed the Scotch if they had anything of which we could
have robbed them.** *
This will do for a voice out of the depths before the
q>och of reform. Once reform got well under way, Ireland
was sure to get some of the benefit, if not from love of the Irish,
at least from that sense of decency whence springs the desire
to dwell in a respectable neighborhood, to keep the street clean
in front of one's window, to have the house next door free from
quarreling neif^ibors. So Ireland, though not in the full flood
of reform— far from it — ^was not untouched by some of its
currents. It speaks well for the progress of fair play in the last
half -century that enough has been said in her favor by noble-
minded Englishmen to fill the shelf of a library. There is an
augury of brighter days to come in the fact that the difSculty
now is not that of a long and disappointing search, but where
to choose amid such abundance. It will be sufficient to cite as
a sample one whose utterances have the best chance of sur-
viving as literature, that stanch friend of every good and noble
cause, John Bright
*tbid* ^Joutmd of a Tour tn th§ Hebrtdea, By Junm BotwdL
* Lif4 of 8amm$l Jokmaon. By Judm Bo«w«U.
26 FAIR PLAY IN IRELAND [OeU
It is as true today as in 1848, when he said : ** You have
toiled at this Irish difSculty Session after Session, and some of
you have grown almost from boyhood to greyheaded old men
since it first met you in your legislative career, and yet there is
not in ancient or modem history a picture so humiliating as
that which Ireland presents to the world at this moment; and
there is not an English gentleman who, if he crossed the
Channel in the present autumn, and traveled in any foreign
country, would not wish to escape from any conversation
among foreigners in which the question of the condition of
Ireland was mooted for a single moment." *
Not less timely is the following : "" I shall be told that I
am injuring aristocratical and territorial influence. What is
that in Ireland worth to you now? What is Ireland worth to
you at all? Is she not the very symbol and token of your dis-
grace and your humiliation to the whole world? Is she not an
incessant trouble to your legislature, and the source of in-
creased expense to your people, already overtaxed? Is not
your legislation all at fault in what it has hitherto done for that
country? The people of Ulster say that we shall weaken the
Union. It has been one of the misfortunes of the legislation
of this House that there has been no honest attempt to make a
union with the whole people of Ireland up to this time. We
have had a union with Ulster, but there has been no union with
the whole people of Ireland, and there never can be a union
between the Government and the people whilst such a state of
things exists as has for many years past prevailed in the south
and west of Ireland." ^^
Again, what could bring out more strongly the contrast
between the callousness of England and the sympathy of the
rest of the world than the following, even though now the
void is not in the stomach; for the pain in the heart is keener
from the added poignancy of disappointed hopes. ^^ Sir, I am
ashamed, I must say, of the course we have taken upon this
question. Look at that great subscription that was raised
three years ago for Ireland. There was scarcely a part of the
globe from which subscriptions did not come. The Pope, as
was very natural, subscribed — the head of the great Mahometan
empire, the Grand Seignior, sent his thousand pounds — the
*Speeehe$ on Questions of Public Policy. Edited by James B. Thorold Rogers.
London, 1883. Ireland, 111., p. 161 d. ^•Ibtd,, iv., 173 d.
1919.] FAIR PLAY IN IRELAND 27
uttermost parts of the earth sent in their donations. A tribe of
red Indians on the American continent sent their subscription ;
and I have it on good authority that even the slaves on a plan-
tation in one of the Carolinas subscribed theu* sorrowful mite
that the miseries of Ireland might be relieved. The whole
world looked upon the condition of Ireland, and helped to
mitigate miseries. What can we say to all those contributors,
who, now that they have paid, must be anxious to know if
anything is to be done to prevent recurrence of these calam-
ities? We must tell them with blushes that nothing has been
done, but that we are still going on with the poor-rates, and
that, having exhausted the patience of the people of England in
Parliamentary grants, we are coming now with rates in aid,
restricted altogether to the people of Ireland. That is what
we have to tell them; whilst we have to acknowledge that our
Constitution, boasted of as it has been for generations past,
utterly fails to grapple with this great question.** ^^
After a picture which it is hard to forbear from quoting
in its entirety despite its length, he adds: ""I venture to say
that this is a miserable and a humiliating picture to draw of
this country. Bear in mind that I am not speaking of Poland
suffering under the conquest of Russia. There is a gentieman,
now a candidate for an Irish county, who is very great upon
the wrongs of Poland; but I have found him always in the
House of Commons taking sides with that great party which
has systematically supported the wrongs of Ireland. I am not
speaking about Hungary, or of Venice as she was under the
rule of Austria, or of the Greeks under the dominion of the
Turk, but I am speaking of Ireland — ^part of the United King-
dom — ^part of that which boasts itself to be the most civilized
and the most Christian nation in the world. I took the liberty
recentiy, at a meeting in Glasgow, to say that I believed it was
impossible for a class to govern a great nation wisely and
justiy. Now in Ireland there has been a field in which all the
principles of the Tory Party have had their complete experi-
ment and development. . . . And yet what has happened?
This, surely. That the kingdom has been continually weak-
ened — that the harmony of the Empire has been disturbed, and
that the mischief has not been confined to the United King-
dom, but has spread to the Colonies." ^*
» Ibtd., !▼.• 174, 17S. « Ibid^ yi.
28 FAIR PLAY IN IRELAND [Oct,
But of all John Bright* s sayings the one by which he will
be longest remembered is the passage which, in its striking
imagery, reads like a reversal of Dante's curse against the
Pisans : ** I believe that if the majority of the people of Ire-
land, counted fairly out, had their will, and if they had the
power, they would unmoor the island from its fastenings in the
deep, and move it at least two thousand miles to the west.
And I believe further, that if by conspiracy, or insurrection,
or by that open agitation, to which alone I ever would give any
favor or consent, they could shake off the authority, I will
not say of the English Crown, but of the Imperial Parliament,
they would gladly do so." *•
England is to be congratulated that amongst her sons she
has not a few who have the courage to tell her frankly what
she needs to know, and what she would not listen to from Irish
lips. The advantage of plain words over honied phrases does
not need to be pointed out to the wise. It will be an evil day
for England when she has no ear for hard truths. The picture
which we all draw in our minds of the tyrant is wrong seated
in power and surrounded by flattery.
Mr. Bagehot somewhere speaks of the lyrical function of
Parliament; by which he means public speaking that tickles
the ear with what it likes to hear. And certainly there is no
lack in recent years of oratory to usher in a reign of universal
democracy with an enthusiasm worthy of the Jacobins. The
small nations even, all of them, are invited to the feast; indeed,
they are to have the place of honor. All save Ireland. She is
the Little Gretchen left out in the cold, looking in at the glory
of the lights, tantalized by the odor of the viands, and straining
her ear to catch the notes of the music that mingles with the
sound of the happy voices. What effrontery in the ragged
urchin to knock at the door of the banquet-hall of Versailles 1
» tbid.. It., 177 a.
THE LITTLE BROWN BIRD.
BY ARABEL MOULTON-BARREIT.
I.
OHN? Sweet John! Sweet- John-to-Whit I *•
The little brown bird in the branches of the
great leafy cedar whistled his heart out to the
sunny air. " Sweet John. Sweet-John-to-Whit**
If you whistle the words you will give a faint
imitation of the little bird's song; but were you to try for a
thousand years you could never get the roundness of the notes,
nor the gay sweet triumph of them.
•* Sweet John," said the bird.
The child looked up into the swaying branches; her eyes
were full of light and a little fear.
** Daddy, I can't see the bird. Where is he?** and she
placed her small hand in her father's. There was no longer
any fear when the man's fingers closed tenderly over hers.
*' John-to-Whit," sang the bird, and his little bright eye
rested on the upturned face. It was such a tiny point of light
that it was mixed up with the sunbeams and the child did not
see it. *' I want to see him, daddy," and her voice sang with
sweet insistence. " Find him."
^ He isn't very much to look at," said the man, obediently
searching the branches with his strong keen eyes, ** but he has
a big soul."
•* Sweet John " whistled the bird.
'* A sweet soul, as well as a big soul," corrected the man,
smiling. '* He wants you to think well of him, girlie."
** Do you see him, daddy? Look, do look."
'*No," said daddy, throwing his head still further back-
ward in an effort to see better. ** I don't see him." ' It was a
very painful position, but he would have suffered much greater
inconvenience to please his little girl. ** I don't see him, but
I hear him. The most beautiful things of life, the things we
want niost; are alwajrs hidden from us."
**I see you, daddy," said the child. The man's heart
swelled, and he clasped the small fingers very closely in his.
30 THE LITTLE BROWN BIRD [Oct,
She was too young to understand the deeper meaning of her
own sweet words, but the innocent tone of them was very
precious to him. " Sweet-John-to-Whit,** sang the bird tri-
umphantly, and the clear note^ came from the far end of the
garden.
**0h, daddy! He has gone." A cloud came over the
brightness of her eyes.
'*>He has only changed his quarters," said daddy cheerfully
and manfully as became a hero in search of the ideal. '*Let
us follow him."
So, through the garden they went; past beds of wind-
blown petunias that lay in a tangle of color and perfume; past
clusters of sunny phlox, and prim sweet marigolds and jas-
mine flowers; past scarlet hibiscus that bent opening buds, all
wet with dew, to earth; past trailing lengths of coralilla and
honeysuckle, and wax-plant flowers, and beds of heliotrope
that stayed their feet by its exquisite breath !
" I love you, I love you."
And on, and on, over the mossy lawn where Chinese bam-
boo swept the grass with heavy fringes of blue-tinted leaves;
and under the tall palms that sang a little tune, their heads
lifted high to the sky; and away now to the Poinciana Regia
trees where the child's feet sank deep in the fallen crimson
blossoms. ** Sweet John," sang the little bird from a pimento
tree; and the brown of his breast was hid in the silvery mist of
the flowers.
" Do you see him, daddy ? " said the child.
"" John ? " said the bird, and there was laughter in his voice
and triumph of concealment. ** Sweet- John-to-Whit ! " and the
blossoms opened and closed on the little brown bird.
"Sweet John!"
The glad clear call fled away behind them out into the
wild free world beyond the garden.
'* He has gone," said the child and her lips trembled. Who
can ]>enetrate to the source of a child's grief, or sound its
depths? ** Never mind," said daddy; and he lifted the child
in his great arms, and held her close and kissed her.
''Let's follow him, daddy," said the child, and her arm
slipped round his neck, and her tangled curls were against his
cheek and she smiled; for here was her kingdom, and she, the
queen. ** Do let's follow him, daddy."
1W9.] THE LITTLE BROWN BIRD 31
^He has gone a long, long, way off/* said daddy very
slowly, for he was thinking how best to comfort his little girl,
further chase being out of the question. *'Yery far away;
over the pastures, and across the rivers, and over the hills, and
down through the valleys, and across the sea, and on, and
on. And now he has reached the end of the world."
" Wm he get lost, daddy? "
'* When he gets to the very edge," said daddy cautiously,
for he felt that he himself was perilously near the brink, ** he
will begin to fly up, and up and up ... "
"As far as the stars?"
** Oh, much further, right past the stars," and daddy's voice
was now quite confident, for would not the little bird's journey
be over when it reached nothing?
"* Does he sing all the time ? "
"" All the time. And now he has passed the stars, and he
goes on, and on and on." Daddy paused, for now that he had
reached space he found the crossing of it very difficult. Reali-
xation of space confounds the minds of even the very, very
wise. But the eyes of the child were looking into his, and they
were full of a strange and beautiful wisdom.
** Hasn't he got to God yet? " she asked wistfully.
"Yes," said daddy very humbly, for his soul was very
big; and though he had the mind of a philosopher he still kept
the simple heart of a child; and the fingers of his little girl
were warm about his neck. " Yes, girlie; the little brown bird
has flown right up to God. All the best and most beautiful
things of life come from God, and return to Him."
" I want to see the little brown bird," said the child.
U.
" Sweet John ! " sang the little brown bird. The heaving
branches of the great cedar hid him from sight as he dived
through the green hollows of leafy seas. "John-to-Whit-
John? " The girl looked up into the branches, a wistful curi-
osity in the depths of her limpid eyes.
" Do you see him ? " she asked the boy. " I wish I could see
him."
The boy, for he was little more, laughed carelessly.
" You can never see a John-to-Whit," he said. "He gets lost
32 THE LITTLE BROWN BIRD [Oct.,
amongst the leaves. And the bird is nothing much to look at.
Dead leaves and ashes. That's what he looks like."
** I want to see him," said the girl, and her beautiful head
was thrown backward in a vain endeavor to pierce the mystery
of the little bird's hiding place. '' Look for him," she added
imperiously. But the boy only laughed.
^ I like better to look at you," he said, his glowing eyes on
her face.
^' Sweet-John-to-Whit," sang the bird, and he put his head
on one side and eyed the girl too.
" When I was a little girl," she said. " I walked here with
daddy."
'' Did he find the little brown bird? " asked the boy with
sudden misgiving.
*' No," said the girl, and her eyes looked straight in front of
her over the bright and beautiful garden where flowers and
trees and palms still grew and blossomed beautiful in the sun-
shine. ''No, he couldn't find the little brown bird." '*He
couldn't find the little brown bird " echoed the boy; and there
was a great relief in his voice, the relief of one who is not
ashamed to fail where a greater than he has been vanquished.
'* But we followed the bird," continued the girl, and now
her eyes were looking much further than the garden; they
gazed beyond it; far, far into the distance.
"Did you?" said the boy, and he laughed. The brown
depths of his eyes held inextinguishable fires of mirth. But the
girl's eyes were on the edge of the world and they held a
gravity beyond her years.
^ We followed him," said the girl, '' and he flew on, and
on, over pastures and through valleys, and over hills and
across rivers and seas to the very edge of the world."
"Sweet John," said the bird overhead. "And then he
flew up and up, right through the stars and beyond them, and
on and on. ..."
" Then you dropped back to earth," said the boy, and he
looked into the girl's face and laughed again. But she did not
look at him, and the wistfulness of her eyes troubled him.
''And then the little brown bird reached God," said the
girl, and the tears sprang suddenly to the clear beautiful eyes.
"Sweet John! Sweet-John-to-Whit," sang the bird, and his
voice sounded far away in the cool darkness of a wild-fig tree.
1919.] THE LITTLE BROWN BIRD S8
^ Why do you cry? " said the boy, and the laugh died away in
his eyes as the light does out of a landscape when a cloud drifts
over the sun. ** Don't cry. I love you. I love you. Do not
cry because the little brown bird went away to. . . ." And then
he hesitated. After all, it was only a f cury tale and very silly
and childish. He could not understand the girl.
*" The litUe bird went to God," said the gu*l softly. ** And
not long ago daddy went too. All the best and most beautiful
things of life come from God and return to Him."
*" I love you," said the boy passionately, and his eyes were
like storm-swept seas. "I love you ... I love you." Then
he put his arm about her and led her away.
ra.
The great cedar branches swayed in the sunshine, and the
wind rushed through the leaves stirring them to tumultuous
joy and life. Like the music of many waters the sound of it
swept through the garden.
** Sweet-John-to-Whit. Sweet?" sang the little brown
bird.
**Do you see him?" said the woman. She was very old,
and her face bore the footprints of heavy sorrows. But her
eyes, bright and hopeful, glanced upward into the tree with
the eager look of a child.
** Sweet John," said the bird, and he looked down into the
childlike eyes of the woman.
** Where is he? Do you see him? " She asked softly of the
little grandson that leaned against her knee.
** The branches hide him," said the little grandson; "'and
he is an ugly little bird."
^ I want to see him," said the woman, and her voice was
full of piteous entreaty. " Find him."
'' If I were to climb the tree . . ." began the little grandson,
and he put his foot on the bench.
*' Come down," cried the woman, and there was fear in her
voice.
*' You will frighten him away."
•• Sweet-John-to-Whit," sang the bird.
** Oh, he is there right enough," said the little grandson.
**ril tell you what Fll do. I'll bring him down with a
stone." And he picked up one from the ground.
?0L. cz« 3
M THE LITTLE BROWN BIRD [OcU
•• Sweet John! " whisUed the bird. " John? ''
** Stop ! " screamed the woman, and she rose feebly from
the bench and snatched away the stone.
Her limbs trembled so violently that a great fear came
over the little grandson. If his grandmother w^e to die out
there in the garden, and he all alone ! He began to cry.
** Hush ! " said the woman, and she drew him to the bench,
and made him sit close to her whilst she comforted him.
•* Don't cry, sweetheart . . . don't cry. You did not mean to
be cruel, but the stone . . . the stone ... it struck right against
my heart.**
** I didn't throw it," said the little grandson, and he began
to cry again. He hid his face against her knees.
"There . . . there . . . Don't cry. You don't understand.
It doesn't hurt now. Come I'll tell you a story."
" John-to-Whit — Sweet John I " sang the little brown bird.
" Once upon a time there lived a little brown bird in the
cedar tree," began the woman; and her hand, which was still
beautiful, played with the little grandson's curls. "He was
only a little brown bird but he had a big and sweet soul. And
he sang all day long."
" Sweet-John-to-Whit," said the bird.
"Do you hear him?" said the woman, and she smiled.
" But you never can see him. I tried to find him when I was a
little girl. It was very long ago. I was smaller, oh ! very much
smaUer than you, and we went together to look for him."
"Who went with you?" asked the little grandson
drowsily, for the caressing touch of the grandmother's fingers,
and the torrent in the cedar, and the scent of the flowers,
and the warm sunshiny air were making him feel quite
sleepy.
"I went with your great-grandfather," said the woman.
" He must have been very old," said the little great-grand-
son, and the lashes lay on his cheek for quite three seconds, and
then slowly raised themselves again. The little great-grandson
was getting very, very sleepy, indeed. There were no giants in
this story : only birds, and the grandmother that he saw every
day, and the great-grandfather who must have been very wrin-
kled and bent and old; and how could such an old man, older
than his grandmother, chase a bird over pastures and hills, and
through valleys and across rivers and seas* till he got to the
1919.] THE LITTLE BROWN BIRD 35
very edge of the world? It must have been just like the edge
of a table, thought the little grandson, and then he too leant
over to see what was below, and lost his balance and fell over
and he went down, and down and down . . . and there lay the
little grandson fast asleep with his head on his grandmother's
knee.
The woman's head rested against the hoary old trunk
of the cedar. Perhaps the weight of the little grandson tired
her, but she was not thinking of that; she was going on with
the story, and the beautiful hand lay peacefully still amongst
the bri^t tangle of curls. She had forgotten the little grand-
son; for now the little brown bird mounted the sky: he flew
straight through the shining stars. How lovely they were, and
so many miUions of them; and how they shone on the little
brown bird as he passed, singing. And now the stars were left
behind and still the little bird flew on, and on, and on. . . .
** I have come to meet you," said daddy. ** I thought you
might lose your way,** and he put his arms about her and held
her very close and kissed her.
** I followed the little brown bird," said the child, and she
put her arms about his neck in the old childish way. ** Is he
singing to God, daddy?"
** Yes," said daddy, and he smiled.
** Shall I see him ? " asked the child, and her beautiful eyes
shone like stars.
•* Yes," said daddy, " for he sings very, very close to God.
All the best and most beautiful things of life come from God
and return to Him. Let us go together to Him now."
Then the child felt the great strong arms close round her
very tenderly, her head rested against his cheek, and together
they sprang upward to God.
IV.
- Sweet-John-to-Whit," sang the little brown bird. " Sweet
John!"
The cedar branches moved triumphantly in the sunshine.
Every leaf was a sun-lit banner that hid away the little brown
bird in their glorious depths.
•• John-to-Whit. Sweet?"
••The boy is asleep," said a woman's voice, ** but . . ."
There came a sharp cry.
36 THE LITTLE BROWN BIRD [Oct..
^ Hush ! *' said a man's voice, and in it was a great tender-
ne89.
"She is asleep too. She was very tired. Take the boy.
Can ypu carry him, dear heart? Hush . . • Hush . . . Don't cry.
Leave me with her. I am glad it happened so. She, she is
smiling still."
'*Did you find the little brown bird?" said the sleepy
voice of the grandson; the muffled sound of the words told you
his lips were against his mother's cheek. Then he fell asleep
again.
''The little brown bird . . ." faltered the woman's voice.
You heard her crjring softly.
*' ^e has seen the little brown bird at last," said the man's
deep voice; there was a smile in the words though you knew
his eyes were f uU of tears. ** All the best and most beautiful
things of life come from God and return to Him."
" Sweet- John-to-Whit. Sweet John!" The clear whistle
sounded through the leaves of the great swaying branches of
the cedar.
" Sweet- John-to-Whit. Sweet John!" The voice of the
little brown bird came from far, far away, right away beyond
the stars . . . on . . . and on . . . and on . . . the little brown
bird was singing in the Heart of God.
All the best and most beautiful things of life come from
God, and return to Him.
DOROTHEA.
BY MAY TOMUNSON.
HE figure of Dorothea presents, in almost ideal
embodiment, the womanly character as we con-
ceive of it today. The conditions under which
Dorothea lived are, it is true, not precisely those
of the present, but she herself is quite essentially
modem, both in the larger sense and in the sense that one can
easily conceive of her as welcoming, and even embracing, the
many opportunities and privileges now open to women. It is
particularly easy to imagine her as enthusiastic in the pursuit
of academical knowledge; and remembering her interest in
matters socially useful, one can easily think of her as applying
her ready intelligence to such practical subjects as domestic
science and market gardening; or one can picture her as en-
grossed in some one of the many forms of philanthropic work,
or absorbed in self-forgetful, merciful tendance upon the sick
and wounded, or actively concerned with the welfare of
orphaned children.
But easy as it is to think of Dorothea as thus engaaed. one
half shrinks from such imagining. Somehow one prefers not
to associate Dorothea with the idea of professional efficiency
and special training, since, even now, when scientific knowl-
edge and trained efficiency are lightly carried and by no means
uncommon, one is rather inclined to think of this sort of service
and this sort of equipment as something apart from the idea of
grace and charm and youthful bloom. The imagination does
not readily accept the idea of training. Grace and bloom go
with spontaneity. That certain indefinable something, that
delicate quality that we designate as chr.^, can never be
coupled with the thought of grind, routine,.;^, idmill toil, hard-
won erudition. Implying as it does a certain simplicity, it
very rarely belongs to the highly instructed. Now Dorothea,
we know, was ** adorably simple and full of feeling." ** Her
nature,*' we are told, ** was always taking on some new shape
of ardent activity; ** her vital energies were always moving in
unison with her spiritual promptings; her sympathies were
38 DOROTHEA [Oct.,
forever hungering for something to feed upon, forever reach-
ing out in some form of direct and specific action. But, how-
ever employed, she would ever need to make for herself some
vivid emotional life. She found comfort in the belief that
" by desiring what is perfectly good, even when we don*t quite
know what it is and cannot do as we would, we are part of the
divine power against evil, widening the skirts of light and
making the struggle with darkness narrower." " She longed,''
we know, " for work which would be directly beneficent like
the sunshine and the rain.** ** How happy you must be,*' she
said to Lydgate, •*to know things that you feel sure will do
great good! I wish I could awake with that knowledge every
morning. There seems to be so much trouble taken that one
can hardly see the good of! **
This clearly expressed need of confidence in the direct
beneficent effectiveness of effort makes one somewhat skeptical
of Dorothea's enthusiastic acceptance of the privilege of suf-
frage. Of course, those who look to the ballot for the eradica-
tion of every evil and the amelioration of every unhappy con-
dition will feel confidently sure of Dorothea's support. They
would do well, however, these persons who resent what seems
to them the injustice of denying to women the privileges of
citizenship, to bear in mind one little fact: in her life with
Mr. Casaubon Dorothea's desire was to give tenderness, not to
claim justice. It was characteristic of her that she could
always look ** along the one track where duty became tender-
ness." There was in Dorothea no lack of inward fire ; we know
that she had moments of rebellious anger; we have seen that
she could be stirred to a high pitch of indignation; but she
was in no way exacting in demands for herself. The dominant
spirit of justice within her was engaged in behalf of others.
Her mind was occupied with the thought of other people's
needs and other people's wrongs. Indeed, it may be said that
tenderness was thu- controlling impulse of her being, a vital
force shaping all ker thoughts and deeds, giving color (one
likes to believe) to her cheek, tone to her voice, beauty to her
face, and grandeur to her form.
No, Dorothea would never be much concerned with the
indirect, impersonal, unreactionary methods of reform. Nor
does the execution of large schemes seem just the work for
her. Consequently one feels no regret at the relinquishment
1919.] DOROTHEA 39
of that plan which for a time occupied her mind — ^the hope of
founding a viUage which should be a school of industry. The
outpouring of that full river of her soul must needs be in re-
sponse to some emotional appeal, some vision of individual
need or hardship, some exigency calling for direct, immediate
action which should be the offspring of some vivid, sympathetic
experience. ** It is wicked/' she said to Lydgate, ** to let peo-
ple think evil of any one falsely, when it can be hindered."
When she offered to do what she could to dear him, she was
quite right in thinking there was nothing better that she could
do in the world. ** And her voice, as she made this childlike
picture of what she would do, might have been almost taken as
a proof that she could do it effectively. The searching tender-
ness of her woman's tones seemed made for a defence against
ready accusers.** The simple inspiration on which Dorothea
acted at all times is most admirable. It is in the doing of these
direct, heart-prompted deeds of mercy and generosity that one
likes to think of her. One feels that the dispensing of whole-
sale munificence may well be left to those who are less en-
dowed with the rarer qualities. ,
But those same rare qualities are none too fine, we believe,
for the offices of wife and mother. There were, however, in
Dorothea's time those who thought it '* a pity that so rare and
substantive a creature should have been absorbed into the life
of another, and be only known in a certain circle as a wife and
mother." But happily the world still holds plenty of people
who see in those functions unlimited scope for the exercise of
noble powers, hosts of people who conceive of nothing better,
nothing nobler, than the full assumption of those grave respon-
sibilities and the glad acceptance of those glorious opportuni-
ties, people who can think of nothing better for any woman
than the outpouring of womanly feeling, the transmission of
noble qualities, the implanting of right thoughts. Those who
so feel would exalt the office of motherhood to the highest
pinnacle; they would admit into its service none but the worthy
— the brave, the unselfish, the sweet-natured, the large-hearted,
the noble-minded.
Despite the general modernity of Dorothea's character,
she was in one respect quite unlike her sisters of today, for
she dressed plainly, we are told, and with little regard to style.
One finds it impossible to imagine a young gentlewoman of
40 DOROTHEA [Oct,
today going abroad with sleeves hanging all out of style.
We feel sure that nothing less than poverty would stiffen the
determination of a young woman of our time to such a point
of independence. The pride of being a lady might, indeed,
give her courage and enable her to do with better grace the
thing she would rather not be obliged to do, but it is not
likely to make her sufficiently independent deliberately to
appear in unfashionable attire — not in this country at least,
where there are no real distinctions of rank. Dorothea, it
is true, could afford better than most women to disregard the
mandates of fashion, for she had, we are told, that kind oi
beauty that seems to be thrown into relief by poor dress. " Her
hand and her wrist were so finely formed that she could wear
sleeves not less devoid of style than those in which the Blessed
Virgin appeared to Italian painters; and her profile, as well as
her stature and bearing, seemed to gain the more dignity from
her plain garments, which by the side of provincial fashions
gave her the impressiveness of a fine quotation from the Bible
... in a paragraph of today's newspaper." Certainly the garb
in which she appears before us suits her noble bearing and
lessens in no degree her natural grace and dignity. Whether
one thinks of her in the long Quakerish gray cloak and white
beaver bonnet, or in the blue-gray pelisse edged with white
fur, or as gowned in that soft white woolen stuff that she was
fond of wearing and which always seemed to have been lately
washed and to smell of the sweet hedges, the attire seems
altogether fitting. Indeed, this individuality of dress is pre-
cisely what one would expect and desire in Dorothea. It does
in truth seem a part of her distinction, just as Rosamond
Vincy's nice observance of fashion and exquisite perfection of
costume seems entirely in keeping with her general punc-
tiliousness in respect to outward forms and her tendency to
attach undue importance to things superficial, matters in
which she was especially clever.
Dorothea, being full of sweet self-forgetfulness as weU
as ^' entirely without hidden calculations either for immediate
effects or for remoter ends," had not that bewitchment which
so often constitutes the fascinating power of a designing
woman. She was neither covetous of conquest nor solicitous of
admiration. And it appears not to have been either her per-
sonal beauty or her cleverness that fixes the attention. It
1919.] DOROTHEA 41
seems that men who were with her were not consciously aware
of these attractions. When Rosamond questioned Lydgate as
to his impressions of Mrs. Casaubon, wishing to know if he
thought her handsome, **She certainly is handsome, but I
had not thought of it,'* was his reply; and when, later, Rosa-
mond drew a similar answer from Will Ladislaw and de-
manded of him what it was that men were thinking of when
with Mrs. Casaubon, the answer came short and sharp, " Her-
self," clinched by the added words, " when one sees a perfect
woman one never thinks of her attributes — one is conscious of
her presence.*' And Lydgate, we know, found in Dorothea ** a
fountain of friendship for men." " A man can make a friend
of her," was his inward comment.
Dorothea possessed, however, one personal charm (a
charm partly spiritual, indeed — or as nearly spiritual as a cor-
poreal attribute can ever be), of which the sensitively organ-'
ized Will Ladislaw was at once and acutely sensible, the charm
of a richly modulated voice. It seemed to Will like " the voice
of a soul that had once lived in an seolian harp." And one re-
members how Caleb Garth was impressed. Do we have now-
adays speaking voices characterized by liquid flexibility? Cer-
tainly the girl voice of today is not remarkable for musical in-
tonation. The young woman who, in conversation with her
land agent or any other man, lets flow snatches of speech
melodious enoujzh to remind one of " bits from the Messiah " is
exceptional, indeed. Recause of this exceptionableness, the
very thought of Dorothea suggests always a human voice,
wonderful, thrilling, mercifully tender, lovingly persuasive.
Her personality presents itself to the imagination in audible
embodiment.
Rut this Dorothea with the voice of "a soul that had once
lived in an aeolian harp " was beset, like other mortals, with
the trials of this earth. And being one of those who bear in
mind the injunction, "Be ye perfect," she was not unwilling
to admit her own need of discipline. No rational being, in his
better moments, will rebel against what he knows will further
his progress towards perfection. Rut his vision is not Blways
clear. His self-knowledge, too, is sometimes incomplete.
Moreover, it is only the noble soul that is capable of resolute
submission. And it seems to be the noblest upon whom the
Lord heaps the heaviest weight of trial. Doubtless the Father
42 DOROTHEA [Oct.,
does this out of love, just as an earnest, idealistic teacher, a
devotee of the arts, is often more exacting of a promising pupil,
demanding of him the very best of which he is capable, prod-
ding him on to his highest possible attainment. Every lover of
excellence is quick in the discernment of potentialities, the
Supreme Instructor no less than the earthly master. And
every trainer, in every art whatever, especially in the art of
expression — and what is man's life but embodied expression?
— ^knows the value of restraint. And in this life of ours, who
can tell what infinitely delicate and inestimable aids to effec-
tiveness may be administered through the agency of that form
of trial known as self-repression? It was to this sort of dis-
cipline that Dorothea was subjected. In her life with Mr.
Casaubon her native strength of will was converted into ^ reso-
lute submission.'* Though high-spirited, "permanent re-
hellion, the disorder of a life without some loving reverent re-
solve, was not possible to her." There were times, however,
when, ^ like one who has lost his way and is weary, she sat and
saw as in a glance all the paths of her young hope which she
should never find again.'' But always the resolved submission
did come. "And the energy that would animate a crime,"
George Eliot remarks with characteristic insight, " is not more
than is wanted to inspire a resolved submission, when the
noble habit of the soul reasserts itself."
It cannot be said that the narrator of Dorothea's history
satisfactorily accounts for her acceptance of Mr. Casaubon. To
explain her choice by saying that there was in her " a dash of
stupidity " (to use Leslie Stephen's expression) seems hardly
fair, unless we qualify the statement with the admission that
the noble have ever something of stupidity about them, some-
thing to stir the wonder of the small-brained Celias of this
world. The fact that Mr. Casaubon was a stick might have
been clearer, yes, to a commoner mind. And we agree with
Celia that " the commonest minds " are sometimes rather use-
ful. Celiacs commoner mind could observe the manner of Mr.
Casaubon's soup-eating and the way he blinked. But it was not
Celia alone who was taken by surprise, not Celia alone who
thought it wonderful that Dorothea should have liked a dried-
up pedant
Her choice could scarcely seem other than wonderful
even to those of us who are favored with a clearer view of
1919.] DOROTHEA 43
the open elevation of her natiure, and some perception of the
fact that ''all her passion was transfused through a mind
struggling towards an ideal life/' Even we who know that
her whole soul was possessed by the thought that a fuller life
was opening before her, and that she looked upon marriage as
a state of higher duties, never thinking of it as mere personal
ease — even we cannot but wonder at her choice. But this
wonder does not lessen our admiration of her wifely devoted-
ness and gentle loving manifestations, nor does it make us less
confidently believe that she was '' full of those affectionate im-
pulses that are the bent of every sweet woman,** and that '' with
all her yearning to know what was afar from her, and to be
greatly benignant, she had ardor enough for what was near
to have kissed Mr. Casaubon's coat-sleeve or to have caressed
his shoe-latchet," if he would have made any adequate sign of
acceptance.
That there is much wifely devotion in this second decade
of the twentieth century cannot be denied by one who goes
about with open eyes. Still, one does not readily picture a girl
wife of today in devoted attendance, after the manner of
Dorothea, upon a studious, formal husband thirty years older
than herself. The young wife of today might, like Dorothea,
possess to an unusual degree the power of devoting herself to
her idea of the right and best, but her idea of the right and best
would probably not be that of Dorothea, and would most likely
not demand of her such service as Dorothea rendered Mr.
Casaubon. For instance, such a picture as the following could
hardly belong to the scenery of married life as we conceive
of it today (the scene would be amusing, if it were not touch-
ing) : '' After she had read and marked for two hours, he
said, 'We will take the volume upstairs — and the pencil,
if you please — and in case of reading in the night, we will pur-
sue this task. It is not wearisome to you, I trust, Dorothea? ' "
" 1 prefer always reading what you like best to hear,' said
Dorothea, who told the simple truth; for what she dreaded was
to exert herself in reading or anything else which left him as
joyless as ever.**
But even Dorothea found it a hard fate to be always try-
ing to be what her husband wished, and never able to repose
on his delight in what she was. And one can safely say that
were she alive today she would be far less likely to marry a
44 DOROTHEA [Oct.,
Mr. Casaubon, less likely for the simple reason that there is in
our time a greater wealth of opportunity. The Dorothea of
today would find other channels for the outrush of her intel-
lectual and spiritual aspirations. Her ardor would be less
likely to '' alternate between a vague ideal and the common
yearning of womanhood." Her energies would be more defi-
nitely and purposefully directed (whether more advantage-
jausly in respect to spiritual growth, we will not say). But we
have ever to bear in mind Dorothea's himger for something
more satisfying than the companionship of ** sustaining
thoughts ** and her longing for ** objects who could be dear to
her and to whom she could be dear." It is certain that Doro-
thea would never be satisfied with any mode of activity that
did not move in alliance with the sympathies and affections.
Just to be occupied, however purposefully, would not be
enough. One recalls a certain little speech of hers, uttered,
somewhat impatiently, in protest to Ladislaw*s expressed fear
that she was too much shut up, and his suggestion that it would
be better for Mr. Casaubon to have a secretary, as Sir James
Chettam and Mr. Brooke advised. " Yes," said Dorothea, " but
they donH' understand — they want me to be a great deal on
horseback, and to have the garden altered and new conserva-
tories, to fill up my days. I thought you could understand that
one's mind has other wants."
Then, the Dorothea of today would possess from the be-
ginning a clearer conception of what should be the basis of
matrimonial union, the only basis on which an adventurer
can safely embark upon that unknown sea. This knowledge
Dorothea had to be taught through the hardships of her life
with Mr. Casaubon, the trials that she had to undergo. And
it was the learning of this lesson that made her the more reso-
lute in her determination to marry Will Ladislaw. Dorothea
at no period of her existence would have been very imagina-
tive regarding the discomforts of a life without abundant
means. Celia could readily conceive of the trial of being pent
up to one accustomed to the expanse and greenness of a park.
"How can you always live in a street?" she exclaimed when
she learned Dorothea's intention of going to London. But
Dorothea, with all her idealism, had in her a strain of prac-
ticality. Did she not say : " I will learn what everything costs."
There is something inexpressibly charming in the naivete of
1919.] DOROTHEA 45
that speedi. How WiU Ladislaw must have blessed her sweet
soul I A man would be a very brute not to respond to such
sweet persuasion.
One particular phase of George Eliot's art is so conspicu-
ously noticeable in the novel of Middlemcwch, and so effec-
tivefy used in the working out of Dorothea's story, as to call
for special comment. Among the many manifestations of deli-
cate poetical feeling which illumine the whole body of George
Eliot's fiction, and especially the novel of Middlemarch, there
is one particular touch that is closely associated with — ^is, in-
deed, a part of — the method by which George Eliot secures for
her figures that richness of background, setting, and atmos-
phere which so characterizes her work. It reveals, moreover,
her keen realization of the way in which visions are inter-
woven with certain moods, and the manner in which par-
ticular aspects of nature are a^ociated for us with certain
qK>chs of our history. Here is an iUustration : '' Any private
hours in Dorothea's day were usually spent in her blue-green
boudoir, and she had come to be very fond of its pallid quaint-
ness. • • • The bare room had gathered within it those memories
of an inner life which fill the air as with a cloud of good or bad
angels, the invisible yet active forms of our spiritual triumphs
or our spiritual falls. She had been so used to struggle for and
to find resolve in looking along the avenue towards the arch of
western light that the vision itself had gained a communicating
power. Even the pale stag seemed to have reminding glances
and to mean mutely, ^ Yes, we know.' And the group of deli-
cately touched miniatures had made an audience as of beings
no longer disturbed about their own earthly lot, but stiU
humanly interested."
Then note the effect of the poetical touch in the following
passage: **She was not aware how long it was before she
answered. She had turned her head and was looking out of
the window on the rose-bushes, which seemed to have in them
the summers of all the years when WiU would be away." One
more example of the same subtle effect : *' So by the end of
June the shutters were all opened at Lowick Manor, and the
morning gazed calmly into the library, shining on the rows of
notebooks as it shines on the weary waste planted with stones,
the mute memorials of a forgotten fate; and the evening laden
with roses entered silently into the blue-green boudoir where
46 DOROTHEA [Oct.,
Dorothea chose oftenest to sit." Just why this mention of
morning sunshine and June roses, this suggestion of flower
fragrance and evening quietude, should make Dorothea's soli-
tude seem doubly mournful and the loneliness of her heart so
very piteous, it is hard to say, yet one feels that it is so.
The history of Dorothea, like that of every life where
there is noble aim and noble habit of soul, is a spiritual his-
tory, a record of spiritual struggle and spiritual growth. Hence
the hold that it takes upon the mind and heart; hence, likewise,
the modernity, in the larger sense, of the figure itself. For it
cannot be denied that the spiritual life of mankind remains
fundamentally the same throughout the ages. If the inner ex-
perience of the first woman (supposing her possessed of a
malleable soul) could be written out with introspective min-
uteness, the trials of her existence, though circumstantially dif-
ferent, would most likely prove to be not essentially dissimilar
from those that try the metal of her pliant-souled sister of
today. In both cases, the march of advancement would doubt-
less progress by the same stages and reveal the same general
processes. And to a master in the art of fiction, the two his-
tories would appear quite equal in plastic potentialities.
MY ANSWER.
BY C. A. CHILTON.
" How have I fared with Him
Whose early promises beguiled my youth T "
You ask.
** Has that fair-seeming high estate
Proved in these years of trial
But Dead Sea fruit? "
" That vast unmeasured store of covenanted joys
Melted — ^and left behind
But sad-eyed — ^vain illusions? "
"niusions!"
Yes, there were illusions*
Dense webs of them before my eyes —
In those first years.
Yet such as fed my novice fancies then
Served well, and wisely, their appointed end.
Ever they lured to higher ground
My wavering, untutored steps.
And now —
Now with the great realities in sight
I bless the dear illusions
Every one!
But, for the subtle slight I read
Between your words.
Touching the honor of my Chosen One,
Take from my lips — as solemn as my vow
My passionate reply:
" A world's-breadth deeper, higher, truer
Than His word
Has been the dear fulfillment of His bond.
Sweet was the spring-time of His love.
But lo ! as once at Cana*s wedding feast.
So has He kept for me — (His own by that first vow)
So has He kept — the best wine of His vintage
UntU nowl "
FACTS RESPECTING SPIRIT-PHOTOGRAPHY.
BY J. GODFREY RAUPERT, K.S^.
iHE publication, in a recent issue of the Chicago
Herald and Examiner, of a photograph of Sir A.
Conan Doyle with the image of an "extra"
which he claims to bear " a general but not very
exact resemblance " to his deceased son, has
once more drawn the attention of the thoughtful public to the
perplexing problem presented by spirit-photography.
In view of the manifest importance and significance of the
subject at this time, and the many inquiries that have come
to me on the subject, it may not be out of place to set forth in
the pages of The Catholic World what long experience and
personal experiment have taught me respecting it.
The late Holy Father, who so clearly, and indeed prophet-
ically, foresaw the coming of the present spiritistic movement
and who was so anxious to guard wealt Catholics against the
perils incidental to it, desired that all the ascertained facts
should be made fully known, it being his conviction that it was
only in this way that a true weapon could be forged for the ef-
fectual combating of this dangerous heretical movement. "The
Chnrch," he said,"basDothingtofearfromwell-establishedfact
and truth. What she has to fear ia imperfect knowledge, the prop-
agation of half-truths, and a misinterpretation of the facts as-
certained." Experience certainly, it must be confessed, is daily
confirming the wisdom of this statement, imperfect knowledge
of the subject, ignorance of facts often withheld from the
public by enthusiastic theorists, and misinterpretation of the
facts established being, beyond doubt, the most frequent cause
of lapses of orthodox Christians into spiiifism. The dissemi-
nation of full and accurate knowledge, and the admission and
right interpretation of facts adequately est&blished, can alone
serve our cause.
Numbers of our young. Catholics, especially in the larger
cities of the country who, as I have good reason to know, posi-
Avtfy devour in our public libraries the fascinating books on
1W9.] Filers RESPECTING SPIRIT-PHOTOGRAPHY 49
spiritism increasingly issuing from the press, have questions
to ask which must be answered. They are no longer satisfied
with the lame and conventional explanations of persons who
daim to speak authoritatively on the subject, but from whose
explanations it is often only too evident that they are them-
selves wholly unacquainted with the facts which modern re-
search has brought to light.
Such ignorant platitudinizing is rapidly bringing Catholic
science into discredit. Thoughtful and well-read Catholics
have again and again spoken to me with positive contempt of
statements on this subject, issuing perhaps from some college
or university professor and clothed in lofty and learned-sound-
ing language, but, nevertheless, disclosing a most woeful and
pitiable ignorance of the subject. Such Catholics are feeling,
and are feeling justly, that in view of what is increasingly be-
ing brou^t to their knowledge, all this foolish talk about fraud
and fake, and double-exposure so far as this aspect of the sub-
ject is concerned, can, at this hour of the day, but damage our
cause and make us ridiculous in the eyes of the generally well-
informed non-Catholic and of " the man in the street *• who, as
the late Professor Alfred Russel Wallace so justly pointed out,
has been found to be the true scientist.^ The circumstance that
a man knows something of photography or chemistry does not
manifestly imply that he knows all about it, and from recent
discoveries we may surely safely infer that he knows very lit-
fle about it at best.
It has to be admitted, of course, that while the Church's
decree, barring a Catholic from experimental research, is a
most wise and timely one, exhibiting the accurate knowledge
which the Roman authorities possess on the subject, it never-
theless places him at a disadvantage, since he cannot secure
for himself that experimental knowledge to which the non-
Catholic has access, and which has been so largely instru-
tnental in bringing about the present movement.
But this disadvantage can be compensated for to a con-
siderable extent by a thoroughgoing study of the works of
scientiflc men of the saner sort, who have no particular reli-
gious or philosophic theory to advance or defend, and, above
aU, by approaching that study in a spirit of humility and teach-
ableness, bearing in mind that there may conceivably be more
* If iradM atid Modan SpitUaaiUmi
a. 4
50 FACTS RESPECTING SPIRIT-PHOTOGRAPHY [Oct.,
things in heaven and on earth than even a college or univer-
sity professor has dreamt of in his philosophy.
One reason, of course, why these inquiries are addressed to
me is because one of my first books on Spiritism * contains prints
of spirit-photographs, which I claimed to have obtained under
conditions guaranteeing their genuineness, and respecting
which it is known that I have never seen cause to change my
mind.
In a work in which the results of photographic experiment
are only one element in the evidence presented, it was impos-
sible to go very deeply into the matter and to produce the avail-
able evidence in full. I was anxious, moreover, not to lay too
much stress upon this particular kind of evidence. I desired
my readers to consider the evidence as a whole and to form
their judgment accordingly. I will now, however, supplenient
the information given in my book by presenting the evidence
of the then highest photographic authority in England which,
so far as I know, has never appeared in print in this country
and which will, I think, answer all the questions of my in-
quirers and, indeed, settle the matter once and for all, for all
open and fair-minded persons. It should, of course, be borne in
mind that we are here not dealing with fully materialized forms
which, as the late Professor A. R. Wallace put it, " shape them-
selves out of the emanations from living bodies in proper
magnetic relation to them," ' and which become visible to the
eyes of all persons present at the experiment. It goes with-
out saying that such forms can be photographed, either in the
dark with the aid of magnesium light, or in daylight, as in the
well-known and carefully conducted experiments of the late Sir
William Crookes. It is here a question of ** photographing the
invisible,*' in other words, of photographing forms so delicately
constructed (apparently because of the insufficiency of the
available amount of such emanations) that they are imper-
ceptible to the natural sight, although believed and, indeed,
known to be present by reason of other very perceptible in-
dications. Can such forms be photographed and have they
been photographed? This is the question before us and is the
question which inquirers everywhere are now asking. I will
answer it in the words of the photographic authority referred
'The Dangers of SptritaalUm,
•iiintaei ahd Wodetn SpMtualism.
1919.] FACTS RESPECTING SPIRIT-PHOTOGRAPHY 51
to, the quotation being taken from a popular lecture which he
delivered in London some years ago when questions, similar
to those now asked in this country, were asked in England:
*
There are some rays of light which, when reflected from
an object on which they fall, are visible; so called, because
they enable the normal eye to see such an object; but there
are other rays which, if thus employed, would fail to render
an object visible, but would still cause photographic action.
These are popularly termed invisible rays because then:
effects are not perceived by ordinary vision. If anything or
entity — call it spirit if you like— -emitted rays of this nature
only, most assuredly it could be photographed by one poS"
sessing even rudimentary knowledge only of photography,
although such a figure could not be seen. It would be amen-
able to the law of optics, by which the image will be pro-
jected by the lense on the plate, and to those of chemistry,
by which that image will subsequently be developed.
When, years ago, I obtained on the photograph of a guest
staying at my house, taken with my own camera and on a
newly-bought plate, no professional medium being present,
the image of a deceased friend of mine which all the members
of that friend's family acknowledged to be a very fair
likeness of him, I realized that the possibility of photographing
the invisible had been proved to demonstration so far as I was
personally concerned. I could not, with the best intention in
the world, discover any flaw or defect in the conditions ob-
served, and the preceding and attending physical manifesta-
tions, indicating the presence of an extraneous intelligence
tended to remove any misgiving that might otherwise have re-
mained in my mind.
But I was not even then satisfied. I thought that, not be-
ing an expert in photography, there might, after all, be some-
thing that had escaped my attention. I therefore placed my-
self in conununication with the expert referred to, the late
Bfr. Traill Taylor, the then President of the Royal Photographic
Society, Editor of the British Journal of Photography and the
admitted highest authority on the subject in England.
I submitted the result of my experiments to him, f uUy de-
tailing the circumstances under which the picture had been ob-
tained. Bfr. Taylor's verdict was as follows : ^ I would give a
52 Filers RESPECTING SPIRIT-PHOTOGRAPHY [Oct,
good deal if I were able to obtain, under reasonable test-con-
ditions, such a picture as yours. I have read your letter with
great interest and have shown it to expert friends. I can only
now say: by all means continue your investigations in this
direction and you will have your reward in greater success.''
Mr. Taylor, strongly influenced by striking evidence of
this character, increasing in bulk and value and coming in
from many and most unexpected quarters, finally decided
upon making experiments himself. He took all the precautions
which his intimate knowledge of the subject would suggest,
and when, to his amazement, identical results were obtained,
he communicated those results to the members of the London
and Provincial Photographic Association in England. En-
tirely eliminating myself, therefore, and my evidence from
the inquiry, I now place before my readers the verbatim re-
port of Mr. Traill Taylor's experiments as it appeared in the
British Journal of Photography,^ the original copy of which
is in my possession.
'Tor several years I have experienced a strong desire to
ascertain by personal investigation the amount of truth in the
ever-recurring allegation that figures, other than those vis-
ually present in the room, appeared on a sensitive plate. The
difficulty was to get hold of a suitable person known as a sen-
sitive or ' medium.' What a medium is, or how physically or
mentally constituted differently from other mortals, I
am unable to say. He or she may not be a photographer,
but must be present on each occasion of trial. Some
may be mediums without their being aware of it Like
the chemical principle known as catalysis they merely act
by their presence. Such a one is Mr. D. of Glasgow, in whose
presence psychic photographs have long been alleged to be
obtained. He was lately in London on a visit, and a mutual
friend got him to consent to extend his stay in order that I
might try to get a psychic photograph under test conditions.
To this he willingly agreed. My conditions were exceedingly
simple, were courteously expressed to the host, and entirely
acquiesced in. They were, that I for the nonce would assume
them all to be tricksters, and, to guard against fraud, should
use my own camera and unopened packages of dry plates pur-
chased from dealers of repute, and that I should be excused
« March 17, 1898.
1919.] Filers RESPECTING SPIRIT-PHOTOGRAPHY 53
from allowing a plate to go out of my own hands till after de-
velopment, unless I felt otherwise disposed; but that, as I was
to treat them as under suspicion, so must they treat me, and
that every act I performed must be in the presence of two wit-
nesses, nay, that I would set a watch upon my own camera in
the guise of a duplicate one of the same focus — ^in other words,
I would use a binocular stereoscopic camera and dictate all the
conditions of operation. All this I was told was what they very
strongly wished me to do, as they d^ired to know the truth
and that only. There were present, during one or other of the
evenings when the trials were made, representatives of vari-
ous schools of thought, including a clergyman of the Church
of England; a practitioner of the healing art who is a fellow of
two learned societies; a gentleman who graduated in the Hall
of Science in the days of the late Charles Bradlaugh; some two
extremely hard-headed Glasgow merchants, gentlemen of com-
mercial eminence and probity; our host, his wife, the medium,
and myself. Dr. G. was the first sitter, and, for a reason known
to myself, I used a monocular camera. I myself took
the plate out of a packet just previously ripped up under the
surveillance of my two detectives. I place the slide in my
pocket, and exposed it by magnesium ribbon which I held in
my own hand, keeping one eye, as it were, on the sitter and the
other on the camera. There was no background. I myself
took the plate from the dark slide, and, under the eyes of the
two detectives, placed it in the developing dish. Between the
camera and the sitter a female figure was developed, rather
in a more pronounced form than that of the sitter. The lens
was a portrait one of short focus, the figure being somewhat in
front of the sitter was proportionately larger in dimensions. I
submit this picture. It is, as you see, a lady. I do not recog-
nize her or any of the other figures I obtained as like any one
I know, and from my point of view, that of a mere investigator
and experimentalist, not caring whether the psychic subject
were embodied or disembodied.
"^Many experiments of like nature followed; on scmie
plates were abnormal appearances, on others none. All this
time Mr. D., the medium, during the exposure of the plates was
quite inactive. After one trial which had proved successful,
I asked him how he felt and what he had been thinking of dur-
ing the exposure. He replied that his thoughts had been ntiainly
54 Filers RESPECTING SPIRIT-PHOTOGRAPHY [Oct,
concentrated upon his chances of securing a corner seat in a
smoking carriage that night from Euston to Glasgow.
""K the precautions I took during all of the several ex-
periments, such as those recorded, are by any of you thought
to have been imperfect or incomplete, I pray of you to point
them out. In some of them I relaxed my conditions to the ex-
tent of getting one of those present to lift out from the dark
shde the exposed plate and transfer it to the developing dish
held by myself, or to lift a plate from the manufacturer's
package into the dark shde held in my own hand, this being
done under my own eye, which was upon it all the time; but
this did not seem to interfere with the successful going on of
the experiments.
"' The psychic figures behaved badly. Some were in focus,
others not so; some were lighted from the right, while the
sitter was so from the left; some were comely, as the dame I
shall show on the screen, others not so ; some monopolized the
major portion of the plate, quite obliterating the material
sitters; others were as if an atrociously badly vignetted por-
trait, or one cut oval out of a photograph by a can-opener, or
equally badly clipped out, were held up behind the sitter.
But here is the point : not one of these figures which came out
so strongly in the negative was visible in any form or shape
to me during the time of exposure in the camera, and I vouch
in the strongest manner for the fact that no one whatever
had an opportunity of tampering with any plate anterior to
its being placed in the dark slide or inunediately preceding de-
velopment Pictorally they are vile, but how came they there?
... I again assert that the plates were not tampered with by
either myself or any one present
" There are plenty of Tycho Brahes capable of supplying
details of observations, but who is to be the Kepler that will
from such observations evolve a law by which they can be
satisfactorily explained?
'' In the foregoing I have confined myself as closely as pos-
sible to narrating how I conducted a photographic experiment
open to every one to make, avoiding stating any hypothesis or
belief of my own on the subject generally, and it only now
remains to exhibit the results, bad and fraudulent-looking as
they are, on the screen."
In a subsequent popular lecture, Mr. Traill Taylor sup-
1919.] FACTS RESPECTING SPIRIT -PHOTOGRAPHY 55
plemented his very interesting exposition by the following
statement from which it will be seen how very deep and abid-
ing a conviction is which is based upon first-hand knowledge
and upon accurate and experimental investigation.
^ I can afford to look with the greatest charitableness upon
editors and photographers who, not having had opportunities
of acquiring a sufficiency of knowledge, relegate these photo-
graphs to the limbo of fraud. I myself did so at one time and
can therefore scarcely blame them for doing likewise. Where
blame rests is in their not scientifically investigating a sub-
ject which ought to be replete with interest to a photographer;
and where misfortune steps in is in the difficulty of being able
to secure access to certain conditions necessary to the de-
siderated investigation, and this altogether apart from belief
or even desire of belief in spiritism, either as a science or a re-
ligion. As known to many, I was afforded exceptional facili-
ties for endeavoring to satisfy myself, first, as to the reality of
human abnormal forms appearing on the photographic plate
by means other than those regularly obtained in accordance
with the well-recognized photographic laws, accepted by every
student of the phenomena of photography; and, secondly, if
such were the case, to do what the Right Honorable A. J. Bal-
four suggested when, in a presidential address to the Society
for Psychical Research, he spoke of the desirability of efforts
being made Mo discover what laws this strange class of
phenomena obey.' •*
It is hardly necessary to add anything to this compre-
hensive and courageous verdict on the part of unquestionably
one of the very highest authorities on photography, whose in-
timate knowledge of the subject may surely be supposed to
cause him to take all the precautions which the most skeptical
mind could deem necessary to impose. It will be seen from
it what the vague platitudes of half-informed writers about
fakes and fraud and double-exposure are worth. They are
more than twenty years too late with their assertions, and such
assertions can but serve to disclose their very great ignorance.
The fact of spirit photography, quite apart from the question
as to the nature of these spirits is, beyond all doubt, an estab-
lished fact in science. The men therefore, whatever tiieir
academic standing, who, at tiiis hour of the day^ still attempt
to explain tiiisse phenomena in the manner indicated are most
56 Filers RESPECTING SPIBJT -PHOTOGRAPHY [Oct,
assuredly blind leaders of the blind who are vainly seeking to
instruct a public which, in very many instances, is infinitely
better informed than themselves. And it must be clear that all
such attempts are but calculated to damage our cause and to
bring discredit upon Catholic science. It cannot be sufficiently
emphasized that we cannot hope, at this hour, successfully to
defend our Christianity by denying facts which patient and
laborious and long-continued research has adequately estab-
lished, and with which the intelligent public everywhere is be-
coming increasingly familiarized. Our defence must be
directed not to the denial of such facts but to the securing of
accurate information respecting them, and to a true and
adequate and reasonable interpretation of them — ^in the light
of those facts which the promoters of the spiritistic movement
are so apt td" conceal from the public. And I maintain that this
can be done even while remaining on purely scientific ground
and without directly urging the Church's teaching, a statement
of the concealed facts referred to positively necessitating an
interpretation of the phenomena favorable to the orthodox
Catholic standpoint.
I am convinced, moreover, that my theory, that while the
** stuff " necessary for the formation of these mysterious forms
is derived from emanations from living bodies, the images of
the dead impressed upon them are obtained from the sub-
conscious minds of the living, is the theory that covers the
whole ground. It is certainly confirmed by the description of
the peculiar characteristics of this very image of his deceased
son obtained by Dr. A. Conan Doyle.
In any case it is difficult to see how the evidence for the
existence and operation of some kind of intelligence, external
to the observer and to the medium, can ever be better than it is
at the present time, and the grave question to which we have
to address ourselves and which we have to answer adequately
and correctly is : What is really the nature and aim of the in-
telligence or intelligences causing these operations?
LUXEMBURG.
BY A. P. SGHIMBERG.
|HE recent letter of the Right Rev. Louis C.
Casartelli, Bishop of Salford, England, to the
Catholics of the Allied nations in behalf of the
Grand Duchy of Luxemburg, has again drawn
attention to this interesting little country which
was until of late practically unknown to Americans.
Luxemburg figured in the public press to a very limited
extent, and for a brief period only, when the Germans violated
its neutrality in 1914, passing through the Grand Duchy on
their march into France. While the War waged and the fate
of mighty empires hung in the balance, the world forgot little
Luxemburg. But after the armistice was signed another army
passed through Luxemburg, the American soldiers on their
march to the Rhine, and in letters to their homefolk, Pershing's
doughboys told of the country's quaint beauty and of the
cordial hospitality of its Catholic people. And Luxemburg
became known to more Americans than ever before in its
history.
The Bishop of Salf ord in his letter calls Luxemburg '* prac-
tically the last thoroughly Catholic nation and State, sovereign
and independent, left, at least in Europe.'* And H. C. Bailey
in the Daily Telegraph of London says: '^AU Luxemburg
stands together for independence. The events of the last four
years have only strengthened the desire of the little State for
complete freedom. Whatever the flag. Republic or -Ducal,
autonomy is its blazon."
Throughout its melancholy past, through the long cen-
turies of foreign domination, merciless taxation and economic
tyranny, Luxemburg, like Ireland, remained true to the Ancient
Faith. Neither the cockle of the Protestant Revolt nor that of
the French Revolution found lodgment in its Ardenne soil.
The splendid faith of the Middle Ages was preserved and to
this day has manifested itself in all Catholic ways, especially
in devotion to the Blessed Virgin and in numerous vocations to
the hdly priesthood and to the religious life for women. In
58 LUXEMBURG [Oct,
proportion to its size, the Grand Duchy has sent forth from
within its borders more priests and nuns than any other Catho-
lic country. One of our American Bishops, the Right Rev.
James Schwebach of the diocese of La Crosse, Wisconsin, is
a native of Luxemburg, as is also the Right Rev. Bishop
Fallize of Alusa, Norway, head of the renascent Church in the
land of St. Olaf .
When Luxemburg lay prostrate in unprecedented misery
in 1666, the provincial council on September 27th of that
year unanimously chose the Mother of God under the title
Comforter of the A£EUcted, as the special patroness of the
capital, the city of Luxemburg. On Sunday, October 10, 1666,
the choice of the pious councilors was solenmly ratified and a
statue of the most merciful Virgin was enthroned, in the
capital's chief church. Eleven years later the patronage of the
Maiden Mother was invoked for the entire land of Luxemburg.
The people's centuries-old love for Mary gave rise in
recent times to an appealing, peculiarly Catholic and uniquely
Luxemburger custom. Each year, during special May devo-
tions in the Church of Notre Dame in the capital city, an Amer-
ican flag is placed close to the Blessed Virgin's shrine and on a
national coat-of-arms beneath the image this invocation is
inscribed : " Comforter of the Afflicted, Pray for Thy Children
in America." And it has come to pass that Luxemburgers
whose wanderlust lured them to the New World, whose heart-
hunger brought them back to the scenes of their youth in the
homeland, knelt at this altar and heard the Help of Christians
invoked for them and their compatriots under the Star Span-
gled Banner.
Another link binds the sturdy Catholics of the Grand
Duchy to their co-religionists in the United States. At Carey,
Ohio, there is a shrine of the Blessed Virgin with a replica of
the statue set up in 1666. This shrine was established in 1873
by the Rev. Joseph P. Gloden, a priest of Luxemburger nativity,
in fulfillment, it is said, of a vow to dedicate the first church he
built in America to the Inunaculate Mother of God, patroness
alike of his homeland and of the new land to which he had
come to labor for God and His Church.
Evidence of the old Catholic spirit of unswerving faith and
deep piety in little Luxemburg is the annual pilgrimage or
*' dancing" procession in honor of St. Willibrord, patron of
1919.] LUXEMBURG 59
epileptics, whose relics are treasured in a magnificent shrine
at Echtemach, one of the larger towns of the Grand Duchy. On
the Tuesday after Whitsunday of each year, a procession
wends its way from the bridge that spans the Sure River as
it flows through Echtemach, through the ancient streets of the
town, to the shrine. The first pilgrimage was held in 1374, fol-
lowing the miraculous healing of an epileptic. Joseph 11., the
Austrian meddler in ecclesiastical affairs, discouraged and the
French masters of the Revolutionary regime forbade the pro-
cession. After 1830 it was revived, and of late has been par-
ticipated in by exceptionally large numbers of the faithful. In
1880 the pilgrims numbered ten thousand. In 1912 they num-
bered twenty thousand, Luxemburgers from all parts of the
land and devout folk from across the German, Belgian and
French frontiers.
When the confident epileptic of five hundred and forty-five
years ago was cured through the intercession of St. Willibrord,
he danced for joy. The marchers in this unique pilgrimage
execute a peculiar step in imitation of this dance of joy, hence
it is called the ** dancing '' procession of Echtemach.
Though the Grand Duchy has an area of only nine hun-
dred and ninety-nine square miles and a population of little
more than two hundred and fifty thousand, the history of Lux-
emburg has a fascination all out of proportion to the country's
size and importance among the nations of the world. To read
the history of Luxemburg is to read the history of Europe, so
wide flung are the ramifications of its story of the past.
The ancient Celts left interesting evidences of their pres-
ence when they gave way to the conquering Romans, whose
roads now traverse the land and whose Csesar-imaged coins
are still turned up by Luxemburger plowmen. In 963-993 the
first Counts of Luxemburg rebuilt a ruined Roman fortress on
a mighty rock caUed Luetzelburg, and from this stronghold the
country and its capital city derived their name. In 1363 Lux-
emburg became a duchy. The Burgundians came into pos-
session of it in 1443, later it was ceded to Spain. While it
formed part of the Holy Roman Empire of the Germans, sev-
eral of its rulers ascended the imperial throne, among them the
illustrious St Henry, whose wife was the chaste Cunegunda.
By the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713 the Duchy was ceded to
Austria. It became part of France by the Treaty of Campo
60 LUXEMBURG [Oct..
Formio in 1797, and riemained under French domination until
after the fall of Najpoleon. The Congress of Vienna, 1815,
raised it to a grand duchy and made it the personal appanage
of William of Orange-Nassau, King of the Netherlands, as
Grand Duke of Luxemburg.
Thus, through the centuries, Luxemburg was under alien
rule; Burgundian, Hapsburg, Spanish and Austrian; French,
royal, republican, imperial, and Dutch. It was a tiny pawn on
the chess-board of Europe, its fate determined by unscrupulous
diplomats who cared nothing for the people's rights and their
welfare. For hundreds of years Luxemburg suffered from the
devastating armies of first one, then another Power. Its men
and boys were pressed into the service of its conquerors, forced
to fight for the glory of ambitious monarchs, for aims always
foreign, often contrary to Luxemburg's weal.
Surcease from the devastation of contending armies, from
exorbitant taxation and economic t3rranny did not come to
Luxemburgers until recent times. In 1839, at the expense
of a final exploitation which left only one-fourth of its orig-
inal area, Luxemburg was made the ward of the Powers, with
its perpetual independence and territorial integrity solemnly
guaranteed. But even the prosperous peace which followed
did not fully satisfy the Luxemburgers, for they were still un-
der foreign rule.
When the last King of the Netherlands died in 1890, his
daughter Wilhelmina could succeed him on the Dutch throne,
but was barred from the grand ducal throne of Luxemburg
by an old family pact of the House of Nassau. The nearest
male heir was Duke Adolph of Nassau, who ruled Luxemburg
until his death in 1905, when he was succeeded by his son,
William. Grand Duke William, a Protestant, had married a
Catholic princess, Marie Anne of the Portuguese House of
Braganza, much to the joy of the Luxemburgers. But no son
blessed this union and under the Nassau family pact none of
the six little grand duchesses could succeed their father. An-
other male of the Orange-Nassau line would come out of Ger-
many to rule Luxemburg, and the people feared that they
might, somehow, come under the domination of the Teutonic
Power.
Anxious to safeguard the independence of their beloved
little land, jealous of their liberties and of their individuality
1919.] LUXEMBURG 61
as a people, the Luxemburgers called upon their chamber of
deputies to revoke the obnoxious statute which forced com-
pliance with the Nassau family pact. Then the charming lit-
tle grand duchesses, in the order of their ages, and their heirs
after them, were made eligible to the throne. And when Grand
Duke William died in 1912, his eldest daughter, Orand Duchess
Marie Adelheid, a native-bom sovereign, began to reign over
Luxemburg, at the age of eighteen years.
When the War broke out the Luxemburgers were dwell-
ing in peaceful prosperity, and looked forward confidently to
a roseate future. With a native and Catholic ruler, lovable
and beloved, on the throne at last, free from the burden of
militarism and the worries of international politics, penalties
of great size and power, the Luxemburgers appreciated the
almost idyllic conditions in their little land. They cared not
at all that it was but a speck on the map of Europe, unknown
to most tourists, especially to Americans.
Now that many Americans have learned something of Lux-
emburg and since it may be brought to the world's attention,
again before its fate its finally determined by the Peace Con-
ference, it is probable that more travelers will include Lux-
emburg in their itineraries. They will find today what Goethe
found in 1792: ** A combination of grandeur and charm, much
earnestness mingled with sweetness.** ^ The grandeur of which
the Crerman poet wrote is not the awe-inspiring grandeur of
the Alps, of Niagara or the wide Mississippi, the South Ameri-
can pampas, or the mighty ocean. The miniature country's
natural beauties are cast in a smaller scale, in a gentler mood.
It is as if nature had selected this land in which to show all her
moods to some extent, but particularly her sweetness and allur-
ing charm.
Luxemburg is hedged in by France, Germany, Belgium.
Her mountainous forest lands cover a section of the Ardennes
plateau which extends beyond the French and Belgian
borders and divides the basin of the Meuse from that of the
Moselle River, which latter stream forms a part of the German
frontier. The potent spell of the Ardennes remains forever
with all who have walked their mountain paths, gazed up-
wards at the picturesque castle ruins, downward to quaint and
colorful villages clustered in the valleys. Luxemburg is like a
^ Au9 Meinem Leb§n,, ill., p. 166.
62 LUXEMBURG [Oct.,
succession of small but exquisite stage settings; modest hills
and shallow valleys, glistening rivers scarcely more than
brooks, charming old houses.
But one thing marred the Luxemburg idyll. Anti-
clericalism came from across the French border sometime be-
fore the War, and has to the present continued its machinations
in Marie Adelheid's little realm. It was to some extent at least
responsible for the girl-ruler's abdication after the armistice
was signed. A Republic of Luxemburg rose and fell within
less than one day, and then the next eldest grand duchess,
Charlotte, was called to succeed her exiled sister on the throne.
The Luxemburgers who through the vicissitudes of their
checkered past remained stanchly Catholic, are manfully fight-
ing this modem enemy. They realize that the sinister force
aims at once at the Church and at the State, that it would defeat
their national aspirations: Mir welle bleiwe wat mir sinl*
Luxemburgers, Catholic and independent.
That is why the Bishop of Salford addressed his letter to
the Catholics of the Allied countries. He declares there is dan-
ger that the future of Luxemburg will be settled otherwise
than the Luxemburgers desire, otherwise than they have a right
to expect from those who have written and spoken many
fine phrases of encouragement to all the little States of Europe.
Though millions of brave men have died and millions suffered
agony to make tiie world safe for democracy and insure self^
determination for all peoples, there is danger that political
intrigue will make a victim at the peace table of Luxemburg,
^practically the last thoroughly Catholic nation and State,
sovereign and independent, left, at least in Europe."
"'We want to renudn what we ere.** The words are from the Lazembvirg
national song, written by the poet Lenta in the native dialect
'WHOSE, THEN, SHALL THOSE THINGS BE?''
BY EMILY HICKEY.
Whose, then, should these things be.
Little things dear to me,
Those little things I have, the small things which
Borne on my life did help it and enrich.
Yet cannot help another's poverty?
It may be I possess
What e'en may help or bless
Kinsfolk or friends when I have passed away;
But these things that I love as well as know.
What of them when I go
Out of the twilight to the breast of day?
Trifles! And yet so dear,
I scarce can name them here;
Trifles to others, not to me.
In verity.
Among them I have kept a little shell.
One gave me, and it meant
What brought us dear content.
Albeit its meaning none but two could tell —
And one of them is with the invisible.
And if you held it to your ear
Not even a murmur of the great sea-spell
In its white spiral could you hear.
Letters? yes, letters too.
And but a few.
For many a one was burned in days gone by;
And, as I know.
All these must go.
Ere I begin the journey that is nigh.
My father, dear my father! Here he laid
His heart before the one beloved maid.
The more beloved wife.
Letters and pretty rimes
64 " WHOSE, THEN, SHALL THOSE THINGS BE? " [Oct,
By love dictated in the far-off times
Of perfect life
With happy leaf and blossom and fruitage, oh !
So long, so long ago!
And other letters too,
Written, my mother sweet, by you
To her, your little child.
Whom you have met.
And gladly known,
(I love to think it true)
Albeit to woman's stature grown,
Long since, beyond earth's joyance or its fret.
In the far country that is Homeland styled.
No more than these and such
As any one might touch
Might smile a kindly smile to look upon —
Oh, trifles, yes, to any save to one.
Most certainly.
But that one, it is I.
I leave not things like these behind,
For any one to find.
And yet they will not have been all unshared
Ere they departed on the flame's white wings.
They held the subtle effluence
Wherewith the spirit dowers material things
From its own springs
I bore it biding hiddenly with me,
And gave it out unconsciously.
For none can say, in all the universe.
That anything is merely his or hers.
But this is not the whole.
The rest? The rest is silence with my soul.
HOW TO READ ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL.
BY C. C MARTINDALE, S.J.
The Doctrine Concluded.
|FTER John's **word8 of heaven," were not any com-
ment of ours an intolerable impertinence and
vulgarity? I will do little more than tabulate
the doctrine we have already watched unfolded
in his GospeL
In Eternity, God exists: God the Invisible, of a Nature
which no other nature, created or imaginable, can compre-
hend. Yet this God has uttered Himself — adequately, in that
mysterious Word which both is He, and is other than He, which
coexists with Him in His Eternity and through Whom all else
is made. For God, through the Word, has created a finite uni-
verse; it too is His limited, inadequate expression; scattered,
stammered syllables of His perfect self-utterance. Into this
world, too, is ever streaming that Light which is suited to
world-minds, reflections and gleams of that Inaccessible Light
in which He is, and which is He; a Light sufficient for human
thought to know what it needs of God; more than sufficient, in
itself, yet proportionate, on the plane of nature, to the mind's
exigencies.
But to this Word, men remained, often, deaf; and to the
Ught, half-blind.
T*hereupon the Eternal Word and the Immortal Light be-
came a man like them, that not thought alone might struggle
its way to God, but that human eyes might see, human ears
hear, and men's weak hands might handle the Divine.
True God, One Thing with the Father, and true Man, born
of a woman, subject to hunger and thirst, weariness of body
and stress of soul, a heart for friendship and for sorrow, a
Man destined to die in the extreme of suffering and contempt.
But by no means only to preach a doctrine and to set a fair
example did Jesus Christ thus enter human history. True,
thou^ts were henceforward to be in man's mind which were
not there before; a manner of life should now be his of which.
66 HOW TO READ ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL [Oct.,
hitherto, he had been incapable. But both creed and code
should be but the expression, in the areas of wit and will, of a
New Life which, through Jesus Christ, was henceforth to be
personally appropriated by humankind.
A New Life, transcending that of mind as essentially as
mind transcends mere sense, was to be inbreathed by a new
Creation into the soul. Man must be born anew, and from
above. Baptism is the Sacrament, the mysterious transaction,
part physical, part spiritual, which, it was covenanted, should
cause, in man, this new Birth. But the life should not remain
inert. Forthwith, like a living Fountain, it should spring from
its inmost spiritual recess, and flood its way through all man,
transmuting him. And its condign food must it have; a food in
no way inferior to itself; a food which should be Christ Him-
self, given, preeminently, in the Supreme Sacrament, the
Eucharist
For, after all, what is this Life? A new, real, substantial
conmiunication, so far as human nature can receive it, of that
Fullness of Uncreated Life which is in God, and reaches men
through Christ. Not that we can become what Christ is, nor
what God is. Not that we shall ever be, or can be called, God,
Yet neither can human thought exhaust, nor the words which
alone express it, fully state, that which by participation in this
Life, we are, and which, at the consummation of all things
shall not only invisibly be, but shall be revealed and mani-
fested.
Such a man, therefore, has in him an Eternal Fact, and,
while for his natural coefficient, so to say, there is a future date
at which he shall be raised from death, and "judged," and
glorified, yet, from the standpoint of the Eternal Life already
his, he is "" separated '' from that which alone separates, evil
will, world, flesh, viewed as rejecting God's new Gift; he is in
Conmiunion ; he is in heaven, in Christ, in God, one with Them,
as They are with one another.
Yet John guards, sternly, the enraptured soul from that
false liberty which such joy in possession might suggest to
its reasoning. The dark, the flesh, the world, the lie, sin, exist;
our initial act of rejection has to be continued; nay, we must
die to them, painfully, as He died, and die all through our lives,
for the sake of the Eternal Life, which though it includes all
reality, and enriches every other life, yet exacts the slaying
1919.] HOW TO READ ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL 67
of those selfish attachments which exist in every will to the
lower forms of life. Not all have that courage : not all ** come/'
in the first instance. In some the element of response seems
not to exist at all; in all it does exist, but in some it is, at the
outset, stifled. Others, indeed, respond; they come, they hear;
but — a terrible mystery — they change; they do not "remain**
in Him ; they are shoots cut off from the Vine-stem, and wither,
and bum; they are anti-ChrisL
But those who remain in Christ remain, necessarily, in one
another; and in the visible Church they form the expression
of that conmion inner Life, in a triumphant, mutual Love.
Do not think that St. John is alone in proclaiming this mys-
tery. It is the essence of our Faith. St. Peter, too, speaks of the
" divine power unto Life ** given to us, that we might " become
sharers in a divine nature ;" ^ and St. Paul recurs again and
again to the doctrine of the vital union between Christ and His
Church, He the Head, she the members, each incomplete and
in truth unintelligible without the other; and of how this
mystic Christ is, indeed, still adequately to be built up, in the
uncharted future, into His perfect self, and of how human mar-
riage, in which two become one flesh is but the shadow of that
supreme espousal; and how in God and man and universe one
Spirit dwells, straining upwards towards the full revelation of
the Sons of God.*
It was of this that the Greek Fathers, too little read and
known, used a language almost too rapturous for modern ears :
how God became man, that men might become gods; how the
Eucharist is the very Medicine that makes Immortal; for this
too the Liturgy prays daily, when the priest mingles at Mass
the wine and water, and reminds the Father how His Creation
of the world was wonderful, but its Re-creation yet more won-
derful, and asks that we may be worthy " to be partakers in
His Divinity, Who in our humanity did not disdain to share."
And of this Catholic philosophy and theology, ever more
perfected across the ages, have taught. There are kinds of life,
they tell us: the stone does not live; the rose, at least, can Uve;
but the lion, more richly and fully than the rose; and than the
Uon, the thinking man; so that while the rose, by culture, can
> 2 Peter 1. S, 4.
*See etpeelaUy Sph. 1. 10-22, 23; U. 13-22; til. 19; It. 8-1«: Col. 1. 16-20. 24-28;
U. e-15, 16-19; ill. 11. And 1 Cor. lU. 9-11, 16-17; ▼!. 15-20; xll. 12-21; 2 Cor. ▼. 17;
mad Romani Till. 16, 18-22, 28-27.
68 HOW TO READ ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL [Oct.,
become a perfect rose, yet may it never be developed into a
thing of animal life; nor the animal of mere instinct, into
humanity. Even so, above all these natural modes of life,
remains a super-natural life, which man, left to himself, could
never claim nor earn, nor into which in any way could he
raise himself; but God gives it to him, freely, as a ** grace," if
he will but accept it.
This super-natural life He did, indeed, already give to our
first parents: but conditionally. They held it, provided they
proved obedient to His command. They disobeyed, and lost
it. That is the Fall. But Adam was regarded not isolatedly^
but as head of the race, and as forming a solid unity with his
descendants. Therefore they, in him, lost that Super-nature,
and were bom on their co-natural level merely — ^in ** Original
Sin.'' ••In Adam aU died."
But not irretrievable was the fault. A Second Adam was
to come into the world: a new Head to a new race; a •'new
a*eation.^ He should be, in a higher sense than Adam, God's
Son; true God, albeit true man. By incorporation with Him,
mankind should recover its super-humanity, with its capacity
for a super-human vision and joy of God. This substantial
union, on earth, is given the name of ** sanctifying grace;" here-
after, it is glory. Glory is the flower and fruit of that germ:
we are what we shall be; but what we shall be has not yet
been made manifest. This grace is, by covenant, given in Bap-
tism, and is increased by every willed unification of the soul
with the Source of grace, preSminently through those Sacra-
ments which symbolize, convey, and cause it; and of these, the
chief is the Eucharistic Communion. By grave sin, this grace
Is lost : its final loss is hell ; its triumph, heaven.
Yet need a man not fear. Though his act of faith, by which
he yields consent to God's revelation, is free, and his acts of love,
whereby he adheres in will to God's command, are free, yet
initial act and even further act of persevering choice, are alike
preceded and assisted by God's own act. His summoning and
supporting grace, so that throughout, the process of salvation
is, indeed, man's, but yet more truly God's. The two wills inter-
twine; better, interpenetrate. As to each "how" in all this
mystery, how each of these things can be, how the new cre-
ation is accomplished, so that man receives thus a divine life,
and yet becomes not God, how by no metaphor he enters into
1919.] HOW TO READ ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL 69
this transcendent relation with the ever-inviolate Absolute —
well, even the law of the first Creation outstrips our compre-
hension: enough we know, through God's good guidance of
our thought, intelligently to believe and humbly to adore.
Thus, without coercing the Gospel's words to suit our
dogma, nor proving our dogma by any misuse of the words of
John, we can see, by a broad yet accurate vision, how Gospel
and dogma make one harmony. And thereby, assuredly, our
^ole spiritual life is enriched. The dogma remains no mere
map; and the Gospel is no bewildering, though beautiful, docu-
ment of ancient Apostolic piety. There have been those who
tell us that John's Gospel marks a crisis in Christian history,
because it breaks with the narrow Palestinian tradition and
abandons its set forms of language, and is accessible to '" Alex-
andrian ** wajrs of thought, spiritualizes the old materialisms,
and in fine offers a Christianity ** acceptable to culture." Chill
and worldly notion, which the Evangelist would have rejected
with horror, and from which even we turn, indignant. The
Gnostics traveled along that road; the Gnosis is dead, dead its
philosophies and spiritualisms: what lives in the Gospel is
first, the human love which may bring poor and peasant to the
side of Jesus weary by the well, bowed at the Apostle's feet,
and making Magdalen His messenger; and then, the outpouring
of a Spirit which a very child, be he but pure in heart, can
recognize and welcome far better than can scholarship ; Love,
^t the last, is betttf , as interpreter, than logic. Even the out-
lined explanations of these pages must be forgotten, in their
thin separate poverty: once the mind has found contact with
John's mind, and moves freely in his circuit of ideas, the world
of his Gospel need no longer be mapped out by diagrams be
they never so exact; its air can be breathed, its mountains
sealed, its vallejrs rested in; it can become our home and
familiar dwelling-place.
The Word of God.
Why does John, in his prologue, describe the Second Per-
son of the Blessed Trinity as the Word?
A very brief account of the history of that expression must
suffice. ^
in John's world, the term Logos, which we translate,
inadequately, ipord, was as much on everybody's tongue as.
70 HOW TO READ ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL [Oct.,
say, evolution has lately been on ours, though its meaning
was, as a rule, much more carefully thought out.
Logos means the reasonable account which may be given
of a thing: the intelligible expression of its nature. It tends
therefore to define itself in two directions ; either as intelligible,
then it approximates to our idea — ** The Idea of a University **
— or as expression: a thought in the brain, a word on the lips.
Greek philosophy began six hundred years before Christ,
by trying to explain the manifold universe by a single formula,
the shorter the better. It was accounted for, say, by water, or
fire, manifesting itself variously; one immanent, ultimate Fact.
This, in itself, is the unseen Thing which underlies all else; the
ultimate account which can be given of things: their Logos,
From the East (presumably) came the notion of (in effect)
two Ultimates, Spirit and Matter, Light and Dark, Truth and
Illusion, of which the conflict, or at least the combination, cre-
ates the world-process, and is to be offered as its reasonable
explanation, its Logos. Plato and Aristotle, in different ways,
far too subtle to explain here, combined the notions of One
Ultimate " God,'* and of ** matter,'* definitely distinct from Him,
and yet governed and as it were ** souled " by Him. It was the
Stoics who best developed this suggestion : the universe is so
indwelt by Cxod as to be, taken as a whole. His adequate Logos,
or expression, while He, in it, is its Logos, or living explana-
tion. You have therefore (to speak briefly, I have to speak to
some extent inaccurately) God, the Ultimate : God, as contain-
ing the universe in Himself : and God, as expressed outwardly
in the universe.
Now it was the habit of the Greeks, Egyptians, Persians
and perhaps of all ancient religions, to present their theories
under a veil of myth, that is, in the shape of a human or
human-divine story. Very many beautiful personifying myths
developed in which the God, the Logos, and the history of the
universe were related. One of the most beautiful is that of
Osiris in Egypt.
Not only, then, were different theories of the Ultimate
account to be given of the Universe, and of God's creation and
preservation of it, current in the pagan world, decked out,
very often, in touching and human mythology, but the Jews
too of Alexandria made great use of them; of these, the writer
whose works best survive is Philo, who died about 50 A.D.
1919.] HOW TO READ ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL 71
These Alexandriaa Jews liked to apply Greek philosophy and
habits of mind to their own very un-Greek religion, and Philo
used the "" logos " idea very frequently, both in allegorizing
the Old Testament, and in constructing a general philosophy.
But his was not a great mind, and his system was very con-
fused, and, indeed, contradictory, and at no point original.
Until this was realized, it was often said that John borrowed his
/ogfos-doctrine from Philo. But the divergencies are radical.
In Philo, the Logos is primarily God's thought, immanent, in
Himself; in John, His uttered Word: Philo calls it God's First-
Begotten, in contrast to the world. His Second-Begotten : but in
John, the Word is the Sole-Begotten: Philo's is the image or
shadow of God; in John, he who sees the Son, sees the Father
also. Philo's Logos is a real half-way intermediate nature, a
link between two separate antagonistic objects. In John, it
'"mediates" because compenetrating and welding into one,
two extremes. In Philo, it is divine: in John, God. And with
John it is a human person too, a man, flesh: that, all Greek
philosophers would have agreed, however divergent else their
systems, it could never be, though as man or hero it might be
metaphorically portrayed.
Therefore John neither borrows nor even adopts logos-
doctrines. He is aware of /ogro5-doctrines, many, beautiful
and in various measure true. He does not say — '* Yours is my
doctrine from another point of view " — ** There' is much to be
said for yoiu* idea '' — *' We mean almost the same thing " —
and "^Each may learn from the other." He simply takes the
term Logos^ and then declares his Doctrine: that the Word
is co-Eternal with God; one with, while yet mysteriously other
than, the Father. Through Him was made the universe. He is
Truth and Life in fullness; He comes, a Light into the world,
and in His fullness we, if we will, participate. For He is be-
come Man, and a man; and to His welcomers He gives power
to become God's children.
The " WrrNBSs.*'
No one can fail to notice the recurrence, in the Fourth Gos-
pel, of the word witness, and allied expressions. Practically,
what John is trying to offer is an answer to the question : What
evidence for your extraordinary doctrine can you provide?
And the situation is complicated by his conceiving the question
72 HOW TO READ ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL [OcU
put, first, by the Jews to Our Lord Himself » and then (though
this is less in the forefront) by his readers to John. And again,
an external (and to us, unnecessary) complication is intro-
duced, by an attempt to accommodate his answer to the re-
quirements of the Jewish law regarding witnesses.
The first external witness is John's own. Whatever else
may be said about the writer of this Cro^iel, this at least is ob-
vious : he gives himself as an eye-witness of historical fact. I
cannot see that this can be seriously disputed. Moreover, if
the objective reality of what he witnesses, is to be doubted, the
whole character of his witness is impaired. Over and above in-
cidental phrases like: We beheld His glory; * and special in-
cidents referred to, like the Water and Blood after the Piercing
of the Side : *'and he who saw bore witness, and truthful is his
witness, and he knows that he speaks the truth;" and phrases
where his personality and his affirmation are descried across
the actual speakers,^ you have the quite definite assertions of
the character and purpose of the book itself ^ resting enturely
on the reliability of its author.*^ And the whole sums itself up,
perhaps best of all, in the emphatic declaration at the begin-
ning of John's First Epistle.
That which existed from the Beginning,
That which we have heard.
That which we have seen with our eyes.
That which we have watched and our hands have handled —
(Concerning the Word of Life: yes! for the Life was made
manifest, and we have seen, and we are bearing witness, and
we are announcing to you, the Eternal Life which existed
with the Father and was made manifest to us — )
That which we have seen and have heard
We are announcing to you too, in order that you too may
have fellowship with us . . . yes, these things we are writ-
ing, even we, that our joy may be fnll-fllled!
Could appeal to personal experience^ full sense-experi-
ence, be made more emphatic?
But it was as clear to St. John and his contemporaries
that this appeal to personal experience might be taxed with
subjectivism, though that word was not at his disposal nor
theirs. He had to appeal to some sort of evidence, other than
•John 1. 14e. «Jolm I. 84; iU. 11. •Jolm zx« 80, 81. •John nl. 84.
1W9.] HOW TO READ ST. JOHITS GOSPEL 73
his own, which his hearers would start by admitting as valid.
Now a Voice to which an even exaggerated authority had been
attributed, was the Baptist's. Of him and his witness, John
therefore has much to say. But that witness presupposed be-
lief in the Baptist. " You believed the Baptist in all other mat-
ters : a fortiori you should believe the whole point of all his
career, namely, witness to Jesus, Son of Mary." But what is
there for those for whom this argumentum ad hominem is not
valid, who can say: "For us the witness of the Baptist has
no cogency? "
I pass over as rapidly as the Evangelist does the appeal to
the witness of Moses and the prophets. Christ made that ap-
peal, and the Jews recognized that their sacred books were a
legitimate court of appeal; but experience had amply proved
that ** Moses and the prophets " supplied nothing which would
convince a mind undesirious of being convinced; and any-
how that past was rapidly becoming too remote to be of much
cogency for that changed world in which St. John was
writing. In any case there was a spiritual opposition
between one element of Moses* work and one element of
Christ* s : through Moses came the law : Christ brought '* grace
and truth " and freedom.'^ None the less, what Moses lifted
up before men's eyes was a symbol, though no more, of that
reality which was Jesus; • the mysterious manna should have
made it easy for men's minds to welcome the True Bread; • the
Jews did ** search " the Scriptures, because they thought that
in them they had "eternal life"*® — ^well, it was those very
Scriptures that witnessed to Himself. He had no need to
accuse them before God of spiritual blindness; Moses himself
did that, Moses, in whom they had hoped. If really they were
believing Moses, they would be believing Him ; for about Him
Moses wrote. "But if you do not believe his writings, how
shall you believe My words? " Words? No, He had definitely
declared : " "If they will not believe Moses and the Prophets,
neither will they believe though one returned from the dead;"
and the summing up of the story of "T^azarus" is justified by the
ill consequences (in so many cases) of the miracle worked upon
the real Lazarus, and by the failure to convince of the Resurrec-
tion itself. Even as Moses and the Law carried no convincing
'John I. 17. 'John 111. 14. •John vi. 32.
**J«lai T. aS-47. ^ See LiOw xtL 31.
74 HOW TO READ ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL [Oct.,
force, so neither did Isaias and the prophets,^' for Our Lord
here definitely declares, there is a spiritual obstacle in the
minds of the Jewish readers which prevents their under-
standing even what they read, and reading recognize as
authoritative.
Our Lord's first appeal is to His own miracles. **The
works that My Father has given Me to accomplish, these very
works bear witness** to My divine mission." Yet you will
notice that all through this Gospel a belief in Christ due to hav-
ing seen a miracle, is subordinated as definitely inferior to be-
lief in Him on His own intrinsic merits. The ** Works " are
a useful — almost a regrettably inevitable — stimulus to belief.
The Messiah was expected to do such things; ^* had He not
done them, there would have been excuse for disbelief; but
now that He has done them, there is no real excuse for not turn-
ing the will towards belief. Christ has fulfilled a condition
promised in order that belief might be the easier. Take some
examples. Nathanael is ** shocked " into submission by Christ's
miracle of clairvoyance. ** Because I said I saw thee under
the fig-tree, dost thou believe?" Jesus asks, half sadly.
'* Greater things than that shalt thou see." The Samaritan
woman, "shocked" in her turn by Christ's having read her
thoughts, rushes to the town, relates the incident, and num-
bers of the townsfolk " believe " because of her ** witness." But
Christ spends two days there, and "far more" believe be-
cause of His words. "And to the woman they said that
•No more because of thy chatter do we believe; for ourselves,
we have heard.' " *• When the officer from Capharnaum begs
him to cure his son. Our Lord protests, " Unless ye see miracles
and portents ye will not believe," and thereby extracts a pro-
fession of faith, antecendent to the working of the miracle.
Then is the wonder worked and becomes a confirmation of
faith rather than its cause." After the miracle at Bethesda,
Jesus similarly affirms that greater works than this act of
beneficence shall the Jews behold, that they may have true
grounds for wondering — the spiritual resurrection of the
ttJohn xU. 88-41.
u John ▼. 38. CA John x. 25. " The works that I do In My Father's name, these
bear witness concerning Me: " " In My Father's name " like ** which My Father has
given Me to do," Is Important God's veracity is Involved. Were Jesus a liar, or de-
ceived. His divine works would be sufficient to convict His Father of abetting His
lie or deception.
^Jobn vli. 81. >*John iv. 89-42. » Jbhn iv. 48^^.
1919.] HOW TO READ ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL 75
spiritually dead.'* " In chapter six, verse twenty-six, the atti-
tude of the Jews towards the great miracle of the Bread seems
put even below wonder-lust; they sought Him not even be-
cause they had seen miracles, but because He had supplied
them with plenty of food.
Jesus is longing to win from the Jews acceptance on His
own merits; because of the intrinsic character of His words
and message. ** If you will not believe Me, at least believe the
works;**" "Believe Me, that I am in the Father, and the
Father in Me; failing that, believe for the sake of the very
works . . . these and greater, shall he do who believes in Me.**
The works are sufficient to condemn the Jews : " If I had not
done among them these works, which no man ever did,
tliey would not have had sin; but as it is, they have both seen
them and have hated both Me and My Father.** " Yet even
this strong affirmation follows and is subordinate to a similar
claim to the cogency of His words.'® The whole episode of St.
Thomas* recovery of faith, and Our Lord*s approval, pri-
marily, of the belief which does not rest upon material signs,
throws light on the whole of Christ*s feeling about miracles,
and even on St. John*s who follows the story of St. Thomas
with an acknowledgment of their due function — ** Many other
signs Jesus did in the presence of His disciples, which have not
been written in this book: but these have been written in
order that you should believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the
Son of God.*' «*
Christ*s miracles, therefore, are a sufficient guarantee of
the divine sanction of His message. But they are not the best
He can do for us : nor all that He intends to do. After all, the
physical cures and even resuscitations had been paralleled,
long ago, by other accredited envoys of God. The real dif-
ference is in the message — a difference affecting alike the na-
ture of the Messengerf and the kind of work which He really
intends to be His work; His unique, unshared work, achieved
within the soul. It stands to reason, that in the long run, the
unique quality in Christ can only declare itself through itself;
and the imique work done in souls, be adequately recognized
not by sight, but by faith, issuing, it well may be, into a unique
and unmistakable experience.
"John ▼. 20. »J<^in x. 88. ^John zt. 24.
» Ibid^ XT. 22. « John zzi. 80, 81.
76 HOW TO READ ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL [Oct,
Our Lord insists that He speaks what He knows, and what
He alone knows, and what He alone c€Ui know.
What we know, we speak;
What we have seen, to that bear we witness • . .
No one hath ascended into heaven (to discover God's secret)
But He alone (knows it) who came down from heaven.
Even the Son of Man Who exists in Heaven.**
What I have seen at My Father's side, I speak. **
The obvious retort to this is : We only have Your word for
it. The first reply of Our Lord is : **
"* I do not merely bear witness to Mjrself . If I bear witness
to Myself, My witness is not true (valid) ; I have an outside wit-
ness. The Baptist. His witness was true. You ought to take
it. Still, I do not take my witness from a human creature at
alL I have a witness greater than John's: My works. But
you do not accept them. There are, too, Moses and the
prophets. But neither do you understand them."
And again, in chapter eight, verse thirteen, the Pharisees
say:
*' You bear witness to Yourself; such witness is worthless."
Now Jesus answers : ** Even if I do. My witness is valid.
Because I know my Origin and my Destiny. You know neither.
Your way of judging is a human way. I judge no one. [Does
this very difiBcult sentence receive its meaning from what fol-
lows? I. e.p 1 am Mem, pass no verdicts, not even on My own
message?] But even if I do pass verdict on Myself, my verdict
is valid, for I am not alone — but there are Myself and My
Father. Now in your law, it is settled that the evidence of two
witnesses must hold good. Well, there are here Myself, the
Eternal Son of God; and My Father, Eternal God. You do not
know Me, really — ^nor yet My Father. If you really knew Me,
you would know Him too." Here is an argumentum ad
Judaeos: an appeal to the regulation of the Mosaic Law. Twp
witnesses are needed. For Jesus of Nazareth there are two :
the Eternal Word who makes, indeed, one Person with the Man
Jesus, but is independent in existence of that humanity, . and
the Eternal Father, Who also sanctions Him.
»Jolm ill. 11. 13. This is Joluumliie dletlon. Maldonatns sees well (U. 465)
that Our Lord does not use this plural of Himself. He considers it a generalisation x
Men speak of what they know, etc.: so, foo. L
» John TiiL S8. ••John t. tl.
1919.] HOW TO READ ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL 77
But to tell the truth, we are no further forward. ** Yes,"
say the Jews, ** we know You say You know, that You have
seen^ that You are the Son of God, and God. But why should
we believe You? We still have to take your word for it Why
should we? As a matter of fact, Your claim seems to us a
horrible blasphemy. We have no means of testing Your
claim."
Our Lord answers in effect: "'You have, or you should
have. There ought to be in you an interior response to My
words. Something in you — you somehow— ought to leap up
and cry, 'Yes, that is truel I know it. I afiSx My seal to it.
My whole self is explained by it, and rushes to welcome it.' If
it does not; if you have no such afiSnity with My message, and
neither do nor wish to nor can welcome it, well, you are wrong;
you are mutilated men; you are dislocated and out of vital
communion with the world and with God. You ought to ex-
perience that unique consciousness which asserts, without
tolerating any denial, that My words are God's word^ and
true."
But is not ttiis the strangest doctrine? Does it not reduce
all the act of faith to mere feeling and emotion?
Whether or no, St John states this as clearly as possible.
** Men preferred the daric to the Light, because their works
were evil ... he who does the truth comes to the Light, that it
mqr be made manifest how his works are done in God." *^
** He who accepts His witness, sets his seal to it, that God
is truthful" «•
**You have never heard the voice of God nor seen His
shape; but you have not got His word (His mind, as we should
say) remaining in you, because you do not believe in Him
Whom He sent" *^ . . . I know you, and how you have not the love
of God in you. I came in My Father's name, and you do not
accept Me; others come in their own name, and them you
accept How can you believe, if you accept one another's
opinions, and do not seek the 'Mind of the Only God? " ^
^ If a man chooses to do My will, he will know whether
My doctrine is from God or My own invention.
Mjolm UL 19-21. »Jolin ill. 33* •'John ▼. STb, 38.
m John T. 42, 43, 44. That Is: You hunt for Me— €. g„ in the Scriptures; but jou do
not find Me. You form theories, and inquire about people's "views;** but jou cant
get the View of God. The word 864a wliich can of course mean glory, must needs
be rsndered liere* I think, as I have done. It is unlikely that there is, eren* any
latent " ambiguity ** in John's use of it here. Contrast with viL 18.
78 HOW TO READ ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL [Oct.,
'' You seek to kill Me, because My Word (or Mind) finds
no place in you. What I have seen at My Father's side, that I
speak; and you what you have heard from your father, that
you do:*® (You are God's sons? No!) If God were yoiu:
Father, you would be loving Me . . . Why cannot you under-
stand My words! because you cannot appreciate My thought.
[This is what this difficult sentence practically means.] You
are from your father the devil, and you choose to work the
lusts of yoiu* father ... He who is of God, hears the words of
God : the reason that you do not hear them, is, that you are not
of God." '^
All this passage, chapter eight, verses thirty to fifty-nine,
is directly to the point.
" If you were blind, you would not have been guilty. But
as it is, you say : We see. So your sin remains." There is a
double doctrine in this very compressed sentence, if not a
triple one. First: You are unseeing; you neither do nor can see :
despite your claim to sight. You willfully prefer the dark. So,
from this point of view, to start with, you are guilty. Second :
You don't really see, but you say you do, which is equivalent
to saying the dark is the Light, and you teach that, and mislead
the world. This too is a horrible guilt. Third: You are right
in saying " you see." That is, you have the power of sight, and
the Light is shining for you, and the object of vision is there,
and in your hearts you are seeing : but you refuse to acknowl-
edge what you see in your conscience, and say that there is
nothing there. This is to blind your conscience, and a soul-
suicide. ""I know Mine, and Mine know Me.'^ You do not
believe, because you are not of My sheep. My sheep know My
voice, and I know them, and they follow Me." •*
'* He who sets Me at naught, and does not accept My words,
has his judge. The word that I spoke, that shall judge him at
Last Day."'^ (Notice here again, the distinction between
p-fl^axa the actual words listened to, and \6yoq their spiritual,
vital content which is not " heard," but rejected *by the soul,
and thereby made the occasion of its self-chosen separa-
tion.)
"Everyone who is *of the truth' (i. 6., belongs to it, is
* bom of • it) hears My voice," "
•John vlil. 38. ••John Till. 42-47. » John x. 14.
"John X. 26, 27. "John xU. 48. MJohn zvlil. 87.
1919.] HOW TO READ ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL 79
This Discourse in the Supper-room is full of apposite sen-
tences; especially John xiv. 6, 10, 17, 24; xv. 16; xix. 22, 24;
xvi. 9, 13; xvii. 2, 3, 9. So also is the First Epistle: ii. 19, 20, 24,
27; iii. lb. 6, 9, 24b; iv. 5, 6 (very strong), 7, 15, 9-12 (very strong
too), 18-20. Cf. Second Epistle 1, 2.
There are two main elements in all this which are points
of anchorage. For any supernatural result, Grod's initiative
and grace are necessary. And man's will is free. Mapping
out the Eternal Fact in time, this is what happens : There is
enough Light in the world, even apart from the Incarnation,
for men to know God " naturally." To know him sufficiently.
The human intellect may muddle its conclusions terribly; may
achieve very curious and (in reality) false ideas about Grod.
But it can know Him enough; and if in the end it rejects the
knowledge possible to it, it does so through evil will. Hence we
need not fear to say, that, in God's judgment, pagans, the ignor-
ant, scholars and skeptics, may well have that amount of knowl-
edge of Grod which is possible to their temperament and cast of
mind, natural or acquired. But Christ came into the world to
give a supernatural knowledge of a super-natural union with
Grod. How are we, then, to give in our adhesion to Christ?
He supplies us with sufficient natural evidence. His miracles:
prophecies concerning Him; the character of His sinless life
and incomparable preaching: the result in the lives of those
who sincerely live by Him : a cumulative agreement of which
each part multiplies itself into each other part and is not
merely added to it. But this is " sufficient evidence *' for what
exactly? To make it prudent for us to give in our intellectual
assent to this: '* Christ is Grod's envoy, and His doctrine is
sanctioned by Grod and therefore true. But what makes us
actually give in that assent? Well, sheer reasoning, if it be
no more than a natural consent. But such a consent is in any
case improbable, because the evidence is not coercive. There
is no two plus two equals four about it. Grace, th^efore; and
the assent is supernatural. Grace solicits the attention in the
first instance; I look: it illuminates the mind, in the next; I
see: it strengthens the will, in the last; I adhere. I **8ee/'
** hear," " come," " believe," am. But how do I know that has
happened?' Well, how do I ever know I am alive? or not
dreaming? or not hypnotized? By direct intuition. Immediate
awareness. I know it It is vital exp^ience. It is no good
80 HOW TO READ ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL [Oct.,
telling me I'm not alive. And, if I believe, it is no good telling
me I do not.
Is not this reducing Faith to "feeling?" Not exactly.
Mere emotional feeling may be, and often is, quite absent. On
a higher level, reasonable assent there must be and is. But
some other name than feeling must be found for that precise
mode of consciousness which awakes and responds to grace.
Grace cannot make you get more out of a thing than what
is in it: therefore, not out of an argument. Arguments are
natural things; therefore, supernatural stuff is not to be got
out of them, however much the arguing mind be deluged with
grace. The inexperienced may find it hard enough so to dis-
sect themselves as to "realize" that in their assent, and
therefore mode of consciousness, is a double element, natural
and super-natural. Often an onlooker can see more clearly
than can they. But St. Teresa, for example, insists till she
grows tired of it, on the absolutely indisputable knowledge
which the soul has when it receives an authentic conmiuni-
cation from God that it has received it. It simply cannot doubt
it. Its intellectual mapping out of the pros and cons may be
hesitating and faulty; but as to the fact, it simply cannot doubt
about it, because something has happened which is it It is a
vital self-conscious way of being. We repeat, this need not over-
flow into the emotions: it may be quite a dull experience; but
it is a direct one, and under all the soul's sheaths and surfaces.
Therefore, all alike the Father "draws" to Jesus. Else,
no one would approach. Even of these, not all yield to His
solicitation. They are not His. They oppose Him. But if
they are His, they " come " to Christ, for all that is the Father's
is His too: therefore, they too are His. He speaks; they can
" hear:" He " chooses " them, they welcome His call. Thence-
forward, none can snatch them out of His hand. But they can
snatch themselves — separate themselves. " Have I not chosen
you, the Twelve? Yet out of your numbers, one is a devil." On
God's side and Christ's, all is love: yet that love, if it cannot
kindle the human heart into a reciprocal glow of heavenly
heat, chars it to a cinder.
John is happiest, and therefore writes most easily, when
he is not wrestling with " proofs." They are l)ut incidentally
dtsc^^ in, becaufie of restive thoughts and wills, and actoal
problems in the elurly Mstdry of the Christian Church. He is
1919.] HOW TO READ ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL 81
not constructing an apologetic, primarily : not seeking to solve
the mystery of predestination and perseverance. He is hymn-
ing the Communion of the Soul with Christ. He supplies
illustrations and authority to the professed and formal
theologian, yet not such is he. He would be sorry, almost,
were " proofs " in the front rank. He wants Christ to be self-
sufficient: he exults, to find that He knows His own and His
own know Him. "Dilectus mens mihi: et ego illi." And humbly,
together with the great rapture of inconununicable personal
knowledge, comes submission to that Church's doctrine to
which all Saints, however triumphantiy ecstatic, have yielded
their unhesitating assent; It remains that
. . . The Master is so fair.
His smile so sweet to fallen men.
That those who meet Him unaware
Can never rest on earth again.
[the end.]
AN UNCANONIZED SAINT.
BY MABY FOSTEH.
xn.
I HEN Caterina was left alone outside the city
walls, she looked at the olive trees which
gleamed dully in the shadow the sun had cast
on them, at the waving cypresses and at the
tinkling little brook. Then she looked up to the
cloudy vault above her.
" Madonna," she said slowly. " I don't think he meant it"
*' Dear Lord God," she prayed in her little chapel before
seeking her father's house, " You won't take him from me, will
You? If he does not really believe in You, send him to good
Don Filippo who will tell him all that is right and good."
For a few days she was almost as happy as ever in her
quiet trusting faith, and each morning she watched for his
return. But the days stretched into weeks, and he did not
come. Strangers came to see the church and the house, but he
was not amongst them. Don Filippo said his daily Mass. heard
the confessions of his simple folk, and performed his parish
duties as usual but no one came to him for instruction.
Slowly Caterina began to realize that he was gone.
" Madonna," she whispered, eis she stood in her dark cor-
ner in the church, " he is really gone. I shall never marry, and
have dear little babies to love me." Her voice faltered in a sob.
Perhaps after all, he never loved me, though I loved him bet-
ter than any one but the dear God and you. Won't you send
him to Don Filippo that he may learn to love you? Surely
you must wish him to do so! But perhaps he will find a priest
in England who will make him believe. And then," she added
naively, " he would come hack to me."
She sobbed quietly for a few moments, and then raised her
head. "After all, dear God, You must have Your way," she
said softly.
Little children came trooping into the church as she stood
there, laughing as they stretched forth their little hands to the
sanctuary lamp. Caterina smiled through her tears.
1919.] AN UNCANONIZED SAINT 83
** How You must love those babies, dear God,'' she whis-
pered, ^ and how glad You must feel that they are so happy in
Your House."
She watched them as they trotted down the stone pave-
ment, making clumsy attempts at genuflections, and dis-
appeared behind the leathern curtain where their cries mingled
with the shriUer voices in the street. Caterina had grown thin
and silent But now, as she prayed for strength, it came to her.
The neighbors scarcely had time to notice her listless step
and altered demeanor, before she was as her old self again^--
not inwardly, for she would never be the same light-hearted
girl. But outwardly her cheerfulness came back to her, and
she resumed her old life with all the interests that had filled it
before she had met the artist stranger in the church.
So time passed on, weeks giving place to months, and they
in their turn speeding by, till spring came round once more.
Caterina was very weary of waiting, poor child, but she never
gave up hope. That anyone should not love and believe in the
Grood God, was something that she had not known was possible.
She had never met anyone in her quiet life, who was not in
the habit of spending a few minutes each day in prayer before
the tabernacle. Yet she remembered she had never seen him
pray, and that he had often smiled at her faith and devotion.
Her childlike mind could not comprehend the mystery, so she
prayed the more earnestly to her one real Friend, and left the
answer in His safe Hands.
"Are there people who do not love the dear God?" she
asked timidly of Don Filippo one day.
The priest looked at her in some surprise. He was hard
working and earnest with an intense love for his parishioners,
and the big warm Italian heart for children, and he was watch-
ing Caterina rather wistfully as she grew into womanhood.
**Alas! my dear child," he retiu^ned quietly, "do we all
love Him as we should? "
"But, I mean, are there people who do not believe in
Him?"
"Ah, yes, child. You have heard of the missionaries,
priests who go to convert the heathen in countries far from
here. There are many, yes very many, in this big world of ours
who have never heard of Him."
"But when they hear, they believe?" she asked eagerly.
84 AN UNCANONIZED SAINT [Oct,
The priest sighed, (^ancing at the upturned face with some
curiosity.
** There are some people who are not good,*' he answeredt
** some who will not believe in Him or love Him. We should
pray for them."
^ Is everyone who does not believe in Him bad? " the gbl
asked gravely.
** Some cannot, my child, some may wish to believe but
cannot, because they have not faith, which is Grod's free gift**
Caterina was silent for a moment Then she said in very
low tones : ^ And those who laugh at Him, and at His dear
Mother? " Don Filippo looked at her sharply.
'*What should you know of such people?*' he asked
swiftly. ** Those are not good people."
The young girl hung her head, flushing deeply. *'Then
we should pray for them," she murmured.
** Yes, we should, indeed, pray for them," the priest replied
gently. ^ We should pray very earnestly for them. They re-
quire many prayers."
Caterina crept home. Some young children had come up
to the priest, and were clustering round his knees, and he
patted their little heads as they looked up fearlessly into his
face with their innocent eyes. But he glanced regretfully at
Caterina's retreating figure, and wondered why she had asked
him such strange questions.
The following winter proved to be a season of unusual
severity. Snow fell in the streets and was piled in great heaps
in the narrow little vicolt The children snowballed each
other, and laughed with glee at the unusual sight of the frozen
fountains. Caterina smiled too, for she fancied that it must be
like an English winter, as she watched the white flakes falling
softly all day.
Christmas came round, and as she knelt in the dusky
church, at the priest's feet, after her simple confession, he de-
tained her for a moment
** Do you pray for the conversion of sinners? " he asked her
quietly, as she raised her bowed head.
"Yes, oh yes, Father," she repMed quickly, ** I pray for them
every day, that is I — I pray for one in particular."
** Then offer your Christmas Mass and Holy Conmiunion
for that soul, and pray earnestly, and still more earnestly.
1919.1 AN UNCANONIZED SAINT 85
Think what a great thing it would be if you could be the cause
of bringing one soul to God."
In the few weeks that followed the festival, Caterina felt
curiously restless and unhappy. She experienced, as it were,
a shrinking from something unknown which seemed about to
happen to her. Gradually she felt as though some task lay be-
fore her, that this soul she desired so earnestly to bring to God,
would require a very heavy price from her. God must be go-
ing to ask her to give Him something very dear to her. Yet her
prayers seemed very difficult to utter, very cold and lacking
in devotion. One day she stood in her corner in the church.
Outside the boisterous January wind rushed through the streets,
and the short day was drawing to a dreary close. The young
girl's face was raised according to her wont, but she stood in
silence, no whispered prayer parting her lips.
It seemed to her that the church grew very dark around
her, and that the sanctuary lamp burnt dimly and fitfully be-
fore the tabernacle door. Suddenly she felt frightened, at what
she knew not. The wind had been moaning sorrowfully, but
now there came a sudden lull, and in the stillness a voice
seemed to say to her :
" Why donH you offer your life for his soul? "
It sounded so dose, that she turned quickly. But she was
alone, and there was no sound, save a sighing whisper from the
rising wind. The young girl knelt, and leant her head against
a chair. She fancied that, for the few minutes it rested there, no
thoughts passed through her brain, but hours of time seemed
to have elapsed when at length she raised her head very slowly,
and turned her eyes towards the one spot of brightness.
** Dear God,'* she scud steadily, ^ if You will turn his soul
to Yourself, and bring him to the Faith, I will give You my life
to do what You will with it. Take it altogether, if You wish.**
How the young life seemed to thrill in her body I how
rapidly the warm blood seemed to leap through her veins, how
strongly the strong heart beat within her breast I And how
dear was the beautiful world, the joy of living in it among the
beauties of nature, birds and flowers, and the lovely country
under the vault of Grod's own heaven.
Caterina turned and left the church skiwly, her head
bowed down. She had left her offering in His Hands to do
with it what He would.
86 AN UNCANONIZED SAINT [Oct.,
xm.
Assist lay bathed in a bright flood of sunshine as Mark and
Tony drove up the steep, dusty road from the station.
'* This is something like the * sunny south,' " said Bland,
and he gave a vicious kick to the great coat for whose services
he had been so thankful in England.
Mark was supposed to be the leader of the expedition,
but he did not know any more than Tony why they were
ascending the road to Assisi. The great dome of Santa Maria
degli Angeli rose amidst the vines, a landmark for the whole
plain. Up above, Assisi's square campaniles reared their heads
upwards and Perugia's site was marked by a tall church tower
upon the horizon.
'' One can't escape churches after all," Standish remarked.
** Everywhere one looks there is some temple dedicated to the
God of the Catholic Faith."
Tony nodded. " All over the world," he returned. " The
Catholic Church is universal, there's no doubt about that.
Mark did not reply and they drove on in silence.
The vines were a tender green on the plain, the fruit trees
were putting forth timid white and pink blossoms. Wild
flowers laughed to each other in the hedges, the pink nettle
flower vying with the starlike anemone, while the humble
violets hid beneath their cool leaves and sent a cloud of per-
fume to freshen the sim-scorched air. Mark found Assisi very
charming. The sun peeped into his room every morning and
blinked at him, as it ro^e over the crest of Monte Subasio, dash-
ing aside the clinging mists with his power. Natiu*e at her
fairest is best enjoyed in solitude, so when Mark and Tony,
each provided with their packet of lunch, set out of a morn-
ing, they parted, each to his own way. Mark always chose the
olive groves, which swept down in silvery confusion to the
plain below. He clambered down a favored gorge which a
little stream had cut out for itself, a huge bed for so small a
creature. It gurgled down in the depths of its high banks, half
hidden by the rich growth on either side and bounded into
the sunshine as it trickled from stone to stone until it dis-
appeared once more into the cool recesses below.
Mark sat down as close as he could get to the water, for
the sun was playing hide-and-seek and was searching for him.
I
I
1919.] AN UNCANONIZED SAINT 87
It was pleasant to sit comfortably on a soft knoll with the
flowers nodding around and the bees droning, as they passed
from bell to bell gathering the sweetness from the cool depths
of the petals.
In the orchards, the peasants were tilling the ground, or,
perched on ladders, they pruned the wealth of silvery olive
leaves, throwing them to the ground in great branches. These
were carried away by flat ox-carts, or tied in bundles on to
backs of mules to be burnt. Below, the little stream was cap-
tured and persuaded to fill a large stone basin where the
women washed their linen. Their voices rose on the hum-
ming air, shrill and loud. Sometimes they broke into song,
weird strains with scarcely any noticeable melody, something
like an Eastern church chant, which they poured out from
throats which were surely made to sing. The dull beating of
the wet clothes upon the stone accompanied their voices, as
the humming insects formed a bourdon to the whole.
There was a tiny shrine at the foot of the path which led
to the washing place. It contained a picture of the Madonna
which displeased the painter's artistic susceptibilities, but he
was struck by the picturesque homage paid to the ugly little
oleograph. Each woman, as she passed, drew her colored
kerchief closer over her dark hair, and knelt for a moment to
say a prayer to the Virgin and her Child. Little babies toddled
up, crying to be lifted to the Madonna, that they might press
their soft lips to the staring pink and white cheeks. A small
girl came with a bunch of freshly culled flowers, and taking
down the gaudy blue and gold vase full of yesterday's blos-
soms, she washed it carefully in the stream and arranged her
fresh posy in it. Then she laid her offering very close to the
picture and her lips moved as she made her prayer. When it
was finished, she tossed back her clustering hair, and with a
loud joyous song, she ran back to her home.
"" These people are all the same,** Mark said to himself.
" They all believe. And what faith they have ! "
The sun grew hotter as noon approached, and the clocks
struck twelve one after the other, and were succeeded by the
melodious clan^ of the church bells as they pealed out the
Ave Maria, answering the deep-tongued Cathedral bell in their
various voices, shrill and sweet; low and harsh. The tower of
a little chapel close at hand in the olive groves almost shook
88 AN UNCANONIZED SAINT [Oct.,
with the eagerness with which its two cracked little bells
obeyed the summons. All round rang out the praise of the
Creator of all, and Mark thought it quite a pretty idea.
To the midday clatter there succeeded a wonderful silence.
Voices in the orchards ceased as the prayer died away on the
peasants* lips, the men replaced their rough hats upon their
heads, the women rose from their knees, and all turned home-
wards. It was very still. Even the insects droned lazily, as if
they, too, wanted a siesta after their labors. Only the brook
ran on hurriedly in its anxiety to reach the plain below.
Mark lazily unpacked his parcel of lunch, and ate. He
threw the paper to the rapacious little stream which clutched
eagerly at its prize and played with it, until a long bramble
stretching out a thorny arm, caught it in its embrace. But still
the river laughed; it was very good-tempered. Standish
changed his position once more. There was very little shade
now, but he laid his head on a little grassy comer which was
shielded by a projecting comer of the bank. From there he
could look down the symmetrical rows of olive trees with their
dainty foliage and dark distorted trunks.
All was very peaceful. Even the church door was closed
and the wizened old man who had rung the bells and locked
the chapel had disappeared. There was something very
drowsy in the air, and following the example of his surround-
ings, Mark slept.
When he awoke the sun had found his way to his shelt-
ered nook, and was laughing and winking at him through the
olive branches. Only it was less ardent now, and Mark allowed
its rays to play upon his face with their chastened warmth.
There were voices close beside him, and the regular thud of
the spade told him that work had begun again. Two bare-
legged urchins stood on the bank above him, regarding him
with large wondering eyes. They sat down beside him as he
opened his heavy lids, and asked him if he had slept well.
Mark smiled. They were such mites, but they were so self-
possessed and confiding.
They told him where they lived, and how many brothers
and sisters they had, and when he asked them their names,
they asked him his. They opened the book which lay un-
touched at his side, looking with bewildered eyes at the strange
prints, and the queer etchings they could not understand. But
1919.] AN UNCANONIZED SAINT 89
when they saw a queenly form m a small engravings they
cried out that it was the dear Madonna, and pressed their rosy
lips to the page with a pretty fervor. Mark did not undeceive
them, but he drew the book gently away.
Then he stepped across the stream and chose a shady
nook near the now deserted washing-pool, from where he could
see Perugia rearing a slender campanile against the western
sky. When the sun chose to set, he would watch its radiant dis-
appearance from here.
The church door had been unlocked and showed a cool
interior dimly lighted by an ugly stained-glass window, but
against the dark background below there burnt a tiny flame.
From out of this coolness into the sunshine came an old
priest He carried a book and his lips moved quietly as he
came slowly forward. Then he raised his head, and slipped
the well-thumbed breviary into his pocket. He was a bent,
white-haired old man, with a shabby snuff-colored cassock,
and an unshaven chin, and Mark, whose person was always tlie
essence of cleanliness, felt a repulsion to the untidy old figure.
But the priest raised a pair of kind eyes, and when he saw
the stranger he smiled and bowed graciously and quickened
his steps, sure of a welcome.
" Ah, a lovely day," he exclaimed genially, ** and you are
comfortable where you sit. Have you seen my little chapel?
There is not much of interest to show you, perhaps, but we
simple folk love it and think it beautiful."
Mark smiled slightly. He did not remember ever having
spoken to a priest before, and this old man was different from
what he had expected. But he refused politely to visit the
chapel, and the priest, glancing kindly at him, did not insist.
'^ Pray for me, my son," he said gently as he turned away,
** and I will pray for you. For we are all poor sinners."
He passed into a small garden near the chapel, and took
a seat under a great bare fig tree. Then he took a huge pinch
of snuff with slow enjoyment and blew his nose loudly.
Presently little feet came pattering along the narrow path and
young voices vied with the stream in merriment, and a dozen
urchins burst into the priest's garden with an easy familiarity
and surrounded him on all sides. Three or four little girls
followed, and pushing their way through the group, seized the
priest's hands and kissed them. Then with much scrambling
90 AN UNCANONIZED SAINT [Oct.,
they settled themselves down like a swarm of bees, and the
priest's voice alone could be heard speaking low and earnestly.
A shrill voice interrupted now and then with a puzzled inter-
rogation, and giddy little heads constantly turned this way and
that and their owners had to be frequently brought to order by
the mild-eyed instructor.
Mark could not hear what was being said, but he watched
the little group with interest and forgot to look for the sunset
glow, as his eyes rested on the picture before him. A wild
whoop from the children told him when the instruction was
over and they scattered all over the tiny garden in pursuit of
a low flying bird, a belated bee, anything, to serve as a vent for
their pent up energy. Then the priest called them, and they
flocked round him once more, wrangling for the places nearest
to him and plucking at his cassock with their sunstained dirty
little fingers. Thus they walked out of the narrow gate to-
gether, in a pushing, struggling mass, and bent their steps
towards the chapel.
From Assisi the sunset hour tolled forth, and once again
the bells took up their tuneful hymn of praise, the two little
cracked bells waving frantically as they joined their discor-
dant voices to the evening prayer. A few men and women left
their work and joined the children in the chapel, and a low
murmur was wafted through the open door as they prayed.
Then they sang a queer tuneless hymn which seemed to have
no beginning and no end. It was not pretty, the voices were
not in tune, some lagged behind, while others took a note of
their own. But somehow the simple rendering did not dis-
please even Mark's critical ear. The sparse congregation
streamed out talking volubly, the women smiled at Mark as
they passed, wishing him a soft good night.
The sun had dipped behind Perugia, leaving a flushed
sky behind it. And as a certain glamour rests upon one de-
parted which perhaps had not been his lot in life, so a radiance
greeted the sun's disappearance. The rosy clouds in the west
told their neighbors in the east how beautiful was the sun
which had just gone from their midst, until the news spread
over the whole sky in a marvelous glow. Nature forgot that
the sun had scorched some of her tenderest blossoms and let
the ruddy magnificence rest upon the weary petals she was
closing so gently, and throw a reddened hue upon the sombre
1919.] AN UNCANONIZED SAINT 91
olive trees. And then it faded, and night crept up, throwing
her dark blue mantle swiftly around.
Mark looked upwards at the pale stars which were ap-
pearing in the sky, and then his eyes fell again on the shrine.
A couple of women were lighting the lamp as they talked and
laughed and prayed in one breath. He felt half pleased that it
was burning, although it only illuminated a very ugly picture.
Still, he had looked to see it lighted ever since he had that
morning spied the conunon blue receptacle filled with oil,
standing near the vase of flowers in the shrine.
XIV.
After that day Standish used to seek his friend, the stream,
very frequently. Each time he went everything seemed differ-
ent The sun never cast precisely the same shadows, new
flowers unfolded their beauties, different mists hung over the
plain. Sometimes distant roads were indicated by a cloud of
flying dust sweeping along in the wake of some hurrying motor,
or a passing carriage caught a ray of the sun and shone like a
diamond for a moment. One day, as he sat there it struck him
that there was an unusual silence around. A few voices sound-
ed from the field, and Mark could not at once discover what
familiar sound was missing. Then he realized that the bells
were silent, and he missed their jangling discord. No one
passed him as he lay in his sheltered nook, but as the day stole
on silently, the old priest walked down the steep path from
the town. He bowed as he saw Mark and they entered into
desultory conversation. Then the artist asked idly :
" Why are the bells not ringing today? "
The good Father stared at him with his red handkerchief
half way up to mop his hot face.
** Is it possible that the signore does not know? '*
'*I haven't the faintest idea," replied Standish, smiling.
^You do not know that the great Signore died on this
day?*'
"The great Signore? Oh! Who is He? One of the town
councilors?" Mark inquired flicking the head off a daisy.
For a moment the priest looked angrily at him and opened
his mouth to i>our out a torrent of words. But as he met the
young man's j^ance of quiet surprise, a look of profound pity
came into his face.
92 AN UNCANONIZED SAINT [Oct.,
" Ah, you do not know," he said very gently. " This is the
day upon which the Good God died for us, nineteen centuries
ago/*
Mark felt, for perhaps the first time in his life, that he
must, indeed, look small in the ^yes of his companion. He mur-
mured some sort of apology and rose with a hurried farewell.
He did not like to be under the gaze of those kindly, sorrow-
ful eyes.
He tried to find another spot in which he could en-
sconce himself during the next few days, but he ended by re-
turning to his favorite comer near the stream. Here, all the
old bitter thoughts of his love and the religion he had so hated
were softened, and in their place came an indescribable long-
ing for something better. With it, was mingled an intense
curiosity about that God Whom he had looked upon as a
successful rival, and the feeling of pressure which he had tried
to express to Tony became intensified.
In the long hours he spent in the orchards, he meditated
ui>on many subjects. He dwelt upon his past life, the life of
which he had been so proud, full of talents, riches and pleas-
ures. Yet nothing stood out above the rest. Even his pictures
had not lived, nor had his art which he had prized so highly,
won him a name. Now that he came to think it out, his ex-
istence seemed to have been empty hitherto — ^peaceful and
pleasure loving as the life of an animal. Surely there was
something higher in man's life than the existence of mere
brute beasts!
Mark had known no opposition. Up to now, there had
never been wanting rich, amiable friends to praise his talent
and to f£te him. Nothing had ever been denied him until a
poor Italian girl had renounced his love for her Faith, and
his London world had laughed at him when they discovered
that there actually was something he could not paint. These
thoughts occurred to him as he idled in the orchards and he
brooded over the crosses which had been suddenly laid in his
path. - * ' '
He had begun to feel a strange friendship for the old
priest whose chapel lay buried in the olive trees, an un-
explained interest in the personality of his new acquaintance.
It seemed strange to him that this quiet old Father — ^like Mrs.
Langford in far away London — ^never spoke of his Faith.
1W».] AN UNCANONIZED SAINT 93
Though of the people, the priest was a well-read and intel-
lectual man, possessing a deep insi(^t into human nature
coupled with a keen appreciation of the beautiful, untutored
though his taste was. And Marie suspected that there was a
very noble nature hidden beneath some perhaps uncouth
characteristics. His hands were alwajrs dirty but Standish
grew accustomed to their touch. He even once suffered a pinch
of the despised snuff to remain on his coat sleeve, for fear of
offending the old man if he flicked it daintily off.
Gazing at the mild countenance of his companion, Mark
often marveled at the complex nature which lay behind it.
How was it possible to combine a broad-minded knowledge of
the world with simple faith, childlike sincerity? When Stand-
ish asked questions about the Catholic religion, he met with
courteous but brief replies.
** You think I am idly curious," he said to his new acquain-
tance one day as they sat together near the chapel garden.
The Father was drawing patterns on the ground with his stick,
raising a cloud of dust which was settling upon the well pol-
ished boots of the artist.
''You are walking on holy ground," the priest replied
gently.
** I do not wish to be disrespectful," the younger man re-
sponded, ''but sometimes I feel that I would like to know
something about your Faith. It interests me, it interests me
strangely."
" We do not talk lightly of what we hold most dear," the
padre said after a moment, " and what we believe is so pre-
cious to us that it is only with those who are in earnest that we
can discuss such things." Marie felt reproved.
"I do not know why I feel interested," he said slowly,
" for I do not want to become a Roman Catholic. Yet some-
thing seems to urge me to ask about these things. I do not
want to scoff now. I have done that in my time — ^it was bad
form, I know — ^worse than bad form, no doubt But though I
want to find out what puzzles me, I do not want to be — "
" caught " he was about to say — " compelled," he substituted,
" to believe what I cannot."
"Faith can never be compelled," the other answered.
"In such matters coercion is impossible. If Cod wants you.
He will give you the grace "
94 AN UNCANONIZED SAINT [Oct,
The last words rang in the artisfs mind all day. That
God should not want him, had never occurred to him. He had
always fancied that it must be the other way about. If he
wanted God at any time he could get Him. It certainly gave
rather a jar to his pride, nor were his feelings soothed upon
the occasion of his next meeting with the old priest.
The latter was telling his beads with a crowd of young
children around him. He waved the young man aside, paying
no attention to him until the prayers were quite finished, and
the last child had said all he wanted to. Mark was acutely con-
scious that, after all, he was only a human atom in the great
world, second even to children where prayers were concerned.
When the priest at length turned to him, his manner was
very gentle and kind and they sat together till the sun was
lowering in the west. Then the old man took his friend to see
his little chapel in the quiet fields, and somehow the bare
interior, with its crude pictiu^es and tawdry hangings, made a
pleasing impression upon the particular artist. There was
something very real in the atmosphere of the place.
No one could have been more surprised than was Mark
himself, when, next evening, he related his story to the priest,
and actually found it easier to poiu* it into his old ears than
it had been to tell Tony upon the Devonshire moors. Before
he knew what he was doing, he was also speaking of the events
which had occurred since his love dream, and of the sensations
he had experienced in the past few months. It was wonder-
fully easy, the Father was both tactful and kind, and Mark was
awai 4^ of anxiously awaiting a reply to his confidences.
"I do not think she has forgotten you," the padre re-
marked slowly, taking a deliberate pinch or snuff. *' I think
she is praying for you.**
"Is that why I have this strange, iu*ging sensation? '• the
young man asked eagerly; then he smiled at himself the next
moment that he could entertain such a thought.
But the priest did not smile.
[to be continued.]
i
i
WASHINGTON'S ASSOCIATE AT YORKTOWN,
BY MARGARET B. DOWNING.
I HOSE who seek stimulus in historical paraUels
may find it abundantly in the expedition led to
America by the Comte de Rochambeau and that
of General Pershing in the late glorious chapter
of American military history. Hope and ma-
terial resources were almost exhausted when on July 11, 1780,
Rochambeau and his army landed at Newport. The devoted
Washington could well be described in the term which gained
such currency in the spring and early summer of 1918, with
his ""back against the wall" and facing the dreaded extremity of
retiring beyond the Susquehanna. Fifteen months later, the
contending armies faced each other at Yorktown, drawn by a
series of strategy which Washington cordiaUy acknowledges
the work of his associate conmiander. There were seven thou-
sand French soldiers under Rochambeau and St. Simon and
five thousand of the Continental Line, with a reserve of three
thousand five hundred Virginia and other militia men. Sur-
rounded, Cornwallis had but one hope of escape, the open sea
and at the mouth of the James and York Rivers, thirty-six
French ships under De Grasse blocked his way. On October
19, 1781, the army of Cornwallis surrendered, and the cause of
American freedom had been won, equally by Washingtc < and
Rochambeau and the troops they commanded.
It was in the summer of 1917 that the American army un-
der Pershing arrived in France. Those were black days when
Foch saw the French line bend and break under the German
offensive which began in March, 1918. Never was the cause
of the Allies more critical than when the American legions were
hurled into the Argonne Woods and stormed about Chateau-
Thierry. In the late autumn came the surrender, as the accep-
tance of the terms of the armistice will be written by history.
AUowing for the changes which the lapse of one hundred and
thirty-nine years had wrought and the difference of the modes
of warfare, there is su£Scient similarity between the martial
exploits of the French allied army under Rochambeau and
96 WASHINGTON'S ASSOCIATE AT YORKTOWN [Oct.,
the American Expeditionary Forces under Pershing to engage
the attention of the chroniclers.
This study of paraUels serves, also, to establish the fact,
seemingly forgotten, that Rochambeau rendered no minor aid,
but was the immediate instrument of Providence for the tri*
umph of the sacred cause of freedom, just as Pershing and his
army were the final weapons of Foch to smite the oppressor.
From the military standpoint, then, there can be no controversy
over the success with which the Commander-in-Chief of the
French allied army executed the benevolent intentions of his
King. Rochambeau, however, too often figures in the Ameri-
can mind solely as a symbol of the friendship of France, gained
through painful weary efforts of Franklin, Jefferson and other
great fathers of the Republic. It is full time that he should be
known for the splendid, virile unusual traits of character,
which his contemporaries give him, an admirable type of old
Catholic France, a member of the ancient noblesse, a sturdy
soldier, an upright, religious man. He is a figure to fill the can-
vas, no matter who takes up the brush to paint him. Wash-
ington shows him as the honest colleague and dependable
ally from the moment he set foot on American soil. In his
greeting to the Commander of the Colonial forces, the French
General wrote: ""I send you a copy of my instructions, and
of my secret instructions as well, for I feel that if we are to
codperate usefully I must have no secrets from my General.''
In the late days of February, 1784, when Washington, another
Cincinnatus, was busy with the cares of husbandry about
Mount Vernon, and Rochambeau, honored by his King, also for
the nonce rested on his sword, he wrote that immortal
eulogy to his former associate which may be found graven on
the statue of the French hero in Jackson Square, Washington,
'^We have been contemporaries and friends in the cause
of Liberty and we have lived together as brothers should, in
harmonious friendship."
Some historians make an episode of the trifling disagree-
ment between Lafayette and the commander who brought the
forces of the French King. Lafayette always impetuous, and
acting as intermediary between the French army and the
Colonial, allowed his zeal and ambition to overrun his pru-
dence in accepting the judgment and experience of the soldier
who had won fame at Klostercamp and Minden where the
1919.] WASHINGTON'S ASSOCIATE AT YORKTOWN 97
elder Marquis de Lafayette fell. But the friction was momen-
tary. Rochambeau in many letters to the brilliant young Mar-
quis, and in speaking of him in letters to Washington, alludes
to himself as " the old father speaking to his dear son.** There
is a saying of Rochambeau, recorded by Lafayette in his
memoirs, which deserves to be engraved on his statue, adja-
cent to the great tribute of Washington. No soldier can make
a nobler claim and with more truth. As Lafayette records the
incident, he had iu*ged Rochambeau to make a brilliant sortie
which could not but add to his military repute, and to do it even
though he had to sacrifice some of his men. Rochambeau re-
plied sternly that he would never consent. Then he added
gently to the noble-minded if somewhat headstrong young
soldier: " If during my years of service, I have retained and
still retain the confidence of my army, it is because, and God is
the witness of my sincerity, that of the fifteen thousand sol-
diers and officers of higher rank who have been killed or
woimded under my orders and in most deadly action, I have
not to reproach myself that I caused a single one to die or be
maimed for the sake of my own fame.**
An incident is related by the Baron Closen, secretary and
later aide of Rochambeau, which throws an amusing human
light on the French generaFs conduct when the troops of the
two armies lay encamped side by side. Some of the Indian
warriors who still clung to the old regime in Canada, had
traveled down to pay their respects to Rochambeau. They
could not conceal their amazement that though the French
soldiers were in quarters in an orchard, the boughs of the
trees hung heavy with fruit, and the nearby bam fowls strutted
about in freedom and at their accustomed pursuits. Things
had been diflferent when a French army was in their country.
Count de Segur, son of the Field Marshal under whom the
General had once served, and a future Academician, has an
illuminating paragraph in his memoirs of this period : " Our
Rochambeau seems to have been created purposely to under-
stand Washington and to be understood by him. For like the
great American, he too is a friend of order, of law and of
liberty. It is his example, much more than his authority,
which obliges us scrupulously to respect the rights, the proper-
ties and the customs of our allies.**
Vivid as these portraits are, Washington's associate at
▼OL. cz. 7
98 WASHINGTON'S ASSOCIATE AT YORKTOWN [Oct.,
Yorktown has painted his own picture in two volumes of
memoirs, as no one else could do it. His private papers, in-
cluding many autograph letters from Washington, which
American historians, with masterly inactivity, have allowed to
remain undisturbed in the files of the Congressional Library,
are also illuminating. Doniol has gathered many documents
dealing with the French army of alliance and has published
hundreds of valuable letters from the Commander to the Min-
ister of War; also the correspondence of Chevalier La Luzerne,
the French envoy to the Continental Congress, including his
report on the presentation of the oil paintings of Louis XVL
and Marie Antoinette, later destroyed by the British act of
vandalism in burning the United States Capitol in 1814.
Mathieu Dumas wrote brilliant memoirs of his experiences in
the American War of Independence. So did the Due de
Broglie and his erratic young colleague. Due de Lauzun, who
ascended the scaffold with him fifteen years after. The regi-
mental chaplain, Abb^ Robin, has left entertaining accounts
of Rochambeau's army. These papers, untranslated, remain
a virgin field for the American patriot who seeks to know
something of the services of France during a crucial period of
the Revolutionary struggle, and of the personality of the Gen-
eral Commander and the brave officers and men who accom-
panied him. Many names encountered there were written
large in the later history of France.
Jean Baptist Donatien de Vimeur, Comte de Rochambeau
and Mar^chal de France, was bom, as he tells in his memoirs,
in the chateau of his family on the River Loire near Vend6me,
July 1, 1725. He was to die eighty-two years later in the same
stately chamber where he was ushered into a life of varied and
noble achievements. He was to spend sixty years on the bat-
tlefield, so that it is plain that he hurries through the homely
details of his early years to reach the great adventures. Yet
he tells enough for the sympathetic reader to fill the long space.
He was the second son and of fragile health. In the old
noblesse there were but two professions, arms and the Chiu*ch,
therefore he was sent in his sixth year to study under the
the Fathers of the Oratory in Vendome.
The young Donatien was not without pride and ambition
in his chosen career. He relates that he was frequently called
the " Little Vicar " because he relished the ceremonial and was
1919.] WASHINGTON'S ASSOCIATE AT YORKTOWN 99
happy when in radiant sacerdotal attire. He was contented
with the Oratorians, but with a stroke of his pen the future
friend of Washington reveals the seething polemics of the era
when that fateful alliteration, Jesuit and Jansenist* was heard
so clamorously. The house of Rochambeau was stanch and
conservative. Knights of the line had fought with the sainted
Louis during the Crusade; one had died in Egypt. All had
followed the Faith with uncompromising adherence. The
father of Donatien, governor of Vend6me, preferred that his
son should follow the Jesuits as there were hints of Oratorian
sympathy for the other side of the controversy. So one morn-
ing 'M. de Crussol, Bishop of Blois, appears at the school,
armed with instructions from the Comte, and conveys the youth
to the Jesuit Seminary in his episcopal city.
Donatien utters no complaint, indeed makes no comment
on this change, but continues his ecclesiastical studies with
zeal and diligence. He has passed the age of fourteen and is
about to receive minor orders when again, say the memoirs,
M. de Crussol appears before him. He has portentous news.
His elder brother has died, he is now heir to the title and must
at once prepare for the army and to carry down his noble
line. And the good Bishop adds solemnly : "" You must now
prepare to serve the King as loyally in the army and with
the same zeal and devotion you would have served God on His
altar.''
The Bishop of Blois makes but one more appearance in
the memoirs of Rochambeau. On the occasion of the assem-
bling of the three classes of the French people, nobles, clergy and
third estate in response to the Cahiers of Louis, Rochambeau
differs with his former superior and mentor. He has passed
almost two years in constant association with Washington and
the Continental patriots and his ideas have been revolutionized.
He cannot see three classes, as he explains to the Bishop, and
afterwards in a letter to Washington, but only two, the priv-
ileged and the unprivileged, and his vote and his sword are
for the oppressed. No doubt the Bishop was sorely tried, for
his horizon had not widened as had his pupiFs.
At sixteen Rochambeau had won a commission and was
serving with St. Simon, uncle of the general who was to serve
under him at Yorktown. He drew his sword in high hope and
with fervor in defence of Maria Teresa in the Bavarian cam-
100 WASHINGTON'S ASSOCIATE AT YORKTOWN [Oct.,
paign against Frederick of Prussia. At twenty-two he had won
a colonel's rank, and he notes that Washington had won his
at twenty-one. He draws stirring pictiu*es of the various cam-
paigns in which he served under Marshals de Saxe, Richelieu,
de Segur, d'Estr^es and de Broglie. He records with evident
pride that he had always been a line officer, that he had re-
fused and disdained using court influence to become an orna-
mental figm*e on the staff. " I never relished the atmosphere
of courtiers,** he writes, " and I could never catch the tone of
the coiu*tiers.** He won his spurs painfully, and on the battle-
field: functionary glory is never his lot. We follow him
through scenes of carnage, and through triumphant entries
into conquered cities, but he is always calm and aloof from
the exterior things, and keeps his soul free from the pollution
of war.
So through the years until he had reached the fifty-fifth,
and was suffering from a violent attack of an old enemy, inflam-
matory rheumatism. He is resting in his Paris mansion, a fine
edifice yet, in Rue Cherche-Midi and the home of the Ministry
of Labor, when he is aroused in the night to go to Versailles.
There he learns that he has been selected to command the
army of alliance and he sets to his task despite bodily dis-
comfort. A grotesque attempt was made in 1838 to translate
into English that part of Rochambeau's diary which describes
the American expedition. But there are so many errors of
proper names, dates and general description that this task also
still awaits some clever pen. The other parts of this wonder-
ful autobiography remain untranslated except in meagre ex-
tracts. In the French, but few copies of the memoirs are found
in this country.
There is one incident modestly told, with no aim at self-
glory but as a necessary part of the record. It is the mission
of the younger Rochambeau, Donatien Marie Joseph, who was
sent to plead with Louis for more troops, for ships and above
all for money to satisfy the demands of Washington's soldiers.
Congress had virtually repudiated the Continental currency.
De Grasse had brought one million two hundred thousand
francs with the men and ships from San Domingo. This war
chest, Rochambeau divided with Washington, louis d'or to
louis d'or until all had been distributed.
He tells of the honors paid him and his officers and
1919.] WASHINGTON'S ASSOCIATE AT YORKTOWN 101
soldiers when he arrived m Philadelphia after the victory at
Yorktown, and he gives a spirited encounter with a pacifist
Quaker who upbraided him for following the profession of
arms. Then the splendid reception in Paris and his few quiet
years as governor of Picardy. His memoirs tell his anguish as
his country was caught in the maelstrom of revolution, and he
writes sadly to his friend at Mount Vernon. But cheerfulness
and firm reliance on the will of God are the paramount traits
of Rochambeau*s character, and throughout his life the spiritual
training received in the novitiate at Blois bears fruit in the
substantial virtues of fortitude, resignation and devotion to an
ideal. There is one splendid saying handed down by the loyal
Closen. When France danced madly in the red stream, after
she had executed her Bourbon King and his Hapsburg consort,
Rochambeau, last Marshal of France under the dynasty, gath-
ered his bewildered army and offered his services to the awful
tribunal. His old friends and aristocratic kindred reproached
him for making peace with the enemy, and hinted at unworthy
motives. Then the hero of Yorktown and of a half century of
wars, drew himself up haughtily and flinging his sword on
high, he exclaimed : *^ France ! whoever rules her, my best and
my aU."
No more graphic picture of the Conciergerie, "^that
sepulchre of horrors/' exists than the one Rochambeau has
written. Despite his endeavor to bring peace and order he
fell under suspicion, for was he not the last great general of
the Tyrant, and why was he so rewarded if he were not too a
tyrant and friend of tyrants? So he was seized in the shelter
of his chapel at the chateau on the Loire and thrown into the
dungeon. He lingered day after day while so many went to
the guillotine. FinaUy he boldly demanded of the President
of the Revolutionary tribunal a fair trial, citing his services
for France, his wounds and sacrifices and adding, as if an
incantation against that evil power : ** I invoke the name of
the great Washington as the safeguard of my honor and that
we made war together for the liberty of America." More for-
tunate than many of his companions in arms in the American
campaign, Rochambeau escaped the guillotine and returned
to his ch&teau on the Loire without the formality of a trial
or, indeed* any charges being lodged against him save the
vague one of being an aristocrat. Here he lived in retire-
102 WASHINGTON'S ASSOCIATE AT YORKTOWN [Oct.,
ment, solaced by a well beloved wife, until Napoleon called
him to become First Marshal of France under the new regime
as he had been the last under the old. Seeking a man who
would be a type of all the noblest and best in France: in the
France of Charlemagne, of the Crusades, of the troubled
Mediaeval Ages, and the stormy reaction against their influences
typified in the Terror, the aged Marshal at the Loire realized
Napoleon's idea.
No finer tribute to this good man, whose early training as a
member of the religious order founded by the warrior Saint,
Loyola, had prepared him so nobly for the duties of life, can be
found than in Napoleon's citation offering him the Grand
Commandership of the new military order of the Loyal Legion.
For this supreme honor. Napoleon's document says, he desired
a man whose martial renown was fair as the fame of France.
Such a man was the Comte de Rochambeau. He desired a
man whose life had been blameless, whose honor was un-
sullied and whose soul was lofty. Such a man was the Comte
de Rochambeau. It was thrilling praise but the days of the
Marshal were running low. He had known the depths and
shoals of fortune. He had sat with nobles of France during
the burning " Night of the Pentecost, " when freely and for the
good of the people they had renounced feudal privileges and
given up centiuy old estates. Napoleon's honors could not
have made a great appeal. His last quiet years were passed
at the ch&teau on the Loire.
A most entertaining paragraph in his memoirs tells that in
more than sixty years of military service he had never set
foot on a foreign country without a regiment at his heels, until
he went to England on a twelve days' leave to visit Lord Corn-
wallis, this sometime in the early nineteenth century. Cour-
tesy and generosity which made so large a part of his nature,
were so evident at Yorktown and in the management of the
details of the surrender, that the British general nourished
the most profound gratitude for his Gallic foe. He invited
him for a visit, and Rochambeau, happy over a holiday as a
boy of twelve, accepted the invitation. Just before the end,
Rochambeau records in his memoirs what he considered the
chief blessing heaven had sent him dm^ing his long life — the
love and devotion of his wife. " She has made my happiness
aU these years," he writes, ** as I hope I have hers by a love
1919.] WASHINGTON'S ASSOCIATE AT YORKTOWN 103
which has never wavered even for a moment." The vener-
able Marshal of France and hero of Yorktown died on May 10,
1807, in the room where he had been born, but now enriched
beyond words with trophies of his American campaign and
by the handsome portrait of Washington in Continental uni-
form painted by Charles Wilson Peale, with a dedicatory
inscription in the First Patriot's writing, "To my cherished
friend and aUy." He was buried simply in the parish cemetery
at Thord, a mile and a quarter down the Loire from the
chateau, his mausoleum occupying a commanding point on
the river. His obsequies as Marshal of France were cele-
brated simultaneously in Paris. The rare American visitor to
the tomb may read a spirited account of the Marshal's life
written by Chevalier de Boufflers. He may read also one of the
most touching of lapidary tributes, that of his wife, who sur-
vived him for more than seventeen years.
A model as admirable in his family as in his armies;
An indulgent but enlightened mind ever
Concerned with the well being of others;
An honorable and tranquil old age
Was the crown of a spotless life :
His tomb awaits me, but before I descend,
I have desired to engrave upon it
The memory of his many merits and virtues
In gratitude for more than fifty years of
Happiness.
Not all of the nation which owes so much to the man who
inspired the tender tribute his Countess has engraved in stone,
have neglected his memory. Ten years ago the Regents of
Mount Vernon sent to the cemetery at Thor6, some saplings of
the noble oaks and sycamores and maples which shade the
tomb on the Potomac. These are now full grown and are silent
guardians of the sacred place where Rochambeau has found
his well-earned rest.
flew Books^
EXPERIMENTS IN PSYCHICAL SCIENCE: LEVITATION, CON-
TACT, AND THE DIRECT VOICE, By W. J. Crawford,
D.Sc. New York : E. P. Dutton & Co. $2.00 net.
Last year a record of a series of experiments carried out by
Dr. Crawford in 1915 and 1916 for the purpose of determining
the nature and mechanism of so-called physical phenomena of
mediumship appeared under the title, The Reality of Psychic Phe-
nomena. The present volume follows as a continuation of this
work, but besides a description of additional experiments with
Miss Goligher, the Belfast medium, and a comprehensive analysis
of the total results, it also contains a chapter of questions and
answers and a chapter each on contact and direct voice phe-
nomena.
The new experiments with Miss Goligher show the same kind
of phenomena as the older — chiefly movements of or pressure on
the stance table, apparently without direct contact with the
medium, and raps conveying intelligence. To the author's mind
they serve to confirm and amplify his theory of a " psychic can-
tilever " issuing from the medium and with its protruding end
causing the phenomena.
In whole. Dr. Crawford's theory is purely hypothetical and
could be sustained, apparently, only by elimination of other pos-
sible causes of the phenomena. Of rival h3rpotheses, that of
mechanical operation on the part of the medium, whether with
or without apparatus, will necessarily lay claim to serious
consideration. In a criticism of the first series of experiments
which appeared in the July number of The Catholic World,
it was pointed out that Dr. Crawford's account lacked evidence
of necessary precautions against fraud and of sufficient control
of the medium ; the present volume fails to show an improvement
in this regard.
Dr. Crawford admits that he considers constant, painstaking
efforts to prevent fraud unwarranted. He thinks that " the true
and genuine nature of the phenomena can always be discovered by
a little investigation." But this is distinctly contrary to the ex-
periences of many distinguished investigators in the field.
Purely psychological considerations have formed a very im-
portant element in the study and investigation of mediumship in
the past. It has been found that tricks may not only be hidden
from ordinary observation, but that the subconscious activities
1919.] NEW BOOKS 105
of persons in certain psychological states will account for much
even in physical mediumship. Moreover, v^here intelligence is
conveyed, thought-transference as well as mental phenomena of
abnormal psychological states, so amply demonstrated by Janet,
Boirac, Alrutz, and others, must be taken into account. In his
later volume Dr. Crawford admits that the medium was in a state
other than the normal waking during the stances, but he con-
fesses that the psychical side of the question puzzles him, and that
he dismisses that part from consideration.
The direct voice phenomena were produced by a medium
other than Miss Goligher and occurred in a completely darkened
room. Under such conditions, as Dr. Crawford also admits, there
can be no control of the medium, who therefore is free to use
fraudulent methods.
The fact that Dr. Crawford has made use of very little exact
scientific apparatus in studying the phenomena is a source of dis-
appointment. One would have expected, for instance, attempts at
photographic reproduction of the cantilever by employment of
different sources of light.
Dr. Crawford proposes as his own opinion that discarnate
spirits manipulate the cantilever, but does not insist upon this
point as essential. There is, however, nothing in the whole series
of phenomena to suggest preternatural causation. If there were
sufficient warrant for the acceptance of the ** psychic cantilever "
theory, it would rather seem that Dr. Crawford had hit upon a
purely natural process and that he thus had dealt a severe blow to
Spiritism. For it must be admitted that whatever force produces
the phenomena, these may be occasioned at will and occur in a
perfectly constant manner according to the laws of physics. On
the other hand, the intelligence displayed gives no evidence of be-
ing supramundane, but seems rather quite unable to go beyond the
suppositions of the experimenter.
STANDING BY. War-Time Reflections in France and Flanders.
By Robert Keable. New York : E. P. Dutton & Co. $2.00 net.
It is a refreshing experience in these days of material tur-
moil and spiritual insensibility to meet with such a book as this
of Mr. Keable's, whose testimony, coming as it does from one out-
side the Church, strikes us by its rarity as well as by its truth.
The circumstances of its writing are these: Mr. Keable had been
for some years an Anglican pastor of a native parish in Basuto-
land. South Africa, and in the third year of the War went to
France as chaplain to a regiment of natives. His book, however,
possesses value not as a chronicle of wasted fields and shattered
106 NEW BOOKS [Oct.,
towns and drifting populations and all the other devastations
commonly described in war-books, but as a record of his own
spiritual reactions — ^what he thought and what he felt rather than
what he saw, and these are, indeed, magnificently out of the
ordinary.
For instance, one of the first things he noted was the popu-
larity among the men of the British Expeditionary Forces of what
he calls the Y. M. C. A. religion. He enumerates its attractions
and advantages: ** It keeps the men's spirit up; it provides them
with amusements; it offers a flavoring of religion, sufficiently
toned down so as not to hurt anyone's feelings (except those of the
Roman Catholics, who stand entirely by themselves in the view
of the army) ; and it is a thoroughly successful business concern."
But after all, he feels, whatever else it may be, this is not the
religion of Christ, and so he says : ** The whole question resolves
itself very simply, therefore, into a question as to whether you
believe Christianity to be a dogmatic, sacramental, sacerdotal re-
ligion, or whether you believe it to be a theistic system of ethics."
As to his own position in the matter the reader is left in no doubt
" Chaplains," he says, ** are an anomaly in the B. E. F. . . . The
greater part of them should be absorbed by the Y. M. C. A., and
the rest should become Roman Catholic. Not that I suppose
either will happen; we are English."
The book is overflowing with splendid and wistfully loving
tributes to the Church. It is full of thf^ most delicate spiritual in-
tuitions and of the keenest observations as, for instance, where the
author contrasts the Church of England and the Church in France :
** In a word, if religion means anything, it means the abandon-
ment of oneself to God, indifferent to appearances; and in Eng-
land, even in religion, it is improper to abandon oneself, and ap-
pearances are everything. . . . Montmartre is an Act of Faith, of
course, but there is something so abandoned and childlike about
it that it brings tears to the eyes. . . . And on any weekday probably
more people worship at Montmartre than in all the churches of
London put together. . . . And above all, Christ shows His Sacred
Heart, which is a figure so humanly simple and sentimental that
English religion is positively shocked at it."
And then there is that War-Sunday at Notre Dame which
" stands out as unforgetable. . . . Far away the mysteries of reli-
gion were being performed. I formulated to myself, for the first
time, the realization that Humanity has gathered, in Catholicism,
the Christ-story to its heart, and made of it a world religion. . . .
Once the Faith of Humanity had gripped the Christ-story, the
Love of Humanity demanded its expression. High Mass at Notre
1919.] NEW BOOKS 107
Dame is a worthy expression. It is Catholic, for everjrwhere
Humanity has striven for expression — ^in India, China, or in the
ancient world — ^it has expressed itself as here. Matins in St
Paul's, or even a sung Eucharist, is a totally different thing. It
is the congregation that is catered for in London; it is Almighty
God in Paris."
Altogether Standing By is a really extraordinary performance
and a sign of the times in which we live; it is a frank utterance
and a most touching cry from the heart of a sick generation. The
author has, indeed, a most uncommon apprehension of spiritual
truths, especially of those spiritual truths which among non-
Catholics are as a rule not so much passed over as totally unper-
ceived. This, together with his brave outspokenness, makes us
wish for his book the widest possible circle of readers.
THE CHURCH AND THE MINISTRY. By Charles Gore, D.D.
New York : Longmans, Green & Co. $6.00 net.
The first edition of this volume was published by Bishop
Gore thirty years ago. The present edition has been revised by
Mr. Cuthbert Turner, the author of the essay on the Apostolic
Succession in the recent volume of Essays on the Early History of
the Church and the Ministry. According to the author it is an
apology for what is in fact the formal or official attitude of the
Church of England — he should say of a certain party in that
church — ^towards non-episcopal bodies. ** She does not condemn
them, but she refuses to acknowledge their ministry."
When Bishop Gore resigned his bishopric some months ago
it was reported that he intended to submit to Rome. This volume
gives not the slightest indication of his having accepted the
Papal claims.
On page after page he uses the offensive terms Romanism
and Romanist; he sets aside with a wave of the hand the special
witness of St. Irenaeus to the Papacy, and proves to his own satis-
faction that St. Cyprian was a good Anglican. He speaks of the
payment of Masses and naively wonders " how frequently, and
from what opposite quarters, we meet with the identification of
Christianity with that phase of Christianity which is characteristic
of the Middle Ages." In his viewpoint authority and discipline
were needed then to win to the Church the untamed and undis-
ciplined races which were to form the material of our modern
nations. The Papal authority of today is to his mind mere im-
perialism, which has colored both church theology and church
organization.
It is amusing to find the learned bishop rebuking his fellow
108 NEW BOOKS [Oct.,
Protestant Christians for heresy and schism, while throughout
this volume he shows his utter inability to grasp the meaning of
these terms.
«
CATHOLIC TALES AND CHRISTIAN SONGS. By Dorothy Leigh
Sayers. New York: Robert M. McBride & Co. $1.00 net.
There are» as Charles Lamb long ago pointed out, books and
" wolves in books' clothing " — and we confess with no little dis-
appointment that the present volume falls, from a Catholic view-
point, into the latter class. To be sure, it is a winsome and at
moments a worshipful little wolf! That is to say, it is an effort
to reproduce the divine familiarity of the Middle Age singer —
and of the saint in every age. But while it attains the familiarity,
it usually misses the divinity. For to achieve Catholic songs, or
even to retell Catholic tales successfully, more is needed than
archaic type or ecclesiological illustration, more than Anglo-Latin
ballad forms, more than a jocose intimacy with Christ and much
more than sentimental visions of Him. What is needed is, briefly,
the Faith: Faith in the Lamb of God Who takes away the sin of
the world — in His sacraments and His Mother, and a real, if
ofttimes stormy, allegiance to His vicar upon earth. These things
made up the sum of the nearness, the intimacy of mediaeval
prayer-poems — ^an intimacy exquisitely reproduced in our own
day by Hilaire Belloc or Joyce Kilmer. Occasionally this very
Catholic consciousness is attained by one as yet outside the body
of the Church, like Gilbert Chesterton — ^perhaps because he never
jests save when very much in earnest. But by the present writer
it is not captured, and so her book will have little real appeal for
Catholic readers. Yet the poet who can achieve a religious lyric as
appealing as this opening one on Judas' kiss, may almost be
trusted to travel further up the ** narrow and green path," as one
gracious Middle English bard described it!
THE STORY OF THE RAINBOW DIVISION. By Raymond S.
Tompkins. New York: Boni & Liveright. $L60 net.
Tsnpifying and symbolizing the best ideals of American man-
hood, the Rainbow Division will live always in the hearts of the
American people whence it was drawn. When praise is given, the
diflBculty lies in making it adequate.
In this respect the author of its " Story " shows his wisdom
by letting the facts, to use a legal term, "prove themselves."
There is nothing of the exalted, the heroic about his story. It is
a human document of the doings of human beings who had no
pretensions save those of the American doughboy. As a conse-
1919.] NEW BOOKS 109
quence it is quick with the tread of the unwearied feet that crossed
unfalteringly the Ourcq, glows with the intrepidity of those
hearts that knew no dismay at La Croix Rouge Farm, inspires with
the spirit of sacrifice that carried them on at St. Mihiel, and en-
dears with the homely humor of the American soldier mingling
with the Germans in the Rhineland. The author has rendered a
rare service in thus catching up the spirit so representative of
the United States. Not merely does he record valorous
deeds, but re-creates the atmosphere in which they were per-
formed — a knowledge of which adds love to the feelings of admira-
tion and pride that have been the universal reward of this won-
derful Division.
ZIONISM AND THE FUTURE OF PALESTINE. By Morris
Jastrow, Jr., Ph.D., LL.D. New York: The Macmillan Co.
$1.25.
Dr. Jastrow of the University of Pennsylvania, while heartily
sympathizing with the effort to establish a Jewish colony in
Palestine, is strongly opposed to the reorganization of Palestine
as a Jewish state. He holds that the existence of a tiny Jewish
state, representing at the most one-tenth of all the Jews, so far
from helping to solve the Jewish Question, will only succeed in
complicating it in various directions. It will, he says, arouse the
opposition of the natives of Palestine and of the adjoining Syria
who resent being pushed to the wall; it will create hyphenated
Jews all over the world ; and it will place Jews outside of Palestine
in a position that will oblige them in self-defence to present a de-
cided attitude of opposition to their fellows who insist upon their
separate nationalism.
RHYMES WITH REASONS. By the Author of " Aunt Sarah and
the War." New York : P. J. Kenedy & Sons. 35 cents net
From the hand of Wilfrid Meynell comes this new volume
of whimsical poems, which may be said to concentrate the message
of those two rare prose volumes which preceded it — Who Goes
There and Aunt Sarah and the War. Mr. Meynell was once aptly
described by the Athenseum as " an earnest wit," and seldom has
that unique combination of qualities been more manifest than in
the present little book. It is very deft, very daring and very dis-
tinguished. Verses such as Leap Years or The Sculptor recall the
gracious and ingenious punning of the same author's Verses and
Reverses. But in Bearers of Lost Sons, A New Commandment, and
Of England: Her New Army, this pregnant and vivacious fancy is
seen playing " about the foot of the Cross "—even the cross of Eng-
110 NEW BOOKS [Oct..
land's multitudinous battlefields. High-souled and deep-hearted
then becomes the music of these modestly-labeled "rhymes" —
and vibrant with such fine compassion that lovers of the best
in our contemporary literature will lift this slim sheaf of verses
up into the company of that which must live when war is done.
Back to Wilfred Meynell himself may well be thrown the closing
apostrophe which he so finely applies to ** the soldier poets : "
O men, the doubly armed and dear of name,
Take your promotion in the ranks of Fame !
Splendid with swords you were; but with a rhyme
You dulled Death's razor-edge, and conquered Time.
SAILOR TOWN. By C. Fox Smith.
«
SMALL CRAFT. By C. Fox Smith. New York : George H. Doran
Co. $1.25 net each.
MAN-O-WAR RHYMES. By Burt Franklin Jenness. Boston:
The Cornhill Co. $1.25 net.
Sir Arthur Quiller-Couch in one of his lectures on English
composition at Cambridge University remarks on the dis-
advantage of the sea as the scene for an epic poem, since the in-
cidents that may happen on board ship are so few and the life so
restricted in movement that the poem almost necessarily grows
monotonous. We are often reminded of this fact in reading the
three books of verse before us, and though they are of course not
epics but series of short poems on various incidents connected with
life at sea, still one cannot avoid getting from them a certain
effect of monotony. There is, however, quite a difference in
quality between the first two books and the last.
The author of Sailor Town and Small Craft, though a woman,
has acquired a wide knowledge of sailors and their ways of think-
ing and talking, and she has the power to bend this knowledge to
artistic use. Her rhythmic sense is well developed, and her songs
and chanties and ballads have in consequence a lively, rollicking
swing. For the most part she follows her own lead, but so far
as she can be said to have a model it is that of a very fine artist
indeed, namely, the author of A Shropshire Lad, and in such pieces
as Gerrans Churchtown, The Prairie Shepherd, Traveller's Rest
and The Traveller she has written deftly and with restraint.
Not nearly so much can be said for the third volume, which is
a collection of pieces having to do with men in the service — ^in
the army as well as the navy. The individual poems are un-
distinquished in workmanship, and in general the author's sense
of rhythm is very defective and is constantly playing havoc with
1919.] NEW BOOKS 111
his tunes. The influence of the Barrack-Room Ballads is pre-
dominant» and most of the pieces have an unpleasantly imitative
effect.
THE PRISONERS OF MAINZ. By Alec. Waugh. Illustrated.
New York: George H. Doran Co. $2.00.
This, although it must be classed as a war-book, is a really
charming affair. The facts it sets forth are commonplace enough,
namely, the daily round in a German fortress, in which the author,
an English officer of twenty, was imprisoned with five hundred
other officers during the last eight months of the War. But the
facts are told with such buoyancy and good humor and in such
an eminently readable style that the reader is hurried along in a
wholly delightful and, in such a kind of book, far from usual
fashion.
The author has no asperities, no rancors — due partly perhaps
to the proverbial generosity of youth and partly to the fact that his
prison experiences were not so severe as those of men in other
prisons in Germany. Moreover, he has real humor. And thirdly
he wields a style of fine literary quality. But, after all, probably
the real reason he escapes the stodginess of most war-books, is
because he is content to be personal and individual and human
instead of trying to represent the collective consciousness and the
general mind of the race. It is in such broad attempts as these
that, as the author himself says, a writer " does not write what
he feels, but what he thinks he should feel. All that is genuine in
him is inarticulate, and the obvious rises to the surface." It is the
merit of the present book, and the reader's gain, that here the gen-
uine is articulate and that the obvious is resolutely kept under.
THE JOURNAL OF A DISAPPOINTED MAN. By W. N. P. Bar-
bellion. New York: George H. Doran Co. $2.00 net.
This volume is a narrative in diary form of various impres-
sions, impulses, ambitions, achievements, and disappointments
of a young Englishman named Barbellion from 1903 until just
before his death in 1917. Barbellion was a self-taught naturalist
who won a position in the Natural History Museum on his merit.
Tense nerves and precarious health seem to have been a part of
his heritage and his emotional reactions in consequence are fre-
quent and marked. He studied hard, read enormously, and in his
Journal revealed the thousand and one impressions which his
books, his studies, the theatre, music, his friends, casual glimpses
on the street or in trains, all made upon him. But while in-
trospective, Barbellion has the saving grace of self-criticism and
112 NEW BOOKS [Oct.,
thus his work has the savor of a mind fundamentally clear and
sound.
His comments on men and books are unusually fine, as, for
example, where he enjoys Hardy's poetry " for its masterfulness,
for his sheer muscular compulsion over the words and sentences."
He confesses to knowing "" what stubborn, sullen, hephaestian
beasts, words and clauses can sometimes be,*' though the reader
would not suspect it, for the volume is written in a style limpid
and graceful enough to derive from the letters of Lawrence Sterne.
The book makes an unmistakable appeal, for it invests the
minor details of life with unfailing interest and mirrors a spirit
^o glowing with romance as to suggest a kinship with Stevenson
himself. Though dying at twenty-eight, this boy had genius. Per-
haps one should say has genius, for everlastingly in the reader's
mind the question, like Banquo's ghost, refuses to down: Is the
authorship a clever literary hoax? If so, the disclosure of the
writer's identity can detract nothing from his fame, even though
he prove to be the ablest of our modern day novelists.
A HISTORY OF THE GREAT WAR. Volume IV. By Sir Arthur
Conan Doyle. New York: George H. Doran Co. $2.50 net.
In this the fourth volume of his history of the War, Sir
Arthur Conan Doyle gives with a wealth of detail the British
campaign in France and Flanders, covering all the actions of
1917 and stressing particularly the operations at Arras, Messines,
Ypres and Cambrai.
He shows at the opening of the new year, the retreat of the
Germans in the Arras-Soissons sector due to the pressure exerted
by Cough's army in the district of the Ancre, and their solidifica-
tion on the famous Hindenburg line. He then takes up the bat-
tle of Arras from April 9th to April 23d, and points out that the
objects of the Arras battle were to hold and use up as many Ger-
man divisions as possible in order to help the French offensive
which was about to start in the south. In this respect, he justi-
fies the heavy losses and the limited results. The author then
outlines the operations in the Arras sector which were of a minor
nature, but no less important than the battle of Arras. In like
manner, he treats of the battle of Messines, the fighting around
Lens, and the third battle of Ypres, which ran from July 31st to
October 3d, and which the author claims as a British victory,
although incomplete in the south. In this arduous struggle, last-
ing three and one-half months, the British took twenty-four thou-
sand prisoners and seventy-two guns, and used up no less than
seventy-eight divisions of the enemy.
191B.] NEW BOOKS tU
The volume ends with a survey of the battle of Cauibrfii in
both its phases. In his summary of the critical period of 1917,
the author states that while the French and British armies had
met with hardly a sii^e repulse, yet in spite of these results in
the west» the year was a disappointing one for the Allies, since the
Russian collapse greatly weakened their position. It clearly
showed that the year 1918 would find them confronted with .the
whole force of Germany aided by contingents of her ^lies, a^d tt^t
their only hope lay in the help that might come Irom the jUuited
States.
Sir Arthur Gonan Doyle has done much for history in thus
presenting the military phases of the War, and, in this voluine, thfi
operations that made the year 1917 a very uneasy one for tfa^
Allies. He gives a vast amount of detail yet not enougt^ to make
the recital a mere technical review of military movements. His
style is clear and entertaining which, together with the subject
matter obtained from the ofiBcial record, makes his work one of
great interest and, as a contemporary chronicle of momentous
events, of some permanent value.
THE GOVERNMENT OF RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES. By Rev.
Hector Papi, SJ. New York: P. J. Kenedy & Sons. $1.00.
The main subject of this treatise is The Government of Reli-
gious Communities iaken from the Tenth Title of the Second
Book of the Code. A preliminary chapter treats of the definition
of the religious state and the religious institute, the excellence of
the religious state, the various kinds and the organization of
religious institutes, and the rules of interpretation and precedence.
Title I. discusses the establishment and suppression of religious
institutes, houses and provinces; Title II. on the government of
religious communities, discusses the various classes of superiors,
their appointment and obligations, the duty of canonical visita-
tion, their parochial rights and duties, their honorary titles, the
duties of confessors and chaplains, the administration of tempor-
alities, and kindred questions.
THE DRAMATIC STORY OF OLD GLORY. By Samuel Abbott.
New York: Boni & Liveright $1.60.
Although not one hundred and fifty years have yet seen the
folds of the American flag waving to the breeze, there is no little
controversy on the subject of its history. Into this, however, w^
do not propose to enter. It seems strange that inaccuracies and
false statements should have crept into so plain a story. .Mr.
Abbott instances the well-known painting of Washington crossing
..^
114 NEW BOOKS [Oct,
the Delaware, which has become classic, as an example of ana-
chronisms and states apropos of the appearance of the flag in the
picture: "The Stars and Stripes on that wild night of high adven-
ture was still to be designed in a room in Philadelphia thirty miles
away" (p. 14).
To be sure, artists should be true to history in historical
scenes, but veracity is an equally desirable characteristic in our
chroniclers. The question of the flag is worth settling, now.
After 1781 the writer gets into calmer waters, and the story
is most interesting. Not always in fights on land and sea does
our flag wave, but in the ways of peace in Arctic Sea or in Africa
in the Livingstone expedition. A most interesting exploit was that
of W. F. Lynch, U.S.N., in the exploration of the Dead Sea, when
Old Glory sailed where, "The blue wave rolls nightly on deep
Galilee," descended the Jordan and swept into the Dead Sea. So
it has floated over the waters into which the Master gazed and
where His disciples ofttimes cast their nets.
Of course, those periods of history when the flag was en-
dangered, are those upon which the writer dwells, and especially
on the late War ending with " Old Glory " at Coblenz on the
Rhine. The writer concludes with an appeal to make known the
glorious achievements of the colors which began their career not
two centuries ago. The book would serve as a review of United
States history, every part of which is linked with The Dramatic
Story of Old Glory.
LIFE OF BLESSED MARGARET MARY ALACOQUE. By Sister
Mary Philip of the Bar Convent, York. London: Sands &
Co. $1.80.
The occasion of the canonization of this Saint renders the
publication of her life both suitable and timely. And this action
of the Church in this era of working for results, for success, some-
times for show, seems more than usually significant. Blessed
Margaret Mary was the saint of apparently small things, of mo-
tives, of abnegation. No matter where we fix our gaze upon her
magnificent mission we note how wonderfully God chooses the
weak things of the world to confound the strong. Shut up in an
enclosed convent, not even appreciated as able or talented by her
own; timid and shrinking among the most retiring; seeking only
humiliation and oblivion, Margaret Mary was triumphant for
the cause of her Beloved.
Her life is fortunately written by a nun — one who, knowing
intimately convent life, could enter into the views and motives of
those who thwarted and opposed, as well as those who befriended
1919.] NEW BOOKS 115
and admired the Saint. Among the former were superiors gen-
uinely anxious to do right, to serve God, yet afraid of any devia-
tion from uniformity, who desirous of making assurance doubly
sure, carefully tested her spirit, and caused her wonderful
humility and obedience to shine forth the more brilliantly. But
there were occasions, also, when the spirit of the world in the
days of Louis XIV. penetrated even into the cloister of the Visita-
tion. On the whole fervor and regular observance ruled. Yet am-
bition or rather tenacity of rank was responsible for much of the
Saint's sufferings as Novice Mistress. Her life, so full of details
of the spirit, is an impressive lesson on Our Lord's ways of seeing
and judging, and affords food for serious thought. The volume
closes with an account of the movement for the consecration of
families to the Sacred Heart, a devotion much favored by our Holy
Father and a sure source of joy and honor to the Sacred Heart of
Jesus.
OUR OWN ST. RITA. By Rev. M. J. Corcoran, O.S.A. New York:
Benziger Brothers. $L00.
The cult of St. Rita has borne an almost charmed life through-
out the centuries from 1457 to our own day. Her gentle per-
sonality, joined to the wideness of her appeal, "as girl, wife,
mother, widow, and nun," have endowed her with an attractive-
ness for the children of the Church who are led to those whose life
resembles their own — she who had lived their life, known their
sorrows, could aid them to win heaven out of the very stuff that
formed obstacles in their upward path.
This story is satisfactory, in explaining many questions con-
cerning the traditional honoring of the Saint, and the emblems
connected with her representations, but in some respects it lacks
definiteness. There are a few typographical errors which might
well be corrected in a future edition.
CANADA AT WAR. By J. Castell Hopkins. Including a Story
of Five Cities, by Robert John Renison, Chaplain Fourth
Canadian Infantry Brigade. Introduction by Sir Robert Bor-
den. New York: George H. Doran Co. $5.00.
Nothing could be more perfunctory than Sir Robert Borden's
preface to this large and important work. The magnificent
achievements of citizen-soldiers, the majority of whom had never
seen a shot fired in anger, would almost unloose the tongues of
the dumb. But the Prime Minister's inspiration runs dry at the
end of a few soulless, platitudinous sentences. Nescis, mi fili,
qnantilla sapientia homines reguntur.
116 NEW BOOKS [Oct,
The book itself is a full and painstaking compilation of Ca-
nadian deeds and heroism. The whole effort of the Dominion is
passed in review, from the very outbreak of hostilities to the close.
The Homeric battles in which the Canadians covered themselves
with glory — ^Amiens, Arras, Cambrai, Valenciennes — are graph-
ically described in the words of eye-witnesses. Numerous photo-
graphs enhance the value and interest of the work. A reviewer,
whose tastes are mainly literary, observes one omission — there is
ho chapter devoted to the literary productions of the War, to the
songs, poems, tales, vignettes that war conditions suggested to
Canadian writers. Such a chapter still remains to be written and
is weir worth writing. For it will record results, less tangible
perhaps, but less perishable also, than trenches captured and
towns re-won.
SBLF-«OVERNMENT IN THE PHILIPPINES. By Maximo M.
Kalaw. New York: The Century Co. $1.50.
This volume contains a record equally honorable to the peo-
ple of the United States and the Filipinos. The conquerors under-
took to train their vassals in self-government, and the latter wisely
permitted themselves to be so trained. The result is mutual re-
spect and esteem, and the advancement of the Filipinos in cul-
ture, prosperity and happiness. Mr. Kalaw singles out for special
encomium the late Representative William Jones of Virginia, and
Governor Harrison as particularly helpful and sympathetic
towards his fellow-countrymen. The archipelago has prospered
marvelously under American rule. Education has been extended,
philanthropy increased, the civilization of the non-Christian tribes
notably advanced. Withal taxation is light, and the national debt
less than three dollars per capita. In these days of colossal
expenditures and unbridled extravagance, such a bagatelle is not
worth notice.
CRUCIBLB ISLAND. By Cond£ B. Pallen. New York: The Man-
hattanville Press. $1.00.
This is described in the sub-title as '*A Romance, An Ad-
venture, and An Experiment,*' and it belongs to the ever-growing
body of Utopian literature, of which Sir Thomas More is the
progenitor in modern times, though it goes back to Plato, if one is
curious in searching out origins. Bellamy's Looking Backward is
the chief modern success in this difficult field of the fictional pre-
sientment of ideas and ideals in conditions supposed to be appro-
priate; though H. G. Wells is probably the name most commonly
thought of in connection with literary Utopias. Dr. Pallen's con-
1«19.] NEW BOOKS 117
fribotioii to the subject is a notable one. It contains a story which
would make a thrilling ** movie," and at the same time it deserves
its title of The Crucible through the way in which it exhibits the
workiug out of philosophical ideas to their logical ultimates, with
the certainty (and much of the explosiveness!) of chemicals in
combination. The ideas he employs are mainly those of ** pure **
Socialism — ^the same which are now rending and blasting that
vaster crucible which is Russia. Crucible Island is a place set
apart by the governments of the world as a prison for Socialists,
in which, however, they are permitted full liberty to run a Socia-
list State of their own. The story describes the great success
the exiles make of their experiment — a success, however, which is
the most awful and tragic failure to poor Mina and Carl, the lovers
of the tale, when the State-mating bureau of the island destroys
their dream of personal love, and condemns Mina to be an item of
the anon3anous motherhood system which is set forth as the logical
result of Socialistic ideas, abolishing the private family. How the
lovers escape after adventurous and most interesting chapters
which describe the Socialistic workings of Crucible Island, make
up a book which fully justifies its sub-title.
WOODEN SPOIL. By Victor Rousseau. New York: George H.
Doran Co. $1.50.
This odd title refers to property in Canadian timber, inherited
by Hilary Askew from his uncle who, living in Massachusetts, has
been steadily and systematically defrauded by those to whom he
intrusted his business interests in Quebec. Hilary discovers this
rascality soon after he arrives upon the scene to take personal
charge of his affairs ; and he at once enters upon a desperate strug-
gle for his rights against powerful and unscrupulous enemies.
The opening chapters are full of animation and humor, and
give the reader well grounded expectations of a story wherein
keen wits and cool, daring action triumph over treachery and cun-
ning. He soon finds, however, that in depicting an energetic fist-
fight the book's jacket conveys the spirit of the content with un-
usual accuracy. Undoubtedly, physical violence is sometimes ap-
propriate and necessary, but few of us share Mr. Rousseau's ap-
parent fhithln it as the supreme remedy of universal applicability.
The attention wanders while the author lingers relishingly upon
the details of these encounters, nor is there any edification gained
when he shows us Father Lucien, the curi, resorting to singlestick
in order to stop the drink habit among his people, beating the prin-
cipal offender into submission, and promising to *' break the head
of every man who has brandy in his house.'*
118 NEW BOOKS [Oct,
There is a love-story, but its heroine is uninteresting, as is
the case with most of the many characters. The plot moves along
traditional lines; nowhere is there any effect of novelty. Mr.
Rousseau's paucity of inventiveness is regrettable, for he has given
to his work a literary quality above the average, as is shown in
some of the dialogue and in the really delightful descriptions of
Canadian scenery.
HERITAGE. By V. Sackville West. New York 1 George H. Doran
Co. $1.50 net.
Heritage will probably attract considerable attention, since
artistically it stands immeasurably above the great mass of con-
temporary writing. Nor is it altogether the usual blatant exagger-
ation for the publishers to compare the book, as they do on the
jacket, to the work of Conrad and to Wuthering Heights, although,
to be sure, it has neither the imaginative glow and solidity of
the one, nor the intense passion and tragic gloom of the other.
Rawdon Westmacott, indeed, is very far from being another Heath-
cliff, on whom he is obviously modeled, nor has Malory the brood-
ing imagination and subtlety of his prototype Marlow in Conrad's
Lord Jim; but there is nevertheless enough original power and
artistry here to bear up even under these high comparisons.
Despite its splendid qualities, however, or rather because of
them — since the finer the edge, the deeper the wound — the present
novel must be considered anything but healthful reading. Not for
the ordinary reasons of decadence or suggestiveness, for from both
of these the book is free, but because of its total lack of an actu-
ating moral principle. This, in fact, is the book's great defect
simply on artistic grounds, since even a work avowedly pagan in
ethics, must, when it deals with man, take into account the moral
order of the universe in which man moves and has his being.
In this connection we are inevitably reminded of such similar,
and yet such dissimilar works as Tess of the D'Ubervilles, Wuth-
ering Heights, and Lord Jim. Beside these, with their final deep
note of tragedy, the present book seems tawdry and thin. In-
stinct and not principle is the law which governs the characters
in Heritage, but it is an instinct arbitrary and unreal. The book
is a more or less glorified plea for naturalism, but it is a natural-
ism which refuses to work on natural lines. That is an old pro-
verb which says that you cannot eat your cake and have it too,
and a still older one, which tells us, what are the wages of sin.
In such ancient saws Mr. West apparently places no credit, and
chooses rather to enroll himself among those to whom the Spanish
proverb ironically refers as those who are •'wiser than the wise.**
1919.] NEW BOOKS 119
FLEXIBLE FERDINAND. By Julie M. Lippmann. New York:
George H. Doran Co. $1.50 net.
Flexible Ferdinand has the reputation of being " soft," and
"yielding," but in reality he is a goodhearted boy, full of char-
acter, that prompts him to take upon himself all the cares of a
family already on the road to dissolution. We are introduced to
him at the age of seven, and leave him a succe^.i,^ul surgeon —
against his will — ^with aspirations for an arti ^career. The
characters of the story are well drawn — ^the hardworking actress
mother, the unsuccessful, despondent father, the utterly selfish
elder brother, the ambitious sister, and above all the wonderful
nurse, Matilda, who reminds one of Martha in Martha bg the Dag,
one of Miss Lippmann's most successful plays. The war theme is
introduced on account of its popular appeal, and we leave Ferdi-
nand about to start for the front after a long and strenuous woo-
ing of his most attractive sweetheart. The story is clean, well
written, and remarkable chiefly^ as a study in character.
THE WORDS OF LIFE. A Handbook of Explanations for Those
Seeking Knowledge of the Catholic Faith. By C. C. Martin-
dale, SJ. New York: P. J. Kenedy & Sons. 60 cents net.
The sub-title of this little book of only fifty-eight small pages
describes its contents but gives no adequate idea of its value. It
is sure to prove a veritable boon to all those who have to do with
the instruction of converts or are thrown among those seeking
light. As the author tells us in a pre-note, the work is not in-
tended to take the place of the Catechism, nor is it a complete in-
struction book, but rather a skeleton outline of Catholic belief into
which an inquirer can fit each new truth as he comes into posses-
sion of it. The practical value of the work is increased by being
produced in two forms: one strongly bound to be kept intact; the
other with detachable leaves which may be torn off and given to
the convert or inquirer as needed and afterwards discarded. It
will prove a very desirable book for free distribution at non-Catho-
lic missions.
HIDDEN TREASURE. By John Thomas Simpson. Philadelphia:
J. B. Lippincott Co. $1.50 net.
It is not a tale of adventure on the order of Treasure Island,
that we have here, but a story of modern farming. Bob Williams,
a lad of eighteen, comes as chore boy to his uncle's farm. He has
initiative, quick wits, and some knowledge of new and better farm-
ing methods than those he finds in use upon his arrival. His un-
cle gradually yields to the persuasions of his enterprising nephew,
120 NEW BOOKS [Oct,
and such improvements as reclaiming rich acreage iiy draini^ and
plowing by tractor, transform the run-down farm, drawing forth
its " hidden treasure " of productiveness and putting it on a well-
paying basis.
Like others of its class issued by the lippincott Compan|r»
the book is thoroughly practical. The story is negUgiUe» but
serves the purpose of imparting valuable bits ot knowledge chat-
tily, and to d.,^^^strate to boys and girls that farm work nuqr be
made more easy and more profitable than work in the cities. It is
inexplicable that Mr. Simpson, addressing a young audience,
should have introduced an incident making light of Sunday cdi-
servance.
IN Preparation for Marriage, Rev. J. A. McHugh, OJP. (New
York: Benziger Brothers. 60 cents net), gathers together for
the use of the clergy the laws of the Church that have refer-
ence to the preparation of couples for marriage. In ten brief
chapters the author discusses the necessity of inquiring about the
fitness of the parties to contract marriage, formal and informal
engagements, the civil requirements, residence, impediments, dis-
pensations, the publication of bans, the knowledge necesfiiary for
the reception of the sacrament of matrimony.
This little manual is valuable both to the newly ordained
priest and to the laity contemplating marriage.
r[E appeal of the epic poet will never be as wide as that of
the dramatic, yet lovers of Milton will be fateful to Allan
H. Gilbert, Ph. D., for A Geographical Dictionary of Milton (New
Haven: Yale University Press). His pages reveal the astonishing
number of places Milton touched upon in his works, and his
intimate knowledge of geographical subjects. His inquiring mind
assimilated, not only the science as then knowiu but also con-
temporary publications illuminating the travels of the period.
r[E American Book 0>., New York, publishes an Introductory
and Secondary Course of New Modern Illustrative Bookkeep-
ing, by Chas. F. Rittenhouse, C.P.A. ($1.20 each), which introduces
the subject by the account method much favored by the best teach-
ers in this department of mathematics and by accountants in prac-
tical bookkeeping. The exercises are reproduced from accounts
of daily business life, the price lists being real business documents.
The Examinations, the Questions and Reviews are abundant, and
the Bookkeeping Accounts are written up in neat script by JSdward
C. Mills.
t9».] NEW BOOKS 121
ESSENTIALS OF SPELLING, by H. C Pearson and H. Suzzallo
(New York: American Book Co.) ; makes the study of spelling
more the work of understanding and less of memory, while giving
fnlt wef^t to the fact that much depends on visualizing of words.
The page of diacritical marks is very succinctly and clearly put.
A knowledge of the alphabet is declared necessary for consulting
a ifictionary, yet it is nowhere given. Where, then, is the place
for an alphabet?
A CATHOLIC SOCIAL PLATFORM, by Rev. Joseph Husslein,
SJ., Ph.D. (New York: P. J. Kenedy & Sons, $2.50 per 100),
** based on the oflBcial pronouncements of the Holy See and of the
Catholic prelates of various countries . . . places Catholics in the
van of social progress." It merits careful reading and practical
application.
TWO other pamphlets whose content is vital to all hopeful so-
cial reconstruction are those of the Catholic Social Guild of
London, published by The B. Herder Book Company (St. Louis,
15 cents each). Questions of the Day, by Rev. Joseph Keating,
SJ., and Dom Anselm Parker, O.S.B., treats pithily and suc-
dnetly the great social problems and their Christian solution. The
Gospel and The Citizen, by C. C. Martindale, S.J., goes a step far-
ther and higher in indicating " the social implications of the Gos-
pel *' as a guide and incentive to make Faith bear directly " upon
human life at large and the various departments of social ideal
and conduct .**
A BOOKLET to be highly recommended to schools and all
teachers is The Objective Teaching of the Holy Sacrifice of
The MiBSS, by the Asters of St Joseph of Philadelphia (Phila-
delphia: The Dolphin Press, 25 cents). The most approved
modern methods are here applied to familiarize the child with the
Saered Liturgy and to arouse devotion of a solid order. The les-
sons are arranged according to grade. The booklet also contains
a useful bibliography with many beautiful extracts from writings
on the Mass and explicit instructions how to follow Mass.
IN The Ee^entids of Spiritual Unity, Ronald Knox (London:
GathoHc Truth Society. Sixpence), indicates the route by which
he traveled to arrive at '* the idea of the Catholic Church.*' It will
prove interesting t« those en route as welt as to those within the
fold of the One True Church.
122 NEW BOOKS [Oct..
FOREIGN PUBLICATIONS.
Among the new books from the Librarie T6qiii are the following:
Canon L4on Duflot's Apologitique Chritienne: La Riuilation,
VEglise. (4 /r.) Professor of Philosophy for nine years, of Apologetics
for eight years, afterwards Moderator of Higher Criticism for a distin-
guished audience for which he had prepared excellent notes on Apolo-
getics, Canon Duflot was well prepared to give a serious, clear, well
arranged, and well distributed Manual on the delicate matters neces-
sarily touched upon in a course of Apologetics.
Of the two parts which make up this work, La Rivilation and
VEglise Catholique, the newest and most profound is certainly the
latter. To form an idea of the importance and the influence of this
second part, it will be sufficient to underline the following titles: The
Constitution of the Church; The Church a Necessary Society; The
Magisterium of the Church; The Legislative, Coersitive and Judiciary
Powers of the Church; The Church and the State; The Church and
Civilization.
Throughout we find ourselves in the presence of profound thou^t
and of sure doctrine, drawn from the very best sources.
La Sainte Eucharistie, by Abb6 Jean Ramel. (3 fr. 50). During
the course of forty years missionary work, in Norway and in France,
the Abb6 Ramel was called upon many times to explain the beautiful
and great subject of the Holy Eucharist, from a dogmatic, moral, and
liturgical viewpoint. Having arrived at the end of his career, when
his weakened forces disabled him for preaching, he has continued his
apostleship by means of the pen, hence the book which he now pub-
lishes.
The eighteen chapters contain all the Catholic Doctrine of the
Real Presence, the Mass, and Holy Communion, explained with exact-
ness and piety, in a clear and simple style, based upon Holy Scriptures,
the Fathers of the Church, the most recent decisions of the Roman
Congregations, the opinions of the best theologians, and illustrated
with numerous and interesting narratives of Eucharistie miracles.
This work will be found serviceable to the preacher, the con-
fessor, and the faithful.
La France, les AUUs ef VAUemagne Devant la Doctrine Chritienne,
by Monsignor Chapon (2 fr. 60) ; and Le Renouveau Catholique: Les
Jeunes Avant la Guerre (3 fr. 50), by Abb6 Rouzic, will be chiefly inter-
esting for French readers.
From the Librarie Gabriel Beauchesne we have:
Volumes XIH. and XJV. of the Dictionnaire Apologitique de la Foi
Catholique, edited by the Abb6 A. d'Al^s, containing articles on Ecclesi-
astical Law; Loretta; Father Loriquet; Louis XVI.; Lourdes; Magic
and Magianism; Mahomet; Marriage and Divorce; Mary, Mother of
God; Mariolatry; Martyrdom; Materialism; Millennium; Miracles; The
Religion of Mithra and Modernism by capable scholars.
IRecent iBventa.
Russia, as the radiating centre of Bolshe-
Russia. vism and the philosophy of social unrest,
still holds the -wondering attention of the
-world. According to trustSn^orthy information the genesis of the
present iK>licy of the Soviet Government at Petrograd has been as
follows :
At the beginning of the year (1919) that policy took a sudden
change when Lenine and his associates decided to abandon their
terrorist methods and their plan for immediate socialization. For
the first month of the year a moderate programme was carried out,
the object at this time being to make peace first and later re-
organize the country and put communism in force. While deter-
mined to keep the power in its own hands, the Bolshevist gov-
ernment endeavored at home to obtain, as far as possible, the co-
operation of the Russian parties that were opposing it; to have the
latter cease hostilities on condition that their present territory
were left to them. The Government itself agreed, in turn, to cease
agitation in other countries.
This policy of the Moderates, however, failed to secure the
longed-for peace, and it was then that the Bolshevists turned to
Peters and Dershinsky (two of the leading Red commissioners),
whose extreme policy it is to make no peace until Europe and the
world are bolshevized. A majority of the Soviets joined this move-
ment, and for the last three months they have been the real gov-
ernment, with only nominal power in the hands of Lenine and
the other people's commissaries. Latest reports indicate that the
Bolsheviki, feeling they have not succeeded in Europe, intend to
develop their propaganda in an easterly direction, with Asia as its
special object. The ground for such propaganda in the East is
apparently well prepared, as China since 1900 has been in a state
of unrest, and the civil strife between southern and northern
China could be used to advantage by the Bolsheviki.
In furtherance of this campaign the chief of the department
at the Bolshevist foreign office in Moscow recently assured a meet-
ing of Chinese that in a short time hundreds of thousands of copies
of a pamphlet printed in Chinese would be distributed in China,
telling the people that victorious Bolshevist troops had occupied
Siberia and intended to march into China and throw out all the
foreigners. The governments of both north and south China
have been invited to institute official relations with the Lenine
124 RECENT EVENTS [Oct.,
Government. In dispatches, Chinese detachments have already
been reported among the Red forces.
Strenuous efforts are being made also to produce anti-foreign
outbreaks in Persia* where Foreign Minister Tschitcherin is per-
sonally in charge of the propaganda campaign. Moreover, India
and Afghanistan, which at the present time are in a serious state
of unrest, offer a fertile field for the spread of Bolshevism. De-
velopments towards the East, therefore, may be looked for in the
next three months, if the present Bolshevist Government still
continues in power, which, in turn, is contingent on the mUittty
situation.
Politically, therefore, the Bolshevists seem to feel that thcfy
have been definitely checked in Europe, a conclusion strengthened
by the fact that at present their doctrines are opposed from vari-
ous motives and in various degrees, by the neighboring States of
Poland, Esthonia, Finland, Letvia, Lithuania, Germany, Czecho-
slovakia, Rumania, Hungary, and Austria, many of which have
troops in the field cooperating with the All-Ru&sian forces of Ad-
miral Kolchak ; while in Russia itself they are facing the armies of
Siberia, Ukrainia and the Ural Cossacks.
With certain of the neighboring States, named above as
opposed to Bolshevist doctrines, peace negotiations have been in
progress for the last several weeks between the Bolshevist Gov-
ernment and those of Letvia, Lithuania, and Esthonia, and accord-
ing to a late but unconfirmed report have been concluded. Estho-
nia's decision to enter into negotiations seems to have been
prompted by distrust of the army and the protests of the Esthonian
workers against the continuance of the War. The Bolshevik en-
voys, according to an English correspondent, " have offered to
recognize Esthonian independence and the inviolability of racial
boundaries, and restore Esthonian property. But it is stipulated
that Esthonia shall not become a base for the enemies of the Bol-
sheviki." Similar proposals have apparently been made also to
Letvia and Lithuania.
Turning to military operations we find matters in a h|ghly
confused state, and because of conflicting reports it is difficult to
visualize the general situation. Roughly speaking, the southern
anti-Bolshevik forces under General Denikin have continued their
successful advance. The forces of Admiral Kolchak in Siberia
and the north, after falling steadily back to a line several hun-
dred miles west of Omsk, at last made a stand, and on the first of
September began a counter-offensive, which so far has met with
success. Latest reports are to the effect tl^t he has broken the
Bolshevik front in three places and threateiis to outflank the Bol-
EVENTS 127
"^ Ika IpIIowing : Section I. declares
^^^^ sovereignty being based
' o^ legislative rights, but
' idual States. Each
''slative elected
men and
•nal As-
tie Presi-
will hold
r or peace
reaties with
csentatives of
L)eing based on
rths of the total
>sia's votes must
omposition of the
. twenty-flve votes;
vViirttemberg, three;
I ties, coupled. Judges
for life and cannot be
nt provides that all Ger-
id that men and women
and duties. Preferential
position are removed, and
ily part of a person's name.
i no tokens of honor may be
ocepted from a foreign State.
lily of Life" the Constitution
s the basis of family life and
it is, therefore, under the special
on the basis of equality of the
all be placed under the same bodily,
s as legitimate ones, and youth must
itual, and physical neglect.
istitution declares that all citizens of
.)Iete freedom of belief and conscience.
id religion plays no part in citizenship.
must be universal attendance at sdiool
irs, and that pupils must attend advanced
years. It will not be necessary to pay
vvill be given needy pupils and their families*
exist only with government permission.
128 RECENT EVENTS [Oct..
Stitccf ate tfdbption of the Constitution, President Eberf hUs
tdken tbe oat& as Imperial President. He has also withdrawn the
deeree whieh designates the Assembly as the "Reichstag** in
difference to protests from the Assembly.
To one feature of the new Constitution the Allies took strong
ettiepUoti, and on September 2d the Supreme Council of the Peace
Gonfei^ence issued an ultimatum demanding its amendment. The
^^ole matter turns about the ultimate union of Germany and
Gefman Austria which appears to be provided for in Articte
Sitty-one of the new German Constitution. This clause, which
acicording to the Allies categorically violates the Treaty of Ver-
sailles, reads substantially as follows :
'* German Austria vdll receive, after annexation to the Ger-
ttvan empire, the right to send to the German Reichstag a number
€t deputies corresponding to the population, and meanwhile said
deputies will have a consultative voice.*'
The German reply to the Allied ultimatum on this point has
been considered unsatisfactory. Definite assurances will be re-
quired of the Germans.
The disturbances in Silesia seem to be due partly to Sparta-
clde propaganda on one side and partly to the provocative attitude
of the German authorities on the other, which has caused insur-
rection among the Poles. The situation thus resolved itself into
k three-cornered fight between the Spartacans, Poles and Germans,
trfaich involved the mining districts and makes more acute the
6oal shortage in Ceiitral Europe. In consequence of these troubles
the Pcdish delegates broke off negotiations which had been going
on in Berlin relative to a plebiscite over the ultimate frontier be-
tween Germany and Poland. Following fierce engagements be-
tween insurgents and Berlin troops, the German authorities de-
dared martial law. Though the insurrection in upper Silesia
spread rapidly in the industrial sections, the German military
authorities declared they had the situation in hand.
Later at a conference of the German Government and the
Polish Mission, the following resolutions were passed: first, the
Germans will refrain from further executions; second, the Inter-
Allied Mission shall start for upper Silesia; third, the Polish Mis-
sion how in Berlin will go td Warsaw and remain there until the
fttter-AIlied Commission has made a report. The functions of
the Commission are limited to those of an investigating board that
shall r^ort t6 the Peace Conference at Paris. Sporadic fighting
is in progress still in many sections of the cotmtry. The Suprlfme
Cbuncil of th^ Peace Conference has discussiid the question of
semfitig troops to Silesia in case th^ Germans are willing to permit
tm.] RECENT EVENTS 129
kfreigH troops to enter the district for police purposes before the
Pcac* Treaty has bieen ratified. - The general impression in Con-
ference circles is that the Germans will consent, because of the
larger property interests involted.
A Inuch mor^ disquieting situation is that provided by the
Refusal of the German troops under General Von der Goltz, to
evacuate the Baltic provinces, as ordered by the Peace Conference.
I^e German Government has addressed a note to the Entente
P(}i>wers, saying it is not in a position to compel the obedience of
ib)j troops by military means, and that "'as a result of the ex-
tni^I^ely excited feeling among the troops, it is impossible now to
pre0i4>are a plan of evacuation and return the troops to the
lid It has not become clear at this writing just what is the pur-
pojfe^ { of these troops whose numbers have been estimated as high
ks eire^lghty thousand men. Many profess to see in it an inter-
Hfltichic^i^al conspiracy headed by General Von der Goltz and Russian
noli) ^s of German origin, aiming at the establishment of a new
(SerCro^an-Baltic state as the base of operations against Moscow.
17 Sjt^eir headquarters are Mitau in Courland. That the army is de-
' AeTTnitied to remain in the Baltic region is shown by the attempt
of the soldiers to become citizens of the newly established re-
publics of Letvia, Esthonta, and others, thus evading the Allies*
orders that the " German '* forces should be withdrawn. When
tliis attempt at citizenship and a local landwehr failed, and orders
for evacuation were actually received from Weimar, the troops
abandoned pretence and declared that, orders or no orders, they
would remain. In face of this resolution the German authorities
at home so far seem helpless.
Von der Goltz is reported to have promised land in Letvia to
the troops uiider his command, and much bitterness has been
caused by the refusal of the Lettish government to grant Lettish
citizenship to German soldiers. The opposition of the Germans to
evacuating the country was also reported to be the result of the
attempt of the Letvian government, headed by Karl Ullman, to
cooperate with the British forces in that region in expelling all the
Baltic barons, who are chiefly of German extraction, and other
Germahs in order to breilk tip the strong German influence in the
former Baltic provinces and to " frustrate the coming alliance be-
tween (lermany and Russia." Well-informed critics are of
dpijiion that Germany intends to try for a league of nations, hop-
ing for the adherence of Russia, Austria and Hungary, and later
df I{afy» Japan, and the smaller nations dissatisfied with the t'aris
Coiif^rMoe.
130 RECENT EVENTS [Oct.,
As a result of instructions sent to him by
Hungary. the Supreme Council of the Allies to the
effect that he must leave the Hungarian
Government in the interest of European peace. Archduke Joseph
withdrew late last month as dictator of Hungary. Stephan.
Friedrich, Hungarian Premier during the short regime of the|
Archduke, has since formed a new Cabinet in which besides tho
Premiership he assumes the post of Minister of the Interior!
The Cabinet decided that elections should be held about September
20th, and the Premier is to consult the Entente Commissions we-
garding their carrying out. I
News dispatches from Budapest and editorial comment#. in
Hungarian newspapers very generally express the belief l^hat
events in Hungary presage a return to the monarchical fori^n of
government. Elements favoring a political and economic it^^nion
between Rumania and Hungary are said to have been very a^ ctive
in Budapest, and it seems that Hungarian politicians are fia^oni-
pletely under Rumanian influence. Color is lent to these rui^^ors
by the report from Vienna that Premier Friedrich has sei^ it a
Hungarian delegation to Bucharest. Besides being empower «ed
to negotiate a separate peace with Rumania, the delgation appah. *-
ently may discuss the eventual union of Hungary and Rumania. -
Premier Friedrich's position, however, is by no means assured
and the next turn of events is problematical. All the members
of a proposed new Cabinet to succeed the ministry of Herr Fried-
rich have been summoned to Budapest by telegraph, giving rise
to a report that an agreement has been reached with the Paris
Peace Conference authorities. On the other hand Premier Fried-
rich is said to have extended his original stipulations as to his
retirement and now makes his withdrawal contingent upon a
guarantee by the Allies that Hungary shall receive money, food,
and raw materials. That the present Cabinet is in a very waver-
ing state is certain, and the formation of a new Cabinet may
shortly be looked for — an event which the Peace Conference will
greet with relief, as the Hungarian Peace Treaty has been ready for
presentation for some time, but no one has come for it.
Latest reports are to the effect that the Rumanian army,
which has been in control of affairs in Budapest and has held on
to that control despite urgent protests from the Supreme Council
of the Peace Conference, has begun to withdraw, a steady move-
ment of trains being in progress. It is believed that the retirement
will be completed within the next fortnight. It is also reported,
however, that the Rumanians have begun the evacuation of Hun-
garian territory without leaving behind any organized poHce»
1919.] RECENT EVENTS 131
and under conditions presenting great dangers of disorder. It is
intimated that the Rumanians hope that, after their withdrawal*
the disorders will be such that they will be asked to return.
After three months of negotiation between
Austria. the Austrian Republic and the Allied and
associated Powers, the Austrian Peace
Treaty was finally signed on September 10th. Under the terms of
the Treaty the former provinces of Bohemia and Moravia and a
part of the duchy of Teschen now form the Republic of Czecho-
slovakia. The rest of Teschen and most of Galicia have been in-
corporated into Poland. The new Ukrainian Republic takes cer^
tain sections in Eastern Galicia and the former Austrian crown-
land of Bukowina. Hungary has separated from Austria along
the historic boundary between those portions of the former em-
pire, but has herself lost parts of the province of Transylvania
which have been awarded to Rumania.
On the south the provinces of Carinthia, Dalmatia, Carniola,
Croatia and Slavonia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as parts of
Styria, are formed, in conjunction with Serbia, into the new
Jugo-Slav kingdom. Parts of Tyrol are taken over by Italy, the
boundaries of which are also extended so as to include most of
the Istrian Peninsula and a strip along the western frontier of the
province of Carinthia. All, therefore, that remains of the former
empire is what is known as German Austria, including Upper and
Lower Austria and parts of Styria and Tyrol. Since the close of
hostilities there has been a movement afoot to annex Austria to
Germany. By one of the most important clauses of the Treaty
this is forbidden.
The Treaty does not stipulate an exact sum to be paid in in-
demnities, but this amount will be fixed by the Reparations Com-
mission on or before May 1, 1921, and payments are to extend over
a period of thirty years. This sum must be paid by the Austrian
Republic and is not to be apportioned among the component parts
A of the country which have been declared independent. In ad-
dition to paying indemnities Austria must also replace, ton for
I ton, all ships lost by the Allies through the activities of the Aus-
trian navy during the War and physically restore invaded area.
Austria's army is reduced to thirty thousand on a purely volun-
tary basis, and the entire Austrian naval fleet is to be handed
over to the Allies, all warships under construction to be broken
up and the salvage used only for industrial purposes.
By a covering letter which accompanied the Treaty the Allies
' set forth the great responsibility of Austria, which therefore can-
■
I •
132 RECENT EVENTS [Qct..
not obtain the same treatment as Czecho-Slovakia and Jilgo-
Slavia, but in view of the small expanse of its territory, promised
to give her economic and financial aid in order ,to .assure her pos-
sibilities of existence. No such assistance from the Allies, how-
ever, has apparently yet been given, and since the signing of the
Treaty, Austria has drifted toward an internal situation almost
chaotic.
Demands are being made for a strong central .government
that can weld the country into a more harmonious national whole.
At present, apparently, each region or district is for itself and all
of them against Vienna. The basis of the trouble seems to be
largely two-fold — the <rontinued decrease in the value of the
crown and fear of famine. The central government thus far
seems to have been unable to cope with either. Recently all vis-
itors were expelled from rural and summer resort regions by a
decree of the provincial governments, and, in some instances, of
the village authorities, all in contravention of the State laws.
Furthermore, in upper Austria, Which is the granary of the em-
pire, the farmers and district officials have decided that all :grain
shall be milled and stored in the districts where grown, and none
exported to Vienna or other parts of the State. This would jnean
actual starvation for the cities and less favored regions of lower
Austria. In its effort to cope with the food and fuel conditions
which threaten the country, the central government has just
issued a decree expelling from the country all persons not legally
residents. This decree, which becomes effective on September
20th, affects principally a large number of Galicians and those
Hungarians who remained after they were ordered to leave the
country by a former decree.
The outstanding feature of the situation in
Rumania. Rumania over and above the recent with-
drawal of its armies from Hungarian soil,
is its continued firm opposition to the Austrian Treaty. The basis
of this opx>osition is the refusal of the Supreme Council of the
Peace Conference to grant Rumania the privilege of making reser-
vations in connection with the rights of minorities in territorjeji
detached from the former Austrian empire, as provided for. in the
Peace Treaty. The Rumanians point out that by royal decrees
which will be approved by the new Chamber of Deputies elected
in September, minorities not only in the new territory .attached
to Rumania, but in the old kingdom, have been more an^ply pro-
tected than the Peace Treaty provides. Rumania, however, .^does
not desire to have forced upon her, so it is said, ,provisiQns which
1919.] RECENT EVENTS J33
it is feared would be interpreted by the minorities as giving them
really the upper hand.
In old Rumania, it is said, the Jews have been given full
citizenship, while in new Rumania measures have been taken to
give ample protection to the Germans in Transylvania and to tl^
other nationalities of the annexed districts. If the same meas-
ures were imposed by treaty, instead of being freely taken by ibe
Rumanians, the minorities would be likely, in the opinion of the
Rumanian authorities, to taunt them with the fact that they
were (d^liged to do so. A spirit of opposition and rebellion
instead of harmony would be favored, the Rumanians say, by
placing Rumania under obligation to third parties in her rela-
tions to minorities.
The Rumanian Cabinet has also refused to accept the de-
cision of the Peace Conference relative to the division of the
Banat between Rumania and Serbia, and as a result Serbia is
reported to be considering the general mobilization of her army.
Banat is a province in southeastern Hungary, between Rumania
and the western part of Serbia, which the Peace Conference in
May decided to divide between the last two countries, ^viiig the
eastern part to Rumania and the western part to Serbia; Although
the Rumanians were aUotted the larger share, they protested vigor-
ously against the decision, appealing to the Treaty of 1916, con-
cluded at the time Rumania entered the War. By the terms of
this pact, Rumania was to receive the whole of the region. Pre-
mier Bratiano of Rumania withdrew from the Peace Conference
several months ago as a protest against the decisions of the
Supreme Council on the disposition of the Banat and on methods
of protection of racial minorities in the small countries of eastern
and southeastern Europe. Rumanian troops occupied Temesvar,
the capital of the Banat, in the course of their recent advance
into Hungary.
An election of a new House of Deputies was set for Septem-
ber, and several weeks ago Premier Bratiano declared that in
spite of his desire to retire before the elections, he had decided
to retain office in order to take personal responsibility for not
signing the Treaty of peace for Rumania. The latest dispatches,
however, announce the resignation of the Rumanian Cabinet,
headed by Premier Bratiano ;*biit-vrtietfaer -this is due to failure of
support on the part of the country in Bratiano*s firm stand against
the Treaty or is merely a form of procedure contingent on the
election of the new House of Deputies, is not clear. From previ-
ous intimation as to the general feeling of Rumania, the latter
would seem to be the case.
134 RECENT EVENTS [Oct..
A dramatic raid on Fiume by a force of
Italy. volunteers from the Italian army led by
the soldier-poet Gabriele d'Annunzio/ has
been the chief event in Italy in the last few weeks. It is easy,
however, to exaggerate the facts, which actually seem to be as
follows : Ever since the Fiume issue became acute at the Versailles
Conference, d'Annunzio has been agitating vehemently in behalf
of Italy's claim to the city. As a result there were serious clashes
between French and Italian troops in Fiume early in the sum-
mer. D'Annunzio has now entered and taken the city with a
force which at first was estimated at twenty-three thousand men,
but is now reckoned at ten thousand regulars and four battalions
of Fiume volunteers. On his entry into the city one thousand five
hundred English and French troops withdrew. The Italian army
and the great mass of popular sympathy are undoubtedly in ardent
support of d'Annunzio's attempt, but Premier Nitti and the Gov-
ernment and all responsible Italian politicians have characterized
the incident as mutiny. Steps have been taken to suppress the
outbreak. In this policy the Government is supported by the
Chamber of Deputies and by the solid backing of the press, with
the exception of a few extremist newspapers. The plan at present
adopted is a land and sea blockade, whereby the mutineers are
to be starved out. The Peace Conference looks on the incident as
a purely local and internal Italian concern, and has decided not to
interfere, at least not at present, apparently having full con-
fidence in the Nitti government.
A portion of the Peace Conference consider the d'Annunzio
coup as a logical consequence of Rumania's successful defiance
of the Supreme Council in its prolonged occupation of Budapest,
which has only recently been terminated.
September 19, 1919.
With Our Readers.
r[E great human family is constantly being drawn closer to-
gether. Mechanical inventions have made the world much
smaller. The nations of the earth, and the people of the nations^
are much closer to one another than ever before, and the prob-
lems of one quickly become the problems of all. Such community
of life may not be acceptable to some, but whether we like it or
not, it is here to stay and to increase.
AS this fact comes home to us we will see more clearly the
need of common truth — of definite principles with regard to
conduct that will guide the whole world and beget justice to all;
equal opportunity; liberty; good feeling and charity. Into clearer
light, because of the very necessities of mankind, is thrown the
position, the right, and the authority of the Catholic Church. She
is the sole Church in all the world that even claims to be able to
fulfill this present need of the world. In presenting a solution
to the fundamental problems of unity in truth and in conduct,
she gives the light that will ultimately solve every problem.
Her light should not be hidden nor obscured. Her voice
should not be that of the gentle zephyrs, but rather the sound of
a mighty wind that fills the world.
So conspicuous is she in the world of today, that knowledge
of her position on any living question is sought by every man.
The conduct of her children becomes readily the gossip of the
world. What works she proposes to launch; how her institutions
labor; how she affects governments, and how in turn governments
affect her — all these, and the list might be extended indefinitely,
are news of an inviting kind to all the world.
The only power today that can adequately carry her voice
is the Catholic press — the printed word that has millions for
audience*
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
OUR own people need to realize the opportunity of. the Catholic
press. They need to realize how thoroughly such a press
should be equipped if it is to do the work which both the Church
and the world will demand of it. It should have, in the first place,
a news service that would command immediate information from
every portion of the globe: that would, by definite information.
186 WITH OUR READERS [Oct,
correct misunderstanding or misrepresentation regarding the pro-
nouncements and the actions of the Holy See. Its news service
upon all matters that even touch Catholic interests should be so
complete and reliable that any inquirer might resort to it with
confidence.
To state the problems which the world is grappling with
today: problems very basic and very fundamental; to expound
their solution is the work of the Catholic Press. But it would be
idle to think that this work can be done by other than trained or
skilled writers. It requires the master hand, the literary crafts-
man who knows his subject matter intimately and thoroughly.
♦ « ♦ ♦
A LITERATURE is created by the enthusiasm of the followers of
the cause it represents. Our Catholic literature and our Catho-
lic press will grow more perfect as the interest and enthusiasm of
our Catholic people in Catholic work and the whole Catholic cause
increases. One feeds the other. The desire to know the extent
of our Catholic Mission work: its manifold departments, will not
only help the Catholic press, it will help the missions also. How
is the Church going to meet and answer the intellectual problems
of the day, to make known the findings of its own ''university"
Of ideas, save through the Catholic press. Can any Catholic who
reviews the fact that scholars and teachers have been called to
ietid and govern the nations of today, remain indifferent to the
fate of Catholic scholarship?
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
SOCIAL work today, covering such a vast field, and exacting
such extended service is but another word for the work which
the Chuteh has done through the ages. Our Catholic laity must
knew that it is primarily their work. They must not only know
the problems, they must know how they can actively serve in
meeting the problems. Their hearts long to know this. Who
shall acquaint them with the vast fields open to them? Only the
Catholic press can be such an organ of publicity and of leader-
ship. It is but leaving the matter in the air if we constantly repeat
that our laity should be active, yet n^er lay down the definite
lines on which they may act. To know these lines : to read also
of what our fellow Catholics are doing — not only in our own colin-'
try, but throughout the world — is an incentive and a guide to
them, and an evidence that the Catholic press is fulfilling its
mission.
Pius X. declared emphatically that we would build our schools
in vain if we have not a stable, intelligent Catholic press. Every
1919.] WITP OUR READERS 137
Catholic today, clerical and lay, should put his mind and his hand
to this task, the upbuilding of the entire Catholic press and Qrth-
olic literature of
WHEN the world seems almost ready to throw itself into a
struggle that will deal solely with material well-4>eing, it is
encouraging to note the emphasis now and again placed upon the
preeminent necessity and w<»tii -of -spipitual virtues and spiritual
gifts. This is the more important and significant when the stajt^
ments are made by secular journals, for with them it is surfly
true to say that such a note has not been too frequently sounded.
i» ♦ ♦ ♦
LIFE in a recent issue said of a wealthy man who died recently:
*The great and lasting gifts to the world are spiritual. He
did not have them to give. Of wiiat he did have he gave as
intelligently as he could and with power and much good.'*
Scribner's for September speaks of a class of women whom
the War has not ennobled — ^the degenerate result of a new nation
with more wealth and luxury than it could assimilate. The same
short essay speaks of how to such people, home has been but ^a
place to sleep in, to take one's morning bath and breakfast, and
then forget.*' **The less home you have, in inverse ratio the more
divorce. Before you get a vital race again you've got to establisfa
homes." **A world in earnest doesnH need an undue amount of
frivolous luxury and amusement : it's glad to own a hearthstone."
**I'm sick to death of the sex talk that's flooded everything for
the last twenty years." ''Men will be more hun[d>le and more
appreciative after what they have gone through, and women will
put maternal tenderness in place of selfish passion." And the
essay concludes with the hopeful words that ''we are looking
forward to a new world of patience, and devotion, and unselfish
giving; a world of home-making and of home-keeping/'
i^ * * *
GENERAL PERSHING'S return to this country recalls, in this
connection, one or two of his noteworthy utterances on spir-
itual values. 'The invisible, unconquerable force let loose by
prayers, hopes and ideals of Christian America is incalculable."
"As soldiers inspired by every spiritual sentiment we have each
silently prayed that the success of. righteousness should be ours.
Today with thanksgiving, we humbly acknowledge that His
strength has givea us the victory."
i» ♦ ♦ *
138 WITH OOR READERS [Oct,
AFTER the great parade of the First Division in New York Qty,
headed by General Pershing, and during which the General
paid his respects publicly to Cardinal Mercier, the New York Times,
said editorially: "At the Cathedral stand, almost as if by acci-
dent, he met the Belgian Cardinal who is called the Soldier of
God. In his purple robe, with bared head. Cardinal Mercier raised
his hand, and with lips moving bestowed th,e apostolic blessing."
r[E Christian Advocate states that Cardinal Mercier by ''his
unconquerable spirit lighted the darkest days of the conflict
(in the Great War), not only for his Belgian countrymen, but
for all who honor nobility of soul." And yet the same editorial
charges Cardinal Mercier with allowing his popularity to be used
'^'to wipe out the stain upon Benedict's pontificals." The use of
the last word of the quotation is an index to the worth of the
entire editorial. Not only does it in the same breath praise Car-
dinal Mercier, as a man of great moral worth and condemn him
as a willing tool of hypocrites, but it absolutely ignores the evi-
dences that Pope Benedict gave of his sympathy with the suffer-
ing Belgians and his protest against Belgium's invasion by the
Germans. The Evening Post of New York, which is not a Catholic
organ, stated as early as August, 1917: "The Holy Father has
not concealed his sympathy with the attitude of Cardinal Mercier.
His heart has bled for Belgium. This he has made known."
« ♦ * *
UNFORTUNATELY, such editorials are inspired by a precon-
ceived prejudice — to injure the Holy Father and to cast dis-
credit upon the Church in this country. The Christian Intelli-
gencer, the organ of the Reformed Church in America, reports
from the notoriously unfair Protestant Review of New York, an
article entitled: "The Case of the Bombs." It contains such
gross unwarranted misrepresentations as the following: "We
have the public declaration of Mr. De Valera . . . that among the
reasons why he and his fellow Sinn Feiners were pro-German
in their sympathies was that the Kaiser intended to restore the
temporal power of the Pope in the event of the success of the
German arms."
And also "the (Protestant) Bible Societies undertook to pro-
vide Bibles or Testaments (Douay Version) for every Catholic
soldier." As matters of fact, De Valera never made any such
statement nor anything resembling it, and the Bible Societies
never published nor circulated a Douay Version of the Bible. The
Chaplains' Aid Association, of the National Catholic War Council,
1919.] WITH OUR READERS 139
printed and distributed hundreds of thousands of the New Testa-
ment, free, to our Catholic and also non-Catholic soldiers, and
supplied the Y. M. C. A. with the Catholic New Testament. And
in that work there was a spirit of fairness that would shame the
belligerent, unenlightened editors of both the Protestant Review
and the Christian Intelligencer.
IN happy contrast to these so-called religious journals are two
estimates published in the secular dailies of New York City:
the Times and the Sun. The former on its editorial page of
September 10th, published the following:
"Apart from and above every other figure of the War, that
of Cardinal Mercier stands august, not merely a symbol of the
steady courage and long endurance of his Belgian people, but of
faith in the triumph of good over evil. A man of the people, long
dedicated to the study of theology and Scholastic philosophy, he
became an Archbishop and a Cardinal in whom revived not only
the antique type of the pastor, counselor and friend of his flock,
but a great administrator and, in the agony of his country, the
inflexible protector of civilization against barbarism.
*The motto of his coat-of-arms is Apostolos Jesu Christi, an
Apostle of Jesus Christ. There is an apostolic energy, love of
truth, large religious spirit, candor and courage in all those pas-
torals and addresses which have made his name famous around
the world. The massacres of August and September, 1914, the
destruction of immemorial monuments of art and religion and
the humanities, the bombardment of 'our dear City of Malines,'
its episcopal palace and metropolitan church, the first stations
of Belgium's long Calvary, brought from him the immortal Christ-
mas pastoral which told the Belgians that their duty was 'patri-
otism and endurance.' 'I hold it as part of my episcopal office
to instruct you as to your duty in face of the Power that has
invaded our soil and now occupies the greater part of our coun-
try. The authority of that Power is no lawful authority. There-:
fore, in soul or conscience, you owe it neither respect, nor attach-
ment, nor obedience.' The Germans burned what copies of it
they could lay their hands on. With more than savage insolence
they tried to call him from the Mass and force him into an apol-
ogy. Then, and afterward, they could not bend his lofty resolu-
tion. He would not sell his own or his 'country's honor.' They
itched to arrest him, but they did not dare. His appeal to the
German, Bavarian, and Austro-Hungarian Bishops and Cardinals,
his messages of consolation and strengthening to his people, his
14D WITH OVR READERS [Oct..
protests against their deportation and servitude — a long series
of brave and dignified words and acts were to be his; and at
length his unfaltering faith was to see the triumph of right and
the salvation of his country.
''In Brand Whitlock's Belgium there is more than one vivid
picture of this character of mingled austerity and charm, strong,
gentle, inflexible, commanding and salient, as if some great 'ath-
lete of the Church' had been reborn from mediaeval times :
" 'I told him that after the War he would have to make a voyage
to America, where he was so much loved and admired, and when
t related how Protestant clergymen and Jewish rabbis had united
with the priests of his own Faith to praise his courage and to extol
his patriotism, he looked at me in the astonishment that was the
product of his modesty. ... I wish more than all that I might
give some sense of the charm and puissance of his personality.
The effect of his visit was most uplifting. He is one of those
great beings that, in a wortd crowded with little men, lift them-
selves far above the mass and by the sheer force of moral grandeur
radiate sweetness and light. In his presence all cares, all petty
feelings, and all haunting fears fade away; one is before eternal
verities, and we felt that night as though we had had a prophet
in the house. Did not our hearts burn within us as he talked
with us by the way?'
"From books and pictures, from statues and windows of cathe-
drals, saints and prophets look at us. It has been thought that
they were Unintelligible to these later times. A saint and prophet,
the most admirable and the most exalted actor on the scene of
nations for four years, has come to New York. He finds here a
whole nation of friends."
« ♦ ♦ ♦
AND the New York Sun wrote just after the freedom of the
city was extended to the Cardinal :
"Cardinal Mercier is a celebrity who wears well. His appear-
ance in less heroic environment than that with which his secular
fame is associated, produces no sense of disillusionment. To scores
of thousands of Americans he is, it is true, a prince of the Church,
but to other scores of thousands he is first and last an heroic
Citizen of a despoiled and ravished country.
"In either rdle he fills the eye and satisfies the imagination. His
brilliant robes befit his dignity and bearing. His manner is that of
one on whom authority sits gracefully. On occasion he might be
stern. Under grave provocation he might be filled with magnificent
wrath. He could unbend to the pleasures of men who have not
risen to the heights of responsibility or walked in the depths of
1919.] WITH OUR READERS 141
suffering he has known. But he could not be dictatorial, or irri^
table, or lacking in poise. His gravity is not the affectation of
high place, the pose of a man adjusting himself to the traditions
of a great office, upholding consciously its outward demands. The
clear light of a scholar truly great in the fine simplicity of glori-
ously endowed humanity, to whom honesty of thought and sin-
c'erity of purpose and unflinching courage are the commonplaces
of a rigorous life, shines from his countenance."
IN his letter to the Bishops of the Committee on Public Interests
and Affairs, Cardinal Gibbons, in a thoughtful paragraph on
** Home Missions " said : ** Some suggest a more active preaching
c«impaign of going out to the people since the millions fail to come
to our churches."
Apropos of such a suggestion, it is interesting to note the
comment of the English Church Times, an Anglican organ, on
public speaking that treated the evidences for the Catholic Faith.
The Church Times thus speaks of the Catholic Evidence group
*'Over and above a Roman Catholic crowd stood the Crucifix. A
young layman made a strong claim for the 'Catholic Roman
Church.' He appealed — suitably in Hyde Park — ^to a world which
i9 weary of controversy, and some of his claims rather added to
the controversy. Withal he was genial, kindly, respectfiil. He
mentioned the Bible, daily prayer, frequent Communion. He was
what we would call 'evangelical.' He was followed by a more
elderly man who begged his sisters and brothers to co^e to a
halt behind the Cathedral at Westminster and to continue their
search for truth. It was a significant assembly."
Might not we here in America go more publicly to the millions
who will not come to our churches, and give them what we alone
have, and for want of which their souls are starved, the saving
truth of duristr
UPON the meeting of the American Hierarchy that was held late
in September, was focussed the full attention and the hope
of every Catholic in America. That meeting will mean much, very
much for the immediate welfare of the Catholic Church and of
the entire country. Such a meeting of the Hierarchy at frequent
intervals was a wish often earnestly expressed by Father Hecker.
As he would have wished, the present Superior General of the
Paulist Fathers officially offered the services of the Community
tb carry out any special works that the Bishops may direct.
142 WITH OUR READERS [Oct.,
UiVDER the newly elected Superior General of the Paulists» the
Very Rev. Thomas F. Burke, the Community may be said to
enter upon a new period of its life. Former Superior Generals
were either among the founders of the Ck>mmunity or else were
closely associated with them. Time has demanded that their sons
in religion take the reins of government. The spirit, the work,
the purpose, will be the same as of old. "All the men in history
who have really done anything with the future have had their
eyes fixed upon the past." The exceptional emergencies and
grave problems of the day demand fresh energy, new interpreta-
tion and immediate application of old truths to new needs. The
world has wandered far from the Church, but its very destitu-
tion is our opportunity. Such is the leadership demanded from
the new Superior of that Community, which has ever aimed in a
special manner to prove to a doubting world that the Church is
not only not opposed to democracy, but is its only safeguard, its
only protector, its only guarantee.
r[E Very Rev. Thomas F. Burke received his early religious
education with the Paulist Fathers. His collegiate course
was made at the College of St. Francis Xavier, New York City.
Later he studied at the Catholic University, where he won his
licentiate in Sacred Theology. He was ordained priest in 1896.
Within a year after his ordination he began his career as mis-
sionary preacher, which has been singularly successful, and his
ability as an orator is known throughout the country. For over
fifteen years he has preached to hundreds of thousands that
eternal truth which is the salvation both of the individual soul
and of society itself. Those years have given him the S3anpathetic
understanding of St. Paul. He has served all classes of society;
has known by experience the needs and the aspirations of the
people; beyond the mission platform his voice has been heard
in the public forum, and his word has been written in the public
press. He organized and administered the Newman Club at the
University of Toronto, and for the past four years was pastor
of St. Mary's Church in Chicago.
He assumes the office of Superior General of the Paulists well
trained in the traditions of the founders, equipped with both
special ability and far-reaching experience. And it will, we know,
be the special prayer of our readers that he may fulfill his high
and responsible task with glory to Christ and His beloved Church,
and with blessings to the souls of men.
1919-] WITH OUR READERS 143
READERS of The Catholic World will learn with deep regret
of the death of the Rev. Gilbert Simmons, who for almost
fifteen years wrote the department of Recent Events in The
Catholic World. Father Simmons died on Wednesday, Sep-
tember 2d, in the seventy-fourth year of his age. It may be said
that he died in harness, having written Recent Events of the
September Catholic World, and having begun the preparation
of notes for the October issue.
What the preparation of Recent Events demanded the out-
sider can scarcely begin to realize. Almost monthly a volume of
notes was made in following the innumerable publications, the
dispatches, the inquiries that had to be consulted.
Few men in modern life were better acquainted with world
events and world leaders than Father Simmons. But his was a
far-off acquaintance with the latter, for he never went into public
life, and was of modesty so great that he never allowed his name
to be signed to any of his work.
4t ♦ ♦ 4t
FATHER SIMMONS was a Scriptural student of exceptional
ability, in the devotional not the critical sense. He was con-
verted to the Catholic Faith in Canada, to which country he had
traveled from England, the land of his birth. He was ordained a
priest of the Paulist Community in 1882. For years he was novice
master in the Paulist Novitiate, and later served as assistant in
the parish of St. Paul the Apostle, in New York Gty. He was
exceedingly popular as a confessor, and his characteristic gift
was that of sympathy, particularly with the afflicted and the
sorrowing. Ever courteous in manner; considerate in speech;
tenacious in his opinions; wide in his reading; devout in his reli-
gious life; he was a man who lived with God. Of himself and of
his history he never spoke. Those who knew him loved and
admired him. One could but wish that he were better known;
that greater numbers might come under his influence, yet, un-
doubtedly, he did a greater work both for himself and for others,
because so truly a hidden servant of God.
We earnestly ask our readers to pray for the eternal repose
of his soul.
B00B9 |tBCBIV89.
Gmmms H. Dqban Co.* New Toik:
Mg "Litae Bit." By U, CorellL $1.75 net StngtM MouMMims. Br A. B.
Cnnntmhitm. fl^ net New iUocef 0/ ihe JTorlh. Ajr B. AiaiMr* U.M net
Marriage While Yon Wait. By J. E. Buckrote. $1.60 net The Font Romde.
By S. Kay^-Smltli. $1^0 net Our CaMoaiig. By G* A. Btnntn^em. .4^4#
net Trouping for the Troope. By M. Mayo. $1.25 net Capfoln ZIIimC.
By B. J. Kreutz. $1.76 net MerehantM of the Mondng. By S. MoCoy. UM
net Simon. By J. S. Clouston. $1.50 net The Doinge Qf Baffiee Hguf. .B9
A. C. Doyle. |1.50 net The Mud Larke. By C Gantin. $1.50 net A World
of Windows. By C. H. Towne. 91.25 net
BoMi A LivBaioBT. New York:
Their Mutual ChUd. By P. Q. Wodehouse. -11.60 net In the Sweet Drg amd
Vrg. By C Morley. 91.50 net The Old Card. By B. Pertwee. 91.00. The
Will of Song. By H. Brnhart and P. Maekaye. 70 eentt. The Storg of c
Looer. (91.50 net The Band of the Jitter. By T. Ilreiatr. 91^ aeL
Thb llACiqLLAN Co.. Now York:
The Home and the World. By Sir B. Titforo. 91.75. Whg We Fail 0* Cftiii-
tians. By R. Hunter. 91*60. Albania^ Past and Present. By C. A* ChewreyL
92.26. Marg OlivUr. By M. Sinclair. 92.00.
OzFOBD UMivBaftRT Puai* New Toiki
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: Judicial Settlement of Confrover-
eiae Betufeen Statee of the American Union» edited by J. B. Seott» JLLJ>.» (two
volumes; Dieabled Soldiere' and Sailon' Pensions and Training, by B. T.
Devlne and L. Brandt; British War Administration, by J. A. Fkdrlle; -SF^ets
of Vie Great War Upon Agricnlture in the United States and Great BrUain. by
B. H. Hibbard.
Wbomab Y. CaowBLL Co.» New York:
A Historg of the New Thought Moaement By H. W. Dretaer. 9S*90.
) FeauaniCM, A. Stokbs Co., New York:
Poems. By Theodore Maynard. 91.86 net Lo» and Behold Yet By S. MacManni.
91*60 net
Tmi Dbtin-Aoau Co., New York:
f he Ethics of Medical Homicide and MuHlaHon. By A. OlUUey, M.D., LLJ>. 94UM.
C.H4af.K« ScaoNsa's Sone, New York:
The Soul of the "C. R. B." By Madame Saint-Ren6 Ttlllandler. 91.50 net
Theodore Roosevelt's Letters to His Children. Edited by J. B. BUbo^ 92.00 Ai^
Thb CsNTvaY Co., New York:
The Comnuind is Forward. By Sergt A. Wodlleott 91.76.
ScHWAan, KiawiN St Fauss, New York:
Moments With the Consoling Christ. By Rer. J. A. Dillon* LL.D. 76 eentt.
Baifsioia BaoTHBas, New York:
Catholic Home Annual — 1930, 25 cents. The Deep Heart By I. Cla^e. 91.60 jnet
P. F. Coixna ft Son, New York:
World's War Events. By F. J. Reynolds and A. L. GhorebllL Thme Volomeo.
B. P. DuiTON St Co., New York:
Studies in the Elizabethan Drama. By A. Symons. 93.50 net Poeme. By H.
Trench.
D. A^nuROM ft Co., New York:
The Shamrock Battalion of the Rainbow. By M. J. Hogan. 91.60 net
PaoPAOATiON OP Fatth Society, Boston:
Life Sketch of Mother Marg Laurence, FJiJi. By Ber. D. J. O'SiilU^rui, VJLL.
Yalb UmvBasirr Pbbss, New Hayen:
Bine Smoke. By Karle W. Baker.
Gabkbodi BMDOWMBifT FOB Intbbmational Pbagb, Washington:
Year Book, tdiS.
GovBBMKBMT Pbintino Ofpicb, Washington;
7*reafv of Peace with Germang.
JjejLoaa won thb Pbbsbbtation or Ambbigan Indbpbmdbmgb, Washington* D. C:
League of Nations Primer. By G. Wharton Pepper.
Illinois Statb Histobical Sogibtt, Springfield:
Traiijaeffons of the Illinois State Historical Soeietg for the Year 191$.
Catbouc Book Exchanob, Wheeling, W. Va.:
Catechisfs Manual — First Blementarg Course. Bf B. MaoEaehen, DJ>. 91^76.
B. Hbbdbb Book Co., St Louis:
The Priesfs Canonical Prager. From the French of Rer. C WUle* C.SS.R. By
Rer. F. Girardey, C.SS.R. 50 cents net
Thb Catholic Tbuth Socibty op Canada, Toronto:
The Catiuklie Truth Societg. By H. F. Mackintosh.
Casa Edrobial db la Cbuzada, Bogota:
EI Diamante Rojo. By Jorge W. Price.
BMIWNB ft Nolan, Dublin:
Coleclkfoin Notes. Our Renaissance. By H. Browne* S.J.
Bloitd ft Gat* Parts:
Le Dieu Allemand. Par D. Cochin. Justice et ChariU. Par Caffdlnal Msrdor.
Tome n.
NOVEMBER 1919
^atholie torW
The lithuanian Clergy and Literature
F. Aurelio Palmieri, OS A., Ph.D. i6i
Memories of France Francis P. Donnelly, S.J. 174
TreasnreB That Orow Not Old Fcmny Morton Peck 175
Macbeth, A Study in Sin ^ Albert B. Purdie 184
The Irish No Man's Land P. G. Smyth 196
A Ballad of Dying Franklin C. Keyes 207
Thomas of London ' Horace H. Hagan 208
Russia, Germany, France,
Italy.
With Our Readers
s
Frioe— 26 cents; $3 per year
THE OFFICE OF THE CATHOLIC WORLD, NEW TORE
120-122 West 60th Street
. I
THE
I
The Chesterbelloc Theodore Maynard i45 !
A Medical View of Miracles Sir Bertram WindU, M.D., FR.S. 221
The Problem of Big Business Leo M. Murray 231 j
An XJncanonized Saint Mary Foster 241 !
4
t
New Books
Recent Events '
-4- ■
3 •
k« ■«AAnif^1aaa nrnttfir ttf tllA PAst OtRcm st NeW TorlL. N. T.
NOVEMBER, 1919
I'abliihed raouthry by Ihe Hi-sioDarir Soctety of Si. Paul the Aposlle of the Stale of New York (Paulist Falben).
■nieredaa second class matter July 8, 1879. at the poit oflSce at New York, New York, under Ihe Act of March 3,
1879. Acceptance for mailing at special rale of postage provided for in Section 1 103,
Act of October 3, 1917, aulhorited OctobeT g, igiB.
THE
^atholie^opld
Vol. ex.
NOVEMBER, 1919
No. 656
THE CHESTEBBELLOC.
by theodore biaynard.
Introduction.
I BOUT eleven years ago in the pages of the New Age
there was carried on a controversy on Socialism in
which the antagonists were, on the one side George
Bernard Shaw and H. G. Wells, and on the other
G. K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc. The debate
was conducted with extreme brilliance, for in that war of wits
not only great blows were struck, but great jests were made. I
believe that in one of these Mr. Shaw coined the word "Chester-
belloc," though I cannot refer easily to the files of the paper; I
am certain that Mr. Chesterton accepted eagerly so perfect a title,
for the combination of two names results in an onomatopoeia which
cannot be improved. What the Chesterbelloc did not refuse, I
may gratefully use.
Though the literary styles of Mr. Belloc and Mr. Chesterton
are as unlike each other as any two things on earth; though there
is between the friends so great a difference of temperament, they
are popularly associated as the exponents of a certain set of be-
liefs, from the subject of God to the subject of beer. Together
they make up one philosophical entity, whereas separated they
might have become merely two journalists writing on a variety
of subjects. United they correct and confirm one another; apart
the efforts of each would have been largely wasteful. Had they
CopTri^t 1919. Tbb MituoNABT SociBTT OP St. Paul thb Aporxx
IN TBB Stats op Nbw Tqbk.
VOL. OL 10
149 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Nov,
been divided by a generation the fame of either would probably
have been greater than it is, but their influence would certainly
have been considerably less.
The strength of the coalition, it seems to me, lies in this,
that it strikes a just balance between innocence and experience,
worldliness and other-worldlinesis. Gilbert Chesterton's roman-
ticism is supported by Hilaire Belloc's practicality. The one man
is mystic and the other a rationalist; and their agreement is
strengthened by the fact that though their arguments do not follow
the same lines they reach the same conclusion. Every road they
tread leads to Rome.
Hardly any other writers have in our day produced so enor-
mous a body of work. Chesterton's and Belloc's printed books
alone would fill a fair-sized bookcase, but their printed books
contain only a small part of their literary output. It would be
almost impossible to collect it, scattered as it is in the columns
of countless papers broadcast over the English-speaking world.
Even of their writings which have been gathered up between book
covers it would be difficult to give a full account, and all that I
propose doing is to write in so many articles on the Chesterbelloc
as, in turn, poets, philosophers, politicians and personalities.
Much of necessity must be omitted. I shall not be able, for in-
stance, to deal with Mr. Belloc as a military critic — and by such
an exception abstract a very considerable bulk of work. Even
the Chesterbelloc as novelists, critics, travelers and humorists will
have to be ignored, except in so far as they come within the scope
of poetry, philosophy, or politics — ^though nearly all the Chester-
bellocian books come, at least in some part, often with a swag-
ger, into such a scope.
Cecil Chesterton is usually looked upon as the greatest disci-
ple of the Chesterbelloc. Influenced he imdoubtedly was by the
older men, and his mind, oddly enough, inclined to be more Bel-
locian than is Belloc himself, though his style possessed the fam-
ily touch. He had, however, a lucidity which neither his brother
nor Belloc could rival, great as they are in debate, and was be-
coming because of these gifts the Parliamentary leader, as it were,
of the party when death took him away. But though he often
directed an army with great skill and personal courage, he was
only the inheritor, not the originator, of the Chesterbellocian
plan of campaign.
1919] TWjr Chesterbellcc 147
L
The Poets.
Johnson, putting into the mouth of Rasselas words which all
except a few have to use at last, cried: *^I have experienced
enough; now give me desire!" Mysticism struggled for mastery
with stoicism in the soul of Johnson, who saw, without being able
to reach it, the contentment of the saints beyond. Mr. Qiesterton
is frequently thought to resemble Johnson. He probably likes
to believe that he does resemble Johnson, for he has several times
impersonated him in pageants with tremendous success. But
though in avoirdupois the two great Englishmen are equal, though
they both belong to that type of men of letters by whom private
debate is preferred to writing, though they both possess a deep
sagacity and humanity and each his crowd of eccentricities,
though Qiesterton is the only man who ever filled Johnson's place
in Fleet Street, though, most important of all, Chesterton is the
most representative Englishman of the twentieth as Johnson was
of the eighteenth century, the two men are far apart in tempera-
ment and spiritual outlook.
The nobility of Johnson's character can never be praised too
highly, but it was, despite a few hints of shame-faced Catholicism,
a pagan nobility, that of a stoicism which would not suiFer the
soul to be crushed. Johnson bore the weight of living manfully
and suffered without growing bitter; his head was bloody but un-
bowed. One can hardly say of him, however, as one can say of
Gilbert Chesterton, that his whole life was one long song of
praise. It may be conceded that Johnson has not winced or cried
aloud; Chesterton has cried aloud his intense joy and will not be
silenced. He more than any man since the day of St. Francis has
preserved into middle-age the virginity of wonder. He grows
ecstatic with delight and claps his hands for glee at every inci-
dent of the day. Each new sunrise strikes him with new surprise.
When the stars come out in the sky he hears uttered for the first
time the awful Fiat of the Almighty. Use and custom have staled
nothing for him. He has remained a child.
Whatever joy a man possesses comes out most naturally in
verse, and as we are seeking to understand the Chesterbelloc, we
cannot do better than to begin with its poetry. We shall find rim*
ning through all the books of the men who make our subject th«
14* THE CHESTRRBRLLOC LNov.,
twin notes of innocence and of experience, and these notes will
prove, I think, the key or clue to their meaning. Hilaire Belloc
relies primarily upon experience. Moreover, like all who do so,
he is disillusioned, though being a Catholic he knows that loss will
be made to serve a divine purpose and that there is a secret which
even in this life may be partially attained. Such a man sees him-
self as he was as a child — ^with the most gracious of regrets. He
has become a man of the world, but is saved from worldliness by
a wistful desire to be a child again. It is in this mood that
Belloc ends his charming dedicatory poems to a child:
And when your prayers complete the day,
Darling, your little tiny hands
Were also made, I think, to pray
For men that lose their fairylands.
If Belloc is wistful for childhood, Qiesterton might almost be de-
scribed as wistful for manhood. He is continually longing to
grow up that he may drive steam engines or be a pirate. Romance
lies all about him and adventures lurk in ambush, hidden round
the comer of riext week or a little further on amid the forests to
be traveled next year. There is no question of affectation about
it. C. K. C. simply does expect to walk into elfland at any
moment. A man doesn't carry about a revolver and a sword stick
unless he thinks that there is a strong likelihood of his being kid-
napped. Gilbert Chesterton goes about London literally armed
to the teeth ready for any contingency.
I have said that Chesterton retains that happy delusion that
romance awaits maturity. I might also add that he retains the
still happier delusion, that he has only just been bom, for the
opening poem of his first book of verse, The Wild Knighty was
written, apparently, a few days before his birthday. Really I
do not think it is possible to have a fresher zest in life than is
expressed in this lyric:
If trees were tall and grasses short
As in some crazy tale,
If here and there a sea were blue
Beyond the breaking pale.
If a fixed fire hung in the air
To warm me one day through.
If deep green hair grew on great hills,
I know what I should do.
1919O The Chestrrbblloc 149
In dark I lie : dreaming that there
Are great eyes cold or kind»
And twisted streets and silent doors,
And living men behind.
Let storm clouds come: better an hour
And leave to weep and fight»
Than all the ages I have ruled
The empires of the night.
I think that if they gave me leave
Within that world to stand,
I would be good through all the day
I spent in fairyland.
They should not hear a word from me
Of selfishness or scorn,
If only I could find the door.
If only I were born.
The Wild Knight, published when Gilbert Qiesterton was
twenty-four, does not contain such good poetry as the later
volumes, but in many ways it is more arrestingly interesting than
either of the others. It contains (the poet himself would admit)
more vigor than lovelihess and some ideas which he has since laid
aside as errors. Yet even these errors were generous. There is
that high-spirited impatience which an idealistic youth commonly
feels for all churches and creeds, and also, a much deeper idea,
the doctrine of acceptance learned from Whitman pushed to fear-
less and even fantastic lengths. Poem after poem enunciates
it, from *TTie Earth's Shame,*' which pictures the mfinite good-
ness of heaven, to ^^Ecclesiastes,'* which pictures what is practic-
ally the infinite goodness of earth. The youth Qiesterton felt
himself to be the prophet of praise and burst in upon the decadent
age of the eighteen-nineties with the holy fury of a crusader. All
his songs were sung in challenge to the sterile cynicism of the
literary world into which he had wandered, and they must be
read by the baleful light of Oscar Wilde.
My eyes are full of lonely mirth :
Reeling with want and worn with scars,
For pride of every stone on earth,
I shake my spear at all the $tars.
ISO THE ChSSTSPBELLOC [Nov.,
A live bat beats my crest above.
Lean foxes nose where I have trod.
And on my naked face the love
Which is the loneliness of God.
Outlawed : since the great day gone by —
When before prince and pope and queen
I stood and spoke a blasphemy —
** Behold the Summer leaves are green ! "
They cursed me : what was that to me
Who in that summer darkness furled,
With but an owl and snail to see
Had blessed and conquered all the world?
To poetry such as this Belloc's work offers a marked con-
trast. It possesses gaiety in plenty and even exuberance, but
Qiesterton's visionary outlook is entirely absent. His Verses are
more accomplished than the poems of The Wild Knight^ and the
book contains some of the most beautiful things written in our
generation; but these, though they have delighted thousands of
readers, have never, I imagine, shaken men to the roots of their
souls as have C. K. C/s boyish poems. These are full of lines of
an almost brutal violence, in which the poet sees, as in an apoc-
aljrpse, the stars fall and the sun become blood; but (I can only
make the point by using the method of Qiestertonian paradox)
the poet has even wilder moments in which he sees, in a stiU
stranger vision, the grass grow and the birds fly.. All this is re-
mote from Belloc's temper. When he writes it is in a mood of
charming whimsicality or playful fancy as in that delightful little
lyric, "The Early Morning:''
The moon on the one hand, the dawn on the other :
The moon is my sister, the dawn is my brother.
The moon on my left and the dawn on my right.
My brother good morning: my sister good night.
Judged by this one small collection of verse, Mr. Belloc is
among the first half-dozen modem singers. (That conclusion will
be challenged, but I will defend it.) The man who could write
"The South Country'* and "Courtesy" is a first-rate poet. Greatly
as 1 admire these fine things, however, I turn with even greater
pleasure to the drinking songs (the convivial pieces of the Ches-
terbelloc are almost the best things of their kind in the English
1919] The Chesterbelloc i|i
language) and to the irony of ^^Dives** and of the ''Lines to a
Lord/* It is characteristic of Mr. Belloc that this poem, like that
written to defend ^^my Chesterton" aganist an Oxford don who
had attacked him, was called forth by the needs of a particular
occasion. The reason for the ^Xines to a Lord" was the Boer
War, during which Chesterton and Belloc to their eternal glory
strongly defended the republic which they saw falling before the
arms of an evil imperialism directed by a still more evil group
of Jewish millionaires. Their biting irony is only possible to a
man who knows the world and is full of that scorn of baseness
which is a necessary part of the poet's character.
We also know the sacred height
Upon Tugela side
Where those three hundred fought with Biet
And fair young Wernher died.
The daybreak on the failing force.
The final sabres drawn:
Tall Goltman silent on his horse,
Superb against the dawn.
The little mound where Eckstein stood
And gallant Albu fell.
And Oppenheim, half blind with blood
Went fording through the rising flood —
My Lord, we know them well.
No public scandal has escaped the scourge of the Chesterbelloc's
satire, nor any public need lacked the support of its eloquence.
Mr. Belloc even at his wildest — and in many poems he is
Rabelaisian in temper — can almost be called classic contrasted
with Mr. Chesterton's vehement romanticism. His exuberance is
kept within strict limits and does not attempt the impossible. But
Mr. Chesterton hurls about him grotesque gothic metaphors, dar-
ing and succeeding where no other man would go. The sense of
evil, perhaps the strongest as it is the most terrible of experi-
ences, has been dealt with by each of the two men; let us compare
their distinct methods. Where Mr. Belloc can say, in one of the
finest of his poems:
It darkens, I have lost the ford ;
There is a change on all things made.
The rocks have evil faces. Lord,
And I am awfully afraid.
tSt The CtiRSTBRBELLOC [Nov.,
Remember me ! the Voids of Hell
Expand enormous all around.
Strong friend of souls, Emmanuel,
Redeem me from accursed ground.
I challenged and I kept the Faith,
The bleeding path alone I trod;
It darkens. Stand about my wraith
And harbor me — almighty God !
Mr. Chesterton opposes a completely opposite spirit:
I broke the infernal gates and looked on him
Who fronts the strong creation with a curse;
Even the god of a lost universe
Smiling above his hideous cherubim.
And pierced far down in his soul's crypt unriven
The last black crooked sympathy and shame.
And hailed him with that ringing rainbow name
Erased upon the oldest book in heaven.
Like emptied idiot masks, sin's loves and wars
Stare at me now: for in the night I broke
The bubble of a great world's jest, and woke
Laughing with laughter such as shakes the stars.
Since Gilbert Chesterton wrote these verses he has produced
another collection of poems, which, if it does not possess all the
surprise of The Wild Knight, is at least free from that book's
worst faults. Poems is not such a good book — if we consider
artistic unity — ^as its predecessor; but it contains several things
even finer than the best of those which are to be found in the
earlier volume. In particular is this true of the love poetry and
the religious poetry.
I cannot think of any writer who feels the simple astonish-
ment of love so vividly as Mr. Chesterton. He has a natural shy-
ness or delicacy in speaking of its tender intimacies, but the
young ecstasy of wonder, though sung in his more recent poems
with less exaggeration, is sung in lines much lovelier than those
which used to be characteristic of his work.
1919] THE CHRSTRRBRLLOC 153
O go you onward; where you are
Shall honor and laughter be.
Past purple forest and pearled foam,
God's winged pavilion free to roam.
Your face that is a wandering home,
A flying home for me.
Up through an empty house of stars.
Being what heart you are,
Up the inhuman steps of space
As on a staircase go in grace,
Carrying the firelight on your face
Beyond the loneliest star.
It is not only in manner that Mr. Qiesterton has suffered a
change, but in his beliefs — indeed it is the solidifying of his
creed which has steadied his craftsmanship. Throughout The
Wild Knight the enemy to be attacked — ^and this poet must always
have someone to tilt against — ^was the Church. G. K. C, how-
ever, assailed it with the weapons of the Faith, with the ideas of
Liberty and Democracy. He did not accuse the Qiurch foolishly,
as do many of the more ignorant pacifists, of being false to itself
by supporting wars. Like the pacifists he entertained the curious
conviction that he was more Christian than Christianity itself, but
unlike them he had some justification for his error. It was a
humble heresy, and consequently one that would soon have to be
discarded. It was a mistake on a point of fact, not a mistake on
a point of principle. We might compare him to a man who was
furiously angry with the Catholic Church because she did not use
holy water. Chesterton who was then quite as much mistaken on
the subject of liberty as the man I have invented would be mis-
taken on the subject of holy water, attacked the Church very
vigorously. Today he attacks the enemies of liberty in the name
of the Church.
In The Wild Knight there were several poems which might
have been written by a Catholic. In the book which followed it,
many of the poems could only have been written by a Catholic,
and one of these, **The Wise Men," I will quote, not only because
it is (as I think) Mr. Chesterton's most tenderly beautiful lyric,
but because it is the bridge which crosses over the chasm between
Modernism and the Faidi.
154 7*^^ CMBSTRMMRLLOC [Nov.,
Ohy we have learned to peer and pore
On tortured puzzles from our youth.
We know all labyrinthine lore.
We are the three wise men of yore,
And we know all things but the truth.
...
Go humbly ... it has hailed and snowed
With voices low and lanterns lit;
So very simple is the road,
That we may stray from it.
The world grows terrible and white.
And blinding white the breaking day;
We walk bewildered in the light.
For something is too large for sight.
And something much too plain to say.
The C!hild that was ere worlds begun
( . . . We need but walk a little way.
We need but see a latch undone . . . )
The C!hild that played with moon and sun
Is playing with a little hay.
The house from which the heavens are fed.
The old strange house that is our own.
Where tricks of words are never said.
And Mercy is as plain as bread.
And Honor is as hard as stone.
Go humbly; humble are the skies,
And low and large and fierce the Star;
So very near the Manger lies
That we may travel far.
Hark ! Laughter like a lion wakes
To roar to the resounding plain.
And the whole heaven shouts and shakes
For God Himself is born again.
And we are little children walking
Through the snow and rain.
The security of the home — ^whether the home be divine or
human — ^and the sense of adventure which by some dark paradox
arises out of the security is the theme of much of Mr. Chester-
ton's verse. It is as strongly put in the love lyric, '^Baycombe,''
as in the poem that I have just quoted. Yet great as G. K. C. is
1919- J THE CH&STRRBELLOC 15s
when he deals with love or religion, he is greatest as a war-poet
^'The Battle of Lepanto/' which many good judges think the best
thing in Poems (some of them will even say that it is the best
thing in the whole of his work) is not, I venture to say, fit to be
compared to The Ballad of the White Horse. I do not imderrate
'^Lepanto," which stirs the blood like a trumpet, but the epic
ballad of Alfred seems to me to be the greatest literary achieve-
ment of the twentieth century. Gilbert Chesterton possesses a
Homeric capacity for describing warfare; for even in his earliest
allegorical fantasia. The Napoleon of Notting Hill, the impossible,
incidents of the fight round the water tower of Campden Hill,
where Adam Wayne threatens his hosts of enemies with destruc-
tion by drowning, or in the last rally in Hyde Park where the
Provost, encircled by his foes, breaks off a branch from a tree
to use as a club, are described with such tremendous gusto that
they become convincing in a way of which even the best war cor-
respondents seldom have the secret. One can think afterwards in
cold blood that the picture is overdrawn; at the time the picture
is intensely real. Macaulay could not describe battles with such
force; while as for Mr. Kipling, whose favorite theme is combat,
he is not worthy of being mentioned in the same breath with Mr.
Chesterton.
Like all of G. K. C.'s work. The Ballad of the While Horse
is loaded with symbolism. But unlike some of his work, in which
the symbolism grows so frantic as to become unintelligible, thb
lK)ok has about it a daylight lucidity. The story may be briefly
told. Alfred, beaten time after time by the Danes, is in hiding
at Athelney, where Our Lady appears to him. Out of the mouth
of the Modier of God all that the broken king hears is:
^ I tell you naught for your comfort.
Yea, naught for your desire,
Save that the sky grows darker yet
And the sea rises higher.**
Armed with this message Alfred once more seeks to rally the
native chiefs. The three men to whom the King goes are Eldred,
a Saxon, Mark, a Roman, and Colan, a Gael. There is hardly
any part of the book more admirable than the description of their
gathering. Eldred, contented, slothful, kindly but bemused with
sleep and ale, is, however, sufficiently wide awake to see the
156 Thb Chrsterbelloc [Nov.,
folly of this last hopeless campaign; yet, because of the message
of Our Lady he consents to join the King, ^'and from a cobwebbed
nail on high unhooked his heavy sword." Marie, who represents
what Rome had left behind her in Britain, order and reason, sees
with his keen Latin mind and eyes the practical difficulties of
waking Wessex to war more clearly than Eldred could see them,
but responds as promptly. Colan of Caerleon, the type of that
Celtic element, never even to this day quite submerged in Eng-
land, characteristically answers Alfred with angry irony, but
assists him with a still angrier energy. The chiefs gather, with
their ragged rabble, and go up against the strong entrenchments
of the heathen. Beaten back by the heavy odds of their enemies,
the little Christian army, with Eldred and Mark and Colan all
lying dead, is rallied by Alfred and, displaying mystical valor,
is led again to the final and fantastic assault. The account of
the battle of Ethandune in its successive phases is given with
graphic power, but cannot be so much as summarized here.
Guthrum is beaten, is baptized, and the Christian settlement of
England won.
The Ballad of the White Horse, an epitome of the whole his-
tory of the struggle between the Faith and its foes, has (so at
least I think) as its most interesting passage that visit of Alfred
as a minstrel to the Danish camp, which is so famous a legend.
Mr. Chesterton has used it to make a profound criticism of the
pagan idea. The philosophical antagonism between Alfred and
Guthrum is the explanation of the military antagonism between
them. The oft-defeated king, harp on arm, wanders alone to the
Danish Camp. Successively, after Alfred has sung a ballad of
one of the old Saxon wars, the chiefs sing songs which are in-
tended to illustrate the pagan attitude. Harold, the young nephew
of the king, praises elementary and barbaric violence — ^the mere
high-spirited wantonness of the Northmen:
** For Rome was given to rule the world
And gat of it little joy —
But we, but we all enjoy the world,
The whole huge world a toy.**
Here it is that Mr. Chesterton shows his genius for criticism. Be-
hind this bluster there is a loneliness half sentimental but alto-
gether desolate; and of this Elf, the minstrel, sings:
191 9-1 The CiiESTERBELLoc 157
^ There is always a thing forgotten
When all the world goes well,
A thing forgotten, as long ago
When the gods forgot the mistletoe.
And soundless as an arrow of snow.
The arrow of anguish fell.
^ The thing on the blind side of the heart.
On the wrong side of the door.
The green plant groweth, menacing
Almighty lovers in the spring;
There is always a forgotten thing
And love is not secure."
Then followed Ogier, the old warrior grown morbidly sav-
age, a man who is possessed at the last only by the primal anger
of the divine:
*^The wrath of the gods behind the gods
Who would rend all gods and men;
Well if the old man's heart hath still
Wheels sped of rage and roaring will
Like cataracts to break down and kill.
Well for the old man then.''
But if Ogier is disillusioned of the pathetic pagan sentimentality,
King Guthrum, the wisest of the heathen, is disillusioned even of
pagan savagery. Ogier had retained the gods behind the gods,
^^gods then are best unsung" — but Guthrum has entered upon that
final phase of paganism which is a hopeless skepticism.
^ It is good to sit where the good tales go.
To sit as our fathers sat;
But the hour shall come after his youth.
When a man shall know not tales but truth,
And his heart fail thereat.
^When he shall read what is written
So plain in clouds and clods.
When he shall hunger without hope
Even for evil gods.
• • • •
^ There comes no noise but weeping
Out of the ancient sky.
And a tear is in the tiniest flower,
Because the gods must die.
ISS THR CHESTBRBBLLOC [Nov,,
^ The little brooks are very sweet
Like a ^rl's ribbons curled,
But the great sea is bitter
That washes all the world."
Then through the lips of Alfred Mr. Chesterton confutes the
pagans who have already confuted each other. "You will ap-
peal,** he cries, "to the pagan simplicities, to the pagan zest of
life — and by them you shall be judged! Is it joy you possess,
you ravishers of the world? Our very monks who in their clois-
ters go gathering grief carry unimaginable fire under the habit
of renunciation! Is it honor, conquerors of the world? We,
the poor of Christ, always defeated, are never broken!
^* Though you hunt the Christian man
Like a hare on the hill-side,
The hare has still more heart to run
Than you have heart to ride !
^* That though all lances split on you,
All swords be heaved in vain,
We have more lust again to lose
Than you to win again.
"Is it even the most brutal enjoyment of life that you pos-
sess, Lords of the world? Weariness and despair are upon
you, for the roots of your philosophy stagnate in the pools of
hell!
"What have the stray gods given?
Where have the glad gods led?
When Guthrum sits on a hero's throne
And asks if he is dead?
Judge for yourselves!" So challenges the Christian King.
Why even on your own chosen ground we overcome you. If for
no other reason than that a man is happier and more heroic by
believing in the cross of Christ than in the hammer o" Thor, he
should be a Christian.
. . . Because it is only Christian men.
Guard even heathen things ! "
This great epic, the summit of Mr. Chesterton's powers, perhaps
19 1 9-] 7^^ Chesterbelloc 159
artistically should stop at the defeat of the heathen and of their
King. But the poet, a preacher in all his woric, sees that the
story is full of symbols of the modem world and insists upon
pointing the moral with prophecy. The heathen, the undying
heathen, he says, will always come again — ^the Christian can
never be at peace in the world or at peace with the world. The
spiritual saga never ends.
Mr. Belloc does not explore such depths in his poems. They
are full of charm; they accept implicitly Mr. Chesterton's con-
clusions; but are mainly concerned (in a spirit quite as Christian
as his friend's apostolic fervor) with the nobler sort of terrestrial
things — ^with Sussex and ale. Mr. Belloc's output of verse, more-
over, is small and, except for one volume, is uncollected. He can
write excellent poetry, but he does it casually. Mr. Chesterton is,
despite appearances to the contrary, a poet before anything else,
while Mr. Belloc is only a poet by accident and at intervals.
These intervals, though divided from each by a wide span of
time, have fortimately resulted in some of the best pieces of con-
temporary verse. In The Four Men^ by a long way the most en-
joyable of his travel-books, he concludes with a poem which, in
its austere sadness, completes and savors the gay exuberance
which is inseparable for long from Mr. Chesterton. The men are
not really at variance; they balance one another.
At the end of a prose passage, full of lines and half lines
which could not be worked into the final lyric but which were too
valuable to throw away as rubbish, Mr. Belloc writes (letting the
reader into the secret of their composition) those lovely and
mstful verses:
I le does not die that can bequeath
Some influence to the land he knows,
Or dares, persistent, interwreath
Love permanent with the wild hedgerows;
He does not die, but still remains
Substantiate with his darling plains.
The spring's superb adventure calls
His dust athwart the wood to flame ;
His boundary river's secret falls
Perpetuate and repeat his name.
He rides his loud October sky :
He does not die. He does not die.
i6o Thr Chesterbelloc [Nov.,
The beeches know the accustomed head
Which loved them, and a peopled air
Beneath their benediction spread
Comforts the silence everywhere ;
For native ghosts return and these
Perfect the mystery in the trees.
S09 therefore, though myself be crosst
The shuddering of that dreadful day
When friend and fire and home are lost
And even children drawn away —
The passer-by shall hear me still,
A boy that sings on Duncton Hill.
That is a poem which will last as long as English speech.
I have had to begin with the poetry of the Chesterbelloc, with
which the Chesterbelloc itself began, but if this article has been
less concerned with Belloc than with Chesterton (as the article on
the politicians is likely to be less concerned with Chesterton than
with Belloc) the reason is not merely that the Belloc bulk is com-
paratively small, but that its interest is narrower and colder than
the flaming cosmic sweep of Chesterton's poetic vision. Yet even
in poetry the Chesterbelloc form one entity; for if Belloc could
not have written The Ballad of the White Horse (and Chesterton
just as certainly would have been incapable of "The South Coun-
try"), he could not have written any of his poems had not Chris-
tian civilization successfully emerged out of the dark ages into
the light of the Middle Ages, unless in other words all that Alfred
the Great had stood for had finally established itself in Europe.
The rollicking drinking songs are a by-product of the Athanasian
Creed, and "Dives" would never have been heard of apart from
the Gospel. Chesterton is concerned with the spiritual struggle
between the Christian and the pagan; Belloc is concerned only
with the results of that struggle — conveniently symbolized as
Sussex and ale! It is the difference between a man bom a
Catholic and the man who is forced to become one.
THE LITHTrANIAN CLERGY AND LTTEBATTmE.
BY F. AUREUO PALMIERI, O. S. A., PH.D.
{HE life of a nation manifests itself in its traditions,
which again are preserved in the national language
and reveal themselves in its literature. Given a
language and a literature, no nation can be consid-
ered to be dead or non-existent, for she herself is
conscious of her existence. Therefore, let us Lithuanians remain
with one language, the language that was not borrowed from the
foreigner, but was constructed by our race and was formed
through ages, simultaneously with the formation of our Lithu-
anian nation. The language is the life of our nation; in it is
preserved the living spirit of our forefathers.'*^
These remarks of a learned Lithuanian ecclesiastic express a
truth generally recognized. They apply to all races and nations.
A language is the immistakable mark of a distinct ethnical unit
So long as its language outlives political changes or decays, the
autonomous existence of a people as a national unit can neither
be doubted nor destroyed.
If the saying be true that ^'a language embodies a soul,'' the
preservation of the national tongue by a racial group must also
signify the preservation of characteristic traits. A people can
lose its own independence and prosperity and territory; its place,
however, among the nations will not be obliterated if it keeps
alive the flame of national genius and the customs and traditions,
tenaciously clinging to its own tongue and literature. "In itself,"
says a Lithuanian writer, "a language is of little concern. It is,
however, the expression of the character of people. Make a
people cast away its own language, and it will be doomed to
death.'"
An historic proof of this assertion is presented by Lithuania
itself. If the Lithuanian people and their country were not
erased from the history or geographic map of Europe, the reason
for their powerful vitality is to be f oimd in the survival of their
lA. Juaitis, T*# History of the LUhuamimn Nation and Its Present Naiional Aspira^
Hon*. Philadelphia* Pa., 1918, pp. 64, 86.
SBrolia, Unser naiional Charakter und seine Bewahmng, in Allgermeine Litauische Rund-
tckam, TUdt, 1911, vol. II, p. 306.
VOL. ex. II
I63 LITHUANIAN CLERGY AND LITERATURE [Nov.,
national tongue. Without this strong weapon of national exist-
ence Lithuanians would have been absorbed or assimilated dur-
ing the trying times when their independence seemed permanently
lost The statement has occasionally been made, in ignorance of
course, that the Lithuanian tongue is a Polish or Russian dialect
and belongs to the family of the Slavic tongues. This gross mis-
take, as C. Hagberg Wright remarks, was a stratagem of politi-
cians. In fact, no Slav is able to understand Lithuanian.* So
widespread is this misapprehension, even among men of letters,
that in the finest libraries of the United States, for instance the
Library of Congress in Washington and the Public Library of
New York, the Lithuanian granunars and dictionaries are found
in the Slavic section.
One of the ablest students of Lithuanian literature, August
Schleicher, says that, among all the Indo-Germanic languages, the
Lithuanian is distinguished for antiquity, and holds a foremost
place in linguistic research.^ In fact, it belongs to a special
group, the Baltic, which embraces old Prussian, Lithuanian, Let-
tish. The first was buried in the Germanization of Prussia. Its
few survivals would test the skill and patience of any profes-
sional philologist. Lettish and Lithuanian, on the contrary, are
living Indo-European languages spoken in the Baltic provinces.
Undoubtedly, because of her political relations to the neighboring
Slavic countries, Lithuania has been affected in her literary evo-
lution by Slavic grammar and vocabularies, and her language
has, in turn, left traces of its influence upon Russian and Polish.
This, however, does not mean that between them there is any gen-
uine aflSnity.'
German philologists have emphasized the native beauty and
the philological value of Lithuanian. In 1800 F. Heilsberg
wrote: "Lithuanians are notable for their aflfability and loveli-
ness; they are compassionate to the sufi'ering and hospitable to
tV. Gaigalaitit, Du Litaniseh BaiHsehe Ffgt. Berlin, 191S, p. 8.
^Litauiscke GrammaHk, Prague, 18S6, toI. L, p. 2.
5Ph. Zenthoefer, Dtr Binfluss dgr lUauiichen Spraehe auf dU BUdung dtr im der Rechis
—und GtrkhUsprache dtr Germantn und alUn DeuUchen in Miti€Uun0»n dt LUauitcktn
Httrarischgn GtseUchaft, vol. I. Heidelberff, 1880, pp. 101-114; Einflutt IVgstnustmndt €uf
Li»9U€n vor dtm 12 Jahrhundert, Ibid,, vol. II, 1886, pp. 306-312; E. Wolter, Ltlfcuofiiimtf » tf#r
rustiseh^lit^uischgn RgchUffPraehe, Ibid., ▼ol. IV, 1894. pp. 49-61; O. Donncr, Ufbtr den
Einfluss de$ LiUuiscken &uf die finnischtn Spraehen, Leiprif, 1884.
• C. Uacberg Wright, The Letts in The Edinburgh Review, October. 1917. no. 463. pp.
347-348. Alio Benjamin W. Dwight. Modem Philology: lU Discoveries, History ond In-
fluence (lit i«riea). New York, 1871, pp. 113, 114. See The Academy, 1883, October
28th. p. 308 (no. 547); Ibid., 1883, September 22d, p. 199 (no. 594).
\
\
I
1919.] LITHUANIAN CLERGY AND LtTERATURR 1 63
foreigners. Crimes among them are extremely rare. Women and
girls of the Lithuanian stock deserve the highest praise for their
constant love of purity, and the best evidence of their lofty moral
standard is given by the fact that the Lithuanian vocabulary has
no word to signify divorce, and that in the translation of the
Bible a periphrase is required to render into Lithuanian the
Sixth Commandment." According to Emmanuel Kant, whom the
Lithuanians claim as countryman, Lithuanian is a finer language
than German. ^'It is an ancient and pure tongue, the tongue of a
people who because of limited territory lived in a state of isola-
tion, and therefore preserved their customs, traditions, and lan-
guage."*
Another German praises the structure and grammatical
forms of Lithuanian, particularly the richness of its modes and
tenses, the regularity of 'the declensions, the absence of articles,
the great number of auxiliary verbs, the use of the dual, enabling
it to share in the perfection of Greek.
The truth of these eulogies is borne out by the testimony of
learned philologists of other countries also. An English scholar
writes ''that Lithuanian is one of the oldest languages in the
world. With Lettish, it shares the honor of being the only living
representative of one of the great families of the Indo-European
tongues, the Baltic family. From the fact that it has changed
more slowly than any other of the Indo-European languages,
which sprang from it, it has been longed beloved by linguists,
beginning with Kant and Schleicher and ending with such modem
investigators as Kurschat, Baranovski, Jaunys, Buya and Meillet.
The language is remarkable for its beauty. Harmonious, richer
in affectionate and cajoling diminutives than any other of the
languages of Europe, Lithuanian possesses the sonority of Latin
and Greek, the primitive qualities of Sanskrit, and the softness
and musicality of Italian. So well have some of the primitive
characteristics of this beautiful language been preserved in the
undisturbed backwaters of Lithuania that, if it were possible for
the Romans^ and the Greeks to rise from their graves, they would
have little difficulty in understanding whole sentences as spoken
TCbr. Gottlieb Mielcke, Littauisch-Deutsches vnd Deutsck LiitaHxschet Wdrterhuck,
Kdnifsberg, 1900. Preface.
SOae of the older Lithuanian writers aaaerts the Latin origin of his race because of the
fact that the Lithuanian tongue bears unmistakable traces of its kinship with Latin. — Quatd^m
mi Lithumnimm p§rt%n§ntim 9m fraomtntit Mickalonit LUhuani, Rtipublicoi itatut rtgni Polo-
«<•#. LUhu&nUtt Pfutti90, Livonit divortorum muetorum, Lugduni BaUTontm, 1627, p. 26S.
I • •. '
164 LITHUANIAN CLERGY AND LITERATURE [Nov,
by the Lithuanians of today, while these could just as easily un-
derstand some of the phrases of the Sanskrit/"
The history of the Lithuanian language has passed through
three distinct phrases: the literary, the grammatical, the politicaL
The literary, the most important, dawns with the Reformation.
Strange as it may seem, up to that date Lithuania was devoid of
written literature. She does not present even fragments extolling
the deeds of national heroes. The history of Lithuanian literature
does not boast of productions as the Russian bylines, the Finnish
Kalevala, or the Scandinavian sagas. To be sure, Lithuanians
have their own popular poetry, the dainos, domestic songs that
generally do not cross the threshold of the ancestral house. Lith-
uanian dainos express a passionate love for the peaceful life of
the fertile land and impenetrable forests of Lithuania. Generally
they ignore the turmoil of war and its bloody trophies. They
portray the real life of the rustic Lithuanian clinging to the soil,
and finding happiness within the narrow boundaries of his coun-
try. The relics of this popular literature have been transmitted
to us by oral tradition. Research into their historic and philo-
logical value is of recent date, and not until the nineteenth cen-
tury were they collected as docimients throwing valuable light
on the earliest period of Lithuanian history.^^
The written literature of Lithuania owes its origin to the
attempts of German Lutherans to scatter the seeds of Protest-
antism in Lithuania.^^ Following the methods that had been suc-
9F. Lee, **The Claims of Lithuania,*' in The Contemporary Review, vol. cxii, August,
1917, p. 182. The first philologist to show the relation between Sanskrit and the Lithuanian
language was A. F. Pott: De Borusso — Litkuanicae tarn in Slavicie quam Letticis Unguis prin-
cipatu commentatio, Halis Saxonum, 1837; De linguarum cum LetHcarum vicinis nexu. Ibid.,
1841. See also: Ph. Ruhig, Betrachtung der Litauischen Sprache, in ihrem Urtprunge, Wesen
und Eigenechaften, Konigsberg, 1745; J. Karlowicz, O Jegyku litewskim (The Lithuanian
tongue). Krakow, 1875.
lOF. Kurschat, Etwas Uber liitouitche Volkspoesie, — Dainos in Grammatik der littauischen
Spraehe, Halle, 1876, pp. 443-464; Ueber das Litauisehe Volkslied oder die Diana, Mitteilungen,
1883, Tol. i, pp. 186-219; Chr. Bartsch, Ueber Liiauisehe Volksliterature, Ibid., vol. ii, 1883,
pp. 75-111; F. and H. Tctzner, Litauisehe VoiksgesSnge. Leipzig (Universal Bibliothek, n.
3694), 1897; Rhesa. Dainos oder Litauischen Volkslieder, Konigsberg, 1825; S. Stanewicz,
Dainas uemayceiu surynktas yr issdutas par Symona Stanewicse. Vilna, 1829; S. Daukantas,
Dajnas Ziamajtiu pagal sodiu Dainininku is srassytas. Petrograd, 1846; H. F. Nesselmann.
Litauisehe Volkslieder gesammelt, kritisch bearbeitet und metrisch ubersetxt. Berlin, 1853;
A. Schleicher, Litauisehe MSrehen, Sprickworte, Ritsel, und Lieder. Weimar, 1857.
llFor the history of Lithuanian literature, see: A. Bezzenberg, BeitrSge Mur Gesehiehte der
Litauischen Sprache auf Grund litauischer Teste des XVI, und des XVII, lahrhundert,
Uottingen. 1877; Ibid,, Die litauisehe Literatur, in P. Hinneberg. Die Kultur der Gegem'
wart, vol. ix, Berlin, 1908, pp. 354-371; J. Sliupas. Lietwviskiejic rastai ir rastininkai (Lith-
uanian writers and writings). Tilsit, 1890; Maironis. Trumpa Lietuviu rasliavos apsvalga
(A short sketch of Lithuanian Literature), in Lietuvos istorya (History of Lithuania), Petro-
grad, 1906 (in Lithuanian); J. lurkunas Scheynius Litausk Kultur (Lithuanian civilization),
Stockholm, 1917.
1919] Lithuanian Clergy and Literature 165
cessful in Poland, Bohemia and Croatia, they aroused national
feeling by translating the Holy Bible or controversial books into
* the common speech of the people. Protestantism had an ephem-
eral growth in Lithuania. Some of the nobility and even a few
of the clergy looked sympathetically upon its expansion and
welcomed its doctrines." The Calvinist displayed great activity
in the literary field. The first book in Lithuanian appeared at
Vilna in 1533 with the following title: Kelone duszios i ana
gyvenima (The Behavior of the Soul in the After Life). It was
printed in Gothic letters." The Calvinists founded three printing
houses in Lithuania.^^ Martin Mazvydys, pastor at Ragait, pub-
lished in 1547 the Lithuanian translation of the Catechism of
Luther, a reading book {Pamokinima skaityti), and the first col-
lection of sacred songs." Two years previous the Little Bible
had appeared. Another pastor, Baltrus Villentas, translated into
Lithuanian the Enchiridion of Luther, and in 1579 published the
Evangelyos del evangeliku (The Gospel for Protestants)." lanis
Bretkunas, the best known among Calvinist Lithuanian writers,
pastor at Labguvo, and later at Konigsberg, printed a second col-
lection of sacred songs {Giesmes duchaunas), ten composed by
himself and sixty-six translated. He published also the Sunday
Gospels with commentaries." Thus the earliest pages of Lithu-
anian literature bear the names of three Prussian writers impreg-
nated with the spirit and the teaching of the Reformation. It was
especially by sacred hymns in the vernacular and by parochial
isp#r Protesiantumus Litauens im XVI, Jakrhundert, AUgemeine Litauiseht Rundschau,
1910. Yol. i, pp. 50-55, 87-94. 117-125, 154-160.
ItThe earliest written monument of the Lithuanian language is a daina embroidered on a
belt in 1512 and preserved at Desda. According to Karbutt, William, Bishop of Modena and
Legate of the Holj See in Prussia and Courland, hj his translation of the Latin grammar
of Donatus into Prussian, is the author of the first book written into any of the Baltic lan-
guages. A. Viscont, La LithuanU religieuse, Geahrt, 1918, p. 78.
mbid, p. 155.
usee Lndvikas lonas Reza, Gtschiehte der litauueksn Bibel, Konigsberg, 1816, p. 5;
A. Bexzenberg, Drr litauisekg Katechismus vom lahrt 1547. Gottingen, 1874; Jacobj, Zur
Gtsckichtt der lUauiseken Uebersetsung des kleinen Luthersehen Kaieckitmus, Mitteilungen,
vol. i, pp. 118-129; R. Schwede, Zur GetchichU der litauischen GesangbUeker, Ibid,, vol. iii,
1888, pp. 396-406.
1<A. Bezzenberger, Bartholomius fVilUnfs Utauisehe Vtbersgisung des Lutherschen
Enchiridions und der Episteln und Evangelien, Gottingen, 1882. The translations of Vil-
lentas were published at Konigsberg in 1579. Among the earliest monuments of the Lithu-
anian literature are to be mentioned the Ritual of Baptism {Forma chriskstima), printed at
Kdnigsberg, in 1559, A. Bezzenberg, Das Utauisehe Taufformular vom lahre, 1559. Gdttingen,
1882 and a Commentary on the Sunday Gospels: W. Gaigalat, Die Wolfenbutteler Utauisehe
Postnienhandschrift aus dem lahre 1573, Tilsit, 1900.
ITA. Bezzenberger, Zur Litauischen Literaturgeschichte, MUteiiungen, vol. iii. pp. 12M29;
L. Q^Utr, Bretkunova Litavska postiUa is god 1591, Zagreb, 1877 (in Croatian).
l66 LITHUANIAN CLRRGY AND LiTERATURR IN«V.,
schools that they attracted the Lithuanian peasants to Lutheran
teaching.
The Lithuanians and even the Polish Catholic clergy were
soon aware of the grievous danger to Catholic faith in the literary
invasion of the Lutherans of Prussia, The Polish clergy had
neglected the use of the language of the people in their relations
with their flock. They despised a tongue that had no literature,
and strove to make Polish the common language of Lithuania.
Polish was the language of education, of the law courts, and of
the upper classes. It was held, therefore, to be the only one fit
for the spiritual care of souls. The result of this policy proved
disastrous to the development of Lithuanian Catholicism.
Melchior Giedrajtis, Bishop of Samogitia, in a letter to the
General of the Jesuits (1587), stated that, because of the neglect
of the Lithuanian tongue by the clergy, many Catholics never
went to confession or Conununion. They ignored their prayers,
and the rudimenta fidei. They offered victims to serpents, oaks
and thunder. Their piety consisted only in refraining from eat-
ing meat on Friday or from going to the Lutheran Church."
The Jesuits, who had been invited to take up the defence of
the Catholic faith and to establish a Catholic academy at Yilna,
resolutely initiated a movement in favor of Lithuanian. Some of
their priests, especially E. Boeck and G. Knishius, preached in
Lithuanian, and their sermons met with great success. Their ini-
tiative saved Lithuania to the Church and raised a barrier against
German Protestantism and Russian Orthodoxy. A well-known
Russian Panslavist, Hilferding, is forced to admit their services
as regards Lithuanian nationality."
The pioneer in the literary Catliolic reaction in Lithuania
was Nicholas (Mikalojus) Dauksza. He still holds the place of
honor in the history of Lithuanian literature. From the stand-
point of style he may be compared to Peter Skarga, exerting the
same influence upon Lithuania as the latter did upon Polish. Some
writers assert that he was a Jesuit, but this is denied by the best
Lithuanian scholars. Simon Dakamitas calls him a canon of Samo-
gitia {kanauninkas Zemaicziu) j^^ and Bishop Kazimieras Valan-
ISLithuanicarum Societatis Jesu hiiioriarum pars ottctore Stanislao Rostovski, recognot-
cente Joanne Martinov, Parii, 1877, p. 153; K. Propolanis, PoUkie apostohstwo w Litwie
(The Polish apostleship in Lithuania). Wilno, 1913, p. 23.
IBLtHra t Zhnud (Lithuania and Samogitia) in Sobranii Sochinenii (collected worka),
vol. ii, p. 374.
iOLietuvos istorija nu Gedimma iki Liublino unijai (History of Lithuania from Gcdy-
minas down to the union of Lublin). (In Lithuanian.) Plymouth, Pa., 1897, p. 519.
19.) LiTHUANiAN CLERGY AI^D LITERATURE 167
czauskas adds that he belonged to the Qiapter of Wamia. In
1595 he published at Vilna the Lithuanian translation of the
Qiristian doctrine or catechism by Diego Ledesma, S. J., printed
in Spanish in Rome, 1573." His translation, like the other pro-
ductions of his pen, was based upon the Polish edition. In 1599,
at Vilna, from the press established by the Jesuits in their acad-
emy, there appeared his literary masterpiece, the translation of
the Commentary on the Sunday Gospels written in Polish by F.
Wuik, S. J.** The beauty and classical perfection of its style
gives to this work in Lithuanian literature the value of an original
composition. Because of this work, the modest canon of Wamia
is recognized as the pioneer of the Lithuanian literaary renais-
sance."
A worthy follower of Dauksza was Konstantinas Sirvydas
(died 1631) a Jesuit, who wrote the first Lithuanian grammar
and dictionary. He translated from Polish and published at
Vilna in 1629 a collection of sermons {Punktay Sakimu)^ re-
printed in the same town in 1845 by Rev. Leonas Mantvydas,
pastor of Sedos. But his translation was far from attaining
Dauksza's perfection of style. His work, however, holds second
place among the monuments of early Lithuanian literature.*^
The literary awakening of Lithuania, alas, was short-lived.
It lasted as long as the danger of Protestant proselytism whetted
the zeal of the clergy. When the Catholic reaction gained the
ascendancy, Lithuanian sermons became rare in the churches,
Polish sacred songs replaced the Lithuanian, Lithuanian prayer-
books gradually disappeared and the common people grew hard-
ened in religious ignorance. The literary production of Lithuania
in the seventeenth century is confined to a few books published
by Lithuanian Protestants in Prussia. From Prussia, too, came
llA new edition of this nre book with teTeral erudite prefaces mnd appendices was pub-
lished bjr £. Volter in the Yolume liii of the Zapiski of the Imperial Academy of Sciences in
Fetrograd: LitovskU KaHkhigis N. Daukssi po isdaniu 1595 goda (The Lithuanian catechism
by N. Daufcssa accordinf to the edition of 1595), Petrograd. 18M. In Russian, see J. Bystron,
Katgehhism Ltdtsmy w prMekhdMti IVitehodniO'Kierwskim (The catechism of Ledesma in the
translation of Eastern Lithuanian). In Polish, Krakow, 1890.
9»Postittm kttolicka, Ui #/# ItMguUymat BvangtKju kiekvUnos ntdtUs w sMvtnUs pt
visus mHus, iu UnkitMko perguldyta, Vilna, 1599. The work, with a learned preface (in
Russian) was reprinted by P. Th. Fortunatov: Postitts etioKcka Jakuv9 Vyuka v Ktcvskom
p^fivodU Nikctaia Damkski (The (Utholic Postil of lakub Vyuk in iU Lithuanian translation).
Petrograd, 1904.
»E. Volter. AT. Dmuksn, tin IH^witchtr NaHon^isehriftsUlUt dfs XVI. JaktrtmdgrU, UU-
Uihm§9m, irol. iv, pp. 363-375; LiftmnsMkigjt Rasstai, pp. 7. 8.
SUUcbard Garbe. SMytwidTM Pumkty k^Mmn iPunktay Sakimu) vom Uhre 1«29. (Sottingen,
1885. See Maironis, Linwvos irtorifm, p. 217; HtuvisMkUjt ItMMtm. Tilsit, 1890, p. 15.
l6S LITHUANIAN CLERGY AND LITERATURE [Nov.,
the best Lithuanian poet of the eighteenth century, Kristijonas
Dunelaitis, who by his poem Melas (The Seasons)^ enriched his
country with a work of great beauty and genuine poetical inspira-
tion. "The poems/' writes W. Vidunas, "of Dunelaitis became a
classical text for the study of Lithuanian. Their importance grew
as time went on. Their beauty was carefully brought out. His
admirers went so far as to proclaim that they were the only Lith-
uanian poems worthy of mention.'***
Considerable literary activity marks the beginning of the
nineteenth century. As before, it received a powerful impetus
from the clergy. Antanas Drazdaukas,*^ a poet, whom his ad-
mirers compare to Beranger among the French and Karpinski
among the Poles, wrote a fiery invective against those of the
clergy who neglected the common speech of the people in their
apostolic ministry. "Daring boldness! You come into Lithuania
without knowing the Lithuanian language, and you hurt the in-
terests of the Church rather than foster them. All understoo<^
Christ and His disciples when they taught the divine wisdom.
But you, you are the only one to understand your speech, while
your spiritual flock are dying of starvation. They asked for
bread, and there was none to give it to them. Don't you know
that faith comes from hearing, and how can you be heard when
you do not talk the language of your flock nor care to learn it?
. . . No wonder then if the enemy steps in and sows tares.
You do not act as befits good-hearted men and zealous priests.
Who banished from Lithuanian parishes the Lithuanian sacred
songs, and rosaries, that were so useful to the knowledge of the
mysteries of faith? Did you not deprive those who cannot read
of an instrument of learning? Who compelled the Lithuanians
to forget their prayers, the Our Father, Hail Mary, the Creeds,
and the Commandments of God? You know how to shear your
sheep, but you do not take care to pasture them."
There can be no doubt that the strictures of Drazdaukas are
2SSee Ludyikas lonas Reza, Dot lakr in vier Gesingen. Ein tdndisches Epos ins Deutschs
Ubgrtngen, Konigsberg, 1818; A. Schleicher. Christian Donaleitis Litauischg Dichtungen.
Erst* vollstindige Ausgabe mit Glossar, Petrograd, 1865; G. H. F. Nesselniann, Christian
Donatitins Ottauischt Dichtungen nach dtn Kdnigsherger Handsehriften mit metrischsr Usber-
sstMung, kritischen Anmerkungen und genauem Glossary Konigsberg, 1869; Ch. Donalitiut;
Litauiseh* Dichtnngen, herausgegehen von Nesselmann, Kdnigsberg, 1884; L. Passarge*
Christian DonaHtius Htauischo Dichtungen uebersstst nnd erUtutert, Halle, 1894; P. Tetzner,
Christian Donaiitius, Alipreussischs Monatssehrift, 1897, vol. xsxit, pp. 277-331 ; 409-441.
S6La Lithuanie dans Is passi et It present, p. 115.
3TJf. Liii, RasMtai, p. 120.
191^0 LlTHUANtAN ClEMGV AND LiTERATVME 169
bitter, even cruel. It would be unjust, however, to say that they
were not justified by the lamentable indifference of the clergy to
the Lithuanian peasantry. Drazdaukas only repeated what Nich-
olas Dauksza had complained of two centuries earlier in the first
page of the Lithuanian translation of the Postilla Catholicka. But
the sarcastic onslaught of the Lithuanian priest achieved its pur-'
pose. The native Lithuanian clergy who had been denationalized
in Polish seminaries felt ashamed of their ignorance of their
mother tongue. They began to study and preach in Lithuanian,
and to cultivate Lithuanian literature, and favor all the literary
enterprises for the awakening of Lithuanian nationalism. The
Bishops took a considerable part in the rebirth of the nation.
Monseigneur Antanas Baranauskas, Bishop of Sejni, equaled and
even surpassed the literary renown of Dunalaitis in his poem
Ankyszcziu Sgilelys (The Forest of Ankysciu), published in 186L
Bishop Antanas Baranauskas (Baronas) was bom in the
little town of Ankysciu.^^ He pursued his studies in the seminary
of Wamia and also in Munich and Rome. In 1884 he was con-
secrated suffragan Bishop of Kovno, and in 1897 transferred to
the see of Sejni, where he died in 1902. Baranauskas was a
scholar of note, a learned philologist, and a delicate poet. His
researches in the ancient fragments of the Baltic languages rank
among the best contributions to the historic granunar of his
native tongue. But his popularity is due to The Forest of Anky-
sciu. This poem, qualified by Maironis as *^the pearl of the Lith-
uanian language," appeared in 1861. It perpetuates the tradi-
tions of the Dainos; it reflects the Lithuanians' love for rustic life,
for the soil that they till, and speaks in the mysterious language
of the forests and lakes. It is not epic in its conception, but
rather a series of pictures, after the fashion of an idyl. It won
for its venerable author the title of bard of Lithuania.
From a literary point of view, the influence of Motiejces
Kazimeras Valancauskas on the modem cultural development of
Lithuania was even more considerable. He was bom in the vil-
lage of Nastrania, district of Telsze, in 1801. After his ordina-
tion he filled the chair of theology in the ecclesiastical academy
of Vilna, and was appointed rector of the Seminary of Wamia.
In 1850 he was consecrated Bishop of Kovno (Samogitia), and
died in this town in 1875. His name is attached to the beginnings
tSMainmit, op, cU,, p. 146.
170 LITHUANIAN CLERGY AND LiTEMATVME [Nov.,
of research into the historical past of Lithuania, as also widi the
social movement among the Lithuanian Catholics. The most
valuable production of his literary labor is The History of the
Diocese of SamogUia^ a work that exceeds the limits of its sub-
ject, and assumes the importance of a general history of Lithu-
ania. The list of his writings by E. Walter contains twenty-seven
titles. He enriched the ascetic literature of Lithuania with a
great number of devotional books, both original and translated
from other languages.
At the suggestion of Bishop Valancauskas, Simanas Daukan-
tas (1793-1864), devoted himself to historical research, and in
1845 published at Petrograd his masterpiece on the traditions
and customs of old Lithuania, an invaluable woik for the study
of folk-lore. Lithuanians are indebted to him for the first and
most complete history of their own country from Gedynimas down
to the Union of Lublin."*
A Lithuanian priest also, Antonas Juskevycius (1819-1880),
deserves the highest praise for having spent his whole life in
amassing, arranging and illustrating the riches of Lithuanian pop-
ular poetry. He collected 5,624 dainos.*^ The wonderful mas-
tery of Lithuanian folk-lore possessed by this modest priest is
shown by his authoritative woik on the marriage customs of the
Lithuanians of the district of Wieluni, published at Kazan in
1870 and subsequently translated into German.*' After the dras-
tic measures taken by the Russian Government to extirpate the
Lithuanian language,** the best minds of Lithuania were obliged
to write their own productions in Russian, and found professional
activity only in the chairs of Russian universities. The Russian
Government regarded the study of Lithuanian as the pastime of
^^AprasMos Zemaftiu IViskuputes (Description of the diocese of Samogitia). Vilna, 1848.
A new edition of bit erudite work was published at Shenandoah, Pa., by Rev. V. Matulaicius,
1897. Biographical data about the author in Lietuvisskieje Rasstau PP* S2-74; Maironis,
op. cit., pp. 237-240; Mat&us Kazimir Wolonczewski, MitttUungen, vol. iii, 1888, pp. 102-104.
tOLietuvos istorifa nuo teniausiu gadyniu iki Gedimmni Didsiam Littuvos Kunigaikseim
(Uistory of Lithuania from the prehistoric age down to Prince Gediminas the Great), Ply-
mouth, Pa., 189t. The second volume was published in 1897. Concerning the writer see
E. Volter, Simon Dowkont, Mitteilungen, vol. iii, 1888, pp. 260-26S; Haironis, pp. 235-237.
nUetuviskot dajnos usrasytos par Antana Juskevice. Vol. i and ii, Kasan, 1880; vol.
iii, 1882. The fourth volume, entitled: LUtuviskos svotbmtt dmjnot (Popular nuptial songs),
was published in Petrograd, 1883.
tlVothine teda Veluncyciu Littuviu sutasyta par Antana Juskeviet 1870 metusf. Kazan,
1880. HcckMeitsbriuch€ dt WitUmitcktn, LUauer, Mittlilungen, vol. Ui, pp. 134-178; 201-248;
321-383. The writer has left also a monumental Dictionary of the Lithuanian language.
SlSee Perkunelis, Prttsg-vgrbot in gross'LUausn durck Graf MwravUm, 1863-1904. AW-
gemeimt LitanUche Rundsckau, Tilsit, 1910, pp. 73-80; 108-117.
I9I9] LITHUANIAN Clergy AND LITERATUHE 17 1
phylological dilettanti rather than as the expression of the living
soul of a gifted people.
Happily, the Lithuanian language flourished outside of the
historic Lithuania. Tilsit became the literary centre of Lithu-
anian literature. In 1883, at Ragnit, appeared the Auszra^ a lit-
erary magazine to which the best writers of Lithuania contributed,
especially Dr. Jonas Basanavycius, an authority on Lithuanian
archaeology.
Lidiuanian emigrants to America loyally preserved the love
of their native coimtry, and actually created an entire literature
to fill the gap of their earlier literary history under the persecu-
tion of tsaristic Russia.*^ The first Lithuanian paper of the
United States, Vienybe Lietuvninku (Lithuanian Unity), appeared
at Plymouth in 1885. At present the number of Lithuanian
papers and magazines in this country exceeds thirty-five. The
masterpieces of all literatures, especially of Polish, Russian,
English and German, have been translated into Lithuanian. An
untiring worker in this field was a former pupil of the seminary
of Seiny, Dr. Vincas Kudirka (1858-1899), who translated into
his mother tongue the works of Slovacki, Schiller, Mickiewicz,
B3rron and others.
To evaluate accurately the production of Lithuanian writers-
outside of Lithuania during the forty years of the ostracism of the
Lithuanian language in Russia, one would have to cover the
works embraced in the careful bibliographies of Jonas 2^av-
ikutis."
In 1905, at the beginning of the Russian revolution, a liter-
ary revival took place in Lithuania. The clergy contributed to its
progress. Under the pseudonym of Maironis, M onsignor John
Mlnteresting data oa this subject will be found in the yearbook of the Lithuanian clergy
edited bj Her. P. Lapelit: Amtrikos LUtuviu kat^Uku: MttratHt 1916. Chicago, 1916.
^SusMim 0rba stoHstica vitn LUtuvitsku knygu oUamstu Prusust nu 1864 metHiki pa-
Mgai 1896 mrtu (List or statistics of Lithuanian books printed in Prussia from 1864 till
1896). lUsit, 1897; Suskmta arba tMistika visu lUiuvissku knyguaUpauttu Amerikof nuo
pmidos LietuvisMkcs Amerikoi emigfcijos iki 1900 metm (List or statistics of Lithuanian
books published in America from the beginning of emigration to America down to 1900).
Plymouth, Pa^ 1900. (In Lithuanian.) The richest Lithuanian bibliography is that com-
piled by S. Baltramaitis and published by the Academy of Sciences of Petrograd: Sbomik
bibKograpkitheskikh maierimlov d/i# §eografii % statittiki Liivy (Collection of bibliographical
material eonceming the geography, ethnography and statistics of Lithuania). Petrograd, 1881.
(In Russian.) As to the earliest Lithuanian bibliography see M. Stankiewics, BibUografia
Htewska od 1547 do 1701 (Lithuanian bibliography from 1547 till 1701). Krakow, 1889.
Id Polish; Ibid,, W tprawit gromrndsenia m^terymhw do dMtgjow PismUnmicta Ktewtkiego,
(The qtMStion of the assembly of material c onc erning the history of Lithuanian literature.)
Krakew, 1890.
172 Lithuanian Clbrgy AND Literature (Nov.,
Matsulevic, rector of the Seminary of Kovno, published a great
number of delicate lyrical poems, which brought him great pop-
ularity. Mention may be made only of the following: Pavasaris
bahai (Voices of Spring) and Parskausmus Garbe (Through Suf-
ferings to Glory. A pioneer of the Lithuanian Catholic press was
Rev. Aleksandros Dambraukas, bom in 1861, whose activity was
not confined to literature. He founded the theological monthly
magazine Draugija (The Society), the leading organ of the Lith-
uanian clergy. As chairman of the Society of St. Kasimir,
founded for the purpose of publishing scientific and religious
books, he stimulated popular culture and even brought to light the
first Catholic translation of the whole Bible by Joseph Skvireckas,
professor at the Seminary of Kovno.** The Catholic daily Viltis
(Hope), at Vihia, was foimded in 1907 by Rev. Joseph Tumas,
and later on directed by Rev. F. Kemesis, who at present is an
indefatigable champion of the Lithuanian Catholic press in the
United States. Three Lithuanian priests of the diocese of Vilna,
Novicki, M ironas, and Petrulis inaugurated the publication of the
Ausra, an illustrated weekly. The learned historian of Lithuania
under the Poles, Kazimiras Propolanis, rector of the Church of
St. Stanislas in Rome, founded the ecclesiastical review Vadovas
(The Guide) at Sejni. At the same town there has been pub-
lished Saltinis (The Source), a weekly largely circulated among
Lithuanian Catholics and founded by Rev. Joseph Laukaitis.
In 1914 twenty-five papers and magazines, of which seven-
teen had a frankly Catholic character, appeared in Lithuania.
The SakiniSf as I was told in Lithuania, issues more than 50,000
copies a week. Between 1904-1914 the Lithuanian press pub-
lished over twenty-five hundred volumes originally printed in
Lithuanian or translated from other languages. The number of
original woiks is steadily increasing. Dramatists of renovm, like
Keturakis, Gizutis, and Vidimas, the author of the Shakespearean
t6The earliest tnntlator of the Bible into Lithuanian was Jonas Bretkunas. Maironis,
op, cit,, p. 214. The first printed Lithuanian Bible was that of Samuel Boleslas Chilinskis
(London, 1660). See: An account of the trafuluiicn of thcBibU into the Lithuonian tongue.
Oxford, 1659; M. Stankiewicz, Study ia bibliograficsne nod literatura litewska, Wiadomosc o
Biblii KtewtkUf, drukowanej w Londyni* 1663 rohu, i o wrsekomyn jej tlomacMU Samuelu
Boguslvwic Chytinskim, (Bibliographical studies in Lithuanian literature. A monograph on
the Lithuanian Bible printed in London in 1663 and the supposed translator Samuel Boguslaw
Chylinski.) Krakow, 1886; H. Reinhold, Die sogennante Chylinskische BibelubersetMung, in
Mitteiiungen, vol. iv, pp. 105-163; 207-273. Reza published his translation of the Lithuanian
Bible in 1824. Biblia, tai esti, IVitsas Sewentas Rasstas Seno ir Naujo Testamento, Lietu-
wiukay perstallytas, ism naujo perweiadetas ir ketwirta karia isMspaustas, Tilsit, 1824.
1919) Lithuanian Clergy and Literature 173
trilogy Probociu Seseliai (The Ancestors' Shadows) are striving
to lay the foundations of a national theatre. Satrijos Ragana,
Bite, Lazdinu Peleda, Zemaite have shown that Lithuanian women
are anxious to contribute to the upbuilding of an independent
literary Lithuania. Their novels, filled with graceful descriptions
of rural life, testify to the flexibility of the Lithuanian tongue
and the richness of its vocabulary.
The linguistic argument is brought forward by the leaders
of Lithuanian nationalism who aim at the political freedom of
their own coimtry. If Lithuania is peopled with a race ethnic-
ally distinct from the Slavic races, if the best proof of this asser-
tion is afforded by the language, if Lithuanian culture develops
independently from that of the other peoples with whom in the
past the country was forcibly associated, then, at this time, when
the small nationalities of Europe are rising from lethargy or
oppression, there is no reason to deny to Lithuanians the right to
proclaim their political autonomy, to mark their own boimdaries,
and to establish in their native capital, Vilna, the centre of
Lithuanian culture. Between Germans, Russian and Poles, Lith-
uania has fought the hardest battles for the preservation of her
national existence. Russians were not able to absorb Lithuania
by violence, nor could the Germans and Poles succeed in their
endeavors to denationalize her by means of their culture.
At the end of his interesting work, Luhuania, Past and
Present, Vidunas writes as follows: "The great powers want to
bury the Lithuanian language and customs. Of course they
attribute to their own culture a greater value. This is the con-
viction of Russians, as well as of Poles and Germans. These
peoples are animated by plans to spread their power. By means
of the absorption of so many living forces they hope to strengthen
their own national body. They wish to expand their own influ-
ence at the expense of the weak. The Lithuanian tongue is
threatened with extinction. The study, however, of the Indo-
European language shows its grammatical importance. It holds
a foremost place in the history of philology; it throws light upon
the modes of thought and the speech of a group of races. Hence
it follows that from the point of view of civilization, the Lithu-
anian nation is entitled to live its own life. It would be wrong
to object that the civilizing power of that tongue is exhausted.
We are just beginning to achieve great philological value. But,
174 MEMORIES OF FRANCE [Nov.,
however that may be, it would be unfair to base upon the civil-
izing power of a language the right to existence. No men can
take the life of those who, according to their notions, are im-
worthy to live; for the Almighty called them to existence. The
same is true with peoples. The divine power leads them through
the intricate windings of history, and assigns to each its place
and role.**
We subscribe to these wise words. If the World War has
been waged with the purpose of re-establishing the freedom of
races enslaved to ambitious and unscrupulous power, and if one
of its chief aims was the defence of small nationalities, Lithuania
may justly claim her own national autonomy. If the hour has
now struck for the full awakening of Lithuania, we feel that this
joyful revival of a vigorous race will serve the interests of Chris-
tian civilization and add to the list of Catholic nations a people
that never flinched from its devotion to the Catholic Church, even
in the face of martyrdom and violent denationalization.
MEMORIES OF FRANCE.
BY FRANCIS P. DONNELLY, S. J.
A " gpltrmghe," Irish dirge written with GdeUe **intemdl rime,*' to the mr: Lament ofMcnree,
The lilies of France, once fair and white,
Were bright in bloom and gladdened the glance;
Their dance was the dance of fairy sprite;
Ah, light of poise were the lilies of France!
Lilies of France, your snows have all fled;
And wet are the eyes you held to entrance;
Lilies of France upon you have tears bled;
You are red like the poppy, lilies of France!
The woods of Argonne, green home of song.
Where thronging birds ever blithely trilled on.
Where echoing dells held melody long,
Ah, glossy green leaves had the woods of Argonne!
Woods of Argonne, your music is hushed.
Where rushed the harsh din till the battle was won.
Woods of Argonne, where our fair ones lie crushed.
Fall has blushed there forever, woods of Argonne!
TREASURES THAT GROW NOT OLD.
BY FANNY MORTON PECK.
|ERTAIN citizens of New York claim with pride to
belong to that exclusive class of natives whose in-
terest in monuments and objects of art is not damp-
ened by proximity, who have seen all the sights of
the metropolis, have scaled the heights and probed
the depths, have admired its most familiar wonders and enjoyed
the beauties hidden from all but its inner circle. If such a one
would come nearer to having a clean bill of metropolitan experi-
ence, I would suggest an addition to the record of his accomplish-
ment. In one of the most accessible parts of town, in the imme-
diate vicinity of the Cathedral, may be found a museum of un-
usual content, whose exhibits not only interest, but, better, inspire
the spectator with an edification worth going far to seek, for they
are the trophies of victors in a great war, the war daily renewed
of Qirist and His missionaries against ignorance and error. I
refer to the Museum of the Missions in the office of the Society
for the Propagation of the Faith. The following brief descrip-
tion of certain of the exhibits chosen at random will introduce
the collection to those of our readers to whom it is unknown.
Since 1909 Monsignor John J. Dunn has been amassing his
treasures, as there arrived by degrees from mission lands gifts
and specimens from the grateful priests and sisters whom he has
aided by his contributions of money and supplies. At present
one room of good size houses the exhibition. Around the walls
and surmounting the cases one sees ominous-looking weapons of
war and of the chase, discarded deities, helmets used in African
devil-worship, snowshoes from the frozen North, and so on, a
testimony to the obedience of the Qiurch's emissaries to Christ's
designation of the whole world as a mission field and every
creature as a hearer of the preaching of the Gospel.
That no comer is too dark and no soul too humble is borne
witness to by the objects shown in the section devoted mainly to
Africa and the islands of the Pacific. In these lands, remote
from Christian influence, Satan himself directly is the worst foe
176 Treasures that Grow not Old [Nov.,
of the missionary, and some of the contributions sent by the in-
trepid priests who must contend against devil-worship are sinister
in the extreme. A large wooden dagger of peculiar shape was
once a factor in diabolical seances in Lower Nigeria, and some
of the native converts testified to having seen it, in their pagan
days, move long distances through the air unsupported. Near
it is a wooden gavel, formerly used to summon the devil-worship-
pers to their orgies. Scarcely less unpleasant is a headsman's
block from Dahomey, the actual basis of execution of many an
unfortunate in that State. Here is a handful of leopard's teeth
bimched together, employed as a charm against evil.
A glimpse of native life is given by a child's ^^dress," a
hoop of soft woven material in imitation of snakeskin; a neck-
lace, also of snakeskin, with bell attached, by means of which
the whereabouts of the baby yielding to wanderlust could be
ascertained; and a sample of red material, looking like stiff
paper, but in reality bark cloth, out of which, when they attend
to the matter at all, the natives make strong and comfortable
clodiing. A model of a British East African canoe is long and
shaped like our newspaper boats of long ago, with planks sewn
together with thongs, and, notwithstanding the fact that the swell-
ing of the wood in the water closes to some extent the holes thus
made, constant bailing is necessary to keep afloat.
The most arresting exhibit from the Gilbert Islands is some
garlands of human teeth, formerly used as dancing ornaments,
and obtained by a cannibal tribe from the bodies of their victims.
To offset this gruesome story, it is comforting to be able to relate
that this same tribe has now been entirely converted to Catholi-
cism.
Across the room is the British Indian collection, with many
samples of the domestic and religious art of the country. Really
beautiful are some alabaster elephants equipped with houdahs,
and a pair of candlesticks, whose bases are curved serpents' tails,
while half a shelf is given up to a series of little silver images
illustrative of the popular life and beliefs of the natives. A
pair of shoes, of the style we have here, suitable for the muddy
roads of India, must reduce shoe designing to a pathetic sim-
plicity. A wooden sole rests on two horizontal pieces of the same
material, and, as the donor points out, when a small knob set
towards the front has been firmly grasped by the big toe and its
I9«9] TREASURES THAT GROW NOT OLD 177
neighbor, laces or buttons are superfluous! Idols there are
aplenty, conspicuous by the hideousness of their traits, the notable
exception being an exquisite reclining Buddha of alabaster, one
of the finest pieces in the entire collection.
A most diverting series of statues, which have outlived their
usefuhiess even for the missions, has been donated by Father
Aelen, of Nellore, of which we may mention representations of
St. Antony, who has been reconstructed piecemeal, as each part
of him died of old age; and of St. Francis Xavier, whose beard
and stole alone betray him. An Infant Jesus in the Manger is
strongly suspected by Father Aelen of having seen service as an
idol in former years. But presently the smile that could not be
suppressed is forgotten, and the hardships and privations of the
life of the heroic missionary, of which these figures are but the
humorous expression, are borne in upon us very forcibly. At
sight of his old shoes, worn to shreds in God's service and re-
placed as a great event by a convert on the occasion of his mar-
riage, we stand in quiet awe, and feel that we are in very truth
in presence of treasures that grow not old.
The Japanese section of the museum is next in order, and
is a veritable Pantheon of Buddhist and Shintoist divinities. A
delightful little bronze statue represents Shaku (Buddha) as a
boy, with the right hand pointing towards heaven and the left to
earth, standing poised for the legendary three steps forward and
four backward, which it is alleged he took at birth, exclaiming:
"I alone under heaven and on earth merit all respect." Passing
with a mention Fu-Do the Immovable, designed to frighten evil-
doers, and Aizen-Mijo-0, a rather novel conception of the god of
love, of ferocious aspect, with three eyes and six arms, we pause
a moment before two handsome gilded specimens of the Fox Cod,
the favorite deity of Osaka, sitting facing each other, each with
one paw raised and tail stiffly erect. The sender writes that
most of the shops and homes of Osaka have a god-shelf, with its
pair of male and female foxes. In the grounds of nearly all
the factories is a fox shrine, endorsed by "the firm," who would,
they say, expose themselves to ruin by neglecting this practice.
Bearing the foxes company are Ama Inu, the celestial dogs
that guard the entrance to the Shinto temples. Cerberus himself
is no fiercer, and the Shintoists who repair to their places of
worship for prayer possess in full measure the courage of their
VOL. ex. 13
178 TREASURES THAT GROW NOT OLD [Nov.,
convictions* The bronze female figure, clad in a red cloak, whom
we next observe, is presented to us as Kishi-Bojin, formerly a
woman who devoured children, in second life a demon for pun-
ishment and the mother of five himdred infants, of whom she
was condemned to consume one daily. Having been converted by
Buddha, the Japanese adore her as the protector of children, and
offer her as ex-votos the clothing and toys of their deceased
little ones*
Further on, it is pleasanter to behold a small wooden figure
of Diakoku, the most popular of the seven gods of happiness,
squatting upon his inevitable sacks of rice* Numerous little
shrines or altars are to be seen here and there, one to Buddha in-
voking him as the "protector of sinners.'* Two very beautiful
objects are a pair of yellow copper candlesticks, such as are
used in Nippon as o£ferings to Buddha. The base is a tortoise,
who is symbolic of ten thousand years of life, and upon his back
stands a crane, representing a thousand years, who holds the
candle — ^both exquisitely fashioned.
In addition to religious trophies our museum contains many
charming examples of the art of the Land of the Rising Sun, and
as well some exhibits of real historical value, for instance, the
small sabre in the collection of swords, most of them about a
hundred years old. It was once the property of a woman of the
Samurai, and is suggestive of a sinister page in the history of
Japan. In accordance with a very old custom each daughter of
a lordly house, when about to be married, was presented with
such a sabre, with the following injunction: "You are about to
leave your house and now belong to your husband and his fam-
ily. For your honor and ours, you can never return here. If
any difficulties arise which you cannot bear, take this sabre and
put an end to your troubles.'* Even the yoimg and weak were
not spared the tragic duty of hari karu
The gentle influence of Qiristianity is gradually driving
these dire customs into the background, and we turn with relief
to the objects belonging to or made by the Catholic Japanese,
whose minds are filled with kinder thoughts than suicide, demons
and false gods. The number of these Catholics is being daily
augmented, thanks to Japan's zealous bishops and missionaries.
Here telling proofs of their success greet us on all sides, ranging
from the fan of a pagan priest of Hokkaido, who exchanged the
I9T9.1 TREASURES THAT GROW NOT OLD 1 79
garb of a bonze for the habit of a Trappist lay-brother, to the
necklace of a sorceress, sent by Bishop Berlioz of Hakodate* Its
owner was converted by a woman catechist, and died some years
ago in excellent dispositions and was followed into the Churc)
by her blind husband and her son.
Two hand-painted china dishes bear the images respectively
of Qirist and the Blessed Virgin. Their decidedly Japanese fea-
tures and the sti£f folds of the robe of Our Lord are at first aston-
ishing, but surprise soon yields to the gratifying realization that
Catholicism has indeed become the lasting belief of many of
the natives of Japan, and that East and West have not only met,
but become one in honoring Jesus and His Blessed Mother. A
bell which was in use for many years at the isolated Hakodate
mission has been sent by Bishop Berlioz. Could it speak English,
its tongue would tell us, I am convinced, golden tales of piety
and heroism and, its work taken up by a more powerful succes-
sor, its faithful service surely entitles it to the honored place it
now occupies. Not far oflf is an Imperial Cup of white and green
china, which was granted to Father Jacquet, Bishop Berlioz's
Vicar General, for exceptional services during the famine of
1905; and beside it, in a basket, are samples of the food eaten
by the natives during that famine, dried grains of wheat and two
hard substances which give every indication of being nothing
more nor less than stones.
We shall close our account, necessarily incomplete, of the
exhibits from the Island Kingdom, with a word or two about a
little bronze statue, from Hakodate, of the Blessed Virgin and
her Divine Child, both as unmistakably Japanese as the artist
who fashioned them during, or shortly after, the time of St.
Francis Xavier. The statue was left by the last member of a
Christian family to his pagan relatives, whose descendants have
had it for three himdred years. It is to be hoped that the light
of faith will not be denied to the present members of the family,
whose roof was shared for so long with the Mother of Divine
Grace.
The Chinese section of the museum is the last and, perhaps,
the most interesting, for the missionaries from the Celestial King-
dom have been particularly generous in their contributions. To
many of us China seems a mission land par excellence. Its enor-
mous extent, its conservatism as old as the world, and the conse-
iSo TREASURES THAT GROW NOT OLD [Nov ,
quent dangers, never wholly absent, for the valorous priests who
brave them with a divine equanimity, make it loom large upon
the horizon of the pagan world. Who of us, in extreme youth,
was not admonished to put by pennies for the rescue of Chinese
infants? In consequence, if we weathered our first natural storm
of indignation over the privations entailed, many of us grew up
with an interest in the babies we had saved and in their ensuing
career, and from them our solicitude took in the Church in gen-
eral, of which they are no doubt by this time stable pillars.
The Chinese exhibit aboimds in charming bits of local color.
Quantities of opium pipes and incense sticks are redolent of the
East. Little wooden figures of accurate workmanship show us
the Celestial at home at his trade, in the fields. Here we see
a pair of shell spectacles, with elaborately carved nose-piece and
sticks hinged in the middle. These are the badge of intellectu-
ality, we are told, and the desire to appear learned rather than
vision more or less defective, seems to be the prime factor in
their adoption by the Chinaman. Another evidence of the
proverbial peculiarity of the heathen Chinee is a razor, which is
used, the card tells us, not to shave the beard, which, if he can
achieve it, the native carefully guards, but to do its worst upon
his unoffending head, leaving nothing but the queue. Since the
declaration of the republic, it would seem, even this check to the
shaver's thoroughness has been removed.
Father Frazer, a yoimg American priest who volunteered for
the missions in 1905, has sent some curious things, among others,
one of his calling cards, a large piece of stiff red paper about
eight by five inches in size, with his name in Chinese in large
black letters down the centre. The card case is in proportion,
and we pass on with the conclusion that calling must be one of
the pet extravagances of the Chinese. A wedding invitation, also
on red paper about twelve by six, is not unlike the calling card
to the uninitiated.
But it is Chinese religious belief that furnishes most of the
curios in this section of Monsignor Dunn's museum. Of the three
religions of China — Buddhism, Confucianism and Taoism — the
first is the most popular. Buddhas without number, large and
small, artistic and hideous, of metals costly and mean, line the
shelves and look down at us from their seats upon the cases.
Some are exceedingly valuable and have played in their day
I9I9-] TjfSASURES THAT GROW NOT OLD l8l
important parts in the idol worship of the country of their origin.
A necklace of Buddhist beads comes from Wen-Chow, and, we
understand, the words **0 mi do vd^ must be said on each bead,
the meaning, however, having long been lost. Many little images,
idols of some sort, would furnish a delightful hour to a student
of comparative religions, but even the average spectator finds
much that is interesting in each. Two have realistic beards of
coarse hair, and look hoary enough to have been adorned by the
Chinese Adam, Pan-ku. A shockingly ugly deity is the "Guardian
God." In each temple he stands beside the divinity venerated
there, with his object in life, "FoA ohV^ (Punish the wicked)
written upon tablets which he carries. The missionary who sent
him informs us that when more than life size he is quite terrible
to behold, and he is doubtless a brilliant success at worrying those
who regard him into righteousness, at least for the moment. A
little further on one makes the acquaintance of the Goddess of
Mercy, a gilded squatting figure of extreme ugliness, whose
clients, looking "not with the eyes, but with the mind," must rely
upon her interior beauties of disposition, nobly ignoring her
physical handicaps.
A white china statue of the most famous goddess of the
Chinese Empire, "The Goddess That Has Pity on the World,"
was sent by Father Frazer from Ning-po. In life she was a virgin
who sacrificed her arms that medicine might be made from them
for her parents. Heaven, believing in compound interest, com-
pensated her with an ample supply of arms, to wit, one thou-
sand, which must have been something of an embarrassment of
riches. Her invocation is enormously widespread in China, and
the childless, the wicked, the good — all hope to receive from her
the object of their petitions. Two good copies of the tablet called
"the Eight Signs," one from Chu-san, show the superstitious puz-
zle which is foimd over nearly every door in China to ward off
evil spirits. The face of a tiger, which would do credit to a
futurist artist, dominates the picture, and he must be most effi-
cacious, for his fiery eyes and sharp fangs would strike terror
into something of far greater address than a boneless wraith.
Whether the Chmaman be a Buddhist or a Taoist, he is first
of all an ancestor worshipper, and this cult may be called the
real religion of the Celestial Kingdom. The museum boasts sev*
•ral ancestor tablets (ihais)^ small slabs of meUl, stone or wood.
!8a Treasures that Grow not Old [Nov.,
upon each of which is written the name of an ancestor of the
owner. The well-to-do have special temples erected to contain
them, but the poor have, if not a room, at least a comer, dedi-
cated to their special worship, which takes place with great cere-
mony several times a year. This ancestor worship was the main
stumbling-block of the early missionaries, some, notably the
famous Jesuit Ricci, even seeing the advisability of allowing it in
a mild form. It was finally prohibited by a Papal bull in 1742,
with the consequent defection of large numbers of influential
converts.
But the Chinese section of the Museum of the Missions can
show Christian curios as well as pagan. The native children are
taught embroidery by the Sisters, and some exquisite samples of
die work of the pupils of the Sisters of Charity at Ning-po — slip-
pers, scissor-holders, mats, etc. — ^are shown for our admiration.
Father Montanar, formerly a missionary in Kwang-tong and
foimder of the Chinese Catholic mission in New York, has sent
as one of his contributions two tiny pairs of dainty embroidered
satin slippers, which belonged to the little daughter of one of his
catechists. They suggest pleasant pictures of the little lady her-
self, and one wonders whether she outgrew them or is one of
those heroic little Christians who think no age too early to begin
to make war upon the pomps and vanities of the world.
That the little Christians of China can push the love of their
religion to the borders of heroism is attested by a little statue of
Our Lady of Lourdes, which is one of the most valued exhibits in
the collection. It is the work of a Chinese Sister, as one may in-
stantly infer from the face of Our Lady, who holds a dear little
Chinese baby in her arms — the Infant Jesus. Were it not for the
rosary at her right side, we should be inclined to doubt the
printed label which identifies the statue. At the time of the
Boxer uprising, when Sisters and children were being driven from
their burning convent in the Pe-tang compound north of Pekin,
one of the little ones remembered the statue and, at the risk of
her life, ran back into the burning building to seek it. The
Blessed Virgin watched over her youthful client, and child and
statue came forth in safety, to the great relief of the Sisters.
Other articles that repay consideration are a chalice-box
beautifully carved by a Chinese priest; a tea-caddy of black silk
intricately embroidered in white, made by orphans in Han-kow
I$190 TREASURES THAT GROW NOT OLD itj
under the care of native Sisters; and a biretta such as was worn
by Qiinese priests for three hundred years, which will be a sur-
prise to Americans, who are accustomed to nothing half so fine.
It is black, heavily embroidered in gold, with two long streamers
at the back — a most imposing a£fair, which must have made the
wearer resemble Confucius himself.
The piece de resistance of the Giinese section is a bronze
statue, which is the first thing that greets the eye as the room is
entered, and the last thing to which one turns a fascinated gaze
upon leaving. It comes from Bo-zen, is five hundred years old,
and is a representation of the Goddess of Reason, a female
swathed figure about two and a half feet high, carrying between
her folded arms a detachable stick with a tuft of horsehair fast-
ened to it, by which her votaries of the past kept the flies from her
divine countenance. But it is the face itself that is remarkable.
The rounded but shrewd features seem to tell of an insight that
began with the ages, and a glitter in the black, beady eyes dares
the beholder to set them a problem they may not read. But,
with the coming of the missionaries, the ancient dame's day was
done, and she now stands a relic of a creed outworn, a testimony
to the failure of her powers unwilling to yield supremacy to
the light that now floods her former domain, the dazzling and
eminently reasonable light of the Catholic Faith.
HACBETH-A STUBT IS SIN.
BT ALBERT B. PURDIE.
S CAMPBELL once said there were scenes
acbeth that he could never wish to see acted
le stage, because, like certain passages in
lylus, they defied representation. liiis ia
ips very true with respect to the histrionic art,
hut the critic might have added with profit that the play is a
world-tragedy, acted every day and by everyone on the world-
stage — for it is the story of a great temptation and a faU.
To form any conclusions as to the nature of Shakespeare's
religious beliefs is outside the scope of this article; we will con-
tent ourselves with the observation that if he was not a profess-
ing Catholic, his work, nevertheless, breathed Catholic teadiing,
practice and devotion. This is especially true of Macbeth. As
the dramatist made Holinshed his historical source, so he almost
seems to have referred to St. Thomas Aquinas for his philosophy.
He takes the stem truths set forth by the Angelic Doctor, and
clothes them with flesh and blood; he verifies them in the arena
of life; they are warm and alive in the characters that move
in the cycle of his play, and they remain, perduring and im-
mutable, after the strife of human lives is quieted and man and
woman have returned to elemental dust. St. Thomas and Shake-
speare are statement and illustration of the same truths, and if
we would appreciate the one, it is not well to ignore the other.
Coleridge has indeed expressed the opinion that "the gen-
eral idea is all that can be required from the poet — not a
scholastic logical consistency in aU the parts." But our pur-
pose is to show that in the tragedy of MadteA, " Scholastic
logical consistency " is to be found, that the play is indeed a
complete study in sin, and lends itself to an analysis, whidi
corresponds in a remarkable way to the treatment of the same
subject by the greatest of Christian philosophers.
The theme broadly divides itself into three parts:
(I) The Temptation to Sin. Acts Ml, Sc. I. Summ. L
Ilae. Q. 75-84.
I9I9.» MACBETH: A STUDY IN SIN 185
(II) The Sin. Act II., Q. 71.
(III) The Consequences of Sin. Acts II-V, Q. 85-87.
I. The Temptation to Sin.
St. Thomas, following St. Augustine, defines sin as that
which is said, done or desired contrary to the eternal law, which
is nothing else than the Divine Will regulating the natural order
and forbidding any interference in that order. Every created
being, by fulfilling the purpose of its existence and acting in
accordance with the end to which it was ordained by Cod, is
playing its appointed part in the Creator's great scheme. An
act of rebellion means not only suicide to the agent (since it
deserts its proper sphere of activity) but is a tendency to sub-
vert the order to which it naturally belongs, and above all con-
stitutes an ofi'ence against Cod, Who is the Upkeeper and Con-
server of the universe. Among beings in this world sin is
properly attributed only to man, who, although necessarily de-
termined to happiness as an end, is able in virtue of his power
of free-will to seek that happiness in other good than Cod, Whom
nevertheless his right reason infallibly dictates is the ultimate
object of his happiness. Man reaches his end by the observance
of acts, and into these acts enters the twofold element of rea-
son and free-vrill. The function of the reason is limited to the
infallible judgment on the goodness or badness of an act; it is
left to the will to determine on its performance or omission,
and so primarily to the will we must attribute evil acts, and the
resultant moral perversion of a human nature.
An evilly-inclined will {malitia voluntatis) is thus the prime
interior cause of sin {causa sufficiens complens peccatum est
solo voluntas); but there are two exterior causes of great mo-
ment, namely man and demonic agencies, which by suggestion,
persuasion and temptation influence the will to become interiorly
false to itself.
Shakespeare approached his study in sin as a dramatist no
less than a philosopher, and so with tremendous effect he opens
his play with the introduction of the preternatural exterior cause
of sin. The first scene may indeed be regarded as declaring
the existence of the powers of evil with whom "fair is foul and
foul is fair.'' They make their appearance in an arid waste
— a prelude of contrast to the sphere of strained activity in
1 86 MACBRTH: A STUDY tN SiN [Not..
which they are soon to play their part The arid waste is their
natural abode; they enter the habitation of human beings only
by invitation. When there arise the foundations of a possible
home within the human breast, they are at once at the side oi
the builder, who is perhaps fool enough to parley with them,
and weary not in their importunities till the roof is closed over
their heads.
Sin is indeed, as Monsignor Benson remarks, ^the chang-
ing of an ideal. The change was already at work in Macbeth,
when in company with Banquo, while thundery rack was driven
over the blasted heath, darkening the serene blue of heaven, he
was confronted by the malignant spirits, whom his inner trad-
ing with evil had implicitly convoked.
First WUchr--A\\ hail, Macbeth! hail to thee, thane of Glamis!
Second WUch—K\\ hail, Macbeth! hail to thee, thane of Cawdor!
Third Witch--K\\ hail, Macbeth! that shall be king hereafter!
and as they are about to disappear, Macbeth is awakened from
the thoughts that obsess his mind:
Stay, you imperfect speakers, tell me more:
By Sinel's death I know I am thane of Glamis
But how of Cawdor? The thane of Cawdor lives
A prosperous gentleman; and to be king
Stands not within the prospect of belief
No more than to be Cawdor. Say from whence
You owe this strange intelligence?
But deaf to exact questioning, they vanish like bubbles into the
air.
"The devil,'* says St. Thomas, "tempts by exploring the
inner condition of a man, diat he may work on that vicious pro-
pensity to which a man is more prone. Though he cannot abso-
lutely turn the will, he can in a way work a change in the baser
powers, and though he does not force the vrill, nevertheless he
inclines it." The "witches" seized on Macbeth's growing pas-
sion and nurtured it by their pretended prophecies. When we
remember the nature of demonic knowledge, we easily perceive
that every trace of the miraculous or even of the power of fore-
telling the actual future, peels off from their utterances. These
spirits prey on the intellects and imaginations of men, and ow-
ing to their peculiar relation to time and place, can convey the
ICMMlitttOlvcft, D- 134.
If 190 MACBETH: A STUDY IN S/N iSy
knowledge drawn from one mind to the mind of another by
means of transmission more express than those employed by men.
This explains the ^'prophecy" that Macbeth should be thane of
Cawdor; the collation of the thaneship had in fact been already
decreed by Duncan. That knowledge on the part of the evil
spirits was a useful handle; they are expert connoisseurs in the
workings of the human reason and will: building on the effect
which they knew the true information they had given would have
on their victim, and seeing that it would serve to heighten his
feverish ambition, they went a step further, and foretold what
they infallibly knew Macbeth's perverted nature would eventu-
ally press into fact
Banquo whose reason was less disturbed at once realized
the possibility of deceit. But in Macbeth, function was
smothered in surmise, and *^the swelling act of the imperial
theme'' so overcame him, that he refrained from a reasonable
estimate of his suspicions.
This supematnral soliciting
Cannot be ill; cannot be good: if ill,
Why hath it given me earnest of success,
Cotnmendng in a truth? I am thane of Cawdor:
If good, why do I yield to that suggestion
Whose horrid image doth unfix my hair,
And make my seated heart knock at my ribs,
Against the use of nature?
And so the fortress of his soul was yielding — ^not through ex-
ternal compulsion, be it noted, but because the traitor within
the gates was raising the portcullis to the enemy, and the enemy
did not fail to seize the advantage.
A second exterior cause of sin, says St. Thomas, is homo,
which Shakespeare introduces in the person of Lady Macbeth.
She has been called the Qytemnestra of English tragedy, and
is in truth the woman of a wild and remorseless determination
which carried her rough-shod over all the dictates of right
reason, and ^^screwed to the sticking-place" the courage of her
husband, whose will was not yet utterly divorced from reason.
Lady Macbeth knew her husband's dominant weakness better
than himself. This is perhaps a feminine prerogative: it was
manifested in the garden of Eden, and is exercised the world
over today.
iSS MACBETH: A STUDY IN SiN [Not.,
Imiy Jfac6«tA'— -Glamifl thou art, and Gtwdor; and flhalt be
What thou art promised; yet I do fear thy nature;
It is too full o* the milk of human kindness
To catch the nearest way; thou wouldst be great;
Art not without ambition, but without
The illness should attend it; what thou wouldst hi^ly,
That wouldst thou holily; wouldst not play false,
And yet wouldst wrongly win; thou'ldst have, great Glamis,
That which cries 'Thus must thou do, if thou have it;
And that which rather thou dost fear to do
Than wishest to be undone." Hie thee hither.
That I may pour my spirits in thine ear,
And chastise with the valour of my tongue
All that impedes thee from the golden round.
Which fate and metaphysical aid doth seem
To have thee crowned withal.
{Enter a Messenger)
What is your tidings?
Messenger — ^The king comes here to-night
The castle of Inverness, where ^^the air nimbly and sweetly
recommends itselT' and "heaven's breath swells wooingly,"
where all is sense-repose and peace, is now the stronghold of a
woman's fierce volitional activity.
Lady Macbeth stifled the cry of reason, and makes outcast
her very conscience, that naturale judicatorium of human beings,
in which sure sentence is passed on the morality of acts. She
flings defiant arms to Heaven, and not only unsexes but de-
humanizes herself. And this monster is to precipitate the ruin
of a falling man. On the first meeting of husband and wife,
the subject is referred to only in general terms:
Macbeth: My dearest love,
Duncan comes here to-night.
Lady Macbeth: And when goes hence?
Macbeth: To-morrow, as he purposes.
Lady Macbeth: never
Shall sun that morrow see!
But in Macbeth conscience makes one last appeal, even if on
ignoble scores. He saw the possibility of eternal punishment
{reatus poenae aetemalis)^ and what grieved him more deeply,
the punishment which would dog him for the rest of his mortal
days (poena concomitans) — ^'Ve still have judgment here." Had
the sinner paused a moment and weighed fully these considera-
tions, there might have been hope; but he curtly dismissed them.
I9I9-] MACBETH: A STUDY IN S/A iSf
and weakly posited two last motives of excuse, more debased
because more personal — ^his kinship to the virtuous and generous
Duncan, and his own present reputation.
Genuine desire to withdraw had now deserted Macbeth. It
is a common phenomenon that the weaker sharer in a tempta-
tion will often lodge a slight objection, which he himself is
afraid to look fully in the face, and over which he is content
to be dragged by the stronger. Macbeth's little resistance was
only to prove his wife's strength, and this purpose it fully
achieved. She thus attacks him —
Was the hope drunk
Wherein you dress'd yourself? hath it slept since?
And wakes it now, to look so green and pale
At what it did so freely? From this time
Such I account thy love. Art thou afeard
To be the same in thine own act and valor
As thou art in desire? Wouldst thou have that
Which thou esteem'st the ornament of life,
And live a coward in thine own esteem.
Letting "I dare not" wait upon **I would,"
Like the poor cat i' the adage?
Macbeth: Prithee, peace:
I dare do all that may become a man
Who dares do more is none.
Lady Macbeth: What beast was*t then.
That made you break this enterprise to me?
When you durst do it, then you were a man;
And, to be more than what you were, you would
Be so much more the man. Nor time nor place
Did then adhere, and yet you would make both:
They have made themselves, and that their fitness now
Does unmake you. I have given suck and know
How tender 'tis to love the babe that milks me:
I would i^ile it was smiling in my face
Have plucked my nipple from his boneless gums,
And dash'd the brains out, had I so sworn as you
Have done to this.
This terrible determination of a fierce woman steeled the man's
nerv6 to action.
The first act in this drama of sin is concluded. A human
will has been assailed; a human will has been broken: the devil
with his pomps and the world with its allurements have played
their part in a tremendous fall. Macbeth is a man undone.
He stands at the very Rubicon of crime — his wife by his side
supporting him.
igo MACBETH: A STUDY IN SiN [Nov.
II. The Sm.
Consummatio peccati est in opere. Night lies fast and
heavy about Inverness castle, and only the dismal shriek of the
owl, ^^the fatal bellman,'' at times disturbs the quiet. The man
of sin ere he enters the presence-chamber is walking in the
shadowy court, and there he encounters once more the power
of good. Past midnight, and Banquo, the happy genius of his
days, confronts him with latest tokens of the King's good-will
and pleasure: but it is too late — ^this final grace is refused, and
the royal kiss is given to one irretrievably pledged to treachery.
The last ray of light spends itself in the darkness, and the
shadows have utterly closed round the soul of Macbeth. Dis-
ordered and distraught, he waits the near moment when he shall
be called to fill the perfect measure of his sin. His will and
word are insurgents against the law of Cod {concupUum et dic-
tum contra legem aetemam); it only remains to do. But the
deed undone already tortures him, and his imagination deals
a first avenging blow:
Is this a dagger which I see before me,
The handle toward my hand? Come, let me clutch thee.
I have thee not, and yet I see thee still.
• •••••••
And on thy blade and dudgeon gouts of blood,
Which was not so before. There's no such thing:
It is the bloody business which informs
Thus to mine eyes.
This grim hallucination was the last interior protest against the
sin, but Macbeth bore up against the shock, his heated passions
suffering no cold breath, and the signal bell found him ready.
Duncan's blood seals his finished compact with the devil: the
bond uniting him to Cod is broken; the eternal law is injured,
the sinner has signed his ultimatum. The shadow of eternal
unrest begins to creep over the soul of Macbeth, and to lie
heavy over his mortal days. The prospect of sleeplessness in
this world and in the next is evident to him in all its horror:
Methought I heard a voice cry ^^Sleep no more!
Macbeth does murder sleep"— the innocent sleep,
Sleep that knits up the raveU'd sleave of care.
The death of each day's life, sore labour's bath.
Balm of hurt minds, great nature's second course.
I9I9-] MACBETH: A STUDY IN SiN ic,l
Chief nourisher in life's feast —
Still it cried '^Sleep no more!'* to all the house
^'Glamis hath murdered sleep, and therefore Cawdor
Shall sleep no more: Macbeth shall sleep no more!''
Terrible forebodement! the mocking bruit of an unavailing
Requiescat troubling the poor soul in the long reaches of the
life to come.
Duncan is in his grave:
After life's fitful fever, he sleeps well,
but ^^Macbeth shall sleep no more.''
III. The Consequences of Sin.
The first, general effect of sin, says St. Thomas, is the
corruptio naturae. Man is the subject of a threefold natural
good — the intrinsic principles of his nature by which he is
constituted a rational being, the natural tendency to the per-
formance of virtuous acts, and lastly, the gratuitous gift of or-
iginal justice or rightness. The first of these goods is immune
from the vitiating influence of sin, for no morally bad act can
make us less rational, less than men: the last of these goods, the
donum originalis justUiaef whereby the baser powers were abso-
lutely subject to the control of the reason of man, was lost to the
human race in the sin of Adam, and the dire effects of his fall
are the heritage of all creatures. It is to the second good,
namely, the natural tendency to virtue, to which St. Thomas re-
fers, when he says that the first general effect of sin is the
corruption of our nature. We are placed on the road of life
with our eyes turned Godward, but we are free to go forward
or to turn in the other direction: a step either way makes the
next step easier, and the third step easier still, until at last we
find ourselves journeymen to the goal of good or of evil.
The last three acts of the play exemplify this in the moral
state of Macbeth, who stands to suffer this huge consequence
of his act, diat his hold on good grows more infirm (^%ings bad
begun," he says, "make strong themselves by ill," IIL, 2), whilst
he has habituated himself to evil, that he has irritated the tores
which original sin brought to his nature — sores that render his
reason hesitant in action, his will in arms against good, his
whole self prone to conmiit wrong and burning with a gro¥ring
passion*
iga MACBETH: A STUDY IN SiN (Nov.
But besides thus sapping his moral forces, he is in a state
of guilt {culpa) J incurred by his changed relation to God, from
whom he has deliberately turned — ^an offence which must re-
main imputed to him till he makes sufficient satisfaction; and
this guilt* viewed in relation to the subject is in the nature of a
macula or stain, which, says St. Thomas, **debitum decorem ab
animo aufertJ*^ As in the case of material things, a bright ob-
ject may lose its brilliance after coming in contact with another
object, so in the world of the spirit, the soul loses its splendor
when it comes in contact with the baser good to which it cleaves
inordinately. Once illumined by the light of God's grace and
the flashing torch of its own reason, it has preferred to tread
in the byways of darkness, with the result that its white purity
is stained and its pristine lustre tarnished. It is not merely the
blood on their hands that frightens Macbeth and his wife, but
the cold shadow cast inwardly upon their souls:
I am in blood
Stepp'd in so far that, should I wade no more
Returning were as tedious as go o'er.
Lady Macbeth felt the same burden of guilt, was conscious
of the indelible stain, but restrained giving it expression till at
last, too long pent up, it burst involimtarily from her lips:
Out, damned spot! out, I say! . . . What will these hands
ne'er be clean? . . .
These are the first eff'ects of sin on the disposition of the
human soul, and it remains to consider with St. Thomas and
Shakespeare the more particular and more important conse-
quence, which goes by the name of punishment {de poena
peccati). St. Thomas says that if a thing rises in rebellion
against the order to which it is properly subject, the consequence
is that it will be suppressed by that order and by the govern-
ing power of that order. Now the sinner rebels against an
order — the highest order conceivable, whose governing power
is God: the result is that he must be suppressed by that order,
and this suppression is known as punishment. The obligation
which a man owes to the economy to which he belongs and
against which he offends has a threefold aspect, viewed firstly
in relation to his own proper reason which he is boimd to obey,
secondly in relation to the rights of other men, which he is bound
I9I9-] MACBETH: A STUDY IN SiN 193
to respect, and lastly in relation to God, whose eternal law calls
for his whole obedience. An act of sin is rebellion against
these three orders, and consequently incurs a triple punishment
— from self, from men and from God.
Macbeth's sin began interiorly with the willful disregard
of the dictates of right reason, and so his first punishment will
come interiorly from his inmost soul. His mind will stand to
torture him with anxiety and insecurity, his conscience will be
racked with remorse, and despair at last will freeze his very
heart JussistU Dominey lU omnis inordinatus animus sibi ipsi
sit poena. This is known as concomitant punishment {poena
peccati concomitans) j and it pursues the sinner through hb whole
course of crime.
Anxiety and insecurity seized hold of Macbeth inunediately
after the murder:
Whence is that knocking?
How is it with me when every noise appals me?
Moreover, this very anxiety and insecurity, bom of sin, opens
the way to further sin, and thus, in the terms of St. Thomas,
sin may even be the indirect punishment of sin. Having mur-
dered Duncan, he murders the two grooms, until at last the *^im-
perial theme'' is consummated, and he sits a King. But peace
is not yet:
For Banquo's issue have I filed my mind:
For them the gracious Duncan have I murderM;
Put rancours in the vessel of my peace
Only for them, and mine eternal jewel
Given to the common enemy of man.
To make them kings, the seed of Banquo kings!
Rather than so, come, fate, into the list,
And champion me to the utterance!
And to the utterance — ^to the very extreme he will proceed.
But fresh alarm descends upon Macbeth, for the seed of Banquo
is saved and that means his doom. The ghost of Banquo (awful
nemesis!) takes the place prepared for him at that ^^great feast.''
Macbeth breaks under the strain, he can play the part no longer,
and the horrible sore on his mind is bared to all the world.
St. Thomas places as one of the pimishments of sin the
increased liability to temptation from the powers of evil, and
so it is hardly surprising to find Macbeth at this juncture hav-
VOL. ex. 13
194 MACBETH: A STUDY 11^ SiN [Not.,
ing recourse to the ^Veird sisters,'' wkose pronouncements had
been so surely verified. Macbeth has given them his "eternal
jewel," and that was all they bargained for; they in turn set
him in the enjoyment of the worldly good he desired: now
they—
by the strengdi of their illusion
Shall drag him on to his confusion:
He shall spurn fate, scorn death and bear
His hopes liove wisdom, grace and fear:
And you all know security
Is mortals' chief est enemy.
Children of the father of lies, they make cruel and wan-
ton sport of their captive. Macbeth straightway damns these
powers of evil, cuts himself loose from them, but only to drift
faster down the strong stream of sin. Black clouds of despair,
the severest pimishment of self on self, darken the twilight in
which he has been walking since diat evening when with Banquo
he paced the troubled heath. This despair is the worst element
in concomitant punishment, the punishment which hurt human
nature inflicts upon itself. It broke the heart of one of the sin-
ners; it hardened the heart of the other:
Out, out, brief candle! *
Life's but a walldng shadow, a poor player
That struts and fiets his hour upon the stage,
And then is beard no more; it is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury.
Signifying nothing.
The sinner not only rebels against the order of his proper
reason, but also against the order of human government to which
he happens to be subject, and lastly against the whole order of
the divine economy. Accordingly, he merits punishment from
man and from Cod.
Macbeth
Is ripe for shaking, and the powers above
Put on their instruments.
The human forces first begin to concentrate against the
usurper after the murder of Banquo. All their eff'orts are in-
augurated "with Him above to ratify the work" — ^in proper con-
trast to their enemy, who initiated his career under the auspices
of the powers below.
I9I9-] MACBETH: A STUDY IN S/A 195
The last phases of Macbeth's earthly punishment are swift
and terrible. He is oppressed within and without. Yet there
is no contrition, only bitter reproaches —
Canst thou not minister to a mind diseased,
Pluck from the memory a rooted sorrow.
Raze out the written troubles of the brain,
And with some sweet oblivious antidote
Cleanse the stuffed bosom of that perilous stuff
Which weighs upon the heart?
No! it cannot be so. Causa complens peccatum est sola
voluntas. Those in sin must themselves cast out the disease:
the will freely turned to evil — it must freely return to good:
Therein the patient
Must minister to himself.
But Macbeth had smothered every tendency to good and showed
no movement to repentance. Devil-bought and God-forsaken,
he is now no man: the close of the ^^imperial theme" leaves
him a moral wreck — everything lost, except the mere animal
instinct to save his life:
They have tied me to a stake. I cannot fly,
But, bear-like, I must fi^t the course.
He fights and dies: the order of human government has pun-
ished the disturber of its quiet: the brief turmoil of his life
is ended.
There only remains the punishment to be inflicted by God,
and at this human speculation must stop short. Shakespeare
pursues Macbeth no further: the application to the individual
of the Qiristian principles of the doctrine of eternal punishment
rests with none but God.
Such is Shakespeare's study in sin, closely allied in treat-
ment to that given by St. Thomas and the Catholic Church.
Morality in the text-books is not a diff'erent thing from morality
in real life: the former is based on the latter, and it is only
when we are in hand-grips with the concrete that the awful
meaning of a truth is realized.
THE miSE VO MAN'S LANS.
BY P. G. SHTTH.
is not a popular word nowadays, especially
those who would like to see the "world's
or democracy" closed according to the oft-
isized programme, with every nation, great
mall, basking contentedly and prosperously
in the sunshine of self-determination,
A one-fourth fiery carbuncle garishly attached to a three-
fourths glowing emerald, constituting the insular "gem of the
sea," Ulster is the hope and pride of uncompromising fanatics
and unrelenting political tricksters, the despair of conscientious
statesmen and bewildered editors, the bane and alarm of the
dove with the olive branch. It is the sorest spot on the face of
creation, obstinately defying the efforts of all doctors and doc-
trinaires. Even the extreme surgical operation now proposed —
of amputating it from the main body — has only evoked a gen-
eral chorus of condemnation.
To most Americans, of all creeds and politics, standing
as it does in the way of settlement of the Irish question, it may
be truly said that the name of Ulster has become anathema.
Yet, give that northern province its due. It is a crystallized fact
that it has done much good in its way — that is, Irish Ulster has
— much good not only for the test of Ireland, but for England
and Scotland, for Europe, for America.
To briefly enumerate, Ulster gave Ireland her celebrated
representative parliament of Tara, the mother of all parlia-
ments; it gave her, through St. Patrick, who there learned ihe
manners, customs and language of the country, Christianity; it
gave the same to Scotland and the north of England; and from
the world-famous University of Armagh, where Alfred of
Northumbria and other British kings were educated, it sent forth
missionaries that gave Europe religion and science. In later
days it gave to Ireland valiant and triimiphant armies, the last
to yield to foreign power; and to America tens of thousands of
brave Revolutionary soldiers, when the Irish language was as
common as the English in the army of Washington.
If if.l The Irish No Man's Lanm i^
Only at l^ng inttrrals did a wart of inyation of land-
hungry cmigrante make the pot of Ulster seethe. Three of
these waves were Milesian or native Irish. First it was al-
lotted to the Irians or descendants of Ir, son of Milesius, who
built the great fortress of Emania of the Red Branch Knights
and ruled the province for many centuries. Next, in A. D.
332, came the filibustering Three CoUas, of the race of Here-
mon, son of Milesius, with a great army that swept all before it
with slaughter, burned Emania, formed the kingdom of Oirghi-
alla (consisting of the present coimties of Louth, Armagh,
Monaghan and Fermanagh) and reduced the Ulster of the
Irians to the present county of Down and the southern part of
Antrim — ^the main location of the present friction and general
impleasantness. The third invasion was headed by Owen and
Connell, sons of King Niall, who colonized the districts called
after them Tir-Owen and Tir-Connell, now Tyrone and Donegal.
This arrangement and division, which occurred in the fourth and
fifth centuries, held good for over 1,200 years.
At the time of the third invasion came St. Patrick. The
place was not new to him; he had spent many early years, not
overpleasant ones, in Ulster. Ten miles east of Armagh is
Lough Neagh, the largest sheet of water in the British Isles,
and several leagues northeast of the lake rises a long bleak
hill, in shape like an inverted dish, whence it is called Slemish,
or Dish Mountain. On its slopes once roamed a solitary figure
— ^young St. Patrick, tending the herds and flocks of his harsh
master, Milcho, whose rath lay in the valley below, where winds
the river Braid. Here St. Patrick passed the six years to which
servitude was limited by Milesian law, developed the character
reflected in his Confession: ^^I remained in the woods, and on
the mountain, even before the dawn, and I was roused to prayer
in snow and ice and rain, and I felt no injury from it, nor
was there any slothfulness in me, as I see now, because the
spirit was then fervent in me."
What Croaghpatrick, with its now celebrated annual pil-
grimage, is to Connacht, Slemish ought to be to Ulster, and more
so, for the great apostle of Ireland spent but one Lent on the
former mountain and six long years on the latter.
Full thirty years after his servitude on Slemish, Patrick
comes again into Ulster, comes bachaU or staff* in hand at the
198 THE IRISH NO MAIL'S LAND [Not.,
head of his white-robed company of clerics, to preach the gospel
of Christ. The territory embraced only Down and the part of
Antrim extending north to his old place of slavery by Slemish.
A circumscribed, contracted district is this new Ulster of the
Irians and the Red Branch, and so the apostle finds it in more
ways than one. Milcho, his old master, refuses to receive him.
MacCuill employs assassins to kill him, but afterwards repents,
is converted and becomes a saint Dubhan and Dubhaedh steal
his horses. Saran, twenty-six years king of Little Ulster, pre-
vents him from founding churches and is menacing and truculent
in his opposition, declaring: ^^Wherever I find a priest I shall
bring him under the edge of the sword.*'
The good in local human nature triumphed, however, and
with the aid of stanch friends and earnest converts St. Patrick
sprinkled the pkce with small churches, built in the original
Irish manner of wood or earth, and foimded what became in
course of time great schools and monasteries. Coming in his
latter days to Armagh he built a church and shrine on a site
granted him by the chieftain Daire in what is now Scotch street
and founded the primatial see of Ireland. Not long afterwards
he died and his remains were deposited in Downpatrick in the
tomb where later laid the remains of St. Bridget and St. Columb-
kille — ^a sacred spot which the proposed mutilation of Ireland
would confirm in cold and indifi^erent foreign keeping, like the
Holy Sepulchre under the ward of Paynim.
At Armagh there arose a great university whose seven
thousand students filled the streets when the church bells rang
at mom and eve. These included many from foreign lands,
^^poor scholars" of the period, supplied with books free, taught
and fed without charge. Among them was Aldfred, later King
of the Northumbrian Saxons, who, grateful for his entertain-
ment, wrote a poem in which he says (this felicitous translation
is by James Clarence Mangan) :
I also found in Armagh the splendid.
Meekness, wisdom and prudence blended:
Fasting as Christ has recommended,
And noble counsellors untransc«nded.
•
I found in each great church moreover.
Whether on island or on shore,
Piety, learning, fond affection.
Holy welcome and kind protection.
1919-] The Irish No Man's Land 199
I found the good lay monks and brothers
Ever beseeching help for others,
And in their keeping the holy word,
Pure as it came from Jesus the Lord.
I found in Ulster, from hill to glen.
Hardy warriors, resolute men,
Beauty that bloomed when youth was gone,
And strength transmitted from sire to son.
St. Fiech who wrote in the sixth century calls Armagh the seat
of empire. Historians call it the capital of Ireland in tem-
porals as well as spirituals.
Among other fs^mous schools and monasteries that sprung
up in the north were Bangor, founded by St. Comhgall,
with three thousand monks; Downpatrick, which sent forth the
famous scholar, John Duns Scotus (John of Down, the Irish-
man); Derry, founded by St. Columbkille, who loved and
praised it as a place of angels:
Deny, the glory of my native isle,
I celebrate thy praise, by nature blest;
Antrim, of St. Mochte; Ardboe, of St. Colman; Ardstraw,
of St. Eoghan; Devenish, in Lough Erne, with one thousand five
hundred fratres under St. Molaisse.
At this time the province consisted of the territories of
Oriel, Tirowen, Tirconnell, Ulster or Uladh and (in the north-
east comer), Dalriada. For a thousand years, except on rare
occasions of sudden hostile incursions, these divisions were main-
tained and the freedom and integrity of the country vigilantly
and vigorously defended. When, in A. D. 634, Congal, King of
Ulster, played the dangerous game, which afterwards proved so
deadly in the south of importing an army of foreigners to
help him in his ambitions, the national forces annihilated both
Ulidians and invaders in the great six-day battle of Moira, near
Lough Neagh, and for a long time afterwards that intermittent
volcano caused little trouble for the rest of Ireland.
In the ninth century came the marauding Danes and Nors-
men and found the clans unprepared to oppose them. They sur-
prised and plundered Bangor and ruthlessly slew nine hundred
of its monks. They stormed Arma^, put to the sword about
one thousand monks, students and citizens, and marched away
with great spoils. Many seaboard towns and abbeys they plun-
200 THE IRISH No MAN'S LAND [Nov.,
dered. But they made no settlement save a transient one some-
where near where St. Patrick landed on Loch Cuan, whose name
they changed to Strang-fiord, meaning the strong inlet of the sea,
from the tidal currents at the inlet, now Strangford Lough. They
also made the old name Uladh into Ulster, the place of Ula,
adding the Norse ster^ meaning "place," as in Leinster and
Munster.
In 1004 Armagh had a visit from the Norsemen's most
formidable opponent and Ireland's greatest monarch, the illus-
trious Brian Bom, who took from his neck his gold chain, weigh-
ing twenty ounces, and left it for alms on the high altar. Ten
years afterwards, following his death on that memorable Good
Friday after his decisive victory at Clontarf, his body was laid
in a stone coi&n on the north side of the same altar; and here
was also interred the remains of Brian's successor. King Malachy.
An experiment was made to imite Church and State; to tax
the five provinces of Ireland for the regular payment of the pri-
mate. It worked badly; attracted by the prospect of wealth, as
told by St. Bernard of Clairvaux, eight laymen in succession sacri-
legiously assumed the title of Archbishop of Armagh and seized
upon the revenues. This gross abuse was abolished through the
efforts of Archbishop St. Celsus, who died in 1129, and Archbishop
St. Malachy O'Moore, who died in 1148.
Little Ulster was ever the weak spot of the north. It was there
the Anglo-NoYman invaders first broke in under gigantic Sir John
de Courcy, built castles and made settlements, turned the native
monks out of their monasteries and put English monks in their
places, and out of land spoil and plunder built magnificent abbeys
in which no "mere Irishman" was allowed to make his religious
profession. This was the spirit of superiority, of racial prejudice,
for of course there was then no sectarian trouble, no Orangemen.
De Courcy's wife, Lady Africa, daughter of the king of Man, built
magnificent Gray Abbey. This baron of heroic mold, after holding
his own or other people's in Ulster for twenty-seven years, died
poor in France. For a deed of valor performed before the king
he received the privilege, passed on to his successors, the Lords
Kinsale, of keeping the head covered in the presence of royalty.
"His lordship may have the right to wear his hat before royalty,"
said Queen Victoria, when she noticed Lord Kinsale exercising his
privilege, "but he might take it off in the presence of a lady."
19I9*] The Irish No Man's Land joi
Carrickfergus Castle was the chief stronghold of the English
in Ulster, and most tenaciously they stuck to it. In 1315, hard
pressed by hunger and besieged by Edward Bruce, brother of
King Robert of Scotland, when trying to make himself king of Ire-
land, they killed and devoured thirty Scots, their prisoners, before
they would consent to surrender. Cannibalism, starvation and
murder made fetid atmosphere in some of these grim Ulster castles.
Walter de Burgo, called Earl of Ulster, under age but married and
vindictive, starved his kinsman Walter to death in the Green Castle
of Irishowen; for this the dead man's sister. Gyle, had the boy earl
assassinated by his squires while crossing a ford near Belfast one
Sunday morning saying his beads on his way to church at Carrick-
fergus. On account of which three himdred murder conspirators
were followed and put to death; the earPs uncle was tied in a sack
and drowned in a lake down in the County Mayo ; the earl's widow
fled to England with her infant daughter, who afterwards mar-
ried one of the royal family, and the empty title Earl of Ulster
became vested in the English Crown.
The Bissets fled from Scotland in consequence of murder, and
settled in the Nine Glens of Antrim. The MacQuillans, Welsh,
built the island stron^old of Dunluce, the finest in Ireland, on
the picturesque northern coast. Later came the MacDonnell High-
landers in their dark green plaids and deerskin footgear, whence
their name. Redshanks, seized Dunluce and made a settlement.
Their captain, the famous Sorley Boy, the Yellow-haired, drove the
English from Carrickfergus, captured and made the constable,
Walter Floddy, pay ransom, dismissing him one night after supper
with the assurance "plainly that Englishmen have no right in
Ireland." Sorley Boy's son James cau^t Sir John Chichester,
Governor of Carrickfergus, and cut off his head.
The leading family of Ulster, whose chiefs were inaugurated
in the stone chair of Tullahoge, in Tyrone, were the O'Neills, with
the O'Donnells a close second. The southern border was guarded
by the O'Hanlons, standard bearers of Ulster; east of them lay the
MacMahons of Monaghan, one of whose chiefs, Brian, in Dyak
notion of domestic decoration, spiked the heads of Sassenach in-
vaders on the palings of his garden near Carrickmacross ; and east-
ward still the Maguires of Fermanagh, whose chief, when asked
to admit an English sheriff, inquired what would be the fine for
killing him, so he might have the money ready. South of all lay
202 Thb Irish No man's Land [Nov.,
the plucky little principality of East BrefFny, now County Caven,
of the Clan O'Reilly, descended from Brian, King of Connacht, to
which province Cavao originally belonged, people who maintained
their own army, administered their own laws and even coined their
own money.
The chiefs of die Irians, in the present Down and Antrim,
were Magennis, MacCaitan, MacCeough, MacDunlevy and
O'Gowan. As frontier septs, ever confronted by the bristling fort-
resses and encroaching hosts of the enemy, they had to bear the
brunt of the trouble and the conflict, and so wasted away.
The Clan O'Neill well maintained its independence. Under
Shane the Proud numerous English families moved with his per-
mission into Tyrone in the belief diat they would have more peace
and security there than in the Pale, nor were they disappointed.
It was in Shane's time the MacDonnells settled in Antrim. He
made war on them and slaughtered many, dien visited them in
peace, and they slew him. His head was sent to be spiked on
Dublin Castle; his cairn, in the Glynnes of Antrim, scene of patri-
smmands a grand panorama of coast and inland
erce and hrilliimt resistance made by the northern
[nen, headed by Hugh O'Neill and Red Hu^
It the forces of Queen Elizabeth. Their crowning
jf the Yellow Ford, August 15, 1798. The dis-
nined the Irish cause. Artificial famine — ever a
reapon in Ireland — strewed Ulster with emaciated
le news concealed from him that his old enemy
dead, O'Neill went to Mellifont Abbey and sur-
24, 1603, one of the terms of the treaty being free
latholic religion for himself and his foUowers.
-ards, warned of a deadly government plot against
rritories, O'Neill and Rory O'Donnell, respective
and Tirconnell, fled overseas, leaving their unfor-
nd people to the mercy of the stranger.
»st invitingly abandoned and unprotected, the vast
;, whose fertile interior had never been violated
ire in transient raid, naturally attracted the covet-
nost avaricious of men, James Stuart, degenerate
»n of Scots and first oveiking of England and
romptly seized upon th* district from shore to
1919O Thr Irish No Man's Land 303
shore, divided it up into shires or counties and these again into
baronies and offered lands to whoso would buy, with a brand new
title of nobility.
The Ulster Irians' emblems, the lion on a green field and the
red hand, are probably the most ancient armorial bearings in
Europe. The red hand was assumed, probably as opima spolia,
by the O'Neills when they seized upon Tyrone. The dexter or
right hand appears on the silver seal of Hugh O'NeiU, King of
Ulster, who died in 1364, described by the Four Masters as "the
best man of the Irish in his time.'' The poet John Savage describes
the ancient heraldic device as waving over the army of the famous
Shane O'Neill the Proud,
Who raised aloft the Bloody Hand until it hid the sun.
And shed such glory on Tyrone as chief had never done.
When James seized upon Ulster he also stole the red hand,
whose antique honor far outdated and outclassed the arms of his
•wn house of Stuart or Stewart (originally Sty-ward, or "tender of
swine"), and he sold that ancient Milesian emblem, in conjunction
with the newly invented title of baronet and a large grant of the
plundered land, while it lasted, to all who gave him $50,000 and
engaged to erect a strong castle thereon, with bawn or enclosure,
each baronet to have in a canton or inescutcheon on his shield the
red hand (in a field argent a hand gules), "being the arms of the
ancient kings of Ulster." There was a fair response, netting him
over a million dollars.
Since then the red hand in canton or in escutcheon on the
shield of Sir Tom, Sir Dick or Sir Harry is a sign that his is not a
title won by ancestral merit or exploit, but sordidly purchased with
money. Now, in final and ironic abuse and degradation of the red
hand of ancient Ulster royalty, it is seen plentifully in the streets
of Belfast, on the distinctive buttons worn by Orangemen, with the
legend of most dubious import, "We stand for God and Ulster."
"To what strange uses do we turn, Horatio!"
On January 28, 1609, "conceiving the citizens of London to
be the ablest body to undertake the establishment of a Protestant
colony in the forfeited territory," James had a grant made out of
the county of Coleraine, now Derry, and the towns of Derry and
Coleraine, to twelve chief companies of London, consisting of
mercers, grocers, drapers, fishmongers, on condition they should
204 The Irish No Man's LA^D (Nov..
spend a million dollars in the work of plantation, and soon hosts of
cockney faces from the Thames appeared along the Foyle and
Bann. The Derry settlers made the name Londonderry, and they
took as their city seal that of London, to which was later added,
in memory of the celebrated siege, when the grandson of this same
King James in vain knocked for admission, the device of a castle,
with Death sitting at the gate.
Thirty thousand acres of the confiscated land were given to
Trinity College, Dublin, in aid of its efforts and services in turn-
ing young Irishmen into Englishmen and Catholics into Protestants.
Now appears on the scene the infamous Arthur Chichester of
Devonshire, Lord Deputy of Ireland, thief from his youth — as a
student expelled from Oxford for larceny — ^bigot by choice and
scoundrel by nature, of physiognomy so repulsive and petrifying
that, as Father Meehan, the historian, remarks, ^^one is inclined to
wonder that he ever sat to a painter." With him was associated
the merciless Scotch prelate, Andrew Knox of Raphoe. Ignoring
the Treaty of Mellifont, signed only about a year before, which
guaranteed the Ulster Catholics the free practice of their religion,
the pair started a furious Scotch Inquisition, to drive native chief-
tains into revolt and afford excuse for taking their lives and what
portions of their ancient estates were still left them. Mock trials
were held and savage sentences pronounced of hanging, drawing
and quartering. Among those sacrificed to the restless avarice of
Chichester was the- gallant Felim MacDevitt, hero of the Eliza-
bethan wars, he who in single combat slew the fiery Captain Martin,
"though locked up in steel," at Sligo; he now saw his entrails
burnt before him at Lifford, September 27, 1608. With him suf-
fered his intrepid chaplain. Rev. John O'Cahan. Alexander Mac-
Suarley, son of the celebrated Sorley Boy MacDonnell, Brian and
Art O'Neill, Rory and Geoffrey O'Cahan, Patrick O'Moore, and
with them the priests Lewis O'Laverty and Conatus O'Keenan, all
suffered together in 1615, one and all refusing to their latest breath
to save their lives by abandoning their Faith.
Knox incited the only too willing Government to expel all
priests, on penalty of death, from the country. The law was
passed in 1611. Anyone found concealing a priest or nun for-
feited his lands. Catholics were forbidden to educate their chil-
dren at home or abroad, and they were commanded under pain of
fine or imprisonment to attend Protestant services on Sunday.
1919O The Irish No Mai^s Land aos
To confirm the wholesale plunder of Ulster lands, and spe-
cially to secure his o¥m share of it, Chichester summoned the so-
called Parliament of Ireland, which had not met for twenty-eight
years. The Catholics happened to be in the majority, but he over-
came this by creating forty new seats, and his creatures carried all
before them. Some Catholic members weakly acquiesced in the
fraud perpetrated; not only that but Sir John Everard of Tip-
perary, who for his faith had lost his position as Chief Justice of
Ireland, brought in a bill supported by all his servile fellow Cath-
olic M. P.'s, most of whom, like himself, were of English descent,
for the attainder of the Earls of Tyrone and Tirconnell and their
adherents!
This infamy evoked the censure and warning of the illustrious
exile — ^tall, red-haired, vigilant, efficient — ^Florence Conroy, Arch-
bishop of Tuam, founder of the Irish College of Louvain. Writing
from Valladolid, March 1, 1615, to one of those same M. P.'s, he
says: '^Do you doubt that it is sinful to rob men not convicted of
any crime of their property? Were not these noblemen pardoned
by the king? And if they, either to avoid calumnious suspicion
or to practice their religion more freely, retired from the country,
is that a crime either proved or notorious? Moreover, most of
the Catholics of that territory (Ulster) must soon, at least in a few
generations, be perverted to error, and their example and numbers
will spread heresy throughout the other provinces."
Archbishop Conroy died in Madrid in 1629. In 1654 his
remains were transferred to Louvain, where they were interred at
the ri^t of the high altar in the church of the Irish Franciscans and
a becoming monument placed over them. His tomb now lies deep
under dust and debris as the result of the tremendous vandalic
bombardment of a few years ago; but the truth of his remarkable
prophecy is seen in the changed creed, politics and even names
of a large, vexed and vexing element of the population of Ulster.
Deprived of the ministrations of their own soggarths and
given the alternative of any creed but the ancient one, numbers of
Ulster Catholics succumbed after a generation or two, as fore-
told by "Fra Florentinus," and reluctantly abandoned their chil-
dren to the proselytizer. And with the change of creed came,
sometimes compulsory, sometimes in shame or snobbishness, a
change of name. Thus MacShane, a branch of the O'Neills, mean-
ing son of John (O'Neill), became Johnson and Jackson; MacEoin
306 THB IRISH No MAN'S LAND [Nov.,
sprung from Eoin or Owen O'Neill, Owens (the prefix Mac being
abandoned for the finals, each indicating ^^son''); MacHugh
Hughes; MacRory, Rogers; O'Gowan, Smith and Smyth; O'Cahan
Kane; O'Gnimh, Agnew; MacDunleavy, Dunlop; O'BroUaghan
Bradley; Magennis, Guinness; MacCarrghanma, Carson; O'Maol
geimrich, Montgomery; MacSweeney, Sunny; MacThomas, Thomp
son; MacRobert, Robertson; MacCaghwell, Campbell and Cald
well; O'Maolmichil, Mitchel.
Some descendants of these, now in America, through associa-
tion mistakenly caU themselves ^^Scotch-Irish,'' although their
ancestors never saw Scotland. King James' colonists included
many Lowlanders, and Scotch of the border clans, such as the Arm-
strongs, Hays, Hamiltons, Dixons, Grahams, Scotts; but they were
in the main of a Gaelic, Celtic, Irish stock, returned after centuries
of absence. As the late President McKinley, then Governor of
Ohio, himself of Ulster blood, told the Scotch-Irish at their annual
meeting at Springfield, May, 1893 : "Scot though the Ulsterman is
proud to call himself, yet he is a retransplanted Celt"
Like the Janissaries of Turkey, Christians taken young and
moslemized, the posterity of the Ulsterites who were forced to
change creed and surname, became, as was intended, the most
ferocious of anti-Catholics. Of such were the fierce Johnston of
Ballykilbeg, and the "ranting, roaring Kane," who threatened to
kick the queen's crown into the river Boyne, and of such are Sir
Edward Carson, the Orange leader, and the Guinness brothers.
Lords Iveagh and Ardillaun, called the "porter peers," their great
fortunes, now used against their native land, having been made in
Ireland on Dublin stout.
In contrast to the seceders comes the long list, for beatifica-
tion, of Ulster's martyrs for the Faith, as passed upon by the Sacred
Congregation of Rites and confirmed by Pope Benedict, dated Feb-
ruary 12, 1915. Among these are Archbishop Richard Creagh of
Armagh, done to death in London Tower; Archbishop Edmund
Magauran of Armagh, slain while administering to the wounded;
Bishop Redmond O'Galla^er of Derry, murdered by English
troops on the roadside; Bishop Conor O'Devany of Down and Con-
nor, aged eighty, hanged, drawn and quartered; Edmund Dungan,
Bishop of Down and Connor; Heber MacMahon, Bishop of Clog-
her, hanged at Enniskillen; Rev. P. MacFergus and thirty-two of
his brethren of Derry Dominican convent, massacred; Prior John
I9T9-] ^ Ballad of dying 207
O'Flaverty, G)leraine convent, thrown into the river and stoned to
death by the Cromwellians, 1656; Rev. James O'Reilly of same
convent, flogged to death; Rev. Bernard O'Carolan, ears cut off,
hftnged; Rev. Thaddeus O'Boyle of Donegal, and Rev. Patrick
Brady of Monaghan, beheaded. And so on through the ghastly,
dreadful, glorious ordeal of suffering and triumph, which placed
on the fair brow of Ulster a martyr's crovm of many rubies.
In face of such a record the anti-Irish clamor of the alien ele-
ment sinks to a vague and inarticulate murmur, the plaint of
dreaded religious intolerance loses itself in laughter, the hollow
glare of sectarian bigotry dies out like an expiring ember. Across
the No Man's Land of Ireland the hostile forces still perfunctorily
confront each other, but a roseate mom of good will is glowing
over both the hosts, wholesome with the spirit of liberty, fraterni-
zation and peace.
A BALLAD OF DTINO.
BT FRANKLIN C. KETES.
Red and gold is the sunset lying
Hot on the breast of the passing day,
Red and gold are the sad leaves flying.
Earth has forgotten the joy of May,
Golden red are the embers dying,
Soon they will shiver in ashes gray!
Red and gold are the colors of dying,
(White is the color of death they say) .
Rise my soul for the night time cometh.
Reap thy harvest of red and gold,
Precious wheat of the sowing groweth
Crimson poppies are bright and bold, —
Scarlet sin in the darkness gloweth
Godly deeds to the light unfold.
Swift my soul in the midnight flying
Bear thy burden of colors gay,
Hear a voice to thy tears replying, —
Christ will comfort thee on thy way, —
*Tho' thy sins be of scarlet dying
They shall be white as the snow today!**
Red and gold are the colors of dying,
(White is the color of death they say) .
THOMAS OT LONBOir.
BY HORACE H. HAGAN.
IT may well be doubted if Englisb history affords an-
other narrative quite as extraordinary as the career
of the saint and hero known to his generation as
Thomas of London and to us more familiarly as
'Diomas k Becket. Legend, it is true, has embroid-
ered his life with many a fascinating fiction. But stripped of all
such charming inventions, the cold facts spell a story of unsur*
passed interest.
The father of the future martyr was one Gilbert Becket, who,
though sprung from a knightly house of Normandy, had become a
merchant first in Rouen and later in London. His mother was
Matilda, a burgher woman of Caen. He was bom on December 21,
1118, and received his schooling partly at Merton Priory, Surrey,
and partly in Paris. At the age of twenty-two he returned from the
latter city to London and, after several minor employments, en-
tered the household of Archbishop Theobald of Canterbury. Here
his keen vision and resolute character soon made themselves felt
and he became Theobald's favorite counselor. He was largely
responsible for the settlement of the disputed succession to the
English crown whereby Stephen retained the throne during his
lifetime, and Henry Plantagenet, known to us as Henry H, suc-
ceeded him. It was upon his urgent advice that the Archbishop
refused to crown Prince Eustace, Stephen's son. It was but natural,
therefore, that Henry's accession should be to him the harbinger
of splendid honors. In 1155, at the age of thirty-seven years, we
find him filling the great office of chancellor and counted as
Henry's beloved friend and companion There is something quite
captivating about the Thomas of those days just as there is some-
thing very awe-inspiring about the Hiomas of the future. We are
charmed by his magnificence, his gayety, his chivalric courage.
Nor was he less skillful at diplomacy. In 1160 he negotiated
an eminently satisfactory peace between Henry and Louis of
I'rance. Still later he won over the English barons to Henry's pet
project of having, during his lifetime, a formal recognition of his
eldest son as his successor. And, then, in 1162, came the great.
19 19] THOMAS OF London 209
turning point in his career. The See of Canterbury became vacant.
Not only was the Archbishop of Canterbury the primate of the
English Church, but he was one of the most notable prelates in
Christendom. Probably the principal source of his power was the
fact that the common people regarded him as their special cham-
pion, the strongest barrier that stood between them and the tyranny
of the croYm and the nobility. Very likely, it was because of this
that Henry determined to have one of his close friends made Arch-
bishop. Henry was a great ruler. He had some sterling qualities.
But, with scarcely an exception, Europe has never seen a monarch
who was more essentially a despot by disposition.
The newly-discovered civil law was just then beginning to
permeate the intellectual life of Europe. It was a law which
exalted the prince. Everjrwhere on the continent there was appar-
ent a decided eiFort to subordinate clergy, people and nobility to
the king. In Germany and Italy this idea found its leader in
Frederick Barbarossa and its sturdiest opponent in Pope Alex-
ander III, backed by the free cities of the Lombard league. In
France it was later to triimiph in the person of Philip the Fair.
Henry, as the Count of Anjou, the Duke of Normandy, and in the
right of his wife the Lord of Aquitaine and other broad domains,
was a great continental ruler. The despotic principle inculcated by
the exponents of the civil law was intensely congenial to him. It
was his aim to introduce it into England, an aim which met final
defeat when his son, John, many years later, was forced by the
barons of England, with Archbishop Stephen Langton of Canter-
bury at their head, to yield his assent to Magna Charta. The first
great step necessary to accomplish Henry's design was to make
the Archbishop of Canterbury subservient to the throne. In fact, the
Archbishop of Canterbury, historic champion, as he was, of the
people and the lower nobility, cut altogether too great a figure in
Henry's realm to suit him. He was resolved to trim him down, to
make him a mere creature of the Crown. Who could better fill
this requirement than his favorite, his companion, his clear-headed
adviser, the Chancellor Thomas? In vain Thomas scouted the sug-
gestion and pointed to his rich robes and smilingly remarked that
they were overfine for an archbishop. Futilely, he pleaded that his
acceptance of the office would inevitably destroy Henry's friend-
ship. The King would listen to no argument, would allow no
obstacle to impede his impetuous will. Thomas was only a deacon.
VOL. Ot. 14
J 10 Thomas OF London [Nov.,
He had never been ordained priest. Nevertheless he was elected
Archbishop, received Holy Orders from the Bishop of Rochester
on one day and was consecrated by the Bishop of Winchester on
the next. It was a scene remarkable even in an age replete with
wonders.
But the greater wonder was to follow. At the time of Thomas'
consecration one of the bishops had remarked that Henry had at
last wrought a miracle, since he had changed a soldier into a priest,
a layman into an archbishop. This sardonic fling, however, was
fated to have a literal fulfillment. Thomas the Arch-deacon had
been noted for his magnificence; but his morals had been blameless.
He was never Henry's companion in his vices. Still, it was a far
cry from the gorgeously arrayed Qiancellor with his splendid
train of knights and pages, his costly banquets, his martial exer-
cises, his whole-hearted merriment, to the ideal Archbishop of
Canterbury, the worthy successor of an Augustine, a Dunstan and
an Anselm. The world watched with interest, tinctured, no doubt,
with amusement, the course of the new metropolitan. If, however,
it expected surprises, it was not to be disappointed. Thomas the
Archbishop was a man transformed. The marvelous precedent of
Ambrose was eclipsed. His glittering retinue of knights and cour-
tiers was dismissed; his rich robes were discarded; his one time
vivacious countenance became sobered and serious; he surrounded
himself with pious clerics; his fare, once so prodigal, became
frugal; his nights were spent in prayer; he waited upon the poor
and washed their feet; his door was never closed; the humblest citi-
zen had no difficulty in gaining either his ear or his assistance; his
alms-giving was unexampled in England ; his devotion to the duties
of his high post was assiduous and unflagging. If he had been an
ideal Chancellor, he was now an ideal Archbishop.
But this gain was not purchased without a loss. Henry was
first amazed, then disconcerted. No doubt some old enemy of the
Chancellor's whispered in the royal ear that the new Archbishop
was not sincere. But if insincere, why? There could be but one
answer. The Archbishop wished to set himself up against the
King, to have the common people look to him and not to Henry
as their friend and protector. Then came Thomas' resignation as
Chancellor. The King had desired him to be both Archbishop and
Chancellor, convinced that he would sacrifice the interests of his
spiritual to that of his secular dignity. Now that scheme was shat-
1 9 1 9-1 THOMAS OF LONDON % 1 1
tered and the vexing question raised: Did the Archbishop's resig-
nation imply that there was an irreconcilable conflict between
Church and State? As yet, however, the King was not entirely
alienated. But his too loosely chained suspicions had slipped their
leash. Then came an incident which brought the late Chancellor
and his sovereign into a direct clash. Henry's undertakings were
many, his wars almost incessant. Consequently, he usually was in
need of money, fle was, moreover, a bom centralizer. These two
motives lead him to look favorably upon a suggestion that a certain
"aid," which the sheriffs customarily received from the people of
their shires, be transferred to the crown. This project was
broached at a council held at Woodstock. It met with the deter-
mined opposition of the Archbishop, who pitched his case on two
grounds: first, that the sheriffs were entitled to the money, since it
was donated by the people in appreciation of their services; and
secondly, that the enrollment of the sums so derived among the
King's dues would create a written record, making their payment
binding on all future generations. "Thomas," says one authority,
"thus appears to have stood forth as the champion of justice, first
in behalf of the sheriffs and secondly in behalf of the whole EngUsh
people." Another, and yet more notable writer, is even more ex-
plicit. "In the first case," he says, "of any opposition to the King's
will in the matter of taxation, which is recorded in our history, the
opposition was made and apparently with entire success by Thomas
Becket."
The King's rising irritation was transformed into rage by the
Archbishop's attempt to reclaim certain alienated property of his
see, by his prohibition of an uncanonical marriage of Henry's
brother, William, and lastly by the excommunication, without no-
tice to him, of one of the tenants m capite of the crown. Then,
of a sudden, there loomed up the vexing question of the criminal
jurisdiction of the ecclesiastical courts. That this was the cause of
the final break between the King and the Archbishop we cannot
agree; whether or not it was the occasion is a different proposition.
From the Norman conquest down to the reign of Henry VIII, there
is apparent in English history on the part of the ruling forces
a desire, and sometimes a determination, to create a national church
that would be the willing hand-maiden of the civil power. The
murder of Becket prevented Henry II from practically accomplish-
ing this design, and that same crime acted as a powerful deterrent
aia Thomas OF London [Nov.,
on his successors. At this time, however, Henry was resolved to
carry out his plan. To do so he had to reduce the bishops and
clergy to subserviency, as Henry VIII did later, and the demands
he made upon them were the tools selected to carry out his project.
The point where the clergy were the most vulnerable was the crim-
inal jurisdiction of the ecclesiastical courts. That Henry chose to
provoke a quarrel on this issue proves that he was a shrewd general,
not that he was a disinterested monarch intent only on establishing
even-handed justice in his realm. At the very time he was fulmi-
nating against the ecclesiastical courts, he and the nobility were
rigidly upholding and generously adding to a system of forest laws
whose injustice and favoritism are almost unique in legal history.
In any event the conflict was not long in commencing. Seizing
upon a peculiarly atrocious and revolting crime of a cleric, which
to all appearances was leniently dealt with, Henry summoned the
Primate and the English hierarchy to Westminster. Here he de-
manded that they show their adherence to what he called ^^the
ancient customs of the realm.'' What these customs were the
monarch did not deign to disclose and the bishops did not have
imagination enough to conjecture. Desiring to conciliate the King
the Archbishop gave his assent, but added the qualifying phrase,
"saving my order." This, of course, largely destroyed the efficacy
of the consent from Henry's standpoint. In a fit of passion he
dismissed Thomas and the bishops. Soon, however, they were sum-
moned to Clarendon. Every effort was now made to break down
the Archbishop's determination. All the bishops, save one, were
ready to announce their adherence. They begged Thomas to avert
the King's wrath from him and from them by a tardy acquiescence.
Other voices were added to theirs. It is even probable that a
spurious verbal message from the Pope, advising compliance, was
poured into the Archbishop's ear. In an unguarded moment, he
withdrew his opposition. Then, and only then, were what the King
styled the "ancient customs of the realm" produced. Their perusal
was followed by amazement and consternation. Because of an
unreasoning anti-Papal bias, modem historians ordinarily com-
mend the "sixteen constitutions of Clarendon," as these supposed
customs are termed. Nevertheless, some of them were opposed to
common honesty, others to genuine freedom, and nearly all of
them to what, up to then, had been the genius of the English Church.
The statute that provided that the revenues of all vacant bishoprics
I9I9 ] J'HOMAS OF LONDON ai3
and abbeys should go to the Kmg was the invention of one of the
most wicked of English monarchs, William Rufus, and was the
cause of the greatest scandals of his reign. It can be defended
neither on principle nor policy. The statute that forbade the ordi-
pation of any villain without the consent of his lord was a dired
blow at democracy. In those days the Qiurch was the only door
that welcomed the man of lowly origin. Through it Gerbert and
Hildebrand, both sprung from the bosom of the people, reached
the Papal throne. This ordinance was designed to close this single
door. Its presence among the ^^Constitutions of Clarendon'' was
alone sufficient to justify the most unbending resistance on the part
of one who was ever the people's friend; and, as Freeman has
pointed out, the assertion that it passed unnoticed at the time is
erroneous. With but one or two exceptions, the remaining consti-
tutions, if put into force, would have reduced the English Church
to absolute dependence on the crown. It would have retained no
resemblance to die Church of Wilfred and very little to the Church
of Lanf ranc and Anselm.
It is open to doubt whether Thomas, inmiediately upon read-
ing the Constitutions, retracted his verbal promise or whether he
formally assented to them by affixing his seal to die document. But
of Thomas' remorse and decisive repudiation of the Constitutions
as soon as he reached Canterbury diere is no question. He inter-
dicted and suspended himself. He burst forth into the most vehe-
ment self-reproaches. He underwent the most severe penances. He
left nothing undone both to express his horror of his momentary
lapse and his reprobation of the obnoxious constitutions.
The fury of the King now hardened into a stem resolution to
ruin the defiant Primate. The course he took was essentially mean
and ungenerous and has found no apologist. He determined to
beggar Thomas. Through his control of the civil power he had a
series of fines, on trumped up charges, inflicted upon the Arch-
bishop. The first three fines, though unjust, Thomas promptly paid.
Then came the staggering demand that he should instantly turn
over to the King forty-four thousand marks, which Henry claimed
were monies that had come into his hands as Chancellor and of
which no accounting had been made. The Archbishop, although
taken by surprise, instantly called attention to the fact that before
his consecration he had been solemnly released from all such obli-
gations by the royal authority. The King brushed the defence aside.
314 THOMAS OF LONDON [Not.,
Thomas then begged for a few days' grace during which he might
consult his fellow bishops. Knowing that they were, with but one
or two exceptions, his creatures, Henry graciously consented. The
bishops begged Thomas to resign. One or two, more bold, openly
reviled and insulted him. But neither their entreaties nor their
taunts affected him. He knew he was fighting for the liberties of
the Church. He resolved to take a bold course.
When the fateful day arrived for him -to return once more
to Northhampton, all the bishops came and begged him to submit
His answer was to forbid them to take any part in the proceedings
against him. Then in full episcopal robes, his mitre on his head
and his archiepiscopal cross in his hand, he set out for the castle.
But, although the people thronged around him, he had no friend at
court. He was left alone in the cold audience hall while in another
room the council debated his fate. Soon the Bishop of Exeter, hast-
ening in terror from the Council Chamber, begged him to depart,
saying that the King had threatened with death any man who spoke
in his favor. **Flee, then," was the calm and biting response, **thou
canst not understand the things that are of God." Next Hilary of
Chichester railed at him and demanded that he resign. Contemp-
tuous silence was his only answer. The wily Roger of York,
Thomas' most unscrupulous opponent, withdrew from the castle
after it was certain that the Primate would be condemned. Not
long after this departure the door of the audience chamber swung
open and the Earl of Leicester, backed by a train of knights and
some of the bishops, demanded that he listen to his condemnation.
This was the moment for which Thomas had been waiting. Rising
majestically to his feet, he interrupted the Earl, boldly and firmly
denied the jurisdiction of the Council, solemnly forbade the bishops
to give any judgment against him, and gave notice of his appeal to
the Pope. He then started to sweep from the hall. Some voice
cried out: "Traitor." Whereupon die Archbishop fiercely turned
round and exclaimed that were he still a knight his sword would
prove the falsity of the slander. Then, completely master of the
situation, he gained the outside of the castle, where he was ac-
claimed by the vast concourse of the people. This was one of
the supreme heroic moments of Thomas' life. Nobly had he re-
deemed himself.
But neither popular approval nor the momentary discomfiture
of his opponents blinded Thomas to the fact that his situation was
1919.] Thomas OF London 215
perilous in the extreme. Consequently, he determined to escape
to the continent and to make a personal appeal to the Pope and
to the clergy and laity of Qiristendom. So that very evening he
disguised himself and hastened in the direction of Sandwich. Here
he flung himself on a vessel bound for Flanders and, almost before
his enemies appreciated what had happened, was in safety. A fort-
night later he set out for Soissons, where he was welcomed, with
the greatest reverence and honor, by King Louis of France. At
the head of an imposing train he next sought the Pope at Sens.
Alexander was engaged in a death grapple with Frederick Bar-
barossa and was an exile from Rome and Italy. It is needless to
observe that he had no desire to force Henry into an alliance with
the Emperor. On the other hand, the most casual inspection of
the Constitutions of Clarendon revealed that they were impossible
of sanction by the Roman Pontiff. The Pope's lack of enthusiasm
for the Archbishop and his cause has not escaped censure; indeed,
even in that day it was cause of bitter comment from Thomas, the
King of France and zealous churchmen everywhere. It would prob-
ably be a just judgment to say that Alexander acted not as a hero
but as a statesman. Thomas, of course, as Mr. Freeman has pointed
out, was essentially a hero.
But at least the Pope received him with honor. He refused to
accept his resignation. He condemned the Constitutions. Thomas,
however, was to retire to the Cistercian abbey of Pontigny. But the
Archbishop could not be shelved. The clergy generally, and even
the people, understood too well that he was the champion of the
liberties of the Church. The moral position of the Archbishop was
soon strengthened by an indefensible and atrocious act of tyranny
on Henry's part. He suddenly, without any justification whatever,
banished from England not only all the Archbishop's relatives, but
many of his friends and retainers. These victims, to the number
of several hundred, were enjoined to report personally to the Arch-
bishop at Pontigny that they might lacerate his heart and drain his
scanty purse.
The rising indignation of Thomas was certainly not checked
by what Lingard rightly styles a "refinement of vengeance." Find-
ing his letters of remonstrance treated with contempt, he prepared
to excommunicate Henry and his principal adherents. But upon
hearing that the King was ill, he postponed his action against him
— a tenderness that has remained without comment in the writings
216 Thomas ob London LNov.,
of those who have overwhekned him with such epithets as hard-
hearted, unchristian, inflexible, ungenerous. He did not stay his
arm, however, as to the remainder of his principal foes. Their
appeals for protection lashed Henry to madness. He threatened to
expel every Cistercian from his domains if Pontigny still remained
Thomas' shelter. To relieve his hosts from this threatened disaster
the Archbishop took up his residence at Sens. Here he received
the intensely mortifying intelligence that the Pope had so far
yielded to Henry's importunities as to suspend his sentences and
had, moreover, appointed two legates to investigate the controversy.
One of these legates, Vivian, after repeated interviews with Henry,
reported: ^^Never did I know a man to be such a liar."
Nevertheless, the Roman policy was all for compromise; and
Henry himself grew more and more fearful of the threatened inter-
dict. Desirous of intimidating Alexander, he opened negotiations
with the Emperor's Anti-Pope and even dispatched emissaries to
Germany to complete a bargain. But here, he soon discovered, he
had overreached himself. The hitherto submissive English bishops
firmly refused to follow his lead. The nobles murmured. The
people were outraged. Henry was forced to throw over the pro-
jected German alliance. His dickering with the Anti-Pope, how-
ever, had aroused Alexander's indignation far more than his ill
treatment of Thomas, and Henry, alarmed, was forced to take steps
looking to a reconciliation with the Archbishop. Wearily the nego-
tiations dragged along, sometimes apparently on the point of suc-
cess, usually to all appearances hopeless. At last, in January,
1169, a temporary reconciliation of Henry and the King of France
led to a personal conference of the two monarchs and the Arch-
bishop at Montmirail. Henry insisted on a recognition of the Con-
stitutions. Louis was guilty of the inconsistency of urging com-
plaisance. But Thomas, in Freeman's graphic phrase, withstood
the face of the two Kings and rode back to Sens cursed by Henry,
renounced by Louis, but acclaimed by every honest heart.
Then Henry made another false move. It had long been his
determination to have his eldest son crowned King of England dur-
ing his lifetime. In this manner he expected to avoid any chance
of a disputed succession. The right to crown the King was the
most cherished and the most splendid prerogative of the Archbishop
of Canterbury. It was a matter of doubt in the minds of many
whether there could be a legitimate sovereign unless he received
1919] Thomas OF London 217
bis crown from the hands of the primate. Strange as the whole
question may seem to us, it was a vital issue in a day when the
inability of the great mass of the people to read and write had
forced them to depend slavishly on visible ceremonies for even
their most important rights. Thomas realized the powerful weapon
that he possessed in his exclusive privilege to crown the King. The
Pope was resolved to uphold him in this and warned the English
bishops to respect the right of the See of Canterbury. Nevertheless,
Henry, after the failure at Montmirail, could brook no further
delay and persuaded the Archbishop of York to anoint and crown
his son.
By this time Alexander's position had materially changed for
the better. He condemned the Archbishop of York and the bishops
who assisted him and gave Thomas letters suspending them from
their episcopal functions. Henry realized that the struggle, so long
adroitly avoided, was at last inevitable unless a reconciliation was
had. Moreover, his situation was not bettered by the fact that the
King of France was once more his declared foe and had invaded
Normandy. Under these circumstances he bowed to necessity and
sought an interview with the Archbishop at Freitville. Henry's
conduct on this occasion is rightly the subject of controversy. Per-
ceiving the Archbishop approaching, he spurred forward, saluted
him with every sign of friendliness and begged for a renewal of
their ancient affection! Later, he threatened to visit the severest
justice on those who had created dissension between them, a promise
which caused the ^^proud and hard-hearted Archbishop" to throw
himself from his horse and, with tears streaming down his face,
to cast himself at Henry's feet. It was agreed that Thomas should
be restored to his See and that proper amends should be made for
the injury done to him and to it by the crowning of the young King
by Roger of York. In return Thomas promised Henry love, honor
and service. The Constitutions were not mentioned. At the part-
ing it was understood that Henry would soon send for him.
Months elapsed and Henry sent no word. It was only when
it seemed that Thomas was on the point of throwing the whole ar-
rangement overboard and launching the interdict that he yielded
and restored the archiepiscopal lands. It was understood that the
Kmg was to furnish the Archbishop with the money for his journey
to Canterbury. But time again dragged by and no money was
forthcoming. Finally, in desperation, the exile borrowed the nee-
a 1 S THOMAS OF LONDON [Not ,
essary funds from the Archbishop of Rouen and set forth on his
tragic homecoming. In spite, however, of all the wrongs and vexa-
tions which he had endured, he did not quit the soil of France until
he had written to Henry that moving epistle, ending with those
noble words: **Whatever may befall me or mine, may the blessing
of God rest on you and your children."
In December, 1170, six years after his flight to the continent,
the Archbishop entered his city of Canterbury. The rejoicing of
the people knew no restraints. But his old enemies were as active
as ever. The young King refused to see him. The three bishops,
who had officiated at the crowning and to whom Thomas had dis-
patched the papal letters of suspension, had at once betaken them-
selves to Henry's court on the continent and had denounced the
Archbishop in unmeasured terms. One of them, or some close
adviser, supplemented their complaints with the solemn assurance
that neither Henry nor his kingdom would know peace so long as
Thomas lived. These words had the most extraordinary effect
on the monarch. He burst forth into the most terrible excoriation
of the Archbishop and finally let fall those pregnant words, which
bitterly deplored that he was surrounded by sluggards, not one of
whom would deliver him from this "base-bom priest."
Four knights there were, Hugh de Moreville, Reginald Fitz-
urse, William de Tracy and Richard le Bret or Brito, who gave this
exclamation a literal interpretation. Silently they departed from
the court and sailed for the English coast. They reached Saltwood
Castle, wrongfully withheld from Thomas by De Broc, on Decem-
ber 28th. Their host strengthened their purpose by the tidings that
on Christmas the Archbishop had courageously excommunicated
him for his many misdeeds. On that same day there had fallen
from Thomas' lips those prophetic words: "One martyr. Saint
Alfege, you have already; another, if God will, you will have
soon." Late in the afternoon of December 29th an attendant an-
nounced to the Archbishop that four knights from the King wished
to see him. He ordered them to be ushered into his presence and
instantly recognized De Moreville, Fitzurse and Tracy, all of whom
had sworn fealty to him when he was Chancellor, a fact of which
he soon reminded them. The interview commenced calmly, but
the knights were not long in taking a high tone which struck fire
from the Archbishop. When, finally, they menaced him, he sprang
from the couch on which he was sitting and cried : "You threaten me
I9I90 THOMAS OF LONDON 2 If
in vain; were all the swords in England hanging over my head, you
could not terrify me from my obedience to God, and my Lord the
Pope* Once I gave way. I returned to my obedience to the Pope,
and will nevermore desert it"
The knights retired and armed themselves. The Archbishop
refused to listen to the pleas of his followers that he escape. ^*I
am prepared to die,'' he answered, and again, ^^Let God's will be
done." The monks, who were present, urged him to take refuge in
the cathedral, but he would not hear of it until the vesper diant
reached his ears. He then rose and said that now he would go to
the cathedral, as it was his duty to be there. His followers would
have barred and barricaded the cathedral doors, but he solenmly
forbade them, saying that the church must not be turned into a
castle. At last there was. heard close at hand the clang of arms
and the heavy tread of armored men. Terrified, all of the Arch-
bishop's followers except three — ^Robert, his old instructor, Wil-
liam Fitzstephen, and Edward Grim — sought safety in flight. The
knights rushed into the church with swords and axes in their hands.
One of them cried out: ^^ Where is Thomas Becket, traitor to the
King?" Silence was the only answer, but then came the question
from Fitzurse: ^^Where is the Archbishop?" Instantly Thomas
turned and replied: ^^Reginald, here I am — ^no traitor, but Arch-
bishop and priest of God ; what do you wish?" He then descended
to the transept and fearlessly faced his foes. They demanded the
absolution of the bishops. He refused to yield to their threats, right-
ly asserting that the Pope alone had authority in the matter. They
told him that he must die, only to be met with the reply: ^^I am
ready to die for God and the Church; but I warn you, I curse you
in the name of God if you do not let my men escape." Fitzurse
reached out his hand and gripped his shoulder, exclaiming that he
was their prisoner and seeking to drag him out of the church. The
old-time martial strength awakened from its repose and the Arch-
bishop easily disengaged himself from the unfriendly grasp. Nor
could their combined efforts move him from his post, and Tracy,
seeking to pinion him, was flung down on the pavement. Then
Fitzurse approached with drawn sword and struck at his head, but
merely dashed off his cap. Exclaiming ^To God and the blessed
Mary, to the patron saints of this church, and to St. Denys, I com-
mend myself and the Church's cause," the Archbishop bowed his
head, clasped his hands and awaited the fatal stroke. The first
a2o Thomas of London [Not.,
blow was intercepted by the faithful Grim, the only attendant who
now remained by him. At the' second blow Thomas cried out:
"Lord, into Thy hands I commend my spirit.*' The third stroke beat
him to his knees and he turned to the altar and murmured in a low
tone, caught by the faithful Grim: "For the name of Jesus and for
the defence of the Qiurch I am ready to embrace death." He then
fell flat upon his face and received from the hand of Brito a mighty
blow which separated the crown of his head from the skull and
scattered his brains over the cathedral floor.
Their bloody mission completed, the murderers rushed from
the church, and the night descending in fearful darkness brought
with it a great storm of thunder and rain. But the fury of the ele-
ments could not prevent the people nor the monks from gathering
in great numbers in the desecrated church. Popular voice at once
burst forth into the cry. Saint Thomas, an enthusiasm soon con-
firmed by miracles.
When the news of the murder reached Henry he was thrown
into a state of the deepest consternation and grief. He dispatched
trusted envoys to the Pope to protest his innocence and to offer his
submission to any test. Later, at a Council at the castle of Gorram,
he met the Papal legates, swore on the Gospels that he had not
wished or ordered the Archbishop's murder, renounced the Con-
stitutions of Clarendon, swore adhesion to the Pope and restored
the property of the See of Canterbury. Twelve years later, when
his sons had rebelled against him and he was encompassed on all
sided by treason and misfortune, he resolved to have recourse to his
old Chancellor. Dressed in the garb of a penitent and with bare
feet he approached the holy tomb and remained long in prayer,
with tears streaming down his countenance. He then submitted to
a public scourging and, after a night spent in prayer and fasting,
departed. On the very day Henry left Canterbury the King of
Scotland, who had invaded England, was defeated and taken pris-
oner, and the fleet with which his rebellious sons had set out from
Flanders was driven back. So, in the judgment of the monarch
and his contemporaries, did the martyr reward Henry's penitence.
1.^1
iICAL VIEW OF MIRACLESJ
BY SIR BERTRAM WINDLE, M. D., F. R. S.
CURIOUS little incident, throwing a light upon an
even more curious form of mentality, was made pub-
lic some months ago by a Catholic journal published
in London* This paper, which was interested in a
movement to send soldiers in France for a short
visit to Lourdes, had arranged for a lecture to be delivered on the
happenings there by one thoroughly familiar with them and for
the chair to be taken by a very distinguished medical man. Think-
ing that the address might be of interest to other members of that
profession, an advertisement was sent to that old and respectable
organ of the medical profession. The Lancet, calling attention to
the occasion.
To the astonishment of those who sent it, admission was re-
fused to the announcement on the grounds — as stated by the man-
ager — ^ihat "the medical profession does not believe in miracles."
In the first place it may be doubted, without any disrespect to
that gentleman, whether the manager had any special claim to
speak for the medical profession, and in the next it may be sug-
gested, with complete confidence, that it would be quite possible to
enumerate quite a list of medical men of good standing in their
profession who do believe in miracles. Finally, it can be asserted
boldly that, though perhaps comparatively few in number, there
are cases of sudden cures which elude the explanations of those
who utterly refuse to give credit to the hypothesis of miracle. Is
there any excuse for the attitude of such? Only one plea can be
put in for them, and that is ignorance — ^the kind of ignorance
which Dr. Johnson pleaded as his excuse for wrongly defining some
part of the anatomy of a horse. If that is an excuse, such persons
may have the benefit of it, but is it really an excuse? Is it really
pardonable for any man pretending to be guided by scientific con-
siderations to place himself in the position of first making a state-
ment and then having to admit that he had not previously taken
the trouble to examine the evidence?
I Mrmam Mtdkatn ito Mitads pw It Dodrar U Btc : Piuto. l»lf.
22a A Medical View of Miracles [Nov.,
Anyone who acted on these principles in a scientific matter
would find it very hard to regain his credit with his scientific
brethren; is it only in matters where religion is concerned that
slip-shod methods of this kind are permissible? It may be con-
venient to consider this question of miraculous cures once more
and in the light of the most recent evidence, and, as the writer of
these lines has had a medical education and is the holder of a
medical degree, he may at least claim to be in a position to estimate
the character of the evidence medicine would require to satisfy
itself on a point of this kind. To clear the way let us throw over-
board certain preliminary and foolish objections to our views
which are commonly made.
Number One — "Oh, you are prepared to believe anything!"
This is a common and most foolish remark. It is made by those
who are wholly ignorant of the kind of evidence required before
it can be acknowledged that a miracle has occurred. Something
may be learned by what is to follow of the kind of evidence which
can be put forward. It cannot but appear to be very strong. Let
those who read it and have open minds remember that, strong as
it is, it has not, so far as we know, as yet passed the bar of ecclesi-
astical investigation. Number Two — "These things don't hap-
pen!" Well, unfortunately for that argument, they do and with
such publicity as to render this remark quite out of court. Num-
ber Three — "It is all *faked' by the priests!" This vulgar argu-
ment, once made use of by decent but mistaken persons, now be-
longs entirely to the Maria Monk School; it has been abandoned
by all persons worthy of the slightest consideration and need not
detain us. Number Four — "No doubt they happen, but they all
have a nervous foundation and can be explained on the great hys-
teria principle" — ^which, by the way, is used to cover much igno-
rance in medical circles. As a sufficient answer, we shall study
some cases which this kind of explanation cannot possibly cover.
But to it may be added this pregnant fact, almost, if not quite,
unknown to medical men, that a Pope was, perhaps, the very first
to emphasize the importance of discounting cures into which any
kind of nervous element entered. In the middle of the eighteenth
century (from 1747-1751) when, it may be justly said, medical
men were densely ignorant of nervous conditions, Benedict XIV
issued his writings on the Beatification of the Servants of God in
which he deals with the matter in a way that could not be bettered
1919] A Medical View of miracles 123
today. Speaking of so-called miracles in hysterical persons, he
says that it is very difficult to show that such cures are miraculous,
and adds that ^^if sometimes the postulators of causes of Beatifica-
tion have tried to establish such, I have never seen them succeed.'*
Number Five — ^The last invented explanation: "Oh, it is all sug-
gestion!" No one wants to minimize the potency of suggestion,
but two remarks may be made under this heading. First, sugges-
tion can only act through the nervous system, and we are proposing
to limit ourselves here to cases in which the nervous system can
be left out of count. Secondly, we may ask with Hilaire Belloc in
his preface to Jorgensen's little book on Lourdes: "If what happens
at Lourdes is the result of self-suggestion, why cannot men, though
exceptionally, yet in similar great numbers, suggest themselves into
health in Pimlico*or the Isle of Man?"
I propose, as I have said, to consider a very few cases. They
will suffice to prove my thesis, for if we once show that miraculous
occurrences do take place at Lourdes, or elsewhere, then each case
brought forward becomes one for separate investigation and judg-
ment. With regard to these cases I shall claim that one of three
things must be true: (1) Medical diagnosis, i. e., the recognition of
individual diseases, is utterly untrustworthy, or (2) Medical
teachers are ignorant of the fundamental facts of their science, or
(3) Miracles do occur, and I will begin with a case which I have
myself quoted elsewhere.^ It has been dealt with often by others,
but has never been controverted nor, to my knowledge, even shaken.
It is consequently worthy of the closest attention. A negative an-
swer to the question, "Was it a Miracle?" can only be made on the
lines of the extraordinary statement of a German writer in a Berlin
paper in 1902 : **The cure of Pierre de Rudder cannot be true, be-
cause it would be a slap in the face for all the laws of biology and
pathology."
This statement is about as scientific and as convincing as Zola's
utterance: "I don't believe in miracles; even if all the sick in
Lourdes were cured in one moment, I would not believe in them!"
De Rudder was a Belgian woodcutter on whose left leg a tree
fell in 1867, fracturing both bones. He was attended by a medical
man, but no union of the fragments took place. Matters seemed so
hopeless and, indeed, from the medical point of view, were so
hopeless that an amputation with a subsequent artificial limb was
advised.
* Sm TIWTGtardI ffuf SfltoiM,- ehtpter M MIndep.
334 ^ MEDICAL VIEW OF MIRACLES [Nov.,
The patient refused to consent, and for eight years continued
to drag himself about with an ununited compound fracture, that is,
a fracture which communicates with the open air. From this, neces-
sarily at a time when antiseptics were practically unknown, there
was a constant and very offensive discharge. Moreover, as time
went on, the ends of the bones gradually died and rotted until
there was an interval between them amounting to three centimetres,
or something more than an inch. De Rudder could twist his leg
round with his own hands so that the toes pointed backwards and
the heel forwards.
In December, 1874, one of the doctors interested in his case
saw and examined his leg and found it in the condition described
above. In the following January (1875) another medical man
who knew his case well saw him, again advised amputation and
was again refused. From that time until the day after the cure,
he was not seen by any medical man, and the suggestion has been
made that during that time a spcmtaneous cure had taken place;
the occurrence at Oostacker being a mere "fake" for the bene-
fit of the Qiurch. Fortunately, as I have said, the condition was
not one which only a medical man could diagnose; anyone could
detect what was wrong, and there were plenty of persons to testify
to his condition up to a few moments before the cure happened.
On the 2d, 4th and 6th of April, 1875, no less than six per-
sons, friends of de Rudder, charitably helped him to dress his
unfortunate leg, and testified to all the revolting conditions above
mentioned. On the 7th de Rudder went by train to Oostacker,
where there was a sort of shrine of Our Lady of Lourdes. To reach
the shrine from the railway station he had to make use of an
omnibus, and a curious proof of his condition is afforded by
the fact that the conductor of that vehicle grumbled very much,
as indeed well he might, that de Rudder's imperfectly bandaged
limb had allowed a quantity of discharge to escape on the floor
to its damage and its conductor's annoyance. De Rudder came
to the shrine; sat down on a seat, tired out with his journey; we
may assume that he said a prayer or two, but we are not told
so. However that may be, he suddenly experienced a shock; felt
that he was cured; stood upright; knelt down; rose up again and
was able to walk without crutches or any other assistance to the
omnibus. On the next two days he was examined by the two
medical men who had previously seen him and who testified that
his leg was perfectly strong and sound. He lived for twenty-diree
19^9] ^ MEDICAL VIEW OF MIRACLES 225
years after this, pursuing his avocation as a laboring man, and
died at the age of seventy-five, of pneumonia*
What had happened? Let us first consider what happens in
ordinary cases of fracture when all goes well. The ends of the
bones which are in a freshly broken condition become united by
what is known as callus, that is, fresh bone grows and unites the
two broken ends; a kind of permanent splice is formed; the bone
is as strong as ever. But evidence of what has happened will al-
ways be present in the bone, easily detected in the dried specimen
by the trained eye.
In the case of an unhealed compound fracture, the ends of
the bone would not be fresh and before they could be got to unite
it would be necessary either surgically to "freshen" them or that
some natural process should produce a similar effect. Any surgeon
will admit that the union of bones which have a gap between
them of an inch and which have been suppurating for eight years
is a thing which, with or without surgical interference, is almost
impossible. The proof of this is the repeated advice to amputate.
How is this new bone formed? From a lime salt which exists in
small quantities in the blood and which is slowly supplied to the
uniting bones. In fact, it takes three or more months for bones
to knit firmly even under favorable conditions. It is estimated
that at any one moment there is less than one and a half grammes,
that is, about twenty grains, of this lime salt in the blood. Now
in our case it was sudden; the whole thing seems to have been
over in a moment; the work of three months — even in a normal
and recent case — done in thirty seconds. That must strike any-
one as wonderful. But the mechanism is absolutely' baffling to
the physiologist on any other explanation than that of miracle.
To build up the amount of bone which had to be built up
to fill the gap between the ends of the bones — ^for there was no
shortening of the limb; the entire gap was filled up — it is esti-
mated that five grammes (i. e., about seventy-five grains) of the
lime salt in question would be required. At any one time there
is about one-third of this amount in the blood; where did the re-
maining two-thirds suddenly come from? To this inquiry there
seems to be no answer possible on physical lines. Until there is,
and there seems to be but little prospect of any answer, we may
diallenge our opponents, who deny the possibility of miracle.
226 A Medical View of Miracles [Nov.,
to offer us any reasonable explanation of the sudden union and
of the sudden supply of material necessary for that purpose.
Now let us apply our three explanations to this case. Can
the diagnosis have been wrong? Wholly impossible in this in-
stance. Were the bones really united? After de Rudder's death
the bones were removed, photographed and deposited in a mu-
seum ; there is no sort of doubt that the bones represented to have
been his have suffered fracture and undergone reunion. Is there
any possibility of such a sudden cure taking place under normal
circumstances? None whatever unless all our medical knowledge
is mere illusion. Therefore, either all the evidence carefully piled
up and investigated in relation to this case, which — ^let it ever be
remembered — is not one of the Middle Ages, but, so to speak,
of yesterday, is a carefully conceived and frigid lie, or the oc-
currence is one so wonderful that — ^with all due submission to
any future decision of the regular tribunals of the Qiurch — it is
certainly legitimate for the lay Catholic to look upon it as a
miracle.
I have dealt at considerable length with this case, in the first
place because it admirably exemplifies many points which I have
been anxious to bring out and then because it has been considered
by so many writers; has been before the public so very prominently
without, so far as I am aware, any real doubt having been thrown
on the circumstances attending it. The other cases which I shall
iselect are less well known; may be briefly described; and all ex-
hibit the same leading features — suddenness of cure and apparent
impossibility of accounting for it.
Varicose veins are an affliction which all have heard of and
most people, at some time or another, have seen. They are un-
fortunately very common; can be cured in early stages and in
certain cases by operation, but when of long establishment are
generally and properly regarded as quite incurable. Yet in the
case of a priest, aged nearly sixty, who had suffered from this
ailment in a most aggravated form for nearly twenty-five years,
there followed a complete cure after his first bath at Lourdes.
It could hardly have been a cure of suggestion, since the sufferer
went unwillingly, without the slightest hope or expectation of a
cure and solely in obedience to his Archbishop's orders. Besides
it is impossible to suppose that suggestion could produce any ef-
fect in a case of this kind. Not to be too technical, the first thing
I9I».] A MEDICAL VIEW OF MIRACLES 127
ivhidi occurs in this ailment is an inflammation of the walls of the
veins hy which they lose their flexibility. They become enor-
mously dilated and tortuous, appearing like huge knots of worms.
They lose the valves which normally assist in the circulation, and
in the later stages ulceration of a serious character and most in-
tractable appears. To all these various miseries this patient was
a victim. Yet he was cured and instantaneously.
He was seen by doctors, who declared that the condition was
incurable just before he went to Lourdes; he was seen again im-
mediately after his return and found to be in perfect health and
with no signs of varicose veins; he was again seen seven years
after his cure — there had been no relapse. What had happened?
The thickened coats of the veins had resumed their normal con-
dition; the elongations had disappeared — ^a most wonderful thing
— and perhaps most extraordinary of all, the valves had been
restored to their normal places. That these things could have
taken place at all by natural means-— even under medical treat-
ment — ^is a thing which no surgeon would credit. Not even would
he allow that it might occur after a long and slow recovery, for
the tendency of this ailment is to go from bad to worse. Not
certainly could he be persuaded that it could take place in a single
moment
The next case is one in which suggestion can find no place,
for the patient was a child of two years old, bom with congenital
club feet, the daughter of a Catholic doctor. He and his wife
were naturally much distressed at the condition of their baby.
As a medical man he very naturally and properly made his first
appeal to the resources of his profession. The child, at the age
of fifteen months, was operated on by a specialist, who performed
tenotomy in each leg. The operation did little if any good and
the use of apparatus was equally ineff'ectual. The doctor and his
wife took the child to Lourdes. After the third bath the child
walked perfectly, naturally; that is, as a normal child of two
years old would walk. In this case, which was followed through-
out by the father, himself a medical man, there were two remark-
able features: the cure of the club feet and the inmiediate restora-
tion to full strength of the muscles of the thighs and legs which
had been seriously atrophied by disuse, but which were normal in
appearance and function after the cure.
Cancer of the tongue is known to be a very deadly
338 A MEDICAL VIEW OF MIRACLES [Nov.,
particularly when it recurs. Doctor Le Bee narrates a case and
gives photographs where cancer had shown itself and an operation
bad been undergone. The disease recurred as it so often does.
A second operation was advised but refused. The glands in the
neck became affected — the inevitable sequel in such cases. The
patient tried to get to Lourdes, but could find no place in the
train; made a novena; bathed her tongue with Lourdes water and
was completely and instantaneously cured, the infected glands
becoming normal at the same time. Eight years later no recur-
rence had taken place. To a medical man comment on such
a case is needless; he must admit that the cure is of a kind unknown
to surgical science.
So, too, widi another woman afflicted with serious and long-
standing lupus which had caused perforation of the cheek and
soft palate. She had been under constant medical advice for
some ten years. She was seen eleven days before she went to
Lourdes by a medical man who gave a certificate as to her con-
dition. Her state was deplorable for, owing to the perforations,
she could not eat unless the hole in her cheek was plugged with
cotton wool. It is perhaps hardly necessary to say that every
form of treatment, including die actual cautery had been tried,
nor need any medical man be reminded of the horribly otfensive
nature of the discharge and other conditions connected with such
a case. She was accompanied to HiOurdes by a nun who dressed
her cheek continually and on the morning of her visit to the well,
i^en the hole was large enough to permit a finger to be passed
through it, Tliree hours after the last dressing at which no change
was noticed, and at the end of one of the processions which take
place daily, the chedc and die palate were found to be completely
healed, all the perforations, so cdivious in the morning, having
disappeared. Five days after her return home she was seen by
the same doctor as before her departure who certified to the extra-
— j; J : '=-able change in her condition.
istmctive. The case was so well known and
ition that it formed the subject of discussions
sty of Metz where the woman lived. Many
sed, it appears, but the most curious was that
o urged that a certain treatment must have
ring the journey and that by the aid of this
could have been cured in twelve days. There
I9I9-] ^ Medical View of Miracles 229
is not the slightest evidence that any treatment other than dress-
ing had been applied. Indeed, both the patient and the nun de-
nied anything of the kind. But the most curious fact is that the
woman had actually been attended and comparatively recently
by this very Dr. MuUer — one of the many doctors she had tried.
If he knew that there was a treatment which would cure her in
twelve days, why, it may fairly be asked, did he not make use of
it and cure her without the trouble of going to Lourdes? The ex-
cuse really proves the impossibility of explaining the case on or-
dinary medical lines.
Other cases could be quoted; let these suffice. What are the
main things to be noted about them? In the first place there is
not one of them which presents the smallest difficulty in the way
of diagnosis. Fracture of both bones of the leg; varicose veins;
club feet; cancer of the tongue; lupus — if any student at his
final examination for medical degrees failed to diagnose any one
of these he would most certainly and most properly be rejected.
There is one small loophole in the lupus case, but we need not
trouble about it, since the doctor who was the author of the sug-
gestion never thought of it until after his patient had been cured
at Lourdes. There is, moreover, no evidence whatever for the
alternative explanation. In the second place, the pathology and
history of such cases are perfectly well known; they are as fa-
miliar to medical men as his daily beat is to a postman. They
are all amongst the most common of the ills of humanity and it
is almost inconceivable that anything much more is to be learned
about any of them — ^anything, that is, which could help us to
account for the method by which they have all been cured.
Thirdly, there is not one of them in which, by any kind of special
pleading even, the influence of the nervous system or of a hyster-
ical condition can possibly be invoked.
Lastly, and as a corollary to this, imless everything which
we have learned about medicine is a delusion, there is not the most
remote chance that any one of these patients can have suggested
themselves into a cure. The baby did not know what was happen-
ing and, if it had, will any one argue that distorted feet can be
put right and new muscular fibres suddenly produced by sug-
gestion? Or again, can suggestion suddenly produce an enormous
superabundance of lime salts in the blood and suddenly unite
aso A Medical View of Miracles [Not.,
by them fragments of bone which hare been smidered for years?
To ask the question is to answer it
The Qiurch has not, we understand, pronounced any of these
cases to be miracles and we shall not attempt to do so. But surely
we may ask, whatever they are, are they not very proper mat-
ters for medical discussion? And is it not just and proper that
we should ask those who refuse to believe that miracles can happen,
to be good enough to throw some light on the mechanism of cure
in these and other like cases.
Before concluding, special emphasis must be laid upon one
point which has been alluded to in all these cases and that is the
suddenness of the cure. In many of the cases the patient states
that he or she felt a sudden shock, or a great pain, oi; a feeling
as if hot irons were being applied, and the cure is found to have
been effected. Doctor Le Bee calls especial attention to this Time
Factor to which I had myself directed attention in my book al-
ready mentioned. Such a method of cure, or rather, perhaps,
such a history of cure, is quite unknown to medical science in cases
of this kind.
It is quite what one would expect in cases of a hysterical na-
ture, and, by the way, let it be parenthetically said that whilst
the cure — ^permanent of course — of a hysterical condition may
not be a miracle, it is none the less a very special grace to the
patient and still more to her uphappy family. But the cases with
which we are concerned are of long standing and involve profound
— one would suppose irreversible — changes in the tissues. If such
cases could get well by natural means, which it is almost if not
quite impossible to imagine, it is incredible that such changes as
must take place could do so with absolute suddenness and com-
pleteness.
Those who deny that God works miracles even today, or even
that there is a God at all, may reasonably be invited to throw
some light upon the mechanism of these cures and especially on
the suddenness and completeness which they exhibit. There is
only one alternative: to call them lies! No one familiar with
the facts can advance that argimient It may be left to those who
nowadays alone make use of it, the less educated and less repu-
table of our opponents.
THE PROBLEM OF BIG BUSINESS
BY LEO N. MURRAY.
|F all men were equal in their equipment for life;
were angels and Adam had not fallen — ^there would
altruists, and if none were self-seekers — or if men
or by the lack of any training; if all men were
if all men were imbiased by a particular training
be little ground for economic debate.
But the fact that the foregoing conditions are not realized,
no one will deny. And the fact that there is a deal of economic
debate, no one can deny.
The old story of the three men viewing a field (it might as
easily have been thirty-three) is in point. One was a geologist,
and the field spelled itself into his mentality in geological terms.
Another was a farmer, and the field meant sowing and cultivation
and reaping to him. The third might have been a real estate man,
and, naturally, his concern would have been with different factor-
possibilities than those of his friends. And so on and on. All
were agreed, however, that the field in question was useful. The
question of "how" and "why" was the parting of the roads.
This oft-told legend is not without application to an impor-
tant question of to-day. The field is large-scale productive indus-
try — ^Big Business. The geologist and the farmer and the real-
estate man have their counterparts in the Socialist, the Capitalist,
and the Cooperationist. They are agreed on one point: the field
is useful. From that point on they disagree. Let us see in what
different lights each of the three views the field, and then whether
any of the three is entirely right or entirely wrong, or whether
they are all more or less right or wrong.
Few will seriously question the utility of Big Business. The
concentration of highly expert management in a particular field;
the resultant efficiency and the economy of production costs made
possible by this concentration; the large-scale production and
standardizing of product which is corollary to it — are sufficiently
obvious to the everyday observer. The, at least, potential utility
of Big Business is undeniable. Moreover, Big Business is neces-
sary for a nation that would keep step with its economic rivals.
asa THB PROBLEM OF BIG BUSINESS [Nov.,
Usefulness and necessity postulate at least potential good.
Yet experience has shown that Big Business, just because it is
big, has big potentialities for evil, too. There is an argument
contra as well as an argument prOj neither entirely unreasonable.
For to counterbalance the good of economy in production, large-
scale production and standard product, efficient management and
specialized division of labor, there are the only too familiar evils
of ^'pitiless persecution" of the small competitor, exorbitant
monopoly and combination prices, squeezing of small stockholders
for the illegitimate enrichment of '^malefactors of great wealth"
and a dozen other things. And these evils flow from the same
source as the afore-mentioned good.
In view of this, various groups of thinkers theorize on Big
Business and propose and advocate ways and means to handle this
industrial device, which, in spite of its enormous advantages, has
proved its potentiality for evil by actualizing it, acting in far too
many instances with an emphasis on its consciousness of brute
size and a lack of emphasis on its moral responsibility. These
ways, means and theories are matters worthy of our consideration.
The Socialist theory, most radical of all, would cure by kill-
ing. (By the Socialist, we mean the Marxian, or so-called ortho-
dox). True, he would not admit that he was killing; he would
say he merely advocates state ownership and control of all pro-
duction and products. But whatever his intent, the Socialist would
kill Big Business in its understood sense. For the state-ownership
scheme of the Socialist would destroy all incentive for expert
managerial production, and could guarantee no better than a man-
agement of production by a ^'chosen-by-lot managerial medio-
crity." As the efficient managerial factor which Socialism would
eliminate is one of the primary reasons for Big Business, it fol-
lows that, in practice, the Socialist theory would kill Big Business.
The Socialist is wrong in his logic. He talks of the right
of labor to the whole product (deducting merely the actual value
of the replacement of the capital instruments involved). But he
does not tell us how economic determinism and moral rights,
which are at opposite poles, can be maintained in the same para-
graph. This observation is not new; it is none the less true and
relevant.
The Socialist is wrong, again, in his economic theory (whidi
is the basis for his desired socializing of tbe means of production) ;
I9I9) 2r/w Problem of big business 233
for he denies the right (again!) of Big Business to a return on its
capital and he denies it on the ground of "no title.'* He lays
down the principle that labor is the sole determinant of value — and
does not prove it He concludes from his principle that the whole
product belongs to the laborer, but does not tell where the laborer
gets his title to possession of the material on which he labors.
Nor does he recognize what every sane economist knows, and any
thinking observer will admit, that scarcity and utility are the
factors that make for value, and not labor in any primary sense.
(I may labor for forty years on a machine for producing perpetual
motion, but will the machine have any value? Very probably
not!)
Again, the Socialist errs by dreaming of his Mirage State
and arguing from that Utopian consideration to the consequent
necessity of destroying Big Business as at present understood. But
he forgets that his Mirage State, even in its ideal fulfillment, would
be but a nationalized or internationalized aggregation of mediocri-
ties, in serfdom to an oligarchy of Lenines and Trotzkys, or to a
mob-control of soldiers' and sailors' and workingmen's commit-
tees. His Mirage State, now holding the reins in Russia, has
beautifully vindicated the criticisms of Catholic philosophy on his
system.
So much for the radical Socialist theory of how to deal with
Big Business. It is a theory drawn from poisoned wells which
Would kill and not cure the most important industrial device of
our times. Big Business — and worse yet — it would also kill' the
whole Christian social order. But we may be wasting time shoot-
ing at a straw man. It dbes not seem likely that Socialism will be
seriously considered by the normal sane man in the future. The
Russian Reds have painted a flaming warning on Northern Europe.
It will be difficult, if not impossible, to conceal the ghastliness of
that warning.
A second solution of the Big Business problem is the solu-
tion of the Cooperationists. This theory is devoid of tainted radi-
calism and deserves serious consideration. It argues, fairly
enough, that the existence of a minority class, constantly increas-
ing its wealth by receipt of "workless income" in the shape of re-
turns on its capital, is economically and socially an unhealthy
condition. It aims at a more socially and economically expedient
and less socially dangerous distribution of the national income to
234 TtfE Problem of big Business [Nov.,
05 manyy instead of to as few, individuals as possible. It would
obviate the danger of a constantly more marked stratification of
society into hostile classes: of employer and employee — capitalist
and labor. It involves no programme of dispossession and con-
fiscation, but would substitute a cooperative society of workers and
managers for a cooperative society of owners and managers.
Now certain observations are in order. Our concern here
is with Big Business, by which term, from common parlance, is
meant large industrial enterprises engaged in production. Conse-
quently, we are not dealing with cooperative credit societies or
cooperative agricultural societies or small-scale cooperative pro-
ductive societies or even cooperative mercantile societies. Each
of these forms of cooperation has much to make it worth a trial
(and, indeed, each has been tried with good measure of success
in many cases), for each makes for a more widespread distribu-
tion of the national income, and any conomic action in that di-
rection not involving an over-great loss of eflficiency and economy
is largely desirable. But these are not the concern of this article.
Nor can we touch here the morality of interest or fair profits.
At least the presumptions are with the morality of these institu-
tions; that they are morally good is here taken for granted.
These limitations understood, we return to cooperation as a
solution of the Big Business problem. Cooperation may take two
major forms which must be considered separately (in reference
to productive enterprise always). First, there is what is called
the* "perfect form*' of cooperation. The essence of this, accord-
ing to Professor Taussig, consists "in getting rid of the managing
employer" — or from the converse view, according to Dr. Ryan,
"the perfect form occurs when all the workers engaged in the
common concern own all the share capital, control the entire
management, and receive the whole of the wages, profits and in-
terest."
There is little question that such a system would be ideal,
granted its practicability. It would have every advantage and
none of the disadvantages of the Socialist scheme; it would make
for a wide distribution of the national income and a more equi-
table and imiversal standard of living; it would furnish individual
incentive and protect the rights of private property, for, as Dr.
Ryan points out so well, it is not a system of collective owner-
19 19.) THE PROBLEM OF BIG BUSINESS %%^
ship, but a system of immediate private oumership and control of
a definite amount of specific capital.
But ideal though the system seems to be, its practicability in
the particular matter with which we are now concerned, is quite
another thing. Big Business, precisely because it is big, needs
precisely the efficient managing employer that Perfect Coopera-
tion aims to avoid. For only such a manager, it would seem, and
only with the incentive of profit to himself, would or could make
Big Business maintain its present efficiency — and efficiency is the
particular reason for Big Business. True, as Dr. Ryan points
out, directive talent of the altruistic type may be developed in
time, but from the present outlook it would seem that that time
is very far distant. Again, Big Business requires big capital.
This is another objection to cooperation-ism in this field; not in-
superable, of course, for a cooperative society "acorn," like a
captain of industry "acorn," may become an "oak." But it will
be long in growing since the shoots are not yet even visible.
Professor Carver is right when he says that capital is the limit-
ing factor in the present industrial situation and without it Big
Business is impossible.
It may be added also that unless cooperative production were
universal, it would tend to reestablish the very system it purports
to avoid: the employer and wage system. Experience shows that
a cooperationist society tends to become a closed corporation, once
it is in full swing. "Perfect cooperation, therefore, does not ofiFer
an adequate solution of the Big Business problem — ^though its
future possibilities in certain limited fields of production may not
be denied.
There is, however, a second form of cooperation, popularly
known as the co-partnership form. Co-partnership exists when
some or all of the employees of a concern own stock in the busi-
ness of the concern which employs them, and not only own stock
but participate directly in the management of the concern. A third
element, profit sharing, is usually considered an integral element
of this form of cooperation.
The most notable experiment in this line, according to Dr.
Ryan, is that of the Metropolitan Gas Co. of London. "Practic-
ally all the company's six thousand employees are now among
its stockholders," says Dr. Ryan. "Although their combined
holdings are only about one twenty-eighth of the total, they are
336 THE PROBLBM OF BTG BUSINESS [Nov.,
empowered to select two of the ten members of the board of di-
rectors/' What may prove to be an even more notable experi-
ment in this line has recently attracted much attention in our own
country. The Sears-Roebuck Co. of Qiicago, employing between
thirty and forty thousand, has gone in for a co-partnership scheme
which involves stock ownership and profit-sharing, but which, in
the information of the present writer, does not include direct em-
ployee participation in the company's management, although cer-
tainly a degree of management participation is involved in the
very fact of stock ownership. More than ten per cent, of the total
issue of common stock of the Sears-Roebuck Co. is already owned
by the employees and, as the particular co-partnership scheme in
use involves a progressive acquirement of stock by the employees,
it will probably not be long before the employees of this concern
will have a very substantial part even in the direct managerial
end of the business. Just at present, however, the emphasis in
the Sears-Roebuck case seems to be on the profit-sharing phase
of co-partnership. It is not yet a strictly co-partnership enter-
prise.
Not that the profit-sharing phase of co-partnership is not im-
portant. It is important and is often used alone, without the
other elements of the co-partnership device. It is described by
Gide as a system by which ^'profits, instead of falling exclusively
to him (the employer), are divided according to some system of
sharing between the employer and employees, the workmen thus
receiving an addition to their regular wages, if the enterprise has
been successful." A more satisfactory definition is quoted from
Schloss by Dr. Ryan. Profit-sharing is said to be "the system
under which ... a substantial and known share of the profits
of a business belongs to the workers in it, not by right of any
shares they may hold or for any other title, but simply by right
of the labor they have contributed to make the profit" A con-
crete expression of this device is had in what is called the Ryan-
Callahan plan, which has considerable vogue in the Middle West,
and is best exemplified by the Louisville Varnish Co. of Ken-
tucky, which pioneered the device. Profits are divided into two
equal parts. One part is divided among the owners, the other
among the employiees. This is certainly a large-visioned policy,
and its local successes have been most marked, due in part prob-
ably to the generosity of the division.
^919] THE PROBLEM OF BiG BUSINESS 337
One thing is sure, the advantages of the co-partnership scheme
(as inclusive of profit sharing) for solving the problem of Big
Business are very great. Co-partnership takes some of the sting
out of the "universal absenteeism of ownership." It gives a
greater number a share in the annual national income from the
productive processes. It is an incentive to each individual em-
ployee. It is socially advantageous, as it tends to close up the
unfortunate class-gap between employee and employer. More-
over, it makes for stability of labor, for when a laborer receives
a fair wage and a division, however small, of the profits earned,
and when, in addition, he has a voice in the actual management,
the inevitable result is loyalty to and interest in the industrial unit
to which he is attached.
True, like everything else human, even this comparatively
ideal thing is open to objection. For some it does not go far
enough; for others, it goes too far. It is claimed that the profit-
sharing phase of the co-partnership plan will lessen the incen-
tive of the entrepreneur-owner. This has not been the experi-
ence in Louisville. Says President Callahan of the Louisville Var-
nish Co.: "This system has proved to be of the greatest satisfac-
tion to everybody concerned. It brought about a character of
service that before the war enabled us to develop a business that
was outstripping all competitors, and in the final analysis the
owners, although they got only half the returns of the business,
realized more on their money invested than the owners of com-
petitors did. And the reason was that every man had an interest,
an individual, personal interest, in everything going on."
The example of this company is not discouraging to manager-
owners. And there seems to be no valid reason why this "no
incentive" objection should be so often advanced. For the per-
centage of profits that go to the employee will not be the whole
loaf by any means; nor should it be. Moreover, what the manager-
owner loses in this regard, he gains tenfold in increased indi-
dividual responsibility and eagerness for maximum productivity
on the part of each employee, and in rendering stable his own
position as capitalist and the position of other capitalists; for,
given no mitigation of the present order of a constantly fattening
and numerically decreasing capitalistic minority, the danger of
social revolution is no mere fantasy of the imagination.
Another argument against the profit-sharing phase of co-part-
238 The problem of Big business [Nov.,
nership is on the score of fairness. If the employee is to share
the profits, he should share the losses. This looks like a serious
objection. It is a real difficulty, although not necessarily alarm-
ing; for Big Business, as we know it, seldom would frighten a
worker from accepting a proposition of profit-sharing and loss-
sharing. Furthermore, it is always understood that the proportion
of gross profits which goes for a sinking-fund against risk or some
similar contrivance will not be included in the percentage of net
profit distribution made to the employees.
A third objection is made by Professor Walker: "Suspicions
are likely to arise regarding the employer's good faith in declar-
ing the amount subject to distribution, unless the workmen or a
committee of them are to be allowed such access to the employer's
books and accounts," which access he goes on to take for granted,
"few business men would willingly accede." For reasons given
above, and by reason of a publicity-law, to be argued for later,
also because strict co-partnership, providing employee participa-
tion in the management, will safeguard this danger to its profit-
sharing phase, one may take exception to Professor Walker's
qualification.
This second form of cooperation, then, appears practicable
and has advantages to recommend it to far-sighted business men
Even in its partitive exemplification in profit-sharing, it is good
In its complete form of stock ownership and managerial participa
tion by employees plus profit-sharing, it gives the greatest promise
Both forms have been given a trial and considerable impetus lo
cally during the present war. It is to be hoped that strict co
partnership will become the universal rule; for it is, as Dr. Ryan
puts it, "a partial solvent" of the problem of capitalism in gen-
eral, and particularly of the problem of Big Business productive
enterprises.
Up to this point our concern has been with the Socialist-
Radical theory and the Cooperation theories. There remains the
capitalist position, or as it is called in economics, the theory of
Individualism. The individualist is strictly conservative. He is
against any change in the present order. He is for allowing the
individual unlimited rein and imlimited possibilities (not, of
course, illegal or immoral) for development of industry and the
acquiring of wealth. He bases his stand on the claim that any
limitation on the ri^t of acquiring will deprive society of great
I9I9-] thb Problem of big Business 239
leaders, great captains of industry, great inventors, because it will
deprive them of stimulus or incentive.
The individualist is right and he is wrong. Great incentives
and great stimuli are necessary to secure the development of
great industrial talent. But a general modification of numerical
unlimitedness is not necessarily a deprivation of necessary incen-
tives or stimuli. A poor inventor does not cease his efforts to pro-
duce his masterpiece because he knows that he must share the
profits of his ingenuity with those who risk their capital on it.
So too with a captain of industry. It is not absolutely necessary
for incentive that his numerical financial possibilities be absolutely
unlimited.
Besides, some modifications of Individualism do seem im-
perative. That Individualism must have an important place in
any proper solution of the Big Business problem is granted, but it
must be a restrained Individualism. Its unrestrained form has
led to the serious social-economic evils, already mentioned, of
pushing small competitors to the wall by illegal methods such as
rate discrimination; a]i)itrarily limiting the supply of a com-
modity and thus forcing exorbitant monopoly prices on the con-
sumer. But, worst of all, partly as an effect of the foregoing,
partly as a cause. Big Business is largely responsible for the
economically bad and dangerous situation of enormous concentra-
tion of wealth in a small capitalistic group. This fact makes limi-
tations and restrictions on it imperative.
There is no intention here of denying private property rights
nor the presumptions in favor of the morality of interest and
profits in the present order. But these rights must be restricted in
the interest of the common rights of every man. The first right
in the distribution of the economic goods of a national income is
the right of each individual in the nation to a decent livelihood
for himself and for his progeny. That right stands higher than
any canon of capitalism or right of private property. And that
right Big Business has not respected in its manipulations and star-
chamber methods. Big Business must be taught to respect that
right.
What Professor Devas advised for the reformation of joint
stock companies thirty years ago is applicable to Big Business.
^^Let us,** he says, ^^compel publicity of all prices, all charges, all
payments, so that discrimination may be checked; let local or cen-
240 The Problem of Big Business • [Nov..
tral authorities have a voice in the settling of price-lists and fo]i)id
sudden, great and uncalled-for changes of prices.'* This is good
advice, but it does not go far enough to meet present and more
acute economic evils. A further programme is necessary, and it
is here embodied in certain reconunendations taken from the first
reconstruction pamphlet of the National Catholic War G)uncil, viz:
( 1 ) "Labor ought gradually to receive greater representation
in the ^industriaP part of the business management — the control of
processes and machinery; nature of product; engagement and dis-
missal of employees, hours of work; rates of pay, bonuses, etc.,
welfare work; shop discipline; relations with trade unions. This
would vastly improve relations between the employees and em-
ployers and increase the efficiency and productiveness of each
establishment.''
The Catholic reconstructionists recommend also:
(2) 'The prevention of monopolistic control of commodities.
(3) "Adequate government regulation of such public monop-
olies as will remain under private operation.
(4) "Heavy taxation of incomes, excess profits and inheri-
tances."
Add to this excellent programme government price-fixing,
where competition breaks down, universal employer's liability for
accident to employees, and a minimum-wage law, and you have a
fairly comprehensive program which will allow capitalists a just
place in the sun without crowding out a nation of workmen from
the beneficent rays of the same celestial body.
To return to our analogy: The field is certainly useful. Of
the three men viewing it, one is certainly wrong, while neither of
the other two is exclusively right. The view of the stickler for
"perfect cooperation" seems impracticable and the view of the
stickler for individualism rampant is unreasonable. Once again,
the via media is the thing. The true solution of the Big Business
problem, it seems safe to say, lies in the secondary form of cooper-
ation-ism (including profit-sharing) and in the legal limitation of
capitalism's potentialities for evil, with the simultaneous safe-
guarding of its potentialities for good.
AN UKCANONIZED SAINT
BY IIARY FOSTER.
XV
|ONY, tired for the moment of Assisi, had packed his
bag and set off for a short, solitary tour. He had not
intended to be away more than ten days, but that
time had lengthened into nearly three weeks before
he showed his round, sunburned face again at the
hotel door. At dinner the friends chatted about the traveler's ex-
periences, and afterwards, as they were having their coffee in the
cool hall, Standish surprised the younger man by the wonderful
flow of uninteresting conversation that he kept up. It was only
when Tony suggested that it was now time for them to leave Assisi
that his friend's glib talk ceased for a while.
Later on, when everyone had ostensibly gone to bed, Mark
tapped at Bland's door. Tony had not yet thought of beginning to
undress. He was carefully arranging films of the photographs he
had taken on his little tour, consulting a notebook as he did so,
and numbering each roll before sending it away to be developed.
He just looked up and nodded as the artist entered the room, and
continued his work.
Mark went to the open window. The moon had risen and was
casting a strange white light upon the misty plain, and creating
vague, fanciful shadows in the small garden beneath the window.
Neither spoke for some moments, Mark's silence a contrast to the
garrulous chatter he had indulged in downstairs. Suddenly he
turned half round from the window and, plunging his hands deep
in his pockets, he blurted out with evident difficulty:
*Tony, old boy, I'm going to be a Catholic."
Bland nearly let kodak and films roll on to the floor when he
received this astounding intelligence. He made some sort of in-
articulate murmur, and looked expectantly at his friend.
"I've had rather a wretched time since you went away,"
VQt. ex. 16
243 AN UNCANONIZRD SAINT [Nov.,
Standish continued, turning back to the window. **I felt so restless
and moody. At nights I could not sleep, or, if I did, my rest was
broken with strange dreams — dreams which I could not remember
when I awoke, but which left me with a curious, worn-out sensation,
as though I had been working very hard or using my brain in some
de^ study. When I sat in the vineyards I was unhappy, for it
seemed as if things were not right. Something great and good
seemed to hang before me, something I wanted greatly, though I
knew not what it was, something which I could not reach. Then
there was that compelling power always urging, urging me forward
I knew not where. So strong was it sometimes that I would jump
to my feet feeling that I was being bodily compelled to rise.''
He paused for a moment, under the influence of a strong emo-
tion, and then continued:
^'I had made acquaintance with an old priest in the olive
groves, a man who interested me strangely; and this place with
its marvelous atmosphere seemed to hold a spell over me. I began
to wonder, in the midst of all these strange sensations, to wonder
about this God in Whom young and old, simple and intellectual,
believe. When I asked some idle questions of the padre, his answers
were brief. It was as though he replied unwillingly; he would not
advertise his wares, so to speak. He said no more than courtesy re-
quired, and I — I felt out of it, somehow. Something seemed to
prevent me from acquiring the knowledge I sought, and, as is
always the way, the less I could discover the more anxious I grew
to know more. My old friend said a few things which impressed
me and, Tony, I began to realize that there must be something
higher in life than mere pleasurable existence; that there are others
in the world besides myself, and that I am not so awfully impor-
tant."
He paused again. Tony had ceased his occupation, but he
still remained near the table where lay his photographic appliances.
**But I didn't want to give in," went on Standish slowly,
^'though I was attracted, and for a day or two I avoided the old
man. But it was no use — I had to seek him again. All my strange
fancies redoubled, I had no peace; ever did I feel pushed onwards.
I hated the idea of seeking instruction. I hate it still. Yet I feel
I must, I must become a Catholic I don't know why. I don't want
to, yet I must It's — it's indescribable."
"I don't think it's quite straight of the old chap to force you
I9»9-] AN UNCANOmZRD SAINT 343
to join his religion," remarked Tony after a little silence, putting
his pencil in his mouth, as his pipe was not handy.
**But that is what he has not done," interrupted Mark. "He
has almost discouraged me; curiously enougli, he has put me off
again and again. No, it is something within me that made me ask
him to instruct me. I can't understand it; I feel I am doing right.
What we call our conscience tells me so, but it is sadly against the
grain, old boy. Yet I must do it for peace sake."
Tony whistled. "Hypnotism," he observed briefly.
"I wish I could think so. But hypnotism in these days, and
with me! No," he added with much hesitation, "it seems as if, as
if — someone were wishing very much that I should do this."
The two friends were silent for a long time. It was not Tony's
way to offer comments on any confidences.
"I shall want to stay on here a bit," Mark said at length in
his natural tones, as he prepared to seek his own room, "but do as
you like. Bland; do not feel tied to me. I feel Fm treating you
rather badly, old man, but you must forgive me. I'm not myself."
Tony inwardly agreed with the latter sentiment. That Mark
should humble himself to the doctrines and beliefs of any church
was something so extraordinary that Bland shook an incredulous
head. Certainly Standish was not himself. And as for those feel-
ings and promptings of which the artist had spoken, they were quite
above Tony's head to fancy. So that gentleman betook himself to
bed, to dream practical dreams about his own practical life.
That there was a wonderful charm about Don Benedetto no
one could deny, Mark least of all. If the old priest could be enter-
taining on other subjects, he could be doubly so upon that nearest
to his heart. Mark soon found that no matter how difficult he felt
it to break the ice anew each day, he was held spellbound by the
time his instruction was over. Gradually he was carried away by
the beauty and depth of religion, and grew rapt in his new task.
Very soon a soft love for what he was learning crept into his soul.
He was an intelligent pupil and learned quickly, and when he was
called upon to accept what, a few short months ago he would have
laughed at, he could only humble himself in silent wonder.
"I think someone must be praying very earnestly for you,"
the priest remarked one day, taking a large pinch of snuff and scat*
tering most of it upon Mark's well-brushed coat. Then he remem-
bered the young man's story, and added with an easy familiarity:
344 Af^ UNCANONIZED SAINT (Noir^
^^Doobtless it is little Caterina. Our Italian girls are faithful and
they love the good God/'
"She must have forgotten me long ago,*' Mark replied. But
the idea pleased him.
The time of his instruction was drawing to a close and he was
conscious of a feeling of peace and rest. The old urging feeling
had gone, and all he desired was to quickly embrace the Faith
which he was beginning to love with a fervor he had not known
before. He began to imderstand Caterina's love for him and, as
God gradually became to him what He was to her, he realized how
right she had been in giving up her lover.
Just before he was received into the Qiurch, he wrote to Tony,
who had again set off on a wander:
I am pegging away hard at my studies, and I expect to be received
very soon. I know you'll wish me joy on the occasion, even though
you may not agree with me. But I have a proposal to make to you
of which I am sure you will approve. Will you meet me in Siena
and be with me for a certain event which I earnestly hope will take
place there after I have left Assisi a Catholic? In other words, I
am going to seek Caterina and, if she will have me, we shall be
married.
By the way, I heard from Mrs. Langf ord, such a nice, kind letter,
saying that you had told her about me. She congratulated me
heartily, and added that she had always known that this would hap-
pen. I must write and tell her what I hope to do in Siena. I think
it will please her romantic heart, won^t it? As soon as I can I will
fix up dates. Meanwhile, do keep yourself fairly free, like a
good chap. . . .
Old Don Benedetto led his new child out of the chapel him-
self, a few days later. He took a very noisy pinch of snuff as they
stood together at the foot of the path, watched by a group of peas-
ants who were talking excitedly among themselves of the scene
they had just witnessed in the church. The old priest remarked
that he was sorry that his work was over, and he looked rather
wistfully at Standish. He shook his white head slowly when Mark
promised to return with his wife.
"I am getting old," he said. "I hope God will soon call m«
home."
His erstwhile pupil took an earnest and grateful farewell of
him, feeling, as he turned his back upon the little hamlet, that he
«f I*') . An Uncanonizrd Saint 145
had bidden goodbye to a real friend. He felt happy, yet gravely
80. His great dream was accomplished, but life lay before him to
be faced, and it could never be die same as hitherto. New respon-
sibilities confronted him, and more would be expected of him. He
even thought soberly of his coming meeting with Caterina, and he
recollected that it was now two years since he had seen her. But the
idea that she was not waiting for him still, never entered his mind.
Bland met his friend at the station at Siena next day with
rather a glum face. He had never expected that Mark would really
become a Catholic, and it seemed to him to set a barrier between
them, so that he did not quite know how he should be received.
But as they drove up the steep street to the hotel where Bland
already occupied rooms they chatted merrily enough.
Mark, with a sense of friendliness which Tony greatly appre-
ciated, forbore to seek Caterina the first day and gave himself up
wholly to his chum's society. But Tony felt that Mark was lost
to him in more ways than one.
XVI.
When Mark went out next morning his footsteps turned at
«ice in the direction of the southern part of the city. But as he
entered the familiar streets they faltered. He could not make up
his mind to go down the Via Benincasa, and he paced the streets
nearby undecidedly.
If he should chance to meet her here before other eyes, what
should he do? How receive her? Once he thought of going back
to the hotel until evening. But the days were at their longest and
darkness did not fall till late, and in the cool evenings people
would be sitting at their doorsteps. Perhaps it would be better to
venture down the familiar streets now, and enter the little chapel.
She might be there.
He paced irresolutely between the tall houses, looking at his
watch occasionally, and glancing round, half -fearing, half -longing
to see the familiar figure. Hitherto he had not given a thought
as to how they should meet again, and the place of their encounter
had not occurred to him until he stood within a stone's throw of
her dwelling. Just before noon he turned resolutely down the
street which led to the steep Via Benincasa, recollecting that once
the Ave Maria rang out the chapel would be closed.
346 AN UNCANONIZBD SAINT (Nov.,
Of course the usual tribe of small boys and girls greeted him
at the head of the street, offering themselves as guides. Mark
smiled. Caterina must have formed one of such a crowd some
ten or twelve years ago. But he told them that he knew his way,
and shook his head to the demands for **franco-bolli/*
He looked down the street almost timidly. But only a few
old women sat at their doors, and one or two little boys played in
the gutters. The little church was open and he entered slowly. At
first, from the glare without, there seemed to be a profound dark-
ness within, but as his eyes grew accustomed to the gloom he turned
them eagerly to her old comer. But there was no upright figure
standing there, no upturned face, no earnest eyes fixed upon the
tabernacle door. He seemed to be quite alone. Then the swinging
lamp caught his eye, and with that sense of novelty which still
attended his every act of devotion, he sank upon one knee, making
the unfamiliar sign of the Cross.
A rustle and a few indistinguiahable words greeted his ears
and he turned quickly. His eyes, now used to the sombre light,
descried something in the old comer, something half-leaning
against a wooden seat. His pulses throbbed wildly as he rose and
went towards it. He heard a torrent of words poured forth in a
well-remembered tone, he saw a pair of hands clasped, and earnest
eyes upturned in prayer. Then he imprisoned the figure in his
arms.
Oh, Caterina, my darling, I have come back to you,'' he
cried in a low voice, and he felt her head drooping against his
breast.
**I did not expect to see you,'* she whispered, kissing his hand,
^^but you are a Catholic now; I saw you kneel. I expected that
God is good.''
^'Yes, Caterina, I am a Catholic now," he said softly, *'and
I have come bade to you."
She tumed to the altar. **Ah, dear God," she sighed.
Mark poured out his eager love into her listening ears, and
she smiled wistfully as he spoke. But he felt her hands thin and
hot in his clasp and he tumed her face towards the dim light and
peered at it anxiously.
"You have been ill, my Caterina," he exclaimed. "Have you
pined and drooped for me? What a bmte I have been!"
She did not reply, but her lips quivered and her brown eyes
*9>9] AN UNCANONIZBD SAINT 247
filled with tears. But she smiled again as he whispered eagerly to
her, telling her that illness would have no part in her life now that
he had returned to loye and care for her. Then she wept quietly,
so softly that he did not know that she was weeping until her warm
tears fell upon his hands.
"Are you not happy, Caterina?*' he asked tenderly. "Are you
not glad that I have returned?'*
"Ah, so pleased, so grateful,*' she murmured brokenly.
"Do you love me still, my darling, as you loved me two years
ago?"
For answer she clung closer to him, but her tears continued,
and he regarded her with anxiety, they fell so hopelessly.
"You will marry me, won't you, Caterina, now that I am of
your Faith? I think it was your prayers that brought me to it.
For these past months I have felt urged, as it were, to the Qiurch.
At first sadly against my will, but I could get no rest until I had
inquired into the truth. Then, as the beauties of our Faith were
unfolded to my listless gaze, I grew to love them and to love
our God."
She listened eagerly, with her eyes fixed on his face and her
lips parted.
"When will you marry me?" he persisted, as he finished his
story, marveling at her strange, tearful silence. *
"I am ill," she replied gently, and shook her head. "I am
very ill. They say I will not live."
"But I will make you live. You have fretted your life away
since I spoiled your happiness. Now I shall make amends to you
a hundredfold. I will live for you and make you love your life."
"Oh, I do love it," she sobbed.
*Then we shall be married at once," he assured her eagerly.
"I will have you cured and made well and strong."
But she shook her head again. "I cannot marry. They say
I am dying, and I think I am."
"But you will grow strong again, my love, with care," he in-
sisted. "See, together we will pray and ask God to give you
strength and health."
"No," she cried, "we cannot pray for that."
"But surely we may ask Him for anything?" he inquired
humbly. "May we not ask Him for all we want?"
"Yes, but not for that, not for that. I cannot — ^
248 AN UNCANONIZRD SAINT [Nov.,
He turned to her gravely. ^^Caterina, what do you mean?
Don't you want to live?"
She clung to him, sobbingly, as he paused.
"What is it, chUd?" he asked softly. "You are ill, my dear-
est, and it makes you fearful about yourself. But God can give
you back your health.''
She bowed her head.
"Then let us ask Him now, together, for this favor," he said
gently.
But she drooped silently before him.
"Caterina, what have you done? What is it that makes you
hide from me? Do you think the good God wants you? Is that
why you will not pray for your recovery?" He bent over her, and
just caught the words she murmured hesitatingly:
"I know He wants me."
Mark did not speak at once. He was puzzled. But she re-
peated her words more firmly and met his eyes bravely.
"How can you know?" he asked in bewilderment "What
have you done, Caterina. Oh! what have you done?"
"Don't be angry with me," she whispered. "Oh, Mark, you
must understand. I felt I had to do it, just as you felt you had
to believe. It was sadly against my will, too, and more than ever
it is hard now, bitterly hard." She paused, and he waited anxiously.
"Tell me," he whispered encouragingly.
She bent her head so low that he had to stoop to hear her fal-
tering words :
"I prayed for you so hard," she murmured, "but it seemed
as if the dear God and His holy Mother would not listen to me.
At first I thought it was not true that you did not believe; I was
sure you would come back to me, and I asked the Madonna to
send you quickly. But you didn't come. Then I found out that
there really were people in the big world, like you, who did not
love God or believe in him; some, too, yes, some who scoffed at
Him. And Don Filippo told me Aat I must pray very earnestly
for them. I did, but you never came. I told the dear Mother of
God that if only she would make you a Catholic and send you back
to me, we would be so good. We would give all our little children
in a special manner to her. But she didn't answer. Afterwards, I
thought that perhaps God would let you see His truth but that He
might not will that you should return to me. Then I was not gen-
I9I9*] ^N UNCAIiONIZED SAINT 349
erous. I could not give you to Him without wanting you for my-
self, too, but after a little I gave in and left it all in His hands.
After this last Qiristmas I began to feel restless and unhappy, as
if the good God was going to ask me to give Him something really
precious. I was frightened. I foimd it hard to pray. But at last
I knew what He was asking for.**
She paused for a long time.
"He asked me to oflFer my life for your soul." She continued
more slowly: "Since I did so, I have felt that He has taken my
little offering, and I felt that you were being drawn nearer and
nearer the truth. I seemed to be drawing you with my own hands.
At the same time I felt ill and weak and I grew no better. They
tell me I will never get well, and I know it.*'
Mark had buried his face in his hands as she spoke, and he
did not move even when she laid a little hand upon his head in a
mute caress. She waited patiently, the tears drying on her sad face,
her lips moving as she prayed for strength for them both and
uttered words of gratitude, too, for the joy that had come to her in
answer to her prayers. At length he raised his head.
"Caterina," he said, "will you come to our old meeting place
under the cypresses this evening? We could talk there, and I
diould like to think over everything before I see you again. Can
you walk so far?'* he added quickly.
"Oh, yes," she responded. "I could walk there. I can walk
a little, though I get easily tired. They do not understand my ill-
ness; they call it a decline." She smiled a little, but Mark winced.
"I shall wait for you in the old place," he said quietly, and
as he assisted her to rise he felt how frail she was. "You are sure
you can walk so far?" he repeated with tender solicitude. She
nodded cheerfully.
"Anywhere to meet you," she whispered.
He kissed her forehead, and they knelt together for an in-
stant's prayer.
He drew back the fastenings of the now locked door, and she
closed it after him, smiling lovingly as she did so. Then he passed
into the warmth without. But though the sun shone, and the chil-
dren laughed, there was no sunshine or music in his heart. Towards
the bottom of the street he met an old woman slowly toiling up-
wards. He fancied he remembered the weather-beaten old coun-
tenance and paused hesitatingly before her.
448 AN UNC^^' j^^^
•^' ^^f^r^^ welled up into her
*^ . i*/> '> ^ifw A^' '"i! 'SewiU not be with us
"ii^s^/l^sdJed^f-.^^j^bersloyfly from
^y^ the
long- *
'•^ '"Jnodiff^" ^' rrtte A«*« **■*" '*®'^ mother died.
-^ ^/Swft^ ^.'^^i.r Ae, too, is gone and she Uves with
^Z'^i^'^ '^'''t, with me long." The old woman shook
^iKiti'*^?"'^ in Ms pocket.
Msrk ptf t "' . ^y could buy for her to make her strong
**jg ^^\^^ **See, if I give you some money, won't you
^ ^'^\t^'cine for her?" The woman shook her head again,
*^y *^ wistfuUy at the coins.
**' •«>UL si/?nore, the good God wants her," she said with the
iwtjisni of her class and race.
**ff^t take the money," urged the artist, "and put it to any
vou like; get her any comforts you can, and yourself, too."
^ He hurried away, without waiting to hear her thanks and
prayers-
[to be continued.]
flew JSooks^
THE AWAKENING OF ASIA- By H. M. Hyndman. New York: Boni
&Liveright. $2.00.
The relations between Europe and Asia, according to tlie author, can
be compared to two great tides — ^the tide of Asiatic invasion that swept
over Europe for a thousand years; and the tide of commercial conquest
that has swept from Europe into Asia. These two vast movements he
sketches in resume, and then proceeds to greater detail on the result of
the commercial invasion of Asia and its future consequences.
The book was withheld from publication for two years by the censor;
the time was neither ripe nor propitious for such a frank discussion of
Far East subjects. Today it is essential. Therein lies the service of this
admirable study. Frankly an advocate of Asia for the Asiatics, Mr.
Hyndman sums up each one of the big problems with deadly accuracy —
the dramatic development of Japan from feudalism to capitalism in the
short space of a century; Japan's amazing industrial growth and her
spread of influence in Korea, Manchuria and northern Qiina; the awaken-
ing of the Chinese, the real background of the Boxer troubles and the
hideous opium traflb: which will ever remain a blot on England's history;
the case of misrule and the diplomacy of carpet-baggers in India, with
the present inevitable struggle for Indian freedom. These subjects are
vitally important to the world's peace and progress. They are not matters
that can be laid aside casually; they grow with the days and become more
and more formidable. Of all the Christian powers, the United States
alone seems to have exercised the simple principles of honor in dealing
with China, althou^ of late, and in dealing with other Asiatic problems,
she seems to have fallen into the ways of the European nations. In short,
Europe's treatment of Asia is nothing to be proud of; Asia has had — and
still has — good grounds for rising up to slay Europeans.
In the long list of evils it is difficult to pick out the worst, but cer-
tainly the most glaring was England's opium traffic. The author assures
us that gradually the traffic is being decreased. Recent reports from the
Far East, however, show Japan using England's effective weapon — she is
planting poppy in Korea and Shantung today!
The author sees only one solution for the Indian problem — to give
the natives gradual but assured freedom, to readjust the abominable
finances of that great country — ^in other words, to withdraw from India
and permit the Indians to work out their own salvation.
We can no longer speak of these Asiatic peoples as backward and
heathen; we have an entirely different set of circumstances to deal with
than those that presented themselves in the Far East ten or twenty years
ago. The East has awakened. The yellow peril has become yellow im-
provement The ebb is approaching — and it is time for the tide to begin
to flow back again.
352 IfBiw BOOKS [Not.,
ALBANIA, PAST AND PRESENT. By Constantine A. Chckrcri. New
York: The Macmillan Co. $2.25.
The national problem of Albania is not local or individual, but an
int^ral part of the whole Balkan problem. She stands today a land
desolate and ravaged by many years of war and under the military occu-
pation of Italy, France, England, Serbia and Greece. For three thousand
years the Albanian people have been subjected to the severest tests of
massacre and pillage and political double-dealing. Today their national
spirit is as keen as ever. They dream of a strong and neutral Albanian
state in the midst of the Balkans, which would relieve the tension between
Italy, Serbia and Greece, and be the beginning of a real Balkan Confed-
eracy. This is a country that Bismarck said ^'is not worth the bones of
one Pomeranian soldier,*' the same which England, Russia, France and
Italy made a sovereign state in 1912 and handed over to an unknown Ger-
man Prince, William of Wied. Today Albania calls out for her sovereign
rights — and the basis for those rights are written down in Mr. Chekrezi*s
volume.
Although Albania has been ^'the foundling among nations,'' the liter-
ature in English concerning her past and present is generally scattered in
fugitive magazine articles. This represents the first serious attempt to
give an adequate, consequential picture of the country. It is written by
an Albanian whose education was finished in the United States, and who
writes with a valuable perspective on both the past and the present. The
picture he shows is of a land of great natural resources and sturdy, indus-
trious people, constantly being invaded or infiltrated by contiguous powers
— Greece on the soutii, Serbia on the north.
Such a succinct statement of Albania cannot help but quicken interest
in a great problem that lies before the nations today. In these pages we
have the past and the present. Is the future to be written in the sufferings
of a people?
THE PLACE OF AGRICULTURE IN RECONSTRUCTION. By James
B. Mormon. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co. $2.00 net.
As the Assistant Secretary of the Federal Farm Loan Board and
the author of Principles of Rural Credit and Principles of Social Progress^
the author brings to his subject a knowledge that is intimate and extensive.
He outlines the labor problem arising on the return of peace, and
shows the attempts that are being made by Great Britain, France, Canada
and the United States to quiet industrial unrest by making farming at-
tractive to the returned soldiers.
In an orderly way, he takes up the proposed plans for land settle-
ments in the various countries and then analyzes them, showing the
merits and deficiencies in the diflferent schemes. Mr. Mormon is to be
commended for his industry in obtaining the very useful data which he
places before the reader. However, one is not inclined to agree with
him in his contention that in the United States the labor problem is acute
because of the lack of opportimities for employment.
I9I9-] ifS^ BOOKS 853
But he speaks truly when he shovrs that the tmdency in labor move-
ments in the United States is toward the cities. As a consequence the
farms are being depopulated. The results are and will continue to be
far-reaching and serious in their effects. The matter is one of large di-
mensions, and can be solved only by wise l^islation bom of close
study. Mr. Mormon has made a strong plea for a really progressive,
constructive programme regarding agriculture, and by it has contributed
a worthy service toward a better adjustment of our post-war labor con-
ditions.
FATHER TOM. By Peter P. McLoughlin. New York: G. P. Putnam's
Sons. 12.50 net.
In this volume the life and lectures of the late Rev. Thomas P. Mc-
Loughlin have been set forth in a very pleasing manner. It is written with
the affection and personal interest of a brother. In large measure the
writer has drawn his material from the letters and diaries and published
articles of the priest, thus adding the autobiographical feature to the
chronicle of a life's work. No one who has read the book can fail to
share in the large affection which follows one who lives and teaches God's
love and law. And this "Father Tom" did in a singularly effective way.
To many readers, not less interesting than the biography itself will be the
ten lectures which form the second part of the volume, for the most part
on topics relating to music. The last, "Melodies of Mother Church," is a
choice discourse that displays a charming scholarship.
WHY WE FAIL AS CHRISTIANS. By Robert Hunter. New York: The
Macmillan Co. $1.60.
In the first part of his book Mr. Hunter takes up the later career of
Count Tolstoy, and asserts that his endeavors to carry out his conception
of Christian duty were unsuccessful because he insisted upon the indi-
vidualistic instead of the communistic interpretation. Mr. Hunter en-
deavors to prove that in giving up wealth, the demands of family, and
die privileges of his social status and in becoming one with the peasants
even to the extent of toiling in the fields, Tolstoy was following the
teachings of Christ. What he demands of the world today is to carry on
where Tolstoy faltered and make communism a universal fact. Only
thus, he insists, can we fulfill the precepts of the New Testament, and
only thus can we escape the cataclysm which is inevitable if the present
economic situation is permitted to continue.
Mr. Hunter obviously writes from a profound personal conviction.
His book, however, leaves three big difficulties unanswered: first, his in-
sistence that only in communism can the precepts of Christ be fulfilled is
based upon a false interpretation of Christ's teachings; second, how is
universal communism as a practical matter to be effected; third, will com-
munism justify Mr. Hunter's claims for it and insure the happiness and
eontentment of mankind? One cannot help feeling that the industrial
progranmie outlined by the American Catholic bishops offers a solution
354 tfEW Books [Nov.,
eminently more somidy more practical, and more certain of fulfilling a
noble end than the communism advocated by Mr. Hunter.
His book, however* will not have been written in vain if it helps to
make men realize that industrial unrest can be settled only when the rich
display toward the poor the Qiristian characteristics of sympathy, gen-
erosity, and justice.
•
THEODORE ROOSEVELT. A Verse Sequence in Sonnets and Quator-
zains. By Russell J. Wilbur. With an Introduction by William Hard.
Boston: Houghton MiflUn G>. $1.00 net
The present collection of sonnets and ^'fourteeners,'' the fruit of
Father Wilbur's long and deep admiration for his subject, is a character-
sketch in verse of Theodore Roosevelt. Most of the pieces appeared,
just before Colonel Roosevelt's death, in The New Republic^ where they
attracted attention both as the work of a priest and on their own account
It is a composite portrait, which attempts in a series of sharp, vivid
flashes a presentation of the manifold traits that went to make up a pe-.
culiarly complex personality — ^in its less admirable as well as in its
really noble phases. This entire acceptance of the facts gives the book
its merit as biography, and as biography it has unusual excellence.
Looking at the poems purely as literature we are obliged to give a
much more qualified approval. They are, like their subject, vigorous
and downright rather than subtle and fine. On the score of thought and
content the sonnets are unexceptionable — sometimes humorous and in-
genious, often incisive and penetrating, always striking and bold; it is
in their workmanship, their technique, that the deficiency lies, a matter
perhaps not to be wondered at when it is considered that practically all
of the pieces were composed in a single month.
BOLSHEVISM. By John Spargo. New York: Harper & Brothers. $1.50
net
This is a scholarly treatment of a subject of absorbing interest.
The author, who at the entry of the United States into the war was too
true an American to remain allied with the Socialist Party, has pre-
sented a comprehensive study of an outgrowth that is new in name but
old in reality — the cruel dictatorship of an unscrupulous minority. Mr.
Spargo knows the men he speaks of, and has been in intimate touch with
internal conditions in Russia. He therefore speaks with the authority
bom of knowledge, and patently without prejudice. His condemnation
is that bom of the mind and die inelasticity of logic Because he is
logical he has reached his present conclusion as to those Americans who
inexplicably look with favor upon Bolshevism.
Mr. Spargo opens his volume with a historic resume of the social
and economic conditions in Russia previous to the outbreak of the World
War. He then shows the rise of the Russian people in the difi'erent revo-
lutions which had as their purpose the overthrowing of the oppressive
yoke of Tsarism and which culminated on March 15, 1917. From this
1919*] Nei^ Books 255
period on the author gives a critical survey of the transition from Bour-
geoisie to Bolsheviki. He delineates the failure of Kerensky and at-
tributes it primarily to the sabotage of Lenine and Trotzky and other
Bolshevik leaders, who under the guise of proletarianism were making
ready to seize the government by a coup dTetai.
As a believer in Social Democracy, Mr. Spargo has taken great
pains to show that Bolshevism is in no sense synonymous with the doc-
trines of Marx. His philosophy is at times open to question, but his logic
in Bolshevism is ine\dtable and praiseworthy.
COMMON SENSE DRAWING. By Eleanor Lane. New York: Krone
Brothers. $3.00.
The teacher called upon to teach art work will find this a very valu-
able addition to her library of practical and helpful text-books.
All of the material is simply and clearly planned, so that the teacher
will be able to present the lesson to the class in the natural sequence of
normal development and interest.
The book is profusely and splendidly illustrated, beginning with
lessons suitable for pupils from the first grade and graduated through
the eighth grade. The one question which mi^t arise is whether or not
the lessons are too far advanced for some of the pupils in the grades
for which it is intended.
This book particularly emphasizes the teaching of lettering and
perspective and is a very practical and valuable contribution to this phase
of art teaching.
THE CONFESSIONS OF A BROWNING LOVER. By John Walker
Powell. New York: The Abingdon Press. $1.00 net.
There is something challenging about the author of The Ring and
the Book that invites battle. And battle there is. Browning clubs.
Browning symposiums. Browning fellowships — the gentleman must be
attacked in mass formation, terrible in its ardor for the fray. And the
reason? Browning's was the sublest intellect in poetry since the days
when men created worlds anew about the cheer of the Mermaid Tavern.
Mr. Powell's book is one word more in an unending bibliography of
volumes about Browning's message.
It has its merits, its platitudes, and its prejudices peculiar to the
author's theology. At times it is nebulous, though not in a Sordello
fashion; at times it is merely impressionistic; at times it is too busied
in making, if not much ado about nodiing, at any rate much ado about
the obvious. It is not a minutely scholarly work, but then it does not pre-
tend to be one. In a word, die book is a personal interpretation of
Browning's genius, with an especial stress on the poet's artistic gifts and
his concepts of philosophy and theology. While all of Mr. Powell's
readers will not agree with him in all of his own theological ideas, there
is much in the book that will be stimulating to them and worthy of their
praise. As it chances, the preface and the last chapter are the sanest and
856 Nmh^ Books [Nov.,
the most inspiring sections of the volume. And one of the most far-
reaching results of this book and of other books on the subject will be
to make us renew an acquaintance with the best the poet has to offer
us. Browning is not always a joyous companion or a safe guide; but
he is one of the ten or twelve worth-while poets in EInglish literature.
THE HILLS OF DESIRE. By Richard Aumerle Maher. New York: The
Macmillan G>. $1.50.
The author of The Shepherd of the North has given us here a love
story that begins with marriage, instead of moving toward it as a climax.
The tale is worked out in soenes that vary widely, ranging from an old»
erstwhile fashionable section of New York to the open country, traversed
in a gypsy van, and crossing the seas to France, where the topmost peak
of the hills of desire is reached under the tragic conditions of a military
hospital set on fire by German shells. It is a journey of the spirit
as well as the body; many misunderstandings and heartburnings are ex-
perienced before our heroine, now a Red Cross nurse, finds her wounded
soldier-husband and drags him from the flames^ saving his life at the
risk of her own, to be rewarded by complete reunion, with all that was
dark cleared away.
Though the novel b somewhat Joosely constructed, thus lacking much
of the gripping quality the author is so well able to impart, it has many
moments of strong and beautiful appeal that preserve continuity of in-
terest.
CYNTHIA. By Leonard Merrick. With an Introduction by Maurice
Hewlett New York: E. P. Dutton & Co. $1.75.
Save in a few exceptions Leonard Merrick has been set down as
a novelist's novelist. Until the recently issued limited edition of his
works he cannot be said to have commanded popularity, with the excep-
tion, of course, of The Man Who Understood Women and Conrad in
Quest of His Youth. During the past few months, however, he has be-
come a steady seller. This change of a whimsical popularity naturally
piques one's curiosity. Are general readers improving their standards?
Have they arrived at Merrick's plane?
Here is Cynthia, for example. It is the tale of a young novelist
who marries the daughter of a prosaic man of commerce, and is not very
successful. He contends with the misunderstanding of his people, pov-
erty; he yields to the temptation of ''easy money;" he writes books for
popular authors — and in turn becomes popular. The story swings from
London to Paris to London. It is full of discouragements and futile
strivings and failures. These, doubtless, make up the events of every
b^inning author's life, and in that the tale is nothing unusual. But where
it does differ from the hosts of other stories on similar themes is in the
character of Cynthia Kent, wife of the young novelist, and in the finish
of style and characterization for which Leonard Merrick is justly famous.
The book, in reality, is a study in the growth of a young girl's
I9I9-] Nsw Books 257
soul under the hard circumstances of being an author's wife. It is a
novelist's novel from the viewpoint of the novelist's wife. Merrick's pen
has a facile way of sketching in women, of giving them life and being
and tenderness and charm. Cynthia is one of his most successful women.
You are glad to have met her. She is very distinct. She is very real
Real women characters are what make a good novel. Perhaps we have
come to appreciate this fact. Perhaps that is why Leonard Merrick's
popularity is experiencing a remarkable return.
FIFTY YEARS OF EUROPE, 1870-1919. By Charles Downer Hazen.
New York: Henry Holt & Co.
Professor Charles D. Hazen of Columbia, the author of an excellent
text on Europe since 1815 and of a war book, Alsace-Lorraine under
German Rule^ has written an authoritative manual of European history
since 1870, which should be of inestimable value to students in under-
standing the remote and precipitating causes of the Great War. Such a
volume would have received a hearty welcome in the days of die S.A.T.C.,
when college instructors were attempting to instruct student-soldiers in
the War Aims course. In a text of this kind aside from sifting an immense
amount of detail, selecting the really important, and compressing into
small space a world of material, the great difficulty is in attaining coher-
ence and unity. This Dr. Hazen has accomplished by elaborating the
thesb that: ^There was a certain tragic unity to that intervening period
between the Franco-Prussian War and the World War, the shadow of the
former, the dread of the latter hovering over the minds of men, full of
menace, inspiring a recurrent sense of uneasiness and alarm."
The nationalization of Italy and Germany under the blood and iron
policy of the Houses of Savoy and of HohenzoUem is followed by an
account of the War of 1870 with its disastrous results and abominable
Treaty of Frankfort. The third chapter is given over to the German
Empire, its constitution, working government, the Kulturkampf, Bismarck
and the Socialists, social reforms, and the formation of the dual alliance.
The Germans are characterized as a people of great qualities, but endowed
with so little political talent that they were submissive under an autocratic
military system.
With Bismarck, the author is out of sympathy save in his attack
against the Church and the teaching orders. The same moderate anti-
clerical bias is noticeable in the following chapter, 'Trance under Third
Republic," in his description of the Dreyfus case and the separation of
Church and State by the persecuting and confiscatory acts commencing
with the Law of 1901. However, a decided attempt is made to deal fairly
with the papal question in the consideration of Italy since 1870. The
account of Great Britain and Ireland is especially good, and the treatmoit
of the Irish question is eminently fair. Short chapters deal with Austro-
Hungary, the British Colonies, the Partition of Africa, the small sovereign
states, the Balkans, Russia, the Far East and the Balkan Wars. In the
last hundred pages the World War is viewed in the conventional way of
VOL. ex. 17
258 New BOOKS [Nov.,
a lay lecturer who has drawn from a considerable wealth of material.
While naturally such an account can neither be scientifically accurate
nor detached, it is doubtful if a better outline of the war is available in
brief form. A bibliography and several additional maps would make
the book much more serviceable for student or reader.
MY ITALIAN YEAR. By Joseph Collins. New York: Charles Scrib-
ner's Sons. $2.50 net.
Certainly there are parts of this book that fall within the meaning
and purpose of the well-known list of things ''that never would be missed.''
Some of the author's reflections on the religious side of Italian life are
among them. He observes, quite correctly, that there is religion among
the people. But it troubles him, inordinately, we think, that the Italian
peasant does not inquire into the validity or righteousness of the Church's
teaching. He is troubled, too, about Benedict XV's neutrality during the
war. Although he is an enthusiast about Italy, and for the most part has
good words to say about the land and the people, he can scarcely lay
claim to being an authority on Italian problems.
THE FOUR ROADS. By Sheila Kaye-Smith. New York: George H.
Doran Co. $1.50 net.
In these days there are novels and again novels, but the reader
will wander far before he will discover a more exquisitely told story
than this of a Sussex farming family and their reactions to the war. We
say ''exquisitely told story" advisedly, since the style qua style is nearly
beyond praise — simple, lucid, supple, delicately and yet firmly phrased,
brimming over with the light and sound and scent and color of an
English countryside. Moreover, it is marked by a rare restraint proper
to the real artist. For example, this is the way in which in two sentences
the author not so much announces as suggests the death of Tom Beatup
in battle in France, sentences by the way which seem almost worthy to
stand beside Thackeray's on Waterloo and the death of George Osborne.
After describing the round of daily tasks of Tom's young wife in her
Sussex home, the novelist gives us a peaceful picture of her as she lies
asleep. "She lay very still — nearly as still as Tom was lying in the
light of the moon. . . . But not quite so still, for the stillness of the
living is never so perfect, so untroubled as the stillness of the dead."
Merely that, nothing more.
The characters of the story are most human and are sharply and
clearly delineated. In the person of Mr. Sumption, the poverty-stricken
minister of the squalid little congregation of the Calvinistic Bethel, the
author achieves a real triumph. This ex-blacksmith with his large
and noble nature, preaching his terrible doctrine of fire and brimstone
and the last Judgment, stands out in heroic proportions, and the scene
where, under the stress of the news of the execution of his son as a de-
serter in France, he falters in his belief in predestination, is presented
with a masterly and poignant art.
1919-1 NJSW BOOKS 259
The jacket of the book describes the author as a realist, but there
is in her work nothing of the morbid, the mean, or the debased, which
we have come to associate with that word. Rather this story of humble
lives is characterized by a fine simplicity, wide tolerance, and a mag-
nanimous outlook. And the style, which is the adequate medium for its
subject, is a pure delight. From end to end of the book there is not a
single weak or slovenly sentence.
THE DAY OF GLORY. By Dorothy Canfield. New York: Henry Holt
& Co. $1.00 net.
With this collection of stories and sketches we are disposed to find
the unusual fault that the content is too brief. These scenes of France
during the war are written with such strength and delicacy, and in a tone
so exquisitely, understandingly sympathetic, that they attain individuality
notwithstanding the vast bulk of the literature of which they form a
part. Only one of them is not directly concerned with the war, a visit
to Lourdes. This is told in a manner to win for the non-Catholic author
the appreciative thanks of all Catholics. She does not find it neces-
sary to tell us what she thinks of the stupendous act of faith she wit-
nesses, but in a lovely spirit of tenderness and compassion tells us what
she sees. No miracle is vouchsafed on this occasion to strengthen hope
and relieve the ineffable pathos she records. This fact, however, is
gained only by inference, since she does not mention it, so wholly free
is her narrative from the least shadow of depreciation; nor does she fail
to tell, at length, of the great night procession in the pouring rain, with
candles, and shouting hynms of praise, of the pilgrims whose faith bids
them rejoice in the Lord always, even when the longed-for answer to pe-
tition is withheld.
SOCIAL STUDIES OF THE WAR. By Elmer T. Clark. New York:
George H. Doran Co. $1.50 net.
If one takes Dr. Clark's book seriously, he cannot but come to the
conclusion that its author is a bigot who, because of his peculiar point
of view, does not know the truth, or worse, knows it and willfully mis-
represents it
In his first chapter, ^^Immorality in Europe During the War," sup-
posedly personal observations, he startles by extravagance of statement.
But whatever inclination there may be to believe him is totally destroyed
by the chapters on "What Does Ireland Intend?" **The Roots of the
Irish Questions," and especially *The Pope and the War."
When Dr. Clark leaves the semi-political and takes up the purely
religious, as he claims he is qualified to do, he becomes absolutely ridic-
ulous. One cannot bear with patience such statements as the following:
"Yet the greatest opportunity in the realm of religion today is possessed
by the Roman Catholic Church — and so it seems plain, that if Rome
would consent to make the adaptations demanded by the spirit of the
26o NSW Books [Nov.,
age, she would come into a new influence. These adaptations would have
to run the entire course of her life . . . That action would have to be
accompanied by a radical change of heart and attitude toward the en-
tire question of scholarship, and especially as it affects the Bible and the
doctrines of the Church. This would mean the overthrow of the authority
of the Church in matters of dogma, the upsetting of the entire range of
traditions which are unsupported, the opening of the minds of all people
to whatever light may be in the world, and the b^inning of a new edu-
cational method among them." And this is only one of many!
It is impossible to review satisfactorily a volume containing so many
misstatements and breathing the spirit of narrow New England Protes-
tantism.
THAT ARCH LIAR, FROUDE." By Ernest R. Hull, SJ. New York:
P. J. Kenedy & Sons. 35 cents.
Between June 29th and August 7th, 1918, the Times of India (Bom-
bay) carried on a controversy on the Church of Rome in relation to the
Anti-Conscription Policy of the Bishops in Ireland. Father Hull in the
pages of the Examiner commented on the discussion, and refuted every
statement that maligned the Catholic Church. He has arranged these
articles in pamphlet form, not only to show up the unfairness of the
average Protestant controversialist, but *Ho teach the modem newspaper
a lesson of greater caution and reserve in the future."
The brochure defends the Anti-Conscription manifests of the Irish
Bishops, shows the absurdity of the English No-Popery campaign that
followed it, answers a dozen or more objections on the Armada, the claims
of Pope Gregory VII, the massacre of St. Bartholomew, etc., and gives
testimony after testimony from non-Catholic sources of the utter unre-
liability and dishonesty of Froude as an historian.
DANGEROUS DAYS. By Mary Roberts Reinhart New York: George
H. Doran Co. $1.60 net
Mrs. Reinhart has given us a novel of social conditions in this coun-
try immediately preceding and during the war. It is an extensive study,
including the menace of the alien enemy plottings in the industrial world,
as well as the selfish inertia and frivolity of gay, fashionable circles,
with the gradual awakening of some of its units to patriotic duty and
sacrifice. Though unnecessarily long, it is readable; the characters are
recognizable types and the various complications and side-issues well
knit together. It lacks any feature unique or striking enough to project
it from the mass of products from this thoroughly worked field, but iso-
lated, is eligible as a fair transcript of contemporary American life and
thought. This is unfortunately true of the finale, obviously presented as
being beyond cavil, wherein the elopement of Clayton Spencer's faithless
wife enables the husband to find married happiness with another woman,
under the sanctions of propriety and convention.
1919.] New Books a6i
MR. DOOLEY ON MAKING A WILL AND OTHER NECESSARY EVILS.
New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. $1.35.
It is difficult to write a review of anything said by Mr. Dooley. All
one can do regarding any fresh remarks by the old philosopher is to say
that the new book is just more of Mr. Dooley. And in this volume there
is a whole lot. He philosophizes on so many sundry and diverse sub-
jects that one wonders from what Pierian Spring this homely speaker
has drank, so keen is his insight into human nature, so penetrating his
logic and his humorous sarcasm so engaging in its etchings of man's
frailties. We may differ as to the cure of our ills, social and economic,
but of this we can be sure, that if there were more Mr. Dooleys, and
more extensive application of his philosophy of life, we should soon see
our troubles disappear proportionately.
We do not recommend the reading of Mr. Dooley. We insist upon it.
THEIR MUTUAL CHILD. By Pelham Grenville Wodehouse. New York:
Boni & Liveright $1.60 net.
Readers in search of diversion will find it in this contribution from
Mr. Wodehouse, who seldom disappoints in this respect. The humor
of the earlier portion is so exuberant as to verge upon farce, causing
misgivings as to the possibility of keeping it up successfully to the end
of a book of goodly proportions. After a time, however, the author un-
expectedly turns on a current of seriousness and we find ourselves follow-
ing the marital troubles of Kirk and Ruth Winfield. Much of their diffi-
culty, as well as their final reconciliation, is centred in their small son, a
delightful infant, whose upbringing along lines of the most advanced
method of white-tiled, sterilized sanitation is a source of deep dissatisfac-
tion to his father. The wit the author brings to play upon this subject
is keenly edged with satire.
Mr. Wodehouse does not permit himself to exaggerate beyond plausi-
bility; his treatment is satisfactory, even in the graver phases. These
are sufficient to give the book reason and substance, but not to affect its
character as entertainment of the lighter sort. Most of the content is
genuinely funny; and all of it is clean.
THE DOINGS OF RAFFLES HAW. By A. Conan Doyle. New York:
George H. Doran Co. $1.50.
Eighteen or nineteen years ago when Raffles Haw first saw the light
of print, Conan Doyle was in the heyday of his reputation as the creator
of Sherlock Holmes. Today it is refreshing to turn again to these pages.
For the story of Raffles Haw, which being extravagantly mysterious, is a
big and powerful yam. The evil that inmiense wealth can bring — that
is the basis of the story; its action and mystery, however, is concerned
irith how the character makes and spends his billions.
In the same volume are two characteristic Sherlock Holmes yams
—•The Red-Headed League" and "The Boscombe Valley Mystery," the
former having all the fine flavor of romantic detection that brought Doyle
263 New Books \ Not ,
his repute and popularity. Now that he has gone in for Spiritism,
one has to be thankful that he left us this delightful heritage. His earlier
work is by far the best and has the most claim for permanence.
THE LIFE OF THE PARTY. By Irvin S. Cobb. New York: George H.
Doran Co. 60 cents net
The life of the party was Mr. Algernon Leary, the well-known law-
yer, who attended the festival — ^a child-party for grown-ups — clad in pink
rompers, to represent himself at the age of four. How, after he had
made his adieus at three o'clock of a cold winter's morning, he lost suc-
cessively his taxicab, his overcoat, his money, his way in Old Green-
wich Village, and his reputation as a respectable citizen, is told in a
series of Cobbesque complications. Finally, a fugitive from cold, fright-
ened landladies and outraged policemen, the desperado in pink rompers
breaks through a friend's transom and ends his triumphant evening in a
total collapse.
COMPLETED TALES OF MY KNIGHTS AND LADIES. By Beatrice
Chase. (Olive Katherine Parr.) New York: Longmans, Green &
Co. $1.75 net.
Miss Parr tells us, in her prefacing note, that WhUe Knights on
Dartmoor and T€des of My Knights and Ladies are recalled from cir-
culation, and this present volume is to be considered "the permanent hand-
book of the Crusade." The said Crusade was, it will be remembered, or-
ganized by the author, with the cooperation of Mr. John Oxenham, for
the spiritual defence of the fighters in the Great War from their most
formidable enemy, the social evil. The end of the war has ended the
work which it brought into being. This history of the movement con-
tains, in condensed form, the essential substance of the two earlier books,
with some additional material, bringing the story to a close, in which the
author bids farewell to her knights and proclaims the Crusade as emin-
ently successful. The record is now published in durable, attractive bind-
ing, making it a companion for her former Dartmoor books.
THE CHRISTIAN MONARCH. By Rev. William Couch. New York:
Longmans, Green & Co. $1.00 net.
We sympathize with the author of this little brochure, in his pro-
test against the modernistic spirit of the "Life and Liberty" movement
in the Church of England, which is being fostered by men of the type
of Dr. William Temple. Such men, he says, see "no finality even in the
Creeds of the Catholic Church — ^no conclusiveness in the *faith once de-
livered to the saints.' They seem to confuse the revelation of God with
man's appreciation of it."
Again we agree with this zealous high Churchman in his denuncia-
tion of the attempt to democratize the Kingdom of God contrary to the
will and institution of its divine Founder, Jesus Christ.
But how pitifully weak is his attempt to prove the divine character
19190 ^ElV BOOKS 263
of ^the Protestant Church, by law established/' He may deplore the
modernism of the present Bishop of Hereford, and object to the English
Parliament passing a marriage law against the Church's wish, but by
what authority does he condenm them both? Only by the right of
private judgment which the Broadchurchman and the Erastian claim to
follow with equal right. There is only one solution — the acceptance of
the papal claims. The Pope is the only guarantee of the Church's free-
dom from the anarchy of heresy and schism.
MOMENTS WITH THE CONSOLING CHRIST. By the Rev. John
Dillon, LL.D. New York: Schwartz, Kirwin & Fauss. 75 cents.
In this little volume the prayers of The Imitation of Christ are ar-
ranged for prayer and converse with Our Lord as Our Teacher, Refuge,
Rest, Strength, Hope, Light, Mercy, etc. As the Bishop of Newark observes
in the preface, for five centuries men and women have gathered courage
and comfort from the thoughts of Thomas a Kempis. So personal is the
message his writings convey that, open them where you will, the passage
that first meets the eye will seem a personal message to each individual
soul.
BAKER'S BIOGRAPHICAL DICTIONARY OF MUSICIANS. Revised
and enlarged by Alfred Remy, M. A. New York: G. Schirmer Co.
Doctor Theodore Baker's Biographical Dictionary has been the com-
panion of musicians and music-lovers for the past nineteen years. Mr.
Alfred Remy has done a great service to music students in revising and
enlarging the scope of the work and bringing it up to the present day.
He has increased the size of the original work by adding some two thou-
sand biographies of the famous musicians of later times. He has covered
many phases heretofore unthought of with unusual thoroughness. The
matter of pronunciation is especially taken care of without going too
deeply into the subject of phonetics. The preservation of Dr. Baker's
original idea in apportioning the space to the composers and aligning
the necessary facts without overestimating or underestimating the position
of the composers is the most notable feature of the work. In the difficult
matter of appraising biographical material the compilers of this useful
work have shown fairness, discretion and discernment No doubt there
are some omissions, but this is inevitable in a list of six thousand names.
It is an invaluable work for classes of History of Music.
THE NEW EARTH. A prophetic vision. By Henry Hadlcy- Words by
Louise Ayres Gamett. Boston: Oliver Ditson Co. $1.00.
This is one of the new American musical compositions of which we
may well be proud. The emotional and spiritual content of the text is
inspired by the rebirth of our world through pain and sacrifice. The poem
breathes throughout lofty thought and an appealing sincerity. The verse
is strong of rhythm and vivid in imagery, and of exceptional beauty and
power. Mrs. Gamett has divided her poem into five parts, under such
264 New Books \ Not. ,
headings as: "Sword of Deliverance," '^Comrades of the Cross," "The
Unconquerable," *The New Vision of Peace," *The Song of the Marching
Men." Mr. Hadley in setting the text to music has followed in matter
and mood the emotional contrasts of the verses, avoiding over-elaboration
in favor of a large simplicity and a clarity of utterance. The opening is
strong and truly majestic. The strongly dramatic opening chorus, the
appealing Agnus Dei for alto solo, the exquisite "Lullaby" for women's
voices, the superb march movement for chorus at the very end of the work,
deserve special comment. The last number is built upon a virile march
theme, used with striking effect through the entire cantata. The brevity
of the work gives the strength of concentration, and the music is inspira-
ional for both soloists and chorus.
THE DREAM OF MARY. A Morality. Music by Horatio Parker.
New York: H. W. Gray Co.
This beautiful cantata is both simple and sublime. The play, of
which the "Morality" forms a part, depicts "the childhood of a saint."
Its beauty and innocence of any but a pure melodic appeal gives it a
decided religious flavor.
Solo voices and adult chorus are required for the proper rendition of
the cantata, besides a children's chorus and organ accompaniment. The
text as a whole provides a superb framework, upon which the composer
has spun his colorful tonal tapestry. The work is inspired, beautifully
written, the union of text and music being a marvel of true interpretation,
in keeping with the spirit of the play. It is an effective piece of writing
and the themes themselves are quite simple, well within the ability of the
pupils of academies and members of church sodalities. The music is of
dignified and melodious appeal. It deserves more than ordinary favor,
and cannot fail to create an excellent impression if competently inter-
preted. It is a most appropriate presentation for the sacred seasons of
the year, such as Advent or Lent.
THE WILL OF SONG. A Dramatic Service of Community Singing.
Devised in Cooperation with Harry Bamhart by Percy Mackaye.
New York: Boni & Liveright. 70 cents.
Mr. Mackaye has become rather widely known in the last decade or so
for his masques, pageants, civic rituals, and similar productions. The
present work, which was put together in cooperation with Mr. Harry
Barnhart, a director of communal singing, is marked by a certain innova-
tion which the authors look upon as having very important consequences
in this particular field. This is the invention of the so-called Group
Person owing to the necessity the authors felt for evolving communal,
and not simply individual. Dramatis Personae for communal drama.
This composite Group Person is a choral unit which symbolizes such
ideas as Love, Joy, Liberty, and Brotherhood, and is enacted by the
audience itself under the leadership of a few outstanding symbolic figures
such as Will, Soul of Earth, Spring, Play, Song, and Imagination. Like
I9I9-] iVlffFP BOOKS 265
most modem efforts at symbolism the ideas of the present production
are rather hazy and indefinite, and the literary appeal of the whole is
very slight But a much more impressive effect would probably be wrought
by an actual performance.
A PRIMER OF OLD TESTAMENT HISTORY. By Rev. Francis
Gigot, D. D. New York: The Paulist Press. 60 cents.
This work offers to Catholic youth a much needed text-book of Bible
history. The author is well known in Biblical literature. The Primer
is a wonderfully complete and connected narrative of the Old Testament.
The chronology of the Douay version of the Bible is followed throughout;
debated questions are carefully avoided and the story of the Old Testa-
ment is told in clear and concise language especially, suited for children's
developing minds. A special merit of the work lies in the illustrations that
are calculated to make the work concrete and easy to understand. The
dates set at the head of various chapters give the reader an orderly pros-
pectus of the sequence of events described in the work. References to the
books of the Old Testament placed at the beginning of the chapters will
encourage the youthful reader to peruse the books of the Bible, and to
become more thoroughly acquainted with the Sacred Scriptures. The dic-
tion of the Primer will gain in smoothness on future revisions; the high
merit of the work will soon make new editions necessary.
LYRA ANGELICA. Motets in honor of the Blessed Sacrament and
the Blessed Virgin Mary. Written for two or three equal voices with
organ accompaniment. New York: J. Fischer & Bro. Score, 80 cents;
voice parts, 60 cents.
This is a beautiful example of smoothly melodious, tunefully devout
Church melodies. Nine are written for two equal voices and three for
three equal voices, either male or female. Six of the number are Bene-
diction Hynms, five hymns in honor of the Blessed Virgin, and a Veni
Creator Spiriius. All of the motets are simple, combining originality
and worth of musical thought with exceptional musical skill in the effec-
tiveness of the harmonies. It is an ideal collection for a small male choir,
and especially adapted for chapel exercises in convents and academies.
The themes are quite simple, the harmonies dignified, the text and notes
happily blended. The accompaniment is very melodious and admirably
suited to the voice parts, the beauty of which it serves to bring out
A COLLECTION of stories entitled True Stories for First Communi-
cants, told by a Sister of Notre Dame (St Louis: B. Herder Co. 90
cents), contains many stories of the childhood of the Saints calculated
to inspire faith and arouse piety. Among them those of Tarcisus, Genuna
Galgani, Jean Baptiste Vianney and Blessed Julie are especially to be
commended.
But, while all things are possible with God, and faith may remove
mountains, stories of miraculous occurrences far removed from the normal
266 New Books [Nov.,
experience of the child are of doubtful pedagogical value in laying the
bases of faith and piety. On this score we take exception to some of the
stories included in this little volume. If true, they should be accom-
panied by full names and dates. Otherwise they are valueless.
The illustrations are done by W. Pippett; it goes without saying that
they are charming.
CATECHISM NOTES COMPILED TO ASSIST TEACHERS (Dublin:
Brown & Nolan, 30 cents), are clear, simple, and to the point. They
are based on the Maynooth Catechism, follow its order, in some parts page
by page, but will be found exceedingly useful in conjunction with any
Catechism of Christian Doctrine. Simple explanations of words and
phrases are given, though these are meant as aids, not substitutes for the
words of the teacher. .
The notes furnish a reliable framework for instruction. An appen-
dix, containing explanations of the chief prayers used by Catholics, of
the feasts and fasts, the central devotions, vestments and the Prophecies
of the Messiah, will prove helpful also to converts and adult Catholics
seeking short explanations on such points.
BIBLE STORIES FOR CHILDREN! BY A CATHOLIC TEACHER
(New York: Schwartz, Kirwin & Fauss, 50 cents), contains twenty-five
stories of the Old Testament History, from Creation to the Machabees, and
about forty stories of the Life of Christ adapted to children from ten to
twelve years of age.
The lessons of the events are very simply and naturally pointed out,
but not dwelt upon; that is left to the teacher. Altogether this little volume
forms an extremely welcome addition to this branch of literature for
juveniles. We trust it will meet with the cordial reception it deserves.
THE VICTORY OF THE GARDENS, a pageant in four episodes, writ-
ten for the United States School Garden Army, by K A. Murphy, is
suitable for presentation by a very large number of children of all school
ages from primary to high.achool. Exact stage directions for scenes and
costumes are given. For the music such airs are indicated as will be
found suitable, not only to the rhythm but also to the spirit of the various
parts. Mother Earth gives of her bounty and the pageant ends with the in-
vocation of the "God of All Nature,*' a harvest hymn.
A CHARMING volume of selected Tales frdm Hans Andersen^ with
illustrations, comes from the preds of J. B. Lippincott Co., Philadel-
phia. It forms one of the Children's. Classics (sixty cents), so attractive
for gift books.
THE full text of the Treaty of Peace with Germany is provided in the
September publication of the American Association for International
ConcUiation (407 West 117th St, New York City) .
1919*] i\r^Fr Books 167
PLANT PRODUCTION, by Ransom A. Moore and Charles P. Halligan,
B. S. (New York: American Book Co.) 9 presents to teachers and stu-
dents, or to all classes of farmers and horticulturists, clear, practical in-
formation and guidance as to crops, fruits, gardens, trees (ornamental as
well as useful), landscape gardening and, in fact, every branch of in-
struction for all who cultivate the soil for profit or pleasure. Ample illus-
trations add to the value and interest of the book.
TRANSACTIONS OF THE ILLINOIS STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY
FOR THE YEAR 1918 is an interesting issue for all concerned with
the history of the State, as the centennial meeting of the society was held
in April of that year.
THE CHATTERJEE'S PICTURE ALBUMS, a series of five paper-bound
albums containing sixteen really beautiful color reproductions of the
works of Oriental artists, are published in Calcutta at the Modern Review
Office. Price, two rupees each.
BACH FOR BEGINNERS IN ORGAN PLAYING, edited and compiled
by Edwin Shippen Barnes ($1.50), will interest young organists who
are pursuing serious work on the pipe organ, as it is the first practical
work of its kind for beginners on the pipe organ. A wealth of Bach litera-
ture in its simpler form is supplied to the beginner by this collection. Mr.
Barnes in his 'Toreword" says: *'The intention in preparing this volume
has been to provide, in an easy and accessible form and in a logical se-
quence, the very easiest organ compositions of Johann Sebastian Bach."
The arrangement of the volume is admirable. The compiler has carefully
provided directions for phrasing, fingering, and metronomic guidance,
thus afiTording every possible aid for an exact performance of the easier
works of the great contrapuntist.
A VISION OF MUSIC, by H. M. Gilbert (New York: H. W. Gray Co.,
jrjL25 cents), is unquestionably novel and interesting. The poem is one
of the most beautiful of Father Faber, and the music, so effectively set to
the poem, is of exceptional melodic and harmonic beauty, displaying origi-
nality and power. All the varying moods of the lyric are strictly con-
formed to, the rich melodic material weaving itself into a richly colorful
tapestry of sound. It is essentially religious, yet it will be found attractive
for secular choruses as well as church choirs.
THE story of the old-time troubadour, who turned from the world, en-
tered a monastery and later, as Bishop of Toulouse, cooperated with
Saint Dominic and Simon de Montfort in putting down the Albigenses,
will be told in dramatic style in Mr. Thomas Walsh's latest book of poems,
Don Folquet, which the John Lane Company announce among their Fall
publications. This tale, full of literary and controversial contrasts, marks
the first introduction into English literature of the grim Folquet or Foulc-
ques of Marseilles.
268 New Books [Nov.,
FOREIGN PUBLICATIONS.
Aux EtatS'Unis, a French reader for b^inners, by Adolphe de Mont-
bert (New York: Allyn & Bacon, $1.20), is a companion volume to the
author's La Belle France, which it may follow or precede.
Its chief interest for the student is its portrayal of how American cus-
toms strike a Frenchman visiting the United States for the first time. A
second interest is found in the colloquial character of the work and its
Gallic flavor.
Pedagogically the book meets the need of a first and second-year
French reader. It consists of vivid narrative and idiomatic conversation
supplemented by notes and a questionnaire. The illustrations and the map
furnish additional material for conversation. The vocabulary contains all
the forms found in the text. Aux Etats-UrUs and La Belle France are the
result of a frank and earnest efi'ort to strengthen the bonds between the
two great Republics by giving the American youth a grasp of the practical,
everyday colloquial France, an understanding of the French land, lan-
guage, and point of view, a sympathy for the French attitude of mind
and an appreciation of the admir^le French qualities of head and heart.
The work is attractively printed.
Dominicales, by Eugene Duplessy, directeur de '^La Repose" (Paris:
Pierre Tequi) , is the first of a three-volume "Sermonaire." It extends from
Advent to the Feast of St. Joseph. The author, who is well known by Cat-
echists and Apologists, wishes to preach the Gospel, instruct the faithful,
defend religion, to reach the different audiences that a parish priest has
most frequently before him, to be an aid to his confreres, not a substitute.
He has truly realized his desire. His work will be of the greatest service to
priests, and will also make agreeable reading for the faithful.
Gabriel Beauchesne presents the third volume in Canon Louis Prunel's
Cours Superieur de Religion: Les Mysteres, This volume is devoted to the
mysteries of the Trinity, the Incarnation, and the Redemption, with an
appendix on the Blessed Virgin Mary. With rare felicity, M. Prunel
attains the object which he proposes for his course: to give in exact terms
the substance of doctrinal teaching upon each of the articles of Christian
Dogma without omitting any important question and, on the other hand,
to make his work intelligible for people in the world, by avoiding detailed
developments and purely technical problems. The exposition is solid, and
always clear; controverted questions are summed up in a most satisfactory
manner, without taking part in any of the quarrels between Catholic
Schools. The Course has already rendered great service to many believers
who wish to be instructed, and to unbelievers seeking light
Santa Rita, a sacred drama by F. Aurelio Palmieri, O. S. A. (Florence,
1919) , deals with the death of St. Rita's sons, her entrance into the con-
vent, some of the miracles performed by her as an Augustinian Nun, and
ends with her saintly death. The characters are well drawn. The drama
gives evidence of unusual ability and should become, if translated into
English, very popular as a play for academies.
IRecent iSvents.
Some notion of the chaotic conditions in Russia
Russia. may be given when it is stated that during the
past month in European Russia alone (i. e., leav-
ing out of account the movement of Kolchak's forces in Siberia) , no less
than nine military operations have been on foot. These may be sum-
marized as follows: 1. German-Russian forces drive the Letts back and
capture Riga; 2. British and French warships in Riga Harbor clear for
action; 3. Two divisions of Esthonian troops thrown against the^German-
Russian forces; 4. Russo-Esthonian troops under General Yudenitch on
the front southwest of Petrograd advance, cutting that city's rail com-
munication with Pskov, and even, so latest reports state, capturing the
suburbs of Petrograd; 5. Counter-revolution against the Bolsheviki re-
ported in progress in Petrograd; 6. Martial law declared in Moscow; 7.
General Denikin continues advance on Moscow from the south; 8. General
Petlura, leader of the anti-Bolshevik Ukrainian army, declares war on Gen-
eral Denikin; 9. The Polish army makes further advance, capturing
Dvinsk.
The salient feature of the situation is that though the various forces
operating against the Bolsheviks are many, they are each acting from
different motives and in several instances are mutually hostile among
themselves. In some cases the reasons are clear. The German-Russian-
Lettish imbroglio, for example, seems to have arisen as follows: Colonel
Avaloff-Bermondt, conmiander of an anti-Bolshevik force operating near
Riga, the Letvian capital, sought permission of the Lettish Government
for the passage of his troops to the Russian frontiers. The Letvian author-
ities, fearful that their autonomy and independence of Russia would be
thus endangered, refused this permission, whereupon Colonel Avaloff-
Bermondt entered into an alliance with the German troops under General
Von der Goltz and advanced against Riga. He has proclaimed Courland
and Mitau as belonging to the Russian General Government and has as-
sumed the title of Governor-General. Severe fighting has taken place
between the Russo-German forces and Lettish troops reenf orced by Estho-
nians. With the aid of tanks, aeroplanes and gas the Russo-Germans broke
through the Lettish lines west of Riga, and their advanced guard entered
and occupied Riga itself. Later reports state that the Letts have repulsed
further attacks with sanguinary losses to the enemy. British warships
have become involved in the fighting, having been fired upon by Russo-
German forces, and an unconfirmed report declares a British force has
been landed in or near the city.
^^o Recent events inov.,
Offers of an armistice made by Colonel Avaloff-Bermondt have been
rejected by the Lettish Government. Troops are being mobilized every-
where in Livonia and the neighborhood of Riga preparatory to the struggle
against the invaders. Various rumors as to the Russo-German alliance are
in circulation. The French version is that the anti-Bolshevik are Russians
first, and Germanophiles or friends of the Allies afterwards. According
to this version the Nationalist Russians in the west, failing to get the sup-
port they sought from the Allies, became busy with an appeal to the Pan-
Germans, with whose help they set up a new *^West Russian" Government,
whose banner the Pan-German and reactionary army of Von der Goltz
forthwith adopted as useful camouflage. The Von der Goltz movement
is considered primarily anti-Bolshevist in character, though it has in the
background the ambition to resurrect German influence in the Balkans.
The two most important military moves of the month have been the
advance of General Yudenitch on Petrograd and that of General Denikin
in the south on Moscow. General Yudenitch's northwest army, which is
composed of Russians, Letts, Esthonians, and Lithuanians, has been attack-
ing Petrograd on a line from Pskov through Riga to the Gulf of Finland.
A late report states that Kronstadt, the Petrograd citadel, has surrendered,
but thb has not yet been confirmed. It is known, however, that a general
advance on Petrograd has been effected by the anti-Bolshevist army, in
which thousands of prisoners have been taken, and heavy gains made
on the entire front. Gatchina, which is considered the strongest position
this side of Petrograd, has been captured by the Yudenitch forces, and
the early fall of Petrograd is looked upon as a practical certainty. This
news is supported further by reports of serious fighting in Petrograd be-
tween adherents and opponents of the Soviet regime. The ^'counter revo-
lutionaries" are reported to have taken possession of several important
buildings and Government institutions. Competent observers are of the
opinion, however, that the Bolsheviki are still powerful and that the forces
of the Soviet Government will put up a stout resistance before they are
overcome. It is believed that the Yudenitch advance came as a complete
surprise to them. Not expecting an action on the northwestern front, they
were bending all their energies to dealing with Denikin in the south.
General Denikin's advance against Moscow, the Soviet capital, has
reached Ore, an important railroad centre two hundred and thirty-eight
miles south of Moscow. Two batteries of artillery, thousands of pris-
oners and great quantities of material have fallen into his hands. Denikin
is pressing his attack on a two-hundred-mile front, advancing northwest
steadily and systematically on parallel lines of railway. The most impor-
tant result of his progress is that he now has behind him vast and rich
tracts of Russian territory. It is clear that his progress against the prin-
cipal Bolshevist army has compelled the Soviet Government to reduce
their strength in other theatres, thus enabling the Russian northwestern
army under Yudenitch and Kolchak's Siberian forces to make considerable
advances.
ISI90 RECENT EVENTS 271
Large quantities of war material have been supplied by the Allies
to the White armies under Denikin, and it is upon this assistance from
the Allies that Denikin's series of successes has largely depended. The
French General, Mangin, whose recall to Paris from command of the
Eighth Army was recently announced, has been instructed to proceed to
South Russia and join General Denikin. He is to be accompanied by
Basil Maklokoff, Russian Ambassador in Paris, their mission being to
coordinate the policy of the anti-Bolshevist Governments. General Hol-
man of the British Army has been with Denikin. for several months, super-
intending the delivery of uniforms, tanks, aeroplanes, and other equipment
furnished to the Southern Russian army by Great Britain on behalf of
the Allies.
A disquieting feature of Denikin's situation is the declaration of war
upon him by General Simon Petlura, the Ukrainian military leader. Vio-
lent fighting has been reported between the two forces. The attitude of
Denikin's troops has long been hostile towards the Ukrainians, whom they
regard as traitors to Russia since they made peace with Austria and Ger-
many even before the Bolshevists, thus preparing the way for the peace of
Brest-Litovsk. For a time the Ukrainian forces and those under Denikin
effected a junction in their common effort against the Bolshevists, but
recently the Ukrainian troops withdrew, leaving a gap between them and
Denikin's troops through which the remainder of the Bol^evist force
which had been driven out of Odessa are working their way northward.
The Ukrainians are reported to have attacked the volunteer army under
Denikin north of Odessa.
With regard to the Poles, Denikin's army considers them as allies,
and negotiations are in progress to establish permanent contact between
them. To all appearances, Denikin is firmly established in Kiev, the
Ukrainian capital. The Bol^evists have been counter-attacking heavily
with reenforcements drawn from the eastern front, but these attacks have
been repulsed, and Denikin is again taking the offensive. His left, how-
ever, is exposed to an attack from either Bolshevists or Ukrainians, and. a
junction with the Poles would greatly strengthen this position.
From Admiral Kolchak's front comes a report of a Bolshevist retreat
along the whole line, which is considered more than a mere strategic trans-
fer of troops to the south against Denikin. The advance of the Siberian
army under Kolchak since the resumption of his offensive on September
1st, has been carried out with few reverses to a distance averaging seventy-
five miles along the whole front. The advance of several portions of the
lines has been made against serious resistance and counter attacks. Volun-
tary enlistment among the refugees behind the Kolchak lines has been
stimulated by the offer of bonuses and of subsistence for the families
of volunteers, and it is now proceeding faster than the men can be
equipped. Fifteen thousand volunteers were enrolled in September.
Late in September reports were persistent that Kolchak had handed
over the chief direction of the All-Russian Govemmept to Denikin and
a72 Recent Events [Nov.,
subordinated himself to that chief, but this has since proved false.
Kolchak is still the titular leader and as such has issued a proclamation
calling for an assembly of the Zemstovs of the All-Russian territory to be
held at the end of October.
The Von der Goltz adventure in Courland and
Germany. the Baltic states still continues to be the outstand-
ing feature of the German situation. There has
been constant interchange of notes on the subject between the Supreme
Council of the Allies at Paris and the German authorities at Berlin. Early
in the month Germany delivered to General Dupont, commander of the
Interallied Mission at Berlin, a memorandum declaring that it had recalled
General Von der Goltz, had stopped pay, supplies and munitions to the
German troops there, and was doing everything possible to bring about the
withdrawal of the German soldiers. General von Eberhadt has been ap-
pointed in place of General Von der Goltz to take charge of the evacua-
tion. The memorandum insisted that Germany had exhausted its means
of coercion, and requested the appointment of an allied commission to
visit the Baltic provinces and verify this fact According to Swiss advices,
the German Government further issued a proclamation to the German
troops exhorting them to withdraw from Russian territory in order to
avert the blockade of Germany and other military measures threatened by
the Supeme Council.
The German reply to the Allied note demanding withdrawal was con-
sidered unsatisfactory by the Supreme Council, and Marshal Foch was in-
structed to draw up a new note. Diplomats and military men of all the
Allied and Associated Powers are agreed that the troops under General
Von der Goltz are a menace to Entente interests as they are now operating
and should be withdrawn. But there is a great difference of opinion as to
the best means of effecting their disarmament and disbandment A con-
siderable number of Von der Goltz's troops are for the most part men
whose properties have been ruined by the War, and they have sought the
Baltic provinces as a pioneer country where they could re-establish their
fortunes. Many of them are Germans who were expelled from Alsace-
Lorraine, and there are numerous sea-faring men without prospect of
employment, because Germany lacks a navy and merchant marine. Con-
sequently they are foot-loose, desperate and eager for any adventure and
ready to follow any bold leader. In the opinion of experienced Entente
officers who have recently been in the Baltic territory the Berlin Govern-
ment unquestionably has lost control over the Baltic troops, which arc
estimated as anywhere from 50,000 to 200,000 men.
As a result of the attack on Riga by the combined forces of Russians
under Colonel Avaloff-Bermondt, and Germans under Von der Goltz, de-
mands were made on the German Government that German ships on the
Baltic be recalled to their home ports and that all others be forbidden
to leave. The Allied and Associated Governments have engaged them-
1919] Recent events 273
selves to help the German Goyemment get German troops out of the
Baltic provinces. A portion have already been withdrawn under stringent
orders from Berlin, and Von der Goltz himself is reported to have urged
upon his troops the necessity of withdrawing to save Germany from a
renewal of the blockade.
The German Government's position is difficult to describe. Technic-
ally it is faultless. It has addressed proper orders to the troops and for-
bidden supplies to be sent them, but plotting is still carried on with Berlin
for its centre. South German troops still go adventuring into the Baltic
regions, and the Government is rather colorless in its declarations.
Marshal Foch's latest note declares that full responsibility for the
Baltic situation rests upon the German Government, and that the coercive
measures now in force will not be lifted until the German troops with-
draw behind their own border. The Allies possess the power of advanc-
ing from the Rhine to occupy Frankfort and Mannheim and, in addition,
British and French warships are in the vicinity of Riga. Foch's note
accuses the German Government of double-dealing in the Baltic situation,
but leaves a way open for further diplomatic correspondence. The note
does^ot appear to deal with the immediate situation growing out of the
German attack upon Riga, but refers to the German offensive as a violation
of the armistice, and objects to the formation in Courland of a German-
Russian Government.
A further peculiar complication in the Allied-German interchange of
notes on the Baltic situation is afforded by recent invitations from the
Entente that Germany join in the blockade of Soviet Russia. This apparent
contradiction in Allied councils is due to the fact that the Supreme Coun-
cil ever since last July has been considering movements to stamp out
Bolshevism and that this has just found issue. The Foch note, on the
other hand, is the result of considerations of a much more recent and
pressing problem — the continued presence and activity of the German
forces in the Baltic. The indications are that the German reply to the
suggested plan against Sovietism will neither be an unconditional refusal
nor an indication of assent It is said that Germany will suggest the in-
stallation of an international commission to deliberate on the proposition.
Meanwhile the official answer to the invitation will be deferred until the
Government has had an opportunity to consult the Scandinavian and other
neutral Governments.
In a recent address to the National Assembly, Chancellor Bauer, dis-
cussing the future status of the German army, explained that full reduc-
tion of the army would be impossible until the Peace Treaty came into
force, but announced that two months after ratification of the Treaty
the army would be definitely reduced to 200,000. He also said that, owing
to the amount of business before the National Assembly, new elections
would be impossible before spring. A bill providing for Economic Coun-
cils was being rapidly prepared, th^ Chancellor announced, in the hope
that they would be able to begin operations with the New Year. He said
VOL.*C]Llt9
274 RECENT Events [Noy,,
the aim was to establish an obligatory Arbitration Court to settle trade dis-
putes and thereby limit strikes to the utmost.
The German authorities have begun the evacuation of the first and
second zones in Schleswig complying with the Peace Treaty conditions.
Thd International Commission is preparing the arrangements for the ple-
biscite to decide whether the regions involved shall remain German or join
Denmark, and is making plans for the adminbtration of the districts.
The French press expresses surprise and regret at
France. the action of the Supreme Council in inviting
Germany to join in the blockade of Bolshevik
Russia. Among the possible consequences forecast by the commentators
is that it will afford Germany, in her negotiations with the Russians, an
opportunity to say that Germany alone is able to lift Russia out of the
wreck. It is also asked whether this note b not likely to neutralize the
effect of Marshal Foch's ultimatum regarding the Baltic. Some writers
even predict that Germany will use the Council's invitation as a ground
for claiming equal treatment and immediate admission to the League of
Nations.
The text of the note inviting Germany to participate in the blockade
of Soviet Russia shows that Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Finland,
Spain, Switzerland, Mexico, Chile, Argentina, Colombia, and Venezuela
also have been invited to initiate measures to prevent their nationals from
engaging in any trade with Bolshevist Russia. The measures recommended
are: (1) Refusal of permission to sail to every ship bound for a Russian
Bolshevist port, and the closing of all ports to ships from Bolshevist
ports. (2) Similar regulations to be adopted with regard to all goods
destined for Russia by any other route. (3) Refusal of passports to all
persons to or from Bolshevist Russia. (4) Measures to be taken to hinder
the banks from granting credit to commercial undertakings in Bolshevist
Russia. (5) Refusal by the various Governments to permit its nationals
any facilities of intercourse with Bolshevist Russia, whether by post or
wireless telegraphy. The preamble of the note declares that the open
enmity of the Bolsheviki is directed against all Governments and that pro-
grammes of international evolution, circulated by the Bolsheviki, consti-
tute a grave danger to the national security of all the powers. As every
increase in the capacity of the Bolsheviki for resistance increases this
danger, it would be desirable for all nations wishing peace and the re-
establishment of social order to unite in resisting Bolshevist government
The formal ratification of the Peace Treaty with Germany has been
indefinitely postponed. The decision not to complete the formal ratifica-
tion of the Treaty at this timie was due chiefly to the inability of the three
ratifying powers on the Entente side to make the necessary preparations to
carry out provisions of the Treaty which must be attended to within a brief
time after the actual ratification* Moreover, the delay in formal ratifica-
1 9 1 9.] Recent Events
375
tion seems due also to the desire to have the United States participate in
all the steps for the enforcement of the Treaty with Germany. American
delegates to the Peace Conference are of opinion that the Conference will
adjourn December 1st at the latest. They expect that the final action of the
American Senate will be known by November 15th, and they calculate
that a fortnight will then be sufficient to clean up the rest of the work of the
Conference. Reports are also current in Peace Conference circles that
the Conference may be replaced by a council of ambassadors presided
over by M. Pichon, the French foreign minister, with Marshal Foch as
his adviser.
While official announcement of the ending of the state of war has not
yet been made, it is provided that the promulgation of the ratification of
the Peace Treaty will be considered the date for the cessation of hostilities.
The French Senate has ratified the Peace Treaty and also the Franco-
American and Franco-British Defence Treaties. President Poincare has
signed a decree of general demobilization effective upon "the cessation
of hostilities."
General rejoicing by the press over the ending of the censorship
marked the return of a state of peace to France. Military control, not only
of the press, but of all public measures for the control of movements of
travelers across the frontiers as well as within France; the supervision of
ports, restrictions on importations and other matters which have been in
the hands of army officers have now passed to the civil authorities. The
right of requisitioning is terminated, and the military authorities have also
lost jurisdiction over certain crimes and misdemeanors, no longer having
the right to search private property.
The election of a successor to President Poincare b now only three
months distant, yet Parliamentary elections to choose members of the
Senate and Chamber of Deputies must first be held, as these, in joint ses-
sion at Versailles in January, must elect the tenth President of the Re-
public.
Results of the coming election are regarded as more obscure than any
since the fall of the Empire in 1870. This is all the more true because of
the death of 500,000 voters in the War, the coming of age of an equal
number of new voters, and the anticipated modification of party lines by
new issues resulting from the War and reconstruction. As an example of
this last, the coming election will be the first since 1870 in which the Re-
public will not be attacked by Royalists or Imperialists. Imperialists have
virtually disappeared, and the Royalists have abandoned their demand for
the return of the Duke of Orleans to become King of France.
Conservatives who were not Royalists, but strong Catholics, and had
kept up the fight against the anti-clerical tendencies of the Republic, have
announced that they finally accept the separation of Church and State and
merely coimt upon an unprejudiced execution of the law. This has made
possible the n^otiations now under way for an alliance of all parties
except the extreme Socialists in certain departments, including that of the
a76 Recent Events [Nov.,
Seine, which embraces Paris, the object being the union of all political
forces in France opposed to the Bolsheviki and the extremely radical trend.
Fiume throughout the month since our last notes
Italy. were written has continued to be the salient fea-
ture in the news from Italy, but it is easy to ex-
aggerate the importance of the controversy. The Italian Premier and
Government have continued to show a firm front of opposition to d'Annun-
zio and hb followers, and signs are not lacking that within the next
month a solution, on the basis of compromise, will be found to this vexed
question. What the nature of that compromise will probably be, and the
chief incidents in the situation during the month, are indicated below.
At first the method adopted by the Italian Government to bring the
Fiume rebels to terms was blockade and starvation, but at the beginning of
October the Government issued orders to lift the blockade, and Italian
authorities in the vicinity of Fiume received instructions to allow mail and
foodstuffs to pass into the city. The decision was taken after the Govern-
ment had examined and discussed a protest from the Fiume National
Council. The military blockade, however, against the soldiers and civilians
entering the city was continued.
An incident that threatened further complication of the Italian situ-
ation was the landing of American sailors on the lower Dalmatian coast
late in September, who seized Trau, previously occupied by irregular
Italian soldiers operating in sympathy with d*Annunzio. The landing of
the American forces was at the request of the Supreme Council
at Paris, in which the Italian Government has representation. Under the
Allied agreement Italy was in control, by the Treaty of London, of that
part of the Dalmatian coast extending down the east coast to Port Planca,
but not so far as Trau. Later, a second landing of American marines was
made at Spalato, ten miles further down the coast from Trau, to prevent
outbreaks between Italians and Jugo-Slavs. The adjoining coastal regions
are being patrolled by Italian, British, and French forces in addition to
the Americans.
As the latest effort at solution of the Fiume imbroglio, Foreign Min-
ister Tittoni has made the following proposal: He asks only the annexation
to Italy of the district of Volosca, lying between Fiume and Trieste, in
order to establish again a boundary between the enlarged Kingdom of
Italy and the proposed buffer state, Fiume. Signer Tittoni further asks
that the Island of Lagosta be added to the other Dalmatian Islands assigned
to Italy under the original division of these blands between Italy and Jugo-
slavia. His project, besides making Zara, the capital of Dalmatia, a free
city, provides that it be* represented diplomatically by Italy.
This proposal by the Italian Government has found many adherents
both in Italy and in the other countries. It seems to be favored even by
d'Annunzio himself, who, according to late dispatches, has sent a message
to Premier Clemenoeau requesting him to take the initiative in securing
I9»9.] RECENT EVENTS 2Tj
from the Allied Governments a declaration making Fimne a free port He
has also drafted a manifesto inviting Serbians and Italians to recognize
mutual national rights. Altogether the prospects are good for an early
solution of the Fiume difficulty.
The other principal event of the month in Italian politics was the
ratification of the German and Austrian Peace Treaties by royal decree,
Italy being thus the first Allied power to complete ratification of the
Treaty with Germany, and the first to take steps towards approval of the
Austrian pact. The Italian action in ratifying the German Treaty by decree
— a power vested in the King, when a Treaty does not affect a frontier
alteration — ^is expected to assure the speedy bringing into effect of the
document signed at Versailles, June 28th. The Treaty stipulates that it
shall become effective when three powers besides Germany have ratified it,
and official notice of their action has been deposited. Besides the Italian
ratification, both houses of the British Parliament have now ratified the
Document, and also the French Chamber of Deputies and French Senate.
October 22, igip.
A special note sent out by the publishers of " The Catholic World ''
to its subscribers on October j6th, informed them that the November issue would
appear much later than the usual date of publication. The delay uku due
to no fault of the publishers : but to a ivalk-out of the pressmen of the local
unions of New York City in protest against their ottm IrUemational Union.
The latter itfould not sanction a strike by the Local Unions and believed that
all Local Unions ought to abide by the contract which through the IrUemational
they had made wiA the employing printers.
All requests for a compromise have met wiA a deaf ear from the Local
Unions and up to date they have refused to call off the walk-out.
Our readers will note that the type dress of the present issue is not the
same as usual, but this also was uruxvoidable. Moreover, the extraordinary
difficulties encountered in publishing have no doubt resulted in typographical
errors ond imperfections in printing.
We regret the delay in publication, but we wish to assure our readers
that all the work done on this issue of '' The Catholic World ^* as upon its
other issues have been Union labor.
If the present conditions continue to prevail the publication of succeeding
issues will probably be late also, for which lue ask the patience and forebcitr''
once of our subscribers.
With Our Readers.
AFTER pursuing a course of murder, pillage and satanic cruelty, the
Russian Bolshevist leaders have abandoned their so-called principles
of Soviet rule. Communism in land is abandoned; differential wage is re-
established — ^men who work better get more pay; also those who direct
enterprises are not only permitted but actually invited to receive very
large salaries. The same leaders protest now that they will protect indi-
vidual ownership and the rights of the individual to the fruits of his labor.
It remains to be seen, as Mr. Herbert Hoover recently stated, whether
we will learn by the lesson given in Russia and Hungary or whether we
will be plunged into the same abyss and, after sorrows and disaster, pain-
fully reconstruct that which we now have.
BOLSHEVISM must be warded off, not only that the new democracies
of the world may grow, but that our own democracy may live. And if
America fails, democracy throughout the world will die. In the recent
War America made a great and heroic sacrifice. The spirit of unity, of
generosity, of unselfishness that led her to fight for a principle, will have
to be maintained if the fruits of the victory are not to be lost.
Many have interpreted the victory as a long-sought opportunity to
get for themselves more of this world's goods. They have reduced it to
an ignoble scramble for material wealth. During the War labor, mechani-
cal manual labor, had the world and society at its mercy, and knew it.
Capitalists, no doubt, benefited by the war; labor benefited equally, if
not more.
« « « «
LABOR has always maintained that its claims were just: founded upon
the necessity of a living wage. It claimed and won the sympathy of
the multitude because capital was in the seats of power and influence.
Capital could outrage the moral law and there was none to bring it to
task. Labor would never descend to the despicable, immoral deeds and
practices of capital. It would never enter into combines that would merci-
lessly throttle the small competitor; it would never wantonly destroy pro-
ducts to increase cost by diminishing supply. It would never amass capital ;
indeed, capital and all connected with it was the object of its scorn and
hate. Clothed in self-righteousness, labor appealed to the public and
won the public's approval.
UNQUESTIONABLY organized labor is not only the friend, but has
been and is the saviour of the laboring man. Without it his cause
is dead; without its power capitalism would never have been brought to
1919] With Our Readers 279
do him justice. Mr. Gary put himself in a hopelessly bad position re-
cently when he said he would not negotiate with the representatives of the
men who worked in the steel plants. The men have a right to be heard;
they have a right to organize. But the same eternal moral law governs
capitalist, labor organization and individual laboring man alike — ^indeed
every man or group of men. The laboring man has no more right to be
dishonest than any other man; nor have the labor organizations such a
right The laboring man, if he is receiving a just, living wage, has no
right to hold up industry; no right to play the highwayman and declare:
"More money or I won't work.'* He has industry and society by the
throat. He can strangle both if he wishes, but he has no right to do so.
The laboring man has no right to break his contract, so long as his
contract does no serious injustice. The laboring man has no right to
destroy his product in order to raise its price. The labor organization has
no right to amass such capital as will enable it to carry on warfare against
those who have no capital, and thus win out.
IT is a great and far-reaching question, in which one may balance the
long, untold wickedness and unscrupulous inhumanity of capital against
the laboring man. But it is certainly true that whoever violates the moral
law of God loses in the end. The laboring man profited most by the War;
he is profiting most now. He does not hesitate individually and through
his union to demand and to obtain the highest wages that he can. His day
is here, and he must get all he can. It is not a question of justice, but of
opportunism. But opportunity does not constitute moral right. Money
makes no man happier, wiser or better. If all the wealth of the United
States were distributed equally among all its citizens they would be no
better off than they are today. A nation that measures its soul by gold
has gone a long way towards infamous decay. Alas, that it must be
said that this is the attitude of the laboring man and the labor union today.
There are those among the leaders who are trying to save the situation,
who see the deep chasm ahead, but their efforts are often futile. A radical,
disintegrating spirit is driving toward destruction. Labor today commits
the very sin that roused its righteous indignation against capitalism. It
has learned all* too well from the master it affected to despise. It com-
plained of the capitalist who destroyed five hundred pianos to increase the
price of pianos. But it will ask for a five-hour day and for forty-four
hours a week and a higher wage.
LABOR once charged capitalism with being "soulless." Undoubtedly
some strikes today are justifiable. Wherever inhuman and unjust
conditions exist, men may and should strike if other means fail. But
men who have "gone out"on strikes where no unjust conditions exist
will tell you frankly that morality. Christian teaching have nothing to
a8o With Our Readers [Nov..
do with the case: that they want shorter hours and higher pay — and if
they can get it, they would be fools to let the opportunity slip. Justice
they have never stopped to consider. Or, if it troubles them, they brush
it aside, saying they must follow the majority: that they belong to the
Union and must stand with it or be blacklisted. They must follow
whether its demands are just or unjust. Could anything be more '*soul-
less" than thb?
IN the present situation, the dignity of Labor is fast evaporating. The
personal relations of the employer to the employee are getting quite
beyond the control of both. The homely virtue of justice, of giving
just payment for a wage received, has gone by the board. It does hot
trouble the conscience of the working man. The individual is merged
in a great movement; he has lost his identity; hb personality; his Chris-
tian worth as a man. He is a small, unimportant wheel in a great ma-
chine. Personal morality, personal responsibility, personal worth are
superseded by the law of might and of force. Labor with its new and
untold power, in its turn, will crush everything in its path to greater
might and greater force.
In the great sacrifices of this country, attendant upon reconstruction
and readjustment. Labor has not shown itself heroic. On the contrary,
it grows more and more selfish every day. Multiplied strikes have
caused a deficiency of production in this country which it is estimated
amounts to ten millions a day. Mr. Hoover stated recently that the most
startling economic phenomenon in Europe was its demoralized industrial
production.
Labor knows the result; knows the consequences. In all fairness
it may be asked: Is Labor bearing its fair share of sacrifice here for the
rehabilitation of our country?
IT is permissible for any man to repudiate his former radical views;
but those who sponsor them cannot repudiate the ultimate responsi-
bility for every act generated by them. Theorists, orators, philosophers
are often far from int^iding that their pronouncements should be logic-
ally reduced to action. When their readers and followers so reduce them,
they are even surprised. Mr. Foster, a labor leader of today, wrote
some time ago that the enemies of capitalism wer6 ^^o more careful to
select weapons that were 'fair/ 'just* or 'civilized* than is a householder
attacked in the night by a burglar. . . . With him the end justifies the
means. Whether his tactics be 'illegal' or 'moral* or not does not con-
cern him, so long as they are effective.**
It is highly improbable that Foster has really repudiated his radical
views. And it is morally certain that they have affected and influenced
thousands of working men. His attitude before the Senate Investigating
1919] With Our Readers aSt
Committee was shifting: he explained his statement ^that scabs ought
to be ruthlessly exterminated/' by saying that he meant they ought "to
be educated.*' He stated that no consideration of "legality" or "religion,"
"patriotism," "honor," "duty," should 'stand in the way of "effective tac-
tics" — although he added that all of these terms are relative terms. And
he still advocates "race suicide."
These, he maintained, were his personal views and had nothing to do
with the strike he had organized. But it is surely not comforting to think
of his present position and power, when we remember that neither pub-
licly nor by writing has he ever repudiated the views he took such pains
to disseminate when he was a Syndicalist and an Industrial Worker of
the World.
Is it not more likely that such men have entered the American Federa-
tion of Labor to turn it to their own radical, unprincipled purposes —
to socialize, as John Fitzpatrick put it, "the basic industries of the United
States?"
• • « •
THE war has shown what is the fate in time of even the greatest phy-
sical force nation in the world. Any organization that follows its
leadership, any organization that does not build on justice and right will
go the same road of failure and of defeat The pity of it is that the
road is always strewn with desolation and ruin and death.
THE failure of President Wilson's Industrial Conference is lamentable
and significant. The President performed a real service to social
justice and peace, or attempted to do so, when he acted. He endeavored
to bring together a body of men who are experienced in industrial life
and to gain through their good offices some insight into the larger poli-
cies in industrial directions, which will fit into the newer social life
whose formation we are now preparing. The attempt failed. The labor
group withdrew and renewed the sense of confusion of which the country
is conscious.
• • • «
CONFLICT always narrows vision and intensifies activity. The indus-
trial conflict has developed two conflicting codes of justice, those
of employer and imion which are at variance in principle and policy.
Property rights and authority, based on ownership or control of capital,
are in conflict with human rights as these are defined by labor. There
is, however, a vast section of the industrial world wherein we find rela-
tive peace and satisfactory adjustment of differences. The full force of
actual and latent differences is brought out by the well-known issues
that came to expression in the breakdown of the Industrial Conference.
Peace must come as it usually comes in complex situations through
compromise in policy, restoration of mutual trust and the grasp of wider
views of social welfare in which party interests must take a subordinate
282 With Our Readers [Noy.,
place. There is scarcely a doubt that employers reconcile their own dif-
ferences in this way and labor unions no less.
AT this moment in our history, and in the history of the world, there
is supreme need of a patriotism which breeds toleration, patience
and mutual confidence. Our national intelligence is challenged quite as
much as our common good will. The latter we can control by adequate
moral force and worthy motives. Our intelligence is limited, rather our
understanding of relations, rights and the drift of social forces. Good-
will can accomplish wonderful things when there is universal confusion.
A world wrenched out of its harmony does not promote clear thinking,
much as we need it. If increased production b a crying need now, we
have not yet found the way to insure it. Perhaps a study of the spirit
and methods of The Truce of God during and after the eleventh century
might help us to recover the Peace of God in which the way to social
justice might be found.
IN the welter of industrial conflict which b the aftermath of war;
when might still battles against right to sway classes and men, the
ovation to Cardinal Mercier, as ''one whose name has fired the heart and
imagination of America as almost none other in this war," is deeply sig-
nificant. The universal acclaim of the spiritual ringing through every
utterance of press and people reveals the secret altar where men wor-
ship, the leadership men crave. Justice and Charity must triumph.
America will be true to the basic ideals of her being. Men still worship
and follow Christ after they have crucified Him.
A PRACTICAL world is skeptical. It requires the test; it seeks for
proof. ''Because," said the spokesman of the Protestant Episcopal
Convention to the Cardinal, "we see in your career something of the
print of the nails do we greet and honor you as a great shepherd and a
great Christian leader." The world's testimony to "moral strength"
that is "not an abstraction: the strength of men and women willing to en-
dure and to suffer — to die rather than be dbhonored," was voiced by ex-
Justice Charles £. Hughes at the Merchants' Association of New York
City. When "strength needed a voice;" "justice needed a voice;" "hu-
manity needed a voice;" "religion needed a voice," Cardinal Mercier
spoke. "The gims of the Huns could silence Antwerp, but they could not
silence Mercier. Physical force can meet and overthrow physical force,
but physical force cannot meet and overthrow spiritual force, deriving
its constant sustenance from faith in an ever-living God." Mercier "mobil-
ized" the spiritual resources of mankind. Hb victory b "priceless be-
cause it has reenforced our confidence in the eternal verities." Cardinal
Mercier demonstrated, so said the presiding officer, Mr. Breed, that "the
I9I9-] With Our Readers 283
surest guide for men and nations in the hour of peril b a simple faith
in a righteous God."
^Through all the trouble and terror, I never once doubted God's
justice*' — ^''I had a duty to fulfill; I fulfilled my duty," are the Cardinal's
simple summaries.
THE ^'shining light for all time" of "lofty example" in spiritual stan-
dards, is the motif running through die addresses of the Bar As-
sociation of New York, met to pay homage to "so brave a champion of
right and justice." "No soldier, no statesman, has so intimately spent
our imagination," is its estimate, '^e followed him, his deeds, his
ministrations; we heard his voice across the sea, and we believed what
he said and we knew what he said was true." He seized the opportunities
for service of his great position "with a power and devotion as nearly
supernatural as human power and devotion can attain." His power was
that of "a holy man, clothed with the power of the Spirit," his victory
in what seemed "an unequal contest" was that of "the holy man sustained
by the mighty forces of religion and morality."
In his letter of regret that he could not participate in the Bar As-
sociation's tribute to this great exponent of the moral bases and philoso-
phy of law, Mr. Elihu Root, the great jurist and leader of the American
Bar, said, "Cardinal Mercier gave voice to the conscience, the humanity
and the sense of justice of Christian civilization. He was the embodiment
of moral power standing alone and imdefended. His clear and fearless
appeals for the right against foul wrong stirred the better instincts of
men the world over, and by the compelling force of a great example
lifted them up to the level of sacrifice and daring.
'The underlying truths of the moral world are the same in all re-
lations. They are the same in the religion of which he is a Minister,
in the moral philosophy of which he has been so long a teacher, and in
the foundations of the jurisprudence which this Association seeks to make
a living force in the administration of the law among a free, self-govern-
ing people.
"By membership in this Association, Cardinal Mercier would but
join himself to a group of his brethren co-workers with him in the same
great cause; and how proud we should all be if upon our rolls we might
be associated with his revered and ever-to-be-remembered name."
"I do not express any personal opinion; I express the Christian doc-
trine on right," Cardinal Mercier truly said. But as a Venezuelan writer
has aptly put it: "Ideas cannot be effective motors except among the
great, spiritual and generous."
THE impersonation of Christian teaching. That is what America sees
in Mercier. "You are for us a symbol of that which men live by
and die for, the motto of Ambrose, Bishop of Milan, 'Honor above all,' "
284 With Our Readers [Nov.,
was the word of the President of Princeton. Colombia University's Presi-
dent hailed him as ^Vorthy Prince of the Church and a Captain of the
hmnan spirit.** ^'Cardinal Mercier in the hands of the enemy, overborne
but never overawed, a guiding star of his own people, became a star of
hope to all the world. He was a saviour of America and of mankind,"
stated the Chancellor of New York University, and in conferring the
degree of Doctor of Letters, he addressed him as ^Prince of the Ancient
Church of your fathers and moral leader of many faiths, prophet of free-
dom who have confirmed men and nations in the truth that maketh men
free, teacher and philosopher who in the face of war has made of letters
a very sword of the spirit."
This **sword of the spirit" the Cardinal wielded in time of direst
stress in behalf of ^serenity" as **our expression of defiance to our op-
pressors, our daily act of patriotism. The homage of Belgium to the wis-
dom, the goodness, the justice and the mercy of God." Truly, as he has
said elsewhere: "Only a man with some virtue is capable of an act of
virtue. What is really virtue is the perseverance in the first decision."
Cardinal Mercier, Cardinal O'Connell has said, "stood for conscience
at a moment when the world seemed to have lost its bearings, and pointed
to the law of God as a fixed star in the heavens."
IN his many happy utterances and introductions incident upon the
entertainment of Cardinal Mercier, the Archbishop of New York has
pointed to the relation of this great Christian to Christ. He calls him
the "faithful shepherd of the world," and his country "the Bethlehem of
a newer liberty," and asseverates his faith in man's great amen to the
standards of God, by calling him "this man beloved of God and men."
'The Communion of Saints:" the union of souls in God, in mutual
sympathy and forbearance, is the doctrine the Cardinal sees exemplified
in every tribute laid at his feet. He rejoices in the increase of faith in
that "Communion of Saints" which the war has brought He makes of
it, as it truly is in the great economy of God, the basis of a united coun-
try and a united world. He accentuates "self-abnegation" as "one of the
factors" of victory.
At the Chamber of Commerce in New York he pleaded for united
hearts and combined efforts "for the welfare of the great principles of
life, justice, love of humanity and love of religion as the basis of moral
and social order." At Harvard, as in his own educational work at Lou-
vain, he stressed the obligation "to work for the formation of moral per-
sonality to serve the social order."
"We are brethren in Christian faith," he told the Protestant Episco-
pal Convention. "We are at this moment to unite our efforts to show the
world that our brotherly feeling is only a corollary of the Fatherhood of
God."
In his every utterance we find the same constructive charity of Christ
as sent his priests forth ready to dare danger and death: "My dear, I
i9«9] With Our Readers 285
have done my duty; go and see if you will do yours,** which challenges
the quick response: "We are ready to obey. We wanted only to know
your mind.*' This intrepid defender of right is tender to the tempted.
He pleads for practical help, practical sympathy to stem the insidious
temptations of Bolshevism in his own land; he points the way, in charity
to the oppressed, to draw the serpent's sting; by example he teaches how
evil may be overcome by good.
CARDINAL MERCIER has caught the very soul of America in his es-
timate: The "spirit of spontaneity and initiative . . . brought finally
under a common discipline and a realization of a perfect force of law.
You have, more than any other nation, I think, the feeling of your own
responsibility. • • . You accept willingly the discipline of law. . . You
have that respect for authority, because it is authority, combined with a
deep sense of responsibility, • • . embodied in this unique republic. . . •
You have the feeling of moral and social order supported by your own
personal responsibility."
America's tribute to Cardinal Mercier is an evidence of her ideals,
of her willingness to follow spiritual leadership that deals not in abstrac-
tions, of her assent to Catholic principles when vitalized in action. The
saints of God will ever be leaders of men.
AS we went to press last month a momentous meeting of the American
Catholic Hierarchy was in progress in Washington, D. C, at the
Catholic University of America. Never since the Third Plenary Council
of Baltimore in 1884 has such a gathering of the spiritual leaders of the
Catholic Church in America been convened. Space was annihilated, per-
sonal obligations were laid aside that this great body might come together
for common counsel and common action. The most remote dioceses, even
to Porto Rico, were represented among the ninety-two archbbhops and
bbhops who assembled in Divinity Hall for the impressive opening cere-
monies of the First Annual Meeting of the American Catholic Hierarchy.
His Eminence, Cardinal Gibbons, presided, the only prelate now living of
those who assisted at the Third Plenary Council of Baltimore.
THIS is the day of organization. The motto of our great Republic:
"United We Stand," holds good for every force within its border.
The problems that confront the Church in America: the issues fraught with
eternal values for souls, are not peculiar to this diocese or that — they are
universal. Never was there greater need for Catholicity in principles.
Catholicity in action, than today, when, as our Holy Father has said:
"the whole structure of human society is in danger, and all civic charity,
swept by storms of envious hate, seems likely to shrivel up and disappear."
The American Hierarchy recognized that "the indispensable method of
1
286 WITH Our Readers [Nov.
our time is organized action and a common plan of campaign," hence their
meeting and its consequences — a new proof, if proof were needed, of how
truly the great organism of the Church lives and functions in time.
THE important outcome of the meeting is the establishment of the Na-
tional Catholic Welfare Council for the religious, educational and
social well-being of the Catholic Church in the United States. To this
end Catholic publicity will be promoted, recognized agencies engaged in
foreign and home missions will be assisted, and the public interests of the
Church in this country systematically supervised. The permanent Boards
established indicate the scope of the activities to be coordinated: Educa-
tion, Social Work, Press and Literature, Lay Societies, Home and Foreign
Missions.
It may readily be seen what a wonderful power for encouragement
and standardization these Boards will prove to Catholic activities now in
being and also fruitful of others still to be.
AS the entire Hierarchy, which forms the personnel of the Council, can
only meet annually, an Administrative Committee, composed of three
Archbishops and four Bishops, will be its executive organ. The chair-
men of Boards will be drawn from this Committee, thus keeping every
activity under the immediate guidance and protection of the episcopate.
Both clerics and laymen toiling in the varied fields of Catholic endeavor
will be afforded thus the assurance and stimulus of direct ecclesiastical
sanction.
« « « «
THE full import of the step, taken so advisedly in this hour of recon-
struction by the American Hierarchy, may not be estimated as yet,
but the vast possibilities it portends for a closer union of hearts and hands
in rendering effective Catholic principles and methods cannot be exagger-
ated.
The Source of both vision and light, the Spirit of God, living in the
Church and directing these His chosen instruments, will see to it that
vision will enlarge vision and light increase light.
A USEFUL agency for spreading Catholic ideals is The Lecture Guild.
This comparatively new organization has just issued a fine list of noted
public speakers on Literature and Drama, Philosophy and Religion, Travel,
Music and Art, Science, History, Sociology and Current Topics. It fur-
ther holds in reserve **an ofiSce list of prominent Catholics who may be
called on for special occasions." The Guild offers its services to Catholic
schools, clubs, parishes and other bodies to arrange programmes of lec-
tures, engage lecturers and in every way save them "time, worry and cor-
respondence."
\
1919] With Our kEADERS 287
In this crucial period of readjustment it is scarcely necessary to ac-
centuate the value of an organization whose purpose is to make avail-
able correct Catholic opinion.
The Advisory Board of the Lecture Guild counts among its members
the editors of America^ The Cathouc World, The Rosary Magazine^
The National Catholic War Council Bulletin^ the Assistant Editor of the
Catholic Encyclopedia^ the Hon. Maurice Francis Egan, Miss Clare Cogan
and Mrs. Joyce Kilmer.
The Secretary, Miss Blanche Dillon, may be addressed at the office
of The Lecture Guilds 7 East 42nd Street, New York, or interviewed on
Mondays and Fridays, between 10 A. M. and 5 P. M.
The Lecture Guild would be happy to add to its lists the names of
well-recommended Catholic lecturers from any part of the country.
w
E take pleasure in calling the attention of our readers to the second
intercollegiate historical competition announced by the United States
Catholic Historical Society. The competition is open to all undergraduate
students of Catholic universities, colleges and seminaries. The conditions
to be fulfilled by all competitors are as follows:
1. An essay on ^'Catholic Day," March 25, 1634, the distinctively
Catholic anniversary of the United States.
2. The essay should show painstaking historical research, with refer-
ences to primary and secondary historical sources, and should be accurate
and impartial in estimating historical values. The style should be simple,
direct, and clear.
3. Every contestant must be certified by the faculty as a student in
course, of the institution to which affiliation is claimed.
4. The manuscript must be typewritten, must contain no fewer than
2,500 words and may not exceed 5,000 words. It must be received at the
office of the United States Catholic Historical Society, 346 Convent Avenue,
New York, before January, 1920.
BOOKS RECEIVED.
Georob H. Doran Co., New York :
Barbara of Baltimore, By K. H. Taylor. $1.50 net. Bulldog Carney, By W. A.
Fraser. $1.50 net. Lovt Laughs Last, By S. G. Tallentyre. $1.75 net. Joan at
Halfway, By G. McLeod Rogers. $1.50 net. The Book of a Naturalist, By W. H.
HuasOD. $3.50 net. Tho League of the Scarlet Ftmpemel. By Baroneis Orciy.
$160 net. The Crime, By the author of "I Accuse" Vols. 3 and 4. $9 50 each
net. TVIe Tower oj London, By Maj -Gen. Sir G. Younghusband, K.C.M.G. $4.00
net. ^^ Open Sesame r^ and Other Stories, By Mrs. B. Reynolds. $1.50 net. David
Blaine and the Blue Door, By £. F. Benson. $2.00.
Bkmziofr BROTHfeRS, New York :
St, Joan of Arc, By Rev. D. Lynch, S.J. $3.50 net. Eunice, By J. C. Clarke. $1.75
net. Held in the Everglades, By H. S. Spalding, S.J. $1.25. The Finding of Tony.
By M T. Wagfcanum. $1.35 net. Out to Win, by Rev. J. P. Conroy, S.J. $1.35
net. The Awurican Priest, By Rev. G. T. Schmidt. $1 35 net.
Charles Scribmbr's Sous, New York:
Dtctionary of the Apostolic Church, Edited by J. Hastings, D.D. Vol. II.
D. Appleton & Co., New York ;
French Ways and Their Meaning. By E. Wharton. $1.50 net. Small Things. By
M. Deland. $1 35 net.
BoNi & Liver IGHT, New York :
Iron City. By M. H. Hedges. $1.75 net.
Columbia University Press, New York:
Vergit and the English Poets. By Elisabeth Nitchie.
American Book Co., New York :
A School History of the Great War. By A. McKinley, Ph.D., C. A. Coulomb, Ph.D.,
and A. J. Gerson, Ph.D.
Allyn & Bacon, New York :
Model English. Book III. By F. P. Donnelly, S.J. $i.30.
Thb Amfrican Press, New York:
The Irish Issue, By William J. M. A. Maloney, M.D. 10 cents. Pamphlet.
The Devin Adair Co., New York :
The New Blach Magic, By J. G. Raupert, K.S.G. $3.00 net.
Thomas Y. Crowvll Co , New York:
The Maid of Orleans, By M. S. C. Smith. Punishment and Reformation. By F. H.
Wines, I^L.D. $3.50 net.
The Century Press, New York :
Whalls America 9 By Edward A. Ross.
The Four Seas Co , Boston :
Anglophobia, By J. G. Cook. $1.35 net. My Rose and Other Poems. By E. MacLeod.
$1.35 net.
Boston School of Political Economy, Boston :
Bolshevism : Its Cure, By D. Goldstein and M. M. Avery. $1.50.
Yale University Press, New Haven :
The Chronicles of America, Edited by Dr. A. Johnson. 50 vols. $3.50 per vol. by the
set. A Subject-Index to the Poems of Edmund Spencer^ By C. H. Whitman, Ph.D.
$3.50. Sweden's Laureate. Translated by C. H. Stork. $1.35.
J. B. LiPPiNCOTT Co , Philadelphia :
Lost Wtth Lieutenant Pike, By E. L. Sabin. $1 35 net. A Chtld^s Garden of Verses,
By K. L Stevenson. $1.50 net. The Little Lame Prince, By Miss Mulock. $1.50
net. Larkspur, By J. D. Abbott. $1.35.
Rev John J. Phklan, Toledo, Ohio:
Pool^ Billiards^ and Bowling Alleys as a Phase of ComnurcialiMed Amusements in Toledo^
Ohio, By Rer. J. J Phelan, M. A. $1.50.
Australian Catholic Truth Society, Melbourne:
Zeal for Souls, By Father Saint-Jure, S.J. The Sources of a National Spirit, By
Rev. D. G. Purton, M.A. Pamphlet.
Bloud & Gay, Paris :
Le Bon Combat, Par Abb« E. Griselle. La Guerre et la Vie de PEspret, Par M.
Legendre.
Pierre T£qui, Paris :
Consignee Catholiques, Par Monsignor Tissier. 3 fr. 50. Le Plus Parfait. Par A.
Piny, 3/r. 50.
Examiner Press, Bombay :
The Spanish Armada. By E. R. Hull, S. J. 8 annas.
DECEMBER 1919
THE
^atholie ^orld
American Family Life in Fiction Maurice Francis Egan 289
The Armenian Crisis Walter George Smith 305
The Return of the Magi Geoffrey Bliss, SJ. 317
The Chesterbelloc Theodore Maynard 319
A Theorist of the Russian Revolution
F. Aurelio Palmieri, O.SA., Ph.D. 331
Chnslmas in the Rio Grande Country
Margaret B. Downing
344
The First Christinas
Caroline Giltinan
354
Capitalism and Christian Democracy
Anthony J. Beck
355
An TTncanonized Saint
Mary Foster
365
French-Canadian Poets and Poetry
Thomas O'Hagan
373
The Road to Connaught
Daniel A. Lord, SJ.
382
New Books
Recent Events
Russia, Rumania, Germany,
Italy, Hungary,
France,
With Our Readers
Price— 26 cents; $3 per year
THE OFFICE OF THE CATHOLIC WORLD, NEW YORK
120-122 West 60th Street
Entered m MOond-cUit matter at th« Poit Office at New York. N. T.
Vol, CX
DECEMBER, 1919
1^ E JV .<J>U'=BLIC<i4TI0'fi5
A Primer of
Old Testament History
*5By Rev. Francis E. Gigot, D.D.
The Well Known Biblical Scholar of St. Joseph's
Seminary, Dunwoodie, New York
'T^HIS is the first of a scries of Biblical
Primers to be published. It sum-
marizes Sacred History from the crea-
tion of the world to the coming of
Our Blessed Lord. The book is well
printed in handy size. It is enriched
with illustrations and appropriate maps.
An excellent volume to be in the
hands of pupils beginning a Scripture
Course.
Vrke 60 Cents
Carriage loc
THE PoA UL I S T "P R E S S
i2(hi22 WEST 60th STREET,
NEW YORK CITY
^
)
Published monthly by the Mifsloaary Society of St. Paul the Apostle of the State of New York (Paulist Fathers),
Entered as second class matter July 8, 1879, a^ ^e PO»t oflfice at New York, New York, under the Act of March 3,
1879. Acceptance for mailing at special rate of p>ostage provided for in Section 1 103,
mmm- M, * , Act of October 3, 1917, authorised October $, 1918
■B ■-
» .
THE
^atholie^opld
Vol. ex. DECEMBER, 1919 No. 657
AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE IN FICTION.
BY MAURICE FRANCIS EGAK.
T is a platitude to say that the novel in English
became, after the advent of Jane Austen and the
successes of Thackeray and DickensandTrollope,
an important indicator of the currents of social
life. Jane Austen, writing early in the nineteenth
century, protests against the scorn with which the novel was
treated by those who wanted to be considered ^^superior," and
she was right. Miss Edgeworth followed in her footsteps and
the novel of family life in England was created.
Until Dickens made his appearance, there still remained
a strong prejudice against the novel, which included the
romance; in fact, until Miss Austen practically created a new
type or until Sir Walter Scott by his method defined what a
romance exactly was, there had been some confusion, and the
bad reputation of the licentious French romans still lingered
about every work of fiction.
Richardson, who spoke the language of the English middle-
classes of his time, had already written Clarissa and Miss
Burney had produced her famous Evelina. Both Richardson
and Miss Burney appealed to the woman ; Fielding and Smol-
lett and Sterne wrote for the man; but it must be admitted that
the coarse plain-speaking of these three was innocence itself
compared to the ultra-pruriency and the constant digging for
vile worms around the roots of life that characterize the more
Copyright 1919 The Missionabt Socibtt op St. Paul tbs Apoitlb
nc THB Statb of Nbw Yo«k.
19
290 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE IN FICTION [Dec.
modern school of English novels. Violet Meynell escapes this,
though she is of the new school; but Compton MacKenzie and
Cannan and, of late, Bennett are examples of a decadence in
morals and a morbid sensuality which would have excited the
honest indignation of Sterne and Fielding.
U Mr. Galsworthy's latest novel is a picture of the real
Young England of the present time, the War has not improved
it; and we know that before the War the most read of the
English novelists gave the impression that English society
deserved all the denunciation which Father Vaughan cast
upon it.
With very few exceptions, the French novelists devote
themselves to the consideration of sex relations. It is true that
no novel can adequately represent life without going into the
consideration of sex; and the French have this excuse, that
nature in their vocabulary represents a very different thing
from what it did with the English; again, French novels were
never written for the family as a family. Mr. Somerset Maug*
ham's The Moon and Sixpence, which the author tells us is in-
tended for family reading, would have been placed on the index
of any French family. Halevy once, in an access of parental
affection, declared that he would write a novel which his
daughters could read, and he produced the Abbe Constantin;
Zola, too, in a burst of sentiment, published one which he
thought might be put beside the "prayer book of a young girl;"
and Balzac never intended that even Eugenie Grandet should
be read aloud before the maternal hearth. The modern English
novehsts have no such reserve, though I am happy to say that,
so far, our Americans, as a rule, preserve a decent reticence.
It must be admitted that the mother who did not permit her
daughters to read Adam Bede and David Copperfield because
of the episodes of Hattie and of Steerforth, would be looked on
with amazement now; times have changed; whether for better
or worse, it is hard to say; but the point of view of what may
be said in print or in speech has been very much broadened. In
Europe, there is a plain distinction between coarseness and
immorality, even between impurity and indecency, though they
are very close together, and these distinctions are being made
more apparent in our country.
Running over the titles of the novels before me and the
names of the authors, I am struck with the fact that Christian-
1919.] AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE IN FICTION 291
ity, as a spiritual and active force in family life, does not seem
to have the place it had twenty-five years ago. Another thing,
if Miss Yonge, whose novels are very much underrated, has no
successor in England, the author of The House of Yorke^ whose
novels have been too easily forgotten, has no representative
among us Americans. Christian Reed might claim this place,
perhaps, if her novels were not pictures of an ideal life, rather
than of our life as it exists. For some reason or other, the
writer of Catholic novels in the United States seems to have dis-
appeared. There was much more activity in this line in the
days of J. V. Huntington and Mrs. Sadlier. The name of Richard
Aumerle Maher occasionally appears; but the whole field of
readable fiction seems to have been given over to writers of
no particular religious convictions.
It must be remembered that the author of today reflects
the tone of society much more than of his own special idiosyn-
crasies; and we may take the books before us, choosing them
simply because they present phases of family life in our coun-
try, as indicating the trend of the social attitude.
Here are two late novels — The Moon and Sixpence and
The Gay-Dombeys. The Gay-Dombeys is by Sir Harry Johns-
ton. It is a continuation of the lives of the descendants of the
personages in Dickens' Dombey and Son. It is ornamented
with an enthusiastic preface by Mr. H. G. Wells, in which Mr.
Wells gives us to understand that Sir Harry Johnston's knowl-
edge of life — ^which the old-fashioned novelist would call
"high-life" — is greater than Mrs. Ward's and his pictures of
life more real. When we turn to the book itself, we discover
that Sir Harry Johnston's idea of the reality of things is to
drag in "sex" whenever he has an opportunity, or whenever he
can make an opportunity. And his disadvantages in compari-
son with Dickens or Mrs. Humphrey Ward are glaring — even
if only the quality of decent reticence were to be considered.
Pierce Egan's Tom and Jerry is without doubt the literary pred-
ecessor of The Pickwick Papers, but, when we observe how
greatly Dickens improved on the work of the delineator of
London's sporting society in the time of George IV., one won-
ders why Sir Harry Johnston has failed so utterly in improv-
ing on the work of his illustrious predecessor. The critics as a
rule give Dickens too little credit for good taste. Between him
and Sir Harry Johnston, it may not be a question of morality; it
292 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE IN FICTION [Dec
is certainly a question of taste, with the odds entirely in favor
of the elder writer. According to Sir Harry, Victorian morals
were not much better than those which Mr. John Galsworthy
paints as characteristic of Young England during the War;
but they were covered with a thick veneer of silence.
The books of the American novelists are not run into the
same mold as those of their English brethren, and the most of
them are well written. The *l)est sellers'* in the United States
are, as a rule, exceptions to this latter statement. Fannie
Hurst, for instance, who makes a specialty of pictures of family
life in cities among what are called the "'conmion people,**
uses words as they come; her style is excessively tense when it
is not very near to the ordinary colloquy of the people she de-
picts. For instance, in "A Petal on the Current,'* from Humor-
esque, she says : The girls made foray into a little side pocket
of the bedroom for changing of shoes, whitening of noses, and
various curlicue preambles.** And again:
The milky-fleshed, not highly sensitized, pinkly clean crea-
ture of an innocence born mostly of ignorance and slow per-
ceptions, who that morning had risen sweet from eleven
hours of unrestless sleep beside a mother whose bed she had
never missed to share, suddenly here in slatternliness, a
draggled night bird caught in the aviary of a night court, lips
a deep vermilion scar of rouge, hair out of scallop and drag-
ging at the pins, the too ready laugh dashing itself against
what must be owned a hiccough. Something congenital, and
sleeping subcutaneously beneath the surface of her, had
scratched through. She was herself, strangely italicized.
This is a dash of color, splashed on the canvas, not quite
in the manner of Henry James, but certainly effective.
Edna Ferber, the author of Dawn O'Hara, and Fannie
Hurst are the principal exponents of Jewish family life in this
country; Miss Hursfs studies are made in the large cities; Miss '
Ferber*s in small western towns. Miss Ferber is the finer
author — ^less melodramatic, less intense than Miss Hurst, more
carefully trained as a writer; but both have great sympathy
with the sinners, while showing the blackness of the sin and
placing their figures always against the corrective background
of an ideal of family life. Miss Hurst's pictures of Jewish life
have been, so far, confined, as in the very striking and interest-
ing Humoresque, to one class of society — that is, to the newly-
1919.] AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE IN FICTION 293
arrived poor Jewish emigrants and their descendants. Miss
Hurst is wise enough to be realistic, but not too realistic; she
claims the inalienable right of an artist to choose her subjects
and to group them as effectively as she will. Her "salesladies**
in the department stores are types — at least she persuades us
to believe that they are types. The elder people have traditions
of virtue, not, it is true, unmaterialistic, but comfortably bour-
geosie. If they read the Talmud or the Old Testament, they
are not deeply affected by its mysticism. There is no relation-
ship between Miss Fannie Hurst or Miss Edna Ferber with
Sydney Luska*s Yoke of the Thora, and his other novels of
Jewish life in New York, which were never "best sellers.*'
When "Sydney Luska** assumed his real name, Henry
Harland, and wrote The CardinaFs Snuff Box and My Friend
ProsperOj the brilliancy of his performance made us almost
forget his earlier work; but the deep religious feeling of the
Jews in Sydney Luska*s novel hardly exists in the short stories
of Fannie Hurst or in the novels of Edna Ferber.
Miss Ferber*s Fannie Herself, gives a picture of a Jewish
widow treading her way through the "alien com** of a typical
western town. The Jewish widow pays no attention to the
rules of "kosher;** her most trusted friend is a Catholic priest;
her daughter Fannie is free to read any of the Gentile literature
that pleases her, and she at once takes the books of Zola from
the public library, without fear, and without reproach from her
mother. One can imagine how the new school of English nov-
elists would have Fletcherized this incident, until it was chewed
interminably; but Fannie and her mother take it simply as an
ordinary matter. It shows the very liberal tendencies of the
Jewish f amUy of which Fannie's mother was a type.
There is in these stories of Miss Ferber*s a race back-
ground, but a very faintly tinted religious background, and
there is no compulsion, spiritual or social, brought on the
Jews of this western town to take any religion seriously. It
seems evident that, while the modern Jewish conventions tend
toward making morality something more than a social con-
vention, the beginning of wisdom, so far as the fear of God is
concerned, is now not very actual. Both in the stories of Fan-
nie Hurst and Edna Ferber the quality that tends toward the
betterment of life, is the love of comfort and peace to be found
in the contentment which only family life can give.
1
294 AMERICAN FAMILY UFE IN FICTION [Dec.
A marriage for love, in which perhaps a Ford car and a
house with sleeping porches are included, is the minimum for
which these clever, hard-working and energetic Jews strive.
The superiority which Miss Hiu^t and Miss Ferber have over
their English contemporaries is that they not only know the
life they describe, but they never seem to be superciliously
superior to it, and they have a good moral balance.
Isaac Goldstein, who has grown comfortably well off by
manufacturing cheap "pants," may not have been immaculate
in his youth; his code of morality excuses this in the eyes of his
male friends, but, when he becomes a husband and a father,
his point of view changes, and neither Miss Hurst or iMiss Fer-
ber will condone any other than decent conduct on the score
of temptation. In fact, their Jews have a great respect for the
Ten Commandments, the Synagogue still exists for them as a
race institution rather than as a religious one; but it is evident
that the rectitude and righteousness of the Jew depends very
largely on his remembrance of the Synagogue and the tradi-
tions of his father.
The young Jews of these skillful writers are very advanced;
they are Americanized; they smoke, they eat oysters and pay
no attention to "kosher,** except when the elder people are
about; Judaism to them is a rather indefinite Deism; they have
great race self -consciousness, but no pride of race. In all these
pictures of family life where the questions of conmiercial ad-
vancement, of very commonplace comforts and meretricious
luxuries come constantly into conversation, there is no sign of
the necessity of religion as a rule of life or as a motive of self-
sacrifice. The fathers and mothers are unselfish and generous
and kind because they are fathers and mothers, and because the
old Jewish father and mother look on children and the welfare
of children as most pleasing to Jehovah; but they see their
progeny adopting the ways of the Gentiles without very bitter
qualms. They will not have mixed marriages. If Barney
O'Neill, the eminent buyer for Goldstein & Company, takes
Rachel, the saleslady in the linen department, out to lunch-
eon or pays her any other attention which shows possible inten-
tion, her father and mother are up in arms at once. Such a
marriage, no matter how important Barney's position may be
(and the value of positions in trade is eagerly discussed by the
youngest Jewish boy or girl), would mean unutterable disgrace.
1919.] AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE IN FICTION 295
Then would the Jewish father and mother, who hoped that
Rachel would have had a wedding reception in a quasi-fash-
ionable hall, cast ashes on their heads and their garments, and
fly to the Rabbi for such consolation as he could give or such
prayers against the horrible event as he could utter. The
younger Jews retain the same objection against mixed mar-
riages, but it seems to be through a fear of exciting the indig-
nation of their parents or of cutting themselves off from
friends and neighbors of their own race that keeps this alive.
Miss Fannie Hurst has discovered the type of the haughty
''saleslady" or the scornful cloak model whose business it is to
appear as fashionable as possible, but who in her heart longs
only for domestic life, with mission furniture or Louis Quat-
orze or whatever is the mode, a husband who is a good pro-
vider, and a certain number of children. At the heart of these
novels, which evidently contain a great amount of truth, occa-
sionally enameled with touches of romance, there is the admis-
sion that the life of a contented family is the highest possible
object to which human nature can attain.
Miss Hurst, in Every Soul Hath Its Song, an earlier collec-
tion of stories than Humoresque, touches in the ''Sob Sister" on
the theme which has made "The Lady of the Camellias" the
subject typical of the romantic treatment of a very terrible
and common episode of life; but the lesson of the story is not
that chastity in itself is valuable, but that the **fille de joie" — a
joyless creature, after all is said — ^f ails in her duty as a woman
to the family. The most scrupulous reader will not need to
blush at the presentment of the lost woman in the person of
Mae Munro. Mr. Max Zincas, the "Armand" of the story, is not
prettily decked with the colors of romance as Alexander
Dumas, with his meretricious unreality, adorns the admirer of
"Marguerite Gautier." In Miss Hurst's stories, as in all the
American fiction in this group, the vice from which St. Mary
Magdalen was rescued by the Cleansing Grace is not tinged
with iridescent colors. In fact, the typical American author is
still so clear-eyed in his views of the permanence of the family,
that he is only beginning to condone that custom of our coun-
try, divorce. Miss Hurst is frankly, but never coarsely, vulgar
— that is, she makes no pretence of standing apart from the
very vulgar people she describes, and this is a sign of the sin-
cerity of her art and the fine quality of her work. Her style is
296 AMERICAN FAMILY UFE IN FICTION [Dec.
as colorful as a circus poster, but who would read Miss Hurst
if she attempted to analyze >Mrs. Meyerburg, in *'In Memoriam/*
after the manner of Henry James or with the academic exact-
ness of Mrs. Wilfrid Ward? Miss Edna Ferber has a wider
sympathy than Miss Hurst, greater humor.
Mrs. Norris — ^Kathleen Norris — is an admirer of Miss
Hurst's work and this is a feather in Miss Hurst's hat — a big
plume, for Kathleen Norris speaks to an enormous audience,
with no uncertain voice, when the essentials of morality are
concerned. She has a keen eye for character, and all her
novels concern themselves with social conditions that are not
exotic. Mother was the first, and the leit motif of the rest.
More sophisticated than the most ^'eminent" of the women ""best
sellers," Mrs. Gene Stratton-Porter, with a greater knowledge
of life, more charm of style, Mrs. Norris holds a high place in
the hearts of readers who like to find themselves in safe hands.
Mrs. Norris supplies, too, a religious background; her people
may not be pratiquant, to use a French word, but she makes
sure that there is somewhere a moral clock of standard time
not entirely out of view.
The Story of Julia Page is diffusive, but it is a very im-
portant novel of contemporary life. The prim little girl who
comes home from a mixed school in the afternoon, does not tell
all the things she has heard and seen during the hours spent
among children of all kinds — ^many of whom are cherubic
only in appearance; and the prim little girl may give the im-
pression to those who have forgotten their childhood, that all
h^ life is prim and ignorant of evil. This is the attitude which
readers of the school of prudery take on the manifestations
of actual life in literature; but the most scrupulous of this
school ought not to object to The Story of Julia Page. Mr.
Arnold Bennet, Mr. Wells, Mr. Cannan and others would never
have written in this way of Julia Page, the repentant :
But no outside influence ever could bring home to her the
realization of the shadow on her life as forcibly as did her
own inner musings, the testimony of her own soul. If she
had but been innocent, how easy to bear Jim's scorn and the
scorn of the whole world! It was the bitter knowledge that
she had taken her life in her own hands nearly twenty years
ago, and wrecked it more surely than if she had torn out her
own eyes, that made her heart sick within her now. She,
1919.] AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE IN FICTION 297
who loved dignity, who loved purity, who loved strength,
must carry to her grave the knowledge of her own detestable
weakness. She must instruct her daughter, guarding the blue
eyes and the active mind from even the knowledge of life's
rough side; she must hold the highest standard of purity be-
fore her son, knowing, as he knew, that far back at her life's
beginning, there were those few hideous weeks that, in the
eyes of the world, could utterly undo the work of twenty
strong and steadfast years! She must be silent when she
longed to cry aloud; she must train herself to cry aloud at
the thing she had been. And she must silently endure the
terrible fact that her husband knew, and that he would never
forget. Over and over again, her spirit shrank at some new
evidence of the fact that, with all his love for her, his admira-
tion, his loyalty, there was a reservation in her husband's
heart, a conviction — of which he was not perhaps conscious
himself — that Julia was not quite as other women.
She had confessed her sin and received absolution; she
had not deceived the man she had married — ^but that exquisite
thing — ^not a negative thing — ^her purity, had been sullied.
How foolish she would seem in the eyes of the "moderns'* who
people the scenes of Mr. John Galsworthy's novels! It was
Renan, I think, who said of his scheme of life : "Sin? We efface
it!" In fact, it is only with the American novelists that those
sins which strike at the foundation of the family seem to be
vitally bad. And, with some of them, the evil lies in the sense
of loss of something fine rather than the breaking of an im-
mutable law.
In many clever novels, one is irritated by the needless
suffering inflicted on the heroes or the heroines by the lack of
knowledge of moral matters which three words with the most
simple-minded of parish priests would settle. Mrs. Norris does
not irritate us in this way. One reason is that she does not
raise questions of casuistry which she cannot answer. Right
and wrong are plain white and black to her; she has no sym-
pathy with the sin, though she has pity for the sinner; and she
has some warrant for this, for Dante, whom Raphael placed
among the Doctors of the Church without rebuke, sang with
tears in his voice of the fall of Francesca. And, then, with most
of her people, there is the appeal to faith and the practices
which follow the Faith, whether blurred for a time or not. In
298 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE IN FICTION [Dec.
Josslyn's Wife, by no means so good a story as that of Julia
Page, the lesson lies in these words :
**You must forget all about it," she said. "You never did
anything to deserve a prison experience — ^it was a horrible
mistake."
"It was a mistake from a human standpoint," Gibbs con-
ceded thoughtfully, "but I don't know about my record in a
higher tribunal. I wonder how many of the fellows serving
life terms now ever had an angel for a mother, and a saint for
a wife, clothes and friends and warm food from the hour they
were born, always money to buy prestige and service and
preference — ! Ellen, if I had my life over again, do you know
what I think it would be? According to the principle that
until every other man had it, I didn't want it, and until every
other child had it, I didn't want my son to have it — ^whatever
it was, travel, clothes, education, toys, everything."
"I suppose that's loving your neighbor as yourself," added
Ellen's thoughtful voice.
It is unusual to find an American writer who puts the
lesson quite in that way, and none yet have been found to
show that the men and women who do this perfectly are not
the men and women with families, but those men and women,
following the mystic voice of St. Paul, who deny themselves
that the poor little child may learn or that the rich child may
be taught that the things of the spirit are above all. Mrs. Norris'
one theme is the preservation of the family; nothing could be
better described than the youth of Julia Page and the circum-
stances which helped to mold it. The character of her mother,
the self-indulgent, the ill-regulated Emeline, is worth consider-
ation by all students of the evils that undermine family life in
our country, which no laws will change, and which no general
spread of "book-learning** will affect. She resented the coming
of her baby. She was wedded to the frivolous amusements of
the moderately poor in cities. "By the time Julia was weaned,
Emeline had found :he wrapper habit; she had also slipped
back to the old viewpoint; they were poor people, and the poor
couldn't afford to do things decently, to live comfortably.**
The coming of the little child did not draw this mother to
the contemplation of the divine Mother; she did not look up,
but down. The realism of these first chapters is a lesson in
the right kind of realism. In addition to the loss of the spirit-
1919.] AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE IN FICTION 299
ual in life, the incapable mother makes the possession of things
the real test of living; to be poor, in the conventional sense, is
to be doomed.
If the example of the courage of the people of the South
after the Civil War taught us anything, it was that families
might be poor and still keep their ''gentleness" as a proud
possession. They might live on corn pone, sweeten their coffee
with molasses, do without the old luxuries of the dinner table,
and yet preserve what they could of its ritual. This tenacity of
belief in the value of what is called ''gentleness*' is one of those
qualities, which, outside of religion, adds much to the stability
of the family life. The Hebrews believed in it when they pre-
served their pedigrees; when an American family gains or
conserves this quality, its course must be upward.
Probably no two authors can be more different in their
points of view, apparently in their experience, than Edith
Wharton and Booth Tarkington. Whatever might be said of
an exaggeration here and there in Mrs. Wharton's novel.
House of Mirth, it is true to the section of society which she
depicted — a section of society which was only temporarily
diverted from its pursuits by the necessities of the War. It is
almost as negligent of the real claims of the family as those
patricians, under the later Csesars, who considered it the duty
of the stupid proletarian to have children. But in Mr. Booth
Tarkington's The Turmoil and The Magnificent Ambersons,
we find few exaggerations. It is the society — or, rather, one
stratum of it — ^in the Middle West, to the life. U Amelia Dob-
bin in Thackeray's Vanity Fair is true, then the very interest-
ing but foolish mother in The Magnificent Ambersons is as true
to life. But it is not Isabel or her son, George, that makes the
real interest of this novel — ^it is not what they do, but what
their environment induces them to do; they are the slaves of
circumstances and things, and Mr. Tarkington, in regard for
truth, could not make them otherwise. In the case of Isabel,
her motherhood is everything, but there is little of the spiritual
in it; she is as selfish as she is unconsciously destructive — ^but
very charming withal. There is no background of the super-
natural in these stories; in fact, if one spoke of the supernat-
ural to any of Mr. Tarkington's real characters, the more intel-
ligent — ^none of them is more than merely intelligent — ^would
think of the vagaries of Sir Conan Doyle or Sir Oliver Lodge.
300 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE IN FICTION [Dec.
Apart from the delicious humor of Mr. Tarkington's books
about boys, in which class one may include his latest, Ramsey
Milholland, his novels are seriously sincere and graphic; he is
Henri Bordeaux, lacking the logic or the system of philosophy
without which no Frenchman can write. He proves one thesis
— that a family can not be built upon mere possessions in these
modern times when the truth still prevails that the spirit is
more than the letter.
The Cricket, by Marjorie Benton Cook, is a study of the
effects of the criminal selfishness of a fashionable mother on a
child of good instincts and unusual cleverness. The keynote
is struck in the opening conversation between two opulent
persons in society — Wally Bryce and his wife.
"Look here, Wally, don't begin on that mother stuff. I
didn't want her any more than you did, and we were fools
to have her. That may be abnormal, unnatural and ail the
rest of it, but it's the truth, and there are lots of other women
just like me. You can't lump us any more than you can lump
men. We don't all of us have the maternal instinct, not by
a long shot."
"Don't talk that way. Max," says the husband; "it's not
nice."
"There you go. It's all right for you not to want a child,
but it is indecent in me. That's a man-made idea, and it
won't work any more. Lots of us don't find motherhood
either satisfying or interesting, and we're getting courage
enough to say so."
"The less you say about it, the better," counseled Wally.
The father finds the luckless child, Isabel, thrust upon
him I he is lazily affectionate; the responsibility alternately
amuses and bores him; he is the **homme moyen sensuel;" and
Isabel brings herself up very blunderingly. How she does it is
well told. Her position is so typical, that it is worth studying
as an example of a social tendency.
The hero of The Road to Understanding, by Miss Eleanor
H. Porter, came of a family too elegant for words; he has a
touch of that social haughtiness that causes the heroine of A
Daughter of the Land, by Mrs. Gene Stratton-Porter, to refuse
an admirable man, who talks well, and is very much her
superior, because he is unable to write a letter expressive of
his real qualities. The story is one of the conflict of social
1919.] AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE IN FICTION 801
**classes'' in a new city. There is a Denby Mansion and a proud
Denby father, who has made money. There is the opulent
son of the type of George Amberson, but more foolish. Burke
Denby falls in love with a nurse maid« the daughter of a grocer,
who had spoiled her, too. The grocer, dying, had unexpectedly
left her to earn her own living. The difference in their social
position is indicated by the tone of their conversation. No-
body in the Denby family dreams that Burke, with his '^culture
and traditions,*' can ally himself with the beautiful nurse of his
Aunt Emma's children. Burke shows Helen Burnett the view
from the top of the hill.
"^A
€€
My, ain't this real pretty?" exclaimed the girl.
The young man scarcely heard the words, else he would
have frowned unconsciously at the "real pretty." He was
looking at her lovely, glorified face.
"I thought you'd like it," he breathed.
"I know another just as fine. We'll go there next."
A shadow like a cloud crossed her face.
"But I have so little time!"
The cloud leaped to his face now, and became thunderous.
"Shucks! I forgot What a nuisance!"
The purist who says "shucks" is shocked when the lady of
his thoughts says "swell;" but he marries Helen; the father, a
type of the unreasonable parent who gives his child everything
he wants, and at last refuses him what he wants most of all,
disinherits the son and the wife who says "swell!" Nowhere,
except in our country, could two young people be so utterly
unprepared for the realities of life; and nowhere, except in our
country, would the case be looked on as usual; yet it is usual.
Mr. Denby has an arrogant and selfish affection for his "cub" —
and nothing more. Among his newly-discovered traditions,
there is no feeling of duty towards the essentials of the family.
Mrs. Gene Stratton-Porter, who divides with Mr. Harold
Bell Wright the quality of the first of "the best sellers," hews
her figures out of life. She fancies that her philosophy of life is
"sunshiny." She tries to "let a little sunshine in" at every mo-
ment, opportune or inopportune, but she succeeds in gathering
together a group of the most disagreeable persons, to make a
chorus for her heroine, Kate Bates, "a daughter of the land."
No Norman peasants could be willing to sacrifice more for the
302 AMERICAN FAMILY UFE IN FICTION [Dec.
land than these people. Kate's burning desire for education is
a desire common to her class, a desire which the farmer's
daughter cherishes more than the farmer's son.
It is a pity that our Crovernment, which is doing so much
for agriculture, does not study more carefully the actual
needs of the farmer and his wife and children on the far-off
farms. If he is selfish, if the land obsesses him, if he is inclined
to make his kin slaves to the land, his hands seem to be against
every other man, because he has not learned the value of co-
operation. The family, as Mrs. Stratton-Porter depicts it, has
no real solidarity; things are everything. There is no spiritual
life; it would be a relief to find in this book a downright villain
who had any conception of his relation to God. But, though
purists will be shocked at Mrs. Stratton-Porter's English of
the people, her work is sincere and it, therefore, rings true.
People who buy her books do so for that reason, and because
her aspirations are theirs.
In The Homestead, by Zephine Humphrey, we have an-
other novel of country life — ^New England life this time. Miss
Humphrey writes well. She knows the heart of the American
woman, chained to things. Barbara, with the weight of the
^'homestead" on her soul, turns to dreams of Italy, to splendors
beyond her gray horizon. She is, like all the persons in nearly
all the novels before us, of a religion that does not satisfy the
longings of the heart, that contents neither the desire for
beauty, nor makes beauty actual as a part of Ireligion fused
with everyday life. Barbara begins to be saved when ^^the
thing" to which she is chained disappears — this book could
have been written only by an American of insight and per-
ception of spiritual values.
Charles Norris, the author of Salt, has made a keen, re-
lentless exposition of the life of a young American, who drifts.
He has the instincts on which are founded good character and
high principles; he is the elemental man in a civilization in
which the influence of Christianity remains, but from which
belief in its dogmas has vanished. He is a young pagan, but
not an evil young pagan. He can be saved to society only by
a good woman — to the family, which is the foundation, he is
instinctively drawn; but, though he has had the education of
the moderately rich, nobody has taught him anything essential.
In business, he is dishonest, because everybody about him is
1919.] AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE IN FICTION 303
conventionally dishonest; he is astonished to find that men
who steal in an apparently respectable way, have no sympathy
with him when he is found out. He gropes, to find how he can
make the spirit dominate the appeal of mere things; a Catho-
lic young man, on whom the kindly light shines, were he a
mere newsboy or the son of a Senator, could not have escaped
the guidance lacking in the life of this young pagan. The
eternal womanhood saves Griffith Adams — or, rather, is the
beginning of his salvation. Should he marry Margaret? It
meant riches for his son; or Rosa, who means motherhood and
the simple virtues of the family life. He decides for Rosa — by
instinct, by a yearning for the love of the family. Salt is realis-
tic; but, unhappily, true to a life which is around us. It has
gone beyond the sixth edition, because of its unhappy truth
and of the lesson it carries.
My Antonia, accented in the Bohemian way on the first
syllable, is a picture of a corner of our life quite new. Miss
Willa Gather, in depicting it, shows a quality that almost
deserves to be called genius. Antonia ought to have a place
among the great heroines in fiction; or, rather, a place among
the great characters which the great writers of fiction have
created. The scene is laid in the Nebraska prairies; the story
is that of a Bohemian family. Antonia has the spiritual back-
ground of faith; it helps to save her in the end — that and the
belief, which is a part of hope, that she may do her ^^bif in the
life of the world as a wife and mother. Miss Gather has pro-
duced a masterpiece, which, if printed in France, could not
have escaped the notice of the Academy. The glimpse of the
character of Antonia's husband, born in Prague, is very happy.
And Ambroch's opinion of his brother, Leo, the erratic :
"That's like him," Ambroch said to the visitor. "He's a
crazy kid. Maybe he's sorry to have you go, and maybe he's
jealous. He's jealous of everybody mother makes a fuss over,
even the priest."
Here, in My Antonia, too, is the tyranny of things, from
which the world, in a blind way, is trying to escape : and the
answer in it, as in all these stories from life, is the love of the
family. In The See-Saw, by Sophie Kerr, it is the same theme.
iZlarleth is the irresponsible man, the product, too, of our civil-
ization — ^"I thought I could do anything and get away with it.
304 AMERICAN FAMILY UFE IN FICTION [Dec.
and then every way I turned I got whacked" he says, after he
has divorced his wife, Marcia. And —
Across the chasm of the lonely, unsatisfied years, the
heartache, the humiliation, Marcia Crossey looked at her
husband, and felt something of the unbreakable tie between
them. She knew that for all his repentance he was as he had
been before — ^that he would hurt her again, in a thousand
ways, in their life together, and that she would never be
strong enough and fine enough to make him over, or shield
herself from the painful difficulties of his faults and her
inadequacies. Yet above and beyond this was the demand
that might not be denied, the demand marriage makes upon
two who are really married, that concession, adjustment,
endurance, shall not be shrunk from nor denied, but lived
fully, and so subordinated and forgotten, in the greater thing,
which is true love, tried and understanding.
There is no question, then, that, at the basis of our civil-
ization, the old idea of the value of the family exists unaltered.
Whatever Mr. Shaw's real principles are — and nobody has yet
discovered the convictions of this Celtic Puck — ^his opinions
about the home and the family are looked on here as bits of
brilliant and amusing comedy. These novels so far as their
testimony goes, show that the Protestant churches, in our
country, have become negligible as factors in the moral life
of the average man. How far Catholics in this country are
affected by the prevailing, very amiable paganism, I cannot
tell. There are no novels, written for Catholics, which give us
a clue — those of Mrs. Norris seem to show that, even among the
self-indulgent and indifferent, the Church restrains. This is,
however, certain — that the conscious and spiritually regulated
^ucation of the heart and mind and character, on which the
foundation of the f avily must be founded, seems to occupy no
given place at all.
/
THE ARMENIAN CRISIS.
BY WALTER GEORGE SMITH.
Editom'8 Note. — The writer of this article, who is a Pliiladelphla lawyer, and
former President of the American Bar Association, was a member of the American
Commission for the Relief of the Near East, and spent much time In Constantinople
carrying on the work of the Conunlsslon. What he says of the Caucasus Is based
on his own personal obsenration and notes taken during a tour of that country In
the spring of 1919.
|ONG before the unspeakable tragedy of the World
War riveted the attention of mankind upon the
struggle of Christian civilization for continued
existence, the cruel and systematic persecution
of the Armenians by their overlords, the Turks,
was continually appealing to its conscience. There are few
more remarkable instances of strength of racial character than
that of this long-suffering people. Their fate now hangs in
the balance. Whether they are to survive or to join the long
list of other nations destroyed by the unreasoning fanaticism
of the Musselman hordes, depends upon the outcome of the
effort to call to their aid the forces of civilization in order to
give them the right to live unmolested in their own land.
Since the capture of Constantinople, in 1453, seated the Turks
in firm possession of Western Asia and the Balkan Peninsula,
Armenia has been but a geographical expression. A once
powerful nation was scattered and downtrodden, until by the
last estimate, it amounted, in 1914, to not more than three and
one-half million people.
A glance at the map will show the ancient home of the
Armenians to be the mountainous region southeast of the
Black Sea, and extending in a parallelogram eastward almost
to the Caspian Sea and south to the Mediterranean and to the
border of Syria. The Biblical designation is Ararat. In Roman
times there was the Greater and the Lesser Armenia, the for-
mer being the country now spoken of as the Caucasus, the lat-
ter a portion of Asia Minor. At an early date Cilicia became a
part of Armenia. In modern times this country was partitioned
between Turkey, Persia and Russia. Since the War of 1914,
one of the provinces extending from Batoum on the Black Sea
to Baku on the Caspian seceded from Russia, and received
^9iL, OL, ao
306 THE ARMENIAN CRISIS [Dec.
recognition from the Powers as the Republic of Georgia.
Southwardly from Georgia the territory as far as the Taurus
Mountains possesses a compact Armenian population of per-
haps 1,500,000 people, who have set up a provisional republic
not yet recognized by the Powers. Still further south and on
the other side of the mountains, are the Armenian vilayets of
Turkey, Van, Sivas, Erzeroum, Diabeker, and Adana. They,
with Aleppo and Bagdad, have been largely depopulated of
the former Armenian residents. Their political future, with
that of the remainder of the Turkish Empire, has not yet been
determined.
The Armenians are Indo-European in their origin. Their
history goes back to centuries before the Christian era. They
are mentioned in Strabo, Herodotus and Xenophon. The
Armenian plateau covering about 120,000 square miles,
formed part of the Roman and Byzantine Empires. It is trav-
ersed by mountain ranges with lofty peaks reaching high
above the level of perpetual snow, the most notable being Ara-
rat. Among these mountains the Tigris, the Euphrates and the
Araxes Rivers takes their rise. Among the many lakes, Sevanga
and Van are the larger. The climate is very hot in summer
and cold in winter. There are but two seasons: winter from
October to May, summer from May to October. Most of the
inhabited portions are from five thousand to eight thousand
feet above sea level. Grapes grow in the Lake Van country,
while other products are wheat, barley, tobacco, cotton and
hemp. The country is, however, more pastoral than agricul-
tural. The Armenians claim a majority of the permanent in-
habitants of the plateau. Though statistics are unreliable, the
Kurds, Turks and other races separately are in a minority,
though collectively they may exceed the Armenians. It is said
that in Russia and Persia with Armenia, are 2,100,000 Armen-
ians; in the Turkish vilayets that 200,000 survive, and of the
refugees from Turkish Armenia in the Caucasus are 500,000
more; in Syria, Mesopotamia, Cilicia, Konia are 250,000, mak-
ing a total of 3,050,000, to whom should be added 200,000 in
the Northern Caucasus, 300,000 in Constantinople, Smyrna
and other parts of Turkey, 300,000 in Europe, Egypt and Amer-
ica, giving a total of 3,850,000.
Christianity penetrated into Armenia in the third century
and was well established in the foiu*th. St. Greogry the Illu-
1919.] THE ARMENIAN CRISIS 307
minator was the first Metropolitan. Legends tell of the teach-
ings of the apostles, SS. Bartholomew and Thaddeus. The
Annenian Church was represented at the Council of Nicsea.
The decrees of the Council of Chalcedon were rejected, how-
ever, and since the fifth century the Armenian Church, with
intervals of union, has been a separate ecclesiastical body, dif-
fering from Western Christianity on the doctrine of the Trin-
ity.
Literature has had a well-marked development in Ar-
menia from early times, and notwithstanding the conquests by
Persia and Turkey, it has never ceased to exist. The early
Christian theological writings are valuable, and date from the
invention of the national alphabet in the fifth century. They
translated the Bible and produced valuable controversial and
historical works. In the latter half of the eleventh century the
last king of Armenia succumbed to the Sejukian Turks. Sub-
sequently those who fled into Cilicia and aided the crusaders
were rewarded by being given an independent kingdom which
survived until 1375, when it was overcome by the Mame-
lukes.*
It is said that before the recent massacres there were forty
to fifty thousand Protestants, sixty to seventy thousand Catho-
lics, and the remainder of the Armenian population belonged
to the Gregorian, the national church. The massacres and de-
portations have reduced the total number of Armenians by
probably 1,000,000 souls. These massacres following so closely
upon those of 1894-1896, under Abdul Hamid, have entailed
a loss of population since the Treaty of Berlin in 1878, of not
less than 2,000,000.
The ultimate responsibility of these tragedies rests upon
the inept statesmanship of Ehigland in 1852 and 1878. Russia,
whose domination would have at least given peace and pro-
tection to the Armenians, was opposed by England and France
in the Crimean War and then held at San Stephano. The
unhappy Armenians were again relegated to the mercies of the
Turk, notwithstanding the bitter knowledge of Turkish faith-
lessness.
A carefully devised propaganda, even in our own day, and
with the knowledge of the frightful crimes of 1915 and their
direful consequences, fresh in our minds, seeks to rob the
^Ciatholte Enegelopmdim "Armenia.** Chambers Encgelopmditu ** Armenia."
308 THE ARMENIAN CRISIS [Dec,
Armenians of sympathy and assistance on the ground that they
are after all an ignoble race who suck the life blood from the
simple Turks, rousing their fury and justifying, or at least
extenuating, assassination. It is the same old plea that seeks
to expose the ''pogroms*' against the Russian and Polish Jews.
It is baseless.
Armenians are not exclusively, nor predominately, given
to mercantile pursuits, but on the contrary eighty-five per cent
are devoted to agriculture and the smaller crafts. While they
show an aptitude for commerce which has made them success-
ful wherever they are protected, and have been noted as doc-
tors, lawyers, engineers and chemists, they are proficient as
well in their skill in handicrafts. The fact is they are the lead-
ing people of energy and natural endowments in the Near East,
and their success wherever attained has been the result of in-
dustry, thrift and temperance — ^virtues unknown to their Turk-
ish oppressors.
The cause of their persecution is not far to seek. It lies
in the peculiar character of the Turk, his incapacity for intel-
ligent political rule and the stringent requirements of his re-
ligion. Unable by his natural constitution to advance beyond
the elementary principles of civilization, thus lacking the effort
necessary for successful agriculture, he has remained century
after century essentially unchanged from the pastoral nomads
of Central Asia from whom he descends. A brave fighter and
susceptible of a certain chivalry as a warrior, he is utterly
without constructive ability or steady application to any of
the arts of peace. For four and a half centuries he has camped
in Asia Minor and some of the fairest lands of Europe. He
found great cities, with teeming villages and well-watered
farming land, capable of subsisting a dense population, and
now where it is not a desert marked by the magnificent ruins
of civilization, it is but a pasture for the sheep and cattle which
form his main possessions. The Turkish peasant is content
with the scantiest farming and lives in poverty, ambitionless
and lethargic.
He is not without amiable qualities. He is kind to the
poor of his own race and is fond of children. He takes good
care of his animals and has a love for flowers. Coming with
baskets of vegetables to sell in an Oriental market, he will deck
them and sometimes himself with blossoms. In the higher
1919.] THE ARMENIAN CRISIS 309
ranks of society he is gracious, hospitable and generous. Indi-
vidual instances of real kindness which he is sure to meet, pre-
disposes the traveler to like the Turk and to contrast with
favor his gentle, easy manner with the keen, business-like
methods of the Armenian or Greek with whom he may have
dealings. On the other hand, the educated Turk is a master
in the diplomatic art as understood in the Orient, and too often
practiced in the Occident. He has for generations maintained
his domination in Eiu*ope by playing off the interests of each
of the Powers against the other. With unerring appreciation
of the modern mercantile instinct, he has practiced with im-
punity his tyranny over his Christian subjects, relying upon
the melancholy truth that commercial advantage has invari-
ably overcome the compassion for human life and suffering.
Even now he is watching with a hope, based upon past experi-
ence, that the clash of interests will leave him at least some
measure of political power, although he knows he stands be-
fore the world bankrupt morally and financially, with his
hands stained by the blood of myriads of his Christian sub-
jects.
Opinions may differ as to the natural capacity of the Turk
for civilization, but certain it is that the religion he professes,
so long as it is an integral and separate part of his political
system, is an absolute bar to his continued rule over popula-
tions of a different faith. In theory and in practice Mohammed-
anism permits but scanty toleration of a different faith under
the rule of the Sultan. The head of the State and the com-
mander of the faithful are the same individual. Absolute
obedience is laid upon the conscience of the true believer to
execute the orders of his civil superior, who is at the same time
the representative of his faith. He cannot embrace any other
religion without conmutting a capital crime against the Turk-
ish state, therefore conversion to Christianity under existing
conditions of the Turk is impossible. He believes that he for-
feits paradise by disobedience, while he is sure to obtain it by
performance of religious duty whatever it may be, even the
cold-blooded murder of a friend or neighbor who is a Chris-
tian or other **infldel.'*
That there are exceptions does not change the rule. When
the three adventurers, Talaat, Djemal and Enver, with the
party of the Young Turks behind them, ruled the Empire in
310 THE ARMENIAN CRISIS [Dec.
the name of the Sultan» they knew the fanaticism of the people
and, believing that Germany would win in the Great War,
deliberately planned the complete extinction of the Armenian
race. We have seen with what alacrity the officials, with a
few honorable exceptions, sprang to their work. We are told
by Lord Robert Cecil' that in the autumn of 1914 a Congress
of Ottoman Armenians was offered autonomy if it would
actively assist Turkey in the War, and when this was refused,
though the Congress promised that individual Armenians
would obey the laws as Ottoman subjects, the massacres im-
mediately began and were carried out until seven hundred
thousand or more than two-thirds of the entire Ottoman Ar-
menian population was killed. The Turks are jealous of the
Armenians' superior capacity. For this reason, as also because
of their Christian faith, they consider them enemies.
Furthermore, the Young Turks believed it unsafe for the
future of Mohammedanism to have a large and virile people
rising to power who could not be trusted as friendly to their
alliance with Germany. How far the plan for massacre and
deportation was known to Germany, has been revealed by
Mr. Morgenthau in the story of his Ambassadorship in Con-
stantinople, and more directly by Dr. Johan Von Lepsius in
the collection of documents published recently in Berlin with
the authority of the new German Ministry. It is therein shown
conclusively that the Central Powers through their diplomatic
and military officers were able to follow step by step the hor-
rible events of 1915, and could have stopped them at any time*
It was part of their policy they should go on. To attain a com-
plete Musselman Turkey was the plan of the former Christian
Empires, and their own conduct in Belgium, in France and in
Italy shows that they would have no inconvenient sympathy
with the victims of the plans of the Young Turks.
But, it may be asked, how could a brave people, even
though numerically inferior, submit to slaughter without some
show of resistance? The fact is, that wherever they had not
been deprived of their arms, which was the case in the greater
part of Turkey, they did fight bravely and effectively. The
Turkish authorities made long and careful preparations be-
fore issuing orders for the massacres and deportations. At
first they conscripted the Armenians of military age into their
* Report of the Philadelphia Commission on Armenian Relief, p. 19.
1919.] THE ARMENIAN CRISIS 311
army, then they segregated them and deprived them of their
weapons, and when they were thus at their mercy, orders for
massacre and deportation were issued. In Russian Armenia,
however, the young men organized volunteer forces, and Gen-
eral Andranik bore the brunt of the heaviest fighting in the
Caucasus campaign. After the Russian army broke down they
took over that front, and for five months delayed the advance
of the Turks. Besides this service to the Allies, there were Ar-
menian soldiers serving in their forces in Syria and in the
British, French and American armies on the field. The Ar-
menians have suffered in this War more cruelly than any
other people, and established a right by actual service to the
benevolent protection of the Allied Powers, to whose cause
they have been steadfast from the beginning.
In their brief before the Peace Conference, their represen-
tatives have truthfully said:
The misfortune of the Armenian people is, that in conse-
quence of Turkish tyranny during the last quarter of a cen-
tury, the civilized peoples of the West see in them nothing
but a persecuted Christian people to arouse their pity and
the need of their help. It is not pity, but respect, which such
a n tion fond of their liberty and work deserve. A nation
which has so much endured and so much resisted.
The people who for thirty centuries, from long before the
time when Xenophon spoke of them, have lived in those high
plateaus as the Armenian people; the people which play the
part which history and geography assign to them; which
have in their annals recorded what they have done; which
have set their right to their territory; who have after each
devastation, built and rebuilt, and rebuilt; which have
thought and produced; that people is in every case the Ar-
menian people.
One hundred years ago seven graduates of Amherst Col-
lege, of the Congregationalist faith, began the foundations of
the American Missions in Turkey. They have made thousands
of proselytes to their faith, though the Armenian is as a rule
tenacious of his own Church ; but in addition they have reillu-
mined the ambition of the youth for education and self-de-
velopment. When the War broke out there were stations at
many points of Turkish Armenia and Syria where schools,
hospitals, and relief work were carried on under the care of
312 THE ARMENIAN CRISIS [Dec.
American missionaries, especially Congregationalists and
Presbyterians. These stations are representative of years of
effort and millions of investment. They have sent many Ar-
menian young men and women to America, where they gradu-
ated in medicine and technical science, from our colleges and
universities.
The Catholic missions, under French influences, have been
successful especially in Syria. Large Catholic dioceses have
grown up also at Trebizond, Angora and elsewhere. What is
the situation today? The Armenian population of six vilayets
of Van, Bitlis, Diarbeker, Sivas, Adana and Erzeroum, in other
words almost all of Turkish Armenia has been depleted of its
Christian occupants by massacre, deportation and flight. The
Catholics of Trebizond and Angora have been almost com-
pletely exterminated. In Syria the stations are surrounded by
wretched survivors of the deportations, and kept alive by sup-
plies furnished from America.
When the American friends of Armenia were informed of
the persecutions, they forthwith formed the American Com-
mittee for Armenian and Syrian Relief, now merged into the
Near East Relief, and took energetic means to save the rem-
nant of the people. The sympathy of the American public
found expression in subscriptions from all parts of the Union,
while the Federal Government, through its Army and Navy
Department, gave the free use of transports, and authorized
the expenditure of large sums of money through the food ad-
ministration of Herbert Hoover. Not less than $30,000,000
have been expended during the past four years in this work
of charity, while thousands of men and women in America
have given their services as collectors and hundreds in Tur-
key as nurses, teachers and ministrants in every way possible.
Notwithstanding this untiring effort to put into practice the
Christian law of human brotherhood, the calamity has been
too great for any organization adequately to meet. The terri-
tory of Russian Armenia was already war worn and desolate
when the hordes of refugees poured over the mountains and
entered Erivan, Alexandropol, Igdeir, and passed along the
railway lines to Tiflis in Georgia. It was the winter season, the
reserve stores of provisions had been largely destroyed by the
Turkish armies, and famine ensued in its most appalling as-
pect. As late as March 29, 1919, Dr. John H. T. Main, an
1919.] THE ARMENIAN CRISIS 313
American Relief Commissioner in charge of the work in the
Caucasus, reported:
I have been studying the refugee concentration points
along the former boundary line between Russian and Turk-
ish Armenia. Alexandropol, a large centre, and Etchmiatzin,
a small one, are typical. In the one are sixty-eight thousand
refugees by actual census at our bread and soup kitchens. In
the other there are seven thousand. Refugees have streamed
into these places, hoping to find it possible to cross the border
into their former homes in Turkish Armenia, near Kars.
Concentration at these two points, without food or clothing
and after a winter of exile in the Caucasus and beyond, has
produced a condition of horror unprecedented among the
atrocities of the Great War. On the streets of Alexandropol
on the day of my arrival, one hundred and ninety corpses
were picked up. This is far below the average per day. One-
seventh of the refugees are dying each month. At Etchmiat-
zin I looked for a time at a refugee burial. Seven bodies were
thrown indiscriminately into a square pit as carrion, and
covered with earth without any suggestion of care or pity.
As I looked at the workmen, I saw a hand protruding from
the loose earth — ^it was a woman's hand and seemed to be
stretched out in mute appeal. To me this hand reaching
upward from the horrible pit, symbolized starving Armenia.
The workmen told me that the seven in this pit were the first
load of thirty-five to be brought out from the village that
morning. The car had gone back for another load.
The refugees dare not go forward. They halt on the border-
land of their home. The Turk, the Kurd and the Tartar have
taken possession of their land and will hold it by force of
arms. A line almost like a battle line from the Black Sea
region where is located the Southwestern Republic with
Kars as its capital, to the Caspian Sea where Baku is the
capital of the Azerweijan Republic, together with a line of
Turks, Kurds and Tartars between these two extremes, holds
the refugees where they are. The total number is more than
three hundred and thirty thousand. To this must be added
the local inhabitants, also suffering from indescribable hard-
ships. The Allied forces on the Turkish side are not in suf-
ficient numbers to dominate the situation. The only solution
is a considerable number of troops to be used as a policing
force, supplied by a mandatory power. Many Armenian
soldiers would be available for such service. • . •
S14 THE ARMENIAN CRISIS [Dec.
At this last moment can Christian civilization do some-
thing to restore and help? . . . Should our Government
delay in reaching out a helping hand to this suffering people?
The question of political expediency ought to be forgotten in
the presence of this world catastrophe. These people look to
America. Our Government is under moral obligation to
respond.
The magnitude of the relief work assumed by the Near
East Relief may be partially realized from the fact that it has
undertaken the care, entire or partial, of more than forty thou-
sand orphans in the Caucasus alone, in addition to many sta-
tions at Syria, Anatolia, Mesopotamia, and one in Palestine.
The crucial point is the Caucasus. There is but one line of
railway extending through this region. It runs from Batoum
on the Black Sea to Baku on the Caspian. From Tiflis a branch
extends southwards to Kars, to Erivan and Alexandropol, and
southeastward into Persia. On this over-burdened line, with
trains guarded by detachments of British troops, it has been
hitherto possible to transport five thousand tons of flour per
month into the afflicted region.
During the past summer, a reorganization of the relief
work was arranged, after consultation in Paris, between Near
East representatives and Herbert Hoover, which met approval
by the Peace Conference and resulted in sending Colonel Wm.
N. Haskell of the U. S. Army as High Commissioner, with dip-
lomatic authority to the Allied Powers to take over the entire
direction of relief work in the Caucasus. Since then. Major
General John G. Harbord, Chief -of-staflf of General Pershing,
has gone out to make report to the United States Government,
accompanied by a large staff of competent army officers. The
prospect of ultimate success of plans for permanently repatri-
ating the refugees, was marred at this point by announcement
by the British Cabinet of its intention to withdraw its soldiers
from the region they had been policing since the spring. This
was the signal for the massing of Kurdish, Tartar and Turkish
troops on the borders of the Armenian Republic, and the
recommencement of ruthless massacre. After strong appeals
to public opinion in England and America, the British Cabinet,
without rescinding its orders, suspended their execution.
The situation remains critical in the extreme. On all sides
it is admitted that without strong military guards, the work of
1919.] THE ARMENIAN CRISIS 315
relief must cease. The Greorgian Republic is unfriendly to the
Armenians. The railroad runs through the Georgian territory
for more than half of its length. It is certain the trains would
be stopped and starvation would do the work planned by the
Young Turks, without the aid of the knives and guns of their
armed enemies. All that has been accomplished would come
to naught. The flame of fanaticism would be lighted through-
out Tiu*key, and it is to be feared that the refugees to the
southward would be certain victims. It must be borne in mind
that except in Mesopotamia and Palestine, where the British
are in possession, and Smyrna, where the Greeks have lately
landed, along the coast of Syria, the same officials who exe-
cuted the orders of the Young Tiu*ks are in control of the Em-
pire in Asia. Constantinople is strongly held by the Allied
Powers, but the machinery of government remains under the
Sultan. With or without his connivance. Young Tiu*kish lead-
ers wield power throughout the interior. They were not dis-
armed at the close of the War. They have gathered in a new
harvest, they are desperate and determined. Enver Bey is in
the Caucasus and a Congress of Young Turks is in session at
Erzeroum. For 1,000,000 or more Armenian victims, not more
than one half of their assassins have been punished by death.
The Allies will find the situation more difficult to deal with
than ever, should the British Cabinet persist in its extraordi-
nary determination to knock the one prop from under the
trembling cause of the Armenians in the Caucasus.
When, in the spring of 1453, Mahomet the Conquerer laid
siege to Constantinople, the Christian powers of Europe, not-
withstanding the appeal of the Pope, stood idly until the gal-
lant Emperor Constantine and his few thousands of brave
defenders were overwhelmed. In consequence, the fairest
city in the world, the Oriental bulwark of Christian civilization,
the treasure house of antiquity, fell; and with it the cause of
Christ in Asia. It took two hundred years of war to save
Europe from a similar fate. The Musselman power has de-
cayed during the intervening years because of his inherent in-
capacity for civilized life. In our day a choice is offered to
Europe and America to light again the torch of faith and hope
in the cradle lands of our religion and our civilization. The
old passions of selfishness and national aggrandizement,
joined to great exhaustion of military power, checked the
316 THE ARMENIAN CRISIS [Dec.
nobler sentiments of humanity among the Italians, French and
English. The first two peoples care little or nothing for the
Armenians; the English are almost overwhelmed by their bur-
dens, foreign and domestic.
Is there not a clear duty resting upon the people of the
United States to give active and direct military and financial
aid to Armenia? It will not be for long, for the chances are
that in a few years they will repay every dollar expended for
their relief. They are the most virile people of the East — one
of the most virile in the world today. Even amidst the hor-
rors of massacre and starvation they tiun with eagerness to
every opportunity for education and self-help. Shall we refuse
to do for them what we have already so well done for the
Philippines? Can we do so and escape the condemnation
which fell upon the Levite who passed the other way rather
than succor the traveler who had fallen among thieves? Our
democracy is the hope of the world. It is a treasure we dare
not lay up in a napkin. A policy of selfish withdrawal from
responsibility by us, the most powerful among the family of
nations, who have come unscathed out of the World War as
compared with our Allies, will bring self-reproach and the
condemnation of posterity.
There are now pending before the Senate Committee on
Foreign AfTairs, bills to authorize the President to send Ameri-
can troops to keep order in the Caucasus pending the deter-
mination of the political status of Armenia. It is probable
that the British Government is awaiting the outcome of these
bills. Should these or similar legislation be rejected and the
British give up their ward, the Armenian question will be for-
ever settled by the extinction of the race in their historic land.
It is unbelievable that such a sequel should follow the century
of effort made for this people by the Western world. Just
as Greece, from a simple, poverty-stricken people, has arisen
to be a powerful and enlightened kingdom in less than one
hundred years, so Armenia, if she receive but reasonable pro-
tection, will take her place as the leader of a new civilization
in the Orient.
THE RETURN OF THE MA6L
BY GEOFFREY BUSS, S.J.
''The first was Melchoir, old and pale» with long hair and beard.
He offered gold to the Lord. The second was Gaspar, young, beard-
less, and of a ruddy complexion: he brought incense, an offering
proper to God. The third, Balthazar, was a Moor, with a long beard :
he offered myrrh, which signified that the Son of Man must die." —
Venerable Bede.
Caspar. — My Lord Melchior, old and wise!
Pardon me that I surmise
Hidden secrets in thine eyes.
Melchior. — No longer will I hold apart
The thing that burns within my heart
For after we had found at last
(All doubts and fears, all falterings past).
The Child we came so far to seek.
Nursed by that Mother Maiden-meek,
And 3ielding to the Might afar
That called us forth, that lit the star.
Fell down, and bowed our foreheads low.
Then stood again our gifts to show, —
Ah, then while one brief moment sped
I saw upon the Infant's head
A golden crown of Kinghood stand,
A sceptre in His little hand;
The while His Mother as a Queen
Shone out in robe of silver sheen.
And like an echoed trumpet-call
This word the heavens above let fall:
O principes attollite
Portas Regi Glorisel
Balthazar. — I thank thee, Melchior, for thy words dispel
A lingering fear. Now let Prince Caspar tell
If no glad sight for his young eyes befell.
Caspar. — Melchior! as I came to thee.
Came the vision unto me:
For when I had looked again
Where before the Child was lain,
318 THE RETURN OF THE MAGI [Dec.
Only blinding splendor shone
That I might not gaze upon.
But about me everywhere
Hung great angels, tranced in prayer.
And a starry shimmer pale
Hovered o'er the Mother's veil.
Then I heard a voice repeat
In lov^ accents dread and sv^eet
Words of mystic import three:
Hodie Te genuL
Melchior. — Only the snowy-hearted may
Such wonders see. Balthazar, say!
Was any vision thine this day?
Balthazar. — O dearly loved! for every pain and awe
I scarce may tell the strange sad thing I saw
There was no change at first; that Mother mild
Sat silent still, and nursed the Holy Child.
But sudden, while I watched the picture sweet,
I saw the baby hands, the tiny feet.
All gashed and torn, with red wounds gaping wide;
And one deep furrow marred His tender side.
Then o'er Him bent His Mother, with a look
That tore my heart; and all my spirit shook;
And as mine eyes grew dim with grief and fear.
The Child Himself spake tenderly and clear:
Ego si exaltatus fuero.
Omnia ad Meipsum traxero.
Melchior. — Take heart! I saw Him crowned a King!
Caspar. — I saw angels worshipping!
Balthazar. — ^Yes, Princes: in the midmost of my grief
God spake to me, and gave my heart relief.
Full many a soul, like us, from East to West
On tired wing shall come to make its nest
In these same Wounds: and there find perfect rest.
THE CHESTERBELLOC.
BY THEODORE MAYNARD.
II.
The Philosophers.
|HERE is a very real difficulty which arises in con-
sidering the philosophy of the Chesterbelloc,
and it is this — that Belloc, though he cannot help
introducing philosophy into practically eveiy
page he writes, has not definitely set himself to
explain his philosophy. About many subjects he has written
with a wealth of minute detail. He is prepared to elaborate an
historical or political or economic thesis, but the larger theory
upon which they rest can only be inferred from the fact that
Belloc is a Catholic and from the casual remarks he makes.
The reason, I suppose, is that to his mind the Faith is as much
to be taken for granted as the twelve-times-table. While Gil-
bert Chesterton, who has come from circles where every sort
of skepticism has had its fling, will put himself to the trouble
of explaining the most elementary points of Catholicism,
Hilaire Belloc, secure in his own creed, having known nothing
but that creed from childhood and being unable to understand
any other system of thought than lucid Catholicism or lucid
agnosticism, passes by every vagary of modernism in con-
temptuous silence; or if he breaks his silence (as frequently
happens) it is only to have the fun of insulting the heretic,
never to gain the merit of converting him. Hilaire Belloc is
always speaking or singing about the Faith; he never conde-
scends to argue about it. He will praise the Chiu*ch as loudly
as you like; he hardly thinks it worth his while to prove the
Creed. His attitude seems to be that if a man is a Catholic,
well; if he is not a Catholic, so much the worse for him, but
that is his own affair.
Chesterton on this, as on so many points, offers a strong
contrast to his friend. He is expansive and sympathetic where
Belloc is expansive and scornful. His interest in even the in-
sanest heresy is as deep as Belloc's indifference to it. The
Chesterbelloc unites in accepting the historic belief of Christ-
320 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Dec.
endom, but there is a striking difference in the method of ac-
ceptance. Where Belloc, with his orderly Latin mind, reaches
it along the road of hard logic, Chesterton jumps to it by intu-
ition. The one man is a mystic, the other a rationalist, who
knows the history of our world and has seen the Roman
Church succeed to the Roman Empire as the director of civil-
ization. For this and for a hundred other quite plain reasons
he is a Catholic; but his greatest reason is that apart from the
doctrines of the Church there is no other philosophy capable
of convincing his reason. He holds the Faith after having
eliminated everything else, and is a Catholic because there is
nothing left for him to be.
Belief that grew of all beliefs
A moment back was blown;
And belief that stood on unbelief
Stood up iron and alone —
So Mr. Chesterton said of Mark in his Ballad of the White
Horse, and the verse fits tMr. Belloc like a glove. This spirit
is an explanation of the uproarious pugnacity and offensive
geniality of the man who wrote: "We are Europe; we are a
great people. The Faith is not an accident among us, nor an
imposition, nor a garment : it is bone of our bone and flesh of
our flesh : it is a philosophy made by and making ourselves.*'
If, as he is never tired of declaring, the Catholic Church makes
men, it follows as a corollary that anyone who wishes to be a
man ought to join the Catholic Chiu*ch. There he leaves the
matter.
Though Belloc, as we have seen, does not concern himself
with the deepest philosophy except in passing, there is a great
deal of philosophy in his work that will have to be considered.
He may be described as dealing with the same subject in its
secondary aspect where Chesterton deals with it in its primary
aspects. He is terrestrial; G. K. C. is celestial. He speaks of
the fruit of Faith, while G. K. C. speaks more particularly of
its roots. It is here that we must split the Chesterbelloc in two
in order to bring the two parts together again. Their sane
materialism and their sane spirituality are united in a higher
synthesis which is Christianity.
From this point on, imtil we reach the subject of that
cosmic philosophy so brilliantly expounded by Mr. Chesterton,
1919.] THE CHESTERBELLOC 321
the question to be discussed is the practical rather than the
abstract side of the Chesterbellocian doctrine. Mr. Belloc's
views upon reaping a field or sailing a boat, as his readers will
have discovered, are not unconnected with the more transcen-
dental mysticism of G. K. C. It is taken up with eating and
drinking, with climbing mountains and fording rivers; it often
does not appear to be philosophy at all but merely high spirits.
As it says in The Path to Rome: "One should from time to
time hunt animals, or at the very least shoot at a mark; one
should always drink some kind of fermented liquor with one's
food — and especially upon great feast days; one should go on
the water from time to time; and one should dance on occa-
sions; and one should sing in chorus. For all these things man
has done since God put him in a garden and his eyes first be-
came troubled with a soul. . . . Oh! what good philoso-
phy this is!"
Some over-refined people might consider that passage a
piece of gross materialism. It is, of course, not intended as
a complete code of conduct or a ten volume treatise of meta-
physics. But it is admirable sense and may safely be taken,
if not as a philosophy, then, at least, as a test of philosophy.
Though one cannot altogether judge a man's mental health by
the quantity of food he eats, the way in which he eats is surely
an index to his character. Manners are a reflection of morals.
To Hilaire Belloc, Sussex is not only the most delightful
place in all the world but is in some way a noble symbol of the
world. "My country," he cries, "it has been proved in the life
of every man that though his loves are human, and therefore
changeable, yet in proportion as he attaches them to things un-
changeable, so they mature and broaden." Yet the sadness
of mortality hangs even over that sacred land. His love is
tinged with a serene melancholy. He has enjoyed the world,
and after all his travels and experiences tells his fellows that
one of two fates is the best that can befall a man — either to be
a wanderer with all the bitterness of it or to remain steadfastly
in one village until death finds him.
Mr. Chesterton has an equal love for the pagan simplici-
ties, but in his mouth Mr. Belloc's phrases turn somehow into
Christian doctrine. His humor grows wilder as he grows
more serious. Even the most casual of his miscellaneous opin-
ions is likely suddenly to expand into an universal dogma.
VOL. ex. 21
3a THE CHESTEBBELLOC [Dec
Tbe diriBe gales swing on snuJl hinges and are mored bj a
londL Wkcn the acrmon is on simplicitT v^ bear that 'tt is
simplfr ks^ eat caTur on impulse than gn^ie-nots on principle.*
Mr. BeQoc vould simphr ignore prigs; Mr. Cbcsterlon over-
wIm !■■ thcsB vith their own priggishneas. He actnaDy nukes
thcsB fed fools simnlT becanse ther haxe not made fools of
innunenhle pcnons with e;«-^aaaes and
peeii ganDCfits who prar for the retnm of the Majrpole or the
Ohncpiaa gamrs Bat then is about these people a haunting
aitd alanniskg sDmelhing wiiich soggests that it is just pnwihlr
thai they do not keep Christinas. It is painful to regard
Vi-'ST^aw aatzre in sacfa a hg^t, but it seems somehow p^^TT^ht^
thai Mr. Gecffipe Moore does not wave his spoon and ahonl
when the p;>dding is not ali^L It is evm possible that Mr. W.
E. Teats nerv p^Jls cmckerv.'*
GiSkcrt Chesl£rtc4i has an extraordinaiy knack of •'***^™g
inslai: Jt the in^o* heart of any qu^stkoi. Spejiking in Whia£s
ITrciSi; Wzik iik* WziHdL v:poji the f«nmist f iLllArr that dnnart
tidij s d^LlL azwi afler havinj^ arjord lh;&t wc^oen liad to be
iVG=rs^ is a hzzrCrt^ ans because men wn^f f cirord to hrrnmr
is coe psrtir=Llar tradd be sjtvs: ""Wccnen were not
kept at iKcae s coder to keep tbeaa ajotv^w; oin the contrary
kxp: at brcoe in onAer to ketfp tbcm brxxad.^
I belknne i^iat this pown- of iLlIuxsiimoca possessed
V» so hL^ a de^'s^ br GilSert Ox^itertcva is id..>e £rst and last
fc; the qriilTj =3 ii= rf ^ii^ I ha^^ *J?^J»*r 5?^^
wZl prv*e tie key to aH his w^cfft — his iaiKV>eac>f . This scpcr-
krirr ot irmcesice o'^^" experi«K">f » *isi::tir>d iy Kiiare Bel-
jf.
SKCL it is h» ycinc:r<ju f ^:ric:x*a to
«^fl:iaie &0t f^rts rf exj^erifittce irtc^ Ji wvck->iH^T fi^-ttcf»iiy.
Yet he feeis = k» bcoss thx: Jiwt J A»a j^raeraJ ci
Uld z^AL Y — ^^'^ ^^=^ wvcd whxri: «fcA of w; iis ^^
before He wa« bcca i= pjr«25e.^ T^iis »ift$^ cf
rcsuioc so be telis as. with ^r«y f rw,
•AH itttn ^sA iZ wncfcsa are cvmc^nbs cf :>wt: wcol for
try>:igb •m'j^ L?» carace frarac it bfre. jaiC iS^-cyi^. :hf )fn» of
the pfedf^e v^ focipinjeit ±ie =>H=>rcy cf :» ^*i^^^i^ca: i:2s tibe
WkinH. bit th«e axDts a dxw^ aa^ r^aC kco: :x ti>e iT« of
wfaes to bre^ ii ooce is to be ar:ac^ iKt nn^btii and to
Jt
1919.] THE CHESTERBELLOC 323
I i seem to drop the burden; and in the second and the third time
jt' it is done, and the fourth it is done more easily ....
f until at last there is no more need for a man or a woman to
l: break that pledged word again and once again ; it is broken for
£ good and for all. This is one most common way in which the
sacred quality is lost : the way of treason. Round about such as
[L choose this kind of relief grows a habit and an air of treason.
\^ They betray all things at last, and even common friendship is
- at last no longer theirs. The end of this false issue is
fc despair.'*"
r, Mr. Belloc has rendered honorable service with his doc-
t trine of experience, but this doctrine, though an excellent cor-
i rective of opinion, is obviously unable to create or inspire. It
is a methodical but a wearisome teacher and the scholar who
sits at its feet turns his lesson slowly. So much so that Mr.
Belloc brilliant disciple of a dull pedagogue, often gets be-
yond his lesson, and has to confess that things which a mystic
like G. K. C. apprehends at once are beyond his own grasp,
even when he accepts them upon good authority.
An amazing gift of insight is the major part of Mr. Ches-
terton's genius. From the time when he first began to write,
even before his philosophy hardened and clarified into ortho-
doxy, he appears to have been full of a wisdom older and
wiser than the world. In The Wild Knight he was a boy in
revolt with convention; but by the time The Defendiuit, his
first volume of essays, was published he had become (with ex-
traordinarily little doctrinal change) the defender of tradition.
In his early poems he had condemned priests, but in essays
written a couple of years later he was justifying ascetics. With
each successive book he became nearer and nearer to the
Catholic position, until in Orthodoxy Catholicism finds a very*
able modem apologetic.
Before we come to a consideration of this volume, which
contains the explicit declaration of Mr. Chesterton's creed, it
would be as well to make some remarks about the Chesterbel-
locian method. Mr. Belloc according to his mood either rea-
sons so closely that one gets tired of the argument, or sings so
good a song to prove his point, that the listener often forgets
the reason because of the rhyme. He will shout down a heretic
(that is when he does not contemptuously ignore him) with a
* On Something
324 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Dec.
stentorian chorus, or treat him, as he did the excited French
anarchist he met on the Path to Rome, of whom he has writ-
ten : *'I had no time to preach my full doctrine, but gave him
instead a deep and misty glass of cold beer, and pledged him
brotherhood, freedom and an equal law.** But G. K. C. argues
interminably, using a method peculiarly his own. Perhaps I
can best put it by saying that he hides a mace in his jester's
bauble. Just at the point when the controversialist is split-
ting his sides laughing at the clown's jokes he got his head
split with the crusader's mace. Here is an example of how the
thing works :
"When Shaw said to some atheist *Never believe in a God
that you cannot improve on,' the atheist (being a sound theo-
logian) naturally replied that one should not believe in a God
whom one could improve on; as that would show that he was
not God. In the same style in Major Barbara the heroine ends
by suggesting that she will serve God without personal hope,
so that she may owe nothing to God and He owe everything to
her. It does not seem to strike her that if God owes everything
to her He is not God. These things affect one merely as tedious
perversions of a phrase. It is as if you said, *I will never have
a father unless I have begotten him.' " '
Always controversial, «Mr. Chesterton introduces his pug-
nacious philosophy even into the realm of literary criticism.
His admirable studies on Browning, Blake, Watts and Dickens
are occupied with a great deal more than the books of the per-
son under consideration. He wanders round his subject, on
the sound principle that the longest way round is often the
shortest way home, and succeeds as a result, in a way that no
other critic that I can think of has succeeded, in flooding the
mind of the writer with a light by which others can read.
Chesterton's sense of the right clue to literature is after all only
a part of his sense of the right clue to life. The same dexterity
he has displayed in convicting Shaw of error, has enabled him
to write those romances in which Flambeau is convicted of
sin. As a critic Mr. Chesterton can be accurately described as
a cosmic detective.
Something more than a thirst for adventure (though he
has that thirst to a high degree) has led G. K. C. to the making
of novels, and that is, the hunger and thirst after righteous-
> George Bernard Shaw,
t
1919.] THE CHESTERBELLOC 325
nes8. Consequently all his detective stories have been philo-
sophical, most of them have been also theological. Putting
aside the early fantasia entitled The Napoleon of Notting Hill,
and the later book The Flying Inn, whose point is primarily
political, we shall find that Chesterton's remaining essays in
fiction are all detective tales, and that they all branch out
from one central mystical idea. In The Man Who Was Thurs-
day, God is the Fugitive; in The Ball and the Cross (the worst
book Mr. Chesterton ever wrote) God is the Clue; in the
•Tather Brown" books God is the Detective; in Manaliue, the
last of the series, God is at once the Criminal, the Detective
and the Clue. The idea of the wildly happy optimist unravel-
ling mysteries by the force of his simplicity was roughly
sketched out in the book of short stories called The Club of
Queer Trades. Innocent Smith is Basil Grant turned up again,
and I will make the guess that the very entertaining play
Magic was originally intended to be a Father Brown tale which
took another form by accident. There is, however, this con-
trast between the innocence of Father Brown and the inno-
cence of Innocent Smith, that the one becomes deep by being
simple and the other happy by being simple. The priest is as
wise as a serpent precisely because he is as harmless as a dove.
Smith is as happy as a child because he is a good child. Inno-
cent Smith and innocent Brown are the babes and sucklings
out of whose lips God has not only perfected praise but
philosophy.
As we shall see when we come to the crowning achieve-
ment of Mr. Chesterton's career, the pivot upon which his
faith turned was fairyland. When all the modernists had
done then* worst with his mind, he retamed his sanity and
saved his soul by remembering the stories his nurse had told
him. Reason is justified of her children. From the nursery,
fed upon logic and romance, G. K. C. came out like Jack the
Giant Killer to attack the world and smashed in the skeptic's
skull with a baby's rattle.
Whether as admirers or detractors three-quarters of Mr.
Chesterton's readers look upon him as a very amusing intellect-
ual gymnast or as a tiresome intellectual contortionist. Very
few understand that he is first and last and always a very pro-
found philosopher. When so clever a man as Mr. Shane Leslie
could actually ascribe to Mr. Chesterton Shaw's aphorism
326 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Dec.
that the golden rule is that there is no golden rule — ^ remark
which G. K. C. has several times specifically attacked — one is
struck with horror to imagine what the run and ruck of Ches-
terton*s readers make of him! Now there is an easy form of
paradox which was exploited by Oscar Wilde and the decad-
ents, a trick consisting of the uniting of literary version with
moral perversion. But the Chesterton paradox (which is
grammatically speaking an oxymoron) is an attempt to bring
a truth to a point to push it home. The argument is shortened,
perhaps I should say foreshortened; the thing defended by it
is plain. A missionary remonstrating with cannibals would
appear highly paradoxical to them, as Chesterton has pointed
out; but he would only appear paradoxical because cannibals
are wrong in eating human flesh. In just the same way Ches-
terton is paradoxical; that is he preaches doctrines which the
modem world has long ago forgotten. For saying that twice
two are four the drawing-rooms applaud him for his brilliance,
with a rider to the effect that he is unpractical though original.
Gilbert Chesterton had, in Heretics and elsewhere, dealt
vigorously with the philosophy of other writers; but had given
the world little more than the negative side of his own until
Mr. G. S. Street's challenge provoked him to write Orthodoxy.
In this amazingly clever and powerful book Mr. Chesterton
does not really defend any new thesis: all that he does is to
explain how he came to believe in an old one : how, after be-
coming a pagan at twelve and a complete agnostic at sixteen,
he came to find that the various explanations of the universe
upon the ground of pure logic either explained too much or too
little. **The real trouble with this world of ours is not that it is
an unreasonable world, nor even that it is a reasonable world.
The commonest kind of trouble is that it is nearly reasonable,
but not quite. Life is not an illogicality; yet it is a trap for
logicians." . . .
"I never read a line of Christian apologetics. I read as
little as I can of them now. It was Huxley and Herbert Spen-
cer and Bradlaugh who brought me back to orthodox theology.
They sowed in my mind my first wild doubts of doubt.'*
Beginning at the right end with the doctrine of free will,
Chesterton found that most modern arguments were argu-
ments in a circle. They had some logic in support of them,
but it was a maniac's narrow logic, irrefragable within its lim-
1919.] THE CHESTERBELLOC 327
its but unsatisfying. "He understands everything" (so he
writes of Mr. McCabe), "and everything does not seem worth
understanding.*' Everything was bound with the determinist's
chain of causation, and a strict dogmatic veto was set upon
the supernatural; for where the Christian has an elastic sys-
tem which accepts facts with their attendant paradoxes, the
materialist is bound to deny all that does not fit into the rig-
idity of his creed. "The madman is not the man who has lost
his reason. The madman is the man who has lost everything
except his reason."
Very soon, however, Gilbert Chesterton discovered that
reason itself was doubted. Free thought having exhausted
itself sought to break out again in a free-will unbalanced by
reason. The Superman descended upon us with a transcen-
dental doctrine of volition. The test whether a special action
was good or bad was taken away, and action itself was made
the end of being. Faith having failed, reason failed; reason
having failed, morality failed — and the world was tossed about
wildly among the blind gigantic forces, between Nietzsche and
Tolstoy who sit down together "in the land of nothing and
Nirvana. They are both helpless — one because he cannot
grasp anything, and the other because he must not let go of
anything.** Against these tendencies, opposed, but resulting in
an equal deliquescence, the Faith preserved the sanity of men :
"The creeds and the crusades, the hierarchies and the horrible
persecutions were not organized, as is ignorantly said, for the
suppression of reason. They were organized for the difficult
defence of reason. Man, by a blind instinct, knew that if once
things were wildly questioned, reason could be questioned first.
The authority of priests to absolve, the authority of popes to
define, the authority, even of inquisitors, to terrify; these were
all only dark defences erected roimd one central authority,
more undemonstrable, more supernatural than all — the author-
ity of a man to think.**
I have said that there was nothing very original in Mr.
Chesterton's philosophy itself; but there was a striking origin-
ality shown in the method by which he reached it, just as there
is a striking originality shown in his expression of it. Before
G. K. C. could find the Faith, he had to establish for his soul
free-will and for his intellect reason. These came, so we are
assured in all seriousness, through nothing else than fairy
328 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Dec.
tales. "All the terms used in the science books, *law,' *neces-
sity,' *order,' 'tendency,' and so on, are really unintellectual, be-
cause they assume an inner synthesis which we do not possess.
The only words that ever satisfied me as describing Natiu*e are
the terms used in the fairy books, *charm,' *spell,' *enchant-
ment.' They express the arbitrariness of the fact and its mys-
tery."
So vivid was his sense of wonder that he could never be
brought to believe in a clock-work universe, controlled by
necessity. The fact that a thing had happened a thousand
times at most should only lead us to think that its happening
again was probable; the cool logician of fairyland knows
better than to imagine that it must therefore happen again.
There might even be a law of nature — ^but any law could be
broken. The law frequently is broken; that it persists is only
due to the continuous exercise of the divine will. "Because
children have abounding vitality, because they are in spirit
fierce and free, therefore they want things repeated and im-
changed. They always say, *Do it again;' and the grown-up
person does it again until he is nearly dead. For grown-up
people are not strong enough to exult in monotony. But per-
haps God is strong enough to exult in monotony. It is possible
that God says every morning, 'Do it again,' to the sun; and
every evening, *Do it again,' to the moon. It may not be auto-
matic necessity that makes all daisies alike; it may be that God
makes every daisy separately, but has never got tired of mak-
ing them. It may be that He has the eternal appetite of in-
fancy; for we have sinned and grown old, and our Father is
younger than we."
Whatever else this outlook on the world does it certainly
keeps alive in a man the freshness of surprise; and upon such
a willingness to admit the marvelous does good reason depend.
The whole romance of life is contained in the ethics of
Elfland. In all the legends it is the younger son, the despised
and rejected of men, who comes into the kingdom. Neitzsche,
and the coarse moderns, had gloried in making heroes strong;
chivalry in making its heroes feeble. The thrill we have in
beholding the weak things of the world confounding the
mighty, is the daily refreshment of modest people. Time and
time again Mr. Chesterton has preached that the prime neces-
sity of joy is humility.
1919.] THE CHESTERBELLOC 329
There is a more intimate connection between Rome and
romance than the mere sound and derivation of the words.
In the case of Mr. Chesterton, Elfland saved him for Christen-
dom, and, from this central section to the end. Orthodoxy be-
comes gradually but definitely Catholic. Fairy tales had pre-
pared him to accept the improbable; they also helped him to
accept the obvious, the doctrine of original sin, and to declare
it as the basis of all sound and joyous democracy. The fact
that things necessarily improved of themselves as the latter
evolutionists said, is very good reason for leaving things alone.
It was only the man who saw that damnation was likely and
salvation possible, who was likely either to be a revolutionist
or to get to heaven. From men is demanded not merely
strength enough to get on with this world, but strength enough
to get it on. '*Can he hate it enough to change it, and yet love
it enough to think it worth changing? Can he look up at its
colossal good without once feeling acquiescence? Can he look
up at its colossal evil without once feeling despair? Can he,
in short, be at once not only a pessimist and an optimist, but a
fanatical pessimist and a fanatical optimist? Is he enough of a
pagan to die for the world, and enough of a Christian to die
to it?"
Mr. Chesterton's feet have found solid ground and he
knows the path he is following and its end. He has found his
creed and is able confidently to contrast it with other religions.
"Students of popular science, like Mr. Blatchford, are al-
ways insisting that Christianity and Buddhism are very much
alike, especially Buddhism.*' But G. K. C, having appre-
hended the genius of the Faith, denies with violence that the
creeds even faintly resemble one another. The externals of
religion are often similar: their rites may be identical; it is
what they teach that demonstrates their vivid difference.
'This is the intellectual abyss between Buddhism and
Christianity; that for the Buddhist or Theosophist personality
is the fall of man, for the Christian it is the purpose of God,
the whole point of his cosmic idea. The world-soul of the
Theosophists asks man to love it only in order that man may
throw himself into it. But the divine centre of Christianity
actually threw man out of it in order that he might love it
^'According to Himself the Son was a sword separating
brother and brother that they should for an seon hate each
332 THEORIST OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION [Dec.
of elementary schools. Fire, water, earth and gas are the
unconscious shapers of the world. Research as to our final
end and our earthly origin are discouraged, if not forbidden.
Truth is declared to be beyond the reach of the human powers.
The study of the highest ethical problems, the ceaseless efforts
of great minds to solve the mysteries of our inner life are ridi-
culed, as waste of time, the delirium of a starving madman
who throws away a piece of bread or meat. Prayers are pro-
hibited, or scorned. Priests are insulted as slave-dealers
struggling to hold their grip on a credulous and ignorant pro-
letariat. The beautiful hymns of the Orthodox litiu*gy have
been replaced by scurrilous songs deriding the ""long-gowned
priests," and "the monkish dish-lickers." The term itself of
Orthodoxy has been deformed into that of Bezglavie, which
means "headlessness."
Of course, all the details of the fierce persecution of Russian
Christianity are not available at this time. The frontiers of
distracted Russia are closed to the curious eyes of European
wanderers or observers. We are not able to compile the lists
of Russian bishops, priests, monks, and faithful whose death
has been found indispensable to the establishment of the hu-
man brotherhood of which the anti-Christian social reformers
talk so glibly. It is still impossible to count the churches de-
stroyed, pillaged, or desecrated; nor is it yet possible to esti-
mate the extent of the seizure and theft of religious vessels and
movable goods. But the experience of the Russian Church im-
der Bolshevik tyranny recalls the most sanguinary days of the
Church of Christ in the early centuries of our era.
It has been pointed out that the leaders of Russian Bol-
shevism are Jews. It ought, however, to be made clear that its
irreligious and political code has been framed by purely
Russian minds. It would be unjust to say that Russian anarch-
ism, in its attempts to sap the foimdations of doctrinal Chris-
tianity, and to undermine the social institutions resting there-
upon, is the intellectual product of the Jewish intelligentsiia in
Russia. It was outlined in its minutest details by Russian
dreamers, and philosophers, and, strangely enough, even by
those who may rightly be regarded as among the foremost
champions of anti-Semitism. In fact, the father of Russian
anarchism, a religious (or more accurately, irreligious) and
social system that differs from Bolshevism only in name, is
1919.] THEORIST OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION 333
Mikhail Alexandrovitch Bakunin, a genuine Russian, and a
member of the Russian nobility.
A notable revolutionary theorist. Prince Peter Alexieevich
Eropotkin, once wrote that Bakunin was '"a gigantic figure, a
man who gave up everything for the triumph of his revolution-
ary ideal, who lived for it alone, borrowing from his concep-
tions the purest views of life, and who became an inspiration
to those whose lives he touched." ' Kropotkin is a panegyrist
rather than a biographer. His gorgeous epithets are rhetori-
cal tinsel. It may be conceded, however, that Bakunin was a
revolutionary spirit by conviction. His life is the faithful mir-
ror of his theories. For the sake of revolution he gave up his
freedom, his country, his material welfare. He never retracted
his theories. He never flinched from the extreme conclusions
of his social and religious nihilism. In a word, he was the
brain organizing and defining the doctrine of the Russian revo-
lution. The Bolsheviki seized upon his spiritual and intellect-
ual estate, and put into practice the theories formulated by
him. He did not live to witness their destructive power, and
the consequent downfall of Russia, a country he loved in-
tensely, in spite of his imprecations. Perhaps the vision of his
fatherland, broken and bleeding under the Neronian rule of his
disciples, might have modified his views.
Michael Bakunin was born in May, 1814, in the village of
Priamukhino, in the district of Teriok, government of Tver.
He was the oldest of a family of eleven children. His father,
Alexander, had in his youth been a diplomatist, serving as at-
tache at the Russian embassies in Naples and Florence. His
mother belonged also to the Russian nobility, and descended
from the historic family of Miuraviev. The first seeds of revo-
lutionary ideas were sown in the son's heart by his father, a
passionate admirer and disciple of the Dekabrists.
At the age of fifteen, Bakimin entered the Artillery School
of Petrograd, and after three years (1829-1832), was attached
to the service of a battery in the government of Minsk. He
witnessed the Russian military authorities' method of smother-
ing in blood the Polish revolution. The cruelty of repression
filled his heart with hatred and dismay. As soon as possible
(1834) he resigned his conunission and went to Moscow where
he devoted his time to the study of philosophy. He began,
*A. I. Sack, The Birth of the Ruaian Demoeraeg. New York, 1918, pp. 188, 189.
334 THEORIST OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION [Dec.
with juvenile enthusiasm, to study the sensualism of Condillac;
afterwards, the metaphysics of Fichte absorbed his attention.
His first literary exertion was a Russian translation of Einige
Vorlesungen uber die Bestimmung der Gelehrten (1836).
Later, he plunged into the study of the Hegelian transcendent-
alism. In 1836, he published a preface to the Russian transla-
tion of Hegel's Ggmnasialreden. In 1840 appeared the first
portion of an incomplete philosophical treatise.'
He then went to Berlin, mastered German so well, and be-
came so intimately acquainted with German literature, that he
was able to write in German the first of his papers, which ap-
peared in the Deutsche Jahrbiicher (October, 1842).* In this
paper he timidly expressed the fundamental tenet of Russian
nihilism: *The desire or pleasure of destruction is at the
same time a desire or pleasure of creation.'' ' One may see in
this principle a travesty of the well-known axiom of Scholas-
tic philosophy : Corruptio unius est generatio alterius. From
this principle of his, Bakunin necessarily derived the obliga-
tion to overthrow all the social and religious forms of modern
society in order to build on the debris the ideal man or social
organization.
The revolutionary appeals of Bakunin made him suspect
to the Saxon Government, and he was obliged to leave Dres-
den, and to seek refuge, first in Switzerland, then in Belgium
and at last in Paris, where he lived until 1847. Here he met
the two lawgivers of international Socialism, Karl Marx and
Engels, and became acquainted also with Proudhon and
George Sand. As in Germany, Bakunin had felicitated him-
self on being rid of fading beliefs in the immortality of the
soul, so in Paris, in his frequent conversations with Marx, he
stirred the latter's enthusiasm for a political upheaval that
would have led to victory for socialistic aims. At a much later
period, in his autobiographical notes (1871), he said: **Marx
was much more advanced than I was, as he remains today, not
more advanced, but incomparably more learned than I am. I
*Max Nettlau, Michael Bakunin. Bine biographiache Skizze, mil AuszHgen aua
aeinen Schriften und Nachwort von Guatav Landauer, Berlin, 1901, pp. 4, 5. Lektzit
o naxnachenii uchebnykh, Teleakop, Moskva, 1835, vol. xxix., pp. 3-57; O Filotofti,
Otechestvennyia Zapiski, 1840. Petrograd, Ix., sect vl., 53-78.
*Die Reaktion in Deutaehland, Bin Fragment von einem Franzoaen. Deataehe
lahrbUchern, October, 1842, pp. 11-21.
*Die Lust der Zerstdrung ist zugleich eine Schaffende Lust. The German term
Luat means both "desire** and "pleasure."
1919.] THEORIST OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION 335
knew then nothing of political economy. I had not yet rid
myself of metaphysical abstractions, and my Socialism was
only instinctive. He, though younger than I, was already an
atheist, an instructed materialist, a well-considered Socialist.
It was just at this time that he elaborated the first foundations
of his present system. Wesaw each other fairly often. . . .
But there was never any frank intimacy between us. Our tem-
perament would not suffer it. He called me a sentimental
idealist, and he was right; I called him a vain man, perfidious
and crafty, and I also was right." • In other notes of 1870, he
closes the views of Marx that had influenced his mind : *'Marx
states that all the political, religious and juridical evolutions
in history are not the causes, but the consequences of economic
evolutions. The remark is a fecund one, and the discovery of
a brilliant mind. Yet Marx is not the man who revealed it.
Others, before him, had a glimpse of it, or had expressed it
partially. But, Marx may justly claim the honor of having
asserted it strongly, and made it the great basis of his entire
economic system." '
These quotations are evidence that in spite of his bitter
controversies with Marx, Bakunin completed his revolutionary
training under the leader of German Socialism. The last rem-
nants of Slavic mysticism were burnt out by the atheism of
Marx. From Marx, Bakunin derived the leit-motiv of his
socialistic philosophy — the prominent, perhaps one should say,
the exclusive rdle played by the economic motive in the shap-
ing of the religious and political evolution and destiny of man-
kind.
In 1848, Bakunin returned to Germany to take part in the
revolutionary movement in Central Europe. At the risk of his
life, he showed his devotion to his principles. He was ar-
rested and imprisoned in the fortress of Koenigstein January
14, 1850; he was condemned to death, but the death sentence
was commuted to life imprisonment. The Austrian Govern-
ment claimed him, and after a new trial, held on May 15, 1851,
condemned him to be hanged. A new commutation of the
capital sentence took place, but life imprisonment was again
imposed. He had to undergo the full measure of harshness
6 Bertrand Russell. Proposed Roads to Freedom : Socialism, Anarchism and Sgn»
dieallsm. New York, 1919, pp. 38, 39.
* James Golllaume, Michael BakQmUne: notice biographique, (Euvres de Bakou^
nine, toI U. Paris, 1907, p. 1|<
336 THEORIST OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION [Dec.
characteristic of Austrian prisons. In the citadel of Olmiitz, he
was shackled and chained to the wall. His resistance never
yielded, and his hatred for political forms of government in-
tensified.
His prison torture soon terminated. The Russian Govern-
ment claimed him, and, to use his own words, he was placed
"at the mercy of the bear.** He was confined in the fortress of
SS. Peter and Paul, and at the outbreak of the Crimean War
transferred to Schliisselburg. He there endured a long mar-
tyrdom until 1857. His health was shattered. In the loneli-
ness of his dungeon, he tried to enliven his drooping spirit
by dramatizing in his imagination the legend of Prometheus,
chained to a rock on Caucasus by order of the Tsar of
Olympus. One of his letters gives a graphic account of his
sufferings: *'Terrible indeed is the fate of a man condemned
to life imprisonment. His existence is one that has no ideals,
no hopes, no purposes. Every day, at sunrise, I told myself:
*You are becoming besotted. Tomorrow you will sink deeper
in dullness.* This atrocious toothache will last many, many
weeks. It will come back at least twice in a month. I did
not sleep either by day or night. I was unable to do anything.
Reading was even too great an effort to me. In the dead of the
night, my heart, my loins felt the burning voice of a ghost
whispering to my ear : Tou are a slave, you are a corpse.* Yet
I was not disheartened. Were I a religious man, religion
would have stirred within myself the heroic zeal of the mar-
tyrs. But, the wish to reject all the attempts to a reconcilia-
tion never grew weak. My soul kept alive, and burning, and
glowing, the holy fire of revolt.*' * In 1857, Alexander II. con-
sented to give him freedom, or, rather, to allow him to enjoy a
circumscribed freedom in the frozen steppes of Siberia. He
was interned at Tomsk. Here he married a Polish girl, An-
tonia Ewiatkowska. From Tomsk, thanks to the mediation
6f his maternal uncle, Muraviev Amoursky, governor of East-
ttn Siberia, he went to Irkutsk (1859). Th6 resignation of
Muraviev suggested to him a plan of escaping from his place
bf e:itile. His attempt succeeded, and, through Japan, he
reached San Francisco, whence, on October 15, 1861, he wrote
to his friends Herzen and Ogarev : *The astonishing success of
•|». A. Berllni Apo^tolp anarMiii (The AiMsUes of Anarchy). Petrograd, 1917,
pp. 7| 9t
1919.] THEORIST OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION 337
the speculations of the Americans, mostly fruitful, though not
always free from blame, commonplaceness of their material
welfare, impervious to the throb of the human heart, and their
national vanity, that gets pleasure at little expense, have con-
tributed, it seems, to deprave this nation. The hard struggle,
in which they are now entangled, will probably be helpful to
them, inasmuch it will make them find again their lost soul." '
From New York he reached London on October 27, 1861. Here,
he received the most cordial welcome from his old friends,
Herzen and Ogarev.
In Europe he renewed his revolutionary propaganda. As
an ardent Slavophil, he saw in the Polish revolt of 1863, the
first step towards the emancipation of autocratic Russia. His
address to the "Friends of Russia, Poland and the Slavic
World" is a fiery appeal in favor of the overthrow of the auto-
cratic regime. He followed with enthusiasm the success of the
Italian revolution, lived at Naples and Florence till the autumn
of 1867, and corresponded with the pioneers of Italian unity.
A fruit of his literary activity was the foundation of an Italian
paper, Libertate Giustizia, that combated the revolutionary
mysticism of Mazzini. The device of the Mazzinian party,
Dio e popolo, provoked the bitterest gibes from the Russian
atheist.
While in Italy he strove to connect the scattered threads
of the social revolutionary movement into a compact organized
body. A group of internationalists clustered around him. It
embraced French, Italian, Scandinavian, German and Polish
revolutionists. The group was given the name of *The Inter-
national Alliance of Socialistic Democracy." Bakunin himself
drew up its programme, an open profession of religious and
social anarchism: *The Alliance," it reads, ^Meclares itself an
atheistic organization. It aims at the final and complete aboli-
tion of classes, at the political, economic, and social equality
of all individuals of both sexes; it states that the earth, the in-
struments of production, and all capital are the collective prop-
erty of the conmiunity, to be utilized only by the workingmen,
viz., by their agricultural and industrial associations. It holds
the belief that all the political states now existing and founded
upon the principle of authority, are to be melted into them and
with them."
* Correpondcuiet de Michel Bdk0ttnine Lettres d Henen et A OaoMff, par lOehel
DngomanoT. Paris, t$W, p. 123.
▼OL. Gl. 29
338 THEORIST OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION [Dec.
By this programme Bakunin endeavored to alienate the
working masses in Italy from the revolutionary mysticism of
Mazzini. In his Riponse d'un International a Mazzini, pub-
lished in French, in the Liberti of Brussels (August 18 and 19,
1871) he asserted the atheistic character of the socialistic
league."
Bakunin's group affiliated with the International Work-
ingmen*s Association, founded at London in 1861. The en-
tente, however, between the extreme Socialists headed by
Bakunin and the moderate Internationalists, led by Karl
Marx, was short-lived. It was followed by a violent campaign
of mutual defamation, which weakened the initial strength of
the "Internationale."
In 1870, Bakunin retired to Switzerland and devoted more
time to literary work. Some of the most complete of his writ-
ings, especially his "L'Empire knouto-Germanique et la Rivo-
lution Sociale, a fiery invective against Teutonism, its culture
and policy, was written at Lucerne. The struggles with Marx,
the invitation of the Russian youth to the overthrow of Tsar-
ism, the organization of the socialistic forces throughout
Europe absorbed his last energies. Bereft of resources, he
could support himself and his family only through the generos-
ity of his brothers living in Russia, and of devoted friends. He
died at Berne, July 1, 1876. Before his death, conversing with
his intimate friend, Alexander Reichel, he admitted the bank-
ruptcy of modem philosophy. "Our philosophical vagaries,"
he said, "culminate either in the conception of an intangible
happiness, built of clouds, or in a desperate pessimism." "
Bakunin is, so to speak, the architect of Russian anarchism.
He traced its master lines, he laid the main foundations. This
x« (Euvres, vol. vl. Paris, 1913, pp. 122, 123.
^The most complete biographical source of Bakounin is the four volumes of
Bakounin's life, written in German by Max Ncttlau: Michael Bakanin: Etne Biogra-
phie (London, 1896-1900). This monumental work was not printed, but only multi-
graphed to the number of fifty copies, which were sent to the most famous libraries
of the world. See also: Mikhail A, Bakunin: biograflcheakii oeherk, in Byloe, Petro-
grad, 1906, n. 8, pp. 228-254; Bakounlne, VhiMtotre de ma vie, Paris, 1898; A. Herzen,
Michel Bakounine, Revue politique et littiraire, Paris, 1908, s^rle v, vol x., pp. 491-
495; Max Nettlau, Bakunin und die rusaiehe revolutiondre Bewegung in den lahren
1868-1873, in Arehiv ftkr die Geschichte dea Soeialiamn* und der Arbeiterbewegung,
Leipzig, 1914, vol. v., pp. 357-422; A. A. Komllov, Molodge gody Miklaila Bakunina:
ix istorii russkago romantizmcLt (The Youth of M. Bakunin: some pages from the
history of Russian romanticism), Moscow, 1915; H. Seymour, Michael Bakunin: a
{biographical aketch, London, 1888; A. J. Sack, op. eit., pp. 171-186; B. Russell, op.
'Cit.9 pp. 32-55. S. A. Vengerov, Istoricheskii slovar russklkh piaatelei: istochniki
(msjtorlo J>Xc\Xojxuy of Russian Writers). Petrograd, vol. 1., 1900, p. 149.
1919.] THEORIST OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION 339
system was constructed to rule the spiritual powers of man,
and to regulate his social activities. On one side it protests
against the ceaseless yearnings of the human soul towards
the sunlit heights of mysticism; on the other, it proclaims the
end of those civil institutions that were ever regarded as the
bulwark of the social order. The anarchism of Bakunin is a
virulent attack against both Church and State. God is the
master tyrant to be interned in His fabulous Eden, and kings
are His satellites, who follow the tyrannical policy of their
divine leader. It is both a religious and social anarchism; it
presents a double face to its observer.
Alexander Herzen has justly remarked that the Slavic
genius is rather initial than perfective. Foreign influences
determine its development." The anarchistic philosophy of
Bakunin is the result of his intellectual training, and his teach-
ers have not been Russian. His mind showed a plastic recep-
tivity to the influence of both Germany and France. The ex-
tremes to which he developed these impressions into a system
is perhaps indicative of his genuinely Slavic origin. Herzen
once wrote : *^ith us, thought, knowledge, conviction, dogma
do not remain in a state of theory and abstraction. They do
not confine themselves within the narrowness of an academic
session, or conceal themselves in the bookcase of a scholar, in a
jail. The exact opposite is what takes place. They break their
chains, and precipitately, without reaching maturity, pervade
the public life and, as it were, with their feet bound, they jump
over the vestibule to the extreme corner of the arena." "
From a religious point of view, the anarchism of Bakunin
is rooted in the Hegelian philosophy of the identity of think-
ing and being, and may be looked upon as the final develop-
ment of the religious conceptions of Feuerbach. A German
writer, who professes an easily conceivable hatred against
Bakunin, the satyrist of Teutonism, was right in asserting that
the origin of what the Russian anarchist calls his system can
be traced to the time of his sojourn on German soil.'" Religious
anarchism is the extreme logical consequence of the Hegelian
philosophy of religion. Feuerbach carried out Hegel's philo-
^Dn diueloppement des (dies riDolutionnaires en Rusaie. Londres, 1853, p. 19.
"Herzen, Kolokol: izbrannuia atatl (The Bell: Selected Papers). In Russian.
Genera, 1S87, p. 719.
^Michael Bakunin nnd der Radicalismus, Deutsche Rundschau, Berlin, 1877,
Tol. zil., p. 232.
340 THEORIST OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION [Dec
sophical concepts to their logical conclusion* and in his strong
criticism of his master, proves that the final conclusion of
Hegelianism is unadulterated materialism. In fact, the whole
kernel of the religious philosophy of Feuerbach may be ex-
pressed in his famous saying that ''the personality of God is
nothing else than the projected personality of man.*' " Feuer-
bach, however, though not an orthodox Hegelian, in his mater-
ialistic conception of religion, and theoretical atheism, dared
not to apply his religious nihilism to social life.'* The task of
working out to the fullest degree the practical consequences
of Hegel's thought, was assumed by the leaders of German
Socialism, by Marx and Engels. They held that atheism ought
to be the leaven of a society delivered *f rom the idealistic frip-
pery of religion."
But German Socialists, in expounding the materialistic
conceptions of social life, hesitated to advocate violence for
the contemplated atheistic reconstruction of society. What
it dared not undertake, Bakunin took up with the zeal of
apostleship. He declared not only that atheism will be the
organizing power of a reconstructed kind, but that violence
and rebellion are the instruments of its conquests."
According to Bakunin, philosophic idealism culminates in
the denial of the existence of a personal God, or in the idea
of God as an abstract and metaphysical being. The final evo-
lution of philosophic thought marks the exaltation of matter
and the humiliation of spirit. "Everywhere, in short, reUgious
or philosophical idealism, the one being but the more or less
free translation of the other, serves today as the flag of ma-
terial, bloody, and brutal force, of shameless material exploit-
ation; while, on the contrary, the flag of theoretical material-
ism, the red flag of economic equality and social justice, is
raised by the practical idealism of the oppressed and famish-
ing masses, tending to realize the greatest liberty and the
human right of each in the fraternity of all men on earth." "
In the same work, God and the State, Bakunin gives vent
to his bitter hatred against God and every form of religion.
For him, 'The idealistic abstraction, God, is a corrosive poison,
" D(u Wesen des Christentums, Sdmmiliche Werke, vol. vi., Stuttgart, 1903, p. 273.
16 F. lodl, Ludwig Feuerbach, Stuttgart, 1904, pp. 3. 4.
" See B. Bfalon, L' Internationale in La Nouuelle Reuue. Paris, vl., ann^e, toL
zzYi., p. 753.
^ God and the State, New York, s. d., p. 47.
1919.] THEORIST OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION 341
>n>
which destroys and decomposes life, falsifies and kills it.
Belief in God is an offspring of the root of all the absurdities
that torment the world." Religion is the nursery of all crimes,
the bacillus of the contagious diseases that infect the social
body. "Christianity is precisely the religion par excellence^ be-
cause it exhibits and manifests, to the fullest extent, the very
nature and essence of every religious system, which is the im-
poverishment, enslavement, and annihilation of humanity for
the benefit of divinity.** "
Christianity, however, is not a compact body. It ramifies
into the great branches. Orthodoxy, Catholicism, and Protest-
antism. The national Church of Russia does not stir the satyr-
ical mind of Bakunin. He agrees with Herzen, that the Byzan-
tino-Moscovite Christianity neither civilized nor emancipated
those within its jurisdiction.
With regard to Catholicism, Bakunin renders justice to the
sanctity of its ideals, while scorning its priesthood. ^'What is
there more sublime, in the ideal sense, more disinterested,
more separate from all the interests of this earth, than the doc-
trine of Christ preached by the Catholic Church? And what
is there more brutally materialistic than the constant practice
of the same Church, since the eighth century.** " All the Chris-
tian Churches when compared with the Roman Catholic
Church are bankrupt.*' "
Protestantism is frankly disliked by Bakunin as the bour-
geois religion par excellence. "It accords just as much liberty
as is necessary to the bourgeois, and finds a way of reconciling
celestial aspirations with the respect which terrestrial condi-
tions demand.*' **
Since no form of Christianity is fitted for the social and
moral betterment of man, the war against it, and generally
against God, or the idea of God is a social and moral necessity.
Man's human history is the history of his development
by rebellion and by thought Both these weapons of his
humanized being, are the characteristics of Satan." By Satan
man becomes free; by God, he chains himself to slavery.
"Perfection consists in the progressive negation of the
primitive animality of man by the development of his human-
ity. Man, a wild beast, cousin of the gorilla, has emerged from
» Ibid,, p. 64. *» Ibid,, p. 22. " Ibid., p. 24. « Ibid,, p. 45.
* (Envres, vol. i., p. 226. ** God and the State, p. 46. >• Ibid., p. 10.
342 THEORIST OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION [Dec.
the profound darkness of animal instinct into the light of mind»
which explains in a wholly natural way all his past mistakes
and partially consoles us for his present errors. He has
emerged from animal slavery, and passing through divine
slavery, a temporary condition between his animality and his
humanity, he is now marching on to the conquest and realiza-
tion of human liberty." *•
But if irreligion is the granitic pillar of social progress,
why do men, and especially the proletariat, prefer religious
fetters and the divine slavery to a godless emancipation? Ac-
cording to Bakunin, the proletariat is the victim of two great
dark powers, the political and the sacerdotal, that is of the
governments and the priesthood. Oppression, poverty, ignor-
ance act as narcotics upon them.*^
Such were the theories of Bakunin's religious anarchism.
They are invoked and developed to justify his scheme of social
reforms. If religion hampers the free play of human energies,
its abolition is a social requirement. Religious despotism, be-
ing the stool of political tyranny, deserves to be wiped out from
the civilized world." Theology is an anachronism. It ought to
disappear. Its gravestone is being carved by Positivism.
Jesus Christ must sink in His grave. "Our Christ," writes
Bakunin, "differs from the Protestant and Christian Christ in
this, that the latter is a personal being, ours impersonal; the
Christian Christ, already completed in an eternal past, presents
himself as a perfect being, while the completion and perfec-
tion of our Christ, science, are ever in the future; which is
equivalent to saying that they will never be realized." " The
battle to be fought in the name of progress resolves itself, in-
deed, into an everlasting duel between God and man. All
priests, except of those that have been burnt by the fire of per-
secution, have been the natural allies of all the tyrants."
The logical consequences of the theories of Bakunin are
that atheism and materialism express the truth." He could not
conceive the divine omnipotence as creating a man capable of
determining himself for good or evil. God was to him a phan-
tom, the absolute vacuum, a metaphyi^ical abstraction, the
moral and inmioral cause of all slaveries." By the denial of
26 Ibid,, p. 31. 27 Ibid., p. 16.
28 (Euvres, vol. x., p. 303. 20 God and the State, p. 34.
^ FideTalisme, aocialisme et antithiologisme. CEuvres, vol. 1., pp. 67, 68.
^ CEuures, vol. 111., p. 296. ^ (Euvres, vol. v., p. 321.
1919.] THEORIST OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION 343
the existence of God, Bakunin was logically forced to deny
free will and a soul separated and separable from the body.
The religious anarchism of Bakunin spread among Russian
revolutionists hatred of God and His Incarnate Son. The songs
of Russian Socialists are saturated with it.
We need scarcely observe that all the above mentioned
grievances against Christianity are precisely its titles of glory,
the jewels of its crown. Christian idealism, an idealism spring-
ing from the most perfect Man Who ever conversed with men,
the Incarnate Son of God, has trained legions of true supermen.
It is an idealism embodying the most sublime and beneficent
yearnings of the human heart. The product of Christian
idealism is that social reform to which we owe the abolition of
slavery, the consciousness of our human dignity, the exaltation
of woman, the end of despotism, the civilizing of barbarians,
the defence of the weak against the strong and violent.
Atheistic revolutionary Socialism has undergone the or-
deal of fire. In Russia the brotherhood of anarchism has re-
placed private property with robbery, violence, and brigan-
dage. Men who promised to improve the social conditions
of the working masses have reduced them to despair, to star-
vation, to brutishness. They talk of freedom, of full respect
for the rights of individuals. In fact, they strangle the most
sacred liberties of their fellow-men, and murder those who
do not accept their words as their rule of life, or dare to keep
alive in their hearts the inextinguishable flame of the love of
God and of faith in His divine Son.
It has been clearly shown by the history of the revolu-
tionary movement that material egotism is at the bottom and
in the heart of all socialistic upheavals. And in the stern
combat between Christian idealism and materialistic atheism,
there shines forth in all its historical truth,' the saying of Mon-
tesquieu : ^'Christianity, that is, the religion of suffering, sacri-
fice, and mortification, is also the religion assuring the great-
est human happiness on earth."
CHRISTMAS IN THE RIO GRANDE COUNTRY.
BY MARGARET B. DOWNING
IENORA lives in a secluded village around which
the footliills of a great range of the Rockies rear
defending walls against the storms of the higher
regions and the restlessness of the world beyond.
Her house is square and adobe at the edge of the
tiny city, and her land extends from the mud road magnifi-
cently outlined on the urban map as Avenue Don Diego de
Vargas across the hills to the river. This historic stream, the
Rio Grande, might be considered merely lithographical at
Seiiora's crossing, but she owns the grist-mill five miles north
and has held immemorial water rights which add immense
value to her ranchito.
There are acres of apricot, plum and small sweet Mexican
apple trees which were in full bearing before the treaty of
Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed, and which have yielded an
ample annual crop ever since, despite that disturbing instru-
ment. There are acres of wheat and com, generous spaces
given to vegetables and herbs and the corral sweeps up the
sandy hill witli a shelter of sage and mesquite, where a burro,
a cow, several sheep and swine, and many plump and depend-
able fowl spend busy, noisy hours. Sefiora lives on the pro-
duce of her land as her fathers have done for many hundred
years before. They crossed the Rio Grande with Onate in 1598,
and like them, she exchanges her fine flour and meal, excellent
and sound fruit and vegetables for such staples of food and
clothing as she may desire. She sells the surplus and divides
her income into three equal parts; the first goes to the bank,
the second to the church and to charity, and the third for her
own pleasure and comfort and that of her family. And, a strong
stake IB th« future of the Rio Grande country, Seftoras are
multiplied ia the many villas as the Mexicaa, aid and new,
calls the lessea- townships, which are not yet affected by the
poison which enters the soul with steam, electricity and petrol.
Days tread on each other's heels in Seiiora's domain utter-
ly lacking that much heralded quality of the sand country.
1919.] CHRISTMAS IN THE RIO GRANDE COUNTRY 345
somnolence and silence, for the Senora goes about the house
all morning in a perfect fury of cleaning, closely followed by
the Indian maid, Incamacion, and in the corral the aged serv-
itor Jose drives everything before him like a whirlwind. The
hens and other live things of the barnyard make as much noise
and work as industriously as though they were in New Eng-
land. The unquenchable sunshine is here, as described in that
popular book. Sunshine, Silence and Adobe, and there are
miles of sun dried brick within sight, made into comfortable
dwellings called placitas, like Senora's.
This indomitable woman's home was built by her grand-
father, the miller, in 1735, and it is evident that life in his days
radiated from the kitchen and the corral, as indeed it con-
tinues to do at the present The kitchen is on the southern end
of the square and is sixty feet long and about forty wide, with
a fireplace as roomy as the ordinary bed chamber. A veranda
of equal proportions gives on the corral, and in former days
the sheep shearers came to the placita and the Indians
pounded the com into meal and ground the pepper into the
fine aromatic chili powder. Senora keeps only a few sheep
now, and the great flock is in charge of her oldest son at the
ranch by the mill.
Those are grand occasions when Senora overlooks her
charges and selects the victims for the feasts of December, and
this may be reckoned the first step in the elaborate prepara-
tions. All of December is, in a way, a preparation for Christ-
mas along the Rio Grande, for midway in Advent, as mi-
carime in the longer season of penance, comes that beloved
fiesta of the Mexican, the twelfth, the day given over to honor
the vision of Our Lady of Guadalupe to the poor savage. In
the mellow days when Indian summer is waning, Senora*s
porch is decked with garlands of vivid peppers awaiting the
time until they are dry enough for the mill, interspersed with
glistening strings of garlic and onions. Great ollas — earthen-
ware receptacles which, on the Rio Grande, are baskets and
barrels combined — ^brimming over with frijoles, stand sentinel-
like under the arches. Then comes Trinidad the head shep-
herd, with his master Senor Amado, and they spend hours in-
specting the small flock in the corral before finally marking
two lambs for destruction and driving them into a waiting
stockade.
346 CHRISTMAS IN THE RIO GRANDE COUNTRY [Dec.
There are chickens, turkies, ducks, and geese, even de-
mure guinea hens and an arrogant peacock in prime condi-
tion for the oven, though naturally the Mexicans do not often
slay the bird of the gorgeous tail but only his wives. Those
of Mexican blood, as their ancestors centuries ago in Spain,
may relish all such fancy dishes as fowl on the side or for any
inferior occasion, but on great days, such as favorite feasts
of Our Lady and at Nativity, the mainstay of the banquet is
the backbone of a lamb cut with about five inches of flesh on
each side, then again chopped into pieces and simmered for
hours over a slow fire with much garlic and chili, and herbs
without number. To this end the lambs in the stockade re-
ceive the tenderest attention for weeks before the holocaust,
one for Guadalupe day, one for Christmas. Other preparations
go forward. Although the meal, which is used daily, is ground
at the mill, for such great fiestas as December twelfth and
twenty-fifth, skilled Indian women come down from San Juan
and pound corn for hours in a mammoth wooden bowl and be-
times stir and turn the drying grapes, and the latest crops of
prunes and apricots.
All the zeal is not confined to the culinary department.
Senora's grandfather, in placing the kitchen and store rooms
in the southwest ends of the placita, left rather darkened
spaces for living and sleeping apartments. But there is no
room without a lamp burning before a picture or statue in the
dim recesses where the light from the court gets small ingress
through the tiny windows. In the salon on the north side,
fronting on the Avenue, named for the reconquistadore, there
is a large painting of the vision of Guadalupe, the work of an
untrained Indian employed at the mill under its original pro-
prietor. It is a wonderful production, but quite as worthy as
many of the futurist and other freakish efforts. Not even in
the desert are the skies so fearfully indigo or the sage so
bristling and gaudy. The Holy Virgin looks ferocious, yet
the legend of Guadalupe paints her as fair a vision and as
tender a mother as mortals could behold. Senora, however,
sees none of these artistic defects, nor is she aggrieved that
the robe instead of being of celestial blue is of tropical violence
in red, yellow and purple.
The painting is on the wall over the wide fireplace where
the fragrant pinon branches blaze in the evenings even through
1919.] CHRISTMAS IN THE RIO GRANDE COUNTRY 347
the summer, and it covers full five feet of space measured each
way. About the halo, which is painted the deepest orange,
Senora has arranged a row of lamps in brackets and alternate
shades of white and blue. With the opening of December
every twilight when her family and guests gather in the draw-
ing-room for a cup of chocolate and some tortillas^ the hard
brittle biscuits — a combined cake and cracker common in the
Mexican countries — the lamps are lighted. There are at least
six other lamps on the mantle below the picture which bmn all
day, and Senora uses only the sweetest and purest of olive oil
for her votive oflferings. She makes shift with poorer quality
for her salad, reluctantly it is true, but for her lamps will have
none but the best.
In other rooms additional lights twinkle. Each room has
its precious memories, naturally since one hundred and eighty-
five years have elapsed since the good miller, Juan Ortiz, sus-
pended from the crane in the kitchen the massive iron pot
which had crossed the Rio Grande with Onate. A tremendous
history has this homely vessel which Senora can recite with
spirit; how it was buried in the orchard when the Juan Ortiz of
his day fled with the Spanish settlers from the maddened and
revolting pueblos of 1680 along the Rio Grande to the border.
There they encamped on the Texas side for more than ten
years until the reconqueror, De Vargas, led his victorious army
back. Then Ortiz dug up his treasures and his son removed
upward to the secluded valley, where he built his mill and laid
the foundation of the family fortunes in the thousands of
acres in the sheep country to which he was given title.
But Senora's Ortizes married Ortegas and Oterminas and
Ojedas, until her relatives have as many 0*s in their names as
the descendants of Irish kings. They have been born and they
have died in each of the dark chambers of the old placita, and
the daily progress of the present chatelaine is prayerfully in-
terrupted each morning as she makes her way through each.
For she pauses before the light and kneels a moment, seeing
no doubt some child struggling into life, then going forth;
some aged relative going peacefully and thankfully to sleep;
or the youthful and hopeful struck down in their vigor. A
lamp bums in the great kitchen, for a young brother of the
Senora thrown from a horse in the corral and brought in to
breathe his last before the fire. Often the Senora pauses be-
348 CHRISTMAS IN THE RIO GRANDE COUNTRY [Dec.
fore the yawning fireplace, and gazing at the light takes out
her beads and prays for a moment before continuing her
tasks.
In December rumors begin to grow of the plays for which
the padre is training young men of the village, ancient miracle
plays brought into the land by the good Franciscans. Formerly
many were performed, and were the delight of these shut-in
lives. Only two survive now, except in centres where archaeol-
ogists take pains for their revival — The Vision of Our Lady of
Guadalupe and Natividad. However, Natividad is per-
formed on the eve of Guadalupe, and the Vision is a part of
the routine of Christmas Eve. Senora explains that the padre
likes it so, and she too thinks this best, for acting is only acting
and should not come so near the fiesta, which is the real thing.
Senor Amado on the day the lambs were selected, confided
that in his family December 12th is kept in the most elaborate
manner, for his mother is Guadalupe, and his youngest sister,
who will come all the way from El Paso, is also Guadalupe,
and she has a daughter bearing the same name, and there are
other granddaughters and nieces and great-granddaughters,
and great-nieces who bear the name. It was a bewildering re-
cital.
In the first week of December came Senora Maria Guada-
lupe or as she is known in the United States, her mother told
me, in her home in Denver, Mrs. Karl Adolf Webber, and her
two daughters, all she has left under the roof tree of her five
children. A daughter is married in El Paso, another is a nurse
in a hospital in St. Louis, a son is in France. Senora speaks
of all regions outside those which passed from Mexico after
the war of the "roaring forties" as the United States, but she
never names the political jurisdiction under which she is now
governed. Not that she resents the change. It is only a habit
contracted from her father, who fought against Phil Kearney.
Such cooking, cleaning and upturning as mark the days
immediately preceding December 12th! One of Senora*s six
sons is an Indian agent, and he has sent her from time to time
exquisite blankets and rugs. These are taken from cedar
chests, aired and hung up all over the placita, until the bal-
conies and porches look like a bit of the Grand Canal when
the Doge went down to wed the Adriatic. Sons and daughters
arrive from distant parts. Those with wives, daughters or
1919.] CHRISTMAS IN THE RIO GRANDE COUNTRY 349
daughters-in-law bearing the name of Guadalupe are domiciled
with Senora. Others go down to the larger and more modem
house of Senor Amado at the mill. On the afternoon of the
eleventh all the Guadalupes, including the venerable head of
the family, journey across the hills to the mission where an
aged Franciscan is in residence. Twice a month only does he
come to the village, for his is a wide parish covering half of a
large county.
Only the Guadalupes go to confession and to Holy Com-
munion at the High Mass said on the morrow. Such is the
custom, all other members of the family will attend to this
pious duty on Sunday. It was easy to discover why, when
Senora, looking superb in her best black silk, her mantilla
with the longest fringe, her fan of scarlet and gold and at least
three-quarters of a yard long, drove off with at least a dozen
lesser Guadalupes. All the other members rushed about set-
ting a long table in the kitchen, which was re-furbished with
rugs and dazzling copper kettles and pans, huge tubs of ger-
anium and cascades of ferns, and comfortable chairs from the
living room. Every dainty conceivable was set forth, for the
religious ceremony would last until almost noon, and the
luncheon hour would then be at hand.
The savory dish of lamb was filling the air with odors
which whetted the appetite. Beautiful hothouse flowers had
come by express from Denver and the second daughter, who
was Maria Estifania and hence would have a great feast at
Twelfth Night, deftly decked the table in clusters of roses and
lent an air of enchantment to the dark recesses beyond the fire-
place. A smaller picture of Our Lady of Guadalupe Was
placed on an overhanging shelf. Myriads of lights twinkled all
around, and tall wax candles were on the table ready for the
lighting at a signal from old Jos^, who was watching the road
from the church.
The signal is given, the lights are lit, the dish of lamb
steams at the head of the table, and a dozen other big dishes
are ranged in proper order when Senora leads the procession
into the banquet hall. Then Amado, her eldest bom, takes
her hand and raises it to his lips and kneels before her, saying
in rich, quivering tones : "Our Mother, bless us, on your name
day." Everyone kneels, and the dear old lady goes from one
to the other laying her hand in blessing on each head until she
350 CHRISTMAS IN THE RIO GRANDE COUNTRY [Dec.
comes to the very youngest Guadalupe, a great-grandchild of
seven years, who this momentous morning has received the
dear Son of her Lady patron for the first time. The white-
haired, aged woman gathers the radiant little cherub in her
arms, and caresses her.
"You must bless me, my dearest little one, my Lupita, on
the day of your First Communion and you must bless us all,"
and holding the child, she tells her to make the sign of the
Cross and to say after her, "I bless you all, my dear ones, and
may our dearest Lord and Our Lady of Guadalupe have us
always in their tender care."
The feast lasted until late afternoon, for long lines of re-
tainers began to drop in and receive bountiful gifts from the
table. When the banquet was finally declared over, Senora
was borne in state to the salon where. Our Lady of Guadalupe
smiled down from a throne resplendent with lights and flow-
ers. Just before dark, the Archbishop called with his cure and
the aged missioner who had been a friend of Senora*s youth.
There had been a reception at the Convent in the mountains
and the prelate had been celebrant. All partook most guarded-
ly of the excellent fare set forth on a table in the drawing-room,
for similar celebrations were going forward in dozens of other
homes at which they must call, and the hereafter of rich, spiced
Mexican dishes of state evidently possessed terrors.
The Archbishop discussed amiably the miracle play of the
Natividad which he and we and all the mountain side had seen
the night previous. There had been some amusing anachron-
isms, such as the shepherds putting the Evil One to flight with
a crucifix on the night when the angels were singing Gloria in
Excelsis Deo. The miracle plays of the Southwest were of
lighter textiure, explained the prelate, than the average survival
of the ages of Faith, and no critical estimate was possible.
The people had performed them and had grown familiar with
the parts long before critics began their destructive work. Any
attempt to change or improve would destroy their reverent
feelings. He had taken part in one as a boy and would be
reluctant to cast doubt on the ability of the shepherds to fore-
see on the night of the Holy Birth, the power which the Cross
was to have over evil. It was a weary, happy assortment of
Guadalupes that gathered under Our Lady's picture that night
and recited the prayer in her honor. Then, one by one.
1919.] CHRISTMAS IN THE RIO GRANDE COUNTRY 351
Senora extinguished the lights which had been gleaming about
her through ten days previous.
For a day or two there is a lull. Then the great prepara-
tions begin anew. Senora considers Christmas only in the light
of a solemn, religious feast and all her gifts are in the natiure
of charity. She has a grand dinner and the second lamb
dressed in the traditional way — as necessary a part of the din-
ner as the stuffed eel is in Italy. Certain fowl are divided and
fed riotously, packages of wheat and corn are tied up, and
little bags of dried fruit are marked and put away. Boxes of
clothing are arranged, some sent off by the mail cart, others
tied on the burro's back and taken over the hills. On the
mantle under Our Lady of Guadalupe, a prominent place is
given to St. Stephen, for he was the name saint of the Senora's
dead brother. San Juan di Baptisto, the name par excellence in
her family, has several shrines, all well illuminated. Good
St. Joseph receives great honor to the joy of the old stableman
who comes in several times a day and kneels before him
devoutly.
Senora tells that every Christmas Eve, for sixty years with-
out fail, save for those interruptions which will come with the
rearing of eleven children, she has attended the miracle play of
'The Vision," and she tells of various actors, long since dead,
with a gusto which recalls the boulevardier's memories of
Booth, Irving and Rachel. *The Vision" fills all her need for
histrionic relaxation, in fact, except for the dramas performed
when she was at the Convent in Mexico and when her children
and grandchildren attended various schools adjacent, she has
seen no other plays save these simple pastorals of the padres.
Possessing a quick mind she can repeat every line of *The
Vision," and the actual performance is rendered more enjoy-
able by her spirited renditions in advance.
The poor Indian is making his way over the cactus-strewn
waste towards the city, when he hears the voice and sees the
vision. His delight, as expressed by the actor, was excellent,
though he chuckled and laughed more than the red man does
in ordinary intercourse. But as Senora severely pointed out,
none of us have ever seen an Indian after he had seen our
Blessed Lady. The vision commands him to go to the Arch-
bishop and tell that it is the pleasure of the Queen of Heaven
that a shrine be built on that spot in her honor. The words
352 CHRISTMAS IN THE RIO GRANDE COUNTRY [Dec.
are simple and direct, and Indian-like the bearer of the heav-
enly mandate repeats it over and over in the selfsame tone.
The Archbishop is haughty and is garbed in a tight micomf ort-
able-looking cassock of a dreadful hue of purple, and his
biretta of red is perched rather coquettishly on the side. He
kneels through the entire play, some two hours, and reads out
of one of the largest books imaginable. He never lifts his eyes
when his servitor conveys the message, dismisses him with a
frown and reads, reads, reads. The Indian, fortified by the
thought that he advances the heavenly pleasure, refuses to
accept the Archbishop's dismissal, insists so bravely on seeing
him that, finally, he is scourged away.
He goes back disconsolate and without awaiting for the
appearance of the vision begins a loud complaint, and displays
his bruises and stripes. Our Lady comforts him and sends him
back, tells him he must see the Archbishop and deliver her
message. The poor Indian is in a panic and he acts it very well,
too. The sacristan now takes a hand and appears before the
prelate, and in a loud voice tells him he must hear a message
from heaven. The Archbishop seems quite skeptical that
heaven would pass him by and select an ignorant Indian. He
is convinced that Our Lady, if she had affairs of importance,
would consult with him personally, all the time he reads his
great book. The sacristan, who is uneasy and sees a shining
in the countenance of the messenger, craves leave to produce
him. This he does, by means of an undignified push which
sends the poor messenger headlong into the episcopal prie-
dieu. The Archbishop is arrested by the glowing countenance,
but shows caution at first. He tells the Indian, if indeed he
comes from the Queen of Heaven, he, the Archbishop, her faith-
ful servant, asks a sign that he may know she has sent him, and
not an evil power. Back goes the Indian, Our Lady is waiting
for him, and merely nods to him to gather some roses which
have miraculously begun to bloom on the cactus bushes and to
take them to the skeptical prelate. When the Indian is admitted
he opens his blouse to show the roses, when lo, instead of the
mystic flowers painted on the coarse cotton fabric, is the wond*
rous picture enshrined in the great church at Guadalupe, which
the Archbishop began at once to erect.
There are long waits, filled in with songs which sound
cxoUc *The Holy City" and "Holy Night," but that lovely old
1919.] CHRISTMAS IN THE RIO GRANDE COUNTRY 353
hymn of the Andalusians, ""Natividad," is sung also, and most
plaintively by a young mountaineer who has been attending
the Christian Brothers* College. Between the waits, Senora
sketches in some of the history of the old play, and she repeats
what her friend the Archbishop, not the dignified visitor
on the stage, but the courteous visitor of her name-day had
once told her, that this is the one miracle play which is of
American origin, that is North American, since the event
happened in Mexico nearly four centuries ago, and that it has
been performed continuously in the Rio Grande country, with
few interruptions, for more than two hundred years. An added
reason for enjoyment and the reverence which steals over the
heart in the presence of something anointed with precious
and holy associations.
It may be, as critics have said, that The Vision of Our Lady
of Guadalupe as literature, is more worthless than the sing-
song of child rhymes, but the words have stirred the simple
savage and the sturdy pioneer of the Rio Grande to efforts
towards higher things, and opened a way of escape from the
deadly influence of the desert into the mystic realms where
heaven pities the anguish of earth and stoops to alleviate it.
Everyone in the village, everyone from about the foothills
and the mountains who can borrow, beg or hire a team, comes
to the play. The old hall where it is enacted is crowded to the
porch and beyond into the streets. Custom makes nine-thirty
the hour, and indeed few of the homekeepers are at leisure
before that time. Senora, and many of her daughters, grand-
daughters and domestics have stood for long hours in the
kitchen, through the morning and afternoon receiving Indians
who rent her land, the families of the men employed at the
mill and on the ranch, giving to all chocolate and tortillas.
All went forth currying fat bundles and frequently a squirming
live f owL
While the glorious vision of Our Lady yet lingers on the
homely stage, the choristers from the church begin to sing
the Adeste Fideles, for midnight is close at hand. The entire
community goes from the play to the church nearby, singing
the old hymn as they plod along. The streets are cluttered, and
Amado, who is guiding his mother, complains of the sloth of
the council. But everyone is happy and good natured, and
files into the church to the resounding strains of the Gloria.
▼OL. ex. 23
354 THE FIRST CHRISTMAS [Dec.
The aged missioner sings a High Mass and preaches a sermon
of generous length, first in Spanish and then in English, for
even this peaceful valley is filling with the people from the
United States, as Senora calls them. Three o'clock peals from
the church tower before the last strain of the Christmas hjrnm
invites the congregation homeward.
The snow is falling as we come from the midnight Mass»
spreading a misty veil over the refuse of the streets, over the
jumbled vehicles, rude and elegant, over the concourse of peo«
pie, and it seems clear to us all that, even so, has the mantle
of God's love covered up all the years which have gone before,
and that the records of our lives are made white and shining.
The aged and toil-worn padre, fifty years amongst these of the
simple faith, has climbed the high balustrade against the main
entrance and greets the crowd as it pours from the church.
""Happy Christmas, my people, for as many as have re-*
ceived Him to them He gave power to be made the Sons of God I
Happy Christmas, my people, sons of God, aye and His daugh-
ters.'*
THE FIRST CHRISTBIAS.
BY CAROLINE GILTINAN.
Mother of the Baby God
Born in wondrous way.
Now His tiny, fumbling hands
On thy face will stray.
One searching so thine eyes may touch
He must not find them wet!
Mother of the Baby God.
For this one day — ^forget!
CAPITALISM AND CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY.
BY ANTHONY J. BECK.
APITALISM is defined by Henry Somerville as
""the system of society in which the means of
production, land and capital, are privately owned
by a relatively small section of the community,
while the majority of the people depend for
their livelihood upon working as wage-earners for the owners
of capital.^ Other social students see the chief characteristic
of Capitalism in the systematic use of property for profit and
purposes of income.' Capital dates back into the mists of an-
tiquity to the home of the man who first undertook to use part
of his money or property for the production of more wealth.
But Capitalism was born after the close of the Middle Ages.
Its principal causes were the so-called Industrial Revolution
and the liberalistic, individualistic system of political economy
engendered by the religious revolution of the sixteenth cen-
tury.
From the writings (e. g.. Opus Maius) and scientific re-
searches of Roger Bacon, a Franciscan monk who lived in the
thirteenth century, it appears that epoch-making inventions
would have revolutionized commerce and industry long before
the eighteenth century, had not the religious upheaval of the
sixteenth century, and resulting wars, disturbed the regular
progress of industry. Having been put off for more than a cen-
tury, these technical triumphs coincided with the proclaiming
of the liberalistic Manchester system of political economy.
Charles S. Devas writes : ''From about the year 1750 as a start-
ing point a tremendous change began, and a great part of in-
dustry was gradually transformed, passing from the traditional
or empirical stage to the scientific." ' In the textile industry,
e. g., John Kay and his son, Robert, invented devices which
doubled the productive powers of the weavers. In 1767 Har-
greaves came to the aid of the sorely pressed spinners with his
spinning-jenny, which enabled one man to do the work of
1 Amerietu toI. xxl., no. 23.
s Rey. Henry Pesch, SJ., Stimmen der Zeit, yoI. 1xxxy1.» no. X
9 Political Beonomg, third edition, p. 77.
356 CAPITALISM AND CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY [Dec.
eight Arkwright produced a still more important spimiing
instrmnent and practically took the industry out of the hands
of women in homes, placing it in factories. In 1785 Cartwright
devised the power-loom, which early in the nineteenth century
struck an equally severe blow at the domestic occupation of
men and made weaving a machine industry. By 1800 new de-
vices enabled the bleaching to be done thirty times as quickly
and the printing with one per cent of the labor formerly re-
quired. Meanwhile Eli Whitney had invented the cotton gin
in the United States, and one of the principal materials for the
textile industry was furnished in abundance. The growing
need of some powerful driving force for all this machinery
suggested the use of the steam engine in textile factories, which
could now quit the mountain valleys and running streams to
locate near coal fields.
The middle of the eighteenth century saw a momentous
change in the iron trade also. The use of coal for smelting was
first successfully tried by Roebuck's method, while James Watt,
who took out his first patent in 1769, harnessed steam as a mo-
tive force. Since then there has been a wonderful triple alli-
ance of coal, steam and iron. One discovery quickly followed
another: the rolling mill and puddling furnace of Cort; the
safety lamp of Humphrey-Davey; the hydro-electric machine
of Armstrong; the Bessemer process of making steel, the Diesel
engine, which enables ships to travel many thousands of miles
without stopping for more oil; the electric furnace, steam tur-
bine, automobile, typewriter, moving pictures, Marconi's wire-
less telegraphy, Wright's aeroplane, the cyanide process, Merg-
enthaler^s linotype, the induction motor, electric welding — ^in
short, the almost endless list of wonderful inventions in manu-
facture, agriculture, conununication, and transportation that
stamp the last one hundred and fifty years as an age of machin-
ery. The application of steam to locomotion, at sea, by Bell
and Fulton and, on land, by Stephenson, made the whole world
one vast market. Morse's telegraph and Bell's telephone made
possible the almost instantaneous transmission of price lists
and orders, thereby furnishing the necessary industrial nerves.
The mediaeval merchants and manufacturers usually had their
city and vicinity for a market. Their modem colleague deals
with all the world. These changes rendereci money mobile and
induced the Catholic Church to permit the taking of interest;
1919.] CAPITALISM AND CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY 357
for now a man could easily invest his savings and, conse-
quently, would suffer a loss if he loaned it without compensa-
tion.
While these material, technical, and financial changes
were taking place an equally fundamental and far-reaching
transformation was felt in the science and ethics of political
economy. Adam Smith (1723-1790) is by many considered the
••founder of the modem science of political economy.*'* His
system was liberalistic in the extreme. It was taken in great
part from the writings of the French Physiocrats, especially
Quesnay and Turgot^ and prevailed during the time when
Capitalism developed. 'The individualistic system of free
competition," writes Father Pesch,® "has also been styled the
'capitalistic system of free competition,' not that 'Capitalism'
and 'individualism' are identical concepts, but because, on the
basis of the individualistic system, the preponderance of Cap-
ital in the organization and direction of industry and of almost
the entire cultural life of the nations actually asserted itself
fully." Smith and his disciple, Ricardo, and a long list of
••classical" political economists of the Manchester school advo-
cated economic liberalism. ••Its characteristics," says Devas,
•*were to be irreligious and unhistorical; ... to believe
also that unregulated relations were in general the only rational
relations of society." Cardinal Gasquet, an eminent historian,
points to the opposition between true Christianity and the earl-
iest beginnings of the liberalistic system when he says of cer-
tain ••reformers" of the sixteenth century: ••These 'new men'
looked not so much to the •good' as to the •goods' of the Church
and desired more the conuersio rerum than any conuersio mor-
um. What Janssen long ago showed to be the case in Germany,
and what Mr. PhiUipson and M. Hanotaux declare to be cer-
tainly true of France, is hardly less clear in regard to England,
when the matter is gone into, namely that the Reformation was
primarily a social and economic revolution, the true meaning
of which was in the event successfully disguised under the
cloak of religion with the assistance of a few earnest and
possibly honest fanatics." ^ Smith in his Wealth of Nations,
jeers at Christianity, while John Stuart Mill's Principles of
4 Volume Library, by Prof. Ruof, of Chicago Uniyersity.
ft Devas, loe, cit, p. 651. 6 Idem,, p. 164.
T Quoted by Henry Somenrille In Fortnightlg Review, vol. xxi., na 3.
358 CAPITALISM AND CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY [Dec.
Political Economy, sets aside the very elements of Christian
family life. *The classical'* or orthodox political economy, by
being nominally separated from ethics, and presented as a
science of tendencies only, and as hypothetical and neutral,
could in consequence promulgate with comparative impunity
the most unsocial and immoral doctrines.**' Smith and his
followers championed unlimited competition. Thus Smith
taught that unrestrained freedom of the corn trade was the
only effectual preventive of the miseries of famine. In reality
free trade in food may aggravate a famine by drawing supplies
from countries and districts which are poor to those that are
rich. Devas holds the liberalistic system responsible for the
starvation of ten million people in India and Ireland.* While
millions of her people were dying of hunger, India exported
food worth millions of dollars.
During the Christian Middle Ages man and his needs were
the central point around which domestic industry and small-
scale commerce revolved. Goods were produced and sold that
the consumer might be well and abundantly supplied with
necessaries of life, while the producer and merchant had a
handsome living. Unrestrained striving for gain was during
this entire period unbecoming and un-Christian, as the Thom-
istic philosophy on political economy still ruled the minds of
men — at least officially. While the feudal period witnessed
unfair privileges, tryannical use of power, exploitation by
heartless lords, and pressure exerted by guildsmen on consum-
ers and apprentices, the age of ^^industrial liberty** brought
starvation wages and cruel crushing of competitors.
Unlimited competition soon resulted in the arbitrary con-
trol of social tools by the few; in greater fluctuations in supply
and demand; in the promotion of the gambling spirit; and in
disastrous crises and panics. Large-scale production dominated
by the desire for profit tends to foster misdirected manufactur-
ing and artificially stimulated consumption. How could it be
otherwise when a large part of the available capital is invested,
not primarily with the thought of benefiting society and inci-
dentally earning a good return, but with a view to the highest
possible dividends? The immediate aim of Capitalism, says
Father Pesch, "is the enrichment of the owner of the means of
production and the utmost enjoyment of life on the part of the
8 Deyas, idem,, p. 653. • Loe, dt, p. 145.
1919.] CAPITAUSM AND CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY 359
capitalist families." ^® The system serves the public welfare
only indirectly.
Consequently the modern world did not benefit as much
as it might have from its marvelous superiority over the medi-
aeval and ancient world in social tools. Devas assigns two prin-
cipal reasons for this phenomenon: (a) Many of the greatest
inventions serve our welfare much less than appears at first
glance; (b) heavy losses and injuries, due to the Industrial
Revolution and other causes, have had to be compensated for
by improved methods. For instance, millions of square miles
of land have been turned into a desert.^^ We have witnessed
the wholesale destruction of timber in Minnesota, Maine,
Michigan, and Wisconsin. Exhaustive farming has resulted in
many millions of acres of deserted farmland.^' Some years
ago Secretary of Agriculture Wilson denounced the ^'mining"'
style of farming at a congress of agriculturists. The pollution
of the Great Lakes necessitated the appointment of an interna-
tional commission to deal with the evil. According to Sir
William Crookes careless disposal of garbage and sewage re-
sults in an annual loss of $75,000,000 in England alone. Think
of the waste on this score in our country! Then again the
world's supply of many useful plants and animals has been
squandered in great part. The seal, walrus, sea-otter, beaver,
bison, and various kind of birds have been grieviously dimin-
ished. Europeans introduced rabbits in Australia, thereby
ruining thousands of acres of pasture land. There is also a
vast production of goods known as ''cheap and nasty" which
are really not cheap, if by cheapness we mean that the cost is
low in comparison with the utility."
As for modern inventions many wonderful improvements
in the methods of production affect things not used by the
great body of the people. Many are employed in turning out
costly luxuries. Some of the most conspicuous technical tri-
umphs have been achieved in the means of transportation and
communication — ^steamships, railways, telegraphs, aeroplanes,
etc — all admirable inventions whose chief effect is to enable
men to live close together rather than to be better housed and
nourished. "It is one of the ironies of history," admits Henry
Somerville, "that after an era of unparalleled progress in ma-
10 Loe. eiL, p. 166. ii Devas, loe. eit, p. 91.
12 America^ yoI. x., no. 22. is Intermountain Catholic, May 1, 1913.
360 CAPITALISM AND CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY [Dec.
terial civilization the main problem before the modern world
should be the problem of poverty." ** "We are confronted,"
writes Devas, *Svith the very serious question, why after such
a brilliant advance we are not better off, why so many are
hard-worked, ill-clad and ill-housed, so many tens of thou-
sands of people even in Great Britain are bowed down with
abject poverty, and if we reckon our subject countries, so many
tens of millions." ^^ Perhaps the most crushing indictment of
the capitalistic system from a conservative authority are these
words of the illustrious Pope Leo XIIL: "A small number of
very rich men have been able to lay upon the masses of the
poor a yoke little better than slavery itself." *•
Nevertheless, the fact that the world did not reap as much
gain as it might have under a well-regiilated Christian system
from the Industrial Revolution and the discovery of new con-
tinents and vast mineral resources, does not remove the actual
progress made under Capitalism. Dr. John A. Ryan is of opin-
ion that "economic conditions are better for the masses than
they have been at any previous time." " This implies a great
deal in view of the enormous increase in the world's popula-
tion during the last two centuries. Capitalized wealth has, in
the words of Archbishop Keane, created "a haven of peace and
a home of plenty for the starving multitudes of Europe." " It
opened the treasure house of America's vast natural resources
many decades before a rigidly regulated feudalistic system
would have unlocked them. If, in spite of our great natural
wealth, we have in a comparatively short period of national
existence acquired a teeming proletariat, this is due, not only
to industrial oppression but also to the fact that for many dec-
ades the United States has been the land of promise for mil-
lions of poverty-stricken Europeans. Maurice Hillquit, the
Socialist leader, admitted in his controversy with Dr. Ryan
that "on the whole, life is more propitious today even to the
masses than it was at any time in the past." " •Those who
gave full rein to the system of free competition," observes
Father Pesch, "can point with pride to its undeniably great
achievements, at least in so far as no former epoch brought
14 FoTtnightlg Review, vol. xxi., no. 3. is Idem,, p. 81.
16 Encyclical on The Condition of Labor,
IT Eperybody*» Magazine, November, 1913.
18 Speech on Washington's birthday in Louisville some years ago.
10 Series In Everybody's Magazine,
1919.] CAPITALISM AND CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY 361
about in a few decades such progress in the economic produc-
tion and distribution of goods/' *® The eminent German Jesuit
authority on political economy f lu'ther admits that "the great
historic vocation of capitalistic production, namely to create in
the form of private property gigantic enterprises of the utmost
influence, social institutions of production and distribution,
would not have been fulfilled within the limits of the average
citizen's wealth.*' Capitalism utilized and stimulated scien-
tific achievements, thereby effecting a vast saving of time and
labor. It gave the world an unprecedented and at times most
beneficial race of men — captains of industry, merchant princes,
money barons, great engineers, and daring empire-builders.
**Westinghouse and Edison," observed the New York Evening
Post on the death of the former, "illustrate to best advantage
that organization of society which gives free scope to individual
talent and places no limit upon the legitimate rewards it may
reap." Prof. Thorstein Veblen takes the position that the pres-
ent system compensates for its waste by *inaking men work
hard and unremittingly." *^ Father Pesch notes that Schaeffle,
one of the leading economists of modem times, considers the
capitalistic system the relatively most perfect among the in-
dustrial systems developed in the world's history. "A return
to the old order," says Schaeffle, "is not desirable; it would do
away with the advantage of capitalistic production on a na-
tional scale, without resulting in a more equal distribution of
wealth." ** It would evidently be impractical and absurd to
divide our complex and costly social tools among the owners
and workers, and production would no longer be adequate.
However, Schaeffle believes that "capitalistic society is
rapidly undermining its foundations . . . through an ir-
remedial system of unrestrained industrial competition which
tolerates no stable possession and results in excessive political
centralization." This in turn gives birth to a movement toward
democracy in industry such as is now making itself felt in the
United States, Great Britain and other countries. In Britain
the Labor Party is developing great strength at the expense of
the old liberal parties, and in our country strong labor and
farmer movements are getting under way and may easily con-
verge into a new party. "Not since the development' of the
SI Bverjfbodg'B Maoaxtne, November, 1913. so Idem., p. 165.
ss Ban imcf Leben des ioxUiUn Koerper$, i
362 CAPITALISM AND CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY [Dec.
present capitalist system after the Great Industrial Revolution,"
says a leading Catholic weekly, ^as the civilized world faced
such a radical change as is taking place today.** The Pilot
official organ of His Eminence, Cardinal O'Connell, predicts
that the ''day of the wage earner strictly as such is drawing to
a close.** ** A strong tendency has set in toward nationaliza-
tion of certain industries, especially public utilities; toward co-
operative societies of producers and consumers; and toward
co-partnership, or at least joint management, by capital and
labor. Unfortunately, the workers in some trades show an
inclination to abuse their ascendancy by aping the autocratic
methods employed by unscrupulous capitalists. Were this
tendency to spread, it might give Capitalism a new lease on life
by estranging those among the middle classes sympathizing with
Labor. Even if Labor steers safely past the rocks of absolutist
control and vengeful methods, our system is likely to retain
capitalistic characteristics for many a year, as the co-partner-
ship plan will probably not come into general vogue in the
near future. Similarly, profit may be curtailed, but it is likely
to remain a dominant factor in industry and commerce until
the majority of our people, now under the influence of religious
and economic liberalism, are imbued with the saving principles
of Christian Democracy. The tide now setting toward de-
mocracy in industry will result in a disastrous flood unless
guided by levees built on the Christian social teachings of the
Church, especially the famous encyclicals of Pope Leo XIII.,
particularly those on the Condition of Labor and on Christian
Democracy.** In the great PontiflPs encyclicals, sajrs Prof. G.
Toniolo, former president of the Catholic Union of Italy, *Vc
possess a unified complex of sociological teachings, brought
together in a system which rests against the supernatural,
which measures up to the problems of our age, which absorb-
ing everything, takes unto itself all that is true in modem
Science and is proven by experience.** "
With the introduction of Social Democracy, the worker
would no longer be able to sell his labor power by a free con-
tract. The omnipotent State would tell him what to do and at
what remuneration. The capitalist of the liberal school acts
on the fallacy that '"any contract not brought about by physi-
98 September 13th.
14 In L'eredtta di Leone XIIL ' . , . ^
1919.] CAPITAUSM AND CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY 363
cal force or downright deception is fair." *^ He also denies his
employees the right to organize, basing his refusal on the
specious argument that his recognition of a labor union would
Infringe the liberty of his unorganized workers. A funda-
mental of Christian Democracy is the freedom of contract, and
that freedom "^does not consist in an abstract right but in the
ability not to contract." ^ The worker must be in a position to
obtain just terms, and the employer must not be coerced into
accepting unjust conditions. Christian Democracy replaces
**the inmioral principle of unlimited free and fair contract,"
which Dr. John A. Ryan blames in great measure for our indus-
trial and social ills, with a contract which gives labor a living
wage, the consumer fair prices, and the capitalist a just profit.
Under modem conditions this freedom of contract is fre-
quently impossible of realization without the aid of organized
power; and Pope Leo recognized the worker's right to organize
and to collective bargaining.
Even modified Socialism would introduce public owner-
ship of the means of production and distribution, placing all
industries and vital national agencies at the mercy of a few
politicians. In the enormous waste and outrageous mismanage-
ment which characterized the Bolshevist regime in Hungary
and the rule of the socialistic soldiers* and workmen's councils
in Berlin, we have practical object lessons in such centralized
control. Capitalism tends to place similar power over the
most important industries into the hands of a few financiers
and grasping captains of industry, frequently exerting a bane-
ful influence on officials and government. Christian Democ-
racy favors nationalization of certain public utilities which
constitute natural monopolies and give the best service to the
community under public management and ownership. In
other industries it meets the exigencies of large-scale produc-
tion and distribution by introducing cooperation and co-part-
nership. The Social Reconstruction Programme issued by the
National Catholic War Council leaves no doubt on this score :
'The full possibilities of increased production will not be
realized so long as the majority of the workers remain mere
wage-earners. The majority must somehow become owners,
or at least in part, of the instruments of production. They can
Sf Dr. Ryan In The Catholic ChariHe$ Review, toI. 11.» no. 3.
M Dr. O'Hani In America, toI. xvU^ no. 14.
364 CAPITAUSM AND CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY [Dec.
be enabled to reach this stage gradually through cooperative
productive societies and co-partnership arrangements." This
declaration has been hailed as sensational in even some Chris-
tian circles inclined to be over-conservative. Still as early as
1891 Pope Leo XIII. declared that "in no other way" can a
father provide properly for his children than "by the owner-
ship of profitable property." *^
Christian Democracy spells genuine Christian Solidarism,
because it aims at uniting all classes of the commonweath in
a brotherhood of men respecting the fatherhood of God and
codperating wholeheartedly and consistently for the welfare
of the individual and of the nation. When the public welfare
is supreme and promoted in accordance with the precepts of
the Gospel the people truly rule and enjoy Christian Democ-
racy, no matter whether their form of government be republi-
can or monarchical. On the living rock of Christian Democ-
racy and Christian Solidarism must the structure of national
greatness be reared, if it is to endure and serve the genuine
welfare of the people.
27 The Condition of Labor.
AN UNCANONIZED SAINT.
BY MARY FOSTER.
xvn.
ARK dined very early, avoiding the hotel in which
he was staying, for he did not wish to see Tony
just yet. He ate absent-mindedly, not knowing
what was put before hini» only urging the waiter
to make haste. He paid his bill before the last
course was served and hurriedly left the restaurant. But once
outside, he slackened his steps and walked slowly to the Fonte-
branda, thinking of the interview which lay before him, think-
ing of all he had heard that day. The children ran after him,
begging for stamps, but he did not observe them, so rapt was
he in his own reflections.
When he arrived at the trysting-place, he found he had it
to himself. She had not yet come, and presently he began to
wonder anxiously if he ought to have asked her to walk so
far. But even as he was scanning the road upon which long
level rays of the sun played, he described her figure in the dis-
tance. She walked slowly, painfully, it seemed, but when she
saw him she made an effort to quicken her steps. He sprang
forward to meet her, making her put her thin little arm
through his, and together they left the high road and wan-
dered to the little stream and sank down beside it under the
cypresses.
"I must not let you stay here long," Mark said tenderly,
as she crept close to him. *The night ait might be bad for you.
See, Caterina, I have been thinking about everything since this
morning, and I want you to listen to what I have to say. May
not God have accepted your offer as He accepted Abraham's?
May we not, then, pray for your recovery?"
**I think not," she replied quietly. "Would you beg to be
released from a promise? Would you ask for a present you
had given to be returned to you? Abraham didn't. No, dear,
dear Mark, God must have His way whatever it is. I don't
think we should ask back what we have given Him."
«1
366 AN UNCANONIZED SAINT [Dec.
'"Caterina, I think you are a saint!'* Mark exclaimed
fondly. *lt shall be as you wish. But listen, my darling, I
want you to marry me all the same. Won't you be my dear
wife, even though it may be for only a short time?"
The young girl turned a radiant face to his.
'You would really marry me?" she whispered.
'My precious one," he said with a new humility in his tones,
''you would be doing me the greatest honor if you would ac-
cept me. There is something between us which I cannot talk
about, and I cannot describe what you are to me and how I
revere you for all you have done."
Caterina hid her face on his shoulder.
"Never speak of it," she said shyly, **for it was not I who
did it, but something which compelled me to do so. And I
didn't like domg it."
''Dear noble little girl!" he cried softly, and his voice
broke.
'This is what I think," he said after a few moments, in
practical tones. "Let us be married very soon and let me take
you away from here where you have suffered so much at my
hands. We should go anywhere you wish, but I would like to
take you to England and let one of our great doctors see you,
so that, if it is God's will, you may be cured."
"I would love to go with you, Mark. But ah! Italy!
I am afraid to leave Italy."
"Afraid, my darling? We would reach England diuring
the summer, it would be warm then. And I would take you to
the great sea which you have never beheld, and show you all
the beauties of the seashore, and — **
"But Italy is home to me," she put in quietly. "And when
God wants me, I should like to be at home. It feels nearer,
somehow ..."
"Then we'll stay here," he replied at once, "and I will get
some clever doctor here to see you. I will do all I can for you
and you must try your very best to live, my dearest, if God
wiU let you. But Caterina, do not talk of leaving me. I don't
think I can bear it. I am not yet resigned. You must pray for
me that I may have strength and patience, my little saint
Now," he added changing his voice, "I will make arrangements
for our speedy marriage. Each day will seem a year until I
can call you my wife.'
99
1919.] AN UNCANONIZED SAINT 367
•*You have made me very happy, Mark, so very happy,**
she said softly. **! think I have never been so happy in my life.
This morning when I got up, the sun seemed brighter than
usual, the children seemed to smile at me more sweetly, and
dear old Monna Pica told me I looked better as we sat making
the salad. I don't know why I felt so lighthearted. Perhaps
deep in my heart I felt your coming. And I cannot tell you
how grateful I am to you.**
"Grateful to me !" he echoed rather bitterly.
*Tes, grateful, indeed,** she insisted, *Yor you have made
me a woman. I think also, that I am better than I would have
been if I had never known you.**
The sun had dipped behind Siena, and a few pale stars
already glimmered in the sky. From the valley, sounds of
evening rose on the still air, and belated birds chirped drows-
ily as they settled themselves for the night. Mark and Cater-
ina rose to their feet, and stood for a moment gazing at the
beauties before them, and the young girl's eyes strayed towards
the city and fixed themselves upon it with the great home love
shining in them. Then they walked back quietly.
Bland was expecting his friend. He had been surprised
when the dinner hour had arrived without bringing him, but
he reflected philosophically that a man in love is unaccount-
able for his actions. So he himself made a hearty meal, con-
versing with the diners at the next table to his, and, after din-
ner, with everyone who entered the smoking-room. Then he
strolled out to the small plot of ground behind the hotel, by
courtesy called the "garden.** Here he found Mark.
"Hello!** cried Tony, *T)een here for long?**
"Not very,** Standish replied, "I strolled home leisurely.**
He turned his face towards the light, and Tony saw that it was
grave and sad.
"How many more changes is my good friend going
through?'* the younger man asked himself. *1 have never seen
him wear that expression before.** He sat down expectantly,
and tactfully f orebore to utter the questions which were burn-
ing on his lips.
**Well, Tony,** Mark said presently, •^ou will congratulate
me, won't you?**
'Tlather!'* exclaimed Bland, genially, ^ell me all about
It-
• -.-»»
i.i.
368 AN UNCANONIZED SAINT [Dec.
Mark told him what was necessary — ^that there was to be
a wedding but a very quiet one, very soon, for Caterina was
seriously ill. But he did not say that she was said to be dying,
nor did he relate her story. Tony would not have understood.
**I shall write to my aunt,*' Tony announced, when he Jhad
heard all that was to be told him. *'She will be jolly glad to
know this.**
*T>o,** Mark assented. "She has been a very good friend to
me. I think I will write to her, too,** he added, for it occurred
to him that he might tell her all. She would understand.
XVIII.
Mark was agreeably busy during the next few days, but his
happiness was tinged with sadness. Caterina had suddenly
grown much weaker. Her strength seemed to be leaving her,
and she was obliged to spend most of her time upon an impro-
vised couch. The neighbors collected round her, weeping;
and when the news of her approaching marriage went round,
they wept again, while they smiled at her happy face.
The children stared wonderingly at the marvelous things
that disappeared into the humble house. An invalid couch,
an unknown curiosity to them, with di£Bculty passed through
the narrow door, and the nameless objects which followed
made them stare the more. And their round eyes grew
rounder, and their little mouths tremulous, at the sight of the
delicious fruits and other dainties that followed in the wake
of the other wonders. Occasionally, some daring urchins
climbed the stairs after the laden messengers and gazed
through the open door at the familiar form lying upon the un*
familiar couch. Monna Pica told them to run away, but
Caterina smiled, and beckoned them forward, filled their rosy
mouths with something they had never before tasted. The
strange gentleman who was always there, looked kindly at
them and spoke to them sometimes, until they began to have
a wondering reverence for him, as the source whence all these
good things cam*.
But Cateriaa grew weaker, and was unable to leave fh%
poor little room which love had so beautified. They waited
from day to day in the hope that she might gain a Uttle
(rtrength in order to be able to walk the few paces to the
1919,] AN UNCANONIZED SAINT 869
church. For hope dies hard, and each morning as he entered
her flower-decked room, Mark fancied he saw a change for the
better in her thin, wan face.
•Tomorrow/* he would exclaim, joyfully. 'Tomorrow you
will be able to go downstairs."
But "tomorrow" came, and it was still to be "tomorrow."
In the meantime Mrs. Langford had replied to the letter
Mark had sent her — ^replied in her characteristically downright
way.
**When you get this," she wrote, *^ou may expect me in
twelve hours. I am coming out to Siena, in the first place to
nurse little Caterina, and in the second, to be with her at
her wedding. I think I can help you both . . ."
She arrived next morning, and entered the sick room, so
different from the Mrs. Langford Mark had known in London,
that he scarcely knew her. A marvelous womanly tenderness
took the place of abrupt reserve, as she bent over the young
girl.
**My dear, Tm glad I came," she told her nephew after-
wards as he was escorting her to her hotel. "I shall not have to
teach that young thing our ways, rather should she teach us
hers, for she is a little saint. But ah ! Tony, there is trouble in
store for your friend. The poor child won't be here long.
"And how Mark has changed," she went on. **What a fine fel-
low he has become! He has been through the furnace, and
has come out purified. He should be able to make a place for
himself among the true artists of our times, for he has suffered
— and ah ! he will suffer still more."
The celebrated doctor whom Mark had sent from Florence
came the day after Mrs. Langford's arrival.
She followed him out of the room when his brief examina-
tion was over.
"What is it?" she asked, going straight to the point.
"It is a consumption," he replied. "What you might call
a decline, and the heart is very weak. But it is strange, for
she has a splendid constitution and peasant robustness."
"Then you think she will come through?" Mrs. Langford
exclaimed eagerly. But he shook his head.
Impossible," he said. ''She cannot livi long, in fact she
may go any day. Nothimg can sav« her.'*
"She 15 gtiJig t0 be married," Mrs. Langfwd said presently,
VOL. tSb S4
370 AN UNCANONIZED SAINT [Dec.
and her tones were almost harsh. 'There is no time to be
lost?"
"If he still wants to marry her,** the doctor replied. He
was used to many sorrowful sights, his profession had hard-
ened him to view grief with equanimity, but he went out of that
lowly dwelling with a bent head.
Mrs. Langford reentered the sick room. Mark had re-
turned to his seat near Caterina and the young girl looked up
at her entrance, and taking one of the old lady's hands,
kissed it.
'Tell us together, signora," she begged. And Mrs. Lang-
ford told them.
'1 will go to the padre this evening," Mark said rising and
bending over Caterina. ''And I shall ask him to marry us to-
morrow."
When the priest toiled up the narrow little stairs that even-
ing and entered the flower decked room, he found Caterina
alone waiting for him.
Next morning early, her greatest Friend Whom she had so
often visited in His humble dwelling near her home, came to
her in the little room which loving hands had made into a
bower of flowers for His reception, and a very simple cere-
mony took place shortly after, when Mark and Caterina were
made husband and wife. Besides Mrs. Langford and old
Monna Pica, Bland was the only other wedding guest, and he
was much moved at the quiet touching scene.
When all was over, and congratulations had been given,
he slipped away, feeling his presence almost a sacrilege in a
place where Catholics knelt in prayer.
"Mark," Caterina said softly when the day was drawing to
a close. "Will you paint me a picture? I should so like to see
one of your works before I — ^I leave you. Paint the dear Ma-
donna and her little Child."
Mark shrank back. Painting was more than ever distaste-
ful to him; he had locked up his oils in his portmanteau, and
the very idea of again trying to depict what he had signally
failed in was painful to him.
"I can't," he replied brokenly. "See, how I have failed.
It seems I cannot paint any more."
Caterina drew his hand from his brow.
- ^I think you can, now," she said gently. "You must have
1919.] AN UNCANONIZED SAINT 371
your art when I am gone, and I think God will make you a very
great painter some day. Try — try for me. Bring your paints
here, and let me see you at work once more."
XDL
Perhaps Caterina did not realize what Mark suffered when
once again he set up his easel and painted while she watched
him at his task. He could not but compare the present with
the past when she had posed for him in his studio two years
ago, full of life and strength. He called to mind how they had
talked together, how he had been first attracted by her sweet
face, until he had grown to know her more intimately and to
love her.
Mark suffered silently. He did not tell her that all delight
in his art seemed to have vanished. Yet she was aware that he
worked with pain and difficulty, and she knew that it must be
through pain and sorrow that he would find his gift once more.
Thus the days slipped by, unmarked by any change save that
Caterina gradually grew weaker.
At last the painting was finished. Mark brought it to his
wife's bedside with a new humility of manner. What could
she, a poor girl know about art? Yet he waited anxiously for
her decision, feeling that her judgment would decide if he
were ever to paint again. No more would his old efforts satisfy
him. There was something else to be sought in art, something
higher that he wanted to reach. And if that was to be with-
held from his grasp, he felt that he would gladly sell his paints
and easel, and dismantle his studio.
The canvas was small, and Mark held it before her gaze
in silence. As she looked the tears rushed to her eyes, and she
clasped her thin hands.
"Oh, Markl'^ she whispered, half fearfully. •^Oh, Mark!
how very beautiful it is I The dear Mother of God and her
little Son! But ah! what a sad face the sweet Madonna has.
Though she is the Mother of God, is she not thinking of all that
is to happen to her Baby in the dim, lonely future !"
'"You like it, Caterina?" Mark asked huskily.
"Like it I" she echoed, softly. "Oh, Mark ! you have much
to live for."
One night, as Mark was keeping an uneasy watch, Caterina
372 AN UNCANONIZED SAINT [Dec.
stirred in her restless sleep and opened her eyes. Through the
window, faint streaks could be seen in the sky heralding the
approaching dawn, and a bird or two chirped lazily without.
'l^et us watch the dawn together,'' Caterina said quietly,
and together, they watched the pale primrose tint giving place
to deeper coloring, and the few grey clouds roll off in the dis-
tance. The blue vault overhead, shook off its dark night
mantle, and smiled at the coming day. The sun rose gloriously,
throwing out his golden darts like great stretching arms over
the sleeping city, until he sent a shaft right through the little
window, lighting up the sick room with a sudden brilliance.
In the tender light of a new day Caterina lay quietly. Oc-
casionally her lips moved as her eyes turned to the picture, and
as they rested upon it a light glowed in their dullness.
^'Mark, it is very near," she said, gently; but he did not an-
swer.
The church bells rang out, echoing the cathedral's deep-
voiced call, and Caterina smiled faintly as the bells close to her
window joined in. They were dear, old friends and she had
often rung them herself, in the days of her strong happy youth.
*'Mark," she said when they had ceased, '"God has been
very good."
"Very good," he repUed, sof Uy. "I thank Him for all His
mercies."
''And for taking me to Himself."
''And for taking you to Himself, for by that means He has
shown me His truth. But oh, my wife, my little saint, how shall
I live without you ?"
"It is His will," she said gently, and she laid one weak little
hand upon his bent head, and with the other raised his face
to hers. She gazed very earnestly at him, and then, pressing
her lips upon his forehead, parted from him.
"Now to God," she murmured. She lay back. And Mark
knew that God had accepted her offering.
[the end.]
FRENCH-CANADIAN POETS AND POETRY.
BY THOMAS O'HAGAN.
iN the land through which flows the St. Lawrence,
m which is enshrined the memory of a Fronte-
nac, a Champlain and a Bishop Laval, there has
taken root and blossomed a distinctive Cana-
dian literature which during the interval of
years since the Bourbon lilies were snatched from the brow of
New France, has developed in beauty and strength with a
flavor and form all its own. This literature is, indeed, of the
household of France speaking to the soul with the accent and
grace of the motherland, but enriched by the breath and spirit
of an heroic people whose gift of toil has turned forests into
smiling gardens and filled temples with the splendor of strong
and heroic faith.
French-Canadian literature and especially its poetry is a
mirror of the people. It is replete with joy and beauty and the
fine optimism of consecrated hearts. The French-Canadian
poet since the days of Michael Bibaud has woven into his verse
the finest of idealism. His muse, too, is aflame with patriot-
ism. He owes no double allegiance. For him is the St. Law-
rence with all its historic memories and not the Thames. His
heart follows the voyageur and the coureur de hois.
The question arises here: When did French-Canadian
poetry with its individual note and form begin? From the fall
of Quebec in 1760 to the year 1850 — that is, for nearly a hun-
dred years — the genius of French-Canada was groping towards
the light in dimness and with unsteady step.
Imagine, if you wiU, seventy thousand people subjected
to conquerors who tried to stifle every passionate yearning of
the French-Canadian heart, whose policy and plan it was to
blot out from the memory of the conquered their glorious past,
and build a new horizon around every French-Canadian home
that would limit alike its vision and its thinking. These hun-
dred years were for the French-Canadians truly years of
struggle, in which they fought for the freedom of faith and in-
374 FRENCH-CANADIAN POETS AND POETRY [Dec.
dividual liberty. Seeing the double yoke about to descend
upon their necks they girded themselves for the battle.
Then the French-Canadian found his soul, and finding it
in the lists of victory, turned his mind to the higher things of
the spirit. French-Canadian poetry really dates from about
the year 1850. Benjamin Suite, the best authority living today
on the intellectual development of French-Canada, tells us
that until 1850 or 1860 we find little individuality in the poetic
work of the French-Canadian. He lived on the literary tradi-
tions of the end of the reign of Louis XIV. and the first half of
that of Louis XV.
The first poet of note in French-Canada was unquestion-
ably Octave Cremazie, who was bom in the city of Quebec,
April, 1830, and pursued his studies in the Seminary of Que-
bec. Cremazie had a rich and cultivated mind, and the lofty
and ardent note of Canadianism in his work entitles him to a
first place among the patriotic poets of Canada. His knowl-
edge of literature was very extensive, being thoroughly famil-
iar with the great poets of England, Germany, Spain and Italy.
He is said to have quoted with equal facility Sophocles, the
great Sanscrit Epic, Ramayana, the Latin Satirist, Juvenal and
Uie Arab and Scandinavian poets.
Strength, fire and energy mark Cremazie's lines. His
love for his native land was a very passion, and when a finan-
cial catastrophe removed him from its shores, he yearned and
mourned for his beloved Canada, homesick and sad unto
death. From 1852 to 1862 — and these are the years that verily
mark the beginning of French-Canadian poetry — Cremazie
wrote and published Le Drapeau de Carillon, Le Canada^ Un
Soldat de V Empire, Aux Canadians-Frangais and Le Vieux
Soldat Canadien. From 1862 to 1878 he spent in Paris in en-
forced exile, and his diary, written during the siege of Paris
by the Germans, is full of interest and the wise judgments and
observations of a poet and scholar. The ^'Morning Star** of
French-Canadian poetry lies buried in the cemetery of Havre
in the land of his ancestors, but far from the shores he loved
to chant in song.
We translate, as illustrating his work, the last stanza of
his patriotic poem Le Canada, not that it presents Cremazie at
his best, but because it strikes the dominant note in his work —
patriotism :
1919. FRENCH-^CANADIAN POETS AND POETRY 375
Oh, happy he who seeks no skies
Where strangers toil and weep,
But finds felicity and joy
Where his forefathers sleep.
There are several French-Canadian writers whose work
both in prose and verse is full of distinction, but who are not
known as poets. The late Abb6 Casgrain has written several
poems of merit and has made an admirable translation into
French verse of Byron's Prisoner of Chillon, but it is rather as
a prose writer — ^historian, critic and chronicler — that Abbe
Casgrain will be known. He has been termed the foster-father
of French-Canadian literature, and sixty years ago gathered
around him in the very shadow of the Quebec Cathedral a
number of ardent literary souls such as Dr. La Rue, Joseph
Charles Tach^ Antoine Gerin-Lajoie and the aged Philip Au-
bert de Gasp& Again Sir Adolpe Routhier, one of the sanest
and most cultured critics in Canada, the author of our Cana-
dian national song, **0 Canada," has done some good work in
verse, but his place among French-Canadian writers must
assuredly be that of the essayist, accomplished critic and nov-
elist
Napoleon Legendre who was born in Nicolet in 1841 is
also both prose writer and poet. This gifted French-Canadian
who received the honorary degree of Doctor of Letters from
Laval University in 1890, reveals much delicacy and sensi-
bility in his poetic work. In translating ^'Evening" from his
volume Les Perce-Neige published in 1886, we have endeav-
orded to preserve the poetic mold of the original.
The breeze touches lightly the foliage
The air is pure as a tear ;
The sea beats noiselessly its pebbly shore
With its blue wave so clear.
The rays of the sun that lit up the hills
Are now waning their fire;
And the purple tint of each fading beam
Creeps higher and higher.
The brook hard by whispers its secret
As it murmurs along;
While the nightingale hid in its green-clad nest
Trills a passionate song. * ^
376 FRENCH-CANADIAN POETS AND POETRY [Dec.
Sing, winged poet, O sing ! Thy voice
Is an echo on high
To proclaim the God we adore
In rapt notes of the sky.
There are several minor poets whose work deserves our
notice. A little volume, quite unpretentious, bearing the title
Au Foyer de Mon Presbytire, from the pen of M. L'Abbe Apol-
linaire Gingras, contains some charming little lyrics full of
simplicity and feeling. The Auant Propos, or Introduction, to
the modest volume is so full of quaint humor and clever al-
lusions as to justify a quotation from the tender memory-
laden lines of "A Fireside Memory*' found within its covers:
Amid the pleasures of the town
My soul is void of mirth,
For I dream of the quiet happiness
In the village of my birth:
And tears oft stir my heart
As memory beats its wing;
And I see again a cottage bright
And hear the young birds sing.
Perhaps no French-Canadian poet was as much the poet
as the late Pamphile LeMay. He not only was dowered with ex-
ceptional poetic gifts but he looked the poet as well. Bom
at Lotbini&re, Quebec, the memorable year of 1837, his first
studies were pursued at the Christian Brothers' School. After
spending a brief period in the United States, young LeMay
returned and was for some time at the Seminary in Ottawa.
Later he took up the study of law, and when the Hon. Mr.
Chauveau became Prime Minister of Quebec, he received the
appointment of Provincial Librarian, which position he held
till within a few years of his death.
LeMay had a very high artistic sense and a great spiritual
endowment as a poet. His poetry is marked by a fine wedding
of thought and diction and his sonnets have a rare finish. They
are decidedly the best that have come from a French-Canadian
pen. Laval University, which does not lightly set its approval
upon literary work, bestowed upon LeMay two gold medals —
one for his &ie poem The DUcouery of Canada written in 1867»
and the other for his National Hymn written in 1860. In 1870
1919.] FRENCH'CANADIAN POETS AND POETRY 377
he translated into French alexandrmes Longfellow's beauti-
ful idyll, Evangeline. So well did he accomplish his task that
Longfellow wrote him that his translation had added to the
worth of the poem.
LeMay is the author of a long list of works in both prose
and poetry, among the latter two volumes bearing the titles
Les Vengeances and Une Gerbe. In the last named may be
found a poem 'To the Expatriated" from which we translate
the two following stanzas :
/
Return all whom your native land
Has mourned alas! with many a tear;
On shores bereft of warmth and love
You drag out lives from year to year:
Far from the skies of your natal shore
You seek in vain content.
Return before your steps are stayed
And the fires of life are spent.
Return! the sun is shining bright
O'er our broad meadows
All in blossom.
Reposing 'neath its golden light.
Return! the peaceful swallow,
When Spring its season doth renew,
Takes ever towards its faithful nest
Its flight.
Happy those who never leave
For other shores their native vale.
Like leaves that clothe the summer wold
Yet fade on bough despite each gale.
Return that your dust may mingle
With the ashes of our dead.
To rest in the shade of holy ground
With the humble cross above each head.
Return! the sun is shining bright
O'er our broad meadows.
All in blossom.
Reposing 'neath its golden light.
Return! the peaceful swallow.
When Spring its season doth renew.
Takes ever towards its faithful nest
Its flight.
378 FRENCH'CANADIAN POETS AND POETRY [Dec.
It is worth noting that four French-Canadian poets, Le-
May, Legendre, Frechette and Suite were bom within a few
years of each other — that is, about the year 1840. It is a com-
mon thing for genius to reveal itself in cluster. Note, for
instance, the great men who were born in both Europe and
America about the year 1809. The greatest group of English-
speaking Canadian poets were bom almost the same year —
1860 — namely: Roberts, Carman, Campbell and Lampman.
When Louis Frechette's volume Les Fleurs boriales was
crowned by the French Academy in 1880, it was recognized
that a French-Canadian poet of more than ordinary promise
was added to the choir of Canadian singers. Frechette who
was born in Levis, Quebec, and obtained his early education at
Nicolet College, studied law with Pamphile LeMay in the office
of Lemieux and RemiUard, Quebec. After a few years spent
in journalism in Chicago, Frechette returned to Canada and
abandoning Justinian and Blackstone gave himself up entirely
to letters. His most ambitious poetic work is his '*La Legende
d'un Peuple," a kind of oratorical epic. This poem its author
dedicated to France. Jules Claretic of the French Academy
wrote its Foreword.
Dr. Louis Honore Frechette has been called the Lamartine
of Canada. We find in his work something of both Lamartine
and Hugo. The poetry of memory filled his soul. Writing once
to his friend Alphonse Lusignan, he said: ^'Memory is all — ^it
is the soul of life.'' Frechette resembles Hugo at times too in
mistaking fine rhetoric for true poetry. On the occa-
sion of Queen Victoria's Jubilee in 1897, he was made a Com-
panion of the order of St. Michael and St. George. Several of
the Canadian universities honored him with degrees, and to-
gether with Suite, Casgrain and LeMay he was elected one of
the first Fellows of the Royal Society of Canada.
"My Little Friends," taken from his volume bearing the
title Pile-Mile, published in 1877, is representative of the
poetic work of Frechette:
Fair children dowered with silvery voice.
Fresh as flowers of rarest choice.
Cherubs in your joy so gay;
In your pretty dresses bright
Like to angels clad in light —
Rubens' dream in pencill'd ray.
1919.] FRENCH-CANADIAN POETS AND POETRY 379
I love to see you on the green
By your mothers guarded — seen;
Playing like bright butterflies
Dancing on their silken wings.
Heedless what the future brings.
Or the great world with its sighs.
Run and leap, O joyous throng.
Ceaseless with your games and song —
O'er the greensward skipping go;
But when your joy doth sparkle bright.
You'll ne'er forget, one deems you right
Little angels here below.
Oh, keep your trust forever strong.
Your childlike innocence of wrong;
These twain to you are given.
In danger's shadow find no rest;
And, if your mother's heart is blest.
You'll find your place in heaven.
William Chapman who, as his name indicates, is of Eng-
lish origin on his father's side, was bom at St. Francois de
Beauce, Quebec, in 1850. His first volume of poems Les Que-
becquoises appeared in 1876. This was followed by Les
Feuilles cT Erables in 1890. In 1904 appeared Les Aspiratidns
and in 1910 Les Rayons du Nord. The two latter gained for
their author the highest prize of the French Academy.
The beautiful poem •The Poplars," full of rhythmic swing
and sentiment taken from Les Feuilles d'Erables is ample tes-
timony to the fine poetic gifts of Chapman:
Hail! tall poplars bending o'er my pathway
With your richly-laden foliage and your perfume sweet
and strong;
You sway above my head like an undulating arbor
With your nesting choir of song.
I love to look upon you in that season of delight.
When to all the sun brings life and youthful bliss ;
And zephyr-laden May, happy woer for a day.
Thrills the soul with warm ecstatic kiss.
880 FRENCH'CANADIAN POETS AND POETRY [Dec
For in the lisp of the leaves that tremble,
And the song from the nest swaying low,
I seem in raptur^to hear sweet voices
Telling the story of long ago.
One evening in June, when the breeze grew jealous.
And had loosen'd her ringlets of jet black hair.
We stroird together o'er the fresh green meadow
*Neath the gathering shade of your trustful care.
From your summits there rose sweet songs and murmurs;
A bird was chiding the echoes that start ;
We came and sat there under your branches
With a gift of love and spring in our heart.
*****
Yes, dear old poplars, 'neath your friendly branches,
When Spring comes smiling I love to rest;
For I seem to find here the spirit departed
Of that happy eve with its joys so blest!
Of that brilliant coterie of French-Canadian writers, bom
as we have said about 1840, the sole survivor today is Benja-
min Suite, poet, historian, chronicler and critic. Suite is won-
derfully versatile. He has a most tenacious memory for his-
torical facts, and is without a question the best authority we
have in Canada on the history of the French-Canadian people.
As a poet his lyrics are marked by great simplicity and
naturalness, and a felicity of diction which gives a personal
touch or charm to whatever he writes.
Suite was bom at Three Rivers in 1841, and gave to the
public his first volume of poems Les Laurentiennes in 1870.
In 1880 was published his volume Les Chants Nouveaux. His
monimiental work UHistorie des Canadiens-Frangais, a work
in eight volumes, occupied him from 1882 to 1885. In 1897 Mr.
Suite read a very scholarly paper before the British Associa-
tion, which met that year in Toronto, on The Origin of the
French-Canadians.
In his volume of poems Les Laurentiennes, Mr. Suite pays
a beautiful tribute to the memory of his countryman, Francis
Xavier Gameau, perhaps the greatest of our Canadian histor-
ians. We will quote it here in full, using the translation by
Miss Mary Mclvor:
1919.] FRENCH'CANADIAN POETS AND POETRY 381
A tomb of monumental granite raise
O Canada proud of thy liberty
To him the chronicler of vanished days.
That unborn eyes may the record see.
Muse of our land! open again with tears
The book of gold where shines each hero's name;
To thee the offering of his hopeful years
Was made and what hast thou to give but fame?
■
A weary while he strove with courage mild
To bend his soul to strangers who despised;
Yet held he sacred rights altho' exiled.
Till Death less cruel but more just than they,
Marked his high place 'mid the immortal throng
And honors worthless thro* a long delay.
Now to his mourning countrymen belong.
A monument above that silent mound
To show a people where his ashes lie ;
To poet and to artist holy ground.
When musing on the days long since gone by;
And now for that his words revealed so well
Those early sires unknown to many a son, —
Who for the love of our old banners fell
Glory and he are wedded — ^both are one!
The old literary guard that brought lustre to French-
Canadian letters during the past half century have well nigh
passed away. Benjamin Suite still remains but not **superflu-
ous on the stage of time,'* for though approaching four score
years his pen is still active.
What the future has in store for French->Canadian litera-
ture we know not. The singers of the dawn, the builders of
light and hope have indeed wrought and planned well. May
their successors prove worthy of their mantles and their lyre!
THE ROAD TO CONNAUGHT.
BY DANIEL A. LORD, S.J,
I HE scene is the living room of a small house in the
Protestant plantation of Leinster. The room is un-
plastered, with plain but massive boards, forming
the walls, which are broken by two huge, rough
doors on leathern hinges, and b; a single glazed-
window. No ornaments interfere with the grim
plainness of the room, save a heavy musket which crosses a large
cavalry sabre just above the wide open hearth and a royalist bugle,
evidently a trophy, that hangs on the opposite wall. On a stand
near the centre of the room but toward the back wall is a massive
open Bible. The single table and the plain solid chairs are sub-
stantial without sign of comfort; yet there is about the room a per-
meating atmosphere of feminine care and thought. The chairs
are not set at rigid angles, but are placed invitingly, some near
the table, others close to the hearth; the table and the single has-
sock are covered with carefully knit cloths of intricate design, and
a plain white curtain is draped at the little window.
Evidently the home-like atmosphere is due to the woman who
is stirring a small pot that hangs in the open fireplace. She is
young, not more than twenty-five, with dark hair and wide blue
eyes, typically Irish in cast, slim of waist and deep of chest. Her
face at present is reddened slightly by the heat of the crackling
fire; normally she is rather pale, and there are marks of pensive-
ness and perhaps suppressed vitality in the single, thin line that
occasionally marks her .white brow and in the tight set to her
rather full lips. She is clad in a plain gray frock, relieved by a
band of white at neck and wrists. A white starched cap rests
lightly upon her hair.
It is the winter of 1659. A bitter wind is lashing the country-
side and sending the sparks in occasional showers over the hearth
stones. A particularly shrill blast causes the woman to look ap-
prehensively toward the window and into the gathering dusk of
an early winter evening. . '''
Presently, satisfied with the contents of her pot, she removes
it deftly to the hearthstone and goes to the cupboard whence she
carries two metal platters and two deep mugs. These she places
near the fire to warm. As she stoops, a man's figure appears for
an instant at the window. He glances in almost furtively, his eyes
moving rapidly above his heavy fur collar. From his angle he can
1919.] THE ROAD TO CONNAUGHT 383
catch only a glimpse of the woman near the fire before he passes
on.
A loud knock at the door brings the woman swiftly about, a
half smile of expectancy on her lips. But the knock is not re-
peated, and her smile fades as she realizes that it is not the signal
she had expected. Slowly she moves toward the door, trembling
slightly from cold as she passes the window.
The Woman. — ^Who knocks?
A Man's Voice. — ^A shepherd strayed from his path in his
search for a lost lamb.
The Woman (after an instant's pause). — ^Whose shepherd
are you?
The Man's Voice. — ^The Lord of the Manor.
The Woman (with a reassuring glance at the musket). — I
have a musket at hand, unless you come in peace.
The Man's Voice (a touch of humor in his voice). — ^Your
mercy, mistress, but the sight of your fire has made me as peace-
ful as a tabby on the hearth. In any case, Fd rather die a swift
death from your musket than a slow one here from this killing
cold. , ,^j
The woman hesitates, then impetuously flings Up the heavy
bar of the door and opens it sufficiently to allow the stranger to
enter. A gust of wind accompanies him, sending the sparks
whistling up the chimney. The woman shuts the door behind him,
leaning her whole strength upon it, and then rests against it
watching him with mingled pity and suspicion.
He is a tall, strongly built man, bundled to the ears in a great-
coat of sheep's wool. For a moment he sees only the fire and half
stumbles across the room, his palms outstretched toward its glow.
The Man. — God's mercy on you, mistress ! The glow of your
fire is wine to my blood. My hands tremble like the hands of a
palsied witch. Another mile, and I should have lost my precious
nose. , ,.i^
As he speaks, he is unwrapping the heavy cloth that holds his
collar up about his face. This he now drops behind him on the
hearth, standing revealed as a handsome, clean-cut Irishman, not
more than two years the woman's senior, with sparkling eyes more
than balanced by the unyielding firmness of his mouth. The
woman stands with the light of the fire full in her face as he turns
toward her for the first time with an elaborate half- jesting, wholly
grateful bow.
The Man. — On the word of a shepherd, the tradesman most
384 THE ROAD TO CONNAUGHT [Dec.
beloved of God» you have my heart's deepest thankfulness. I
beg. • • .
A sudden leap of the flames lights up his profile. The
woman's hand leaps to her heart, and she staggers back a step,
her terrified eyes riveted on the man's smiling face.
The Woman (in a horrified, half-whisper). — Mark!
For the first time the man's eyes rest on the woman's face. A
flush of joy leaps to his cheek. He springs across the intervening
space and catches the sinking figure of the woman in his arms.
The ilf a/i.— Nell ! My little sister. Nell!
For a moment he holds her, looking longingly into her face,
while her frightened sobs alone break the silence. Then he speaks
in a voice calm and soothing.
Mark. — My poor little sister! My lost lamb! Nell! . . •
The shepherd has found the most precious lamb of his fold. Bless
God for that! I've tramped Leinster from end to end looking for
you. I've looked in at the maids in the dairies, praying you might
be with them. I've watched the women as they came in from the
fields, hoping that my eyes would single you out from their midst.
Every spinning wheel I heard seemed to promise that your hand
was turning it. All in vain until tonight. My poor little lone
lamb!
A fresh gust of sobbing shakes the woman, and she struggles
for an instant to free herself.
NelL — Don't, Mark! I'm not worth it; I'm not worth your
search.
Mark (tenderly and drawing her toward the fire). — ^My little
sister, you are worth whatever it is in my power to give.
Nell. — But in the face of all I've done . . •
Mark. — I do not know what you have done. I never listened
when men spoke. Persecuted men are bitter, cruel even toward
their own. I've wanted to find you and let you speak for yourself.
I've found you now; thank God and Mary for that!
The long pause is broken only by her sobs. He places her
gently on the chair and kneels beside her.
Mark. — ^When I returned from Valladolid, the holy oils still
moist on my hands, and the strength of God's blessed priesthood
full upon me, I found that the worst had already been done.
Munster and Leinster overrun by Cromwell's friends; Catholics
and Irishmen driven from their homes to hell or Connaught, and
only those left behind who . . . who had married Cromwell's
men and given up their Faith. It had been quick work, quick and
complete. In a little cave in the hills of Connaught, I found our
mother and father.
1919.] THE ROAD TO CONNAUGHT 385
Nell checks her tears and turns all eagerness to him.
Nell. — ^You come from them? They think of me at times?
Mark (bowing his head). — Often, sweet.
Nell. — ^And always with hate for their daughter?
Mark. — ^With pity and love; never with hate.
Nell— Thank God! Thank God! Mother is well and father,
too?
Mark (almost bitterly). — ^War on women is an easy thing.
Cromwell kills unarmed men with clubbed muskets, unarmed
women with starvation. Our father is waiting for you back there
in Connaught. Our mother led me through the cold to you to-
night.
Nell (suddenly dry-eyed). — She is dead?
Mark. — ^Thank God, the horror of it is over for her. Her's
was the death of a martyr of God.
Nell (rising to her feet and speaking with bitter intensity). —
A martyr ! Sweet saints, a martyr I And I, her daughter, have not
even a farewell kiss to cherish as a benediction from the dear
saint. Oh, mother, mother, you die of starvation in Ck)nnaught,
while I live on ... in Leinster. Mark, dear Mark, is there
hope of pardon for such as I?
Mark catches her in his arms and looks at her searchingly.
Mark. — ^This man, this minion of Cromwell ... he
married you?
Nell (suddenly defensive). — Oh, that at least.
Mark. — He loves you? '
Nell (lowering her head slowly). — ^He says little, but I know
he does.
Mark. — ^Has a baby come?
Nell. — God has not blessed us.
Mark (in a quick burst of anguish). — ^Nell, Nell, why, why
did you do this? Why did you fly from the persecution that
should have fired your Irish blood? . How could you have borne
the thought of mother and father driven at the point of a sabre
into Ck)nnaught, while you remained behind? How could you give
up the Faith you once clung to . . . all for this man?
Quietly Nell slips from his arms and lifts her head to face
him.
Nell. — ^Because, Mark, I love him.
Mark (scarcely comprehending). — ^Why, I don't . . .
Nell. — I love him so much that for him I gave up home and
family and Faith . . . and happiness.
Mark (still uncomprehending). — Happiness? What do you
mean?
386 THE ROAD TO CONNAUGHT [Dec.
Nell. — ^Yes, that most of all. Oh, don*t you fancy that I have
suffered? My woman's heart has known the anguish of Judas
burning and searing it night and day. I have built up my love out
of treachery to my God and my people, and even love cannot make
me forget that. For him I have thrown away my right to happi-
ness.
Mark (his arms about her protectingly ) . — ^My poor little
Bister.
Nell (with a single dry sob). — ^And now mother is dead. She
can never say that she understands and forgives me.
Mark. — She said that before she died.
Nell (a note of joy in her voice). — She did, Mark? She did?
Mark. — She made me promise to look for you and bring you
back to father and to God. That is why I asked for the Leinster
mission. (Half whimsically.) The spies are sharp in Leinster,
and the roots and berries here make abominable diet. I was laid
by the heels thrice, the last time just yesterday at Kilmainham.
But the guard loved the sight of gold better than the sight of his
prisoner, and I left him an empty cell to keep till morning.
Nell. — ^Was it worth all that, Mark, to find me?
Mark. — It was worth all the nights spent in the open, all the
pangs of hunger and of loneliness to find the best, the dearest lamb
of my flock. (He takes her hands tenderly.) And now we're
going back the long road to God and father and Connaught, NelL
Ah, but how short the road will seem to me. Come, Nell !
As he speaks, there is the sharp crunch of a horse's hoofs in
the snow. It has been growing rapidly louder but they have
scarcely noticed it. Now they hear it, and their hands slip apart*
Mark turns apprehensively, while Nells runs to the window and
looks out into the dusk. When she turns from the window, her
face is ashen.
Nell (in a high, terrified whisper). — It is he. He must not
even guess who you are. Quick; lie here near the hearth and
seem to doze when he enters. Above all, he must not know you
are a priest. I think ... I think he might kill you.
Even as she gives the commands, Mark flings himself at full
length on the hearth and appears to doze, his head buried in his
arm. Nell replaces the pot on the fire to rewarm and tries to grip
her vibrating nerves. A sharp rap at the door, and she hurries to
open it.
Framed in the doorway stands her husband, a finely built
man, stately under his forty odd years, hardened physically with
service under the Protector and spiritually from contact with the
Protector's creed. He is dressed with something of the trooper
1919.] THE ROAD TO CONNAUGHT 387
still in his attire; a large military cape is wrapped about him and
a leathern cap sets far down on his brow. He stands for a moment
knocking the snow from his boots.
Nell has slipped partially behind the door out of the way of
the sweeping draft.
NelL — Come in quickly, John. The wind is freezing me and
ruining the fire completely.
John enters* closes the door easily, and bends to kiss her with
something like reverence in his manner.
John. — It is a terrible evening, Nell, colder than ever I knew
in York. The breath of my beast made an ice corslet for his chest
Thank God for a warm fire.
Nell has taken the heavy cloak from his shoulders and hung
it upon a peg to dry. John paces toward the fire, and then stops
suddenly at sight of the recumbent form. He turns inquiringly
toward Nell.
John.— Who is this?
Nell (nervously working over the cloak). — ^A shepherd
strayed from his path in search of his sheep.
John. — It is risky business, Nell, and you alone.
Nell (pleadingly). — I know, John; but it was so bitter out,
and he so weary and cold. I hadn't the heart to refuse him
shelter.
John (bowing his head in grave assent). — ^Nor should I have
had. Asleep?
Nell (evasively). — He was quite exhausted . . .
John. — Good! (He looks at the stranger attentively, though
he cannot see his face.) A fine strapping sort of man, the girth
of shoulders and thickness of wrist that Oliver would have loved
to lead in a charge. A shepherd, you say?
Nell (busy at the table). — So he told me.
John (thoughtfully). — Somewhere in this bitter night a
skulking priest lies hiding, a man of this fellow's girth and stature.
I saw him when the pursuivants brought him into Kilmainham,
bound and bowed, but with untamed eyes and unquivering lips for
all that. Last evening, they tell me, he escaped, the sly trickster.
I wonder if this man . . •
Nell (the horror of it flashing upon her). — ^No, no! Not
that!
John turns with obvious surprise in his glance. Nell resumes
her work at the table feverishly, setting the dishes, placing the
chairs in their positions, and covering her confusion with rapid
chatter.
NelL — Come, sit down, John; I want to hear all the news from
388 THE ROAD TO CONN AUGHT [Dec.
the village, and you promised to tell me all you heard. The meat
is piping hot, and Fve warmed the ale against the chill the weather
has sent through your veins.
John (half to himself, his eyes once more on Mark). — Such
cold might drive even the foxes from their lairs.
Nell (running to him and laying her hand on his arm). —
John, you aren't listening to me. Sit, I beg of you, or all my labor
for your comfort will just be lost.
Yielding to her insistence, John crosses the room and seats
himself moodily at the table. Nell keeps up her chatter all the
while. She goes anxiously to the hearth where her platters have
been warming, and when Mark stirs as if in his sleep, she stoops
to whisper to him, but notices that her husband's eyes are upon
them.
Nell. — John, your coat sleeve is almost like ice. Wasn't it
enough to freeze your marrow, riding against that terrible wind?
(Pouring out the steaming ale into two mugs.) Here, drink this
before you eat. Why, your poor hand is still trembling with the
cold.
John raises the mug to his lips, his eyes still on the apparently
sleeping stranger; and then without tasting the ale, he sets the
cup emphatically on the table.
John. — ^The stranger must be cold, too. He will eat and drink
with us. (In a loud voice.) Shepherd!
Mark stirs and tosses uneasily. Nell seizes her husband's
arm and presses him to turn.
NelL — ^No, no, John I Let him sleep. He is so tired and worn.
John (almost kindly). — ^Nell, you were young when the Gos-
pel light touched your soul. (Nell shrinks involuntarily.) You
never learned the knavery of these priests. I more than half sus-
pect that this shepherd —
Nell. — ^But suppose it were so; would not the laws of hospi-
tality—
John (roughly). — ^No laws bind for such as know no law. (He
turns and calls again.) Shepherd! (He strides over to him.)
Shepherd !
Mark stretches himself with a great affectation of sleep.
John. — ^There is meat and drink awaiting you as soon as you
can' shake off your drowsiness. Stand up, man. No guest of mine,
save he who has looked me squarely in the eye.
Mark rises slowly but with real dignity to his feet, fully pre-
pared now to fight it out to the end. The two men face each other
looking full into mutually hostile eyes.
Mark. — My thanks, host ! A lost shepherd like myself stands
1919.] THE ROAD TO CONNAUGHT 389
sorely in need of food and drink after his wanderings. And I have
yet much to do this night.
John has been looking at him squarely and with growing con-
tempt Now he glances at Nell over his shoulder; she is standing
with her hand pressed terror-stricken against her cheek.
John (in a voice of steel). — I suspected as much. It is the
escaped felon. (To Mark.) Shepherd? You lied there, too. No
shepherd you, but a popish priest!
Mark (simply but with conviction). — I am a shepherd like the
Good Shepherd, and ready to lay down my life for the sheep the
wolves have scattered.
John (turning away contemptuously). — ^You shall have your
•hance. (To Nell.) Nell, my cloak!
Nell (piteously). — ^What are you doing?
John (incisively). — ^Taking him back to his felon's prison.
Nell. — John, you must not; this is our home —
John. — Less place, then, for traitors.
Nell. — John, I beg of you —
Mark.—rLei it be, mistress. I thank you for your prayers
though you hurl them at a rock. Perhaps my day is not yet come,
despite your husband's making.
John. — ^That, the judges will decide.
ffell. — John, listen to me! Let him go. You know what
prison means for him . . . the rack, the thumb-screws, the
galleys, perhaps the colonies.
John. — Fit punishment for traitors.
Mark. — ^Mistress, I beg of you —
ffell. — John (he strides toward his cloak), for my sake . . .
John (turning abruptly). — For your sake? What do you
mean? Enough of this sentimentality. This man is a priest.
Nell. — I know, and yet . . . John, I beg . . .
John (coming to her). — ^For a priest you and I can have no
pity . . ' Why for your sake?
Nell— I . . .
Jo/rn.— Well?
Nell (desperately). — In the old days ... I, I knew him.
John. — ^Knew him? (Suddenly seizing her wrist in an agony
of doubt.) Good God, Nell, he is not your lover?
Nell (breaking away and throwing her arms about Mark). —
He is my brother.
There is a moment's pregnant pause. Mark slips his arm
about her heaving shoulders and stands facing John calmly.
John leans heavily against the table, blank astonishment in his
eyes.
390 THE ROAD TO CONNAUGHT [Dec.
John (vaguely). — ^Your brother? I did not know . • .
Mark. — We never crossed before. I was in Spain when you
came.
John (with renewed contempt). — In Spain; ah, plotting with
England's and Ireland's foes.
Mark (almost angrily). — Plotting to save my countrymen
from the tyranny and brutality of men like you and your thiev-
ing troops of —
Nell (wildly).— Mark, don't.
John (imperiously to Nell). — ^Nell, come to me.
Mark (releasing her and stepping back a trifle). — I'll not
speak out my mind to you. You are her husband and I think you
love her.
John (disregarding Mark utterly, and taking Nell's limp
hand). — ^You loved me well enough to give up all this for me, did
you not?
Nell bows her head silently.
John. — I do not know why this man, this priest, came int«
our home. But he cannot stay.
Nell (impulsively). — John . . •
John (with fierce emphasis). — ^No priest, not even your
brother, can remain beneath my roof. I could not risk the wrath
of God.
Nell. — John, please listen . . .
John (turning sternly to Mark). — ^Your freedom shall not be
touched. I cannot take her brother to death or to torture. You
may go in safety. But if you return, I shall not promise as much
again. Now go !
Mark does not move.
Mark (quietly). — Not without her.
John gazes fixedly and without comprehending.
John. — ^What did you say . . .
Mark. — ^Not without her. I have come to bring her back i%
her people and her God.
John (releasing Nell's hand and walking toward Mark). — I
could not have understood you rightly.
Mark. — Perhaps not; how can I say? But let me be quite
clear. I've tramped the length of Leinster, braving your pursui-
vants, living in your caves and stables, now in your filthy prisons,
now in your rotten courts, hungry and lonely and dead from
weariness, searching for my lost lamb. And now that I have found
her, I am going to take her back with me to Connaught. Is that all
quite clear now?
John. — ^You contemptible spy!
1919.] THE ROAD TO CONNAUGHT 391
Nell. — John . . .
John (not heeding her). — ^You steal into my house disguised,
like a thief or a felon. You come while I, her husband, am away,
you with your smooth, Irish face and your oily Papist tongue to
rob me of my wife • • .
Mark. — You dare to speak of robbery? You who stole her
from her Faith and her people? You who robbed us, already
stripped of lands and liberty and God's blue sky, of our one lone
lamb?
John. — She came with me willingly.
Mark. — And she will go with me willingly, or not at all.
John (turning to Nell). — ^You have heard him?
Nell bows her head.
John. — ^And you are silent?
She is motionless. John takes an agonized step forward.
John. — Good God! you couldn't . . . you are not think-
ing that • . .
He catches himself suddenly by a strong act of will and turns
to Mark. His voice has grown almost tender.
John. — ^You say I stole her from you. Let her speak the
truth. Nell, did I win you fairly as ever man won maid?
Nell. — ^Yes, John. (Going to Mark.) Oh, Mark, Mark, you
don't understand. There was more than love ; there was gratitude
to him for • • . what is more precious than life.
Mark (taking her hands). — ^Nell, what do you mean?
Nell (shuddering). — ^When Drogheda fell, I was there.
Mark starts, and Nell covers her face with her hands.
Mark. — I did not know.
Nell. — I had gone to visit Cousin Margaret. We girls fled as
the soldiers stormed the city and rushed through the streets. We
fled madly, not knowing where to go. Oh, the unspeakable horror
of it all. Men with glazed, open eyes lying in the mire and almost
tripping us as we ran. Women wandering wildly through the
streets praying for death. The clash of the soldiers and the horrid
scream of the bugles! They found us, a brutal band in leather
and steel. I cried for help, and their eyes were merciless. They
seized me ; I think I should have gone mad, when he came . . •
Mark. — ^Merciful God !
Nell. — • . • flinging the soldiers to right and left and
fighting his way to me. He picked me up and carried me to safety.
For three days he hid me and cared for me though it meant his
head had he been found. And when the soldiers marched away,
I promised him if ever he came for me, I would be his wife. (A
tense pause.) Margaret I never saw again.
392 THE ROAD TO CONNAUGHT [Dec.
Mark (comprehending at last). — ^And when he came
again . • .
Nell. — I kept my word.
Mark (still caught with the horror of her possible fate). — I
did not know; I never dreamed . . . (To John.) You are a
brave man, sir; from the depths of a brother's heart, I thank
you.
John. — Are you satisfied now? Will you go back to Con-
naught . . . alone?
Mark. — ^No! You risked your life to save her body. I have
risked my life for her soul. You fought your way through sol-
diers and periled your head three days for her. I have walked in
the midst of your spies and risked my head long months for her.
My claim is stronger than yours. I claim her for God.
John (to Nell). — ^You hear him?
Silence.
John. — Shall we answer him as man and wife?
Still silence.
John (suddenly passionate). — ^You do not love me!
Nell. — I do ! A thousand times, I do !
John. — ^You have been happy here with me?
Silence.
John (almost in agony). — ^You have . . . have you not?
Nell. — ^Yes, yes . . . and no?
John (horrified). — ^And no?
Nell. — Oh, there have been moments, days when my heart
would seem to split. I did not know what it would mean when I
gave you my promise in Drogheda. I kept my promise, but our
home has been built on treachery and lies. The shame of my de-
sertion when I thought of my mother and father treading alone
the bloody road to Connaught, the bitter anguish at thought that
the daughter they trusted had forsaken them in the hour of their
greatest need, the longing of my woman's heart for my betrayed
Faith—
John. — ^You are a Protestant.
Nell. — ^Not in truth. That was a lie lived for you.
John (overwhelmed). — ^That, too?
Nell. — That, too. As Protestant, I could stay with you; as
Catholic, I must go. I chose to stay even at that cost.
John (sinking into a chair). — Gk>od God!
Nell. — When I knelt beside you in the church, I loathed my-
self in the depths of my soul. The voice of your preacher railing
at my Faith struck blood from my heart. The church where I had
knelt to adore at the Mass you despised, seemed to reel above my
1919.] THE ROAD TO CONNAUGHT 393
head. I felt as if the dear Jesus would strike me dead were I not
80 utterly, utterly contemptible.
Mark (coming to her). — He loves you too much ever to close
His Heart against you.
John. — It is the spell of priestly witchcraft in your soul.
Nell— No, no!
Mark. — It is the compelling voice of Christ.
Nell. — In the silences of the night, I would lie with dry throat
and aching heart. The shadows cried. Traitress! My temples
throbbed. Traitress! I could see my father and mother suffering
off there in Connaught, suffering for Christ, and weeping in each
other's arms for the daughter who had betrayed Him. I could
have screamed in terror.
John — ^You never told me.
Nell. — ^You could not understand. At times I have stood near
the clear lake longing to feel its waters closing over me in peace
. . . but that would not bring peace.
They stand a silent, tense group. Mark speaks first.
Mark. — Come, Nell! Together we are going back to Christ
and our father. In Connaught they are waiting for you.
John (springing to his feet). — ^You shall not take her till she
has spoken the final word. Nell, I offer you my heart, my home,
my honor. This is a delusion, a trick of Satan. It will pass with
the passing of this man. It is priestly craft snaring your soul.
You owe your life to me, remember; I offer you mine. You will
not be happy without me, Nell.
Nell. — I know it . • . but I have not been happy without
Christ.
John. — ^Then you are going?
Nell. — John, no other man shall ever claim my heart.
John (suddenly freezing). — I ask you, are you going?
Nell. — I must ...
John. — ^Back to idolatry and Papist superstition?
Nell.— Back to Christ
John (turning to Mark, coldly). — ^Take her at once. My
house is no place for Papists.
Nell (in quick agony). — John, John, can*t you see that this
is breaking my heart?
He stands without heeding her.
Nell. — Can't you see that my duty to God comes first?
He turns his back upon her, facing the fire. Nell, as if struck,
falls back a step. Mark's arm is suddenly about her waist.
Mark. — Come, Nell ; it is bitter cold outside, but not so bitter
as the heart of one that has loved.
394 THE ROAD TO CONNAUGHT [Dec.
Nell stands for a moment with anguish in her face; then she
goes slowly with Mark to where her cloak hangs. He takes it
from the peg» while Nell slowly slips ofiF her white cap and lays
it on the table. Then he places the cloak gently about her and
pulls the hood over head. His heavy coat soon falls from his
shoulders, and he stands ready for the road.
Mark (at the door). — ^The moon is rising to light our way
back to Connaught. Come, my sister.
Nell (still looking at John). — Good night, John.
He does not turn.
Nell (very softly) . — In my heart you will always be my lover.
Good night!
Mark stands in the doorway while Nell passes silently out
into the dusk. The door closes gently.
John does not move for a moment; then slowly he looks
toward the door. With a sudden determination, he shakes ofiF his
mood, walks firmly to the window and pulls the curtain shut with-
out even a glance into the night. He goes to the door and bolts
it with a heavy bar. He then strides back to the table. As he does,
his eye lights upon the white cap which rests there. Tenderly he
picks it up, running it through his fingers. With a sudden ges-
ture he is about to crush it, but he pauses, and then slowly raises
it to his lips. His lips quiver, and he falls to his knees with a
mighty sob as
The Scene Closes.
flew JSoofts^
A SCHOLAR'S LETTERS FROM THE FRONT. By Stephen H.
Hewett. New York: Longmans, Green & Co. $1.50.
The letters which have been collected in this volume were
nearly all of them written from the front. A few earlier ones
are included as giving an idea of the writer's character and in-
terests. Mr. F. F. Urquhart, Fellow of Hewett's Oxford College —
Balliol — contributes a valuable biographical introduction, and the
work is dedicated to the dead soldier's old headmaster, Dom
Ramsay of Downside.
These letters are as interesting and as moving as any similar
collection of the last three or four years. To Hewett the War
was the most searching of experiences, but he took it with a
cheerful heart. Born in India, twenty-six years ago, he was edu-
cated at Downside, the famous English Benedictine School, and
in 1910 won the coveted Balliol scholarship as a youngster of
seventeen. He was as good at games as at his books, Mr. Urquhart
tells us, and indeed played hockey for his university against
Cambridge in 1914. A brilliant classic, he carried ofiF the Craven,
the Hertford and the Ireland scholarships. And he was a capable
and devoted member of the Oxford Bach choir. On the outbreak
of the War he received a commission in the 14th Warwicks. Six
months after he had reached France, death came to him as he led
his platoon into action at the Somme.
Several of the letters are addressed to well-known Oxford
dons. We find him writing, e. g., to Cyril Bailey, the translator
of Lucretius, and the authority on ancient Roman religion: "If
Newman repels you I should like to have a long argument on
the subject. As for the Jesuits, well the army too is 'a system
squashing individuality,' and (though the parallel may not be
quite exact) we knew what we were in for and so did Father
Tyrrell. The monastic system is traditionally a 'militia,' and
as a system it has stood the test of practice and of time, as being
— in our point of view — a means of keeping up things which we
regard as as much incumbent on our honor as the defence of all
that is English against all that is German."
Stephen Hewett had meant, if he were spared to return to
his old school and don the Benedictine habit. But it was not to
be. His fellow-oflicers regarded his death as an irreparable loss.
^Things are very different without Stephen Hewett," his com-
396 NEW BOOKS [Dec.
pany commander wrote. This little book is a worthy memorial
of a noble spirit, and will surely have its inspiration for many
a reader in years to come.
THE TOWER OP LONDON FROM WITHIN. By Major-General
Sir George Younghusband. New York: George H. Doran
Ck>. $4.00 net.
Very few Americans, or Englishmen, for that matter, could
tell you whether or not the salt-cellar used by Queen Elizabeth
is still extant. Perhaps it is an unimportant bit of erudition.
Surely it is of less significance than the fact that the well-remem-
bered queen possessed such an article contributory to savor and
flavor. But a very readable recent book will enlighten you on this
hitherto possibly obscure point, and will tell many more fascinat-
ing things beside. The Tower of London from Within is the
creditable achievement of Sir George Younghusband, the Keeper
of the Jewel House in the Tower. It is written in an entertaining
style, and has a due regard for the things that are of high interest
to the general reader. It is full of treasons and trials and execu-
tions, vivid memories of those good old days, which were bad
enough when they were young. Dukes and earls and courteous
knights flit through the pages, ghostlike, silent visitors, asking
us to remember that they were the talk of London when Eliza-
beth was queen and Drake was hoisting sail in the Channel. Not
the least interesting feature of the book are the many reproduc-
tions of old prints, which aid in a marked degree in making our
imagination S3rmpathetic of the unrolling of ancient chronicle.
PUNISHBIENT AND REFORMATION. A Study of the Peniten-
tiary System. By Frederick H. Wines, LL.D. Revised by
Winthrop D. Lane. New York : Thomas Y. Crowell Co. $2.50.
Sir Thomas More (now St. Thomas More), the only man
who ever cleared the docket of the Court of Chancery in England,
declared at the very beginning of his Utopia "if we suffer your
people to be ill-educated, and their manners to be corrupted from
their infancy, and then punish them for those crimes to which
their first education disposed them, what else is to be concluded
from this but that you first make thieves and then punish them?"
Probably this expression is the aptest text for a review of a
book on modern penology, for it is above all on education as pre-
ventive that penologists dwell. Mr. Lane, revising Dr. Wines*
classical book on the subject of the reform of the criminal
through punishment, has above all dwelt on how much environ-
ment, home life, the school, the city streets mean in the produc-
J
1919.] NEW BOOKS 397
tion of criminals. Both these authorities a quarter of a century
apart would agree in declaring that modern life first makes
thieves, and then punishes them.
In his additions to Dr. Wines* book, Mr. Lane has very prop-
erly emphasized the fact that the physical counts for very much
less in the criminal makeup than it did twenty years ago when
Wines first wrote. It is a question of mind and not body that
makes the criminal, and statistics seem to show that about one-
fourth of our prisoners are feeble minded. But as many cunning
criminals escape conviction, this proportion is probably too large.
It is interesting to find that perversions of the will are coming
to be recognized as the main causes of criminality. Knowledge
of itself does not afford much protection.
Mr. Randolph's suggestions of constructive eugenics to help
in the problem of crime prevention are interesting and include
''the abolition of certain non-eugenic customs such as the pre-
vailing requirement that women teachers may not marry,'' to
which the modern social order needs educating, but he also sug-
gests "the dissemination of information about birth control,
thereby making parenthood intelligent and voluntary and de-
creasing the number of undesired and uncared for babies" which
would almost surely open the door to vice. It is a common fail-
ing with many sociologists to neglect the idea of vice while devot-
ing themselves to the thought of crime, that is, the infraction of
law in such a way as might lead to imprisonment. The volume,
in spite of belittling the natural law as a background, is a valuable
abstract of the present position of penology.
JOHN AYSCOUGH'S LETTERS TO HIS MOTHER. Edited by
Frank Bickerstaffe-Drew. New York: P. J. Kenedy & Sons.
$2.00.
Anything from the pen of Monsignor Bickerstaffe-Drew is
sure of its welcome on this side of the Atlantic, and these letters
written during 1914, 1915 and 1916 will find many eager read-
ers; they were written during the reverend novelist's absence
from England in active service in France and Flanders, and they
were the last letters his mother lived to receive from him. He
meant them to cheer and console her hours of loneliness and
anxiety, and nothing could exceed the tenderness of the filial piety
they display throughout. As '"war-letters" they are as good as
any written from the English trenches. Devoted readers of the
long line of fine novels which John Ayscough has to his name,
will rejoice to possess this book of letters, if only because it con-
tains so many interesting revelations of the author's personality.
398 NEW BOOKS [Dec.
80 many valuable passing comments on his own books and those
of his masters in the art of fiction, so many wise and moving
reflections upon the art, religion and life of our own day.
THE CHRONICLES OF AMERICA. Edited by Dr. Allen Johnson,
Professor of American History in Yale University. New
Haven: Yale University Press. Fifty volumes at $3.50 per
volume by the set.
The Cotton Kingdom, by William E. Dodd. Professor Dodd
of the University of Chicago has aptly chosen the title of his study
of the Lower South of the pre-Civil War epoch, for in that eco-
nomic unit cotton was indeed enthroned king with its capital the
delightful planter town of Charleston. The kingdom is well
described, its extent, its net-work of rivers so valuable for the
marketing of crops, its peculiar labor system, and its abominable
despoliation of the Cherokees, Creeks, and Chickasaws in its mad
policy to extend the cotton acreage. The heavy emigration into
the southwestern Eldorado, where cotton magnates were speedily
created by the high prices of cotton and the mounting values of
negroes is accounted for by showing the industrial decline of the
Old South through the failure of the tobacco crop and the failing
fertility of its worn-out soil. Small wonder was it, that states-
men of the New South came to regard cotton with favor and
slavery as a necessary foundation of Southern prosperity. Natur-
ally Jefferson's philosophy was thrown aside, when theorists
appeared who minimized man's inherent rights and emphasized
the Biblical and philosophical arguments supporting slavery and
the fundamental inequality of man. The year 1850 urged the
claims of philosophers of the stamp of President Thomas Dew of
the College of William and Mary, of Chancellor William Harper of
South Carolina, of the poet-novelist William Gilmore Simms, of
Calhoun's successors, Yancy, Davis, Slidell and Foote. Such were
the men who like the late Pan-Germans were imbued with a mis-
sion to extend Southern Kultur into Texas and the territories, and
if need be by aggressive wars and filibustering expeditions into
Cuba, Mexico and Central America. What cared they for negroes
or for the welfare of "crackers" and "hill-billies" as long as cotton
was increasingly profitable? Were not Southern planters the rul-
ers of America? Was not the aristocratic society of New Orleans
and Charleston the cream of life? The South- was prosperous;
surely its philosophy was sound.
Professor Dodd writes from a Southern viewpoint, which is
occasionally apparent in attempts to explain away something, or
in a characterization of James Ford Rhode's work as one in which
1919.] NEW BOOKS 399
''the tone is perhaps too patriotic/' He is at his best in depicting
the social and religious life and in framing a brief for the South
as a section in which literature, science, and education were not
neglected. His consideration of the labors of the Methodists and
Baptists has a friendly tone as compared to his less kindly atti-
tude toward Presbyterian divines from Princeton College and his
harsh estimate of Catholics and Episcopalians, whom we are to
condemn as equally diplomatic in dealing with slaves and slave
owners.
Of the Catholic Church in 1850 he writes :
'The lower South had been and still was outwardly an irre-
ligious, dram-drinking, and duelling section. The French priests
had built a compact religious community in and about New
Orleans, but they had not pushed this work up the rivers and out
into the great stretches of country where plantation life was
dominant. Nor was their easy-going moral system entirely adapted
to the needs of rural life. The Cathedral Church, the monastery,
and the parochial schools filled the round of a priest's life and
duties. The saving of souls in distant plantations was not his
especial concern. Dueling and card-playing and horse racing were
not beyond the range of his own interests ; why should he stir up
a crusade against them? The faith of the Roman Catholic Church
was, therefore, comparatively stagnant in the Lower South.
Aside from a few churches in Louisiana and Charleston, firmly
established parishes in Mobile, and a diocese in Florida, this
branch of the Christian Church had not become a force in the
planter civilization." In a footnote (p. 98) there is added: "The
Roman Catholics of New Orleans, whose easy-going methods
suited some twenty or thirty thousand merchants and planters,
contributed their mite in the direction of religious orthodoxy. In
New Orleans, Baton Rouge, and Mobile there was a nucleus of
Catholicism, that might under better skies have won a controlling
influence in large districts of the cotton kingdom."
TMe Old Northwest, by Frederick Austin Ogg. Professor Ogg
of the University of Wisconsin sketches the history of the old
Northwest Territory from the French surrender of Montreal and
Detroit until the admission of the Northwestern States into the
federal union. There is a correct estimate of this section in Amer-
ican history, but it is arrived at in the prosy way of the class-room
lecture. There is nothing dramatic in the telling of the tale,
though the chronicle is so replete with romantic episodes. The
scene when Vaudreuil delivered an empire to Sir Jeffrey Amherst,
the Pontiac conspiracy uniting all the Indian tribes from Fort Pitt
400 NEW BOOKS [Dec.
to Fort Chartres, the expedition of George Rogers Clark and his
colonials, and the breaking-down of the Indian power by Mad
Anthony Wayne at Fallen Timbers were the sort of stories that
Parkman delighted to narrate or that Roosevelt could dash ofiF in
virile style.
The writer does not hesitate to emphasize the dastardly
action of British agents in exciting the Indians to murder non-
contending frontiersmen, who had no connection with the Revo-
lutionary movement. Yet when they paid bounties for scalps,
they were but carrying out the idea of the Earl of Suffolk who
wrote: "God and nature hath put into our hands the scalping-
knif e and tomahawk to torture them into submission." Nor does
he fail to suggest the importance of the active assistance of Pire
Gibault in urging the French settlers of Kaskaskia and Vincennes,
as well as the neighboring Indian tribes, to receive Major Clark in
the name of Virginia and of the allied French monarch. Dr. Ogg
then outlines the growth of population, the huge migration from
the coast-board States into Ohio, the ventures of the Ohio and
other land companies, the removal of the Indians, the uprising of
Tecumseh, the skirmish at Tippecanoe which made of Harrison
a president, and the failure of the West in the War of 1812.
Especially valuable for the general reader is the description of life
in Ohio where were met men of all nations. As the economic side
is in no way passed over, the Cumberland Road and river naviga-
tion are enlarged upon as factors contributing to the rapid develop-
ment of the territory.
Dutch and English on the Hudson. By Maud Wilder Goodwin.
This volume offers a splendid picture of the old colony of
New Netherlands, supplemented as it is with maps showing the
location of manors, a chart of New Amsterdam and prints of such
worthy burghers as Peter Stuyvesant, David de Vries, and Peter
Schuyler. One can visualize Henry Hudson on his bedecked
Half-Moon sailing in 1609 through the Narrows around the
heavily wooded Manhattan Island, and up the lordly stream past
the Palisades, the Highlands, and the Catskills. Yet it is hard to
picture the mighty metropolis of today as a primeval forest, hid-
ing here and there an Indian village. The Dutch East India Com-
pany was not slow in establishing fur posts at Albany, Orange
and Nassau in New Jersey and even near Hartford, Connecticut,
nor in purchasing Manhattan from the Indians at the rate of a
tenth of a cent an acre through the driving bargaining of Peter
Minuit. The early Dutch location on Manhattan below the
wooden wall (Wall Street) is interestingly described with its
1919.] NEW BOOKS 401
peculiar Knickerbocker-like governors. Probably the most useful
chapters deal with the huge feudal manorial grants to the Dutch
and later English patroons. The Van Rensselaer manor is minutely
described as the most typical, being quite like the expansive
holdings of the Pauws, Melyns, Van Cortlands, Philpses, Schuy-
lers. Van Twillers, and Livingstons. However, the Dutch days
were soon ended and the wooden-legged Peter Stuyvesant, obstinate,
courageous autocrat that he is described, had to surrender in 1664
to the English fleet under Colonel Richard Nichols. It would have
been well at this point if Miss Goodwin had developed the Dutch
and English rivalry and the causes of the attack.
Under the governorship of Nichols the Dutch are brought by
tact to give their loyalty to the Duke of York and to live in har-
mony with the English settlers, despite differences in customs,
language, and religion. It was the same policy which in the last
few years won the allegiance of the Boers to the British Empire.
The Duke's laws would seem to call for a more substantial treat-
ment. A brief resume is given of the governorships of Colonel
Francis Lovelace, the Cavalier favorite whose title to fame pro-
ceeds from his establishment of the Long Island race track; of
Colonel Thomas Dongan (the last Catholic governor until Mr.
Martin Glynn) who interested himself in postal roads and a colon-
ial postal service ; of the maligned Edmund Andros who fell when
William of Orange was named king by Parliament; of Colonel
Benjamin Fletcher who antagonized the burghers by building
Trinity Church and the merchants by his embezzling and secret
dealings with buccaneers : of the Earl of Bellomont ; of Lord Corn-
bury a relative of Queen Anne*s whose tenure was shortened by his
theft of public funds; of Robert Hunter, and of William Burnett
the famous bishop's son. It is an account of placing favorites of
the crown who too frequently looked upon the governorship as a
sinecure to enrich themselves and upon representative legislatures
as an objectionable interference with their right of exploitation.
Here we have a fundamental cause of the Revolution. The Leisler
revolt and the famous Zenger freedom of the press trial are duly
emphasized. Withal Miss Goodwin has made a worthy contribu-
tion to the series.
*
Age of Big Business, by Burton G. Hendrick. In his study
Mr. Hendrick shows the development of American business from
the competitive stage of 1865 to the monopolistic stage of today,
from the local market to the world market, and from the limited
liability company to the heavily capitalized trust To find such
an essay treating the question in an historical, conservative, com-
▼OIm cz.
402 NEW BOOKS [Dec.
mon sense manner is indeed refreshing, especially when one con-
siders the possibilities of the subject matter for engendering class
hatreds, if developed by a journalist of radical tendencies. In the
history of American business as in the American politics, there is
much that is undeniably corrupt. However, it is not the sore spots
of our industrial life that one cares to view under the magnifying
lens of our intellectual muckrakers of the past generation or of
the nihilistic parlor demagogues of today. What interests the
student and the general reader is the rise and expansion of indus-
try as an interpretation of America's greatness and future. This
interest is satisfactorily met by Mr. Hendrick's volume.
In 1865, the United States was a nation of farmers, artisans,
and small business men, with but a score of millionaires and with
a $100,000 standard of wealth. In Pennsylvania independent oil
drillers and open air forges gave little evidence of a future Stand-
ard Oil Company and United States Steel Corporation. Coal and
iron were imported; natural resources were untouched; the fac-
tories were family or partnership affairs; horse-cars encumbered
city streets; cattle were driven on Fifth Avenue. Competition
was destructive. The merger of a few hundred miles of railroad
was denounced at a time, when there were thousands of oil drill-
ers, four hundred and fifty coal operators, two hundred harvester
companies, fifty salt companies in the Saginaw valley, fifty copper
companies in Michigan, one hundred developers of the Comstock
lode, thirty transportation companies in New York City, and
uncountable lumber concerns. Combination of capital and con-
centration of business were necessary to develop the national
wealth and to compete for world trade. The period following the
war marked a great change. Commodore Vanderbilt's career is
selected as illustrative of the transition from the old to the new era
of business. Railroad consolidation was the idea of this genius,
who could scarcely read and who was under the spell of clairvoy-
ants and mediums. Vanderbilt connected New York and Chicago
by one road instead of seventeen, cutting the running time in
half and incidentally amassing, by 1877, the first fortune of a
hundred million dollars. The Commodore's idea was a success.
Consolidation followed in every industry.
A chapter is given to the career of John D. Rockefeller and
the rise of the Standard Oil Company. It is not a pleasant story,
but a mighty interesting one ; the campaign against Archibald, the
scandal of the Acme Oil Company, Archibald's manoeuvres, the
struggle for railroad oil terminals, the gathering in of the pipe
line companies, the forcing of rebates, the establishment of the
trust, the legal difficulties, the wiping out of competitors and
1919.] NEW BOOKS 403
middlemen, the entrance into the banking and the raihroad busi-
ness» the fight with the Steel Corporation in the Messaba and Colo-
rado mining fields. The work of Carnegie and the Pittsburgh
millionaires in creating the huge Steel Corporation is told in quite
as dramatic a style. Another chapter recounts the invention of
the telephone by Bell» its perfection by Gray, Puppin and Edison,
and the rise of the American Telephone Company. The organiza-
tion of public utilities is then considered with sketches of the labors,
too often of a political nature, of Yerkes, Widener, Elkins, Ryan,
Dolan, Hanna, W£3tney and Calhoun, in obtaining control of munic-
ipal railways. Next there is developed the consolidation of the
farm machinery business and the incorporation of the Interna-
tional Harvester Company under the skillful manipulation of
George W. Perkins. The concluding chapter deals with the auto-
mobile business and the phenomenal career of Henry Ford.
SHINING FIELDS AND DARK TOWERS. By John Bunker.
New York: John Lane Co. $1.25 net.
Many readers who have read John Bunker's recent contri-
butions to the various magazines — or who know the story of his
literary association and close friendship with Joyce Kilmer —
will give warm welcome at Christmas time to this lirst collection
of his poetic work. The volume is of generous size, and it con-
tains many good things, as was expected of it — also a few sur-
prises which were not expected of it. For it not only proves that
Mr. Bunker is a poet — ^it rather seems to indicate that he is three
different kinds of a poet. At one extreme he gives us the "New
York Sketches," very familiar and colloquial impressions of the
metropolis in very "free verse" — scarcely rising in effect beyond
a vivid but inelegant prose. On the othei^ horizon we find him
building a whole series of poetic structures — ^are these, perhaps,
the "dark towers" of the title? — of which "Enemies Three" may
be chosen as an example. These are highly traditional in form,
exalting in tone, but encrusted with a musical but remote Eliza-
bethan phraseology. Midway between these two extremes stretch
the fertile meadow lands, the "shining fields," which one likes \o
believe most truly representative of Mr. Bunker's inspiration.
For here are poems such as "The Flute Player," **The Great Re-
fusal," noble themes nobly treated — ^work impregnated with the
beauty of nature and the other beauty of pain, and with the su-
preme and all-inclusive beauty of God.
Two of the longest poems in the book are written in the
manner of, in fact are dedicated to, Francis Thompson. Others
are frankly "rumorous" of Crawshaw, of Gerard Hopkins, of Ten-
404 NEW BOOKS [Dec.
nyson and — ^inevitably — of Joyce Kilmer. That is to say, Mr.
Bunker has enjoyed and experimented with a wide range of
poetry. Not the less for this has he remained captain of his
poetic soul. His is a highly personal muse, tender and chastened,
yet capable of merriment, with the far vision of the pure in
heart Lyrics such as ''Revolution,'* 'To Harsh Judgment Think-
ing Itself Wisdom," or, in more playful vein, "Boons," are distinct
additions to the sum of modern poetry.
HISTORICAL RECORDS AND STUDIES. New York; U. S.
Catholic Historical Society.
Volume XIII. of this series published by the Historical So-
ciety presents as its piice de resistance Part II. of Mr. Condon's
interesting essay, "The Church in the Island of San Domingo."
There are, besides, sketches of the careers of Cardinal Farley and
Archbishop Hayes, an attractive life of Giovanni Battista Sartori,
first Papal Consul to the United States, and an illuminating paper
by Father Barnum, S.J., on the Catholic missions of Alaska.
Among the shorter contributions are to be found one by Father
Gerald Treacy on Andrew Carney, as well as a compilation of the
literary work of John A. Mooney, and finally two papers pre-
senting data of a particularly valuable nature — ^the first on the
destruction of the Charleston Convent, the other on the question
of Catholic "desertions" during the Civil War.
A PADRE IN FRANCE. By G. A. Birmingham. New York:
George H. Doran Co. $1.50 net
This volume contains the experiences of a " Chaplain to the
Forces " behind the lines in Belgium and France.
The author, who is Canon Hannay, the well-known novelist,
was designated a P. B., that is, one assigned to a permanent base.
During the latter part of the War he did spiritual and social work
among the men in the training and convalescent camps. The
author was limited by circumstances to a field that was far re-
moved from the spectacular action of the front lines, and conse-
sequently is able to write nothing of those things which go to make
a war book thrilling in movement and inspiring in bravery.
He saw the dull, monotonous, seamy side of war with none
of all those great movements of men in battle or the personal acts
of self-sacrifice which make war interesting although monstrous.
Yet he did have many opportunities in his relations with men to
get something tangible from them which might be of value to a
world interested as never before in knowing the life of the soldier
in battle and out of it. And particularly, when the person in con-
1919-] NEW BOOKS 405
tact happens to be a minister who might seek deeply into men's
souls and bring forth facts to help in the strengthening of their
religious faith. However, if Canon Hannay saw much, he has iiept
it to himself. The book is extraordinarily commonplace in con-
tent. It fails, like an aeroplane with a missing engine, to rise more
than a few feet above the ground.
WORLD'S WAR EVENTS. Compiled and Edited by Francis T.
Reynolds and Alden L. Churchill. Vols. I., II., and III. New
York: P. F. Collier & Son.
The compilers of this fine series conceived the novel but very
logical idea of building a history of the World War from the
writings of those men who, in other publications, official and
otherwise, treated of some special phase of the struggle. These
selections were made because they were the words of eye-wit-
nesses or of those qualified by rank and position to know the
truth of what they spoke. The first article is a reprint from the
National Review of June, 1916, of an essay on **What Caused
the War," by Baron Beyens. Some of the other articles are by
Sir John French, Roland G. Usher, Capt. Mucke of the Emden.
We have also the judicial decision of Judge Mayer on the sinking
of the Lusitania. The second volume contains a masterly article
from the pen of Raoul Blanchard, and the compilers have paid
The Catholic W6rld a well deserved compliment by inserting
in the third volume that wonderful essay by Abb^ Felix Klein
on "The Wounded Heroes of France," which appeared in the
October, 1918, issue.
Altogether one cannot speak too highly of this splendid col-
lection. No library, whether reference or otherwise, can afford
to be without it. It is a well balanced symposium of the best
that has been written about the War. The problem that con-
fronted the compilers must have been to keep the work within
bounds. They have succeeded in this admirably, yet have chosen
wisely and well.
TRAVELLING COMPANIONS. By Henry James. New York : Boni
& Liveright. $1.75 net.
The influential position of Mr. Henry James in the literary
foreground was maintained with such perennial vitality that
probably very few took note of the length of its tenure; conse-
quently, it is almost startling to read the dates^ of the stories
reprinted in this volume and to be thus reminded that fifty years
have elapsed since he made his entrance into the field of fiction, a
young author already master of a mature, fine and individual art.
406 NEW BOOKS [Dec.
How distinctive his art was may be best realized by those who delve
into the volumes of magazines of that period, and read the stories
that appear side by side with his. From these sources the pub-
lishers have compiled the present collection, which must not be con-
sidered an assemblage of relics, gratifying only to devotees of the
author. These stories have an intrinsic interest and appeal for the
general public. It is matter for congratulation that Messrs. Boni
ft Liveright have retrieved these scattered bits and placed them
in the arch with which the worlis of Mr. James span a half-centnry.
SERMONS IN MINIATURE FOR MEDIATATION. By Rev. Henry
E. O'Keeffe, CS.P. New York: The Paulist Press. $1.25.
A pastor Is always glad to see a new book of sermons or
meditations. A man of the mitier, he has an expert's interest in
how others develop familiar themes, what new viewpoints, what
striking illustrations, what telling anecdotes enhance their expo-
sition. In Father O'Keeffe's sermons ideas are to be met on every
pagC' Such headings as "A New Sheen on an Old Coin," "The
Censoriousness of the Righteous," "Jesus and the Plain People,"
"The Moral Beauty of the Cross" will of themselves awaken
pregnant trains of thought in a preacher's mind, and supply him
with a sermon antecedently to all reading of the author's dis-
course. His treatment of the Feasts of the year and the Sunday
Gospels is likewise fresh and unconventional.* The opening ser-
mon of the present volume, "Hopes for the New Year," draws
from the circumcision of our divine Lord admirable moral les-
sons. Even as He obeyed a law to which He was not really sub-
ject, so the Catholic will loyally obey Church laws even if he is
unable to discern their necessity. The Circumcision of our Sa-
viour suggests to ourselves the spiritual circumcision of the heart.
lips and tongue. Again, in the leaven in the meal. Father O'Keeffe
sees a picture and a parable of religion in the modern world.
The volume, by reason of its clearness, brevity, and talent
tor expressing practical issues in an unhackneyed way, will be
a valuable addition to every preacher's and pastor's library.
'H OF TURNUS. But W. Warde Fowler. Oxford: Black-
$1.75.
>wler, in these critical and exegetical observations upon
, Book XIL, brings to a close the series of Virgilian
ich he so brilliantly inaugurated in The Gathering of
and continued in Mneas at the Site of Rome. These
ttle books immeasurably strengthen the position of the
thor as the chief among English Virgilians. They are,
1919.] NEW BOOKS 407
so to speak, the full flowering bloom of that delicate insight and
profound learning of which the commentator's noble chapters on
Virgil in his Religious Experience of the Roman People were the
bud and promise. No scholar, with the solitary exception of J. W.
Mackail, has ever brought a surer taste or a more varied learn-
ing to the study of the prince of poets. An English reviewer ad-
mirably described the first of Mr. Fowler's volumes in this series
as "the epitome and quintessence of English Virgilian taste, a
taste which is as remote from the common judgment of German
erudition as from the centre thrice to the utmost pole."
Mr. Fowler's choice of the twelfth book was determined by
the fact that it is the only one of the last four which contains a
complete story in itself, "while at the same time it forms a mag-
nificent conclusion to the greater story of the whole epic." It
is matter for thought that Mr. Fowler regards the last book of
the JEneid as the most mature of all twelve, the most revelatory
and the worthiest of close study and leisurely reflection.
For two years this great scholar confides to us in his preface.
Virgil, "with his large and liberal humanity," has been his con-
stant and helpful companion. "It has been" — he goes on — "a
time of great anxiety and sorrow; but the dark days are now
passing away. As I write, it is becoming daily more certain that
violentia, with its delusions and pretences, is not to prevail, and
that justitia and fides are still to be the foundation- stones of our
civilization."
THE FREEDOM OF THE SEAS. By Louise Fargo Brown. New
York: E. P. Dutton & Co. $2.00.
It is doubtful if any phrase figuring in the well-known "four-
teen points" has been the object of greater misunderstanding
than that of the "freedom of the seas." The present volume will
aid greatly in furnishing the historical background necessary to
a fair judgment both upon the true meaning of the phrase and
the scope of its application. It traces both the theory and the
practice of the international law of the sea from the earliest days
down to the present time. It shows the various meanings that
have attached to the principle of a free sea in successive cen-
turies, and distinguishes clearly between the earlier claims of
individual nations to exclusive dominion over portions of the high
seas adjacent to their territories, and the later claims based upon
exclusive rights of colonial commerce and upon the rights of a
belligerent to restrict the commerce of other nations in time of
war. The last of these meanings has now come to be the centre
of controversy. In the event of war how far may a belligerent
408 NEW BOOKS [Dec.
interfere not only with the maritime commerce of its enemy,
carried in enemy ships, but with the commerce of neutral states
with the enemy, carried in neutral ships? Are merchant ships
of the enemy, privately owned, to continue to be subject to cap-
ture and destruction, or must the old American claim of the im-
munity of private property be revived and recognized? May
neutral ships be prevented merely from carrying contraband, or
may their commerce with the enemy be entirely cut oflf even to
the extent of restricting their commerce v^th neutral neighbors
of the enemy?
Miss Brown sketches with emphasis the underlying issues of
commercial rivalry. She writes in an engaging manner and sum-
marizes historical controversies in admirably succinct phrases.
But her style suffers from a suggestion of flippancy which is out
of place in the treatment of a serious subject. The concluding
chapter on "The Law of the Sea Tomorrow" touches so lightly
upon problems of such complexity that the lay reader may well
be at a loss to follow the argument. We are promised in the
preface a more thorough study of the period since 1713 in a subse-
quent volume.
DEMOCRACY. By Shaw Desmond. New York : Charles Scribner's
Sons. $1.60.
This book under the form of a novel purports to give a pic-
ture of the unrest of the English proletariat during the several
years immediately preceding the War, throughout the War itself,
and continuing down through the months since the signing of the
Peace Treaty. Denis Destin, the hero, is a Socialist who gives up
his clerkship in the city to enter journalism and politics in order
to advance the workers' cause, and the progress of the story shows
his conversion from the theory of syndicalism and direct action to
that of militant politics and the regular processes of governmental
change.
The author gives a graphic account of the modern industrial
turmoil in England, and under thin disguises presents close por-
traits of the chief modern leaders in English politics, govern-
ment, and labor ; but as a novel the book cannot be considered an
artistic success. It is so weighted with the various social theories
in vogue among the innumerable political parties in England that
the story is smothered in the confused welter.
As an exposition of social theory also the book must be con-
sidered a failure, since the author seems to have neither fixed prin-
ciples nor definite ideas, and like his hero is obliged to leave things
much as he found them — ^in a complete muddle. Despite the
1919.] NEW BOOKS 409
melodramatic ending with the crucifixion of Creagan by an angry
mob» the book leaves us cold; it is inconclusive in every way.
The style is staccato and the author effects the headless sentence
first made popular by Carlyle. In general the author follows the
journalese tradition* but it is high-class journalese, English
rather than American.
THE YOUNG VISITERS. By Daisy Ashford. With Preface by
J. M. Barrie. New York: George H. Doran Co. $1.00.
The question that has been agitating the London reading
public which has snapped up half-a-dozen editions of The Young
Visiters in a month, is, Who wrote it? The ofiBcial party, that
is» the publishers together with such writers as Hugh Walpole,
Frank Swinnerton and Sir James Matthew Barrie, stoutly affirm
that The Young Visiters is **,the unaided effort in fiction of an
authoress of nine years,** and that in the present book ** the pen-
ciled manuscript has been accurately reproduced, not a word
added or cut out.'*
The Young Visiters tells, with childish punctuation and spell-
ing, the story of Mr. Salteena, ** who is not quite a gentleman but
you would hardly notice it but can't be helped anyhow," his un-
happy love affair with Ethel Monticue, " who had fair hair done
on the top and blue eyes," and Salteena's friend and successful
rival, the dashing Bernard Clark, who "was rather bent in the
middle with very nice long legs, fairish hair and blue eyes." Sal-
teena, who is the son of a butcher, has social ambitions and
through his friend Clark meets the Earl of Clincham who — for a
consideration — is to polish up his manners and introduce him
into the higher circles.
The book is such an extraordinary performance there will
probably always be doubts as to the exact circumstances of its
making.
MERCHANTS OF THE MORNING. By Samuel McCoy. New
York: George H. Doran Co. $1.25 net.
Mr. McCoy writes pleasing verse, and unlike many of the
modern school of versifiers he is not at odds with life and the
world — ^he is content with the great simplicities. He is neither
sentimental nor cynical nor affected, nor does he adopt the pose
of extreme sophistication and hard cleverness which profess su-
periority to traditional ways of thinking and acting and feeling.
These of course are all negative merits, but they are merits nev-
ertheless. There is no great passion or emotion in his book, no
sweeping vision, but what he does sing he sings simply and
410 NEW BOOKS [Dec.
clearly. Among the best pieces are "The Bright Day," "The
Hobby Horse," and "The Holy War," but he achieves his finest
metrical effects in "Sarin."
CATECHIST'S MANUAL. First Elementary Course. By Rev.
Roderick MacEachen, D.D., Wheeling, West Va.: Catho-
lic Book Co. $1.75.
This volume will be most serviceable to young catechists, and
youthful mothers in their task of guiding the opening minds of
children.
It is well calculated to impress upon mothers the fact that
children are a sacred trust of God's love, and lead them to learn
of God's own Blessed Mother, how to fulfill the holy office of a
true Catholic mother.
SECOND MARRIAGE. By Viola Meynell. New York: George H.
Doran Co. $1.50.
Alice Meynell's daughter has written another novel, her sixth.
Second Marriage, while it may not greatly add to Miss Meynell's
literary reputation, will, at any rate, sustain it. The setting of
this story is in the wide flat fens of England; the characters are
the members of a family which had possessed its lands for cen-
turies. It is with the subtle processes of their souls that Miss
Meynell is chiefly concerned in this book. There is first the
marriage of Ismay, the beautiful eldest daughter, to the man who
loved her with such abandonment; his death causes her return
to her parents' home where she meets her cousin, Arnold. The
slow progress of their love-affair is a revelation of Ismay's char-
acter, and the subsequent marriage brings the story to a close,
it is all written in a delicately beautiful prose.
MR. STANDFAST. By John Buchanan. New York : George H.
Doran Co. $1.60.
Those who have read Greenmantle and The Thirtg-Nine Steps
by John Buchanan will recall a delightfully reckless character
by the name of Richard Hannay. In the pages of Mr. Standfast
he is the hero of an exciting secret service yarn that takes him
to the desolate coast of Scotland and France trailing a dangerous
and elusive master mind of enemy spydom — Graf von Schwabing.
In this hunt he is assisted by a militant pacifist (?) and a delecta-
ble girl, Mary, who, in the end, furnishes the satisfactory element
of a romance.
As it is not fair for a reviewer to relate the plot of a mystery
story such as this, the reader must go and search for it himself.
And in that searching we can guarantee that he will have a pleas-
1919.] NEW BOOKS 411
ant, exciting and wholly illuminating time. For there are spy
stories and spy stories; and this belongs to the other kind. It is
not written in the usual breathless style of action that we are
accustomed to And in most spy stories ; the literary flavor is there.
The book is excellently written. The action does not simply
sweep along the characters; the characters sweep along the action
— real, live people who have real blood in their veins. Another
unusual touch is given the story by the use of Pilgrim's Progress
as a code. Mr. Standfast, of course, reaches his journey's end
after many vicissitudes.
WAR AND LOVE. By Richard Aldington. Boston: Four Seas
Ck>. 91.25 net
The author of these poems has been unwise enough to write
a foreword in which he declares that his present book, unlike his
volume. Images Old <md New — " is a book by a common soldier
for common soldiers." For this statement gives the reader an
opportunity to take issue vnih the British Lieutenant author, and to
assure him that his impressions of love are the attributes of a
special character and reveal a decidedly pathological stigma.
There has been no lack of singing in English of the intensities
and nudities of human passion, singing raised in a technical
way to the levels of pretentious literature; therefore there is little
need to specify any praise for Mr. Aldington's method of delivery
of his carnal moods. A confessed devotee of the lusts, he remains
lustful amid the carnage and horrors of the battlefield; the sight
of death does not present to him any other picture than contrast
with the beauty of the flesh, and it would almost seem as though
the eternal majesty of the event passed over his head unnoticed, in
the protoplasmic yearnings of his poor, bedraggled, blood-stained
body. The psychologists and physiologists have names and classi-
fications for beings that reveal so clearly the marks of the brute.
Mr. Aldington does not need the critics; he needs a physician.
NEW RIVERS OF THE NORTEL By Hulbert Footner. New
York: George H. Doran Co. $2.00 net.
Mr. Footner writes a very charming account of his explora-
tion of the headwaters of the Fraser, Peace and Hay Rivers in
Northwestern Canada. He ascribes vividly the scenic beauties of
river, lake, mountain and forest, the joys and hardships of camping
out in the open vdthout a guide, the customs and traditions of the
Slavi Indians, and the lives of the pioneers and traders of the vnld
Northwest. The book is well illustrated by seventy-five photo-
graphs taken by the author.
412 NEW BOOKS [Dec.
REZANOV. By Gertrude Atherton. New York: Boni & Liveright.
70 cents.
In the pleasant, convenient form of the publishers' ** Modern
Library " we have now a reprint of Mrs. Atherton's semi-historical
novel, first published in 1906. The selection is appropriate, as the
little book embodies an interesting incident in the story of our
country, the projected Russian aggression in California, in the
year 1806, and also represents the author satisfactorily. No one has
written more effectively and enthusiastically of California than
Mrs. Atherton; in her hands the picturesque values of such a story
are certain of full justice. It is the historical interest and ques-
tions of state craft that predominate in this instance, however,
and in dealing with them the author shows that she familiarizes
herself with her subject before attacking it.
Further application of this excellent principle would have
precluded such an expression as ** Romanism " on the lips of a
Spanish Catholic girl, and other matter distasteful to Catholics.
i
MARYOLIYIER. By May Sinclair. New York: The MacmiUan
Co. $2.00. r^^O^fe^i
This is a very dull, drab life story of a most uninteresting
personality. Mary Olivier's relatives and friends are for the most
part drunkards, imbeciles, lunatics and stupid atheists. The book
is written ostensibly to set forth the author's crude ideas on pan-
theism, and her superficial dabblings in German philosophy. She
is evidently beyond her depth, but that does not prevent her from
rolling off page after page of the most incoherent attacks on every
Christian doctrine. Her admiration for Swinburne and Walt
Whitman may account for the immoral tone of more than one inci-
dent she records. When the French atheist does this sort of thing,
he is at least interesting in a flashy way, and makes some attempt
at style. His English imitator only succeeds in being vulgar, blas-
phemous and inane.
^-i:^
BARBARA OF BALTIMORE. By Katharine Haviland ^Taylor.
New York: George H. Doran Co. $1.50 net.
This is a clear, well-written story of a Baltimore home during
war time. The inevitable German spy gives it the touch of mys-
tery, and the invalid English soldier hero, visiting Dr. Crane and
his family, gives it the touch of romance. The elder daughter is
the villain of the piece, and her selfishness and dishonesty are
punished in good old-fashioned style. Barbara is a sweet girl
heroine of seventeen, worthy of winning the love of any man.
1919.] NEW BOOKS 413
IN A Sketch of Mother Mary Lawrence, F. M. M., by the Rev.
D. J. 0*SuIlivan, M. A.L. (Boston : Society of the Propagation of
the Faith» 25 Granby Street) we find a flower of New England
growth, blooming early in the field of the Chinese Missions. Marie
Comtois» in religion Mother Mary Lawrence, was of French-
Canadian stock settled in Worcester, Mass. She became a Fran-
ciscan Missionary of Mary in 1904 and in 1914 China was assigned
as her portion of the vineyard. The mission of Chang Chung in
Manchoria was confided to her care, but her years were to be short.
In 1917 she closed a life beautified by spiritual and corporal works
of mercy, at the age of thirty-three. A priest who knew her and
gave her the last rites of the Church, said, when asked to write his
impressions: *To do justice to a saint, in writing of her, the writer
himself should be a saint." This American girl, when she saw the
dire poverty of the Chinese poor, wished for the pennies she had
spent for ribbons, ice cream, and candy. The story of her life is a
mute appeal to other souls to deny self and follow the call of the
Lover of souls.
THE road by which souls have traveled on their journey towards
truth is perennially interesting: but it is not often that we
may rejoice in following the footsteps of a convert from Judaism
— one, too, thrilling with the glad enthusiasm of that greatest of
adventures. This is the theme of The Heavenly Road, by Rosalie
Marie Levy. It is divided into four parts: a short survey of the
Jewish nation as the depository of the prophecies of the Messiah,
the life of Jesus Christ as the fulfiUer of these prophecies; next
**What think ye of Christ?" the magnet of the millions through the
ages who have followed Him; lastly what was Christ's mission?
The earnest words of this convert are calculated to inspire travel-
ing on *'the heavenly road" with strength and perseverance until
they too reach the *'One Fold and the One Shepherd." This book-
let may be obtained at 39 K Street, N. W., Washington, D. C.
Price 25 cents, postage, 5 cents.
GOOD OLD STORIES FOR BOYS AND GIRLS, selected by
Elva S. Smith (Boston: Lothrop, Lee & Shepherd. $1.60 net).
Miss Smith, as librarian of the Carnegie Library, Pittsburgh,
has great experience as to what sort of stories boys and girls like.
These she has gathered from many sources. The charming illus-
trations of Miss Bridgeman, sometimes fairylike, sometimes weird,
but always of the enchanted land, enhance the individuality of the
characters of the various stories.
414 NEW BOOKS [Dec.
WE are pleased to notice a fourth and revised edition of a*
Student's History of the United States by Channing. The
book is published by the Macmillan Company (New York). It
presents in a condensed way the history of the United States since
the days of early discovery and settlement of the continent. The
special value of this edition is that the book has been brought
completely up to date» concluding with a summary of America's
participation in the Great War.
VOLUME XV. of the Dictionnaire Apologitique (Paris: Gabriel
Beauchesne)» among other articles, gives a complete study
of "Modernism;" an exposition of "Monism," by Rev. P. Malle-
branco, S.J., an article on the destruction of ancient "Monuments,
by Paul AUard, and one by Godefroid Kuth on the "Middle Ages.
99
«<
THE CATHOLIC HOME ANNUAL FOR 1920 (New York: Ben-
ziger Brothers, 25 cents), contains many interesting articles
by well-known v^iters, beautifully illustrated. We note especially
Blessed Joan of Arc — Saint-elect," by Rt. Rev. Mgr. John Walsh;
The Feasts of Our Holy Mother Church," by Rev. Edward
Garesch6, S.J.; "The Rosary," by Rev. Thomas M. Schwertner,
O.P., and "Subiaco, The Cradle of the Benedictine Order," by Rev.
Michael Ott, O.S.C
AN attractive and useful gift book is the new "thin edition" of
the Manna of the Soul, with Epistles and Gospels by Father
Lasance (New York: Benziger Brothers. $L00 to $4.75, according
to binding).
THE New York Committee of the Fatherless Children of France,
11 West 46th Street, offers attractive cards of Christmas
greetings at ten cents each. The price of one such card keeps one
little war orphan in its mother's home for one day. Cards at $3.00
and $36.00 representing a month's and a year's support may also
be had. The committee offers further a special calendar for 30
cents. The work of the Fatherless Children has the approbation
of the Cardinal Archbishop of Paris. Those who help these His
little ones, will give assuredly to the Christmas Babe Himself.
IRecent Events,
The result of the month's military opera-
Russia, tions have been distinctly unfavorable to
the anti-Bolshevist forces. They have suf-
fered severe reverses on the three principal fronts. On the north
and west Admiral Kolchak has been forced to retire on a wide
line» and at this writing is even contemplating the abandonment
of Omsk, the capital of the All-Russian Government. The civilian
population of Omsk has already departed, and Kolchak has also
ordered a preliminary evacuation of the city by the American
hospital and such government departments as are not directly
necessary to a military defence. It is intended to turn Omsk into
a fortified town surrounded by trenches, but the Supreme Gov-
ernor and the Government, as represented by the Council of Min-
isters, will remain.
Kolchak's withdrawal seems to have been caused by the
recent departure of the Czech troops from the Siberian front.
These forces, which deserted the Austrian armies early in the
War and joined the Russians, have been in Siberia since the Bol-
shevist coup under Lenine and Trotzky, in opposition to which they
placed themselves under Kolchak's command. They have re-
cently been ordered back to Czecho-Slovakia by the Supreme
Council at Paris, and the gap made by their departure afforded
the Bolshevists the opportunity for a wide advance. Kolchak
met the menace by ordering several regiments to the scene, but
lack of transportation facilities made it impossible for these
troops to arrive in time, and the retreat was decided upon.
General Yudenitch, who in our last month's account was ap-
parently on the point of capturing Petrograd and had succeeded
in wresting Gatchina, the strongest point south of Petrograd,
from the Bolshevists, has since lost Gatchina and has been stead-
ily pressed back by the Red armies, over a front of forty-seven
miles^ The failure of Yudenltch's advance has been ascribed to
lack of supplies and men, and especially to his disappointment
in not receiving aid from Finland. According to a late report, the
Finns have decided to send to Yudenitch's assistance a force of
30,000 men in a new drive on Petrograd, but this is unconfirmed.
In the south Denikin has been forced to retire a short dis-
tance from Orel on the road to Moscow, and has met with a num-
ber of local reverses from the Bolshevists on bis whole front In
416 RECENT EVENTS [Dec.
addition he has been hampered by attacks in Iiis rear by Bolshe-
vist cavalry and on his western flank by the Ukrainian forces
under General Petlura. A recent report, however, is to the effect
that the Ukrainians have been taken in the rear by a force of
30,000 Galicians in alliance with Denikin and that, as a conse-
quence, Petlura intends to lay down his arms.
It has been sometimes asserted that Kolchak and Denikin
aim to restore Tsarism or a Russian. Monarchy, but the probability
is that the aim of the anti-Bolshevist leaders is rather to restore
Russia geographically; that the independence of Finland and Po-
land is only half-heartedly recognized by them, and that separa-
tion of the Baltic States is distasteful, since Kolchak, as head of
the All-Russian Government, continues to think instinctively of
these States as provinces of the Russian Empire. This policy has
caused the Baltic States to withhold their aid. For, although op-
posed to the Soviet Government at Moscow, they are equally de-
termined on existence independent of Russia.
As a consequence of this desire for autonomy, a conference
of the Baltic States is now in session at Dorpet, Livonia. Dele-
gates from Finland, the Ukraine, Poland, Letvia, Esthonia and
Lithuania are in attendance. While Russia is also represented.
The Bolshevist Government has been invited to send representa-
tives to this conference to discuss the question of the exchange
of prisoners of war, on which further negotiations are dependent.
The conditions for an armistice with the Bolshevists have not
yet been fixed by the conference, but the Baltic States have agreed
on a neutral zone and have decided to ask the Allies to supervise
it. The Allies are not represented at the Dorpet Conference, but
are kept fully informed of its progress.
The representatives of the Baltic States have issued a long
ofiBcial statement explaining their attitude regarding their entry
into negotiations with the Bolshevist Government. In this state-
ment, which has been made public by the Esthonian Legation in
London, representatives of these Governments point out that it is
not their intention to intervene in the internal affairs of Russia.
The communiqui concludes with the statement that these Gov-
ernments are prepared to enter upon pourparlers with Russia, but
that in order to safeguard their future, they earnestly request the
great democratic States "to supervise the fulfillment of the treaty
should peace be concluded" between them and the Bolshevists.
As a consequence of the disasters to the various anti-Bolshe-
vist movements, radical changes in the Allied Russian policy are
expected in many quarters. Rumors of a proposed parley with
the Soviet Government are numerous, and these were given a cer-
1919.] RECENT EVENTS 417
tain countenance by a recent Guildhall speech by the British Pre-
mier. French statesmen are strongly opposed to such a parley
^th the Reds, believing that Bolshevism in Russia will fall of its
own weight, sooner or later, and that those who aid in its down-
fall will have the greatest power in rebuilding Russia. If the
Allies do not do this, France believes the Germans will, and there-
fore wants the Allies to continue to aid those forces opposed to
the Soviets. Syice Lloyd George's Guildhall speech, Bonar Law,
the Government leader in the House of Commons, has assured
that body that Great Britain has no intention of opening peace
negotiations with Lenine and Trotzky until the House of Com-
mons has had an opportunity to discuss the subject.
Despite the repeated demands of the Su-
Rumania. preme Council that her troops evacuate
Hungary, Rumania still continues her grip
on that country, and is thus the most serious obstacle in the way
of peace in Central Europe. The situation may be succinctly set
forth by the statement that peace in Central Europe cannot be
achieved till the Hungarian treaty is signed, that the Supreme
Council will not sign a treaty with the present Hungarian minis-
try of Premier Friedrich, which it looks upon as a mere tool of
Archduke Joseph, and hence has demanded the election of a new
ministry, and finally that no fair elections can be held in Hun-
gary till the Rumanian troops have been withdrawn. This Ru-
mania has so far managed to avoid.
Rumania's answer to the last three notes of the Peace Con-
ference has just been received in Paris and voted entirely un-
satisfactory. In it, instead of the complete evacuation demanded
by the Supreme Council, Rumania states that she is now with-
drawing her troops to the River Theiss or Tisza, and says nothing
about any further removal. What Rumania seeks to gain from
the occupation of Hungary is to fix her boundary further west
than it was fixed by the Peace Conference. The Thiess line lies
far to the west both of the Peace Conference's line, and the one
which the Rumanians hope eventually to establish. The various
notes of the Supreme Council also insisted that Rumania recog-
nize the fact that the value of the materials seized by her troops
in Hungary must be deducted from the reparations due her, and
also that she must sign the Austrian treaty or not be allowed
to sign the Bulgarian treaty. Rumania's reply is evasive on these
points.
Reports reaching Paris say that the Rumanians have begun
to withdraw their troops from Budai>est. They are evidently
Gi. 27
418 RECENT EVENTS [Dec.
moving back to the Theiss line. These reports say that much
disorder accompanies the withdrawal from the Hungarian capital,
and that ''requisitions" are being conducted on an unprecedented
scale.
Another aggression of Rumania is her recent announcement
to the Supreme Council that she has annexed Bessarabia, a coun-
try about the size of Ireland, formerly belonging to Russia and
still Russian in its customs and ideals, and apparently opposed,
to a large extent, to union with Rumania. Since the armistice
Rumanian troops have occupied this territory, and during the en-
tire history of the Peace Conference, Rumania has been trying
to have it allotted to her. The Conference favored a plebiscite,
but this did not appeal to the Rumanians, who seemed to doubt
their success under such a plan, and decided to make the best of
their opportunity and boldly seize the country. As we go to
press, elections are in full swing for the new Rumanian Parlia-
ment which will meet November 20th. The two hundred and
forty seats to be filled in the Chamber of Deputies are being
sought by two hundred and forty Liberal candidates, under the
leadership of J. J. C. Bratiano, former Premier. It is significant
that provision has been made for the representation of Bessara-
bia in the new Chamber. The opposition of M. Bratiano and
also of his successor in the Premiership to the Peace Treaty as it
now stands, and apparently the whole-hearted opposition of all
Rumania to that document, is based on their refusal to subscribe
to that clause of the Treaty recognizing the rights of minorities,
whether by means of plebiscites or by autonomy.
It has frequently been asserted that there is a lack of honest
cooperation among the Allies in dealing with Rumania. England
and America stand firmly for obliging her to respect the orders
of the Peace Conference. France and Italy have been accused
of not being really so firm as they might be. This charge is borne
out by the fact that the French newspapers generally are favor-
able to Rumania in the latest Hungarian controversy. France
has economic ties with Rumania, and it is known that Italy is
seeking to establish friendly relations with her as the new mis-
tress of the Balkans, in view of a possible Italian confiict with
Czecho-Slovakia and Serbia as a consequence of the Flume inci-
dent.
Reports as to internal conditions in
Germany. Germany are somewhat conflicting. On
the one hand the number of unemployed
has been reduced considerably from month to month. On Au-
1919.] RECENT EVENTS 419
gust 30th, 301,000 unemployed were counted in one hundred and
thu-teen cities. On October 19th only 232,000 unemployed were
counted in one hundred and seventeen cities, including Berlin
and most of the large places. The Federal Labor Ministry cal-
culates from these figures that there are about half a million un-
employed in all Germany, while not six months ago it was nearly
a million and a half. From talks with officials and labor leaders,
competent investigators assign the following reasons for this
comparatively favorable situation: First, employees have al-
ready gained a considerable increase in wages and other privi-
leges all around. Second, they are tired of strikes, seeing their
gains in wages swallowed by enforced idleness. Third, the re-
awakening of trade with foreign countries, which has already as-
sumed a much larger proportion than is realized outside of Ger-
many.
On the other hand the mark has reached the lowest value in
its history, the American dollar at present being worth from
thirty-five to forty marks, whereas, normally it is worth only four
marks. Moreover, the introduction of the eight-hour day has
crippled German industry in competing with countries where pro-
duction is greater, and many businesses are on the verge of bank-
ruptcy. To remedy this condition, however, German industrial
leaders are counting on the compulsory eight-hour day being
introduced into other countries, as it has already been
introduced into the principal trades in England, and once the
eight-hour day is universally accepted by all industrial countries,
they believe that Germany will not find it difBcult to compete again
in the world's markets.
As a means of stopping emigration from Germany, which had
been urged in some quarters as an economic necessity, the news-
papers are calling attention to the recent report of the German
Mining Commission sent to France to ascertain the extent of the
damage done to French mines during the War. The Commission
reports that the work of reconstruction will have to be done ''from
the ground up,'' and that the task is so great as to furnish work for
all the unemployed in Germany for the next eight years.
On November 4th a ten-day cessation of all railway passenger
traffic throughout Germany was put into effect by the Government,
and since November 16th only trains absolutely necessary have
been allowed to operate. This plan was decided upon in an effort
to prevent a national catastrophe owing to lack of coal, and to safe-
guard the transportation of potatoes before the first frost comes,
the trains being used to carry only these necessary supplies. The
predicament is largely the result of protracted strikes in the rail-
420 RECENT EVENTS [Dec.
way repair shops, which have prevented production of the rolling
stock needed to offset the wastage caused by the War, and to take
the place of the five thousand engines handed over to the Entente.
A committee of radical leaders has issued a manifesto, an-
nouncing that the general strike of all workers to support the
metal workers in their protracted walkout has been abandoned,
owing to the attitude of the Majority Socialists and of the trades
unions. The metal worker's strike still continues, but Minister
of Defence Noske has adopted very severe measures to prevent the
outbreak of the general strike. Troops have occupied the head-
quarters of the Independent Socialists, and documents were seized
which, it is said, prove Communist activity on the part of the In-
dependents.
German Bolshevists who planned to observe the anniversary
of Lenine's victory over Kerensky on November 7th, were foiled
by Minister Noske. Sixty Independent Socialist and Communist
leaders in Berlin were arrested, and processions which the radical
element attempted to organize, were broken up by Government
forces without trouble. In Munich, Hamburg and other large
cities the anniversary of the Russian Red Revolution passed with-
out incident.
The vital statistics of the German people during the War
period have recently been published. The total German losses,
including deaths from underfeeding due to the blockade, as well as
the direct losses in the armies, are now placed by the ofiBcial
statisticians at 5,500,000. The report also shows the effect of the
War upon the birth and death rates. In 1913 the number of
babies born in Germany was 1,839,000, and as the deaths of the
year amounted to 1,006,000 there was a gain of 834,000 in the
population. By 1918, on the other hand, these figures were almost
reversed. There were 1,630,000 deaths and only 945,000 births,
so that there was a net excess of deaths over births of 885,000.
The past month in France has been for the
France. most part one of expectation rather than of
action. The Supreme Council, it is true,
has addressed notes to various countries — ^to late enemies such
as Germany and to late Allies such as Rumania, both of which
have paid equally scant heed to the Council's demands and remon-
strances; but in the main the attitude has been that of waiting to
see the result of the deliberations of the American Congress on the
Peace Treaty. The Supreme Council on five different occasions
has formally announced that on a certain day it would fix a date
for the coming of ofiScial peace, and as many times has postponed
1919.] RECENT EVENTS 421
the date in the hope that America would be able to deposit her
ratification at the same time as England* France and Italy» and
perhaps Japan. In the event of the Treaty's rejection by America
it is the general opinion of the French press that the League of
Nations is doomed.
As a result of the long debates and proposed reservations of
the American Senate, the formal deposit of ratification by the vari-
ous countries who have already accepted the Treaty will, accord-
ing to trustworthy information, be delayed no longer and will al-
most certainly be made before the end of November, no matter
what action the Senate may take. The conclusion of the Peace
Conference seems to have been definitely set for December 1st, a
date chiefly determined by the American and British delegations
who insist on leaving France at that time.
For the past few months European diplomats have been going
ahead making plans in anticipation of the failure of the League.
It has so happened that this work has been done largely without
America, and the preparations for putting the Treaty into effect,
have been made by those nations which have ratified it, namely,
England, France and Italy. For some time it was the ordinary
presumption that the Council of the League of Nations was to be
more or less of a clearing-house for the execution of the Treaty.
Several months ago there appeared one day an announcement of
the creation of a new commission, one not named in the Peace
Treaty. It was to be known as the Commission on Coordination,
and to it were to report all the Commissions not tied to the League
of Nations, and it, in turn, was to report to the different Foreign
OflBces. Four days later its name was changed to the "Commis-
sion for the Enforcement of the Peace Treaty." This Commission
now stands to play the rdle it used to be supposed the Council of
the League would play. It is to be one big, powerful piece of ma-
chinery for the enforcement of the Peace Treaty. It vnll be
stronger than the Reparations Commission, for it will have all
the powers given to the Reparations Commission and others in
addition.
Elections for the French Parliament are now being conducted
through the whole of France. After a lapse of nearly half a cen-
tury Alsace-Lorraine will again be represented. Not a single can-
didate in the restored provinces has been found to go before the
people as a protester against union with France or even as a neu-
tralist
M. Cl^menceau is apparently fixed in his determination to quit
party politics immediately after the general election. Whether he
will accept the nomination to succeed President Poincari at the
422 RECENT EVENTS [Dec.
end of January, is still regarded as an open question, but the feel-
ing is growing that he will not. What is generally believed is,
that he will insist, if possible, on controlling the selection of his
successor in such a way that Aristide Briand will not be able to get
the nomination. In the early part of November the Premier ap-
pointed Captain Andr6 Tardieu to a Cabinet post. Until this ap-
pointment Briand was regarded as the only probable successor to
Cl^menceau. Tardieu was looked upon as a mere possibility. The
latter's entry into the Ministry, however, has greatly improved
his chances, and he is now considered as Briand's most danger-
ous rival.
No solution has yet been found for the
Italy. Fiume problem. Foreign Minister Tit-
toni's compromise plan proposed that Italy
should be given most of Istria, as well as a certain suzerainty over
the city of Zara in Dalmatia, with a considerable number of the
Dalmatian islands, while Fiume itself and the surrounding terri-
tories would be a buffer state under control of the League. The
mainland of Dalmatia, except Zara, would go to the Jugo-Slavs.
This proposal has been rejected by the American Government as
giving Italy a great deal of territory inhabited by enormous Slav
majorities. Rumors are current to the effect that new proposals
are to be made, the initiative being assigned to France in one re-
port, while another has it that Italy has received from Lloyd
George a pledge that a settlement of the Adriatic question, consist-
ent with the honor of Italy and the interests of all the Allies,
would be reached. Meanwhile disorders between D'Annunzio's
troops and Italian regulars passing through Fiume have been re-
ported, but details are withheld.
The result of the Italian elections, set for the middle of No-
vember, are awaited with great interest The War and the new
method of voting have brought about a great change in the class
of candidates for the Chamber of Deputies. The electoral reform
consists in voting not merely for a candidate representing one
constituency, as was the case formerly, but for a list comprising
from ten to twenty candidates who have the same aims and polit-
ical programme. This reform has for object to prevent cor-
ruption, which was much easier when only one candidate had to
be dected by a relatively limited number of electors. On the
other hand, it has had the effect of eliminating from the lists many
of the best known Deputies whose terms expire, such as Barzilau,
ex-Minister and a delegate to the Peace Conference under Orlando,
ex-Premier Sonnino, and others, who are unwilling to have their
1919.] RECENT EVENTS 423
names figure in lists of candidates with whom they cannot fully
cooperate owing to differences of opinion. The two parties which
are expected to make the largest gains are the Socialists and the
Popular Party, or Catholics, as they are the only two parties
which have constantly had a definite political programme, well
organized and widely diffused. The other parties can hardly be
called parties, as they are mere followers of a leader and are called
after him, as, for example, Giolittiana (followers of Giolitti), fol-
lowers of Orlando, Salandra, etc.
The Popular Party has a large programme of reforms, among
them being wider popular education, energetic measures for the
development of agriculture, so that Italjfteay produce what is nec-
essary for her own consumption, and the entire reorganization of
Italian industries to enable the nation to be less dependent upon
imports. It also requests that the Government guarantee respect
for the Church.
D'Annunzio has issued a proclamation to the citizens of
Fiume setting the date of the Italian elections for the election of a
Deputy representing Fiume in the Italian Chamber of Deputies.
Commander Luigi Rizzo, formerly of the Italian navy and at pres-
ent commander-in-chief of the D'Annunzio sea forces, is the can-
didate announced by the D'Annunzio bureau of information.
Conditions in Hungary continue to verge on
Hungary. desperation. In Budapest alone nine hun-
dred thousand persons are out of work;
scarcely any money is in circulation except Communist paper,
which is practically worthless; clothes and the necessaries of life
are almost unprocurable. The small peasant proprietors were
alienated by the highhanded methods of the Bela-Kun Soviet
regime, whose mismanagement in the cities closed the factories
and in the country produced stoppage of the food supply. The
capital is without coal and almost without food, pumpkins and
watermelons being the only nourishment the great majority of the
people can obtain. To these hardships have been added recent
heavy snowfalls accompanied by severe cold.
Reports indicate that the suffering is very intense both in
Vienna and Budapest because of lack of fuel and food. The situ-
ation is made worse in Budapest by the presence of the Rumanian
troops, who are reported to be still seizing food-stuffs and supplies
of all sorts, regardless of the warnings of the Supreme Council.
The Allied Commission in Budapest has been unable to let the
hospitals in Hungary have supplies for their patients because of
the immediate seizure of these supplies by the Rumanians. Hence
424 RECENT EVENTS [Dec.
large stocks of medicine and hospital equipment are held in stor-
age in Budapest under an American guard, while Red Cross sup-
plies originally intended for Budapest have been diverted else-
vrhere en route, to prevent them from falling into Rumanian
hands. The people in Budapest are reported to be cutting down
the trees in the parks and on the boulevards, and digging out the
roots in an effort to get enough fuel.
The political situation also is in turmoil, and latest reports
indicate that the Allies have taken energetic measures to bring it
to order. Sir George Clerk, the Allied Emissary, has delivered on
behalf of the Supreme Council at Paris, it is stated, an ultimatum
to Premier Friedrich, whose government succeeded the short
regime of Archduke Joseph, who in turn came into power on the
downfall of the Soviet established by Bela-Kun. The ultimatum is
said to notify Premier Friedrich that he must form a coalition
cabinet within forty-eight hours, or must retire from the Premier-
ship. The Supreme Council has taken the position that it is not
prepared to negotiate a treaty with the present government of
Hungary, holding that it is not properly representative of the na-
tion. Count Albert Apponyi, the Magyar Nationalist leader and
former Prime Minister of the Hungarian Kingdom, has accepted
the presidency of the peace commission, which will go to Paris
when summoned by the Supreme Council to negotiate the Hun-
garian peace treaty, but there is no indication that the Supreme
Council will receive this commission.
Persistent reports for the last several months would seem to
indicate that there is a widespread desire throughout Hungary
for the restoration of the old monarchial form of government.
Various names have been mentioned in this connection, the most
frequent being that of the Archduke Francis Joseph Otto, eldest
son of former Emperor Charles. The Duke of Connaught and
King Ferdinand of Rumania have also been spoken of, the mon-
archist party having issued a statement saying that, while It is
desirous of reestablishing a kingdom, It does not favor the restor-
ation to the throne of any member of the Hapsburg family. In
the doubtful event of Archduke Francis* selection and the still
more doubtful sanction of him by the Allies, he would assume
the throne under some sort of regency by the State Council, as he
has not yet reached his seventh birthday.
November nth.
With Our Readers.
A LENGTHY and useful essay might just now be written on the
forgetfulness and the blindness of the world. The nations
apparently are so shaken with radicalism and revolution that they
seem in danger of losing their very life. This is, we believe, only
apparent : yet the evil is great and far-reaching : certainly serious
enough to merit all the thought and action that we, who believe in
the continuance of Christian civilization, can put to it.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
THE Great War brought us, as a people, back to many basic
truths we had forgotten or neglected. Strange to say, the
world saw again and accepted basic Catholic truth which it had
long and often ridiculed and denied. Duty was once more en-
throned in its high place. Previously, because duty was duty, it
had been robbed of merit. In some perverse way the world had
divorced the voluntary from duty, and had claimed, in a fatuous
way, that only the former was meritorious and worthy. Lowell
had sung the modern fallacy in his Sir Launfal: ''He gives nothing
but worthless gold who gives through a sense of duty." The na-
tion-wide draft changed all this. A man's highest merit was his
duty to his country — to serve not where he wished but where his
Government found the best use for him — at home or overseas.
The Great War made fasting and mortification even fashion-
able. It pressed home to men the reality and the necessity of the
Catholic truth underlying our eternal redemption by Christ — ^vicar-
ious sacrifice. The youngest among us, the healthiest, the strong-
est, the bravest went out to die that we might live.
The world had forgotten : the world was forced once more to
remember.
♦ ♦ « «
THE War has passed. The heights to which we climbed we find
too high and too lonely. We would return to the pleasanter
valleys below: give over the strain and the tension — and live in
peace. But the strain from which we thought ourselves free, has,
in some way, possessed the valley also. We cannot escape it. The
War still, in effect, endures. We cannot clearly analyze: we are
at a loss to define, or to explain, but we find the valley from which
we went forth to the hills, a changed place. The world is changed.
How far is the change to go? Will the old peace ever reign again?
426 WITH OUR READERS [Dec
Does the present change mean practically a social revolution?
Prophet indeed would be the man who could answer truthfully
and definitely.
Not only do we know a great change has taken place but that
mighty forces are battling each other* and upon the successful
play of one or the other will depend the immediate future of na-
tions and of civilization. No man may count himself unimportant
in the struggle. It is a war into which every man, woman and
child is drafted for service by the supreme call of God. No one is
exempt. And as the war of physical fighting led the world to rec-
ognize its f orgetfulness : led it to see the necessity and importance
of basic truths, long scorned, may not this even greater war for the
very life of Christian civilization lead many to recover ancient
truths and renew ancient sacrifices?
^p ^p ^p ^p
ONE may easily allow weak imagination to play the rdle of
reason. The latter demands knowledge both of principles
and of facts, and carries with it the heavy burden of concrete jus-
tice. Imagination shifts the burden from self and idly pictures
two classes — those who support law and order, and those who do
not. Under the former it categorically classifies all who stand for
the present economic system : under the latter all who do not It
does not take pains to discriminate, nor to ask itself whether, in
making such ill-considered classification, it does an injustice to
law and order and to the very economic system which its seeks to
maintain and defend.
How many, without regard to principle, stand for the pres-
ent system because it protects them in their own injustices,
their own violation of God's law, and their own evil doing? How
many stand for it unintelligently, never seeking to amend its
faults and thus strengthen it? Its evils are not only apparent but
glaring. Leo XIII. pointed them out many years ago. If time has
led the world to forget them, it does not mean the world has cor-
rected them. They are as true and as apropos today as when first
written. Leo XIII. spoke to a world which did not and does not
recognize nor accept his authority. It is now being forced by
other and harsher means to acknowledge his wisdom. Reading
it now for the first time, one might readily believe the following
introduction was written but yesterday:
'That the spirit of revolutionary change, which has long been
disturbing the nations of the world, should have passed beyond the
sphere of politics and made its influence felt in the cognate sphere
of practical economics is not surprising. The elements of the con-
flict now raging are unmistakable in the vast expansion of indus-
1919.] WITH OUR READERS 427
trial pursuits and the marvelous discoveries of science; in the
changed relations between masters and workmen; in the enormous
fortunes of some few individuals, and the utter poverty of the
masses; in the increased self-reliance and closer mutual combina-
tion of the working classes; as also, finally, in the prevailing moral
degeneracy. The momentous gravity of the state of things now
(detaining fills every mind with painful apprehension; wise men
are discussing it; practical men are proposing schemes; popular
meetings, legislatures, and rulers of nations are all busied with
it — and actually there is no question which has taken a deeper
hold on the public mind."
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
THE serious evils and injustices the Encyclical points out still
endure, only aggravated by the greater centralization of
wealth. It will hardly be said that the world has grown more Chris-
tian since the Encyclical was written.
The continuation and increase of those abuses prove, at least,
that many who claim to be such, are not the true supporters of
law and order and justice. They regard the present system as a
means of making all they can get ; and, provided they escape suc-
cessful prosecution by the civil law, they are doing ''right." That
is the simple canon of modern business. Therefore to group all
who stand for modern business and for the entire economic sys-
tem, without reservation, as defenders of law and order and
Christian civilization is ill-advised to say the least.
In similar way many who are opposing present-day evils are
not opposed to the present-day economic system. They believe in
it but they wish it modified and perfected unto justice. Keenly
alive to the growing evils that have fixed themselves upon it as
excrescences, they realize that unless the evils are removed the sys-
tem will be carried under by the weight of its own ills. Often they
may be high-tempered, their language may be intemperate and
highly colored, but the justice of their plea and the less fortunate
ones in whose name they make it, ought to lead us to see their
merit more readily. Our souls ought to be equally — and more-^
sensitive to abuses than theirs : our hands more ready to work for
their removal. We are but injuring law and order and justice and
the present economic system when we class them all indiscrimi-
nately as revolutionists.
« ♦ ♦ ♦
EXACT knowledge of aim and of motive is the handmaid to jus-
tice. And justice, however irksome, will alone promote
truth. The radical and the revolutionist would be glad if the
conservatives would drive into their camp those who might be
428 WITH OUR READERS [Dec.
termed the honest liberals. And much of the far-flung radical
propaganda has this very thing for its object — ^to label the de-
fenders of the present system, defenders also of the evils
which, in defiance of Catholic principles and Catholic teaching,
have attached themselves to it.
In the alignment and the judging of forces there must there-
fore be the study and the reading that will enable us to know
''what we are talking about." Much is heard today of the ''parlor
Reds," of those who talked more defiantly than they acted: who
never dreamed their preachments would be reduced to action:
but who now find that their doctrines have been logically interpre-
ted by more practical followers. The ideas, the teachings, the
dogmas which their forerunners circulated by the si>oken and
written word, have brought forth action and been incorporated
into social and economic life. Ideas are not barren. The creeds
of today are the deeds of tomorrow.
« « ♦ ♦
THE Catholic Faith is not only a revelation concerning eternal
life; it is a philosophy for temporal life. It directs not only
the individual, but, through the individual, all human relations
and all human society. God has made certain laws for the uni-
verse. While He abides with them, still they, as a rule, work
their pre-ordained course. Christ our Lord has revealed divine
truths and given them to the Church for safe-keeping. The
Church gives them to us to carry out, and it is for us to study, to
apply, to readjust. It is for us to know their application which is
their philosophy. The Church does not inaugurate or create phil-
osophy : it stimulates, protects and safeguards it. It never put into
execution the inevitable sequence of the truth, that Christ died for
all, namely that all men are equal. Rightly and vdsely it allowed
men to see and declare the liberty of man; the freedom of the
slave; the integrity of the family; the onward march to Christian
democracy.
Under her inheritance there rests upon us the need of con-
stant study first of her principles and her teachings, secondly, of
the application of them to the life of our day. Human nature may
never change: but human life in its infinite readjustments is al-
ways changing. It is changing now with kaleidoscopic rapidity.
To anticipate and to measure, require watchfulness, knowledge.
The great Catholic truths are the magnet which draws in right di-
rection all these forces, tendencies, conditions and impulses. If
ideas always precede and guide actions, we may easily see our
duty in the premises. We also ought to know and to read : we also
ought to speak and cast broadcast our inestimable inheritance —
1919.] WITH OUR READERS 429
to combat the idealistic and evil-breeding preachments of parlor
Socialists and zealous revolutionists.
The growth of Catholic schools of sociology; of Catholic serv-
ice schools; the increase of Catholic book and pamphlet literature
on the subject are hopeful encouraging signs. Every parish ought
to have its reading circle and study club. Every Catholic ought
both to support and interest himself in such reading matter. If,
in any great measure this were done, would we not send forth into
modern society those ideas of Catholic teaching — old yet new —
which by their divine strength would not only appeal but captivate
and lead to far-reaching Catholic action.
THE advertisements of new books concerning communications
with the dead are pitiful evidence of both the need of personal
faith in a living God and the lack of it. For the Catholic the Com-
munion of Saints is a living truth. We are all made one in Christ
and through Christ with the Father. This is a fact — not to be
made so at some future date and after death — ^but by the power of
Christ, here and now. It is the forgetfulness of this fact that has
made the world forget God. Man is so poor and God is so gener-
ous. The medium in which He gives us life with Him is Christ,
His Divine Incarnate Son. By reason of his faith a Catholic
knows he lives with God and also with his beloved dead, because
they also live with God. The integrity of time and eternity: of
this life and the life to come: of his loved and loving ones here
and hereafter, is by that Faith preserved and perfected.
♦ ♦ ♦ 4t
THE life of God for man is the imitation of Christ. Christ as
Man accepted not only the will of God: but He bowed His
sacred Head even to the will of man. He came to do the will of the
Father Who sent Him. He never sought to anticipate it. In this
He gave a supreme example of a supreme truth — ^that belief in
God exacts acceptance of and confidence in His will. To strive to
anticipate it : to strive to lift the veil from a future which He has
decreed to be dark, is fundamentally to question His right as our
Creator and His will as our God. The first of the Ten Command-
ments is the basis of all the others. Weaken that, and the whole
structure of one's obedience is weakened.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
THE cult of spiritism and spiritualistic stances and all and
everything connected with them is an index of the lack of
faith in God. They who walk without Him give themselves to
everything that in turn gives promise of supplying His absence.
Superstitions, charms, taboos multiply: and those who refuse to
430 WITH OUR READERS [Dec.
accept the magnificent reasonable truths of Christianity give
credence to paltry, inconsequential and unreasonable beliefs.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
THE grave importance of the whole question should lead us
not only to watch against, but positively avoid, everything
that urges or tempts us to know the future. Little may be thought
of fortune-telling. Many who indulge in it call it trivial; they
claim not to consider it as serious. It is a pleasant contest of
clever guessing. But is it not true that every one of us is more or
less affected by what is told us of our future? No question is more
interesting to everyone of us. Our souls are open-eared at once
when the word is mentioned. Our own fears and ambitions have
already made them superlatively sensitive. When prophecy falls
upon them we at least have the burden of rejecting it and assuring
ourselves we give it no credence. And this burden is ours even
though it be but the reading of palms, or of a teacup or an up-
turned cut at cards. The cultivation of positive faith in God and
His providence through all the mazes and tragedies of life is dif-
ficult enough. We are not free to handicap it even in the slightest
way. We are not free to think ourselves so certain of absolute
trust in Him that we can afford to juggle with necromancy.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
QOD has divine, infinite concern for our souls and our bodies,
for our present and our future. To prefer any other means
to Him is certainly questioning and endangering that intimate
personal trust and love that should bind us to Him. To live up to,
to walk with a large-hearted, big-minded human friend taxes every
power we have. To live worthy of him, we often feel, is quite
beyond our best powers. We can but give him, we say, what we
have and this we give gladly.
To walk with God is to walk with Divine Omnipotence. To
give Him absolute trust and utmost confidence is the first condi-
tion of divine companionship. Then through His divine power He
will raise us up to heights that of ourselves we could never attain.
It is worth while to let Him work His holy will in us — ^whatever it
may be. And thus our hearts shall possess what it was never pos-
sible, in their brightest dreams of the future, to conceive.
IN the September, 1919, issue of The Catholic World, we spoke
of the missionary call from the East and how Maryknoll had
and would continue to answer it. Father Francis Xavier Ford,
a graduate of Maryknoll, speaks of how compelling that call is
even in the silence of the night at Yeungkong, China :
'^Benedicte, Stellm Cmli, Domino. — The sky at night is a won-
1919.] WITH OUR READERS 431
derful gift of God to us. Especially these cool crisp nights when
its blue is deeper and the stars seem close and compel our admir-
ation. It is all so peaceful, so removed from grosser life, God-like
in its silent speed and gentle power.
''It is a nightly call to thoughts of the foreign missions.
Even to the natural man it brings the questioning thought of what
the other half of the world is doing. Even the purse-proud feel
small in presence of its majesty. It makes us all so childish in
our puny might, and purifies and clarifies our relations with the
universe.
"It takes our thoughts from self and selfish seeking, and as
though in contrast with its cold spirituality, it warms us to our
fellow-man. The twinkling lamps of the hillside homes or city
streets are mellowed in our thoughts and we feel grateful for
their warmth.
"To the missioner its silent appeal is bewitching. The famil-
iar stars watching over a strange land are links with home. They
are His comforting angels — God's eyes that watch with Him, that
aid Him in his review of the day's work, that teach him peace,
perhaps, when the heat of the day and the drain on his smiles
have been trying.
"They reassure Him that the world is God's, though men may
not heed Him; fhey promise by their steady light to praise the
Lord and give Him glory while the few worshippers in the heathen
night are sleeping."
<< I T makes one's heart bleed to read the appeals of the mission-
1 aries among the negroes in our South — and to realize how
helpless we are to send them more than a mere pittance." So
speaks an appeal from the Catholic Mission Board for work
among the colored people.
That Board at present pays the salaries of one hundred and
forty-nine sisters and of fourteen priests. The salary paid the
latter is only $15 per month — so that the "overhead" must be
slight indeed. Indeed the entire monthly payroll is only $3,240.
Yet the Board has difficulty to meet this. It yearns to be able to
extend its efforts, for the need is pitiable. Therefore the appeal
goes to the Catholics of America. The office of the Board is One
Madison Avenue, New York City.
-' BOOKS RECEIVED.
Tbb Hacmillan Co., New York:
The Next Step in Democracy, By R. W. Sellan, Ph. D. 11.50. StOTm in a Tea-
cup. By E. Phillpotts. Second Report of the Joint Commisi on on the Book
of Common Prayer Appointed by the General Convention of I';i3. |1.50. The
Wild Swans at Coole, By W. B. Teats. |1.25.
G. P. Putnam's Sons, New York:
A Short History of Rome. By G. Ferrero and G. Barbagallo. |1.90 net Voltaire
and His Letters. Translated by S. G. Tallentyre. |3.50 net
Thb Four Seas Co., Boston:
Ibsen in England. By M. A. Franc. |2.00 net Poems. By B. Curran. fl.OO net
The Soothsayer. By V. von Heidenstam. 11.25 net Siances wiUi Carlyle. By
E. Hacleod, A.M. |1.25 net
Yalb UNiVBBsmr Pbcss, New Haven:
Tales from the Secret Kingdom. By Ethel M. Gate. |2.00. The Policeman and
the Public. By A. Woods, A.M. |1.S5.
Frederick Pustbt St Co., New York:
Prmfatio in Missis Defunctorum. Prmfatlones in Festis et Missis Votivis. S.
Joseph, Spousi B.V.M.
Russell Saoe Foundation, New York:
American Marriage Laws in Their Social Aspects. By F. S. Hall and E. W. Brooke.
B. W. HuEBSCH, New York:
The Old Freedom. By Francis Nellson. |1.00.
Clark & Fmnrrs, New York:
Old-Fashioned Verses. By Wm. T. Homaday.
Marshall Jones Co., New York:
Walled Towns. By Ralph A. Cram, LL.D. |1.25.
BoNi ft LivBRiGHT, Ncw York:
Our America^ By Waldo Frank. |2.00 net
Tbb Abingdon Press, New York:
A History of Latin America. By W. W. Sweet fS.OO net
E. P. DuTTON ft Co., New York :
The Homestead, By Z. Humphrey. |1.90 net The Betrayers, By H. Drummond.
11.90 net Labor in the Changing World. By R. M. Maclver.
Gborgb H. Doran Co., New York:
Jeremy. By H. Walpole. 91.75 net Sunrise From the Hill-Top, By B. Barmby.
Simonetta. By E. Lef^vre. $1.50 net
Henry Holt ft Co., New York:
The Old Madhouse. By Wm. C Morgan. |1.90 net.
Alfred A. Knopf, New York:
Poems. By J. C. Squire. $1.50 net Books in General. By S. Eagle. $2.00 net
Charles Sgribner*s Sons, New York:
War In the Garden of Eden. By K. Roosevelt American Painting and lis Tra-
ditions. By J. G. Van Dyke. |2.50.
The Page Co., Boston:
Famous Generals of the Great War. By C. H. L. Johnston. $2.00 net The Bust"
ness Career of Peter Flint. By H. Whitehead. $1.50 net Celebrated Spies and
Famous Mysteries of the Great War. By G. Barton. |2.00 net
Little, Brown ft Co., Boston:
Health Through Will Power. By J. J. Walsh, M.D., Ph.D. $1.50 net
Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston:
Life of Dante Alighieri. By C. A. Dinsmore. $2.50 net The Philosophy of Con-
flict. By H. Ellis. 92.50.
Thb Atlantic Monthly Pbess, Boston:
The League of Nations. By Stephen P. Duggan.
J. B. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia :
Winona^s Way. By Margaret Widdemer. |1.S5 net
Gommittbe on Special War Activities, National Catholic War Council, Washingtoiia
D. C:
A Program for Citizenship.
Extension Press, Chicago:
The Reformation. By Rev. Hugh P. Smyth. 91-25.
A. C. McCluro ft Co., Chicago:
Good Cheer. By Humphrey J. Desmond. 60 cents.
The Bobbs-Merrill Co., Indianapolis:
Bolshevism and the United States. By Charles E. Russell. 91'50 net
Kansas Statb Board or Agriculture, Topeka:
Twenty-first Bi-ennial Report of the Kansas Board of Agriculture,
Burns ft Oates, London:
Some Ethical Questions of Peace and War. By Rev. W. McDonald, D.D. 9$,
JANUARY 1920
'. :>
. 4
.■:'■ '
THE
<3[atholie ^pld
FreBent Wages arid Prices
John A. Rijaiiy D.D. 434
A Po^sh Mystic on the National Resurrection
i Monica M, Gardner
The Silver Lining
Song \}{ Going
The llvil of Poverty
Affiribation
Henry Bordeaux at the Gpal
The First Snow
The Chesterbellpc
Niagara in Winter
Shakespe&re and the Art of Music
John Cavanangh, C.S.C,
Katharine Tynan
Vincent McNablr, O.P.
Ldura Simmons
William H. Scheifleij, Ph.D.
E. J. 0' Toole
Theodore Maynard
Edward F. Garesche, SJ,
F. J. Kelly, Mus.D.
Revival of French Catholic Social Activity
Max Turmann, LL.D.
The Doctrine of Signatures
The Loyalist
Harrieilc Wilbur
James Francis Barrett
New Books
Recent Events
Russia, France, Italy, Germany
'^ With Our Readers
Father Hecker and Present Problems
Price— 26 cents; $3 per year
The Sditor
THE OFFICE OF THE CATHOLIC WORLD, NEW YORK
120-122 West COth Street
444
450
463
464
470
471
476
483
496
498
504
510
515
Rnt^rfd u ^N^ond-class matter at the Post OCQce mX New York. N. 1.
JANUARY, 1920
.10%
A Primer of
Old Testament History
RcTJ. Francis E. Gigot, D.D.
The Well Known Biblical Scholar of St. Joseph's
SetninaTy, Dunwoodie, New York
'T^IIIS is the first of a series of Biblical
Primers to be published. It sum-
marizes Sacred History from the crea-
tion of the world to the conning of
Our Blessed Lord. The book is Veil
printed in handy size. It is enriched
with illustrations and appropriate maps.
An excellent volume to be in the
hands of pupils beginning a Scripture
Course.
Price 60 Cents
Carriage loc
THE PoA UL I S T ^RESS
jio-iii WEST 6oih STREET, NEW YORK CITY
1
THE
^atholie^opld
Vol. ex.
JANUARY, 1920
No. 658
I
\
I
PRESENT WAGES AND PRICES.^
BY JOHN A. RYAN, D.D.
NE of the statements in the Social Recon-
struction Programme of the National Catholic
War Council is that the present level of wages
should not be reduced, except in a small number
of cases. That statement received considerable
criticism at the time the Programme was issued. I do not think
it is receiving so much criticism now. The reasons given for^
that declaration were three. First, that wages have not on the
whole increased faster than the cost of living since 1913; sec-
ond, that the average level of wages now, high as it is, is not
above a living wage in the great majority of instances; third,
that even if it were true that the majority of workers are get-
ting more than a living wage, there are no good reasons why
their remuneration should be reduced.
The first reason given in the Progranmie is that wages have
not increased faster than the cost of living since the beginning '
of the War. When that was published, there were no statis-
tics of current wages which were at all general. It was known
that high wages prevailed in certain industries, such as the
shipping industry and other industries having to do with war
supplies, but there was no scientific or statistical information
available. Recently, however — within the last two weeks —
> One of a series of lectures delivered at the Fordham School of Social Service
on the Catholic Programme of Social Reconstruction.
Copyright. 1919. The Missionaby Society op St. Paul the Apostlb
IN THE State of New Yoek.
VOL. ex. 28
434 PRESENT WAGES AND PRICES [Jan.,
some rather general and fairly representative figures have
been published concerning the present level of wages. In the
light of these we can judge of the correctness of the statement
in the Council's Programme that wages have not increased
faster than the cost of living. There are sufficient statistics
to form a fair approximation to the truth, and to produce some
confidence in the judgment that was pronounced in regard to
the rise in wages and the rise in the cost of living.
The Council's Programme stated that the cost of living
had risen at least seventy-five per cent since 1913; that is, from
1913 until January or February, 1919. The recent figures given
by the U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics indicate that the rise
in the cost of living from 1913 to December, 1918, was about
seventy-four per cent; so that the statement in the Council's
Programme was not far out of the way. They show, further,
that the rise in the cost of living from 1914, jp«*>H»fore the
War began, to June, 1919, was seventy-five per'^cirit: that is
the general average throughout the country. No one pretends,
at least in the Bureau of Labor Statistics, that these figures
are based on complete knowledge of all the important influ-
ences or elements that enter into the cost of living. All that
can be claimed is that these are the prices of a sufficiently
large number of commodities to be fairly representative of
what the cost of living is, and that the figures have been gath-
ered in a sufficient variety of cities and towns in the country
to justify putting them down as a general average.
Now as to wages: The National Industrial Conference
Board published recently a statement of the weekly increase
in wages in eight industries between September, 1914, and
March, 1919 — about the same period covered by the cost of liv-
ing statistics. The increase in wages for male workers varied
from sixty-two per cent to one hundred and ten per cent, or an
average of eighty-five per cent. That is ten per cent more than
the increase in the cost of living. The wages of females in-
creased sixty per cent to seventy-five per cent, or an average
of sixty-six per cent. It may be interesting to know what in-
dustries these were, so that we may have some idea of the
importance of these figures as representing the remuneration
which prevails among large classes of workers. The indus-
tries are metals, cottons, wool, silk, boots and shoes, paper,
rubber and chemicals. These are manufacturing industries.
I
I
I
1920.] PRESENT WAGES AND PRICES 435
The United States Bureau of Labor Statistics has published
the hourly earnings in eleven large industries, four of which
are about the same as four of those in the list of the Indus-
trial Conference Board. In these eleven industries, wages in-
creased between 1914 and 1919 from fifty-one per cent to one
hundred and fourteen per cent, an average of seventy-five per
cent, which was the same as the increase in the cost of living.
The Bureau also published the figures for wages in two other
industries, namely, anthracite coal and bituminous coal. The
increase in wages in the former is only fifty per cent; and the
latter only thirty per cent.
Hence the coal miners who are on strike now, and who
have been giving the Government considerable trouble because
of the strike, have some just claim to an increase in wages.
Since 1914 their wages have increased only thirty per cent, and
the gener«^l cost of living has gone up seventy-five per cent.
Probably u*c cost of living has not risen seventy-five per cent
in the regions in which these coal miners live. Rents prob-
ably have gone up only slightly with them, and perhaps some
other items have not increased anything like seventy-five per
cent; but, even after we make all due allowance for these ex-
ceptions, we still find the increase in their wages rather meagre
as compared with the increase in the cost of living. They have
not had an increase in wages since 1917, and we know
that the cost of living has increased considerably since that
time.
These statistics of increases in wages bear out fairly well
the declaration of the Council's Programme that wages have
not, on the whole, increased faster than the cost of living be-
tween 1914 and 1919. The probability is that there has been a
slight excess in the increase in wages over the cost of living,
taking the country as a whole, but it is not alarming, and it is
not nearly as great as many people think. There have been
enormous increases in the remuneration of certain classes; but
when we talk about a general rise in wages, we are not talking
accurately unless we have the results of a very large and very
representative set of figures and investigations.
The second reason which the Council's Programme gives
for not reducing wages is that, for the most part, the present
level of wages is not in excess of what is required for a reason-
able and decent cost of living. In the eight industries described
436 PRESENT WAGES AND PRICES [Jan.,
by the National Industrial Conference Board, the average week-
ly wage for males last March was $23.37: that is a little less
than four dollars per day, and four dollars per day is scarcely
a living wage for a family in the cities today; most authorities
would say that five dollars are required, and some would make
the estimate higher. The average wage for females was $12.23
per week in these eight industries. That, I think, is not an
excessive living wage for women in cities now. In Washing-
ton a few months ago I helped to fix wages for women in the
printing and publishing trades there, to comply with the new
minimum wage law. We agreed upon $15.50 per week. That
figure was recommended unanimously by the men represent-
ing the employers, the girls representing the employees, and
the persons representing the general public. A little later, un-
der the same law in the same city, the same kind of a repre-
sentative group fixed a wage of $16.50 for girls in the mercan-
tile industry. This was considerably higher than any mini-
mum wage fixed by any public body in the United States. I
think the next highest is $14.00.
In the twenty-seven large industries covered by the Labor
Bureau survey, forty-eight per cent of the males got less than
fifty cents per hour, and fifty-six per cent of the females got
less than thirty cents per hour at the beginning of 1919.
Working for fifty cents an hoiu* for ten hours a day yielded the
worker $5.00 per day, which is about a living wage. If he
worked only eight hours he would have but $4.00. Thirty
cents per hour for a ten-hour day, means $3.00 per day or $18.00
per week. That would be a living wage for women. If they
work only eight hours a day, the wage would be $14.40 per
week, which is probably a living wage in most cities. There-
fore, I conclude that the statement in the Council's Programme,
to the effect that the present rates of wages are not, on the
whole, above a living level is fairly well substantiated by what
statistics we have.
The third reason given for not reducing the present rate of
wages is that, even though the present rates of wages are in
excess of a living wage, there is no good reason for reducing
them. The Programme points out, in the first place, that no
Catholic authority maintains that a living wage in every case
is a completely just wage. The question of what constitutes a
fully just wage is a tremendously difficult one; I do not know of
1920.] PRESENT WAGES AND PRICES 437
any one who pretends to have answered it. I do not know how
any one would go about forming a set of standards or rules,
by which to determine with anything like accuracy, what would
be a completely just wage in the case of any group of workers.
As a matter of fact, when people talk about certain workers
or classes of workers getting exorbitantly or outrageously
high wages, all that they have in mind is that these wages are
much greater than these persons were accustomed to receive.
Of course, that proves nothing. If we took custom as a basis
to determine the measure of justice, we never could increase
the wages of even the poorest paid and the most sweated
classes.
The industrial resources of our country are ^parently
great enough to give all the workers at least living wages, and
quite a considerable portion of them something more. So long
as that is the case, so long as we have the resources, there
cannot be conclusively demonstrated any reason why the
present rate of wages should fall, even though they be more
than living wages in the majority of cases. As a matter of
fact, the majority are not receiving more than living wages.
Even if they were, it is impossible to show that these wages
should be reduced as a matter of justice. Moreover, there
are some good economic reasons why they should not be re-
duced.
Generally speaking, the higher the levels of wages are in a
country at any given time, the better will be the conditions of
business. High wages mean a large demand for goods by the
masses, and this in turn means great activity of production.
I do not say that this is always true, but merely that we can
lay it down as a general proposition that a condition of high
wages is better for business than a condition of low wages.
Hence, there does not seem to be any reason from the side of
either justice or economics why present rates of wages should
be lowered, taking them as a whole. Some extraordinarily
high wages are being paid in certain occupations, but these will
be brought down in time by the force of competition. In some
cases, indeed, these exceptionaUy high wages will continue,
for the reason that the occupation is not popular with wage-
earners, and will not attract them unless the wages are what
we should call extraordinarily high.
Suppose that wages should be reduced considerably : who
438 PRESENT WAGES AND PRICES [Jan.,
is going to benefit thereby? For the most part the benefits will
go to some employers, to the least efficient particularly, and
to the more comfortable class of the consumers, who are not
themselves wage-earners. The wage-earners wiD lose by the
reduction in wages more than they will gain through the fall
of prices. Inasmuch as the worker does not consume all that
he produces, the gain from lower prices is shared by others,
whereas a reduction in wages is borne by himself alone.
Measuring in a rough way the comparative claims of the
dififerent classes, we are justified in concluding that the
wage-earners have a greater claim to be favored in this matter
than the comfortable classes of consumers and the least effi-
cient among the employers.
This is a tremendously difficult problem, and it is regrettable
that we cannot discuss it at length, in order to give some idea
of the task that will confront industrial society for a long time
to come, that of trying to adjust fairly the remuneration of the
difTerent classes of workers in the community, and trying to
weigh adequately the claims of the consumers as against the
producers. In relation to any given commodity, the consum-
ers are mainly a different class from the producers, and be-
tween the two there is a real antagonism. No one, so far as I
know, has discovered any formula which will enable us to say
when the producer is exploiting the consumer by getting too
much wages, and yet wages come ultimately from the
consumer.
Our second problem concerns itself with the reduction
of prices. As already pointed out, prices have increased, that
is, the general cost of living increased seventy-five per cent
between June, 1914, and June, 1919. I might say that there
was a further increase from June to September, but since Sep-
tember there has been apparently a slight decline, so that the
present range of prices (November, 1919) is probably a little
higher than that of June. With regard to this problem of high
prices, the Council's Programme says that a general policy of
government fixing of prices would probably not be effective,
because public opinion is not ready for it, and because Con-
gress is still less inclined to do anything of the sort. We had
some government price-fixing during the War in the matter
of wheat, fuel, and a few other commodities. So far as it went
and for the purpose for which it was instituted it was a fair sue-
1920.] PRESENT WAGES AND PRICES 439
cess. Remember I say 'for the pmpose for which it was insti-
tuted.*' That purpose was to prevent extortionate prices, or
notably extortionate prices* on the one hand, and to increase
the amount of products on the other. Therefore, the price was
put pretty high; it was put high enough to induce people to
raise wheat, for example, who would not have done so other-
wise. The same rule applied in the case of coal.
People who complained that the price of coal fixed by the
fuel administration was out of all proportion to anything that
prevailed before, should have remembered that one purpose
of this price-fixing was to guarantee to the owners of mines,
producing at a high cost, a sufficient reward to induce them
to continue operating. The mines, for instance, in West Vir-
ginia from which the product has to be hauled to the railroad
in wagons, began again to produce, and did produce a good
deal because the price was high enough to enable them to make
a profit. For the mines with better facilities of production
this price meant unusual profits. Yet the price was not fixed
as high by the Government as it would have been if the de-
termination of it had been left to competition. The same
thing holds good in the case of wheat. We thought the price
of wheat was extraordinarily high at $2.20 per bushel, for it
was a much greater price than wheat had sold for during the
preceding ten years; but it induced farmers to produce wheat
who could not afford to do so otherwise : moreover, $2.20 was
considerably less than would have prevailed in 1918 and 1919
in the absence of government action.
Nevertheless this remedy would be scarcely effective in
times of peace. The persons who produce any article, as wheat,
coal, cotton, wool, or anything else, do not produce at the same
cost. The question is, according to which of the varying costs
is the price to be fixed? It should yield a fair profit to the pro-
ducer; but to which producer? To the one best situated? In
that case, the least efficient producer cannot produce at all.
Perhaps it is not a concern of the Government whether many
or a few are enabled to continue in business. That is one thing,
but it is quite another thing for the Government to come in and
say : **We realize that people do not want you to produce any
more and we are going to fix the price so that you cannot do
business.*' That would be a serious responsibility for any
government to take, and perhaps more than any government
440 PRESENT WAGES AND PRICES [Jan.,
is willing to take. As things are, the Government is not re-
sponsible for the high cost to the producer, and if he is driven
into bankruptcy that is none of the Government's business; but
if the Government fixed the price which drove the high-cost
producer into bankruptcy, it would be to some extent responsi-
ble. That is the serious responsibility which confronts any
government that attempts to fix prices in time of peace. It
must make the price so high that everyone can make some
profit, the more efficient producers an enormous profit, or fix
it so low that only those will be able to continue in business
who are most efficient and whose product the country needs, or
it must strike some average between the two, in which case
some of the high-cost producers will be driven out of business,
and the Government will be then responsible. The question
might then reasonably be raised whether the Government
ought not to compensate the latter for the losses inflicted upon
them.
The Federal Government and some of the city govern-
ments have been trying the remedy of prosecuting profiteers.
With a great blare of trumpets that policy was announced a
few months ago, and great hopes were raised that it would
succeed in materiaUy reducing the cost of living. It has not
materially reduced it as yet; it may have had some slight in-
fluence in that direction. It has frightened, somewhat, a great
many unscrupulous dealers and producers who were ready to
boost prices still further and who had the power to do it. The
prosecution by the Department of Justice of profiteers of this
kind probably prevented some prices from being as high as
they would have been if that had not been done. We cannot,
however, expect that this method will reduce prices to any
great extent, because the high level of prices, on the whole,
is not caused by profiteering.
Another remedy would be greater production. When the
world gets down to the business of producing goods again at
about the rates at which it produced before the War, we
can look for a considerable reduction in the prices of com-
modities.
The Council's Programme mentions monopolies as one of
the causes of high prices of some commodities. The Pro-
gramme does not recommend any particular means of dealing
with monopolies, and I do not know of anyone that has any
«
1920.] PRESENT WAGES AND PRICES 441
confident recommendation for meeting this problem. The
consumer is compelled to pay unnecessarily high prices
through one combination getting control of a certain com-
modity or, more frequently, through a number of different
combinations or concerns coming to an agreement among
themselves as to what the price shall be. That, I say, is more
frequent than the other form. It prevails in many lines of
retail merchandise. Certain staple groceries are sold at the
same price in all the stores of the city. That does not happen
by accident. Sometimes all that is necessary to effect an
agreement of this kind is to have a central *l)ureau of informa-
tion,*' as it is euphemistically called. From this bureau a man
with a telephone at his elbow communicates with each of the
stores and gives them the prices quoted for the day, and they
act accordingly. That is what a monopoly means : concerted
action to fix prices. What can be done about that? I don't
know. The remedy of the Government fixing a maximum
price is one commonly advocated, but for the reasons I have
already given, and for many other reasons, that does not seem
to be an adequate remedy.
The Council's Programme suggests that the policy of gov-
ernment competition should receive more attention than it has
as yet received. That is a rather radical method, but we may
have to come to it. It has been instituted in a small way in
some States of the West. In my own State of Minnesota, some
thirty years ago, the farmers who were in control of the legis-
lature enacted a law providing that prisoners in the State Peni-
tentiary at Stillwater should be employed making the twine
which the farmers use in binding grain at harvest time. The
prison-made twine was sold at four cents a pound less than
the price of the twine made by the private manufacturers.
More recently the State has gone into the business of manu-
facturing a whole line of harvesting machinery in the State
prison. Of course, the effect has been to keep the price of the
prison-made machines below what it would have been if farm-
ers were obliged to get them from the private concerns. And
the privately manufactured machines are likewise sold at a
lower price in Minnesota, owing to the State competition.
There seems to be no good reason why that principle should
not be extended, if no other method seems adequate to restrain
the rapacity practiced by monopolies, and through agree-
442 PRESENT WAGES AND PRICES [Jan.,
ments between firms that ought to be competing with one
another.
The Council's Programme recommends as the best rem-
edy for high prices the organization of cooperative stores. That
has been found to be a very effective device in England, and
a very effective method of benefiting the consumers, especiaUy
the poorer classes of consumers, even when the prices are not
excessively high. The method is very briefly this : a group of
persons in a community get together and organize a consum-
ers* mercantile concern. It is a joint stock company, but every
stockholder has one vote and no more than one, no matter
how many shares of stock he holds; so that the thing is ex-
tremely democratic. The store sells its goods at about the same
rates as the privately-owned stores, but the profits from the
sales are distributed among the consmners as a dividend on
purchases. The consumers who are stockholders get interest
on their investment — ^five per cent I believe is the usual figure
in England — ^but in addition to that they get a dividend on the
purchases and out of the profits of the concern; so that the
saving which the consumer makes is not in the way of cheaper
goods at the time he buys them, but in the way of this rebate
or dividend which he gets every three months. That, in sub-
stance, is the scheme.
It is a great education in democracy, in saving, in thrift,
and a great training in the art of codperation. It makes for
altruism as against selfishness; it gives men self-respect when
they find they are, after aU, able to do something in the way
of managing a business concern, when the truth comes home
to them that business ability is not something to be found only
in a few hmnan beings, but that there is a certain amount of it
in everybody. From this experience they acquire more con-
fidence in themselves, train themselves to take more interest
in social affairs as against their own private, selfish affairs.
This consumers' codperation would prepare the workers for
the day when they could combine to produce things, as well
as to own stores. Many of us believe that the workers will not
forever be content to be merely wage-earners. Many of us be-
lieve that they should be the owners and managers of the tools
which they work, and that the only way of preparing them
for this is through these cooperative stores.
The beneficial effects of codperative stores in reducing
1920.] PRESENT WAGES AND PRICES 443
prices could be greatly increased through codperative market*
ing associations organized by the farmers. A whole army of
unnecessary middlemen could be eliminated if the farmers
were organized so that they could sell directly to the consum-
ers. Both classes would be immensely beneiBted.
In spite of all these remedies, prices will continue to be
pretty high, at least they will not recede to their pre-war level,
for a good while; for the principal cause of high prices is the
increase in the volume of currency in circulation. Prices are
high mainly because the purchasing power of the dollar is
low. The purchasing power of the dollar is low because we
have too much money in circulation for the amount of business
that is to be done. Practically all economists are agieed in
accepting what is called the quantitative theory of money,
which holds that if the quantity of money increases faster than
the amount of business to be done, prices must go up, since
money is becoming cheaper. Remember that money is not a
fixed measure like a yardstick, which always remains three
feet in length. Money is subject to the law of supply and de-
mand. For many years the supply of gold has been increasing
too rapidly, and during the War we have had inflations of
currency and too many substitutes for money. So long as this
condition continues the dollar will be cheap, and everything
for which it is exchanged will be dear.
A POLISH MYSTIC ON THE NATIONAL RESURRECTION.
BY MONICA M. GARDNER.
HE better hour is now near, the second spring in
our lives, another youth. Poland will give us
back; will give us back what we have lost for
i her — ^joy, fire, the heart's health."
Thus Zygraunt Krasinski, the Anonymous
Poet of Poland, expressed the innermost conviction of his soul,
to an intimate friend more than seventy years ago in the dark-
est moments of his country's history wlien, rent by persecu-
tion, abandoned by Europe to her doom, Poland was, seem-
ingly, the outcast of the nations.
But another calling than that of defeat and dereliction was
foretold to her and urged upon her by her great poet-mysttcs
through those terrible years when the Rising of 1830 was being
avenged in blood and in the tears of the countless prisoners and
exiles of Poland. The nation's death was, in the extravagant
language of Zygmunt Krasinski, but as Christ's, the prelude
to a glorious resurrection. Her shame was the folly of the
cross whose triumph shall blaze forth from horizon to horizon.
Her sufferings were the penal fires Uirough which she needs
must pass, ere she stand transfigured before the world in a
new era of justice, purchased by her purgation and initiated
by her restoration to freedom.
We do not propose to dwell upon the complex, tortured
personality of the Anonymous Poet who gave his country her
most inspired form of national mysticism. That mysticism, it-
self, is our immediate concern. We will merely indicate cer-
tain features of his spiritual biography that explain the nature
of his teaching. Out of an abyss of private and patriotic pain,
his name unrevealed by reason of the tragedy which ruined
his life, be evolved the message to his own people and to the
human race that is being verified in so remarkable a manner
by present events. When a boy of eighteen Krasinski saw, in
1830, the desperate rising of his nation for liberty. For the
rest of his life, till he died at the age of forty-seven, his burn-
ing patriotism was confronted with the spectacle of his country
1920.] A POLISH MYSTIC 445
being done to death under the heel of Asiatic revenge. In-
evitably, the first fruits of Krasinski*s genius* the masterpiece
of his early youth, was the drama named, in the bitterness of
his soul, the Undivine Comedy, in which despair is only re-
deemed by its final cry of Galilsee vicistL Yet it is significant
that this, the only great work of the Anonymous Poet that can
be charged with pessimism, is not national, but sociological.
The agony of Poland was being enacted before tlie eyes of
her devout son: the moral he derived therefrom was hope,
resurrection, love.
In the beginning his outlook was not fully defined. It is
true that in Iridion, the noble play that follows the Undivine
Comedy, Krasinski pleads with his compatriots that the
hatred of a persecuted nation for her persecutor leads to
death, and that love, the only constructive power of the uni-
verse, alone can save the conquered. To protect author and
reader from the Russian dungeon and Siberia, the purport of
the drama was disguised as the conflict between Rome and
Hellas. It closes thus, in the Coliseum: ""And the sun rose
above the ruins of Rome and there was none to tell me where
were the traces of my Thought. But I know that it lasts and
lives.** Iridion, however, does not contain the clearly con-
ceived and definite moral of Krasinski*s later teaching. It in-
volves one aspect of it, but no system. Krasinski*s own soul
was still swept by fires of hatred for the oppressors of his coun-
try. Iridion's vindication of the triumph of love over ven-
geance, was the poet*s well-nigh reluctant surrender to his own
higher voices. "Logic, necessity,'* he writes to a friend, "led
the author to this conclusion. What is, is. Not our caprices
rule the world, but Divine reason."
For years after the completion of Iridion, Krasinski wan-
dered in intolerable spiritual darkness. The problem, ever
before his and his nation*s eyes, of a hideous injustice perpe-
trated against a defenceless people with no sign of help from
heaven, shook his faith. In the opening lines of his poem
Dawn he tells how : "At first I trusted that the God of pitying
love, after days but few, would send avenging angels from
on high, and burst that grave that stands before the world.
But the days passed by, passed by the years. In vain dawn
struggled with the blind strength of night. Then sank my soul
into that chaos of doubt where all light is changed into eternal
446 A POLISH MYSTIC [Jan..
night. And from all the cycle of those lived out days one in-
scription standeth: There is no hope here.**
But he never ceased to search for the truth that should
save his people and interpret the enigma of God's providence.
Through anguish and travail, after he had walked, as he says
in Dawn, through hell, at last there rose upon his sight the
Orient, and the mysteries he had so long wrestled with were
made manifest to him. He gazed, with undimmed vision, upon
an up-rising, only possible because preceded by pain and
death. He saw it with the eyes of a poet, and, as a poet,
hymned it in Dawn, the song of his spiritual rebirth, and in
the more concrete Psalms of the Future and Resurrecturis.
Taking Krasinski's poetry alone, we may regard him as an
idealist, a dreamer, as, in fact, a great poet. His prose writ-
ings and the many letters in which he bares his soul to his inti-
mate friends, disclose him as a philosopher and thinker who,
for all his agony of yearning for some revelation upon the
mystery of his country's fate, would accept no solution that
did not commend itself, first of all, not to his heart, but to his
reason.
What were the facts with which Krasinski was constrained
to grapple? His nation had been torn in three, blotted out
from the land of the living by what has been well termed one
of the greatest crimes of history. Krasinski had been **bom
in fetters," to quote the famous line of Mickiewicz, referring
to himself. His school and college days in Warsaw were
passed in an atmosphere seething with hopeless struggles to
save the last vestiges of the rights of the Kingdom of Poland
that ended in the outbreak of 1830. Then came the years suc-
ceeding the downfall of the Rising. The country became a
scene of death, parting and desolation. Prisons, mines and
convict settlements in Siberia were filled with Poles too mmi-
erous to be counted. The religious faith, nationality, language,
literature of Poland were treated as a penal ofifence. The chil*
dren and youth of Poland were prohibited by law from learn-
ing their own history and traditions, forbidden to be brought
up as Poles. Only the unbroken power of the national ideal,
fostered by the secret teaching of the poets of Poland, could
have preserved life in this oppressed people who seemed
doomed to perish.
The national and spiritual guides of Poland faced
1920.] A POLISH MYSTIC 447
no abstract difficulties, but matters involving the actual
existence of their country. How justify the Divine
Providence that left unrectified a crime that cried to heaven
for vengeance? Why had Poland been thrust down into the
grave? And if she were to be reckoned no more among the
living but with the dead, what hope was there for her youth,
what object for them in life? They were caught in the bonds
of a conquered nation, driven towards temptations to moral
corruption that such a situation ofifers, of which the Russia of
Nicholas I. was unsparing. What more salutary incitement
against the lethargy of compulsory inaction and despair;
against the desperate expedients forced upon the young by
poisoned morals than some great national ideal, some assur-
ance of a better future to be secured by individual efifort? But
where could such be looked for?
Against every external circumstance, against hope itself,
Krasinski found the answer. In its simplest form he gave it
to his nation in the series of lyrics. Dawn. Banned by the
Russian censor. Dawn was carried clandestinely into Poland,
devoured in secret by Polish men and women, and watered
with their tears. The prose introduction to this poem smn-
marizes the theory won by its author with his heart's blood,
which, at long last, brought peace for himself and hope for
his country. The process by which he groped his way thereto
is in part worked out in an earlier philosophical prose writing.
The Treatise of the Trinity (Of the Trinity in God and the
Trinity in Man: Of the Trinity in Time and Space: Of the
Standpoint of Poland among the Slavonic Races). It was never
finished, and was published, as Krasinski left it, as recently as
1912.
These incomplete, often obscure pages, with their out-
bursts of passionate patriotism, throw strong light upon the
painful quest, by a son of an unhappy country, for the truth
that meant life or death to him, because it stood for the life
or death of his nation. By its nature this work could only
speak to a few. All that was highest and most illuminating in
it was wrought into a perfect whole of doctrines that, despite
their mystical exaltation, shone clear as noonday, in a poetry
that appealed to all. Dawn is the idealization of these doc-
trines, the Psalm of Faith their recapitulation, the remaining
Psalms and Resurrecturis their practical application.
448 A POLISH MYSTIC [Jan.,
The Treatise of the Trinity and the preface to Dawn af-
ford the best general idea of Krasinski's tenets. We will tdce
first Krasinski's own lucid summary of them in Dawn, and
afterwards follow the steps by which he built them up in the
Treatise.
The signs of dissolution that marked the world before
Christ's birth, is the argument which opens the introduction
to Dawn. "'In the days of Caesar preceding the great day of
Christ the ancient world had reached the final consequences
of its history:'' complete religious doubt, ruin and confusion
of mind, endless yearning and vain longings for a life not to
be found. Then arose Julius Caesar, "'as the angel to whom it
was ordained to remove the impediments from before the feet
of the approaching God. He led the world to the material unity
without which no word of life could be dispersed abroad. He
changed the known world into one great, broad highway."
Thus the diffusion of Christianity was rendered possible.
"Discite historiam exemplo monitir Krasinski continues.
In the French Revolution he saw the reproduction of the birth
throes preceding the Christian era; in Napoleon the spiritual
counterpart of the conqueror who had prepared Christ's
kingdom. In Krasinski's view, the logic of history and the
Divine ordering accounted for Napoleon's career. Napoleon
was to introduce the new and transfigured epoch of the human
race when the teaching of Christ shall be completed in politi-
cal relations. ""But before that truth shall unfold and fulfill
itself," the world must run the same spiritual course as in the
expiring days of pagan Rome — that of yearning, restlessness,
denial, doubt.
•That anarchy is so fearful that of necessity it tends to
cataclysm — that desire so great and hitherto in vain that of
necessity it smnmons the aid of Our Father Who is in Heaven.
When did Cod ever abandon history when history raised its
hands to Him? Infinite desire brings with it eternal yearning
and infinite grief. From man collectively shall often flow the
bloedy sweat of agony on the Mount of Olives of history. Were
it otherwise there would be no spirit of humanity training it-
self by its own will. Where would the merit be with which
it merits in this time? What is that merit if not its life in his-
tory, if not that space of toil divided into the moment of death
and of the resurrection of the dead from death? Not to die.
19200 A POUSH MYSTIC 449
we must be God : to die, man. If the Divine Spirit unites it-
self with the nature of man the Divine Life breaks asunder
the human grave — Christ died and rose from the dead. . . .
"You all know, my brothers, that we were bom in the
womb of death: and from the cradle your eyes have been
used to look upon the livid stains of death on the body of the
European world. Hence the eternal grief that gnaws your
hearts : hence the incertitude that has become your life. But
every end contains in itself the successive beginning : the day
of death but precedes the hour of awakening. Consider at-
tentively, and the signs of death shall on a sudden be trans-
formed for you into the signs of resurrection.
**Christ manifested to the peoples the idea of humanity.
Before Him, save for the Hebrews, there were no veritable
nations, because the aim to which the nations are advancing,
to which they gravitate as planets to the sun, was unknown.
He promised that there shall be in the world one only fold
and shepherd. He bade those who pray to the Father to re-
peat each day these words. Thy Kingdom come;* and with
that sigh for two thousand years we have all besought God for
the realization of this ideal on earth.**
Here Krasinski turns to the question of hiunanity. A
prominent principle in his teaching is the identification of in-
dividual morality with political morality. The same laws that
govern the conduct of the soul must equally govern that of
states. The transfiguration of the political sphere must begin
with the abjuration of the sin against the Divine idea that was
committed in the dismemberment of a living nation.
"Christ dwelleth in thee, oh, humanity;** thus he expresses
a part of this thought later in the Psalm of Faith. "He liveth
in thy bosom, resides with thee, thy Guest. Thy blood is His,
thy body is His body. With thee shaU be what did befall to
Him. All thy vicissitudes He carried in His flesh. He mani-
fested all thy hopes to thee. Whence art thou bom? Of a
pure virgin womb, for of God*s thought and in God*s image.
Whither art thou bound? Unto the Father's city. Through
what must thou needs pass? Through toil and martyrdom.
And when Christ on the sunmiit of Mount Thabor girded Him-
self with the eternal dawn, seest thou not what that sign to
thee fortells? Before thy earthly lot shaU be in full accom-
plished, thou too» humanity, shalt be transfigured.**
450 A POLISH MYSTIC [Jan.,
•^Behold, then," he says in the Treatise of the Trinity, ••as
the plant must necessarily pass through the light to grow and
become a flower, under the same necessity each man and all
collective humanity must pass through the law of Christ and
work it out in themselves to gain salvation. Salvation for
each man is eternal life, the angelic state in a world higher
than the earth of to-day. For humanity it is the Kingdom of
God on earth, that is, the estate of the Christianization of
civilization. Without that hiunanity on earth, without passing
through that Kingdom here, no earthly spirit will reach eternal
life. For what is hmnanity thus come into Christ's Kingdom?
The collective state of aU individual men, the proof that they
are ripe for the angelic condition. Therefore, each must in-
exorably pass through Christ. Who from the beginning does
not pass through Him, that is, does not work Him out in him-
self, will not be, as He was, the living law on earth.''
Krasinski defines humanity in Dawn as: '"the collectivity
and union of all the potentialities of the himian spirit, ex-
pressed visibly on this earth by the harmony and love of its
members, that is, of 'nationalities.' " As the members of the
body, submissive to the will that rules them, make up the in-
dividual ego, thus the nations form humanity. Christ's words
did not at the outset permeate the political sphere because
the transformation of that policy depended on the Christian-
ization of the individual soul.
••But in our days each individual is Christian, and all the
relations between them are Christian. Where shall the Chris-
tian idea further extend? Obviously in the sphere so far un-
affected, so far untransmogrifled : and that is the sphere of
policy. The world is nigh, not to a great change (for nothing
can be changed of Christ's words), but to their great •trans-
figuration,' to the deeper comprehension of them, to their higher
glorification. The world today understands whither history is
drawing near. It knows that history is ruled by Divine wis-
dom, and that its end is humanity in harmony with the Divine
Will, recognizing and fulfilling the law given it by Cod." The
means to this end are the nations. They are the living notes in
one great harmony, in the mighty harp of the universe that
in the ecstatic vision of his Dawn the poet beholds as the in-
strument upon •Vhose strings the Spirit wanders, on whose
strings the Spirit playeth, in that song alone it resteth."
1920.] A POLISH MYSTIC 451
^^Governments are a human* nationalities a Divine crea-
tion.'* If the world in Krasinski's scheme is to model itself
after the pattern of Christ and the relations between govern-
ments and peoples are to be founded on the morals taught by
Christ, then it follows that the destruction of a nation, a mem-
ber of the hmnanity which is to constitute Christ's kingdom,
is a direct contravention of God's high destinies for the human
race.
''He is a child who says that this was a political crime.
That crime is a far more heinous one, for it is a religious
crime, transgressing beyond human spheres and touching the
Divine, because: 'Ho seek to slay sacred nationality, when
without it the realization of the idea of humanity on earth
cannot proceed, is a violence against Divine truth, against eter-
nal truth, is a sacrilege."
There then unfolds before Krasinski's vision the reason of
his nation's fall, the explanation of her long sufifering, her
sublime calling for the future. In her humanity had been most
profoundly outraged: in her the ideal of hmnanity that was
to save the world should be most exalted. Krasinski's whole
analogy of the life of man to that of the human race here comes
to his aid. Christ died for man. One nation shall die for
humanity. Christ, our individual Exemplar and the Exem-
plar of humanity, rose again. Poland shall rise likewise
from the grave, and by and with her resurrection the new
epoch of himianity will be heralded to the universe. Without
the redressal of such wrong it is obvious there can be no such
regeneration of political relations.
It is impossible here to deal in detail with Krasinski's theo-
ries on the Trinity. We wish merely to draw attention to cer-
tain passages of the Treatise of the Trinity as they illustrate
the doctrines we have already considered, or affect more di-
rectly Krasinski's national mysticism. Krasinski saw the tri-
une not only in God and man, but likewise in history, time,
nature and sufferings. From the premise that the first Person
of the Blessed Trinity is All Being or All Power, the second
Person All Thought or All Knowledge, the Third All Life, All
Spirit or All Love, Krasinski divides the history of mankind
into three parts, the age of Jehovah, the age of Christ, the age
of the Holy Ghost The first epoch, the ancient world, corre-
sponds to the epoch of being or existence; the second, the
I
452 A POUSH MYSTIC [Jan.,
Christian era, to that of thought or knowledge; the third, the
future era, to that of love.
*The world of thought is bom upon the hitherto existing
world of being, but before they both recognize each other,
bring their contest to its close, struggle no more against each
other, and then unite and flow together into the one world of
the spirit, how many ages must pass? How many transforma-
tions, tribulations, tempests must befall? How much blood
be shed from the body, how much despair from the soul?"
The Holy Ghost, as All Love, is the union between the first
and second Persons of the Blessed Trinity. The spirit links
being or existence with thought or reason. Thus, the world of
the spirit, the third epoch, is the perfection of the two preced-
ing worlds, when there shall be one rule of mutual charity,
and hence a Poland, risen glorified from the tomb. According
to Krasinski we are in the state of transition between the sec-
ond and third epoch: 'Transition from the epoch of torpid
existence to the epoch of the living Spirit on this earth; from
a government despotic, deaf, blind, dumb, to God's kingdom in
which shall flower the fullness of the harmonious life of
humanity." This theory of transition was Krasinski's harbor
of refuge in the incomprehensible and wearying perplexities
of existence.
From the reciprocal self-impartation of the three Persons
of the Blessed Trinity, Krasinski deduces that of created beings
to each other and that of humanity in general.
''In humanity the social state, the sanctification and up-
lifting of which is the aim of humanity, is of itself that very
reciprocal self-impartation of human spirits. Everywhere and
always who gives receives back: who loves grows: who cre-
ates something external is in that same moment himself cre-
ated higher. To impart self to others on earth is in outward
seeming to suffer diminution, to lose somewhat of self, even
to be utterly destroyed — ^but this is only a delusion. That de-
struction is itself destroyed, because in reality only by that
means the living spirit grows and immortalizes itself. Christ
expressed it in these words : 'He that shall lose his life he alone
shall find it.' Surely God imparted Himself to the world,
poured Himself into it, and thus continually works — and is
anything of God diminished? By the very nature of the spirit
the more it creates the more creative does it become. It gains
1920.] A POLISH MYSTIC 453
strength by its every act : by the very fact of what it gives out
it grows more powerful: in this is its immortality." Christ
''poured Himself into humanity by the most laborious life and
most painful death. But then was at once manifested the
truth of the law which is the law of life, because before human
vision He rose again from the dead and before human vision
ascended into heaven."
From such doctrines it is an easy step to Krasinski's view
that his nation was called to sacrifice herself for the human
race and to acquire immortality by laying down life. There is
the same thought in Dawn, but expressed in poetry.
Christ by His human life and death first showed the in-
dividual soul her way, teaching her the mysteries of her exist-
ence and of her eternal future. Krasinski, drawing out his
favorite parallel between the unit and collective humanity,
insists that humanity must be taught by some given model
the same truth of its immortality and of the road thither.
We have seen this indicated in the introduction to Dawn.
Krasinki analyzes it more closely in the Treatise of the
Trinity.
'The necessity of such exemplars is the eternal law of his-
tory. Nothing is there brought about flimsily or easily. All is
done little by little, with difficulty, laboriously, and beyond
measure gravely and sternly. No abstract thought, no idea un-
justified by execution, no theory taken alone can direct the
destinies of the world. It must first take flesh, it must become
a living example, a doctrine with a beating heart, whence not
only ideal principles but crimson life-blood shall shed itself on
all. By the sacred labors and sacred passion of Christ, by His
transfiguration, resurrection, and ascension, each individual
human spirit has been exalted into, if I can thus express it,
a member that cannot be cast out from the structure of all
creation because, passing through death, it consequently has to
fling off that condition of the lowest stages of the spirit and
live consciously without end. Behold in these days, when the
Christ ordinance is beginning to permeate collective spheres,
when it exacts an earthly realization, and when for the same
reason history is stepping into the road which is to lead it to
the Kingdom of God, there must likewise be found in this
earthly world of humanity a member not to be cast out, im-
movable, the living foundation of the whole future edifice.
454 A POLISH MYSTIC [Jan.,
Only a nationality can be such : but it is not enough to conceive
this by thought, history must prove it by deed/'
The Pole's application to his country is self-evident. But
Krasinski would have no passive idealism without its relent-
less exaction of practical deed. He lays down the doctrine
of Poland's vocation: it is for the Poles to prove it by action
worthy of the national calling. As» notably in his Psalms of
the Future, the Anonymous Poet again and again inculcates
upon his people that the nation's mission of initiating the bet-
ter epoch of the human universe is dependent on the nation's
purity and on the moral worth of each member of the nation —
let his countrymen show the world, says he in the Psalm of
Love, that *'to be a Pole is to live nobly and to God." Begin-
ning at the other end, he proves by the history of Poland that
her death was preceded by "deed," the deed, the activity, on
which Krasinski always lays such emphasis. She defended
Christendom for centuries against the Moslem hordes. Her
soil ran red with the blood of her Christian knights : and the
last act of her independence was the formation of the Con-
stitution of the Third of May that placed her in the van of the
liberal reformers of Europe. With the eyes of a prophet and a
mystic Krasinski regarded that stage of his nation's history
when politically she was no more, the period in which he him-
self was living, as her second epoch, the epoch of transition
between her first and second life.
But how is the resurrection of a nation to be gained? By
the rugged road, the via dolorosa of painful effort to which
Krasinski ever pointed.
"No one without deliberation and strong resolve, without a
thousand vacillations, investigations, searchings, painful de-
ceptions, sinkings of the powers of thought and their alternate
uprisings, shall reach the self -inebriation of their own Christ-
likeness, woken in them by the manifestation of the Son of
God. The collective spirit of a nation must pass through pre-
cisely the same cycle as individuals if she is to rise from the
dead and once more stand in the circle of living creative na-
tions, ruling by political deed : and if added to this she is to
become the historical pattern of their earthly immortality, her
soul divorced from government must in her death be in-
ebriated with the very Christ-ness of collective spirits, such as
hitherto on earth there has not been, and which depends on
1920.] A POUSH MYSTIC 455
the incarnation of the ordinance of Christ in all internal and
international forms in the world. Such an incarnation, being
the new shedding forth of the spirit of Christ from the narrow
bounds in which till now the world has kept it, to all the limits
of the world, tends of necessity to the creation of an organ-
ization higher, more rational and more holy than that which
hitherto existing on earth has everywhere crippled the law of
all love, and, by that same, universal nature also."
This then shall be the "day of the Holy Ghost,'* bom in
the womb of a nation, "in whose darkness must shine the vision
of that day." Then shall Christ's words, from being heeded
as words only, be brought into action in every department of
human life — apolitical, commercial, social. Passing from the
region of prose the Anonymous Poet sings that day for which
he yearned as with an exile's longing, in the exultant strains
that bring the poem Dawn to its close.
"And that new world all rejoicing as a church shall flower
to God. The Polish land, the Polish Eden, is desolate no more
nor mourning. Nor behind me nor before me is there darkness
any more. All is light and all is justice. Clear our purgatorial
anguish, and our sorrows and oiu: bondage. Long the terror
of our sleep. We believed it. We believed in eternal pain and
toil. They were but the sanctuary's entrance, but one step
upon the stairway : they were but the night of merit."
Such is the merest summary of Krasinski's teaching.
Conceived and elaborated as it was in the midst of his coun-
try's tragedy he never beheld it justified by events. Equally
he never ceased to believe in its truth, as he believed in his God,
to his dying hour.
THE SILVER LINING.
BY JOHN CAVANAUGH, C.S.C.
I VERY cloud, in the proverb, has a silver lining.
and it is fair to suppose that the great war cloud
that for years lowered over the world, shut-
ting off its sunshiDe, has its own bright and in-
spiring side. More beautiful than any courage
displayed by men on the battlefield, for example, have been
the noble strength and patience of mothers and sisters left
at home to suffer the sorrows of fear and constant worry. In
the late War, more than ever before, the part borne by women
has been duly recognized and no doubt will have its proper
appreciation in history. Someone has asked why the world
has never erected a monument to the memory of a woman. Of
course, the world has erected monuments to women — to the
immortal Joan of Arc in France, for example, and at the other
end of the scale to that noble Irish woman in New Orleans
who spent her life befriending the newsboys of that city. But
if it were true that the world had erected no monuments to
women, the explanation probably would be that every good
man who ever lived was himself a monument to some noble
woman who, as mother, sister, wife or sweetheart encouraged
him to be his best and to do his best. All the same it is lawful
to hope that in the new day of enlarged activities for women
they may have their share of the monuments, and that there
may yet be lifted up to the clouds a symbol so strong and beau-
tiful and eloquent as to be a fit interpreter of womanly cour-
age and virtue in the War.
We have in mind here, however, another sort of silver lin-
ing to the war cloud. Probably no one who has talked with
chaplains or soldiers, has failed to express the hope that
stories of heroism or piety may be gathered into book form for
the edification of posteri^ and to commemorate the spiritual
qualities of the men who made up the fighting forces of Amer-
ica. It is to be hoped that every chaplain will contribute his
quota of beautiful incidents to the record, and it is much to be
desired, though too much to hope for, that the officers and the
1920.] THE SILVER USING 457
soldiers and sailors themselves, as well as the zealous and
efficient men who carried on the work of the Knights of Co-
lumbus, may contribute according to their knowledge to the
fund of that ''storial thynge that toucheth gentlenesse." Per-
haps it may be worth while to open the campaign of edifica-
tion with a few examples.
To begin with, we have the beautiful story of the good
chaplain — ^for the present he shall be nameless — ^whose piety in
death led to several conversions and the end is not yet. He was
one of those cheery, wholesome, self -forgetting men who so eas-
ily win their way into the hearts of the soldiers. With him cour-
age, which had been instinctive as regards nature, had been re-
fined and strengthened by years of meditation, by the lifelong
habit of faith, by heeding all the holy voices and lifting his eyes
to all the sacred visions that had come to him in youth and
afterwards. The roughest men in the army felt for him the
chivalrous admiration that coarse miners in the old days of the
Wild West used to feel for a beautiful, innocent girl who hap-
pened to flutter by their camp on a sightseeing expedition. But
while they worshipped him like a star apart and above them,
they had for him all of a child's confidence in its mother. They
went to confession to him in the trenches, a few steps from a
group of smoking and chatting companions, or they stood at
his side, when better arrangments could not be made, with
companions touching elbows all around, utterly regardless
whether their sacred confidences were overheard or not. Nat-
urally the men loved him in their rough frank way and the
officers were his devoted, admiring friends.
Well, one day they earned in this good priest, and the
doctors at once recognized that the shrapnel had done its work
and he could not live. The oldest of the surgeons, with tears
in his eyes, bent over the yoimg chaplain and said :
"Father, you cannot possibly live. Is there anything we
can do for you? Is there anything that will make your last
moments happier?"
Pale and faint and barely conscious the priest turned his
face towards the kindly surgeon and said:
"I do wish I could make another visit to the Blessed Sac-
rament before I die." As it chanced there was not a Catholic
in the group and they had only a dim notion of what the noble
priest meant by a visit to the Blessed Sacrament. They asked
458 THE SILVER USING [Jan.,
questions, however, and learned that the nearest chapel was
two hundred miles away. Depressed and silent they were
about to turn to their work again when a young lieutenant
of the aviation service said:
*'Doc, if you can bandage up the Father's wounds so that
he will live for two hours, I will bring him to the chapel."
And in a few minutes the dying priest was flying through
the air almost literally on the wings of love at the rate of one
hundred miles an hour to meet his God. The amazing thing
is that the priest actually made the journey of two hundred
miles through the air, received the holy Viaticum and had his
visit with the Royal Host. I never heard what happened to
the doctors. Perhaps some reader of this story may be able
to tell me, but the young aviator has since become a Catholic
and is now arranging for his reception into a religious com-
munity. His three sisters, as a result of hearing this story,
have also been received into the Church and are now novices
in a community of nuns.
Almost as beautiful in its way is the story of poor Pat
Conway — that was almost his name — the terrible recidive.
He was a recidive only in the sense that he was powerless to
resist the temptation to go to confession at every opportunity.
His own chaplain was a Protestant clergyman, but Pat man-
aged to see Father Davis of the adjacent regiment every day
to get absolution, and sometimes showed more than a willing-
ness to confess oftener than once a day. The result was that
the confessor soon began to shim the penitent with as much
adroitness as often the penitent shuns the confessor.
The Protestant chaplain in Pat's regiment was a noble
fellow with all the beautiful qualities of an ideal chaplain.
Among other things this refined and scholarly man was so
ChrisUike in spirit that he never hesitated to run after Father
Davis to attend to a dying Catholic boy in the regiment. ""But
there will be times," he said to the good priest, "when I won't
be able to go for you or perhaps can't find you. What shall I
do then?" Father Davis told him that the most he could be
expected to do under such circiunstances would be to sug-
gest pious dispositions to the dying man and perhaps help him
to remember the old Catholic prayers. This noble preacher
went dutifully to work like a child at its catechism, learning
th« Our Father without the heretical appendix, the Hail Mary,
1920.] THE SILVER LINING 459
the Conflteor, the Acts of Faith, Hope, Charity and Contrition
and the Hail Holy Queen. He had them letter perfect in a
short time, and more than once he helped a poor Catholic
boy to remember the faith and the prayers of his childhood in
the Supreme Hour.
Next after Pat's passion for going to confession was his
uncontrollable desire to *'go over the top/' and as nearly always
happened in such cases, he went over the top once too often.
When the stretcher bearers laid him down to receive first aid,
Pat was hovering on the borderland of consciousness with only
a short time to live. The poor fellow searched the hospital
with his eyes for the priest, and seemed worried when the
familiar features did not appear. The Protestant chaplain
suggested holy thoughts, however, and helped with the reci-
tation of the prayers. They were all said with unction, but,
somehow, Pat was not quite at ease. Something seemed to
be lacking even to his poor cloudy brain.
'Tather,'' said he to the minister — ^remember Pat was half
delirious — ^*Tather, say a Latin prayer over, won't you?"
In going over the matter with Father Davis afterwards
the minister said:
*lt was a dreadful moment. Father. You had taught me
English prayers, but never a Latin one, and I am ashamed
to say that I knew no Latin prayers whatever. But some-
where from the dim caverns of memory I seemed to recall
just two Latin words and bending over the dying boy in sheer
desperation I said: 'Dominus vobiscum' and Pat, who had
been an altar boy in his youth, answered 'Et cum spiritu tuo'
and died with the old familiar words actually trembling on
his lips."
None of us will doubt but that the good preacher's prayer
for Pat was heard in heaven, and surely none of us but will
hope that some day Pat's prayer also may be answered, and
that so good a man as this noble chaplain— of whom, thank
God, there were many in the War — ^may share Pat's faith and
learn all the Latin prayers.
That the War had awakened the slumbering piety in many
an easy-going man will, of course, not be doubted, but that
does not render less interesting the zeal and ingenuity with
which our men, young and old, sought the sacraments in the
hour of danger. Father M. J. Walsh, C.S.C., Vice-President of
460 THE SILVER UNING [Jan.,
Notre Dame University, was for a time condemned to suffer
the experiences of the school for chaplains at Fortress Monroe
before going over to begin his distinguished labors on the fields
of France. One morning he was awakened at two o'clock
by a vigorous rapping on the window-pane beside his bed —
the chaplains there were quartered in little huts. Startled
and puzzled. Father Walsh asked:
**Whafs upr
"You are for one thing, Father," came the answer, "we've
just got to see you.**
In a few moments Father Walsh opened the door and ad-
mitted two flushed, panting boys, sixteen or seventeen years
of age. They had stolen past their own sentries and had run,
with hardly a moment's intermission, a journey of fourteen
miles to make this midnight confession, and must hurry back
the same distance under penalty of severe punishment, make
their way once more past the sentries so as to be ready to start,
at five o'clock, for the boat that was to take them overseas.
Surely, these boys were running in the way of the Com-
mandments. Let us hope they went through the War with-
out misadventure and that, all the rest of their lives, they may
be as anxious to confess under easier circumstances.
Of deeds of heroism done by the soldiers themselves there
will probably be no end of stories. One hears of men who
captured single-handed large numbers of the enemy, and the
first impulse is to recall that Irishman who brought a dozen
prisoners into camp and who, when asked how he had man-
aged this seemingly impossible feat, replied:
"Be gorra, I surrounded them."
Nevertheless very wonderful feats of personal courage
will probably be fully authenticated as regards both contend-
ing sides when the smoke of battle is completely blown away.
Three stories of Notre Dame boys are perhaps interesting
enough to be recited here. There was Arnold Mclnemy, with
the good nature and kindliness of the giant as well as the bulk,
the captain of the football team in his graduation year, and
acclaimed by the fans as a heady and nervy player. He ran the
usual gamut of the college man suddenly made over into a
lieutenant. One day he set out at the head of five soldiers to
capture a machine gun that was doing deadly work from a
peculiarly favorable point of vantage. One after another the
1920.] THE SILVER UNING 461
five men fell stark, though they advanced as cautiously as pos-
sible and under the best available cover; and **Big Mack'' was
alone when he reached the nest of the machine gun. I never
learned in detail how he performed the miracle, but he did
actually capture the gun, marching the foiu: soldiers operating
it before him with their hands held high as he made his way
back to our lines. He thought he had completely disarmed
them and probably relaxed his caution too much in conse-
quence. One of the prisoners managed to get behind him and,
snatching a magazine revolver which he had concealed in his
sleeve, he shot Mclnerny in the back, the bullet passing com-
pletely through the body. The wound was obviously fatal and
most men would have considered the War over, so far as they
were concerned. While staggering under the shock and in-
deed almost in the very act of falling, Mclnerny fired four
shots in quick succession and the unfortunate men fell in their
tracks. It is not perhaps a pretty story to tell, and one wishes
that the prisoners might have arrived in safety within the
American lines, but they had renewed the War by breaking
faith with **Big Mack'' and, as a feat of alertness and nerve,
his deed is worthy of remembrance.
On the other hand, the story of Lieutenant Harry Kelly,
who took the honors in the law school on his graduation a year
before, is the record of an American boy who fared badly,
but gave an inspiring example of courage in seemingly hope-
less circumstances. Kelly and his men were surprised by a
cleverly planned and courageously executed night attack by the
Germans, involving the front and two flanks of the particular
bit of trench in which they were located. It was in the dead
of night and the men bounded out of their trench to grapple
at close range with the foe. Kelly, in advance of his men,
was seriously wounded and fell to the ground unconscious.
When he recovered his senses, he heard soldiers talking con-
fusedly near him and believing they were his own men, he
made his whereabouts known. They proved to be Germans,
however, and he was made prisoner.
An enemy soldier took hold of his right arm, another of
his left, a third walked before him with bayonet drawn and
two others, carrying gun and bayonet, marched behind him.
The darkness was impenetrable and the prisoner limped along
with diflSculty for he had been shot through the leg. It would
462 THE SILVER LINING [Jan..
seem that any thought of escape was out of question, but to
the prisoner the prospect of capture and detention was less
endurable than death. With a sudden swiping motion of the
arm he released himself of the soldier on his right side and, at
the same time, threw the soldier in front of him out of his path
and jerked himself loose from the captor who held his left arm.
The darkness now was rather in his favor and he had stumbled
along a distance of twelve paces, when one of the enemy sol-
diers threw a hand grenade with faultless aim. There was a
crash and a blinding flash and Kelly fell to the ground again
unconscious. He afterwards learned that the miniature battle
was renewed over his prostrate body, and his own soldiers suc-
ceeded in carrying him back to their trench. He will walk
through the world henceforth with an artificial leg as a melan-
choly souvenir of a deed of decision and courage such as the
world loves.
The death of Melville Sullivan makes another kind of
story. He was a Virginia boy, the only son of refined and
wealthy parents. He had the soft Southern face, the soft
Southern manners, the soft Southern voice, and inevitably
everybody loved him. With the sure instinct of their tribe the
boys called him ''Dixie.*' One day he came to ask me for a
letter that would admit him into the aviation service, and I
had no idea that I was signing his death warrant when I
granted his request. He soon became a brilliant aviator with
all the daring of youth and skill and courage.
One day something went wrong with the engine and Dixie
fell a thousand feet to the earth. The first to run to his assist-
ance was another Notre Dame boy. Captain Mulcahy, who had
known and loved him at school. Dixie was not dead, but at-
tempts to bring him back to consciousness proved useless.
Mulcahy took from his pocket a little cross blessed with the
indulgence for a happy death, and shouted into Dixie's ears,
now closed forever to the sounds of the earth, the words of the
Act of Contrition. Dixie never heard them, but he was an
innocent soul, and I like to believe that somewhere they were
heard and somehow they counted for Dixie.
There must be thousands of beautiful stories of priestly
courage and virtue and of lay piety and prowess. They are in
some degree a spiritual compensation for the shocking expe-
riences of the world's most dreadful War. They ought not to
ig2a] SONG OF GOING 46S
be lightly passed over or forgotten or permitted to remain the
treasured memories of a little group. While merchants and
manufacturers are fitting another war, less bloody but hardly
less desperate, to make use of the economic resources opened
by the great catastrophe, while great statesmen scramble for
the lion*s share of the spoils of war and dole out the scraps of
liberty to the little nations, the spiritual heritage of a War
that touched the heights of heroism, as well as the depths of
degradation, ought not to pass completely out of the memoiy
of mankind.
SONG OF GOING.
BY KATHARINE TYNAN.
I WOULD not like to live to be very old
To be stripped cold and bare
Of all my leafage that was green and gold
In the delicious air.
I would not like to live to be left alone.
The children gone away.
And the true love that I have leant upon
No more my staff and stay.
I would not live to stretch my shriveled hands
To an old fire died low,
Minding me of the long lost happy lands
And children long ago.
Let me be gone while I am leafy yet
And while my birds still sing
Lest leafless, birdless, my dull heart forget
That ever it had Spring.
THE EVIL OF POVERTY.
BY VINCENT MCNABD, O.P.
I HE problem of poverty has become so overlaid
with the dust of modern money-making as to
deceive, if that were possible, even the elect. In
order to prove this, the motive of the following ar-
ticle, let me quote largely from an article by the
well-known and learned Franciscan, Father Cuthbert, O.SJP.C.,
of Oxford. In the year book of the Catholic Social Guild for
1915, under the title "Poverty as a National Asset," he writes :
"Catholics will remember that poverty is a state consecrated
by our Lord Himself; ... as such it enters into the
Christian scheme of life, and to banish it from our midst
would be to close an avenue of spiritual perfection to the in-
dividual and, ultimately, to the State itself.
"It is, indeed, at all times a proper act of neighborly char-
ity to relieve the poor man in his necessify; it may be at times
good to put him altogether beyond the reach of want. But it
would be a fatal mistake to close one's eyes to the real moral
and spiritual values which poverty holds for no small number
of men.
"Much of the energy which is expended in trying to do away
with poverty, would be more usefully employed in teaching
men the value of a poverty honest in itself and noble in its
endeavor. We should get near to the Gospel ideal, if this
too had its place in our social ideals and were kept more con-
sistently in the forefront of our programme of social better-
ment.
'The Catholic Church at least will never wish to do away
with poverty absolutely, but will ever maintain amongst its
own ideals that of honest and honorable poverty." ^
If we venture to express an emphatic dissent from the
general tendency of these words, it is because the writer of the
words, as a Franciscan and as a man of talent, possesses a wide
influence, especially on questions so Franciscan as poverty.
Poverty is of two kinds: voluntary and involuntary. It is
■ CathoUe Social Year nook, 1815. pp. 75, 7n.
1820.] THE EVIL OF POVERTY 465
regrettable that nowhere in his article does Father Cuthbert
make the simple distinction between "Voluntary Poverty" and
"involuntary poverty." Voluntary poverty is a dearth of
things which a man takes upon himself for a good eild. In-
voluntary poverty is a dearth of things which a man finds upon
himself, for the most part by the will of others and for no other
end than that of money-making. Voluntary poverty may be,
and for the most part is, a virtue. Involuntary poverty, may be,
and for the most part is caused by sin. Now this virtue of vol-
untary poverty is in those who are voluntarily poor; and this
sin of involuntary poverty is in the causes or makers of the
involuntary poor. The virtue of the Poverello is in the cell of
the Poverello: the sin of the New York slums is not in the
slums but in Fifth Avenue !
Poverty is an evil. It is not always and essentially, though
usually and causally, a moral evil; yet by its definition it is
always and essentially a physical and an economic evil. To
realize that poverty is always and essentially a physical evil,
we have but to attempt to define poverty. Let us meditate
on this definition of an accredited writer: "Poverty or want
is defined as the absence of those things which are necessary,
not in a conventional way, but absolutely necessary for the
bare upkeep of human life in a state of physical efficiency.
For a man to live he needs to be housed, to be clothed suffi-
ciently against the inclemency of the weather, and to have a
sufficiency of food to nourish his body. Where all, or any of
these, is absent, there is want." *
This poverty is such an evil that even we mendicant friars
with solemn vows of mendicant poverty, are rarely, if ever,
supposed by our rules, to experience it. The decrees of
Clement VIII., (1599) which still regulate religious life, con-
tain the following provision: "Let the clothing of the com-
munity and the furniture of the cells be bought out of common
funds. It should be uniform for the community and the Su-
periors alike. It should so befit the poverty they have wedded
that, although there is no room for what is superfluous, there
should be no lack of what is necessary.*'
The recent Code of Canon Law legislates for nuns' dow-
ries in the spirit of this decree of Clement VIII.:
Can. 547. §1. — In monasteries of women the postulant
*Pouertu in Cork, by ReT. A. M. MacSweeney, O.P., MA. Cork, 1917.
voi^ ex. 30
466 THE EVIL OF POVERTY [Jan^
shall bring the dowry demanded by the Constitutions or de-
termined by lawful custom.
§2. — This dowry shall be handed over to the monastery
before the taking of the habit; or, at least, its handing over
shall be ensured by some act valid in civil law.
§4. — This dowry so prescribed cannot be condoned either
wholly or in part, except by an indult of the Holy See, for
religious orders with pontifical approval; or except with the
leave of the local Ordinary, for religious orders with diocesan
approval.
Can. 549. After the first profession of a religious woman,
her dowry shall be invested in secure, lawful and fruitful
investments . . . Before the death of the religious it
is altogether forbidden to spend it in any way whatsoever,
even for building a house or for paying a loan.
Can. 550. §1. — The dov^ies shall be wisely (caute) and
wholly administered by the Convent where the Mother Gen-
eral or the Mother Provincial usually dwells.
§2. — Local Ordinaries shall be at great pains to preserve
these dowries. Especially in their visitations they shall de-
mand an account of them.
All these regulations make it clear that the Church does
not expect even the Mendicant Orders to experience that lack
of the necessities of life which competent authorities accept as
the definition of poverty. Indeed for the time being the
Church insists on her religious women having a fixed capital
invested to bring in a fixed income. Such a provision
may or may not commend itself to Catholics of the twentieth
century, but it makes it clear that the Church regards ""pov-
erty," that is the lack of necessary things, as an evil.
The present state of poverty in the world is a state of sin —
the sin of theft. Whether it is, or is not, a fulfillment of the
Beatitude, "'Blessed are the poor," it is assuredly a breach of
the Commandment, "Thou shalt not steal." In saying this we
must not be taken to deny that poverty is sometimes the sin of
the poor person himself. But this admission does not negative
the fact that the present state of poverty is the sin of theft;
that is the sin whereby some folk have less than they ought be-
cause some other folk have more than they ought.
My readers might be excused if they scrupled to accept
this seemingly revolutionary doctrine on the word of an in-
dividual writer. But they cannot be excused from accepting
1920.] THE EVIL OF POVERTY 467
it when it is vouched for by the authority of a Pope. In the
Rerum Novarum Pope Leo XIII. says :
The condition of the working people is the pressing ques-
tion of the hour. . . . There can be no question whatever
that some remedy must be found and found quickly for the
misery and wretchedness pressing so heavily and so unjustly
on the vast majority of the working classes.
According to Pope Leo XIII. the present state of the vast
majority of the working classes (that is of the world) is not
a blessing of God, or a state of ""real moral and spiritual val-
ues," but a state of injustice.
The result of civil change and revolution has been to di-
vide society into two widely different castes.
On the one side there is the party which holds power be-
cause it holds wealth; which has in its grasp the whole of
labor and trade; which manipulates for its own benefit and
its own purpose all the sources of supply; and which is
even represented in the Councils of the State itself.
On the other side there is the needy and powerless multi-
tude; broken down and suffering.
Here the Pope develops his thought. Through ill-housing, ill-
feeding, and like conditions pqverty bears fruit in a high death
rate; especially a high infant mortality. The present state of
injustice towards the poor is robbery with violence! The ills
that we so denounce when they are public, casual and slender
in the strikes of the poor, are hidden, permanent and enor-
mous in the present status of the rich.
Workingmen have been surrendered all isolated and help-
less to the hard-heartedness of employers and the greed of
unchecked competition. The mischief has been increased by
rapacious usury, which although more than once condemned
by the Church, is nevertheless under a different guise, but
with like injustice, still practised by covetous and grasping
men. To this must be added the custom of working by con-
tract and the concentration of so many branches of trade
in the hands of a few individuals, so that a small number of
very rich men have been able to lay upon the teeming masses
of the laboring poor a yoke little better than that of slaverg
itself.
468 THE EVIL OF POVERTY [Jan.,
The present state of poverty, far from being a good thing com-
ing down from the Father of Lights, is a morally evil thing
due to such vices as "hard-heartedness, greed, rapacious usury,
injustice, covetousness." Moreover this state of poverty is
rapidly becoming one of slavery. The State has ceased to be
a commonweal or a commonwealth where men are, on the
whole, equally free and rich. It is a tyranny wherein there
are very many who have too little because there are a very
few who have too much.
It is undeniable that some souls have been found to thrive
on poverty. But, for the most part, this is voluntary poverty;
or to be more accurate, "voluntarily chosen poverty." If the
poverty which is not voluntarily chosen but only voluntarily
accepted, has resulted in good, this has not sprung from the
poverty, which was evil, but from the human will, which was
good. No one can understand, or should write, about the so-
cial evils unless they understand that a thing or state or act
is not good because a will can draw good out of it. Indeed
there is nothing so evil that a will cannot draw some good
from it. Yet, in spite of the good which a good will can cre-
ate, evil is evil. The Crucifixion on God's side is the redemp-
tion of man; on man's side it is the murder of God. It is, at
once, God's best, and man's worst deed.
The Church wishes the present state of poverty to end.
Once more we should excuse our readers who scrupled to fol-
low us in this opinion. Once more we beg our readers to
realize that this is not the chance opinion of an unauthorized
individual; but the authoritative statement of a Pope. In the
Rerum Novarum Pope Leo says:
Neither must it be supposed that the solicitude of the
Church is so preoccupied with the spiritual concerns of her
children as to neglect their temporal and earthly interests.
Her desire is that the poor should rise above poverty and
wretchedness and should better their condition in life; and
for this she makes a strong endeavor.
These are hardly the words of one who thinks that "much of
the energy which is expended in trying to do away with pov-
erty, would be more usefully employed in teaching men
the value of a poverty honest in itself and noble in its en-
deavor." »
* Catholic Social Year Book, 1915, pp. 75, 76.
1920.] THE EVIL OF POVERTY 469
Again Pope Leo XIII. says of the present state of poverty :
"Some remedy must be found and found quickly for the mis-
ery and wretchedness pressing so heavily and so unjustly on
the vast majority of the v^orking classes." We do not seek
remedies for Divine blessings or for a state of things which
holds ''real moral and spiritual values." This call of the Pope
to destroy poverty is the call of God. "And there shall be no
poor nor beggar among you : that the Lord thy God may bless
thee" (Deut. xv. 4).
This warlike attitude towards the injustice which is at the
root of our present state of poverty is a characteristic of the
Church's saints and social workers. Even when their sense
of charity is engaged in offering relief or encouragement to the
poor» their sense of justice is denouncing or seeking to destroy
the roots of poverty. Seldom has this twin sense of charity
and justice found fuller or fitter expression than in the words
of Frederic Ozanam, founder of the Society of St. Vincent de
Paul : **Let no one say that in treating poverty as a priesthood,
we aim at perpetuating it. The same authority which tells us
that we shall always have the poor amongst us, also commands
us to do all we can that there may cease to be any poor . . .
God did not make the poor. He sends no human creatures into
the chances of this world without providing them with these
two sources of riches, which are the source of all others — ^in-
telligence and will .... Why should we hide from people
what they know, and flatter them like bad kings. It is human
liberty that makes the poor." *
The total destruction of the injustice of involuntary pov-
erty is and must be the Gospel ideal. It is said that this de-
struction of involuntary poverty can come about only by the
birth and growth of voluntary poverty, Deo gratias. Such a
consummation would be altogether after the great manner of
our Redeemer, Whose "self-emptying," or voluntary poverty,
is the riches of the world.
To sum up with a practical proposal. We religious, and
especially we mendicant friars, should take our own standard
of living as the minimum standard for the poor. We should
advocate that the poor should have as many cubic feet of house
room as we have; should have as much leisure time as we have;
* Lift of Frederic Ozanam, by O'Meara, pp. 229, S24.
470 AFFIRMATION [Jan.,
should spend as much per unit on clothing as we spend; should
have the same standard of food as we have, should have as
many opportunities of education, after their manner and by
their own choice, as we have; and should have as much guild-
cooperation and liberty as we have.
This is a practical and irresistible proposal. If we say
that it is not practical, because our standard of comfort is too
high for the poor, then we are not poor. But if we say we are
poor, then the others who are poor should have our standard
of comfort. This would not mean Communism, nor yet the
Kingdom of Heaven on earth. But it would mean the begin-
ning of that justice which we can oppose only by warring
against God.
AFFIRMATION.
BY LAURA SIMMONS.
Oh heart, keep faith with Him ! the' scant and poor
Thy cupboard's meagre spread; lavish the more
Thy love, thy steadfast faith, thy gracious cheer —
Tenfold they shall return, more rare, more dear;
Of such as these the multitudes are fed —
The two small fishes and the barley-bread!
HENRY BORDEAUX AT THE GOAL.
BY WILUAM H. SGHEIFLEY, PH.D.
HE election of Henry Bordeaux to the French
Academy will meet with approval at home and
abroad. He is not only the most popular novelist
of France; he is also a patriot, whose War rec-
ord as captain and major has been crowned by
a literary service in writing the glowing pages of La Vie
Hiroique de Gugnemer and La Chanson de Verdun. Bor-
deaux's foreign vogue is equaled only by that of Anatole
France and of the three B's : Bourget, Barres, and Bazin. Like
these three» he belongs to the traditionalist group» whose writ-
ings have in recent years exerted a marked influence upon
French thought. Like them, he cherishes the order, stability,
faith, and self-sacrifice which for centuries made France pre-
eminent in Europe. More than any other, he stresses the im-
portance of the family as the basis of society. And since the
family thrives best under stable conditions, he advocates de-
centralization, local autonomy, a return to the soil. Not even
Barr^s has so concerned himself with the fate of the diracinis
and diclassis. Hence Bordeaux's exaltation of Savoy, his home
and the home of St. Francis de Sales and Vaugelas, of Joseph
de Maistre and Costa de Beauregard. This province, with its
picturesque landscape and honest toilers, has inspired his best
work.
Love of his native region Henry Bordeaux received as a
heritage. Born, in 1870, at Thonon, on the shore of Lake Gen-
eva, he descended from an ilfnifaious line of magistrates and
public officials. His father, an upholder of piety and discipline
like Joseph de Maistre, was a lawyer. His portrait appears in
Les Roquevillard. He served with distinction in the war of
1870, and then became chief magistrate of his town. A fol-
lower of Le Play, he inculcated in his children respect for tra-
dition, for the family, and for rural France. Having chosen
his father's profession, Henry studied at the College Stanislas,
receiving his licentiate in law and letters in 1889. But, owing
to his journalistic success in connection with the exposition
472 HENRY BORDEAUX AT THE GOAL [Jan.,
of that year, he began to look toward literature as his life
work. Although admitted to the bar, he practiced only four
years.
During this time, and whUe performing his military ser-
vice, he continued to read widely in the classic and modem
writers, according preference to moralists and sociologists. The
writing of verse he soon abandoned because metrics hampered
the free expression of his thought; but his talent for vivify-
ing and interpreting a subject after the fashion of Sainte-Beuve
he revealed in Ames Modernes (1894). Three years later the
French Academy, which was to award him various prizes,
crowned one of his works. In 1900 he published Le Pays natal,
his first novel, and by no means his least. Since then he has
devoted all his time to letters. His thirty volumes consist of
fiction, criticism, and essays. Though ranking high as a critic,
he owes his fame chiefly to his novels, the best of which are Le
Pays natal, La Peur de vivre, Les Roquevillard, and Les Yeux
qui s'ouvrent. All attest their author's conviction that the mis-
sion of art is social and moral.
Le Pays natal, the story of a **diracini qui reprend racine,*'
is an appeal for provincial autonomy and return to the soil.
Bordeaux, as a disciple of Taine and Le Play, depicts, like
Barr^s and Bazin, the evils of excessive centralization and its
concomitant desertion of the country for the cities. Lucien
Halande, after wasting his best years in Paris, returns to his
estate in Savoy, striving to restore the former vigor of this
region. "My natural life was here . . . Yes, I have broken
the solid chain that my family had wrought, link by link, from
generation to generation !'' he exclaims. As his interest in local
affairs revives, he comes to realize his obhgation to the past
and his civic responsibilities. The decadence of provincial life
and the malign influence of universal suffrage lead him to con-
clude that in our democracy everything must be reshaped. So
he marries a neighbor of the old stock, and prepares to
set about his task. This novel, in its serious purpose and its
fine sensibility, strikes the keynote of Bordeaux's social
creed.
Somewhat similar is La Peur de vivre, which condemns
the civic and moral cowardice of those individualists who
avoid the burdens and sacrifices of life, adopting the motto,
"Avant tout il faut assurer sa tranquilliti." Such are th«
1920.] HENRY BORDEAUX AT THE GOAL 473
Dulaurens and the Orlandis, egotists living only for self-
gratification. How different are Bordeaux's contrasting char-
acters! Indeed) people more worthy of esteem than the
Guiberts are not to be found in the French novel. Truly Cor-
nellian, they put honor and family above wealth, and, at their
country's sunmions, accept cheerfully every obligation. No
girl but would like to be Paule Guibert, the faithful guardian
of the fireside. No youth but would wish to be her brother
Marcel, the officer who in the Sahara gives his life for France.
Most admirable of all is the heroine, their widowed mother.
Much as she loves her six children, Madame Guibert does not
hesitate to offer up "the last flower from her deserted garden"
when duty calls.
La Peur de vivre, "beau comme un cri de jeunesse" is|
Henry Bordeaux's masterpiece, the hymn of his manhood to
what is worthiest in the human heart. Into this favorite work,
with its scene laid at Le Maupas, his country estate, he has
put most of himself. He has written nothing fresher and
purer, nothing in which young hearts are more ardently
animated by ambition to consecrate themselves to noble
ideals.
Characteristic, also, if less beautiful, is Les RoqueviUard,
which treats of family solidarity. Like Balzac, Comte, Le Play,
and Bourget, Bordeaux believes that the family, not the in-
dividual, is the social unit. Accordingly, each individual
should remember that his own reprehensible conduct may
make all his relatives suffer. Thus Maurice Rouquevillard, a
young lawyer, in eloping with a married woman, causes the
death of his mother and brother, spoils his sister's marriage,
and compels his father to sell their ancestral estate to redeem
the family honor, a heritage which for centuries has been with-
out stain. Yet, to this sacrifice the father consents without
hesitation, since "the dispossessed family may regain the do-
main. It is not the patrimony that makes the family; it is the
succession of generations which creates and maintains the
patrimony." The fine mystic chapter in which M. Roquevil-
lard, alone amidst the giant trees of his estate, invokes the
assistance of his ancestors, is Bordeaux's most imaginative
creation. Nowhere else is his philosophy of life so condensed
as in the conclusion, where we read: *There is no lofty in-
dividual destiny. There is no grandeur except in service. One
474 HENRY BORDEAUX AT THE GOAL [Jan.,
serves his family, his country, God, art, science, an ideal.
Shame be unto him who serves only himself. Man's honor
consists in accepting his subordination."
In the more polished Les Yeux qui s'ouvrent, Bordeaux
attacks individualism from another point of view, concluding
that **the object of marriage is not the happiness of the con-
tracting parties, but rather the creation of a new family: it is
the child." If, therefore, a couple have children, they should
not dissolve their union for personal considerations. That is
why the author condemns his heroine, Elisabeth Derize, who
would insist upon divorcing her unfaithful husband, Albert.
It is her indifference to his historical studies that has been
chiefly to blame for his infidelity. Yet, even though Elisabeth's
grievances were more serious, the novelist, because of the two
children involved, would disapprove of their divorce. The
"link," he declares, makes marriage indissoluble. Fortunately,
Elisabeth comes to realize that a woman should judge her hus-
band's conduct as a whole rather than by one act; and, thanks
to the efforts of Albert's mother — a woman not unlike
Madame Guibert — she succeeds in saving her threatened
home. After La Pear de uiure, this is Bordeaux's most pop-
ular novel.
Some critics would class with these four volumes five
others: Le Lac Noir^ dealing with sorcery and judicial man-
ners; La Robe de laine^ contrasting the pure life of a Christian
woman and the frivolity of the world; La Neige sur les pas,
describing an architect's indulgence toward his unfaithful wife,
for the sake of their child; La Croisie des chemins, exalting
duty above pleasure; and La Maison, personifying the family
in epic fashion. All five are books of uplift by a moralist striv-
ing to regenerate society. Worthy to be ranked immediat'^ly
after them are three volumes of short stories and ten volumes
of criticism, the first of which alone — Ames Modernes, written
at the age of twenty-three — ^reveals admiration of Ibsen and
the individualists.
Bordeaux has contributed to numerous reviews, including
the Atlantic Monthly. He can express in a few phrases the
salient thought of a work or the outstanding traits of an author.
The three volumes of his Vie au ThiAtre show him to be, also,
a penetrating dramatic critic given to broad generalization and
to sympathetic appreciation, one inclined, therefore, to dwell
1920.] HENRY BORDEAUX AT THE GOAL 475
upon beauties rather than faults. His impeccable prose is sober
and natural, free from argot and neologisms.
In the delineation of character Bordeaux excels. No con-
temporary French writer has painted a finer gallery of por-
traits. These characters are so strongly individualized that
they differentiate novels which treat similar themes. His re-
spectable women are refreshingly numerous, and Bordeaux's
popularity arises in part from the fact that, rejecting the cyni-
cal distortions of "naturalism" and the unhealthy innovations
of Parisian literature, he chooses what is sane and elevating.
Everywhere he adjusts art to social doctrine. He is too much
of a moralist to be neutral. He glories in his native soil and
in those who till it. Having observed the careless, iconoclastic,
wealth-worshipping society of today, he prefers the faith, or-
der, and authority of ancient France.
He would combat the individualism of his contemporaries,
and demonstrate the social importance of the family and the
essential laws of its development. Like Bruneti^re, he seems to
say to his compatriots: "If we have suffered from a malady
for the past hundred years, it is from the inability to escape
from ourselves, to subordinate ourselves to considerations, ex-
igencies, and interests that are supreme. It is from this that
we are suffering; and unless we take care, it is from this that
we shall die."
THE FIRST SNOW.
BY E. J. o'tOOLE.
IAZILY they fell, and leisurely, the great white
flakes. Timidly, as if they were intruders that
hoped to steal in, unnoticed, with the gray dusk
and grayer twilight. True, they were only pre-
cursors: tomorrow's first sun slants would run
their veils to tears. Yet the crowds hurrying on the streets
smiled their welcome and pushed and scurried with a holiday
enthusiasm, for the first snow is always an occasion. Tired old
human nature likes the first of anything.
From a window five stories up, in the Dyner Building on
the corner of Main and Tenth Streets, a girl stood, quite mo-
tionless, her round face all but touching the wide window-
pane, watching, without focus, the huge flakes drifting care-
lessly down, down, down to the blurred yellow lights that had
just stuttered but into the half dark of the street below. A
long, red pencil was caught lightly between two rows of teeth,
white as the snow tliat was blanketing the stone sill. Behind
her, the ofBce was empty. A typewriter on the desk extension
just balanced a loose page that tipped perilously from the roll.
A shaded electric glossed the papers on the desk. The light
faltered and fell, as it chmbed the shadows of the high room.
As she watched, Peggy was thinking of other first snows.
She could remendier them all, from the one when she was six —
seventeen first snows since then — when her grandmother had
bundled her up and let her stand on the great front porch,
where the flakes blew in and kissed her face and were gone;
when she was ten, her mother's soul had gone out of its tired
body, on the first white morning of that year. Yet even more
vividly could she recall the last two.
The first of these was just such a day as this, and at just
this hour, five in the evening. The wet, heavy flakes were
blinding, and the little old man ahead of her was finding the
snow and the crowds too powerful a combination. So she
watched, and finally asked if she might help him. Unlike old
people, his pride was untouched, and the little gray eyes were
1920.] THE FIRST SNOW 477
piteously glad when she let him put his arm through hers and
change his cane to his other hand. But age had breasted too
many a storm before this one, and presently she was forced to
stop with him in the shelter of a corner store.
Then, he came. Jinuny, big and ruddy, smiling with all
the joy of a boy at the first snow. He knew the old man,
in fact boarded next door to where he lived, so, because it was
on her way, they both helped him the short distance left to go.
Through the tantalizing flakes, the tall, young man on the left
stole glances across the battered hat of the little old man, at
the girl who took her strange job in so happy a manner. The
lad's heart pounded at the sound of her voice, and he wished
a thousand times within those two, short blocks that the old
man, who was doing so nobly now between them, lived at the
end of the car line.
That was the first snow two years ago. And Peggy, who
knew so few in the city, and Jimmy, who knew fewer, came
that night to know each other; and if subsequent snows that
winter, and showers that summer were allowed to witness, both
were lucky. For they went these blocks, and some few added,
every day together and there was no old man between them.
Then came the first snow a year ago. Peggy started a little.
It was at this hour, too. In fact, all first snows, if she remem-
bered well, came at dusk. How Jimmy had come bouncing
into this same office when he had found the "boss" was gone.
Noisy and jumping about, like a big kid. Peggy had called
him that. Indeed, he was more that than any other thing to
her — a big, overgrown boy. They did not go home, either of
them, for supper that night. They went to a place on Main
Street — all white, with wide windows — ^where they could
watch the snow still falling past the lights, along the curb-
stone. "Gee whiz, I love the first snow. Peg." He said it a
hundred times, if he said it once. Then they had tramped,
care free and slowly, for an hour, arm in arm, looking in shop
windows just beginning to hint at Christmas sales. Then they
went in to a movie, and when they came out the snow had
stopped falling.
It was dirty, heavy, sticky snow along the streets in March
when Jimmy said good-bye to her at the station. He had
wanted them to see Father Dunnigan and be married before he
wentt but Peggy had insisted, no. His last words were:
471 THE FIRST SNOW [Jan.,
"Cheer up, Peg, Fll be back before the snow flies, and we'll keep
flrst-snow night again."
But now, Peggy stood and stood, watching it tumble and
glide — these fairy ships, that loafed into port — and Jimmy was
thousands of miles away. She was wondering if snow came
as early in France. Whenever it came, he would kiss the first
flake on his sleeve. She knew that.
The clang of cars, and horn shrieks came dully up the
canyon of stone from Main Street, where the flood of a day's
work was loosening itself, as per schedule. Peggy turned and
pulled the last toppling leaf to safety and put them in the
drawer. There was just the semblance of a sob as she locked it.
In the elevator on the way to the street, Mr. Ferguson, the
bald-headed bachelor from Keman's, remarked on the weather
and offered her a ride home in his Winton. But she begged off,
with the excuse of several errands. For she did have errands.
Out in the street the crowd was a five-thirty Main Street
crowd. The only difference was that everyone smiled at every-
one else, save stout ladies, who tried to squeeze through with
open lunbrellas, where they could scarcely have gone with um-
brellas closed. Peggy went on briskly; to all those passing,
simply a girl hurrying home from a day in an office. So does
the world pass by — ^for how the world would pause were it to
see the visions that go down the cities' streets, in young hearts
that dare dream, and old hearts that remember.
In fancy Jimmy was towering heads taller just beside
her, whispering his funny talk that needed no answer, while
he steered her through the jam and across dangerous tracks.
True happiness needs no realities. She was humming, as she
came to a restaurant — ^white and with wide windows. They
wouldn't miss her at Mrs. Delaney's, where she boarded. U
Jinmiy were here, she would not go home for supper.
Purposely, she chose a table for two. Had she dared she
would have ordered two portions of everything. A huge, red-
faced man stared at her from the next table. She whispered
to Jimmy. No, that was foolish. If Jimmy were really there,
the man would not dare to stare at her. She was totally un-
conscious of those who came and went up the narrow aisles.
Jimmy was telling her all about France and the "boches."
She looked at her watch. "Come on, Peg, let's get out in the
snow." She could have sworn she heard him say it.
1920.] THE FIRST SNOW 479
It was still early, so she returned slowly to Main Street,
looking at the brightly lighted windows : displays of wonderful
landscapes and colorings; furniture, flag-draped; cozy look-
ing furs, on models that looked beautifully frozen; at jew-
elry windows, with their rings — all kinds — and diamonds
sparkling.
A little before seven, she went up the stone steps of St.
John's to make a visit, and Jimmy was still with her. They
had often done that, made their visits together. The spirit of
the first snow was even here. It came in and left wet, unsolved
patterns on the linoleum of the aisles, clung to the shoulders
and veils of those who passed or knelt near her.
**The first snow, and he hasn't come." That was no way
to pray. Peggy checked herself. "Please, dear Lord, take
care of him, and bring him back. And • . . and if . . . make
me strong."
In the vestibule, she saw the "Roll of Honor," as she
turned to take the holy water. Jimmy's name must be there.
She would look. An old woman, short, with hair just turning,
came and stood beside her.
"You have some one, gone — eh?" The voice was very in-
terested.
•*Yes." Peggy turned and blushed.
"A brother?"
•*No— not a brother." Peggy could not make out the fea-
tures well in the shadows. The light was so fixed it showed
only on the list of names.
**! had one." The older woman went on talking, it seemed
to Peggy, more at the lighted list than to her.
"A son?" Peggy ventured.
"Yes ... he was killed." The little whisper neither rose
nor fell.
"Is his name there?'* Peggy moved a little closer to the
narrow shoulders.
"No — ^he doesn't live here. I don't either, that is, I didn't."
There was a long pause. Each kept looking at the names,
though neither was reading.
"I got word today." The old lady went on.
Peggy started. Apparently, the other did not notice.
•This afternoon." The whisper was still, even lifeless.
"On the two o'clock mail. They don't write much, do they?
480 THE FIRST SNOW [Jan.,
Just killed in action. But then they have so many
to notify." .|
"I'm awfully sorry." Peggy touched the mother's arm
ever so lightly.
"I know, dear. You see I had to tell someone. Fve been
telling Our Lord and His Blessed Mother, most of the after-
noon. You see — ^but, maybe, you are in a hurry.
"Oh, no." Peggy encouraged. "I've had my supper."
"Well then, let's walk outside. Denny loved the snow.
Denny was his name, you know."
An awful something seized Peggy — loved the snow,
echoed in her brain. She stood breathless.
"Now, maybe dear, you don't care to hear about it."
"But, I do," Peggy objected. "Come," and taking the
woman's arm, they went down the steps to the street. It was
still snowing.
"You see, Denny and I lived up North, and I had his father's
insurance, so Denny was finishing school. When the War
came his whole class went, and I knew, though he never told
me, how he wanted to go. So I told him Donald, that's my
other son who is married and lives here, wrote and asked me
to come to stay with him. He did, you know, but I felt he
never thought I'd accept. You see, his wife isn't very friendly
to me. I'm a little too old-fashioned, I imagine. And Denny
said it would be only a year, at the most, so I cried by myself,
when he was around, and kept telling him to go."
"You encouraged him," Peggy interrupted, "and all the
time you needed him so."
"Well, that's the best I could do, dear. Women must do
that, you know. Mothers, anyway. Make men of our boys,
though we always want — in fact, always do keep them just
that in our hearts. That is the hardest part of the work thjat
God gives us to do."
"But he was all you had, really."
•*Yes," the voice was a little tired, as if she chafed at self-
defence, 'l>ut I wasn't all he had. He had his life and his
future, and he used to say: *When it's over, if I didn't go, the
fellows wouldn't understand.' You see, when he wouldn't have
me, he'd always have what I gave him, or he'd regret what
I kept from him."
There was silence then, as they went slowly on. In fact,
1920.] THE FIRST SNOW 481
Peggy couldnH think what to answer, and she feared too long
a speech, for her throat was strangely tight. She was glad,
now, she hadn't tried to keep Jimmy from going.
"You live far?** Peggy ventured. "Maybe, you had better
take a car here." They were at the corner of Main Street again.
"Why, I'm in no hurry home,** the old woman said, almost
playfully. "Donald*s in Washington, on business, and his wife
will probably be out, and it*s awfully lonesome, always . . .
It will be tonight. Can*t we . . .** She looked square about
into the face of the girl at her side. "A movie — I like them,
and it*s warm and dry, and there's music.'*
Going in, Peggy marveled anew at her venture. How
Jinmiy would like it when she told him how strangely her first
snow night was spent!
Once in their seats, they were both silent. Peggy waited
for the other to begin but she sat very still, nearly rigid, and
Peggy, watching from the corner of her eyes, knew the old
lady saw nothing that was on the screen. Only when the W^
pictures came did she slip her hand over to touch Peggy*s.
Peggy, too, found her thoughts wandering from the pic-
ture and the long captions. She was tempted to kiss the hand
that lay so still upon her own. Here was courage such as she
had never dreamed of. How could that Denny, who lay beneath
some hastily sodded mound in France, have ever hoped to
come back, who inherited such a mother*s valor. The bravest
do not often return.
When they came out the snow had stopped, though it lay
sparkling in the yellow lights, in a few tiny places where none
had stepped. The wide walks and pavements were a slushy
brown. The old lady refused Peggy's offer to go home on the
car with her. She protested she was no invalid. And Peggy,
who watched her climbing on the high rear steps, wondered
why she had thought of her all the evening as an old woman.
Peggy waved her hand and turned to walk home. Jimmy had
lived out this way, and she knew every stone and house.
It was early still, so Peggy did not hurry. She had so many
things to think of. The farther from Main Street she went, the
huger became the blocks of untrodden and untarnishing snow.
She looked up, for the stars were out in full splendor, and
wondered if the stars and snow brought such dreams and
strange happenings to people in France.
VOL. CZ* 31 w^
482 THE FIRST SNOW [Jan^
Up the front steps to Mrs. Delaney's she went, ahnost drag-
ging her feet. She was loath to step back to realities, to stuffy
halls and close, small bedrooms, to sputtering gas, after the
exaltation of the night.
Two flights up she went. Tired in body, yet her mind
jumping and hopping, and rapidly turning over and over all
the little things the old — there's old again — ^lady had said. As
she put the key in the lock, her foot scraped against a letter
that had been all but shoved under her door. It frightened
her. She had not thought of a letter. Jimmy was the only one
in all the world she ever heard from.
Quickly she unlocked the door, and picked the letter up.
Fumbling, she knocked over several things on the stand be-
fore she found a match, and let the gas flare up with a great
pop. She tore the envelope. With one glove still on she read,
then read again, then turned the slip of paper. Somehow, she
got her glove and hat and coat and rubbers off. Somehow, she
found the envelope and slip again, and, somehow, she began to
understand just what it meant — that one little line from the
War Office in Washington, "... that James J. Courtney, 1410
Oak Street . . . was killed in action November 1, 1918."
When he was going, Jimmy had said: "You're the only
one in the world. Peg, so you'll get my medals when they
come."
Peggy went to the stand, opened her purse, and took out
her rosary. It was one of pearl that Jinuny had given her the
Christmas before. Like a dream it seemed — all she was doing.
She might have been beside his mound in France, for all her
senses told her of the room and the things about her. Over
to the bed she went, with vague visions of a tall, red-cheeked
boy in khaki; of a woman, whose thin lips were suddenly
caught at the comers; of soft snow falling all about her.
Quickly, she knelt and buried her head in her hands. The
tick, tick of the clock might have been the clanging of cathedral
bells, for all she heard or heeded. For a long time the white
pearls were still. It was only after a sob that they began to
unwind themselves over the slender fingers that cupped her
face.
THE CHESTERBELLOC.
BY THEODORE MAYNARD.
III.
The Politicians.
R. GILBERT K. CHESTERTON has said of his
brother Cecil that he was born a fighter and that
he argued from his cradle. What was true of the
very brave and able man who bore so honorable
a part in the political debates of the Chester-
beiioc, IS equally true of the other Chesterton and of Belloc.
Temperamentally they are controversialists incapable of let-
ting slip any opportunity for preaching their doctrines. Hard
and frequent blows have been struck by them, and the ex-
treme pugnacity of their nature has f ortimately been provided
with a himdred outlets by a world whose trend makes rapidly
for the very things they hate with a special fury. Other men
have observed the trend and have disliked it; the Chesterbelloc
has maintained that capacity for indignation which results
in violent protest and violent action.
When first the voices of the young writers on the Speaker
were heard they were full of angry argument. Today, fifteen
years later, the editorials of the New Witness are as trenchant
as were ever the columns of the paper of those patriots who
denounced the infamy of the Boer War. There is, however,
this difference. Time, though it has not weakened the early
wrath, has solidified it with a philosophy. The men who re-
sisted the attack upon the South African Republic have seen
an attack being made upon the English res publica. Danger
is needed to make a nation conscious of itself and danger has
awakened the dogma of democracy. A state indeed may be so
far gone in decay that the increasing power of the rich is only
viewed by the people with stupid acquiescence; normally it
stirs up the sleeping sense of popular liberty. Modern society
is in a phase of transition, but for the mass of the people the
changes are so effectively masked by Parliament and the press
484 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Jan.,
as to be almost imperceptible, though in reality they are swift
and far-reaching. The Chesterbelloc has clearly marked the
changes and their consequences; it has warned the world as
to what is being attempted and, in order to counteract that
attempt, has restated the doctrine of democracy.
Sociologists have discovered a word that saves the necessity
for thinking; that word is progress. A partial understanding
of the biological theory of evolution has comforted men with
the notion that things of themselves are certain to get better.
To this Mr. Chesterton has made the obvious answer that if
things of their own nature are certain to get better one might
as well not interfere with them; the reformer may go to bed
and get up in the millennium. The reformers have done so —
continuing, however, to talk vaguely in their sleep of progress
and eugenics and labor compounds. Unfortunately they are
likely, upon getting up, to find themselves in hell. For "^prog-
ress," as the Chesterbelloc is never tired of pointing out, is only
a metaphor for walking down a road — ^very probably the
wrong road.
Things of themselves do not tend to get better; they tend
to get worse. The aim of the reformer consequently should be
to resist evolution, which he can do in no other way than by
revolution. But he must have a creed. He must make up his
mind as to what he wants to preserve before he begins to de-
stroy. Every good revolutionist is a good conservative. The
French Revolution was, as Mr. Belloc says, advocated as a
reversion to the normal, to some primal right of man which
had been lost and which has to be recovered. In Mr. Ches-
terton's political writings there constantly occurs the figure of
the white post taken by him as a symbol of the world. If you
want to keep your white post (he says) you must repaint it;
if it is to be the old white post you must make it the new white
post. At the end of the eighteenth century in France the revo-
lutionists built their arguments upon the implied contract
which was the cement of society; in the beginning of the twen-
tieth century in Russia the anarchists wish to uproot the foun-
dations upon which society rests. There is much breaking
and there may be more; but there will be no building. The
Bolshevists have burnt the plan, as the Fabian Society has lost
the map, and while one group of men run about Russia tear-
ing down walls in a blind fury, another set wander about
1920.] THE CHESTERBELLOC 4U
England, with as blind a futility, trying to make up their minds
what to do.
The Chesterbelloc, on the other hand, is able to tell you
exactly what it wants and what it does not want and why. At
a time when democracy is forever in the mouths of politicians,
but never in their hearts, the Chesterbelloc has kept it alive
in the brain. Subtle doubts of equality have been expressed by
the philosophers on the ground, apparently, that some men are
fat and others are thin, some men tall and others short, some
men clever and others dull, some men (it has come to this)
are rich and others poor. The dogma of democracy, as given
in practically the identical words by the two Chestertons and
by Belloc, is that the things common to all men are infinitely
more important than the things peculiar to some. Like most
of the great transcendental doctrines, they will admit, this is
incapable of proof, except by the results which follow its ac-
ceptance or rejection — the energy, honor and happiness of
the society which accepts it; the lethargy, dishonor and misery
of the society which neglects it.
The sterility of most modem political and economic ex-
periments arises first from their philosophical bewilderment,
and secondly because of an ignorance and contempt for his-
tory on the part of politicians and economists; for if they knew
the history of Christian civilization they would understand
Christian people. Mr. Belloc is always insisting that the his-
torian must know the Catholic Church. He should be a Cath-
olic; at least he should be acquainted with the Catholic posi-
tion. Without such knowledge he will have no key to Europe
or to these civilizations which have sprung from Europe. To
grasp the meaning of Christendom he must first grasp the
meaning of Christianity. Yet many contemporary intellec-
tuals, finding that the Faith does not appeal to them (rarely
have they knowledge of what the Faith is) put the considera-
tion of it away with contempt. Consequently they either en-
tirely misread or find it convenient to ignore history. One
really talented man has actually made a proposition that edu-
cated folk should only pay attention to the newest things. The
fads of the present (we learn) are of more importance than the
great religions of the past, and so far from students studying
the classic writers, they should not dream of wasting their
time upon any book more than ten years old. There is at first
486 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Jan.,
sight the appearance of daring about such an idea; it is as
attractive as the brilliant folly of youth, and bears its savor
of adventure. In fact, however, it turns out under examina-
tion to be only the old game of begging the question. The
modernists find it somewhat simpler to ignore the facts than
to give up the habit of making theories. If the world will not
fit, they will pretend that it does not exist. On this fear of the
past Mr. Chesterton has written in What's Wrong With the
World:
The last few decades have been marked by a special culti-
vation of the romance of the future. We seem to have made
up our minds to misunderstanding what has happened;
and we turn, with a sort of relief, to stating what will happen
— ^which is (apparently) much easier. The modern man
no longer preserves the memoirs of his great-grandfather;
but he is engaged in writing a detailed and authoritative
biography of his great-grandson. Instead of trembling be-
fore the spectres of the dead, we shudder abjectly under
the shadow of the babe unborn. This spirit is apparent
everywhere, even to the creation of a form of futurist ro-
mance . . • The old story, we know, was supposed to begin :
'-'Late on a winter's evening two horsemen might have been
seen — ." The new story has to begin: "Late on a winter's
evening two aviators will be seen — ." The movement is
not without the elements of charm ; there is something spir-
ited, if eccentric, in the type of so many people fighting over
again the fights that have not yet happened; of people still
glowing with the memory of tomorrow morning • . .
But when full allowance has been made for this harmless
element of poetry and petty human perversity in the thing,
1 shall not hesitate to maintain here that this cult of the
future is not only a weakness but a cowardice of the age • . .
The upshot of this modern attitude is really this: that
men invent new ideals because they dare not attempt old
ideals. They look forward with enthusiasm, because they
are afraid to look back.
Now in history there is no revolution that is not a restora-
tion. Among the many things that leave one doubtful about
the modern habit of fixing eyes on the future, none is stronger
than this: that all the men in history who have really done
anything with the future have had their eyes fixed upon the
past
1920.] THE CHESTERBELLOC 487
The Chesterbelloc is often accused, by those who have not
troubled to read its work, of drawing a stained-glass picture of
such a mediaevalism as never existed, and then inviting mod-
ern men to conform themselves to it. As a matter of fact the
Chesterbelloc (or what practically amounts to the whole Ches-
terbelloc as historian, Belloc himself), is if anything perhaps
a little less than just to the Middle Ages. He acknowledges the
attractiveness of the ideal almost attained in the twelfth and
thirteenth centuries, but not only declares that that ideal was
gradually decaying in the fourteenth century, but had lost most
of its vitality in the fifteenth. The reason, he thinks, was that
the Middle Ages came to their perfection too suddenly to last;
that they had not sufficient root to support their load of loveli-
ness for long, and were compelled to make way for the more
vigorous Latin growth of the Renaissance.
We have been used for some time past to the Teutonic
theory of civilization. It was supported by many of the his-
torians and by nearly all the dons at the universities. All that
is hardy and honorable in the English character, we were con-
stantly informed, came from the rude virility and sterling
simplicity of our Germanic blood, so that at last an obscure
Sinn Fein poet came to believe it enough to make the execrable
couplet :
Saxon and Teuton
They grew the same root on.
The Chesterbelloc, however, has consistently met this loose
assertion of the academics with a flat denial. It seems that
the whole of our civilization derives from Rome. As Mr. Ches-
terton puts it in his history, 'The important thing about France
and England is not that they have Roman remains. They are
Roman remains." We are only too inclined to view the past
falsely foreshortened by distance and to pass lightly and un-
attentively past a period full of important organic change.
The Roman occupation of Britain, for instance, is generally
thought of as a brief episode of no permanent consequence.
Mr. Chesterton reminds us that England was directly Roman
for fully four hundred years; longer than she has been Pro-
testant and very much longer than she has been industrial.
So far from the Teutons being the makers of England they
were the people that nearly destroyed it. Our civilization was
488 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Jan..
Roman until the Barbarian came, and when those great waves
from the Baltic had passed, it remained Roman. Even in
blood the English are probably far more Gaelic than Teutonic,
for at each invasion little more than a slight infiltration came
into the original stock. As for the law, the religion, the ar-
chitecture, the literature of England, these were re-latinized
and the country was made once again a part of Europe. From
the south came philosophy and arms and arts, for the new
Rome carried on for centuries the work it had inherited from
the old.
A deep knowledge of history informs the politics of the
Chesterbelloc, and in its proposed reforms it can point to the
experience and example of a happier age. This knowledge,
moreover, is very far from being bookish. Mr. Belloc can
write dully when he is trying to be particularly lucid, but he
is never dull as an historian; on the contrary, he u^ then
extraordinarily vivid.
This is due to the historian's concern with actualities, his
insatiable thirst for first-hand evidence and personal observa-
tion. No other such writer has studied geography so closely
or found in it so frequently the clue to an enigma.
G. K. Chesterton and his brother, Cecil, though they have
been unable to give the close study to history that Belloc h!as
given, have done useful and even brilliant work in it. G. K. C.'s
Short History of England does not attempt more than a gen-
eral outline, but as a critical guide to the ordinary reader it is
invaluable. Its light is not the light of day but rather of the
lightning that suddenly illuminates a landscape and that often,
because of its sudden clarity, reveals more than the sun is able
to show with its steady shining. Cecil Chesterton in his Nell
Gwynn and more especially in his last book. The History of
the United States, has a greater command than his brother of
the professional manner. His native lucidity made him an
admirable interpreter of facts; and an appreciation of the
relative importance of details with a capacity to coordinate
them is of infinitely greater value to the world at present than
a plodding patience in research.
Mr. Belloc in one of his essays, collected in First and Last,
said that '"upon the right reading of history the right use of
citizenship in England will today depend." The politics of the
Chesterbelloc, now to be considered, are founded upon the
1920.] THE CHESTERBELLOC 489
reading of history which I have attempted to summarize and,
being deep in the experience of the past, can offer much to the
needs of the present, for the Chesterbelloc proposes not merely
a poetic revival of mediaevalism, but a practical revival of
Christendom.
The Faith, being a vital spiritual force, resulted in certain
secular consequences. The framework of the Christian state,
its body of laws and to a great extent its methods were imposed
by Roman arms. But a new spirit re-created society destroying
by degrees, and with the strange new doctrine of the equality
of men, the slavery which had seemed normal to the- older
civilization. The slave slowly turned into the serf and the serf
into the free peasant-proprietor; there was no sudden up-
heaval but only a gradual decay of the Servile Institution.
Working parallel with the economic transition was a political
transition which at last grew conscious of itself as democracy.
Men having come to believe themselves equal in the eyes of
God, began to insist that they were equal in the eyes of the
law. They went further and demanded the right to make their
own laws. Government no longer could be exercised with the
passive consent of the governed, but only with their active ap-
proval. Democracy, that is government according to the gen-
eral will, was in the air.
Unfortunately it remained in the air and never came fully
into operation. In England the struggle which had been going
on between the barons and the crown, ended at last in the
king's head falling beneath the axe, and his son's return as the
paid servant of the new aristocracy. The Parliament which
had overthrown the monarchy had also overthrown the
democracy, and the English people learned the bitter lesson
of the rapacity of the rich.
Parliamentarianism has long been thought of as the same
thing as democracy. It may be argued that it is the most con-
venient means of achieving democracy, but even at its best
it can be considered as only the democratic machinery. As it
exists in the modern world, however, "Representative gov-
ernment" does not represent anybody except the governing
class. The general desires of the people are not ascertained and
the will of the people is not carried out. The country is in-
deed invited to vote, on the respective merits of this or that
team of parliamentarians and their policies, but it is not con-
490 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Jan.,
suited about the policies, and its choice is limited to one of two
teams picked from the same governing class.
By the very necessities of its own nature Parliament tends
to become an oligarchy. At first it was a close aristocratic
body, but during the memory of living men birth has come to
count less and mere wealth more in its system. The old politi-
cal families still count and have a prescriptive right to places
within the governing body, but the new political families are
the real power. The honest, narrow English squires could
hardly be called democratic though they sat in the English
Parliament; they did not represent the English people, but
they represented something English. They are passing — and
their successors are not democrats. These also, though they
sometimes but not always sit in Parliament, are not representa-
tive. They are not even English. The governing class is gov-
erned in its turn by a group of cosmopolitan financiers.
The evil of plutocratic government has, in our time, come
to a head in England. In the State it is corrupt and in society
it is oppressive. It is this evil that the Chesterbelloc has sin-
gled out for attack.
To expose the present condition of politics Hilaire Belloc
founded in 1911, soon after he had left Parliament, the paper
known as the Eye Witness and which was later, under the
successive editorships of Cecil and Gilbert Chesterton, named
the New Witness. The two main objects of the paper are to
attack political corruption and to resist the establishment of
the servile state.
The consideration of the thesis that capitalism is becoming
increasingly imstable, and must, unless property be again
widely distributed, result in the reestablishment of slavery,
will have to be postponed until a little later in this article. I
must first deal with the attack made by the Chesterbelloc upon
the party system. It was made in three ways : by Mr. Belloc
in Parliament; by lectures and articles out of Parliament;
and by means of satirical political novels. The thesis was
fully stated with all Mr. Belloc's intimate knowledge and Cecil
Chesterton's lucid logic in The Party System. To a great ex-
tent that book is already out of date; there is no longer an
official opposition; the Front Benches are not forced to the
expedient of collusion in private and collision in public. Yet
the book retains a high value and interest.
1920.] THE CHESTERBELLOC 491
Sham criticism of the present Govermnent is still en-
gineered and is always followed by a sham withdrawal, but the
old solemn and formal farce of opposition has, for at least a
little, while, disappeared. 'Money still plays its part and has
indeed more power than it ever possessed. Honors are more
than ever bought and sold, and policies dictated by the rich.
Even tlie clean sweep of the old gang announced when the last
Prime Minister fell, has not been carried out, for Churchill and
Chamberlain are of too old a gang to be broken. But the
governing class no longer employs the subterfuge of splitting
itself in two parties in the way Cecil Chesterton (I think I can
detect his hand in the following passage) described in The
Party System:
But, it may be asked, is there anything wrong in men dif-
fering in politics yet remaining on friendly terms in private
life? Is there any reason why a man should not marry a
woman because her family belongs to the political party op-
posed to his? Not the least in the world. Such things would
naturally happen in the most real and earnest political con-
flict. But they would happen as exceptions; there would be
perhaps one or two such cases in every generation. When
we find such things not exceptional, but universal, we may
safely say that we are not considering a certain number of
examples of personal sympathy or attraction over-riding
political differences, but a general system of government by
a small, friendly, and closely inter-related clique. We are
not surprised at Romeo loving Juliet, though he is a Montague
and she a Capulet. But if we found in addition that Lady
Capulet was by birth a Montague, that Mercutio was at once
the nephew of a Capulet and the brother-in-law of a Mon-
tague, that Count Paris was related on his father's side to
one house and on his mother's side to the other, that Tybalt
was Romeo's uncle's stepson, and that the Friar who mar-
ried Romeo and Juliet was Juliet's uncle and Romeo's first
cousin once removed, we should probably conclude that the
feud between the two houses was being kept up mainly for
the dramatic entertainment of the people of Verona.
The ground of The Party System is covered also by the
series of satirical political novels which appeared in rapid se-
quence from Mr. Belloc. Emanuel Burden, the first and best
of these books, is already a recognized classic of sustained
492 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Jan^
irony. Following on its account of how an honest, but some-
what stupid English merchant, was trapped and at last broken
by a financier engaged in exploiting the riches of a malarial
African district, we hear of another English merchant, more
stupid than Mr. Burden, and just a shade less honest, who, hav-
ing through sheer luck accumulated a fortune, is pushed, much
to his bewilderment into politics, and finally is honored with
a title because of his contributions to the party funds. Mr.
Barnett, the Jew financier of Emanuel Burden, appears again
in Mr. Clutterbuck's Election as the Duke of Batterseas, and
has a finger in the pie of the novels which followed that
book.
In Pongo and the Bull he effects the downfall of the Gov-
ernment, despite the desperate attempt of the leader of the
opposition to keep the Government in office by means of an
elaborate piece of stage management. Had Pongo not been
chased by the bull he would have entered the chamber of the
House of Commons at the Prime Minister's cue, "the leader of
the opposition is morally guilty of assassination." But an acci-
dent ruined collusion and precipitated the General Election
which the Front Benches were seeking to avoid.
A Change in the Cabinet is simply an amusing study in
nepotism, where a half-wit whose wife has lost her enormous
allowance from the American millionaire, her father, receives
a place in the Cabinet and five thousand pounds a year, plus
expenses to save him from (comparative) starvation. The
thing is put more briefly in one of the Cautionary Tales for
Children.
Nepotism, so entertainingly described in these verses for
children, though having something corrupt about it, is ob-
viously much less positively evil than that direct and indirect
giving and taking of bribes which is the secret sore of English
politics. Yet both nepotism, for which a kind of defence can
be made out, and the indefensible practice of bribery, are after
all only symptomatic. They are consequences of a disease, not
the disease itself. That is nothing less than a plutocracy which
works through an oligarchy under the appearance — the camou-
flage, blessed word! of democracy. It endangers the State,
because the interests of finance are international, and patriot-
ism is an exploitable commodity. It endangers the home, the
unit of the State; because the rich, with a contempt peculiarly
1920.] THE CHESTERBELLOC 493
modern for the poor, are destroying in turn one after another
of the private liberties of the people. It endangers society, the
organization of the State; because the means of wealth are
concentrated into the hands of a few who are able to establish
a domination over the lives of the many who have become
dispossessed.
In 1912 appeared Mr. Belloc's book, The Servile State,
whose thesis was that capitalism, as an economic system, grow-
ing increasingly unstable, is striving to establish itself in stable
equilibrium, and that the stability would be nothing else than
a reversion to the servile institution, in which, under possibly
some new name, the mass of men would be compelled by law
to work for the profit of a limited number of masters. The
argument was not that such a consummation is inevitable;
but that the trend of society was towards it. Mr. Bclloc con-
fined himself to definition and to abstract discussion, as of a
mathematical problem, of his theory. He did not say that
slavery was wrong, but merely considered whether a revival
of it were probable. He declared that Socialism led to the
establishment of the Servile State by being deflected from its
objective in its impact upon capitalism; and ""that the Capital-
ist State breeds a Collectivist Theory which in action produces
something utterly different from Collectivism : to wit, the Ser-
vUe State."
To counteract both Capitalism and Collectivism, the
Chesterbelloc has preached the reestablishment of a system
of widely distributed property, such as was general in England
before the Reformation, and is still general over the greater
portion of Eiu^ope. In it, men would own their own bodies,
their own land, and their own tools and, having economic in-
dependence, could be free.
When Leo XIII. issued his encyclical letter, Rerum
novarum, he declared the pressing question of the moment
to be the condition of the working classes; and today, the
importance of sound economics is so overwhelming that, with
the War over, nothing else is of much consequence. The yoke
laid by the rich upon the necks of the masses of the popula-
tion weighs heavier than in the great PontiflTs day — for even
if there is a show of improving the lot of the workers in its
material aspect, if modem social reform supports the granting
of greater comfort and security to the laboring classes, it ac-
494 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Jan.,
companies its benefits with an increased control over the lives
of men. It means to destroy destitution and freedom at one
blow. The more discerning of the Socialists have already be-
gun to doubt the wisdom of strikes whose sole object is the
obtaining of higher wages, preferring the gaining of a higher
status to the illusory bulk of a pay-envelope. Yet, in all the
welter of controversy, with collectivists, syndicalists and
bolshevists shouting against one another, very few economists
are demanding the independence and dignity which would re-
turn with a society where private ownership would be normal.
Still, there are many hopeful signs of a new spirit and the guild
idea, tacked on to a modified form of Socialism, is gaining
groimd. The more ground it gains, however, the more Social-
ism loses, so that it is significant that Mr. Orage has foimd it
convenient to rename his proposals, ""National Guilds'* instead
of "Guild Socialism."
Only recently has the world begun to know anything of
the mediaeval industrial organization. We were allowed to
read that the religious houses were suppressed because they
were avaricious, but never that they were suppressed because
the king and his servants were greedy for gold. About the
guilds, however, there was an unanimity of silence. As Mr.
G. K. Chesterton remarks in his Short History of England:
The boy and girl reading the stock simplified histories of
the schools practically never heard of such a thing as a bur-
gher, until he appears in a shirt with a noose around his neck.
When the mere fact of the existence of the craft guilds was
suppressed, it was still less likely that a word would be said
as to how they were destroyed and why. The fratricidal mur-
der of the Protector Somerset cannot be altogether condoned
by a Protestant coimtry, but while admitted, it is set off (like
Henry's matrimonial adventures) to the debit side of a ledger
where Protestanism stands as an enormous credit balance.
There is, however, a debit never posted in full to the account,
the enclosure of the common lands, and another debit not
posted at all, the destruction of the guilds. G. K. Chesterton
makes the point in a characteristic passage of his history:
The Mediaeval Trade Unions were struck down, their
Ift20.] THE CHESTERBELLOC 485
buildings broken into by the soldiery, and their funds seized
by the new nobility. And this simple incident takes all its
common meaning out of the assertion (in itself plausible
enough) that the Guilds, like everything else at that time,
were probably not at their best. Proportion is the only prac-
tical thing; and it may be true that Caesar was not feeling
well on the morning of the Ides of March. But simply to say
that the Guilds declined, is about as true as saying that
Csesar quietly died from purely natural causes at the foot
of the statue of Pompey.
The doctrine of liberty, preached not as an intellectual ab-
straction, but as a practical part of work-a-day life explains
the pugnacious attitude of the Chesterbelloc which to many
people seems to be mere wantonness. If the Chestertons and
Belloc have exposed politicians, it is not because they take a
malicious delight in scandal for its own sake, but because they
desire the honor of their country and the liberty of their
fellow-countrymen.
NIAGARA IN WINTER
BY EDWARD F. GARESCH^, S.J.
THOU great priest of all the nations, thou
Whose immemorial chanting shakes the sky !
The suns of ages on thy reverend brow
Linger, in glorious life, immortally.
1 come again to hear, eternal tone
Of immolated waters, where the leap
Of thy vast splendor makes perpetual moan
And lifts unwearied litanies from the deep.
And lo!
I find thy priestly waters clad in snow.
And where thy choral rapids used to sweep
Surpliced in hills of frost, like acolytes, they sleep.
All rubrical, in white.
Hills, waves and trees are vestured deep with light
As for high splendors of some solemn feast.
The mighty altar of thy hills, aglow
With ceremonial show.
Twinkles with mimic suns; thy tapers bright
Astound the reverent sight.
And wistful, sedulous clouds of swirling mist
Have never ceased
To hang the shivering trees, by sunbeams kissed,
With wonderful bright robes and baldachins of fleece.
O the vast arc of that white altar, glowing
With crystal columns of thy frozen streams.
Gigantic pillars, halted in their flowing,
Lucent with lightenings of marmoreal gleams.
Their flutings vaster than old Egypt's glory.
Chiseled to fretted arabesques of frost, —
In the white windings of that splendor hoary
The wildered sunbeams wander and are lost.
Ah, bleak and beautiful, and clear
With more than earthly glitterings of delight,
Thine ice-built altar here
Quivers with marvels of celestial light,
Kissed
With wild and tremulous mist,
And streaming clouds of glory from its height.
I«a0.] NIAGARA IN WINTER 497
Around, in robes of state,
The reverential forests stand.
With their deep, paradisal fruitings hoar.
Obsequious they wait
While, chanting low, the waters deck them more.
Strewing their crystal splendors on the land.
Weaving the woods with many a strange device
With snowy bands and crackling stays of ice.
Until amazing glories flash and flow
Where the white forests glow.
And all the common world is covered under
With hills of splendor and with vales of wonder!
The vaporous incense of thy restless wave
Is whirled in clouds of glory, freezing far.
On every jutting crag the restless play
Of thy swift, eager water piles away
A heap of gelid foam. The furious war
Of freezing torrents, teased to flinging spray.
Hath left thy stones as lovely as a star.
Where the pale stretches of thine ice fields are.
Hark, the trapped surges impotehtly rave.
Roar furious, prisoned in their icy cave.
And still
The steadfast waters keep their constant will
On pouring towards the brink of their desire.
The sacrificial torrent whelmed and lost
In wonderful, deep frost.
Leaps onward with its immemorial fire.
With all its ancient joy and all its fear
The liquid litany of the waves I hear.
And echo through the white, impassive walls
The solemn verberations of the falls.
No fetters of imperious cold
This sacrificial surge can stay
From the wild winter's freezing hold
The eager torrent leaps away.
And through the far-flung ice resistless poured
The ever valiant wave, to win its way.
Shakes the white lightenings of its silver sword!
▼OL. cz. 32
SHAKESPEARE AND THE ART OF MUSIC.
BY P. J. KELLY, MUS. D.
If Music and Sweet Poetry agree
As Ibey must needs, the sister and the brother.
Then must the love be great, 'twixt thee and me.
Because thou lovest the one and I the other.
Dowland to thee is dear, whose heavenly touch
Upon the lute doth ravish human sense;
Spenser to me, whose deep conceit is such,
As, passing all conceit, needs no defence.
— Passionate Pilgrim.
^ITH these words, Shakespeare sings of the inti-
' mate relationship between music and poetty. No
other dramatic poet has exhibited in his worits
such great admiration of music and such tech-
y nical knowledge as did Shakespeare. Of all his
dramatic works, but five are without allusions to music. He
therefore is a very valuable addition to the history of music,
as his characters discuss the object of music, philosophy of
music and also the practice of the art.
There is a very intimate association between Shakespeare
and music, for he lived at a time in which much vitaUty was
exhibited in musical circles. The voice of music was abroad.
Every aspect of life was accompanied by appropriate strains.
Across the wooded hills, on the village common, in mansion
and cottage, a real love of the art revealed itself in divers
. manners. It would be diflicult to determine the great influ-
ence that music exerted in the life of Shakespeare. Shakes-
peare's excursions in the musical province are a direct out-
come of a great joy in its charms. He is always happy when
speaking on music and its place in life. To him it is some-
thing real. It is the human side of it that attracts him. It
is evident that to him, the art of sound was full of fascination.
And whether his reference is humorous or full of enthusiasm,
he speaks with the voice of one who knows and understands.
The number and diversities of Shakespeare's allusions to
music in its many forms proves an active interest in it. A
clever man can write eloquently about it, without being par-
ticularly sensitive to its influence, but that by Shakespeare
1920.] SHAKESPEARE AND THE ART OF MUSIC 499
it was regarded seriously, must be obvious to the careful stu-
dent of his works.
In sketching out a programme of Shakespearean music,
certain familiar things are plainly indicated. We have Men-
delssohn's fairy music to Midsummer Night's Dream, epitome
of all that is best in his work. Then there are Berlioz's dra-
matic symphony, Romeo and Juliet, Tschaikowsky's symphonic
poem, Hamlet, and the incident music written by Arthur Sulli-
van to the Tempest and Merchant of Venice. Besides there
are the following overtures : Beethoven's Coriolanus, Weber's
Oberon and Berlioz's King Lear. We conclude the list with
Richard Strauss' symphonic poem Macbeth, and the Shakes-
pearean preludes: Nicolai's Merry Wives of Windsor, Goetz's
Taming of the Shrew, Gade's Hamlet, and Schumann's Julius
Caesar. Of all musicians, Berlioz is the most interesting in
connection with Shakespeare, whom he is better qualified to
interpret than any other.
Shakespeare's influence with the master of masters of the
art of music, Beethoven, was very marked. He was well
acquainted with the poet's works, and read him with avidity in
German. Looking into his immortal music, we have his own
authority for connecting Shakespeare's name with two mag-
nificent sonatas. When asked to explain the hidden meaning
of Sonata Op. 31 No. 2 in D minor and Op. 57 in F minor, the
composer replied: "Read Shakespeare's Tempest." In the
overture Coriolanus, Beethoven derived his matter mainly
from Shakespeare. Wagner has analyzed the constituents of
this overture, showing how the themes relate to incidents in the
life of the Roman. The force and dignity of the opening, stand
for the inflexible will and haughty bearing of the hero; while
the second subject, of a tender and pleading character, one
can hardly be wrong in associating with the tearful entreaties
of the Roman matrons which woke the filial piety of Coriolanus
and led to the tragedy of his death.
The influence of Shakespeare upon music is naturally
connected with the settings of the songs which are innumer-
able. Of contemporary and very early settings, there appear
to be very few. However, towards the end of the seventeenth
century, examples are more numerous. In 1678, Purcell pro-
duced his "Overture" and "Incidental Music," both character-
istic and beautiful, to the masque in Shadwell's version of
500 SHAKESPEARE AND THE ART OF MUSIC [Jan^
Timon. In 1690, the same Shadwell, having adapted The Tem-
pest, Purcell contributed music to it; two pieces, "Come unto
these yellow sands," and *Tull fathom five," being especially
admirable. Later on he wrote the gossamer-like fairy music
for the adaptation of A Midsummer NighVs Dream. We have
also fine settings of the songs in As You Like It, Twelfth Night,
The Merchant of Venice, The Tempest, and the dirge in Romeo
and Juliet. The lyric "It was a lover and his lass," has been
set sixteen or seventeen times and others nearly as often. Some
of the sonnets, passages out of Venus and Adonis and The Pas-
sionate Pilgrim and non-lyrical extracts from different plays
have been given a musical dress.
In Shakespeare's Plays we find folk music and song, but
no sacred music of the *Te Deum" or "Sanctus" kind, for there
was no call for it in the subjects he treated. Yet in Henry VIU.,
in the death scene of Queen Catharine, we have "sad and sol-
emn music." He also made use of instrumental music. In his
Antony and Cleopatra, Act IV., Scene 3, solemn and strange
music is heard. None of such music has been preserved. It
may have been only a few chords or snatches of melody, yet
it was a second stage of instrumental music. Shakespeare
must have known the Mystery Plays. Certainly the trained
musician who idly turns the poet's leaves to see what musical
allusions he makes, is astounded at his intimate knowledge
of music, that art which so many of the poets rave about with
so little understanding. Shakespeare knew what he was talk-
ing about, and could move at ease among musical technics.
Had we no other sources of information as to the intimate
connection of music with the life of the time, we should find
it reflected in Shakespeare's Plays, not only by the frequent
introduction of songs sung by the characters, which, be it
noted, are always relevant to the action, but by the introduc-
tion of professional musicians, such figures in those days, and
by the proneness of the characters to point their moral, or
adorn their philosophy with apt musical similes. The histor-
ical plays have fewer musical allusions than either the trage-
dies or the comedies. Shakespeare stands out among all the
Elizabethans, for his appreciation of the divine art, a sort
of appreciation, which in its perception of music in all its then
known forms and phases, we might term democratic. It is
never quite safe, however, to count upon a dramatist's acting
1920.] SHAKESPEARE AND THE ART OF MUSIC 501
consistently with the dogmas of his characters; a man may
smile and be a villain; so in Shakespeare's world at least a
man may be musical and be a villain, for the most detestable
of all his characters gives expression to his sinister motives
in metaphors drawn from music :
O, you are well-tuned now.
But I'll set down the pegs that make this music.
The most often quoted passage about music in Shakes-
peare is the one about ""the man that hath no music in him-
self/' and he is declared as *'fit for treason, stratagem and
spoils." A careful reading of the second scene of Act I. of
Two Gentlemen of Verona, will surprise the reader with more
musical allusions than are found in any other single Shakes-
pearean scene, unless it be in Twelfth Night One of the most
playful touches in Shakespeare in connection with music, is
the picturing of the musician looking for compliments in As
You Like It: "Shall we clap into it roundly without hawking
or spitting, or saying *we are hoarse,' which are the only pro-
logues to a bad voice?" In Much Ado About Nothing, Act II.,
Scene 3, Balthazar, the musician, strives with might and main
to win a compliment from Dom Pedro, but only gets: 'Thou
singest well enough for a shift."
Shakespeare's muse presents wonderful specimens of the
strength and music of our language, as well as facility and
felicity of construction; and this power of transferring the
inmost truth of things into musical verse makes him, as Emer-
son says, "the highest type of the poet." In addition to the
extreme beauty and melody of his versification, "the golden
cadence of poesy," and breathing the highest passionate elo-
quence, the reader's attention is called to the striking paral-
lelisms and analogies in phrase and metaphor throughout all
his plays and poems. Yet he seldom repeats himself or plays
upon but one string. The same thought and image is con-
veyed by a happy alternation of phrase, combining both
euphony and melody with harmony of thought and feeling.
Musical Echo.
How dost thou like this tune?
It gives a very echo to the seat
Where love is throned.
—Twelfth Niffht, 11. 4.
\
502 SHAKESPEARE AND THE ART OF MUSIC [Jan,,
Echo— Music of the Hounds.
We will fair queen, up to the mountain's top
And mark the musical confusion
Of hounds and echo in conjunction.
— Midsummer NighVs Dream, IV. 1.
Chime of Bells.
Slow in pursuit, but matched in mouth like bells.
Each under each. A cry more tunable
Was never holla'd to, nor cheered with horn.
— Midsummer Night's Dream, IV. 1.
Music A Charming Awakening From Sleep.
Procure me music ready when he wakes.
To make a dulcet and a heavenly sound.
— Taming of the Shrew.
Aside from the choice of musical sounding words, which
abound in Shakespeare's works, we find the musical phenom-
enon of alliteration, a device which can rise to heights of great
beauty in the hands of a master. The simplest form of this
kind of verbal music in Shakespeare, is the alliterative epithet,
"pale primrose," "fierce fire," **midnight mushrooms," "reel-
ing ripe," "curled clouds," "mischiefs manifold," "ebbing Nep-
tune," etc. Such epithets abound throughout his plays. Then
we have lines like, "I will not struggle, I will stand stone still."
Shakespeare did not deliberately invent involved combina-
tions of this sort; he was more like Mozart, with an inward
spring of music forever bubbling up and out, lisping in num-
bers, because the numbers came, and adorning his verse with
sound patterns of which he was, at most, half conscious but
which have formed themselves in a very musical mind. Music
with him was a natural and powerful means of expression;
he uses it to carry his purpose a little further than the spoken
word will take it.
Shakespeare's allusions to musical instruments are far too
numerous for detailed mention; he draws glibly from all of
them. The viol da gamboys, a baritone stringed instrument,
is connected inseparably with a gentleman's liberal education
in Twelfth Night; the vile squeaking of the wry-necked fife
in the masques, is held up to ridicule by Shy lock; the lute is
pilloried over Hortensio's head by the Shrew; and even the
various kinds of bag-pipes which seem all equally sour, are
differentiated; the '*Lincolnshire bag-pipes" in Henry IV.; the
1920.] SHAKESPEARE AND THE ART OF MUSIC 503
**woollen bagpipes*' in the Merchant of Venice, and so on. He
refers to the Virginals, a precursor of our pianoforte, and de-
lights us with a most perfect metaphor in Winter's Tale, drawn
from the method of playing them, which required quite a dif-
ferent "touch" from the modern piano: "Still Virginalling
upon his palm."
Shakespeare most frequently mentions the lute, an instru-
ment entirely different in its construction from the lyre. He
speaks of it four times as often as the other common instru-
ments of the home, and, in fact, it was **popular" in Tudor
days, just as the pianoforte is popular now, or as the harp
was in our grandmother's time.
Nay, but his jesting spirit; which is now crept into a lute
string, and now governed by stops.
— Much Ado About Nothing, III. 2.
And there I stood amazed for a while
As on a pillory, looking through the lute.
— Taming of the Shrew, II. 1.
Bap. Why then, thou canst not break her to the lute?
Hor. Why no; for she hath broke the lute to me.
— Taming of the Shrew, II. 1.
It is supposed that Shakespeare wrote his inimitable works
without much thought of their permanence, still less of their
eternal value, and probably the idea that the lyrics contained
in them would be handled by a series of great composers,
never occurred to him. Can one not imagine a flush of pride
on the well-known features, were it possible to make known
to him, that scarcely a single musician of all future ages left
his lyrics untouched? As the unrivaled worth of Shakes-
peare's plays sank into the minds of men, so composers of all
nationalities hastened to avail themselves of his words. To
evolve adequate musical settings of Shakespeare, appears to be
as great an obsession, as the desire to write fugues in the name
of Bach. Shakespeare, not only occupies the highest pedestal
of literary fame, but claims universal approbation for the art
he inspired.
REVIVAL OF FRENCH CATHOLIC SOCIAL ACTIVITY.
BY M.«C TUBMANN, LL.D.
IN France and abroad I have often met with de-
risive criticism directed particularly towards
Catholics. "You do not know how to organize,"
they would say, or; "Form yourselves into a
political party." Formerly they would add:
"Be a Centre 1" pointing to the too famous German Centrum.
For diverse reasons the formation of such a political Centre
was impossible, but the Catholics of France have organized
intellectual and social centres to which I wish to direct the
attention of the readers of The Cathoug World.
As a Frenchman living abroad I was much interested in
attending the recent reunions, during the month of August,
which were known as "La Semaine Sociale de Metz." This
social week was made possible, because among Catholics,
clergy and laity alike, there is more ardent good-will than ever,
and more personal generosity towards the cause of the
Church and the people. Notwithstanding the harrowing
years we have lived through, human beings consumed with
avarice and an insatiable thirst for sensual pleasure unfortun-
ately still exist. But, in contrast to this pitiable type, often
completely swept away by excessive luxury and corruption,
there is an increasing number of souls of the ^lite who strive
to stem the tide of physical and moral evils brought about by
the War.
Never before have vocations been so numerous in the con-
gregations of men. I could instance Parisian novitiates not a
few, whose aspirants count many already in their forties, for-
merly occupying brilliant positions in the world. Responding
to the divine call, their one desire is to serve God and their
neighbor.
With this multiplicity of vocations to the priesthood and
religious life so noticeable in France today, in all walks and
stages of life, we remark another pleasing evidence : the activ-
ity and prudent assurance with which French Catholics assert
themselves in the social field. The problems to be solved were
never more numerous or complex, more delicate or mors criti-
1920.] FRENCH CATHOLIC SOCIAL ACTIVITY 505
cal. Our bishops have sought to indicate whefls the solution
may be found, or at least the principles for their solution.
Several have published pastorals recalling to mind the instruc-
tions of the Encyclical, Rerum Novarum, and applying them
to the present contingency.
The letter of his Eminence Cardinal Maurin, Archbishop
of Lyons, relative to the workingmen's associations, and pro-
fessional organizations, created the greatest stir.
That, in the social field, the French Episcopate is quite
capable of demonstrating how fearlessly the Church voices jus-
tice, was evidenced in a recent event. On the thirteenth of last
October, M onseigneur Germain, Archbishop of Toulouse, having
learned that the conciliatory committee between the directors
of the city banks and their clerks on strike, could not effect
an adjustment because the directors refused the arbitration
allowed under the law of 1892, called a meeting of the bank
directors and two delegates of the Association of Catholic
Clerks. At this meeting the Archbishop urged that the actions
of the Association were strictly in accord with the principles of
Catholic sociology exposed in his recent pastoral^ on social or-
der. He asserted that, in conscience, the directors could not
disallow the arbitration claimed by the strikers. But, again
the directors, alleging formal orders from their Paris manage-
ment, refused to arbitrate. During a general meeting of the
strikers, the propositions of the Archbishop were made known
and met with warm applause. The members of the labor union
begged their comrades of the Catholic Association to convey
to the Archbishop their sincere gratitude. This is a
typical instance of the existing spirit of Catholic circles in
France.
But one may ask — are these organizations, these social
works numerous and in accord with this leadership? To an-
swer this question fully would require many pages of The
Catholic World. The discussion must necessarily be
limited.
To consider first Catholic intellectual activity in France,
we will enumerate the Catholic universities, and the many
flourishing religious establishments of secondary educa-
tion for young men and young women. The universities
^ St Thb Cathouc Wobld* '*With Our Readers," vol. cix., p. 709, for m tunmuury
of thlt paftoral.
506 FRENCH CATHOLIC SOCIAL ACTIVITY [Jan^
rank as follows: Paris, Lille, Lyons, Toulouse and Angers.
They are frequented by large numbers of students. Of recent
years they have enjoyed the advantages of keen interest in
new ideas and great simplicity in methods. This does not
mean yielding to doctrinal innovations, but showing in other
lines a proper initiative, and a real desire to meet actual
necessities. We must confine ourselves here to two examples of
this spirit. Six years ago the Catholic Institute of Paris opened
to ambitious persons a course in higher commercial studies,
particularly for those desirous of pursuing a commercial, finan-
cial or industrial career. Besides this, at Angers the Catholic
University maintains a school of agriculture and a school of
commerce. It expects to extend its activities to a school of
arts and crafts under the direction of religious already estab-
lished in Nantes.
It would be a grave error to think there are no ardent
Catholics among the faculties of the colleges and State universi-
ties. On the contrary they are numerous and active. Many
have grouped themselves in an original manner, as the authors
and publishers of a periodical known as the Bulletin of Catho-
lic University Professors. The subscribers to their Bulletin
form a veritable family. It was started in 1911 by a noted
professor, Joseph Lotte, who shortly after his conversion set
out to become an apostle.
In the month of July, 1914, in spite of difficulties, the
Bulletin had about six hundred members and decided on a
thoroughly Catholic mode of procedure. But the War sus-
pended the Bulletin, its editor being mobilized. Before the
close of 1914 the apostolate of Lotte was crowned by the su-
preme sacrifice. Nevertheless the apostolate flourished. Lotte's
enterprise was not forgotten, and in 1917 it was resumed at
Lyons by a small group of professors who maintained its initial
Christian spirit. Today it has more than doubled its sub-
scribers. We could cite further many endeavors which unite
Catholics belonging to the liberal professions. Among them
let us mention the "Social Union of Catholic Engineers." This
union meets under the leadership of an association legally
constituted, of hundreds of engineers, graduates of various
schools, without counting a large number of student engineers
welcomed as guests and participating in many of the advan-
tages of the association. The members are recruited among
1920.J FRENCH CATHOLIC SOCIAL ACTIVITY 507
Catholic engineers exclusively. Their aim is to promote their
professional and moral interests, and to work along Catholic
social lines; their motto is: 'To serve God, to serve each other,
to serve others." This general purpose is explicitly realized
by fraternal feeling among its members, by reforms of special
interest to the profession, by founding or maintaining economic
institutions and bureaus of information. Its members, imbued
with the desire of exercising their profession in a truly Catholic
manner, give much time in their periodic reunions to practical
religious instruction, without neglecting technical and social
questions.
Another instance of the revival of Catholic activity in
France was the great success of La Semaine Sociale de Metz,
during the first week of August this past year. Our readers
are no doubt familiar with this activity when, for a period of
eight days, a group of important present-day problems are
discussed in lectures given by cleric or lay specialists. The
inspiration is essentially Catholic. The doctrine discussed and
applied to the different topics is that of the Encyclical, Rerum
Nouarum.
La Semaine Sociale was inaugurated at Lyons in 1904 and
has been held from that time imtil the orders for general mo-
bilization were issued on Simday, August 2, 1914. Monday,
August 3d, was the appointed time for the opening of the
Semaine at B^an(on, but the reunions were necessarily ad-
journed until victory was assured. Their recent revival in
reconquered Lorraine, under the patronage of the new Bishop
of iMetz, Monseigneui: Pelt, was interesting and significant.
A large Catholic audience, not alone from Alsace-Lorraine
but from all quarters of France, participated, as also a num-
ber of foreigners, coming particularly from Belgium and Lux-
embourg.
Before the War, French example was gradually being fol-
lowed in a number of countries: Belgium, Holland, Wales,
Spain, Poland, Switzerland, Canada, Uruguay and Argentine
Republic had their Semaine Sociale. Undoubtedly these coim-
tries will also resume this interrupted work.
Other general works along moral and social lines, for reli-
gious and intellectual activity, could be mentioned, but we shall
limit ourselves to pointing out a few of the most recent and
efficacious. The aim of this rapid review is to see what has
508 FRENCH CATHOLIC SOCIAL ACTIVITY [Jan.,
been done in the line of professional organization for the bene-
fit of the masses.
First, we must realize that prior to the War, there were no
so-called workingmen's Christian unions of any importance.
But today — and this is another good symptom of Catholic ac-
tivity — they are establishing themselves particularly in Paris,
opening registry offices, labor bureaus, and departments of
legal advice. One can only hope these associations will prosper
and develop. For those employed in commerce and industry,
there is the larger Parisian Union, founded in 1887 by seven-
teen young clerks, old pupils of the Friars, and members of a
pious confraternity, placed under the patronage of St. Benedict
Labr6. It numbers already about nine thousand members,
grouped in seventy-five sections throughout the environs of
Paris, and affiliated with similar unions in other important
cities. This association is professional in outline and constitu-
tion and distinctly Catholic in spirit and personnel. It is one of
the models in France of Christian unionism. Its prunary aim
is the mutual benefit of its members, effected through the reg-
istry office, the legal council, a codperative society, a loan office
and a cooperative restaurant. For a more detailed study of
the workings and remarkable results of these several institu-
tions, we must refer those of our readers who are especially
interested to one of our books, Actiuitis Sociales*
The Paris union of clerks extends its activity to night
schools, banking courses, conferences, a library and a monthly
bulletin. Religion is the actuating spirit of the organization.
In the corporation of Parisian clerks, this union plays an im-
portant part, and during the recent strike of the banks' per-
sonnel, its attitude had to be reckoned with.
When we turn to the women's associations we find again
the most powerful in Paris. On September 14, 1902, eighteen
teachers, fifteen clerks and as many working girls formed the
very first Catholic Women's Professional Association. This
was the nucleus of what is known today as, UUnion des syndi-
cats* fiminins or because of the street on which their central
* Activltis Sociales, by Max Turmann, LL.D, Paris: LecolTre-Gabalda. Chapter
on "Examples of Unionism," p. 43 et seq,
*It must be clearly miderstood that the French word Sgndicat used here as a
union, an organization, association or federation has no connection with the term
syndicalism, nor the unworthy socialistic movement which syndicalism usually •x-
presses.— [Editor C. W.]
1920.] FRENCH CATHOLIC SOCIAL ACTIVITY 509
office is located, Les Syndicats fiminins de VAbbaye. It is
composed of eight associations — teachers, commercial and in-
dustrial clerks, clothing operatives, stenographers and type-
writers, servants, nurses, matrons, housekeepers and factory
workers, numbering fifteen thousand members, divided into
fifty sections in the environs of Paris.
The entirely Catholic associations are united for the pur-
pose of furthering their professional and economic interests,
and thereby obtaining mutual benefits for members. They
have study clubs, and information bureaus, registry offices,
night schools, recreation centres, a cooperative society, an in-
firmary, and club, housekeeping courses, a dispensary, lodging
houses, and restaurants reserved exclusively for women. One
can see how far-reaching are the services of this organization.
And these are not the only Catholic Women's Associations.
Others flourish in the provinces, especially in the southeast,
affiliated with the central Parisian group of the Rue de S^ze.
The best proof of the social and religious importance of these
Catholic groups^ is, that during the past months in a number
of French territorial points, the revolutionary Socialists have
fought them on every side, but the Catholic associations
were inflexible. Much could be added concerning the myriad
groups of young people, from the *' Association of Catholic
Youth in France" to innumerable study clubs, societies, and
gymnasiums scattered through city and country parishes.
The patriotic courage displayed during the War by the vic-
tims who fell before the enemy proved the value of the moral
formation achieved by these Christian organizations.
Today with their outline reconstructed the reunions have
revived with new ardor. In this brief summary we have
merely stated facts, which we believe will convince our Amer-
ican friends that, more than ever, the Catholics of France
despite the difficulties and perilous times which have deci-
mated their ranks, are full of energy and hope for the future.
*For a detailed list and brief sketch of all the Catholic Works of France* we
refer the reader to a pamphlet by Francois Veolllot, entitled Les (Envres CathoHqutt
de Prance, Paris: Bloud et Gay.
THE DOCTRINE OF SIGNATURES.
BY HARRIETTE WILBUR.
iONG ago, before chemistry proper was dreamed
of and before medicine became a science, men
were always seeking for remedies and cure>alls.
Now all the sciences have had their origin in
superstitioD, and medicine no less than her sis-
ters. In the light of twentieth-century knowledge, many of
these old remedies seem very silly; yet they served one pur-
pose, at least: if they were not cures, the experiments grad-
ually led to the scientific rules which now govern the practice
of medicine.
The early simplers had one very peculiar method of test-
ing their cures, and that was by the "doctrine of signatures."
In an early work on The Art of Simpling, William Coles
says: "Yet the mercy of God which is over all His works,
maketb Grasse to grow upon the mountains and herbes for
the use of men, and hath not only stamped upon them a dis-
tinct forme, but also given them particular signatures, where-
by a man may read, even in legible characters, the use of
them." So, in the days of folklore medicine, when super-
stition had much to do with beliefs and practices, a resem-
blance between the external characters of a disease and those
of some physical agent was supposed to indicate that the agent
should be employed in the treatment of the disease. Thus,
a red cloth was plainly the cure for scarlet fever, because it so
agreed with the red, blotched skin of the sufferer; and not-
withstanding its discomfort, a close swathing in scarlet flan-
nel was the remedy in such cases. The same rule held good
in the case of herbs.
Our hepatica, or liver-leaf, owes both its Latin and its
English names to the shape of its leaves, and because of its
appearance it was once thought to be "a sovereign remedy
against the heat and inflammation of the liver." And, owing
to a black pupil-like spot in its corolla, (he eyebright, or
euphrasy, was plainly, as revealed in its "legible characters,"
created for use in eye-troubles.
1920.] THE DOCTRINE OF SIGNATURES 511
... in physic by some signature
Nature herself doth point us out a cure:
The Liverwort is by industrious art
Known physical and sovereign for that part
Which it resembles; and so we apply
The Eyebright by the like unto the eye.*'
— William Brown, in Britannia* s Pastorals.
Then purged with eyphrasy and rue
His visual orbs» for he had much to see.
— Milton.
The lungwort (Pulmonaria officinalis) has white-spotted
leaves which were fancied to resemble a diseased lung, and in
this way the plant, which possesses demulcent properties, came
to be used in diseases of that organ. A lichen (Sticta pulmon-
aria) has a flat, expanded, somewhat lung-shaped thallus, and
so has also been used for such a remedy. Because the lung-
wort leaf could, by a stretch of the imagination, be made to
look exactly like a dewlap, it was at one time a very popular
remedy for the pneumonia of bullocks, one of its names being
bullock's-lungwort.
The granulated roots of the white meadow saxifrage, re-
sembling small stones, were supposed lo indicate its efficacy in
the cure of calculus complaints, hence the name "saxifrage,"
or "stone-breaker." The hard seeds of the gromwell were also
used in cases of stone; it was formerly known as lythewale,
or stoneswitch. Spleenwort, from the shape of the leaf, sug-
gested its name and its uses; it is believed in some rural dis-
tricts of the old world that swine, when affected with the
spleen, will resort to this plant, and, according to Coles, the
ass does likewise, for he tells us that: "If the asse be op-
pressed with melancholy, he eates of the herbe asplemon or
mill-waste, and eases himself of the swelling of the spleen."
The pile wort has a tuberous root long thought, from its ap-
pearance, to be an efficacious remedy for this trouble.
The walnut was regarded as clearly good for mental
cases from its bearing the signature of the whole head; the
outward green cortex answering to the pericranium, the
harder shell within representing the skull, and the shape and
convolutions of the kernel implying the covering and matter
of the brain. Hence, the outside shell was considered good
for wounds of the head, whilst the bark of the tree was re^
512 THE DOCTRINE OF SIGNATURES [Jan^
garded as a sovereign remedy for the ringworm, by the same
sign. Its leaves, too, when bruised and moistened with vinegar,
were used for earache, perhaps because the ears appear to
grow from the head much as leaves from a branch. For scrof-
ulous glands, the knotty tubers attached to the kernel-wort
have been considered highly efficacious. Our Lady's-Thistle,
from its numerous prickles, was much recommended for
stitches in the side. Nettle-tea is still a common remedy with
many of the old-world peasantry for the nettle-rash, while
the scabious, from its scaly pappus, led to its use in scabies,
or even leprosy. The leaves of the wood-sorrel were believed to
preserve the heart from many diseases, from their being **broad
at the ends, cut in the middle, and sharp towards the stalk.'*
Similarly the heart-trefoil was so called, and used, because "not
only is the leaf triangular like the heart of a man, but also
because each leaf contains the perfect image of a heart, and
that in its proper color, a flesh color."
Self-heal, or prunella, is called carpenter's herb, on ac-
count of its corolla being shaped like a bill-hook, hence its use
for wounds of all kinds. St.-JohnVwort, with its leaves
marked with blood-like spots, which appear, according to tra-
dition, on the anniversary of his decollation, is still "the won-
derful herb" that cures all sorts of wounds. Herb-robert, from
the beautiful red hue assumed by the fading foliage, was
supposed to be "a stauncher of blood," while as a preventative
against hemorrhage of every kind red roses have long been
a favorite remedy in Germany. The water-soldier, from its
sword-shaped leaves, was reckoned among the applications for
relieving gun-shot wounds. Solomon's Seal was also long
believed to be of use as a wound-dressing. Gerarde, describ-
ing it, tells us how "the root of Solomon's Seal stamped, while
it is fresh and green, and applied, taketh away in one night
or two at the most, any bruise, black or blue spots, gotten by
falls, or women's wilfulness in stumbling upon their hasty
husband's fists." The specific name of the tutsan (Hypericum
Androssemum) derived from the two Greek words signifying
man and blood, refer to the dark red juice which exudes from
the capsules when bruised; it was once applied to external
wounds, and hence it was called "balm of the warrior's wound,"
or "all-heal." Gerarde says: *Thc leaves laid upon broken
skins and scabbed legs heal them, and many other hurts and
1920.] THE DOCTRINE OF SIGNATURES 513
griefs, whereof it took its name 'toute-saine' of healing all
things."
Quaking-grass and aspen were both powerful ague-reme-
dies, as would be inferred; the purple marsh wort was an ex-
cellent remedy against the purples; the yellow bark of the bar-
berry, when taken as a decoction in ale or white wine, was
said to be highly useful in cases of the j aundice, hence in some
parts of the Old World the plant is known as "jaundice-berry."
An apple mixed with saffron was also recommended for the
jaundice, while rhubarb, we are told, by the doctrine of sig-
natures, was the "life, soul, heart, and treacle of the liver."
As the woody scales on the cones of pine-trees resemble fore-
teeth, so pine-leaves boiled in vinegar were used as a toothache
medicine.
In the case of the rattlesnake weed (Hiracium venosum)
again crops out the old doctrine of signatures, for undoubtedly
its remedial virtue has been attributed to the plant solely on
account of the fancied resemblance between its leaves and the
markings of the rattlesnake. The rattlesnake plantain has also
been reputed as an infallible cure for both hydrophobia and
snake-bites; it is said that the Indians had such faith in its
medicinal value that they would allow a snake to drive its
fangs into them for a small sum, if they had these leaves on
hand to apply to the wound. The snake-cane is a tropical
American palm having a ringed, snake-like stem; its juice
is used by the natives as a cure for snake-bites, as is also the
snake-wood, an East Indian vine.
In accordance with this doctrine, it was once generally
believed that the seeds of ferns were of an invisible sort, and
thus it came that the possessor of fern-seed could become
invisible. In Ben Jonson's New Inn this belief is noticed:
I had
No medicine, sir, to go invisible,
No fern-seed in my pocket.
And again, in First Part, King Henry IV.
Gadshill: We have the receipt of fern-seed, we walk in-
visible.
Chamberlain: Nay, by my faith, I think you arc more
beholding to the night than to fern-sccd for your walking
invisible. 11. 2.
▼OL. cz. 88
514 THE DOCTRINE OF SIGNATURES [Jan.,
The weak, trailing, knotted stems of the knotgrass was looked
upon with superstition; an infusion of it was supposed to
have the effect of stopping the growth of an animal. For this
reason it was called, as by Shakespeare, "hindering knotgrass.'*
Beaumont and Fletcher, in the Coxcomb mention the legend:
We want a boy extremely for this function,
Kept under for a year with milk and knot-grass.
Pliny pointed out the folly of the magicians in using the cata-
nance, or blue succory, for love-potions, on account of its
"shrinking in drying into the shape of the claws of a dead
kite," and so holding the patient fast. The horse-shoe vetch,
from the shape of its legumes, and the moonwort, from the
crescent-shaped segments of its fronds, were believed to have
power to unshoe horses treading upon them, hence the former's
name of "unshoe-the-horse." The hound's-tongue has been
reputed to have the magical property of preventing dogs bark-
ing at a person, if laid beneath the feet. Of the valerian Top-
sell informs us: 'The root of the herb valerian (commonly
called Phu) is very like to the eye of a cat, and wheresoever
it groweth, if cats come thereunto, they instantly dig it up for
the love thereof, as I myself have seen in mine own garden,
for it smelleth moreover like a cat."
Such is the curious old folk-lore doctrine of signatures,
which in olden times was regarded with so much favor, and
was for a very long time recognized without any questioning
as worthy of men's acceptation. Among the blessings we owe
to science, is a deliverance from many of these nauseous pre-
scriptions so popular with the old herbalists.
Grandmother's gathering boneset today:
In the garret she'll dry and hang it away.
Next winter I'll "need" some boneset tea —
I wish she wouldn't think always of me !
—Edith M. Thomas.
THE LOYALIST.!
BY JAMES FRANCIS BARRETT.
Chapter I.
[LEASE continued, Peggy. You were telling me who
were there and what they wore. Oh, dear! I am
so sorry mother would not give me leave to go. Was
it all too gay?"
"It was wonderful!" was the deliberate reply.
"We might have danced till now had not Washington
planned that sudden attack. We had to leave then — that was
early this morning — and I have been abed since."
It was now well into the evening and the two girls had been
seated for the longest time, it seemed, on the small sofa which
flanked the east wall of the parlor. The dusk, which had begun to
grow thick and fast when Marjorie had come to visit Peggy, was
now quite absorbed into darkness; still the girls had not lighted
the candles, choosing to remain in the dark until the story of the
wonderful experience of the preceding day had been entirely
related.
The grand pageant and mock tournament, the celebrated
Mischienza, arranged in honor of General Howe, who had resigned
his ofiSce as Ck>mmander-in-chief of His Majesty's forces in Amer-
ica to return to England, there to defend himself against his ene-
mies in person, as General Burgoyne was now doing from his seat
in Parliament, was an event long to be remembered both for the
> Historical facts constitute the background of this story. Its hero and its
heroine are, of course, fictitious; but the deportment of General Arnold, the Ship-
pen family, the several military and civic personages throughout the story is de-
scribed, for the most part, accurately and in conformity 'with the sober truths of
history. Pains have been taken to depict the various historical episodes which
enter into the story, such as the attempted formation of the Regiment of Roman
Catholic Volunteers, the court-martial of Major General Arnold, the Military Mass
on the occasion of the anniversary of American Independence, with as much fidelity
to truth as possible. The anti-Catholic sentences, employed in the reprimand of
Captain Meagher, are anarchronisms ; they are identical, however, with utterances
made in the later life of Benedict Arnold. The influence of Peggy Shippen upon
her husband is vouch^ for by eminent authority.
Due appreciation and sincere gratitude must be expressed to those authors from
whom immense quantities of Information have been taken, — to John Gilmary Shea
in his Htstory of the Catholic Church in the United Slates; to Martin I. J. Grinin's
CatholicM and the American Revolution; to F. J. Stimson's excellent work. Memoirs
of Benedict Arnold; to John Fiske's American Revolution, and to the many other
works which have been freely consulted.
516 THE LOYALIST [Jan.,
•xtravagance of its display, and the peculiar prominence afforded
the foremost families of the city, particularly the Shippens.
Edward Shippen was a gentleman of rank, of character, of
fortune, a member of one of the oldest and most respected fam-
ilies in the city of Philadelphia, whose ancestor, of the same name,
had been mayor of the city nigh an hundred years before. He
belonged to the society of Friends, or Quakers, and while he took
no active interest on either side during the years of the war, still
he was generally regarded as one of the sympathizers of the
Crown. Because of the social eminence which the family enjoyed,
and the brilliance and genial hospitality which distinguished their
affairs, the Shippens were considered the undisputed leaders of the
social set of Philadelphia. The three lovely Misses Shippen were
the belles of the more aristocratic class. They were toasted fre-
quently by the gay English oflBcers during the days of the British
occupation of the city when their father's house was often the
rendezvous of the titled celebrities of the day.
"And was your Captain there, too?" continued Marjorie, re-
f'^rring, of course, to Captain Monstresor, the engineer of the
undertaking, an erstwhile admirer of Mistress Peggy.
'Tou must know, my dear, that he arranged the spectacle.
I saw little of him until the dance. In truth, he seemed more
popular than General Howe, himself."
Marjorie sat up.
"Tell me! Did the tournament begin the programme?"
"No!" replied Peggy. "The military procession of boats and
barges with Lords Howe and Rawdon and General Howe and
General Clinton opened the event in the late morning, sailing up
the river to the Wharton House, the scene of the tournament."
Marjorie nodded. "The noise of the guns was deafening. When
the flotilla arrived at Walnut Grove, which was lined with troops
and bedecked brilliantly vnih flags and bunting, the pageant
opened."
"Where were you in the meantime?" asked Marjorie, care-
ful to lose no details.
"We were seated in the pavilions — seven ladies in each —
clothed in Turkish garments; each wearing in her turban the
favor with which to reward the victorious knights."
"And who was your knight?"
"The Honorable Captain Cathcart," quickly replied Peggy, her
eyes beaming with a smile of evident satisfaction and proud joy.
"Lord Cathcart, whom I met here?"
"The same," answered Peggy. "He was the leader of the
'Knights of the Blended Rose.* "
1920.] THE LOYALIST 517
•«1
'What an odd name!'* Marjorie exclaimed.
'I know it. They were named after their device. They were
dressed in white and red silk, mounted on gray horses and at-
tended by esquires. They were preceded by a herald who bore
their device, two roses intertwined above the motto 'We droop
when separated.' My knight rode at the head, attended by two
British ofiScers, and his two esquires, the one bearing his lance,
the other his shield emblazoned with his device — Cupi^ astride
a lion — over the motto 'Surrounded by love.' "
**You little Tory," interrupted Marjorie. "I shall tell Gen-
eral Washington that you are disloyal and have lent your sym-
pathies with a British oflBcer."
"I care little. The Yankees have little refinement — "
"Don't you dare say that," snapped Marjorie, her whole being
animated with sudden anger. "It is untrue and you know it.
They are patriots and — "
"Forgive me, dear," murmured Peggy, laying her hand on
the arm of her provoked friend. "I said that only in jest. I
shan't continue if you are vexed."
There was silence.
"Please! I am not angry," Marjorie pleaded. "Do con-
tinue."
"I forget my story now. What did I tell? There was so
much that I am confused."
The Knights of the Rose!" suggested Marjorie.
'Oh yes ! Well this body of knights made the circuit of the
square and then saluted their ladies. On a sudden, a herald ad-
vanced with a flourish of trumpets and announced that the ladies
of the Blended Rose excelled in wit, beauty, grace, charm and
accomplishments those of the whole world and challenged a denial
by deeds of arms. Whereupon a counter sound of trumpets was
heard from afar and another herald galloped before a body of
knights in black and orange silk with the device — a wreath of
flowers surrounding a burning heart — over the motto 'Love and
Glory.' These were the Knights of the Burning Mountain, who
arrived on the scene to dispute the claim of the Knights of the
Blended Rose."
"It must have been gorgeous!" exclaimed Marjorie, clasping
her hands together before her.
"Indeed it was. Well, after several preliminaries, the en-
counter took place, the knights receiving their lances together
with their shields from their esquires, whereupon they saluted
and encountered at full speed, shivering their spears against the
shield of their adversaries. They next encountered and discharged
518 THE LOYALIST [Jan.,
their pistols and then fought with swords. Again the two chiefs
of the warring factions, Captain Cathcart of the Blended Rose and
Captain Watson of the Burning Mountain, met in mid field to try
the force of their arms as champions of their respective parties.
They parried and thrust with true knightly valor until Major
Grayson, as marshal of the field, intervened at the critical mo-
ment, declaring the ladies of both parties to be fully satisfied
with the proofs of love and the feats of valor shown by their
knights, and thereby commanded the combatants to desist. This
ended the tournament."
"How wonderful!" sighed Marjorie. "I would I had been
present. And your knight was the hero?"
"Of course," replied Peggy with a smile. "I am sure that
he would have worsted Captain Watson, had not the Major
stepped in. But the banquet was splendid."
"And Captain Cathcart!" reminded Marjorie, with a slight
manifestation of instinctive envy.
"Why ! He attended me, of course," was the proud response.
"Each knight escorted his lady through the triumphal arches
erected in honor of the Generals who were present, along the long
avenue lined on both sides with the troops and the colors of the
army. At the third arch, which was dedicated to General Howe
and which bore aloft on its top a huge flying figure of Fame,
we entered the great hall. Here refreshments were served and the
dancing began, and continued until midnight, when it ceased that
we might throw open the windows to witness the wonderful dis-
play of fireworks and rockets. And then the supper I — "
"Gorgeous, of course!" exclaimed Marjorie.
"Gorgeous, indeed!" Peggy repeated — "a great room, with
fifty or more pier glasses, drapped with green silk and himdreds
of varieties of flowers of as many hues and shades. An hundred
branches of lights, thousands of tapers, four hundred and thirty
covers, and there must have been more than twelve hundred
dishes. The attendants were twenty-four black slaves garbed
Oriental fashion with silver collars and bracelets. And then we
danced and danced until dawn, when we were interrupted by the
sound of distant cannon."
"And then your knights were called to real war," remarked
Marjorie.
"For the moment all thought this to be part of the pro-
gramme, the signal for another great spectacle. Suddenly every-
thing broke into confusion. The officers rushed to their com-
mands. The rest of us betook ourselves as best we could. We
came home and went to bed, tired in every bone. Mother is sorry
1920.] THE LOYALIST 519
that I attended, for she thought it too gay. But I would not
have lost it for the world."
And perhaps her mother was right. For Peggy was but
eighteen, the youngest of the Shippen family. The other girls
were somewhat older, yet the three were considered the most
beautiful debutantes of the city, the youngest, if in anything, the
more renowned for grace and manner. Her face was of suflBcient
plumpness to give it charm, delicate in contour, rich with the
freshness of the bloom of youthful years. Her carriage denoted
breeding and dignity, sweetened by a magnetism of personality
and a vivacity of manner, that drew to her, in love and admira-
tion, all who came within her influence. Still her attitude was
more prepossessing than permanent.
Like her father, she was a Quaker in many of her observ-
ances, to which creed she steadfastly adhered with a rigorous
determination. She so frequently manifested her political sym-
pathies, often intensified by irrational and passionate utterances,
that her father was led to observe that she was more a Tory at
heart than General Howe, himself.
Her companion, Marjorie Allison, was about her own age,
but as intensely patriotic as she was loyal. Her parents had
always lived in Philadelphia, as their parents had before them,
coming originally from the mother country to which they were
now opposed in martial strife. The thrill of patriotism for the
cause of the infant Republic, which throbbed violently within
her breast, had been inspired to enthusiasm more by intense
antipathy for the Church of England than for the English Gov-
ernment. This antipathy was kept alive and invigorated by the
doleful memory of the privations and adversities endured by her
ancestors from the agents of this same Government because of
their Catholic worship and their heroic efforts to follow their
leligious convictions.
The sympathies of the Allisons were undivided; they were
notorious Whigs, ardent champions of the rights which the new
Government so strongly asserted, and which they had pledged
themselves stoutly to defend; ardent champions of the eternal
principles on which the new Republic was built. The psychology
of the Allisons' allegiance was no different from that of innum-
erable other families. Usually, strange to relate, society, while
constantly moving forward with eager speed, is just as constantly
looking backward with tender regrets. But here were no re-
grets. Religious persecution leaves no tender memories in its
trail. Dissatisfaction with the past is never rendered more mem-
orable than by the fanatic attempt to separate the soul from God.
520 THE LOYALIST [Jan.,
Marjorie and Peggy had been friends from girlhood. They
understood each other very well. Each knew and appreciated the
other's peculiarities, her virtues and her foibles, her political
propensities and religious convictions. They never discussed their
differences as to the manner of religious worship. They avoided
a clash out of respect for each other's convictions. Not so, how-
ever, in matters relating to the form of government. Marjorie
was a Whig, an ardent champion of the rights of the Ck>lonists,
while her more aristocratic friend was Tory in her sentiments,
moderate, it is true, but nevertheless, at times, inclined to be ex-
treme. Notwithstanding these differences, their friendship had
been constant and they had always shared their joys and sorrows
alike.
The days of the British occupation of the city had been
glorious ones for Peggy and her sisters. The love of display and
finery characteristic of them, was satiated by the brilliance and
the gayety of the winter season when titled British ofiScers were
fSted and entertained extravagantly. None outshone the Shippens
in the magnificence of their entertainments. Their house was
ever open in hospitality, and more than once it was whispered
about that their resources had reached the point of exhaustion.
At these functions Marjorie found herself a welcome guest
For Peggy took care that her little friend was never overlooked,
even if on one occasion a pang of regret sent her to bed with
copious tears when the favor for the evening had been bestowed
upon her fair guest. Marjorie, however, maintained a mature
composure and a marked reserve, as was her wont, throughout
it all, and Peggy again reassured herself that her misgivings
were without foundation. Marjorie disliked the titled gentry.
They were, without exception, hostile to the faith she so stead-
fastly professed. She bore with them merely for the pleasure
she derived from the cdterie made brilliant by their participation.
So the winter passed, giving way to lovely spring, whose gen-
tle zephyrs dispelled the cold, the ice and the snow that had sent
the British into the ball-rooms for protection, the while they
afflicted and distressed the patriots at Valley Forge. With the
advent of favorable weather, operations began anew; the hopes
and the courage of the Ck>lonists were now exalted to the highest
pitch. The disasters of Long Island and Fort Washington had
been offset by the victory at Saratoga. While the British had
taken and held the important cities of New York and Philadel-
phia, as well as the town of Newport, still they had lost an army
and had conquered nothing but the ground on which they were
encamped.
1920.] THE LOYALIST 521
Now» the beginning of the fourth period of the war the joy-
ful news was heralded, far and wide, that the Government of
France had formally acknowledged the independence of the
United States and that help was on the way to assist the Colonists
in their struggle. At the same time Lord North's conciliatory
measures in Parliament gave indication to the patriots that the
British Government was weakening. The joy of the Whigs knew
no bounds, and Marjorie was beside herself as she related the
glad tidings over and over again. The fourth epoch of the war
augured well for the success of the cause.
In all the Ck>lonies there was, at this stage of the war, no
city more important than Philadelphia. Whatever there was of
wealth, of comfort, of social refinement, of culture and of courtly
manners was centred here. Even the houses were more imposing
than elsewhere throughout the country. They were usually well
constructed of stone or brick vdth either thatched or slated roofs.
They were supplied with barns bursting vnih the opulence of the
fields. The countryside round about presented a fattened ap-
pearance. Its furrows swelled with the impulses of life and of
nurture; its fields teemed with fruitage, were bedecked vnih
foliage, and ornamented with well-kept trees and clipped gardens.
Indeed, no place in the Ck>lonies presented a more striking pic-
ture of affluence and of comfort.
Nor was it vdthout its gentry, cultured and dignified. Its
inhabitants were composed for the most part of members of old
Quaker families and others faithful to the Church of England
and devoted to the political principles of the mother country —
the proud possessors of wealth and the exemplars of the most
dignified deportment. Already its fair sex were renowned
abroad, as well as at home, for their "beauty, grace and in-
telligence." They moved with all the gayety and charm of
court ladies. The wealth and luxury of a capital city were
there; for even in the infancy of the Republic, Philadelphia
had attained a distinction, unique and preeminent. What
more natural, then, than that their allegiance should be divided;
the so-called fashionable set adhering to the Crown; the common
townsfolk, the majority of whom were refugees from an ob-
noxious autocracy, zealously espousing the Colonists' cause; and
the middle class, comprised of those families holding a more or
less neutral position in the war, and willing to preserve their es-
tates and possessions, remaining undecided, and so maintaining
good oflBces with both sides throughout the strife.
The British army took possession of the city, after its vic-
torious encounter on the Brandywine, on the twenty-sixth of
522 THE LOYALIST [Jan.,
September, 1777. Sir William Howe selected for his headquar-
ters the finest house in the city, the mansion which was once the
home of Governor Richard Penn, grandson of William Penn.
Here General Howe and his staff of officers passed a gay winter
much more interested in the amusements, the gayeties, the dis-
sipations carried on in this old Quaker city than in their efforts
to capture the army of General Washington.
The infatuate populace, indifferent to the progress of the
Revolution, unaffected for the most part by the righteousness of
the cause of the Ck>lonists, became enamoured of the brilliance,
the fashion and display of the English nobility. They cordially
welcomed General Howe and his young officers, electing them the
leaders and favorites in all the social gayeties and amusements of
the season. Such was the luxury and dissipation of the British
in the city, at dinner parties, cock-fights, amateur theatrical per-
formances, that Dr. Franklin was led to remark in Paris that
General Howe had not taken Philadelphia as much as Philadel-
phia had taken General Howe.
The general plan of campaign for the year 1777 did not in-
clude the capture of Philadelphia. Howe had been ordered to
march from New York, which city he had taken the preceding
August, to the vicinity of Albany. There he was to join forces
with the army from Canada under General Burgoyne, that was
to penetrate northern New York. Why he elected to march
against Philadelphia, and be obliged to retrace his steps in order
to reach Burgoyne, was unknown at the time. The total collapse
of Burgoyne's expedition at Saratoga and the menace of the Amer-
ican Army under General Washington obliged him to alter his
plan and to remain in the vicinity of Philadelphia, and make
the city his headquarters for the winter.
In the meantime. General Washington's army, which had
been continually harrassing him, went into winter quarters in
close proximity, at Valley Forge, a bare twenty miles distant,
northwest of the city. Here the little army of the Colonists
menaced the position of the British while enduring, with heroic
fortitude, the severities of the winter season. Shoeless and shiver-
ing, the soldiers were quartered in cold, rudely constructed huts,
overcoated in torn blankets, with stuffed straw in their boots for
want of stockings. Their food was scarce as their clothing and,
at one time, more than two thousand men were reported unfit
for duty because barefoot and otherwise naked. Many a night
the men were compelled to remain seated by the fire for want of
blankets. And, day by day, the supply of fuel diminished, and
the neighborhood became more destitute of trees and timber.
1920.] THE LOYALIST 523
The morale of the troops seemed to feed on misfortune; but
their hopes and courage were suddenly intensified when the news
of the alliance with France reverberated throughout the camp to
the booming of cannon and the shouts of the whole army. There
was no respite, however. While the enemy was living in luxury
and comfort in the gay city, the Continentals under the patience
of Washington, and the military genius of Von Steuben, were
being rounded into a toughened and well-drilled fighting machine,
strong in organization and bold in spirit, a worthy match for the
rapid and accurate movements for which the better equipped
British army was becoming famous.
That Sir William Howe found it easier to loiter in Philadel-
phia than to play a strategic game against Washington in the
depths of an American winter, was due none the less to the want
of decision which characterized all of his actions than to the
stupid mismanagement vnih which the campaign of 1777 was
directed. The British had gained the two most important Amer-
ican cities. New York and Philadelphia, but the entire American
army was still in the field. The acquisition of territory was of
no military importance, while the forces of the enemy remained
intact and well organized. Moreover, Burgoyne was left to his
fate and at Saratoga an army was lost.
Nor was any advantage to be derived from the possession
of the American capital. Washington's position at Valley Forge
had held the British in check all venter. And whatever of work
the Congress was required to do, could as well be done at York as
at Philadelphia. As a basis for military operation the city was
without value, for it was difficult to defend and hard to supply
with foodstuffs. But it was rich, extravagant, fashionable, a
''place of crucifying expenses,*' and its fine houses, good pave-
ments, and regular arrangement of streets, impressed Howe as
the most fitting place for the British army to establish winter
quarters. And so they sat down for the winter.
"We shall never forget the splendor of it all; it was wonder-
ful!" exclaimed Peggy v^th a deep sigh.
"A farewell party!" said Marjorie. "Undoubtedly the gallant
Britishers outdid themselves. Howe leaves soon, does he not?"
•Tes. Next week."
"Which means that the period of entertaining is about to
come to an end."
"I suppose. But wasn't the winter glorious! I shall never
forget it."
A smile covered her face, dotting her cheeks with two tiny
524 THE LOYALIST [Jan.,
dimples. She held her hands together over her knees while she
sat quite motionless, her eyes looking out into the darkness of the
room. Presently she bethought herself.
"Let us light the tapers!" she announced, jumping up from
the sofa.
"It is late," Marjorie remarked, as she, too, prepared to arise.
"I must leave for home."
"Stay! It is still early. Soon we shall be obliged to settle
into quietude. Dark days are before us."
"Why!" Marjorie exclaimed. "I should think that the fu-
ture augurs well. I do vdsh the soldiers would evacuate the
city."
**When General Howe leaves, all may as well leave with him."
"When does he leave?" impatiently asked her true American
friend.
"Next week, I understand. The great Mischienza, you know,
was arranged in his honor as a farewell celebration."
"General Clinton, I presume, will succeed. He seems the
most logical choice."
"Yes. He already has been appointed to the supreme com-
mand."
"I hope he decides to evacuate."
"I do not know. Perhaps," was the sole response.
But it already had been decided. Upon the departure of
General Howe, instructions were forwarded from the ministry
to Sir Henry Clinton, the new Commander-in-chief, to evacuate
the city at once. The imminent arrival of the French fleet, to-
gether with the increasing menace of the Continental Army at
Valley Forge, constituted a grave peril to the isolated army of the
British. Hence it was determined that the capital city must
be abandoned.
Clinton intended to transfer his army to New York by water
in order that the bulk of his forces might be concentrated for the
spring campaign. On account of the vast number of Tories who,
apprehensive of their personal effects, had begged to be trans-
ferred with him, he was obliged to forego his original intention
of sailing by water in favor of a march overland. Accordingly
on the morning of June 18, 1778, the rear-guard of the British
marched out of the city, and on that same afternoon the Amer-
ican advance entered and took possession with Major-General
Benedict Arnold, the hero of Saratoga, as Military Governor.
The joy of the Whig populace knew no bounds. No longer
would the shadows of dark despair and abandoned hope hang
like a pall over the capital city. No longer would the stately
1920.] THE LOYAUST 525
residences of the Tory element be thrown open for the diversion
and the junket of the titled gentry. No more would the soldiery
of an hostile army loiter about the street corners or while away
the hours at the Taverns or at the Ck>ffee Houses. The Ck>ngress
was about to return. The city would again become the political,
as well as the civic, centre of American affairs. The people would
be ruled by a governor of their own accord and sympathy. Phila-
delphia was to enter into its own.
Chapter II.
"It won't do, I tell you. And the sooner he realizes this the
more satisfactory will it become for all concerned."
''Sh-h-h," answered Mrs. Allison in a seemingly heedless
manner. She was seated by the side window in her old rocker,
intent only on her three needles and the ball of black yarn. "Judge
not, that you may not be judged!" she reminded him.
"He is too imprudent. Only today he contemptuously dis-
missed the Colonel and the secretary; later he requested them to
dine with him. We don't like it, I tell you."
As a matter of fact, there was no more stanch defender
or constant advocate of the cause of the Colonists than Matthew
Allison himself; and when the proclamation of the new Military
Governor ordering the closing of the shops and the suspension
of business in general until the question of ownership was estab-
lished, had been issued, he was among the first of the citizens
to comply with it. True, his sole source of income had been
temporarily suspended. But what matter? It meant order and
prevented the wares from falling into the hands of the enemy.
His small shop had enabled him, with his vdfe and daughter, to
eke out a comfortable existence. Their cozy home, while un-
mistakably plain and unadorned with the finer appointments in-
dicative of comfort and opulence, nevertheless was not
without charm and cheeriness. It was delightful in its simplicity
and neatness.
Allison had welcomed the entry of General Arnold into the
city as a hero coming into his own, but he was not slow in per-
ceiving that the temperament of the man rendered him an un-
happy choice for the performance of the onerous duties, which
the successful administration of the ofiSce required. Readily and
with genuine satisfaction did he yield to the initial mandate of
the Governor; but when the scent of luxury from this same
Governor's house, the finest mansion in the city and the identical
one lately occupied by the British commander, was diffused
sion. M»i,j,
V<a eavt- fxprc^sion'io pai" ^"^ Assatls taction.
"Why allow yourself to be disturbed at his manner ot U\-
ing?" asked his wife, picking up the conversation at the point
flhere he had left it.
"And you and I and the vast majority of us sacrificing our
gll. Why they tell me that his quarters abound ia luxury to a
degree never excelled by Howe himself."
"Well!" was the simple reply.
"And that the Massachusetts Regiment has been appointed
jiis guard of honor; and that two armed soldiers have been sta- -
tioned at the doorposts." He spoke with evident passion, the
ardor of which pervaded his entire being.
"And yet I daresay you would be the first to disapprove of
the other extreme," admonished Mrs. Allison in her soft and
gentle way. "Under martial law you know, there must be no
relaxation of discipline, notwithstanding the fact that the Amer-
icans once more control the city."
"Laxity or no laxity, it is extravagant for him to be housed in
the finest mansion in the city with a retinue of servants and at-
tendants only excelled by Sir William Howe; to be surrounded by
a military guard of selective choice; to maintain a coach and
four with footmen and servants, all equipped with livery of the
most exclusive design; to live in the greatest splendor, notwith-
standing the avowed republican simplicity of the country as well
as the distressed condition of our affairs and finances. Who is
paying for this extravagance? We, of course. We are being
taxed and supertaxed for this profligate waste, while our shops
are closed to all future trade. These are not alone my opinions;
they are the expressions of the men about town. This was the
sole topic of conversation today al the Coffee House."
For where else would the news of the day be found if not
on the street comers or at the Coffee House. This latter institu-
tion, like its London prototype, was the chief organ through which
the public opinion of the metropolis continually asserted itself.
Its convenience lay in its adaptability for the making of appoint-
ments at any hour of the day, or for the passing of an evening
socially for a very small charge. It had its characters who became
as famous as the institution itself, its orators to whose eloquence
the crowd listened with admiration, its medical men who might
be consulted on any malady merely for the asking, its poets and
humorists who in winter occupied the chair of learning nearest
the stove and in summer held the choice places on the balcony.
1920.] THE LOYALIST 527
and who discoursed fables and politics with renewed embellish-
ment upon the advent of every newcomer. The atmosphere al-
ways reeked with the fumes of tobacco. Nowhere else was smok-
ing more constant than at the Coffee House. And why any one
would leave his own home and fireside to sit amid such eternal
fog, was a mystery to every good housewife. But every man
of the upper or the middle class went daily to the Coffee House
to learn and discuss the news of the day.
"I suppose Jim Cadwalader waxed warm today on the subject
and gave you inspiration for your ideas/' submitted Mrs. Allison.
^'Why do you not suspend your judgment for a while until you
learn more about the Governor — at any rate give him the benefit
of a doubt until you have some facts/' continued she with that
gentleness and meekness so characteristic of her.
"Facts!" said he, "'I am telling you that these are facts. The
Colonel saw this, I tell you, for he dined with him. And I want
to tell you this," he announced, pointing towards her, ''he hates
the Catholics and is strongly opposed to any alliance with a Cath-
olic country."
"Never mind, my dear. We cannot suffer for that."
"I know, but it may concern us sooner or later. Our fathers
endured severe tortures at the hands of a bigoted Government,
and if the new Republic gives promise of such unhappy tidings,
we may as well leave the earth."
"I would not take any undue alarm," quietly answered Mrs.
Allison as her deft fingers sped on with her knitting. "General
Washington is broad-minded enough to appreciate our loyalty
and our spirit of self-sacrifice. And besides the new French
Alliance will prevent any of the intolerance which made itself
manifest in the person of King George. With a Catholic ally,
the Government cannot very well denounce the Catholics, as you
will discover by the repeal of several laws which have rendered
life more or less obnoxious in some of the Colonies. And I think,
too, that we have given more than our share to the cause. With
so much to our credit, no public official, whatever his natural in-
clination, can afford to visit his bigotry on us. I would not worry
about General Arnold. He will not molest us, I am sure."
"I don't think that he pleases me anyway."
"And why?" she paused to ask. "Because he maintains too
expensive a livery, or has surrounded himself by too many at-
tendants?"
"No. I dislike the man. I do not like his traits."
"It is unkind of you to say that. Who enjoys a greater repu-
tation for skill or bravery or personal courage than he? What
i
528 THE LOYALIST [Jan.,
would have become of Gates, or our army, or the French Alliance
were he not at Saratoga, and there too without a command, you
must remember."
"I know all that, but he is too blunt, too headstrong, too
proud, too — "
Marjorie's figure at the door interrupted him.
Although Mistress Allison was not twenty, she maintained
the composure of a married woman, sedate and reserved like the
matrons of this period. Her dress was neat and well chosen, a
chintz cotton gown, of a very pretty blue stamp, blue silk quilt
and a spotted figured apron. The vivacity of her manner and
the winsomeness of her behavior were prepossessing, and she was
beautiful to look upon: her complexion as dazzling white as snow
in sunshine; except her cheeks, which were a bright red, and her
lips, of a still deeper crimson. Her small oval face was sur-
mounted by a wealth of dark brown hair, craped up with two
rolls on each side and topped with a small cap of beautiful gauze
and rich lace — a style most becoming to a girl of her age. Health,
activity, decision were written full upon her, whether in the small
foot which planted itself on the ground, firm but flexible, or in
the poise of her body, agile or lofty.
She was the only child of Mr. Allison and a much admired
member of the city's middle class. It was said, and with some
truth, that the inhabitants of Philadelphia were rated according
to their fortunes. The first class was known as the carriage
folk, who proclaimed, almost without exception, their pretended
descent from the ancient English families by their coats of arms
imprinted upon their carriage doors. The second class was com-
posed of the merchants, lawyers, and business men of the city;
and the third class were those who exercised the mechanical arts.
These felt their social inferiority and never hoped for any associa-
tion with the upper classes. The Allisons were of the middle
rank, and were looked upon as its most respected members.
Plain, simple living folk, they made no pretence to display.
Neither did they affect aristocracy. Their manner of living was
as comfortable as their modest means would allow. It was a
common habit for the people of this class to indulge in luxury
far beyond their resources and no small amount of this love of os-
tentation was attributed to the daughters of the families. In this
regard Marjorie offended not in the least. Whether helping her
father in the shop during the busy hours, or presiding at the Coffee
House, or helping her mother with the affairs of the household,
she was equally at home. Neither the brilliance of the social
function, nor the pleasures of the dance aroused unusual desireft
1
(
1920.] THE LOYALIST 529
in her. Indeed, she seldom participated in such entertainments,
unless on the invitation and in company with the Shippen fam-
ily with whom she was on the most intimate terms of friendship.
The gay winter season of the British occupation of the city pro-
duced no change in her manner or attire. The dazzling spectacle
of the Mischienza found her secluded in her home, more from her
own desire than from her pretended deference to the wishes of
her mother.
Her happiness was in her home life. This was the centre
of her affection, the object of her tenderest solicitude. Here she
busied herself daily, either in the care of the house, and the prep-
aration of the meals, which were by no means sumptuous owing to
the scarcity of all foodstuffs, or at the wheel where she made
shirtings and the sheetings for the army. A touch of her hand
here and there, to this chair, slightly out of place, to this cup
or to that plate in the china-chest, to the miniature on the wall,
leaning slightly to one side, or the whisk of her sweeping-brush
through the silver-sand on the floor, transformed a disorderly
spot into one of neatness and taste. It was here that she spent
her days, enduring their unvarying monotony, with sweet and
unbroken contentment.
As she hurriedly entered the house, she arrested the atten-
tion of her father and put a period to the conversation.
"Oh father, have you heard?"
"What news now, child!"
"Washington has engaged the British."
"And how fared?"
"They were compelled to withdraw."
"Thank God."
"Where, Marjorie, did you come by this good news?" in-
quired the mother.
"At the State House. A courier arrived from Monmouth
with the tidings," answered Marjorie, still nervous to narrate
the story, and forgetting to remove her hat.
'When did this happen?" asked her father, impatiently.
It seems that General Washington started in pursuit of
Clinton as soon as he had evacuated the city. He had decided
that an attack must be made as soon as possible. When the
British reached Allentown, they found the American army gain-
ing the front and so they turned towards Monmouth. Near the
Court House the British were outflanked and the Americans
gained the superior ground and so the battle was won. Then
General Lee ordered a retreat."
"A retreat?" exploded Mr. Allison. "What for?"
VOL. cz. 34
.5**-:^-
«<1
THE LOYAUST [Jan..
"I do not know, but that was the report. Lee retreated when
Washington virrived on the scene/' continued Marjorie.
'And then?"
'He rallied the iT€>ops to another front and began the attack
^ew, driving the British hack a considerable distance. Nightfall
^nded the battle, and when dBy broke, Clinton had withdrawn.
"Arid Lee ordered a retreat!" exclaimed Mr. Allison. "A
d- poltroon!"
"All say the same. The crowd was furious upon hearing
06 message, although some thought it too incredible. The joy
qI the victory, however, made them forget the disgraceful part."
"My faith in him has never faltered," quietly observed Mrs.
^ison, as she prepared to resume the knitting from which she
bad ceased on the sudden entry of Marjorie.
"And his pretended friends must now croak forth his
praises," rejoined her husband.
"There were shouts and cheers," continued Marjorie, "as the
jiews was being announced. Each newcomer would add another
detail to the story, with beaming delight. All said that the retreat
from the city and the defeat of the British augured a speedy
termination of the war. The country is wholly united again
under General Washington."
"And what will become of Lee?" asked the father.
"The traitor!" snapped Marjorie. "They ought to court-
martial him. The crowd greeted his name with hisses when the
details began to impress themselves upon them. I daresay, he has
few friends in the city tonight, except perhaps among the Tories.
He is a disgrace to the uniform he wears."
"Undoubtedly, the losses were heavy."
"No one seemed to know. The minor details of the engage-
ment are still unknown. They will come later. The consoling fea-
ture is that the enemy were compelled to withdraw, which would
indicate that they were worsted. The remnants, I suppose, will
concentrate at New York. There will occur the next great battle."
"God grant that it will soon be over," exclaimed Mrs. Allison.
'And now, daughter, have you more news?" asked her father.
'Oh yes! General Arnold is going to give a ball at the City
Tavern on the Fourth of July to the officers of the French army.
It will be under the auspices of the American officers of Washing-
ton's command and in honor of the loyal ladies who had with-
held from the Mischienza. And I have been invited to attend,"
proudly announced the girl.
"I should think that we have had enough of social life here
during the past winter," quietly announced the father.
1920.] THE LOYALIST 531
"Well," replied Marjorie, "this affair is to exclude all who
participate in the English army festivities. Only Americans will
be present."
'How did you come by this report?" asked her mother.
'Peggy Shippen. I stopped there for a short time. They told
me of the proposed invitation and that I was included.'
"1
"Vc((($y oaippen. i sioppea mere lor a snori iime.
u«iL 1 was luciuucu."
"How came they by the news?"
"I suppose General Arnold told them."
"Is he acquainted with them? I wonder — *'
•Tes. They were presented to him, and he has already hon-
ored them with his visit."
"I don't like this," said Mr. Allison, "and you can be as-
sured that there will be little restriction as to the company who
will comprise this assemblage. The Governor will take sides
with the wealthy, be their sympathies what they may. Well, if
he establish the precedent, I dare say none will be so determined
as to oppose him. Do you wish to go, daughter?"
"I think I might enjoy it. The French soldiers are so gallant,
I might find much pleasure there."
"Very well, you shall attend," said her father.
And so it was decided that Marjorie would be present at the
Governor's Ball. As custom did not require mothers to accom-
pany daughters to such functions, but allowed them to go un-
attended, Mrs. Allison preferred to remain at home. To what
splendor and gayety the affair would lend itself was a matter of
much speculation. This was the Governor's first event, and no
one was aware of his prowess on the ball-room floor.
Once the list of invitations had become public, it was under-
stood quite generally that no distinction was made between t]^ose
that had, and those that had not, attended the Mischienza.
Whether the number would be surprisingly small, or whether
the affair would fail of success without the Mischienza ladies,
could not be foretold. Indeed such speculations were idle, since
no discrimination had been made. There were a number of
young French ofiScers in the town and one or two of General
Washington's aides had remained, because of the pressure of
immediate business after the British evacuation. These, of
course, would attend. All the other available young men be-
longed to the families who had held a more or less neutral posi-
tion in the war, and who had not offered their services to the
patriots nor yielded allegiance to the foe. As these neutrals
were among the most prominent people of the city, their pres-
ence would, of course, be altogether desirable.
532 THE LOYALIST [Jan.,
Marjorie was invited through the efforts of Peggy Shippen,
who had proposed her name to His Excellency on the occasion
of his visit to her house. She would be included in their party
and would be assigned a partner befitting her company. Be-
cause of the prominence of the Shippens, it was thought that
the gallant young French officers would be assigned to them.
Marjorie rejoiced at this, although the Shippen girls evinced no
such sentiment. Whether it was because the French alliance
was distasteful to them or because their Tory leanings took pre-
cedence, they preferred other guests for partners. But as the mat-
ter was to be decided by lot, their likings were not consulted.
Ere long the city was agog with speculation respecting the
coming ball. The battle of Monmouth was accorded a second
place. The disdain of the middle class, who had been embittered
against such demonstrations by the profligacy displayed during
the days of the British occupation, soon began to make itself
felt. That it was the first official or formal function of the new
Republic mattered little. A precedent was about to be established.
There was to be a continuation of the shameful extravagance
which they had been compelled to witness during the winter and
which they feared they would be forced to maintain for another
protracted period. Living was high, extremely high, and the
value of the paper currency had depreciated to almost nothing.
Indeed it was said that a certain barber in the town had papered
his entire shop with the bills and that ^^ dog had been led up and
down the streets, smeared with tar, and adorned cap-a-pie with
paper money. To feed and clothe the army was expense enough
without being compelled to pay for the splendors of a military
ball. Small wonder that the coming event aroused no ordinary
speculation.
Nevertheless preparations went on vnth growing vigor and
magnificence, and not the least interested was Marjorie. The
event was now awaited with painful anxiety. Even the war for
a moment was relegated to a place of minor import.
[to be continued.]
Bew Booke*
THE OLD MADHOUSE. By William De Morgan. New York:
Henry Holt & Ck). $1.90.
Mr. De Morgan died leaving the last chapter of The Old Mad-
house unwritten. The novel was completed by his wife from the
notes of the author and in accordance with his expressed inten-
tions. It is the familiar triangle-motive, with a beautiful and de-
signing woman at the apex and two intimate friends at the base,
one of whom, the husband, is too loyal and honorable to be sus-
picious; the other, temperamental, susceptible, and just loyal
enough to have scruples and misgivings. A half dozen other well-
drawn characters help to keep the story going vfiih the aid of an
interesting dog and cat. We do not include the clerical uncle of
the temperamental chap; and yet he overshadows the whole story
and almost redeems it from conventionalism of plot. He appears
in the first chapter, an admirably written chapter, dispensing
avuncular wisdom over his cup of tea to his widowed sister-in-
law. Just as the reader settles down to accept him for thirty-
four chapters he pulls out his watch and sees it is time to be
going. Then we got the surprise of our life. As a chapter-
ending the following is most excellent : "She expected to see the
old boy again shortly But she was mistaken, for she never
saw him again."
An ending like this for a first chapter is almost sufBcient
by itself to float any triangle plot with streamers flying. One's
curiosity about triangles may be jaded, but it is not often that a
staid old gentleman of regular and conservative habits, with not
an enemy in the world, bids his sister-in-law a casual good-bye
of an afternoon and proceeds to drop into sheer nothingness to
the mystifica|ion of all Scotland Yard. It is true he appears again
at odd times, and in a manner that is, unfortunately, odd also and
unpleasantly reminiscent of the cheap trickery of stances and
their "materializations." A concession perhaps to a contempor-
ary wave of something very much like a species of vulgarism.
It lets down the artistic ambition of the present story several
notches.
The late Mr. De Morgan seemed to have every qualification
of a great master of fiction. Keen observation, mellow and spark-
ling humor, vfide and varied experience, a retentive memory, the
artist's enjoyment and appreciation of men and things, energy,
industry, and an ingenious style — ^what more does a novelist need
534 NEW BOOKS [Jan.,
in the way of equipment? It was enough to win for him a large
public whom he taught to look towards him for pleasure of an
intellectual and refined sort. And yet he fails to mingle on equal
terms with the great Victorians with whom he consciously chal-
lenged comparison. With all his endowments and accomplish-
ments he remains a mere journeyman — a very splendid kind of
journeyman, if you wish — in comparison with Thackeray or
Dickens. Owing to some spiritual narrowness he could not mount
a platform opening on the wide world. His atmosphere is the
stuffy atmosphere of an air-tight suburban parlor. He has a
scientist's eye for details, but is deficient in the artist's power of
making his details the eye-pieces of universal experience. The
individuality, which imparts the stamp of originality on a product,
has in his case more of the character of oddity than of genius.
But it is hard to deny him genius. Here is a man who was
the inventor of a bicycle, a smoke-consuming grate, the "most
effective sieve in existence," and the famous De Morgan tiles.
After amassing a fortune by means of these ingenious contri-
vances he turned his hand to the production of novels at the age
of sixty-four! When he died in 1917 he had written eight novels;
and, although they were of a length we now find appalling —
containing some 250,000 words each — ^yet employing no sensa-
tional or melodramatic methods, they rode among the best-
sellers like merchantmen among light pleasure craft. If this is
not genius what a wonderful thing genius must be!
THE DAY'S BURDEN AND MISCELLANEOUS ESSAYS. By T.
M. Kettle. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. $2.00.
This is a revised and much amplified edition of a memorable
book of essays entitled The Day's Burden: Studies Literary and
Political which the late "Tom" Kettle, the brilliant young ex-
parliamentarian and university professor, published in Dublin in
1910. Since those days much water has flown beneath the bridges;
the whole world has been plunged in the valley of the shadow
of darkness, and poor Tom Kettle himself has fallen victim to a
German bullet upon the field of honor.
It is heartbreaking to read these essays again and to know
that the hand that penned them will never write another line.
They have all the inimitable charm that blossomed in his light-
est effort; for Kettle was a writer of extraordinary charm no less
than wisdom, and of all the Irishmen of his hour his outlook
was the widest and finest. His was a profoundly Catholic spirit.
Catholic in the fullest and richest significance of the word. And
so it was fashionable in Dublin, for a time, to compare him with
1920.] NEW BOOKS 535
Belloc and Chesterton; indeed the present reviewer has often
heard Kettle described as ''the Irish Chesterton." It begins to
emerge more and more clearly, however, that Tom Kettle's
stature was in reality several cubits higher than that of either
of those extremely versatile English publicists. "G. K. C," pow-
erful as is his critical pen, could no more rise to the heights of
Kettle's essay, The Fatigue of Anatole France, than he could
write that superb Shakespearean paper on A New Way of Mis-
understanding Hamlet. After the deep bourdon-note of human-
ity sounded in November First: The Day of All the Dead, Bel-
loc's most solemn utterance is but a splendid shout. There can
be no doubt that what Kettle has written will abide. He wrote
incomparable philosophical essays, and brief political treatises —
like The Open Secret of Ireland — the delightful verbal sword-
play of which concealed from many a profound, almost uncanny,
insight into the problems under consideration. He was the only
English-writing artist of recent years who could produce con-
vincing and authentic satirical poetry; he is sure of his place in
letters if only as a distinguished exponent of satire. (William
Watson's best efforts in this direction, for example, are poor
and flaccid beside Kettle's.) What lyrical poetry has lost in his
death may be realized from his Sonnet to his little daughter,
Betty, written in the field, before Guillemont, Somme. He ful-
filled in his own life that most palmary condition of great poetic
creation — he was himself "a pattern of the best and honorablest
things." Most noble, most magnanimous he was, and a very
great Irishman as well. May God rest his soul!
CHRISTIAN ETHICS: A TEXT-BOOK OF RIGHT LIVING. By J.
E. Ross, C.S.P., Ph.D. New York : The Devin Adair Co. $2.50.
Christian Ethics satisfies exactly the need long felt by teachers
whose duty is, not to mete out the thorough treatment of a moral
theology professor to his class of seminarians, but to give a popu-
lar though systematic and satisfying grasp of the correct princi-
ples of human conduct which should constitute an integral, yea
an essential, of the higher education of our young men and young
women destined even for secular pursuits. Dr. Ross is one of the
many Paulist Fathers assigned to a work of vital importance for
the welfare of Catholicity among our professional laymen,
namely the work of keeping Catholic students of secular univer-
sities in constant touch vnih the principles and practices of their
Holy Faith. He is specially fitted for composing such a work,
for experience is the best teacher. His experience as lecturer
on ethics to the Newman Club of the University of Texas has
536 NEW BOOKS [Jan.,
taught him how to present to the student mind moral princi-
ples with condensed clarity, and to vitalize those principles by
application to the burning questions, social and economic, na-
tional and international, that possess the minds of all men at
the present hour. Here in four hundred and sixty pages are con-
densed the principles of right reason and Christian revelation
which must govern all individual and social activities of man,
and which, if heeded and properly applied, would solve the prob-
lems that puzzle the cunning of crafty statesmen who are doomed
to failure because they ignore the Creator and His moral law —
the indispensable foundation on which must be builded the wel-
fare o'f mankind.
The synopsis at the opening and the bibliography at the close
of each chapter, and the complete index and bibliography at the
end of the book are excellent features. Christian Ethics deserves
popular patronage as a text-book in academies, colleges and all
higher institutions of learning.
SECOND REPORT OF THE JOINT COMMISSION ON THE
BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER APPOINTED BY THE GEN-
ERAL CONVENTION OF 1913. New York: The Macmillan
Co. $1.50.
The General Convention of the Protestant Episcopal Church
in the United States of America appointed at its session in 1913
a Commission of seven Bishops, seven Presbyters, and seven lay-
men to consider the revision and enrichment of the Book of
Common Prayer. The First Report of the Commission was re-
ceived by the General Convention of 1916, and further consid-
eration of the matter was deferred till the recent Convention in
Detroit. The Second Report, a substantial volume of three hun-
dred pages, was prepared primarily for the use of the Delegates
who would act upon certain sections of it. Its publication gives
opportunity for the study of certain tendencies in the Episcopal
Church which are of great interest to Catholics. The Detroit
Convention considered the first part of the Report, but passed on
the more important portions to the next Triennial, to meet in Port-
land, Oregon, in 1922.
This Report epitomizes in an interesting and quasi-official
manner, the development of the Oxford Movement in the Epis-
copal Church since the last revision of the Prayer Book in 1892.
It seems to show that on the whole the tendency in the Episcopal
Church is towards enrichment of liturgical forms along definitely
Catholic lines. And this is the more interesting in view of the
fact that the list of twenty-one Commissioners consists, with but
1920.] NEW BOOKS 537
possibly three or four exceptions* of names which are not usually
reckoned as among the High Church party. Nevertheless, it is
quite evident that the Report looks towards an "advanced" ritual
(in the strict sense of the word). A definite effort is made to
legalize certain forms which have, for some time, been widely
used without authorization. The Calendar is enriched by the in-
troduction of fifty-three ''Black Letter Saints' Days," among which
it is a bit startling to find the festivals of two Popes, and the
"Canonization" of "The Martyrs of China, 1900."
Exception was taken to parts of the Report by Delegates at
Detroit, notably Ambassador Page, who claimed that the Com-
mission had exceeded its enabling act in reporting propositions
involving "the Faith and Doctrine of the Church," among which
were such matters as "Prayers for the Dead" and "Reservation
of the Sacrament." For the Report recommends four Prayers
containing direct petitions for the Departed, and a proper Collect,
Epistle and Gospel for use in the Celebration of the Holy Com-
munion at funerals. Provision is also made, by rubric, for a
restricted Reservation of the Communion, for the Anointing of
the Sick, and the enrichment of the Communion Office itself by
the authorization of new Proper Prefaces, the Benedictus qui
venit, the Agnus Dei, and the Pater Noster, vnth its introduction
substantially as in the Missal. There is also, in the Appendix,
a bolderized Compline Office, as well as short services of Prayer
and Thanksgiving suitable for Guild meetings, and reminiscent
of the rejected suggestions of 1892.
All this would seem to indicate that the Episcopal Church
is progressing in at least a High Church direction, were it not
for the constant evidences of that effort after "comprehensive-
ness" which, in this Report at least, results in compromise. The
opposition developed at Detroit towards the only important
changes in the Prayer Book thus far brought under discussion,
leads one to wonder if perhaps the Commissioners may not have
put more into their report than may be expected ultimately to
find its way into the revised Services of the Episcopal Church.
THE LITTLE FLOWERS OF SAINT FRANCIS. Translated by
Thomas Okey. Illustrated by Eugene Burnand. New York:
E. P. Dutton & Co. $15.00.
One of the most beautiful books of the year is this edition
de luxe of Thomas Okey's English rendering of / Fioretti di S.
Francesco, with thirty exquisite drawings in color by Eugene
Burnand. "For his studio M. Burnand has chosen Assisi, St.
Damian, the sweet Umbrian vales and hills; he has placed his
538 NEW BOOKS [Jan.,
models in a natural setting, under the light and color of the magi-
cal Umbrian sun, in a land of which St. Francis was the poetical
and mystical emanation." The result is eminently satisfying.
The value of the volume is further enhanced by an appendix
taken from a Spanish manuscript and appearing here for the
first time in English.
This noteworthy addition to Franciscana, is a masterpiece
of typographical art. A volume with an appeal for every book-
lover, and most especially those who know and love the Poverello
and Assisi.
The American edition is limited to five hundred copies.
POEMS— FIRST SERIES. By J. C. Squire. New York: A. A.
Knopf. $1.50.
For several years past Mr. Jack CoUings Squire has impressed
his critics as the ablest of living parodists in verse, but few people
have realized that Mr. Squire was all the time a serious, original
poet. Definite recognition of him in the latter capacity probably
came when he printed The Lily of Malud, one of the three finest
poems collected here. The present series contains what the
author wishes to preserve of his four volumes of "serious" poetry.
One of the things Mr. Squire desires to intimate by his choice of
a sub-title for this volume is that ''under Providence other (and,
let us hope, superior) collections will follow it."
There is much in these pages that is very beautifully con-
ceived and Thought. "August Moon," for example, — an exquisite
nocturne, full of tranquil music : the long poem "Rivers," which
is as lovely an evocation of the spirit of the "noble great rivers"
of the world as is Masefield's "Ships" of the glory of the seas'
standard-bearers. Since there is room to quote in full only one
of the briefer poems, it shall be the splendidly dramatic "Sonnet"
on page 102:
There was an Indian, who had known no change.
Who strayed content along a sunlit beach
Gathering shells. He heard a sudden strange
Commin^ed noise; looked up; and gasped for speech.
For in the bay, where nothing was before.
Moved on the sea, by magic, huge canoes,
With bellying cloths on poles, and not on^ oar,
And fluttering coloured signs and clambering crews.
And he, in fear, this naked man alone,
His fallen hands forgetting all their shells.
His lips gone pale, knelt low behind a stone,
And stared and saw and did not understand,
Columbus' doom-burdened caravels
Slant to the shore and all their seamen land.
1920.] NEW BOOKS 539
THE CRIME. By Dr. Richard Grelling. New York: George H.
Doran Ck>. Vols. III. and IV. $2.50 net, each.
In two large volumes Dr. Richard Grelling, who startled the
world with / Accuse! continues, like a relentless prosecutor, to
pile up evidence against a criminal many times proved guilty of
the most terrible crime in history — the instigation of the World
War.
Dr. Grelling, in the third volume, as additional proof of The
Crime comments in greatest detail on the speech of Chancellor Von
Bethmann HoUweg delivered on December 9, 1915, wherein it is
clearly shown that the German mind was filled to excess with
plans for the forceful annexation in the East and West and the
linking of Belgium and Poland as well as the Russian Baltic
Provinces to the German Empire. His speech of April 5, 1916,
is likewise dissected with the same results. With the evidence
all in, the author quotes the words of the Kaiser, ''Before God
and history my conscience is clear. I did not want the war."
The fourth volume is somewhat in the nature of addenda.
It takes up the so-called Belgian state papers of 1905 to 1914,
published by Germany to show that the war against her was one
in which she was merely the defender against aggressors who
would destroy her. After examining them at great length the
author gives his conclusions that they were tenaciously com-
piled and full of lacunae.
The four volumes of The Crime form a monumental work
that will long remain a standard reference for the students of the
future. They treat this subject in a minute and complete manner
and are masterly in their logic and comprehensive detail..
MARY THE MOTHER: HER LIFE AND CATHOLIC DEVOTION
TO HER. By Blanche Mary Kelly, Litt.D. New York: The
Encyclopedia Press. $1.00.
'Tor the first time in many centuries no one dare speak ill
of the Mother of God," writes the Rev. John J. Wynne, S.J.,
in his very expressive foreword to Miss Kelly's latest book Even
to those attached to other and older books that link them in love
with the Queen of Heaven, this latest biography will surely be a
volume of rare charm.
It is no facile task to write down the facts in the life of the
Mother of God. The gospel story is so incomparably written that
one may well hesitate to do again what has been once for all
accomplished. And if one cannot bring to the task a poetic in-
sight and a poetic utterance, one should hesitate forever. Happily
the author of The Valley of Vision has the gift of poetry,
540 NEW BOOKS [Jan.,
and her new book can be counted as a labor that is an achieve-
ment. She tells the years of Mary's life with a simplicity becom-
ing to great things, and makes the old familiar story fresh and
fascinating with the gladness and the glamour of romance.
Fully as interesting is the second part of the book, which
treats of the subject of Catholic devotion to Mary. It takes up
the matters of Mary's titles, her feast days, the prayers and hymns
composed in her honor, the shrines erected to her glory, and the
paintings and works of sculpture which adorn them. The chapter
entitled ''Shrines and Pilgrimages" is one of the most valuable in
the volume. It gives a detailed account of the most important
churches built in honor of the Blessed Virgin throughout the
world from the early churches in Jerusalem to the last-built tem-
ple of today. There is a wealth of erudition gathered in this part
of the work, and it should be welcome to all who desire to have
in a small volume many things which they are often eager to
know.
OUT TO WIN. By Joseph P. Conroy, S. J. New York : Benziger
Brothers. $1.25.
Father Conroy says of St. Ignatius: "He loved boys truly
with an understanding of their earliest needs, with a sympathy
for their inmost nature, an appreciation of their individual differ-
ences, and an ability to adapt himself to every single boy."
We think Father Conroy has made these qualities his own.
He knows boys and in this series of talks with them he is so
natural and entertaining that one reads him with interest from
beginning to end. He is concerned with the character develop-
ment of the boy between the ages of fifteen and twenty, that
period in which the boy is "waking up to his rights." Though
intensely serious. Father Conroy writes with much humor. He
speaks the boy's vocabulary, oftentimes inelegant but always
emphatic.
To those, also, who have the care and training of young
boys we earnestly recommend this little volume as thoughtful
reading.
POBMS, WITH FABLES IN PROSE. Two volumes. By Herbert
Trench. New York: E. P. Button & Co. $6.00 per set.
Although he was thirty-six years old before, in 1901, he pub-
lished his first book of poetry, Deirdre Wedded, Mr. Herbert
Trench undeniably ranks today in company with Robert Bridges,
W. B. Yeats, Thomas Hardy, A. E. Housman, and Alice Meynell,
as one of the half-dozen most distinguished contemporary prac-
1920.] NEW BOOKS 541
titioners of the art of English poetry. Of course there are other
singers of unquestionable merit and significance. There is
Laurence Binyon whose Sirmione and Death of Adam are poems
of which modern literature may well be proud. There is that poet
of strangely uncertain inspiration, yet indubitable genius, — John
Masefield. And there are also the curiously crude and meta-
physically involved, yet powerful work of Lascelles Abercrombie,
and the achievement of Walter de la Mare, a craftsman of nar-
row range but flawless execution. One may be fairly certain,
though, that what Herbert Trench has created will withstand
oblivion with a finer steadfastness than almost any poetry writ-
ten in this generation.
For he is that extremely rare thing among contemporary
poets: a scholar and philosophical thinker no less than a poet.
He has been — and not absurdly — spoken of in the same breath
with Ck)leridge. Indeed one able critic has discovered in his genius
''a mingling of adventurous romanticism, intuitive mysticism,
and reasoned philosophy, comparable, magna intervallo, to the
endowment of Coleridge." That gift of ecstasy, however, which
makes of The Ancient Mariner the most magical piece of verse
in the language. Trench is far from possessing. Neither has he
the final felicity of diction, — donum paene divinum — ^which is
characteristic of the author of Christabel. His verse abounds in
roughnesses; more than once he is willfully negligent of that first
duty of the poet, labor limse. But he has written no poem that
is without vigor, swiftness, and radiance. He is unsurpassed by
any living poet as a painter of external nature. He produces
slowly, and so six years elapsed before he published his second
book. New Poems (1907), which contained "Apollo and The Sea-
man," perhaps the noblest poem Mr. Trench has so far written.
Here the allegory is one of a moving and beautiful simplicity,
and nowhere in all his writing is his gift for imaginative phrasing
so splendidly discoverable. Through this poem there blows a
wind that has traversed the seas of the world; a salt and cleans-
ing and healing air. Lyrics and Narrative Poems, which appeared
four years later is not so much a new book as a re-ordering of
earlier verse. "On Romney Marsh at Sunrise," one of the besl
things in this volume, is written out of a finely true emotion.
These two volumes contain everything Herbert Trench has
written up to the present time, together with some interesting
Fables in Prose, This is his first Collected Edition, and the pub-
lishers have clad noble poetry worthily. Some day book-lovers
will search for this beautiful edition as today they seek the early
volumes of Swinburne and Morris. Mr. Trench's quality is classi-
542 NEW BOOKS [Jan.,
cal and permanent. He belongs to English literature, and if peo-
ple knew what they were about, he would, like Matthew Arnold,
be honored as a classic in his life time. But we are a perverse
generation.
THE MODERN COMEDY. By O. R. Howard Thomson. Boston :
The Cornhill Co. $1.25.
There is nothing very modern, nor at all comic, in the title
poem of this little book. But there is a good deal of modernity,
and of experimentation in many moods, "occasional'* and other-
wise, in its various lyrics of love and war, of science and faith,
of nature and art — ^and Williamsport!
When the story of recent American poetry comes to be writ-
ten, more than a word of gratitude should go to publishers who,
like the Cornhill Company, have been so persistent and generous
in their publication of contemporary verse. They give to the
young poet what the ''little theatre" offers to the young drama-
tist — a chance to be heard. And while the hearing means much
eventual sifting of the chaff from the wheat, it is a brave adven-
ture. And once, perhaps, in a year or in a decade, it is justified
by the discovery of some beauty which shall live — ^and which
might so easily have been lost.
IRELAND'S FAIRY LORE. By Rev. Michael Mahon. Boston:
Thomas J. Flynn ft Co. $2.00 net.
Father Mahon's book should be of double service. It is writ-
ten entertainingly, and it presents in an easy fashion not likely to
scare off the unerudite, one of the most fascinating fields open
to scholars at the present day. It is unfortunately true, so far
as America is concerned, that even now, after the Irish Renais-
sance has^done its work, the folk and fairy lore of Ireland is
known to a comparatively few research workers and poetic en-
thusiasts. Yet these old legends have a beauty which is marked
and unique even among the beautiful major mythologies of the
world. They deserve a wide currency, and any attempt to give
them their rightful place in the imaginative heritage of humanity
is deserving of success.
BLUE SMOKE. By Karle Wilson Baker. New Haven: Yale Uni-
versity Press.
Sometimes a poet will define his (or her) quality for the
reader in a line or two, and this Mrs. Baker has obligingly done
for us in a couple of verses in the poem "Gossamer,*' where she
describes her poetry as
1920.] NEW BOOKS / 543
A cobweb, fine and frail and fair.
That trembles in the passing air.
Her poetry is, moreover, wistful, graceful, delicate, feminine
— fanciful rather than imaginative.
BOOKS IN GENERAL. By Solomon Eagle. New York: A. A.
Knopf. $2.00.
For the last six years there has appeared, weelc by week, in
The New Statesman of London, over the pen-name of "Solomon
Eagle," a causerie on books and on things in general. A selection
of some fifty-odd of these papers has now found an American
publisher in Mr. Alfred Knopf. Solomon Eagle's weekly-page is
undeniably the finest thing of its kind in contemporary literary
journalism. This nimble writer has at indefatigable command
a wide-ranging knowledge of letters, old and new, an impeccable
taste, a rare gift of humor, and an inexhaustible flow of high
spirits. He treats of The Beauties of Badness, and of Moving
a Library, of Shakespeare's Women and Mr. George Moore and
The Cattle of the Boyne; he tells how Mrs. Barclay Sees It
Through; expatiates on £5 Misspent; and propounds the mo-
mentous question. Was Cromwell an Alligator? The selection
is delightful, though — carper that one is! — one misses the fa-
mous commentary upon a certain American newspaper's inter-
view with Mr. Alfred Noyes, the superb badinage at the expense
of a certain New York publisher's announcement, and the ex-
cruciatingly funny excursus on War Poetry. But the imaginary
biography our causeur contributed to the American Who's Who:
the engaging excoriation of that *'polyphoisboisterous" critic,
Archibald Henderson: the lines addressed to the importunate
Tennessee librarian — these are here, and they are all perfect. And,
in more serious vein, no sounder criticism than Solomon Eagle's
has yet been uttered on Herrick, Stephen Phillips, and Henry
James — to take three papers at random.
This man's gift is not far removed from genius.
ADDRESSES IN AMERICA, 1919. By John Galsworthy. New
York: Charles Scribner's Sons. $1.25 net.
This volume consists of seven addresses given by John Gals-
worthy before American audiences in the course of his visit here
last spring. His Lowell Centenary lecture and his speech to the
League of Political Education are included m the number.
We hear a great deal these days of the union of hearts and
hands which should now subsist between ** American and Briton"
544 NEW BOOKS [Jan.,
— to borrow the title of the second of these addresses — and it is
doubtless desirable that Americans should understand the mental
processes and appreciate the culture of enlightened Englishmen.
The truth is, however, that Mr. Galsworthy has never written less
felicitously, less convincingly, than he has done here. If in these
pages there is a single original or striking thought, we have failed
utterly to find it. The Atlantic Monthly, the publishers of these
lectures tell us, declares that "we must listen to Mr. Galsworthy.
If the future of the world depends upon understanding between
men and nations, we have reason to be thankful for his peculiar
gift of sympathetic insight; he lives always in the House of the
Interpreter." This is one result of being in a state of extreme pro-
Entente exhilaration!
STUDIES IN THE ELIZABETHAN DRAMA. By Arthur Symons.
New York : E. P. Dutton & Co. $3.50.
Symons himself once wrote, in a brilliant little preface to the
Biographia Literaria, "while there is a great mass of valuable criti-
cism done by critics who were only critics, the most valuable
criticism of all, the only quite essential criticism, has been done
by creative writers, for the most part poets." The man who
penned these words has no superior and hardly an equal among
Jiving English critics; he is also, at his best, an extremely fine
poet. His criticism, like Pater's, is quickened mediation; and he
has all the delicate penetration, the luminous insight of his
master.
The present volume consists of more than a dozen essays on
plays of Shakespeare, and on the dramatic work of certain of
Shakespeare's contemporaries. Adequately to display the quality
of this absorbing book there is unfortunately no space here; one
can merely tabulate. To our mind the most valuable of the
Shakespearean studies are those on Antony and Cleopatra and
on Romeo and Juliet, this latter surely, after Dowden's famous
essay, the most beautiful of all interpretations of the play. (The
opening sentence may serve to indicate the rare treat in store for
him who reads further : "The play of Romeo and Juliet is like a
piece of music, and it is the music which all true lovers have
heard in the air since they began listening to one another's
voices.") It is safe to predict that this work, like the author's
earlier Studies in Prose and Verse, vnll take and keep a high and
special place among the most significant achievements in criti-
cism of modern English letters. All the essays were originally
contributed to periodicals. They have now received a thorough
revision at the hands of the author.
1920.] NEW BOOKS 646
WAR IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN. By Kermit Roosevelt. New
York: Charles Scribner's Sons. $1.60 net.
Just as refreshing as its title, this book brings a breath of
those strange, far-off places that are so old as to be ever new.
After reading so many volumes treating of the War in France
and Belgium, it is a rare delight to be transported to the land of
the Tigris and the Euphrates, back again to the storied ruins of
Babylon and Bagdad.
The author, the illustrious son of a versatile father, knows
the value of the places he fought in and has presented them in all
their glory. He writes in a style that is richly entertaining and
marked with the free, easy swing that so characterized his father's
writings. Indeed, there is much of the father in the writings of the
son, and all who loved the tang of outdoors that is to be found
in the elder Roosevelt's books will find much here to gratify them.
If this work be taken merely as a promise, and it is decidedly more
than that, it is a portent of great things to follow. The book in
itself is very worth while.
A HISTORY OF LATIN AMERICA. By William Warren Sweet.
New York : The Abingdon Press. $3.00 net.
This book covers briefly for students and those general read-
ers who are interested in Latin countries the past history and
present conditions of Spanish America. Each chapter concludes
with a bibliography full of suggestions for those who would do
further reading, thus making a valuable and interesting hand-
book, and giving a connected history of events.
The author feels that the Spaniards were no worse than the
English in their treatment of the savages. There were many
marriages from the beginning between Spaniards and natives, so
that today there are the following proportions of the people of
Latin America belonging to the half-breed or mestizo race: Mex-
ico, fifty per cent; Peru, thirty per cent; Bolivia, from thirty to
forty per cent; Venezuela, seventy per cent; Chile, sixty per cent.
There are many who consider the mestizo as the coming race in
Latin America, especially in the western regions, and the develop-
ment of many of the States seems to depend largely on the de-
velopment of this mixture of the white and Indian people. So far
Latin America has been governed by the pure white race, while the
Indian and the mestizo have been practically serfs. The latter
have gone on rapidly increasing while the Indian is decreasing
in numbers.
There were twelve universities in Latin America in the
Colonial period, eight of which were established before the crea-
yot. GZ. 35
546 NEW BOOKS [Jan.,
lion of Harvard. There was considerable scholarship, much ex-
cellent work being done in medicine and surgery. The bulk of the
books published during the religious period were upon religious
subjects, written by ecclesiastics. Seventeenth century Mexico
produced a rare poetical genius, a nun by the name of Juana de
la Cruz. On the whole, the Colonial period in Latin America was
more fruitful in a literary sense than the Colonial period of the
English Colonies. The work of education was entirely in the
hands of the Church; and the favorable account the author gives
must be taken as a tribute from one who is evidently not in sym-
pathy with Catholicism. He is prejudiced, but tries to be just.
Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Chile are characterized as
progressive States politically, industrially and economically;
while Venezuela, Colombia, Paraguay, Peru and Bolivia are back-
ward. Professor Sweet says that the Monroe Doctrine met with
the approval of the Spanish Americans up to the time of the
Mexican War. This country has since lost ground with them,
especially since the Venezuelan controversy, and the famous
proclamation of Secretary Olney: "Today the United States is
practically sovereign on this continent, and its fiat is law upon
the subjects to which it confines its interposition."
The friendship of Latin America is worth striving for; the
republics are increasingly stable, the people are financially re-^
sponsible, and economically the Latin American countries will
progress more in the next fifty years than in the previous four
hundred.
DICTIONARY OF THE APOSTOLIC CHURCH. Edited by James
Hastings, D.D. Vol. II. Macedonia-Zion. New York:
Charles Scribner's Sons. Cloth, $7.00; half morocco, $10.00.
The second volume of Hastings Dictionary of the Apostolic
Church is liberal Protestant in tone like its predecessor. The
majority of its articles are written by professors of theology and
Scripture in theological schools and colleges of Great Britain and
the United States. The only article by a Catholic is on Polycarp by
Mgr. Pierre Batiffol of Paris. The Biblical articles treat of the
Epistles of St. Paul (Philippians, Thessalonians, Romans, the
Pastoral Epistles), and St. Peter, and discuss briefly New Testa-
ment names and other subjects connected with Scripture. The
theological articles include marriage, divorce and predestination.
It would take a volume to point out the heresies and false
statements that one meets with on every page. We are told, for
example, that celibacy is not a higher state than marriage; that
divorce is allowed for adultery; that there are but two sacra-
1920.] NEW BOOKS 547
ments; that there is no sacrifice in the New Law; that the his-
tory of demon possession in the New Testament is not authentic;
that Christ shared the ignorant viewpoint of His time; that justi-
fication by faith is the teaching of St. Paul; that the Reformers
were altin to the prophets in their conviction of the truth of their
message, and much else of a like nature.
THE TVTLD SWANS AT COOLE. By W. B. Yeats. New York:
The Macmillan Co. $1.25.
To those who have followed the later Yeats it has become
increasingly evident that he has wandered farther and farther
into that ultimate fog for the literary worker, where words are
mistaken for things. Never remarkable for the vigor or depth of
his thought, he here presents the spectacle of a man snared in
his own limpid and beautiful style. Like most of his previous
work, the present is a book of tones and atmospheres, with the
tenuous quality, the occasional verbal magic, the pagan wistful-
ness and the gray melancholy which Yeats, more than any one
else, has caused us to associate with the Celtic temperament.
'The Phases of the Moon," a parable of the artist and his relation
to life, is one of those pieces of intricate and elusive symbolism
of which Yeats is so fond and of which the average reader will find
it difBcult to catch the significance. The predominate note of the
book is one of regret and disillusion, with here and there a touch
of acridity. It is the weary gesture of a man who has long put
his faith in dreams and has at last found them wanting.
WHAT IS AMERICA? By Edward Alsworth Ross. New York :
The Century Co. $1.25.
It is in many ways a useful little book that Professor Ross
has written. Its title would seem to imply that there are many
persons who ought to know the answer. And, as is usual in such
cases, there are. But these individuals very frequently are the
very ones who never think to ask the question. In asking it for
them, the author has done them a kindness. For so many millions
of people accept their Americanism without a knowledge of what
America is, that it is always timely to raise the question. The
fiist chapter deals with the make-up of the people of the United
States from the days of Plymouth to the coming of the Italians
and the Slavs. The book proceeds with an account of the variety
of ways in which Americans make a living, sketches the develop-
ment of business, describes the growth of education, and in other
ways traces the evolution of American standards.
We regret to say that in his chapter on "Marriage and the
548 NEW BOOKS [Jan^
Family," Professor Ross defends divorce as a ''cautious provision
of relief for the mismated." "The fact is," he says, "that two-
thirds of the divorces are granted to aggrieved wives, and the
r* ason why American wives will not put up with the drunkenness,
cruelty, or unfaithfulness in their husbands that the women of
other countries put up with, and that their grandmothers bore in
silence, is that they respect themselves more, have a higher ideal
of what a union should be, and know that once they are divorced
they can support themselves by their labor." Such treatment of
this vital topic is, to say the least, inadequate and superficial.
Professor Ross must admit that there is a great deal more to be
said on the question.
The book is not an elaborately detailed analysis of American
life, but rather a popular handbook, making its appeal to those
who are not over-radical, or over-conservative, and who are not
over-learned;^ to those who believe in progress, and democracy,
and justice. As an appendix to the volume it is refreshing to find
the text of the Constitution of the United States, a document re-
ferred to frequently by us all, but, unfortunately, almost as little
read as the Virginia Bill of Rights which accompanies it. Perhaps
Professor Ross' book may tempt many who have promised some
day to commit to memory the words of the national anthem, to
study the Constitution of their country.
OLD-FASHIONED VERSES. By Wm. T. Hornaday. New York:
Clark & Fritts. $2.00.
In this rather sumptuously bound and illustrated book the
author has made a collection of verses dealing with a wide variety
of themes. The War and its aftermath, the West and the spell of
nature, wild life, friendship and love, and nonsense verses. The
verses are pleasantly rhymed and correctly metred, and the senti-
ment is unexceptionable, but the ideas are commonplace and the
book as a whole lacks distinction. The most spirited piece in the
volume relates the destruction of the English fleet under Crad-
dock by Speck von Spec, and the latter's subsequent defeat by
Sturdee off the Falkland Islands.
VERGIL AND THE ENGLISH POETS. By Elizabeth Nitchie.
New York: Columbia University Press. $1.50.
Miss Nitchie's aim in this interesting Columbia dissertation is
"to trace the changes in the reaction to his [Virgil's] poetry in the
different periods of English literature, and to study his influence
especially on the representative poets of England under the vary-
ing conditions of the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, Pseudo-
Classicism, and Romanticism."
1920.] NEW BOOKS 549
She has traversed much territory, and with a sort of thor-
oughness; yet in many places, and on the whole, she is cursory.
Her treatment of Bede, of Shakespeare, of Gray, of Wordsworth —
to take a few poets at random — is altogether inadequate. Not
that her monograph is without value. But an intensive study of
the influence of Virgil (Miss Nitchie, we notice, insists upon call-
ing the poet Vergil) still remains to be done. There are too many
gaps here. And her remarks on page twelve show that she
is unwilling to attempt the very thing we most need: we need
light on the influence of Virgilian diction upon the diction of the
English poets.
THE MUD LARKS. By Crosbie Garstin. New York: George H.
Doran Co. $1.50 net.
These are humorous short sketches of English soldier life at
the front, many of which originally appeared in Punch. They
are, to our great relief, not transcripts from actuality, but rather
a free and imaginative rendering of military experiences told with
much zest and humor — a humor, too, really funny without being
vulgar. It is by turns dry, whimsical, farcical, extravagant, ironic,
light, high-spirited. And though much of it is typical British
fun-making, the author has also a close insight into the Irish
temperament, which is not at all strange, since, as we gather
from the book, he comes from Ireland. Such chapters as "The
Riding Master," "Leave," "Funny Cuts," "A Faux Pas," "The
Harriers" and "The Camera Cannot Lie" are a joy to the harassed
reviewer, while in "War Vegetation," "I Spy," "Lionel Trelawny,"
"A Rest Cure" and "The Bobby Trap" there is an element of
ultimate surprise which reminds one of the ending of a typical
O. Henry story. In The Mud Larks Mr. Garstin has produced
a thoroughly readable and amusing book.
THE SWORD OF DEBORAH.. By F. Tennyson Jesse. New York:
George H. Doran Co. $1.00 net.
Miss Jesse, the great-niece of the illustrious poet, takes up
the pen to show the might of the sword in the hands of her fellow
women. Not that they themselves carried the sword. They were
of the sword but lived not by it. Rather they were the workers
of the Women's Auxiliary Army Corps, the Volunteer Ambulance
Drivers, the First Aid Nursing Yeoman and the General Service
Voluntary Aid Detachment, those four great organizations of
British women who were powerful factors in carrying on the War
to a successful close.
The author sketches in a charming way the work done by
550 NEW BOOKS [Jan.,
these uniformed organizations, and gives an intimate picture of
the patriotic women, each of whom represented a man released
for active military duty, as they labored at menial tasks of manual
labor, assisted in transporting the wounded, or cared for the
stricken soldier in the great emergency hospitals back of the
lines.
. -» > . «
A DAUGHTER OF THE NORTHWEST. By Irene Welch Gris-
som. Boston: The Cornhill Co. $1.50.
This novel in its opening indicates a claim upon the reader's
attention that is not justified later. The scene is laid on the
Pacific Coast, in the Columbia River region, a picturesque section
which the author describes well and with the affection of old
acquaintance. She introduces the subject of the Oregon lumber
business, upon which she seems well informed, going at some
length into the requirements for improving conditions there. Had
the story been built around this, better results might have been
produced. As it is, nothing comes by corollary; there is not even
connection, in the sense of dependence. The plot might be worked
out in any locale. In fact, its situations have repeatedly served
novelists, and there is no originality of treatment to give them a
touch of freshness.
CAPTAIN ZILLNER By Rudolf Jeremiah Kreutz. New York:
George H. Doran Co. $1.75 net.
This vivid tale pictures the life of an Austrian officer during
the early campaigns against the Russians in Galicia. The writer
evidently holds that all war is unjust and "a monstrous crime
against humanity." The common soldiers are *'cattle driven to
slaughter" or "day laborers in the service of death." "Right is
wherever might happens to be," and all the nations are prompted
in their so-called patriotism by "religions which sow love and
reap hate."
We believe that the writer is a rabid Socialist of Jewish stock,
who is obsessed by an intense hatred of Christianity and its
priests, who are held up to scorn on every page. They are "cow-
ards, beasts, traitors, and intolerant hypocrites," who travel
about "with greasy frocks and unwashed necks, uttering unreal,
professional banalities of duty to God and country." Even the
last anointing of the dying, which wins the respect of the most
abandoned criminal, is made the theme of a nasty jibe.
The book continually harps upon the incompetence of the
Austrian General Staff, the cowardice and cruelty of the command-
ing officers, the treachery of the Slav regiments, and the total lack
)
A
1920.] NEW BOOKS 551
of enthusiasm of the average soldier, who fought like a slave under
the lash. No sensible reader will deem this coarse and irreligious
treatise an accurate picture of real conditions in the Austrian
army. It condemns both sides with equal impartiality.
«
OUR CASUALTIES AND OTHER STORIES. By G. A. Birming-
ham. New York: George H. Doran Co. $1.50 net.
This volume of war stories is written with all the pathos and
humor that characterize Canon Hannay's best work. His sym-
pathies are plainly with Carson and the alien Ulster Irish, l)ut he
does his best to appear fair to both Catholic and Protestant in these
portraits or caricatures of the Irish soldiers at home and abroad.
Many of the historical events of the past few years form the basis
of his stories, viz., Ulster's disloyal purchase of guns and ammuni-
tion from Germany, the Dublin rebellion of 1916, the training of
the veteran stay-at-homes, and the like. Occasionally, he gives a
sly dig at the excessive red tape of the medical hospital corps, the
stubbornness of the old-fashioned folk in opposing the daylight
saving law, and the Irish hatred of the Government, "meaning
the police."
The best stories, to our mind, are "Getting Even," "The Up-
right Judge" and "The Mermaid." We have heard of this last
named legend before, although it had a Breton instead of an Irish
setting.
THE SPANISH ARMADA. By Ernest R. Hull, S.J. History of
England Series. New York : P. J. Kenedy & Sons. 35 cents.
This study of the Spanish Armada is a contribution to a
series dealing with English history from the Catholic point of
view. The purpose is to correct many historical errors that have
been made by non-Catholic historians and kept before the English
public by text-books and histories for many generations. The tra-
ditional view of the Armada has been that it was the attempt of
the Pope, aided by that gloomy and fanatical monarch, Philip II.,
to establish the Catholic power in England by force of arms.
"The Armada, as pictured in the mind of the average Protestant
of today — ^unless he has corrected his impressions by critical read-
ing — is the Armada as it was pictured in England in the throes
of excitement which accompanied the expectation of its arrival."
Father Hull shows that the Armada was a political act of self-
defence against England, for outrage against international law per-
petrated by English adventurers such as Sir Francis Drake, who
were patronized and supported by Elizabeth. Secondly, it was a
last resort to force after the failure of all efforts to secpre diplo-
• • • •
• • •••.
* . • • r
552 NEW BOOKS [Jan,
matic redress from England. Thirdly, any religious motives in
the case were accessory and followed the inauguration of the
Armada enterprise.
The support of Sixtus V. to the Armada expedition was very
half hearted, and reluctant, and was given only after the scheme
had been well inaugurated by the King. Father Hull describes the
Spanish King as a high-minded Spaniard, a devout Catholic, and
one who was anything but a fanatic. He had no ambition to crush
Protestantism in England by force of arms. The terms which he
wished to secure, as shown by his instructions on the sailing of
the Armada, were to obtain the privilege of following their religion
for the persecuted Catholics of England; to secure indemnity for
the pillaging of Drake; to get England's guarantee to withdraw
her interference in the Netherlands. The Armada was significant
for it revealed the growing weakness of the Spanish Empire,
showed the growing strength and superiority of England's sea-
manship and suggested to England colonial enterprise, giving her
the confidence necessary to undertake it.
APOSTOLIC zeal marks the chapters in Rev. George T.
Schmidt's book on The American Priest (New York: Ben-
ziger Brothers. $1.25). Clear before him rises the dread respon-
sibility devolving upon our national priesthood to stem the surg-
ing onrush of anarchy and irreligion, twin spectres from hell, the
one driving men on to material, the other to spiritual ruin. Zeal,
loyalty, humility, kindness are chiefly stressed as virtues to be
peculiar to the priests of our country in the counter campaign.
Sound and practical advice in regard to visiting the sick is given in
the book. One might have looked for more insistence on study of
social questions for the American, more insistence on prayer for
the priest, but perhaps Father Schmidt deemed these too extremely
obvious to require more extended treatment. To young secular
priests particularly the book seems to direct its appeal.
AN attractive compilation of "Consoling Thoughts for Every
Day in the Year" is Whom the Lord Loveth, by Henriette
Eugene Delamare (New York: P. J. Kenedy & Sons, $1.00, post-
paid $1.10). The author has drawn freely from Scripture, the
great Catholic ascetics, poets and essayists of the past, and many
well-known and well-loved authors of today, in an effort, well
achieved, to lift up hearts unto the Lord.
IRecent iSvente.
The military situation on the three princi-
Rttssia pal Russian fronts during the past month
has been uniformly favorable to the Bolshe-
vists. On the Eastern or Siberian front, beginning on the fifteenth
of November with the capture of Omsk, the Soviet Army has
steadily advanced on a wide front several hundred miles beyond
the former Kolchak capital. At present they are twelve hundred
miles from Irkutsk, the new capital of the All-Russian Govern-
ment. At no point, apparently, were the anti-Bolshevist forces able
to make a stand, and rumors were current at the beginning of De-
cember that Admiral Kolchak might yield the supreme direction of
affairs to General Denikin operating in the Southwest. To date,
however, he is still in nominal command of anti-Soviet military
efforts and, according to a recent rumor, has made it known that
unless the Allies support the White Armies, he may cede a part
of Siberia to Japan in order to save the rest of Russia from the
Bolshevists.
Color was lent to this last report by the fact that fresh Japan-
ese troops have recently been landed at Vladivostok. It is not
yet clear, however, whether the new forces are reenforcements
or replacements or units which have been serving in Siberia since
the Allied and Associated Powers decided to go to the assistance
of Czecho-Slovak troops, making their way from Russia to their
native land. Japan's original force in the joint undertaking was
approximately 30,000 men, while the United States sent in about
8,000 men and the European Allies lesser forces.
A revolutionary movement against the Kolchak Government
was started in the middle of last month by the social Revolution-
ary-Zemstvo group in Vladivostok under the military leadership
of General Gaida, former commander of the Czecho-Slovak forces
on the Siberian front. This revolt was occasioned by dissatisfac-
tion with the extra-constitutional methods of the AU-Russian
Government and resentment over the dissolution of the Siberian
Assembly by Kolchak. The uprising was quickly suppressed,
however, and General Gaida, who was captured with his staff,
has since left the country.
Partly as a result of this incident, but chiefly because of the
opposition of social revolutionary elements, Kolchak has since
formed a new coalition Cabinet under Premier Victor Pepaliaeff,
formerly Minister of the Interior in the AU-Russian Gov^ifirment.
554 RECENT EVENTS [Jan.,
The new Cabinet has been formed with the greatest possible
socialistic tendencies compatible with Kolchak's stand against
Bolshevism. Larger powers are given to the recently created
Zemstvo Congress, and every effort is to be made to placate the
Cossack atamans and the Czechs. In reforming the Cabinet it has
been the endeavor also to eliminate the influence of the military
over civil matters, which is generally considered to have been one
of the notable weaknesses of the Kolchak Government. Since the
fall of Omsk, Irkutsk has been the seat of government.
On the southwestern front under General Denikin, the
month's campaign has been one of alternate advances and re-
treats, with the advantage at present apparently resting with the
Bolshevists. According to late dispatches the Bolshevist forces
have captured Kharkov in Southern Russia, which has been one
of the bases of General Denikin. The occupation of Volki, about
twenty miles southwest of Kharkov, also is claimed by them. It
is reported that volunteers of General Denikin's army, eighty-five
miles east of Kief, have been driven out of Pirratin in the Gov-
ernment of Poltawa. The Bolshevists report the capture also of
the staff of the famous cavalry division of General Mamontoff,
which earlier in the month in the course of several brilliant raids
in the rear of the Bolshevist forces, had taken 2,500 prisoners.
Fighting on the southern front has reverted to the type of the
days of Waterloo, and cavalry is being extensively used on both
sides.
The Bolshevist successes against Denikin seem to have been
achieved by massing against Denikin's centre heavy forces of
picked troops, including their new cavalry and also Lettish and
Communist troops hitherto held in reserve, besides a large num-
ber of troops withdrawn from the trans-Siberian front. The
Bolshevist forces greatly outnumbered those opposed to them by
the volunteer army.
At the same time on the western flank important successes
have been won by the Galician troops, 15,000 strong, who had
formed the mainstay of the Ukrainian Army under Petlura. They
have broken with Petlura and, after prolonged negotiations,
placed themselves at Denikin's disposal for operations against the
Bolshevists. As the movement for the independence of Russian
Ukraine was nurtured in Galicia, this defection from Petlura is
looked upon in some quarters as signal proof of the insolvency
of this leader and the separatist movement he represents. Rem-
nants of Petlura's forces are now defeated and scattered, Petlura
himself hastening northward through Volhynia, and his tempor-
ary ca^t41» Kamenemspudolsk, has been entered simultaneously
1920.] RECENT EVENTS 555
by Denikin's troops and the Poles. On the other hand some ob-
servers think that Ukrainian nationalism has failed simply for
lack of what has contributed largely to Polish success, namely,
the moral and material support of the Allies, and that the crown-
ing injustice of Allied discriminations against the Ukrainian di-
rectory, is the recent award of a mandate over Eastern Galicia to »
Poland.
The Russian Northwest Army, which attempted last month
under General Yudenitch to capture Petrograd, has been definitely
defeated and scattered, a large portion of this army having been
forced back into Esthonia. There has been some talk of a new
offensive against Petrograd, and the Esthonian Government has
been requested by General Estievar of the French Army to permit
the reconstruction of the army of General Yudenitch and allow
the West Russian forces, formerly commanded by General Avaloff-
Bermondt, to be mobilized in Esthonia for a fresh attack on Petro-
grad. The Yudenitch debacle is ascribed to the fact that the full
force was used at the front and the necessity for reserves was
ignored. Four of the Russian divisions formerly under Yuden-
itch have been organized under the Esthonian General Tonnison,
and are protecting the positions below Narva against the Bol-
shevists.
The most important event in the Baltic region has been the
capture of Mitav by the Letts and the general evacuation of Letvia,
Lithuania and Courland by the German force formerly under
General von der Goltz. Ever since the German repulse by the
Lettish forces from before Riga last month, the Germans have
been retreating before the Letts. Late reports have been received
from East Prussia, however, stating that five train loads of troops
of the German "Iron Division," who had arrived at Tilsit on their
way to the interior of Germany, have suddenly refused to proceed
further in accordance with the Allied G)mmission's orders, and
four train loads have gone back northwest of Memel, where they
still threaten Courland. Their numbers are said to be fifteen
thousand. Further east the evacuation appears to be proceeding
regularly, but the Memel force seems to have got out of hand
and to intend to defy the Allies. Unless they agree to withdraw
in a short given period they will be declared outlaws, which means
that the Letts and Lithuanians will be allowed by the Allied Com-
mission to march against them.
The representatives of the Government of Esthonia, Letvia,
Lithuania, Poland, Ukrainia, and White Russia in conference at
Dorpat have declared themselves in favor of a military and politi-
cal convention to defend their independence against aggression
556 RECENT EVENTS [Jan.,
equally from the Germans, from the Bolshevists, and from the
All-Russian Government under Kolchak, which last is in favor
of a united Russia. To the All-Russian plan, the Baltic states are
as strongly opposed as to Bolshevist or German attack. Soviet
delegates were sent to the Dorpat conference, with the ostensible
purpose of negotiating for the exchange of prisoners, but they
endeavored to widen the conference to include peace parleys. A
late dispatch states that the conference between the Baltic states
and the Bolshevists has been adjourned till the end of December.
Negotiations for exchange of prisoners have also been going
forward at G)penhagen between a British representative and M.
Litvinoflf, the Russian Soviet representative. M. Litvinoff en-
deavored to turn these discussions also into peace pourparlers
with the Entente. His communications to the American, British,
French and Italian Ministers at Copenhagen, however, have been
returned to him. The Ministers hold that to take ofBcial cog-
nizance of the communications would be a breach of faith with
Denmark, which consented to Litvinoff's presence in the country
for the purpose of meeting a British delegate on the question
of the exchange of prisoners and on condition that politics should
be excluded from his programme.
The result of the French elections last
France month was a sweeping victory for the Bloc
National, the patriotic grouping of non-
Socialist parties which have supported Cldmenceau's Government,
and a strong repudiation of anything in the nature of Bolshe-
vism or Soviet rule. The Bloc National will have more than five
hundred of the six hundred and twenty-six members of the next
Chamber, while the Socialist representation will be reduced from
one hundred and five to fifty-five. Jean Longuet, the Socialist
leader and most prominent French Bolshevist, was defeated.
The Socialists were responsible for making Bolshevism an issue,
and it is they who feel the sting of defeat. Six months ago seven
Socialist parties united for the purpose of getting control of the
Government. When Longuet and his lieutenants some weeks
before the election came out openly as friends of the Soviets,
Cl^menceau took a hand and formed the Bloc National. Not only
did the election show that the extremists could not swing labor
for Bolshevism, but it made clear that several thousand French
Socialists loved France more than their party. For a great many
French Socialists voted the Bloc National because they feared
Bolshevism. The returns from the provinces show that the farm-
ers and inhabitants of small towns also steered away from
1920.] RECENT EVENTS 557
Sovietism. Besides M. Longuet, leader of the Minority Socialists,
other defeated radical leaders were Pierre Remandel, leader of
the Majority Socialists, Henry Franklin-Bouillon, the Radical So-
cialist Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee of the Cham-
ber of Deputies, who had urged rejection of the Peace Treaty,
and Pierre Brizon. In the Paris municipal elections only four
Socialists were elected.
Despite the announcement of Cl^menceau, who is seventy-
eight, that he will retire, rumor persists that he will be the next
President. One of the planks of the platform of the Bloc Na-
tional calls for more power for the President of the Republic,
to make him a stronger figure in national and international poli-
tics. The election of French Senators will take place in Jan-
uary, and soon thereafter the Senate and Chamber of Deputies
will meet to elect a President.
Universal regret, and some sharp criticism, has been ex-
pressed in the French press over the rejection of the Peace Treaty
by the United States Senate. The American peace delegates, who
had intended leaving France on December 1st, delayed their de-
parture till the tenth, as a result of French and English impor-
tunity, to await the decision of the Senate. On their departure
Hugh Wallace, the American Ambassador to France, was in-
structed to take up the work relinquished by the American dele-
gation and fo represent the United States in the various discus-
sions and conferences. His powers are strictly limited, and word
has since been given out at Washington that he has been author-
ized to sit at the Council meetings only on matters having to do
with the Hungarian and Bulgarian Treaties, without taking action
on them, but in order to keep the United States Government in-
formed about them. He will have nothing to say in any other
business.
Meanwhile, since the departure of the American delegation,
Cl^menceau has visited London and had a three-days' conference
with the English Premier. In this conference Italy's Foreign Min-
ister, Vittorio Sciatoia, also participated. The object was the
formation of a closer alliance between England and France in
view of America's withdrawal from European affairs. France de-
manded, in the absence of America, that England carry out her
pledge to guarantee the former country against German attack.
The plan of the League of Nations will be retained in the
Anglo-French arrangements, as its great use as a piece of politi-
cal machinery is recognized. Nevertheless, in the widest official
as well as political circles of England, the League of Nations in its
ideal sense, as it was originally intended, is now considered dead.
558 RECENT EVENTS [Jan.,
One of the gravest questions affecting the entire international
situation is that of the claims of Ireland; and unless the ques-
tion of her rights and self government be settled the international
situation will remain disturbed and disturbing. England and
France, with Italy, have decided also to establish inter-allied mili-
tary machinery, with Marshal Foch at its head, to insure that Ger-
many lives up to her bargin.
Despite the action of the Senate, hope is still entertained in
France that America may be won to participation in European
affairs. As a result of the London conference, the American
Government will be notified that in order to facilitate a compro-
mise between adverse parties in the United States Senate, the Al-
lies are willing to accept, to as great an extent as possible, some
of the reservations to the Versailles Treaty proposed by the Sen-
ate Foreign Relations Committee. It is s^d the Allies will "do
everything in order that America may participate in future con-
ferences," and are willing that America shall take all the precau-
tions she regards necessary to protect her own interests.
Besides the terms of the new economic agreement between
France and England, the London conference also considered the
Fiume question. It is understood that the British and French
representatives informed the Italian Foreign Minister that they
would sponsor Italy's cause at Washington, but that no settle-
ment of the Fiume problem would be acceptable unless it con-
formed with President Wilson's conditions.
The Jugo-Slavia delegates early in the month became a party
to the Peace Treaties with Austria and Bulgaria, to which they
have hitherto objected. The Supreme Council in agreement with
the Jugo-Slav delegation, conceded certain modifications in the
peace terms with Austria, notably the advancing of the date for
payments to the Jugo-Slav State on reparations due it. Rumania
also has signed the general Peace Treaty, as well as the Austrian
and Hungarian Treaties, with the necessary provisions for minori-
ties. The Bucharest delegates also declared their willingness to
withdraw from Hungary to the boundary line laid down by the
Peace Conference last June. The decision of Rumania to recede
from her defiance of the Supreme Council has removed one of
the ugliest problems of European politics.
Late dispatches indicate that the Fiume
Italy imbroglio is finally on the eve of settle-
ment. According to report, an agreement
between d'Annunzio and the Italian Government has been signed
1920.] RECENT EVENTS 559
by Premier Nitti and d'Annunzio, whereby the latter is to hand
over the command of the city of Fiume to regular troops under
General Caviglia, former Minister of War. This occupation of
Fiume by Italian regular troops is considered merely in the nature
of a trusteeship, pending a final decision of the Entente Powers
as to the city's ultimate disposition. The Italian Government is
said to be willing to take possession on these terms, feeling con-
fident that its claims to Fiume are so manifest, its title must be
recognized. In diplomatic circles it is said that the retirement of
the American members of the Supreme Council probably would
facilitate a settlement of the Fiume problem, which it was im-
possible to obtain with American participation. OfScial an-
nouncement concerning the Fiume arrangement is soon expected
fiom the Italian Government. It acknowledges, in a sense, the
right of Fiume to decide its own destiny according to the princi-
ple of self-determination, and promises to do everything in its
power to have a decision of the Fiume National Council accepted
by the Allied and Associated Powers. At the same time it is be-
lieved that d'Annunzio and his troops will be pardoned, the pa-
triotic ideals which moved them to enter Fiume being taken as
a mitigating circumstance.
The recent Italian elections resulted, on the whole, in a vic-
tory for the Socialists, the new Catholic party securing the next
largest number of seats. The Socialists have elected one hundred
and fifty-six members to the Chamber of Deputies and the Catho-
lics one hundred and one. Both these parties have defined pro-
grammes, are well organized, attend assiduously the sittings of
the Chamber, and, in fact, work as regular parties. The remain-
ing groups comprise a smaller number of adherents, so that alone
and unsupported they cannot counterbalance the power of the
above mentioned parties. The smaller groups include Radicals,
who count only fifty-four Deputies; Reformist Socialists, led by
Bissolati, who total twenty-five, and Republicans, who number
about a dozen. There remain outside these parties or groups
about one hundred and sixty Deputies. Thirty of these have
formed a new group called "Group of National Reconstruction,"
comprising men of different political views, who fought side by
side in the War and are united by desire for concrete reforms
necessary for the reconstruction of the national life. Most of the
Deputies outside these regular parties and groups, represent
moderate tendencies. The Socialists' success is ascribed to the
general apathy of the voters, only sixty per cent of the Milan
electors having voted, only thirty per cent in Rome, and only fif-
teen per cent in Palermo. As all the Socialists voted, the news-
560 RECENT EVENTS [Jan.,
papers point out that, had the other citizens troubled themselves
to vote, they could have swamped the Socialists. It is declared
that the voters were not attracted by the fact that, under the new
electoral law, they had to vote for fifteen candidates instead of
for one, as formerly.
The new elements which have entered the Socialist Parlia-
mentary group are declared to be animated by revolutionary sen-
timents, and to favor an extreme policy which, in their opinion,
will lead inevitably to the advent of Bolshevism in Italy. Since
the election, the Chamber of Deputies has been the scene of num-
erous outbreaks and demonstrations against the King and Gov-
ernment, and, for a time, rumors of the wildest character re-
garding the possibility of a serious crisis, involving not only the
Cabinet but also the reigning house of Italy, were in circulation.
Hope has been expressed by Premier Nitti that all the other
parties will form a coalition against the Socialists.
Because of public demonstrations in Rome on the opening
of Parliament against the Socialist Deputies for their disloyal and
pacifist attitude, a general strike was called by their sympathizers
in the Labor Exchange. The strike continued for several days,
with rioting and serious disorder, especially in Rome, Genoa,
Turin, Milan, Mantua, Bologna and Florence. Order was finally
restored by the military. As a result of the outbreak ten persons
were killed, one hundred wounded, and one thousand placed
under arrest.
The chief cause for German delay in sign-
Germany ing the protocol, preliminary to putting
the Peace Treaty into effect, has been the
German objection to reparation for the sinking of the interned
German fleet at Scapa Flow last June ; and throughout the month
there has been a constant exchange of notes on the subject be-
tween the Government at Berlin and the Supreme Council. The
Berlin authorities at first contended that the internment of the
fleet at Scapa Flow did not constitute the final disposition of the
warships, the sinking of which must not be charged to Germany,
but to the Allies who interned the fleet in a British and not a
neutral port, contrary to the stipulations of the armistice. More-
over, they contended that Admiral von Reuter was cut off from
communications with Germany and believed that the armistice
ended at noon on June 21st. Therefore, in accordance with mari-
time custom, he began sinking the fleet. The point was raised,
also, that, as von Reuter was a prisoner, he had lost his command,
and therefore Germany's responsibility for his acts ceased.
1920.] RECENT EVENTS 661
The British Admiralty in the beginning of December largely
destroyed the foundation for this plea by publishing two letters,
one from Admiral von Trotha» Chief of the German Admiralty, to
Admiral von Renter, and the other. Admiral von Renter's com-
munication to the commanding ofScers of the interned fleet.
These letters were found in Admiral von Renter's safe in the
salvage operations last July, on the German flagship Emden,
Von Renter's communication, dated June 17th, gave orders to the
commanding oflBcers "for necessary preparations for sinking their
ships so as to insure that, on receipt of an order, they will sink as
rapidly as possible." Von Trotha's letter, which is expressed
in guarded phrases, says, among other things, with reference
to the Versailles Peace Conference, that "the first condition will
be that the ships remain German, and that their fate, whatever
turn it may take under the pressure of the situation, will be con-
summated by ourselves, and that their surrend^ to the enemy
remains out of the question." As regards the means by which
von Trotha was able to communicate with von Renter, it is noted
that, on May 4th, a ship called the Dollart reached Scapa Flow
from Germany, and on June 17th — the very day von Renter issued
his order to sink the ships — two ships, the Bardenia and the
Schleswig, also from Germany, arrived at Scapa Flow, bringing
clothes and provisions for the interned crews.
The German rejoinder to this disclosure alleged that the ob-
jectionable passage from the von Trotha letter had not been
properly translated, and that it was "out of context with the rest
of the letter." On the threat of an ultimatum from the Supreme
Council, however, Berlin, while waiving the question of guilt,
finally agreed to repay for the Scapa Flow loss. Objection is
made, however, to the manner of reparation suggested in the Al-
lied demand for 400,000 tons of shipping, dock material,
dredges, etc., "because the execution of the demands formulated
in the protocol would compromise irretrievably Germany's eco-
nomic life and also render impossible of execution the other enor-
mous obligations which the Treaty imposes on Germany." Ber-
lin proposed instead that compensation be made by the offer of
such harbor material as can be spared without seriously disturb-
ing Germany's economic life, the amount and the mode of com-
pensation to be decided by a board of Allied and German ship-
ping experts. To this the Supreme Council agreed, and this ship-
ping board has since been constituted and is now in session.
With this disposal of the Scapa Flow controversy, it is calculated
that the Treaty between the Allies and Germany will be put into
effect before January Ist.
VOL. cac* 36
562 RECENT EVENTS [Jan.,
The long-discussed question, what to do with the German
U-boats, was recently settled, when the Supreme Council decided
that they should all be sunk with the exception of ten, which will
be given to France. There are between ninety and one hundred
U-boats, most of them now in English ports. It was decided to
give the ten submarines to France, because she was not able to
build submarines to any great extent during the War on account
of her facilities being devoted to the manufacture of munitions
for the Allies. Italy is to receive the Austrian submarines. The
Supreme Council also adopted the British suggestion for the par-
tition of the German war fleet. Under the arrangement Great
Britain will receive seventy per cent of the total tonnage ; France,
ten per cent; Japan, eight per cent, Italy, ten per cent, and the
United States, two per cent.
According to a recent announcement in the House of Com-
mons by Winston Spencer Churchill, British Secretary for War,
the Germans have handed over to the Allies 5,000 guns, 25,000 ma-
chine guns, 3,000 trench mortars, and 1,700 aeroplanes. They
have still to deliver forty-two locomotives and 4,760 railway trucks.
The authorities at Berlin are greatly disappointed by the fail-
ure of the Premium Bond Loan. Five billion marks, it was thought,
would be subscribed, but the amount will fall considerably short
of four billion. The Government will subscribe in order to bring
the figure up to the last-mentioned amount. The lack of success
is all the more remarkable in view of the long and costly campaign
by which the Government endeavored to persuade people to sub-
scribe. The failure of the loan is variously ascribed to lack of
confidence in the Government's financial measures, to the un-
compromising attitude of the Entente, to internal political trou-
bles, and to depreciation in the value of German money.
The tax measure proposed on December 3d before the
National Assembly by Mathias Erzberger, Minister of Finance,
is also the subject of severe criticism. The capital levy, it is said,
''will leave Germany bloodless and make economic recuperation
impossible." In Hamburg the feeling against the levy is par-
ticularly strong. In view of the strong hostility of banking and
financial interests, it is rumored that the Government intends to
withdraw the measure.
According to competent observers there is no immediate
danger of a successful movement under military leadership, and
the monarchial element, though loud, seems confined to certain
sections and to be without general influence. There is some fear
of Bolshevism, however, especially if the coming winter is very
cold and Lenine succeeds in penetrating the country and orgaur
X920.] RECENT EVENTS 563
izing his forces. Fear is also expressed that if the Allies do not
mitigate their present policy, cold and hunger may drive the
people to anarchy.
Meanwhile the present Government hangs on, and even if
there are some changes in the ministerial coalition, it is felt that
the bloc is too strong to be ousted by anything short of a revolu-
tion. This coalition of majority Socialists, Centrists, and Demo-
crats has three hundred and twenty-seven seats out of a total
of four hundred and twenty in the National Assembly, and, de-
spite internal quarrels and jealousies, it is generally thought fear
of the reactionaries on the one side and of the Spartacides on the
other, will keep the coalition intact until the spring elections.
The rise in the curve of labor employment and production
is the one bright spot of the German situation. This movement
has been steady, and production in the mines, shipyards and gen-
eral industries has reached a level approaching the pre-war basis.
The depreciation of the mark, however, still continues, and for
this adverse condition there seems to be no remedy. The Govern-
ment printing presses are turning out marks at the rate of 70,000,-
000 a day, 13,000,000 of which represents new paper money put
into circulation.
December 20th.
With Our Readers.
FATHER HECKER AND PRESENT PROBLEMS.
BY THE EDITOR.
THE curtain of time folds about some great and holy men as
the mantle of a prophet. Events prove that, in some way, they
had the power to forecast the years: to extend their gaze, and
events show the present interest of their estimate, their zeal, their
judgment.
On December 18, 1819, over one hundred years ago, Father
Isaac T. Hecker was born. He founded this magazine, The
Catholic World, in 1865.
As we face a new year, it is our purpose to review the life,
aims and work of Father Hecker in as far as they show how he
anticipated the crisis which the world now faces, and what means
he outlined to meet that crisis.
FATHER HECKER was an intense, aggressive Catholic priest
and apostle. He was consumed by love of Catholic truth and
he gave himself completely to its service. He was not content
with half measures. He realized what Father Lattey says in his
recent volume. Back to Christ: "Christ asked for all, and asked
for it as His right." "Divine Love is infinitely active," as Father
Hecker would say, and Divine Love in the Person of the Holy
Spirit dwells within the soul. Father Hecker borrowed of this
infinite activity: hence his ceaseless energy, his desire that every
power of the individual, in its fullness, be actively devoted to the
cause of Christ.
To Father Hecker the Church was God's voice upon earth.
As God's creative goodness extended to every order and portion
of His universe, so the truth of the Catholic Church would vivify,
explain, redeem and sanctify every field of human activity and
every faculty and power of man. As the light from heaven it
was the light for this world and for us who dwell for a time
therein. He was consumed with zeal to carry it, and have every
other Catholic carry it, to the ends of the earth.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
DEFINITE Christian truth alone can satisfy the soul: lacking
it, the soul still hungers, and its hunger must be satisfied. Many
thus made destitute have attempted to console themselves with
the preaching that one ought to forget self and give self entirely
1920.] WITH OUR READERS 565
to others ! The essence and fullness of Christianity, such preach-
ing maintains, is social service. Never to think of self: to find
self-perfection simply in serving others. The acceptance of this
preaching leads to the utter rout of the soul. It leads to forget-
fulness of all definite laws of self-perfection: of those sacred
obligations that are the stronghold of man's dignity and man's
worth. It robs the heart of those high personal standards, inde-
pendent of all others, which should be held inviolate were death
and disaster to descend upon the whole world. It submerges the
individual under the waves of the world's tragedy, and the world's
suffering. What one has not, one cannot give to others. The
body may be clothed by him: but the soul will still cry out un-
answered, uncomforted.
So the modern world is being confounded by its own gospel
of human altruism. Its hunger has led it to seek food: but the
food it can get of itself only leaves its hunger more unsatisfied
and torturing. Having no personal faith in a personal God, it
cannot feed itself; having no food for itself it cannot feed others.
Bread and the circus may have delayed, they did not avert the fall
of Rome. Welfare work only palliates and postpones; man seeks
justice and the right to live according to his independent dignity,
his personal worth. To limit humanity to itself is to write down
humanity as both hopeless and helpless. The history of the race
and the experience of the individual confirm this.
FAITH in a personal God as our Creator, demands the union
of the soul with God. Faith in Jesus Christ as our Saviour,
demands the perfect obedience of the individual to Christ: an ac-
ceptance, an obedience to all His revealed truths and to all His
commandments. It means the surrender of self to Him Who is
our life: an intimate union than which nothing is more tem-
porally or eternally important. That union is the rule of our
relations with others : it is Christ in us and as He is our Saviour
so only, through union with Him, can we be saviour, helper,
guide or comforter to others. FromT Him radiates the light of the
world: only inasmuch as we are in Him may we radiate light to
others. Personal perfection is the first, the constant and the last
work of each Christian soul. All his other labors and his good
works are measured by its strength, its fidelity, its growth. Only
in the measure of his perfection can he aid his fellowmen. He
may have riches and distribute his goods to feed the poor, but
unless he have charity, it profiteth him nothing.
is the grace of God : it is the favor of God : it is the
566 WITH OUR READERS [Jan.,
union, the life of the soul with and in God. It is the life of God,
the Holy Spirit, living, reigning within us, by Whom we know
that we are the temples of His indwelling Self.
This is the crowning work of Christ Who, through Himself,
has brought to our souls the Holy Spirit, the Sanctifier.
♦ ♦ 4t 4t
TO keep, to perfect this life with and in the Holy Spirit, is the
first and greatest care of every one of us. All other work will
be vain without it. It is the source of our own peace and strength
and purity and unselfishness. It is known under various titles —
the life of prayer, the interior life, the spiritual life.
We may, therefore, rightly ask: what will be the issue of all
our human endeavors, of all our efforts, of all our reconstruction
programmes unless they be informed by this interior spirit, seek-
ing its guidance from prayer, from love of the sacraments, from
personal devotion to the Holy Spirit? The world may laugh the
true answer to scorn : as the world may not understand one who
gives up all to spend his days in prayer. But the world knows
not its own evils nor their cure.
FATHER HECKER not only foresaw the urgent need of the wide
cultivation of this interior spirit life, but he himself was an il-
lustrious example of it. His whole life was a life of prayer. He
sought solitude in the first days of his Catholic life. He begrudged
the hours necessary for study because they intruded upon his
hours of prayer. He often speaks of the favors he gained therein.
It was the sole sustaining strength of his great mission. He knew
the world of his fellowmen. No one realized more clearly than
he the social and economic injustices of his day. No man felt
more keenly and more deeply the spiritual destitution of those
who were without the true Faith: with apostolic spirit he
yearned to go to them and help. Yet he realized that his success
would be measured by his own interior life with the Holy Spirit
of God: to lose or impair that union, was to threaten every ex-
ternal act to which he might put his hand. Intellectual gifts : zeal
of the heart: untiring labor of the body — ^these he might possess,
these could win him distraction and forgetfulness in the glory and
honor of external work — but they would fail, both for himself and
for others, unless he kept not alone the touch of, but intimate
union with the Holy Spirit, unless, indeed, his life were hidden
with Christ in God.
He was blessed with a great mission to his fellow Americans.
He was a leader of his time and of times to come. He is to us an
1920.] WITH OUR READERS 567
inspiration. But if we take at all the lesson of his life, we must
grasp, first of all, the lesson of continued and abiding prayer : of
learning to live in the presence of God : of seeking the guidance of
the Holy Spirit within us, not only for every act and for every
work but for that power of initiation, that courage of achievement,
that passion for perfection which, in turn, are begotten of and
crowned by the Holy Spirit within us.
THESE should be commonplace truths to every Catholic. As
the Catechism of the Council of Trent tells us : "The pastor
must also teach that there are certain admirable effects, and cer-
tain most ample gifts of the Holy Ghost, which are said to orig-
inate and emanate from Him, as from a perennial fountain of
goodness. For, although the extrinsic works of the Most Holy
Trinity are common to the Three Persons, yet many of them are
attributed especially to the Holy Ghost, to give us to understand
that they proceed from the boundless love of God towards us:
for as the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Di\dne Will, inflamed
as it were with love, we can comprehend that these effects, which
are referred particularly to the Holy Ghost, arise from the ex-
tieme love of God towards us."
The Church constantly calls us to prayer. It calls us to it more
insistently today. In this diocese, for example. His Grace the
Archbishop has appointed an entire week for thoughtful prayer
before the Blessed Sacrament, solemnly set in exposition. It is
that aged call of the Church with two appeals that are really as
one. An appeal for the suffering world that God may look upon
it in mercy; an appeal that we may be more devout, more prayer-
ful, more interior. Love of the Holy Spirit will lead us to answer
with ready hearts. As Father Hecker said: "The measure of our
love for the Holy Spirit is the measure of our obedience to the
authority of the Church, and the measure of our obedience to the
authority of the Church is the measure of our love for the Holy
Spirit."
♦ * * *
THIS interior spirit was the secret of Father Hecker's confi-
dence : of his peace : of his strength, which despite the de-
pression of adverse circumstance and unjust criticism, expressed
itself in Christian humor and even gayety. In his own day he heard
some of the doubts that have been repeated in ours. A clergyman
told him that "Dr. Newman" (not as yet Cardinal) said, when he
was told that Father Hecker intended to found the Paulists : "Oh
yes; the Americans do not know what obedience is»" and Hecker
568 WITH OUR READERS [Jan.,
answers : "As our Holy Father is not unwilling to give us encour-
agement, let us indulge the hope that our Divine Master will not
refuse some little out of the way corner in heaven to his unworthy
servants, and 'rebels/*'
He had undertaken the seemingly impossible task of
converting America to the Catholic Faith. The commnuity of
Paulists in 1865 numbered seven priests. Father Baker one of
the ablest and most beloved died. Father Hecker wrote, in a letter
to a friend in Europe: ''We are only six. Two of these quite
broken down. A fine set of fellows are we to set afoot the con-
version of the country. Don't be alarmed. We have now taken
root in eternity. We are not shabbier than the Apostles were in
the natural order. If twelve of them were enough for the con-
tinent. But — But what? Anyhow we intend to live, work and
die bravely. And as for the rest, let those who follow look to it."
He gave the example and the secret of his interior life. '*Men
whose souls are actuated by the gifts of the Holy Spirit; men
whose countenances are lit up with a heavenly joy, who breathe
an air of inward peace and act with a holy liberty and a resistless
energy," were, he declared, the need of the day. So he could
write : "Father Baker's death has energized me in all directions."
BUT he who so believed in the zeal and perfection of the ex-
ternal work : in giving all one had to God, believed also that
he could not so give, or that the giving would be fruitless, unless
it was wholly fired by an interior life of personal perfection and
of constant prayer and recollection.
"Peace is gained by a wise inaction, he declared, and strength
by integral resignation to God, Who will do all, and more than
we, with the boldest imagination, can fancy or desire." "The
Church asks for men, not cyphers or cripples" — but it was the
Church that asked for them as her children. And "the enlargement
of the field of action for the soul, without a true knowledge of the
end and scope of the external authority of the Church, would only
open the door to delusions, errors, and heresies of every descrip-
tion, and would be in effect merely another form of Protestantism."
Father Hecker repudiated utterly and, in that repudiation,
anticipated the modern philosophy that preaches as man's high-
est perfection the free expression of himself: to know life to its
fullest emotional possibilities — such a philosophy as was voiced,
in his earlier years, by the poet, Alan Seegar — ^"to act out your-
self," "obey your instincts," "assert your manhood," was, in Father
Hecker's words, "to lose one's manhood." These extravagant
1920.] WITH OUR READERS 569
efforts to magnify man were, according to him, the natural re-
bound from the opposite extreme of Calvinism.
The mistake made by souls that were led astray by such in-
dividual independence or by too great an absorption in external
work arose, according to Father Hecker, "from their not sufS-
ciently appreciating the necessity of the authority and discipline
of the Church, as the safeguards of the soul."
As he saw clearly, and preached constantly the integrity of
God's universe, the perfect synthesis of all truth, of reason and
of revelation, of nature and of the supernatural, of how Christ is
the Alpha and Omega of truth to men, and the Church, His voice,
so Father Hecker also saw and lived what may be termed the in-
tegrity and fullness of the Christian's spiritual life — ^the office
and power of the Holy Spirit to sanctify by His supernatural gifts
all our natural gifts and to make the entire man resplendent
with the grace and power of God. "Now when the soul sees that
the external authority is animated by the same divine Spirit, with
Whose interior promptings it is most anxious to comply; when it
appreciates that the aim of external authority is to keep it from
straying from the guidance of the indwelling divine Spirit, then
obedience to authority becomes easy, and the fulfillment of its
commands the source of increased joy and greater liberty, not
an irksome task or a crushing burden. This union of the inner and
outer divine action is the secret source of Catholic life; the inward
principle prompts the obedience of Catholics to the divine external
authority of the holy Church. From this is born the conscious-
ness of the soul's filiation with God, whence flows that perfect
love and liberty which always accompanies this divine sonship."
BY cherishing and cultivating this interior life of prayer we
become not only faithful children but faithful missionaries
of the Church. Father Hecker saw how the sphere of the in-
dividual was to be widened in the modern world. He saw how
effective for good or for evil might be the personal example of
every Catholic. Out in the marketplace, in shop or in office the
individual man or woman would have the opportunity to explain
the doctrines of the Church: to lay down the right ethical
principle on a social, economic or labor question. Father Hecker
so loved, so appreciated dogmas that he saw and championed what
few of us see, yet what is so necessary for us to see, particularly
today if the world is to be restored to Christ. Nothing with him
was unaffected by or independent of Catholic dogma. "Every
religious dogma," he wrote, "has a special bearing on political
570 WITH OUR READERS [Jan..
society." Therefore he worked for a well-informed, intelligent
Catholic laity. He labored untiringly for a great Catholic press,
for books, pamphlets, tracts, even for a Catholic daily. He would
fire others with like enthusiasm. He wanted the individual Cath-
olic layman not only to be prepared, but actually to speak: to be
aggressive: vigilant of opportunity: with initiative and energy:
carrying into every corner, to every ear that would listen, the
message of the Catholic Church.
Was there ever an hour when his message and inspiration
were needed more than now? The Holy Father may speak. But
what of his message if we do not study and imitate and follow it.
Our appointed leaders, the bishops, may lead and plan and urge.
But what of their work, if it be not taken up and made vigorous
with far extending life by our hands?
Now according to Father Hecker, "to be guided by God's
Church is to be guided by God." He prayed that every Catholic
should see this, and he believed that, once seeing, the zeal and
activity of the Catholic laity would know no limit. "What we
need today is men whose spirit is that of the early martyrs."
And Father Hecker believed that the very opportunities and needs
of the day would play their part, under God, in fostering such
enthusiasm and such sacrifice. "The Church is the sum of all
problems, and the most potent fact in the whole wide universe.
It is therefore illogical to look elsewhere for the radical remedy
of all our evils. It is equally unworthy of a Catholic to look
elsewhere for the renewal of religion."
FATHER HECKER saw and foresaw the growth of democracy
throughout the world. With us that growth is common-
place. To some, who lacked the insight of Father Hecker, the
American Republic sixty years ago was not only a dangerous
but an un-Catholic and even anti-Catholic experiment. De Maistre
said this country would not last, and The Dublin Review in 1865
foretold the speedy disruption and downfall of the United States.
Today we are praying that the new republics of the world
be as fair in their constitutions as is our own country. The Holy
Father recommended to the new Czecho-Slovak Republic the Con-
stitution of the United States as a model. Father Hecker was as
conscious as any one of the predominant Protestant sentiment in
America; he saw greater persecution of the Church and of
Catholics than we have seen. But he also saw that the Consti-
tution of the United States was not un-Catholic or anti-Catholic:
that under it Catholics might work with freedom : that its princi-
1920.] WITH OUR READERS 571
pies, if rightly carried out to their full logical term, would lead
to Catholic truth, as of Catholic truth they were born.
"He whose intellectual vision is open to the light of first
principles and their main bearings, and is not altogether a stranger
to true history, knows full well that the Catholic Church has
battled her whole lifetime for those rights of man and that liberty
which confer the greatest glory on the American Republic."
''It is an error, radical and gross, to say that the basis of the
American character is the spirit of political and religious rebel-
lion." "They want to make out that the American States claim
to be indifferent to religion. They accuse us of having a theory
of government which ignores the moral precepts of the natural
law and of the Gospel. Such is not the case, and never has been
from the beginning. This is a false interpretation of the Amer-
ican States."
And as it was founded on justice: as it gave the greater re-
sponsibility to the individual, so Father Hecker saw the golden
opportunity of showing the true American that his very first
principles were a preparatory declaration of the Catholic Faith/
Father Hecker had no misgivings: he did not demand the Amer-
ican form of government for all nations of the world. He
would not say that in other countries it would he fulfilled nor
fulfill the mission it had here. "The Catholic Church has flour-
ished under all forms of government." "Neither do we wish to
plant our American ideas in the soil of other nations. The mis-
sion of the American Catholic is not to propagate his form of
government in any other country." The American loved liberty
and since he loved it, he could be led to love the truth that was its
sole foundation. "Protestantism as a religious system was an in-
sult to all ideas of freedom." America was free in good measure
from the religious passions and prejudices of the Old World. In a
new land the people had to stand together to form a new country.
Many would be willing to listen : "If the Catholic religion were pre-
sented to their attention without exaggerations and in the light of
its real character, the more impartial and intelligent minds would
assimilate this knowledge."
TO Father Hecker this was not alone a mission to Protestants
as such, that is those who retained some positive belief in
parts of the Christian creed. He saw the rapid drift of Protestan-
tism towards Unitarianism, for such it is in great measure today,
in spite of its various names — ^and that from Unitarianism it
would drift to Universalism. He saw the undermining of all
572 WITH OUR READERS [Jan^
Christian truth : as the Catholic Faith was **the mother of civiliza-
tion," so he saw what we are seeing, civilization itself threatened.
He anticipated the appeal we must make for the world's recov-
ery, an appeal to the reason of man: to the things he still holds
dear, showing him that their only security is Catholic teaching
and Catholic doctrine. It is the commonplaces of life and the
fundamentals of society that are threatened.
"Democracy is the spirit of the age," said Father Hecker, and
he prophesied it would sweep the world. But the safeguard of
democracy, indeed the mother of it, is the Catholic Church.
They who know not Christian truth nor Christian history know
not how to treasure and to guard it. They use it to their own
destruction. They pervert it and make it the instrunient of law-
lessness and irresponsibility and disorder. They who so misuse
it, also use it as a weapon against the Church. It is for us not
to crush what is good therein: but to nurture the good: to show
its guarantee: to expose the errors: to give sight to the blind
by the saving waters of God's truths. "Satan seizes hold of the
noblest aspirations of the soul, and by deceiving men under the
guise of a real good, leads them quite astray. For what under-
lies the promises of Protestanism and its innumerable sects: and
rationalism, so called and its different phases, and the secularists,
religious radicals, materialists, revolutionists, socialists, inter-
nationalists . . . for their name is legion and their confusion of
tongues is as great as that of Babel — ^what underlies their prom-
ises is in one aspect true and in a sense desirable. The right an-
swer to all their fine promises is this : Tou afiBrm some undoubted
truths and you hold out a desirable good; but the way that you
point out for realizing the one and attaining the other is sub<-
versive of all truth and the supreme good, and it will not reach
even what you aim at, but end in entire disappointment and an-
archy. Put together the fragmentary truths afiBrmed by each of
your different religious sects, and you will find them all con-
tained in Catholicity. Make a list of all the honest demands for
ameliorations and reforms in man's social, industrilil, and politi-
cal condition — ^it will not be a short one — ^and you will discover
that they have their truth in the spirit, and are justified by the
teachings -and the practice, of the Catholic Church.' O sincere
seeker after truth ! Did you but know it, the path lies open bef ose
you to a perennial fountain of truth, where you can slake to the
full that thirst which has so long tormented your soul. O sincere
lover of your fellowmen ! There is a living body which you may
enter and cooperate with, whose divine action is realizing a
heavenly vision for the whole human race, brighter and more
1920.] WITH OUR READERS 573
beautiful than the ideal, which so often haunts your lonely
dreams!"
So Father Hecker catalogued two great movements in the
world: the Catholic Church that taught the ways of justice here
for man: of peace and of order and the way of eternal life; and
the forces of revolution, of godlessness, of disorder and of decay,
that won influence only because they are able to deceive men.
No writer of the present day could give a clearer synopsis of the
world's condition. And Father Hecker concludes : "Only the uni-
versal principles of reason and revelation grasped and welded by
such an organic world power as the Catholic Church, can guide
aright the tumultuous masses of mankind when the transition from
one phase of civilization to another has begun."
^^j^pATHER HECKER saw very clearly the need of Catholic edu-
I cation. We see that secular education has sown the seeds
of personal irresponsibility: of ignorance of the moral law: of
forgetfulness of God. Father Hecker wrote: "It is clear that the
chief aim of the advocates of the present public-school system in
the United States is less the desire for general diffusion of
knowledge than the advancement of a pet theory of education;
and many of them insist upon its exclusive adoption, because they
imagine that its spirit and tendency are against the spread and
progress of the Catholic faith. They are blind to the fact that
it is equally destructive to every form of the Christian faith;
that it leaves, because of its practical inefficiency, thousands of
children in ignorance; that it does violence to the religious con-
victions of a large body of citizens of the Republic; that it tram-
ples upon the sacred rights of parents, and endangers the State
itself by perverting its action from its legitimate function. 'Heat
not a furnace so hot that it doth singe yourself is good advice.
The so-called American public-school system is a cunningly-
devised scheme, under the show of zeal for popular education, to
force the State, in violation of American principles of liberty, to
impose an unjust and heavy tax on its citizens, with the intent
of injuring the Catholic Church while in the meantime it is sapping
in the minds of the American youth the foundations of all religion
and driving them into infidelity."
TO him was evident the need of widespread, energetic work
on the part of Catholics. As in the past, the Catholic Church
inaugurated and led in works of social welfare and social better-
ment so should we lead today. "The great majority of her (the
574 WITH OUR READERS [Jan.,
Church's) saints were men and women whose hearts were over-
flowing with warm and active sympathy for their race, consecrat-
ing their energies to its improvement spiritually, intellectually,
morally, and bodily, and not seldom laying down their lives for
its sake."
He foresaw that women, as of old, were again to be leaders
in the work. In the old and in the new fields of endeavor, they
would bear the message of Catholic loyalty and Catholic truth, and
extend the kingdom of God on earth. The signal services ren-
dered by Catholic women during the crucial days of the War,
both at home and abroad under the direction of the National
Catholic War Council, have been a singular vindication of his
prescience of the wider field and the greater need of the mission
of Catholic women in social work.
HE anticipated the modern objection that the Church had no
concern for men's welfare here: but only for his life here-
after. 'The Catholic Church places no gulf between God and
humanity, or divorce between heaven and earth, or antagonism
between revelation and reason, or religion and science; and she
repudiates the doctrine which emphasizes faith at the expense
of good works. Hence the accusation of modern infidels against
Christianity, as confining itself exclusively to man's happiness
hereafter — *a post-mortem happiness' — ^while ignoring his actual,
present good — ^is altogether false when made against the Catholic
Church."
And to the much agitated question of Christian unity.
Father Hecker gave what must be always the only true answer:
"The only road open for us to be Christians, consistent with
reason, with moral rectitude, and with a proper respect for our-
selves, is to become Catholic. For the expositions of Christian
doctrines by the Catholic Church are consonant with the dictates
of reason, in harmony with our moral feelings, and favorable to
the highest conceptions of the dignity of human nature."
* * 4t 4t
WE may well end this review with Father Hecker's estimate of
what kind of men this age demands if we are to win back the
world to Christ:
"The age is superficial; it needs the gift of Wisdom, which
enables the soul to contemplate truth in its ultimate causes. The
age is materialistic; it needs the gift of Intelligence, by the light
of which the intellect penetrates into the essence of things. The
age is captivated by a false and one-sided science; it needs the
1020.] WITH OUR READERS 575
gift of Science, by the light of which is seen each order of truth
in its true relations to other orders and in a divine unity. The
age is in disorder and is ignorant of the way to true
progress; it needs the gift of Counsel, which teaches how
to choose the proper means to attain an object. The
age is impious; it needs the gift of Piety, which leads the soul
to look up to God as the Heavenly Father, and to adore Him with
feelings of filial affection and love. The age is sensual and effem-
inate; it needs the gift of Fortitude which imparts to the will
the strength to endure the greatest burdens, and to prosecute the
greatest enterprises with ease and heroism. The age has lost and
almost forgotten God; it needs the gift of Fear to bring the soul
again to God, and make it feel conscious of its responsibility and
of its destiny. Men endowed with these gifts are the men for
whom, if it but knew it, the age calls. Men whose minds are en-
lightened and whose wills are strengthened by an increased action
of the Holy Spirit. Men whose souls are actuated by the gifts
of the Holy Spirit. Men whose countenances are lit up with
a heavenly joy, who breathe an air of inward peace, and act with
a holy liberty and a resistless energy. One such soul does more
to advance the kingdom of God than tens of thousands without
those gifts. These are the men and this is the way, if the age
could only be made to see and believe it, to universal restoration,
universal reconciliation, and universal progress, as far as such
boons are attainable."
IN line with the need for prayer to solve correctly the problems of
our times, comes the annual invitation to unite in the Octave of
our times, comes the annual invitation to unite in the Octave of
Prayer for Church Unity, beginning January 18th, the Feast of St.
Peter at Rome, and ending on January 25th, the Feast of the
Conversion of St. Paul.
We earnestly recommend this pious custom to our readers.
By it they become incorporated in the work of the Church mili-
tant, ever striving to realize the words of Our Lord : "That they all
may be one, as Thou, Father, in Me and I in Thee ; that they may
also be one in Us; that the world may believe that Thou has sent
Me."
BOOKS RECEIVED
B. P. DuTTON A Co.. New York:
The English Catholic Revival in the Nineteenth Century. By P. Thureau-Dangln.
2 vols. 912.00 per set. The Drift of Timions, By B. Keable. |2.00 net.
Conrad in Quest of His Youth, By L. Merrick.
BoNi St LivBBiaHT, New York:
The Modern Library: Baudelaire: His Prose and Poetry. Edited by T. R.
Smith; Redemption and Other Plays, By L. Tolstoy; Best Ghost Stories.
85 cents each. The Cobbler in Willow Street, and Other Poems. By G.
0*Neil. 91.25 net Dust of New York, By K. Bercovice. 91. 60 net.
LoNGMANSt Grben & Go., New York:
Elementary Americaji History and Government, By J. A. Woodbum, Ph.D.,
and T. F. Moran, Ph.D. When the World Shook, By H. R. Haggard. $1.60 net.
Benedictine Monachism, By Rt. Rev. C. Buller. 96.50 net.
Habcoubt, Brace ft Hows, New York:
McAroni Ballads, By T. A. Daly. 91*50 net
Bbnzigeb Bbothbbs, New York:
Talks to Parents. By J. P. Conroy, SJ. 91.25 net. The Things Immortal. By
Rev. B. Garesch^, S.J. 91.25 net
Ghablbs ScBiBNBB'ft SoNS. Ncw York:
Introduction to Economics. By John R. Turner, Ph.D.
Habpkb & Bbothebs, New York:
The Early Life and Adventures of Sylvia Scarlett. By C. Mackenzie.
Path BBS op thb Blbssbd Sacbambnt, New York:
Calendar 1920. 55 cents.
Alfbed a. Knopf, New York:
The Three Mulla-Mulgars. By W. de la Mare.
Bbentano's* New York:
The Complete Poems of Francis Ledwidge. 92.50 net.
D. Applbton a Co., New York:
High Benton. By Wm. Heyliger. 91.50 net
DoDD, Mbad & Co., New York:
The Future Life in the Light of Modern Inquiry. By Rev. S. McComb. 91.50.
Thb Macmillan Co., New York:
Reynard the Fox. By John Masefleld. 91.60.
OxFOBD Univebsity Pbbss. New York:
Napoleon. (A Play.) By H. Trench. Direct and Indirect Costs of the Great World
War. By E. L. Bogart.
Geobgb H. Doban Co., New York:
Father Duffy's Story. By Rev. F. P. Duffy. Broome Street Straws. By R. C.
Holliday. Peeps at People, By R. C. Holliday. The Vital Message. By Sir
A. C. Doyle.
The Madbigal, New York:
Songs of Adoration. By G. Davidson. $1.30 net.
P. J. Kenbdt a Sons, New York:
Democratic Industry. By J. Husslein, S.J. $1.50 net The Priest's Vade-Mecum.
By P. Bouvier, S.J. 91.00.
Thb Foub Sbas Co., Boston:
Poetry and Dreams. By F. C. Prescott $1.50 net. International Pocket Library,
The Gold Bug and Other Tales. By E. A. Poc. Two Wessex Tales; Modern
Russian Classics; Gitanjali. By R. Tagore. The Importance of Being Earnest.
By O. Wilde. Mademoiselle Fife. By G. de Maupassant. By Violence. By J. Trevena.
The Last Leon. By V. B. Ibafiez. A Shropshire Lad. By A. E. Housman. The
Man Who Would be King. By R. Kipling. 25 cents each. A Cry Out of the
Dark. By H. B. Stevens. $1.25 net A Whisper of Fire. By A. Ryan. $1.25 net
Houghton, Miffun Co., Boston:
Poems. By J. Drinkwater. 92.00. A History of France, By W. S. Davis, Ph.D. 93.50.
Thb Cobnhill Co., Boston:
An Acreage of Lyric, By D. L. Mann. 91.25. History of the Yankee Division,
By H. A. Benwell. 92.00. John Brown, Soldier of Fortune. By H. P. Wilson, 92.50.
Pbteb Rbillt, Philadelphia:
Poems. By Francis X. Doyle, SJ.
John Jos. McVbt, Philadelphia:
Exposition of Christicui Doctrine. By a Seminary Professor. 92.75 net
GovEBNMBNT Pbinting Ofpicb, Washington:
Handbook of Aboriginal American Antiquities. Part I. By W. H. Holmes. The
Administration of Correspondence-Study Departments of Universities and Col-
leges. By A. J. Kean. Prehistoric Villages, Ctistles and Towers of Southwestern
Colorado, By J. W. Fewkes.
B. Hbbdbb Book Co., St. Louis:
A Dictionary of Ccuion Law, By Rev. P. Trudel, SJ. 91.50 net The Undying
Tragedy of the World. By W. F. Robison, S.J. 91-50 net
Bubns & Oatbs, Ltd., London:
The Armour of God.
AusTBALiAN CATHOLIC Tbuth Sogibty, Melboumc:
The Infallibility of the Church and Her Teaching Authority. By Rev. J. Sullivan,
SJ. Christian Unity. By a Missionary. Is There Salvation Outside the Church?
By Rev. H. C. Semple, S J. Pamphlets.
, u\r^^>FEBRUARY 1920
VliVl
of^^ THE
atholie tJJorld
Tl\e Conservative Mind William J.,Kerby, Ph.D. 577
** Beneficent America " One in the Government Service 591
The Lamb ' Francis Carlin 600
The "Open Bible" in Pre-Reformation Times
/. M, Lenhart, O.M.Cap. 601
The Chesterbeilloc Theodore Maynard 617
An Irish Pilgrimage E. J, Quigley 630 •
French Catholic Scholars William P. H, Kitchin. Ph,D, 634
A Seventeenth Century HohenzoUern Mary J. Malloy 646
The Lost Manuscript of Father Kino
Margaret Hayne Harrison, M.A. 653-
Beauty Armel O'Connor QGO
The Loyalist James Francis Barrett 661
New Books
Recent Events
Russia, France, I^^^ly^ Austria
Germany, Hurgary
With Our Readers
Price— 25 cents; S3 per year
THE CIFICE OF THE CATHOLIC WORLD, NEW YCEX
120-122 West GOth Street
EotrrtsI ar lecond-clasa miitter at the Po»l Office at New York, N. 1.
isi E IV 'PU'SLICcATIO^
A Primer of
Old Testament History
Sy Re^. Francis E. Cigot, D.D.
The WeU Known Biblical Scholar of St. Joseph's
Seminary, Dunwoodie, New York
^nr^HIS is the first of a series of Biblical
Primers to be published. It sum-
marizes Sacred History from the crea-
tion of the world to the coming of
Our Blessed Lord. The book is well
printed in handy size. It is enriched
with illustrations and appropriate maps.
An excellent volume to be in the
hands of pupils beginning a Scripture
Course,
THE
O-tholicll^rld
Vol. ex.
FEBRUARY. 1920
No. 659
THE CONSERVATIVE MIND.*
BY WILLIAM J. KERBY, PH.D.
OME years ago the newspapers reported the efforts
of two scientists to construct flying machines. Of
one it was said that he worked on Vight theories
but could not fly. Of the other it was said that
he was working on wrong theories and could fly.
As a matter of fact, the Wright brothers tell us that they found
traditional scientific data unreliable and they were compelled
to depend upon their own investigations in solving the problem
of the airship. We behold here another aspect of the ages
old diff'erence between theory and practice, between fact and
principle, between thinking and doing.
In the social order, theories are aristocratic while facts
are plebeian. Call any plausible guess by the name hypothesis
or law or theory or principle and at once it moves about like a
1 An cITnrt Is nuiclc lii this study to describe conservatism and radicalism as
social tendencies, and to call attention to popular estimates of them which fail to
take account of moral and spiritual values. Once the social mind surrenders belief
In objective truth and separates striving for Justice fiom the divine law of Justice,
the basis of tiie spiritual Judgment of life Is lost. Ihe writer hopes to complete
this study by a later article on the place of the Church in the soilil order. As
a spiritual, moral and social force she touclies all social interests and olfers the
basis upon which we rest the solution of our social problems. Her belief In ob-
jective truth and In the inviolable supremacy of the moral law has far-reaching
social consequtMices. It is in this nlone that we may And guidance between the
extremes of conservatism and radicalism which are ever recurrent In human society.
The term "radicalism** is used to indicate the general tendency toward changes
in the social order rather tluin the Irmentable extremes which are now so lawless
and fbumerous. 1*lie term ^'conservatism** relates to views and standards wliich
develop in tlie ortii.iarj' processes of social and political life, seen as such. The
term "theory** is tal^en to indicate any view accepted or proposed as the basis of
• sfH*iaI Institution. In this sense It may be false or true. Many of tlie theories
of Indiviiliuilism once accepted as true, are now repudiated as false.
Copyright. I»a0. The Missionaby Society of St, Pavl tub Apostls
i:< TBI State of New Yobk.
fOi^ CZ* 8'
I
578 THE CONSERVATIVE MIND [Feb^
grand seigneur. It mounts a throne and, in LowelPs phrase,
asks facts to pause and do it courtesy as they pass by. A the-
ory cannot harm a fact, but the tiniest fact may upset a whole
philosophy. Hence, when a fact threatens a view, one who
holds to the latter feels an impulse to deny the former. A
scholar was asked how he accounted for a certain well-
authenticated fact which was at variance with his philosophy.
He answered quite directly and simply, ^1 do not attempt to
account for the fact. I deny it."
A taste for theories disturbs one's liking for facts and
tends to interfere with one's judgment of them. This occurs
because theories or generalizations do not take hold of entire
facts. They touch them only at points; whereas it is in the
nature of a fact to insist on plenary recognition. Theories
avoid detail. Yet there is nothing in the universe except de-
tail. Facts burden the mind and memory, overwhelming them.
The mind has devised generalizations by which it can handle
enormous quantities of facts with greatest ease. The Infinite
does not generalize. It sees comprehensively every item in the
universe.
Nature knows well that both theory and fact are es-
sential in social life. Hence, she has wisely provided types
of mind with a liking for each.V The coi^eryative J3 ihe apos-
tle of^fact; the radical is the apostle of theory! The con-
servative sees while the radical interprets. Each dislikes the
other and mistrusts him. Each is the only medicine that can
correct the constitutional disorders of the other. Each is com-
plete in structure, but incomplete in function. Each is, to
borrow Emerson's phrase, ''a good half but an impossible
whole.*' Functionally the conservative mind just as it is, is
of fundamental importance to our institutions. Since this is
the case, the value of the conservative mind does not depend
on its ability. An infant king sleeping in the royal cradle is
just as useful in maintaining the stability of institutions as a
philosopher, because the king is a symbol as well as person-
ality. It is not alone conviction or ability makes the conserva-
tive mighty. His greatness is derived also from his function.
Nature works with a high factor of safety, hence she does
not trust the security of institutions to the outcome of debate.
In times of revolution, institutions are tested more or less by
debate; hence, the peril of revolutions. What would become
1920.] THE CONSERVATIVE MIND 579
of the stability of the social order, of sanctions, standards and
parties, of the varied institutions of property, of the settled
adjustments of thought and feeling which is the social order,
if one could by reasoning alone unsettle the conservative mind?
Nature is deeply interested in the conservative attitude, but
she is less concerned about conservative arguments. It is vital
that radical changes be resisted in order to slow them down.
Civilization has established a speed law for reform which the
radical constantly violates. It is imperative that change be
opposed. That it is opposed sometimes unfairly, sometimes
with strange dullnesss, intolerance and delusion, is of no par-
ticular consequence to nature, whatever be the judgment of
logic about such things. Logic is petulant with conservatism
because it argues badly at times, but nature does not worry.
The conservative may be wrong to his heart's content in argu-
ment if he be right in his attitude.
Nature must protect conservative leaders against their
own limitations. If President Wilson could be swayed and
compelled by the arguments of Mr. Gompers, if Mr.
Gompers could be bested in argument by Mr. Debs, and
if Mr. Debs could be argued out of his radicalism by a single
taxer, our institutions would melt into hopeless confusion.
The foundations of the social order are not made out of
syllogisms. They are constructed from convictions. Hence
we find the value to civilization of the organic and persistent
repugnance that the conservative mind feels for all that the
radical is, and for much that he represents. Were the situa-
tion otherwise, our safety would lie only in suppressing
all radicals who could argue well. Where the earth is per-
fectly flat, surface waters, unless they are absorbed, become
stagnant and offensive. Nature provides against this diflB-
culty by varying the smf ace of the earth in order to insure
satisfactory drainage. The waters flow with the slant of the
surface. Nature gives a slant to the human mind. Arguments
flow in obedience to a law of mental gravitation along oiur
mental slants. Prejudice, illusion, philosophy, fixed concep-
tions of loyalty to a policy, a conviction or a leader, as these
are found in the conservative mind, protect it effectively
against the floods of argument poured upon it by the radical.
Thus the argument of the radical as it affects the conservative
may be described in the happy mixed metaphor of a popular
680 THE CONSERVATIVE MIND [Feb^
orator, as resembling ^'water on a duck's back, in one ear and
out the other.'*
**Congress believes in what is and is opposed to what ought
to be," said a United States Senator some years ago in address-
ing a convention of architects. This statement gives us the sit-
uation in a nutshell. The conservative is the prophet of es-
tablishment, of the fact, of what is. Logic, theories and
ideals, marshal their forces and attack him but he remains
unfearing and undisturbed. His attitudes are deeper than the
penetrating power of any adverse argument. They are below
the frost line. Hence, surface variations of heat and cold do
not reach them. The conservative mind is the safety deposit
vault of civilization with a time lock which nature herself
opens with slow caution. The conservative is door-keeper of
the temple of progress. He feels that he is the trustee of civil-
ization, the sealer of the ethical weights and measures in the
terms of which the transactions of life must be conducted.
The practical conservative does not see any particular rela-
tion between the truth of a statement and the proof of it. After
all, as the world goes, debate consists largely in measuring
your information against mine. It is a comparing of items of
knowledge in order to determine him among a number who
has the greater amount and the better command of it, just as
boys count and compare their marbles. The winner is secure
until another boy with more marbles joins the circle. The
conservative has power of attorney conferred upon him by
nature, but she revokes it at will. He is essentially pragmatic.
Institutions have worked; therefore they are right. Institu-
tions are working; therefore the presumption is in their favor.
No institution is universal in its effects; therefore, we must
be tolerant of much of our failure and we must make supple-
mentary provision for the situations in which we fail.
The radical on the contrary, sees a profound relation be-
tween the proof of a statement and the truth of it. On this
account he loves to argue. He thinks that all of his mental
processes obey syllogisms as loyal subjects obey a king whom
they love. Hence the radical believes in debate, loves it» chal-
lenges the conservative to joint debate on evei'y possible occa-
sion. Yet it is all illusion, for the mental processes of the radi-
cal obey his mental slant with the uniformity of a law. Nature
has provided a mental watershed which divides the processes
1920.] THE CONSERVATIVE MIND 581
of the conservative and the radical minds in just as marked
a way as a range of mountains determines the flow of waters.
The radical is always an impulsive dreamer. Bulwer Lytton
says in Kenelm Chillingly, "Moral philosophers have so mud-
dled their brains with the alcohol of new ideas that their moral
legs have become shaky and the humane would rather help
them to bed than give them a licking." This expresses with
fair accuracy the judgment that the conservative makes of
the radical in general.
Conservatism requires scholarship in order to prove its
case, because ability to prove it has undeniably its place in the
scheme of life. The radical has need of feeling rather than of
scholarship. He knows the aspirations of humanity much
more thoroughly than he knows its history, and he voices
those aspirations with teUing effect. The general tendency
of scientific training moves in the direction of a radical habit
of mind. And yet with the tremendous emphasis given to
education, nature has taken care to keep an abundance of
live conservatism on hand. Bancroft writes of Virchow, who
had a passion for politics, that he was a radical "as true men
of science naturally would be." The words of Professor Clark
are much to the same effect. *The scientific habit of thought
makes one hospitable to new ideas. A man who cultivates
that habit is open to conviction where an ignorant person is
not so. He is accustomed to pursue the truth and let the quest
lead him where it will. He examines evidence which appears
to have force even though the conclusion to which it leads may
be new and unpleasant." If memory be not at fault, Hohen-
lohe was afraid of the great school system which Germany
had developed, and he proposed to make the conditions of ad-
mission to schools still more exacting, lest the Fatherland find
a learned radical proletariat on its hands. In the same spirit
Louis Blanc, who was one of the first radicals to enter the
French parliament in 1848, admitted without reserve the dan-
gers of general education to the stability of institutions.
Secular education is accompanied by increasing inde-
pendence of mind, increased capacity for doubt, the depend-
ence of assent upon evidence regardless of consequences.
Education aims to extend and make more secure the domin-
ion of reason in the life of man. Now the great danger against
which the social order must be protected is found in reason.
582 THE CONSERVATIVE MIND [Feb.,
Reason has its dangers no less than has ignorance. Morley
speaks as follows in writing of Edmund Burke: **If you en-
courage every individual loose upon all subjects without any
restraint from a sense of his own weakness and his subordin-
ate rank in the long scheme of things, then there is nothing of
all that the opinion of ages has agreed to regard as excellent
and venerable which would not be exposed to destruction
at the hands of rationalistic criticism.'* Furthermore, it is the
clear teaching of Burke himself that civil institutions may not
be measured by the tests of pure reason and that logical con-
clusions may be the most mischievous. Mallock has a similar
thought in The Immortal Soull
If logic, if reason, if evidence were the sole support of faith*
the old faiths by which men have lived would decompose far
more rapidly than new faiths could construct themselves.
It is worth while here to quote a remarkable paragraph
from Leckey*s History of European Morals, which offers cor-
roboration of these views :
It would be difficult to overestimate the number of those
whose genuine convictions are due to the unresisted bias of
their interests. By the term "interests" I mean not only ma-
terial well-being but also all those mental luxuries, all those
grooves or channels for thought which it is easy and pleasing
to follow and painful and difficult to abandon. Such are
the love of ease, the love of certainty, the love of system,
the bias of the passions, the associations of the imagination
as well as the coarser influences of social position, domestic
happiness, professional interest, party feeling or ambition.
The stability of institutions and of civilization rests on the
certainty that human nature cannot be entirely educated, that
it will never be entirely rational. The mental luxuries which
Leckey catalogues, love of ease, love of certainty and system,
associations of the imagination and affection, have been more
powerful in human history than argument and independence
of mind. Much of the alleged action of reason incidental to
widespread education is harmless and, on the whole, illusory.
Sumner remarks to the point in his Folkways, 'The most elab-
orate discussion only consists in revolving on one's own axis.
1920.] THE CONSERVATIVE MIND 583
One only finds again the prepossessions which he brought to
the consideration of the subject, returned to him with a little
more intense faith." Lowell calls attention to the same gen-
eral truth in his lines:
This world were doomed
Should dullness fail to tame
Wit's fettered heels
On the stern stocks of fact.
(The conservative mind is contemplative while the radical
mind is analytical.] When we analyze social facts one part of
our minds beholds one aspect of things. In contemplation,
however, we are submerged in vision, and reasoning tends
but to disturb the comfort of our position without adding to
its strength. The radical mind consumes its energy in taking
attitudes with vehement attachment; hence, it is that so many
analytical minds are irritable, and radical movements are
nervous, intolerant and difficult to put up with. Ruskin was
right when he said to Norton, "Analysis is abom^ble busi-
ness." Strangely enough, those statements are/only partly
true. The conservative is a contemplative when he looks at
reality but he is analytical when he looks at the copiplete ideal.
He analyzes it, resists it, and even argues against it. On the
other hand, the radical is analytical and rebellious in the face
of the established order, but he is an indiscriminate contem-
plative when he looks toward the ideal. The conservative
takes ideals seriously but he keeps them at a distance from
which they give him light, comfort and inspiration. The radi-
cal approaches so near to the ideal that his mind catches fire
which resembles the prairie fires of the West. Imagination
enables the radical mind to bound over obstacles and to fly
past the problems of the real as a high speed train flies past
the telegraph poles along its pathway. The conservative re-
sembles the track walker who plods along and looks at the
roadbed, instead of the horizon, and gives detailed care to the
maintenance of way on which the safety of the high speed
train depends.
The radical mind is briUiant and facile when dealing with
generalization, ideal or axiom, while the conservative mind
is slow and glued to earth. The latter will work painfuUy
584 THE CONSERVATIVE MIND [Feb^
and patiently to gather the facts by which to impress an audi-
ence, but the radical will trust to a dozen assumptions and
his splendid pictures of the ideal when he wishes to win an
audience. He strews his principles and generalizations before
the timid conservative and dares the latter to walk over them
as over a bridge between the fact and the ideal. The conserva-
tive, however, with the caution of the ponderous elephant, tests
every plank carefully before trusting his weight upon it. Since
the conservative finds that the planks bend under his weight,
he wiU ordinarily refuse to take the risk. A statistical
table furnishes safer footing for him.
Architecturally, the radical mind shows Gothic character-
istic of mass without weight. Twenty facts burden a man and
hinder his steps, but principles are imponderable. Twenty
are not heavier than one. The construction of the radical and
the conservative minds shows well the wisdom of nature.
The conservative mind is like an apartment house, while the
radical mind resembles an auditorium, the aede^ of the Ro-
mans. Life is full of inconsistencies. Controversies exist
everywhere within our institutions. Interests of the most
divergent kinds are forced into nearly every individual life.
As a result we discover that consistency is often impossible
and nevertheless we strain after it. Brockelhurst says in lane
Eyre, that consistency is the first of the Christian duties. It
is in any case difficult. Life produces inconsistencies. Na-
ture produces a type of mind that can tolerate them and dwell
among them. The conservative mind can do this. It can
place its different opinions in separate apartments. They live
near one another, but they need not meet any oftener than
do the residents of any apartment house. When inconsist-
ent views do meet, conventional forms of greeting are suffi-
cient to avoid friction. Thus, for instance, a man's political
opinions may say a pleasant Good Morning or Good Evening
to his religious opinions as they meet in the corridors. Possi-
bly, they could not live in the same apartment at all. One's
business views may act in a surly manner when they meet
one's moral principles. The method of separate apartments
for opinions is resorted to very largely in this life, howsoever
we may dislike and regret it.
Undoubtedly, the ideal life is unified and consistent and
it places moral and spiritual standards in their rightful su-
1920.] THE CONSERVATIVE MIND 585
premacy. But we are dealing with facts and wayward pro-
cesses of mind now, and not with moral laws. As a matter of
fact, life is full of inconsistencies and nature has prepared
the conservative mind to bear them. George Eliot calls the
brain *^a congenial nidus of inconsistent beliefs.** Classic il-
lustration of conservatism's inconsistency is found in its atti-
tude toward revolution. The conservative mind is an advocate
of the last revolution, but a determined enemy of the next one.
It does not admit the principle of revolution except in retro-
spect. It admits only revolutions in which it is not interested
or the one revolution which produced it. On the other hand,
the radical asserts the principle of revolution. When the next
one establishes him, he too will deny that principle.
The radical mind is architecturally unlike the conserva-
tive mind. It is not an apartment house, but rather one vast
room with cold severe lines, unbroken by cozy corner or any
inviting recess. There is no privacy. All opinions, emotions,
views and systems must live together in the full sight of one
another all of the time. The radical mind escapes none of the
unreasonable extremes of consistency. This condition causes
a wear and tear on the radical's nervous system which gives
us far-reaching insight into the psychology and the law of
revolutions. Logical codrdination, consistent unity, rigid
syllogisms, system, flourish with irresistible vitality. Every-
thing must be in harmony with everything else. Thus, for in-
stance, when the radical mind admits Socialism into its cham-
ber, former attitudes tend to disintegrate and Socialism starts
the work of complete and unified mental reconstruction. Very
often it despises religion, denounces marriage and parental
authority over children and loses itself in mad dreams.
Consistency of truth with truth is not an acquired taste.
It enables us to proceed from known to unknown truth. The
scholastic philosophers were fond of the principle Verum vero
vere nunquam repugnat But consistency in social relations
and everyday life is another thing. If a conservative finds
that a fact contradicts a theory, he drops the theory and
accepts the fact. The radical prefers to drop the fact. The
conservative with his taste for inconsistency, can compromise
and easily does so. The radical while he remains radical,
cannot compromise mentally at all. Hence, he loses his sense
of humor and the conservative finds it The latter goes through
586 THE CONSERVATIVE MIND [Feb^
life with double joy and the former with double loss. The
radical is, as Goldsmith found Burke, 'Too fond of the right
to pursue the expedient." The conservative mind has only
such emotions as its opinions produce while the radical mind
has only such opinions as its emotions produce. The former
is organized by its opinions while the latter is governed by its
emotions. The radical accuses the conservative of dishonesty
while the conservative declares that the radical is dangerous.
Without a doubt, both of them are somewhat in error. The
great mistake of the radical lies in confusing consistency with
l\onesty. Consistency touches the relations of opinions among
themselves, while honesty affects one's relations to one's ex-
pressed opinions. We can be consciously inconsistent, but we
cannot be consciously dishonest within our minds. The rela-
tion of the conservative mind to its own expressed opinions
is usually honest enough, while the greatest inconsistency may
be found in crossing lots from one opinion to another. It is
difficult to be patient with the one-sided estimate of conserva-
tism to which Oliver Wendell Holmes once gave expression. In
his mind, to be a conservative ""is to let all the drains of thought
choke up and keep all the souFs windows down — to shut out
the sun from the east and the wind from the west — to let rats
run free in the cellar and the moths feed their fill in the cham-
bers and the spiders weave out their lace. before the mirror
till the soul's typhus is brought out of our neglect and we begin
to snore in its coma or rave in its delirium." Such a view is
its own refutation. It is utterly unworthy of a scholar.
After the worst has been said against the conservative, it
remains still his supreme role ''to recognize the precedence of
the facts of morality and conduct, of the many interwoven
affinities of human affection and historical relation over the
unreal necessities of abstract logic," to quote Morley again.
The conservative sees a situation as a highly complex adjust-
ment of life. To the radical a situation is merely a series
of orderly definitions. One can change a definition in a min-
ute, but one would labor a lifetime in changing a situation.
The philosophy of the conservative is summed up in the strik-
ing statement of Falkland, "If it is not necessary to change, it
is necessary not to change." The radical believes that it is
necessary to change and that, therefore, change must be made.
Change is a problem to the conservative. It is an axiom to
1920.] THE CONSERVATIVE MIND 587
the radical. A problem must be studied while an axiom need
but be followed. Hence, the aptness of words written years
ago in the Atlantic Monthly and modified to suit the thought.
**Given a problem before which wise men have pondered and
waited long to determine the safest line of approach, up comes
the radical along any line which he occupies at the moment,
suddenly running, his head low down . . . and the problem
has vanished."
The attitudes of the conservative and the radical minds
toward change are characteristic and interesting. The con-
servative mind has an organic repugnance for the new. What
is new is wrong. Innovation is the original sin of society. **The
idea is new, but excellent,'' said a typical conservative recently
when discussing a harmless innovation. Lowell caught the
thought admirably in his lines:
So I turn Tory for the nonce
And think the radical a bore,
Who cannot see, thick-witted dunce,
That what was good for people once
Must be as good forevermore.
The conservative mind is timid before new thoughts as a
little girl is shy in the presence of strangers. There is a heavy
import duty on new ideas at all conservative ports. In many
cases, the duty amounts to practical exclusion. This happy
metaphor, whose authorship escapes memory, pictures the sit-
uation exactly. The construction of the social order is a mar-
vel of achievement. To organize the feelings, judgments, as-
I>irations and aims of miUions of persons and to secure like
attitudes among them on the more important interests of life,
is a miracle of human accomplishment. There is no social
order until men think and feel and judge alike, until they co-
dperate with one another and trust one another. Now, the
emotions, standards and terms in which vital interests are ex-
pressed, and proportions by which life is guided, must be rela-
tively stable else confusion awaits us. A long, painful and un-
certain process must be gone through before a social order
can be established. Mirah says in Daniel Deronda, "I like what
I have always seen there because it brings back to me the
same feelings — the feelings that I would not part with for any-
588 THE CONSERVATIVE MIND [Feb^
thing else in the world/* Now a new thought, a new fundamen-
tal theory, challenges the entire established order. If nature
were indifferent to that change, there would be no safety for
civilization. It is imperative that innovations be bad form.
Nature, at least, has said so. All of the accumulative fear of the
unknown is heaped upon the soul of the social order when a
radical change is proposed. **There is a great caving-in of the
social crust,** says Baldwin, "when a new thought comes.**
Hence, the striking praise of stupidity which Bagehot uttered.
He held that it is the basis of all stable public opinion since it
"chains its gifted possessor mainly to his old ideals.** *The
best security for fixedness of public opinion is that people
should be incapable of comprehending what is to be said on
the other side.** Belloc reminds us that, "great institutions in
a state breed around them an atmosphere, or what I may call,
a halo of illusion.** Is not the halo stronger than any argmnent?
Stupidity is by no means the possession of ignorant people.
A learned professor may be a stupid politician. A capable
theologian may be a poor statesman. Coventry Patmore said
of Tennyson: "He had a singular incapacity for receiving at
first hand and upon its merits, any new idea.** Hence the typi-
cal conservative mind tends to take on a moral antipathy for
what is new. The new seems wrong; hence it is not debatable.
Here nature works with a high factor of safety again. After
conservatism fixes the charge of moral error upon a new
thought, its progress is delayed and its proportions are nar-
rowed greatly by the time that it has refuted the charge. After
that it can force debate to the point where the conservative is
forced to accept it instead of condemning it. But, generally
speaking, conservatism opposes innovation for so long a time
that new thought becomes old and then it becomes safe. Theo-
logians devised a remarkable series of phrases, beginning with
innovation and ending with heresy, by which phrases one*s
exact position might be determined if one started downward
from orthodoxy toward heresy. These distinctions were made
in order to be fair and truthful in dealing with the innovator.
Yet as phrases they exerted no control over the emotional atti-
tudes of observers. The feeling against innovation of any kind
is usually warranted for many reasons. Saintsbury in
writing of Defoe says that observers have frequently noticed
among the English, "a tendency to drag in moral distinctions at
1920.] THE CONSERVATIVE MIND 589
every turn, and to confound everything which is novel in ex-
perience, unpleasant to the taste and incomprehensible to the
understanding, under the general epithets of wrong, wicked
and shocking.** Whatever be the terms in which we describe
the situation, it seems that the initial impulse of conservatism
to confound the new with the wrong, has an important function
in compelling radicalism to clarify its own ideas, to understand
their limitations and to tone down the hatred which its first
utterances usually express against the established order. ^
We have, of course, attempted to describe types rather
than individuals, and they have been described with some ex-
aggeration in the hope of stimulating attention. To complete
the study we should take the type that is partly conservative
and partly radical. Probably most of us belong to this class.
One can understand the description of Maddox Brown, the Pre-
Raphaelite: 'In passions and emotions he was an old-fash-
ioned Tory. His reasoning, however, and circumstances made
him a revolutionist of the romantic type.** The work of de-
scribing this type would be less interesting because it is less
extreme. There is, however, a further phase of the radical
mind which might be mentioned by way of conclusion. When
the radical is lifted into power, his new environment sets in
motion a series of mental processes which tend to make him
conservative. If the conservative falls into weak positions in
society, the process of radicalism begins to work on him, but
he offers a less tractable field. We are told that in Germany
radicals were sometimes placed in positions of responsibility
in the hope that they would become conservative. Responsi-
bility sobers. The newspapers told us some years ago that
Aristide Briand ''was big enough to throw consistency to the
winds" in handling the great French strike which confronted
him. He went against his well-known views and associates
the moment that he faced the threatening complexities of an
acute national situation. Looking upwards toward institutions
which crush us, gives us one point of view. Looking back-
wards from the security of exalted situation, gives us another.
When a revolution has killed the conservatives which stood in
its way, it turns around to kill or suppress the new radicals
which threaten it. Revolution when successful always outlaws
counter-revolution.
The conservative mind is the organ of responsibility and
590 THE CONSERVATIVE MIND [Feb.,
caution in human society. In it the spirit of a nation finds
lodgment and reverent guardianship. The conservative mind
is the trustee of civilization and the defender of its continuity.
The radical mind with its acute sensibilities to injustice and
with its fearless welcome for new thought and new ideals,
prepares the way for the progress which is the law of life.
Of course, no one forgets the mistakes of conservatism or of
radicalism. Each needs the other. Each is a positive danger
without the other. Both are truth-seekers, but they differ in
their understanding of the truth and of the seeking. The
merits and the mistakes of each, their limitations, conflicts,
defeats and victories have a place in nature's cosmic plans.
Not past but present wisdom can secure to conservatism
the confidence that the multitude insists upon placing some-
where. Just now, the tempered radical mind seems to have the
best of it. Perhaps, the fact that our chief executive has called
himself "an animated conservative,'* conveys hope if not prom-
ise that the conservative mind of the nation will do its duty
in the face of our problems, rather than force the trusting
multitudes to place their hopes in that radicalism that destroys
the world.
99
''BENEFICENT AMERICA.
BY ONE IN THE GOVERNMENT SERVICE.
N a classical work on the immigration problem,
my attention was called to the following passage :
**The immigration of foreigners into the United
States has been long recognized as one of our im-
portant social and political problems. Perhaps no
other question has aroused more bitter feelings at times, or has
called out more lofty sentiments of altruistic purpose. On the
one hand, our government has been besought to protect our
people from the degrading influence of the immigrant. On
the other, it has been declared that our doors should never be
closed against those suffering from religious or political perse-
cution. Generally speaking, there has been little difference of
opinion regarding the latter sentiment. There has been great
difference of opinion, however, relative to the effects, eco-
nomic, social and moral, of immigration upon American
standards of living." *
The immigration problem has a moral aspect. '*Do the
foreign immigrants imbibe the spirit, the sentiments, the ideals
of America? These strangers of all races and nations who
come and go, will they help to make our history and shape our
destinies?" The question was unanswered before the War.
Now, that the storm is ovjer, we reply in the affirmative. The
constant unity of purpose of all the sons of America, both by
birth and by adoption, has shown the groundlessness of the
opponents of immigration.
The War has truly marked the greatest victory of Amer-
ican idealism. It has brought into full light the magic power
of what may be called the fascination of America. As soon
as the trumpet was sounded, all racial hatreds, religious anti-
nomies, class struggles of alien inunigrants, have been super-
seded. The vision of America drawing the sword to fight
for the dearest liberties of mankind, and the onward sweep
of democratic institutions filled all hearts and minds. The
national consciousness of all Americans, both native and for-
> J. W« Jenks and W. J. Lauck, The Immigration Problem, New York, 1917, p. S.
592 . ''BENEFICENT AMERICA'' [Feb^
eign born, shone forth in broad daylight. The alien immi-
grants instinctively felt that it was an honor to carry arms
under the American flag, for the War waged by America
marked a new era in the history of the ceaseless efforts of the
human race towards a wider brotherhood of peoples and
nations.
The World War has brought into full light this fact : that
when the hour of danger strikes, America can trust all the
members of her great family. Those whom the migratory
movement brought from old Europe into the healthy organic
life of America democracy, have been Americans of spiritual
lineage on the bloody battlefields of France, Belgium, Italy
and Russia. America is indeed the only nation that possesses
spiritual energy in the assimilation of foreign elements to such
a high degree as to transform them into flesh of her flesh and
bone of her bone.
In translating the foreign correspondence of the Bureau
of War Risk Insurance, the writer of tliese pages came to realize
the success of the Americanization of alien immigrants in this
country. By the term Americanization, I mean the spiritual
evolution which relieves the immigrants from the burden of
racial prejudices, manners and customs brought from the Old
World, and imbues them with the American ideal of freedom
and the political institutions which embody it. In the letters
of the foreign born who have been serving under the Amer-
ican flag, the spiritual Americanization alluded to presents it-
self as an accomplished fact. They breathe the purest love
for their American ideals. Moreover, through the Bureau of
War Risk Insurance the relatives of those soldiers have felt
the generous hand of America, and thus the spirit of Amer-
icanism has expanded beyond its political frontiers. In the
hearts of many who have never come to this country, America
is looked upon as the nation predestined to weave the golden
bonds of international love.
The foreign correspondence of the Bureau of War Risk
Insurance is handled by a few translators, who, after a short pe-
riod of inevitable groping, found their way and fulfilled their
task to the best of their capacity. The earliest documents
translated by them were written in French, Spanish, Italian.
Soon, however, the philological task of the Bureau increased
its area. Letters came from Greece. Slav soldiers, or their
1920.] "BENEFICENT AMERICA" 593
relatives, used their own languages in communicating with the
Bureau. Their example was followed by the immigrants from
the Scandinavian or Eastern countries. It soon became neces-
sary, therefore, to increase the staff.
The foreign correspondence of the Bureau of War Risk
Insurance embraced letters written in thirty different lan-
guages. We may group them under several headings, as
follows :
1. Latin correspondence. Letters written in the romance
languages form the bulk of all the foreign correspondence;
chiefly Italian, French and Spanish. We have received letters
in Portuguese and Rumanian, and have translated numerous
oflicial documents from ecclesiastical Latin.
2. The Slavic correspondence. All the Slavic languages
are represented. The writer has handled letters and documents
written in Russian, Polish, Bohemian, Slovak, Ruthenian,
Slovene, Serbian, Bulgarian, and Paleoslav (Liturgical Sla-
vonic). To these languages, Lithuanian may be added, because
of its geographical position, although it is not a Slavic tongue.
3. The Scandinavian correspondence. Letters and docu-
ments in Danish, Norwegian and Swedish are grouped under
this heading.
4. The Ural — Altaic languages, embracing letters written
in Finnish, Esthonian, and Hungarian.
5. The Greek correspondence. This is one of the most im-
portant of the Bureau, and comes next in volume after the
Italian correspondence.
6. The Germanic correspondence. Letters and documents
written in German, Dutch and Flemish.
7. The Semitic and Armenian correspondence, embrac-
ing letters and documents written in rabbinical Hebrew and
Yiddish, and in Armenian and Arabic.
8. The Far-Eastern correspondence. It embraces letters
and documents written in Japanese, Chinese and Hindustani.
These languages are handled outside of the Bureau's staff of
translators.
9. Malayan langugages and Hawaiian. Hawaiian letters
and others in Tagalos, Vizcayan, Bicol, Ilocano; and other
Philippine dialects have been received.
A simple enumeration of these languages shows that the
Bureau of War Risk Insurance is in touch with the most remote
594 "BENEFICENT AMERICA" [Feb.,
countries of the worid. Within its narrow limits, it feels the
throbbing pulse of all the peoples who aligned themselves with
America in the giant struggle against militaristic autocracies.
Its staff hears, in the most varied languages, the same voice of
the "champion of free mankind."
It is not an easy task to translate the documents the Bureau
receives from its foreign correspondents, many of whom are
illiterate. The Italians, who are exceedingly numerous, write
in almost all the dialects of their provinces. According to their
geographic position, the Greeks intersperse their common
tongue with Turkish words, or they cull from their classical
writers the gaudiest blossoms of style. The Slavic writers,
especially the Poles, seem to have entirely forgotten the rules
of the national orthography. The letters in the Slavonic lan-
guages put to the test, not only the grammatical and legico-
graphical learning of their translators, but also their patience.
I happened once to pore over a letter whose strange words
were variagated with a frequent "i;an." •The writer is Dutch,*'
I said to myself. But, to my great surprise, I found myself
unable to extract the hidden meaning of that unusual
language. The words looked like Finnish, but the Finnish
dictionary threw no light on the mystery of the apocalyptic
sheet. It was unveiled, however, as soon as I read the first
lines of the letter aloud. The writer had written in plain
English, but took the liberty of transcribing English words ac-
cording to Dutch pronunciation.
In their rude and uncouth style, these foreign letters have a
great human value. They show, as it were, that even the most
illiterate among the soldiers perceived the basis of a most
profound philosophy of the War. Far from being the "dumb
bayonets*' of whom a Russian General once boasted, the sol-
diers enlisted in the American armies, from whatsoever corner
of the world they came, are men who knew for what they
fought and why they were morally bound to fight. They sac-
rified their lives willingly for the freedom of all peoples and
for a better social organization. Their letters breathed se-
renity, confidence, even when death lay in wait for their
writers in the mud of the trenches. "We are fighting for
America,** say proudly these sons of the last hour, and they
are happy because their adopted land has provided for their
mothers, wives or children in the old country. The first im-
1920.] "BENEFICENT AMERICA" 595
pression, therefore, we receive, when reading these foreign
letters, is the moral conquest by American idealism of alien
elements, whom economic reasons, rather than religious or
social ones, compelled lo seek refuge on the hospitable soil
of America.
"Dear sister," writes a Scandinavian, "I am now a soldier
for* Uncle Sam. I suppose you do not understand why I am
going to the front when I do not have to, but this is a good and
a free country, and worth fighting for. What would I have been
if I had been in Denmark now ? I will give all I have to this coun-
try or for this country, and the only thing I have worth talking
about is my life, which is no better than that of anyone else.
There are many married men that are going. I did not have
to go but I wanted to go and I went. Remember America did
not enter the War for gain! No! It is to make the world a
good and safe place to live in; it is to protect the small coun-
tries in Europe and for the future generation; it is for my
own sister that 1 and all the American soldiers fight, and I
do not think we will slop before we reach Berlin and capture
the Kaiser and the men he lias around him. My dear sister,
I have taken out, or rather Uncle Sam has given me, an insur-
ance policy which you, my own darling girl, shall have in case
I shall be killed. . . . After the War, I will come home lo see
you and, if you want lo go, 1 will take you back with me lo the
far West, to the beautiful and free country, the only free coun-
try in the world, which has been much better to me than
Denmark ever was or ever will be."
Greek soldiers express the same feelings. The War that
demands of some of them the supreme sacrifice is a War of
redemption. "I am sure," writes one to his father, '•if any-
thing should happen to me that you will receive the news with
the heroism of a true Greek and that you will not be sorry
if you lose your son, who is fighting for the safely of humanity,
for Greece, and America, and France." Another Greek letter
says : "I wish to inform you that I am a soldier in the Amer-
ican army. I know that you will be sorry, as you are my
parents, but think how the world is suffering today from the
German menace. Everybody must doliis bit. We must keep
the Germans from attempting to dominate the world; they
have to understand that they are going to be defeated. We
must let them know that small nations have equal right to
596 ''BENEFICENT AMERICA'' [Feb^
live with the big nations, and we must no longer have the
German sword hanging over our heads.*'
Liberty is a gift from God to humanity and nobody has
the right to deprive men of it. The quotation that follows
blends harmoniously the ancient ideals of classic Greece with
the modern aspirations of the genuine American spirit. **The
American Government, with great energy, is preparing a big
army, and every soldier expects to be sent over soon to fight
the Hun. In their patriotic speeches, the ofiQcers mention our
country, Greece, as being the first democracy in the world,
from which the American democracy is derived. Such kind
words make me proud of my native country and I am ready to
give everything for my adopted one.'*
In another Greek letter we read: "I want to tell you that
I am a soldier in the American Army, and I am very much
satisfied. In a short time I will be sent to France to fight for
justice, and if my destiny has reserved the honor of my death
there, you will remember that at least I have done something
in this world, that I have fought for the liberty and rights of
mankind."
Let us quote also from the letters of American soldiers
of Italian descent. In a witty fashion, one of them describes
the hardships of the military life: "We are obliged to cook
our meals without fire and our shoes are in bad shape, with
the soles broken, but, after all, we are happy to fulfill our
duty towards our American flag." Others, and they are legion,
lay stress upon the glory of being called to fight for the de-
fence of civilization, of freedom, and above all of America, the
country where they have found what the old Europe could
not grant to them, democratic liberty.
There is much in common in these letters. The words
are diff^erent, but they express the same feelings. An exalted
patriotism is not the monopoly, so to speak, of native Ameri-
cans. It is vigorous in the souls of those who by the constant
accretions of immigration are toiling and moiling to achieve,
in its minutest details, the magnificent building of American
democracy. One recalls the phrase of a keen observer who
wrote: "A man may be a good and patriotic citizen of the
United States even though he knows no English. Like Francis
Lieber, his heart may long have learned to throb American
pulsations, though his lips may still be refractory in national-
1920.] ''BENEFICENT AMERICA'' 6»7
izing themselves." The truth of this remark is evident in read-
ing the letters of the soldiers of foreign descent, and m the
study of their simple language. I believe there is no ground
to fear a lessening of American ideals because of the streams
of alien immigration. A subtle spiritual force works out the
miracle of transforming the illiterate, raw material coming
to us into a virile manhood. New elements of life are added
to the store of American vital power; that those elements are
mostly sound and morally strong, we may infer from this for-
eign correspondence. Like native Americans, they have fought
for the same American ideals, with the same enthusiasm and
the same gallantry. The moral fascination of American ideal-
ism has been more powerful than racial antipathy, religious
animosity, and social inequality.
The second impression received in translating the letters
of the foreign allottees is of the supreme exaltation of mother-
hood. The great services rendered by the women of the Allied
countries in the final crushing of German militarism have
been chronicled everywhere. We are better acquainted, how-
ever, with how much the women have done, than with how
much they have suffered. The inner tragedies of mothers'
hearts have perhaps not been put into such high relief. They
are the heroines of the World War. They have refrained
from tears and have smiled to imbue their sons with the love
of sacrifice. Whether Greek or French or Italian or Slav, the
mothers of the American soldiers of foreign descent have ut-
tered, in their simple style, words that have stirred up the most
generous feelings in their sons' hearts.
Their language at times reminds us of the noblest expres-
sions of the Spartan mothers. They are poems of truly tragic
sublimity. In a short sentence they tell the story of endless
martyrdom. "I have received the news of the death of my
son," writes an Italian mother. "My heart bleeds to death,
but I feel in every fibre that I have fulfilled my duty in allow-
ing my son to be immolated for a loftiest and holiest cause."
A Greek mother of Sparta shows in the following extract the
genuineness of her Spartan lineage: "As the ancient Spartan
mothers used to send their sons to war with joyful songs, so
do I, my son, from the sweet country of liberty, Greece, I send
you my blessings and motherly kisses, JBOid I pray to God and
our Virgin to strengthen you in your fight against German
598 ''BENEFICENT AMERICA" [Feb.,
brutality. Do not come back without the laurels of victory.*'
A mother of the island of Crete, the nursery of the pioneers of
Greek independence, bravely calls her son to face death: "I
know, my boy, that you are not strong enough, but gallant
soldiers when in the thick of the battle don*t think of anything.
They draw strength from the sacred conviction that they are
facing death for safety of mankind, and then they are
strong as lions, and endure their sufferings without murmur.
As a mother, of course, I shed tears, my son, but on the other
hand I am proud to offer the life of my life upon the altar
of liberty.**
I remember a letter of a Polish mother who, in a moment
of despair, had claimed the immediate release of her son from
the army. She was dying of sorrow, of anger, of desolation.
Two days after sending her first letter, she wrote again to the
Bureau : "I wish to revoke what I explained to you yesterday.
When I think of so many victims which the War has taken,
and how terrible are its ravages, I am ashamed of myself.
For the moment I was demented by a feeling of egotism, and
I wished to have my son back. Let my son fulfill his duties as
it behooves a faithful son of my country. I will never be
against anything which the War makes necessary, and es-
pecially what is required by such a great President as Wilson.
I am ready to endure the most cruel torments, and I ask your
forgiveness concerning my previous mistake, which I commit-
ted in a moment of despair.*'
The counsel that mothers give their sons is full of lofty
ideas, and noble concepts. Note the language of an Italian
mother: **We learn that you have been serving in the army
for the rights of justice and freedom, for our love and dignity,
for the greatness of America. I know this, because in spite of
the fact that we are so far beyond the ocean, we wish you to
give help with your youthful courage, and crush and trample
down forever our earthly enemies. No fears, no sighs escape
from our bosom, but though boundless space divides us from
you, our encouragement and perennial blessings will be always
with you.*'
The third feeling awakened in me by reading the foreign
correspondence of the Bureau of War Risk Insurance is grati-
tude to America. All the letters coming from foreign coun-
tries exalt the generosity of "the nourisher of starving peoples,"
1920.] "BENEFICENT AMERICA'' 599
to ^uote the expression of a Greek writer. Thousands of
families, hundreds of thousands of women and children, have
been saved from starvation by the payments of the Bureau
of War Risk Insurance. I quote from the letter of an Italian
mother: '^My entire family united with myself, pray God that
war may end with victory for America, because America has
practised the seven works of mercy. She has given food to the
starving, and distributed bread. Surely, God will protect all
Americans, and they will be honored throughout the world.
My prayer will be heard before God, and victory will be for
America."
The characteristic qualities of Sicilian vivacity and Italian
deference find expression in a letter to President Wilson from
an Austrian-hater of Palermo : "You cannot imagine the hap-
piness that the little, old Italian father of a soldier feels after
reading your magnanimous words, and of the good that you
are doing for all the people of the whole world, and of the
peace that will be bestowed by God through so worthy a per-
son. I read these words on a picture of your handsome and
gracious person — 'We will win the War for world peace.* I
do not care for the fact that my son was able to send me
twenty-five or thirty dollars a month before his enlistment,
provided we shall be able to destroy the tyrant, and cry aloud:
Long live President Wilson ! Long live the Army ! Long live
America !*'
Some of the Italian letters are impregnated with the most
delicate feelings of maternal love and religious gratitude. "I
have received your money, dear, dearest son. I have kissed it.
I went to church to light candles before the image of the Blessed
Virgin. I have thought of the days when I have denied to
myself a morsel of bread to nourish you. My blessings upon
you, dearest son! May they be as numerous as the drops of
milk I gave you. I shall not squander the money which gen-
erous America grants you. I am satisfied with a piece of bread.
I will wait for you, and keep your money, and when you will
come back, crowned with the laurels of victory, I shall accom-
pany you to the church; we shall pray together, and adorn
the altar of the Blessed Virgin with flowers and candles."
But enough of quotations ! They speak more fully of the
Bureau of War Risk Insurance than the most eloquent self-
eulogy. In a recent address to the employees of the Bureau of
600 THE LAMB [Feb^
War Risk Insurance, Colonel Henry D. Lindsley said: •The
work in which we are engaged is one of the most remarkable
undertakings in all history, both in magnitude and purpose.
The War Risk Insurance Act is a monument to civilization,
and those who are privileged to help in its administration,
are rendering a social service that is the highest expression of
the humanity which our soldiers and sailors fought to save.'*
This is not only the verdict of native Americans, but the
plebiscite of all the nations. No doubt, when fulfilling, their
task, when weary of their labors, when meeting with obstacles
in their mission, the tireless workers of the Bureau of War
Risk Insurance think of the many tears that have been dried
by their toils; they feel deeply the nobility of their calling, and
the honor that is theirs of writing the brightest page in the
history of Beneficent America.
THE LAMR
BY FRANaS CARUN.
I AM the Son of Man and I
Am the Son of God Who came to die;
And, having died for men astray,
I am the Light and so the Way.
I am the Lamb of God Who bears
The sins of cockles, wheat and tares;
Since flesh is grass; and so 1 am
The humble Scapegoat, I, the Lamb.
I am the Lamb of God, being of
The Sire Eternal and the Dove;
For I am God, yet of the Three
The Lamb of God's HumUity.
THE "OPEN BIBLE" IN PRE-REFORMATION TIMES.
BY J. M. LENHART, O.M.CAP.
NE of the stock-in-trade grievances against the
Catholic Church is the "alleged" fact that the Bible
was withheld from the laity in pre-Reformation
times. The story has been repeated for fom- hun-
dred years, with countless variations, by Protes-
tant writers. Not only third and fourth rate popular polemic
tracts gave expression to this, as they supposed, frightful in-
crimination in virulent language, but also seemingly sober
scholars have rarely failed to brand the Church with the crime
of hiding the Bible from the laity. Hence the notion has
taken hold of the Protestant mind that an "open Bible has
always been taboo** in the Catholic Church.
We may pass by the false assumption underlying this
charge — namely that the reading of the Bible is necessary for
eternal salvation. If such were the case, what would have
become of the millions who lived before the Bible was accessi-
ble; what of the millions of illiterates today? The assumption
is absurd. From her earliest years the Church has guided
the life of her children by the teachings of Scripture through
oral instructions, since printed or written characters were un-
intelligible to them. And her teachers and preachers were
aided by many ingenious devices of signs and symbols which
conveyed to the minds of the illiterate the truths of the Bible
in a striking manner. By these helps people who could not
read the printed or written Word of God, were made familiar
with its content to a remarkable extent. The walls of the
churches spoke eloquently through Biblical representations to
unlettered men and women of the great truths of creation and
redemption, so much so that the Protestant antiquarian, A. Rob-
ertson, published his description of the Biblical sculptures and
mosaics in St. Mark*s Church, Venice, under the significant
title of The Bible of St. Mark} Indeed, every church was an
"open** Bible to the pious worshipper within its walls. And on
the low walls of the dwelling of the peasant and artisan were
^Londoo, 1898.
602 THE ''OPEN BIBLE'' [Feb^
rude prints representing scenes from the Scriptures and lives
of the saints which brought home to him daily the reality of the
holy living and holy dying of the Saviour and His most faithful
disciples. There are still preserved 1,697 of such Biblical im-
ages or pictures, the small remnant of a very large mass.
**The paintings upon the walls of the churches," remarks,
pertinently, G. E. Woodberry, a non-Catholic,* "conveyed more
noble conceptions to the peasant and artisan than their slow
imagination could build up out of the words of the preacher.
Like children, they apprehended through pictures, they
thought upon all higher themes in pictures rather than in
words; their ideas were pictorial rather than verbal; paint-
ing was in spiritual matters more truly a language to them than
their own patois. It is difficult for a modem mind to realize
the place which pictures filled in mediaeval life, before print-
ing had brought about the great change which has resulted in
making books almost the sole means of education." And those
hundreds of thousands of Biblical prints given lavishly to un-
lettered people by the monks and friars were ever so many
pages of an **open" Bible read by both the illiterate and edu-
cated man and woman by the wayside as well as at the hearth
with unflagging eagerness.
At a time when means for intellectual instruction were
rare, not every school child could be furnished with requisite
books. Yet the problem of teaching Bible history to children
without using the printed text was most ingeniously solved by
the production of illustrated abridgments of Scriptural history
and Biblical doctrines which have puzzled the scholars of our
own times. These learned authors inform us that the so-called
Biblia Pauperum, and kindred artistic productions of pre-
Reformation times, served to take the place of the Bible among
the poor clergy or were intended to aid the poor people in
understanding what was preached to them or were made for
the use of such poor people who could not afford to buy com-
plete copies of the Bible or, again, served as models for artists.
But all of these views are but fanciful assumptions which fail
to grasp the real purpose of these artistic productions.
These illustrated works are nothing else but mnemonic
Bible helps, ordered by schoolmasters from the artists and
used in common schools as a means for teaching Bible history
'Historg of Wood Engrauing, New York, 1S83, p. 28.
1920.] THE "OPEN BIBLE" 603
and doctrine. We still possess copies once the property of
schoolmasters, bound up with similar mnemonic schoolbooks,
of morals, history, and natural sciences. Copies of no less
than eighty-two different editions printed from 1460 till 1520
are still preserved, attesting the great care taken in pre-
Reformation times to impart a thorough Biblical knowledge to
school children. At least 3,500,000 children had been educated
in the schools during the sixty years preceding 1520. From
these mnemonic Bible helps and both handwritten and printed
Bible manuals, these millions of pupils had acquired a better
knowledge of the lessons of the Bible than do millions of chil-
dren in these days of the much vaunted "open'* Bible. For the
ignorance of Bible knowledge now rampant would have been
branded as criminal in pre-Reformation days. From the
mnemonic Bible helps, likewise, additional millions of chil-
dren, who never received a regular school education, were in-
structed in Scriptural history and doctrine. In 1520 the last
edition of these mnemonic Bible helps appeared in print.
These were replaced by an uninterrupted series of Pictorial
Bibles which completely discarded the useful mnemonic de-
vices of former days, substituting more artistic representations
with a short text at the bottom. The older and ruder produc-
tions had outlived their usefulness, since the printed text was
placed in the hands of the pupils; the pictorial "open** Bible
manual gave place^ in the schools, to the textual "open" Bible
history.
The reading public, both cleric and lay, was likewise sup-
plied with an amazing multitude of Bibles and parts of the
Bible, handwritten as well as printed, in pre-Reformation
times. We still have copies of two hundred and thirty-nine
different editions of the whole Bible printed in nine different
languages between 1450 and 1520. The number of editions of
portions of the Bible printed within the same period, runs into
thousands. They are literally countless. These tens of thou-
sands of Bibles and parts of the Bible were printed to be sold
to, and read by, Catholics. The Catholic printers of this great
mass of Bibles made a living by publishing copies of the Bible,
conducting a regular trade on strict business lines, an impor-
tant aspect of the question generally overlooked by writers on
the subject. The production of those Bibles, like the book-
market in general, was regulated by the law of- supply and de-
604 THE ''OPEN BIBLE'' [Feb^
mand. With the exception of Bibles donated to friends by the
printers and copies destroyed by reckless shipping, all printed
Bibles were eventually bought by Catholics in pre-Reformation
times, so that there is almost a complete equation between de-
mand and supply, the cases of over-production having been
quite rare. Think you that printers would have published so
many editions of the Bible, if there was no likelihood that they
would readily be sold? Would any modern publisher reprint
successively, year after year, a work which was not selling?
Truly, the Bible was an "open" book in pre-Reformation
times: it was printed everywhere in large numbers.
Several classes of people, however, made no demand for
printed Bibles. The dignitaries of the Church, the monks of
the large monasteries, the rich noblemen, and the wealthy
burghers were the happy possessors of libraries well stocked in
artistic manuscript Bibles. The quaint Bibles in handwritten
characters had cast a personal spell upon these Bible-readers
so that printed Bibles had no attraction for them. No less
than eight thousand manuscript copies of the Latin Bible are
still preserved in the public and private libraries of Europe
and America, a small remnant of a large mass which has per-
ished by the ravages of time. Likewise there are still extant
two hundred and two manuscript German Bibles out of a total
number of 3,600 copies of handwritten Bibles in Germany
which had existed in pre-Reformation tinfes. This is stated
by William Walther, a Protestant scholar of unquestionable
authority. Since the fastidious lovers of superbly illuminated
manuscript Bibles looked askance at the productions of the
printer's press, a lively trade in beautiful manuscript copies of
the Bible was carried on for a long time after the invention of
printing. Even printed Bibles were re-written by copyists in
the time-honored style. An instructive example of this kind is
the so-called "Stratter Bible" in the University library at Gratz.
It is a verbal transcript of the German Bible printed at Stras-
burg in 1466, and was executed by Erasmus Stratter by order
of Archbishop Bernhard Rohr of Salzburg (died 1487). So
the handwritten Bibles entered into sharp competition with the
printed copies on the market, and the printers had a hard
struggle, at first, with the text writers resulting eventually in a
falling-off of the total output of printed Bibles for the time
being.
1920.] THE ''OPEN BIBLE'' 605
It was to the material interest of printers, as well as copy-
ists, to multiply copies of the Bible in pre-Reformation times:
they made a living by selling them in the market. The earli-
est printers were also booksellers, with traveling agents
to extend their sales. Antony Koberger of Nuremberg
had in 1490 agents for the sale of his books in every larger
city of Christendom. The itinerant book agent never
failed to frequent the fairs in the towns and larger vil-
lages, where he took his place among the stall-keepers and sold
Bibles.
Large advertisements in folio size were displayed on walls,
while smaller hand bills, in quarto or octavo, were lavishly
distributed all over the town or city. Some of these smaller
hand bills were eventually pasted on the inside of the cover of
the books bought, and were thereby saved to posterity.
Again the itinerant book agent would go out of the beaten
roads to monasteries nestling in secluded valleys or hidden
away in dense forests, where some of his best customers dwelt.
Here he would deliver the. books ordered by the monks on his
last trip, would offer new ones for sale and receive new orders.
An instance of this kind is a Latin Bible, still preserved, which
was sold August 8, 1487, to the Benedictines at Montebourg in
France by the book agent Janicart, as an inscription at the end
of the volume informs us. In this way numerous book agents
carried the Bible from village to village, hamlet to hamlet,
settlement to settlement, and even into the lonely huts of the
backwoods.
Book selling was also conducted, then as now, by dealers
in cities and towns who were wholesalers as well as retailers.
The book trade was centred in certain parts of the cities, par-
ticularly in the vicinity of churches and colleges or universi-
ties. In Strasburg the book shops were grouped around the
Cathedral and the Imperial Palace, in Paris around the Uni-
versity in the Rue St. Jacques, in Leipzig around the colleges
in the neighborhood of St. Nicholas Cemetery, in fact, in every
city the trade of bookselling thrived in a comparatively narrow
compass. Certainly things have changed during the last three
centuries. Yet there is nothing in the annals of bookselling
so remarkable as the conservatism of the dealers at London.
Until within the past few decades, the book trade was almost
entirely confined to a radius of half a mile, taking St PauFs
606 THE ''OPEN BIBLE'' [Feb..
Cathedral as the starting point. Literature and Paternoster
Row have always been almost synonymous terms. From the
cities and towns the book trade spread into smaller villages,
where printing could not thrive. We know about 1^0 print-
ing houses had been doing business at about two hundred and
twenty different places previous to the year 1520. Yet the
number of booksellers who opened shops in very small locali-
ties cannot be reckoned.
The early publishers and sellers of Bibles, whether fixed
or migratory, always found a ready market for their goods.
They were constantly meeting actual demand and hence were
trading on safe ground. The result of their business activities
was a surprisingly large circulation of the Bible among peo-
ple of all classes. The humanist, Sebastian Brant, stated in
1494 that all lands were full of copies of the Scripture. At
about the same time the anonymous author of the Dutch
Chronicle of the Countries of Overmaas declared that ""books
and Bibles are found everywhere and are very cheap, so that
a very good printed Bible is sold for three Rhenish florins and
less." A few years later the humanist, Conrad Celtes (died
1508), informs us that the ""priests could find a copy of the
Bible in every inn, if they chose to look." This remark is very
striking; for the inns were the places where the migratory
book agent sold his goods to the peasant and artisan of
the small villages. And furthermore the inns occupied the
place of literary club houses in those days, as they still do in
many localities of Europe. If an ""open" Bible was found in
the smallest villages, as Celtes assures us, there was surely
no scarcity of Scriptures in the larger towns and cities.
But some Protestants still cling to the old story that the
Reformation first ""opened" the hitherto concealed treasures of
heavenly wisdom to the laity by translating the Bible into the
vernacular tongues and placing it in the hands of the common
people. Happily this crude misconception is fast losing
ground even in Protestant circles. In face of the multitude of
vernacular Bibles produced in pre-Reformation times, no se-
rious Protestant historian will uphold any longer the old claim.
We even owe to Protestant scholarship some of the best his-
torical studies on this subject. Modern researches have estab-
lished the fact, that long before the Reformation of Luther,
the people of almost every country in Europe had the Bible
^cfc, 1920.] THE "OPEN BIBLE" 607
to already translated into their own tongues. In most nations,
\k there was in circulation not one, but many different versions,
both handwritten and printed. There are still preserved
seventy-five handwritten Bibles and portions of the Bible in
German dating from the fourteenth century and one hundred
and twenty-eight written before 1500.
The first printed edition of Scripture in the vernacular
was issued at Strasburg in 1466, a Bible in High-German. From
1466 till 1520 were printed forty-seven editions of the vernacu-
lar Bible: seventeen in German, thirteen Italian, twelve
French, two Bohemian, one Dutch, one Spanish, and one Rus-
sian for the Catholic Ukrainians and Ruthenians. These num-
bers do not include the edition of the Bible in Bohemian for
the Hussites, printed at Venice in 1506. These forty-seven
editions comprised no less than 25,000 single copies of the
whole Bible. The number of portions of the Bible in the ver-
nacular printed from 1462 to 1520 may run up to one hundred
thousand single copies; they were never properly estimated.
Not only was the laity supplied with vernacular Bibles, but
the Latin Scriptures were more plentiful still, a fact over-
looked quite frequently even by Catholic authors. From 1453 till
1520 no less than one hundred and ninety editions of the Latin
Bible were issued comprising a sum total of at least 120,000
single copies, not counting copies of parts of the Bible. Be-
sides these, two issues of the Bible in Greek appeared in print
consisting of about 1,700 copies. All in all, four times as many
complete Bibles were printed in Latin as in the vernacular
languages. It is a mistake to suppose that this mass of Latin
Bibles was published exclusively for the clergy.
Even if the Catholic Church had given the Bible to the peo-
ple only in the Latin version, she would not have concealed it
from the laity: nor would it have remained "an unknown
book" among lay people. A Latin Bible was no sealed book
to the laity as such. At the beginning of the sixteenth century,
and for two centuries afterwards till up to the middle of the
eighteenth century, Latin was the language of science, of theol-
ogy, of philosophy, of legislation, of history, and of medicine.
"Latin," writes Macaulay,' "was in the sixteenth century the
language of court as well as of schools, the language of diplo-
macy, theological and political controversy. A person who
■**BsMy oo Bacon."
608 THE ^'OPEN BIBLE'' [Fcb^
did not read Greek and Latin could read nothing or next to
nothing. It was absolutely necessary to be uneducated or
classicly educated.*' In Germany, three times as many Latin
books were written and printed annually during the Reforma-
tion, till the year 1580, as books in German or other languages.
Latin works on jurisprudence exceeded in number German
works year after year till as late as 1750, and Latin medical
books exceeded such in German till up to 1706. These Latin
legal and medical tomes were surely not written by Catholic
priests, but by laymen. Catholic as well as Protestant. Condi-
tions were the same in other countries of Europe. These
facts clearly demonstrate, that every educated lay person
could read, write and speak Latin both before, and for two
centuries after, the Reformation. The majority of Latin
Bibles were printed both before and after the Reformation for
these educated lay people. This is expressly stated by the
author of the preface to the German Bible printed at Cologne
in 1480. **The educated people may read Jerome's Vulgate
(Latin Bible), but the unlearned and simple folk of the clergy
and the laity should use this edition which is in good
German."
Educated lay people not only read Latin Bibles piously,
but even prayed in Latin and from Latin Bibles. Certain por-
tions of the Latin Bible were printed separately to serve as
prayer books for the educated laity. It would detain us too
long to give a complete enumeration of the various extracts
from the Latin Bible arranged in the form of prayer books
and widely used in pre-Reformation times. I only point out
one striking case of this kind. The ordinary prayer book used
by the laity in England was the Primer made up of Psalms and
short extracts from various other Biblical Books. No less than
one hundred and twenty editions and 100,000 copies appeared
in print from 1478 till 1535, all in Latin. The first English
edition was published in 1535. Yet the Primer was a layman's
book of devotion for private use at home and in church. In
Italy there were published eleven editions or 10,000 copies of
this book in Greek for the use of educated lay people who pre-
ferred to pray in the language of ancient Greece. In face of
these facts it is sheer folly to assert that a Latin Bible was a
sealed book to the laity in pre-Reformation days.
Readmg the partisan histories of the Reformation, we
1920.] THE "OPEN BIBLE" 609
must needs conclude that the Latin Bible was doomed, as soon
as the great Reformer had placed an "open" Bible in the
hands of the laity. But no such thing happened. The demand
for Latin Bibles increased after the Reformation. From 1521
tiU 1600 no less than three hundred and eighty-two editions
of the Latin Bible were printed, just twice as many as during
the seventy preceding years (1450 to 1520) ; from 1601 till 1700
we count two hundred and sixty-two editions; from 1701 till
1800 one hundred and ninety-two editions, and in the course
of the nineteenth century one hundred and thirty-three edi-
tions. These figures show that the sixteenth century was the era
of the Latin Bible. And Protestants printed Latin Bibles in the
same way as Catholics. Already as early as 1522, the very
year when Luther's German Bible first appeared in print, the
Protestant Osiander published a Latin Bible. Seven years
later Luther and Melanchthon issued a Latin Bible at Wit-
tenberg. Still later the followers of Luther, Calvin, and
Zwingli edited Latin Bibles, each giving expression to the va-
rious doctrinal divergencies of their particular sect. We may
fairly put the question, why so many Protestant editions of the
Bible in Latin? The answer is easy. The Protestant theolo-
gians who were expounding the teaching of their church in
ponderous Latin tomes could not do without a Latin Bible,
and the educated Protestant layman gave preference to a Latin
Bible just as the Catholic lay people had done both before
and after the Reformation. Every one who is familiar with
the Latin Bible will eventually share their predilection. More-
over, we must not overlook the patent fact that a great preju-
dice against vernacular literature existed in educated circles
both before and long after the Reformation which prevented
many from using vernacular Bibles. In September, 1545, Con-
rad Gesner, a Protestant, published the first history of litera-
ture ever written. As a matter of course in those days, it was
written in Latin, a ponderous tome of one thousand two hun-
dred and sixty-two pages. Gesner states on the title-page that
literature includes only works written in Latin, Greek and
Hebrew, the rest being "barbarous books.*' An author, there-
fore, who wrote a book in the vernacufar or translated the
Bible into the language of the people was performing an
inglorious work; he was not entitled to a place in the catalogue
of illustrious writers. Educated readers who laid claim to
TOL. GZ. if
J
610 THE ''OPEN BIBLE'' [Feb.,
genteel breeding, regarding the vernacular books very much
as trash unfit to be read by refined people. Vernacular Bibles
were good enough for half-learned women and peasants, but
not for men of learning. We must guard against the error
quite often committed by authors who apply the modem stand-
ard of valuation to these literary productions of former cen-
turies. We now praise what cultured men of past ages slighted.
These facts clearly prove that the Latin Bible was the *'open'*
Scripture for the educated laity in a better way than the vernac-
ular Bible was for the less educated lay people.
Yet the claim is still proudly upheld by some that the Ref-
ormation first gave an "'open Bible*' to the people, no matter
how many Bibles may have been written and printed by Catho-
lics. It is a foregone conclusion that ^neither after nor before
the invention of printing was the Bible a free book and that the
Church uniformly set itself against the circulation of the Bible
among the laity." * As evidence the various prohibitions issued
by the Church against indiscriminate dissemination of vernac-
ular printed books are brought forth. After the invention of
printing and the subsequent large circulation of printed books,
the harm done by pernicious works increased in a manner
hitherto unknown. The Church was forced to take precaution-
ary measures by insisting on a preventive censorship of all
printed works. Bibles as well as other books. This was first done
thirty-four years after the invention of printing, in 1479. In
a Brief of March 18, 1479, Sixtus IV. granted the fullest powers
of censorship to the University of Cologne, and praised it for
having hitherto checked with much zeal the printing and sell-
ing of irreligious books.
But this cannot, by any possibility, be interpreted as a
prohibition of printing or reading the vernacular Bible for the
simple reason that no vernacular Bible had been printed yet in
the Low German dialect spoken by the people of Cologne;
the seven editions of the Bible in High German printed from
1466 till 1479 were as unintelligible to them as the Latin Bible.
Moreover, immediately after this supposed prohibition two
editions of the Bible in Low German were published, in 1479
and 1480, at Cologne, by the printer of the University, Henry
Quentel. Obviously the University did not ask for powers of
censorship to suppress German Bibles. Those powers, in fact,
*Scliaff, BUtorg of the ChrUtUui Church, Tol. t., p. 722.
1920.] THE ''OPEN BIBLE'' 611
were applied for and granted to check the cu'culation of Latin
pernicious pamphlets, as modem researches have revealed.
Preventive censorship laws were enacted for the diocese
of Wiirzbm-g (1482), Mayence (1485), Cologne (1487), Trier
and Magdeburg (1501), and the Republic of Venice (1491).
Finally, on May 3, 1515, the first Papal censorial decree
was given for the entire Church and universally accepted,
whereby all writings without exception were subjected to cen-
sorship. These laws dealt with the printing and selling of
Bibles, and did not prohibit reading the Bible. A licensed
Bible is not a prohibited Bible. Moreover, these laws do not
aim primarily at restricting the circulation of vernacular Bi-
bles, but only secondarily; they prohibit printing heretical and
incorrectly translated theological and irreligious books in
general. As for the reading of the Bible, the Universal Church
never prohibited the reading of the Scriptures.
It is a misstatement to say that Latin Bibles were printed
exclusively for those poor ecclesiastics who could not afford
to buy a handwritten copy. Poor ecclesiastics were all well
provided with extracts from the Bible in the form of breviaries
and, in case they needed a complete Bible, they could easily
borrow one from their church library. This had been a stand-
ing practice before the invention of printing and was con-
tinued long after the press had turned out thousands of printed
Bibles. True, many printed Bibles were purchased by clergy-
men. Yet the greatest bulk was secured by educated lay people
of both sexes. Protestant historians paint the minor ecclesias-
tics in the blackest colors as a set of lazy and ignorant people.
This is more than an exaggeration. Yet every candid historian
will admit that many of these clergymen did not invest their
rather slim income in printed Bibles. And the rich ecclesiastics
of higher rank and the monks of the larger monasteries, were
so wedded to their handwritten Bibles that they looked dis-
dainfully upon the productions of the press. Hence the Latin
Bibles were the Scriptures for the educated laity. These Latin
Bibles circulated freely among laymen, and no Catholic has
ever yet been prohibited from reading the Scriptures in Latin.
It is evident, therefore, to prohibit the reading of vernacu-
lar Bibles would have been merely to withhold the Scriptures
from a small minority of half-educated lay people^ a class
least prepared to derive the greatest benefit from the pious
612 THE "OPEN BIBLE" [Feb.,
reading of the Bible. Nothing is more subversive of faith
than shallow enlightenment and a smattering of knowledge.
Shallow draughts of knowledge intoxicate the brain. Hence
indiscriminate reading of the Bible by half-educated people
has been quite often not for their best interests. The Church
had witnessed in her long career many lay people perverting
the sacred text to defend their errors. She had to safeguard
the truth against men who wantonly misinterpreted the Bible
in order to support a variety of heretical doctrines. Quite
naturally she warned her children against erroneous inter-
pretations and abuses of the Scriptures. There were prelates
and theologians who did not favor the movement to place
the vernacular Bible in the hands of half-educated people,
too ignorant to read the Scriptures in Latin. In 1530, the ma-
jority of Catholic bishops and priests in England declared
that it was not necessary to have the Scriptures in the English
tongue, and in the hands of the common people, and that,
considering the unsettled state of things at home, the circu-
lation of an English Bible among the people would rather tend
to confusion than to edification. And those EngUsh prelates
and priests could have found the best justification for their
attitude in the development of the Reformation in Germany.
Bibles in the vernacular were circulating in Germany
without opposition from the Church in pre-Reformation times.
As soon as the translation was found to be correct, it could
be printed and spread without hindrance. But this German
Bible was grossly abused sometimes by half-educated people.
Some of them found in their Bibles the revolutionary doc-
trines which Luther later, in 1520, set forth in his virulent
pamphlets on the Reformation of the Christian State, Baby-
lonish Captivity and Christian Liberty. Clear-sighted theo-
logians like Geiler were wide awake to the dangers threatening
the faith and warned the people against the seductive teachings
of self -constituted lay expounders of Scripture. Yet there was
not a single theologian in Germany who would have advo-
cated the complete suppression of the vernacular Bible.
Protestant historians completely overlook this revolutionary
tendency of the great class of readers of the vernacular Bible
in Germany on the eve of the Reformation, when they blame
the Church for introducing preventive censorship. In 1479,
this measure was first resorted to in order to check the cir-
1920.] THE ''OPEN BIBLE'' 613
cuIatioD of certain Latin pamphlets which advocated the
spoliation of the **rich" Church. It was a contest between the
clergy and the burghers. Six years later the Archbishop of
Mayence introduced censorship in his diocese to check "books
about the rights of the clergy and the deepest problems of
faith which had been translated from the Latin." And yet
this mandate of 1486 is, in the eyes of Protestant historians, a
prohibition of printing the vernacular Bible. It was aimed
not at the Bible, but at pamphlets that used the Bible to prove
their destructive errors. The Catholic Church never made any
restriction as to reading the Bible in the vernacular, before
the flagrant abuses of the Bible by the Reformers and their
disciples called for pertinent regulations. The first restrictive
law in this matter was passed as late as the year 1564, when
the Council of Trent had closed its session. But even this
restriction was not an absolute prohibition, since everyone
was permitted to read Bibles translated into the vulgar
tongues by Catholic authors, as soon as he had received a
special permission from the bishops to do so. This disciplin-
ary regulation, therefore, was no prohibition, but a necessary
supervision.
However, the annals of history do show one unqualified
prohibition forbidding lay people to read the Bible in the
vernacular. This prohibition was not made by the Catholic
Church, but by Protestant England. On July 11, 1533, Henry
VIII. was excommunicated. Three years later, August, 1536,
Cromwell, the King's vicar-general, ordered English Bibles to
be provided in the churches for anyone to read, an injunction
re-issued on September 5, 1538. But it was not long before
Protestant England experienced the sad consequences of such
indiscriminate Bible reading. As early as April 12, 1540, Crom-
well stated in Parliament: "'When the King had granted that
the Bible might be read in the vernacular, the privilege was
wretchedly abused, some turning it to the support of heresies
and some of superstitions. The King was determined to pre-
vent abuses and punish irreverent treatment of the Bible.
For these objects he had selected certain bishops and doctors
who should set forth what Christian people have to know.'**
The mediaeval Church had witnessed the same abuses of
Bible reading time and again, and had employed the same
■ Gairdner, English Church in ihe Sixteenth Centurg, p. 215 et $eq.
614 THE ''OPEN BIBLE" [Feb^
means for checking them. 'Experience has made it mani-
fest," wrote the committee of Catholic theologians which is-
sued the first restrictive law in 1564. *Hhat the permission to
read the Bible indiscriminately in the vulgar tongues has from
rashness of men done more harm than good.** Nevertheless,
the Catholic Church did not forbid the reading of vernacular
Scriptures. She left this questionable honor to Protestant
England. In 1543, Parliament passed an ""Act for the Advance-
ment of True Religion," which sets forth that •'many seditious
people, arrogant and ignorant persons have taken upon them,
not only to preach, teach, and set forth the Scriptures by ser-
mons, but also by printed books, whereupon diversity of opin-
ions, tumults and schisms have sprung and arisen among the
subjects; that a great multitude of subjects, most especially
of the lower sort, have so abused the Bible in the English
tongue that they have thereby grown in divers erroneous
opinions and fallen into great division and dissension among
themselves." These official statements are the best vindica-
tion of the attitude of the Catholic clergy, in 1530, as to the
translation of the Bible into English. The gloomy forebodings
of the heads of the Catholic Church in 1530 that ''at this junc-
ture the English Bible would rather tend to confusion than to
edification" had come true in 1543.
The repressive measures taken by Parliament to remedy
said abuses went beyond the wise regulations made by the
Church in that matter. They were nothing short of an absolute
prohibition to read the vernacular Bible for certain classes of
lay people. Parliament enacted in 1543 that "from and after
the first day of July next no women, nor artificers, prentices,
journeymen, serving-men of the degrees of yeomen or under
husbandmen, nor laborers shall read within this realm, or in
any other of the King's dominions, the Bible or New Tes-
tament in English to himself or to any other privately or
openly upon pain of one month's imprisonment for every time
offending contrary to this act. Persons other than women,
artificers, prentices, journeymen, serving-men of the degrees
of yeomen or under husbandmen, and laborers may read to
themselves and not to none other any text of the Bible and
New Testament. Likewise every noblewoman and gentle-
woman may read to themselves alone and not to others any
text of the Bible or New Testament. Again every nobleman
1920.] THE ''OPEN BIBLE" 615
and gentleman being a householder may read or cause to be
read by any of his servants in his house and to his family quietly
and without disturbance any text of the Bible or New Testa-
ment. Yet every merchantman, being a householder was al-
lowed to read to himself privately the Bible and New Testa-
ment. But no person was permitted to read, preach or teach
openly to others the Bible or any part of Scripture in English.**
The annals of the Catholic Church know of no restrictions of
this kind throughout the nineteen centuries of her existence.
These minute injunctions surely do not bear out the Protestant
contention that the Reformation gave an ''open** Bible to the
laity.
Even less ''open** was the English Bible in Virginia in the
seventeenth century. Sir William Berkeley, Governor of Vir-
ginia for thirty-eight years (1642-1680), wrote to the Lords
Commissioners of Foreign Plantations in one of his dispatches :
"I thank Grod, we have not free schools nor printing, and I hope
we shall not have these hundred years. For learning has
brought disobedience and heresy and sects into the world, and
printing has divulged them and libels against the Grovern-
ment. God keep us from both.*** No Catholic ever penned
such a sweeping indictment against education and printing.
Printing and publishing of the English Bible has always
been a prerogative of the Crown which granted exclusive privi-
leges or patent rights to certain parties for the purpose. But
those monopolists, or King*s printers, raised the price of Eng-
lish Bibles sometimes to exorbitant sums, and devised all ways
and used all means to quash competition from Dutch printers.
Because of them the English Bible was not allowed to be
printed in the American Colonies, so that, from 1639 till 1782,
only four editions of the Bible were issued in North America,
one in an Indian dialect and three in German. The printers
of Catholic Bibles were not hampered by such commercial
monopolies. Before May 3, 1515, every printer could publish
any amount of Bibles at any place, outside five German dio-
ceses and the Republic of Venice, unhampered by any laws
of censorship or patent rights. Since May 3, 1515, the editions
of Bibles are subjected to censorship. As soon as the censor
has finished examination, he is to give approbation free of
charge and without delay, and this under pain of excommuni-
'Henlng*! Statutes at Large of Virginia^ yol. xtI., p. 2, par. 517.
616 THE ''OPEN BIBLE' [Feb^
cation.^ A printer who has once obtained the necessary ap-
probation is in no wise restricted; he may publish as many
Bibles as he sees fit. But it was otherwise with the printers
of English Protestant Bibles. They were bound to print the
Authorized Version in the same way as the Catholic printers
the Approved Version, and needed, moreover, a special license
from the Crown. Since these patent rights are granted to but
few printers, it is evident that the Catholic vernacular Bibles
are a much more **free" book than the English Bible.
The American Revolution made the English Bible a '^free**
book on this side of the Atlantic. As soon as independence was
secured, Robert Aitken printed the first English Bible on this
soil at Philadelphia in 1782, a great folio Bible. To the Catho-
lics, however, belongs the honor of having published eight
years later the first quarto Bible in English in this country,
printed by Mathew Carey at Philadelphia in 1790.
Our inquiry reveals the fact that the Bible was an "open**
book in pre-Reformation times, and in many ways more **free*'
in Catholic countries than in Protestant England. '^Whether
the Catholics in the Middle Ages could read or not,** writes
Father Graham,' "I do not hesitate to assert that, with few
exceptions, they had a personal and intelligent knowledge and
a vivid realization of the most necessary facts in the Sacred
Scripture and in the life of Our Divine Lord to an extent which
is simply not to be found among the millions of our nominal
Christians in this country today.** It simply is not true that
the Reformation first gave an "open** Bible to the "Scripture
thirsty** lay people.
V Bull of Leo X., Hay 3, 1515. * Where We Got the BibU, p. t8.
THE CHESTERBELLOC.
BY THEODORE MAYNARD.
IV.
The Personauties*
MIGHT be inclined to exaggerate if in order to
counteract the prevailing opinion of Chesterton
and Belloc, I went out of my way to show how
different they are from each other; but even
if I did my worst and wildest in an attempt to
accentuate the differences between the two men, I would be
certain to be nearer the truth than are those who imagine unity
of philosophy to imply identity of character. That strange ani-
mal, the Chesterbelloc, has a duality of personality as marked
as that in Stevenson's description of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. I
do not mean, of course, that Belloc displays a brutality opposed
to Chesterton's angelic benevolence. There is no antagonism;
the conflict is not between light and darkness; but there is a
contrast as unmistakeable as that of red and blue — ^which are
complementary colors. I could write at length, as they do
in the dull though clever psychological novels, to emphasize
the fact that Gilbert Chesterton is dreamy, indolent, mystical,
unfathomably simple, where Hilaire Belloc is wide-awake,
active, practical, rationalistic and not a little sophisticated. It
would be possible, if I wanted such sport, to run the matter to
earth and find the secret of Belloc in his French blood and of
Chesterton in his English temperament. A hundred personal
details could be worked in — on the one hand Belloc's actuality,
his love of the concrete, for ^11 1 know his preference of mar-
malade to jam, and on the other hand Chesterton's fantas-
ticality, his extravagance, and his possible gluttonous passion
for jam. I would enjoy such a method of criticism and if I
do not propose following it in detail, the reason is that I can
make my point more briefly and quite as picturesquely by
saying that Chesterton differs from Belloc as completely as a
statue in Notre Dame differs from a statue in the Parthenon.
618 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Feb^
Phidias might not have accepted Belloc as a model for a Greek
god, and it is hardly polite to say that Chesterton would have
been a first rate gargoyle, but the special qualities of each are
as distinct as the special genius of romanticism and classicism.
In their attitude of mind, which I have tried to illustrate by
the rival statues, the one man has a sensationalism very for-
eign to the other. There is certainly something very great in
the serene symmetry of Milton, but Browning is not less of a
poet for being grotesque. Belloc admires Milton though he
is incapable of appreciating Browning. He is Latin; and
where he fails to see the fomi and regularity demanded by
the canons of antiquity, is inclined to reject as mere barbar-
ism the rugged violence he is unable to admire. The Elgin
marbles and the verse of Racine are enduring things, but they
do not sum up the whole of art. The North has to learn of the
South, from whence all its standards come, but it has a pow^
of expressing mystery and astonishment which the South has
never learned. The remedy is not a modification of each,
rounded by a sterile compromise, but the development of the
peculiar gifts of each along its own lines. The Grothic and the
classical do not coincide — they complete one another; and
the energy of their excesses may be controlled by encouraging
both.
Before we pass to a consideration of biographical facts
concerning the Chesterbelloc, it would be as well to observe
their personalities as reflected in their styles. There are some
writers who conceal themselves in their books; Chesterton
and Belloc belong to the other sort who reveal themselves. To
read them is to hear them speak, and those who know the men
will catch the tone of their voices and the sound of loud and
frequent laughter. So I take passages of poetry and prose,
which are, simply because of their excellence, not the best ex-
amples which might be given of the distinctive marks of style.
They are, however, characteristic enough, I think, to illustrate
my argument as to the classical method of Mr. Belloc and the
incurable romanticism of Mr. Chesterton.
First then, I have been in some doubt whether or no to
quote the fine dedicatory poem of The Man who was Thwrsday,
which reminds Mr. Edmund Clerihew Bentley of his revolt in
company with G. K. C. against the decadence of the eighteen-
nineties.
1920,] THE CHESTERBELLOC 619
Fools as we were in motley, all jangling and absurd,
When all church bells were silent our cap and bells were heard.
After some hesitation I have decided upon the lyric sung by
the impossible Irishman Dalroy as he draws up the army of
the English democracy, unstirred since Wat Tyler*s day, for
the final assault upon an alien tyranny, Mohammedism vic-
torious in England:
Lady, the light is dying in the skies,
Lady, and let us die when honor dies;
Your dear, dropped glove was like a gauntlet flung
When you and I were young.
For something more than splendor stood; and ease was not
the only good.
About the woods in Ivywood, when you and I were young.
Lady, the stars are falling pale and small.
Lady, we will not live if life be all.
Forgetting those good stars in heaven hung.
When all the world was young;
For more than gold was in a ring, and love was not a little
thing.
Between the trees in Ivywood, when all the world was young.
Compare with this lyric, Mr. Belloc's magnificent sonnet, which
appeared, like so much of his verse, embedded in an essay.
He had written of a priest who once preached a sermon on
the text "Abba Father," and whose eyes were illuminated by
the vision of something distant; of rest as soldiers know it
or writers when they end their books; of the tides of salt water
and of death, the final rest. Then he concludes with this mov-
ing and magnificent sonnet:
We will not whisper: we have found the place
Of silence and the ancient halls of sleep
And that which breathes alone throughout the deep
The end and the beginning; and the face
Between the level brows of whose blind eyes
Lie plenary contentment, full surcease
Of violence, and the ultimate great peace
Wherein we lose our human lullabies.
620 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Feb^
Look up and tell the immeasurable height
Between the vault of the world and your dear head;
That's Death» my little sister, and the Night
That was our Mother beckons us to bed:
Where large oblivion in her house is laid
For us tired children now our games are played.
I daresay that better examples of prose could be found in
books abounding in splendid passages than the two I have
chosen almost at random — ^but they will suffice for my purpose.
The first is from that early collection of Mr. Chesterton's essays
entitled The Defendant, where he found more exciting adven-
tures in defending good traditions and even good conventions
than the bohemians find in their attack upon them. In this de-
fence of rash vows he declares the rashest of all vows to be that
made in marriage whose very rashness is its strength:
There are thrilling moments, doubtless, for the spectator,
the amateur and the aesthete; but there is one thrill that is
known only to the soldier who fights for his own flag, to the
ascetic who starves himself for his own illumination, to the
lover who makes finally his own choice. And it is this trans-
figuring self-discipline that makes the vow a truly sane
thing. . . . All around us is the city of small sins, abound-
ing in backways and retreats; but surely, sooner or later,
the towering flame will rise from the harbor announcing
that the reign of the cowards is over and a man is burning
his ships.
Mr. Belloc's style has at its best, as in this quotation from
his Life of Danton, a slow, solemn, processional effect. In the
same book he marshals the long line of the French kings to
ride in cavalcade in ghostly glory. The prose takes on the
ring and rhythm of poetry as the pageant of history moves
in stately pomp across the printed page. Macaulay had a
panoramic trick he often used; so also had de Quincey; but
no other man has possessed Hilaire Belloc's power in this sort
of writing.
But with the false step that produced civil war, that made
of the ardent and liberal West a sudden opponent, that in
its final effect raised Lyons and alienated half the southern
1920.] THE CHESTERBELLOC 621
towns, that lost Toulon, that put the extreme of fanaticism
in the wisest and most loyal minds — such a generous and easy
war was doomed, and the Revolution was destined to a more
tragic and to a nobler history. God, who permitted this proud
folly to proceed from a pedantic aristocracy, foresaw things
necessary to mankind. In the despair of the philosophers
there will arise on either side of a great battle the en-
thusiasms which, from whenceever they blow, are the fresh
winds of the soul. Here are coming the heroes and the epic
songs for which humanity was sick, and the scenes of one
generation of men shall give us in Europe our creeds for
centuries. You shall hear the Chant du Dipart like a great
hymn in the army of the Sambre et Meuse, and the cheers
of men going down on the Vengeur; the voice of a young
man calling the grenadiers at Lodi and Areola; the noise
of the guard swinging up the frozen hill at Austerlitz. Al-
ready the forests below the Pyrenees are full of the Spanish
guerillas, and after how many hundred years the love of the
tribe has reappeared again above the conventions that cov-
ered it. There are the three colors standing against the trees
in the North and the South; and the delicate womanly face
of Nelson is looking over the bulwarks of the Victory, with
the slow white clouds and the light wind of an October day
above him, and before him the enemy's sails in the sunlight
and the black rocks of the coast.
Such a mastery over verse, such a command of noble prose
has naturally given the Chesterbelloc an immense literary
reputation. In order to comprehend the magnitude of its
power, we must remember how varied its books have been,
in what widely separated fields its campaigns were fought and
its laurels won. Gilbert Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc have
between them covered practically the whole scope of literary
activity. Indeed I think that if we except drama (which Belloc
for some odd reason has omitted to touch) it will be found
that each of them has excelled in half a dozen completely
different forms of writing. They have suffered as such men
must from their generous refusal to become specialists, just
as Robert Louis Stevenson suffered by his wide interests and
the variety of his work. The world, which is a dull dog, can-
not understand the genius of a man who is great enough to be
at once poet, novelist, biographer, critic, historian, essayist,
theologian, philosopher, and pamphleteer. That Belloc can.
622 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Feb^
according to Mr. Thomas Seccombe, write a sonnet while
waiting for his companion to finish his drink is a reason — a
very bad reason — ^for believing that the sonnet must be very
bad. It undoubtedly is true, however, that talent of this order
is likely to dissipate itself; for while a constriction of effort
brings less enjoyment it is likely also to achieve a more lasting
success.
The Chesterbelloc has chosen rather to enjoy itself, to
fight, to drink, to laugh and be happy, careless of that future
fame which is the preoccupation of small minds. Mrs. Ches-
terton once told me a story of how her husband spent an hour
with a publisher outlining the scheme of a book he proposed
to write, and was asked what sum of money he thought he
ought to receive for his labors. "Oh, I don't know,'* he replied,
"about twopence I suppose." He is utterly regardless either
of cash or credit. Full of fine writing as his books are, few of
them, I think, will live long, though they have frequently
double the merit of work which has double their chance of
longevity. This is because they are crammed with allusions to
the most ephemeral modem philosophies; many a joke good
when made, will be unintelligible in twenty years time, simply
because the occasion which called it forth will be forgotten
long before then. To give an example that occurs to me. Is
any one of the coming generation likely to recognize the name
of Mr. McCabe? Yet G. K. C. devotes whole pages to that gen-
tleman. And precisely who is Mr. Salt? G. K. C. went cru-
sading against him two years ago and oblivion has already
washed his memory away.
Admirers of the Chesterbelloc will agree with its detrac-
tors on the point of certain irritating tricks only too conmionly
employed by it. There is about Belloc frequently a madden-
ing habit of reiteration, an expansive elaboration of simple
points, which has grown upon him lately and which has been
very much in evidence in his articles written upon the War.
He can be painfully dull; and if Belloc's work at such mo-
ments is full of a peculiar logical monotony, Chesterton is apt
to weary the reader with tricks of another kind. Antithesis
becomes mechanical and paradox after paradox clicks out with
the regularity of clockwork. A great deal of this is due, no
doubt, to the fact that a harassed journalist writing with the
printer's devil at his elbow, finds it easier to get through his
1920.] THE CHESTERBELLOC 623
work quickly if he imitates himself. But the deeper reason
is that which he himself gives in excuse for a similar fault in
Browning: ^*In many of the comic scenes of Shakespeare we
have precisely this elephantine ingenuity, this hunting of a
poem to death through three pages. In the Elizabethan dram-4
atists and in Browning it is no doubt to a certain extent the
mark of a real hilarity. People must be very happy to be so
easily amused."
G. K. C. is amused easily, and has the ability of a child to
amuse himself. He may occasionally tire us with paradox
because he is tired himself and acts, as tired men do, by habit.
More frequently, I imagine, we are tired because he isn't tired,
and his high spirits are as distressing to us only for the same
reason that a rowdy boy is distressing to his sick mother.
If Belloc's chief fault as a writer is a provoking pomposity
and Chesterton's chief fault a provoking playfulness, these
are, when one comes to think of it, the signs of middle-age
and of youth. Indeed they are the signs of that innocence and
experience, which I picked up in groping round for a key to
the Chesterbelloc, and which has fitted the lock better than I
had dared to hope. Nowhere does it fit better than into the
spiritual history of the two friends.
Going back to where we began with the early volume of
G. K. C.*s poems we will see a very young man, hardly more
than a boy fresh from an English public school (where ex-
travagant devotions are, to put it mildly, not encouraged) on
his knees in wonder before a blade of grass. The sense of
stark astonishment had taken the juvenile atheist so strongly,
the indifference of men to the world they lived in, appeared so
horribly unnatural that he seemed ready to starve and scourge
himself to call attention to what others ignored.
I stood and spoke a blasphemy —
"Behold! the summer leaves are green!'
Gilbert Chesterton did not see then why his attitude of ex-
travagant humility was right, but he passionately proclaimed
that it was the right attitude. His pagan joy was compelling
him to a Christian asceticism. For he had already discovered
the doctrine which was and which remains the centre of his
philosophy, that the fullest possible enjoyment is to be found
624 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Feb.,
not by extending our ego to infinity but by reducing our e^
to zero. He found later, to his intense surprise, that Chris-
tianity had discovered this doctrine before him — and that the
only people who ever inherited the earth have been the meek !
He had discovered why one should be humble.
In the same way he felt the need for ownership in his
bones years before he saw its necessity in economics. As a
child he deUghted in drawing pictures of a man surrounded
by as many personal belongings as could be crowded upon
the drawing paper. His favorite book was Robinson Crusoe,
because the shipwrecked sailor saved his goods and enjoyed
them on a desert island. But like all the sensitive and honor-
able young men of his day he, who had not an atom of tem-
peramental desire for public ownership, recited the solemn
formula about the socialization of all the means of produc-
tion, distribution and exchange — simply because he was hor-
rified by the poverty of the slums and saw at the time no other
means of removing it except collectivism. Then (this is how
Mr. Chesterton has described to me what happened) he found
that the innocent fairy tale he had made up about an im-
possibly beautiful person called a peasant-proprietor was con-
firmed by the facts of experience. Chesterton had imagined
such a being and wished that he existed. Belloc, whom he
met at that moment, was able to assure him that the peasant-
proprietor did exist in thousands!
Again, G. K. C, in his fantasia. The Napoleon of Notting
Hill, invented for himself a patriot whose patriotism only ex-
tended to the fourth lamp post of the next street, and who
for that tiny country was ready to die. Suddenly the expe-
rience of the Boer War confirmed Chesterton's innocence. A
Semitic sneer taught him what imperialism thought of a small
republic, and he joined the stafif of the Speaker with Hilaire
Belloc, to expose the shame which was being brought upon
his people.
To take a fourth instance. Gilbert Chesterton had imag-
ined the rod of authority descending with noise like thunder
into the hand of an ordinary man. Adam Wayne, the king
in The Napoleon of Notting Hill, was representative simply be-
cause he became king by chance, in the way that a demo-
cratic House of Commons might be got together by taking
the first six hundred and seventy men one met walking up
1920.] THE CHESTERBELLOC 625
Charing Cross Road. G. K. C. had even dared to think of this
careless democracy as existing in the highest spiritual tri-
bunal — and then he discovered that the Papacy was founded
not only upon a rock but upon Peter :
When Christ at a symbolical moment was establishing His
Great Society, He chose for His corner-stone neither the bril-
liant Paul nor the mystic John, but a shuflQer, a coward, a
snob — in a word, a man. And upon this rock He has built
His Church, and the gates of Hell have not prevailed against
it. All the empires and kingdoms have failed, because of
this inherent and continual weakness, that they were found-
ed by strong men and upon strong men. But this one thing,
the historic Christian Church, was founded on a weak man,
and for that reason it is indestructible. For no chain is
stronger than its weakest link.^
The mention of Peter brings me to a point where I must
ask a question which many people are asking about Gilbert
Chesterton. How is it that, holding the briefs he does, he has
not become a member of the Catholic Church? Hilaire Belloc
everyone, of course, knows about. He is vehement in his re-
ligion and public in his profession of it. But Gilbert Chesterton
is a mystery. I am constantly meeting people who believe him
to be a Catholic (I use the word of course in its true sense of
Roman Catholic), having gathered that much from his writ-
ings, and who are greatly surprised to be told that he is still
a member of the Church of England. There are men, of whom
Mr. W. H. Mallock is an illustrious example, who admit the
logic of the Catholic position, and who even urge it against
all other philosophies, while remaining outside the Catholic
Church. This assent is purely intellectual, lacking the super-
natural element of faith. With Gilbert Chesterton it is other-
wise. He does not merely state the Roman doctrine of author-
ity with the impartiality of Mr. Mallock. He writes about it
casually and appears to take it for granted as a practical ne-^
cessity. What is more striking, he possesses that thing so diffi-
cult for the highest Anglicans to catch, the authentic Catholic
note. He moves in the Catholic atmosphere. Why does he
not submit to Rome?
I do not like to discuss the subject and only do so because
* George Bernard Shaw.
VOL. OL 40
626 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Feb^
I cannot ignore it My opinion is that Gilbert Chesterton has
not acted upon his conclusions, because of his dislike of crises.
There are probably a few subtle and strong reasons for him
to stay where he is, but these would not, I think, hold him
unless there were also certain roots of sentiment which could
only be dragged up with pain. In Orthodoxy he promised to
write another book on Christian authority as soon as anyone
challenged him to do so. Many people have thrown out the
necessary challenge, but Chesterton has shown a ciurious re-
luctance to answer it. His sincerity is unquestionable and if
he has been silent on one highly important point, the reason
must be that he does not wish to declare himself before he is
completely certain. The hero of so many fierce controversies is
entitled to this much spiritual quiet untouched with the dust
and din of debate. The end is inevitable. It will probably be
postponed as long as possible, but there is only one end. Has
he not assured us, in the monograph on Blake, that every man,
if he could live a thousand years, must become either a com-
plete Catholic or a bottomless skeptic?
Such brief biographical facts as I must record are these:
Gilbert Keith Chesterton was bom in Kensington oh May 29,
1874. His father was an estate-agent, whose interests were
artistic rather than commercial, and his mother has been de-
scribed as the cleverest woman in London. Both are alive.
G. K. C. went, as did his brother Cecil, to St. Paul's School,
Colet's famous foundation, and left it to study art at the Slade
School. There he met the lady who later became his wife.
Chesterton, though he possesses considerable talents for black
and white drawing and has illustrated several books with
sketches of a striking originality, was not perfectly fitted for
an artistic career; so, after a short period as a reader in a
publisher's office, he definitely became a journalist. From the
Speaker, where in company with Belloc, he had brilliantly
attacked the Boer War, and where many of his early essays
and poems appeared, Gilbert Chesterton passed to the staff
of the Daily News. The sole bond between him and the group
of radical Nonconformists who owned the paper was anti-
imperialism, and in the last years of G. K. C.'s connection with
their paper his position upon it was, to say the least, anom-
alous. Yet week after week he wrote upon such subjects as
came into his head — and varied as were these subjects they
1920.] THE CHESTERBELLOC 627
nearly always were such as would shock the conscience of most
of their readers. There is a story told of how Mr. Cadbury,
the chief proprietor of the Daily News, expressed a wish to
meet G. K. C. "Ah, Mr. Chesterton !" he said, kindly beaming
upon him, "I have often wondered where you wrote your little
articles and what your inspiration is." "Well," was the reply,
"I generally write my little articles in a pub and my inspira-
tion is beer. If that doesn't work I try more beer !" The Daily
News showed towards its great contributor a more than Chris-
tian patience, but in the end the long connection was broken,
and G. K. C. felt himself a free man. Though shortly after-
wards The New Witness provided a personally controlled plat-
form for the Chesterbelloc, I think that Chesterton was never
more truly himself than in the old days when he publicly bias-*
phemed the god of LitUe Bethel in LitUe Bethel itself. Though
G. K. C. no longer walks Fleet Street where his height and
breadth of body, his great black ulster and wide hat were as
well known as the might of his pen; though Beaconsfield con-
tains him as the cave contains the anchorite; though even his
editorship of The New Witness rarely brings him to town, his
spirit lives in that old haunt where it was most at home. He
is an incurable journalist.
Hilaire Belloc was- bom on July 27, 1870, in his
grandmother's house in Versailles. This lady was a daughter
of Colonel Swanton, an Irishman who held a commission in
Napoleon's armies, and wife of Hilaire Belloc, the painter
whose work is now in the Louvre. On his mother's side, the
Hilaire Belloc we know was descended from Dr. Priestly, the
famous chemist In 1880, Hilaire Belloc was sent to the Ora-
tory School at Birmingham, where he was under the eye of
Cardinal Newman; and, leaving in 1887, studied mathematics
for a few months in Paris. Later, he went on to a Sussex farm
for a year; did some writing in London and in his twentieth
year traveled to Colorado and California. Upon his return the
French Army claimed him, and Hilaire Belloc served his time
with the English Regiment of the French Artillery in garrison
in Toul. These experiences furnished him with the matter for
several fine essays, and a speech with which he held the House
of Conunons spellbound.
Leaving the French Army, Belloc went to Balliol College,
Oxford, where he took the senior Historical Scholarship and a
628 THE CHESTERBELLOC [Feb,,
first class in Honor History Schools in the summer of 1895,
after being president of the Union. The next year he married
a Califomian lady, but stayed on at Oxford for the fellowship
which he naturally expected. No man with such a record
was ever denied a fellowship, but though Belloc stayed on for
four years, growing poorer and poorer, not even a tutorial post
was offered him. At the age of thirty he found himself with
a young family, with no profession, with no fortune of his own,
and unable to make a living at Oxford. The consciousness
that his religion was the cause of the injustice of the treatment
he received, made his sense of that injustice the more bitter;
and despair and stark necessity drove him to London to live as
best he might by writing. None of his books, though he had
already written Danton and The Path to Rome, had a popular
sale, nor could he obtain anything better than a subordinate
place upon the Speaker at £150 a year. London was too ex-
pensive, so he tried, in 1905, the experiment of a farm house
in Sussex.
Mr. Belloc was elected to Parliament as a member for South
Salf ord in 1906, having previously been refused as a candidate
on account of his religion by five constituencies to which he had
been proposed, including Dover and Croydon. The election
was quite accidental, the understanding being that his candi-
dature should not involve any chance of election. Once in
Parliament Belloc proposed certain reforms, the most notable
of which was the auditing of the Secret Party Funds, the cor-
ruption of which he exposed. He was, therefore, abandoned
by the official machine, which had supported his first election,
but stood without the intention of continuing in Parliament,
having found his membership of no service to the political
ideas he had at heart. He intended to resign at the first elec-
tion; hearing, however, that certain wealthy subscribers to
the Secret Party Funds had challenged his reelection, he was
at the pains of standing again for the same constituency of
South Salford in which he had created a large body of inde-
pendent opinion and was reelected, though by a reduced ma-*
jority, in the election of 1910. This second election had been
undertaken only as a challenge and without the intention of
taking further part in Parliamentary action, which he had dis-
covered to be futile. He refused to stand a third time, though
strongly pressed to do so within the constituency and else-*
1920.] THE CHESTERBELLOC 629
where. In his last speech in the House he told that assembly
that he proposed to attack them from without, as he found
reform of their corruption from within to be impossible.
Hence the founding of the Eye Witness, which became and
remains under the name of The New Witness, the organ of
the Chesterbelloc.
To see Belloc is to be aware of his enormous energy; to
read his load of books is to be astounded at the many-sided
activity that has made them possible. What gives them their
value is something greater than the literary or scholarly quali-
ties of which they are full — that is their actuality, for Hilaire
Belloc has, above all things, an appetite for reality. In his
practicality, his logic and his irony he is thoroughly French.
Yet with gifts greater, I sincerely believe, than those of any
other living man, Belloc has, despite his vivid sense of actual-
ity, a touch of the pedant in him and, at times, an unfortunate
preference of tactics to strategy.
When the worst has been said, there is a greatness about
the Chesterbelloc which is not easily paralleled in our day.
Indeed that is to put it inadequately, for that body of doctrine
to which the Chestertons and Belloc have given life is the hope
of the modem world. Amid lesser men these have swung their
swords like heroes, and their trumpets have summoned what
is no less than a complete Catholicism in action throughout all
the spiritual and secular affairs of society. This is ^she that
Cometh forth as the morning rising, fair as the moon, bright as
the sun, terrible as an army set in array.'* I cannot venture
to speak of my personal gratitude to the Chesterbelloc for so
great a thing.
AN IRISH PILGRIMAGE.
BY E. J. OUIGLBV.
iHE best known of all pilgrimages was Canterbury,
sung in immortal language by Chaucer. Since
his day millions have read of the pious Canter-
bury pilgrims of old Catholic England. Today,
millions in England never heard of the holy spot,
ot Its niurlyr saint, of its historic pilgrimage; for the pilgrim-
age died in Lutheran times, and its resurrected form is pale
and* weak and ghostly. In the sister island, in Ireland, is a world-
famous pilgrimage, dating from the days of St. Patrick, a
pilgrimage often prohibited by state law, a pilgrimage whose
holy places were laid desolate by the state spoiler, but never
deserted, never abandoned by the people of Ireland. The fame
of St. Patrick's Purgatory in Donegal spread through mediieval
Europe, and the visits of great numbers of foreign pilgrims
are recorded. But more interesting than the visitors and their
pious records of fasts, prayers and visions are the many refer-
ences in European literature to the holy isle and its wondrous
cave in lone Lough Derg in County Donegal. To that lonely
island went, legend tells us, St. Patrick, to spend Lent in pen-
ance and solitude. To it, in after days, went the missionary
saints of Ireland; and from them the peoples of Europe first
heard of the wonderful cave on the little island, where peni-
tents entered to finish their penitential exercises, and where
many saw weird sights of suffering souls, in purgatory and in
hell. From nearly every nation in Europe came pilgrims.
With footsteps strong and bosom brave.
Looking for that mysterious Cave
Where the pitying heavens still show
How my salvation I may gain
By bearing in this life the purgatorial pain.'
From England came Alfred the Great, back to the land of
his youthful studies. From Wales came the knight Owen
about the year 1153. The wonders seen by him in the cave
may be read in several contemporary writers. They are found
in the Chronicle of Roger of Wendover. From Italy came
■ Caldr«n'( Purvalorto dt Son PatrieUt. HcCMtbj^a Tniulmtliw.
1920.] AN IRISH PILGRIMAGE 631
Guarino da Durrazzo and Godalth (1248). The old French
version of their travels and visit to the holy isle, and their
visions, is preserved in the Royal Library of Turin. From
Flanders came Le Sire de Beaujean, in the year 1305. In the
cave he had a vision of the souls in hell, some of whom he
recognized. In 1353, George Crissaphan, a Hungarian knight,
visited the sainted isle; and his record of his twenty-eight
weird and wonderful visions is prolix. An account of four
of his visions was reprinted in 1871 in the Hungarian maga-
zine SzcLzadok. They are marvelous and detailed. In the
same century (1358) Louis de Sur visited St. Patrick's Purga-
tory. He wrote his account in barbarous Latin, and students
of things medis&val may read it in Codex 3160 in the Palatine
Library in Vienna. Two years later, among other noted
names, we find Fra Tadio of Pisa, Lector of the Ara Coeli in
Rome, visiting the Purgatory of St. Patrick. Another Roman,
a Carthusian, Giovanni by name, sought permission to visit
the famous spot; but permission being refused, the good man
must have been moved by a letter from St. Catherine of Siena
counseling him to submission and obedience.
But the most interesting pilgrim of mediaeval times was
Chiericati, the Papal nuncio, who visited the Purgatory in
1515. He tells us that he and his companions arrived at the
lake shore in the evening, and by blowing a horn and waving
a flag they got from the island the needed boat, which was
made from a huge beech trunk, hollowed in the centre. Each
of the passengers paid a penny to the ferryman. He describes
the acts which were recognized as **making the station'' or ful-
filling the pilgrimage; the fast, the night vigil in the church,
the long prayers said by the pilgrims bareheaded and bare-
footed round the hard rocky "beds." •'Behind the church,'*
writes the nuncio, "is the Piu^gatory. The door which is made
of iron is about three cubits from the ground. The Purgatory
is a grotto made in the rock, on the level of the ground. It
enters so far that twelve persons can stand at their ease in it.
It is two and a half cubits wide. It is true that at the back the
grotto turns aside for two cubits, where they say St. Patrick
slept." Chiericati tells us that he was afraid to enter; but he
watched the canons carrying torches to conduct the ingoing
penitents. Two of his companions, accompanied by five pil-
grims, spent a night in the cave. The names of all the pilgrims
632 AN IRISH PILGRIMAGE [Feb^
were recorded in a huge book. The nuncio examined it and
noticing the name Guarino da Durrazzo, concluded that it
must be a forgery or a joke. Later he saw this pilgrim's
^journey described in an ancient manuscript** and knew the
signatures to be genuine.
It is quite possible that there may have been exaggeration,
if not fabrication, about the wonderful visions in the famous
cave. We have nothing save the testimonies of scores of pil-
grims and writers for the existence of these wonders. But in
the very sober, though very unreliable, history of Ireland, by
Blessed Edmund Campion (1552-1588), the Martyr, we notice
a less credulous note than that found in the records of the
pilgrims quoted. Campion wrote, ^^Devout persons have re-
sorted thither for penance, and reported at their retiu'n strange
visions of peace, of pain and of bliss appearing to them.**
But the story of the pUgrimage, its penances and its Pur-
gatory, appear in all European literature, pre-Ref ormation and
even post-Reformation. Thus in No. 87 of the Early English
Text Society Series we find the Early South English Legendary^
giving a long account, by a thirteenth century writer, of the
famous isle of penance. Adown the centuries, in English lit-
erature there are references to St. Patrick's Purgatory. Even
Fox, the pseudo-martyrologist, gives it a passing sneer. In
old French stands the thirteenth century poem of Marie de
France, Expurgatorie St Patriz. Wonderful old Rabelais
(1483-1553) gives the Purgatory two commemorations in his
witty filth. A contemporary of his, Etienne Forcatel, in his
De Galliorum Imperio et Philosophia, weaves a romance which
introduces the holy shrine of Donegal. In the Escurial Library
in Spain, an old Catalan manuscript and a Latin one in the
national library of Madrid give the Spanish mediaeval ideas
of the pilgrimage. But in the works of Juan Perez de Montal-
van (1602-1638), who has been called **the first-bom of Lope
de Vega*s genius,** we find a learned priest-poet writing with
true sympathy, with a knowledge of things sacred, and with
poetic genius, the praises of St. Patrick*s isle of penance. This
work was famous and had a great influence on the many Span-
ish writings on this favorite theme. Today it is little read, for
the Vida y Purgatorio de S. Patricio of Montalvan was eclipsed
by the Purgatorio de St. Patricio of Calderon (1600-1681). It
is one of Calderon*s finest pieces, and is the incomparable work
1920.] AN IRISH PILGRIMAGE 633
on the theme. It was translated with care and genius by the
Irish poet, D. F. McCarthy.
That Dante owed some of his inspiration to the accounts
which he had read in Italy about the holy isle and holy cave in
Ireland, is admitted by Dante scholars. For, this theme was
sung by Uberti in his Dittamondo, before Dante had written
a line. Nor were these the sole Italian singers of the Purga-
tory. Ariosto in Orlando Furioso (1474-1553) wrote:
And next to Ireland shaped his course;
And saw the famed Hibernia, where
The godly sainted elder made the cave
In which men cleansed of all offences are;
Such mercy there, it seems, is found to save.
As I said before, state laws ordered the pilgrimage to
cease. The buildings on the holy island were leveled, its
churches defiled, its chalices stolen, its altars profaned and
destroyed; and yet in no year was the holy spot without its
pilgrims. Even when persecution was at its highest pitch.
Lough Derg was frequented by the pilgrims of Ireland, pray<«
ing to their patron and to their God.
Thirty years ago three thousand pilgrims visited the island
during the season from the first of June to the fifteenth of
August. In 1918 nearly twenty thousand made the exercises.
Daily, at the little railroad station of Pettigo, might be seen
crowds of pUgrims alighting from trains, to journey on foot
or on motor or on Irish jaunting car, the three miles of road
to the lake shore. What a medley they were ! And how they
will increase in the coming day of Ireland's freedom ! What a
great democracy is the Catholic Church ! For here were the la-
borer, the school teacher, the city doctor, the famous lawyer,
the farmer's wife and daughter, the carpenter, the priest, the
grandsire, the shop-assistant, the nurse, the high government
official, the postman, the baker, the judge of the high court
the friar, the smith, the city merchant — all children of the one
family, all earnest about the one thing necessary — salvation;
and salvation by prayer and penance.
'*No longer visions of the other world, no longer revela-
tions, but prayer and austerities under the patronage of the
nation's AposUe. This is all that is left of the practices of the
ancient pilgrimage." '
•Pte* Dtlahajr*, 8 J., BoUandUt, Anta§9ta BQilmu^tmnm, torn, iiitl.
FRENCH CATHOLIC SCHOLARS.
BY WILLIAM P. H. KITCHIN, PH.D.
I HERE is an unlovely form of intellectual snob-
bery which ignores or decries the work of Catho-
lics, and which assumes that the heterodox alone
hold the gates of knowledge and occupy the fort-
resses of accomplishmeDt. Far be it from us to
minimize our separated brethren's achievements. Jealous de-
preciation of others' gifts and graces is a loathsome vice, and
is bound in the long run to recoil on the detractor himself.
Moreover, several non-Catholic theologians, exegetists and his-
torians have accumulated materials that will ever be useful
to the Christian in his contest with unbelief. The writings
of Lightfoot, Westcott. Swete, Ramsay, Farrar and Creighton
contain admirable pages, that Catholics might cordially sub-
scribe to. But while we generously admit and admire the
beauties of our neighbors* estates, we should not be blind to
the magnificences of our own. The present article is confined
designedly to one language, French, and in that one language
alone we shall find that Catholic scholarship need not blush
for its upholders, their labors and results.
Today, as in earlier times, the chief assaults of unbelief
are concentrated on our blessed Lord's divinity. Prove that
Jesus was not God. and the foundations of Christianity are
sapped. Elevate Him as far as human imagination can reach;
make Him super-man and super-angel as well. All of no
avail; that transcendent being, who still falls immeasurably
short of infinity, is not the God I long to adore 1 and His
"Come to Me all ye who labor and are burdened," is only the
hollow dream of magnanimity, it is not the merciful revela-
tion of beneficent power. Such has been the efi'ort of rational-
istic exegesis during the past century, and such are its aims
today. Such is the deadly poison hidden under the specious
nectar of Renan's honeyed phrases.'
* Paul Claudel hai given another pnxif of the pllaDcr of hli muK to the itrlldDg
llnei In which he b»% pilloried theu learned hereafei In hit Chemta d* Croix:
U n'cit pa* 1> ChrlBt U n'eit P«i le Fill de I'Uomme. a n'eit pa« DIen.
Son iranslle est menteur et ion Ptre n'eit pas aiu deux.
C'est un fou, c'est un Imposteurl Qu'll parlcl Qali M talMl
La Talat d'Anna la loutBetle et Rcnan la balaa.
1920.] FRENCH CATHOLIC SCHOLARS 635
As an antidote we have Abb^ Fouard's Vie de Jisus, which
has reached in French twenty-four editions, and has been
translated into several other languages as well.' The liter-
ary flavor of this work is high, as evidenced by the curious
fact that after the Imitation of Christ it was the favorite book
of EmUe Faguet, and always lay on his writing table. But its
scholarship is none the less competent, accurate and wide.
Fouard is perfectly acquainted with all the literature bearing
on his subject; while his numerous sojourns in Palestine en-
abled him to give an actuality and color to his narrative that
mere book-learning would be incapable of furnishing. His
entire life was devoted to studies on the beginnings of Chris-
tianity, and he produced in addition to the above a life of St.
Peter, of St. Paul in two volumes and of St. John, published
posthumously.
Written about the same time, written too along similar
lines but more abundantly, is the Vie de Notre Seigneur of
Bishop Le Camus.' Le Camus is as good a scholar as Fouard,
but not nearly as good a writer. He has not the simple yet
dainty vocabulary, the artistic phrasing, nor that intangible
deftness which floods old scenes with new lights and frames
them in fresh perspectives. A work of more popular appeal,
but not nearly so learned, is Father Didon's Jdsus Christ.^
Didon was a remarkable preacher, a still more remarkable let-
ter writer — his letters to Mile. Th6r6se V are now in their
fifty-first edition — and in the life of Our Lord, too, one often
hears the intimate, personal note sounding. Abb^ Fillion*s
recent volume, JSsus Christ d'aprds les £vangiles, although the
work of a very great scholar, is written expressly for a popular
audience; and it has reached its public. In one year five
editions were called for.
A marvelous mine of information, which contains also
the answers to the latest objections and a r^sum^ of the most
recent publications on the subject, is the magnificent article,
JSsus Christ, in the second volume of the Dictionnaire Apolo-
gitique.^ It is from the pen of the Jesuit, Father L^once de
*A11 Abb^ Pouard's works are translated into English, and published by Long-
manst Green ft Co., New York. The English version of Ills Life of Christ has
reached eight editions.
'Three yolomes. TweWe editions in French. English version published by
Cathedral Library Association, New York.
* Forty editions in French. English version in two volumes. Kegan Paul,
Trench ft Co., London. *Coll. 1288-1538.
636 FRENCH CATHOLIC SCHOLARS [Feb.,
Grandmaison, the editor of Les Etudes, and is truly an honor
to Catholic competence and erudition. But more telling and
more authoritative, too, than any eulogy I might pronounce
is the praise of an avowed opponent and somewhat bitter
critic. In the Hibbert Journal for July, 1916, Professor J. F.
Bethune-Baker undertakes a detailed criticism of this article.
*There is much in it to admire,'* he writes. "Of the vast litera-
ture of the subject M. de Grandmaison seems to have an easy
control. ... He marshals the materials which his vigilant
and accomplished scholarship has collected with the skill of
an experienced general.'* The critic then proceeds to find
fault with the author because the latter does not admit the
modernist theories, bcause he believes in the historicity of the
Gospel narratives, because he clings to miracles and other
things no Catholic could dream of allowing slip. He con-
cludes: *Though I differ profoundly from M. de Grandmai-
son ... I cannot take leave of him in any but the most
respectful way." The painstaking and thorough studies of
Abbe Lepin, Jisus Messie et Fits de Dieu and Jisus Christ, Sa
Vie et Son CEuvre, also deserve mention.
Only second in interest to the Divine Founder of Chris-
tianity are the Gospels that tell His life, and the apostolic
writings that set forth His doctrine. German criticism, often
the docile handmaiden of German philosophy, has weighed
every sentence, examined and put on the rack every word of
these writings. It has striven to prove them mere pious leg-
ends, or chains of interpolations, or party pamphlets published
in the interests of God knows what obscure sects, or the residua
of furious personal controversies, or anything and everything
but what they are. The Gospels and the apostolic writings
may be called the Verdun of the Higher Critics, where these
shock troops of the pen were foiled. An admirable exposition
of Gospel problems and controversies in brief compass and
the simplest possible form is found in Monseigneur Batiffol's
Six legons sur les Evangiles.^ His view of the synoptic ques-
tion as set forth in his third lesson is, that Mark is the oldest
writer, Luke the most recent and Matthew comes between the
two; while a more ancient document *Hhe sayings of the
Lord" in Aramaic was the source on which the Evangelist
partly depended. Such a simple theory can scarcely explain
• ElereB edltioiu.
1920.] FRENCH CATHOLIC SCHOLARS 637
the curious coincidences and divergences of the Evangelists.
But then the brief character of this volume, and the fact that
it was originally a course of lectures given to the young ladies
attending the Institut Catholique of Paris, precluded the
author from indulging in very recondite developments.
The synoptic problem receives fuller consideration and
more elaborate treatment in the recent work of Abbe Levesque,
No8 Quatres Euangiles. He regards the Synoptics as the crys-
tallization of the first elementary oral instructions given by
the Apostles; that instruction being modified somewhat to suit
the particular audience, Jewish (St. Matthew), Greek (St.
Luke), Roman (St. Mark), to whom it was delivered. More-
over, he believes that for purposes of convenience in oral
teaching the Apostles had divided the career of Our Lord
into four periods: (1) His baptism; (2) Galilee; (3) the last
week in Jerusalem; (4) Christ's death and resurrection. This
division, consecrated by primitive usage, the Evangelists ad-
hered to scrupulously, although awkward and unsuitable from
a historical standpoint.^ In fact, extraordinary though it ap-
pears to our minds, the Evangelist rather than break this
fourfold division, preferred to displace certain actions of our
Saviour and even to omit some altogether." The theory is novel,
seductive and argued cogently, but Qui lo sa? No less fresh
and interesting is the closing chapter of his book, *'Some Lit-
erary Devices of St. Matthew.'* There he examines thoroughly
the five great discourses in St. Matthew. The curious formula
closing them, **and it came to pass when He had finished,"
Abb^ Levesque thinks was the consecrated formula used by
the first preachers at Jerusalem.® The discourses themselves
consist invariably of a fundamental point or doctrine around
which are grouped other teachings of the Master given at dif-
ferent times and places, but closely connected with the central
theme. As with the discourse so with the facts of Our Lord's
life, St. Matthew is not guided at all by chronology. Rather
he groups the facts to uphold a thesis, namely that Christ is
the Messiah. The stereotyped formulas "at that time," "then,"
"behold that" are again the consecrated formulas of the earli-
est preaching used to direct the attention of the hearers to the
public life of Jesus.*®
Few, if any, questions relating to the New Testament are
* Pace 5. " Pages 53-75. • Page 275. » Page 805 c< $eq.
^ rATHOUC SCHOLARS [Feb.
FRENCH CATH^^"^
d exact history of Abbe Jacquier,
omitted in the ^^^^ J^ouveaa Testament^ The detaUed
ffistoire des lii^res ^^ ^^^^ comprises some two hundred
Bnalys^ ^ioSy^^^*^^ P^^" ^^^"^ exposing a bewilder-
^"^ ^er of hypotheses on the formation of the Synoptics*
^* ^^thor concludes that no theory renders a really satisf ac-
f'X^ccount of the facts. He thinks, however, that the Evan-
aelists utilized some older written documents and also relied
to some extent on oral tradition. Abbe Jacquier devotes his
fourth volume exclusively to the writings of St. John. With
full and ample knowledge of (he delicate problems involved —
linguistic, textual, literary, theological — ^he examines the mani-
fold difficulties proposed and concludes in the traditional and
Catholic sense. Very noteworthy on the same theme are Abb^
Lepin*s conscientious and thorough studies, UOrigine du Qua-
triime Evangile and La Valewr Historique du QuatriSme
EiHingile. M. Lepin has compressed the marrow of these
books into his able article on St. John in the Dictionnaire
Apologitique^^ After a full weighing of the difficulties and
theories of our opponents he formulates his serene and lumin-
ous conclusion: *lt is then with full certainty that we can
proclaim the Fourth Gospel the work of the Apostle St.
John." "
Another favorite thesis with unbelievers is that the faith
of the early Christians is not the faith of today. Such was
the position the rebels of the sixteenth century adopted to
justify their revolt; such is the assertion of contemporary
infidels to discredit the Church. They maintain that Chris-
tian doctrine has ^'developed'* so radically that it has under-
gone a complete metamorphosis, and that the teaching of the
twentieth century has no kinship whatever with that of the
first. An adequate answer to this contention will be found
in Abbe Tixeront's Histoire des Dogmes. These three volumes
trace, with immense learning and diligence, theological
thought in the formative ages. They show how under the
pressure of heresiarchs and heresy the Church was led to
make an inventory, so to speak, of the riches she possessed;
and how successive Councils undertook to formulate her
creed with scientific exactness.
^ Four Yolumes. x Vol. li, pp. 235-282.
u Vol. !., coU. 1599-1750. ^« Ibid., vol 1., colL 1749, n. S2S.
1920.] FRENCH CATHOLIC SCHOLARS 639
The scope of this work is not primarily apologetic, much
less polemic. Its aim is objective.* It exposes the controversies
and provisional solutions that eddied about great problems,
until some religious genius, an Athanasius, a Cyril, a Hilary
or an Augustine, put the question in its true focus and indicated
the methods and elements of explanation. And it shows, too,
how the early Fathers had literally to forge the language of the-
ology; and how these subtle Greeks and Orientals, less fortun-
ate than the Scholastics, were hampered sometimes by a total
lack of terms to express their far-fetched concepts, and some-
times by the imprecision and vagueness of the words they were
obliged to use. Only little by little and at the price of many ten-
tatives and trials did theology fashion for herself a language of
scientific exactness and accuracy and withal flexibility. I may
remark in passing that Tixeront maintains there is not the
slightest connection between the logos of Philo and the Logos
of St. John.^* His three volumes cover from the beginnings of
Christianity up to 800, the last heresy exposed being the Icono-
clastic. Two supplementary chapters set forth the theology
of St. John Damascene and the fortunes of theology under
Charlemagne. After reading that immense repertory of eru-
dition, one realizes the hoUowness of Harnack's learned sneer,
that Catholicism in philosophy is simply Christianized Platon-
ism and in organization, Roman imperialism.
Monseigneur Batiffol's books on Christian origins are di-
rected especially against Harnack and his school. The first
volume, UEglise Naissante et le Catholicisme,^^ shows that the
creed of the first converts did not differ materially from ours.
One hundred and seventy pages are devoted to the examina-^
tion of apostolic times. The author proves that Christianity
was not merely a spiritual movement, not merely an associa-
tion for mutual assistance, but a true and admirably organ-
ized society. The basis of this society was the apostleship,
the principle of unity and authority established by Christ Him-
^HUtorie des Dogmea, vol. 1., p. 55. (In English, History of Dogma, B. Herder,
St Loiilg.) See also Br^hier. Let idie$ philosophique$ et religleuies de Phtlon
d*Alexandrie. Brthler shows that St John's Logo$ and Phllo's agree only in name.
Herriot, another valiant Catholic, who, as mayor of Lyons, was a tower of strength
to his fellow dtixens daring the War and signalized himself by his charitable
endeavors. Is also an authority on Philo. His volume is called Philon le Jnlf.
^Pive editions in French, translated into English and German. The English
version, Primlitpe CathoHclsm, is published by Longmans, Green ft Co., New York.
640 FRENCH CATHOLIC SCHOLARS [Feb^
self. But Christianity is also a system of doctrine, which pro-
poses articles of belief and rules of obedience. The Gospel
is a divine message to which the convert gives his allegiance.
The initiated have certain forms of prayer and sacrifice, in
which they alone have the right to participate. But the scoflfer
and evil-doer must not be tolerated in the Christian commun-
ity. In epch city the faithful formed an "assembly" or church,
ruled b^ an elder, whose authority, directly or indirectly, had
been transmitted by the Apostles. This "overseer" gave unity
to each church; and Jesus Christ gives unity to the Church:
conclusion, the budding Church of the early centuries was
Catholic, corpus sumus de conscientia religionis et disciplines
imitate et spei foedere, says Tertullian.
A later volume La Paix Constantinienne et le Catholicisme
treats of the relations between Church and State, and extends
from the days of Septimus Severus to those of Pope Liberius.
In his second chapter Batiffol approaches the interesting prob-
lem of ecclesiastical organization. The Church did not imi-
tate the priestly colleges of pagan temples in its hierarchy;
on the contrary, certain Emperors, Maximin Daia and Julian
the Apostate strove to copy the organization of the Catholic
priesthood. Nor does he admit that the creation of ecclesias-
tical provinces is due even to the Council of Nice. Its rulings
applied only to the East; did not affect Africa, Gaul, Spain
or Italy. Moreover, Christianity had its roots in a past extend-
ing far behind the administration and administrative changes
made in the Empire by Diocletian. "The word 'province' is
consequentially Catholic, and likewise the thing itself and all
is old." The last chapters describe the csesaro-papism of Con-
stantius II., who by deceit, violence and threats succeeded in
imposing an Arian creed on the astounded and horrified
world.*^ But Pope Liberius did not yield. Outwitted and put
to all appearances in the wrong by the slippery sovereign and
his still more slippery and unscrupulous advisers, the Pontiff
was true to his duty and his office, Liberius immaculatus Papa.
A further volume, announced but not yet published, will re-
count the history of the foiu*th and fifth centuries, to be called
Le Catholicisme Romain de S. Damase a S. Leon.
All this early period is covered from a hagiographic stand-
" St. Jerome's magnificent phrase is one of the winged words of history and
literature. Ingtmuit totut orbit $t Arianum te et8$ miratus est.
i
1920.] FRENCH CATHOLIC SCHOLARS 641
point by Paul AUard.^* He was a pupil of de Rossi, and im-
bued by that illustrious master with an ardent love of the
early heroes of our Faith, the martyrs and confessors of the
first three centuries. In five magnificent volumes AUard has
told the moving story of the martyrs of the Roman empire.
Three volumes on Julian the Apostate describe^ that prince's
belated attempt to galvanize moribund paga;ii:>4.vinto some-
thing dimly simulating life. Nearly all AUard's numerous
subsequent writings have reference to the martyrs, and he had
just finished the opening chapter of a new volume on their
glories when the Master called him home. I notice that the
Anglican dean of Gloucester (England) in his interesting
work entitled The Early Christians in Rome, relies mainly on
Roman Catholic authorities, and most of all on Allard, for
whose work he cannot find sufficient words of praise. Dean
Spence-Jones admits fully that the number of the early mar-
tyrs was very large. He' admits also that Marcus Aurelius
was a bitter opponent of the Faith, and that the philosophic
emperor must have known of some of the victims of his cruel
laws. But most wonderful of all he admits that St. Peter
lived and taught in Rome, for not otherwise could the Apostle
have become such a preponderating force in the church of the
metropolis. How far has not this dean drifted from old moor-
ings 1 Time was when the martyrs were represented as a few
impossible fnnntirf^ m^rmg^ .tQ tjig patTlotif poliry of a wise
government. J3c^f ar has he not traveled from the contemp-
tuous scc^ of Gibbon, and even from the superior, academic
fi^'^^^iicle tolerance of Lecky!
History during the past twenty-five years has been as-
[duously cultivated by French Catholic scholars, and well-
nigh countless are the books produced dealing with various
periods of the Church's existence and activities. Among the
notable numbers of Gabalda*s Bibliothique de VHistoire Ec-
cldsiastique may be mentioned : L'Eglise Byzantine by Father
Pargoire, who traces the fortunes of the Eastern Church from
527 to 847. This book, within its narrow limits (only three
hundred and eighty pages of text), is an admii:able study of
the period.
The literary history of early Christian Greece, from the
^Only a few of AlUrd's minor works hare appeared in R n tfUh, e.g.. Ten
LeetartM on the Martyrit R. ft T. Waahboume, London.
cs. 41
i
642 FRENCH CATHOLIC SCHOLARS [Feb.
apostolic writings to Justinian, is narrated in Monseigneur
BatifTors Litterature Grecque.^^ The author limits himself
to classifying, dating and valuing the remains of the first five
centuries of Greek Christian literature. His judgments are
personal, his criticism sober and restrained. But he does not
read into these sometimes very uninspired writers, merits
which they never possessed: see, for instance, his verdict on
fourth and fifth centiwy poetry.*® When dealing with polemical
authors his own acciu^ate scholarship and wide knowledge of
the questions at issue, enables him to view the controversy from
the correct perspective and judge its literature accordingly.
Les Croisades, by Louis Br^hier, describes the heroic ef-
forts of mediaeval Europe to drive back the Moslem hordes,
and tells also the deplorable jealousies and strifes that ended
in the failure of these expeditions. The bibliography ap-
pended to the chapters of this book is particularly full. Le
Schisme Anglican is studied by J. Tr6sal. His work is substan-
tial, and puts forward interesting views. But unconsciously
this book suffers from the tacit comparison one makes of it
with the exceptionaUy competent and absolutely impartial
study of the same period by James Gairdner, The English
Church from Henry VHL to the death of Mary. Dom Le-
clercq tells of L'Espagne Chritienne and UAfrique Chritienne.
In the latter work his abundant knowledge overflows into two
yolum^s^^ may be al-
leged in excuse. Jean Guiraud writes on U^gli^e Romaine et
les Origines de la Renaissance. This study reached' four edi-
tions and has been crowned by the French Academy. "
Entirely polemic is the tone of another of M. Guiraud's
works— i/i5foire Partiale, Histoire Vraie.^"^ The first two vol-
umes after reaching thirty-four and thirty-one editions respec-
tively are at present out of print. The third and fourth vol-
umes treat of VAncien Rigime. The former discusses two prob-
lems: (1) the edict of Nantes; (2) Catholic philanthropy in \
the eighteenth century. The latter is devoted entirely to the
Jesuits. These books have acquired enormous popularity in
France, and must have done untold good there. But a certain
narrowness in their plan militates against their usefulness and
"Four editions. "Page 263 et seq.
"Four volumes. Some of Gulraud's works have been brought out in English
by R. St T. Washboume, London.
1920.] FRENCH CATHOUC SCHOLARS 643
diffusion elsewhere. The author gave up to France what was
meant for mankind — I mean his aim is throughout to refute
French anti-Catholic writers, particularly writers of educa-
tional works. He quotes, therefore, very often obscure bigots,
pernicious, no doubt, at home, but unknown to the outer
world.
Far more elaborate than any of the foregoing is Pierre de
la Gorce*s Histoire de la Rivolution Frangaise.^* The author
shows how the pre-revolution clergy, with few exceptions, had
high ideals of duty. The bishops, even of the smaller sees,
used to distribute thousands of dollars in charity yearly.
Some abbeys supported as many as fifteen hundred poor.
Numerous religious orders and congregations made benevo-
lence the rule of their lives. And when the upheaval came,
which broke down all the conventions and shelters and safe-
guards of life; when great spiritual lords woke one day to find
themselves outlaws and pariahs, most bowed to their fate with
stoic dignity, and no insignificant number won the martyr's
crown. How the victims of the September massacres prepared
themselves for death, how the deported priests bore the hor-
rors of their exile and imprisonment is as tragic and as lumin-
ous a story as is found in Church history, and is admirably
recounted by M. de la Gorce." The same author has written
also a long history of the second empire, each volume of which
has had eight and nine editions, while the seventh and last
volume has been crowned by the Academy.
The affairs of Russia, both civil and religious, are re-
corded by A. Leroy-Beaulieu in his L'Empire des Tsars et les
Russes.^^ It is hardly necessary to recaU that M. Leroy-Beaulieu
is also an eminent authority on social questions and political
economy. Georges Goyau has written the history, mainly from
the religious standpoint, of modern Germany. His Allemagne
Religieuse *' has been crowned by the Academy. He describes
forcibly the shipwreck of faith under the dissolving; acids of
Kantian and Hegelian philosophy. He shows how clerics
reared in that unhealthy atmosphere do not hesitate to hold
lucrative posts and to teach officially doctrines they have long
"Two large octaTo Tolumes. Ten and seven editions respectlTely. Some of
Goree's works have also been put Into English. R. ft T. Washboume, London.
■Vol. 11., pp. 244-324. >• Three volumes.
"Five volumes, seven editions. R. ft T. Washboume, London, has brought
out a few of his minor works In English.
644 FRENCH CATHOUC SCHOLARS [Feb^
ceased to believe. M. Goyau is also responsible for four vol-
umes, Autour du Catholicisme Social, in which he sketches
Catholic workers and movements of the nineteenth century.
His gallery of portraits includes Leo XIII., Cardinal Manning,
Comte de Mun, 011^-Laprune. But M. Goyau is just as much at
home writing ancient history. His study of the Vatican, its
masters and inmates, written in collaboration with MM. Fabre
and Perat^ is splendid; while his life of St. Melania, a popu-
larization of Cardinal RampoUa's learned work on that saint,
is a little gem.
This brings us to another series of Catholic handbooks
also published by Gabalda, Le$ Saints,^^ to the production of
which many laymen as well as clerics have contributed. The
aim of the series is to present a short account, generally lim-
ited to two hundred pages, of the saint and his period, written
by a thoroughly competent specialist — an expert, who should
be able to condense into a few pages deep research and pro*
longed study. Nearly a hundred of these lives have appeared,
of which I have read perhaps a score. Certainly the most
difficult life of all to recount is the Blessed Virgin's, on ac-
count of the sublimity of the subject and the paucity of the
material; but if I am not entirely devoid of taste. Father R^ne
de la Broise's monograph is an unqualified success. Paul
AUard produced two lives, S. Basile and S. Sidoine Appollin-
aire. Godefroid Kurth was responsible for S. Boniface and S.
Clotilde; Petit de JuUevile, Jeanne d'Arc; Aim^ Puech, S.
Jean Chrysostome; Abb^ Vacandard, S. Victrice. The editor
of the series, Henri Joly, wrote an introductory volume. La
Psychologic des Saints,*^ and the lives of St Ignatius, St
Teresa and the Venerable Eudes. M. Vianney*s life of his
saintly relative, the wonderful Cur6 d*Ars, reached twenty-
seven editions.
Not a^ belonging to the same series but to the same order
of ideas the very remarkable Life of St Bernardin of Siena
by Paul Thureau-Dangin^^ deserves mention. The same writer
produced La Monarchic de Juillet twice crowned by the
Academy, and La Renaissance Catholique en Angleterre au
dix-neuviime siicle.^^
** Of this series some thlrty-flye or forty numbers have been Englished. Benclger
Brothers, New York.
*v Eleven editions. **Six editions.
»An English edition Is published by Longmans, Green ft Co., New York.
1920.] FRENCH CATHOUC SCHOLARS 645
Long vistas of other scholars still open before me, e.g.,
Imbert de la Tour, Monseigneur Baudrillart, Fathers Yves de
la Bri^re and A. Brou, but I must conclude; yet not without
mentioning, at least, the great Benedictine savants. Abbot
Cabrol and Dom Germain Morin. Abbot Cabrol is the di-
rector of the Dictionnaire d'Archiologie Chritienne et de
Liturgie, of which some fifty parts have appeared. Dom Ger-
main Morin is one of the highest authorities on patristic litera-
ture. He is as keen on the scent of a lurking manuscript as
a bloodhound is on the trail of its quarry, and has made some
wonderful discoveries in these fields. His "find" of 1917 fully
equals, if it does not outshine, his past explorations. Buried
in a manuscript of the ninth century, the property of the
Wolfenbiittel Library, he found no less than thirty-three
hitherto unknown sermons of St. Augustine, and three or four
miscellaneous pieces which he also ascribes to St. Augustine.
The discovery of a new sermon of the Bishop of Hippo is at
least as important to patrologists as the location of a new
shoal or island to navigators.
The savants of the Catholic Church are fully equal to those
of other creeds. Their Faith is to them a guide, not a hin-
drance. It saves them from fantastic speculation; it preserves
them from the subtle idolatries of self. It ever directs their
attention to the wonderful legend of Augustine musing on
the Trinity and meeting the little child, who wished to pour
the ocean into a hole scooped on the strand; and so it im-
presses on them the pitiful limitation of human minds before
the boundless realms of knowledge. It would be shameful if
we, through mere indifference, blinded ourselves to their very
splendid achievements.
A SEVENTEENTH CENTURY HOHENZOLLERN.
BY MABY J. MAIXOY.
j HERE is silence dow in the dark eyrie of the
Hohenzollem eagles; their nest is empty, their
brood dispersed. Their parting cry is already
i faint in the unheeding ear of a new time and
I century that has put down the Brandenburg from
d broken the sceptre of his power. And yet in the
abode of that race there was, every now and then, a softer
note than the scream of its warrior bird, a wing more tender, a
flight less abhorred of its fellow-creatures — a rara avit, in-
deed, of Hohenzollern blood and bone, but not of Hohen-
zollem hardness of heart or poverty of spirit.
I.
Marianne Fran^oise de Hohenzollern, bom in 1611, was
the daughter of John George, Prince of Hohenzollem, head of
the only Catholic branch of the House of Brandenburg, and
President of the Holy Roman Empire — that abstraction which
has been pithily characterized as neither holy, Roman nor an
empire. Her mother was Fran^oise de Salins, a cousio of the
Duke of Lorraine; the families of both parents were inti-
mately allied with most of the sovereign houses of Europe.
Marianne was held at the font by the Empress Anne, wife of
that Matthias of Austria in whose reign the Thirty Years* War
commenced, and received the name of her imperial godmother.
The Empress was deeply attached to her little namesake, mak-
ing almost an idol of her as she grew; but her sudden death,
followed closely by that of the Princess of Hohenzollern, threw
the care of Marianne's rearing and education entirely upon
the Princess of Furstenberg, her sister, who was much older,
and looked upon her rather in the light of a daughter.
Marianne was possessed of such unusual talent and in-
telligence for her years that her masters frankly acknowledged
their wonder. Surrounded by flattery and adulation on all
sides, of a budding beauty that promised even richer develop-
ment, her early life was simply a passage from one delight to
1920.] A XVII. CENTURY HOHENZOLLERN 647
another. Fortunately, perhaps, for the young girl, she found,
in one of her sister's chaplains, a friend as judicious as kind.
A man of great piety and learning, he undertook the direction
of her studies, and under his enlightened guidance she made
such solid progress that she was laughingly styled La docte
Catherine of the seventeenth century. All the while, through
the same fostering care, the character of the youthful Princess
was emerging, beautiful and singularly unspoiled, from the
crysalis of worldly trappings.
Music was her passion. She lost no opportunity of gratify-
ing her taste for it, and became a proficient herself in the art.
Her great pleasure was to visit certain religious houses where
the service was particularly fine, to mingle her own voice with
that of the nuns. This led to what seems a rather singular
proceeding on the part of Marianne. It is said that she fre-
quently sang a canticle of her own composition at the Conse-
cration on Sundays and festivals, endeavoring in this way to
render a formal public homage to God.
The habit of visiting these convents led to a gradual and
quiet observation of the lives of their inmates. The impression
made became a very deep one. She at last determined to obey
the call she was sure she heard in the depths of her soul. But this,
she knew, could not be done without great opposition, if, in fact,
she succeeded at all in accomplishing her desire. A letter writ-
ten to a friend on the subject fell into the hands of her brother-
in-law. Prince Furstenberg. He was furiously angry, at once
forbade all further intercourse with the nuns, declared she
should never become one, and ended by informing her that
"she had no say whatever in the matter, or as to her future life.
A person of her rank was not permitted to dispose of herself
at pleasure."
Poor little Marianne ! She had neither the spirit nor power
to oppose a man like her brother-in-law — a pleasant person
he must have been to live with. Obliged to submit, at least
outwardly, to his will, she took her place in his court as he
desired, fulfilling the duties of her rank and station with a
grace and sweetness that ought to have softened him. But the
life was very irksome; she seized every opportunity to with-
draw as much as possible from it, and lead a more retired and
congenial existence. This did not please Furstenberg at all;
his next step was to deprive her of her director, whom he
648 A XVIL CENTURY HOHENZOLLERN [Feb^
believed encouraged her desires, and to take her with his wife
and himself to the Diet of Ratisbonne, whither he was sum-
moned in 1630. In this city, Marianne charmed every one who
saw her. Her beauty, talents and amiability drew all hearts
to her. It was not long before a number of suitors for her
hand presented themselves; but she paid them no attention,
receiving their compliments with such indifference that more
than one German princelet left her presence indignant, to
nurse a deeply-injured self-love, more real than affection.
But on this point her inclinations were not consulted. Mar-
ried she must be, it was decided; and timid, unsupported,
deeming it a duty to obey her family, she finally consented
to accept the hand of Ernest V., Prince of Isenberg, selected
as her spouse for reasons of state. The bridegroom was a
man considerably older than herself; he bore a great name
for his military achievements in the service of Austria, and
stood high in the esteem of the world. '"But grave suspicion
attached to his private character," says a contemporary. *'His
first wife, Caroline d'Arensberg, died suddenly — the cause was
never known, and it was said that happiness was not an in-
mate of his dwelling."
It was to this man that Marianne was yielded up. It was
thought her charm, her youth and beauty, would conquer his
heart; but it was a victim whom he led to the altar, and the
marriage blessing was a knife of sacrifice.
Their nuptials were celebrated at Brussels, with only less
magnificence than those of the Emperor himself, at Vienna.
Prince Isenberg appeared delighted with his young bride; but
in her heart there was fear and foreboding. She betrayed
nothing of these feelings in public, however, and played her
part with all the ease and grace expected of her.
Not long after their marriage, the Prince was sunmioned
to the war between the Emperor and Gustavus Adolphus of
Sweden. Although so short a time her husband, the seeds of
suspicion and jealousy had already been insidiously sown in
his mind in Marianne's regard by the evil influence of some
about him who hated the young wife. They persuaded him
that her reserve was in reality exaggerated melancholy, and
attributed it to base causes. Leaving the Princess at Cologne,
Prince Isenberg pereniptorily forbade her to go elsewhere dur-
ing his absence, and surrounded her, to her great discomfort.
1920.] A XVII. CENTURY HOHENZOLLERN 649
with numerous spies and useless attendants. Her chief friend
and comforter in her distress was the Carmelite Prioress of
Cologne, whose counsel and sympathy were towers of strength
to her.
Notwithstanding the retired and even secluded life she led,
respect and admiration found her out. Her unworthy hus-
band, becoming acquainted with this fact, made himself still
more obnoxious and disagreeable to his girl-wife. He would
permit no word in her praise to be spoken before him, and
resented the slightest interest shown in her. The Infanta
Clara Eugenia, the famous Governor of the Low Countries,
formed a great attachment for her and endeavored to draw
her to her court, invoking for this purpose the influence of
her nephew, the King of Spain, with Prince Isenberg; but he
was obdurate: leave Cologne she should not.
All these trials Marianne endured patiently, till finally ''a
bad woman,** as the old Visitandine Annals of Alby naively
and rather inadequately hand the lady down to history, re-
solved to make the separation of husband and wife final. To
this end she brought false charges and even forged letters to
the Prince, and when she had succeeded in inflaming his pas-
sions against his wife, she informed the latter that her hus-
band was contemplating her death, producing a poison as
having been ordered by him to be administered.
Such was the story told Marianne. Seeing no other way
of escape, she resolved on flight. This could be to France only,
as neither Spain nor Germany would afiford her asylum, on
account of the estimation in which the Prince was held in those
countries. Accompanied by a few ladies, two gentlemen of
Languedoc, one of whom held the office of her page, and
several devoted servants, she secretly withdrew from the city,
under cover of night. In spite of the precautions taken, how-
ever, their flight was almost inmiediately discovered by the
wretched creature who was the cause of it. It did not take her
long to send the news, highly colored at that, to the Prince.
Infuriated at the flight of his wife, and ignorant, it would
seem, of the foul accusation brought against him, he set his
people at once upon the track of the fugitives, intending to
wreak signal vengeance upon the unfortunate girl whom he
had taken a most unregarded oath to "love and cherish.**
The small band was overtaken, and the Princess would
650 A XVII. CENTURY HOHENZOLLERN [Feb,,
have fallen into the hands of her relentless pursuers if it had
not been for the generous self-sacrifice of her page. Alone,
he faced four of the Prince's men, delaying them with a valiant
struggle until the others had made good their flight. He paid
for his heroism with his life — ^but the Princess reached Paris
in safety.
This city did not afford her the refuge she hoped. It was
impossible to remain there for any length of time without be-
ing recognized, rendezvous as it was for all Europe. She
found shelter, however, in a remote old country house in
Languedoc, where for two years, under an assumed name,
unknown to her neighbors, she was the good angel of the
peasantry for miles around.
n.
Into this new stage of her career, she threw herself with
all the abandon of a soul set free. Amidst the pomp of courts
she had tasted nothing but misery. The darling of an em-
press, rich, beautiful, uncommonly gifted in both mind and
person, she had found, in her hour of need, no more comfort
or solace than the poorest beggar who came to her for assist-
ance. And deep down at the bottom of all was the sting of
her own infidelity to the real Bridegroom of her soul. This
was the great weakness of her life, and one deplored until its
end. But in serving her Lord in the persons of His poor. His
sick and His afiOicted, she at last found true happiness. The
wrongs she had suffered at the hands of her miserable hus-
band were now forgotten, except as occasions of prayer for
him.
Two peaceful years thus passed away. So far, she had
been successful in hiding from the world; but the secret of
her identity was finally disclosed by the ingratitude of one
whom she had befriended and benefited — no uncommon oc-
currence in a world where a good deed seems somehow to be
often more rigorously punished than a bad one. Summoned
before the Parliament of Toulouse by a lawsuit brought by
this party against her, she was obliged to reveal her name,
rank and motive for seclusion. The result must have caused
her a fleeting smile. The magistrates, overcome at their own
temerity in calling before their bench one in whose veins
flowed the blood of sovereigns, exhausted themselves in apolo-
1920.] A XVII. CENTURY HOHENZOLLERN 651
gies; the principal ladies of the town hastened to offer their
civilities; privacy was no longer possible — ^her dear life of
retirement, "the world forgetting, by the world forgot," was
at an end.
The secret of her whereabouts was now fully made known,
and everybody had a great deal to say about it. One of her
sisters, the Princess of Baden, inmiediately came forward to
offer her a shelter from which she declared no power of Prince
Isenberg should tear her. Others of her family made the
same offer. Those who had so easily allowed her to be sacri-
ficed in the first instance, vied with each other, now, in per-
suading her to abandon the home of her choice and resume
her exalted station, with the assurance of being effectually
protected from the anger of her husband.
She listened to none; she took a resolution that was not
so easily to be combated as that first one which had suc-
cumbed to the attacks of the world upon her inexperienced
youth. She sought an interview with Monseigneur Gaspard de
Lude, Bishop of Alby, in Languedoc, begging him to obtain
for her a retreat in some convent of his diocese. The Bishop,
knowing her pitiful story and compassionating her misfor-
tunes, willingly granted her request. At his instance, she
found shelter with the Visitandines of his city, who received
her with the greatest kindness and sympathy. Her joy was
so intense that, on entering the convent for the first time, she
kissed over and over again the walls which were to hold her
a voluntary prisoner for the remainder of her life.
A strange thing happened. Prince Isenberg had under-
gone a wonderful change of heart — a very cataclysm indeed;
for it must have been with stupendous throes that such a heart
as his was awakened to better feelings. Realizing at last the
worth of Marianne, and how wholly undeserving he was of
the treasure he had thrown away, he would place no obstacle
in her path, as she feared, leaving her entirely free to follow
her own desires. **0h, let me enjoy my happiness," she cried
to her importunate relatives, "do not try to draw me away
from itl"
Soon after taking up her abode in the Visitation Monas-
tery, she asked to be allowed to lead the life of a postulant,
as she could not, of course, become a nun. This favor was
granted her. For two more years, she lived among the Sisters
652 A XVII. CENTURY HOHENZOLLERN [Feb^
quietly and contentedly; then the news came that Prince
Isenberg had fallen in battle, fighting gallantly against the
foe. She was free at last!
Marianne lost not an instant in begging admission into the
Conmiunity. On January 7, 1644, she received the habit, and,
says the chronicler of the convent, **She seemed now to really
begin to live — all her sorrows were forgotten/' Preparations
were making for her profession, at the end of the year of
probation, when she suddenly received intelligence that her
husband was not dead, as reported; he had been grievously
wounded and left for dead, even entirely lost sight of for some
time, but had now recovered, and taken his place among men
again. How was it that these tidings were so late in reaching
the unhappy Princess? -One fact remained: her hopes were
fatally blasted, and for twenty long years she remained in
the monastery of Alby leading the life of a religious with
superhuman fidelity, just as if she were really the nun she had
longed to be.
It does an unregenerate reader of her story good to learn
that the Prince did really die at last, in 1664, begging the par-
don and prayers of Marianne with his last breath. And it will
astonish no student of human nature to hear that she gave
him both, and — ^with the amazing inconsistency of the femi-
nine heart that its Creator alone, perhaps, can fathom — ^the
tribute of a few tears, which he certainly did not in the least
deserve.
The long-delayed profession took place. Marianne Fran-
(oise de Hohenzollem, Princess of Isenberg, became simply
Sister Marianne Francois, and the world knew her no more.
She died in 1670, at the age of fifty-nine, "beloved and deeply
regretted by the Sisters with whom she had been united in
religion for thirty years, although but six professed.**
THE LOST MANUSCRIPT OF FATHER KINO.
BY MARGARET HAYNE HARRISON, M^.
MANUSCRIPT of priceless value to historians
was discovered a few years ago when Dr. Her-
bert Bolton, of the University of California,
searching through the Mexican archives, came
upon the original historical memoir of Father
Kino, the great Jesuit pioneer of our Southwest. It has given
to the world the best account we shall ever possess of the be-
ginnings of California, Sonora and Arizona, during the years
between the period of 1683 and 1711. The manuscript has been
translated, edited and annotated by Dr. Bolton, and it has
been published recently under the title. Kino's Historical Me-
moir of Pimeria Alta. The original Spanish title is Fauores
Celestiales.
That such a manuscript had existed was known through
references to it in the works of the early Jesuit historians of
the West and Southwest These references to an Historia or
Relacion by Father Kino were most certainly not to any of
Kino's known writings, which consisted of a diary, three
relaciones, two or three letters and a map. In the Prologue
to Venegas' Noticias de la California, completed in Mexico in
1739, the editor states that *Tather Venegas, to write his his-
tory, had present the manuscript history of the Missions of
Sonora by Father Eusebio Francisco Kino." It was used by
Father Alegre in his History and by Father Ortega in Aposto-
licos Afanes. Bancroft refers often to Father Kino's man-
uscript, although he was not aware that the document con-
tinued to exist. For a century and a half the work lay ne-
glected and forgotten in the archives of Mexico City until its
fortunate discovery eleven years ago. There is no question as
to its authenticity.
Father Kino, who is to the Southwest what Father Juni-
pero Serra is to California, was bom near Trent, in the Aus-
trian province of the Tyrol in 1644. His family was most
probably of Italian stock. He studied in the universities of
Ingolstadt and Freiburg, and when still a very young man,
654 THE LOST MANUSCRIPT [Feb^
on recovering from a serious illness, he resolved to become a
missionary and dedicate his life to religion. Indeed in Favores
Celestiales, Father Kino writes that he owes to San Francisco
Xavier many blessings — his recovery, his entry into the Com-
pany of Jesus and his journeying to these far-off missions.
Father Kino set out for the New World in April, 1678, but was
delayed in Seville, and did not arrive at Vera Cruz until the
spring of 1681. Not only as a fearless and ardent missionary
and explorer, but also as an expert cartographer and ranch-
man, he became widely known and beloved among the natives
of arid Lower California, where his first work lay. First win-
ning the confidence of the natives with gifts of maize and other
eatables, he taught them the Spanish language, the use of cloth-
ing, the art of singing, the simple elements of the Faith and
the recitation of prayers. He watched over his people in all
things and was ever ready to defend them against false
charges. He was the greatest favorite with the Indian boys and
one might often see him starting out on horseback for a long
trip, followed by a crowd of them — one or two mounted be-
hind him as a reward for good conduct
The urgent request for half a million dollars from the
Spanish Government, together with an order, dated Decem-
ber 22, 1685, to suspend the conquest of California because of
a recent native revolt, put an end to all California mission-
ary enterprises until they were revived, twelve years later, by
Fathers Kino and Salvatierra. On learning that the conquest
of California had been suspended. Father Kino was given a new
field of work with his assignment of Pimeria Alta, in 1687.
Here, in the country of the Upper Pimas on the Sonora River
near the present Arizona line, he founded the Mission of Dol-
ores, which was his headquarters for nearly twenty-five years.
The ruins of Dolores, the mother mission, are still standing,
and are the oldest mission ruins in Arizona and Northern
Sonora. Under the shadow of this dear home was written
the Favores Celestiales. With Dolores as a base, a score of
missions were established on both sides of the Sonora Arizona
line, and starting out from Dolores, Father Kino made over
fifty journeys inland, among wild tribes, through desert wastes
where no white man had ever dared to go, crossing and re-
crossing all of the country between the Magdalena and the
Gila, the San Pedro and the Colorado. He worked with suc^
1920.] THE LOST MANUSCRIPT 655
cess among the wildest and most untamed savages. No cow-
boy of today could excel him in the saddle, his average trip
being thirty miles a day for weeks and months.
Truly he seemed a Fra Angelico reincarnated and turned
pioneer. His companion for eight years. Father Luis Velarde,
writes of him that he was an ascetic in his daily life and would
often pass whole nights in prayer; he never slept in a bed
and Father Velarde once saw him being flogged mercilessly
as a penance. '*He was merciful to others but cruel to himself.
While violent fevers were lacerating his body, he tried no rem-
edy for six days except to get up to celebrate Mass and to go
to bed again. And thus by weakening and dismaying nature
he conquered the fevers.** It is now two hundred years since
this intrepid pioneer established stockraising in the valleys of
the Magdalena, the Altar, and the Santa Cruz, where it has
flourished ever since. He started stock ranches all . about the
region, to furnish a food supply for the Indians of the Mis-
sions, and to enable his missions to have a secure basis of
economic prosperity and independence. As the ^'Celestial
Favors** he desired most, he asked only that his missions
should prosper and be rich in souls.
Favores Celestiales opens with a dedication to the very
Catholic Majesty of Our Lord, Philip V., and consists of five
parts, of greatly unequal lengths. It is a history of the main
part of Kino*s life — his life and labors in Pimeria Alta, with
much attention also to affairs in California. Part I. is a history
of affairs in Pimeria Alta, now the land known as Southern
Arizona and Northern Sonora, with a discussion as to whether
California was a peninsula or an island, always one of the
most absorbing topics of Father Kino*s life. He enters into
a discussion of the benefits — spiritual and temporal — which
might be obtained from further conquests in '"this most exten-
sive part of North America which is the largest and best por-
tion of the earth.** Parts II., III. and IV. cover the years from
1700 and 1707, with emphasis on Father Kino's own explora-
tions in Pimeria Alta, along the Gila and Colorado Rivers and
along the Gulf Coast. Part V. of the manuscript, incorporated
during Father Kino*s last days, as a fitting conclusion, is a re-
port to the Spanish King, arguing for further conquests in
California with the idea of establishing a new kingdom to be
known as New Navarre. The general nature of the Favores
656 THE LOST MANUSCRIPT [Feb^
Celestiales is official, being written at the request of the Father
General of the Jesuit Order. Compiled at various times over
a period of ten years, it was all written at the mother mission
of Nuestra Senora de los Dolores.
In the University of Ingolstadt Father Kino had been
taught that California was a peninsula, but after his journey
there, he changed his mind and wrote that it was the largest
island in the world. After his visit to the Gila River, however,
he went back to the peninsula theory because of the gift of
some blue shells, which were exactly similar to certain other
blue shells he had seen in 1685 on the Pacific Coast of the Pen-
insula of California, and there only. He argued thai if the blue
shells had come to the Yumas from the South Sea, there was
probably some land connection with California and the ocean,
by way of the land of the Yumas. He at once resolved to trace
the "blue shell" clue down. He journeyed to San Xavier del
Bac to found a mission there and also to call a convention of
the principal governors and captains for more than forty
leagues around, to find out whether the blue shells presented
to him could have come from any other region than the op-
posite coast of California. They all asserted that there were
none like them in this nearest sea of California, and that only
along what they called the South Sea could such shells be had.
The next year he made a trip as far as the Gulf of California
and learned that he had come to the head of the Gulf. He
found the natives in that region greatly resembled the Cali-
fomians in the dress of the men and women. Here, as in
California, the men cut their hair one way, and the boys an-
other. Lastly, there were many trees there native to California,
"such as the incense tree and the tree bearing the fruit which
they called medesse/* ,
In 1701, Father Juan Maria de Salvatierra, founder of the
permanent Jesuit missions in California, who was a great per-
sonal friend of Father Kino, and who owed his inspiration for
that work to Father Kino's unfailing enthusiasm and encour-
agement, came by sea from California to the Pimeria missions
to discuss with his friend the advancement of spiritual and
temporal conquests and new missions in California. His visit
over, he decided to attempt to return home by the land route,
in spite of the open hostility of the Apaches on the frontiers
of Sonora. Starting from the pleasant mission of Dolores,
1920.] THE LOST MANUSCRIPT 657
Father Salvatierra set out first, and Father Kino overtook him
later. At thirty-one degrees latitude, they arrived at the Sea of
California, but finding a sand dune more than sixty leagues
around, situated at the head of the sea, and their pack animals
being exhausted, they returned, having twice sighted Cali-
fornia. Father Salvatierra went on through La Concepcion del
Cabotca. As they parted company Father Kino writes : "The
question then arose whether the Father Rector (Salvatierra) or
I should carry the beloved picture of Our Lady of Loretto, and
although I should have been content to have the Father Rector
carry that great consolation with him, his Reverence deter-
mined that we should draw lots by writing on two little papers
^north' and ^south;' and as on drawing the little papers the
one for the *north* fell to me, to me fell the joy of carrying this
great Lady of Loretto in the north of this Pimeria, she being
our North Star."
He then describes a subsequent journey to the Quiquimas
nation of California Alta. Reaching the top of the California
Sea, he passed over to the other side, towed on a raft by the
Indians and sitting in a basket, ^Haking only my breviary, some
trifles, and a blanket in which to sleep, and afterwards some
branches of broom weed which I wrapped up in my bandana
to serve me as a pillow." The road led by many small and
pleasant rancherias, where the people received him with great
hospitality, and listened to his preaching with the keenest in-
terest. The natives were lighter in hue than those he had met
previously. The land was most fertile; he saw beautiful fields
well cultivated with crops of maize, beans and pumpkins, with
large drying places for the pumpkins. Among other gifts
Father Kino received, were the famous blue shells from the
opposite coast of California and from the South Sea.
In 1702, Father Kino was at last perfectly convinced that
California was a peninsula. He again returned to the Yuma
Junction, descended the Colorado to the Gulf, and saw the sun
rise over its head. Father Kino's work as an explorer is re-
markable in that instead of being accompanied by hundreds
of horsemen in his expeditions, as were De Soto and Coronado,
he traveled almost without military escort, often without any
white men; sometimes, as on his three trips to the Gila River,
with only his Indian servants.
Kino never failed to be impressed with the fertility and
a. U
658 TUB LOST MANUSCRIPT [Feb^
beauty of the California lands. To him they seemed a verit-
able garden of the Lord, with large and spacious plains, beau-
tiful meadows and fertile valleys. Everywhere abounded
grain and fruit. 'In order that sugar . . . may not be lacking
to the Calif omians, heaven provides them with it in abundance
in the months of April, May and June, in the dew which at that
time falls upon the broad leaves, where it hardens and coagu-
lates. They gather large quantities and I have seen and eaten
it." Father Kino planted pumpkins, melons and watermelons
in California, and the plants bore fruit sometimes three times
a year. The pearls of this favored land also made her famous
throughout the world. It was indeed a case of pearls before
swine as far as the Califomians were concerned, for he calls
them a race "who live satisfied with merely eating." They
slept in caves in winter, all huddled together, and in summer
they took their rest lying under the shade of the trees. He
recognized that their minds were quick and alert and capable
of better things with training. The chief occupation of the
men, as well as the women, was the spinning of thread and
fibre, fine and coarse, of which they made bags and nets for
fishing; of grasses the men wove baskets which served many
purposes — ^plates for eating, hats for the women, and drink-
ing glasses.
Father Kino was most zealous in bringing the Spanish
Government to a realization of the immense and glorious
field, both spiritual and temporal, which it possessed in the
Pimeria district and in the Califomias. The disaffected in his
province hindered him by spreading false reports of revolts
and all kinds of disturbances, which made the Government
very loath to send more missionaries to aid his work. The fact
was that the Pimeria was a comparatively peaceful district,
and yet Father Kino complains that in the twenty-three years
preceding his writing, false rumors had been a terrible hin-
drance to the good work. An interesting argument for the
conversion of California was that a great port of call could
be established there to receive ships from China, and to suc-
cor the many persons sick from scurvy which they usually had
on board. He further remarks that in both the Califomias and
the Pimeria, the natives were easy to convert, as they had no
particular sect or idolatry difficult to eradicate, such as polyg-
amy, nor bonzes as in Japan or China, "and although they
1920.] THE LOST MANUSCRIPT 659
greatly venerate the sun as a remarkable thing, with ease one
preaches to them, and they comprehend the teaching that God
Most High is the All Powerful and He Who created the sun,
the moon, and the stars, and all men, and all the world, and
all its creatures." He also writes the King of Spain that in the
twenty-one years since conversions began, more than 30,000
souls have been brought into friendly relations with the
Fathers, and to the desire of receiving the Catholic Faith. He
means in the region between the Pimas, Yumas, and Quiqui-
mas alone.
The value of the Favores Celestiales as a source may be
judged from the fact that Father Kino quotes from about two
hundred documents, drawing upon the correspondence of many
years. The larger portion of the documents quoted are let-
ters from his superiors, associates and friends, such as Father
Salyatierra, the founder of the permanent Jesuit Missions in
California. Seven diaries of exploring expeditions are also
cited at considerable length. Professor Bolton says that nearly
all of these diaries, and the whereabouts of quite all, have been
hitherto unknown. The discovery of the manuscript further-
more discloses the chief source of extant secondary works;
Ortega's Afanes, from which all information concerning the
history of this period in the Pimeria region has hitherto been
drawn, is merely a summary of Father Kino's Favores Celes-
tiales. From the founding of Mission Dolores in March, 1687,
to January, 1691, very little has been known of Father Kino's
doing. Again, from April, 1701, to Father Kino's death, in 1711,
there had been a complete lack of primary sources. In fact the
Favores Celestiales puts the early history of a large part of
our Southwest on a new basis. Professor Bolton, whose edit-
ing and translation is an admirable piece of scholarship, opens
his preface by saying that in publishing Father Kino's great
work, he is carrying out a wish expressed in 1705 by Father
Tamburinji, Father General of the Society of Jesus. Thank-
ing Father Kino for his noble work, he acknowledged receipt
of the first part of Favores Celestiales: "I heartily rejoice that
your Reverence may continue your treatise on those missions,
entitled Celestial Favors, the first part of which you sent us
here. I hope to receive the other two parts which your Rever-
ence promises, and that they may all be approved in Mexico, in
order that they may be published."
660 BEAUTY [Feb.
The work should be of interest to all students of American
history, and of intense value to scholars of the past of our
Southwest. Aside from historical considerations, it is valu-
able as a personal portrait of one of the greatest of our pio-
neers, who stands revealed in this autobiography. In all his
splendid work as missionary, church builder, pioneer explorer
and ranchman. Father Kino never loses sight of the ideals
which brought so many of his Order to the New World as our
first agents of civilization — the knowledge that there was but
one thing in this world worth striving for — the saving of im-
mortal souls.
BEAUTY.
BY ARMEL O'CONNOR.
. . . and The Good, which lies beyond is the Fountain at once
and Principle of Beautg: the Primal Good and the Primal Beautg
have the one dwelling-place atid, thus, alwags, Beautg's seat is
There, — ^Plotinus.
The sun shines bright in many places.
Beauty stoops into the vault;
One Light illumines many faces,
Shows perfection through the fault.
And every mountain, sky or river
Holds one heavenly reply
To my questions, from the Giver
Of the Gift that cannot die.
Yet I destroy my purest pleasure
While I hesitate, compare.
God is the undivided Treasure . . .
Timeless Beauty is my share.
THE LOYALIST.
BY JAMES FRANCIS BARRETT.
Chapter III.
N imposing spectacle greeted Marjorie's eyes as she
made her way, in company with the Shippen girls,
into the ballroom of the City Tavern. The hall was
superb, of a charming style of architecture, well
furnished and lighted, and brilliantly decorated with
a profusion of American and French flags, its atmos-
phere vocal with the strains of martial music. Everywhere were
women dressed with elegance and taste. The Tory ladies, gowned
in the height of fashion, were to Marjorie a revelation at once
amazing and impressive.
On a raised dais sat the Governor in his great chair. He
was clothed in the regulation buff and blue uniform of a Major
General of the Continental Army. On his shoulders he wore the
epaulets and about his waist the sword knots General Washington
had presented to him the preceding May. He bore also upon his
person the most eloquent of martial trophies, for his leg, wounded
at Quebec and Saratoga, rested heavily on a small cushion before
him.
Marjorie, who saw him for the first time, was attracted at
once by his manly bearing and splendid physique. His frame
was large, his shoulders broad, his body inclined to be fleshy.
His presence, however, was magnetic, his manner simple and with-
out affectation. He looked the picture of dignity and power as he
received the guests in turn and greeted each with a pointed and
pleasant remark.
*'Isn't he a handsome figure?" whispered Peggy to Marjorie
as they made their way slowly to the dais.
Marjorie acquiesced in the judgment. He was still young,
hardly more than thirty-five, his weather-beaten face darkened
to bronze from exposure. His features were large and clean-cut
with the power of decision written full upon them. A firm
and forcible chin, with heavy lines playing about his mouth, eyes,
large and black, that seemed to take toll of everjrthing that
transpired about them, suggested a man of extravagant energy, of
violence and determined tenacity in the face of opposition. No
one could look upon his imposing figure without calling to mind
662 THE LOYAUST [Feb^
his martial achievements — ^the exploits of Canada, of the Mohaifiic,
of Bemis Heights.
**So this is your little friend," said he to Peggy, eyeing Bfar-
jorie as she made her presentation courtesy. He was now stand-
ing, though resting heavily on his cane with his left hand.
**Mistress Allison, this privilege is a happy one. I under-
stand that you are a violent little patriot" He smiled as he gently
took her hand.
*'I am very pleased, your Excellency," softly answered Mar-
jorie. 'This is an occasion of rare delight to me."
"And are you so intensely loyal? Your friends love you for
your devotion, although I sometimes think that they miss Gen-
eral Howe," and he smiled in the direction of Peggy as he turned
to her with this remark.
"You know. General," artfully replied Peggy, "I told you that
I was neither the one nor the other; and that I wore black and
white at the Mischienza, the colors now worn by our American
soldiers in their cockades in token of the French and American
alliance."
"So you did. I had almost forgotten."
"And that there were some American gentlemen present, as
well, although aged non-combatants," she continued with a sub-
tle smile,
"For which reason," he responded, "you would I suppose
have it assume a less exclusive appearance."
"Oh, no ! I do not mean that. It was after all a very private
affair, arranged solely in honor of General Howe."
"Were some of these young ladies at the Mischienza? And
who were they that rewarded the gallant knights?" he asked.
"Well, the Chew girls, and my sisters, and Miss Franks.
There was Miss White, and Miss Craig," she repeated the list
one after the other as her eyes searched the company assembled
in the hall. "And that girl in the corner. Miss Bond, and beyond
her, her sister: then there was Miss Smith. Miss Bond I am told
is engaged to one of your best generals, Mr. John Robinson."
"We are accustomed to call Mr. Robinson, General Robinson
in the army," he ventured with a smile.
She blushed slightly. "We call him Mr. Robinson in society
or sometimes Jack."
"And who might have been your gallant knight? May I ask?"
The Honorable Captain Cathcart," she proudly replied.
'And who has the good fortune to be your knight for this
occasion?" he questioned, seeking in their hands the billet of the
evening.
««r
1920.] THE LOYAUST 663
"We do not know/* Marjorie murmured. "We have not
as yet met the Master of Ceremonies."
He looked about him, in search evidently of someone.
"Colonel Wilkinson!" he called to a distinguished looking oflBcer
on his right, "have these fair ladies been assigned their partners?"
The Colonel advanced and presented them with their billets,
which were numbered and which bore the name of the partner
who was to accompany them during the entire evening. Peggy
opened hers and found the name of Colonel Jean Boudinot, a
young French officer. Marjorie saw written upon hers a name
unkown to her, "Captain Stephen Meagher, aide-de-camp."
"Captain Meagher!" exclaimed the Governor. "He is one of
General Washington's aides, detailed for the present in the city.
Do you know him?"
"No," replied Marjorie timidly, "I do not, I am sorry to say.
I have never had the privilege of meeting him."
*There he is now," said he, indicating with a gesture of the
eyes a tall young officer who stood with his back toward them.
Marjorie looked in the direction indicated. A becomingly tall
and erect figure, clad in a long blue coat met her gaze. Further
scrutiny disclosed the details of a square cut coat, with skirts
hooked back displaying a buff lining, and with lappets, cuff-linings
and standing capes of like color. His bearing was overmastering
as he stood at perfect ease, his hand resting gently on a small
sword hanging at his side; his right wrist showed a delicate
lacen ruffle as he gestured to and fro in his conversation. As he
slightly turned in her direction, she saw that he wore his hair
drawn back from the face, with a gentle roll on either side, well
powdered and tied in a cue behind. His features were pleasant,
not large but finely chiseled and marked with expression. Mar-
jorie thought what a handsome figure he made as he stood in
earnest conversation, dominating the little group who surrounded
him and followed his every move with interest and attention.
"Let me call him," suggested the Governor to Marjorie who
at that moment stood with her eyes fixed on the Captain. "I am
sure he will be pleased to learn the identity of his fair partner,"
he added facetiously.
"Oh ! do," agreed Peggy. "It would afford pleasure to all of
us to meet him."
The General whispered a word to an attendant who im-
mediately set off in the direction of the unconcerned Captain.
As the latter received the message he turned, looked in the direc-
tion of the dais and gazed steadily at the Governor and his com-
pany. His eyes met Marjorie's and she was sure that he saw her
664 THE LOYAUST [Feb^
alone. The thought thrilled her through and through. He excused
himself from the company of his circle, and as he directed his
footsteps towards her» she noted his neat and close fitting buff
waistcoat, and his immaculate linen revealing itself at the throat
and ruffled wrists. Nor did she fail to observe that he wore a buff
cockade on his left breast and gilt epaulets upon his shoulders.
**Captain Meagher/' announced General Arnold. *'I have the
honor of presenting you to your partner for the evening, Mistress
AUison.*'
Marjorie courtsied gracefully to his courtly acknowledg-
ment.
*'And the Misses Shippen, the belles of the Mischienza!"
Stephen bowed profoundly.
*'I was just remarking. Captain, that General Washington has
honored you with a special mission, and that you have run away
from your duties tonight to mingle with the social life of the
city."
*'Or rather. Your Excellency, to acquaint myself with its
society," good naturedly replied Stephen.
*Then you do not relax, even for an evening," inquired Peggy,
with a coquettish turn of the head.
''It is the duty of a soldier never to relax," answered Stephen
naively.
"And yet one's hours are shortened by pleasure and action,"
continued Peggy.
"As a recreation it is far sweeter than as a business. It soon
exhausts us, however, and it is the greatest incentive to evil."
"But you dance?" interrupted the General.
"Oh, yes. Your Excellency," replied Stephen, "after a
fashion."
"Well, your partner is longing for the music. Come let ye
assemble."
And as the dance was announced, the first one being dedi-
cated to "The Success of the Campaign," Stephen and Marjorie
moved off and took their places. Peggy and her sisters were soon
attended and followed. They were lost at once in the swirl of ex-
citement among the throng.
"And you live alone with your father and mother?"
Marjorie and her partner were sitting in a distant comer
whither they had wandered at the conclusion of the dance.
Stephen began to find himself unusually interested in this girl
and was inquiring concernedly about her home life.
"Yes. Father's time is much consumed with his attention to
1920.] THE LOYALIST 665
the shop. Mother and I find plenty to occupy us about the house.
Then I relieve father at times* and so divide my hours between
them," quietly answered Marjorie.
"You have not as yet told me your name/' observed Stephen.
"Marjorie," was the timid reply.
"Marjorie Allison," repeated Stephen. *That sounds like a
Catholic name."
"It is," replied Marjorie. "Our family have been Catholic for
generations."
"Mine have, too," volunteered Stephen. "Irish Catholics who
have left a history behind them."
"Is your home here?" asked Marjorie.
"Here in this country, yes," admitted her escort. "But I live
in New York and it was there that I volunteered at the outbreak
of the war and saw my first service in the New York campaign."
"Are your parents there too?" inquired the girl.
And then he told her that his father and mother and only
sister lived there, and that when the war broke out he determined
to enlist in company with a number of his friends, the young men
of the neighborhood; how he took part in the campaign about
New York and his "contribution to our defeat," as he styled it; of
the severe winter at Valley Forge and his appointment by Wash-
ington to his staff. She listened with keen interest but remained
silent until the end.
"And now you are in the city on detailed duty?"
"Yes. Work of a private nature for the Commander-in-
Chief."
"It must be a source of satisfaction to be responsive to duty,"
observed Marjorie.
"It is God's medicine to detach us from the things of this
world. For, after all has been said and done, it is love alone
which elevates one's services above the domain of abject slavery.
In such a manner do the commands of heaven afford the richest
consolations to the soul."
"And still, a certain routine must weary at times."
"Not when the habit is turned to pleasure."
**You are a philosopher, then?"
"No. Just a mere observer of men and their destinies."
"Have you included the duration of the war in your legitimate
conclusions?"
"It is not over yet, and it will not terminate, I think, without
an improvement in the present condition of affairs. The pro-
posed help from France must become a definite reality of no ordi-
nary proportion, else the discordant factions will achieve dire
»»»
666 THE LOYAUST [Feb..
results. Tell me/' he said, suddenly changing the topic of conver-
sation, ''were you in attendance at the Mischienza?'
"No, I did not care to attend.'*
1 would I had been present'
'Tou would have been expelled in your present capacity.'
"Ah yes! But I would have affected a disguise."
"You would expect to obtain important information?" She
fingered her gown of pink satin as she spoke, oblivious of every-
thing save the interest of the conversation.
"I might possibly have stumbled across some items of value."
"None were there save the British oiOGicers and their Tory
friends, you know."
"A still greater reason for my desire to be present. And why
did you not dance attendance?" he frankly asked.
"Do you really want to know my sole reason?" She looked
at him somewhat suspicious, somewhat reliant, awaiting her
womanly instinct to reveal to her the rectitude of her judgment.
"I should not have asked, otherwise," Stephen gravely replied.
"Well, it was for the simple reason that my soul would bum
within me if I permitted myself to indulge in such extravagance
and gayety the while our own poor boys were bleeding to death
at Valley Forge."
Stephen grasped her hand and pressed it warmly. "You are
a true patriot," was all he could say.
Whether it was his emotion for the cause of his country or
the supreme satisfaction afforded him by the knowledge that
this girl was loyal to the cause, Stephen did not know, nor did
he try to discover. He knew he was thrilled with genuine grati-
fication, and that he was joyously happy over the thought which
now relieved his mind. Somehow or other he earnestly desired
to find this girl an ardent patriot, yet he dared not ask her too
bluntly. From the moment she had entered the hall in company
with the other girls, he had singled her out in the midst of the
company. And when the summons came to him from the Gov-
ernor, he had seen her standing at the side of the dais, and her
alone. Little did he suspect, however, that she bore his billet,
nor did he presume to wish for her exclusive company for the
evening.
She danced with grace and was wholly without affectation.
How sweet she looked, and how interesting her conversation, yet
so reserved and dignified. But she lived in the city and the city,
he knew, teemed with Loyalists. Was she one of these? He
dared not ask her. To have her declare herself a patriot, enrap-
tured him. She was one of his own after all.
1920.] THE LOYALIST 667
Moreover she was one with him in religious belief — ^that
was a distinct comfort Catholics were not numerous, and to
preserve the Faith was no slight struggle. He was thoroughly
conversant with the state of affairs in the province of New York
where Catholics could not, because of the iniquitous law and the
prescribed oath of oflBce, become naturalized as citizens of the
State. He knew how New Jersey had excluded Roman Catholics
from office, and how North and South Carolina had adopted the
same iniquitous measure. Pennsylvania was one of the few col-
onies where all penal laws directed against the Catholics had been
absolutely swept away. To meet with a member of his own
persecuted Church, especially one so engaging and so interesting
as Marjorie, was a source of keen joy and an unlooked-for
happiness.
*Tou will not deny me the pleasure of paying my respects
to your father and mother?" Stephen asked.
She murmured something as he let go her hand. Stephen
thought she had said: "I had hoped that you would come."
'Tomorrow?" he ventured.
*'I shall be pleased to have you sup with us," she smiled as
she made the soft reply.
'Tomorrow then it shall be."
They rose to take their part in the next dance.
As the evening wore on Peggy, wearied of the dance, sought
a secluded corner of the great room to compose herself. She had
been disappointed in her lottery, for she detested the thought of
being a favor for a French officer and had taken care to so ex-
press herself at home long before. She could not rejoice at Mar-
jorie's good fortune, as she thought it, and found little of interest
and less of pleasure in the evening's doings.
She was aroused from her solitude and made radiant on the
instant at sight of the Military Governor, limping his way across
the hall in her direction. He had seen her seated alone, and his
heart urged him to her side. With the lowest bow of which he
was then capable, he sought the pleasure of her company. Her
color heightened, she smiled graciously with her gray blue eyes,
and accepted his hand. He led the way to the banquet room and
thence to the balcony, when they might hear the music and view
the dancing, for his lameness made dancing impossible.
*'I hesitate to condemn a young lady to a prison seat, when
the stately minuet sends a summons," he said as he led her to
a chair a little to one side of the balcony.
'Tou should have thought of that before you made us cast
668 THE LOYAUST [FA,
lots," she replied quickly. "I was wearying of the rounds of
pleasure.'*
"Is the company then, all too gay?"
"No, rather extravagant"
'Tou insisted on the Mischienza ladies being present."
"And can you not distinguish them? To what better ad-
vantage do they not appear than the others? Their gowns are
superior, they give evidence of more usage in society, their head-
dress is higher and of the latest fashion."
"And their hearts, their hopes, their sympathies! Where
are they?"
"You know where mine lay," she adroitly replied.
'True, you did wear a French cockade," he laughed.
"Please do not call it Trench.' I scorn all things Trench.' "
"They are our allies now, you must know."
"For which I am most sorry. I expect no mercy from this
scheming Papist country," she replied bitterly.
"But they have lent us much money at a time when our
paper currency is practically worthless, and the assistance of
their fleet is now momentarily expected," the General went on
to explain.
"And to what purpose? Lord North has proposed to meet
our demands most liberally and with our constitutional liberties
secured, I fail to see why further strife is necessary."
"But our independence is not yet secure."
"It was secure after your brilliant victory at Saratoga. With
the collapse of Burgoyne, England saw that further campaigning
in a country so far removed from home was disastrous. It only
remained to formulate some mutual agreement. We have tri-
umphed. Why not be magnanimous? Why subject the country
to a terrible strain for years for a result neither adequate nor
secure?"
She talked rapidly, passionately. It was evident from the
manner of her address that the subject was no new one to her.
"You can be court-martialed for treason," he remarked with
a slight smile playing about the heavy lines of his mouth.
"Is it treason to talk of the welfare of the country? I look
upon the alliance with this Catholic and despotic power as more
of an act of treason than the total surrender of our armies to
King George. To lose our independence is one thing; but to
subject our fair land to the tyranny of the Pope and his emissary,
the King of France, is a total collapse. Our hopes lie in Eng-
land alone."
The Governor was struck by this strange reasoning. Why
1920.] THE LOYAUST 669
had this mere child dared to express the very thoughts which were
of late intruding themselves upon his mind, but which he dared
not permit to cross the seal of his lips? She was correct* he
thought, in her reasoning, but bold in her denunciation. No one
else had dared to address such sentiments to him. And now he
was confronted with a young lady of quick wit and ready re-
partee who spoke passionately the identical reflections of his
more mature mind. Clearly her reasoning was not without some
consistency and method.
"I am afraid that you are a little Tory." He could not allow
this girl to think that she had impressed him in the least.
''Because I am frank in the expression of my views?" She
turned and with arched eyebrows surveyed him. "Pardon me,
if you will, but I would have taken no such liberty with any other
person. You gave me that privilege when you forbid my allud-
ing to your former exploits."
"But I did not want you to become a Tory." He spoke with
emphasis.
"I am not a Tory I tell you."
"But you are not a Whig?"
"What, an ordinary shop maid?"
"They are true patriots."
"But of no social standing."
"Tell me why all the Mischienza ladies courtsied to me after
so courtly a fashion," he asked.
"They like it. It is part of their life. You must know that
nothing pleases a woman of fashion more than to bow and cour-
tesy before every person of royalty, and to count those who pre-
cede her out of a room."
"Surely, Margaret, you are no such menial?" He compressed
his lip as he glanced at her sharply. He had never before called
her by her first name nor presumed to take a liberty. It was
more a slip of the tongue than an act of deliberate choice, yet he
would not have recalled the word. His concern lay in her manner
of action.
"And why not a menial?" Evidently she took no notice of
his presumption, or at least pretended not to do so. "Piety is by
no means the only motive which brings women to church. Posi-
tion in life is precisely what one makes it"
"Does social prestige appeal to you then?"
"I love it." She did not talk to him directly for her attention
was being centred upon the activities on the floor. "I think that a
woman who can dress with taste and distinction possesses riches
above all computation. See Mrs. Reed, there. How I envy her!"
670 THE LOYAUST [Feb^
"The wife of the President of the Council?" he asked, ap-
prehensively bending forward in the direction of the floor.
'The same. She enjoys a position of social eminence. How
I hate her for it." She tapped the floor with her foot as she spoke.
"You mean that you dislike her less than you envy her
position?"
Just then her young squire came up and she gave him her
hand for a minuet, excusing herself to the Governor as graciously
as possible.
Scarcely had she disappeared when he began to muse. What
a fitting companion she would make for a man of his rank and
dignity! That she was socially ambitious and obsessed with a
marked passion for display he well knew. She was not yet twenty
but the disparity in their ages — he was about thirty-seven and
a widower with three sons — would be offset by the disparity of
their stations. No one in the city kept a finer stable of horses
nor gave more costly dinners than he. Everybody treated him
with deference, for no one presumed to question his social pre-
eminence. The Whigs admired him as their dashing and per-
haps their most successful General. The Tories liked him be-
cause of his aristocratic display and his position in regard to the
Declaration of Independence. Why not make her his bride?
She possessed physical charms and graces in a singular de-
gree. She dressed with taste; her wardrobe was of the finest.
Aristocratic in her bearing, she would be well fitted to assume
the position of the first lady of the town. Peggy, moreover, pos-
sessed a will of her own. This was revealed to him on more than
one occasion during their few meetings, and if proof had been
wanting, the lack was now abundantly supplied. She would make
an ideal wife, and he resolved to enter the lists against all suitors.
Her mind was more mature than her years, he thought.
This he gleaned from her animated discussion of the Alliance.
And there was, after all, more than an ounce of wisdom in her
point of view. Mischief brewed in the proposed help from a des-
potic power. His own signal victory ended the war, if only the
Colonists would enter into negotiations or give an attentive ear to
the liberal proposals of Lord North. The people did not desire com-
plete independence and he, for one, had never fully endorsed
the Declaration. Her point of view was right. Better to accept
the overtures of our kinsmen, than to cast our lot with that Catho-
lic and despotic power.
His musings were arrested by the arrival of an aide, who an-
nounced that he was needed at headquarters. He arose at once
to obey.
1920.] THE LOYALIST 671
Chapter IV.
Stephen awoke late the next morning. As he lay with eyes
closed, half asleep, half awake, the image of his partner of the
evening sweetly drifted into his dreamy brain, and called up a
wealth of associations on which he continued to dwell with rare
pleasure. But the ominous suggestion that her heart could not
possibly be free, that perhaps some gay oflBcer, or brilliant mem-
ber of Howe's staff, or a gallant French oflBcial, many of whom
now infested the town, was a favored contestant in the field,
filled his mind with unwholesome possibilities, and chased away
the golden vision that was taking shape. He sat upright and,
pulling aside the curtains of the little window that flanked his
bed, peered into the garden behind the house. The birds were
singing, but not with the volume or rapture which is their wont
in the early morning. The sun was high in the heavens and
flung its reflecting rays from the trees and foliage; whence he
concluded that the morning was already far advanced and that
it was well past the hour for him to be astir.
And what a day it was! One of those rare July days when
the tints of the earth and the hues of the sky, though varied in
color, seem to blend in one beautiful and harmonious whole.
The cypress and the myrtle, emblems of deeds of virtue and
renown, had already donned their summer dress. The many
flowers bowed gently under the weight of the fitful butterfly
or the industrious bee, or tossed to and fro lightly in the arms
of the morning breeze. Overhead maples, resplendent in their
fabric of soft and delicate green, arched themselves like fine-
spun cobwebs, through which filigree the sun projected his rays
at irregular and frequent intervals, lending only an occasional
patch of sunlight, here and there, to the more exposed portions
of the garden.
But nature had no power to drive Majorie's image from his
mind. Try as he would, he could not distract his attention to
the many problems which ordinarily would have engaged
thoughts. What mattered it to him that the French fleet was
momentarily expected, or that the Continental Congress was
again meeting in the city, or that he had met with certain sus-
picious looking individuals during the course of the day ! There was
yet one who looked peculiarly suspicious and who was enveloped
as far as his knowledge was concerned, in a veil of mystery of
the strangest depth. She was a flower too fair to blush unseen
or unattached. His own unworthiness confounded him.
Nevertheless he was determined to call that very day, in re-
sponse to her generous invitation of last night, and in accordance
672 THE LOYAUST [Feb^
with the custom of the time. He would, perchance, learn more
of her, of her home, of her life, of her friends. But would he
excite in her the interest she was exciting in him? The thought
of his possible remoteness from her, pained him and made his
heart sink. The noblest characters experience strange sensations
of desolation and wretchedness at the thought of disapproval and
rejection. Esteem, the testimony of our neighbor's appreciation,
the approval of those worth while, these are the things for which
we yearn with fondest hopes. To know that we have done well
is satisfaction, but to know that our efforts and our work are
valued by others is one of the noblest of pleasures. Stephen
longed to know how he stood in the lady's esteem, and so her
little world was his universe.
Dispatching the day's business as best he could, the expec-
tant knight set out to storm the castle of his lady. Ere long the
little white house of her describing rose before him. He had seen
it many times in other days, but now it was invested with a new
and absorbing interest. There it stood, plain yet stately, with a
great pointed and shingled roof, its front and side walls unbroken
save for a gentle projection supported by two uniform Doric pil-
lars which served as a sort of a portal before the main entrance.
Numerous windows with small panes of glass, and with trim green
shutters thrown full open revealing neatly arranged curtains,
glinted and glistened in the beams of the afternoon sun. The
nearer of the two great chimneys which ran up the sides, like
two great buttresses of an old English abbey, gave indications
of generous and well fed fireplaces recessed in the walls of the
inner rooms. The lawns and walks were uncommonly well kept,
and the whole atmosphere of the little home was one of comfort,
simplicity and neatness, suggesting the sweet and serene happi-
ness reigning within.
Stephen closed the gate behind him. A moment later he
had seized the brass knocker and delivered three moderate blows.
"Captain Meagher!" said a soft voice. "I am so pleased you
have come."
"Mistress Allison, the pleasure is indeed mine, I assure you,"
replied Stephen as he grasped her hand, releasing it with a gentle
pressure.
She led the way into the narrow hall.
"Mother!" shK addressed a sweetly smiling middle-aged
woman who now stood at her side, "I have the honor of present-
ing to you. Captain Meagher, of the staff of General Washington,
my partner of last evening." And she betrayed a sense of pride
in that bit of history.
1920.] THE LOYAUST 673
Stephen took the matron's hand, for among the Americans
the custom prevailed of shaking hands, albeit the French visitors
maintained that it was a '*comic custom.** Stephen thought it
democratic and in keeping with the spirit of the country.
The parlor opened immediately to the right and thither
Stephen was conducted without further ceremony. Mr. Allison
would be in shortly; he was as yet busied with the trade at the
shop. The old clock at the corner of the room with its quaint
figure of Time adorning the top, and its slowly moving pendulum
proclaimed the hour of five, the hour when the duties of the day
came to a close and social life began. The old fireplace, black
in this season of desuetude, but brilliant in its huge brass and-
irons like two pilasters of gold, caught the eye at the extreme
end of the room, while, in the corner near the window, a ma-
hogany round tea-table stood upright like an expanded fan or
palm leaf.
Stephen seated himself in a great chair that lay to one side
of the room.
"I had the good fortune of being your daughter*s partner
for the evening, and I am happy to be enabled to pay my respects
to you.'* He addressed Mrs. Allison, who was nearer to him on
his left.
**Marjorie told me. Captain, of your extreme kindness to her.
We appreciate it very much. Did she conduct herself becom-
ingly? She is a stranger to such brilliant affairs.*'
^'Splendidly!** answered Stephen. ''And she danced charm-
ingly," and he glanced at her as he spoke and thought he de-
tected a faint blush.
"I did not attend on account of its extravagance,** remarked
Mrs. Allison. "I had duties at home, and Marjorie was well
attended.'*
Indeed!" pronounced Marjorie.
It was magnificent, to be sure,** went on Stephen, "but it will
excite no uncertain comment. Repiiblican simplicity last night
was lost from sight.**
"Which I scarce approve of,** declared Marjorie.
"You did not suit your action to your thought,** smiled her
mother.
"True,** replied the girl, "yet I told you that I was anxious
to attend simply to behold the novelty of it all. Now that it is
over, I disapprove of the splendor and extravagance especially in
these times of need.'*
"Yes,** volunteered Stephen, "she did voice similar senti-
ments to me last evening. Nevertheless she is not alone in her
?0L. GE. 43
"1
««1
674 THE LOYAUST [Feb^
criticism. The Gazette today publishes a leading article excoriat-
ing the Military Governor for his use of the teams, which he had
commanded under pretence of revictualling the army» for the
transportation of his private effects to and from the City Tavern.
It spells dissatisfaction at best/'
'There has been dissatisfaction from the first day on which
he took up residence at the Slate Roof House/' said Mrs. Allison.
The figure of Mr. Allison appeared in the room to the rear.
Stephen rose quickly to greet him, expressing his extreme
pleasure.
It was a great day for a tradesman when an oflSlcer of the
Continental Army supped at his table. The house was in a mild
uproar since Marjorie announced the coming distinction, on her
return from the ball. From the kitchen chimney went up a pillar
of smoke. Mrs. Allison and two of her neighbors, who were
proud to lend assistance on such an important occasion, could
be seen passing in and out continually. A large roast lay sim-
mering in the pan diffusing savory and provoking fumes through-
out the house. And it was with distinct pride that Mrs. Allison
announced to the company that they might take their places about
the festive board.
The discourse bore on various matters, prominence being
given to politics and the affairs of the army. Mr. Allison took
care to ask no question that might embarrass Stephen. The com-
plaints of the tradesmen, the charges of the Whigs, the mur-
murings of the Tories and the annoying articles in the morning
Gazette, all were touched upon in the course of the meal.
Stephen volunteered the information that Conway and Gates
were in hiding and that Clinton was driven to New York, where
Washington was watching his every move, like a hawk, from the
heights of Morristown.
''General Washington holds General Arnold in the highest
esteem," remarked Mr. Allison.
"As the bravest General in the Continental Army," quietly
replied Stephen.
"He would make a poor statesman," went on the host
"He is a soldier first and last/'
"Should a soldier be wanting in tact and diplomacy?"
"A good soldier should possess both."
•Then General Arnold is not a good soldier," declared Mr.
Allison.
"A criticism he hardly deserves," was the simple reply.
•Tou saw the Gazetted
*Tes. I read that article to which you undoubtedly refer."
1920.] THE LOYAUST 675
"And you agree with it?"
••No. I do not."
••I am sorry about it all. Yet I am inclined to hold the Gov-
ernor responsible to a great extent. He would be an aristocratf
and it is the society of such that he covets."
••Perhaps jealousy might inspire criticism. Envy, you know,
is the antagonist of the fortunate."
••But it is not his deeds alone that cause the unrest among
our citizens. It is not what he does but what he says. It helps
matters not in the least to express dissatisfaction with the man-
ner of conducting the war, neither by criticizing the enactments
of the Congress, or vehemently opposing the new foreign alliance.
This does not sound well from the lips of one of our foremost
leaders and we do not like it."
••I was not aware that he voiced any opposition to the fur-
therance of the alliance with France," declared Stephen.
••He might not have spoken in formal protest, but he has
spoken in an informal manner times without number," rieplied
Mr. Allison.
••I am sorry to hear that. I did not expect such from Gen-
eral Arnold," muttered Stephen.
Marjorie had as yet taken no part in the conversation. She
was interested and alive, however, to every word, anxious, if pos-
sible, to learn Stephen's attitude in regard to the common talk.
She took delight in his defence of his General, notwithstanding
the overwhelming evidence against him, and was proud of the
trait of loyalty her guest disclosed in the face of her father's
opposition.
Mrs. Allison and Marjorie participated in the conversation
when the topics bore, for the most part, on current events, un-
interesting to Mr. Allison, who munched in silence until some
incomplete sentence called for a remark or two from him by way
of a conclusion. Stephen's animated interest in the more com-
mon topics of the day, led Mrs. Allison and Marjorie to the con-
clusion that he was a more practical and a more versatile man
than the head of their own house.
All in all he made a profound impression on the family, and
when the repast was finished and the table had been cleared, they
sat long over the fruit and the nuts, before retiring to the sitting
room for the evening.
•Tou are not in the habit of frequenting brilliant functions?"
Stephen asked of Marjorie when they were quite alone. It was
customary for the older folks to retire from the company of the
younger set shortly after the dinner grace had been said. Of
676 THE LOYAUST [Feb^
course* grace had to be said; Mr. Allison would permit no bread
to be broken at his house without first imploring benedictions
from heaven, and, when the formalities of the meal had been
concluded, returning thanks for the good things enjoyed.
*'I never have attended before,*' answered Marjorie, smooth-
ing out a side of her apron with her hand.
'Ton are quite friendly with the Shippen family, I under-
stand."
"Oh yes! For several years we have been united. I am in-
vited to all their functions. Still I am not fond of society.*'
"And you spend your time alone?" Stephen was persistent
in his questions. He sat opposite to her and studied her expres-
sion.
"Between here and the store, and perhaps with Peggy. This
is about all, for I seldom visit. I am hopelessly old-fashioned
in some things, mother tells me, and I suppose you will say the
same if I tell you more,*' and she looked at him with her head
half raised, her lips parted somewhat in a quizzical smile.
"Not at all! You are what I rather hoped to find you, al-
though I did not dare to give expression to it You can, possibly,
be of some assistance to me."
"Gladly would I perform any service, however humble, for
the cause of our country." Marjorie sat upright, all attention
at the thought.
'Ton remember I told you that I was detailed in the city on
special work," Stephen went on.
"I do."
'^ell, it is a special work but it is also a very indefinite
work. There is a movement afoot, but of its nature and purpose
I at this moment am entirely ignorant. I am here to discover
clues."
"And have you no material to work on except that? It is
very vague, to say the least."
"That and suspicion. Howe found the city a nest of Tories;
but he also found it swarmed with patriots, whose enthusiasm,
and vigor, and patience, and determination must have impressed
him profoundly as portending disaster for the British cause.
With the morale of the people so high, and renewed hope and
confidence swelling their bosoms, a complete military victory must
have appeared hopeless to the British General. What was left?
Dissension, or rebellion, or treason, or anything that will play
havoc with the united determination of the Colonists."
She breathed heavily as she rested her chin on her hand
absorbed in the vision that he was calling up.
1920-] THE LOYALIST 677
*' Arnold's victory at Saratoga has convinced Britain that the
war over here cannot be won,'* he continued. *' Already has Lord
North thrown a bomb into the ranks of the proud Tories by his
liberal proposals. Of course they will be entirely rejected by us,
and the war will continue until complete independence is
acknowledged. True, we had no such idea in mind when we
entered this conflict, but now we are convinced that victory is on
our side and that a free and independent form of government
is the most suitable for us. We have enunciated certain prin-
ciples which are possible of realization only under a democratic
form of government, where the people rule and where the rulers
are responsible to the people. Such a system is possible only in a
great republic, and that is what England must now recognize.
Otherwise the war must go on."
''Have our aims taken such definite form? I know — "
**No! They have not," interrupted Stephen, "they have not
and that is where trouble is to be expected. But such is the state
of mind of many of the more experienced leaders and their opin-
ion will bear much scrutiny. But it is because all are not united
in this, that there is room for treason under the motive of mis-
guided patriotism. And it is to scent every possible form of that
malignancy that I have been sent here; sent to the very place
where the Tories most abound and where such a plot is most
liable to take root"
"And you expect me to be of assistance to you," asked Mar-
jorie, proud of the confidence which she so readily gained.
"I expect much. But perhaps nothing will eventuate. I can
rely on you, however. For the present, naught is to be done.
When the time comes, I shall tell you."
"But what can I do. I am but a mere girl."
"Did I think you to be ordinary, I might not have asked
you," quickly exchanged Stephen.
Marjorie dropped her head and began studying the stitches
in her gown. But only for a second for she as quickly raised
her head and asked:
"Wherein then can I be of service to you?"
"Listen!" He brought his chair to a point nearly opposite
hers. She was seated on the settee, yet he made no attempt to
share it with her.
*Tou are friendly with the Shippen family," he went on.
"Now, do not misinterpret me. I shall require no betrayal of
confidence. But it is generally known that the Shippens are
Tories, not avowedly so, yet in heart and in thought. It is also
generally known that their house was the centre of society dur-
1
678 THE LOYAUST [Feb^
ing the days of the British occupation* at which all maimer of
men assembled. The walls of that house, could they but speak,
are able to relate many momentous conversations held over the
teacups, or in quiet corners. The family themselves must know
many things which might be invaluable to us."
"And you want me to learn that for you?'* inquired Marjorie,
in alarm, as the horrible thought forced itself upon her.
''I want you to do nothing of the kind," quickly answered
Stephen. 'Tar be it from me to require you to barter your
benevolence. I should deplore any such method as most dis-
honorable and unworthy of the noble cause in which we are en-
gaged. No! I ask this, simply, that through you I might be per-
mitted the honor of visiting the home of Miss Shippen and that
by being acquainted with the family I might acquire a general
entree to the Tory social circle. In this way might I effect my pur-
pose and perchance stumble across information of vital impor-
tance. Thus, can you be of great assistance to me."
"I shall be delighted to do this, and I shall tell you more —
perhaps you may ask me to do something more noble — some-
time — ** She hesitated to express the wish which was father
to her thought.
"Sometime I expect you to be of real service to me and to
our country — sometime — **
Marjorie did not answer. She knew what she would like to
say, but dared not. Why should he unfold his mission to her at
this, almost their first meeting? And why should he expect her
to be of such assistance to him first, and then to the country?
And then, why should she feel so responsive, so ready to spend
herself, her energy, her whole being at the mere suggestion of
this young man, whom, until last evening, she had never thought
to exist. She felt that she was as wax in the hands of this soldier;
she knew it and enjoyed it and only waited the moment when
his seal would come down upon her and stamp her more to his
liking. She was slightly younger than he, and happily his con-
trary in nearly all respects. He was fair, she was dark ; his eyes
were blue, hers brown; he was lusty and showed promise of
broadness, she was slender.
Twice she opened her moulh as if to speak to him, and each
time she dropped again her head in reflective silence. She did not
talk to this young man as she might to any number of her more
intimate acquaintances. Even the very silence was magnetic
Further utterance would dispel the charm. That she would enlist
in his service she knew as well as she knew her own existence,
but that he should arouse so keen an interest in her, so buoyant
1920,] THE LOYAUST 679
an attitude, so secure an assurance, amazed her and filled her
with awe. She had never before experienced quite the same
sensation that now dismayed her, nor had any one ever brought
home to her her worth as did this young soldier. Yes, she would
help him, but how?
So they sat and talked. They soon forgot to speak of His
Excellency, or the Army, or the Shippens. Neither did they re-
solve the doubts that might have been entertained concerning the
manner of men who frequented the home of Peggy and her sis-
ters; nor the Alliance which had just been established, nor the
vital signification of the event. They just talked over a field of
affairs, none of which bore any special relation to anyone save
their own selves. At length the old clock felt constrained to speak
up and frown at them for their unusual delay and their profligate
waste of tallow and dips.
Stephen rose at once. Marjorie saw him to the door, where
she gave him her hand in parting.
"We have indeed been honojjg^p'f^BI^ay, Captain, and I trust
that the near future ^^^'^^^^S^^Sretu^ of (he same. I am entirely
dl/n^rjpC^spered Marjorie wondering why the words
"L^STto her more reajily. .^.
l</r»'«^n the contrary. Miss AlUson. it » ^ ^°^^ ,.. He bowed
|?ed My humble respects to yonr parents. Adieu,
•^cef uUy! -l^eeled. and went out the door.
[TO BE CONTINUED.J
!
' I
J
flew ISoofts.
ST. JOAN OP ARC. The Life Story of the Maid of Orleans, By
the Rev- Denis Lynch, S.J. New York: Benziger Brothers.
$2.50.
The canonization of Joan of Arc is the occasion of this pub-
lication. Moreover, the searching examination of her process, has
resulted in setting the personality, the purity, the sanctity of the
Maid of Orleans in such high relief as to attract biographers.
Joan has never lacked admirers — admirers of her chivalrous
career, her courage in devoting herself to all her nature shrank
from, at the call of God; men not always of her own faith, but
capable of appreciating nobility wheresoever found, such as de
Quincy, Lang, Clemens, Quicherat; to name but a few. But the re-
searches of the last fifty years have brought to light many new
documents, all tending to the honor of Joan. In this task of
investigating the true sources of her life, the narnieTOf Pfere Ayroles,
SJ., is prominent. If history is often a conspiracy algai^st the
truth, it would seem that the worst enemies of the God, W]^ ^^
Truth, is the hypocrite who lies. The task of investigating db^
truth with regard to Joan, was made more onerous by the sup-^
pression or destruction of testimony. It is hard enough to un-
earth documents, but it becomes well-nigh impossible when they
have been tampered with by those who, not content to blacken
a reputation for their own day, were so wise in their generation
as to leave little trace of their treachery. Joan's worst enemies
were not, to our mind, the violent English, but the traitorous
Burgundians, the supine French, who lifted not a finger to save d
their own champion, and, worst of all, the tribunal masquerading
as the Church, which condemned her. Her death was a foregone
conclusion. Arrayed against her were the hatred of the enemy,
the fanaticism of the University of Paris and the traitor's fear
lest his victim escape to tell the tale.
Chapter III. gives us a depressing view of the state of France,
nor must we forget that Joan's lot was cast towards the close of
the Middle Ages — she died in 1431. On page forty-seven some
error has crept in concerning a date, 1812 — ^probably a misprint.
In Chapters XIX. and XX. one is struck by the fact that the same
ground fought over by our soldiers in the late War, was contested
by Joan, and for the same prize^ — the possession of Paris.
Few of the actors come out of the story with much honor.
r"
1920.] NEW BOOKS 681
save their victim; but we think the blame has not been quite
fairly apportioned* and the defence of Cliarles VII., St. Joan's
'"gentle Dauphin," is not conspicuous for its success.
THE REFORMATION. By Rev. Hugh P. Smyth. Chicago : Ex-
tension Press. $1.25.
In a modest preface, the author states that his book was pri-
marily designed to meet a local need, to combat the partisan teach-
ing of history in the public schools. Since this same difficulty is
multiplied throughout the country, the book also fills a very defin-
ite, universal need. It is one of the sanest and soundest, as well
as one of the most readable commentaries on the Reformation
and its connection with modern American Protestantism that we
have seen. It appraises fairly and intelligently the natural good
consequent on the advent of Protestantism and at the same time
spares no denunciation of the great harm it has done. It is a
vigorous attack on the Reformers and their systems, but shows
no bitterness. To belie any criticism as to its truthfulness, it
proves its contentions and statements by numerous quotations,
almost exclusively from recognized Protestant sources.
The scope of the book is wide, while its bulk is comparatively
small. After an enlightening chapter on the causes of the Ref-
ormation, or more properly religious Revolution, it sketches the
Reformers and their systems as they developed in ten various
countries. It then analyzes the tenets and expansion of the mod-
ern American Protestant sects. We confess that we are particu-
larly partial to the chapters on Protestantism, taken collectively.
The author has clearly sensed its weaknesses, and as clearly and
forcibly exposed them. The book will prove helpful to all who
are called upon to answer "the constant and unabashed misrep-
resentations of Catholic doctrine and history, of which local
schools have been persistently guilty.**
THE MIND OF ARTHUR JAMES RALFOUR. By Wilfrid M.
Short New York: George H. Doran Co. $2.50.
It is a reverent mind, a large and luminous intelligence oper-
ant in the domain of religion, philosophy, science, letters, politics
which is here revealed. The volume, consisting of comprehensive
selections from the writings and speeches of Mr. Balfour, covers
every phase of his keen mental activity exercised through several
decades on the supreme concerns of humanity. His two chief
works, A Defence of Philosophic Doubt, and The Foundations of
Belief are especially laid under contribution. The passages
chosen are at once a record and a memorial of noble service ren-
682 NEW BOOKS [Feb.,
dered the cause of Theism against the systems of Naturalism,
Positivism, and Evolution. The relations of reason and authority,
of science and religion are definitely elucidated; the philosophy
of aesthetics is made the subject of incisive discussion.
In other departments we witness the same virile play of mind
— on problems of education, of eugenics, of medical and psychic
research, and on diplomatic and political issues of the day, in-
volving the alliance with America, and the War with Germany.
The exquisite sense of form evidenced throughout these pages,
and the justness of the estimates in the literary papers testify
what a litterateur was lost in Mr. Balfour, whose distinction in so
many different fields of endeavor entitles him to be regarded as
'"one of the most able and unusual intellects of our day."
POEMS. By Theodore Maynard. New York: Frederick A.
Stokes Co. $1.35 net
It is scarcely more than a year since life, for the present
scribe, was made considerably more joyous by the duty of re-
viewing a small volume entitled Folly, by a young English poet
named Theodore Maynard. If we remember rightly, we hailed
him straightway as one of the blithe band of "modern mediaeval-
ists," and were carried on to declare that the book seemed des-
tined not only to provide beautiful things for the present but to
promise great things for the future.
And now this future — or rather this reviewer — or rather, in-
deed, this poet — is more than justified, not by new work, but by
a much richer, fuller and fatter gathering of his past achieve-
ment. For the present volume contains the lovesome Patmorean
dedication and nearly all of Folly, with what the author himself
thinks best worth preserving from his two earlier books. Drums
of Defeat (1915) and Laughs and Whiffs of Song (1917). It also
carries the strong and sonorous introduction, which Gilberi Ches-
terion contributed to one of the former volumes, and which drew
immediate attention to the fervid and colorful work of the young
poet. Altogether it is a precious book — a book in the main new
to American readers, and one which no lover of the best in mod-
ern poetry can afford to be without.
Not, indeed, that its contents are all in the poet's best vein —
no volume from a youthful and living poet is ever, probably,
wholly in his best vein. But it is splendidly a part of the vital
man — and the not less vital child — who happens to dwell in Theo-
dore Maynard. There are rumors of the "Chesterbelloc" in many
of the charming ballads, and the poem 'Tolly" will inevitably
recall Joyce Kilmer's "heart-remembered" lyric of the same title —
1920.] NEW BOOKS 683
in spirit if not in letter. But there is a distinctly new voice and
a new mystical vision in such poems as '* Apocalypse/' or the
''Divine Miser/' or in that ringing song of Gothic spaciousness and
bold final couplet, his song of ''Laughter." To voice and to vision,
here's hoping a long life — and in all seriousness, a merry one!
LO, AND BEHOLD TE! By Seumas MacManus. New York:
Frederick A. Stokes Co. $1.60 net.
In these tales culled apparently at random from the stores of
Irish legend and Irish experience, we have Seumas MacManus at
his best — high praise for even a good book. In their unforced
drollery, their quaint, elfin, tongue-in-the-cheek wisdom that will
have its laugh in the end at human nature, they seem the very
embodiment of the mother-wit of this people, above all laughable
and above all lovable, whom this native author knows so well. He
tells his stories in the manner that best of all matches their ma-
terial — the leisurely manner which suggests boundless time and
limitless good nature, the straight-faced manner of the rogue who,
with a perfectly grave countenance, presents to you the astound-
ing adventures of Billy Burns on the moon, the irresistible man-
ner which somehow manages to convey the radiance, the un-
quenchable happiness of the Irish temperament. The tales are
delicious throughout, and the book might well be suggested as a
general antidote to certain types of "realistic" fiction.
AMERICAN PAINTING AND ITS TRADITION. By John C. Van
Dyke. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. $2.50 net.
The nine painters, to each of whom Professor Van Dyke de-
votes a chapter of his volume, are Innes, Wyant, Martin, Homer,
La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, and Sargent. He treats
each one sympathetically, partly from the point of view of the art
critic, partly from that of the biographer. One could wish that
certain other painters had been included, and that the develop-
ment of each of those selected for treatment had been pointed out
in more detail. Little is done to trace the continuity and growth
of American art traditions. The book is rather a series of separ-
ate chapters sufficiently isolated to have appeared as a series of
readable magazine articles.
Readers of The Catholic World will be interested to know
that Homer Martin was a Catholic and for years lived and worked
in a house adjoining the Paulist Fathers* House, and that John La
Farge, for whom Professor Van Dyke feels keen admiration, did
extensive and remarkable work in the Church of St. Paul the Apos-
tle in New York Qty. Of Homer Martin, Professor Van Dyke well
684 NEW BOOKS [Feb^
says: ""His landscapes were deserted of man; they were silent,
forsaken places, with a solemn stillness about them. Only God and
Homer Martin had seen them/* Professor Van Dyke treats La
Farge enthusiastically : "'In the arts he was our first great scholar
and spoke as one having authority. With his learning, his imag-
ination, and his skill he gave rank to American art more than any
other of the craft For that reason he is today hailed as master,
and written down in our annals as belonging with the Olympians.
He deserves the title and the separate niche."
Not the least valuable of Professor Van Dyke's chapters is
that on James McNeil Whistler, whose Ten O'Clock and Gentle Art
of Making Enemies exacted the penalty by their amazing bril-
liance of winning him repute as a wit who happened to paint, in-
stead of as an artist who achieved an occasional witticism.
As Professor Van Dyke had a personal acquaintance with all
the painters of whom he writes, there is about his studies an air
of intimacy which lends charm to the volume. The reader on
laying it down may feel that the last word on the traditions of
America painting has by no means been said, but he will have
learned much of value regarding a select and brilliant group of
American painters.
A SUBJECT-INDEX TO THE POEMS OF EDMUND SPENSER
By Charles H. Whitman. New Haven : Yale University Press.
$3.50.
As one of the soundest of American Spenserians, Dr. Whit-
man has long been known and widely honored by scholarly stu-
dents of earlier English literature. This fine Index to his favorite
poet's works is the fruit of years of careful investigation and inti-
mate loving knowledge of Spenser's text, and of painstaking analy-
sis of the results achieved by other scholars. The author has been
able to revise his manuscript since the recent publication of Pro-
fessor Osgood's fine Spenser Concordance. In these two works
the student of the great Elizabethan poet has now a splendid ap-
paratus with which to approach his task.
This Subject-Index is at once an index and a dictionary. "'It is
an index," writes Dr. Whitman, "in so far as it includes the names
of persons, places, animals and things; whatever, in fact, has a
function and a definite meaning — whatever, in the compiler's
judgment, would be likely to prove of interest to the student of
Spenser and his age. It partakes also of the nature of a diction-
ary in that it includes brief explanations, allegorical and otherwise,
whenever such explanations seem necessary." Like so many of
the more valuable results of American scholarship in the field of
1920.] NEW BOOKS 685
English, this Index owes its inspiration to» and was undertaken
at the suggestion of. Professor A. S. Cook of Yale.
From recent indications it is not, perhaps, rash to predict for
Spenser a growing constituency among modern readers of poetry.
Too long has he been regarded solely as **the poet's poet." Much,
of course, yet remains to be done for his elucidation. As Dr.
Whitman points out, there is need of a Dictionary of Spenser
as complete and definitive as Toynbee's magisterial Dante Dic-
tionary. One might add also that the time is surely ripe for an
extended treatment of Spenser's mind and art such as Sir Sidney
Colvin has lately done for Keats. Cory's recent book is unsatisfac-
tory, and unworthy of Spenser's genius. Meantime Dr. Whitman
is heavily the creditor of all who love poetry and appreciate sound
and vital scholarship.
MY ROSE AND OTHER POEMS. By Euphemia Macleod. Bos-
ton: The Four Seas Co. $1.25.
The present volume has imaginative quality, and its author, ex-
cept for occasional slight metrical lapses, is mistress of the finely
cadenced line. She has what seems to be rare for poets in these
days, a spiritual outlook, and — ^which is rarer still — spiritual in-
sight. A number of the poems are written in behalf of dumb
animals or in protest against vivisection, but unlike many anti-
vivisectionists. Miss Macleod does not restrict her tenderness sim-
ply to the brute creation. Though in several places she would
appear to disclose a distinct pantheist tendency, her work as a
whole betokens what our Anglican friends call the ''sacramental-
ist attitude." One of the most charming poems in the collection
is 'The Word Made Flesh," a colloquy between the Blessed Mother
and the Divine Infant. Other pieces of distinction are: "'My
Rose," ''Communion," 'Tour Little Flower," and the sonnet
'Triendship." In the long poem "The Spell of Casals," there are
passages showing, in cadence and phrasing, the influence of
Francis Thompson.
OUR AMERICA. By Waldo Frank. New York: Boni & Liveright.
$2.00 net.
The author tells us in a foreword that he has written this
book to interpret America to France. It is a unique work, prob-
ably without competitors; most Americans would scarcely know
themselves in its mirror. To say that it is without interest would
be to say what is not true ; to say that it is thoughtlessly written
would be a hasty comment on an author whose work ever3rwhere
evidences the pale cast of thought. It is, indeed, an interesting.
686 NEW BOOKS [Feb-,
thoughtful book, written in an easy» somewhat emotional style.
But it is nothing if not pessimistic in its historical backward
glancing and in its view of the present. And it is often lacking
in a sense of perspective and proportion. Of the old school of
writers Mr. Frank has little to say, but he is full of the Spoon
River Anthology, of Dreiser, Anderson and Frederick Booth.
New England is redeemed in Thoreau and Robert Frost and Amy
Lowell, who is, by the way, 'Hhe first true man of letters of our
America." And "the song of Whitman's vision was the orchestra
of life."
There is much to be gained by a perusal of Mr. Frank's in-
terpretation of Our America. But in reading the book we cannot
help being careful in the matter of where we place the emphasis.
Perhaps the author will agree that the pronoun in his title is im-
portant. He surely does not say that he is speaking of your
America. And if your conception of America in history and art
and literature differs at all from his, well, you are not of the elect
of whom he is the prophet. What could be simpler?
DAVID BLAIZE AND THE BLUE DOOR. By E. F. Benson. New
York: George H. Doran Ck). $2.00 net.
The David Blaize, to whom Mr. Benson introduced his read-
ers some months ago, was such a lovable little fellow it is not
strange his creator should cling to him. Many would have wel-
comed his second appearance under conditions more or less like
those of the first, for David Blaize was an interesting picture of
life in an English public school. Mr. Benson has not followed
this plan, however, but presents his hero at the age of six and
leads him through a blue door of phantasy into a fairy tale. The
story is told in a manner that so strikingly resembles Lewis Car-
roll's, it is hard to believe the likeness unintentional. The in-
evitable comparisons thus challenged are not favorable to this
book, which is scarcely to be counted among Mr. Benson's most
successful achievements. His qualifications are many and in-
creasingly command respect; but to hit the mark in this special
line of endeavor requires a touch of unanalyzable magic which
we do not find in David Blaize and the Blue Door.
IBSEN IN ENGLAND. By Miriam Alice Franc Boston: The
Four Seas Co. $2.00 net.
Miss Franc writes with a refreshing vigor and although she
admires the Norwegian dramatist, her admiration has nothing of
the hectic about it. Her book involved a considerable amount of
research which has been carefully done. Miss Franc brings into
1920.] NEW BOOKS 687
sharp contrast the two seemingly irreconcilable groups of English
critics ; the one led by William Archer, who was among the earli-
est heralds of Ibsen, the other by Qement Scott, who saw in
Ibsen *'a foe to decency and a reviler of sacred things." As Miss
Franc pictures the situation one is reminded of an exciting Rugby
game with the critics fighting vigorously on opposing teams, the
great theatre-going public looking on, and the Norwegian dra-
matist playing the unenviable part of the football.
The question as to whether Ibsen belongs with Sophocles and
Shakespeare or whether he sinned against truth by portraying
psychological anomalies instead of real men and women is one
which remains unanswered, even after a perusal of Miss Franc's
volume. To the minds of many the laudations of Mr. Archer and
the pro-Ibsen critics prove nothing except that a cult may arise,
and the clamorous insistence of its worship may win a reverent
hearing and a large adherence. Whether for good or ill Ibsen's
influence, as Miss Franc points out, has shown itself unmistak-
ably in the work of Pinero, Jones, and George Bernard Shaw.
One does not need to be a devotee of Ibsen to appreciate this
interesting volume, which is unquestionably a worth-while addi-
tion to the history of modern day drama.
TROUPING FOR THE TROOPS. By Margaret Mayo. New York:
George H. Doran Ck). $1.25 net.
Much has been said of that new element introduced into the
War, the employment of the actors' art for the preservation of
morale among our troops; but little of this has come at first hand
from any member of the profession whose name has long been
proverbial for swift answer to appeals of charity, and is now no
less honorably associated with ideals of patriotism, fervent and
practical. This slender volume is Miss Mayo's personal account
of the adventures that befell her and her fellow-players on their
mission of entertainment at the front. There is not the slightest
trace of exploitation of anyone concerned in the undertaking; it
is a straightforward narrative of what they did and saw, light and
amusing in its general tone. Yet, though its seriousness is re-
served for the distressing scenes witnessed, its lively wit is exer-
cied mainly upon the hardships endured by the performers. It
is clear that this contribution of gayety was made at the cost of
sacrifice. Response to the significance underlying its humor is
aroused by the remark of the young actress whom Miss Mayo
cites as having, midway on the return journey from a specially
exhausting experience, revived sufficiently to sigh her thankful-
ness that she had only one life to give for her country.
688 NEW BOOKS [Feb^
FRENCH WATS AND THEIR MEANING. By Edith Wharton.
New York: D. Appleton & Co. $1.50 net.
Here, in subject-matter at least, is an appropriate counter-
blast to Madame de Treymes, the brilliant novelette of French
life with which Mrs. Wharton gratified some of her ardent readers
and piqued other some, perhaps a dozen years ago. The earlier
book presented an interpretation of the French moral and social
code which was certainly anything but flattering. Even
those who suspected that the sinister and all-devouring fam-
ily depicted so tellingly in Madame de Treymes represented, in
reality, a few instances erected into a generalization against whose
darkness the simple Anglo-Saxon virtues of the hero might shine
the more resplendently, could hardly have been indifferent to the
result. Mrs. Wharton is so completely the master of her effects
that one puts down the book, half convinced, at least imaginative-
ly. In this present volume of studies, a totally different reading of
the same society is presented — ^a reading which appeals to one as
being probably much more faithful to reality. It leaves us in a
mood which, if not always understanding, is, for the most part,
profoundly respectful of a heroic, disciplined race, at once bril-
liantly homogeneous and brilliantly varied. Mrs. Wharton is par-
ticularly worth reading on the nature of French civilization.
THE GROPER. By Henry G. Aikman. New York: Boni ft
Liveright. $1.60.
SINGING MOUNTAINS. By A. B. Cunningham. New York:
George H. Doran Co. $1.50 net.
These two novels are minor examples of a type of literature
very prevalent in our country at present, and always deserving of
respectful consideration — the class of writing which strives to
present honestly and lucidly some particularly phase of our na-
tional existence. The Groper has its locale at and near Detroit,
and traces the fortunes of a rather unusually sensitive youth who
comes to that city just as the automobile business has begun its
boom. The struggles and initial failures of Lee Hilquit, the sor-
did avenue by which he finally arrives at success, his presump-
tuous and windy folly as a millionaire, and the salutary crash
with which the book closes, are told with a good deal of fidelity
to fact, and some considerable humor. The book does not, as the
saying is, ''get anywhere," in spite of its faint flavoring of didac-
ticism, however, and it leaves one in a state of uncontented specu-
lation as to what particular significance the life of its chief char-
acter can have had to its author, to spur him on to record with
so much truth a career which seems, after all, to have no message
of permanent, or even passing, value.
1920.] NEW BOOKS 689
Mr. Cunningham's novel is much more of a success. His
chapters, in mere outline, ^ould make tiresome reading, it is true.
Their incident would never seem to rise above the level described
in The Vicar of Wakefield — "all our migrations were from the
blue bed to the brown." And yet, unremarkable as it is for either
fine writing or inventiveness of plot, his book possesses a sort of
homespun distinction quite unusual among novels of its class.
This quality is partly a reflection of the native wholesomeness
of the characters with whom he deals, and proceeds partly from
his ability to deal with them convincingly and truly. Into his
rambling account of the fortunes of the family of Peter Rhodes,
the Baptist minister of Barren Rocks, of their calm existence in
which squirrel hunts and prayer meetings furnish an exhiliration
almost too lively to be seemly, going away to school becomes a
dark and daring adventure, and seeking a job in Charleston takes
on the aspect almost of a cataclysm — into his chronicle of this
rude and patriarchial existence Mr. Cunningham has infused a
refreshing reality. He knows not merely his background here,
but his human beings as well. The book is good — not excitingly
good, but good enough to leave on the reader a pleasant and
unqualified impression of restfulness and sincerity.
A HISTORY OP THE NEW THOUGHT MOVEMENT. By Hora-
tio W, Dresser. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co. $2.00.
The "New Thought" is known to one outside the fold rather
by parody of it than by its cardinal principles. Because of the
decidedly superior attitude of its devotees and its insistence on
mind-power over physical realities, it offers an easy target for
the humorist. Such a volume as the present, therefore, detailing
the historical as well as the philosophical development of the
movement, will prove interesting to those who wish to know,
seriously, in what the New Testament consists. It is no easy task
to compass, within definite and dogmatic limits, a system whose
basis is intellectual irrestraint and in which each succeeding
author, disclaiming his master, asserts his own originality. Mr.
Dresser, however, who has been identified with the movement
almost since its inception, endeavors to discover the connecting
link between the various divergent stages of opinion. The move-
ment had its origin some sixty years ago, when P. P. Quimby
discarded the mesmerism he had been practising, and discovered
in the Bible the validity of the mental cure. After the death of
Quimby, Rev. W. F. Evans found an affinity between Quimby*s
teaching and that of Swedenborg, and later prepared the way
for the incorporation of Fichte and Hegel's philosophy. About
690 NEW BOOKS [Feb^
this time, the commercialism of Mrs. Eddy created a schism in
the ranks of the mental healers. Though her branch is the better
known, it was from the more liberal wing of the movement that
the New Thought, in the early nineties, began to take form.
Gradually it spread throughout the United States and in some
foreign lands, until, in 1915, an International New Thought Alli-
ance was founded. The modern movement is a far call from
the doctrine first enunciated by Quimby. It is a distortion of
some few psychological truisms, an exaggeration of false idealis-
tic philosophy in which the mind is deified, and an arrogant
assumption that it alone has the true interpretation of Christ's
mission and spirit. Its appeal is to those choice spirits of the
day who are hungry for something esoteric and distinctive.
SWEDEN'S LAUREATE. Poems of Verner von Heidenstam.
Translated with an Introduction by Charles Wharton Stork.
New York: Yale University Press. $1.35.
That interest in pure literature has survived the pressure of
war-times; that the student and singer, like the poor, are always
with us even in our worst catastrophes, we have evidence in Mr.
Charles Wharton Stork's translations from the Swedish of the
poems of Verner von Heidenstam. "As a poet of content rather
than of form, Heidenstam loses a little in transmission," we are
told on the jacket of the book; yet there may be some ques-
tion whether Mr. Stork's rather acrobatic performances in English
verse are altogether warranted by the original verses he is trans-
lating. The volume shows Heidenstam to be well worthy of a
place in English. He is strong, noble and sensible enough to avoid
red outbursts and patchwork philosophies. This selection of Hei-
denstam's poetry for English translation continues the fashion set
by Mr. Stork in his Swedish Anthology, followed in Jessie La-
mont's versions from Rainer Maria Rilke and in Thomas Walsh's
announced volume, the Hispanic Anthology.
EUNICE. By Isabel C. Clarke. New York: Benziger Brothers.
$1.75.
Eunice, one of Miss Clarke's most perfect heroines, is the
daughter of a Protestant English officer in the Indian service, who
has the lucky chance of being brought up in the pure atmosphere
of a perfect Catholic home. Both boys of the house fall in love
with her, and they have as a rival a Protestant suitor who almost
carries off the prize. She breaks off her engagement at the last
moment to care for her mother — a worldly, immoral drunkard.
After years of sacrifice her tender solicitude wins the grace of
1920.] NEW BOOKS 891
repentance for her dying mother, and her own eyes are opened
to the light of the true Faith. The playmate of her early years
wins her hand at last, although, as ever, the path of true love is
not at all smooth.
It is a story of infinite charm, perfectly told, and remarkable
for its clear cut drawing of the contrast between the spirit of this
world and the spirit of the Church of God.
THE SHAMROCK BATTALION OF THE RAINBOW. By Matthew
J. Hogan. New York: D. Appleton & Co. $1.50 net.
This is the story, as the title imparts, of the old Sixty-ninth
Regiment and the valorous part it played in the recent War. Its
author was only seventeen when recruits were sought to swell the
ranks of the famous Irish unit. He aged himself by a year and
was accepted with other striplings somewhat derisively by the
drill sergeant because of their youth.
However, what he and his fellows did is now a matter of his-
tory that is magnificent in its great lines of courage, sacrifice and
power. It is a story that cannot be told too often, especially when
given in the simple, manly fashion that marks this volume. The
book is splendid in every way and deserves the highest commen-
dation.
The reviewer can pay no higher compliment than to say that
Corporal Hogan writes as well as he fights — and that is high
praise, indeed.
MODEL ENGLISH. Book 11. By Francis P. Donnelly, S.J. New
York: AUyn & Bacon. $1.20.
The first book of this series concerns the earliest problems
confronting the young idea, which is invention; this second book
treats of the qualities of style which the author holds are best
learned by imitation. Accordingly he has placed before the stu-
dent approved masters of various styles of narrative, description,
exposition, argumentation and persuasion. These lessons are in-
culcated, roughly speaking, by the choicest examples of the best
writers of the last two centuries. The models selected are the
result of a wide acquaintance with the greatest speakers and
writers of an extremely prolific period, and form a literary educa-
tion, even should the student fail to profit by the method of imi-
tation. These model passages are chosen from seventy-two auth-
ors, twenty-one of whom are American, the rest British.
Though the writer nowhere states for what age he writes, the
book would seem best fitted for the last two years of high school
and the first college year.
692 NEW BOOKS [Fcb^
MARRIAGE WHILE YOU WAIT. By J. E. Buckrose. New York:
George H. Doran Co. $1.60 net.
This is the story of a war marriage which, contrary to the
usual run of its kind, deals with the working out of the marital
problem, rather than ending with the soldier-husband's return
from France. The couple whose fortunes we follow, marry on
short acquaintance, the bridegroom leaving immediately for the
front. Their ultimate happiness in mutual confidence is not
quickly or easily won, but is frequently jeopardized during the
course of events that lead, at last, to full understanding of each
other, as a basis for their love.
There is acceptable originality in the main proposition, the
tale is plausible and the characters well indicated. The novel
has interest, even though it must be confessed that something
is missing of the quiet humor and charm we are accustomed
to receive at Mrs. Buckrose's hands.
t
WALLED TOWNS. By Ralph Adams Cram. Boston: Marshall
Jones Co. $1.25.
We are all somewhat discontented nowadays with what we
see about us. The rather general idealism of the war days has
gradually lessened, save in the case of those to whom it was native.
All the world is crying out against the evils which seem to be as
encircling as the cannon at Balaklava. Everybody has something
to rail against, and from which to seek escape. A lodge in some
vast wilderness, or a town walled against the foes of happiness —
either would seem a desirable refuge. Mr. Cram chooses the
latter and writes down his ideas in a purple-covered book which
is a delight to the eye. The walled town he would build is not
another San Gemignano, or Rothenbourg, or olden Oxford, but
one something like them in efifect. Justice would reign there, as
in Camelot. Production would be for use, not for profit. Mental
and physical labor would divide all the profits of industry over
and above a limited interest on capital. Hours of employment
would never exceed more than thirty a week. All the dwellers
in any one town would be members of the same religion; and
religion would enter into all the affairs of life as it did in pre-
Reformation times. Society would be organized under the guild
system. In the system of education, primary schools would be
^'conducted largely along the lines first developed by Doctor
Thomas Edward Shields in the early twentieth century.'*
It is a charming picture, and has the possibilities of becom-
ing as real as we wish to make it. It is a plea for the simpler
life, the return to days when our cravings were satisfied without
1920.] NEW BOOKS 895
the vanities and useless toys now deemed so vital and necessary.
Doctor Cram has love and praise for mediaeval days, and for the
monks, who formed centres of righteousness and beauty and sal-
vation, which "radiated circle after circle of ever-widening influ-
ence." So now, he argues, the walled towns are needed to re-
deem the world from selfishness and greed and all the ills that
are bred in the lure of gold.
SMALL THINGS. By Margaret Deland. New York. D. Appleton
& Co. $1.35 net.
The author of The Iron Woman will always have readers
for whatever she chooses to write. This present volume, however,
will probably cause a good deal of murmuring, even among the
faithful. It gives the effect of having been written while the
writer was very much "on the spot" — that is, while she was seeth-
ing with the emotions inspired by her first-hand encounter with
the realities of the War in France, and before she had had the
leisure to think out, or through, her reactions and establish their
relation to her philosophy. A few memorably vivid bits reward
our perusal, but the main part of the book leaves an impression
on the mind of insignificance and confusion. Certainly it seems
to be true that the best novelists have not invariably produced the
best war books.
"MY LITTLE BIT." By Marie Corelli. New York: George H.
Doran & Co. $1.75 net.
This title is unduly unpretending, for when culled from the
various periodicals in which they appeared before and during
the War, and bulked together into one volume, these essays make
quite a big "bit." To be exact, they add three hundred and
eighteen rather long pages to our contemporary literature of
ejaculation — certainly not a contribution to be despised when
one realizes the pitch of vivacious enthusiasm or resentment
which Miss Corelli sustains almost unbrokenly throughout. The
essays cover a wide field, ranging from the nature of war to the
glory of Shakespeare; but whether she be lauding the sea-power
of England or animadverting upon the Christian Church, the
writer's lively personality forces her to lean heavily upon the ex-
clamation point in order to make the intensity of her emotions
clear. Some of the essays, dealing with the work of women in
war, the crime of hoarding, and so on, must undoubtedly have
proved very useful at the time of their first appearance. It is a
question, however, whether any great service has been done either
writer or reader by this cold dishing-up of war-time fare.
894 NEW BOOKS [Ftb^
FIELDS OF VICTORY. By Mrs. Humphrey Ward. New York:
Charles Scribner's Sons. $1.50 net.
This volume, together with England's Effort and Toward the
Goal, make up the trilogy which Mrs. Ward has dedicated to re-
cording England's service in the Great War. As we should ex-
pect from a writer of her attainments, her style and her power
of vitalizing her material, make the book first-class reading. Un-
doubtedly she will find dissenting voices raised against her pro-
nouncement on "Who won the War.'' It is a pity that that puer-
ile question should continue to be agitated, and an especial dis-
appointment to find it raised (and answered, of course) in the
course of any writing which has the generous breadth and dis-
tinction of Mrs. Ward's.
STORM IN A TEACUP. By Eden Phillpotts. New York: The
Macmillan Co. $1.60.
Mr. Phillpotts has written another striking story of Devon
and its dull, drab Protestant workers. The reader is initiated
into all the mysteries of paper making and is introduced to a
number of well-drawn characters who act on impulse and are
swayed by the most primitive passions. The tragedy of the tale
centres around a wife who tires of her husband, and thought-
lessly deserts the home to live with a former suitor. She finally
realizes her mistake, although the immorality of her conduct does
not bother her in the least An old friend of the family succeeds
in bringing her back to her husband — and the storm blows over.
It is at best a most improbable and unconvincing tale, and is
characterized by the worldly and pagan philosophy that dominates
all the author's novels. As a piece of character drawing the book
is perfect, although it leaves a bad taste in the mouth. Some
of its realistic pages are worthy of the most decadent of the
French novelists.
IRON CITY. By M. H. Hedges. New York: Boni A Liveright.
$1.75.
The late Randolph Bourne, so the publisher asseverates on
the paper wrapper of this book, considered Iron City "the finest
first novel he had ever read, and one of the few great American
novels." With this amazing verdict we are decidedly not in ac-
cord. Mr. Hedges recounts, without distinction of style, the story
of his hero's experiences as an instructor in a small denomina-
tional Middle- Western college, situated in Iron City, where he is
brought into contact with various manifestations of social and
industrial unrest. "In the end," the publisher's announcement
1920.] NEW BOOKS 695
dithyrambically proceeds, *'he flings everything into the great ad-
venture of the generation — a dauntless quest for some solution
of the world's ills, the remaking of the world's life." We grow
weary of these youthful remoulders of the universe.
THE LADY OF THE CROSSING. By Frederick Niven. New York :
George H. Doran Co. $1.50 net.
The Lady of the Crossing, whom the hero loves at first sight,
turns out to be a heartless girl without one redeemable trait.
Luckily he finds this out in time, and the perfect maiden appears
on the scene just as the woman of his dreams marries the de-
tested rival. The story is rather a commonplace story of life in
a boom town of Western Canada. It may be founded on
facts, as the author hints, but they are most trivial and
uninteresting.
A KNOWLEDGE of the Psalms and thoughtful consideration
of their exceeding spiritual treasures is one of the great
blessings, as well as one of the most fruitful exercises of the Chris-
tian soul. The Rev. Ronald A. Knox has just given us, through
Longmans, Green & Co., New York ($1.25 net), a small volume
of instructive, practical meditations on a number of the Psalms,
and we earnestly wish for it a wide circulation.
The arrangement is according to a plan that proceeds from
the lower to the higher levels of the spiritual life. The leading
idea of each Psalm is taken, and upon this are ofiFered enlighten-
ing suggestions that stimulate both thought and action. The
text is printed on one page : the meditation on the opposite. The
Douay Version is used throughout. But Dr. Knox's small vol-
ume is but another evidence that the present Douay text should,
at least in a few instances, be clarified and simplified. The reader
will vrish that an index were added to enable him to find, at once,
a particular psalm.
LOST WITH LIEUTENANT PIKE, by Edward L. Sabin (PhUa-
delphia: J. B. Lippincott Co.), is an addition to The Trail Blazer
Series, and, as its name indicates, is concerned with the great
peak which bears Lieutenant Pike's name. The volume contains
adventure a plenty to satisfy the most exacting, and many lessons
in the endurance and self-control so absolutely necessary for the
formation of a hero. The Lieutenant himself is a fine type of a
soldier, and the lad who has been adopted by the Pawnees is the
hero, who makes abundantly clear his appreciation of the honor
of being 'lost with Lieutenant Pike."
696 NEW BOOKS [Feb^
PRIESTS and seminarians who have advanced to the higher
courses in moral theology will find of special benefit The
Epitome of Moral Theology, by Dr. Carlo Telch, published by
Frederick Pustet & Co., New York, price $1.50. The volume is
handy in size, covers in a summarized way the entire range of
moral theology and has a very satisfying index. Much of it is
taken from the well-known work of Father Noldin, S J. The little
work is up-to-date, well printed, and well bound.
THE sketch of Mother Anne of Jesus, of the Congregation of
the Servants of the Most Blessed Sacrament, published by The
Sentinel Press, 185 E. 76th Street, New York Qty, (55 cents) tells
the story of a hidden but fruitful life. Anna Marie Pineau, born
in 1854, devoted her days to the adoration of Jesus in the Blessed
Sacrament. She joined the Congregation when it was still in its
early years and spent her life in its beautiful work till 1911, when
the Master called her home. Externally her life was uneventful,
but the riches of her harvest, none may reckon save the Lord, at
Whose feet her days were passed, in Whose service her lamp
burned unfailingly, to win light for souls seated in darkness and
in the shadow of death.
A WORLD OF WINDOWS, Charles Hanson Towne's new col-
lection of poems (New York: George H. Doran Co. $1.25 net),
is described by the publisher as "every day life through a poet's
eyes." But it is precisely the property of the poet's eyes that
every day life takes on distincton and poignancy while passing
through them. Much of the life here described is shaken by the
winds of the Great War. To its interpretation the poet brings
warm sympathy, a scholarly and experienced facility of expres-
sion, and that eternal rightness of vision which one has learned
to associate with his name.
NOT the least of the many evils incident to the War is the high
cost of books. Popular series at popular prices have become
unpopular series by reason of their unpopular prices. But books
are still sold, and will continue to be. The International Pocket
Library (Boston: The Four Seas Co. 25 cents each) has entered
the field with the challenge of low prices, a chaUenge which is
bound to attract attention. The plan of the new venture calls
for modem classics rather than the veterans, and a glance at the
books in their heavy, waterproof paper covers shows how modern
they are. Many people will surely believe many of them to be
classics as well. It is certainly an interesting array of authors
1920.] NEW BOOKS 697
and titles which the initial offering presents. Guy de Maupassant,
almost an ancient now» is on the list with a selection of tales; as
are Kipling and Hardy and Poe. A. E. Housman's A Shropshire
Lad rubs elbows with Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest;
there are five tales from the Russian; there is a collection of five
stories by the now well-known Ibanez; three short tales by the
less well-known John Trevens; and the present list is complete
with the Gitanjali of Tagore. While there is bound to be a dif-
ference in taste in the matter of selecting a series of this kind,
the idea of publishing low-priced paper-covered volumes is a good
one, and the second offering will be awaited with interest.
IN POEMS, by Francis X. Doyle, S.J., we have collected, in a little
volume, many short lyrics, meditative or religious in tone, some
of which have appeared in Extension, Ave Maria and other Cath-
olic periodicals. Father Doyle modestly styles himself a "weaver
of words," but he does not forget that even simple words may
bear ''God's gold" about with them. (Philadelphia: Peter
ReiUy. $1.00.)
ROBERT BURNS, by Edward Winslow Gilliam (Boston: The
Cornhill Co. $1.25) is a four-act play, more painstaking than
dramatic in quality, covering the life of the Scottish poet from his
peasant youth, through the dissension raised by his work in the
"Auld" and "New" Light Kirks, up to the moment of his trium-
phant social d^but at the Duchess of Gordon's home in Edinburgh.
AMONG the pamphlets of the Catholic Truth Society of special
interest are The Will to Believe, by B. Gavan Duffy, SJ., an
admirable exposition of the right attitude toward truth in a very
readable up-to-date story form; Religion, by Rev. R. Traill, which
builds up simply and clearly the scheme of religion as revealed
and understood by the Catholic Church. Two stories of conver-
sions printed for the Catholic Guild of Israel : The Conversion of
Jules Lewel and The Conversion of Isadore Goschler, two Jewish
students at the University of Strasbourg, are remarkable chapters
in the story, ever old yet ever new, of the wonderful workings
of Divine grace.
FOREIGN PUBLICATIONS.
From the Libraire Gabriel Beauchesne:
Le Dieu Vivant, La Riu6lation de la Sainte Triniti dans le Nouveaa
Testament, by Jules Lebreton. After having treated the Origines du
dogme de la Triniti in a large work well known to theologians, M*
698 NEW BOOKS [Feb^
Lebreton has now taken up the same subject briefly in a volume in-
tended for all believers.
Leaving aside the study of the Hellenic and Jewish milieus, and
the discussion of real or supposed antecedents of the Christian dogma,
he clings solely to the doctrine of the New Testament; he explains
it according to an entirely different plan from that followed in the
earlier work, and eliminates aU technical discussions which, although
indispensable for the theologian, are a burden for the ordinary reader.
Every Christian who wishes to nourish his faith will find interest-
ing matter in this book; he will learn to know better the mystery
he believes, to cling to it more closely, to desire more earnestly to
contemplate it in heaven.
Le Gouvernment de VEglise, by Gustave Neyron, SJ. The chap-
ters composing this volume appeared, at somewhat rare intervals, in
the Etudes: hence they lack continuity, but, at least, they turn about
one central idea — the Government of the Church — ^the excellence of
which the author shows by considering its different aspects. He writes
to defend the Church, and as he defends it with arguments borrowed
from reason, rather than from revelation, he performs to a certain
extent the work of an apologist. His views are very conservative, and
many will not agree with him on all points, although the work, as a
whole, is highly commendable. The author is especially fortunate in
the chapter on the centralization of the power of the Church.
Two appendices, one on the Vatican Council, and the other on
Tolerance, serve to complete the ideas explained in the chapter on
the Church and the government of thought.
From Pierre T6qui:
Consignes Catholiques (Sociales, Pidagogiques, Patriotiques) ,
by Monseigneur Tissier. With this volume of Consignes Catholiques the
Bishop of Ch&Ions closes his pastoral teaching of War time. It is made
up of allocutions, letters and discourses delivered before audiences of
every description: peasants, laboring men, soldiers, school teachers,
and priests. While its contents are interesting chiefly to French Cath-
olics, the pastoral: "Sur les pas da Mattre" might be read with profit
by anyone.
The Librarie Bloud et Gay presents, in brochure, the Discours de
Reception of Monseigneur Baudrillart delivered before the French
Academy and the Riponse of M. Marcel Provost, the Director of the
Academy. The former gives an intimate picture of M. de Mun, Mon-
seigneur Baudrillart's predecessor. M. de Mun's high-minded and pro-
gressive efforts for industrial organization and the awakening of social
conscience were potent in averting Socialism in France, and hence
of interest to American Catholics in this time of reconstruction. Also
M. Provost's summary of the past relations of Church and State in
France and his earnest and hopeful prognosis of future relations.
IRecent Events.
The successes of the Bolshevists continued
Russia. during the past month. They succeeded in
sweeping their adversaries back on thrte
fronts to the south and east. These successes constitute the most
decisive turn in the Russian situation since Lenine and Trotzky
came into power.
In Siberia the Soviet armies have advanced over six hundred
miles west of Kolchak's capital, Irkutsk. In Turkestan they have
taken Bokhara, seat of the most powerful of Tartar emirs, situated
only two hundred miles from the Afghan frontier. They have
made important gains on the Caspian coast, where their advance
is menacing Persia. In Southeastern Russia they inflicted what
S(*ems a telling defeat on the volunteer army of Denikin, captured
Novo Cherask, capital of the Don Cossacks, and a line of other
cities on the Sea of Azov. As a partial offset to Bolshevist vic-
tories in the east, southeast and south, the combined Lettish and
Polish armies have dislodged the Bolshevists in the northwest
from the important river fortress of Dvinsk, thereby establishing
the superiority of the anti-Soviet forces in the Baltic region.
Dispatches received in the Allied countries admit the fatal
character of the blows inflicted by the Bolshevists on Kolchak
and Denikin. The former is variously reported as having been
captured by the Bolshevists and as having been deposed and
made prisoner by Col. Victor Pepaliaeff, the new premier of the
AU-Russian Government. Whatever his individual fate, it seems
certain that his army has been decisively beaten and is now prac-
tically out of the field. In less than two months the Bolshevists
have swept from the frontier of European Russia eastward along
the Siberian Railway, captured Omsk, the original seat of the Kol-
chak Government, and advanced beyond Irkutsk, whither Kol-
chak's headquarters had been removed. The precarious situa-
tion of the latter was turned into disaster, particularly through
the failure of the Czecho-Slovak troops, who had originally helped
him to secure power, and the revolt of Social Revolutionaries
(formerly the adherents of Kerensky) in Vladivostok, Irkutsk and
other towns. Thus the hope that Kolchak would be able to make
a stand at Lake Baikal was shattered, and the rescue of Trans-
vaikalia and the Pacific provinces of Asiatic Russia would now
seem to devolve entirely on the Japanese.
Whereas the weakness of Kolchak's position was apparent
700 RECENT EVENTS [Fcb^
ever since last August and his elimination reckoned with, the
hopes of anti-Bolshevist Russia were built upon the strength of
General Denikin's volunteer army, holding Southeastern Russia
and supported by substantial shipments of tanks, munitions, and
other war material from the British. At the time of the evacua-
tion of Omsk last November, Denikin was making gains against
the Bolshevists in the Ukraine. His position was undermined,
however, by desertions, and chiefly by disorders and banditry
prevailing in his rear, and rendering his disproportionately long
lines of communication nearly untenable. In the last month.
Kief, the capital of the Ukraine, was reconquered by the Bolshe-
vists; Rostov-on-Don, formerly Denikin's seat, was taken also,
and the fall of Novo Cherask, Berdiansk, Mariaupol and Taganrog
followed. According to unconfirmed reports Denikin himself has
been ousted by a coup of his followers. His successor in supreme
command is variously reported as the Cossack General Romanov-
sky and General Wrangel, but this report has been denied.
As against the Bolshevist conquests in the east and soutli,
some solace is offered by the apparent consolidation of the anti-
Bolshevist Western front. The capture of Dvinsk by the Poles
and Letts now establishes a line running from Courland to the
Western Ukraine, where the Poles possess the railway line, in ap-
parent agreement with the Ukrainian directorate.
The situation thus created has a bearing reaching far beyond
the immediate fortunes of the opposing parties in the Russian
civil war. It indicates a general change in Bolshevist strategy,
both political and military. Briefly, the events of the last month
signify that the Bolshevists have abandoned the hope of settling
accounts with their enemies in the west, and are concentrating
all their efforts and energies in establishing their power in the
east, vnih a southward sweep through Afghanistan and an in-
vasion of India as a possible ultimate goal.
The Bolshevists seem to have adopted the German plan of
trying to smash their most powerful enemy. Great Britain, by a
blow directed against India. This design has been evidenced for
some time by their negotiations conducted with the Emir of Af-
ghanistan, an implacable enemy of England, and their campaign
among the tribes of Turkestan and in Persia. The conquest of
Bokhara, only two hundred miles from the Afghan frontier, would
indicate the ripening of the Bolshevist plans in this direction.
Politically the result of the month's disasters has been to
necessitate a new orientation in the Russian policy of the Allies,
and within the next month definite steps towards at least a partial
rapproachement with the Soviet Government may be expected.
1820.] RECENT EVENTS 701
The most stubborn opponent of any plan for negotiations or truce
with the Bolshevists has been France, and more particularly
a^menceau, who was holding out for the total defeat of the Bol-
shevists and the reconstitution, if possible, of Russia on the All-
Russian plan of Kolchak. The reason for this policy was the
large number of Russian bonds and other investments held in
France, and the repudiation of former governmental obligations
by the Soviet Government. Great Britain, on the other hand, has
always tended toward a more conciliatory policy. Now that C16-
menceau has been eliminated from the direction of affairs by his
recent defeat for the French Presidency and by his retirement
from the Premiership, and also because of the collapse of the
Kolchak and Denikin offensives, the indications are strong that
English views will prevail, and that there will soon be a more or
less complete change of attitude towards the Bolshevist Govern-
ment and at least a partial lifting of the Russian blockade.
Beyond the Polish-Lett success against the Bolshevists re-
ferred to above, there has been no great change in the Baltic
situation. The armistice between the Esthonian and Russian
Soviet Governments still continues, and negotiations preliminary
to peace are expected soon to reach a successful conclusion. Re-
cently, however, Esthonia sent representatives to Helsingfors,
Finland, to join in a conference with Letvia, Lithuania, Poland,
and Finland, which is expected to have an important effect on the
Rumanian situation. The principal aim of the conference is to
discuss organization by all five states of a defensive alliance
against Soviet Russia, and a second defensive alliance against
Germany. It appears, however, that Finland will not be a party
to the second project, believing that, owing to her geographical
position, she has nothing to fear from German encroachment in
the Baltic. Moreover, it is declared, Finland feels such gratitude
toward Germany for aid given in the spring of 1916 in saving
Finland from the "Red" Terror, that she could not join in a
movement which might be regarded by Germany as hostile.
Withdrawal at an early date of the American Expeditionary
forces from Siberia has been definitely determined on by the United
States Government, and official notification of this fact has been
communicated to the Japanese Government. The American forces
were sent into Siberia for the stated purpose of aiding the Czech
forces to make their safe exit out of Siberia, at a time when the
Bolshevists were trying to impede their progress eastward more
than a year ago, and secondly to assist in keeping open the Trans-
Siberian railroad and to protect certain supplies. The situation
has reached a point where, with the repatriation of the Czechs
702 RECENT EVENTS [Feb^
and the withdrawal of the Stevens Siberian Railway Commission,
the purpose for which the expedition was sent into Siberia will
have been fulfilled. There are approximately 9,000 American
regulars in Siberia, all the drafted men having been replaced.
The two outstanding features of the
France. month's news in France have been the de-
feat of Cl^menceau for the Presidency, and
the final ratification of the Peace Treaty with Germany, to-
gether with the setting up of the League of Nations and various
other business consequent on the ratification of the Treaty.
Premier Cl^menceau, who only a few days before the elec-
tion of the President on January 17th declared his candidacy,
and had been considered as an easy victor for that office, was
defeated by Paul Deschanel, President of the Chamber of Depu-
ties. The presidential electors in France consist of the three
hundred Senators and six hundred and twenty-four Deputies,
who were elected in December, independently of any presidential
issue. It appears that Deschanel had the support of the Left,
including not only the conservative Socialists, but the radicals
as well, with whom Cl^menceau was extremely unpopular. From
this it must not be inferred that Deschanel is a radical, or that
he leans that way, but merely that the radicals were willing to
do almost anything to defeat Cl^menceau. Deschanel received
support also from the left wing of the Centre, the Centre being
composed of the Bloc National which controls both the Chamber
and the Senate. DeschaneFs candidacy had the backing of former
Premier Briand, Edouard Herriot, the new President of the Radi-
cal party, and Andr6 Lefevre, Vice-President of the Chamber.
The World War ended formally on January 10th, when rep-
resentatives of the Powers which had approved the Versailles
Treaty deposited their certificates of ratification and signed the
proceS'Verbal which put the Treaty into effect. The signatories
were the fourteen Allied and Associated Powers on the one hand
and Germany on the other.
After the documents were signed, a letter from the Supreme
Council was handed to the German representative, Baron Kurt
von Lersner, promising that the Allies would reduce from 400,000
to 275,000 tons their demand for maritime equipment to pay for
the Scapa Flow sinking. This was in reply to the German con-
tention, that the enforcement of the Allies' original demand would
have vitally affected Germany's economic interests.
The United States took no part in the ceremony, and is at
present the only nation in a state of war with Germany. For-
1920.] RECENT EVENTS 703
mal notice has been served on Germany by the American State
Department that conditions of the armistice still govern rela-
tions between the United States and Germany.
In answer to the call of President Wilson, the first meeting of
the League of Nations opened in Paris on January 16th. Eng-
land, France, Italy, Japan, Spain, Belgium and Brazil are the
nations comprising the Supreme Council of the League. L£on
Bourgeois, representative of France, presided at the first session.
The general opinion of the European Press seems to be that the
League will be a failure without the active cooperation of America.
One of the most significant things that has happened since
the signing of the German Treaty is the continuance of the high
command of Marshal Foch. The functions of Marshal Foch as
Commander-in-Chief of the Allied Armies automatically lapsed
when the Peace Treaty went into effect, but immediately after-
ward the French, British, and Italian Governments — with which
Belgium will probably be associated — decided to continue the
Military Council of Versailles, with Marshal Foch as President,
and to extend his sphere of activity. The Military Council will
be concerned not only with the general application of the Treaty,
but with questions of general interest, such as the menace of a
Red Crusade from Bolshevist Russia, and though its powers at
present are purely consultative, French observers see in it "the
embryo of an inter-allied military organization about which may
be formed a solid alliance of France, England, Belgium, and
Italy as a beginning.*'
After a month of agitation over Fiume, lat-
Italy. est advices indicate that the prospect for
an agreement on the Adriatic question has
been accepted by Italy. The agreement, which was the result of
deliberations by Lloyd George and Cl^menceau with the Italian
Premier Nitti, has been handed also to the Jugo-Slavs, who have
forwarded the text of the accord to Belgrade.
It is understood that this plan will make a free city of Fiume,
placing it on much the same footing as Danzig, under the control
of the League of Nations, and will give to the Jugo-Slavs a strip
running between Fiume and Trieste, the latter of which will be
Italian. It is understood further that it provides for the division
of Adriatic islands between Italy and Jugo-Slavia. In return for
concessions Italy would get a mandate over Albania. Minor geo-
graphical adjustments are now in progress, and in addition the
Premiers are hearing the claims of the Greeks, who now desire to
get some share in the Adriatic division.
704 RECENT EVENTS [Feb.,
The settlement is understood to represent the limit of Italian
concessions, and Premier Nitti places the responsibility for fur-
ther difiBcuIties on the Jugo-Slavs, who, at present, have the plan
under consideration. Certain sections of Italian opinion believd
that acceptance of the plan will mean the fall of the Nitti Govern-
ment, but it is held, nevertheless, that Italy will have to agree to
any settlement reached at this time. One interesting feature
stands out, and that is, if Italy does not get Fiume — and it
seems certain now that she will not — the French project of an
alliance of England, France and Italy will have to fight its way
in the Italian Parliament.
This invitation to Italy to participate in the Peace Alliance
with Great Britain and France suggests not only the conclusion of
reciprocal military and naval agreements between the three coun-
tries in the event of armed aggression, but also a definite re-
shaping of Italian policy on lines affecting the common interest
of the three great Western powers. The acceptance of such a
proposal would involve also a formal pledge from Italy that she
will persevere steadfastly in her after-war political tendencies by
more effective cooperation in the solution of national questions,
colonial problems and economic difficulties.
Meanwhile d'Annunzio after his agreement last month with
the Italian Government for withdrawal from Fiume, and the re-
placement of his troops by Italian regulars, has announced that
he would resist any efforts that might be made to expel him from
Fiume. Two plebiscites have already been held in the city, but
these have been declared unsatisfactory by d'Annunzio, and a
new plebiscite ordered by him to determine the future status
of the city. The National Council of Fiume has reversed its
previous decision to accept the Government's proposal, and has
voted to support d'Annunzio, who says he has come to the con-
clusion that the guarantees offered by the Government were in-
sufficient to warrant his leaving. The general opinion of the Press
and the Government, however, is that d'Annunzio has ceased to
be an important factor in the problem and that, in the event of
the acceptance of the new plan by Jugo-Slavia, he vnM be removed
vdthout much difficulty and without serious disturbance to Italian
popular feeling.
Despite labor disorders and the recent success of the Socialists
at the elections, close observers are of opinion that Italy affords
a poor ground for Bolshevism, and it is said that the chance of
a revolution in Rome is less than in any other great capital
The success of the Italian loan is taken as one indication of the
failure of revolutionary sentiments to take deep hold of the people.
ig20.] RECENT EVENTS 705
The subscriptions at the end of the first week passed the 8,000t-
000,000 lire mark, and it is believed the total will exceed 15,000,-
000,000 lire, the amount set as the goal. That the Italian work-
ing people are animated by the spirit of thrift, is further shown by
the fact that 13,000,000 lire has been deposited in postal savings
banks and small popular banking institutions.
Premier Nitti at present is the nation's big man and enjoys
the same advantage as Lloyd George in England — there is no one
in sight to succeed him. His chief concern is to put Italy in train
for economic and industrial revival and development, and he
believes that, within a short period, interest in war questions
will give place to a keen spirit of business enterprise and that
Italy will experience great industrial activity. He has somewhat
placated the Socialists by consenting to the abolition of the oath
of allegiance to the King, and has promised to present a bill by
which the King will be deprived of the right to declare war, re-
serving it exclusively to the Italian Parliament. This means a
radical change in the Italian Constitution. The Premier added
that not only the declaration of war, but the conclusion of treaties,
must be submitted to Parliament
Of all the suffering European countries
Austria* Austria, and more particularly Vienna,
seems to be in the worst material plight,
and conditions there during the last several months have grown
steadily more desperate, till, at last accounts, the people were
literally on the verge of starvation. The following has been
given as an authentic picture of the situation:
For a year the 2,250,000 population of Vienna has been ex-
isting on a dole of bread a day. One hundred grams of bread
and seven grams of fat have been the daily ration. Theoretically
every person was allowed one hundred grams of meat every
three weeks, but, in nine cases out of ten, it was impossible for
the people to get it for their coupons. Of late conditions have
become even worse, so that the population has undergone a re-
duced ration which allotted each week 1,027 grams (about two
pounds) of bread and one hundred and twenty-five grams (one-
fourth of a pound) of cooking flour to hard workers, and five
hundred and eighty-seven grams (a little over one pound) of
bread and one hundred and twenty-five grams of cooking flour
to other people. The fuel ration has been eighteen pounds of
coal a week per family, but the supply has fallen so low that
only a small percentage of the population has been able to ob-
tain its share. The people have stripped Vienna, and every other
imm GZ. 45
\
706 RECENT EVENTS [Feb.,
large city in the country, of every combustible article — sign-
boards, park benches, fences, everything that will burn. Daily
there is a huge exodus of miserable, pinched creatures, young
and old, men and women, armed with hatchets, axes, and saws,
who pour out of Vienna and swarm over the countryside,
cutting down trees for firewood. They will walk ten to twenty
miles, then carry back all the fuel they can bear. They have cut
down thousands of fruit trees, and shade trees which line the
great highways. The starving population has long ago consumed
all animals in the country. The people have ^aten their pets —
dogs, cats, even canary birds and gold fish. They hunt rats and
eat them, and horse meat is a luxury which few can afford.
Children are dying of hunger and cold. The infant mor-
tality rate in Vienna is sixty per cent, and eighty-five per cent of
those between nine months and three years of age are suffering
with rickets. The majority of women in childbed die, while
among those who survive, the loss of weight is serious, result-
ing in diminution of the nursing capacity. It is affirmed that sta-
tistics show that in Vienna alone there were 150,000 deaths from
starvation in 1919.
^s a result of Chancellor Renner's pleas for relief before
the Supreme Council, the Allies in the middle of December
decided to go to the aid of the starving people. They agreed to
the delivery of 30,000 tons of grain from Trieste, the granting
of a credit to Jugo-Slavia to send a further quantity of grain to
Austria, and permission to Austria to continue negotiations with
Holland for a loan of thirty million guilders, for which the Aus-
trian tobacco monopoly is to be set free from the general pledge
of Austrian assets to the Reparations Committee. Later reports
are to the effect that of the 30,000 tons of food at Trieste, only
16,000 had so far been made available, due to transportation
difficulties, and it was said that at the present rate of consumption,
Austria would be able to feed her people only to the end of Jan-
uary on half rations. After that, if nothing is done meantime,
it was declared the nation would face absolute starvation. Among
other relief measures, Italy recently received at Trieste one
thousand Viennese children, to be assigned to Trieste families
for care and possible adoption.
Of course the industrial and economic life of the nation
has come to similar desperate straits. The lack of coal is as bad
as the food shortage and has stopped nearly all manufacturing.
Austria is buying wherever it can, but is manufacturing noth-
ing. As a result its currency has continuously fallen, and the
banks are imposing further and further difficulties in the way
1920.] RECENT EVENTS 707
of such trade as is still possible. Paper notes still circulate in
the country but at steadily decreasing values, the Austrian crown
now being worth about one-thirtieth of its normal value.
Of course the most important German
Germany. event in the past month was the final rati-
fication of the Peace Treaty at Paris the
middle of January, but nothing particular occurred to mark the
occasion in Germany itself. The press comments were bitter or
gloomy, but the general opinion seems to be that Germany must
make a combined and determined effort to carry out the terms
of the Peace Treaty, no matter how severe they may be, and that
if only the Government can establish internal order, the country
will be able to bear the economic conditions imposed.
Serious disturbances occured in Berlin on January 13th when
a mob of communists and radicals endeavored to storm the Reich-
stag buildings on the occasion of the second reading in the Upper
House of an act creating factory councils. The police at first
tried to hold off the rush, but shots were fired by the mob and
finally the guards were compelled to retaliate. In the ensuing
struggle forty-two persons. were killed and one hundred and five
wounded.
The original cause of the riot was the dissatisfaction of the
Independent Socialists over the failure of the Government to pro-
vide a method for the establishment of the workmen's councils
called for by the Constitution, but the immediate cause was in-
dignation at the attitude of the Government towards strikers.
This resulted in the organization of the demonstration in front
of the Reichstag building. The violence that followed, however,
is declared to have been due to Communist agents, who took ad-
vantage of the assemblage and worked on mob psychology to
start the riot. The firm conduct of the Government has appar-
ently checked the spread of disorder.
The beginning of the new year was signalized by strikes and
lockouts, chiefly among railway and telegraph employees. The
Independent Socialists and Communists are charged with respon-
sibility for the strikes, which, while they are ostensibly economic
measures are, in reality, it is declared, political measures to ac-
complish the introduction of an industrial system on the Com-
munist plan. There are also other causes at work, notably the
unparalleled rise in the prices of all foodstuffs and other com-
modities in consequence of the continued depreciation of the
mark. The United States War Department has fixed its official
rate of exchange for all army accounting purposesr f et January,
708 RECENT EVENTS [Feb.,
at two cents. Moreover, the lack of raw materials and coal has
compelled many factories to close against the will of their own-
ers, though there are plenty of orders to fill.
Evacuation of the first zone of the Province of Schleswig has
been started by Germany, as required by the Peace Treaty, pre-
liminary to the plebiscite there to determine whether the province
shall be reunited vnih Denmark. The International Schleswig
Commission, which left for its headquarters at Flensburg on Jan-
uary 18th, has appointed prefects to administer the five adminis-
trative districts in the first zone.
Great Britain, France, Italy and Japan are reopening their
diplomatic relations with Germany as a result of the exchange of
ratifications of the Treaty of Versailles and the restoration of
peace between them and Germany. The United States is not re-
opening diplomatic relations at this time, and will not be able
to do so until after a formal peace has been concluded with Ger-
many. Secretary Lansing, however, has announced the appoint-
ment of an American Commissioner at Berlin.
Since Hungary was last treated of in these
Hungary. notes, a new Hungarian Cabinet has been
formed with representatives of all political
parties. The Christian Socialist, Karl Huszar, is Premier, while
his predecessor, Freidrich, to whose government the Allies ob-
jected, has been given the post of War Secretary. As a result
of this change, the Supreme Council on January 15th finally re-
ceived Count Albert Apponyi, head of the Hungarian delegation,
and presented to him the Hungarian Peace Treaty, which has
been ready for months, but has been held in abeyance because of
the lack of a government at Budapest in which the Allies had
confidence. Hungary is accorded fifteen days to consider the
Treaty and send its reply to Paris.
The Treaty provides that Hungary shall formally waive claim
to Fiume and nil the former Austro-Hungarian territories awarded
to Italy, Rumania, Jugo-Slavia and Czecho-Slovakia. Hungary
must adhere to the clauses of the Treaty with Austria, signed
at St. Germain, concerning national minorities. Under the terms
of the Treaty the Hungarian army must not exceed 35,000 men,
with guns of not more than ten centimetre calibre. Hungary is
to assume a proportional share of the Austrian debt.
Most of the remaining clauses of the Treaty are similar to
those oS the Treaty of St. Germain. A special economic clause
provides iJ^t an arrangement shall be made for the exchange of
foodstuffs, ]:;§S2:jBAterials and manufactured goods between Aus-
1920.] RECENT EVENTS 709
tria and Hungary. By the provision of this clause Hungary
undertakes not to restrict the export of foodstuffs to Austria,
and insures to Austrian purchasers terms as favorable as those
given to the Hungarians.
A great contrast exists between the formerly united coun-
tries, the social-democratic Austria and the strongly monarchist
Hungary, and particularly between the capitals, Vienna and Buda-
pest. In Vienna the Government stands more through the gen-
eral apathy of the country than through vigorous measures of
its own, but in Budapest the reaction from Bolshevism and the
departure of the Rumanians have induced a strongly national,
even a chauvinistic temper among the people. Large sections
of people, including even business men, speak freely of the in-
evitable revanche against the Rumanians and of certitude that
the Slovaks vnSX soon come back automatically to Hungary. It
was for this reason that, among the conditions of recognition
of the Huszar government. Sir George Qerk, the Allies' repre-
sentative, stipulated that the Hungarians were to abstain from
making any attack upon their neighbors, and were to respect the
provisional boundaries of the country, pending the final delimita-
tion by the Peace Conference.
An indication of the reaction from Bolshevism is the re-
peated demand on Austria for the extradition of Bela Kun, the
former Communist dictator of Hungary, whom the Austrian
Chancellor so far refuses to give up, his reason being that the
removal of Bela Kun from Austria would be the signal for the
wholesale murder of Austrians in Soviet Russia. It is said that
nearly ninety-five per cent of the Hungarian people would vote
for the return of a monarchy, a plan to which no objection is
anticipated from the Allies, with the possible exception of Italy,
but it is still uncertain who will become king.
In Budapest the food conditions seem to be better than in
Vienna, though reports are conflicting as to the actual difference.
The poor do not get a regular supply of bread and sugar, and
potatoes are practically unobtainable, but there is a sufficiency
of vegetables and other farm products, and meatless days are
unknown.
January 19 th.
With Our Readers.
SINCE the ending of the War we have on more than one occa-
sion referred in these paragraphs to articles in different periodi-
cals on the relation between religious belief and military service.
"The Christian Under Fire," "The Religion of the Trenches," 'The
Failure of Christianity" are sample titles of such articles. The
uniform trend of them was one of doubt, of questioning, and
even of pessimism. "The Failure of the Churches" might be an
appropriate title for a volume that would gather them together.
This failure of the churches was almost synonymous with the
failure of Christianity itself, for according to such onlookers and
critics, men in the service, brought face to face with reality, saw
the emptiness not only of the preaching "back home," but of all
and everything resembling Christian dogma and definite belief
about Christ and His teachings. Their new experience, in the
judgment of these critics, had made the men not only more care-
less about, but also indifferent to religion. It is perhaps needless
to state that all of these criticisms mentioned were from Protes-
tant sources. Indeed they furnished a very strong indictment
of the Protestant churches from the pen of their own members,
and a true indictment, since the observers and critics were evi-
dently sincere and spoke from what they had seen or heard.
Confirming such criticism there has now appeared the Gen-
eral Report made by the chaplains of the British Army and en-
titled. The Army and Religion, which gives no comforting or
hopeful view concerning the influence on the non-Catholic sol-
dier of his religious belief.
♦ ♦ ♦ i>
THIS report did not include any account concerning the Catholic
soldiers. Father Plater has just edited and issued a volume
which fills the gap. It is entitled. Catholic Soldiers bg Sixtg
Chaplains and Mang Others. Its inquiry is concerned almost
entirely with the Catholic soldiers in the service of Great Britain,
Ireland, Australia, New Zealand and Canada. Definite questions,
so framed as to bring out information on the particular effect of
his religious belief on the man in service, were sent out by Father
Plater. Sixty chaplains and a number of officers answered.
Thousands of letters, written by Catholic soldiers, containing
evidence to the point have also been used in the compilation.
The very wording of the questions shows a spirit and an outlook
1920.] WITH OUR READERS 711
different from the non-Catholic criticism on the soldiers' religion
which has appeared in the magazines.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
RELIGION here is something real. The horror of battle makes
it more real. Religion is a power that draws the soul to God.
There in the crowded battle-front or in the lonely watch, religion
brings a man nearer to God. Religion elevates and sustains
standards. It helps us resist and conquer the strong lustful ap-
peal of the flesh; it gives the sinner hope; it sustains even the
hero; it comforts the wounded; it throws the light of heaven on
this otherwise darkened world. It is real : a living force, all but
tangible. It is not a vain aspiration: a sentiment and an emo-
tion that begin and end with desire, and have no sure eternal
foundation. It is as evident as the hills and as impregnable;
it is as certain as the sun and equally illuminating. It is as
nourishing as food, and as refreshing as drink, and more necessary
than either. It shows the hand of death parting the curtains of
heaven, and makes direct the now obscured vision of God.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
BUT this, it will be said, is religion as it ought to be: such a
power in the world all men's souls would yearn to possess.
If anyone will read this book by Father Plater, he will see this
religion consistently illustrated in the standards, the failures, the
penance, the self-discipline, the heroism of men. There is i^o
question here of mere speculation nor of anxious worrying about
Christ and His truth. Conviction: certainty and peace attain-
able are reechoed here in the answers to the questions of how
the Catholic Faith influenced these men.
♦ i> ♦ i>
TO the question has the War created any difficulty for the men's
faith, the full answer is, '"Not one clear case appears in
all the reports and letters in which a Catholic soldier has been
unsettled in his belief in God by the War." Indeed, a chaplain
who saw four years of service at more than one point states:
"On the whole the War has probably increased the faith ... of
the average Catholic soldier. It has deepened his perception of
the spiritual, the immortal, and the eternal." Another, of three
years' service, says of the Catholic soldier: "His faith becomes
a philosophical necessity to him, and he gets deep insight into
it from his own experience. And another of two years' expe-
rience, whose testimony is supported directly by eight other
chaplains, writes: "Actual warfare increases the faith of Cath-
olics. They are pleased to manifest it. They vrill go to con-
fession in trenches and open places."
712 WITH OUR READERS [Feb.,
In some letters there are illuminating sentences telling elo-
quently of the grandeur of the writer's faith : "I am the only Cath-
olic boy in this hut. When I go to early Communion, I have to
listen to sneers, but I don't mind if I can only love God, and make
myself humble to Him." And another, a private, writes: "I
should say one's faith is deepened, and the sense of the presence
and the nearness of God increased. When in danger I often had
the feeling that the Holy Family were walking a few yards ahead
of me, and any minute I might find myself in their presence."
♦ ♦ i> ♦
THEIR faith was a thing alive : they were the brothers of Christ :
the sons of the eternal Father. " 'God's vrill,' is the clear
settler of all their 'fates' in the minds of our Catholic men. It
comes out again and again in their letters home, in talking over
the prospects of going over the top, in speaking of their com-
rades who were killed and in every other way. Their attitude is
in sharp contrast with the impersonal fatalism of so many non-
Catholics to whom the question of their own or their comrades'
deaths is just as insistent when living under shell fire." This
from a chaplain who had served for five years.
Nor did the Catholic soldier manifest any superstitious de-
pendence on medals, rosaries or other articles of devotion. The
chaplain last quoted testifies: "It (the article) did not give him
an assurance that he was safe from shells: but it was for him a
continued, unconscious prayer for safety: and if he was to 'be
taken' (not 'go West') he was comforted to think that his soul
would leave a body that bore on it the badge of the Sacred Heart
and Our Lady's medal and scapular."
1$ ^ ^ m
THE training of the Catholic school bears its fruit in the testi-
mony furnished by this book. The majority of these Catholic
soldiers, drawn from every walk of life, were "fairly well in-
structed in their religion." A chaplain who had served four years
writes: "The greatest consolation I have had is to find our men
so well instructed in their religion. They generally know all the
essentials, how to hear Mass, go to the Sacraments, pray, etc.;
and I take this to be a great tribute to our Catholic schools, and
a reward for our labor and sacrifices in erecting, maintaining
and defending them."
Of course this encouraging picture has its dark shadows, but
it has its high lights. "One Manchester lad spent an hour at a
barn chapel every night and received Holy Communion. He
used to come two miles to get there."
* m ^ m
1920.] WITH OUR READERS 713
WITH regard to moral falls, the majority of chaplains, judging
from the years of service with the troops, state that they do
not believe that such falls were more frequent in military than in
civil life. Almost all testify to the fact that when such falls did
occur, they were followed quickly by repentance and that contin-
ued falls were the rare exception. In this chapter an officer con-
tributes a paragraph which is singularly important in view of
the various pleas, other than religious, used by many and es-
teemed by them as effective. "Catholicism," he writes, ''stands
as something unique, as the only system capable of influencing
in every aspect man's motivation. Various influences may act as
powerful deviating influences in some one especial direction.
Patriotism for example, or esprit de corps may make a man do
brave things, the instinct of self-preservation may make him
appear a Paladin of courage. Love of a woman may keep him
chaste, or ambition may compel him to put forth his best efforts.
But the one thing which can and does energize that infinitely
faceted thing, motive, which can and does make a man brave,
courageous, chaste, or painstaking, is Catholicism. It is my can-
did belief that, in the acts of men, Catholicism and its teaching
acts as often as a motivating factor as all other influences added
together: more than that, its influence is always towards what
is best."
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
<<r|^HERE are many real saints among the men," wrote Father
1 Doyle : and one most encouraging portion of this report is that
which tells of the return of many Catholics to the practice of the
faith. The section on "Prodigals and Saints" should rouse every
reader of it to a more intelligent appreciation of his faith and
to increased personal devotion.
In the chapter on "The Wounded" a chaplain cites the fol-
lowing as one example out of many hundreds: "I was called to
a cellar in the line, which was being used as a medical aid post.
A young soldier had had his leg half torn away. It was necessary
to amputate. When I got to the place, the surgeons were already
operating. I gave conditional absolution, and waited, holding a
candle for them to work by. After about three hours, the young
fellow came to. He was in dreadful agony, and I said a few
words of sympathy. *Are you a priest?' he said, Tes.' 'Well,
Father, I am suffering terribly, but Jesus Christ suffered on the
Cross far more than I am doing.' Then in a moment: 'I want
to go to confession and Holy Communion.' The confession over,
I hurried away to fetch the Blessed Sacrament, some miles away.
I got back, and there in that deep cellar, lying on a stretcher,
1U WITH OUR READERS [Feb..
that young soul received his Viaticum. Never a word of com-
plaint on his lips, but just the holy names of Jesus and Mary,
uttered in little gasping sobs, with wonderful devotion. An hour
after he was dead."
♦ i> ♦ i>
THE faith of the Irish soldier stands out in preeminent splendor.
He has an intelligent understanding of it. A chaplain of four
years experience, comparing the soldiers of different countries,
gives Ireland first place for religious instruction : "In Ireland prac-
tically every one (is instructed)." Another chaplain writes: **Th6
difference between the Catholics of an Irish battalion and an English
one is startling. As a rule, the former come to confession, and
know how to make it, the latter have to be hunted up, and if,
after much pressure, they do consent to make a confession they
have to be helped considerably. Naturally, there are exceptions.*'
And another chaplain: ''Ninety-nine out of a hundred Irish
would explain correctly the Immaculate Conception, the differ-
ence between the Resurrection and Ascension, who was Pontius
Pilate, how do you baptize — in fact everything." "I remember,"
writes another, "giving Holy Communion one morning in a village
church to nine hundred men of the Connaught Rangers. The
curi, with tears streaming down his cheeks, helped me. At the end
he said : 'Those strong men have all the faces of children as they
kneel to receive their Lord in Holy Communion.*" Of the
"saints" another states: "If I said hundreds, you would think
I was exaggerating, but Fm not Young, innocent boys and old
soldiers from India, living the holiest, most supernatural lives, de-
voted to the Blessed Sacrament, men of prayer. I admit they
are mostly Irish or Scotch-Irish, but there are some English as
well, and, as usual, I exclude Lancashiremen, who count as Irish.**
Their faith was astounding and their gentleness amazing.
"They apologize to doctors for trouble given, and thank them.
Most wounded men seldom get out of themselves so far.'*
♦ ♦ ♦ i>
THIS volume does not seek to present anything like full testi-
mony with regard to the American Catholic soldier and his re-
ligious faith. But from the limited testimony it does furnish,
the American Catholics may well glory in the faith of their own.
"It is my opinion," writes an American chaplain, "that the
faith of our Catholic soldiers in the ranks of the American Army
has been strengthened, rather than otherwise by their experiences
in the War." The highest praise is accorded to the Catholic
American soldier for the faithful practice of his religion. 'The
Americans of New York,** writes a British chaplain, "whom I saw
1920.] WITH OUR READERS 715
whilst in training, before they had seen the line and afterwards
in hospital, were all well instructed and very fervent."
The volume makes us only the more eager to see in print the
full glorious record written by our American Catholic soldiers,
under the inspiration of the Cross, in the service of our Country.
AT a meeting held in Cleveland, Tuesday, December 30, 1919,
some sixty Catholic writers and students of history formed
a new national historical society which henceforth will bear the
name — ^The American Catholic Historical Association. The object
of the new Association is to promote study and research in the
field of Catholic history.
The reawakened interest in international politics which the
World War has aroused, has contributed very largely to a better
appreciation of the part the Catholic Church has taken in the
march of civilization. Students and teachers of history realize
that the War has added vastly to the significance of the Church's
presence in the world; and there is a greater desire on the part
of all who labor in the field of history to approach the problem
of Catholicism, in the past and in the present, with a more honest
and a more sincere critical spirit.
♦ ♦ i> ♦
THE centre of world politics has been changed from the capi-
tals of Europe to the capital of the Republic, which our
fathers, as the Third Plenary Council of Baltimore said, builded
vdser than they knew, the Almighty's hand guiding them.
America has passed beyond her growing years and her destinies
are for the future in the world-stream of humanity, where alone
national character can be formed. To open any volume of this
historic past is to read another page of the history of the Catholic
Church. Civilization, progress, idealism, all are interwoven vntb.
the Catholic Church; and in the same measure as new demands
will be made upon our educators to interpret to us the back-
ground of our history, so in like measure will American Catholics
be expected to know the Catholic past of the world.
^ m ^ m
SUCH an Association as the one just founded, makes it possible
to bring into one body all the Catholic historical scholarship
of the United States. There are six local Catholic historical so-
cieties (those of New York, Philadelphia, Portland, Me., St. Louis,
Chicago, and St. Paul), devoting their energies to local Catholic
history. They are all publishing excellent historical quarterlies.
We have also the Catholic Historical Review, published at the
718 WITH OUR READERS [Feb^
Catholic University of America, wliich is now the recognized
organ of all American Catholic historical activity. But all these
publications are local or national in scope. What was needed
was a society that would bring into one fold all those interested
in Catholic history, without limit of time or place.
♦ ♦ •♦ *
IN October, 1919, letters were sent out to some seventy Catholic
teachers of history in our Catholic Colleges, Academies, Sem-
inaries, and Universities, and a response which surprised the one
who had projected the Association, proved the opportuneness of
the scheme. Accordingly, the meeting to organize the new so-
ciety was called for Cleveland. Some sixty Catholic historical
scholars were present. Papers were read by Rev. Dr. Guildi^
of the Catholic University of America, and by Dr. J. Franklin
Jameson, on the scope of the new project. A constitution was
adopted, and the following officers elected: President, Lawrence
F. Flick, M.D., LL.D.; Vice Presidents, Rev. Richard H. Tierney,
S.J., and Rev. Victor O'Daniel, O.P., S.T.M.; Secretary, Carlton
T. H. Hayes, Ph.D.; Treasurer, Rt. Rev. Monsignor T. C. O'Reilly,
D.D., V.G.; Archivist, Rev. Dr. Guilday. The Executive Council
includes, with the above-named officers, Rev. Gilbert P. Jennings,
LL.D., Rt. Rev. Monsignor Joseph F. Mooney, D.D., V.G., Rev.
Dr. Souvay, CM., Rev. William Busch, S.T.L., and Rev. Zephyrin
Engelhardt, O.F.M.
A meeting of the Executive Council was held recently and it
was decided to organize the 1920 meeting, which vnll be held
during Christmas week at Washington, D. C, into four Sections
or Conferences, dealing with Ancient, Mediaeval, Modern, and
American Catholic history. The permanent headquarters of the
Association will be the Catholic University of America, Wash-
ington, D. C, but the annual meetings will be held in a different
city each year.
THE social value of spiritual qualities is admirably illustrated
at this time when universal appeal is made for thrift. Thrift
as an economic practice related to economic problems, whether
individual or social, is much to be commended. But it does not
begin and end with itself.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
IF we accept the spiritual values set for us by the Gospel and
explained with compelling uniformity and clearness by spiritual
writers, we learn to discipline wants, to practice renunciation, to
be conscious of the claims of the needy and of our power to
promote education and religion, and all of this is the result of
1920.] WITH OUR READERS 717
spiritual vision and impulse. As we gain in spiritual understand-
ing, we become conscious of release from the tyranny of material
things. Simple wants, refined taste, subtle self-control, joy in
intangible things become our portion.
♦ ♦ i> ♦
IN this process thrift occupies a place, modest indeed, but im-
portant. Those who believe in God and love His ways, find in
the teaching of Christ and the practice of the saints, the secret of
higher life. They love and do noble things, because these fit into
the harmony of the spiritual life. Seen in this light, thrift is
not an end but an incident. It is good socially and much to be
commended. But we should believe in it and practice it as a
phase of our spiritual growth and not merely as an economic
virtue.
♦ ♦ i> i>
IF the national appeal now made can but convince the country
of the foolishness of extravagance, it will serve an admirable
purpose. Extravagance may have immediate social antecedents,
but it, too, is a sign of the condition of one's soul. Sanctity
moves always in the direction of simple taste, restrained
desires, joy in renunciation and prompt acceptance of
spiritual values. Extravagance knows nothing of these. We
may bewail it as a social menace, but we must reject it
infinitely more because it is a sign of spiritual decadence.
We may borrow strength for the soul as well as for social life,
from the remark of the good colored woman who said to a child
in her care: ''Not wanting things is better than having them.'*
OUR readers will recall that in his interesting article on "The
Irish No Man's Land" in our November issue, Mr. P. G. Smyth
deplores the ruin of Louvain which he thought involved the Col-
lege of the Irish Franciscans, and consequently the tomb of the
famous Archbishop of Tuam, Florence Conroy, the founder of the
Irish College of Louvain. A letter from an interested reader,
dated "American College, Louvain, December 8th," corrects this
error and adds much interesting data concerning the relics of
this foundation. We print it for the benefit of our readers.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
" p ORTUN ATELY the part of the city where the ancient College
I of Irish Franciscans was located was spared the horrors of
August, 1914. Prompted by the article in The Catholic World
which referred to Archbishop Conroy, I made a pilgrimage there
today. In the wall of the chapel is a stone bearing an inscription
saying that Archbishop Conroy died in Madrid, 1629, in his 69th
718 WITH OUR READERS [Feb^
year, the 21st year of his episcopate; that his remains were in-
terred here (hie) 1654.
"In the wall of the corridor adjacent to the Chapel are the
tombstones of Dominic De Burgo, Episcopus Elfinensis, a native
of Ireland, died 1704; of Fra Tully, 1715; Fratres O'Donnell,
O'Reilly and Lynch all of the eighteenth century; also the tomb-
stone of "Illustrissima Rosa Docharty," 1660. The Brothers (since
1832 the house is occupied by the Brothers of Charity) knew little
of the history of these relics. They had heard that these slabs, now
cemented in the wall, were formerly in the floor of the chapel. May
we believe then that the actual tombs are under the chapel?
"A slab near the door of the chapel tells us that the first
stone of the chapel (the present chapel) was laid by the Arch-
duke and Duchess Albert and Isabelle, 1617.
"Of the original walls one, facing the garden, is still stand-
ing. On this wall between the narrow Gothic windows of the
monks' cells is the date again, 1617. Finally to corroborate the
reputation for learning that the college enjoyed, some of the
tombstones give the degrees — obtained at the University by the
monks: Lynch, Licentiate in Philosophy; O'Donnell, Bachelor
Juris Civilis et Canonici.
"So the tomb of the Archbishop of Tuam, as well as these
other archaeological monuments, escaped the fate that destroyed
so many other souvenirs of the past intellectual glories of
Louvain."
ALIGHT in the world of Catholic laymen went out with the
waning of the old year. The death of the Hon. Thomas J.
Lanahan of Albany on December 27th marks the earthly termina-
tion of a notable career in the service of Church and State, such
a career as it is useful to record and to meditate. The Catholic
World mourns in him a faithful subscriber from its inception and
a friend and admirer of its founder, Father Hecker. This sus-
tained interest in Catholic literature was but an index of his
whole-hearted and unflagging service in the Catholic cause. It is
for us a satisfaction to quote some extracts from a summary of
his life by those who knew and loved it in every detail — the
Catholic press of the city where he was born and for eighty-
three years gave example of what a Catholic layman may and
should be.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
" LJON. THOMAS J. LANAHAN received his education in the
il private school of Captain Michael O'Sullivan, in old St.
John's parish. He was employed in the ofllce of the Albany
1920.] WITH OUR READERS 719
Journal for several years after leaving school and later in the
Merchants' Dispatch office.
"In 1866 he was elected assemblyman from the first assem-
bly district of Albany County and served until May, 1870, when he
was appointed clerk to Mayor Thacher. Later he was appointed
chief clerk of the board of contract and appointment, which was
consolidated with the board of assessors, in which board he
served until his recent illness. His service with the city of Albany
lacked four months of completing a half century.
"Through his entire life he was a leader in Catholic Church
and fraternal circles, devoting his splendid talents unselfishly
to their service.
♦ ♦ i> ♦
<< JLM R. LANAHAN was not only renowned as a public speaker
iVl and elocutionist, but also as a dramatist. He appeared
many times on the stage with professional players, especially in
1872, when he appeared with Walter Reeble as ghost in Reeble's
Hamlet. He was a friend of John Albaugh, Frank Lawlor and
many of the famous actors of that day.
"Under his direction amateur theatricals were promoted in
Albany academies and organizations. As an elocutionist he aided
in the training of many speakers, and was often asked for assist-
ance in the preparation of important addresses. His last great
address was at the installation of Bishop Thomas F. Cusack four
years ago. • . . His oratory was of the polished, graceful style
of the great Daniel Dougherty, but there was a pathos and depth
of feeling in his voice that was distinctly his own, and a fire
which never failed to rouse his hearers to enthusiasm. He was at
his best in the rendition of such poems as Mangan's 'Dark Rosa-
leen,' which he interpreted with splendid effect."
♦ i> ♦ ♦
THIS man of varied talents and multiple activities vnll be
mourned in practically every parish of the diocese of Albany,
for there are comparatively few places within its territory where
his eloquent voice has not been heard, or which he has not
visited.
BOOKS RECEIYED.
BoNi & LivEBiGBT, New York:
The Cockpit of Santiago Key» By D. S. Greenberg. $1.50 net Liberali»m in
America, By H. Steams. $1.75 net The Judgment of Peace. By A. Latzko.
$1.75 net Europe, a Book for America. By S. Roth. $1.25. Debs, By D.
Karsner. |1.50 net The Craft of the TortoiMe. (Play.) By A. Tassln. fl.60
net Their Son; the Necklace, By B. Zamacois. $1.25 net The Book of
the Damned, By C. Fort $1.90 net Outland, By M. Austin. $1.75.
The Swing of the Pendulum, By A. Spadoni. $1.90 net
Frederick Pustbt Co., New York:
Summa Theologiae Moralia, in.—De Sacramentis, By H, Noldin, S.J. Crtd:
From the French of Rt Rev. A. Le Roy by/£. Leahy. $1.50.
Oxford Ukiybrsitt Press, New York:
British Labor Conditions and Legislation During the War, By M. B. Hammond.
T> J Kbnkdy a SonSb New York*
Father Duffy's Story, By Chaplain F. Duffy. $2.50. Willie Frank of StedUy,
By M. de L. Kennedy. fl.OO.
Thb Magbcillan Co., New York:
Stories of Great Heroes, By Rev. J. Higgins. 60 cents. The Soul of Ireland,
By W. J. Lockington, S.J. $1.75.
Longmans, Green A Co., New York:
Catholic Soldiers, By C. Plater, SJ. $1.75 net
George H. Doran Co., New York:
"Morse Henry:* By H. Watterson. 2 Vols. Mince Pie, By C. Morley. 7Jkft
Giddy Globe, By P. Simple, F.T.G.
Marsham. Jones Co., New York:
Gold, Frankincense and Myrrh, By R. A. Cram. |1.2S.
Joseph F. Wagner, New York:
Conference for Married Women, By Rev. R. Kuehnel. The Acts of the Apostles.
By Rev. C. J. Callan, O.P.
The Four Seas Co., Boston:
Ronald o* the Moors^ By G. E. Locke. $1.75 net Wounded Words, By C B.
Whitin. $1.00 net Monographs, By W. F. Allen. $1.25 net.
Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston:
Fantastics, By L. Heam. $1.65. The Cechs in America. By T. Capek. 93.00.
Thomas J. Fltnn A Co., Boston:
Ireland in Religion and Letters, By Rev. M. P. Mahon. $1.50 net
Yale UNivERsmr Press, New Haven:
The Moral Basis of Democracy, By A. T. Hadley. $1.75. Collected Poema.\
By R. U. Johnson. f4'00.
The University Press, Washington:
The Church and Socialism and Other Essays, By J. A. Ryan, D.D., LL.D.
J. B. LippiNCOTT Co., Philadelphia:
Making Tin Can Toys.. By B. Thatcher. $1.50 net
FiANKLiN-WERR Co., Hobokeu, N. J.:
Success in a New Era. By J. J. Walsh, M.D., Ph.D.
Thb Catholic Truth Sogiett, Pittshurgh:
The Fifth Station. By Thomas F. Coakley, D.D. $1.00.
B. Herder Book Co., St Louis:
A Handbook of Moral Theology. By Rev. A. Koch, D.D. $1.50 net Phases
of Irish History, By E. MacNell. $4.50 net Women of 'Ninety-Eight
By Mrs. T. Concannon, M.A. $2.25 net. In a Medieeval Library, By G. Robin-
son. 91.60 net Mystics All. By E. W. Dinnis. #1.60 net
Morehouse Publishing Co., Milwaukee:
Biblical and Oriental Series: The Book of GenesiSp 91.25; The Growth of
Relgious and Moral Ideas in Egypt, 91*50 ; Relgious and Moral Ideas in Baby^
Ionia and Assyria, 91.50. By S. A. B. Mercer.
University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 111.:
The Power of God, (Play.) E^ J. H. Guild.
Thb Ave Maria, Notre Dame, Ind.:
The Journey Home, By Rev. R. Lawrence.
Thb Negro Year Book Co., Tuskegee Institute, Ala.:
Negro Year Book, 1918-1919. Edited by M. N. Work. 75 cents.
McClelland A Stewart, Toronto:
The Grey Nuns in the Far North, By Rev. P. Duchaussois, O.M.L
Burns A Gates, London:
Science and Morals, and Other Essays. By Sir B. C A. Windle, LL.D. 7s,
Catholic Truth SoaETY of Ireland, Dublin:
Months and Days. By J. Guinan, PP. How Far May a Catholic Agree With
Socialists? By Rev. J. E. Canavan, SJ.; The Social Question in Ireland,
by Rev. P. Coffey, Ph.D.; Between Capitalism and Socalism, by Rev. P. Coffey,
Ph.D.; Watching with Jesus, Pamphlets.
Catholic Truth Sogibtt, London:
St, Francis as a Social Reformer, By Father Thomas, O.S.F.C. Souls for Sale;
Mrs. Neville's Convert. By G. Y. Christmas. What the World Owes to the
Papacy. By Rt Rev. Mgr. Grosch. Pamphlets.
BuscoDUCE, Tbulings, Editorium SOCIETAS:
TheologitL Moralis.. By J. Aertnys, C.SS.R. Tome L
MARCH 1920
THE
atholie uJorld
s
The Atonement in St Paul L. E. BellantU SJ. 721
Three New Irish Novels Henry A. Lappin 734
Friends James J. Daly, SJ, 741
Is There a Catholic Theory of Criminology?
Francis T, J, Burns 742
A Keltic Poe , ^ Joseph J. Reilly, PhD. 751
"Petering Out'' ' Francis Aveling, S,T.D. 763
To The Supreme Harry Lee 772
The Personal Influence of Cardinal Newman
W. A. Conacher 773
The Holy Tree Mary J. O'Brien 781
The Story of Beaver Island Rose Mullay 782
St. Patrick's Folk in America Carl Holliday 787
A Prayer Upon the Sea ' Charles /. Powers, C.5.R 795
The Loyalist James Francis Barrett 796
^ New Books
Recent Events
Russia, Germany, France, Italy
With Our Readers
Prioe— 25 cents; $3 per year
THE OFFICE OF THE CATHOLIC WORLD, NEW TORE
120-122 West 60th Street
ftittrtd AS atcoad cJMi nnttor at th« Pott Offloe at New York. N. Y.
Vol. CX
MARCH, 1920
No 660
mm
An Appropriate an
Useful Gift
for the Clergy: for Sisters: for the Laity
is a new Publication entitled:
<^ACK TO CH%IST
By REV. CUTHBERT LATTEY, S-J. .
t '
General editor with Father Keating, S.J., of the Westminster
Version of the Scriptures.
A living, inspiring appeal for the faithful union of the Christian
soul with Christ.
"The world resounds with programmes of Veconstruction/
and in the dreadful slaughter that has overtaken it each would-be
healer finds convincing proof of his own prescription. But the
true remedy for man lies in that misunderstood and maligned
devotion to the Sacred Heart, which indeed embodies in itself
that call which I have ventured to make the title of this book —
Back to Christ." — From the Author's Preface..
Single Copies $L00; postage extra
Kindly order at once. We have been able to publish at this
time only a limited edition.
THE PAULIST PRESS,
120 West 60th Stjieet New York City
uiiiuiiiuiiiiiuiniiHiiimin
§
E
jblishcd monthly by the Mi«sionary Society of St. Paul the Apostle of the Stale of New York (Paulist Fathers).
ered as second class matter July 8, 1879, at the post office at New York, New York, under the Act of March j,
1879. Acceptance for mailing at special rate of postage provided for in Section 1103,
L Act of October 3, 1917, authorized October 9, 1918.
THE
{[Jatholic^rld
MARCH. 1920
THE ATONEMENT IN ST. PAUL.
BY L. B. BELXjUrn, SJ.
E place events in this world's history by relating
them to its central event. For instance, we say
that the strange tale of the Doomed Prince was
written about 1500 years before Christ, and that
More wrote his Utopia about 1500 years after
e Christ-Event is, by convention, the measure for
human history, as of necessity it is the only measure of our
history in the supernatural plane. Christ is the Supernatural
Man. He comes to raise men above themselves by achieving
their redemption. That redemption is His life-work— its start-
ing point the Incarnation, its culmination the Cross, its tri-
umphant integration, the Resurrection. For, in a sense not to
be lightly set aside, the atonement belongs to the whole life,
death and resurrection. In Our Lord's eyes it is one steep
road from Bethlehem to that Calvary whose dark sununit is
illumined by the after-glory of the resurrection, and always
along that way His will is undeviatingly set.
This view of an atonement, which is co-extensive with the
whole of Our Saviour's life on earth, is familiar to St. Paul,
as it is to us, too, in the prayer: "O God, Whose only-begotten
Son by His life, death and resurrection has purchased for us
the reward of eternal life . . ." "God," says the Apostle, *^a8
722 THE ATONEMENT IN ST. PAUL [Mar^
reconciled us to Himself by Christ . . . , for Grod indeed was
in Christ reconciling the world to Himself."^ *'God being rich
in mercy . . . even when we were dead through our sins
quickened us to life together with Christ and raised us up with
Him.*' ''Christ Jesus» . . . though He was by nature God, did
not set great store on His equality with God: rather. He
emptied Himself by taking the nature of a slave and becoming
like unto men. And after He had appeared in outward form
as man, He humbled Himself, by obedience unto death, yea
unto death upon a cross."* We see from this that though
Christ is always actively the Redeemer, yet His incarnation
and life on earth are more correctly anticipatory of the atone-
ment. The essential reparation and vital atonement must
always be found in His sacrificial death: while our restora-
tion to sonship is effected through His life-giving resurrection.
That death is so full of meaning that we may well begin
by summing up its value, and then clearing the ground of
various misconceptions about it. It is a death both retro-
spective and prospective; that is, its effects are to reach both
those who have gone before and the generations yet to be.
Its saving value is for all times and places. It can be viewed
from every angle and flash fresh significances from each new
facet. On the cross the dying Christ is mediating between God
in heaven and men on earth. To ignore any one of the vital
terms of this relationship of God and man through the God
made Man must lead to inadequacy and misconception; even
to stress one note of the truth beyond others disturbs that per-
fect harmony.
Because of this we find the Church refusing her whole-
hearted approval to a teaching that would unduly extend
man's bondage in sin into an enslavement by the devil, or
again to an unbalanced rhetoric that would express God's
loathing for sin by depicting the Father as waging war to the
death against His Son — the substitutional Victim for our sins —
and exercising a revengeful fury, as abhorrent as it is untrue.
Yet an exaggerated idea of the devil's claims on us led to
strange expressions on the lips of a Basil or a Gregory of
Nyssa in the East, an Ambrose and an Augustine in the West,
while equally forced presentments of God's anger against
His Son, dying for us on the cross, may be culled by the
' 2 Cor. V. 18, 19. • Phil. U. 6-8. Weitmlnster Version.
1920.] THE ATONEMENT IN ST. PAUL 723
curious from the published sermons of Segneri, Bossuet, Bour-
daloue, Monsabr^ and perhaps others.*
Such phrases and sentiments, unfortunate even when
taken in their context, give some color and may even be used
to reenforce the hoary difficulty of Socinus, with which, in
its modem garb, we are all so sadly familiar. *lt is urged
that to suppose that Christ died for the remission of the sins
of mankind is to suppose a thing revolting to all our ideas of
the justice of God, since it means that in His wrath with men
on account of their sins. He condemned the whole race to a
cruel and unending punishment and was only induced to spare
them ... by accepting His own innocent Son as a substitute
for the guilty race, transferring His wrath to that Son as
though He were the guilty person and in consequence in-
flicting upon Him the cruel and revolting punishment of the
crucifixion. How, they ask, can we believe in the goodness,
still less the mercy, of such a God, all the more when, as the
Catholic theologians agree in acknowledging, i7 was easily
within GofTs power to forgive the sins of all men without ex-
acting any reparation whatever, in short by doing Himself what
He requires all His creatures to do in regard to offences they
have sustained from their fellouM^reaturesI"^
Let us at once admit that the italicized words state the
truth. God could have forgiven us all our sins and restored
us to that lost pride of race, as easily at least as we, in our
measure, forgive and are reconciled with one another. In
fact. He did not do so, and the attitude that would demand so
seemingly facile a reconciliation is born of human levels and
is typical of a rationalism never more disastrously applied
than when it is cramping and compressing the Godhead into
some wretched pigeon-hole of our brain. The difficulty, how-
ever, remains and resolves itself to these two propositions :
I. So implacable is God in the punishment of sinners.
II. That He consents to transfer that punishment and to
exact it from His Divine Son.
To this we reply is God so implacable? Sin is undoubtedly
a violation of God's law and brings God*s anger down on the
sinner, but while admitting the anger, we wrong God by blind-
ing ourselves to the co-existence, too, of His love. We must
■See RlTl^re's Atonement, toI. 1., p. 9/f.; toI. 11., p. 111/f.; Hu^n, p. 189 /f.
« The Atonement, by S. Smltli* SJ. The Month, April, pp. 241, 242.
724 THE ATONEMENT IN ST. PAUL [Mar..
not forget that God never ceased loving man, even sinful man,
and this before the atonement of Christ as well as after it;
how otherwise explain His will to redeem Him? Grod*s love is
always manifest. It is as certainly the reason as it is the result
of the atonement
Further, we could say that the manner itself of the atone-
ment — the substitution and punishment of Christ for us — ^is
the greatest proof of God's love. By the sin of our first parents
our fallen nature, as we know it, was passed on to us, a nature
which — even apart from inherited evil tendencies — could
never lay the least claim to see God or be united with Him.
But God's infinite love will not be satisfied — these are human
words — with less than such a union. Hence the wide-flung
scheme of redemption divinely decreed, and, in time, to be
carried out by the Incarnate Son of God. The will to redeem
is one Divine Will, the motive of redemption is one Divine
Love. God the Father did not lay His command on an eternal
and co-equal but unwilling Son. Heaven forbid we should
contaminate our minds by imagining an inequality of gener-
osity or love in the Divine Persons. They are united and
"at one" in their desire for our at-one-ment — ^the radical mean-
ing of this fine word should not be lost — ^united and at one in
their choice of the manner of our atonement.
The substitution of the innocent Christ for guilty man, the
withdrawal of the Father's comforting presence, the desola-
tions of Gethsemani and Calvary, the orgy of Jewish and
Roman cruelty, the utter horror of the crucifixion have been
decreed and embraced out of all time by the Divine Will,
as in due time they are foreseen and embraced by Christ's
human will, so much the more touchingly human for its
successive ardors and reluctances and its unwavering fixity
in the last abandonment.
Set if you will against this the easy alternative — that God
should have forgiven us our trespasses as we forgive them
that trespass against us — (we owe these beautiful words to
Christ, Whom, by hypothesis, we are trying to eliminate) —
that there should have been no passion and death and logically
no Incarnation, but that God's justice should have foregone
satisfaction and forgiven our offences by a word just as we do.
Would such a decree of mercy, such a single word, however
mysterious and amazing in the ease of its pronouncement
1920.] THE ATONEMENT IN ST. PAUL 725
and the fullness of its restoration, have appealed so forcibly
to mankind, or taught us so much of the perversity of sin and
the unaccountableness of God's mercy, or proposed to our
imaginations the Divine Exemplar moving so gladly and sadly
among men?
The Redemption is a mystery of love, just revealed to us
in the creative love of Grod, incarnated in the love of Christ
and triumphant in the victory of love over death. It is the
meeting point of all the mysteries, good and evil, life and
death, failure and triumph, and always love has the last word.
The Church and her accredited teachers, her bishops and
priests, have always held and taught the clear facts of the
atonement as revealed to us by Christ and set down in the
inspired writings of the Apostles and Evangelists. Christians
believed quite as explicitly in the first century, as they do in
the twentieth, that men had fallen by original sin and needed
a Messiah or Christ to save them and that, in due time, this
promised Messiah came in the person of Jesus Messiah, God
made Man. They believed, as we believe, that Our Lord and
Saviour redeemed mankind, atoned for them and restored
them to grace by the willing and obedient sacrifice of Himself
on the cross, and by the inevitable complement and triumph-
ant vindication of that sacrifice in His glorious resiurection.
His own words in life, as He dies and when He is risen
again, reveal this truth : **I have come that they may have life
. • . The Son of Man is come to give His life for the redemp-
tion of many. The good Shepherd lays down His life for His
sheep . . . This is My blood of the covenant that is shed on
behalf of many for the forgiveness of sins ... I lay down My
life that I may take it up again. I am the Resurrection
and the Life." And on the Cross the single word TST^Xcorac
"It is done,'' that is "finished," "completed," "made perfect."
I have completely washed away their sins in My blood; now
they are able to receive My life in them; new creation is ready
for instant birth. And on Easter Sunday evening. His rally-
ing speech to that wistful confession of loyalty — "We had
hoped He was going to redeem Israel," — "How slow and dull
of you . • . was not Christ bound to suffer all this and so come
into His glory?"* Why labor the obvious by further testi-
monies from Gospels, Acts, Epistles to this revealed truth?
•John X. 10, 11, 17; zl. 25; zlx. 80. lUtt zx. 2S; zxtI. 28. Luke xxly. 25, 20.
726 THE ATONEMENT IN ST. PAUL [Mar.,
To be Christians we must believe this, and be convinced that
to desert, however momentarily, this age-trodden way of the
cross is to be lost at once in the crowd of those who do not
know Christ. Without His sacrifice all atonement is illusory,
without His resurrection all faith is vain.
Taking this conunon sum of revealed truth as their start-
ing point, and holding steadily to the teaching of Christ and
His Apostles in the Scriptures as assigning to them the limits
within which their endeavors to explain the further signifi-
cance of the atonement must be contained, the Fathers and
Doctors and thinkers of the Church have gone on studying
and restating and unfolding and developing part of the inex-
haustible resources of this doctrine. Their faith — ^f ar from dull-
ing — only added edge to their zest and sharpened their desire
to search and probe amid the further perplexities. Every age
has raised, in the measure proportioned to its needs, such
grand inquisitors of Christian dogma — and they quasi cur-
sores, vital lampada tradunt, and the Church, while blessing
the inquiry, that is founded on faith, has guarded us as jeal-
ously from loss as she has gladly adopted any permanent
gain. She preserves the deposit of faith, teaching with author-
ity what it definitely contains yet admitting quite frankly the
limitations of revelation and its attendant obscurities.
Even if the Scriptm*es themselves did not expressly testify
to such an obscurity,® one would only have to read Our Lord's
discourses, some of His parables and prophecies, parts of the
Epistles of St. Paul and the other Apostles or St. John's Apoc-
alypse to realize how diflScult it is to grasp the full meaning
of many passages in the New Testament. "Nor will anyone
be found to assert, even in our own day, after all that com-
mentators have discussed and Church Fathers have explained
and Councils have defined and the ordinary 'Magisterium*
has taught, that we have now fathomed the depth of Christ's
and the Apostles' teaching, that we already understand clearly
and distinctly all the doctrines which they intended to convey
and which are, in fact, contained in the language they em-
ployed. It is not to be expected that we should. Our knowl-
edge of God's visible creation is singularly limited. We ob-
serve and codrdinate some facts; we rarely penetrate far
beyond the facts themselves; it is only rarely, if ever, we can
•2 Peter lU. 16. BCark iT. 34. Matt zUl. 10.
1920.] THE ATONEMENT IN ST. PAUL 727
satisfactorily explain them. And if God wills graciously to
reveal to us higher things concerning the Divine Nature, the
Mysteries of Grace, His supernatural Providence for men;
what wonder that His revelation should be more pregnant of
meaning than any man or any generation of men can fully
comprehend?"^
The conmion starting-point for any further consideration
of the atonement must be the clear doctrine of Our Lord's
sacrifice and death on the cross, and His glorious resiurec-
tion. The meaning and value of that death and resurrection
are clearly laid down in Scripture, and if we have here set
them down very briefly it is because we assume that they are
familiar concepts to the Catholic mind, as indeed they form
an integral part of the Catholic faith. But much also of the
teaching of Scripture on the atonement, while bearing a clear
primary significance, implies conditions, reveals aspects, in-
volves metaphors, and supplies considerations which are far
from being so transparently clear. So, for instance, St. Paul
tells us that we are **bought at a great price.** No one has any
doubt about the surface meaning of such words, but we may
be excused some hesitation when pressed with such questions
as: Who was the buyer and who the seller; was the price
paid to the seller; was this purchase indeed a contract, etc.?
The direct answers to such questions as these are not always
to be found in the Scriptures. In supplying answers, one is
passing from the teaching of revelation and the clear light of
faith to the realm of theological theory. It was part of the
great work of the Fathers and Doctors of the Church to work
out these theories, make these implications explicit and try
to show how the various aspects and views of the atonement
are integral parts of the doctrine and find a place in the con-
structive whole.
The cross pointing to heaven, planted in the earth and
branching outwards, the whole setting of the drama of the
atonement, is symbolic of these fuller aspects and develop-
ments of the revealed doctrine. Christ on the cross is recon-
ciling heaven and earth. To look at men on earth, the throng
beneath the cross, is to see souls in bondage, enslaved to sin,
about to be purchased or ransomed at a great price. To look
at the heavenly Father is to be brought face to face with
V Dtvine Faith, by P. Finlay, S J., pp. 228, 229.
728 THE ATONEMENT IN ST. PAUL tMar„
the root idea of the theory of satisfaction, exposed and
vindicated by St. Ansehn. Finally, to rest our eyes on
the central Figure poised between heaven and earth is to see
in Him the substitutional Victim bearing the sins of the world,
expiating for sin, propitiating Divine wrath, reconciling God
and man. But further it is to see the inherent omnipotency
of the atonement — God made Man uniting God and man,
Christ the Head, Chief and Incarnate Representative of all
humanity redeeming, atoning, wedding and incorporating
that humanity into Himself.
These four aspects, respectively styled the theories of ran-
som, satisfaction, substitution and solidarity, and respectively
stressing our bondage in sin, God's outraged justice. His me-
diation through the union in Himself of the Divine and human
natures, and, finally, the way our own humanity is caught up
in Christ and saved by Him, do not exhaust the manifold im-
plications of the atonement.^ But it is safe to say that they
embody the most salient lessons of revelation as explicitly
taught in the inspired text and gradually worked out, cor-
rected and developed in the bosom of the Church.
Often the atonement is spoken of as the redemption, a
term by which we mean, that we are ransomed or bought
back by Christ our Ransomer or Redeemer. The Epistles
of St. Paul are full of the word and of kindred phrases. We
are *l)ought at a price" — "at a great price;" we are "the
Church of God which He acquired with His own blood" — "the
blood of the immaculate Lamb, Christ." We are ransomed
from "the bondage of sin," "delivered from iniquity." Sinful
mankind are all "in captivity:" the Jews bound by the Law
and cursed for their infractions of the Law, the Gentiles given
up and handed over to the perversity of their lusts. Christ is
the Ransomer of both Jews and Gentiles. The shedding of
His blood is itself in the nature of a compensation or payment.*
These root ideas of **bondage," "slavery," •'ransom," "pur-
chase" and "price" were at one time elaborated by some few
Fathers into what they thought might prove a harmonious
theory of the atonement. Agreeing that we were all in bond-
age to sin, they proceeded to suggest that we had given our-
*Thus every view of sin has Its counterpart in the atonement, which canoels
sin. Call sin our fall, our violation of God's Justice, our crime, debt, bondage,
disease and death. The atonement is correspondingly our resurrection, satisfaction,
expiation, ransom, deliverance, healing and life.
*1 Cor. vi. 20; vii. 23. Acts xz. 28. Rom. vl. 6, 18-20; vii. 23.
1920.] THE ATONEMENT IN ST. PAUL 729
selves up to our master, the devil. Consequently he might be
said to have rights over us which he would only forego at the
price of Christ's Life-blood. Willingly Christ paid the price
at which we were valued, purchased us from our captor and
so ransomed us and made us free. This exaggerated ampli-
fication of the Scripture teaching on redemption into a so-
called theory of the devil's rights, though championed by sev-
eral advocates among the Fathers and Doctors in the fourth
and fifth centuries, never won complete approval nor escaped
damaging criticism in the Church. In fact, in the gross form
in which it is here set down, it speedily lost general support.
Yet it cannot be too strongly emphasized that there is a very
true sense in which sin enslaves men and binds them to the
devil in the bonds of a bitter apprenticeship and really puts
them under his power. Equally truly the redemption is a ran-
som or purchase and can be described under that figure, and
though the devil could never be one of the high contracting
parties (for the ransom is offered to God) yet by the shed-
ding of Christ's blood the devil's power is broken, and **cap-
tivity is taken captive"*® by Christ's rising from the dead.
The very incompleteness of the ransom theory is precisely in
this, that, as Christ does not offer His life in ransom to the
devil but to God Himself, the theory offers no shadow of an
explanation why God should accept and exact such a painful
ransom from His sinless Son. Clearly this redemptive view
of the atonement must be supplemented and find its logical
integration in a proper understanding of the satisfactory
nature of that atonement.
The Scriptures also ascribe the atonement to the substitu-
tional character of the mediation eflSciently exercised by Our
Saviour on the cross. God takes the place of man. He suffers
and dies for man and in the place of man. He is our proxy,
the substitutional Victim Who takes on Himself the iniquities
of us all. St. John the Baptist sees Our Lord in this char-
acter from the very threshold of His public life and bids us,
too, *%ehold the Lamb of God" (the sacrificial Victhn), "Who
beareth the sins of the world."" "Him Who knew not sin,"
says St. Paul, "God made to be sin for our sakes;" and in an
obviously parallel and substitutional sense he says of the Jews,
speaking himself as a Jew, that "Christ redeemed us from the
i^^pb. It. 8. Pa. IxvU. 19, Vulgate. ujohn 1. 29.
730 THE ATONEMENT IN ST. PAUL [Mar^
curse of the Law being made a curse for our sakes.'*
Whether then Christ becomes sin for us or incurs the curse of
the Law for the Jews equally, in either case. He is our sub-
stitute, charging Himself with our debt and undergoing our
punishment.
Absolutely true within the limits just laid down, this doc-
trine of Christ's penal substitution again affords only a partial
and incomplete account of our revelation on the atonement,
for while bringing into prominence the vicarious nature of
Our Saviour's passion and death, it unfolds no principles by
which we might explain to ourselves the infinite mercy that
supports and transfigures that penal substitution. Indeed, if
this teaching on Christ's vicarious sacrifice is considered apart
and alone as some isolated and solitary fact, it is of all teach-
ings most apt to lead to grave mistakes. Witness the painful
development of the doctrine of atonement in the Reformed
Churches. Yet, when we join to it the explanations already
offered by the ransom-theory, it forms a solid basis and gives
a firm Scriptural foundation to the widely-accepted and com-
plementary teaching of the Doctors of the Church on the satis-
factory nature of the atonement.
To St. Anselm we owe the first reasoned explanation of
the doctrine of Christ's satisfaction for us by His sacrifice on
the cross. In his exposition, this great Doctor takes careful
account of the root-ideas of sacrifice, redemption or ransom,
substitution or vicarious suffering so clearly taught by St.
Paul. He then proceeds to combine and weld them together,
building them into a solid foundation for his logical and har-
monious deductions. It is necessary to explain and stress this
fact in view of such ciurent accusations as that of Auguste
Sabatier, who has no scruple in saying that^' *'the Church's
theory of expiation, far from translating the Apostle's thought,
actually contradicts it." A few words on the Pauline approx-
imations to St. Anselm's argiunent will serve to show the mis-
leading character of this assertion, and may help us to realize
that the undoubted development in doctrine expounded in St.
Anselm's Cur Deus Homo neither implies nor demands a
divorce from the, up to then, ciurent tradition of the Church.
Briefly St. Anselm's argument amounts to this. As sin is
an offence against God, which He in justice cannot allow to
UA. SabAtler, VAp6trt Panl (1896), p. 323.
1920.] THE ATONEMENT IN ST. PAUL 731
go unpunished here or hereafter, the sinner is a debtor till
he has equivalently expiated for his offences. No mere crea-
ture, however, can offer such equivalent expfation, for a
creature's acts are, in virtue of its created nature, finite —
save only in the case of sin which, by being directed against
the Infinite Good, contracts a sort of infinite malice. Sinful
man, is therefore, helpless, but God's love would not leave him
so. Consequently God made Man, took sin upon Himself
and became our substitute. By virtue of His inherent God-
head, the human actions of Christ take an infinite value,^*
while His willing sacrifice and death redressed by their loving
obedience the wrong done to God by the mutinous revolt of
humanity, superabundantly expiated for all our sins and re-
stored God's violated honor in so far as we have, by our
sins, detracted from that honor which is His due.
The elements of this close-knit argument are Scriptural,
but they also presuppose the divine plan of the Incarnation,
while they involve a juridical principle, which is well outside
the scope of both revelation and inspiration. The presupposi-
tion is that satisfaction must needs be made, or punishment
exacted, before sin can be forgiven. The juridical principle
is, that while the extent of the injury is measured by the in-
gratitude of the wrongdoer and the proportion of his de-
pendence on the person he injures, the wrongdoer's capacity
for reparation is measured by the extent of his independence
and by the amount of compensation he can, of himself, afford
to redress the disturbed balance.
Clearly, if satisfaction is necessary for forgiveness, and
man, of himself, can never satisfy God, the Incarnation be-
comes inevitable. Yet, as Peter Lombard insisted, Christ's
incarnation and death was not precisely the only way in which
God could have saved man. St. Augustine's teaching on this
subject had, we may be sure, already suflSciently expressed
the mind of the Church. In the same sense, Alexander of
Hales and St. Bonaventure toned down the excesses of a
philosophical optimism which seemed to treat the Incarna-
tion and atonement as just the logical outcome of God's desire
to save fallen man, instead of reading in these mysteries above
all else the free decree of His love.
>*St Thomai. Supp. A. 76, a. 1. "The Divine operations wrou^t their effect
throng Chritf • body as a mediating organ — a troth exemplified by St John
Damascena in that physical contact by which Christ healed the leper." (Matt TiiL)
732 THE ATONEMENT IN ST. PAUL [Mar.,
Apart from this easily corrected presupposition and legal
principle the entire content of Anselm's argument on satis-
faction is rooted in the Scriptures and is their natural out-
growth and development. It has the merit of combining the
root-ideas of Holy Writ and helping us to understand more
fully their meaning.
Far from being in contradiction to St. Paul's teaching, or
at least alien from it» this doctrine of a sacrifice of satisfac-
tion most nearly comprehends the Apostle's mind on the
atonement considered objectively and in itself. The Scrip-
tural elements of the argument of St. Anselm are vital ele-
ments of the Apostle's doctrine. Nowhere in the sacred text
shall we find a firmer or more boldly-outlined summary of sin
and its reparation than in the vivid list of contrasts drawn by
St. Paul between the first Adam and Christ, the second Adam.^*
The bondage of sinners to sin, God's aversion from them. His
wrath. His abandonment of them to their perversities, the
helpless state of fallen humanity, are stressed by St. Paul,
if only to show forth in relief the benefit of Christ's mediation
in payment of our ransom and to enhance the unrealizable
value of His substitutional, obedient and loving sacrifice. In
virtue of the atonement, we are reconciled to God through
our union with Christ. ^'Scarcely for a righteous man will
one die — ^but God commendeth His own love towards us in
that while we were yet sinners Christ died for us. Much
more then being now justified by His blood shall we be saved
from the wrath of God through Him."" The very wealth of
evidence in the Epistles on these heads makes any further
Scriptural vindication of St. Anselm's views of satisfaction
superfluous.
We have shown how this holy Doctor's statement of the
doctrine underwent careful scrutiny, and even some slight
correction, at the hands of later theologians. St. Thomas
Aquinas himself, while whole-heartedly accepting St. Anselm's
doctrine, drew attention to its subjective value through the
application of Christ's merits to the human race. Once, says
St. Thomas, the Eternal Father has accepted the satisfaction
made by Our Saviour He binds Himself equivalently to re-
store men in the restoration of Christ, Who is the Representa-
tive, the Chief, the Head of that Mystical Body of which we are
"Rom. V. 12-21; 1 Cor. xv. 45-49.
vRom. T. 8, 9. See also Epb. 1. 20-22; Rom. ill. 25.
«
I
1920.] THE ATONEMENT IN ST. PAUL 733
made members. In these words the Angelic Doctor is not
merely echoing St. Paul but he is purposely directing our gaze
to the most salient and faithful aspect of the Apostle's treat-
ment of an atonement, by which we are made one with Christ
through an absorption that gathers us up and incorporates
us into His Mystical Body. And, indeed, however manifold
and various the Apostle's premises, his conclusion is always
this : that we are one with Christ.
To St. Paul, dogma and devotion, objective truth and sub-
jective application, the facts in themselves and their effective
meaning for us, are hardly distinct and severed truths — though
so, too, they may be considered — ^but just aspects of one truth,
through the interaction of the human and the Divine in that
unity in which we are one with Christ. They are as some
divinely-governed ebb and flow, the flux of Christ to the Chris-
tian and the reflux of the Christian to Christ. Once our human
elements are vitalized and transfigured by the Christ-life, then
are we one with Him, incarnated into Him, living in Him, suf-
fering in Him, nay, making up in our own flesh what is want-
ing in His sufferings, co-crucified with Christ, dying with Him
in the flesh that we may rise with Him in glory. **Ye are
bought," St. Paul assures us, **at a great price." The Apostle
will not minimize the cost or slur over the pain. His is not
the way of conciliation and compromise but the higher apti-
tude for drawing out talent, good qualities, even unimagined
heroisms, eliciting sympathy, quickening love, turning the
will into the deed.
In a further article the writer hopes to enter more fully
into this specialized aspect of St. Paul's teaching on the atone-
ment. That teaching has a unique claim on the attention of
all Christians, not so much for the light it throws on the aton-
ing value of Christ's death and resurrection in themselves, a&
in the revealing way in which it explains how that atonement
is extended to us. And as it is the inspired presentment of
the truth falling from the lips of one in whom Christ lived
and spoke, it is most expressive of that vital unity in which the
suffering of the One is redemptive and atoning for many.
It may lead us to verify more fully, perhaps, in our own
experience what is so wonderful in the Story of Calvary.
THREE NEW IRISH NOVELS.
BY HENRY A. LAPPIN.
I SHORT time ago there came into the hands of the
present writer a copy of The Valley of the Squint~
ing Windows, the first novel of a new Irish
writer, Brinsley MacNamara. Now there is not
a single valid reason why this work of fiction
should be recommended to any reader anywhere. As a piece
of writing it is deplorably inartistic; perhaps the very worst
example of pseudo-realism I have ever come across. In a
grandiloquent prefatory note the author informs us that "the
people of that part of Ireland with whom I deal in my writings
became highly incensed. They burned my book after the best
mediaeval fashion and resorted to acts of healthy violence . . .
The country as a whole did not dislike my picture of Irish
life or say it was untrue. It was only the particular section
of life which was pictured that still asserted its right to the
consolation of romantic treatment . . ." The hoary dodge Mr.
MacNamara employs is to paint some of his characters very,
very black, and others impossibly while. People in the small
towns of Meath are, as human beings, not extravagantly dif-
ferent from people in the small towns of Michigan or Mauri-
tius, let us say. They probably talk about their neighbors —
more or less charitably; it may even be that they are not
wholly without interest in newcomers to their native scene.
And skeletons in the cupboard are not confined to any par-
ticular latitude. The inhabitants of this myopically-windowed
valley, however, are altogether void of resemblance to any
people anywhere, unless indeed it be within the walls of an
asylum for pathological freaks. It is not to be wondered at
that these Irish people whom the author has so monumentally
traduced should have burned his book. It is rather a testimony
to their heroic self-control that they refrained from burning
him.
And yet, the other day this book was being puffed ad
nauseam as "the most realistic Irish novel of the decade, a
merciless picture of Irish life, a biting and subtle analysis of
1920.] THREE NEW IRISH NOVELS 735
the rural temperament. The squinting windows are the eyes
of the village through which every act is observed and treas-
ured for gossip. The village watches unceasingly the three
members of the Brennan f amily, who in turn spy upon and
dissect every human secret, however sacred. And — as lilies
grow in the muck — there arises from this background of small
minds and petty acts a noble and ideal love. For superb
realism and grim tragedy Mr. MacNamara's book is unex-
celled in contemporary jBction. He has fused the great trinity
of vital forces, love, work and sin into an absorbing history of
human passion"^
As for the reviews of this egregious novel not many have
departed widely from the convenient publisher's headline;
and at least one sectarian periodical— from which more might
very reasonably have been expected — ^was content to applaud
Mr. MacNamara's lurid pages as an indictment of the priest-
craft, under which some gloomy souls persist in maintaining
that Ireland labors. But of the book's hopeless lack of artistic
quality, of the wild melodrama, the sheer sordidness of it all,
I have so far seen no word of condemnation in any of the
book-reviewing periodicals. Many readers in America, led
astray by the publisher's modest claim for it and by sundry
reviews echoing the said claim more or less fulsomely, have
bought or will buy The Valley of Squinting Windows. Not
every reader will have had sufficient literary experience to
recognize immediately that the book offends clamantly against
every sound canon of the art of writing, and that as a presenta-
tion of Irish human nature it is grossly libellous. There are
many honest but imperfectly-informed people whose views
about Ireland and the Irish it will seriously and unpleasantly
affect And there are yet others, already holding distorted
views, whose bias will unfortunately be reenforced when they
read it. Not for a century has it been so essential that Amer-
ica should view Ireland with unprejudiced eyes. The Valley
of the Squinting Windows will do more injury than any half-
dozen expert anti-Irish propagandists could possibly do in
as many months. Had the author set out determined to harm
Ireland as much as possible in the opinions of the unsophis-
ticated American reader, he could not have more admirably
> Italics are the reviewer's, who commends this utterance as the most beatlflcally
absiint that ever appeared upon a publisher's wrapper.
736 THREE NEW IRISH NOVELS [Mar^
succeeded than he has here. He has written a thoroughly
vicious book.
Glenmornan, by Patrick MacGill, is another new Irish
novel, this time the work of a man who can write much better
than Bfr. MacNamara, but who is, nevertheless, very far indeed
from being an artist of distinction. ^'Romance glimpsed through
Irish doorways" is one of the statements on the paper jacket
Well, a glimpse through a doorway at any rate sounds more
promising than a peep through ^'squinting windows." But
why does this comparatively talented young writer serve up
the ancient Michael J. McCarthy dish: the smug, self-pos-
sessed priest who *Vas an over-fed blatant tyrant, whom the
people obeyed like sheep! Poor people, poor silly, stupid
people!" This is Mr. MacGill's not very prepossessing picture
of the pastor of the Glen : **Devaney was a covetous and crafty
man, holding unlimited control of his flock. Though the
peasantry did not love him, they feared him and he played on
that fear. The poor were his legitimate prey, and not a soul
in the parish dared gainsay his wishes or disobey his com-
mands. He kept the parish under his thumb." This priest
from the altar several times held up to ridicule and contempt
a very poor woman who, when he was building his new house,
was unable to pay all the dues. "When young Reelan" —
the woman's son — ^**came home and heard of this, he was very
angry and went and saw Devaney about the matter. During
the interview he lost his temper and knocked the priest down.
For this Devaney had his revenge. He spoke about the affair
from the altar, pointing out the evil of which the young man,
who had struck his own priest, was guilty. Needless to say,
the peasantry were indignant; the villagers wouldn't speak
to the young man afterwards and the women of the parish
would not buy at his shop.* In the end Reelan had to close
up his business and leave the parish." Doalty Gallagher is
preached against by this Father Devaney, or in the phrase
of the Glen, ^Vead from the altar," in an illiterate and vulgar
discourse which is reported in full, and from which one culls
the following choice specimens: (1) **. . . all papers away
abroad, have, for their first aim and object, the destruction iv
the holy Roman Catholic religion." (2) ". . . as a priest I
must read the papers, a thing that none iv ye must do, bear in
mind, for ye have not been educated up to it and ye might
1920.] THREE NEW IRISH NOVELS 737
fall into sin if ye do things that yer priest forbids you to do.**
When he writes like this, Mr. MacGill does a marked disservice
to both his Faith and his native land.
As for the sinister portrait he has drawn in "Devaney"
— ^what is one to say in criticism of it? This: that to submit
such a portrait to us as that of a representative Irish country
parish priest is a most audacious piece of impertinence* The
Irish peasantry look upon their priests as fathers and pro-
tectors, as veritable ambassadors of Christ to them. They have
always done so. It is not, perhaps, unlikely that, in the past,
some of these priests have treated their unruly parishioners as
many a tactless father has treated an unruly child. It is also
possible that in more than one case real injustice to the par-
ishioner may have resulted from such a kindly despotism.
But Mr. MacGill's portrait is none the less a ruthless, even if
unintentional, misrepresentation. Others who know the Irish
priesthood much more intimately and thoroughly than this
writer are urgent to deny the verisimilitude of the rela-
tionship he depicts as existing between priest and people in
the rural districts of Ireland. Again one insists that this is no
time to indulge in a perversion of Irish realities. Ireland is
jBghting for her life these days. In days to come it will not
at all redound to any Irish writer's credit that in the dark
hour of his country's agonizing struggle for justice and truth,
he was numbered among those whose words strengthened the
cause of her foes.
It is at once a joy and a relief to turn to a third Irish
novel of the present day, in which a faithful and beautiful
interpretation of the Irish spirit is set forth. To this reviewer
it has been a source of great surprise that more attention was
not paid by American critics and readers to Daniel Corkery's
The Threshold of Quiet, an amazingly fine book by a new Irish
writer, which was published on this side the ocean in 1918.
Over in Ireland, where they rarely fail to appreciate a good
piece of writing when they see it, this novel was instantly
and permanently successful. One of the most brilliant of the
younger Irish critics, Mr. Peter McBrien, did not hesitate to
hail it as the finest Irish novel that had ever been published.
With this opinion I am in cordial agreement, and several of
the best critics of this country, to whom I lent my copy, pri-
vately expressed themselves with a like enthusiasm. "Daniel
TQL. GZ. 47
738 THREE NEW IRISH NOVELS [Mar^
Corkery," said Mr. McBrien, **has won the technique of the
European masters, and at the same time caught the freshness
and purity of the undying soul of Ireland.** Hardly less em-
phatic was the verdict of Katharine Tynan: **He writes from
the inside** — she declared — "and he sees within his people by
the vision of genius.** Mr. E. A. Boyd, the able and acute
historian of Ireland's literary renaissance wrote thus — with
a sympathy not ordinarily characteristic of his references in
this kind — of the Catholic spuit that breathes through the
pages of this novel of Catholic Ireland: *The religious note
is particularly delicate and beautiful, spontaneous and re-
served, eloquent but never didactic.** There can, in short, be
no doubt that The Threshold of Quiet was received more
appreciatively by the Irish people than any novel that has
appeared in years. And of all the generous commendations
bestowed upon it there was no word that was not deserved.
The book is a faithful and discerning chronicle of the
quiet, almost cloistral, lives led by a small group of Irish
people, of what used to be called "the lower-middle-class,**
whose homes are in and around the second liveliest of Irish
cities, Cork — ^hill-built above the pleasant waters of the River
Lee —
The spreading Lee that like an island fayre
Encloseth Cork with his divided flood.
The Threshold of Quiet is full of the tender mellowness
and soft serenity of this ancient Irish city. The story of the
book, as Mr. Boyd has remarked, "is almost purely cerebral,
so carefully does the author restrict its movement to what is
passing in the minds of his characters. When the book is
closed all one has seen happening is the departure of Finbarr
Bresnan for America, after a hesitation as to whether he had
not a vocation for the priesthood; the tragic ending to the
story of Stevie Galvin and his brother; the crossing of the
'threshold of quiet* by Lily Bresnan when she finally feels
free to enter Kilvirra Convent, renouncing life and the love
of Martin Cloyne. Even these few dramatic moments are not
developed, but just cause a slight stir of the deep waters of
consciousness in which these lives are submerged.'*
Mr. Corkery*s pages abound in the most magically beau-
tiful evocations of the Irish scene. Of the lovely hillsides
1920.] THREE NEW IRISH NOVELS 739
around Cork, he writes: **Go but three steps up any of those
old-time, wide-sweeping, treeless, cloud-shadowed hills and
you find yourself even at mid-day in a silence that grows on
you. You have scarce left the city, yet you raise your eyes,
you look around and notice little gable ends that finish in
little crosses of stone or arched gateways of sandstone or
limestone, or both, or far-stretching garden walls that are
marked with tablets of brass on which are cut holy emblems
and sacred letters — and as you look the silence seems to grow
deeper and deeper; indeed, you have come on the very
fruitage of the spirit of contemplation — convents, monasteries,
chapels, hospitals, houses of refuge. And to us these quiet
hillsides are also Cork. Perhaps they are the quieter for the
noise in the valley; perhaps, too, that little stir and bustle
is quickened for those long slopes of quiet sunshine and
peace." Mr. Corkery is nothing less than a most fastidious
artist in language, and he invests everything he describes with
a rare magic of words. This is only one of many of the beau-
tiful minor nocturnes in a book the prevailing atmos-
phere of which is delicately and softly crepusculine : *The
September night had set in. Winter had blown its first breath
against the stars, chilling them, brightening them; as yet
there was no moon." The note of peace and calm sounded
at the beginning and maintained so subtly throughout, is
as much an achievement in atmosphere as anything in George
Moore*s The Lake. The lovely Irish places-names, which the
author so often mentions, enchant an exile's heart with their
low chiming music: Clashavody, Shanabally, Curraghkip-
pane, Knockahoogan, Youghal. What a litany I Out of the
the mouths of his characters comes the pure Irish idiom of
English, and in his own person he often writes a vivid and
direct English as it is spoken in Ireland: ^hat letter he
was after posting the very evening Martin and Finbarr visited
him • • .*' (He speaks, too, of the **quenching" of a candle.)
Readers who remember the fine Dominican Church at Cork
will read with joy Mr. Corkery's description of the Christmas
Crib there. The Threshold of Quiet is simply saturated in a
tranquil and mournful beauty.
And the characters of the story, the small handful of
wayfaring souls we come to know with such affectionate in-
timacy, are Irish of the Irish. One has met them again and
740 THREE NEW IRISH NOVELS [Mar.,
again in Cork or Dublin. The gentle Lily, whose soul is a
nun-like soul; *'for such a soul to stay in the world is to run
the risk of losing its gift of spiritual joyousness;" Lily, torn
in twain by her practical certainty that she had a religious
vocation and her desire to stay "in the world.** "On the one
hand, to stay and attend on her father and Finbarr was to
choose the world. It seemed her duty to do so; no other
course seemed reasonable; yet she leant greatly to the belief,
common amongst Irish Catholics, that the right course in
matters affecting the soul is that which does not seem to
square exactly with what we call reason.** The interview
between Lily and Father Cummins is a masterpiece in little:
an infinitely more truthful portrayal of the tender relation-
ship between an Irish soggarth and his spiritual child than
anything else of the kind in the whole range of modern Irish
fiction. Of Lily Mr. Corkery writes: "It had never struck
her that she had been sent into this world to have a good
time.** Self-sacrifice and the sense of duty to be done and a
trust to be kept were ever the marks of Irish maidenhood.
And when Lily and her friends talk in these pages, it is the
talk of real Irish people we are listening to — not a literary
confection of the MacNamara-McGill variety. "And so they
continued, their method of talking about such subjects [re-
ligious vocations] quite characteristic of Irish Catholics —
seriousness covered over with banter, lest by any possible mis-
hap it fall into the whine so relished of the Puritan, so in-
stinctively abhorred of the Celt.** Mr. Corkery is obviously
well aware that there is none more implacably realist
than that same Celt I
To the Irish people their ancient Catholic faith is neither
a picturesque superstition nor a dull disease. Synge and
Yeats, great artists as incontestably they were, failed ulti-
mately as interpreters of the Irish because they thought that
an Irishman*s religion was a fantastic and mythological affair,
with no roots in his reason or will. They were not themselves
Catholic and, therefore, they could not understand the souls
of men and women who lived in and by the Faith. (Douglas
Hyde, someone has truly remarked, was the only non-Catholic
ever to bridge with full sympathy and comprehension this
gulf of separation.) It takes a Catholic artist to understand
and adequately to interpret Catholic life. Granted that his
1920.] FRIENDS 741
artistry is not at fault — that he is an artist born and made —
the better Catholic he is, the better artist he will prove to be.
Corkery is only beginning his career. This novel, and a book
of short stories, A Munster Twilight, are all that he has so far
published. It may well be that he has not yet acquired the
fullest mastery of his writer's craft. Ten years from now, if
he continues to produce, there can be no doubt about the
place he will occupy in Irish literature. He will be nothing
more nor less than an Irish classic.
FRIENDS.
BY JAMES J. DALY, S.J.
Let me not whimper under blows
Of adverse circumstance.
Nor let me meet whatever foes
There be with poisoned lance.
Nor let me buffet ruthless fates
With sullen moods of scorn,
Nor wish when pain breaks down my gates
That I was never born.
My life has been a wild surprise
Of kindnesses unsought.
Taking from gracious hands and eyes
Much better than it brought.
Oh, it was kind of Kindliness
Blindfold to seek my door,
I never could requite her less.
She could not bless me more.
If the future scourge me with rope's ends,
A glad humility
May make half what all courteous friends
Were pleased to see in me.
IS THERE A CATHOLIC THEORY OF CRIMINOLOGY?
-BY FRANCIS T. J. BURNS.
IOT long ago one of our leading newspapers in the
Northwest reported that a certain venire-man,
examined apropos of the most sensational mur-
der case in Minnesota's bistoiy, had been ex-
cused from jury service because he affirmed
that "crime is a disease of the mind;" while a second was
dismissed, because, in his opinion, the prisoner ought to be
classed as a "bom-criminal." The fact that the two men were
excused from juror's duty on the above grounds proves, first,
that their theory of crime was unsatisfactory in practical life,
at least; secondly, that some "other" theory of crime does
obtain, even in quarters where the "bom-criminal*' theory
may thrive. This other theory, the true theory, as far as fun-
damentals are concerned, is, I need not say, held by every
sound judge of the day. It is peculiarly a Catholic theory.
Its statement demands only the statement of well-known
Catholic principles. Even if unacknowledged as Catholic,
it remains, nevertheless, a great social lever, one of the in-
numerable "verities" of Catholic faith and morals, which non-
CathoUc, Christian fellows act upon. If perchance they do not
return thanks, they may be classified as "parasites of Chris-
tianity" after Mr. Arthur Balfour's words.
The judge who dismissed the two venire-men for the
theoretical views just quoted above, implicitly expressed the
one and only tenable preamble of any rational criminological
study, viz., man is a moral being because he possesses free-
wiU.
The materialistic theories of crime, as put forth, for ex-
ample, by Lombroso and Ferri, neglect altogether too much,
if not completely, the chief factor in all crime, namely, the
will. Thus criminological studies by disciples of this cult
start, not at the beginning ab intra, but at the end — ab extra.
Thus: Part I. Etiology.* Cosmic factors of crime (climate.
1920.] CATHOLIC THEORY OF CRIMINOLOGY 743
etc.) . II. Social factors of crime (what others inflict upon us) .
III. Individual factors of crime (atavism, heredity-alcoholism,
etc.).«
Without any attempt to treat adequately the subject of
free-will, I say, as a fundamental postulate of Catholic faith,
philosophy and experience, that the chief cause of crime and,
with few exceptions, always the efficient cause of crime, is the
free-will. I do not deny other causes, but I do class them as
secondary and contributory. If it be said that I attempt, at
one stroke, to simplify matters too easily and too quickly, I
answer that the vagaries of free-will itself are often harder to
classify and analyze than any secondary, contributory, and
for the most part — ^if the literature on the subject is to be
believed — ^material causes.
We may, in fact, underrate the value of the secondary
causes, but we cannot overrate the chief cause, the will. In a
broad sense, the whole discussion of so-called criminology
must be a discussion of the will for the Catholic student.
The doctrine of free-will, as is the case with all vital "life-
doctrines," is like the circle of Trismegistus, whose centre is
everywhere, whose circumference nowhere. That doctrine
will not down even in the light of "criminological" re-
searches. It must be kept in mind and reviewed, in company
with St. Augustine and St. Thomas, by all who are not satisfied
to take a part for the whole, an effect for a cause : all who are
unwilling to accept Spencer's half-views of life for the basic
and panoramic interpretations of the Fathers and Scholastics,
old and new. A kind of illative sense, working throughout
Christian civilization, seems ever and always to apply to the
doctrine of free-will the familiar motto: Nemo me impune
laces$it; because where an attempt is made to brush free-will
aside, inconsistencies result throughout the different spheres
of social, legal and economic order. Law governs civil and
moral life. Is the law obeyed? If not, what is the reason?
An ancient says, "man is the maker of his own acts;" a modem
professor indicates "a biological necessity;" while a modern
*Mr. Lewis certainly speaks with authority in modem penology. If we judge
rightly from his latest work, he believes rightly that religion is one of the big factors
making for social amelioration; yet in his latest formal work, he criticizes society
because "It has proceeded too long on the old (sic) eighteenth century conception
of free-wlU and equality," In dealing with problems like those he proposes to
dlsootf.
744 CATHOLIC THEORY OF CRIMINOLOGY [Mar^
judge implies that, against the examination of a legal offence,
a jury demands, for the time being if you will, as a pragmatic
measure, moral liberty.
It may not be altogether superfluous, therefore, in the
light of what has been said, to review the broad moral problem
which the fathers of criminal sociology have had to face, but
which they have not faced squarely. The problem funda-
mentally belongs to writers on ethics. The problem is, can
a man determine his own thought and volition and through
these, his character, the resultant of thoughts and volitions?
Or are these already determined for him by chance, by cir-
cumstance, by the Creator, or whatsoever force you will?
Voluntarism or Determinism? The answer readily places us
in a position to determine most, if not all, the elements a jury
would care to know in weighing a crime. To say nothing of
the jury, the answer regulates, as Father Maher intimates,
a man's whole life-philosophy.
We will not formally discuss here the Voluntaristic doc-
trine or that of Determinism. In the light of what has already
been said, I submit the following as an outline for the study
of criminal Sociology in any of its branches, from the view-
point of Catholicism; that is to say, the viewpoint of Catho-
lic philosophy and theology. The outline is necessarily incom-
plete, but it may serve, as did the old guide-post on English
rural roads, to point the way.
The Voluntaristic doctrine of Will in man carries in its
train such ideas as responsibility, merit, justice, remorse —
fundamental notions, the mainsprings of social spheres of
activity. Christian society could no more exist without these
notions^ than man's body without food and air. These ideas
of responsibility, merit, justice, remorse, etc., constitute the
ethical relations generated in every day life, by the existence
of the Voluntaristic doctrine of human will. These ideas, of
course, impinge on the theological ideas or notions generated
by the existence of free-will; so that it is not surprising to
find that as late as the Vatican Council "we were reminded of
the doctrine of free-will," lest perchance Catholics might forget
that the ethical relations of free-will reached up beyond the
stars from this mundane world of ours. These ethical notions
inseparably connected with the existence of man's free-will,
have a real objective entity and cannot be resolved **into thin
1920.] CATHOLIC THEORY OF CRIMINOLOGY 745
air" by any amount of personal equation, or of internal spirit-
ual temperament in men; nor by external influences acting
upon them. Under so widely different contemporaneous con-
ditions as those which surround the Esquimaux toiling amid
Arctic snows; the Indian basking in the sunlight before a pagan
temple **along the banks of Ind;*' or a modem RaflSes, of the
Beau Brummel type, passing a moth-like existence amid the
social circles of a highly artificial society in this century —
a law is violated. If the law thus violated be a Divine, a
natural, or human law, the categorizing of the offence straight-
way is seen to depend upon the kind of law violated. The
violation of a Divine, natiural, positive, or ecclesiastical law
may mean that in one or other degree, the violator is guilty
of what Catholics know as "sin.** The violation of some civil
law, because the violation injures the social right of another,
may add the additional note of what is known in common
law and in civil courts as "crime." In Christian civilization,
perhaps there is not a ""crime" against the state or common-
wealth where a law which binds in conscience is violated,
which is not at the same time a sin. On the contrary, needless
to say, there are innumerable sins which are not ""crimes."
Now for the examination of ""sin" and ""crime" — the so-
ciological term ""vice" has been divorced from the idea con-
tained either in sin or crime — two forums have been erected
by the Creator. One is the internal forum — Oman's conscience
over which the Catholic priest presides in the sacred peni-
tential tribunal. The other is the external forum — the or-
dinary civil or ecclesiastical law by which all are made amen-
able to court examinations for ""external violating acts." Both
sin and crime, however, as man is a free agent, must spring
from the same source, namely, the will. Whatever other
differences there may be between them, in this respect they are
identical. To be more specific, a sin and a crime have their
roots respectively in man's free-will, his "potestas, vis electiva/*
his faculty of choice. There ought to be naturally, from this
viewpoint, some common ground of treatment or examination
between the ideas of sin and crime. But I have emphasized
the singular for the following reason. Crime (from Latin,
crimen, accusation) is the general term for offences against
the criminal law. It has been defined as a failure or refusal
to live up to the standard of conduct deemed binding by the
\
746 CATHOUC THEORY OF CRIMINOLOGY [Mar^
rest of the community;'* or again, ^'some act or omission in
respect of which legal punishment may be inflicted on the
person who is in default, whether by acting or omitting to act**
(Sir James Stephen). While one act or omission, in a tech-
nical sense, may render a person a ^'criminal," it is not so
much this ""technical" criminal, who is considered by the crim-
inological school. It is rather the ""instinctive" or ""born" crim-
inal, ""a creature who had been sent into the world predestined
to evil deeds and who could surely be recognized by certain
stigmata, certain facial, physical and even moral birthmarks."
He is not only foredoomed to crime, but to the habit of crime.
This, the type of Lombroso. The other type presented by the
Deterministic school, which took issue with his automaton
theory, presents a man not so much ""bom" to crime as highly
liable to it, because of the ""milieu" into which he is thrust by
fortune. The ""technical" criminal begot by the one mistake
of an otherwise apparently honest man is only interesting in
so far as, more or less, he may be connected with these other
two, namely, with the man who is a bom criminal or the man
who by force of surroundings becomes criminal in habit. In
other words, law-breaking as a pre-ordained heritage or as
an habitual thing, is the reason why this new study has found
no little interest among men, since Lombroso first published
his UUomo delinquente in 1876.
Evidently, therefore, the proper parallel term of a dif-
ferent, but correlated order, to place beside the word, crime,
as it interests sociological students is not sin, but ""vice." Vice,
the opposite of virtue, is a habit which works for evil in man.
It is ""the product of repeated sinful acts; and when formed,
is in a sense also their cause." The commission of isolated
sins does not necessarily render a man ""vicious" in the tech-
nical sense. A man may have many vices and yet be guiltless
of sin, at certain times. St Thomas adds, that the vice is out-
done in wickedness by the sin. Vice in the theological sense,
therefore, and ""crime-making" in the criminological sense,
I. c, an ever present condition, an ""urge," a conjunction of
forces leading a man to break the external law, surely institute
a striking, if not exact, parallel. Now we postulated against
the modern class of social criminologists, the existence of free-
will; hence, for the sake of our parallel, we can say that a
""bad habit" of the vicious man and the criminal habit of the
1920.] CATHOLIC THEORY OF CRIMINOLOGY 747
**can't-be-helped" criminal, are the same fundamentally. Each
habit seems to be a sine-qua-non, for the frequent and recur-
rent violations of one or another.
How, then, does the theologian approach the case of a man
chained in a vicious habit? Of a man who has the habit of
vice? The fact that the man may seem to be, or for practical
purpose is helpless before the onslaught of certain tempta-
tions, does not lead the theologian to deny free-will. Rather
the theologian re-asserts that, in spite of secondary forces,
urging or withholding, a man can act or abstain from acting;
that he can revert to his own condition or attitude of acting or
non-acting; that if he is restrained from without, his mental
and volitional status may be the same as if he were not so re-
strained from without.
But this is not all. The moral theologian, supported by
the moral philosopher, goes further. He employs a technical
distinction, distinguishing between two classes of acts as re-
sults of the will, namely the "actus hominis'* and the *'actus
humanus.*' The "actus hominis** the act of a man, is a phys-
ical act. It is an act placed by a man without, as a great
moralist says, depending on his free-will, e. g., some reflex
acts and acts of an infant, acts of an insane person, etc.^
An "actus humanus,*' a human act, is one done by a rational
being, man, which proceeds, as effect from cause, from delib-
erate free-will. Now, all conditions for action being present,
a man who enjoys sanity is responsible morally for his act,
in the direct proportion in which that act remains an "actus
humanus** or is, in other words, free and deliberate.
Free-will does not mean the capacity or capability of will-
ing with absence of all motive. The will follows the intellect.
Freedom of the will does not imply that man is constantly
exercising his muscles. It does not exclude the restrictive
influence of reflex actions or of acquired, distinct or asso-
ciated methods of living. It allows that man is a social animal
living in society. That society necessarily has some power
over him.
The man enchained by a bad habit, a vice, may commit
only, we will say, one sin a year, the result of the vice; or he
may be guilty of frequently repeated acts against some virtue.
In either case, presuming as the Catholic moralist does, that the
*Noldin, Fundamental Theology,
748 CATHOLIC THEORY OF CRIMINOLOGY [Mar.,
man is free, and capable of eliciting a moral act, the deter-
mination of his responsibility, is always an effort to answer
this question : How far did he exercise his free-will, his faculty
of choosing between good and evil? It is harder for him to
refrain from sinning, after the habit of sin has been formed.
But may not the formation of the habit of sin have been pre-
vented? Cannot the single sin, the easy result of the habit of
sin, be prevented now by his will acting under certain prudent
conditions, etc.? Although in a different sphere, the man
who is an habitual sinner, is correlated to the "born" crim-
inal of Lombroso, or to the "formed" criminal, formed by the
neglect of society, as the later followers of Lombroso assert
But the Catholic theologian starts out by searching for evi-
dence for the exercise of free-will in the case put to him;
while in the parallel case, put before the criminological school,
we find not a search for the exercise of free-will, but a gratui-
tous denial of free-will, which for the most part lifts respon-
sibility from the shoulders of the unfortunate criminal under
consideration, fixing it wherever convenient, on society, edu-
cation, poverty or heredity.
A Catholic theory of sin or crime does, of course, admit
the restraining influences of impediments to the exercise of
freedom. We have already intimated this without explaining,
when we said that the doctrine of free-will takes man as a
creature living in society, influenced by society. "Show me
your company and Fll tell you what you are," is a colloquial
adage that brings out this truth in a different way. Morality
is defined as the "relation of human acts to the norm of moral-
ity, namely, God." The great error of the writers of the mod-
ern school of criminologists, apart from their suppression of
free-will as a preamble of their study, lies in this, they fix their
eyes so steadfastly on impediments to moral responsibility,
that they find themselves, whether aware of it or not, dealing
with acts or types of criminals altogether outside the pale of
moral study or criminal ethics. For instance, cases of degen-
eration, physical or moral, spoken of by Max Nordau in De-
generation, are impediments rather for the study of the
pathologist than the social philosopher. But ignorance, con-
cupiscence, fear, violence, and the like, can be recognized as
"diminishing" factors, in reference to responsibility, simply
because, in greater or less degree, free-will and intellect are
)
1920.] CATHOLIC THEORY OF CRIMINOLOGY 749
impeded in their moral functioning. Under one or other of
these heads may be grouped all the immediate impediments of
a human act. Under remote impediments, may be included
all the other forces which from Lombroso down to Mosby in
our own day» have been made the basis of so much error
and fantastic subjectivism.
A Catholic theory of criminology does exist, then, in so
far as the Catholic theory of explaining the genesis and re-
sponsibility of sin, exists. This can be said to be the case,
chiefly because the Catholic recognizes as a dogma of the
Church and a tenet of philosophy, the doctrine of free-will
in man.
In a preceding paragraph we emphasized that sanity is
one pre-supposed condition without which there is no moral
responsibility. A great proportion of the types of moral aber-
rance upon which modern materialistic criminologists build
shining theories, are beyond the pale of sanity, and would
not be considered by a civil court as capable of transacting
business which involved the making of contracts. U the
forces of a "cruel atavistic heredity,** or the forces of a greedy
modem society, present to us fearful types of the criminal
instinct or achievement, we should first of all attempt to ascer-
tain by means of an expert alienist, whether such enjoy the
sanity a normal adult can claim. Not till such an examination
was completed, would we endeavor to fix responsibility, or to
set up theories of crime which rule out freedom of the will.
Luther denied the freedom of the will and most modern so-
ciologists have fallen into that pit. But it is interesting to
remark that the spokesmen of the nations which fought against
Germany are not acting according to the directive norms
of any purely materialistic criminology, when it comes to the
question of judging and fixing the crimes of the Central
Powers against humanity. Whatever punishment be meted
out to the leaders of Prussianism, it seems certain at least,
that the Allies feel that those leaders are responsible for un-
necessary suffering and bloodshed, and ought to be punished.
But to talk of punishment without supposing freedom of the
human will, is to talk nonsense.
Lombroso, Fern, Maudsley, Mosby — all nearly in concert,
if their works are proof, accept in some form or other. De-
terminism. Determinism says, "given all conditions needed
750 CATHOLIC THEORY OF CRIMINOLOGY [Mar..
for an action, except the act itself, the act necessarily follows."
Farther back still, the remote but certain cause of material-
istic social study is Rationalism, proving, e. g.» that climate
exerted the preponderating effect in shaping the life of na-
tions! What Buckle used to be among historians, the school
of criminal ethicians is among sociologists.
How shallow and how gloomy is all Deterministic and Ra-
tionalistic teaching compared with the Catholic doctrine of
free-will! So long as the rational man is rational, he can
place a human responsible act. These alone shall come up for
his judgment. Moral judgment is not concerned with deprav-
ity tantamount to insanity. In the eyes of the Church, while
man can really act with moral responsibility, even though he
be morally weak, there exists no such thing as the ^'bom*'
criminal. In the very freedom of man, though it is a respon-
sibility, lies his opportunity for betterment. His moral power,
like his mental, may be strengthened by exercise.
St. Philip Neri, seeing one day in Rome a prisoner dragged
to the gaol, exclaimed: 'There goes Philip, but for the
grace of God.** The Church can well insist upon Christian
asceticism as an aid to free-will in reaching the goal of good-
ness. But while she can say "facienti quod in se est, Deus non
denegat gratiam" to one who does his best, Grod gives His aid
in grace, she neither exaggerates the claims of grace, nor
minimizes the claims of free-will; nor neglects to take into
account the warp and woof of circumstances, amid which
man, the sovereign free-agent, finds himself — often against
his own choice. Rather she warns man, that though he knows
what he is, he knows not what he may become, simply because
he is free. She writes, so that he who runs may read, the
words of St Augustine, "God, Who created man without his
consent, will not save him without his consent." Man, here,
means mankind, every man, woman and child bom into this
mortal life.
A KELTIC POE.
BY JOSEPH J. REILLY, PH.D.
|NE day in April, 1862» a young Irish lieutenant
of thirty-four, attached to McClellan's army,
wrote the foUowing letter from Virginia, where
he lay dying, to a friend in New York:
^he surgeons removed my shoulder bone
and a portion of my upper arm. I nearly died. My breath
ceased, heart ceased to beat, pulse stopped. However, I got
through. I am not yet out of danger from the operation, but
a worse disease has set in. I have got tetanus, or lockjaw.
There is a chance of my getting out of it — that's all. In case
I don't, good-bye, old fellow, with all my love. I don't want
to make any legal document, but I desire that you and Frank
Wood should be my literary executors — ^because after I'm
dead I may turn out a bigger man than when living."
That pathetic sentence, half wish, half prophecy, was
destined to come true, for the fame of Fitz-James O'Brien has
survived the revenges of time's whirligig and steadily great-
ened, until he is known to the student as author of some of
the most remarkable tales in American literature.
O'Brien came to New York in 1852 armed with letters of
introduction to G. P. Morris, the ^*cis-Atlantic Tom Moore,"
from the brother of Bishop Collins of Cloyne. Morris was a
member of the literary coterie, which included "Nat" Willis,
Halleck, William Winter and Thomas Bailey Aldrich. Poe
and Cooper were in their graves; Irving was in retirement at
Sunnyside; Paulding was alive but had abandoned literatiure
for the consular service. Bryant, though nearing sixty, was
still in the heydey of his power, but devoted more attention
to diet and exercise than to the doings of literary Bohemia.
O'Brien was not reticent about his history. He was bom
in Limerick in 1828, and was fortunate in his parents; for his
mother was beautiful and cultured and his father a barrister
of ability. The lad was educated at Dublin University and
on leaving college came into a not inconsiderable fortime.
He might have become a gentleman idler had not the spur of
752 A KELTIC POB [Mar^
ambition urged him on, and it was to the great literary Mecca,
London, that he turned in the first flush of boyish enthusiasm.
The way to literary fame, alack, lay through as toilsome a
Grub Street as ever confronted the drudges of Dryden's day
or Johnson's, and the soaring wings of the young Irishman's
ambition were denied all but the most limited of flights.
To Irishmen America has always been the land of allure-
ment. In her generous bosom they found freedom and an op-
portunity for achievement, which were impossible at home.
It is not surprising that the dissatisfaction which O'Brien felt
with conditions in London should have turned his thoughts
to America.
Morris and his friends accepted O'Brien without a ques-
tion. And weU they might. For whatever his weaknesses
of temperament (he was aggressive almost to the point of
pugnacity) his boyish ways, his enthusiasm, his irrepressible
humor and his verve, gave a new and thrilling vitality to their
circle. He was of middle height and athletic build, fair of
complexion, with wavy brown hair, fine blue-gray eyes and
small chin almost concealed by a heavy brown mustache.
His voice was singularly sweet and persuasive — an excellent
thing in man, no less than in woman.
There was nothing calculating about this exuberant
youth; he knew little of the value of money and cared less,
and when the remnant of his inheritance was gone he smil-
ingly made the best of things. But for all that, he must at
times have felt the pinch of poverty and the deadly days when
melancholy succeeded to high spirits. He was a creature of
moods to whom a steady routine was as impossible as a lone
flower to a butterfly. Periods of delectable idUng were fol-
lowed by days and nights of amazing industry, when for
eight or ten hours at a stretch he would work on poem or story
with every energy of his mind fired to a passionate concen-
tration.
O'Brien was not long in finding a welcome for his writings
and soon became known to readers of the Home Journal, the
Evening Post, the Times, the Saturday Press, Putnam*s, Vanity
Fair and The Atlantic Monthly. For ten years he poured out
poems, tales, sketches, dramatic reviews, and even theatrical
pieces, of which many have long been forgotten and might
even defy identification. It is now thirty-eight years since
1920.] A KELTIC POE 753
his old friend, William Winter, collected some two score of
his poems and a dozen of his stories, but the volume has
long been out of print. The poems have a faint aroma as of
fine linen long laid away in lavender, but several of the tales
have won him the fame for which he hoped in the face of
death.
Like most men who are capable of original work, O'Brien
was not ashamed to study closely the productions of other
writers, and indeed to imitate their method and style when
the humor seized him. He knew his Hawthorne, his Hoff-
mann, and his Poe, and caught some of the latter's tricks with
surprisingly good effect. He did not stop there but imitated
Poe in studying Hoffmann, to whom his obligations in The
Wondersmith are unmistakable. Here his theme is of the
kind which one tells to children in the glow of an open fire,
creating an atmosphere surcharged with magic in which mar-
vels can happen because time and place are not. The Wonder-
smith is a man of crime, who foregathers with fortune teUers
and gypsy peddlers and directs their uncanny business of bot-
tling up souls "'the pick of a thousand births, which the mid-
wife steals." In tiny wooden manikins these souls are lodged
and do dark deeds at the command of the Wondersmith. But
all this bizarre wickedness is futile to upset the devotion of
two children, one the reputed daughter of the sinister magi-
cian and the other a poor little organ-grinder, whose crooked
body harbors a soul all straight and shining. The Wonder-
smith and his crew are finally caught in their own toils and
burned to death, while Anita and the Italian boy, like the
lovers in the Eve of St. Agnes, make their escape, haply to a
fairer land and joyous days. The story made a sensation when
published in The Atlantic Monthly (October, 1859), but the
reason is hard to find. It has neither the Keltic witchery nor
the German glamour; it lacks, indeed, that touch of inevitable
magic which gives soul to every tale of ghost and fairy. Per-
haps it was but a jeu d'esprit written after an evening with the
Serapionsbruder. The conception, it must be confessed, has
the Teutonic heaviness, not the Keltic lightness, and had no
more place in O'Brien's genius than a leprechaun in Wilhelm-
strasse.
While O'Brien handles a variety of themes, they are mark-
edly unequal in value. In Tommattoo we have well worn
VOL. ex. 48
754 A KELTIC POE [Mar..
elements : a benevolent old Italian father, his beautiful daugh-
ter and two suitors, one \drtuous, the other villainous, and
virtue is not compelled to be its own sole reward. In
Milly Dove we have the sentimental tale of the "Duchess**
variety in which King Cophetua, in the person of the great
Alexander Winthrop, falls in love with a beggar maid in the
person of Milly Dove who, pretty and scarcely out of her
teens, is clerk in a New England village candy shop. In The
Golden Ingot the theme is alchemy, whose possibilities one
might suppose to have been exhausted generations before, had
not Balzac employed it in one of his greatest novels.
In The Pot of Tulips, O'Brien turns to the ghost story; in
My Wife's Tempter to the diabolical influences of Mormon
propaganda, a subject vastly more interesting in his day than
in ours.
In The Lost Room he invades the realm of visions and
beholds men and women in the garb of earlier centuries hold-
ing high revelry, only to see them melt away again into thin
air. On reading it one conjectures that O'Brien had delved
into the Gesta Romcmorum, and found a romantic appeal in
the story which William Morris was later to retell as The
Writing on the Image. In The Bohemian the theme is mes-
merism, a tempting morsel for every delver into the weird,
and in treatment it is under obvious obligations to Haw-
thorne's The Birthmark.
Philip Brann (the Bohemian) possesses mesmeric power
and finds a susceptible subject in Annie Deane, the fiancee
of Henry Cranston. When hypnotized. Miss Deane makes
revelations regarding a lonely spot on Coney Island, in which
a treasure has been concealed for years. The cupidity of
Brann and Cranston is satisfied when their expedition in
quest of the booty is successful, but the price is tragically high;
for Miss Deane, whose nervous energies are depleted by the
trance, fails to rally and dies in her repentant lover's arms.
The ethical undercurrent of the story is evident in Annie's
appeal to her lover against undertaking the quest. One re-
calls The Birth Mark, the trepidation of Georgiana at her
husband's desire to remove the crimson stain from her cheek;
his insistence and her loving acquiescence; the seeming suc-
cess at first and the tragic denouement. Cranston, on the
one hand, and Aylmer, on the other, risk the lives of the
1920.] A KELTIC POE 755
women they love, the one to gain wealth, the other to gratify
his ideal of beauty, and their selfishness meets with a swift
and terrible punishment.
In Mother of Pearl, 0*Brien owes nothing to either Hoff-
mann or Hawthorne, but much to Poe, to whom his obliga-
tions are obvious. The story, told in the first person quite in
Poe's manner, recounts the marriage of the narrator with a
beautiful American girl, Minnie, whom he meets while travel-
ing in the East. When Pearl is born both love the child with
equal passion. On returning to America all is well for a time,
but gradually an unaccountable languor succeeds Minnie's
exuberant vitality and arouses the apprehensions of her hus-
band. A holiday is planned to New York, where they attend
the theatre and see Matilda Heron (an actress whose wild
genius O'Brien admired), in a performance of Medea. Minnie
is profoundly affected; her eyes never wander from the stage,
her face is tense and her body sways with emotion. That
night the husband unaccountably awakens to find his wife
bending over him with a naked dagger in her hand. He has
barely time to draw his body aside and escape the plunging
weapon. To his bitter upbraiding his wife responds with
stoical indifference, while he, bewildered and bafQed, feels his
love turn to loathing. He abandons his holiday plans, re-
turns home with his wife, and lays her case before a physician,
fearful that her mind is on the verge of collapse. Mystified by
the case, the physician takes up his residence with the hapless
couple and devotes himself to a study of Minnie, while the
husband finds some measure of consolation in his child. Pearl.
One night the two men sit talking late. Outside the
mournful winds of autumn stir the dead leaves and *'chilly
draughts come from unseen crevices, blowing on back and
cheek till one feels as if some invisible lips were close behind,
pouring malignant breaths on face and shoulder." Suddenly
there comes a noise, which fills them both with terror. Spring- .
ing to their feet they fling open a door commanding a view
of the corridor. Tall and white, the figure of Minnie ap-
proaches, a candle in her hand, her white gown spotted with
blood. She has murdered Pearl. Stately and calm as a
goddess answering the prayers of her devotees, she makes
her awful confession, smoothing her hair with her blood-
stained fingers as she speaks. While residing in India she
756 A KELTIC POE [Mar.,
contracted the hasheesh habit, which gradually bound her
as with chains of steel; the greenish paste became her very
existence. It was while under its influence that she attended
the performance of Medea with her husband in New York,
and ''from that instant, murder became glorified in her sight.
. . . Her soul became rapt in the contemplation of the spill-
ing of blood. I was to have been her first victim. Pearl her
second. She ended by saying, with an ineffable smile, that
the delight of the taking away of life was beyond imagina-
tion." The closing paragraph is vivid and, like Poe, concludes
the story with dramatic (one might say, melodramatic)
finality.
Throughout this story, which still retains much of its
original power, we have vivid touches which prove that
O'Brien had studied Poe to advantage. Minnie is of the type
so common in Poe, slender, beautiful, high-strung, with large
dark gray eyes, transparent skin and mobile features. Her
sinuous body possessed a strange and subtle grace; indeed,
she had, to a striking degree, an ''aerial serenity of motion.**
No less appealing was her voice, low, sweet, musical, and yet
distinctive beyond any her lover had ever heard. Quite in the
manner of Poe, O'Brien pictures the gradual change by which
her buoyant joyousness fades into an inexplicable lassitude
which, on occasions, becomes a brooding melancholy. He
consults a physician despite whose optimism he feels (again
like Poe) the shadow of impending disaster. In picturing the
degenerate wife returning from the midnight murder of her
child, O'Brien is thinking of that highly effective scene in the
Fall of the House of Usher, when Madeline, escaping from the
tomb, returns to her brother's chamber and reels across the
threshold in the final agony of death. In each case we have
two men, one with nerves wrought to the breaking point, the
other a friend less agonized, but with every sense painfuUy
alert; the time is the fateful hour of midnight; the autunm
winds sigh mournfully without; then comes a strange sound
which chills their hearts, and the door is flung open to dis-
cover the pallid apparition of a woman, whose white garments
are stained with blood.
It was a pity that O'Brien did not follow his model in
rigidly excluding every non-essential. Poe would have fore-
gone the incident in which the infant Pearl is rescued from
1920.] A KELTIC POE 757
a shark by a Malay diver, and have resisted all temptations
to discuss histrionic art at the performance of Medea. Had
O'Brien's exuberant genius been schooled to a stricter literary
abstinence Mother of Pearl might have ranked as one of the
best tales of its type in American literature.
But O'Brien was his own man after all, and it was not of
his genius in his enthusiastic twenties to accept restraints,
even artistic ones, with resignation.
Adequately to judge the brilliant young Irishman, how-
ever, we should consider his two best tales. What Was It?
and The Diamond Lens. It is these which won him greatest
reputation during his life, and upon which rests his chief
claim for an abiding place in the history of the American
short story. What Was It? was written at odd moments in
the lodgings of his friend, Thomas Bailey Aldrich, and like
Mother of Pearl, shows unmistakably the influence of Poe.
The narrator, when about to fall asleep one night, feels some-
thing drop as if from the ceiling upon his chest and two bony
hands encircle his throat. The suddenness of the attack for
a moment disconcerts him, but regaining his self-possession
he struggles desperately in the darkness, until at last the mur-
derous visitant is overpowered and pinioned upon the bed.
The victor, gasping, gets to his feet and tiurns on the light
only to feel his brain reel as he beholds — nothing. ""I had
one arm firmly clasped round a breathing, panting, corporeal
shape; my other hand gripped, with all its strength, a throat
as warm and apparently fleshly as my own, and all in the
bright glare of a large jet of gas, I beheld absolutely nothing!
. . . Imagination in vain tries to compass the awful paradox."
The creature was bound with cords which rose and
fell with its breathing, while the clothes upon the bed were
shaken by its convulsive efforts to escape. The next day the
strange thing was chloroformed and, a mold made which
disclosed its form. "It was shaped like a man — distorted, un-
couth and horrible — ^but still a man. It was small, not over
four feet and some inches in height, and its limbs revealed a
muscular development that was unparalleled. Its face sur-
passed in hideousness anything I had ever seen ... It was
the physiognomy of what I should fancy a ghoul might be.
It looked as if it was capable of feeding on human flesh." . . .
As the days passed pathos was added to horror for there was
758 A KELTIC POE [Mar.,
no way of feeding the strange creature, whose struggles for
life grew weaker each hour. At last it died and was hastily
buried, still a thing of mystery, sinister and invisible.
There is a fascination about this tale, which still remains,
and it is worth noting that Ambrose Bierce, upon whose
shoulders, in our generation, rests the mantle of Poe, has not
hesitated to follow O'Brien's lead in at least two of his stories.
The Damned Thing and Staley Fleming's Hallucination.
What O'Brien's story might have become in Poe's hands
one may conjecture. That the Kelt had the American in mind
as he wrote it is obvious in more instances than one. It was
quite like Poe to make the narrator an addict to opium, as well
as his friend. Dr. Hammond.
Like Poe also are O'Brien's occasional affectations, his
pretenses of excursions into the recondite. Lying upon his
bed, courting slumber, he read a History of Monsters — "a
curious French work which I had lately imported from Paris."
Despite such imitations of Poe, O'Brien committed a funda-
mental artistic blunder, which would have made the Amer-
ican shudder. One smiles, perhaps approvingly, at his clever-
ness in imitating the American's tricks. Would that he had
mastered his artistry! Never would the crafty Poe have per-
mitted a plaster cast to be made of The Thing (he made no
mistakes after Berenice) any more than he would have named
the undertaker who buried M. Valdemar or have made a
daguerreotype of the reincarnated Ligeia.
It was in The Atlantic Monthly for January, 1858, that
O'Brien published his masterpiece. The Diamond Lens. Here
his imagination, if not more daring than in What Was It?
kept a more unfaltering flight and deserves the conspicuous
place universally granted it for originality of conception, sus-
tained interest and glow of poetic fancy.
The Diamond Lens is the story of a man whose interest
in optics has become a very passion until he dreams of a lens
so perfect as to defy all obstacles, and to penetrate the wonders
of a life whose infinite minutiae have thus far escaped every
investigation of science. He consults a medium (a vulgarism,
alas, of which the fastidious Poe would never have been
guilty), and under the spur of her disclosures seeks out the
Jewish Simon, owner of a perfect diamond. Though put on
his guard by his visitor's questions, Simon is not immune to
1920.] A KELTIC POE 759
the vintage of '48» and finally produces his treasured stone,
which shimmers in the lamplight as if ''all the glories of light,
ever imagined or described, were pulsating in its crystalline
chambers/' The half-drunken Simon is dispatched by the
blow of a dagger and the murderer, after skillfully arranging
every detail to indicate that the fatal wound was self-inflicted,
makes his escape with the diamond. During the succeeding
three months he devotes night and day to his diamond lens
and, with infinite toil and care, finally completes it. Trem-
bling with excitement, he places it upon its platform and ad-
justs it above a single drop of clear water. At first he sees
what appears to be a dimly lighted chaos, a vast luminous
abyss. Depressing the lens with infinite care, he is dazzled
by a scene of indescribable beauty. "On every side I beheld
beautiful inorganic forms of unknown texture and colored
with the most enchanting hues," like clouds of the highest
rarity, which ''undulated and broke into vegetable forma-
tions, and were tinged with splendors compared with which
the gilding of our autumn woodlands is as dross compared
with gold. Far away into the illimitable distance stretched
long avenues of these gaseous forests, dimly transparent, and
painted with prismatic hues of unimaginable brilliancy. The
pendant branches waved along the fluid glades until every
vista seemed to break through half lucent ranks of many
colored drooping silken pennons. What seemed to be either
fruits or flowers, pied with a thousand hues, lustrous and ever
varying, bubbled from the crown of this fairy foliage. No
hills, no lakes, no rivers, no forms animate or inanimate,
were to be seen, save those vast amoral copses that floated
serenely in the luminous stillness, with leaves and fruits and
flowers gleaming with unknown fires, unrealized by mere
imagination.'* Surely such a scene were fit abode for animate
beauty; and as if in answer to the thought there suddenly
emerged from out the silken vista a creature of ineffable
loveliness. "I can not (how often Poe 'could not and dared
not* but did!) attempt to inventory the charm of this divine
revelation of perfect beauty. Those eyes of mystic violet,
dewy and serene, evade my words. Her long, lustrous hair
following her glorious head in a golden wake, like the track
sown in heaven by a falling star, seems to quench my most
burning phrases with its splendors • • . Her motions were
760 A KELTIC POE [Mar^
those of some graceful naiad, cleaving, by a mere effort of
will, the clear, unruffled waters that filled the chambers of
the sea." Bewildered by this vision, he steps back from his
lens and his eye falls upon the tiny drop of water below it.
What a harrowing thought possesses him! Animula (for so
he names this radiant divinity) dwells worlds apart from him,
in a sphere which only his vision can invade, imprisoned in
a drop of water. Through the hours that follow his eyes
scarcely leave the lens; a rapturous adoration thrills him to
behold her, with more than a goddess' grace, float like a flash
of Ught through the glimmering avenues of her dwelling.
In his worship of this glorious divinity he becomes ob-
livious of the passage of the moments, the hours, the days.
His life is absorbed in a passion of admiration; but it is all
in vain. As well reach for the stars at night as for this tiny
creature disporting in that luminous world at once so near
and so infinitely far. He must break himself of this mad
fancy before it destroys his reason. He tears himself away,
seeks the world outside and attends the theatre, only to leave
in disgust and return to his lens — and Animula. But during
his brief absence she has undergone a tragic transformation.
Her face is thin and haggard; her limbs trail heavily; the
wondrous lustre of her golden hair has faded. The thought
of his impotence maddens her lover with grief. To him, hers
is a world forbid, and with the anguish of despair he beholds
her in the pangs of dissolution. Her limbs shrivel, her eyes
are quenched, her golden hair becomes lank and discolored,
the last throes are come — ^for the tiny drop of water is at the
point of evaporation. He faints, to recover hours later
amid the wreck of his instrument, shattered in mind and in
body. They call him madman now, but he insists that they
are mistaken. He lives on charity, yet his eyes behold no
sordid realities of every day, but that world of gorgeous color
in which Animula had her brief but radiant existence.
The daring imagination which conceived this story is
worthy of O'Brien at his best; from the moment when the
diamond comes into the hands of the mad optician, it never
falters or loses its poetic fire. For this Poe might have been
proud to claim it. But in structure it is weak — an indictment
always true of O'Brien, but never of Poe. How relentlessly
the American, like a surgeon with his scalpel, would have cut
1920.] A KELTIC POE 761
away the visit to Madame Volpes, the medium, and pruned
down the incident of Simon to a single paragraph! That
done, he would have recognized in many a touch a skillful
student of his own methods. There is the preliminary self-
revelation in which the scientist declares that his imagination
supplies the limitations of his microscopes and that, lying
awake at night, he has dreamed of a lens so powerful as to
pierce through all the envelopes of matter down to its com-
ponent atoms. There is the marshaling of the names of great
scientists to whom the homage of a devotee is paid; the dis-
cussion of references to scientific discoveries, which are thrown
off with the nonchalance of the savant; the confession early in
the tale that the narrator ^'supposes he is mad; for every
great genius is mad upon the subjects in which he is greatest."'
In the murder episode, moreover, Poe would have beheld a
student of his Cask of Amontilado. For here is the same cold-
blooded determination to compass a murder, the same success
in plying the victim with wine, the same skillful inuendoes,
the same torment of soul deliberately inflicted on the victim,
the same moral blindness on the part of the destroyer, and
finally, the same diabolical minuteness in recounting the ca-
tastrophe, colored in the one case by exultation over the
triumph of vengeance and in the other over the attainment
of the diamond. In the description of Animula and her gor-
geous dwelling he would have foimd a choice of diction and
a poetic fervor worthy of his own genius, and yet vitally dif-
ferent; for here was no pensive melancholy such as evermore
cast its shadow over the soul of Poe, but a fervor by which
O'Brien (and the universal Kelt) claims kinship with the stars.
O'Brien, indeed, was as emotional as Poe and gifted with
as rich an imagination. Both men were opinionated, but
Poe was vastly more the egotist. Both had the dramatic in-
stinct to a marked degree; O'Brien employed his in writing
for the theatre, Poe his in arranging his world as a stage
upon which he himself played the leading rdle. Thus in his
own eyes he became invested with a kind of mournful dignity
and drew about him the mantle of a conscious superiority,
which marked him as a soul apart from the multitude. Play-
ing up to his part he made pretence to a depth of knowledge
which he did not possess, and falsified facts about his life in
order to lend it the color of Byronic romance and make his
762 A KELTIC POE [Mar^
poetic talent appear to have flowered in childhood. O'Brien
was sociable; he liked life and delighted to feel the hum and
thrill of it about him. Poe, with his peculiar attitude of mind,
spent lonely years and, self-centred and self-pitying like Rous-
seau, tended as inevitably as the Frenchman to become sus-
picious even of his friends and to confine his society to per-
sons (chiefly women), upon whose sympathy (one might
almost say, pity) he could unfailingly rely. With Poe melan-
choly was a habit of mind; quite typical was his insistence that
the finest poetry must be tinged with sadness. O'Brien's
melancholy was a phase of his Keltic temperament which, in
the ardor of today, plays joyously among the stars, only to
find itself on the chill morrow plunged in the slough of
despond. We dwell, after all, in a world of brick and stone
and mortar, of trials and accidents and sickness, and it were
not compatible with the great scheme of things that the Kelt
should everlastingly forget the din of the marketplace and
dwell with garlanded head among the fields of asphodel.
All of which must not be thought to imply that O'Brien
was a mere dreamer of dreams. Even a poet may die for
his vision, and the brilliant Irish lad who offered his sword to
the Government at the outbreak of the Civil War had, within
a year, repaid with his ardent young life for the generous
adoption of America. Scarcely more than a boy, he was
dead in his early thirties, before he had fully learned how
important is form in literature and how rigid are the bounds
which art prescribes to the imagination, even in its loftiest
flights. What he might have accompUshed had years been
granted him, we can only conjecture. Perhaps he might have
achieved a place beside the triumvirate of American short-
story masters, sharing unchallenged honors with Irving, Poe
and Hawthorne.
•TETERING OUT.*'
BY FRANaS AVEUNG, S.T.D.
HEN restrictions are removed from traveling and
the shipping shortage is over, without doubt
there will be a great flood of visitors from the
United States to the battlefields of the western
front. Already there are visitors in considerable
throngs — soldiers of the Allied Armies, for the most part, and
voluntary War Workers, as well as civilians from Belgium,
France and England, in lesser niunber. Last Whitsuntide
the tragic ruins of Ypres were full of people, who had come
from all the countryside around in all sorts of vehicles and
by all sorts of ways, to gaze upon the silent ruins and try to
reconstruct for themselves the meaning of war. And so it
was at Douai and Arras; at Lens and Albert and, doubtless,
at all the famous towns and villages and historic sites along
the winding, twisting belt of harassed ground over which, for
so long, and so short a time ago, death brooded and wrought.
But even when the Treaty of Peace was still wet with the
ink of the signatures, it was not easy to reconstruct. The
cobbled roads in the towns and villages were already tidied
and made smooth. The pitted, pock-marked fields were lush
with coarse vegetation. Where gaunt, dead trees thrust their
snapped trunks and broken branches, like accusing fingers, up
towards heaven, the bright green of the new grass and uncon-
quered undergrowth rioted beneath the turquoise blue of the
perfect summer sky. And on the miles and miles of open
plain, where stands never a tree, where almost hidden barbed
wire entanglements, still clinging to their rotting posts and
rusting supports, were just discerned beside the snaky white
chalk lines running here and there, up and down the rolling
surface of the land, the shell holes and the old trenches were
falling in and becoming smoothed and rounded off by the
luxuriance of the growth.
Here, where men struggled and fell and died, are brilliant
patches, acres in extent, of scarlet poppies. Wild mustard
flings its golden flowers far and wide. Bright blue cornflowers
764 ''PETERING OUT" [Mar.,
almost put the very sky to shame. Nature has done her best
to cover up and hide the hideousness and shame that man
put upon her. Little by little, day by day, she toils on to
restore. In winter her rains and frosts break down the
sharp lines of the trenches; the shelters and the dug-outs
tmnble in; the wooden supports rot and crumble away. In
spring and summer her roots twist and grip in the loosened
earth and chalk; her grasses and flowers cast their mantle of
beauty over the charnel houses of the War.
You who will come to see these battlefields, in reverent
journey to visit some beloved grave, whose pilgrim steps will
lead you over the bloody field on which he fell : you, too, who
are led thitherwards by idle curiosity, will never see it as it
was. The very places which the soldiers knew so well, the
places where they lived for weeks and months at a time, were
already unrecognizable after one short year.
So, as the quiet, insistent work of nature goes on and the
gangs of British, French, Russian, Chinese and Grerman labor
"clearing up** are withdrawn, the whole aspect of the country
changes, and, with it, the mentality of those who are looking
on. If the War has left its marks upon the face of nature,
marks which its wonderful and indomitable vitality is quietly
smoothing away, so has it left its marks, no less deeply graved
upon the minds and souls of those who took their part in it.
But those barbed entanglements of the mind, those deep scars
seared into the very soul, are undergoing changes, too; slowly,
perhaps, but none the less resistlessly than those that dis-
figured the smiling fields of France.
You who saw the War only from afar off, reflected in the
columns of the daily papers, brought closer and more inti-
mately home by the letters that came to you from the fighting-
line : you have experienced, to some degree, at any rate, some
of the mind and heart changes of which I write. Far from the
crash and din of the battle, far from the instant dangers threat-
ening by night and by day, far from the ceaseless movement
and feverish business of the fighting part of the War, you none
the less felt the strain of it and bore your share of its horror.
No one who realized at all what it meant could have borne it
without the most profound emotional changes taking place
within him. But for most of you the ties that bound you to the
War were far closer than this, far more personal than the
1920.] ^'PETERING OUT' 765
mere knowledge that it was going on. Your flesh and blood
were there. Your anxieties and fears kept pace with their
dangers. You had some insight, faint perhaps and blurred,
but no less real, into what they were experiencing.
But for them, the fighters! The instincts which thrust
their roots the furthest into the deeps of human nature were
aroused and let loose. With their disturbance the connected
emotions were brought into unfettered play. Conscious, they
wrought a new arrangement into the texture of mental life.
Unconscious, they burrowed into those unexplored chambers
of the mind in which the powerful springs of conduct, and of
life itself, have their hidden lair. Self-assertion, self-preserva-
tion, fear, anger, hate, wove their strands as never before into
the living fabric of the consciousness. The mental energy un-
loosed flowed in unaccustomed channels and stimulated un-
usual passions. Outlooks and values changed, so rapidly and
so unaccountably sometimes that one was horrified to see of
what thoughts one was capable, what desires he could counte-
nance. The whole emotional life, usually so placid and un-
eventful, save for those mimic gusts of self -raised storm, was
stirred and lashed into very maelstroms. Likes and dislikes
followed one another without reason or obvious justification.
Things highly prized were cast lightly away; while those of
no real value claimed, for the moment, our every thought.
Happy, indeed, were they who had some one fixed solid
interest or value at which to anchor the frail barque of their
souls : something so fixed and so stable that it could defy alter-
ation and withstand all the shocks of disordered feeling, all
the buflTetings of abnormal emotions. Of such, one, and un-
doubtedly the most powerful, was religion. Where that held
fast, mental life flowed on with at least something of its
normal tranquillity. But even then, deep and far-reaching
changes took place; and the over-strained, over-excited, war-
taxed mind came out of the War a very different thing from
what it was when it first entered in upon it.
Now things are "petering out." The great armies, as far
as this part of the world is concerned, at any rate, are gone.
Even the labor is dwindling from day to day in number. You
may go for miles over the areas and hardly ever see a soul,
save a few civilians, in a district that was crowded to the limit
of possibility while the War was still being waged. And just
766 'TETERING OUT' [Mar.,
as the material aspect of the landscape is changmg, and has al-
ready changed; just as emptiness has taken the place of
crowds; so are the minds of those of us who are left here for
the time undergoing a fresh set of alterations and readjust-
ments. It is the inevitable recoil, the reassertion of the nor-
mal, the struggle of the currents to overflow the newer, war-
worn channels and run again in the old coiu*ses. In many
ways it is a painful process. The mental changes brought
about by the circimastances of war were forced by the War
and kept pace with it. These new readjustments are forced
by no outward stimulus, but rather by the lack of any real
stimulation. The war changes were fierce, abrupt, cata-
clysmal. These are sluggish, full of effort, gradual.
There are, no doubt, incentives to break and destroy
habits that the War crystallized out of our freedom, habits
both physical and mental; but there is little driving power
left to make the incentives real, living forces and so, effec-
tively, to counter the habits. We see, indeed, the true values
to be substituted; but find it hard to grasp them. Energy is
wanting; and there is little or no external stimulus to force us
to react. The whole thing is "petering out." There is only
lassitude and a general reaction from the strenuous emo-
tional living of the past five years. More life was crowded
into those years than in twenty or thirty of times of peace:
turbulent, insistent, not to be thwarted life. Now it is pale and
thin and listless in comparison — ^just "petering out."
Nothing, perhaps, so much as experience of a war such as
this brings one to realize the utter instability of all the himian
conventions and beliefs upon which we used to rely, the utter
untrustworthiness of one's own self when placed in a circle of
circumstance so much out of the usual. The whole edifice of
our human creeds — social, political, ethical — is apt to totter
and fall away. The philosophy of life which we have acquired
with such pains in all our experience of living, is not equal to
the strain. It fails us now when we most have need of it;
and, indeed, the need is no less great, but rather greater, now —
paradoxical as it may seem — than when the War was raging
round us. Many who had then no other conscious stay and
support than their human philosophy laughed their way
through the War, mocked its worst dangers, and cynically ac-
cepted it as a matter of inexplicable course. They went to
1920.] ''PETERING OUT' 767
their death with the same smile upon their lips as they wore,
in seeming careless irresponsibility, while they were about
their routine tasks behind the line. But beneath the surface
that appeared to their comrades, beyond what was grasped
consciously in their own minds, there must have been some-
thing deeper and more substantial which tranquillized them,
robbed the apparent cynicism of its bitterness, and gave a very
real value to the smile. Of such stuff were they made that
this at least could be believed*.
But of those who won through the great Venture, with
such seeming cynicism and careless ready smiles, most now
seem to have lost that silent well-spring in the unconscious
that gave their philosophy what worth it had. And, having
lost it — or, perhaps, after all, they really never had it — it, too,
has **petered out." The riot of unchecked excitement and
feverish pursuit of amusement that came after the fighting
was at an end — and this, not in the fighting forces alone, but
among the civilians in all the great capitals and lesser towns
and villages — ^was not only the expression of the lifting of an
intolerable load, hitherto bravely borne if with much loathing.
It was at the same time the sign and the effect of the breaking
down of all the barriers, both natiu*ally and artificially, raised
to protect the very soul itself from those strong forces of its
own let loose by the action of the War. I have said that re-
ligion was the sheet anchor of the soul during the times of
stress. It is impossible to generalize from a few examples;
and I have in mind, as I write, merely certain types of men;
but in the main I am persuaded that the vast majority of our
soldiers were sincerely religious in their own personal and
incommunicable way. Theirs was a religion of trust, an atti-
tude towards life and living, a feeling rather than a dogma,
vague and shadowy for the most part, quite unlike the reas-
oned and articulated religion of the ^churches." It was often
compatible with disregard of conventional morality, loose no-
tions as to ownership, the use of language truly abominable to
more refined ears. But, such as it was, there it was to help
them through when they needed help badly enough. Of
course, it is obvious that I am not referring to anything other
than a very generalized sort of "Natural Religion," which Cath-
olics may find it difficult to understand at all. None the less,
it BeemA to have been strong enough to have carried the men
768 ''PETERING OUT' [Mar.,
safely through the dangers which they encountered every day
with comparative tranquillity of mind. It would not seem,
however, to be able to carry them through the dangers of
peace; for it was one of those mental changes suddenly
evolved to meet a particular set of circumstances, which, like
the physical changes of nature, move and alter with the cir-
cumstances that brought them into being. It was a **War
Religion," keyed to crashing shells and roaring guns, timed
to hardships and discomforts 6f every sort. And with the
loosening down of the tenseness of the War it has fallen out
of tune. Like the grim lines of trenches now hidden beneath
the flaunting rows of scarlet poppies, like the ragged shell
holes, now filled to the brim with the yellow mustard or the
blue cornflower, the War Religion has sunk and become
hidden by the newer interests of life, with the War far off in
the background of memory and a thousand new things to
occupy thought. And yet the dangers of peace are in a sense
far more threatening to the soul, and indeed to the ordinary
happiness for which man in this world craves than those of
the War itself.
That this is true is seen in the state of extraordinary un-
rest that is sweeping over the face of the world: unrest in
every department of life, in thought and theory, in politics and
economics, in labor and class and creed. We need now, no
less than ever, some strong, compelling force to steady our
souls. We need clear principles with which to meet the prob-
lems thrust upon us. "War Religion" has failed us here. It
could hardly have been hoped that it could succeed. In the
welter of interests and counter interests, the conflict of classes,
the reshaping of the social fabric that is taking place before
our eyes with fatal and fateful swiftness by makeshift means
and rule of thumb, with behind it the vast driving power of an
unchecked emotional force, we need something more than
feeling to carry us to a safe haven. Human principles and
human compromises are bound to fail. There is only one
thing that can save society from shipwreck. In the meantime,
while events move with such swiftness at home and abroad,
the impression that one gathers in these areas, which have
been left stranded by the passing of the tide of war, is one
of "going to pieces." It is the end of a great enterprise, itself
undertaken for a great end, And like aU other nxort&l things.
1920.] ''PETERING OUT' 769
all human enterprises, it has come to its close. The vast
stores of material left scattered over the bosom of the comitry-
side are gathered into dumps and sold, or moved back to the
bases for trans-shipment to England. Familiar faces cease
to be seen in the mess-rooms, as one by one the old messmates
are demobilized, or, if they happen to be regular soldiers, are
transferred to Egypt, India and Home Stations. The de-
plenished **cadres" of Armies, Corps and Divisions — the little
handfuls of men that represent what, during the War, were
organizations dealing with thousands and scores of thousands
of soldiers, as the case might be — are day by day disbanded
in the country, or sent home one by one to be broken up
there. Before long the last will have taken its departure.
The camps of the Prisoners of War will be closed, their tents
struck, their barbed wire barricades down and the plough of
the farmer erasing the marks, even, that would show that
a camp had ever been there.
For a little time, no doubt, something will be left: some
labor that is found still to be indispensable, some transport,
some feeding machinery, with the few other organizations that
are necessary for its maintainance. The work of the Graves
Registration Units cannot end at once, nor, indeed, until all
the scattered graves have been found and the bodies rever-
ently exhumed and placed within the recognized cemeteries
of the War.
This *^etering out*' at its end is in the most marked
contrast to the days at the beginning of the War, when fever-
ish activity reigned everywhere. Very different is it, too, from
the drilling and training in the hastily organized camps and
barrack squares where the New Armies were being formed
as the Old Army of Great Britain fought doggedly to keep a
place for them, until they would be ready to take their stand
in the ranks of the Allies battling for the liberty of the world.
Then all was bustle, haste and activity, ordered, no doubt, and
methodical, yet none the less supremely exciting for those
who were being trained. There was no time to be lost; and
days were packed full of swift incident
In sharpest distinction, too, is it to the still more thrilling
and exciting war days, when everyone was keyed to the most
tense and there was no time to think or reflect upon the ever-
changing kaleidoscope of hourly events; when quick action
¥0L. ex. 49
770 'METERING OUT* [Mar.,
took the place of more deliberate thought and life — not wholly
unprepared — ^ran through a maze of sudden unexpected-
ness.
These already almost half-forgotten contrasts mark the
present phase and emphasize its character of decay. And in
all the diflFerent moments of the whole terrible, swift-moving
drama, from its beginning to its ending, the instability of hu-
man life and the shifting of its estimates of worth and value is
the one thing that stands out evident and clear.
It is easy to state the fact and speculate upon it; far more
difficult to realize it practically and bend it to our needs.
Even if our lives are unstable — ^if, indeed, we have here no
lasting habitation — they must still be shaped by some ideals
which we think of worth. And which are the ideals that will
stand the test? We had our ideals — or we said that we had
them — during the War; and they were high and noble ideals,
worthy of what is best in the heart of man. But new values
are shaping themselves in the war-tired minds; and the con-
ditions of peace are providing ground for ugly growths. If we
are relying upon ourselves alone we cannot aim high at best
— no higher than the possibility of human nature, and that
only at the level of its average. If we are striving merely for
greater worldly comfort, for amusement, for ^'getting on,**
surely we shall be doomed to eternal disappointment; and the
War will have taught us no lesson that was worth the learn-
ing. The very qualities of which it showed us to be capable,
will have become the more degraded by their misuse; and,
seeking much, we shall find all our energies dissipated in the
end and our hands still empty.
If we once but realized that the emotional instability and
general unrest which the War has left us as its legacy, is the
symptom of a disease from which the world is suffering, we
should learn to look elsewhere than towards its ever-changing
play for the remedy — for the true values by which, whether as
individuals or as communities, to shape our destinies. Per-
haps we should look back to the War itself to catch once again
a reflect of something that shone bright amid all its mists and
murkiness. Or we may look to nature, slow, forceful, pur-
posive in the steady persistence with which it moves towards
the attainment of its immutable goals. But above all we shall
dare to lift up our eyes even to God — since we are free beings
1920.] ^'PETERING OUT' 111
and made in His likeness — if we have any hope of discovering
those eternal values that dominate the perpetual flux and
change of the world. Nowhere else can the fixed and endur-
ing truth for which we crave, which we so dmnbly need, be
found than in the very Truth Itself, from which all other
draws its life and vigor. And there we should find the never-
changing principles of right and justice and honor and love
that are in so great danger of being lost altogether.
Amid the scarlet and white and blue and gold of the wild
flowers on the Artois battlefields there is a soldiers' cemetery.
Mound after mound, each with its little, plain cross at the
head, the graves lie in long, serried rows facing the East.
Here and there among them are self-sown garden flowers —
pansies, forget-me-nots, violets. Some bear the evidences of
loving care — a faded wreath or posy, a plant set in the earth
by loving hands in memory of the brave. The cemetery lies
upon a little eminence among the scars of the fighting. Below,
the heaps of rubble mark where a town once stood. And at
the further end, where the graveyard slopes gently away from
the west, there is one conmion biu*ial place, a mound some
thirty feet by twelve, with a huge overshadowing cross which
bears the names of all who sleep beneath it; or, where the
name is not known, the simple, infinitely touching words — **An
unknown British Soldier.** There are graves there, too, of
which the head-cross is made from the propeller of an aero-
plane; and graves marked by the tricolor rosette of France.
The sun was sinking slowly in the sky, the shadows of the
crosses lengthening on the earth. Birds were singing in the
blue dome above, and a gentle breeze stirred the daisies and
set the poppies nodding in the surrounding fields. A black-
robed woman stood by one of the little crosses in the cem-
etery, holding a child by the hand. She had been weeping,
but her tears were dried. The child's great round eyes rested
on her mother's, full of wonder and sad puzzled distress.
Widow and orphan, there they stood, in the glory of the sum-
mer afternoon beside the grave of him whom they had given in
sacrifice for their country and their faith in right. They knelt,
the mother drawing the child to her embrace by her side, and
her face was lifted in the sunlight. Written there was resig-
nation, but love and pride as well; and, above all, an un-
conquered hope and an undying trust
772 TO THE SUPREME [Mi
O women and children, you won the War as well as your
hero husbands and fathers! And that which made you ^vin
the War is with you stilL If it is slipping from you. you <^an
win it back. It is the spirit that is of value, the spirit clinging
fast to the Divine, drawing strength and sweetness from that
spiritual partnership. The little girl looked up at her mother,
and the mother turned, with grave, steadfast eyes, towards the
child. Her lips moved, and a look of understanding took the
place of the puzzled wonder upon the other*s face. Her little
hand went up towards her forehead; and, kneeling together
by the grave of their loved one, they signed their foreheads,
lips and hearts with the sign of the Holy Cross.
TO THE SUPREME.
BT HARRY LEE.
Be steel unto my flint.
Let loose the flame
From this gray thing,
My soul.
Scarce worth the name.
Blast,
As with dynamite.
Rend, hurl, set free.
Then with Thy chisel keen,
Fashion Thou me.
THE PERSONAL INFLUENCE OF CARDINAL NEWMAN.
BY W. A. CONACHER.
PART from the other great manifestations of his
genius, the question of Newman's personal influ-
ence on his generation is of intense interest.
What was the attitude of that England which at
the Apologia woke up to a consciousness of his
being, and since then has taken the keenest interest in hun?
In Anglican circles Newman was no stranger, nor did the Ox-
ford Movement die out like a fire of paper at his departure
from the scene. But the public who took in the Apologia was
a class wider than Anglicanism : it was that wide class of cul-
tured bourgeoisie which is so definitely a part of Victorian
society, and a large fraction of that class was Protestant and
Nonconformist or non-Anglican — the society which, having
produced Wesley, produced John Bright, Ruskin, Carlyle,
John Stuart Mill.
It was this class which would not be averse to a complaint
against Anglicanism, which would recognize in Newman's
original Calvinism and in a certain note which pervaded his
whole spiritual life some a£Bnity with itself, and consequently
would not altogether "let him go." How far does Newman
consciously or unconsciously respond to this?
When he separated from the Anglican conmiunion, and in
a wider sense cut himself off from English religious opinion,
there were two leading tendencies or schools in exist-
ence and two new ones manifesting themselves. There was
traditional Anglicanism which Newman first thought was cap-
able of a reformation and which he hoped to reform; this
effort, that of the High Church party, is the first of the new
tendencies referred to. But Newman found traditional
Anglicanism too much for him. No better defender and no
better type of it can perhaps be found than Dean Church. To
a startling extent in his History of the Oxford Movement he
accepts the portrait of his church contained in The Vicar of
Wakefield, Pride and Prejudice, The Barset Novels, or Scenes
From Clerical Life, but at the same time he defines and justi-
774 INFLUENCE OF CARDINAL NEWMAN [Mar..
fies the ideal of that church as an expression of national senti-
ment. His claim amomits to this, that the Church of England
is the Holy Spirit working in the people of England, a spirit
ranging at will, recognizable in the good of the past, assured
for the future. Great and lofty as this sounds, Newman saw
in its very vagueness, its variety of interpretation, the danger
point. Here was Liberalism, and he conceived that it would
be the creed of the future, and that it would have its own de-
velopment, its own pernicious and paralyzing effect on Chris-
tian opinion at large. He denounced it in his Apologia, he de-
nounced it in his address when created Cardinal at Rome.
How far his denunciation and his foresight were true must,
after more than half a century, be left to the honest opinion of
present time and posterity.
But there was in England that other great school of re-
ligious thought known as Nonconformity or the Free
Churches. Once Anglicanism was definitely established and
was seen to be what it is, a two-fold movement began within
it; on the one hand the backward movement of Bishop Laud,
on the other the search for something more satisfying, more
definite, which is the endless quest of Anglo-Saxon noncon-
formity. At one time it is Puritanism, at another Quakerism,
now the voice of Bunyan, now the voice of Milton. It ranges
down ways which it finds to be blind alleys, or again like some
tide it fills for a time a wide expanse, till suddenly, at their
appointed hour, the depths shallow, and the waters disappear.
It surges in again with the passion and eloquences of Wesley,
and again it is turned to stagnation, quicksands and waste. In
the accent of its hymns you catch always a note of dissatisfac-
tion, the moiu*nf ul wail of a soul that has not found itself. At
one time it is rich and pure and strong, and then again it finds
itself facing decay and corruption, its virtues turned to vices,
its faith to hollowness or a sickening hypocrisy. And always
with a strange restlessness it is examining new ideas, taking up
new modes, striving and crying, never at peace.
Newman leaving a church which in his day was dogmati-
cally lax, with no marked division other than social between it
and Nonconformity, may well have come to feel his life work
to be, not the conversion of England, but the preparation of
the minds of Anglo-Saxon Protestantism, for a gradual com-
prehension of Catholicism, which in the end would be cumu-
1920.] INFLUENCE OF CARDINAL NEWMAN 775
lative and irresistible.^ The immediate enemy he recognized
to be Liberalism, but his ultimate end in the Anglican sermons
he republished, in Development, the Apologia, the Grammar
of Assent is indirectly to shape and influence English religious
opinion. There his thoughts ever lie, thither they ever re-
tiu*n. In his accidental writings he has always this in mind.
Accept this and the Apologia has at once an immensely
greater significance. It has in fact a genuine raison d'etre.
Accept this and all through Newman's life, its disappointments
and setbacks, are so many barriers heading him off, keeping
hun on his determined path.
I do not mean to suggest that he draws away from Angli-
canism and prefers to view English religious opinion on its
more purely Protestant side. I mean rather that he is content
to leave the Oxford Movement to work out its own salvation.
At a certain moment opinion as to what the immediate out-
come of that movement will be, is over sanguine. By its very
growth the High Church Movement partly absorbed and was
partly reacted on by the main ciu*rent of moderate Anglican-
ism, compromising and temporizing as ever.' Newman him-
self protested against a change either from feeling or logic.
There must be conviction — assent. His relations with Keble,
Church and various others remain a pathetic and tender feat-
ure of his life's story. He is parted from them by a broad
stream, and they look across it at one another with a whole
ocean of feeling in their eyes and in their hearts. But apart
from them and their school, Newman now sees Protestant
opinion in England more as one, and he often finds more defi-
nite earnestness among the Mark Rutherfords than among the
clergy of Barset.
On the one hand, these people are attracted by Newman; on
the other, he addresses himself to them as, like himself, think-
ing the problem of religion the most important thing in the
^ "It it wonderful the extent to which of late years all sorts of persons with
religioos difflculties haye had recourse to him. Members, often ministers, of various
religious bodies, Methodists, Presbyterians, etc., with no sort of leaning towards
the Church, have sought his guidance and advice and ssrmpathy; and his corre-
spondence of this sort . . . was enormous. Now and again one came across some-
thing which almost looked like a cultus of Cardinal Newman outside the Church."
Father Ryder's recollections. Git. U., 359, Ltfe of John Henrg Ctirdinal Newman,
by Wilfrid Ward.
• England's genius for compromise breaks down In two places: the Church and
Ireland.
776 INFLUENCE OF CARDINAL NEWMAN [Mar.,
world. They are attracted and repelled. They read his
Apologia or his Grammar of Assent, his sermons, and they find
what was fundamentally common to him and themselves —
conscience. They see that he has found satisfaction and
peace, but how is to them a mystery, for Development
without the key is but a closed book, a tedious reiteration of
far-off forgotten things. And yet, although they are convinced
that he was mistaken — a pervert, still he remains a mystery, a
fascination. On the other hand Newman has his face turned
towards them and addresses them. He speaks and writes of
Catholic doctrine, he is busy in various activities, in contro-
versies, but beyond this he pubUshes his earlier preaching and
writings, and his later sermons in which he is intelligible not
only to Catholics, but to all who constitute ''the soul of the
Church." Them he knows; are they perhaps his sheep? Is it
significant that he takes up his abode in Birmingham, that
he leaves Oxford for the industrial metropolis, where dissent
rules?
Moreover he is always presenting this enigma. Dissent as
opposed to Anglicanism is always seeking for fervor, for effect
It is the victim incessantly of the demagogue of religion. And
while Newman possesses those arts, while his sermons are
preached with a striking, spellbinding manner of his own,
and his prose style has an enchanting rhythm, when you come
to look into it, when ear or eye, accustomed to the tone, are
beginning to sample the substance and the matter, Newman
has this surprise prepared: what he has to say is entirely
matter of fact, concrete, unemotional, except for the rare and
deep emotion of reality. You expect to find a Romanticist,
you find the purest classicism. Those led away by the fallacy
of provincialism, will find here the correcting touch of uni-
versality. This man, who apparently passed from the senti-
ment of Calvinism to the sentiment of Romanism, is discovered
to be sober, austere, matter of fact.
Protestant England peers as it were into his cell. At
one moment they hear him in accents familiar enough:
My dear Lord and Saviour shall I ever see Thee in
heaven? This world is very beautiful, very attractive, and
there are many things and persons whom I love in it. But i
Thou art the most beautiful and best of all. Make me ac- \
1920.] INFLUENCE OF CARDINAL NEWMAN 777
knowledge this with all my heart, as well as by Faith and in
my reason. My Lord I know nothing here below lasts;
nothing here below satisfies. Pleasures come and go; I
quench my thirst and am thirsty again, but the saints in
heaven are always gazing on Thee, and drinking in eternal
blessedness from Thy dear and gracious and most awful and
most glorious countenance.
Or when he is on the mountain top they hear:
At times we seem to catch a glimpse of a form which we
shall see hereafter face to face. We approach, and, in spite
of the darkness, our hand, or our head, or our brow, or our
lips become as it were sensible to the contact of something
more than earthly. We know not where we are, but we
have been bathing in water and a voice tells us that it is
blood. Or we have a mark signed upon our foreheads and it
spake of Calvary. Or we recollect a hand laid upon our
heads, and surely it had the prints -of the nails in it, and re-
sembled His, Who with a touch gave sight to the blind and
raised the dead.
This and this again and this ever is the note of Evangel-
icalism, and so they ask for more. But though the rhythm is
there, the style is, as a rule, more austere, less emotional, the
subject matter in fact occupied with other things.
Newman had at one time detected in himself an emotional-
ist, but had rooted it out. And so he warns against it. He
speaks coldly, even hardly, of those for whom religion is a
matter of ^'experiences" and sensations. He deprecates the
excited, the exalted frame of mind. He, a master of expres-
sion, will have nothing to do with those who are the slaves of
expression. He preaches pastoral sermons, and instructions,
most of all he insists on the Church, because he has found in
no mere rhetorical sense that the Church is Christ on earth.
And this is what these readers pass over. They pick out the
personal note in Newman, and they are offended when the
personal note is most often one of warning, *Time is short,
eternity is long." They wish to hear him say he has found
salvation, and expatiate amply on that luxuriant theme. The
reason is, of course, that they have substituted devotion for the
grace of the sacraments, and so ever thirst.
And that is perhaps the heart of the matter. Protestantism,
778 INFLUENCE OF CARDINAL NEWMAN [Mar^
of the two relations of self and God, overdoes the side of self
of the human intellect and feelings. We see this in the stoic
manifestation of Puritanism, where man in reality seeks to dis-
pense with his Maker and stand in his own strength. We see
it in his Evangelical Creed of "experience," where what each
*T* feels, is all important, the personal conviction of being
"saved." We see it most clearly in Liberalism or broad
church-ism, with its higher criticism which more and more
presiunptuously defines the Infinite, and with its "Christology"
which seems rather to be describing the symptoms of that hu-
man idiosyncrasy known as belief, than expressing anything
that properly can be called theology.
The message of Newman, if it ever reaches these minds, is
that the Church is a Temple not made with hands, that the
means of grace are set and appointed, that only by them, by
the sacraments, for example, can this mortal put on immor-
tality, or this limited human mind learn to grasp anything be-
yond it, devoid of the limits of time and of matter; in the
Communion of Saints only can it comprehend the ties between
the living, the dead, and those in bliss; and to attain this
finally, it is necessary to submit to the whole system of organ-
ized orthodox Christianity, and not try to substitute for this a
nebulous faith floating on a sea of devotion self -imagined, self-
made.
But it is here that his Protestant readers part company
with him. They fall back on all the historical calumnies and
perversions of Catholicism. They set up the hasty theories in-
vented by the Reformers, when it was realized that, if you cast
down Catholicism, you must set something in its place. They
ignore that Luther could never explain away "Hoc est Corpus
Meum," and that Calvin insisted that you must have a system
to replace a system. And so the old battle begins again for,
humanly speaking, it is futile to expect sudden and wholesale
conversions. Time is the final court of appeal, and to time
the Catholic Church, which has seen so many heresies, so many
schisms, can in confidence appeal.
When Protestants come to Newman and say, here and
here I knew with irresistible conviction that I was right, that I
was "on holy ground," that by this man Grod spake to me, that
by this memory, this practice I am kept holy, what does New-
man say? He agrees. He says 'Vas not the Catholic Church
1920.] INFLUENCE OF CARDINAL NEWMAN 779
your mother?" But the way to secure the fragrance of those
flowers which sweeten your life, is to make sure of the
branches, to make sure of the stem, and to see that it is rooted
in the solid earth. Without that you are only bearing about a
bouquet which will fade and be cast away. Devotion is only
the musical note of religion; but from it Newman leads on to
the slower unheard beat and rhythm of the religious life, and
here he is a master teacher, showing how to distinguish the
false from the true, the unreal from the real. "I get nothing
from him," says Dr. Whyte, when after long dallying he rises
to take up his testimony against the Cardinal, and he goes on
with unconscious bathos: "When one of my congregation
comes to me and tells me that their sin has at last found them
out, and asks me what book they will henceforth keep beside
them" — ^what book! is not this the very patent-medicine view
of religion, and does not Newman's whole teaching consist in
this sequence leading from one to the other of his two extremes,
God and the Soul: The Conscience — Sin — ^Repentance — the
Means of Grace — the Church — Christ.
And then his hearers come back to him. They take him
down another time from their shelves, for they are not quite
convinced he is wrong. H the Catholic Church were only
something else they might believe, if it were not something
which had been robbed of half the energy of Europe, which
humanly speaking had had to struggle on with reduced re-
sources and improvised instruments, if it spoke in accents re-
calling not the South, but the North or the West, then they
might be nearer belief. As it is, they say: No, but go on
looking into Newman's life. And indeed they find there a
noble thing!
Newman conceived the ideal Catholic Chiu'ch, and saw it
through the accidents of a bishop with a peasant mind, or digni-
taries or officials by whom "the kingdom of heaven suffered
violence." Nay, by these very buffetings he was strengthened,
by these set-backs he advanced. He had been introspective,
sensitive, difficile. "Pride ruled his will," but now he said
**Lead thou me on," and in his long career there is a change
in him. Purification and refinement accomplish their work.
He persists, day in day out, with his work, his office, and above
all the mass. And so at the end he begins to show the aureole
of the Saint. At the burning question of the Vatican Council,
780 INFLUENCE OF CARDINAL NEWMAN [Mar.,
you can already see how he has gained in character. At one
time he would have thrown himself into that as keenly as did
Manning and Ward on the other side. Now he knows the
power of silence.
When he wrote his Grammar of Assent nothing is more
remarkable than his docility one may say. He is laying the
foundation for what at one time will be a new branch of theo-
logical science. But he submits it all along to an expert, that
there may be nothing to jar any Catholic conscience, nothing
to cause any scandal.
And so when he earns his dignity of Cardinal, he has a
strange happiness, the sense, as it were, to have attained a state
of grace. He goes to Rome: the old order has changed, and
man still "fulfills himself in divers place and time." To the
robust Pio Nono, all energy and force, convinced and convinc-
ing in his policy and ideas, popular by his essential manliness,
the manliness that appeals to the masses, has succeeded the
gentle Cardinal Pecci; he too has his strength, but the greatness
of his strength is love. To him, to this new and unknown Pope,
the new Cardinal comes. The creation of his cardmalate is
an earnest of the new spirit. And Leo talks with him, sits with
him, all the time holding his hand — those who know the tender-
ness of that southern gesture will divine what is passing. The
words are commonplace enough, but both their thoughts are
at the same place, the long years in the silence of the Oratory
of St. Philip of Neri — surely the Saint is there too with his
client. "Are you many?" says His Holiness. "We have lost
some," answers Newman, and at the thought of Ambrose St.
John who is not there to rejoice in that day, the tears come.
And as once in a garden One said to a heart-broken woman,
"Woman why weepest thou?" so Christ's Vicar, still holding
his hand says gently, "Do not weep." So for John Henry New-
man **The night is gone."
THE HOLT TREE.
BY MARY J. O'BRIEN.
I HAVE been dead, and now I live once more!
Not as I lived in those sweet springs of yore.
When the blind sap, obedient to His call.
Crept sunward in my veins and pulsed through all
My outmost being. Ah! in that far prime
How the green temple echoed praise sublime
To Him Who was its Life! How joyous wings
Beat madly upward as the feathered things
Yearned to Him! And how ev'ry shoot and blade
Worshipped Him dumbly Who their life had made!
I have been dead, but now I live again;
My being wrenched from death to anguished pain.
Made sentient by a Touch — His Touch! Ah me!
Dare I to speak what seemeth blasphemy —
The creant God Who, bending from the skies.
Bade me from out the barren earth arise.
Now hangs, fast-clenched unto my stricken wood.
And bathes me in the torrent of His blood —
How my base fibres shrink and crawl with dread,
As presses closer still the thorn-crowned Head!
I have been dead. O sweet the years of death! —
Yet thro' this pain, like some kind angel's breath.
There falls His comfort on my boding heart:
/ die no more. With Him is cast my part.
I am His Cross and He upbeareth me;
His sign am I unto Eternity.
In the last sky triumphant shall I burn;
To me, O man, your countless eyes shall turn.
I am Hope's beacon in your darkest strife —
Christ's saving Cross, the Eden Tree of Life.
THE STORT OF BEAVER ISLAND.
BY ROSE MULXAY.
I WRITER casting about for material for story or
historical novel, or a student seeking theme for a
thesis in sociology or American Catholic history,
or a collector of the folk lore and folk song that
has become naturalized and localized among us,
t take the chance journey that brought us a few
summers ago to the straggling, interesting, little village of
St. James.
With its fine land-locked harbor that can shelter a navy,
it lies on Beaver Island, the largest of en archipelago some
thirty miles west of Charlevoix, whence it can be reached in
open season by daily steamer, or in closed season by Indian
pony post across the ice.
We landed on the picturesque, dilapidated wharves where
dark skinned fishermen bring in heavily laden boats of white
fish and lake trout caught by hundreds in pound nets staked
down in lower Lake Michigan. At the clean, old-fashioned
hotel, well cooked food was served in a neighborly way by
gentle-mannered girls trained in the Public Schools by Do-
minican nuns.
According to the United States Geologic Survey, the Great
Ice Sheet depositing this group of islands, left a soil ranging
from fair to very good farm lands. These have not always
received the intelligent, scientific care they should have, for
fisherfolk are proverbially poor farmers; but conditions are
changing, and much of the soil is still virgin. The wooded
ravines, the stone-strewn meadows, high kames of sand and
gravel, immense erratic boulders, give the region a New Eng-
land aspect, though its climate is insular, not subject to great
changes of heat and cold.
A wonderful sunset lured us down the King's Highway,
through natural parks, lands caped with spreading juniper,
coning cedars, tapering spruces and lofty pines; for the island
throughout its thirteen miles of length and six of width de-
1920.] THE STORY OF BEAVER ISLAND 783
lights and rests the eye with a changeful charm that is seldom
equaled. The spring woods show the trailing arbutus and
delicately colored spring flowers; in late summer and autumn
they glow with the reds and yellow gold of bitter sweet, siunach,
partridge berry, bunch berry, side by side with delicate ferns
and white bane berry. Great open spaces are covered with
heavily fruited blackberry, red raspberry and wild strawberry
vines. The winter woods wear the browns, greens, and grays
of the cones, needles, trunks and branches of the evergreens,
maples and beeches, or glisten silver white with sleet, con-
stantly changing in the shifting light of the short winter days.
Fur bearing animals were formerly found here in large
numbers, but so successfully did the hunters and trappers ply
their trade, the fox and rabbit alone remain in any large num-
bers. The foxes are still so niunerous as to make turkey
raising a risky business for farmers' wives.
Seven large inland lakes filled with bass and other game
fish furnish abundant food and shelter for wild fowl to rear
their young broods. A common sight in many of the barn-
yards is the captured brood of young ducklings being raised
by foster-mother duck or hen. No snakes are found there;
this, with the fact that potatoes grow to great size and have a
delicious flavor, has given the Island the facetious name of
Beaver Ireland.
The human history of the island group is most interesting.
The quaint old Indian burial grounds on Garden Island still
receive the dead and the gifts to the dead of the thousand or
more Chippewa and Ottawa Indians, descendants of those who
listened to the gentle Marquette. A trip to Garden Island
brought vividly to the attention of the writer the satisfying
labors of these early French missionaries. On the shore the
primitive workshop of an Indian carpenter — two pine trees
supporting a raft of sail cloth — sheltered the clever, silent
workman, cutting from the knees of a bent tree the ribs of a
boat, while his quiet mannered little boys played with the
shavings or wove baskets from sweet scented grasses. We
were told he could conmiand high wages in Detroit, but pre-
ferred working in the open silence.
Before the middle of the last century a colony of Irish
fisherfolk settled here, a hardy and hospitable people who,
with the aid of a small fleet, industriously plied their trade.
784 THE STORY OF BEAVER ISLAND [Mar^
They and their descendants control the Islands today. But
the incongruity of the Island nomenclature with an Irish
and Indian Catholic population is at once apparent. St.
James, The King's Highway, Mt. Pisgah, Lake Genesareth,
Jordan River, suggest a New England rather than a New
Ireland. Remarking this, we were told the story of a strange
chapter in American history; the story of a kingdom that
had existed for more than six years within the boundaries of
the United States and whose king had been tried for treason.
This is its substance : When Joseph Smith, founder of the
Mormon colony at Nauvoo, Illinois, was mobbed and slain,
two aspirants appeared in the field for leadership. Brigham
Young and James Jesse Strang. The latter, a teacher, lawyer,
editor and politician from New York state, was a shrewd man
of great executive ability. A short time before Smith's death,
he had emigrated to Wisconsin and had entered the Mormon
sect. Adopting Smith's method of control, he "Yound" buried
tablets, that were a part of a New Book of the Law of the
Lord, which directed the Mormons to follow him. Brigham
Young, however, was older and more influential in the sect.
Through the medium of the Mormon press, he violently de-
nounced Strang as an impostor, won the majority vote and led
his followers into Utah to found Salt Lake City. Strang led
the minority into Wisconsin, but finding no neighborly atmos-
phere, sought a more sequestered spot for his Lares and
Penates. In 1847 he sailed into one of the most beautiful
harbors on the Great Lakes and gave it his self -sainted name —
St. James. By 1850 he had three thousand followers with
him, whom he set to work to cut the ELing's Highway the
entire length of the Island, and to construct a tabernacle,
where he was crowned king with all the martial and regal
power at his command. He then laid taxes to maintain schools
and support the poor; erected a printing press and issued a
daily paper; wrote a Natural History of Beaver Island that is
now in the Smithsonian Institute; made laws forbidding the
use of tobacco, alcohol, tea and coffee; ordered the women to
wear bloomer costumes; and set up a whipping post where
infractions of his laws were punished. He was a harsh master.
A friendly relation was maintained with the Indians, but
the fisherfolk were made to feel his subtle power; their nets
were torn or stolen and their boats robbed and sunk with
1920.] THE STORY OF BEAVER ISLAND 785
impunity. Aided by the Gentiles of the coast towns, they
waged a border warfare that attracted the attention of the
country. Charges of treason, polygamy, robbing the mails,
harboring counterfeiters and criminals, luring ships onto the
rocks and robbing them, were preferred against him to the
United States Government. He was tried at Detroit, but so
skillfully did he plead his own case, he was acquitted.
Emboldened by success, he returned and had himself
elected to the State legislatiu'e. With shrewd political instinct
he gerrymandered the neighboring islands with his own group
into a new county, of which he was the political head. All
the power and machinery of the law were in the hands of the
Mormons. They were sheriff, judge and jury. The Gentiles
had no redress. Resentment was at fever heat, when the reve-
nue cutter Michigan sailed into the harbor. As Strang was
about to go aboard to pay a visit of coiu*tesy, he was shot from
ambush by two of his own followers, one of whom had been
stripped and whipped at the public whipping post. An up-
rising of the Gentiles followed, in which the tabernacle, the
printing press, the house and library of the Mormon Saint were
destroyed and his people driven into exile.
The fisherfolk now came into their own and the colony
became as unique as its predecessor; for most of the inhabit-
ants were from Galway or the Aran Islands, and had brought
with them the folklore, folk song, the neighborliness, the
quaint philosophy and spiritual life of Aran Mor. The Aran
Islands are a sea-washed group of barren rocks to the west
of Ireland, which have f lU'nished the scene for several modern
dramas and novels. The inhabitants are spoken of as a silent.
God-fearing race, facing poverty and the tragedies of the sea
with a philosophic courage. The wild strength of storms on
their rock-bound coast, followed by the peace and warmth of
sunlight, send the roots of spiritual life deep into their fertile
hearts. They learn to fear and love God. Remote from towns
and schools, they have cherished whatever of knowledge or
lore that found its way from century to century into their iso-
lated land, which has thus become the repository of song and
story of ages past. Many of them possess a "turn'' for philos-
ophy, a fine sense of the poetic, and remarkable memory.
A well-remembered evening was spent in the cottage of
one who had settled when young on Beaver Island; and,
▼OL. cz. 50
786 THE STORY OF BEAVER ISLAND [Mar.,
though advanced in years, still retained the strong, fresh voice
of her youth.
A young harpist, fingering a small Irish harp, inspired our
hostess to chant in Gaelic the long mediaeval songs of *The
Nativity" and *The Passion." With fine appreciation she
would pause every once in a while and say: "I wish you could
understand. The story is beautiful." An old romantic baUad,
*The White Holland Handkerchief," followed. Urged by her
grandchildren to lilt for them to "step to," she lilted for each
his favorite tune: for the little girl, *The Pigeon on the
Gate;" for the little boy, "The Blackberry Blossom" and,
lightly as the blossom itself, he "stepped" with his little bare
feet the ancient dances of his fathers.
On the way back to the hotel, a pathetic incident in her
life was told. Her husband lay in his last illness, but she
must needs attend to the wants of the farm. He felt his hour
approaching, sent for his wife and asked to hear again the
Songs of the Islands, and with the sound of them in his ears
his soul passed away.
There are few existing communities where the spirit of
the old country is retained as on the Island. Neither doctor
nor lawyer is among them. TThe priest is doctor, dentist,
lawyer, judge and weather reporter. Those who have read
Father Gavin Duff'y's Yonder may shift the scenery from the
tropics to the northern woods, and get some idea of the mani-
fold occupations of the resident pastor who is none other
than the convert, Father Jewell, at one time member of the
former Episcopal, now Catholic, monastery at Graymoor, op-
posite West Point. The story of his conversion may be found
in Roads to Rome. He is entirely devoted to his people and
to his work, the broad scope of which employs his tireless
energy. He is endeavoring to establish in this isolated Catho-
lic community those pious customs and public observances
that bring comfort and spiritual joy into daily life and tend
to ennoble toil. His public blessing of the fields on Rogation
Sunday was a scene never to be forgotten.
ST. PATRICK'S FOLK IN AMERICA.
BY CARL HOLUDAY.
TALIAN tradition declares that when Columbus
approached America, an impulsive son of Erin
leaped overboard and swam to the shore, thus
reaching it some minutes before any one else.
The Irish have been coming ever since, until
today they and their descendants number at least twenty-five
million. The first white settler in America was an Irishman;
for it is a fact that Eyres of Galway was the first of the soldiers
chosen by Coluipbus to hold the fort in the West Indies, and
there he spent his remaining days vainly waiting for the re-
turn of his chief .^
Moreover, there is a claim that the Irish discovered Amer-
ica long before Columbus was born! St. Brendan, Bishop of
Clonf ert, set sail in 546 from St. Brendan's Bay, Kerry, to seek
a land **far in the West.*** His account maintains that he
reached a vast country, penetrated inland, and found a giant
river flowing from the East to the West — ^presumably the Ohio.
Some of his descriptions fit rather accurately portions of Vir-
ginia. Wynkyn de Worde, the famous English printer, pub-
lished a narrative of St. Brendan's voyage about ten years
before Columbus sailed from Palos, and long before this,
Latin manuscripts telling of the Irishman*s travels were to
be found in the libraries of Paris, Rome and Padua. Brendan
declares that he ran into an ocean current which bore him
without sail — shall we say the Gulf Stream? Centuries before
Columbus, Norse mariners had named a mysterious western
land *'Great Ireland,'** while Scandinavian sagas tell of a
land west of Greenland called Albania, "whither formerly
vessels came from Ireland."
^ There Is an extant abridgment of Columbus' Journal, giving many such curious
facts. See Wlnsor, ColumbuM, chs. 1., if.; Harisse, ChrUtophe Colombe, 1. For
general account see Bourne, Spain and America,
* See the Saints' Lives In publications of Early English Text Society; see also
Weston, Chief Middle English PoeU, and Romance, Vision and Satire,
*See Ohtheri's account in King Alfred's translation of Oroslus* History of the
World; also Watson, "Bibliography of Pre-Columbian Discoreries," in Anderson,
America Not Discovered bg Columbus.
\
788 ST. PATRICICS FOLK IN AMERICA [Mar.,
Now the first genuinely large immigration of Irish to
this continent was in 1629 when great groups founded a colony
in Guiana. But they were at Jamestown as early as 1616 —
as is proved by the Caseys, Doughertys, O'Conners and
O'Briens on the roll of settlers.* That India rubber ship of un-
limited capacity — the Mayflower — carried William Mullens
and Christopher Martin, both from Ireland.* Cecil Calvert,
the second Lord Baltimore, with two hundred Catholics, more
than one hundred of whom were Irish, left the Isle of Wight
in November, 1633, and in March, 1634, landed on St. Clement's
Island, Maryland, assisted at Mass, and immediately began
the construction of the town of St. Mary. There, it is literally
true, "'religious liberty obtained a home, its only home in the
wide world." There Quakers mutilated by the Piu-itans found
a refuge; there Episcopalians fled for safety; there even
Puritans driven from Boston and Salem found a haven.*
The Irish Confederate War of 1641-1652 and the violation
of Irish treaties by William of Orange drove thousands from
the Emerald Isle to America, especially to Maryland and Penn-
sylvania.^ In 1652 more than 25,000 either sold themselves
or were sold in Martinque and neighboring islands, and that
same year a commission appointed by Cromwell reported that
Irish women were too numerous, and recommended that they
"be sold to merchants and transported to Virginia, New Eng-
land, Jamaica, or other countries." Within four years more
than 100,000 were thus traded away, the great majority into
America.* And they prospered in the West Land. As early
as 1634 one of the wealthiest merchants in the colonies was the
Boston Irishman, James Coogan.* By 1683 Manhattan had an
Irish governor, Thomas Dongan, Earl of Limerick, and an
« Burk, History of Virginia; also Cooke, History of Virginia, and Foote, Sketches
of Virginia,
'Journal of American Irish Historical Society, paper read by T. S. Lonergan,
'*The Irish Chapter in American History," at annual meeting. New York, January
17, 1912. For many curious facts about these and other Mayflower passengers see
publications of Massachusetts Historical Society.
* Osgood, American Colonies in Seventeenth Century, vol. i., pp. 529 et $eq.
Above all, consult Davis, The Day-Star of American Freedom,
*See Hodgkln, Political History of England, vol. vii., pp. 360-376; also Brl^t,
History of England, Period U,, pp. 674-695.
* Condon, Irish Race in America; also American Archives, vol. ill., and Dunlop,
Ireland Under the Commonwealth,
*See Lonergan, **The Irish Chapter in American History.'*
1920.] ST. PATRICK'S FOLK IN AMERICA 789
Irish college was founded on Manhattan Island that very
year.**^
The natural haven of refuge for exiles from Erin was
manifest when, in 1695» the Treaty of Limerick was violated
and, in 1698, the decree pronounced by King William forbade
the export of woolens from Ireland.^^ As a result more than
200,000 Irish Presbyterians left Ulster for America. Lord
Mount joy might well declare years later to Parliament: "You
lost America through the Irish."
Finding seventeenth century New York somewhat hostile
— ^for before 1700 the law of the province threatened anyone
sheltering a priest, with a fine of $1,000 and three days in the
stocks^' — the Irish spread far up and down the coast. New
Windsor was founded by the Irish Clintons; the Mohawk
Valley was settled by Sir W. Johnson, of Meath, and the
valleys of Virginia were filled with Irish Presbyterians by the
name of Hite, Beverly, McKay, McGill, Vance and Glass. Espe-
cially was Patrick County, Virginia, soon teeming with Mc-
Duffys, McDowells, McGruders, Mitchells and Campbells of
Ireland, while the first settlers of the Shenandoah Valley were
John Lewis, of Ireland, and his sons.^*
The Irish immigrants flocked to Philadelphia.^^ Penn-
sylvania had always been friendly to them. When William
Penn, preparing to sail for America, joined the Quakers at
Cork, he appointed James Logan, of Armagh County, Ireland,
his secretary, and in 1736 had him appointed governor of the
colony. Always truthful, always gentle, Logan was so admired
by the Indians about Philadelphia that they named their
future great chief after him. Diu'ing 1728, 5,000 Irish landed at
Philadelphia; the next year, 5,655, and between 1724 and
1742 more than 3,000 annually departed for the Quaker settle-
^ See V. J. Dowling, "Irish Pioneers of New York City,*' Journal of American
Irish Historical Society, vol. tIU.; also Dunlap, History of New Netherlands,
%
^Fronde, The English in Ireland in the Eighteenth Century explains In detail
many of what the Irish considered breaches of faith. But Lecky thinks Fronde
In error, and should be consulted. See also Murray, History of the Commercial and
Financial Relations Between England and Ireland. For brief statement on woolen
exports, see Turner, Ireland and England, p. 92.
" See Osgood, American Colonics in the Seventeenth Century, vol. ill., pp. 444 et
seq,; also Dowling, ''Irish Pioneers of New York City."
" See both Burk and Cooke. For Irish Influence In South Carolina, see Ramsay,
History of South Carolina,
M Watson, Annals of Philadelphia, See also American Archives, vol. III., and
Condon, Irish Race in America,
790 ST. PATRICK'S FOLK IN AMERICA [Mar.,
ment from the one county of Ulster. According to Logan, six
ship-loads came during one week of 1729, and in 1736 they
averaged three ship-loads per day. Over 17,000 came between
August, 1771, and August, 1772. So nimierous, indeed, did they
become in Philadelphia that a public complaint was laid
before the king protesting against their rapid increase and the
large congregations at Mass.
By the time of the Revolution, Pennsylvania was domi-
nantly Irish, and large numbers were to be foimd in New
York, New Jersey and Maryland. By 1737 the exiles were so
nimierous in Boston that they founded the Charitable Irish
Society. Soon they were spreading over New Hampshire,
where they established New Londonderry and Dublin, and
then into Maine, where they founded Belfast and Bangor.
These people left Ireland in such vast numbers that by 1740
entire districts of the island were deserted.^*
The total white population of the United States at the
close of the Revolution was 3,172,000, and 1,141,920 were purely
Irish.** But these figures do not correctly represent their pro-
portion in the Colonial army. Joseph Galloway declared in
the House of Commons that ^'one-half of the American army is
Irish ;"*^ but more accurate investigation has shown that prac-
tically one-half of the regular soldiers of the Colonies in the
Revolution were born in Irelcuid and a third more of Wash-
ington's troops were of Irish ancestry.** A Killamey inMni-
granfs son. General Sullivan, struck the first blow on land
before war was declared by seizing, on December 11, 1724,
Fort William and Mary*® at Newcastle, New Hampshire, and
capturing fifteen cannon and a hundred barrels of powder,
later to be used with telling effect at Bunker Hill. "It was
the first act which could be regarded as one of open and
direct hostility committed by a military force against the
Royal Government.*'
Then on May 11th came the first sea battle of the Revo-
lution. At Machias Bay, Maine, an Irishman, Jeremiah
^McCarthy, Brief Historg of Ireland, and Froude.
» See First Cenens of United States, 1790,
**The teitlmony of Galloway and yarious other exiled Tories may be found in
Parliamentarg Reports and Debates, during the years 1775-1789.
"An examination of Muster Rolls of Massachusetts Soldiers and Sailors of the
Revolutionary War (190%) reveals an astounding number of Irish names.
" See Bancroft, Historg of the United States, vol. iy., p. 94.
1920.] ST. PATRICICS FOLK IN AMERICA 791
O'Brien, with a few followers on board a sloop, attacked the
British warship, the Margcwitta, captured her; turned her
upon the two British cruisers, the Diligence and the Tapni^
quish, coming to her rescue, and then defeated a whole
squadron, containing some of the largest vessels afloat, which
had been sent out from Halifax to crush O'Brien. Little
wonder that James Fenimore Cooper called the deed ^the
Lexington of the Seas,"»« On May 10, 1775, the Continental
Congress issued an Address to the People of Ireland^ declar-
ing: "^We acknowledge with pleasiu*e and gratitude that the
Irish Nation has produced patriots who have nobly distin-
guished themselves in the cause of humanity and America/'*^
Washington's private secretary, Joseph Reed, was the son of
an Irish immigrant. The secretary of the Congress that issued
the Declaration of Independence was Charles Thomson, of
Derry, Ireland, the man whom John Adams called ^'the life
of the cause of liberty," the man whose word was so trusted
that the Delaware Indians adopted him as '"the Man of Truth."
Twelve members of the Continental Congress were of
Irish blood.^^ The ancestors of John Hancock, the presiding
officer, had come from Down County. The parents of Wil-
liam Whipple of New Hampshire were from St. Patrick's
land. Matthew Thornton of New Hampshire was bom in
Limerick County. Robert Treat Paine of Massachusetts was
a descendant of Shane the Proud, Prince of Ulster. James
Smith of Pennsylvania, who raised the first volunteer Penn-
sylvania company for the Revolution, was an immigrant from
Ireland. George Taylor of the same colony, born in Ireland,
had sold himself as an indented worker for two years to pay
his ship-fare. The father of George Read of Delaware came
from Dublin, while the father of Thomas McKean of the same
colony had arrived from near the same city. The grandfather
of Charles Carroll of Carrollton was from ELing's County, Ire-
land, and the grandfather of Thomas Nelson of Virginia came
from Tyrone County. The father of Edward Rutledge of South
Carolina was an Irish physician,, while the grandfather of
Thomas Lynch of that colony had arrived a penniless exile
from Galway. While thirteen Irishmen in Congress helped to
** See Cooper, Btstorg of the American Naug,
'^Joornal of Proceedings of Congress. The Continental Congress actually asked
Ireland and Canada to become part of the new Union.
**See Sanderson, Biographg of the Signers of the Deeiaration.
792 ST. PATRICK'S FOLK IN AMERICA [Mar.,
make the Declaration, Captain John Nixon of the Friendly
Sons of St. Patrick was the first man to read it to the public,
July 8, 1776; Dunlap, the Irish printer of Philadelphia, was
the first to publish it, and John Binns, a Dublin immigrant to
Philadelphia, the first to print it with facsimiles of the signa-
tures.*'
Repeatedly in the dark days that followed, these Irish-
Americans came to the aid of the Government. The Friendly
Sons of St. Patrick of Philadelphia gave $500,000 for the equip-
ping of Washington's army, and on numberless occasions, the
Sons of Liberty, organized by the O'Briens of Machias, Maine,
raised funds for food and clothing for the suffering soldiers.
When the long campaign was over, eight Irishmen were
among the framers of the Constitution.
At Bunker Hill three Irishmen were the commanders.
Generals Warren, Montgomery and Stark. A close friend of
Washington was the Irishman, General Henry Knox, Chief of
Artillery, founder of the Order of the Cincinnati and first
Secretary of War; and the three military advisers of Wash-
ton's career were the same Knox, General Stephen Moylen of
Cork and General Joseph Reed, the son of an Irish immigrant.
When Washington crossed the Delaware five Irish generals,
Sullivan, Green, Knox, Ewing and Hand, were with him. When
the British fleet fled from Boston to South Carolina, two Irish
leaders, John Rutledge and General William Thompson, drove
it from Charleston. When the Tories attempted to rise in the
South, General Andrew Pickens and Colonel John Dooley, sons
of Irish immigrants to South Carolina, with only three hundred
and fifty men defeated them at Kettle Creek, Georgia. Richard
Montgomery of Donegal County, just before the fiu-ious as-
sault on Quebec, December 31, 1775, delivered that concise
and memorable speech to his troops : **Men of New York, you
will not fear to follow where your general leads.""
The deeds of the Irishman, General William Maxwell,
hero of Brandywine and Monmouth, and of Captain John Mc-
Clure end his "Rocky Creek Irish" in North Carolina, rival
the escapades of Cooper's heroes. And the achievements of
Jack Barry, **father of the American navy," who was offered
«* Thomas, Historg of Printing in America, and Buckingham, HewMpaper
Reminiscences.
**Headley, Washington and His Generals.
1920-] ST. PATRICK'S FOLK IN AMERICA 793
$75,000 and the command of a British ship to quit the Amer-
ican cause, are too well known to be rehearsed here. The
English evacuated Boston on St. Patrick's Day, 1776. Wash-
ington immediately gave orders that the countersign should be
"St. Patrick,** and that General Sullivan should be the chief
officer of the day. And in the spring of 1777, when eighteen
new brigadier generals were appointed, six were Irish:
Anthony Wayne, Hand, Reed, George Clinton, Poor and
Conway."
When victory came at Yorktown an Irishman, Ensign Wil-
son of Clinton's Brigade, received the surrendered battle-flags
of Cornwallis; Thomas McKean, the Irish president of the
Continental Congress, announced at midnight the news in
Philadelphia, and the secretary, Charles Thomson, read the
proclamation the next morning to Congress.
The son of an immigrant from Antrim Coimty, Ireland,
General Andrew Jackson,^* defeated the English at New Or-
leans. And the Mexican War gives us the names and achieve-
ments of General James Shields and General Robert Patter-
son of Tyrone County, Ireland, and of Phil Kearny and Com-
modore David Conner.
The Irish famine of 1846-1847, besides killing one and a
half million peasants, drove 800,000 to America between 1847
and 1851,*^ and with the coming of the Civil War they enlisted
by the thousands in the armies of both the North and the
South. To recall but a few of the most famous, we will men-
tion Stonewall Jackson, James Shields, Kearny, Corcoran,
Meagher, Logan, Mulligan, Sheridan, McMahon, Meade and
Cleburne. The Irish Brigade at Fredericksburg went into
battle with one thousand three hundred and three men, and
the next morning at roll call answered only two hundred
names.**
In the field of politics we may recall that Andrew Jack-
son's parents came from Antrim County to North Carolina
just two years before he was born; President Arthur was the
son of an Irish preacher from the same county; James K.
»Ibtd,
**For Jackson's ancestry consult Headley, Lives of Wtnfleld Scott and Andrew
Jaekeon; also Brady, True Andrew Jackson,
"Turner, Ireland and England, pp. 84, 1S5-139. Consult also Condon, Irish Race
in America,
*See Rhodes, History of United States, vol. !▼., pp. 196, 197.
794 ST. PATRICK'S FOLK IN AMERICA [Mar^
Polk was a direct descendant of Robert Pollock of Donegal
and Buchanan owed his perseverance to his North Ireland an-
cestors. An Irishman, Matthew Lyon, cast the deciding vote
in Congress which elected Jefiferson to the Presidency. Wil-
liam H. Seward and James G. Blaine could trace their ancestry
to the Emerald Isle. Old Mother Sullivan of New Hampshire
might say : "I worked in my farmyard, with a future governor
of Massachusetts in my arms and future governors of ^ew
Hampshire and Vermont tagging after me.'***
In the fields of art and literature the children of St. Patrick
in America have made a rather characteristic contribution.
For there is much of the emotional and dramatic, even the
tragic, in the Irish soul, as is evidenced in its artistic expres-
sion. Some of the most famous names in American theatrical
annals are Irish. There are Dion Boucicault, author of Lon-
don Assurance, The Shaughraun, and nearly a score of other
stage successes; John Brougham, founder of Brougham's
Lyceum, and Augustin Daly, founder of the once famous Daly
Theatre. John Drew, the comedian, father of the present John
Drew, was born in Dublin. Tyrone Power, the Irish comedian,
took America by storm in the thirties and forties, and many
yet remember the eccentric dignity of another Irishman, John
T. Raymond, as Colonel Sellers in the Gilded Age. The mem-
ory of Barney Williams (whose real name was Flaherty), has
not yet faded as the famous actor of 1850-1870, and the highly
successful manager of the old Wallack Theatre.*®
In the field of letters Father Abram Ryan is said to have
touched more American hearts than any other American poet
save Longfellow. Richard Henry Wilde's poems were once on
every old-time Southern gentleman's lips. Poe had a heavy
infusion of Irish blood; Joseph I. C. Clarke, the versatile
poet-dramatist, was born in Ireland; Theodore O'Hara, author
of the Bivouac of the Dead, was the son of the Irish school-
master, Kane O'Hara, who gave Zachary Taylor all the book-
learning that stateman-soldier ever possessed.*^
In journalism we may enumerate John Daly Burk, author
*See address by Rooserelt before New York Friendly Sons of St Patrick,
Ifarch 17, 1905.
** See Diinlap, History of American Theatre, and Homblow, Historg of the Theatre
in America; also Ford, Beginnings of Americim Dramatic Literature.
*^ For accounts of Father Ryan, Wilde and O'Hara, see chapters on them In
author's History of Southern Literature and Three Centuries of Southern Poetry.
1920.] A PRAYER UPON THE SEA 795
of the History of Virginia and founder of the first daily in
Boston; John Boyle O'Reilly, poet, novelist and famous as
editor of the Boston Pilot; James Gordon Bennett of the New
York Herald; Joseph Medill of the Chicago Tribune and
Patrick Ford, editor of the Irish World.^*
It is strange that so little has ever been written about the
Irish in American art. It was William Corcoran, so nof an Irish
immigrant, who, with his millions, established in Washington
what is practically the national art gallery of America. The Irish
painter, William Dunlap," was a genuine pioneer in American
art, while in these modern days the unique statue of Lincoln
by Augustus St. Gaudens of Dublin shows that artistic skill is
still the Irishman's heritage. And, pray, let no American for-
get that, in order that future Irishmen might have a comfort-
able home, a son of St. Patrick, James Hoben, drew the plans
for the White House! And so the list might be extended in-
definitely in other lines. This very incomplete sketch seeks
but to give a small contribution to the full tribute merited by
the Irish in America.
" See James Melvin Lee, History of American Journalism.
Tor interesting discussion of early American painting see History of the Rise
and Progress of the Arts of Design in United States, by Dmilap himself.
A PRAYER UPON THE SEA.
BY CHARLES J. POWERS, C.S.P.
My weal art Thou, Lord, and the bourn,
Though adverse winds my course would stay.
And the faint light hath made the way
Of my frail bark, and tempest torn.
Unsafe upon an angry sea.
Now dim I see the distant shore.
Guide me when I shall see no more.
When I shall have no light save Thee.
THE LOYALIST.
BY JAMES FRANCIS BARRETT.
Chapter V.
I HE corner of Market and Front Streets was brisk
-with life and activity at twelve, the change hour,
every day. Here assembled the merchants of the
city, members of the upper class who cared enough
about the rest of the world to make an inquiry into
its progress; men of leisure about town, whose
vocation in life was to do nothing and who had the entire day
in which to do it All conditions, all varieties of character joined
the ranks. Soldiers, restless from the monotony of army life
and desirous of the license usually associated with leave of ab-
sence, civilians eager in the pursuit of truth or of scandal; pa-
triots impatient with the yoke of foreign rule; Tories exasperated
with the turn of the war and its accompanying privations — all
gathered together at the Old Londou Coffee House day after day.
It stood, an imposing three-storied square structure, with a
great wing extending far in the rear. Its huge roof, fashioned for
all the world after a truncated pyramid with immense gables pro-
jecting from its sides, gave every indication of having sheltered
many a guest from the snows and rains of winter. A great chim-
ney ran up the side and continually belched forth smoke and
sparks, volumes of them, during the days and nights of the cold
winter season. A portico of no particular style of architecture
ran around two sides of the ancient building and afforded a meet-
ing place for the majority of the guests. It was furnished with
many chairs, faithfully tenanted when the season was propitious.
Thither Stephen and Mr. Allison were directing their steps
more than a week after they had last met at the home of the latter.
By the merest chance they met. Stephen was seeking a healthful
reaction from a vigorous walk through the less frequented part
of the city; Mr. Allison was making his daily visit to the Coffee
House. Stephen had often heard of the tavern, but had never
been there. Still be was resolved to seek an introduction to its
clientele at the first propitious moment. That moment bad now
come.
Upon entering, their attention was at once arrested by the
animated discussion in progress at a table in the nearest comer
1920.] THE LOYALIST 797
of the room. An officer of the Governor's Guard, in full regi-
mentals, booted and spurred, in company with a gentleman, finely
dressed, was talking loudly with Jim Cadwalader, who was seated
before them holding a half-opened newspaper in his hand. It
was plain to be seen that the soldier was somewhat under the
influence of liquor, yet one could not call him intoxicated.
''Gi' me that an' I'll show y'," exclaimed the soldier as he
grabbed the paper from Cadwalader's hand.
" T' were told,' he went on to read from it, *that it was t'
avoid the 'stabl'shment 'r count'nancin',' he half mumbled the
words, 'of Pop'ry; an' that Pop'ry was 'tabl'shed in Canada (where
't was only tol'rated). And is not Pop'ry now as much 'stabl'shed
by law in your state 's any other rel'gion?' "Just what I was
sayin'," he interpolated. " *So that your Gov'nor and all your
rulers may be Papists, and you may have a Mass-House in ev'ry
corner o' your country (as some places already 'xper'ence).' "
"There!" he snarled as he threw back the paper, "Isn't that
what I wuz tryin' t' tell y'."
"You can't tell me nothin', Forrest," retorted Jim.
"Course I can't. Nobody kin. Y' know 't all."
"I can mind my own bus'ness."
"There y'are agin," shouted Forrest, "y' know 't all, ye do."
"Don't say that again." Jim flared back at him. "I'll— I'll—
I'll—. Don't say it again, that's all."
" 'Cause y' know 'ts true."
"It's a lie," Jim interrupted him. "Ye know it's a lie. But
I don't 'spect much of ye, 'r of the Gov'nor either. None of ye
'11 ever be Papists."
"Now y'are talkin' sens'ble; first sens'ble thing you've said
t'day. No Papists here if we kin help it."
Stephen and Mr. Allison, keenly interested in this remark,
moved nearer to the table. Cadwalader was well known to Mr.
Allison. The others were total strangers.
"What's he goin' t' do about the help from France? Refuse
it 'cause it's from a Catholic country?" asked Jim.
"He don't like it and never did."
"Is he fool 'nough t' think we can win this war without
help?"
"He won it once."
"When?"
"Saratoga."
"That's his story. We didn't have it won and it won't be
won without troops and with somethin' besides shin-plasters."
He turned sideways, crossed one leg over the other and began
798 THE LOYALIST [M
to drum upon the table. "We must hev help/' he went on. "We
must hev it and it must come from France 'r Spain."
"There y* are agin," repeated Forrest, "as if one wuzn't as
much under th' Pope as th' other."
"Forrest!" he turned toward him and shook his finger at
him in a menacing sort of a way: "Don't say that again. Mind
what I tell ye. Don't say it again — that's all. When I'm mad,
I'm not myself."
"Is that so? I s'pose I'm wrong agin, an' you're right Tell
me this. What did yer fool leg'slature in Vi'ginya th' other day?"
"I don't know," murmured Jim. "What did they do?"
"There y' are agin. I thought y' knew it all. Think y*
know ev'rythin' an' y' know nothin'. Passed a resolution fur a
Papist priest, didn't they?"
"And why?" pronounced Jim, flushed with anger, his lower
lip quivering with emotion. " 'Cause he did more fur his coun-
try than you or I'll ever do. Father Gibault. And if it wazn't fur
him, Colonel Clark 'd never hev op'n'd th' Northwest"
"That's just what I say. The Papists '11 soon own the whole
damn country."
Stephen and Mr. Allison moved as if to join the discussion,
which at this juncture had become loud enough to lose the char-
acter of intimacy. Jim was well known to the guests of the
house. The man, who was known as Forrest, was, as his uniform
indicated, a Colonel in the army. The other man was a stranger.
Much younger' than his companion, tall, manly, clad in a suit of
black, with his hair in full dress, well powdered and gathered
behind in a large silken bag, he gave every appearance of culture
and refinement. He wore a black cocked hat whose edges were
adorned with a black feather about an inch in depth, his knees,
as well as his shoes, were ornamented with silver buckles.
"If they did own th' country," was Jim's grave reply, **we'd
hev a healthier place to live in than we now hev."
" 'N whose doin' it?" shouted Forrest "the Papists."
"Thou liest!" interrupted Mr. Allison, intruding himself into
their midst, "a confounded lie. Remember, the Catholics have
given their all to this war — their goods, their money, their sons."
"Heigh-ho! Who're you?" asked the soldier. "What d' you
know 'bout the army? Hardly 'nough *f them to go aroun'."
"A malicious untruth. Why half the rebel army itself is
reported to have come from Ireland."
"How do you know?"
"From the testimony of General Robertson in the House
of Lords. And if these soldiers are Irishmen, you can wager
1920.] THE LOYALIST 799
they're Catholics. And why should we pass laws 'gainst these
crowds of Irish Papists and convicts who are yearly poured upon
us, unless they were Catholic convicts fleeing from the laws of
persecution?"
**What ails ye, Forrest," rejoined Jim, "can't be cured."
"Take care 'f yourself," angrily retorted the Colonel, "an*
I'll take care o' myself."
"If ye did, and yer likes did the same, we'd git along better
and the war 'd be over. I s'pose ye know that yer friend. Jay,
lost Canada to us."
"What if he did. Wazn't he right?"
And then he explained to him.
Canada had been surrendered to England by France in a
clause of the Treaty of Paris in 1763, with a stipulation, however,
that the people of the territory in question would be permitted
the free use of the French language, the prescriptions of the
French code of laws, and the practice of the Catholic religion.
South of this region and west of the English colonies, between
the Ohio and the Mississippi Rivers, stretched a vast expanse of
territory known as the Northwest Territory, where dwelt a large
population without laws, with no organized form of government
save the mere caprices of petty military tyrants, placed over them
by the various seaboard colonies who severally laid claims to the
district. At the request of the people of Canada, it was voted by
the English Parliament to re-annex the territory northwest of
the Ohio to Canada and to permit the settlers to share in the
rights and privileges of the Canadian province. This was effected
by the Quebec Act in 1774.
It was truly a remarkable concession. The inhabitants of
this vast stretch of territory were freed for all time from the
tyranny of military despots, their lands and churches secured to
them and their priests given a legal title to their tithes. It was
the freest exercise of the Catholic religion under the laws of the
English Government. But what a storm of abuse and protesta-
tion was raised by the fanatical portion of the Protestant popula-
tion! The newspapers of the day abounded with articles, with
songs and squibs against the King and his Parliament. The
mother country witnessed no less virulent a campaign than the
Colonies themselves. "We may live to see our churches," wrote
one writer to the Pennsylvania Packet^ "converted into mass-
houses, and our lands plundered of tithes for the support of a
Popish clergy. The Inquisition may erect her standard in Penn-
sylvania and the city of Philadelphia may yet experience the car-
nage of St. Bartholomew's Day." Processions were formed about
800 THE LOYALIST [Mar^
the country and in some places the bust of George III., adorned
with mitre, beads and a pectoral cross, was carried in triumplial
march.
The forms of protest found their way ultimately into the
halls of the First American Congress, which convened in Phila-
delphia in 1774. The recent legislation was enumerated among
the wrongs done the Colonies by the mother country. Feeling
became so bitter that an address was issued by the Congress on
the fifth of September, 1774, "to the people of Great Britain/'
saying : "We think the Legislature of Great Britain is not author-
ized by the Constitution to establish a religion, fraught with san-
guinary and impious tenets, or to erect an arbitrary form of gov-
ernment in any quarter of the globe." "By another act the Do-
minion of Canada is to be extended, modeled and governed, as
that being disunited from us, detached from our interests by
civil as well as religious prejudices, that by their numbers daily
swelling with Catholic emigrants from Europe, and by their devo-
tion to administration so friendly to their religion, they might
become formidable to us, and on occasion be fit instruments in the
hands of power to reduce the ancient free Protestant colonies
to the same state of slavery with themselves." Little did they
think that the breach they were attempting to heal was only
widened by their procedure. The author of the address was John
Jay, a lawyer from New York, with whom Popery was a mania.
Nor did the failure of this method of diplomacy become
apparent until several years later. The measure of appreciation
and the expression of sentiment of the Canadian people in regard
to this ill-timed and unchristian address, conceived in a fit of
passion and by no means representative of the saner portion of
the population, took expression at a more critical time. When,
in 1776, the members of the same Congress, viewing with alarm
the magnitude of the struggle upon which they had entered and
to whose success they had pledged their honor, their fortunes
and their lives, sought to enlist the resources of their neighbors
in Canada, they met with a sudden and calamitous disappoint-
ment. To effect an alliance with the border brethren, three Com-
missioners were appointed — ^Benjamin Franklin, Samuel Chase
and Charles Carroll of Carrollton. Father John Carroll, a Jesuit
priest, was invited by the Congress to accompany the party.
Arriving in Canada, it soon became evident to the committee
that their mission was to be unproductive of results. The Govern-
ment did not take kindly to them, nor would the Bishop of
Quebec and his clergy trust the vague expressions of the United
Colonies, whose statute books, they pointed out, still bore the
1920.] THE LOYALIST 801
most bitter and unchristian sentiments against all priests and
adherents of the ancient Church. Bigotry had apparently de-
feated their purpose. How was still obscure, until it was dis-
covered that the British Government had taken John Jay's ad-
dress, translated it into French and spread it broadcast through-
out Canada. **Behold the spirit of the Colonists/' it went on to
remind the people, "and if you join forces with them, they will
turn on you and extirpate your religion in the same manner as
they did in the Catholic colony of Maryland."
The effect is historical. The Commissioners were compelled
to return; the brave Montgomery was killed before the walls of
the city; Canada was lost to the Colonies and forever forfeited
as an integral part of the United States; all of which was due
to the narrowness and intolerance of those who in the supreme
hour could not refrain from the fanaticism of bigotry.
It must be said, however, out of justice to the Colonists, that
they did not persist in their spirit of antagonism towards the
Catholics. The commencement of the struggle against the com-
mon foe, together with the sympathetic and magnanimous concur-
rence of the Catholics with the patriots in all things, soon changed
their prejudices in favor of a more united and vigorous effort in
behalf of their joint claims. The despised Papists now became
ardent and impetuous patriots. The leaders in the great struggle
soon began to reflect an added lustre to the nation that gave them
birth and to the Church which taught them devotion to their
land. The rank and file began to swarm with men of the Catho-
lic faith, so many indeed, that their great Archbishop, John
Carroll, could write of them that "their blood flowed as freely
(in proportion to their numbers) to cement the fabric of inde-
pendence, as that of any of their fellow citizens. They concurred
with perhaps greater unanimity than any other body of men in
recommending and promoting that government from whose in-
fluence America anticipates all the blessings of justice, peace,
plenty, good order and civil and religious liberty."
Only among the few was the spirit of intolerance still ram-
pant, and among these might be numbered Colonel Forrest.
"See now who's t' blame, don't ye? The likes o' ye an' that
poltroon. Jay, up there in New York. See who started this affair,
don't ye?"
"That's what you say. Egad, I could say all that an' save
half the breath. I've got my 'pinion, though and that'll do fur
me."
**Ye're so narrow, Forrest, y've only one side.
"Is that so? Well, so is the Governor."
VOL. ex. 51
802 THE LOYALIST [Mar^
''Is that his opinion, too?' impatiently asked Mr. Allison.
"What?"
''Does he view matters in that light?"
"Did I say he did/'
"Yes."
There was no further response.
Stephen had, by this time, become thoroughly exasperated
with this man, and was about to eject him forcibly from the
room. His better judgment, however, bade him restrain himself.
A tilt in a public drinking house would only noise his name
abroad and perhaps give rise to much unpleasantness.
"How can a man consistently be subject to any civil ruler
when already he has pledged his allegiance, both in soul and in
body, to another potentate?"
This from the man in black, the member of the party who
heretofore had maintained an impartial and respectful silence,
not so much from choice perhaps, as through necessity. His name
proved to be John Anderson.
'Ton mean an alien?" Stephen inquired.
"If you are pleased to so term it. The Pope is a temporal
lord, you understand, and as such is due allegiance from every
one of his subjects."
And then Stephen took pains to explain clearly and con-
cisely the great difference between the two authorities — ^the civU
and the religious. The Prince of Peace had said: "Render unto
Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that
are God's," which declaration admitted of an interpretation at
once comprehensive and exclusive. He explained how the Catho-
lic found himself a member of two distinct and perfect societies,
each independent and absolute within its own sphere, the one
deriving its charter from the natural law, the other directly from
God. He then pointed out how these societies lived m perfect
harmony, although armed with two swords, the one spiritual,
the other temporal, weapons which were intended never to clash
but to fight side by side for the promotion of man's happiness,
temporal and eternal.
"But it is inconceivable how a clash can be avoided," Mr.
Anderson reminded him.
"Not when it is remembered that each authority is mde-
pendent of the other. The Church has no power over civil legis-
lation in matters purely secular, nor has the State a right to
interfere in ecclesiastical legislation, in matters purely spiritual,
nor over spiritual persons considered strictly as such. In every
Catholic country, the king, as well as the humblest peasant, is
1920.] THE LOYALIST 803
subject to the laws of his country in secular matters, and to the
laws of his Church in matters spiritual."
'Tet at the same time he cannot fail to recognize that the
one is superior to the other.**
*'Only so far as the spiritual order is superior to the secular."
^'Not in temporal affairs as well?"
*'Not in the least. Only in the recognition of the fact that
the salvation of the soul is of more importance than the welfare
of the body. In this is the mission of the State considered
inferior to that of the Church."
"If this be true, how can a Catholic pay allegiance to a
society which he believes to be a subordinate one?"
*'He does not consider it subordinate. U is supreme within
its own sphere. Theoretically it is subordinatq in this: that the
care of the soul comes first; then that of the body. The State
is the greatest institution in matters secular, and in this regard
superior to the Church. The Church makes no pretence of in-
fallibility in statesmanship. Hence a Catholic who is true to his
Church and her teachings makes the best citizen."
••Why?"
'^Because to him, patriotism is inculcated by religion.
Throughout his whole life his soul has been nurtured by his
Church on a twofold pabulum — love of God and love of country."
'The Catholic Church expressly teaches that? I thought — "
''Exactly," agreed Stephen, interrupting him. "The Catholic
has been taught that the civil authority, to which he owes and
pays allegiance, is something divine; for him it is the authority
of God vested in His creatures and he gives ear to its voice and
yields to it a submission as befits a child of God, doing His Will
in all things. For he recognizes therein the sound of the Divine
Voice."
"I see."
"He remembers the teaching of his Church, derived from the
words of St. Paul writing on this subject to the citizens of Rome:
'Let every man be subject to higher powers, for there is no power
but from God; and those that are, are ordained of God,' and the
letter of St. Peter, the first Pope: 'Be ye subject, therefore, to
every human creature for God's sake; whether it be to the king
as excelling; or to governors as sent by him — for so is the will
of God.' "
'Tou must have been reading the Bible," interrupted Mr.
Allison with a smile.
"I have," answered Stephen, as he continued with little or
no attention to the interruption :
804 THE LOYALIST [Mar.,
"The Catholic obeys the voice of his rightly constituted
authority because he feels that he is obeying the voice of his
God, and when he yields obedience to the law of his land, he
feels that he is yielding obedience to God Himself. His ruler is
the mouthpiece of God; the Constitution of his State a most
sacred thing because it is the embodiment of the authority of
God, and he would rather die than commit any untoward or un-
lawful deed which might undermine or destroy it, precisely
because it is from God."
There was no response. All had listened with attention to
Stephen as he emphasized point after point. All, save Colonel
Forrest who wore a sardonic smile throughout it all.
"You should 've talked like that on Guy Fawkes' Day," he
muttered, "if you wanted t' hev some fun. We'd hev some hot
tar fur you."
"Thank God!" replied Stephen. "We shall witness no more
such outbreaks of fanaticism. They have long enough disgraced
our country. They are, I trust, forever ended."
"The Pope Day Celebration ended?" asked Anderson in sur-
prise.
"I hope so. Since General Washington issued the order soon
after taking command of the army, abolishing the celebration,
the practice has never been resumed."
"Wash'ton thinks he owns th* country," mumbled Forrest
in a half articulate manner. "Likes th' Papists, he does. No
more Pope Day! Cath'lic gen'rals! French al-lies! P'rhaps 'II
send fur th' Pope next. Give 'm 'is house, p'rhaps. Give 'im th'
whole coun'ry. No damn good to us, he ain't. No damn
good—"
The next moment Stephen was upon him with his hands
about his throat, his face flaming with rage and passion.
"You hound! No more of that; or your treason will end
forever."
He shook his head violently, tightening his fingers about
his throat. As he did, Forrest writhing in the chair under his
attack, began to fumble with his hand at his hip as if instinctively
seeking something there. Stephen's eyes followed the movement,
even while he, too, relaxed his hold to seize with his free hand
the arm of his adversary. Only for a moment, however, for he
immediately felt himself seized from behind by the shoulders
and dragged backwards from his man and completely over-
powered.
The man who was known as Anderson took charge of the
Colonel, helping him to his feet, and without further words led
1620-] THE LOYALIST 805
him to one side of the room* talking softly but deliberately to
him as he did so.
A moment later they had passed through the door and
vanished down the street in the direction of the Square.
Chapter VI.
The morrow was one of those rare days when all nature
seems to invite one to go forth and enjoy the good things within
her keepings. The sun rose menacing; unless the wind shifted
before noon it would be uncomfortably warm. Still, the air was
bracing and fragrant with the soft perfume distilled by the pines.
Stephen felt the earth to be in tune as he made his early
morning toilet, gazing the while into the garden from his widely
opened window, and responded instinctively to the call of the
countryside. The disagreeable episode of the preceding day had
left unpleasant recollections in his mind which disconcerted him
not a little during his waking hours. He did not repent his
action; he might have repeated the performance under similar
circumstances, yet he chided himself for his lack of reserve and
composure and his great want of respect to a superior officer.
He was early mounted and on his way, striking off in the
direction of the Germantown Road. He had left word with his
landlady of his intended destination, with the added remark that
he would be back in a short time, a couple of hours at the most,
and that he would attend to the business of the day upon his re-
turn. What that might amount to he had no idea at all, being
preoccupied entirely with what he had to do in the immediate
present, for he made it a point never to permit the more serious
affairs of Kfe to intrude upon his moments of relaxation.
He was a pleasant figure to look upon: smoothfaced and
athletic, well mounted and dressed with great preciseness. On
his well-shaped hands he wore leathern gauntlets; he was in
his uniform of buff and blue; beneath his coat he had his steel-
buckled belt with his holster and pistol in it; he wore his cocked
hat with a buff cockade affixed, the insignia of his rank in the
service.
The road lay in the direction of Marjorie's house. Perhaps
he chose to ride along this way in order that he might be obliged
to pass her door, and then again, perhaps, that was but of second-
ary import. This was no time for analysis, and so he refused to
study his motives. He did know that he had not seen her for a
long time, the longest time it seemed, and that he had had no
word from her since then, save the intelligence received from her
806 THE LOYALIST [Mar^
father yesterday in response to his repeated inquiries concerning
her welfare and that of her mother.
"Let us turn up here, Dolly, old girl.*' He leaned forward
a little to pat the mare's neck affectionately as he spoke, while
at the same time he pulled the right rein slightly, turning her
head in the direction indicated. "And if we are fortunate, we
shall catch a glimpse of her."
Dolly raised her ears very erect and opened full her nostrils
as if to catch some possible scent of her of whom he spoke.
She pierced the distance with her eyes but saw no one and so
settled herself into an easy canter, for she knew it to be more to
her rider's advantage to proceed at a slowing pace until they
had passed the house in question.
"You are an intelligent old girl, Dolly, but I must not let
you too far into the secrets of my mind. Still, you have shared
my delights and woes alike and have been my one faithful friend.
Why should I not tell you?"
And yet they had been friends for no great length of time.
They had met at Valley Forge, shortly after Stephen's appoint-
ment to General Washington's staff. As an aide he was required
to be mounted and, by a piece of good fortune, he had been
allowed to choose from several the chestnut mare that now bore
him. He gave her the best of care and affection and she recipro-
cated in as intelligent a manner as she knew how.
**You have served well, but I feel that there is much greater
work before us, much greater than our quest of the present."
They were nearing the house. For some reason or other,
Dolly whinnied as he spoke, probably in acquiescence to his
thought, probably in recognition of the presence of her rival.
She might have seen, had she cared to turn her head, a trim,
lithe form passing to the rear of the house. Stephen took pains
to see her, however, and as she turned her head, doffed his hat
in salute. The next moment, Dolly felt the reins tighten and
whether she desired it or not, found her head turned in that
direction. Her rider was soon dismounted and was leading her
to the side of the road.
"You are early astir. Mistress Marjorie. I had anticipated
no such pleasure this morning."
"It is mutual," replied Marjorie, smiling as she offered him
her hand. "How came you so early? No new turn of events,
I hope!"
"Not in the least. I desired a few hours in the saddle before
the heat of the day set in, and my guardian angel must have
directed me along this path."
1920,] THE LOYALIST 807
Dolly raised both her ears and turned towards him, while
she noisily brought her hoof down upon the sod. ''What a rascal!"
she thought to herself.
The girl dropped her eyes demurely and then asked hurriedly :
"There are no new developments?"
"None that I know of."
"Nothing came of the trouble at the Inn?"
"Then you know?"
"All. Father told me."
"He should not have told you."
"It was my doing. I give him no peace until I had learned
all."
Dolly grew weary of this pleasantry and wandered away to
gladden her lips on the choice morsels of the tender grass.
"I deeply regret my indiscretion, though it was for his sake."
"You mean—?"
"His Excellency."
"I might have done likewise, were I able. Colonel Forrest
is most disagreeable."
"He was not wholly culpable and so I forgave his insulting
remarks against us, but I forgot myself entirely when General
Washington's name was besmirched."
"I fear further trouble," she sighed.
"From him?"
She nodded her head.
"Nonsense ! There will be naught said about the whole affair
and it will end where it began. Forrest is no fool."
"I have other news for you. Captain," announced Marjorie,
her eyes beaming at the prospect.
"And how long have you been preserving it for me?" asked
Stephen.
'But a few days.
'And you made no attempt to see me?
'Had I not met you now, I would have done so this day,
answered Marjorie.
*Tou would have written?"
"Perhaps."
"It is my forfeiture to your reserve."
"And made gallantly."
"Come now! What had you to tell?"
"This. Peggy desires the honor of your company. You wiU
leceive the invitation in a day or two. Just an informal affair,
yet I sensed the possibility of your pleasure."
'Tou did right. I am pleased as I am honored, but neither
808 THE LOYALIST [Mar.,
so much as I am elated at the hopes for the future. Of course,
I shall accept, but you will have to promise to denote my path
for me in the tangled maze of society, in whose company I am as
yet hardly a novice.
"Lud! I ne*er heard one so illil)eral of his graces.*'
"Nor one more candid," Stephen rejoined as quickly. If
he were good at repartee, he had met with one who was equally
as apt.
"You know the Governor will be in attendance," she declared
in a matter of fact manner.
"How should I know that? Is it unusual for him to frequent
the company of the gay?"
"Not of late, the more especially where the presence of
Peggy is concerned," added the little tale bearer with a keen,
though reckless, wit.
"And why Peggy?" He was innocent enough in his
question.
"Have you not heard of His Excellency's courting? Mr.
Shippen has already made public the rumor that a certain great
General is laying close siege to the heart of Peggy. And I have
Peggy's own word for it."
"To Peggy?" He asked with evident surprise. "Why she
but halves his age, and he is already a widower."
"With three sons," Marjorie proudly added. "No matter.
Peggy will meet the disparity of ages by the disparity of stations.
She has avowed to me that no one dares to question the social
preeminence of the Military Governor, nor the fact that he is
the most dashing and perhaps most successful general of the
Continental Army. Position in life is of prime importance to
her."
Is that so? I had not so judged her," was the comment.
'She admits that herself, and makes no secret of it before
anyone. Did you not observe her sullen silence at the ball upon
learning of the identity of her inferior partner? And that she
sat out the major portion of the dance in company with the Mili-
tary Governor?"
"It escaped my attention, for I was too deeply concerned
with another matter which distracted me for the entire evening,"
he answered with a smile.
She pretended to take no notice, however, and continued:
'^ell he has been calling regularly since that evening, and
this quiet and informal function has been arranged primarily in
his honor, although it will not be so announced. You will go?"
she asked.
"]
1920.] THE LOYALIST 809
''I shall be pleased to accept her invitation. May I accom-
pany you?"
'Thank you. I almost hoped you would say that. Men
folks are so sadly wanting in intuition."
"Friday then? Adieu! The pleasure that awaits me is im-
measureable."
"Until Friday."
She extended to him her hand, which he pressed. A mo-
ment later he was mounted.
"My kindest to your mother. She will understand." Dolly
broke into a gallop.
Marjorie stood at the gate post until he was quite lost from
view around the turn of the road. He did not look back, yet she
thought that he might have. She slowly turned and as slowly
began to walk towards the house, there to resume the duties
which had suffered such a pleasant interruption.
Meanwhile, she tried to analyze this young man. He was
rather deep, of few words on any given subject, but wholly non-
communicative as regards himself. He perhaps was possessed
of more intuition than his manner would reveal, although he
gave every appearance of arriving at his conclusions by the sheer
force of logic. His words and deeds never betrayed his whole
mind, of that she was certain, yet he could assert himself rather
forcibly when put to the test as at the painful incident in the
Coffee House. He would never suffer from soul-paralysis,
thought she, for want of decision or resolution, for both were
written full upon him.
That she was strangely attracted to him she knew very well,
but why, and how, she was unable to discover. This was but
their third meeting, yet she felt as if she had known him all her
life, so frank, so unreserved, so open, so secure did she feel in
his presence. It seemed the most natural thing in the world for
her to have waved her hand in salute to him that morning as he
passed; she did it with the same unconcern as if she had known
him all her life.
There was something prepossessing about him. Perhaps it
was his faculty for doing the unexpected. Most women desire to
meet a man of distinctive individuality, who lends continual in-
terest to them by his departure from the trite and commonplace.
What Stephen might say or do was an entirely unknown quan-
tity until it had actually taken place, and this attracted her on
the instant, whether she was conscious of it or not. His manner,
too, was affable, and gave him an air at once pleasing and good
natured. He never flattered, yet said most agreeable things.
810 THE LOYALIST [Mar^
putting one perfectly at ease and inspiring sympathy and courage.
He bore himself well; erect, manly, dignified, without ostenta-
tion or display. His seriousness, his evenness, his gravity, his
constancy and his decision stamped him with a certain authority,
a man of marked personality and character.
So she mused as she entered the door, her thoughts in a lofty
hegira to the far-off land of make-believe — her better self striv-
ing to marshal them to the cold realities of duty that lay before
her. She had been cleaning the little addition at the rear of the
dwelling proper, used as a kitchen, and her work took her into
the yard. Dolly's whinny had caused her to turn her head and
the next moment cares, responsibilities and all else were for-
gotten. Now she wondered what had she been about! Seizing
a cloth she began to dust industriously. The crash of one of
the dishes on the kitchen floor, brought her to her senses. Her
mother heard the noise from the adjoining room:
"What ails thee, child? Hast thou lost thy reason?"
"I believe so, mommy. I must have been thinking of other
things." And she stooped to gather the fragments.
"Was it Captain Meagher? I saw you two at the gate."
A guilty smile stole over the corner of her mouth.
"He was passing while I was in the yard, and he stopped
only to wish me the greetings of the day. I was right glad that
he did, for I had an opportunity of extending to him the invitation
from Peggy."
"He will go, I suppose?" Mrs. Allison queried, knowing well
what the answer might be. She did not spare the time to stop
in conversation, but continued with her duties.
"He is quite pleased. And mommy, he will call for me."
"Be careful, now, to break no more dishes."
"Lud! I have not lost my head yet. That was purely an
accident which will not happen again."
"That poor unfortunate Spangler made a better defende."
"He deserved what he got. So did Lieutenant Lyons and
the other officers of the Ranger who deserted to the enemy. But
my sympathies went out to the old man who kept the gates under
the city. These court-martials are becoming too common and I
don't like them."
"That is the horrible side of war, my dear. And until our
people learn the value of patriotism, the need of abolishing all
foreign ties and strongly adhering to the land that has offered
them a home and a living, the necessity of these dreadful meas-
ures will never cease."
1920.] THE LOYALIST 811
"A little power is a dangerous weapon to thrust into a man's
hand, unless he be great enough to wield it."
"Now you are going to say that General Arnold is to blame
for these tragedies."
"No I am not. But I do think that a great deal more of
clemency could be exercised. Many of those poor tradesmen
who were convicted and sentenced to be hanged, could have been
pardoned with equal security."
"That is the law, my dear, and the law is God's will. Leave
all to Him."
Mrs. Allison was one of those good souls who saw no harm
in the vilest of creatures; faults were overclouded by her veil of
sympathy. When distressing reverses or abject despair visited
any one, Mrs. Allison's affability and indescribable tenderness
smoothed over the troubled situation and brought to light a
gleam of gladness. Quiet, kindly, magnanimous, tolerant, she
could touch hearts to the depths in a manner both winning and
lasting. Whether the fault entailed a punishment undeserved
or inevitable, her feeling of pity was excited. She always sym-
pathized without accusing or probing the source of the evil. She
stretched forth a helping hand merely to aid. No nature, how-
ever hard, could be impervious to the sympathy and the sweet-
ness of her affectionate disposition.
Motherly, was the quality written full upon Mrs. Allison's
face. Her thoughts, her schemes, her purposes, her ambitions
of life, were all colored by this maternal attribute. In her daily
homage and obeisance to God, Whom she worshipped with the
most childlike faith and simplicity; in the execution of the mani-
fold duties of her home, Marjorie was to her ever her treasure of
very great price. She was sustained in her aims and purposes by
an enduring power of will — a power clothed with the soft, warm,
living flesh of a kindly heart. Her marriage with Matthew Alli-
son had been happy, a happiness intensified and concretely em-
bodied in Marjorie, the only child vouchsafed to them by the
Creator. It was Marjorie for whom she lived and toiled and
purposed. And it was Marjorie who embodied the sum-total of
her fancies, and ambitions and aspirations and translated them
into definite forms and realities.
A beautiful landscape unrolled itself before Stephen as he
leisurely rode along the Germantown road. The midsummer
sun was now high in the heavens, with just a little stir in the
air to temper its warmth and oppressiveness. Fragments of
clouds, torn loose from some great heap massed beyond the ridge
812 THE LOYALIST [Mar^
of low hills to the westward, drifted lazily across the waste of
blue sky, wholly unconcerned as to their ultimate lot or destina-
tion. Breaths of sweet odor, from freshly cut hay or the hidden
foliage bounding the road, were wafted along in the embraces of
the gentle breeze. Away to the left and before him, as his horse
cantered along, swelled the countryside in gentle undulations of
green and brown, disfigured now and again by irregular patches
of field and orchard yielding to cultivation; while to the side a
stone wall humped itself along the winding road into the dis-
tance, its uniformity of contour broken here and there by a
trellis work of yellow jasmine or crimson rambler, alternately
reflecting lights and shadows from the passing clouds and sun-
shine. It was a day when all nature was in perfect tune, its
harmony sweetly blending with the notes of gladness that
throbbed in Stephen's heart. Yet he was scarce aware of it all,
so completely absorbed was he in the confusion of his own
thought.
He had a very clear idea of what he was to do in the imme-
diate present, but he had no idea at all of what was to be done
in the immediate future. First of all he would attend Mistress
Marjorie at this informal affair, where, perhaps, he might learn
more about the Military Governor. He half surmised that His
Excellency was not kindly disposed towards Catholics in general,
although he could not remember any concrete case in particular
to substantiate his claim. Still he knew he was avowedly op-
posed to the French Alliance, as were many illustrious citizens;
and he presumed his feelings were due in part at least to the fact
that France was a recognized Catholic country. There was a
negative argument, too: no Catholic name was ever found
among his appointments. These were but surmises, not evidence
upon which to base even a suspicion, nevertheless, they were
worthy of some consideration until a conclusion of a more definite
nature was warranted.
That the Governor was becoming decidedly more unpopular
every day he knew very well. The fact that he possessed the
finest stable of horses in the city, and entertained at the most
costly of dinners, at a time when the manner of living was ex-
tremely frugal, not so much from choice as from necessity, and
at a time when the value of the Continental currency had de-
preciated to almost nothing, occasioned a host of acrid criticisms
not only in the minds of the displeased populace, but also in the
less friendly columns of the daily press.
Censures of the harshest nature were continually uttered
against the Governor's conduct of the affairs of the city govern-
1920.] THE LOYALIST 813
ment together with his earlier order closing the shops. Now the
use that he began to make of the government wagons in moving
the stores excited further complaints of a more public nature,
the more so that no particular distinction was being made as to
whether the stores belonged to the Whigs or the offending Tories.
It was no idle gossip that he curried favor with the upper Tory
class of the city, now particular mention was made of his infatua-
tion with the daughter of Edward Shippen. It was whispered,
too, that the misuse of his authority in the grant of safe passes
to and from New York had led to the present act of the Con-
gress in recalling all passes. Stephen knew all this and he sur-
mised more; so he longed for the opportunity to study intimate-
ly this man now occupying the highest military post in the city
and the State.
For the present he would return home and bide his time
until Friday evening, when he would have the happiness of escort-
ing Marjorie to the home of Peggy Shippen.
''I wonder Dolly, old girl, if I can make myself bold enough
to call her Marjorie. Marjorie, Margaret,'* he repeated them
over to himself. "I don*t know which is the prettier. She would
be a pearl among women; and she is, isn't she, Dolly?"
He would ask her at any rate. He would be her partner for
the evening, would dance with her, and would sit by her side.
Peggy would be there, too, and the General. He would observe
them closely, and, perchance, converse with them. Colonel For-
rest and the General's active aid-de-camp. Major Franks, a Phila-
delphian, but a Jew, would also be present. Altogether the eve-
ning promised to be interesting as well as happy.
He was musing in this manner when he heard the hoof beats
of a horse, heavily ridden, gaining upon him in the rear. He
drew up and half turned, instinctively, at the strange yet famil-
iar sound. Suddenly there hove into view, at the bend of the
road, an officer of the Continental Army, in full uniform, booted
and spurred, whose appearance caused him to turn full about to
await him. It was not long before he recognized the familiar
figure of the aide. Major Franks, and he lifted his arm to salute.
"Captain Meagher, I have orders for your arrest."
"Sir?" answered Stephen in alarm.
"On charges preferred by Colonel Forrest. You are to come
with me at once."
An embarrassing silence ensued. Stephen then saluted, and
handed over his side arms. He wheeled his horse and set off in
the direction indicated, his thoughts in a turmoil.
The Major fell in at the rear.
814 THE LOYALIST [M
Chapter VII.
'Tor still my memory lingers on the scenes
And pleasures of the days beyond recall.
»»
Peggy's voice, timid, soft though pretty, died away into an
enraptured silence which seemed to endure for the longest while
before the room burst into a generous measure of applause. She
was very well accompanied on the clavichord by Miss Rutteledge
and on the harp by Monsieur Ottow, Secretary to the French
Minister. The evening had been delightful; the assembly brU-
liant in quality, and unaffectedly congenial and diverting. The
music had contributed much to the pleasures of the function,
for the Shippen's was one of the few homes in the city where
such a resource was at all possible.
"Major! Major Franks! What do you think of my little
girl? Do you think 'twould be well for her to cultivate such a
voice?"
Mrs. Shippen turned sideways. There was gratification,
genuine complacent gratification, visible in every line of her
smiling face.
"Splendid! Splendid! Of course. Madame, she sings very
prettily," replied the Major, gathering himself from the state of
partial repose into which he had fallen. He sat up.
"And do you know. Major," went on the fond mother, "she
never had a tutor; except some of our dear friends who made
this their home during the winter."
•Tou mean the British?"
"Of course, they did not make so free with everybody in the
city, with only a few, you know. It was for General Howe him-
self that Margaret first made bold enough to sing."
"She does very well, I am sure," was the reply.
The little group again lapsed into silence as Peggy responded
with an encore, this selection being a patriotic air of a lighter
vein. The Major again lapsed into an easy attitude, but Mrs.
Shipman was visibly intent upon every motion of the singer and
followed her every syllable.
"How much does music contribute to one's pleasure!" she
remarked when the conversation began to stir.
"It is charming," Mr. Anderson observed.
"And do you know that we inherited that clavichord? It is
one of the oldest in the country."
"It appears to be of rare design," remarked Mr. Anderson.
"It belonged to Mr. Shippen's father," she boasted. "This
house, you know, was the home of Edward Shippen, who was
1920.] THE LOYALIST 815
Mayor of the city over an hundred years ago. It was then, if I
do say it, the most pretentious home in the city. My husband
was for disposing of it and removing to less fashionable quarters,
but I would not hear of it. Never!"
Major Franks surveyed the great room deliberately.
"Twould make a fine castle!'* he commented as he half
turned and crossed one knee over the other. He felt that this
would be his last visit if he continued to take any less interest,
yet even that apparently caused him no great concern.
And yet, a great house it was, the quondam residence of
Edward Shippen, the progenitor of the present family, a former
Mayor of the city, who had fled thither from Boston where he
had suffered persecution at the hands of the Puritans, who could
not suffer him to be a Quaker. It stood on an eminence outside
the city, yet overlooking it all, with its great orchard, its summer
house, its garden smiling with roses, and lilies; bordered by
rows of yellow pines shading the rear, with a spacious green lawn
away to the front affording a view unobstructed to the Delaware
shore. At the time of its construction was easily the most sump-
tuous home in the city.
The Shippens had been the leaders of the fashionable set,
not alone in days gone by, the days of the colonial manners when
diversions and enjoyments were indulged in as far as the auster-
ities of the staid old Quaker code would allow, but also during
the days of the present visitation of the British, when emulation
ran riot among the townsfolk, in the entertainment of the visitors.
Small wonder that the present lord of the manor felt constrained
to write to his father that he should be under the necessity of
removing from this luxurious abode to Lancaster, "for the style
of living my fashionable daughters have introduced into my
family and their dress will I fear before long oblige me to change
the scene." Yet if the truth were told, the style of living in-
augurated by the ambitious daughters was no less a heritage than
a part of the discipline in which they had been reared.
If the sudden and forced departure of the dashing, as well
as the eligible, British ofiBcers from the city had totally upset
the cherished social aspirations of the mother of the Shippen
girls, the advent of the gallant and unmarried Military Gov-
ernor had lifted them to a newer and much higher plane of
endeavor. The termination of a matrimonial alliance with the
second in command of the patriotic forces would more than com-
pensate for the loss of a possible British peerage. The artful
mother soon discerned that her clever and subtle devices were
beginning to meet with some degree of success.
816 THE LOYALIST [Mar.,
The present function was wholly her afifair, and while it was
announced as a purely informal gathering, the manner and the
scheme of the decorations, the elegance and the care with which
the women dressed, the order, the appointments, the refresh-
ments, not to mention the distinguished French visitors, would
permit no one to surmise this, even for a moment. Care had
been taken to issue invitations to the representative members of
the city's upper class, more especially to the newly arrived French
Officers and their wives, as well as the commissioned members
of the Ck>ntinental Army. There were the Shippen girls, their
persistent friend. Miss Chew, as well as Miss Franks, whose
brother was now attached to the staff of General Arnold, and a
dozen other young ladies, all attractive, and dressed in the pre-
vailing elegance of fashion; the hair in an enormous coiffure, in
imitation of the fashions of the French, with turbans of gauze
and spangles and ropes of pearls, the low bodices with the bow in
front, the wide sashes below. It was an altogether brilliant as-
sembly, with the Military Governor the most brilliant figure of
it all.
"Tell me. Major,'* asked Mrs. Shippen in measured and sub-
dued language as she leaned forward in an apparent confidential
manner, "does General Arnold visit often?"
"Oh yes!" replied the Major at once, "he is very generous
with his company."
Her face fell somewhat.
"Now isn't that strange ! I was told that he made a practice
of calling at no home, outside of ours."
He uncrossed his leg and shifted in his chair rather uneasily.
"Quite true." He saw at once that he had made an unhappy
remark. "But, of course, he makes no social calls, none what-
soever. You must know that the affairs of state require all of
his time, for which duty he is obliged to visit many people on
matters of pure business."
"Oh!" She appeared satisfied at this explanation.
"It seems as if we had known him all our lives. He feels so
perfectly at home with us."
"Exactly."
"You have met him often with us, haven't you, Marjorie?"
"I first met him at the Military Ball through Peggy," Mar-
jorie replied naively.
"But you must have met him here. He has been here so V
often," she insisted.
"Then I vow our General has felt the smite of your fair
daughter's charms," remarked Mr. Anderson.
1920.] THE LOYAUST 817
Marjorie breathed a sigh of relief at the timely interruption.
''Do you really think so?*' asked Mrs. Shippen, with no at-
tempt to conceal her impatience.
'Unquestionably —
'Smiles from reason flow,
To brute denied, and are of love the food.'
«i
So sang the bard, and so sing I of His Excellency."
"But his age ! He cannot now be thinking of matrimony.''
"Age, my dear Mrs. Shippen, is a matter of feeling, not of
years. The greatest miracle of love is to eradicate all disparity.
Before it age, rank, lineage, distinction dissolve like the slowly
fading light of the sun at eventide. The General is bent on con-
quest; that I'll wager. What say you, Major? A five pound
note?"
"Not I. 'Old men are twice children' you know."
The orchestra began to fill the room with the strains of the
minuet. Mr. Anderson arose and advanced towards Marjorie.
"May I have the pleasure of your company?" he said.
Marjorie arose and gave him her arm.
She tripped through the graces of the minuet in a mechan-
ical sort of fashion, her thoughts in a far-off land of amazement
and gloomy desolation. The unexpected and adverse stroke of
fortune which had descended with hawk-like velocity upon Ste-
phen had thoroughly disconcerted her. Try as she would, her
imagination could not be brought under her control. There was
one image that would not out, and that was Stephen's.
A short note from him, gave the first inkling to her. He
had been placed under arrest by order of Major-General Arnold
on the charge of striking his superior officer, in violation of the
Fifth Article, Second Section of the American Articles of War.
The charge had been preferred on the evening previous to his
arrest and bore the signature of Colonel Forrest, with whom, as
she was aware, he had participated in the affray at the Inn.
Little would come of it. Of that she could rest assured.
For if he chose to present his side of the case, cause might be
found against the Colonel in the matter of disrespectful language
against the Commander-in-Chief. On that account the affair would
very probably end where it had begun and his sword would once
more be restored to him. Should the Colonel press the case, how-
ever, it would result in a court-martial. For the present he was
under arrest. He was not confined and no limits were assigned to
him, yet he was deprived of his sword and therefore without
power to exercise any military command pending his trial. Since
▼OL. OL 52
818 THE LOYALIST [Mar^
it was considered indecorous in an ofiBcer under arrest to appear
at public places, it would be impossible for him to accompany her
to the home of the Shippens on Friday evening. This caused him
the greater concern, yet his word of honor obliged him to await
the issue of his trial or his release by the proper authority.
He bade her to be of good cheer and asked a remembrance in
her prayers, assuring her she would be ever present in his
thoughts. He would soon make use of a favorable opportunity
to pay her a call, and he hoped she would attend the party and
enjoy herself to the utmost. From the moment of its receipt,
she had rehearsed the incidents narrated in this letter over and
over again. Go where she would, her thought followed her as in-
stinctively as the homeward trail of the bee.
To follow mere instinct does not beseem a man, yet for
woman this faculty is the height of reason and will be trusted by
her to the very end. Marjorie's instinct told her that all would not
be well with Stephen, notwithstanding his place of honor on the
staff of the Commander-in-Chief, to whom he might readily appeal
should the occasion require. The charge was of minor conse-
quence, and could, under ordinary circumstances, be dismissed;
but it would not be dismissed. He would be tried, found guilty,
and sentenced. A consummation too horrible for thought!
The strange regard for this officer, which she had discovered
to be growing daily in intensity and depth, had been brought
to definite realization by the sudden crisis in Stephen's fortunes.
The sudden revelation of this truth, from which she was wont to
recoil with petulant diffidence, alarmed her not a little. She must
not allow herself to be perturbed over this incident, and no one,
not even her mother, must ever be permitted to detect the slightest
concern on her part.
"You seem unusually preoccupied this evening. Mistress Alli-
son," remarked Mr. Anderson as he led her to one side of the
room at the conclusion of the dance.
Marjorie started. She could feel herself coloring more and
more as she strove desperately to retain her natural composure.
"I? Why? No! Did I appear absent-minded?"
"As if sojourning in some far off land."
She thought for a moment.
"We all inhabit dream countries."
"True. We do. And there is no swifter vehicle to that fair
land than an inattentive companion."
"You mean — "
"That I am entirely at fault for allowing you to wander."
"You are unkind to yourself to say that."
1920.] THE LOYALIST 819
"I vow I mean it."
They neared the settee into whicii he gallantly assisted her.
She made room for him by drawing back the folds of her gown.
"Have you ever had a miniature made?" he asked of her.
"Never. I scarce gave it a thought," she replied nonchalantly.
"In that gown, you would make a perfect picture."
"Could you paint it?" she asked quickly with the attitude of
one who has proposed an impossible question.
"Aye, and willingly, would I," he smartly replied.
"I should love to see it. I should scarce know mine own
face."
She regarded the subject with ridicule, observing as she spoke
the end of the sash with which her fingers had been fumbling.
"You shall see it s^s it is with no artful flattery to disfigure it.
May I bring it in person. The post-rider*s bag is too unworthy a
messenger."
"Lud! I shall be unable to restrain my curiosity and await
the carrier."
"Then I shall be the carrier."
"Nothing would afl*ord me more pleasure."
Neither of the two spoke for a moment. She wondered if
she were imprudent. While she had not known this man before
this evening, still she knew of him as the one who took part in
the disturbance at the Coflee House. He seemed unusually at-
tentive to her, although not unpleasantly so, and innocently
enough she questioned the import of his motives. He had sought
no information nor did he disclose any concerning himself, for
at no time did their conversation arise to any plane above the
commonplace. Yet she was willing to see him again and to dis-
cover, if possible, the true state of his mind.
Stephen, she knew, would approve her action; not only be-
cause of the personal satisfaction which might be derived there-
from, but also because of the possibilities which such a meeting
might unfold. That Anderson was prompled by some ulterior
motive and that he was not attracted so much by her charms as by
the desire of seeking some advantage, she was keen enough to
sense. Just what this quest might lead to, could not be fathomed,
yet it presented, at all hazards, a situation worthy of more than a
passing notice.
She* mistrusted General Arnold, a mere opinion it was true,
for she possessed no evidence to warrant even a suspicion, yet
something about the man created within her heart a great want
of confidence and reliance. He was supremely overbearing and
unusually sensitive. This, together with his vaulting ambition
820 THE LOYALIST [Mar^
and love of display — traits which even the merest novice could
not fail to observe — might render him capable of brilliant achieve-
ments, such as his exploits before the walls of Quebec and on the
field of Saratoga, or of unwise and wholly irresponsible actions, of
some of which, although of minor consequence, he had been guilty
during the past few months. He disliked her form of religious
worship, and she strongly suspected this was the reason he so
openly opposed the alliance vdth the French. She regarded this
prejudice as a sad misfortune in a man of authority. His judg-
ments were liable to be clouded and unfair.
She knew Peggy like a book and she could easily imagine
the influence such a girl could exert, as a wife, on a man so con-
stituted. Peggy's social ambition and her marked passion for
display and domination, traits no less apparent in her than in her
mother, would lead her to yiew the overtures of her impetuous
suitor with favor, notwithstanding the fact that he was almost
double her own age. As his v^fe she would attain a social prestige.
She was a Tory at heart, and he evidenced at sundry times the
same inclinations. She was a Quaker, while he belonged to the
religion of his Majesty, the King, nevertheless both agreed in this,
that the miserable Papists were an ambitious and crafty lot, who
were bent on obtaining an early and complete mastery over this
country. The pair were well mated in many respects, thought
Marjorie, although Peggy's more resolute will and intense ambi-
tion would make her the dominant member of the alliance. Little
as the General suspected it, Marjorie thought, he was slowly,
though surely, being encircled in the web Peggy and her artful
mother were industriously spinning about him.
Marjorie and Anderson sat conversing long and earnestly.
Several dances were announced and engaged in, with little or no
manifest attention on their part At length they deserted their
vantage ground for the more open and crowded room, pausing
before Peggy and the General, who were sheltered near the
entrance.
"Heigho, John!" exclaimed His Excellency upon their ap-
proach, **what strange absconding is this. Have a care, my boy,
lest you have to answer to Captain Meagher."
Marjorie felt the gaze of the group full upon her. She flushed
a little.
'Little or no danger, nor cause alleged," she laughed.
'Captain Meagher!" recollected Anderson, "does he excel?"
"I scarce know," replied Marjorie. "I have met him not over
thrice in my life."
"]
1820.] THE LOYAUST 821
i<i
'Once is quite sufScient*'' said the General. ^Tirst impres-
sions often endure. But stay. Draw your chairs. I was only
sasdng that I may be required to leave here shortly.''
'Tou have been transferred?" asked Marjorie.
'"No! But I have written to Washington begging for a com-
mand in the navy. My wounds are in a fair way and less painful
than usual, though there is little prospect of my being able to be
in the field for a considerable time."
They sat down as requested, opposite Peggy and the General.
''But General, have you not taken us into your consideration?"
asked Anderson. ^
**1 have, yet the criticism is becoming unendurable. Of course
you have heard that matters have already become strained between
the civil government and myself. Only last week my head aid-
de-camp sent for a barber who was attached to a neighboring
regiment, using as a messenger the orderly whom I had staKoned
at the door. For this trifling order there has been aroused a
hornet's nest."
•*Wherein lay the fault?" asked Marjorie.
''In this. It appears from a letter which I have already re-
ceived from the father of the sergeant (Matlack is his name to be
exact) that the boy was hurt by the order itself and the manner
of it, and as a freeman would not submit to such an indignity as
to summon a barber for the aide of a commanding officer. We
have a proud, stubborn people to rule, who are no more fitted for
self-government than the Irish — " He stopped short.
Marjorie bit her lip. "I wish. General, you would withdraw
your comparison. It is painful to me."
"I am sorry. Mistress Allison. As a matter of fact I hardly
knew what I had said. I do withdraw it."
"Thank you so much."
Then he went on.
"These Americans are not only ungrateful, but stupidly arro-
gant. What comparison can be drawn between this dullard,
Matlack, whose feelings as a citizen were hurt by an order of an
aid-de-camp, and I, when I was obliged to serve a whole cam-
paign under the command of a gentleman who was not known
as a soldier until I had been some time a brigadier. My feelings
had to be sacrificed to the interest of my country. Does not the
fool know that I became a soldier and bear the marks upon me, to
vindicate the rights of citizens?" He talked rapidly. It was plain
that he was seriously annoyed.
"On my arrival here, my very first act was condemned. It
became my duty, because of sealed orders from the Ck>mmander-in-
822 THE LOYALIST [Mar^
Chief, who enclosed a resolution adopted by Congress, to close the
shops. From that day, censure was directed against me. I was
not the instigator of it. Yet I was all to blame." He sat up with
his hands on his knees looking fiercely into the next room.
"I would not feel so bitter, your Excellency," volunteered An-
derson. "Military orders, however necessary, always seem oppres-
sive to civilians and shopkeepers."
"I have labored well for the cause, and my reward has been
this. I took Ticonderoga, although Allen got the credit for it.
I would have taken Canada, if Congress had not blundered. I
saved Lake Champlain with my flotilla — a fleet that lived to no
better purpose nor died more gloriously — and for this I got no
promotion, nor did I expect one. I won at Ridgefield and received
a Major Generalship, only to find myself outranked by five others.
At Saratoga I was without a command yet I succeeded in defeat-
ing an army. For that service I was accused of being drunk by
the general in command, who for his service received a gold
medal with a vote of thanks from Congress while I — ^well the
people gave me their applause; Congress gave me a horse, but
what I prize more than all — ^these sword knots," he took hold of
them as he spoke, **a personal offering from the Commander-in-
Chief. I gave my all. I received a few empty honors and the in-
gratitude of a jealous people." He paused.
"General," began Marjorie, " you know the people still wor-
ship you and they do want you for their popular leader."
"I know differently," he snapped back. "I have already pe-
titioned Congress for a grant of land in western New York, where
I intend to lead the kind of life led by my friend Schuyler in Liv-
ingston, or the Van Rensselaers and other country gentlemen.
My ambition now is to be a good citizen for I intend never to draw
a sword on the American side." He again grew silent.
Whether he was sincere in his remarks Marjorie could not
decide. She knew him to be impulsive and impressionable, a man
who, because of his deficiency in breadth, scope of intelligence,
and strong moral convictions, invariably based his
opinions in public matters on his personal feelings. He was
Military Governor of the city and adjacent countryside, yet there
existed an Executive Council of Pennsylvania for the care of
the State, and the line of demarcation between the two powers
never had been clearly drawn. Accordingly there soon arose
many occasions for dispute, which a more even-tempered man
would have had the foresight to avoid. Furthermore he was be-
coming decidedly unpopular because of his extravagant manner
of living, and his too frequent association with the Tory element.
1920.] THE LOYAUST 823
It was entirely possible that he would abide by his decision to
resign all public ofQce and retire to private life, notwithstanding
the fact that he had already dispatched a letter to General Wash-
ington requesting a command in the navy. But Marjorie read
him differently, and was puzzled to account for his action.
Several of the guests prepared to depart. The little group
disbanded as Peggy made her way to their side.
Marjorie and John Anderson lost each other for the first time
in the mdl^e which ensued.
"Perhaps I ought to return," Marjorie muttered to herself,
now that she was quite alone. ''I am sure that he dropped some-
thing." And she began to retrace her steps.
She felt positive that she saw General Arnold accidently dis-
lodge what appeared to be a folded note frqm his belt when he
took hold of the sword knots in the course of his conversation.
Very likely it was a report of some nature, which had been hur-
riedly thrust into his belt during some more preoccupied moment.
At any rate it might be safer in her hands than left to some less
interested person. She would investigate at all events and re-
solve her doubts. Sure enough, there it was. Just behind the
arm chair in which he had been seated but a few moments before.
She picked it up and regarded it carelessly, nervously,
peering the while into the great room beyond to discover, if pos-
sible, an eye-witness to her secret. From its appearance it was
no more than a friendly communication written on conventional
letter paper. It was unsealed, or rather the seal had been broken
and the paper gave evidence of not a little handling. It belonged
to Peggy, for there was her name in heavy bold script on the
outside.
She balanced it in her hand, weighing within her mind one
of two possibilities. She might read it and then, if the matter
required, return it immediately to His Excellency with an ex-
planation. Yet it would smack of dishonor to read the private
corrcf^pondence ol another without a sufficiently grave reason.
It belonged to Peggy, who in all probability had been acquainting
the General with its contents as Mr. Anderson and herself in-
truded upon the scene. She therefore resolved to return it un-
read. Hastily folding it, she stuck it in her bodice, and made her
way into the room where she became lost among the guests.
There would be tirfie enough when the formalities of the departure
were over, when Peggy was less occupied, to hand it to her. She
would wait at any rate until later in the evening.
(to be continued.)
I
flew Boohs.
FATHER DUFFY'S STORY. By Francis P. Duflfy. Chaplain,
165th Infantry. With an Historical Appendix by Joyce
Kilmer. New York: George H. Doran Co. $2.50 net.
When one finishes Father Duffy's tale of humor and heroism^
of life and death with the ''Fighting 69th," he is not quite sure
whether he has read a book about the War or a book about a
grand religious crusade. He is not quite sure if the things that
hover overhead are aeroplanes or angels. The shouts that go
up are battle*cries — ^but they are addressed to Michael of the
flaming sword. St. Patrick seems to have trudged beside these
men on their long marches and stood by them in the trenches. St.
Brigid was there at the rest billets, helping them make the dug-
outs comfortable. It is a reassuring thought, this, to feel that
the fighting of the 69th had something of an act of faith about it.
The book is an evidence of Catholicism in the working, of Catho-
lic faith and practice under the test of the great endeavors, the
valiant struggles, the death and disasters of a bitter war.
And at the same time it is an excellent record of that regi-
ment in the War. Its author has shown a skill that many a jour-
nalist might envy. The work of writing the regiment's history
was originally assigned to Joyce Kilmer. When Sergeant Kil-
mer was transferred to other and more dangerous work, the
job fell to Father Duffy, the regimental Chaplain. Kilmer's la-
mented death stilled a noble and valiant pen. Rather than try
to add to what he had already written. Father Duffy starts the
story afresh, and has put Joyce Kilmer's beginnings of an his-
torical sketch in an appendix. It is a nice tribute from one brave
man to another.
So Father Duffy's story starts back in June, 1917, shortly
after the War with Germany was declared, and when the 69th
was being recruited to full war strength. The final ranks of this
regiment contained only five per cent who were neither of Irish
race nor of the Catholic faith. From this point on, the regiment
is followed through its training here and abroad, into the first
trenches at Arbre Haut, its first losses at Rocroi and the brilliant
coup at Luneville. From Luneville on, the activities of the regi-
ment in the Baccarat Sector and the Champagne defensive be-
come more complicated. The reader senses some of the chaos of
war. Nevertheless, Father Duffy has managed to keep his nar-
1920.] NEW BOOKS 825
rative very clear and readable. He has mingled his humor and
tragedy in such a fashion that interest is always sustained. The
Battle of the Ourcq, for example, has its technical difficulties for
one not versed in military affairs, but he manages to grasp a clear
view of what went on in the light of the men involved in it.
That, in fact, is the singular merit of this book. It is about the
men in the regiment; it is a human document. With surpassing
journalistic skill Father Duffy has managed to work in the name
of almost, if not, every man in the 69th.
The St. Mihiel offensive was another operation in which the
69th played a part, a valiant part, but it was in the Argonne
that it showed especial valor against great odds. Conditions were
unbelievably difficult, and yet these men, aflame with courage
and love of country, fortified with unconquerable faith, went
boldly into that forest maze and took their losses with fortitude.
Finally you see the 69th in the Army of Occupation. Peace
has come. The duties of the regiment are now different. And a
different air seems to settle down upon the men. It is the sort
of peaceful, joyous air that comes at Easter after a hard Lent.
The last pages bring the regiment home to its well-earned honors.
Father Duffy's final words strike a note of noble pride :
''Men pass away but institutions survive. In time we shall
all go to join our comrades who gave up their lives in France.
But in our own generation, when the call came, we accepted the
flag of our fathers ; we have added to it new glory and renown —
and we pass it on."
Here is a book that every Catholic in America should even-
tually read. It will be as interesting a year from now as it was
the day of publication. For it records something more than a
war, the pain and loss of which were better forgotten for the op-
portunities the future holds; it records the faith of men which
is undying. The clash of arms can never be so loud as to drown
the tinkling music of a rosary in the hand. When the noise of
war dies away, the voices of prayer ring clearer. In the 69th they
never were drowned.
LABOR IN THE CHANGING WORLD. By R. M. Maclver. New
York: E. P. Dutton & Co. $3.00 net.
The conffict of nations is ended; but another great conflict,
that between capital and labor, has taken the centre of the stage.
What are the elements of the latter struggle, and what is the out-
come that good men should promote?
The author starts from the premise that the economic system
in which men live is, if not more important than their ideas and
826 NEW BOOKS [Mar^
characters, at least of fundamental importance, and he reaches
the conclusion that no solution of the problem will be found in
"patch-work" of the present system. Therefore, he rejects profit-
sharing, co-partnership and conciliation schemes; for "the root
of industrial evil is the present wage system. The ideal toward
which we must strive is some more cooperative order of produc-
tion." However, his specific proposals are not so radical as this
quotation from the preface would lead us to expect. He does not
advocate Socialism. He would have labor admitted to participa-
tion in management, to the end that the laborer may be given
the recognition due him as a human being, and genuine co5pera-
tion may be brought about between labor and capital for their
mutual advantage, as well as the benefit of the whole community.
He advocates the establishment of minimum living wage rates for
all workers, and minimum decent conditions of employment as
regards the length of the working day, the age at which children
may become wage-earners, safety sanitation and security of em-
ployment. These reforms should, in the opinion of the author, be
effected, as far as possible, by agreement between organized labor
and organized capital. One of the most suggestive chapters in
the book is that on "The Waste of the Present Industrial System."
SPIRITISM AND RELIGION. By Johan Liljencrants, A.M., S.T.D.
New York: The Devin-Adair Co. $3.50.
Among the flood of books pouring from the press today
dealing with Spiritism, those treating the subject from a Catholic
point of view are few but notable. The volume under considera-
tion is the work of a priest who examined in a critical, scientific
spirit a vast amount of data bearing upon his subject, and then
proceeded to deal with it from a theological point of view in order
to estimate the value of Spiritism as a religion. It is through this
aspect of its rapidly growing manifestations that Spiritism has
in these troubled latter days principally appealed to the public
To those without sure faith, it comes bolstered up by the specious
authority of a host of psuedo-scientists and sensational novelists :
Conan Doyle, for example, and Sir Oliver Lodge; proflfering what
are termed sure proofs of personal immortality and of a life
beyond the grave devoid of all that might cause fear or sorrow in
the souls of the living — ^a Paradise, but no Hell; only a mild and
prophylactic Purgatory being retained. In a word, it is as a new
revelation, rather than as a mystery demanding the severest
scientific scrutiny, that Spiritism comes before the modern world
— a revelation which, as Dr. Liljencrants shows, directly opposes
and seeks to overthrow orthodox Christianity.
1920.] NEW BOOKS 827
Dr. Liljencrants traces the history of the movement in mod-
ern times, and then deals at length with a great amount of data,
mainly drawn from books and reports, concerning the physical
phenomena of Spiritism. He does not seem to have had any per-
sonal experience in studying the phenomena, a fact which prob-
ably accounts for the somewhat excessive incredulity which he
manifests as to the preternatural character of most of the alleged
manifestations. In fact, he goes so far as to say that he has
arrived at the conclusion that Spiritism cannot be shown to con-
tain a preternatural element. No modern students of the sub-
ject who have come into the actual atmosphere of Spiritism, would
agree with Dr. Liljencrants in this sweeping conclusion. He
admits, it is true, that no positive proof can be given for the
total absence of preternatural causes "in the ensemble of the
phenomena," and that if it is there at all, "it is more than likely
that this element would be of a diabolical character." Although
Dr. Liljencrants is too arbitrary in ruling out the preternatural
element from the spiritistic phenomena now so rife, he does good
service in amassing a great volume of evidence which goes to
show the ease with which the phenomena may be fraudulently
induced, and by showing in a strong light the anti-Christian char-
acter of the whole movement.
THE COMPLETE POEMS OF FRANCIS LEDWIDGE. New York:
Brentano's. $2.50.
It is a mournful pleasure to possess, at length, within the
covers of one book the total poetical output of the late Francis
Lcdwidge. Lord Dusany writes eighteen pages of introduction
to the work of this young Irish poet whom he came upon, as he
tells us, in the ranks of the Irish peasantry. Ledwidge died in
the ranks of the British army. It is difBcult to predict what his
future development might have been, but at least there is nothing
in this collection to justify the editor in speaking so confidently
of his protdg^ as a genius. Although there is here a great deal
of fragrant and delicate imagination, and much keen and intimate
observation of sky and tree and field and bird, there is nothing
quite so full of Irish reality as any one of a dozen lyrics one
might mention by Joseph Campbell or Padraic Colum, for ex-
ample. Of the genius of either of these poets there can certainly
be no two opinions. Incomparably the finest and most truly
Irish of Ledwidge's poems are the three entitled, "The Blackbirds,"
"To Thomas McDonagh" and "The Wedding Morn;" but it is upon
them that the noble editor makes the following comment — a
comment which would fairly merit to be characterized as brutal.
828 NEW BOOKS [Mar^
did not one» upon reflection* realize that it proceeds out of an
amazing blindness to Ledwidge's innermost inspiration: **• • .
rather than attribute curious S3rmpathies to this brave young Irish
soldier I would ask his readers to consider the irresistible attract
tion that a lost cause has for almost any Irishman/'
Poor Ledwidge has not been the only good man to know the
bitterness of a bewilderment of spirit in these dark and evil days.
GREATER EXTENSION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CHURCH
INFLUENCE. By John A. Godrycz. Philadelphia : People's
Friend Publishing Co.
In the form of a commentary on Cardinal Gibbons' Letter
to the General Committee on Catholic interests and affairs, the
writer of this interesting little volume sets forth the position of
the Catholic Church in the United States towards the apostolic
social and literary problems of our age. The author is a learned
Polish priest, editor of the Polish paper, Przyjacel ludu (The
People's Friend). His views are characterized by considerable
originality of thought, and indicate extensive experience in re-
ligious and social life, while the volume is imbued with loyal de-
votion to the Catholic Church. Some of his arguments are likely
to arouse discussion, yet no one can deny that generally the
writer's conclusions are sound and that the problems are treated
with fairness and frankness.
The best chapters of the volume treat the first and second
points of the Letter: the Holy See and Home Missions. The
writer points out the political and financial needs of the Holy
See, and believes the Catholic Church in the United States should
use its mighty influence to satisfy them. The spiritual sove-
reignty of the Holy See ought to become an international ques-
tion and to be internationally solved, and its critical financial con-
dition ought to be relieved. If the nations really want to pre-
serve Christian civilization, menaced by Bolshevism, they cannot
neglect the powerful spiritual army of the Catholic Church. The
religious spirit can only be revived by her fullest freedom.
The second chapter touches the most difficult problem of
American Catholicism today, the preservation of the Catholic
faith among foreign immigrants. The writer points out that the
American people, as a whole, is not yet Catholic and possesses no
Catholic tradition. Americanization, therefore, does not pay at-
tention to the urgent necessity of preserving the Catholic spirit
among Catholic immigrants. The gap in the American educa-
tion of foreign elements ought to be filled by the Church. If nine
millions of Catholic foreigners could be Americanized without
1920.] NEW BOOKS 829
losing their Catholicism, the Catholic Church would become the
citadel of the Christian faith in the United States. Upon the
Catholic American hierarchy really rests the obligation to see
to it that the process of Americanization is carried out in such
a way as to win the confidence of the alien groups in the non-
sectarian character of the American spirit.
Dr. Grodrycz' book is the literary and scientific result of his
apostleship among his countrymen, and of a thorough acquaint-
ance with the religious conditions existing in America. It cannot
but be of value, therefore, to those who are devoting their energies
to the triumph of Catholic ideals in this country.
THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS: THE PRINCIPLES AND THE
PRACTICE. Edited by Stephen Pierce Duggan. Boston:
The Atlantic Monthly Press. $2.50.
In spite of the voluminous discussions of the League of
Nations in weekly and monthly magazines and of the more im-
pressive, but less convincing, debates upon the issues involved
to be found in the files of the Congressional Record, it may be
said that there is still room for a comprehensive and authori-
tative treatment of the whole subject. Partisan views have been
forced upon the public from every quarter, but there is wanting
an impartial exposition of the underlying principles of the League,
and of the facts of international life on the basis of which a fair
estimate of the practical worth of the League may be reached.
The present volume makes an approach to such a comprehensive
treatment of principles and facts, but falls short of it by reason of
the difBculties inseparable from a volume made up of successive
chapters by different authors. The editor has attempted, with
considerable skill, to group these chapters so as to present a
logical development of the argument, but it was inevitable that
there should be overlapping on the one hand and breaks and gaps
on the other.
Nevertheless, there is much valuable material to be found in
the several chapters, and being the work of scholars, they deal
in most cases with those more permanent elements of the subject
which will retain their importance when the present partisan
controversy has given way to more constructive plans. Part I.
deals with the history, principles and organization of a League
of Nations, and contains among other chapters an excellent his-
torical study of earlier schemes of attaining international peace
by means of an organization of the nations, a good discussion of
the important problem of the limitations which a League of
Nations will impose upon the sovereignty of the member States,
830 NEW BOOKS [Mar^
and a consideration of the economic and military sanctions pro-
vided for in the Covenant of the League. Part II. of the volume
deals with international cooperation as applied to certain con-
crete problems with which the nations are confronted. The prin-
ciple of the self-determination of nationalities is analyzed* the
economic forces underlying political disputes are pointed out,
and the problem of colonial mandates is discussed in connection
with the question of economic concessions and the development
of backward areas. Part III. deals with the relation of the
United States to the League, and discusses the changes brought
about in our traditional policy of isolation and the efifect of the
League upon the Monroe Doctrine. The Covenant of the League
is printed in an appendix, and is followed by a series of useful
biographical notes. On the whole the volume would appear to
be the best handbook yet available.
BROOME STREET STRAWS. By Robert Cortes HoUiday. New
York: George H. Doran Co. $2.50 net.
Mr. Holliday has a talent for prefaces and the reader who,
under his guidance, makes the acquaintance of Broome Street
will want to complete these three hundred pages of sketches,
reminiscences and near-stories. "You might think it a bit odd,"
he writes, ''if you should ask a man whether he had gone to
Yale, and he replied: *No, I went to Broome Street.' Yet streets,
like universities, have a good deal to do with the cut of a man.
Streets are, in a manner of speaking, educators. A great many
people, for instance, have what can most aptly be termed a
Broadway mind. There is, too, a distinctly Fifth Avenue habit
of thought, a Wall Street point of view, a Bowery manner, a
One Hundred and Twenty-fifth Street cast of culture, and so on."
Mr. Holliday's work evokes reminiscences of Addison,
and less remote ones of Dickens, and Tom Hood; but his own in-
dividuality never sinks from sight. His names, by the way, are
often Dickensesque : Nuggens, Mrs. Wigger, Angus Bleake; but
when he gives us Murphy in "An Amorous Conspiracy" he is draw-
ing names from a more universal directory. His style is grace
itself and makes one wonder whether Mr. Holliday could make
a shrewd guess as to the authorship of The Journal of a Dis-
appointed Man. The most striking quality of these charming
papers is their naturalness. A graceful turn of expression, a
witticism, the play of bright humor over every page, have the air
of complete unpremeditation. Mr. Holliday's mind is never mor-
bid nor his style awkward. There is but one disappointing chap-
ter in the volume, that which accuses O. Henry of "amazing
1920.] NEW BOOKS 831
failure." It disappoints less because it is weak criticism than
because, for a moment, the genial author forgets the amenities
and says biting things about the Simon pure devotees of our
American Harun-al-Raschid. However, if Homer be permitted
to nod, a similar indulgence must be permitted Mr. Holliday. To
read the "Romance of Destiny" and "Mr. Nuggens on Eating
Dinner," "Emigrating Back Home," "Folks That Rile Us," is to
see him at his best and to appreciate his contribution to the
literature of charm, grace and healthiness of tone.
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. By Charles J. Callan, O.P.
New York: Joseph F. Wagner. $2.00.
Father Callan has written an excellent commentary on the
Acts of the Apostles. It is a clear, brief yet thorough exposition
of the meaning of the sacred text. He discusses all the difQculties
of interest to the historian, apologist or theologian, for he writes
expressly for priests and ecclesiastical students.
The Acts of the Apostles is a most important book of Holy
Writ, for it gives us an authentic account of the beginnings of
Christianity and of Church organization, and furnishes us with
the connecting link between the Gospel of the Saviour and its
diffusion by the Church to all parts of the Roman Empire. It
furnishes the theologian with facts and teachings unrecorded in
any other book of primitive Christianity, and the apologist with
many testimonies of the Apostolic preaching of the Resurrection.
Father Callan's treatise is at once practical, for it eliminates
such opinions, discussions, explanations and theories as might
be considered curious and unnecessary; and critical, for it gives
in condensed form the most probable arguments and helpful re-
sults of the best critical studies on all the important questions
involved.
THE THINGS IMMORTAL. By Rev. E. F. Gareschi, S.J. New
York: Benziger Brothers. $1.25 net.
In the subtitle, "Spiritual Thoughts for Every Day Reading,"
this little book is aptly described. For busy people to whom
prolonged reading is either distasteful or impossible, it will be a
boon. The subjects treated are most important; the method of
treatment simple, practical and persuasive; and still another
merits each one is completed at one reading of not more than ten
pages. The book would serve admirably for use in the fifteen
minute prayer, advised by the saints, and would lead to not a few
reforms of very common, yet exasperating, faults of character,
which we are so apt to let grow like weeds.
832 NEW BOOKS [Mar^
WINONA'S WAY. By Margaret Widdemer. Philadelphia: J.
B. Lippincott Co. $1.35 net.
Winona» of the Camp Fire Girls, is with us once more, and
will amply justify the welcome she will receive from girl read-
ers. This time, she, with her companions, becomes engaged in
Community Service, using as a centre the house in which they
did the fine work in food conservation told in a preceding volume.
Under Winona's leadership, many beneficial things are accom-
plished that, in the doing, make life as enjoyable as it is earnest.
The main interest of the series is well sustained in this
volume, which, to our mind, is even better than its immediate
predecessor, the incidents being less fortuitous and more prob-
able. In delineation and development of character, also, the
book marks a distinct advance. Its merits make us regret the
more that it shares the singular defect, so prevalent in present-
day writing for the young, the total ignoring of religion. Pa-
triotism, duty and service to others, patience and generosity are
inculcated; but of even belief in the existence of a Divine Author
of every good thought and deed, there is not the most remote
suggestion.
THEODORE ROOSEVELT'S LETTERS TO HIS CHILDREN.
New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. $2.00 net.
The introduction to this collection of letters quotes their
author as having said, shortly before his death : "I would rather
have this book published than anything that has ever been written
about me." The remark is readily comprehensible. No public
man understood better than Colonel Roosevelt the temper and
make-up of his compatriots, and the high esteem in which the
average native-born American holds precisely what these writ-
ings embody most saliently, the fundamental qualities upon
which depends the preservation of the family and the home.
The letters range in date from 1898 to 1911, written from
various places, Santiago, the White House, or Africa, as the case
may be. They are scarcely less varied as to subjects; but through
them all one thing stands out clearly — that in the writer's life,
experienced beyond parallel though it was, the paramount inter-
ests were those that centred in his home. That during his life-
time his private life was veiled from the public eye by a curtain
of reserve, makes these intimate revelations of the more value
now, cementing popular affection more firmly than ever.
There is great charm in these writings, loving and humorous,
the devoted father entering with keenest zest into the least de-
tails that were of interest to any of his children, however young;
1920.] NEW BOOKS 833
giving wise and kindly counsel in the problems that confronted
them as they began to face the world; and, throughout, infor-
mally but unmistakably, setting forth the exalted, unchanging
standard by which he measured all things, great and small.
So manifest is his sympathy for the young and his under-
standing of their difBculties, so widely applicable are his judg-
ments and advice, that the letters become, in a sense, communi-
cations to the children of his fellow-citizens. Assuredly there
could be no more felicitous medium by which the rising genera-
tion may learn the mind of the illustrious American, of whom
Archbishop Hayes has said: "His being was consumed with a
flaming passion for justice and right, for loyalty and truth, for
clean living and honest endeavor."
GOLD, FRANKINCENSE, AND MYRRH. By Ralph Adams Cram,
Litt.D., LL.D. Boston: Marshall Jones Co. $1.25.
'The title . . means simply this : Gold is the pure, imperish-
able quality of the monastic ideal. Frankincense the supreme act
of worship through the Blessed Sacrament, Myrrh the saving qual-
ity of a right philosophy of life that yet must be bitter to the taste
of many people." The three lectures, reprinted under this title
we.e addressed to Anglicans. They would be more or less un-
intelligible to an audience of Catholics, or Protestants other than
the small coterie of "extreme High Churchmen." Some, of
course, of a wider circle of cultivated folk, captivated by Dr.
Cram's cogent reasoning and brilliant style, have grasped, through
his work, some aspects of Catholic truth which they might other-
wise never have been induced to consider.
The lectures in this volume, like his other utterances, viewed
as a Roman Catholic tract might or might not win acceptance,
though the theses enunciated must be recognized as tenable by
Catholics. But as the work of a Protestant Episcopalian they
cannot be considered seriously by either Catholics or Protestants
— or Anglicans. For Dr. Cram is Catholic in everything
but the fact of union with the Holy See. It would not, we
think, be unfair to say that he, and the school of which he is
by way of being the only exponent who speaks urbi et orbi, has
nothing in common with the large majority of Episcopalians,
clergy and laity — not even his belief in Anglican Orders, for the
bulk of Episcopalians do not hold the Catholic doctrine of the
priesthood which is the sine qua non of Dr. Cram's position.
That Dr. Cram himself is painfully conscious of this discrepancy
on the part of those whom he must still call brethren is evident
when he says : "Acceptance of the threefold ministry, and of the
6M NEW BOOKS
fact of Apostolic succession through the la3ring on of fianrf^
the part of those who claim this tactual succession, if it^ did
carry with it a true acceptance of the Catholic doctrine of
nature, and eflBcacy, and mode of operation of the sevexK
ments, would be a still further extension of heresy closely
proaching sacrilege/* Were it not that the lecture from ^w
this passage was taken was deliyered a year before Dr. Kins
sent his letter of resignation to his then presiding bisliopi,
might almost think it a plagiarism!
Yet Dr. Cram and his associates of the ''extreme** Hi^ €3i
party are right in their acceptance and preaching of Csitli<
truth. They know they are right* and do not« apparently,
that the mass of their own household believe them to be ^v^roi^
and deny alike their theology and their practice. Not only this
but as Monsignor Benson showed so clearly, their claim to be ai
integral part of the Catholic Church (a claim taken for granted
as justified in these lectures) is repudiated as fully by the prac-
tice of the Greek schismatics as by the Encyclical of Leo Xin.
They know that their whole fabric of Catholic practice stands or
falls with the fact of their priesthood. And they are convinced
that they have the Catholic priesthood: that there was no gap
in essential form or intention at or after the Reformation — that
theirs is a God-given mission to restore belief in the Catholic
faith, the Catholic sacraments, the Catholic priesthood* which, in
their bona fides, their denomination never lost« in spite of all that
Hanoverian Erasiians, Low Churchmen, and Latitudinarians may
have said, or do say, to the contrary.
Viewed in this light the three lectures become intelligible,
nay, as G. K. C. (the only other champion of ''Anglo-Catholicism**
at all comparable to Dr. Cram) might say, they are the blast of a
trumpet. But to those outside the charmed circle it seems that
Dr. Cram builds a philosophical structure as massive, as coherent,
as gracefully finished as one of his magnificent architectural tri-
umphs — ^but it is a dream church. It floats in the air above the
heads of his co-religionists, who recognize its beauty and perfec-
tion, while they realize, as Dr. Cram apparently does not, that it
lacks reality because a nexus is wanting with the ancient foonda-
tion which rests on the Rock of Peter.
For the rest, the lectures are original and suggestive. Their
scope is far wider than the small groups for which they were
written, and they have a peculiar interest for Catholics as show-
ing, not necessarily the drift of Protestantism towards Catholic
truth and practice, but the amazing fact that a not inconsider-
able number of cultivated and pious people can hold a position so
1920.]
NEW BOOKS
835
re tltfafei-
clice. Sfltr
tbistdai
m taialr^
c pnriicrx
thfTsncr
therew:
AffanCi^
ef in tk'x
estboolt:
tifiKfiiunC'
if it SK**
«
estirt •'
widely at variance with that of their official ecclesiastical connec-
tion and yet, by a mysterious dispensation of Providence, pre-
serve their good faith. It is a volume, the careful reading of
which by Catholics will drive them to their knees to make an
Act of Hope.
THE GRAY NUNS IN THE FAR NORTH. By Rev. P. Duchaussois,
O.M.I. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
This fascinating sketch of the labors of these Canadian
Sisters in the Far North reads like a romance. It is a story of
heroism and missionary zeal rarely equaled in the annals of the
Propagation of the Faith.
After a brief sketch of the life and labors of Madame
DTouville, the foundress of the Gray Nuns of Montreal, the author
describes in detail the founding of the many Indian missions in
Canada (1844-1903) along the Red and Mackenzie Rivers, at Fort
Providence, Lake Athabaska, Great Slave Lake. Rain, cold, snow,
difficult portages, journeys of two thousand two hundred miles
through the wilderness, hostile and immoral savages, barbarian
Eskimos — nothing daunted these brave women. They faced every
danger and difficulty with a smile, and persevered until they won
countless souls to God and His Church.
This volume is well calculated to stir our people to mission-
ary zeal, and to foster many vocations.
ELEMENTARY AMERICAN HISTORY AND GOVERNMENT. By
J. S. Woodburn, Ph.D., and T. F. Moran, Ph.D. New York:
Longmans, Green & Co. $1.50.
This is an "After the War Edition," and the revision called
for by the occasion has resulted in a very satisfactory volume.
As the writers well say, the history has not changed, but
the viewpoint has, making it imperative to enlarge greatly the
scope of the book. Considerable attention is devoted to industrial
and mechanical developments as well as to the labor, immigration
and other problems occupying the public mind of today. The
wars in our history are treated concisely but clearly, and the
proportions of the perspective are well maintained. This, of
course, becomes more difficult as events multiply, each requiring
to be noted and classified. The summary of the World War is
most satisfactory from this point of view — ^balanced and fair-
minded. The maps and illustrations form a useful addition and
are altogether admirable; so, too, are the summaries, questions
and pronunciation of foreign names appended to each chapter.
The book contains also the text of the Declaration of Independ-
836 NEW BOOKS [Mar^
ence, the Constitution with its amendments, and a good topical
outline of its forty chapters, with the area, population, etc., of the
States. The writers connect much information on civics and gov-
ernment with the rise and progress of the country, thus making
a foundation for the separate study of tliat branch so necessary
for good citizenship and the intelligent use of the vote. A pupil
who has mastered the contents of this volume should possess
an all-around understanding and appreciation of the history of
these United States.
FANTASTICS. By Lafcadio Hearn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Co. $1.65.
This posthumous collection of studies and sketches from the
pen of the late Lafcadio Hearn has been gleaned by Mr. Charles
Hutson from the files of the Times-Democrat of New Orleans,
to which the author contributed during the years of his stay in
Louisiana. Students of Hearn's development as an artist wiU
find these pages extremely interesting as recording his impres-
sions of the weird and exotic quality of certain aspects of exist-
ence in New Orleans. ''They are dreams," Hearn himself wrote,
''of a tropical city. There is one twin idea running through
them all — ^Love and Death. And these figures embody the story
of life here as it impresses me . . ." Some of the sketches are
written in a beautiful imaginative prose, but the total effect is
one of a cloying and unhealthy sweetness, and it is not at all
likely that the literary reputation of the author will be noticeably
increased by the publication of them.
THE NEXT STEP IN DEMOCRACY. By R. W. Sellars, Ph.D.,
Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of Michigan.
New York: The Macmillan Co. $1.60.
Somewhat more than one-half of this book is taken up with
a discussion of Socialism, its spirit, history, hopes, the miscon-
ceptions which prevail concerning it, and the objections that
have been raised against it. Apparently the author might be
classed as a kind of moderate evolutionary Socialist, who is con-
tent to wait a long time for the arrival of his completely social-
ized order. In the meantime, he advocates co-partnership, co-
operation and profit-sharing, and he seems to expect that the col-
lectivist organization of industry will always be modified con-
siderably by cooperative industrial institutions under the direct
ownership and management of the groups immediately concerned.
Some of the chapters in the second part of the book are
entitled "The Ethics of Labor," "The Growth of Justice," "Some
Principles of Pecuniary Reward" and "The Conditions of a Social
1920.] NEW BOOKS 837
Freedom." In his formally ethical discussions, the author ex-
hibits all the limitations of those who accept the modern theory
of evolutionary ethics. The beneficent operations of the State
are exaggerated* natural rights are denied, and there is a con-
siderable lack of coherent fundamental principles. The vague-
ness of his exposition in this field is well illustrated in the chapter
on pecuniary reward, the general conclusion of which is: 'The
ideal principle of reward is that of need, reward being thus recog-
nized definitely as a means to an end, a self realization in accord
with a progressive social welfare . . . There is, then, no final
opposition between social need and social merit."
A HANDBOOK OF MORAL THEOLOGY. By Rev. Anthony Koch,
D.D. Adapted and Edited by Arthur Preuss. Volume III.
St. Louis: B. Herder Book Co. $1.50 net.
Volumes I. and II. of this Handbook dealt with the general
principles of Moral Theology. This third volume shows how
these principles are to be applied to man's conduct as an indi-
vidual. Its two parts deal with (a) the care for man's body and
spiritual welfare, and (b) the obligations arising from his voca-
tion, occupation and position in life. The author touches briefly
upon many interesting questions: asceticism, fashions in dress,
housing, amusements, vivisection, temperance, suicide, vasec-
tomy, capital punishment, war, the rights and duties of property,
the necessity and duty of labor, etc. Every chapter concludes
with a short bibliography of English, French, German and Latin
works of reference.
LIFE OF DANTE ALIGHIERE. By Charles Allen Dinsmore.
Boston : Houghton Mifflin Co. $2.50.
This is a well-written book of intelligent enthusiasm and
should stimulate interest in Dante and his works. The third
division of the book, which concerns itself with interpretation
and appreciation, is in our opinion better done than the other
two divisions in which the author treats respectively of the
theatre of events in which Dante moved, and of the sparse ma-
terial obtainable for biographical purposes.
The author is unconsciously humorous in the eyes of a
Catholic reader by reason of his delightfully self-satisfied tone
of de haut en bas whenever he has occasion to discuss Dante's
religion. He studies the Middle Ages through windows of the
Early Victorian New England glaze, in which the saintly figures
of Emerson, Norton, Darwin, Spencer and John Fiske break the
white rays of truth into delicate Unitarian tints. Those old vil-
838 NEW BOOKS [Mar..
lage windows need to be raised if for no other end than to enable
the author of this book to make the interesting discovery that
there still survive on this sublunary planet many persons with a
reputation for intelligence who accept and practice the religion
of Dante.
But we are afraid the author has made up his mind about
those windows, if we may judge from a curious slip in his care-
fully written book. On page 246 and page 280 he states in his
text that the eternal damnation of virtuous heathen was repulsive
to Dante, but he had to accept it on the clear statement of the
Church. The author mourns that Dante's mind was held in
such bondage. We presume that the author's attention was
called to these passages by some better informed friend who read
his proof sheets; because on page 281 there is a footnote,
grudgingly inserted we should say, to the effect that St. Thomas
Aquinas, who was by the way an oflScially recognized theologian
of the Church, taught that if a heathen always acted according
to his lights he would somehow or other receive the means and
grace of salvation. This teaching is based directly on the Bible.
The author's comment on St. Thomas offers an amusing com-
parison with the passages we have cited in his text. 'Dante did
not avail himself of this teaching," says Mr. Dinsmore, "because,
probably, to his mind there was no evidence that to the virtuous
heathen there had been granted a teacher or an internal revela-
tion."
BLOOD AND SAND. By Vicente Blasco Ib&nez. New York: E.
P. Dutton & Co. $1.90 net.
The publishers state that this was the first of Ib&nez's novels
to bring him world-wide recognition. It is a characteristic speci-
men of the author's method, a method which has made him a
great success, especially in these impressionable United States.
This method may roughly, yet with fair accuracy, be described
as a journalistic adaptation of the realistic mode of Zola, satur-
ated with socialistic and "liberalistic" propaganda, and well seas-
oned with aphrodisiac elements. Ib&hez brings to the treat-
ment of this method a literary style that is far indeed from being
of the first or even of the second or third class, artistically speak-
ing: but which is nevertheless a brisk and effective and vigorous
style — the style of a first-class popular writer who happens to
have more general culture, and more mental vigor, than the aver-
age run of newspaper special writers. But essentially his is a
journalistic and not artistic view of life; and journalistic and not
literary is his presentation of his views. Blood and Scuid deals
1920.] NEW BOOKS 839
with the "cherished atrocity" of Spain — the bull ring. The hero
is a celebrated champion bullfighter, whose ambition to be a
torrero is traced from his boyhood to his sordid and bloody death
as a miserable failure, after his fall trom the heights of fame and
greatness. His incidental amours are, of course, introduced with
the author's customary attention to lubricous details. The details
of bullfighting are sweepingly and minutely described, the reader
being spared no horror. William Dean Howells described the
book as a "masterpiece." Well, so it is: a masterpiece of the
mediocre meretriciousness which today passes muster in so
many quarters for genuine literary merit.
THE SYMBOLIST MOVEMENT IN LITERATURE. By Arthur
Symons. New York : E. P. Button & Co. $3.50.
This is a new edition, thoroughly revised and greatly en-
larged, of a book which admirers of the charming prose style and
subtle artistry of Mr. Arthur Symons have known and admired —
in some cases with many reservations — for a number of years.
A distinctly new feature of the present edition is its inclusion of
a bibliography, and notes, and a number of the author's own
translations from Mallarmd and Verlaine. Mr. Symons takes as
his starting point, in these essays, the thesis that "without sym-
bolism there can be no literature" — that symbolism is an essential
factor not only of literature but of language itself. "Symbolism
began with the first words uttered by the first man as he named
every living thing, or before that in Heaven when God named
the world into being. We see in these beginnings precisely what
symbolism in literature really is: a form of expression, at the
best but approximate, essentially but arbitrary, until it has ob-
tained the force of a convention, for an unseen reality appre-
hended by the consciousness. It is sometimes permitted us to
hope that our convention is indeed the reflection rather than
merely the sign of an unseen reality. We have done much if
we have found a recognizable sign." It is from this quasi-mysti-
cal point of view that Arthur Symons studies the work of Balzac,
Merim^, Gerard de Nerval, Gautier, Flaubert, Baudelaire, the De
Goncourts, TIsle-Adam, Mallarm^, Verlaine, Huysmans, Arthur
Rimbaud, Jules Laforgue and, of course, the inevitable and —
just at present — ubiquitous Maeterlinck. Unquestionably the es-
sayist proves his point that symbolism is discernible in the work
of all these great artists; but as he himself lacks the only reliable
foundation for true mysticism, and for the true literary expression
of mysticism, namely, the Catholic Faith, his work suffers from
the same riot of errors which are to be found trooping through
840 NEW BOOKS [Mar^
the pages of most of the writers whom he studies. The large
number of these writers, indeed, are frankly and fully, either
heretics or pagans. Only in the lesser work of Huysmans and in
a few pages of Verlaine, and Mallarm6 are to be found mystical
notes which are in harmony with the teachings of the divinely
constituted authority, the Catholic Church. This book, for that
reason, despite all its unquestionable literary charm, is full of
danger for those who approach it without firm convictions, or
who lack correct knowledge, concerning Catholic mysticism and
Catholic symbolism. For those, however, who are able to steer
their way past its shoals and quicksands, the book is a literary
delight. In a time like our own, when style has all but taken its
flight from current literature, it is a rare pleasure to read pages
so exquisitely wrought, so colorful, and so musical.
CONFERENCES FOR MARRIED WOMEN. By Rev. ReynoU
Kuehnel. New York: Joseph F. Wagner. $2.00.
In these simple, instructive talks Father Kuehnel traces the
social duties of motherhood from the first stage of child life to
the last. He speaks of the mother's great responsibility as a
teacher of her little ones, and tells her how to look after their
physical and spiritual welfare. The five concluding chapters
contain a life of St. Monica, the special patron of mothers.
THE THREE MULLA-MULGARS. By Walter De La Mare. New
York: A. A. Knopf. $3.50.
This is the first American edition — exquisitely illustrated in
color and line, by Dorothy P. Lathrop — of a book that has already
become something of a classic over in England. Mr. De La Mare
is, of course, widely known and honored as one of the half dozen
or so finest living English poets, and in his *Teacock Pie, *The Lis-
tenei s," *'Songs of Childhood," etc., he has written poetry for and
about children with which, for delight, and charm, and subtlety
of insight, no other English poet's work in the same kind can be
compared. And his verse in more *'grown-up" vein is of a mov-
ing and wistful beauty.
To attempt to rehearse ever so cursorily the tale of these
three Mulla-Mulgars would be no less impossible than absurd.
Nothing — and everything — happens in this book. But there is
one thing that never did or could happen in any book from the
pen of this author: that his genius should desert him. His lore
is that of happy whimsical fancies and the tenderest of conceits.
Of these things this beautiful story is full to the brim. There is
something seriously wrong with the youthful heart — be its pos-
1920.] NEW BOOKS 841
sessor seven or seventy years in the world — ^wUch does not re-
joice over the adventures enjoyed or endured by Thumb, Thimble,
and Nod, of whom the mother was *'an old gray fruit-monkey of
the name of Mutt-matutta*' living ''on the borders of the Forest
of Munra-Mulgar/'
THE HOME AND THE WORLD. By Sir Rabindranath Tagore.
New York: The Macmillan Co. $1.75.
In this first long novel to be translated from the Bengali
of Sir Rabindranath Tagore, the plot is unfolded by means of half-
l3rrical narratives put into the mouths of the three leading pro-
tagonists — ^Nikhil, the idealistic landed proprietor of modern
India; Bimala, his impressionable young wife, and the political-
poetic demagogue, Sandip. There is material for one of the great
novels of the world in this story of the conflict between family
and patriotism, between ancient national ideals and the call of
new enthusiasms, finally between spiritual and carnal love. To
be sure, the Bengali poet and philosopher has very imperfectly
realized these possibilities — ^that was perhaps to be expected. But
he has given us a book interesting in its unusual yet realistic
setting, and for its insight into character and into the problems of
India today.
EVERYDAY SCIENCE. By William H. Snyder, Sc.D. New York:
AUyn & Bacon. $1.40.
As the author states in his preface *Hhis book covers a wide
field, and as the subject matter is not chosen for the purpose of
appealing to any group of science teachers," it would not be
easy to assign it a specific place in the schoolroom curriculum.
It was written for pupils of the higher classes of the grade
schools who will have no further training in science. But to any
student interested in the processes of nature it will prove a most
fascinating study, and add greatly to that all-around knowledge
so desirable for a well-informed mechanic, business or profes-
sional man. The book aims to make intelligent and useful citi-
zens, and is well adapted to its purpose. Wherever nature is
harnessed to the car of science in reclamation, irrigation, illum-
ination, forestry, navigation, etc., nature's principles are simply
and concisely explained and applied. A word about the illustra-
tions must be said. A few lack clearness of development but
most of them are good and really elucidate the text. An alpha-
betical index would greatly facilitate the use of the book and
add to its general usefulness, as it would enable one to lay one's
finger immediately upon any one of the many topics.
842 NEW BOOKS [Mar..
THE CURIOUS REPUBLIC OF 60ND0UR. By Samuel L. Qem-
ens. New York: Boni & Liveright. $1.25.
With the above sketch several others— of which ^'Goldsmith's
Friend Abroad" is the most considerable — are herein gathered
from journals to which Mark Twain contributed in 1870-71.
These jets of fantasy which are seasoned with more than Mark's
usual pungency are not of general interest, and will appeal only
to the inner circle of his admirers.
A SPINNER OF WEBS. By Catherine Bement. Boston: The
Four Seas Co. $1.50.
This novel, detailing the love-story of a young minister in
his first pastorate, is not especially interesting or significant from
any point of view. The nearest approach to a real character study
is found in the portrait of Mrs. Morrell, the wife of the former
pastor, a lady of determination in carrying through plans which
do not always spring from unexceptionable motives. However, the
young minister is too shadowy a person in the book for us to
feel the proper thrill of amused sympathy at its close, when this
redoubtable person becomes his mother-in-law.
SIMON. By J. Storer Clouston. New York: George H. Doran
Co. $1.50.
Mr. Clouston, whom one remembers pleasantly as the author
of an amusing farrago, The Lunatic at Large, has now turned out
a moderately good mystery story according to a familiar prescrip-
tion. There is a remote little village where Simon — silent Simon
Rattar — had lived for many years as agent and "procurator-fiscal."
There is a Sir Reginald who is murdered : a detective from Lon-
don, not, of course, from Scotland Yard. There is a love afi'air,
a body buried in a garden — Simon's body — a dramatic denoue-
ment, and — curtain. We have read many better stories of the
same kind.
THE DEEP HEART. By Isabel C. Clarke. New York: Benziger
Brothers. $1.50 net.
Miss Clarke has added to the considerable list of her novels
another which well sustains her reputation as a writer of the
best type of Catholic fiction. It is a love story, involving much
analysis of character, and brought to a happy conclusion by the
conversion to the Faith of an unbeliever whose unscrupulous
selfishness had separated the woman he wished to marry from
her chosen lover, and his friend. Mercifully, his turning to the
"deep heart" of Our Lord was not too late for him to undo the
mischief he had wrought.
1920.] NEW BOOKS 843
As in all this author's novels, the interest is derived not
alone from plot and character delineation, but also from the
depth and clarity of her spiritual perception.
MAN'S GREAT CONCERN: THE MANAGEMENT OF LIFE. By
Ernest R. Hull, S.J. New York: P. J. Kenedy & Sons.
Paper, 35 cents; cloth, $1.25.
Father Hull is well known in Bombay, not only as editor of
The Examiner, but as a clear expositor of the principles which
should guide conduct, politics and right living, as well as religion.
Trenchant and fearless he may be relied on to have something to
say, and to say it with force and brevity. This little book on a big
subject is divided into five parts, three of which concern the on-
tological, psychological and constructional principles on which
the structure rests, while the fourth and fifth sections treat
duties to God, ourselves and other people, with the duties of
various occupations and states of life.
Within its compass is compressed the philosophy that
should guide the thoughts and acts of man as a reasonable crea-
ture.
THE PRIESTS' CANONICAL PRAYER. From the French of
Rev. Charles Willi, C.SS.R., by Rev. Ferrol Girardy, C.SS.R.
St. Louis : B. Herder Book Co. 50 cents net.
The contents of this small volume of sixty-five pages are
taken, the writer tells us, from Le Briviaire Expliqui of Rev.
Charles Willi, C.SS.R. Its purpose is to acquaint the American
clergy with Father Willi's book, to be translated later, and also
to provide them with extracts so well adapted to promote the
spiritual welfare of all who will read them. The latter end in
view is borne out by a perusal of the volume itself. The esteem
we should have for the Divine Office, its excellence and its fruits
are admirably stated. The economy of the Breviary and its aid
to the social works of the priest are well set forth. The book
should be a help to a more devout and profitable recitation of the
Divine Office.
BAUDELAIRE. His Prose and Poetry. Edited by T. R. Smith.
New York: Boni & Liveright. 85 cents.
This volume of the "Modern Library" series contains Swin-
burne's dedicatory poem, "Ave Atque Vale," also translations of
Baudelaire's poems by Arthur Symons, T. P. Sturm, Joseph Ship-
ley and W. J. Robertson. Mr. Sturm, who has edited Baudelaire
in the Canterbury Poets, writes the introduction. The "Fleurs
de Mai," that classic of decadence and patchouli literature, has
844 NEW BOOKS [Mar.,
little to recommend it in English dress. Was it not of the author
that Edmond Sch^rer wrote the withering criticism : ''son uniqae
titre c'est d'avoir contribu6 k cr^er Testh^tique de la dibauche"?
It was hardly necessary to advertise this ultra-modern accession
to the series with the announcement that 'Hhe poet, the publisher,
and the printer were found guilty of having offended against
public morals."
A WHISPER OF FIRE, by Agnes Ryan (Boston: The Four
Seas Co. $1.25), contains one hundred lyrics — chiefly reaching
out toward the mysteries of human love — by a young poet who
stresses the feminist note. Several of the verses, notably ''I Won-
der," are compact and vivid in imagery and spiritual message.
A BOOK that will appeal both to the experienced mechanic
and to the inexperienced one, particularly to the younger
or older boy who delights to handle tools, is Making Tin Can Toys
by Edward Thatcher (Phila.: J. B. Lippincott Co. $1.50 net).
The wounded soldier, especially the man who has lost an
arm or a leg, has roused our imagination and our technical ability
to provide recreational and occupational aid. As a result the bene-
fits have reached and will reach beyond the soldier himself. To
have a side-line of interest, particularly mechanical, is not with-
out its special moral as well as practical value.
Making Tin Can Togs is a book that will stimulate at once the
interest of the boy who has even the beginnings of an imagination
in things mechanical, and give him the knowledge whereby out of
things as cheap as old tin cans he may make useful utensils for
the home, the shop or the camp. The reviewer cannot pass on
the mathematical accuracy of the directions: but he can
acknowledge to a strong desire to get tools and see if he could
achieve success with an old can.
IN This Giddy Globe, by Oliver Herford (New York: George H.
Doran Co. $1.50), we have not been able to see the helpful humor
that is both kindly and wise. It is a cheap proceeding to use the
tragedy of the nations to make a holiday for those who think they
can afford to look on and laugh. To tell us of every country that
its army won the war: to define patriotism as a combination of
*'pat" and *'riot" is but to show how every power of humor is
beggared. The whole presentation of the volume reminds one of
a theatrical *'folly,' and the man who esteems his soul will not
find the time even to look on.
It
ir
■Recent Evented
The most important event in Russian af-
Russia. fairs in the last month was the lifting of the
Allied blockade. This did not mean peace
with the Bolshevists, but was an attempt to enter into trade rela-
tions with the Russian Cooperative Unions without recognition of
the Soviet Government. At first the Soviet Government consented
to the proposed restricted trading with the outside world through
those codperative societies, but later showed a disposition to tie
up the societies in such a way as to make even partial trading
impossible.
England has been the chief advocate of this change in Allied
policy, declaring through her Premier, Lloyd George, that *'Bolshev-
ism cannot be crushed by force of arms," and holding that com-
merce and intercourse with the outside world is the surest method
of bringing Bolshevism to an end. Italy has followed the British
lead in this reversal of policy, while France has only reluctantly
acquiesced. It is the opinion in France that the distinction be-
tween trade with the Russian cooperatives and peace with the
Soviets, as drawn by the British Premier, is so subtle as to be
impracticable, and for them trade and peace are in the long run —
if not immediately — identical. Under any political conditions it
is believed that a considerable time must elapse before supplies
to any appreciable extent can be had from Russia.
Among the principal causes for the new orientation in the
plans of the Allies are, first, the total collapse of the military of-
fensives of Kolchak in the northeast, of Denikin in the south, and
of Yudenitch in the west, and secondly, the growing success of
the Bolshevist peace negotiations with the various Baltic States,
thus breaking '*the ring of fire" with which the Allies had thought
to enclose the Bolshevist territory.
Esthonia has been the first of the Baltic countries to sign a
permanent peace with the Soviet Government. By this peace
ti eaty Esthonia's independence is recognized and she is to receive
moreover, 15,000,000 rubles in gold (normally $7,500,000) as her
proportion of imperial Russia's treasure while being exonerated
from proportional repayment of imperial Russia's debt. On her
part Esthonia agrees that no tax or duty is to be payable at her
ports on goods arriving for Russia, and that no toll shall be paid
on them in transit. All freight charges are to be identical for
846 RECENT EVENTS [Mar.,
Russians and Esthonians. Esthonia gives Russia certain water-
power rights along the river Narova, and in return Russia gives
to Esthonia preferential rights to a concession for building and
exploiting direct railway connections between Moscow and the
Esthonian frontier. Diplomatic and commercial relations are to
be resumed at a date to be decided by further agreement.
Since the signing of the Esthonian treaty unofficial informa-
tion has been received in this country that the Government of
Letvia, the Baltic province bounded on the north by Esthonia
and on the south by Lithuania, has signed an armistice with the
Bolshevists. According to the report received, the armistice was
signed after the capture by the Lettish troops of Guzyn, the lasf
town in Eastern Letvia which the Bolshevist forces had been
occupying. This brought the Letts to the Lettish-Russian fron-
tier and resulted in the complete retirement of the Bolshevist
forces from Letvia. Dispatches from Copenhagen say that Letvia
will not accept peace offers from Soviet Russia pending the con-
ference of representatives of the Baltic States, to be held in
April. In view of the conclusion of peace with the Bolshevists by
Esthonia, however, the Letts are loath that they should be fore-
stalled in the first fruits of the expected trade movement with
Russia and are beginning to feel, now that the Bolshevist forces
have been driven out, that there is no serious obstacle to the ces-
sation of hostilities.
Poland also has been strongly mentioned in connection with
peace with the Bolshevists, and confirmation has recently been
received that the Polish Government, in conjunction with the Al-
lies, is considering the offer of peace made by Premier Lenine,
Foreign Minister Tchitcherin and Minister of War Trotzky on
behalf of the People's Commissaries. The offer, which was con-
tained in a wiieless dispatch from Moscow, invited a friendly
settlement of all disputes and outstanding questions between Po-
land and Soviet Russia. It asserts that the Soviet Government
had from the first recognized the independence and sovereignty
of the Polish Republic, and that there were no territorial, eco-
nomic, or other questions which could not be settled by agreement
or by mutual concessions, as in the case of Esthonia.
The question whether Poland should conclude peace with the
Bolshevists is of course largely dependent on the attitude of her
sponsors, the Allies, and has been the subject of recent conversa-
tions between the Polish Foreign Minister and Premier Lloyd
George. While the exact position of the Allies remains somewhat
obscure, it is asserted in diplomatic circles that the Allies have
at least raised no objections to such a course. It is generally con-
1920.] RECENT EVENTS 847
■^ ^""^i ceded that the position of Poland is difiElcult. She alone cannot
hope to wage war against the Bolshevists. Her situation has be-
come more uncomfortable since Esthonia made peace, thereby
creating a gap in the Baltic defences. If Poland is considering
making peace, she is doing so in the knowledge that the Allies
will not oppose her in this matter.
Of course one of the main reasons for the success of the
Bolshevist peace overtures, besides the change in Allied policy
first commented on, has been the continued military successes of
the Soviet forces, thus generating in the Baltic States the feeling
that they would soon be called upon, unaided, to face the full
impetus of the victorious Soviet troops. Those troops, despite
temporary, but merely local reverses, have been uniformly suc-
cessful on all fronts. On the western sector of the South Russian
front the resistance of the volunteers against the Bolshevists ap-
pears entirely to have collapsed with the Bolshevist occupation of
Odessa. Rostov-on-Don, the Denikin capital, fell on January 9th,
and at last reports Ekaterinodar, which was the headquarters of
General Denikin before his great drive northward toward Moscow,
is being evacuated. The remnants of General Denikin's forces are
being pursued by the Bolshevists into the Crimea. The failure
of Denikin's forces is attributed to four causes : utter indifference
of the peasantry as to whether the Reds or Whites vrin, the spread
of typhus among the volunteer troops, permission given to the
Cossacks to sack each captured city for three days, and the re-
moval from command of their troops of Cossack officers. As to
Denikin himself, according to a recent dispatch from Belgrade,
he has landed at the Bulgarian port of Varna with a few of his
officers. It is reported that he intends going to Bucharest to confer
concerning the danger of a Bolshevist invasion of Bessarabia.
At to conditions on the Siberian front, official confirmation
has been received of the execution of Admiral Kolchak by the
Bolshevists at Irkutsk on the morning of February 7th. There is
still some show of resistance to the Bolshevist armies, however.
Fifteen thousand Czechs, under General Janin of the French
army, are spread over four hundred miles along the railroad
west of Irkutsk. Later despatches report that the forces of Gen-
eral Kappell, commander-in-chief of the Western armies of the
All-Russian Government, have recaptured Irkutsk and established
contact with General Semenoff. General Kappell's troops have
joined with the Czechs and are fighting the Bolshevists in the vi-
cinity of Cheremkova. Cheremkova, which is on the Trans-Si-
berian railway, eighty miles northwest of Irkutsk, has been
retaken from the Bolshevists.
•- %
iTt
848 RECENT EVENTS [Mar.,
An incident that has given rise to consider-
Germany. able agitation and resentment throughout
Germany in the past month, has been the
Allied demand for the extradition of eight hundred and ninety-six
Germans to be tried for violation of the laws of war. Of these,
England demands 97 for trial; France and Belgium, 334 each;
Italy, 29; Poland, 57; Rumania, 41, and Serbia, 4. On the refusal
of Baron Kurt von Lersner, head of the German peace delegation
at Paris, to transmit the list to his Government and his conse-
quent resignation, the demand was communicated by the Allies
direct to the Berlin authorities. Among those demanded are
Ludendorf, von Hindenburg, Mackensen, von Tirpitz, von Beth-
mann-HoUweg, and the other principal civil and military German
oflScials.
The German Cabinet is unanimous in its determination not
to hand over the persons demanded, taking the attitude that it
would be a physical impossibility to arrest these men in Germany,
and that no government could stand which issued orders for such
arrests. In this attitude the Cabinet has the apparent backing of
all sections of German opinion.
The Crerman Government replied to the Allied demand for
the handing over of these men, that it would not comply but that
it would be willing to place on trial all those named by the Allies
before the Leipsic Supreme Court. This offer was accepted by the
Allies who agreed that it was compatible with Article 228 of the
Peace Treaty. In their reply to the German offer the Allies state,
first, that they note that Germany declares herself unable to carry
out the obligations imposed on her by Articles 228 to 230; sec*
ond, that the Allies reserve the right to employ in such measure
as they judge suitable, the rights accorded them in this event by
the Treaty.
The Allies note, however, the German Government's declara-
tion that they are prepared to open before the court at Leipsic
penal proceedings without delay, surrounded by the most com-
plete guarantees and not affected by the application of all judg-
ments, procedure or previous decisions of German civil or military
tribunals before the Supreme Court at Leipsic against all Germans
whose extradition the Allied and Associated Powers have the in-
tention to demand.
The Allies, moreover, agree to abstain from intervention in
the process of the trial or in the reaching a verdict, leaving to the
German Government complete and entire responsibility, but they
reserve to themselves the right to decide whether the proposed
procedure, to.be conducted by Germany, does or does not bring
1920.] RECENT EVENTS 849
about the escape of those guilty from the just punishment for
their crimes. If it permits them to escape, the Allies will exercise
their rights to the full and submit the cases to their own tribunal.
The plebiscite in the first or northern zone of Sleswig pro-
vided by the Treaty of Versailles, to determine the German-Danish
frontier, resulted in an overwhelming victory for Denmark ac-
cording to ofiElcial figures of the election. These figures show that
the Danish adherents cast 75,023 votes, while the Germans polled
only 25,087, thus insuring the reunion of upper Sleswig with its
mother country, Denmark. The plebiscite in the second zone
is to be held March 14th.
The Germans have evacuated Danzig, which is to become a
free city under the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, and also Upper
Silesia, where plebiscites are to be taken to determine whether
Silesia is to belong to Germany or to Poland. The Treaty provides
for the ad interim occupation of Upper Silesia by a total of 18,000
Allied troops. Evacuation is to be accomplished by zones, each of
which will remain under a provisional military administration
responsible to the Inter-Allied Commission.
Internal conditions in Germany continue to grow steadily
worse. The prices of bread, potatoes, legumes, marmalade, butter
and margarine have been raised; and the statisticians figure an
increase on these items alone of 114.50 per cent in the cost of
living this year for each person. The price of beer, too, which is
classed among foods by the Germans, has been raised.
Besides the higher prices, the supplies of food are growing
visibly shorter. Recently the Berlin city government, owing to
the failure of potato supplies, introduced turnip cards again, and
from late accounts it would appear as if the country might have a
repetition of the famous ^'turnip winter" of 1916-1917, which still
lingers as a horrible experience in the memory of every German.
Professor Silbergliet, the statistician of the city of Berlin, has
just given out some interesting figures, reached after a careful
study of the cost of living in Berlin. His investigations covered
the month from July 15th to August 15th last year, and he com-
pared the month of November with that period. Within that
short time the cost of living almost doubled. Since then the
cost of living is more than twice as great as last summer.
One of the most serious factors in the general food situation
is the marked lack of sea fish, due in part to the coal famine
which has kept eighty fish steamers tied up in the Elbe and
Weser. Then, too, some weeks ago the agricultural organizations
of the country pointed out that the ofiElcial harvest estimates of
last year fell short by 2,500,000 tons of the country's requirements
assumed by the National Grain Bureau; but it is now estimated
64
850 RECENT EVENTS [Mar.,
that it will be necessary to import a still larger amount of grain
than 2,500,000 tons. The prospects for getting food from abroad,
however, are very unfavorable owing to the great depreciation of
German currency, the German mark being now down to one cent.
This depreciation has had the effect of raising all foreign prices at
least ten-fold above the prices ruling before the War.
Turning to the industrial situation, reports show that Ger-
man industry is working on 50 per cent of the normal amount
of coal, and if a six-hour day is introduced, and a formidable
agitation is going on to bring it about, then that amount will be
reduced by a half. Railways, gas, electricity and water works
are only getting 25 per cent of their former requirements. In
the various divisions of the textile industry only 30 per cent of
the factories are at work.
The glass industry is working to the extent of only 40 per
cent, and the porcelain industry only 4 per cent. Of six hundred
and fifty paper factories, fifty are producing 60 per cent of their
former output and the remaining six hundred only 25 per cent.
On the other hand, the country is undoubtedly possessed of
great powers of recuperation. There is a desire to work hard
almost everywhere. The people are not spending money quite
as recklessly as formerly. Savings bank deposits are increasing,
there is an increase in marriage and birth rates, and the death
rate has gone down. Since the ratification of the Peace Treaty
German firms have been busy endeavoring to resume trade rela-
tions with French importers and apparently with some success.
Their efforts so far, however, are confined mainly to mail business,
as few can obtain passports to personally push their trade.
The Supreme CouncU as it existed has
France. ended and has been succeeded by the Com-
mittee of Ambassadors on which France is
represented by her new Premier, Millerand. This Committee,
taking up part of the work of the Supreme Council, will be en-
trusted with the task of insuring the carrying out of the Treaty
of Versailles, and the discussion of current routine matters con-
nected with peace affairs. The great questions of international
policy, however, will be reserved for settlement at conferences in
which the heads of the Allied Governments will sit.
Although the Council of the League of Nations held its first
meeting on January 10th and concluded its session on February
13th, its record of accomplishment in that short period is con-
sidered remarkably good. The chief decisions reached by the
Council members at their executive sessions are as follows:
1. Switzerland has been admitted as an original member
1920.] RECENT EVENTS 851
of the League of Nations, although her peculiar international posi-
tion prevents her fulfilling all the usual obligations under the
League of Nations, and although her Constitution makes it im-
possible for her to give her adhesion within the time limit re-
quired by the Covenant. The question of participation cannot
come before her people in the form of a referendum until March.
The Swiss position has been considered unique, and exceptions in
certain articles of the Peace Treaty were made in her favor. For
more than a century Switzerland has had her neutrality recognized
in Europe on the understanding that she would oppose any
country attempting to cross her borders. By the resolution passed
by the Council, the League recognizes her unique status, but re-
quires her to cooperate in commercial and financial measures
against covenant-breaking states and to defend her own territory
under every circumstance. In return she need not take part in
any military action or allow foreign troops to pass through her
borders.
2. The Council appointed a governing commission with five
members to control the Saar Valley. This Commission will have
the widest powers, including the operation of all public utilities,
jurisdiction over civil and criminal courts, the fixing of taxes and
dues and the appointment of local oflScials. The Commission is
really a Cabinet, with a chairman selected by the Council to act
as chief executive. M. Rault, member of the French Council of
State, has been elected chairman; and the other members are
Alfred von Boch Landrath of Saarlands for Saar, Count de Moltke
Hvidfeldt for Denmark, and Major Lambert for Belgium. A fifth
member of the Commission will be announced later.
3. A Commission of twelve international jurists has been
nominated to draft a constitution for a permanent court of jus-
tice. At present a conference is being held at the Hague, where
consideration is being given to drafts submitted by Sweden, Hol-
land and Switzerland.
4. The Council announces that it is prepared to guarantee
the Polish minorities referred to in Article 12 of the Treaty
which the Allies made with Poland and confirmed in the letter
from Cldmenceau to Paderewski last June. This protects all
minorities, whether formed on a racial, religious or linguistic
basis. Thus, the Jews of Poland now come under the protection
of the League.
5. The commission of inquiry on communication and tran-
sit, which was apointed last year in Paris, has been asked to draft
a plan for handling international waterways and land lanes. A
permanent international commission is to be named.
6. The governments of all the countries and the Red Cross
852 RECENT EVENTS [Mar.
I
have been asked to name a delegate to an international convention, ^
where a plan will be drafted for handling international health 1
problems and where a permanent international health body will
be formed. This convention will be held immediately because of
the necessity of dealing with the threatened general outbreak of
disease in Central Europe.
Every effort is being made to extend the work and influence
of the League Council as rapidly as possible. The Council con-
cluded its sessions for the first month on February 13th, and fixed
the date for its next meeting on March 15th, at Rome.
The demand on Holland for the extradition of the Kaiser has
been met by a firm refusal, Holland taking her stand on the
judicial ground that the right of refuge is plain, and that she can-
not withdraw from the former Emperor the benefit of her laws.
During the past month there has been considerable tension
in the French labor world, where strikes of the post-office, rail-
way and mine workers have been threatening. The Government
has relieved the situation by its decision to maintain the indemnity
for the high cost of living established during the War. This in-
demnity is paid by means of subsidies, and the intention of the
late ministry to withdraw these subsidies had led to the threat
of strikes.
Never in the history of France has the franc reached such a
low mark of depreciation, and financial and commercial circles
are greatly depressed over the situation. On the other hand the
new Finance Minister, Francois Marsal, has submitted revised
budget estimates which show economies of 8,000,000,000 francs.
The details of these economies are not divulged, but it is stated
that both the Army and Foreign Office estimates have been largely
1 educed. At the same time new procedure for the relief of the
devastated areas, other than the manufacture of paper money, is
proposed.
Fiume and the Adriatic controversy still
Italy. occupies the centre of the Italian situation.
Contrary to expectation, the Jugo-Slavs re-
jected the compromise proposal as described in last month's
notes, thus throwing the whole matter back upon the Allies.
The English, French and Italian Premiers then drafted a new
plan of settlement and submitted it to the Government of Jugo-
slavia, with the statement that unless that Government accepted,
these terms, the provisions of the Treaty of London for the dispo-
sition of Austro-Hungarian territory, which hands over Fiume to
Italy, would become effective. At this stage matters were still
further complicated by a note from President Wilson rejecting
IMO.] RECENT EVENTS 855
the Allied Premiers* solution, and threatening American with-
drawal from European affairs.
The United States Government declines to assent to the ad-
justment as framed by the English, French and Italian Premiers,
because the United States Government was not consulted in the
matter until after those three powers had agreed upon the plan,
and because the United States is opposed to any form of
coercion applied to Jugo-Slavia. The American attitude on the
Adriatic question is, briefly, that Italy should not have Fiume,
because it is not just to give her both gateways to Central
Europe, as she would have if she were given Fiume as well as
Trieste. President Wilson believes that Italy wants Fiume not
for the sake of the few thousand Italians in it, but be-
cause it is the greatest outlet for Jugo-Slavia. The United
States favors the creation of an independent state, including
Fiume and the hinterland, which is Slav.
At present writing no reply has yet been received to the
American note, but the situation created by it has been considered
so serious by the Supreme Council in London, that it was decided
that nothing should be published in the press until matters had
been more or less straightened out It is known that the Allied
reply has been drafted, and it is said in semi-official circles that
it will assure the President that the Allied proposal was not as
unfavorable to the Jugo-Slavs as he believed. The note will be
brief, consisting of about one hundred and fifty words, and it is
rumored, will say that it is recognized that the Allies cannot
settle the question without the cooperation of the United States,
and will invite the President to present a solution of the Adriatic
problem.
Towards the end of January a great strike was called on the
Italian state railways, which lasted for six days and threw the
country into confusion. The strike was called to obtain higher
wages, based on the five hundred per cent increase in the general
cost of living in Italy, and also to obtain recognition of the rail-
waymen's organizations, the chief among which is the National
Union of Railwaymen, claiming to represent the bulk of the em-
ployees on the State railways. The end of the strike came as the
result of direct negotiations between Premier Nitti and the union
executive. The Government agreed to n^ost of the demands of
the strikers and gave guarantees fo^ (he immediate reference of
the whole subject to parliamentary ^i^u^sion.
February 17, 1920. ^
\
With Our Readers.
THE Pastoral letter just issued by Cardinal Gibbons in the
name of the entire hierarchy of the United States is a docu-
ment worthy the earnest attention of every Catholic. It is thirty-
five years since any document of like importance has been issued
by the Archbishops and Bishops of the Catholic Church in the
United States.
From their mutual deliberations is born the wisdom to guide
us through these most critical times. They exhort us to consider
the significance of recent events, that we may rightly fulfill our
common obligations as children of the Holy Catholic Church and
as citizens of the Republic.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
THE history of the Church in this country has been marked
by increase of numbers, deepening of spiritual life and exten-
sion of Catholic works. 'The Church thrives where freedom
really lives and it furnishes the only basis on which freedom can
be secure." The Holy See has guided us; and the present Su-
preme Pontiff recognizing the importance of America for the
world's restoration, sees from his exalted position the broader
range of opportunity which now is given the Church in our coun-
try. Wonderful has been our growth. The root of it is our Cath-
olic Faith. We will "continue in faith, grounded and settled and
immovable from the hope of the Gospel," ready always to give "a
reason of that hope that is in us" and, if needs be to "contend
earnestly for the faith once delivered to the Saints."
>|t 4t ♦ ♦
THE Bishops exhort to study of the Gospel and a sacred famil-
iarity with the Holy Bible. "This intimate knowledge of
Holy Writ will bring you close to the Person and life of our
Saviour and to the labors of His Apostles." The Catholic spirit
nouiished upon Catholic dogma will see that the true interests of
each part of the Church are the interests of the Church universal.
Prayer, the Sacrifice, the Sacraments, a special devotion to our
Blessed Mother are to be carefully practised and cultivated by
every Catholic.
The nursery of that individual Catholic life is the home. The
home is preserved by Catholic education, and we should be sleep-
less in protecting and building up the edifice of Catholic educa-
tion from the parochial school to the university. Catholic so-
1920.] WITH OUR READERS 855
cieties have been praiseworthy aids in the work of the Church.
'The tendencies on the part of societies to coalesce in larger or-
ganizations is encouraging.''
4t 4c 4t 4t
r every Catholic home missions to Catholics and to non-
Catholics is an object of prayer, of personal interest and
general support. "Pray fervently that light may be given to those
who yet are seeking the way, that they may understand the nature
of that union and concord set forth by Christ Himself, when He
prayed to the Father, not only for His Apostles but, 'for them also
who through their word shall believe in Me: that they all may
be one, as Thou Father in Me, and I in Thee : that they also may
be one in Us that the world may believe that Thou hast sent Me.' "
The Catholic lifts his eyes beyond the horizon of country and
with the vision of Christ sees those of other lands where the har-
vest is great but the gatherers few. Personal generosity will
desire to increase the laborers and the fruit. Therefore, must we
pray for, and cultivate among our own sons and daughters the
desire for the religious vocation, and help in the training of
candidates for the priesthood.
4t 4c 4t 4t
THE temporal order during the past thirty years has undergone
radical changes. The industrial world has grown complex
and powerful, to a degree unprecedented. Education has become
common property. The nations have, at least physically, been
brought into closer contact. Such association had con-
vinced the world that no further war was possible when there
broke upon us the greatest cataclysm in the world's history.
The Catholic body in the time of our country's need answered
every test. The coordinated efforts of our people served most
effectually the spiritual needs of Catholics under arms and the
cause of our country's success. The results obtained through this
merging of activities determined the Bishops to maintain the spirit
of union and coordination for the aims of peace. "We have ac-
cordingly grouped under the National Catholic Welfare Council
the various agencies by which the cause of religion is furthered."
Under the direction of the Council and, immediately, of the
Administrative Committee, have been established: The Depart-
ment of Education, to study the problems and conditions which
affect the work and development ^f our Catholic schools; the
Department of Social Welfare, to QrvArd^^^^^ acUviiies which aim
at improving social conditions iiy ^tAatice with the spirit of
the Church; the Department of v^^ ^ ^tA liVetalure, to syste-
matize the work of publication; v t^* ^^«tV^^^^ ^^ Societies and
\
9'
856 WITH OUR READERS [Mar..
I
i
Lay Activities* to secure a more thoroughly unified action among
Catholic organizations. And the development and guidance of I
missionary activity is provided for through The American Board
of Catholic Missions, having charge of both Home and Foreign
Missions.
The organization of these Departments is now in progress.
'To complete it, time and earnest cooperation will be required. '
The task assigned to each is so laborious and yet so promising of
results, that we may surely expect, with the divine assistance and
the loyal support of our clergy and people, to promote more
efifectually the glory of God, the interests of His Church, and the
welfare of our country.**
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
NOW the war is over, "to men of clearer vision and calmer
judgment there comes the realization that the things
on which they relied for the world's security, have broken under
the strain. The advance of civilization, the diffusion of knowl-
edge, the unlimited freedom of thought, the growing relaxation
of moral restraint — all these, it was believed had given such
ample scope to individual aims and desires, that conflict, if it
arose at all, could be readily and thoroughly adjusted. The as-
sumption is not borne out by the facts.** To bring order out of
the present chaos, one must first secure a sound basis. The
world was once brought out of chaos into order and light.
Through the Gospel of Jesus mankind learned the meaning, and
received the blessing, of liberty: The Church which Christ es-
tablished has continued His work. The Church alone can bring
the world out of chaos into order and light.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
A FUNDAMENTAL error which has brought on the chaos is a
practical denial of the existence of a Personal God and
His Personal Providence. Such practical denial overturns the
principles, for example, on which our American liberties are
founded. The denial affects essentially every corner and angle
of our social relations. It has robbed the world of justice and
of charity. The State that even implicity sanctions the denial,
foretells its own destruction.
The world will return to order and right human living only
through the confession of its dependence upon the Creator and
its acceptance of the truths of Christ Christian standards alone
can make a Christian nation, and without Christian standards a
true democracy cannot exist.
The standard of Christian marriage must be advanced; di-
1920.] WITH OUR READERS 857
vorce publicly and privately condemned : the influence of Catho-
lic womanhood ''because her sphere is no longer confined to the
home*' must be extended in line with her new political rights
and her new responsibility. In industrial relations justice and
charity must prevail. These principles must be carried as livings
preeminent guides by every Catholic into his industrial relations;
into his political life» and his view and his vote with regard to
public office and city, state and national legislation : into his sup-
port or non-support of the press: and his estimate of inter-
national relations. Above all he must emphasize^ defend and sup-
port them in the orucial matter of Catholic education.
With great wisdom our American Constitution provides that
every citizen shall be free to follow the dictates of his conscience
in the matter of religious belief and observance. While the
State gives no preference or advantage to any form of religion,
its own best interests require that religion, as well as education,
should flourish and exert its wholesome influence upon the lives
of the people. And since education is so powerful an agency for
the preservation of religion, equal freedom should be secured to
both. This is the more needful where the State refuses religious
instruction in its schools. To compel attendance at these schools,
would be practically an invasion of the rights of conscience.
Our Catholic schools are not established and maintained
with any idea of holding our children apart from the general
body and spirit of American citizenship. They are simply the
concrete form in which we exercise our rights as free citizens,
in conformity with the dictates of conscience. Their very exist-
ence is a great moral fact in American life. For while they aim,
openly and avowedly, to preserve our Catholic faith, they offer
to all our people an example of the use of freedom for the ad-
vancement of morality and religion.
♦ ♦ ♦ «
THIS Pastoral Letter concludes with a note of hope and con-
fidence. We who live in Jesus Christ, the Eternal Victor,
may suffer distress; we do not know perplexity. Confidently do
our divinely appointed leaders summon us; confident of one
answer. Their appeal is fundamentally for a deeper, keener
realization of our unity as Catholics, as children of God*s King-
dom, as members one of another because we are all the living
members of Christ We have a cotvtf^oii Vask in the forwarding
of which we must lose ourselves ^^ out self interests. That
common effort, common task an<J^ ^tx^^^ acUon are to receive
external manifestation in the N^^^^^^a ViAtoe CAuacU. Indi-
vidual effort is not to be lMuidic^vA\oi^wt ewen Qcealer freedom;
y
^
858 WITH OUR READERS [Mar^
organization and society are not to be displaced or curtailed in
autonomy or initiative. Security gives liberty. Guidance per-
mits us to work more freely. Under the National Catholic Wel-
fare Council, the entire Catholic body of the United States will add
further glorious pages to the annals of the Church in this, our
Country.
>|t 4t ♦ ♦
FOR the information of our readers, we wish to say that copies
of the full text of the Bishop's Pastoral may be obtained by
sending twelve cents to the ofBce of the National Catholic Welfare
Council, 1312 Massachusetts Avenue, Washington, D. C
s
T. AUGUSTINE wrote this great prayer : "Thy whole Creation,
O God, ceaseth not nor is silent in Thy praise: neither the
spirit of man with speech directed unto Thee : nor things animate
nor inanimate by the mouth of them that meditate thereon: that
so our souls may from their weariness arise toward Thee, and
leaning on those things which Thou hast made, pass to Thyself,
Who madest all wonderfully: and in Whom is refreshment and
true strength."
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
THE spirit of man must for its own sake bear such witness and
testimony to its Creator. The body must rest from toil and
receive bodily refreshment: the soul of man must withdraw
within itself in communion with God for its refreshment and true
strength. The ever moving world may distract him: pleasure
and friendship may both excite and feed his emotions: research
may absorb his intellect, but inevitably, soon or late, man will
go into the solitude and demand a valuation of his own self, a
knowledge of his spirit. What is his relation to all these things
and in the great universe where does he stand? Unless his spirit
finds the answer, it is but a lost cloud in the boundless sky, a
wandering atom in the meaningless world.
The thought will not abandon him that his spirit must have
its own place, its own value, its own reason in the sphere of
creation. Unattached, it is meaningless to self, and self persist-
ently demands a reason. Bound only to its fellows, who are in
turn no more bound than itself, it is still unplaced, still undefined.
It demands the fixed, the enduring: that personal relationship
that holds when all things temporal sufi'er shock and hold not.
Therefore is the spirit of man apart and of itself. Human things
may feed it, but only to augment a greater hunger. Love may
comfort it, but only to make it mpre restless for a greater love.
Out beyond the human and the created, in the solitude and the
I
I
I
1920.] WITH OUR READERS 859
fullness of things increate will it seek and find true refreshment
and abiding strength. To God, the Creator, the Cause, and the
End of all will it look with complete satisfaction and eternal
peace.
>|t 4t « ♦
TTOR our spirit was made for a higher life than this one and for a
r brighter world than this. Even the smaller yet quieter and
purer powers of earth hint this truth to us. Slight rays are they
of the one greatest Light. Some hours of the quiet evening;
some sunsets at sea or upon mountain peaks, when we are quite
alone, have the power of revealing greater things: some book
with its inspiring message, some poem, sung with pure artistry
can lift us up to where the difficult things ^eem easy, and the
noble most delightful. Then does the spirit yearn to keep the
passion of that peace: to live forever on that perfect height.
The peace and the perfect height, and the meaning of these
lesser things are known when the soul renders its praise to God
and hears His voice in answer: when in prayer His truth is sure
and strengthening, then is the world transformed and bathed in
a new and holier light.
Whatsoever is the need of man, the same has been known
and satisfied by God. He is our Father and the Father sent His
Only Beloved Son to redeem man from the sin and failure of his
soul, and give him the truth that leads to eternal life. The spirit
of man seeks God and seeks Him in human flesh. Christ is God
Incarnate. And it is this truth which is the sole saving and
comforting support of the spirit of man. He is not wandering
nor lost. He is not stripped of personal dignity and left naked
to chance. He is immortal and through Christ, the Son of God,
he is united in personal eternal life with God the Father and
with all his fellows. Light illumines the darkness. God lifts
the solitude and, incorporated into Christ, the spirit of man is
free and strong and unconquerable.
4t ♦ ♦ 4t
OUR Holy Church names a season of the year for penance and
for fasting and above all else for the spirit of man to give
itself to quiet thoughtf ulness : to the privacy of prayer, to soli-
tude with Christ and with God.
The Church is divinely wise in demanding this exercise of
her children. And her wisdom is reoc^oed by human study of the
helps to physical and mental welUv. . ^^g.
But if the soul seek God sin^y^ «ccot4\ng to its own lights,
it will have a very ignorant gui^V^ r<Q^ \s our Guide, not our-
selves. Christ His Son came mi^J^^ ^o^^^^^ ^^ ^^^ Light, that
\Y
^
860 WITH OUR READERS [Mar.,
II
I
we should not sit in darkness. To know that we sit in darkness :
to say, as a result of our own conclusions, Christ is here, and
Christ is there, avails nothing. From without the Light must
come and by the Light must we see. Much of the devotional talk
of the world is the humanizing of God. Many do not go to Him :
they bring Him to themselves. The truth which He gave and to
which the spirit of man must square himself, is not clearly sought
nor soundly held. His existence, His providence. His relations •
to us are subordinated and interpreted by human needs and {
thus have we become worshippers of things created, instead of ^
the Creator. Life, its beginning and its preservation, are re-
garded not as in His Hands alone, but as in ours, according to
economic and social needs. Death is subjected to human in-
quiry, and immortality depends upon the result of psychic in-
vestigations. A so-called photograph of Gladstone and his wife
receives more attention than the image of Christ on the Cross.
The dead are not alone in God's hands: they are in ours also.
God is not accepted as the sole Keeper of mysteries nor are we
satisfied, as the Psalmist says, *Ho wait upon Him.*' Every means
is employed to search the future: to know our destiny and that
of our beloved departed. The spirit of man seeks God, but it
may easily deceive itself in the search and end in nothing else
than a seeking of self.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
rS Church asks us to give ourselves with greater thoughtful-
ness than ever to solitude, to prayer, because she has the
only true, sustaining food that will nourish and satisfy the spirit
of man. And her sustaining food is her dogmatic truth. Dog-
matic truth is the truth not of man, but of God. Christ has re-
vealed it from heaven to her and she has given it and gives it
to men. God is an Infinite Personal Being, the Creator, the
Providence, the Father of us all. God sent His Only Beloved Son
into the world Who became Man and by His Sacrifice redeemed
us all to eternal life. He died and rose again from the dead and
ascended into heaven. He sent to us the Third Person of the
Blessed Trinity, the Holy Spirit, Who sanctifies us, informs us
and makes us the living temples of God. Through the same Holy
Spirit we are incorporated into Christ as through Christ's power,
given in the sacraments, our sins are forgiven, the pledge of eter-
nal life bestowed, and our souls fortified to meet face to face the
Just Judge. We are one in Christ: we are members of a King-
dom, and therefore do we pray : "Thy kingdom come." We — all
of us — ^the living and the dead are through Christ in God and
with God.
1920.] WITH OUR READERS 861
Surely this religious conviction is far different from the
painful searching, the restless doubting and questioning with
which the world about us is surcharged. It is for us of the in-
heritance to go into the solitude, crowded with the truths of
God, and there to make them our own : to study the teachings of
the Church that they may, more and mpre, with their divine
power give our spirit, as St Augustine says, ^'refreshment and
true strength.*'
rE literature produced in Ireland today is not alone voicing
the present unanimous demand for national independence,
but is also effectively showing, if it needed to be shown, that
such an aspiration has been common to the Irish people since
the idea of nationalism was born into this world. We might
mention many valuable books on the subject, but we will confine
ourselves to two.
There is The Soul of Ireland by W. J. Lockington, S.J. Its
opening sentence is "Ireland. What a history of fearless fighting
for God and country that name records!" The soul of Ireland
is her Catholic Faith. The book has a far greater message than
perhaps the author saw. Chesterton points to it in his intro-
duction. The persecution of Ireland by England is not simply
the control of political government, it was the determined pur-
pose, ruthlessly executed, to destroy the Catholic Faith of the
people: it mattered not if the alternative was their destruction,
England was not only determined for it, but actually attempted
it. She did not succeed, as Father Lockington clearly shows.
Had she succeeded the civilized world would have, hiimanly
speaking, suffered the loss of its civilization. *The one people in
Western Europe which has taken the old form of the Christian
Religion quite seriously, enduring persecution from without and
asceticism from within, has before our very eyes turned a sudden
corner and stepped into a place in the sun.**
« ♦ ♦ ♦
THE resurrection of Ireland is really an historical event that has
the appearance of a miracle. "That is one of a class of
undisputed facts, not actually in form supernatural, but so unique
as almost to force any one, however rationalistic, to an explana-
tion at least transcendental. If the ChrisUan faith is not meant
in some fashion to revive and be ^^ «mt^A ^^ Europe, I, for one,
can make no mortal sense of whi^i ^ Yiappened m Ireland. If
the Catholic creeds are not to sur^ '^ \ cQ^^^^^ ima^e why Ire-
land has survived. Many Englisk \\C^ ±q uol ^ee \hft poml; sfan*
\
/
I
862 WITH OUR READERS [Mar^
ply because many Englishmen are in this matter quite ignorant;
especially well-educated Englishmen. They do not happen to
know how utterly Ireland was crushed; with what finality and
fundamental oblivion the nation was one numbered dead. A
man in the middle of the Age of Reason, the enlightened and
humanitarian eighteenth century, would have been more
astounded by the present prosperity of the Catholic peasantry
than by a revival of the commerce of Carthage.'*
A similar illustration was oCTered by Hilaire Belloc some
years ago in his essay, entitled : "St. Patrick." He says : "Ireland
is the greatest miracle any saint ever worked. It is a miracle
and a nexus of miracles. Among other miracles it is a nation
raised from the dead. . . The preservation of the Faith by the
Irish is an historical miracle comparable to nothing else in
Europe."
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
THE chapter in Father Lockington's book, entitled "The Mass
Rock," will show what sustained the Faith in Ireland.
"There are many glorious monuments today in Ireland that
speak eloquently of her suCTerings in those dark days — days
when Christ's enemies tore the sacred altar asunder, scattered the
protecting walls and washed them in the blood of priests and
people, knowing not in their blindness that they were fighting
against Him, 'cujus regni non erit finisJ But of these monu-
ments, telling of the superhuman steadiness with which the brave
dead followed Christ, to me by far the most touching is the
granite block, a broad table of gray stone, with the sacred name
of Jesus carved deep upon it; that silent table, clasped firmly
by the green turf and held close, as a treasure, to her bosom —
Ireland's priceless Mass Rock."
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
•
ANOTHER book contributing to our thought is Phases of Irish
History by the well-known scholar and professor, Eoin Mac*
Neill. He is a master of his subject. As a scholar he shows the
early national aspiration of the Irish people, enduring through
the centuries, through defeat and despair the same national
coherency, the same national aspiration that is soon to reach its
victorious fulfillment. This shows that Ireland is fitted to work
out its own salvation: that it must for its own life have that full
privilege: and supports from evidence of the past the conten-
tion made recently in The Irish Monthly by the well-known labor
authority, the Rev. J. Kelleher, who writing on the task before
labor in Ireland states : "I am convinced that if we are permitted
to work out our own political salvation, we shall work out a very
1920.] WITH OUR READERS 863
different social future for ourselves from that which I have just
been anticipating for England/'
This aspiration and determination for national life and inde-
pendence is the foundation of present Irish claims. It is not pri-
marily a religious question, however much the so-called Ulster
Delegation, now in this country, attempts to make it so. Writing
but recently the head of that delegation stated that the Irish
people "have no conception of the initiative, resource and ener-
getic application necessary to success in any state, and whose
ideas of tolerance and civil liberty are drawn from the Middle
Ages.'' The Irish people are "petty, ultramontane, priest con-
trolled, retrograde." Of course all this is born of bigotry and
prejudice and will not in the least hurt the Irish cause. More-
over, it betrays itself.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
IF England claims the right to rule the Irish, and justifies the
claim by saying that the Irish cannot rule themselves, she
gives free scope to a theory of domination and tyranny against
which the whole civilized world has protested and ever will pro-
test. Only by making such a claim has England ever been able
to hold Ireland. She holds her not by the free consent of the
governed, but by the use of military measures. She does not
govern: she coerces. She belies in Ireland the claims that she
makes for her intentions and purposes throughout her empire
and her relations with other nations. Therefore, the world dis-
trusts her. America distrusts her. ''Why do the bulk of Amer-
icans distrust England," asks the January Month. And the
Month answers, because of England's attitude on the question of
Ireland. It recalls General Smut's words, uttered in June, 1919,
"the most pressing of all constitutional questions in the Empire
is the Irish question. It has become a chronic wound, the septic
effects of which are spreading to our whole system; and through
its influence on America it is now beginning to poison our most
vital foreign relations."
The Month itself foreshadowed the defeat in the United States
Senate of the Peace Treaty as early as June, 1919, and called at-
tention to the supreme urgency of the Irish problem: "But," it
continues, "statesmanship is bankrupt when Ireland is concerned,
because statesmen have not the courage either to deny Ireland's
claim to be a distinct national ent\K. ot ^o sidmit what logically
follows from its acceptance."
Current events show clearly tK -cnft^^^^ ^lale^men wiW have
to admit the former and accept ^V^^ %i^^'
BOOKS RECEIVED.
Allym ft Bacon, New York:
Fifteen French Plays, fl.OO; Le Voyage de MonMiear Perriehon, Edited by Y. B.
Francois, Ph.D. 80 cento. Le Retour des Soldats. By Prof. B. P. Maloobler.
00 cento. A Short Grammar of Attic Greek, By Rev. F. M. Connell, SJ. I1.4A.
The Modern World. By Rev. F. S. Betten, S. J., and Rer. A. Kauffman, S^.
Vol. I., 11.40. Vol. U IIJM. Household Physics. By C. U. Buchner. |1.4«.
FkBOBUCK A. Stokes Co., New York:
Recompense. By G. Kllngle. The Collegians, By G. Griffin. Maria Bdgeworthz
Selections from Her Works. Carle tjn's Stories of Irish Life.
B. P. DuTTON ft Co., New York:
Bn Route. By J. K. Huysmans. |2.50 net. Mare Nostrum. By V. B. nmllex.
11.90.
Funk ft Waonalls Co., New York:
Habits That Handicap, By C. B. Towns. flJSO.
Tbb Hagmillam Co., New York:
A History of the United States. By J. P. (VHare. |1.25.
BiBNTANO's, New York:
The Cossacks,' By W. P. Cresson. |2.50.
Nbw BiA Publishing Co., New York:
American Rights. By W. R. Palmer and E. Fonos.
Thb Cbntubt Co., New York:
Co0glfi. By B. Oldmeadow.
Moffat, Yabo ft Co., New York:
The City of God. Pamphlet 10 cents.
Gbobob H. Doban Co., New York:
September. By F. Swlnnerton. Happily Married. By C. Harris. Rabbin Limui.
By B. F. Boison.
Longmans, Gbbbn ft Co.. New York:
Preaching. By Rev. W. B. 01>owd. 12.25 net. Nothing, and Other Thtmgs.
By the author of '^Ices In Virtues." |1.40 net The Hidden Sanctuary. By
Rev. J. Brett, L.Th. |1.75 net
GovBBNMBNT PBiNTiNo OFFICE, Washington:
Native Villages and Village Sites Bast of the Mississippi. By D. I. Bushnell, Jr.
Yalb UNrrBBSiTT Pbbss, New Haven:
Tite-D'or. (Play.) By Paul Claudel. |2.00.
Thb Stbatfobd Co., Boston:
The Social Evolution of Religion. By G. W. Cooke. 13.50.
Bbotbbbs of the Sacbbd Hbabt, Metuchen, N. J.:
Caieehism of the Religious Profession.
B. Hbboeb Book Co.. St. Louis:
Great French Sermons. Edited by Rev. D. O'Mahoney, B.CX.. #3.00 net His-
torie Struggles for the Faith. By J. G. Rowe. |1.S0 net The Virtues of a
Religious Superior, Translated from the Latin by Father S. MolUtor, O.FJL
60 cento net
Paul Bloeb ft Co., San Francisco:
Stray Leaves, Author Unknown. fl.OO.
Austbauan Cathouc Tbuth Society. Melbourne:
The Priesthood of Christ. By Rev. P. Phelan, D.D.
Blovd ft Gat, Paris;
La Paix Prochaine et la Mission des Alliis. Par M. Legendle.
Gabbibl Bbaucbbsue, Paris:
Bn Amirique d la fin de la guerre. Par Abb^ F. Klein. 7 fr.
If" you are interested in the cause
of Missions, and every Catholic
ought to be, then you should
subscribe for
CATHOLIC MISSIONS
A Macatioe devoted to Home
and Foreign Miasioni
BeautlfuH; Uluatnted from orltliwl photo-
graphi Uken In all parti of tlu world
leaued monthly by
The Society for the Propagation
of the Faith
Sub5i:ri prion, $2.00 a year
Address: CATHOLIC MISSIONS
3*3 Lexington Avenue, New York City
Sand (Of a FREE Sample Copr
U'ept, Q.
JAMBS
168-874-
™N.*. TUBNED ANKLE SIBAICHIEKED
THE TABLET
Sf)e i&fficUl i&raiin a( tf)e Cattdit Cburtf) in Cn^lanli
PnblWMd WrrUr
nilCE SIXPENCE
IB 30*. l:
THE TABLET, founded in 1S40, waa acquiied in ISGS by Cardinal Vaughan, who de-
termined to supply to Catholic readers a paper exproBsing their own lofty idcalB,
Its reputation is established as that of a Catholic weekly with the scholarly authority of
a Review as well as the lighter interest of a Newspaper.
Its contributing staff includes the foremost leaders of Catholic thought and learning in
Oreat Britain. In a list of recent contributors occur sach names as ;
Cardinal Gasquet Father Thurston, S.J. Rt. Rev. Mgr. Canon Moyc5. D.U.
Father McNabb. O.P. Rt. Rev. Mgr. Canon Barry. D.D. Father C. C. Martindale S.J,
Mr. Hitaire Belloc Miss Katharine Tynan Rev, A. Fortescue. D.D,
Father Plater. S.J. Mr. Wilfred MeyneH Mr. Shane Leslie
THE TABLET is edited by Mr. J G. Snead-Cox, the biographer of Cardinal Vaughan
Stnd a $1 Note for a T'ijjl of 8 Is™«
10 Henrietta Street, Convent •*, - l.o'aion, 'fl.C. i.
Wktn writing la Bdvtrliiiri pltat
,, CrtvoUc World
V
'N^ e w
'=PUBLICc4TION
Sermons In Miniature
for Meditation
ft ^
\
HEHRY E. O'KEEFF'E
Of the Paulisl Fathers
The special features of this n6w volume by the noted
Paulist Missionary are: the sermons^ while short, are
exceptionally helpful, because of their thoughtful-
ness and timeliness. The subjects are of the day.
The treatment bespeaks wide reading and long
pulpit experience. The priest, will find them inviting
as spiritual readings and worthy aids to his ministry
of the spoken and written word-
The book is bound in cloth and attractively printed
Price, $1.2^; Carriage, w cents
T H a "P cA U L I S T
120 West 60th Street,
^- %a s s
New York Qty
IV hen writing to advertisers please mention Tki Catholic World